Slashdot Mirror


Earthlink Sponsors Cheap Linux PCs

prostoalex writes "Earthlink and Microtel are offering cheap Xandros-based computers to anyone who's willing to sign up for Earthlink dial-up service at $22 a month. The desktops on Microtel Web site start at $70 for a basic AMD Sempron machine, Microtel laptops start at $399. ExtremeTech says there is also a SkypeOut gift certificate: 'All Xandros PCs and laptops include free Skype-to-Skype calling worldwide, plus an exclusive bonus voucher for up to 120 minutes of SkypeOut calling to any phone number in the world.'"

179 comments

  1. Xandros... by coop0030 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone use Xandros? How is it compared to like Fedora, or Mandrake?

    It seems pretty fluffy to me (probaby a good thing for who they are trying to target with these discount PCs).

    1. Re:Xandros... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You use Fedora, and think Xandros is too "fluffy"?

      No offense dude, but nothing is fluffy compared to Fedora. :)

    2. Re:Xandros... by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      I can't say I've used the OS personally, but one thing that immediately puts me off is that they are trying to sell antivirus software for Linux. Fair enough, if there's a problem then fix it and feel free to make money doing so, but I don't like that a company feels the need to try making people think there's a problem just to sell a service.

    3. Re:Xandros... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used it a lot, debian based with all the typical KDE goofiness cleaned up (Konq acts like windows explorer, the default web browser is Firefox, a lot of redundencies elminated).

      The install is the slickest I've ever seen, the package management is a customized synaptic with an interface for purchasing commercial software. I really love Xandros, but I don't use it because I suspect a system-wide upgrade would be impossible (might be able to buy an upgrade to the newest Xandros version without reinstalling though). In other words, I don't know what an apt-get install kde would do even if there's a new version of xandros out and the debian repository is unincluded.

    4. Re:Xandros... by craigevil · · Score: 1

      The thing about Xandros is it is setup to look and act prety much like windows. Which makes it simple for someone new to Linux to be able to use it. I bought an inexpensive system from samsclub for $157 and didn't have to worry about paying for a dialup service. Debian Sid rules.

      --
      Debian Sid LXDE Firefox 3.6.4
      GNU/Linux and Firefox, surfing the internet safely.
    5. Re:Xandros... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have Xandros 3 Deluxe at home (I also use Windows XP and Ubuntu). It actually works very well, and reminds me of SUSE (I previously used 9.1 Pro). It includes Crossover Office, so I can use my licensed copy of Office 2000. So far, I have found that everything just works (well, I did have to install mplayer to play DVDs, but the Xandros forums are full of excellent instructions). It is designed so that you really don't have to use the command line at all, which does make it newbie friendly. But, the command line is available, and since it is based on Debian, you can still get all of that Linux hotness.

    6. Re:Xandros... by Yim · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've had a lot of seat-time with Xandros (Corel Linux) and have been pretty impressed with its abilities out-of-the-box. It's got a decent debian style package builder, which isn't completely reliable with rpms straight-through, but works well with deb packages. 3.0.1 OC runs KDE 3.3, which isn't my cup of tea (wmaker) but works well for those used to a pure GUI environment. It lends its flexibility quite well for those who are used to a *nix environment, as it builds source just like any other, but has the easiest install program this side of Mandr(ake/iva), and it all fits on one CD to keep costs low for a machine as one would only need a CD-ROM drive. My biggest gripe is that the CUPS network printing tool is pretty craptacular, as it takes some screwing around to make it not just find but print to the network printers, but Samba seems to be right at home. Overall, it's probably one of the better Linux standalone operating systems that Grandma Smith could probably handle installing and using on a daily basis. It's no OS X, but isn't a Gentoo bitchfest.

      --
      -Yim
    7. Re:Xandros... by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      True, but you also do not want these users passing on Office trojan/virii to the masses do ya?

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    8. Re:Xandros... by xiando · · Score: 1

      There are many good reasons to have a virus scanner installed on Linux systems: Viruses do pass by Linux boxes even if they are not infected: Linux boxes are involved in file transfers (a lot of mail servers run Linux..) and so on. It is important to be able to find Windows and other viruses for other operating systems even if they can not infect Linux.

    9. Re:Xandros... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Sorry, forgot to answer some of your questions. How does it compare to Fedora or Mandrake? Well, I found that it is a touch slower, but it is more integrated (since Xandros packages everything themselves). I also found that it worked better out of the box. I had to do a LOT of fiddling with Fedora to get my local network and Internet working. I had to do even more fiddling with Mandrake to get my sound working. Why? Who knows, it was a pain in the butt. Xandros worked out of the box except for playing DVDs, which was easily fixed by installing mplayer and codecs.

    10. Re:Xandros... by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 1

      But if they don't think there is a problem, they never will.

    11. Re:Xandros... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Uh, actually FC3 ~= SuSE ~= Mandrake, they're all the same. We all run 1 of 2 window managers, we all have easy installers, we all have usable package managers.

      I've used everything from Gentoo to Debian to Ubuntu to FC3, and most of the rest in between, and honestly, there's very little difference from one to the other when your machine is done being built.

