The Michalangelo programmer: Has a grand, sweeping view of what the system should do, but each piece is done in such meticulous detail that it takes years to finish anything.
This really confused me too, because when the helicopter's speed is mu (normal helicopter speeds and the like), the retreating blades should be moving backwards anyways. That's why they're called retreating. It's supposed to be forwards, not backwards.
Slashdot Mirror
For example you could do something along the lines of for every page you want the users to be able to access.
I believe he means something along the lines art communicates better than typical conversation.
NASA had provided coverage through space.com when the Mars Rovers landed, not sure whether or not they will be doing it for this event.
Too bad holophony is patented. I'd like to see more development of it rather than more speakers.
This really confused me too, because when the helicopter's speed is mu (normal helicopter speeds and the like), the retreating blades should be moving backwards anyways. That's why they're called retreating. It's supposed to be forwards, not backwards.
May 15, 1995?
Seriously, would you be worried about a nuclear weapon with "Made in China" printed on it?
If they ask for a specific person, just say "No i'm sorry they're dead".
Oh jeez, I previewed this before I posted, too... First link is the "clean" one (from february), second is the one in January.
I thought this was pretty interesting, here's a picture on January 20th, then another picture from February 20th.
That's no space station...
Of course we cannot achieve perfect knowledge of everything, but two stones will always be greater than one.
Which completely destroys the very reason we want to check out Mars in the first place.
"The voice of the people is the voice of God."
But if they don't think there is a problem, they never will.
Car? Is that one of those "outside" things?
for example. The only weakness I can think of is that it may or may not be easier for someone to guess it.
If it can't determine whether or not a dynamic link (like "delete this") is harmful or not, perhaps this could be the end of Google Accelerator?
Actually, Longhorn is the codename AFAIK.
http://oldgoogle.com/
I wish I could have commented earlier in the thread...
http://oldgoogle.com/
Well, 3.2 feet = 1 meter.
They were just converting it, I don't think they actually closely measured the maximum distance.
If you can't beat them, destroy all evidence that you tried.
Can it handle a slashdotting?