    12. Re:Xandros... by jrboatright · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes. I've been installing Xandros on essentially anyone who's computer I got tired of fixing hag ridden copies of windows on.

      It installs from a single CD.

      It looks and feels a lot like windows

      It just works, out of the box. I have yet to have it fail to find and install the correct video, monitor, and sound on any computer which was running win95/98/me or 2000.

      It runs just find in 128 meg of ram, and WILL run in 64.

      But since I don't give Aunt Bee and Counsin Fred the root password, they can't hopelessly screw it up. OOO, Firefix, T-Bird, GNUCash, and a few other simple tools, and they're set for life.

      Works great. Not reccomended for Linux wonks. But for Aunt Bee, it's great stuff.

    13. Re:Xandros... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xandros is a great Linux distro. Not only for newbies, but also for hard core linux users who want to spend more time using linux than they do fixing it. Quick easy install that brings you into an environment that just works. From there you are only a couple of clicks away from having access to all the Debian software packages you could possibly want. Once you have that you can install all the odd software love and edit /etc/ files to your hearts content, all the time while having a solid functional workstation.

  2. Am I cheap? by xanthines-R-yummy · · Score: 1

    Seems kinda pricey given the number of laptops available on eBay. -X

    1. Re:Am I cheap? by jcgf · · Score: 1

      Yes, but are you looking at new laptops on ebay? I imagine that these have warranty which is worth something. Though I suppose that depends on how good said warranty is.

      Jared

  3. Bill Gates by mboverload · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Could Bill Gates be right about hardware costing dirt in the future? Since they are selling this on software Gates is kind of 100% right.

    1. Re:Bill Gates by Monkey-Man2000 · · Score: 1

      That may be true, but at least in this case he's wrong wrt the price of software.

      --
      This post was generated by a Cadre of Uber Monkeys for Monkey-Man2000 (603495).
    2. Re:Bill Gates by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course he's right, but its not happening because he said it.

      Mobile phone companies have been like this for years, its just an expansion of that.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are not selling any software, they are selling a dial-up internet service.

    4. Re:Bill Gates by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      Honestly, a monkey and an organ grinder could have predicted this. Hardware was one of the boundries for entering the computer market in the past, but now with Cell phones, in-car GPS systems, and everywhere else you see ubiquitious computing machines, you begin to pay less for the hardware (and ironically, the software too!), and more for the support contracts of those platforms, whether they be cellular service, special GPS-like network access, or radio access.

      Just worries me because some day in the future, the need for owning a full fledged computer may be unjustifiable..

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    5. Re:Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gates is kind of 100% right.

      Er, huh?

      I am having issues parsing your sentance...

    6. Re:Bill Gates by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      I am having issues parsing your sentance...

      And I yours.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    7. Re:Bill Gates by epiphani · · Score: 1

      Only reason this hardware can cost dirt is because there isnt a $100 microsoft tax in software.

      --
      .
    8. Re:Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Gates is only right because he noticed that hardware is dirt *now*. You only have to pay more than $50 for a system if you want something newer than 2 or 3 years ago. Systems from 5 years ago are still more than usable. People are donating their old computers all over the world to try to spread technology. The fact that Bill Gates noticed this was not actually news-worthy.

    9. Re:Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, they make the money on the Earthlink subscription.

    10. Re:Bill Gates by symbolic · · Score: 1

      Just worries me because some day in the future, the need for owning a full fledged computer may be unjustifiable..,

      You realize that's heresy, don't you? ; )

    11. Re:Bill Gates by damsa · · Score: 1

      In the future, as global warming melts the ice caps, dirt will be rarer than precious metals. Thus the price a brand new computer will cost equivlent to one dirt clod.

  4. there go, see fry's has those laptops.. by downsize · · Score: 1

    but I don't think they come with that Skype deal. I don't think I'd link up with earthlink @ $22/mo for this offer, too bad i am not in the market though.... bbl going to call up some friends and family to help them out and get them moved into a less frustrated enviroment (non-Windows) :-P

    --
    do you have shinyfeet?
    1. Re:there go, see fry's has those laptops.. by cymen · · Score: 1

      SkypeOut is cheap. Unless they are tossing in a headset the 120 minutes is only worth about $2.40 USD.

    2. Re:there go, see fry's has those laptops.. by PsychicX · · Score: 1

      It's a complete scam. $22/month per dial up? Another $8 will buy you DSL in many places. The PC is nothing special, it's just like any of the other bullshit lies we're fed by advertisers on a daily basis. Whatever you save on your cheap POS system will be paid to earthlink, at $22/month for what is for many people a free service.

    3. Re:there go, see fry's has those laptops.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to blow your bubble but for many people internet isn't free. Even when you goto college you pay through your tuition. If you are talking about work, well there are certain limits on that. For a few people its free, but if you are like most of the country, either you pay for it or you don't get it. if you do get it, it will be limited (think your local library for example). NetZero isn't even free anymore (10 hours/mo. limit). If you are 16 and living at your folks house, then granted internet is a free service.

    4. Re:there go, see fry's has those laptops.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [note: the other post is a premature post, this is what that anonymous coward ment to say]

      Sorry to blow your bubble but for many people internet isn't free. There are always certain costs associated with your internet connection. You will either pay for it directly (isp) or indirectly (apt. complex, neighborhood co-op, tuition, inconvenience, ads, etc.). Eitherway you are getting charged. At work people recieve free internet with a stipulation that they are going to use it for work; think resource. At school you pay for it in your tuition.

      Your statement more likely reflects the living-with-parents demographic as appose to the far majority of people that work and pay for services. The best lesson you can learn in economics is that there is no free lunch.

      As to the service, it isn't a bad idea when you are talking about people that don't want to put together their computer, but don't want to shell out for a dell. It is simple and convinent, plus you get a computer with it. Is to worth it? Depends on your perspective; i doubt earthlink is gearing their connection to gaiming or mass downloading [of large pdfs of course]. Another consideration is, is the availability of broadband.

  5. A Nice Move by hoka · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm glad that more companies are starting to pick up on cheap hardware combined with free software. This will be great for the "moms and pops" who don't care about what they use as long as it works. By offering lots of cheap (with specific hardware) companies can reduce costs for support since there arn't options. It's undercutting the competition just like Ford did, you can have "any color you want, as long as its black". Looking at the specs on the system they don't seem that bad, comparable to a deal Frys had a few weekends ago where you could pick up a full system for $100 (Sempron, CD-Rom, Harddrive, case etc). Some ram upgrade and those machines would probably be plenty for most users.

    1. Re:A Nice Move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno about this. Cheap hardware can cause problems that can't be solved with a patch, such as intermittent crashes. Can you really expect a computer to "just work" when it consists of hardware they couldn't move any other way?

  6. This could be great for Grandmas by putko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If they make it so simple that they send it to you, you plug it in, and it works, that's really great for unsophisticated computer users.

    I wish them the best of luck.

    --
    http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    1. Re:This could be great for Grandmas by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1
      If they make it so simple that they send it to you, you plug it in, and it works, that's really great for unsophisticated computer users.

      ???

      Until those same "unsophisticated computer users" try to install this "great new game they got at the bargain bin at Best Buy."

    2. Re:This could be great for Grandmas by putko · · Score: 1

      Do grandmas play games?

      If the software sold with the box comes with solitaire or other stupid games, that probably enough for unsophisticated users.

      A lot of people don't want to be bothered with installing anything -- that's one of M$'s advantages.

      If you just want a box that allows you to surf, do some basic word processing and make free "phone calls", this looks barely good enough and quite convenient.

      --
      http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    3. Re:This could be great for Grandmas by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Well, if they can't read the box when it says "Windows" and they can't read the screen at home where it says "Linux", then they're just as likely to buy an X-Box game or a Nintendo game and be unable to install it as well.

      Which means your point is stupid.

      If your point was that Linux doesn't have a ton of great games, which is basically true (and irrelevant to a lot of people over the age of 18), then say so.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    4. Re:This could be great for Grandmas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Which means your point is stupid.

      Boy, you got out of the wrong side of bed this morning, didn't you?

      I'm not talking about the latest and greatest FPS - LOTS of "grandmas with computers" have Bridge or Scrabble or similar on their computers. It's my experience that typically they install this stuff "to learn how to use the mouse" and then stick with them.

  7. $22/month for dialup!!?? by carrett · · Score: 1

    why would anyone pay $22/month for dialup when you can get some sort of broadband for $10/month more (or dialup somewhere else for so much less?)?

    am i missing something?

    --
    I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
    1. Re:$22/month for dialup!!?? by ClownsScareMe · · Score: 1

      Because you can get a really cheap computer with it...?

      --
      I read Slashdot for the articles
    2. Re:$22/month for dialup!!?? by wallykeyster · · Score: 1

      Let's do some math. They could get a standard cheap dial-up account for $9.99/month or they could pay $22/month for this one. That comes out to $12 more each month, or $144 each year. If you keep this service for three years (the average PC cycle), you've paid over $400 for the computer. Earthlink certainly didn't lose money on that box and they gained a subscriber that they may not have gotten otherwise.

    3. Re:$22/month for dialup!!?? by wallykeyster · · Score: 1

      I just dug up some more of the details and they lock you in to at least one year of Earthlink and charge you $70 for the basic desktop. So, even if you bolt after the first year, you've still paid over $200 for the box. I can buy the thing without the Earthlink membership for $219, so this isn't a free (as in beer) computer. After that first year, you are less likely to change ISPs simply because of the hassle of changing email addresses and such, so they continue to sell you marked up dial-up service.

    4. Re:$22/month for dialup!!?? by denofslack · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The deal part about this is that you're paying $200 over the course of a year, with no financing or interest charges.

      So you pay $70 for the desktop (plus shipping) and $21 per month for the dial-up service.

      I can imagine a lot of people wanting a cheap server or another pc in the home hopping on this, even if they already have broadband.

      Hell, if I needed another machine, I'd do it in a heatbeat. And I'd never log into the Earthlink account, and would cancel after a year.

    5. Re:$22/month for dialup!!?? by wallykeyster · · Score: 1
      I can imagine a lot of people wanting a cheap server or another pc in the home hopping on this, even if they already have broadband. Hell, if I needed another machine, I'd do it in a heatbeat. And I'd never log into the Earthlink account, and would cancel after a year.

      1. The cheap computer would hardly be worth the cost for a server. This is a 1.5 GHz AMD Sempron, cheapo motherboard (with an SIS chipset, and only two PCI slots), 256 mb of generic RAM, a 40 Gb hard drive, and a one-year return-to-the-manufacturer-without-cross-shipping POS warranty. You would do better to buy a used machine on eBay for the same cost.
      2. You would have to be completely braindead to do this for the computer only. As detailed above, it is not a nice machine. It also does not include a monitor at this price. And, if you aren't using the Earthlink service, you are now paying over $330 for a computer that you can order without Earthlink for $219.
    6. Re:$22/month for dialup!!?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why would anyone pay $22/month for dialup when you can get some sort of broadband for $10/month more (or dialup somewhere else for so much less?)?

      Probably the same people that pay $8/month to rent a remote control from the cable company.

    7. Re:$22/month for dialup!!?? by Shurhaian · · Score: 1

      Not all places have broadband available.

      The fact that dial-up is cheaper elsewhere is another point entirely.

      --
      NB: YMMV. IANAL. Take the above with a grain of salt.
    8. Re:$22/month for dialup!!?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here in fairbanks ak, if you order plain dailup, it'll cost ~$20/month. However, if you pay $5.99 for a long-distance plan, they include free dialup.

    9. Re:$22/month for dialup!!?? by damsa · · Score: 1
      People that travel may want this, as Earthlink is a nationwide service. Connect your laptop when you travel. Leave your new PC connected to your home broadband, use it as a server to back up things once in a while.

      Not many are in this position, but I imagine some other creative uses for a computer.

    10. Re:$22/month for dialup!!?? by GnuAge · · Score: 1

      There are something like 150 ISPs in the US that offer dialup for $10 or less (some as little as $4-5 with no setup fee and no long-term contracts).

      Many of these ISPs are MUCH better than Earthstink. Call the Georgia scientologists over at Earthlink for tech-support and you'll be treated to tedious voice mail and long wait times on hold, vs. my $8 per month dial up ISP where you get a helpful human being on the second ring. You can find the dialup numbers and server settings within a click or two on my ISP's home page; you really have to dig for that stuff on Earthlink.com.

      If you use Earthlink's TotalExcess Windows 'installer' it basically takes over your computer, starting up every time you boot Windows, replacing your IE Favorites with its own hidden ones, & disabling IE's location bar search, in favor of its own search (and no, customizing IE's searches did not give me a Google search back, I would have had to much around with the Registry). I didn't bother to sort it out, just switched my buddy over to Mozilla & Firefox. Their software really fought me, locking up the system when I tried to uninstall it, requiring a reboot & Scandisk.

      Earthfink only offers you only 10 MB of space on their email server and if you fill it up I've observed them disabling your email account without even sending you a courtesy email telling you how to clear it up (heck, even free Netzero does that). After a friend couldn't get his email for a few days he finally got a message saying he could purchase more storage space for only an extra $2 per month. Well, you can buy an 80 GB drive for only $20 after MIR. In other words for your $22 per month Earthlink offers you a generous ¼ cent of storage for your email while Gmail gives you 2.2+ GB (220 times as much) for free. And then Earthlink has the effrontery to spam you with commerical email, eating up your tiny quota.

      A few years ago I even had Mindspring (same outfit, different name) abruptly cancel a dialup account with them without notice just because I was online all night for a week or two, downloading distros, yah, that's the story.

      So basically, you are paying at least $168 over a year more than comparable dialup service would cost, but at least you get a bargain on a machine, right? Wrong, that $69 doesn't include a $50 shipping fee, so its real price is about $120. In the meantime the Friday before last local retailer Fry's was offering basically the same machine with Linspire instead of Xandros for $100. (OK, the Fry's box only has 128 MB, but you can buy an extra 256 MB for about $20 these days.) Feh.

  8. now is when stuff gets interesting by codepunk · · Score: 1

    Free hardware and Free software beat that billy boy...

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:now is when stuff gets interesting by putko · · Score: 1

      When Billy hears about this, I bet he craps his pants.

      There's the potential here for a chunk of the market (unsophisticated cheapos) to have their entire computer experience be non-Micro$oft.

      It is really hard to compete with such a business -- MSN will have to start cannibalizing the main franchise, and that just won't happen.

      Although I hate Earthlink and their goddman telemarketers, this really, really makes me happy today.

      --
      http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
  9. It's aaaalive! by Crimson+Dragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I understand the purpose of this, however I cringe whenever I see dialup being promoted into longevity.

    The internet content of today chokes on dialup. The internet content of the future will not be able to live without broadband.... so why promote expanded use of any kind of dialup? Are we still in an age where there are enough people without broadband (or the cash to afford it) that we must cater in this fashion? Should this be so, efforts to bring prices down in the broadband market and increased efforts towards greater availiability (though less of a problem now) are far more meritorius than taking a dead horse and pulling a Frankenstein on it.

    --
    The Crimson Dragon
    1. Re:It's aaaalive! by jokestress · · Score: 1

      I imagine the users being targeted are not going to use it for much more than email and occasional photo uploads or something. Though I agree that it's like offering a free rotary phone with your telephone service. Drag these people kicking and screaming into the new century! Someone please think of the children!

      --
      Evil sig is livE.
    2. Re:It's aaaalive! by qa'lth · · Score: 1

      Great, a broadband enthusiast.
      So, where should I send the invoice for running a T1 line out to my house, and the monthly fees associated therein.

      'cos, like it or not, something like 80% of the world still accesses through dialup connections. Broadband doesn't have the magicial penetration you think it does. And shitty designers just make things worse on those of us stuck with dialup connections.

    3. Re:It's aaaalive! by brlancer · · Score: 1
      The internet content of today chokes on dialup. The internet content of the future will not be able to live without broadband.... so why promote expanded use of any kind of dialup?

      Don't be so self-absorbed. Lots of people in the U.S. still don't have internet access at home; many don't want it. Many don't want anything more than email and the occasional browsing for information (news, sports scores, movie times, baking recipes).

      "Logic" like yours is the same that pushes for insanely powerful computers just so Joe Schmoe can write and print a letter to a friend. Most people don't need it; why bother pushing it? Eventually, the internet will become an appliance like the tv or the stove--we're nowhere near that.

      --
      Someone asked if I had patched against MSBlast; I said yes, I installed Linux.
    4. Re:It's aaaalive! by Crimson+Dragon · · Score: 1

      There is much passion on this point, and if one rereads my post, I believe the pushing of broadband is more worthwhile than clinging to dialup. I don't propose Grandma using a jackhammer to kill an ant: I propose that we give Grandma the option to do other things than send email all day long.

      --
      The Crimson Dragon
    5. Re:It's aaaalive! by packetl0ss · · Score: 1
      offering a free rotary phone with your telephone service

      Where do I sign up?

    6. Re:It's aaaalive! by Markintosh · · Score: 1

      Are we still in an age where there are enough people without broadband that we must cater in this fashion?

      Yes, you insensitive clod!
      I'd RTFA, but it's still downloading in another tab...

    7. Re:It's aaaalive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Broadband doesn't have the magicial penetration you think it does. And shitty designers just make things worse on those of us stuck with dialup connections.

      Indeed. Life with dialup can be made a lot more tolerable by a few choices in software. Webwasher to strip out ads (Linux version available), Opera with it's ease of disabling graphics - sounds - plugins - backgrounds - it's really hard to make text slow. Or even Firefox with the right plugins and things disabled, but it still far inferior for loading pages in the background while you read and being able to scroll smoothly. An appropriate hosts list.

      Back when DSL was first offered in my area I had a fantastic connection, it was literally a poor mans T1. 1.4 down and 1.2 up, a static IP, and no restrictions from the ISP on servers, and a dedicated server and domain name ($10 a year extra to keep that going if you wanted it) with 200MB of space and a several GB a month traffic cap - not bad for under $50 a month plus the cost of laying the line(they also supported Linux). They went bankrupt and got bought out by a sleazy company that jacked up the rates 5 times and started throttling upload, I still had a contract so they couldn't change mine till it expired, but when it did there wasn't anyone else to choose from at a reasonable price. The cable company wanted $100 for a basic connection, and they didn't even sell the connection I had the closest was over $280 a month, the phone company wanted $345 + KB charges or $149 a month for something far less than what I had.

      So I switched to dialup. It was miserable till I got the filters in place and right software. Up until 2 years ago, I was stuck on dialup as well.
      On the other hand, once I had mail box set up elsewhere, I could take advantage of every 2-3 months free offer that came along and very rarely paid for a connection at all. Cheap is nice, but free is better.

    8. Re:It's aaaalive! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Broadband IS an option in a very large percentage of the civilized world.

      Sure not all of China's 1.3 Billion people have access to it, but be realistic.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    9. Re:It's aaaalive! by ikea5 · · Score: 1
      Where do I sign up?

      www.freerotaryphone.com?r=14734629

    10. Re:It's aaaalive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, there are plenty of people who either only want dialup or can only get dialup.

      We may all be cruising along on DSL or cable, but there are plenty of areas that can't get broadband other than satellite or a full commercial T1. For people living in those places, it's dialup or nothing.

      For others, they may not want broadband at home. I certainly can't live without it, but I know people at work who either don't have an Internet connection at home or who only want dialup. I even know one lady who just signed up with (gasp) NetZero because that's all she wanted to pay. All she wants to do is send and receive e-mail and surf occasionally, but if dialup works for her, why push her onto a broadband connection she neither needs nor wants?

      Finally, as for the attractiveness of this deal, look at it this way. The computer may be a mediocre performer to us, but it'll do most anything many people want it to do. Plus, to them, this deal spreads the cost across a year, which makes the price even more attractive. Throw in a cheap monitor, and they're all set.

      A friend's parents will be perfect candidates for this. They live in a rural area with no broadband and, up until recently, a crappy local ISP they aren't happy with. But it looks like EarthLink has added a POP in their town, which means they'll almost certainly switch. And as long as they're gonna switch, they might as well replace their aging PC with this one, which will be a better performer than what they have now. For them, it's a win-win situation.

    11. Re:It's aaaalive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half of all Internet users in America are still a bigger market than all Linux users.

    12. Re:It's aaaalive! by Bad+to+the+Ben · · Score: 1

      I'm a dialup user and I'm doing just fine, and I really get sick of seeing these kind of rants. Dialup speeds are sufficient for most content, and if there weren't so many web designers that use flash for everything I'd hardly have anything to complain about.

      I routinely download over 1GB a month on my connection (normally about 1.3), and the largest file I've ever gotten was a 600MB Linux iso. If I left my connection on 24/7, I could go further. Sure, I can't get the file RIGHT NOW, but that's what patience is for. I even do some online gaming and get decent pings on local servers. If I can survive on dialup doing this sort of stuff, I figure Mom and Pop type people will be OK.

    13. Re:It's aaaalive! by bgfay · · Score: 1

      There are many of us who haven't gone up to broadband. I've been online for a few years now (and been reading /. for a long time too) and I get by with dial-up. When I need to download a large file (a new distribution, OpenOffice, music or video) I use the connection at work or ask a friend to grab it for me. But for the most part what I do online is perfectly served by dial-up and can be done on my oldest machine (a 1995 box with 32MB of RAM running Windows 98). I want to be able to read news and mail, check weather, and participate in /. discussions. I can do that on dial-up.

      This is no rant against broadband--heavens no, I would love broadband. But my dial-up is less than $13 a month and broadband would be a lot more than that. I'm cheap, that's all.

      --
      Yeah, I'm as old as my UID would suggest.
    14. Re:It's aaaalive! by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      Most people in North America do not have broadband. And most high bandwidth content is completly useless and annoying to the user.

      And even if everyone had really fast broadband into their house, that doesn't mean that "the internet is faster". All those people now consuming more broadband means server loads would be greater, packets would take longer to get to their destination. I have a 100M connection at home, and I consider it very lucky if I can download something at 1.5M. And we are not going to see another dot-com era orgy of spending to improve things this time around.

      In fact, dialup improves the quality of websites in ways you don't even know. I can tell you that the only thing keeping most Corporate websites from being one giant streaming video television commercial is that designers can say "What about the dialup users? They are still in the majority!". When everyone has broadband, get ready for websites to become a whole lot less useable (not that they haven't turned into Flash and streaming-video nightmares already).

  10. $22/month for dialup? by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Insightful
    > [$69.99] with a 12 month EarthLink membership subscription at $21.95 per month

    Well, at least it's running Linux. Because on dialup, it'd probably take at least 12 months to download the patches to secure XP.

    If you've got $21.95/month for dialup, but don't have an extra $2-4/month for DSL from your phone provider (or $20/month from your cable provider), you've got no business spending $333.39 ($69.99 + 12 * 21.95) or "$69.99" for a low-end PC with no monitor.

    Use $300 to buy a year's worth of broadband, and with the remaining cash, support your nearest surplus store ($50) or computer recycler ($10), garage sale ($50), or even lighten the load on your apartment's dumpster ($0.00).

    1. Re:$22/month for dialup? by oirtemed · · Score: 1

      First....Its 333.39 for a new PC with no monitor but INET access and software Surplus store/Garage: 50$ + 12*10(cheap dialup) =170$ and the pc will be used and who know what if any software or whatnot. Recycler: 130$ same thing. Dumpster: YMMV As far as extra 2-4$ a month for dsl...nuh uh. By the time you add taxes and other "fees" that they are allowed to charge now...it is way more than they advertise. Not to mention the main flaw of your arguement: A person who would be satisified with this level of computer would prolly be satisified with dial up. You know...it does work for web and email fairly well....

    2. Re:$22/month for dialup? by vondo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, at least it's running Linux. Because on dialup, it'd probably take at least 12 months to download the patches to secure XP.

      Umm, I hate to break it to you, but every month I have to download about 200MB of updated RPMs for the various Mandrake and Redhat distros I run/admin. It's fine on broadband, but it is in no way a lower volume of updates than XP.

    3. Re:$22/month for dialup? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to chime in: it's the same on Debian/sarge. Does that guy even run linux?

    4. Re:$22/month for dialup? by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Nice math there. I wish it worked.

      I live in the downtown area of a city of a quarter-million people. I have two options for internet access:
      1) $56/mo for cable internet
      2) Dialup

      $300 will pay the *connection costs* of cable.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    5. Re:$22/month for dialup? by aaronl · · Score: 1

      It cost me 100$ to get my DSL installed, which is the first time I've actually had to pay for installation. Many places still have nice deals. Besides, your dialup *really* costs over 50$/mo when you figure in the phone line.

    6. Re:$22/month for dialup? by vondo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, until we start patching the just file(s) that changed (and updating our RPM/DEB db's) Windows will require less bandwidth, I think.

    7. Re:$22/month for dialup? by that+_evil+_gleek · · Score: 1

      cheapest dsl in my area is $29.99 + fee's. You should also consider a person's credit limit, might be a lot lower than yours.

  11. Re: Altivec by Cutie+Pi · · Score: 1

    Well said... it amazes me that Apple zealots still think Altivec is the only game in town, and that Intel only has MMX. It's true that SSE2 and SSE3 don't have catchy names, but they do the same thing as Altivec and VMX

    Um... yeah.

  12. Sweet deal! by markov_chain · · Score: 2, Funny

    All Xandros PCs and laptops include free Skype-to-Skype calling worldwide

    Wow, that's generous! Now if only their internet access offered free access to CNN.com and slashdot.org, worldwide, I'd be putting in my order right away! :^)

    --
    Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
  13. Wait wait wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't Skype on dialup be kind of useless?
    Also, does that $70 machine even have a modem that works with Linux?

    1. Re:Wait wait wait by Valar · · Score: 1

      No, I'm sure they didn't think of that at all. They are going to ship thousands of these all over creation, and then realize that they don't work. They certainly wouldn't _test_ such things out in advance.

    2. Re:Wait wait wait by goodie3shoes · · Score: 1

      Good question - did they find a cheap, presumably controllerless modem supported by the 2.6.X kernel?

      --
      BSA: "Would you like a free Software Audit"? me: "No, thanks. My software is all Free".
  14. About time... by Prod_Deity · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I worked for an out sourced call center for Earthlink in late 03. At that time, Earthlink didn't support Linux at all.

    I had about 3 calls about people wanting to set up Kppp, but I was told by my supervisor to not say anything but "Earthlink does not support any linux distribution"

    One other call was someone calling for a number, but at the time we had to ask what OS they were using, and I did as my supervisor told me to do....

    Right after I gave the statement, the caller gave me an ass chewing, saying that he just needed a number because he just moved to a new state.

    I'm glad to see that one of the bigger dial up companies has changed their stance on Linux... or have they? Anyone know?

    1. Re:About time... by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

      Odd.

      I worked for Earthlink in '99, at one of their in house call centers, and we had a very limited linux support. Essentially we could tell them what files to modify, and what should be in them. Anything beyond that (like if they said "how do I edit a file? I can't figure out vi!"), and we had to stop the support.

      Of course, if the caller was proficient at using any technology, he could have easily gotten a local number from the automated support service on the 800 number. Perhaps he just liked waiting in queues and yelling at people.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    2. Re:About time... by torpor · · Score: 1


      i started earthlink with sky. my original plan for the modem pools was to use linux-based terminal servers .. it warms my cockles to see them finally doing the linux gig ..

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    3. Re:About time... by th3space · · Score: 2, Informative

      I worked for them from whenever they acquired Mindspring until some time in '02 (I'd actually been with Netcom, then Mindspring, then Earthlink), when I got fed up and left...but I was in the hosting group, and we really didn't bother with who was running what, given that we only cared about their sites working (and only tenuously so, at that)...

      Why do I mention this? Well, not only did Earthlink not support Linux externally, they didn't support it internally, either...the hosting and dedicated groups both ran two systems, one Windows (for issue logging, supposedly..I used mine for fuckall) and one *nix (which was pretty much whatever flavor we wanted to use, given that we were the ones who had to fix it if it broke)...granted, if you managed to get over into those groups, you already had a clue as to what you were doing, and you could manage on your own, but every now and again, one of us would end up with some kind of problem and have to rely on others in the group or the systems engineers to help out...I miss that fun, little anarchistic group I worked with...

      Now, I know next to nothing about what Earthlink does these days in terms of support for OSs (internally or externally), but the capability for them to support *nix exists, given that at one point their web servers ran Red Hat (mindspring platform) or Solaris (earthlink platform)...it can't be too terribly difficult to come up with an easily read, step-by-step configuration walk-through (which even in house our dialup and broadband groups relied upon, and I'm sure they carried on that tradition when they started moving things out of house and overseas)...but I'll be damned if I'm going to be the one to call them and find out.

      Of course, they could just as easily support ONLY Xandros on the PCs they've put out, given that it would be standardized and they would know definitively what would need to be done to configure whatever dialer that they had put in place, and then tell people using other versions to go fly it up a flagpole...actually, having worked there, I'd feel pretty safe in assuming that this is exactly what they would do...Xandros=Support / Fedore!=Support.

      --
      "How like you to drag your keyboard to a gun fight." - Aaron Bedard (BANE)
    4. Re:About time... by th3space · · Score: 1

      And as soon as I had hit submit, I vaguely remember there having already been some basic walkthroughs available in-house for the more saavy techs to guide users with...I don't personally recall having ever dealt with that kind of thing, especially since the folks I talked to needed FTP settings and telnet settings moreso than connection settings (still, mostly windows and mac)...

      ahhhh, memories.

      --
      "How like you to drag your keyboard to a gun fight." - Aaron Bedard (BANE)
    5. Re:About time... by Speaker-to-Cats · · Score: 1

      I still do level 2 support for Earthlink. Officially they support setting up a dialup connection on Lindows/Linspire (and there is a okay virtual app on how to do it) and for the other distro's just give connection and email settings. Hearing this news (which they didn't bother to tell us about) on one hand I spend a lot of time explaining why their new Win Xp computer is overrun by spyware and wishing I could send them out a knoppix cd, Then on the other hand I'm thinking oh my god, Im gonna be getting all those calls as the india techs will have no clue about linux ( they can barely handle an XP no browse)! Speaker-to-Cats

    6. Re:About time... by kitzilla · · Score: 1
      worked for an out sourced call center for Earthlink in late 03. At that time, Earthlink didn't support Linux at all. I had about 3 calls about people wanting to set up Kppp, but I was told by my supervisor to not say anything but "Earthlink does not support any linux distribution"

      Way Back When (tm), some tech actually took the time to mail me a FAQ on configuring Linux for Earthlink. If I remember properly, it was keyed to RH5.

      It was an Earthlink document, so there must have been at least some informal Linux support at one point.

      --
      This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    7. Re:About time... by alarosa · · Score: 1

      Wow, lots of ex-Earthlink people posting recently - I worked in the Harrisburg callcenter - dialup/broadband for a year, hosting for 2 1/2 years. Just one minor nitpick, the Mindspring hosting farm in Atlanta was not RedHat based (at least when I started in hosting in 2001), it was all Digital Unix 4/5 (depending on the server).

      Our UNIX of choice for our workstations up here was FreeBSD - my first experience with it, and now I run it at home on my server.

    8. Re:About time... by th3space · · Score: 1

      Goddamnit, you're absolutely right...it was Netcom that was Red Hat (and some NT). How could I have forgotten that stuff? Oh, it's been a few years, that's right ;)

      --
      "How like you to drag your keyboard to a gun fight." - Aaron Bedard (BANE)
  15. Finally by nizo · · Score: 1

    I thought for sure AOL was going to offer something like this after they purchased Netscape a long time ago. Imagine if Joe user's pc is mangled; the ISP rep says "insert the recover CD into your machine and reboot" which is some kind of live distro that lets the ISP guy log into the machine remotely (no matter how mangled the OS may be) and fix the machine or even possibly restore the OS back to the default.

    1. Re:Finally by dangitman · · Score: 1
      live distro that lets the ISP guy log into the machine remotely (no matter how mangled the OS may be) and fix the machine or even possibly restore the OS back to the default.

      Geee, that makes a lot of economic sense for an ISP - to provide free support for your OS, to waste hours of expensive labor costs fixing problems that have nothing to do with the ISP. I can't imagine why they don't do this!

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  16. Interesting choice of CPU... by Noryungi · · Score: 1

    I noticed that the $399 machine comes with a VIA C3 CPU, which I found interesting...

    Has anybody got any numbers/benchmarks showing the C3 performances/power consumption versus Intel/AMD CPUs?

    And, more importantly has anybody actually bought one of these machines, tested it, and installed something other than Xandros on it? OpenBSD and Slackware comes to mind, but any other distribution would also be interesting...

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    1. Re:Interesting choice of CPU... by dotgain · · Score: 1

      I remember putting together a boot-from-flash Linux system to run on a VIA C3, and I couldn't compile anything above 486 instruction-set for it. It might have been a particular revision of this chip, I dunno, haven't got one anymore.

    2. Re:Interesting choice of CPU... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had no problems at all with via c3 on linux. Slackware RH9 Mandrake Knoppix and currently clusterknoppix. A Frys beige box that came installed with (then) Lindows.

  17. Cheaper by kamukwam · · Score: 1

    In other news, people are selling massively 8086-based PC's containing enormous 5.25" disks (imagine how much GB of data can fit on this) for only $2.

  18. This sounds familiar by wallykeyster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Didn't PeoplePC try and fail at this just a few years ago? I don't remember if they were using Windows on the boxes, but the business model of dial-up and "free" computers didn't pan out then. What has changed?

    1. Re:This sounds familiar by BrianH · · Score: 1

      PeoplePC was just too early to market.

      The computers they offered cost them too much, and they spent far too much maintaining their network. Basically, their massive overhead destroyed their profitability.

      Fast forward to 2005: The cost of hardware has dropped substantially, and Linux has matured enough to be useable for the average person. Couple that with the minimal overhead involved in connecting these users to the existing Earthlink network, and the possibility of profitability is far higher.

      Of course, many people have been saying for years that computers would one fday be like cellphones. When I bought my first one, I spent $1500 on the phone and another $100 a month for fuzzy local service. Last year I replaced both mine and my wifes phones for $0 and a promise to maintain $50 monthly service for two years. The phones themselves have become a commodity and are no longer a profit center...they're simply used to drive subscriptions.

      --

      There is nothing so pathetic as seeing a beautiful young theory roughed up by a tough gang of facts.
    2. Re:This sounds familiar by wallykeyster · · Score: 1
      Of course, many people have been saying for years that computers would one fday be like cellphones. When I bought my first one, I spent $1500 on the phone and another $100 a month for fuzzy local service. Last year I replaced both mine and my wifes phones for $0 and a promise to maintain $50 monthly service for two years. The phones themselves have become a commodity and are no longer a profit center...they're simply used to drive subscriptions.

      Your analogy holds on the other side of it too. There are still plenty of nicer cell phones that are not free (or even cheap). If you need a basic phone just to be on the network, then get the free one and give up your choice of network. If you care about the network you use, desire the flexibility to change later, or need that kick ass phone, then this doesn't work for you. You pay $200 for a phone and shop for service on it.

      Hardware needed to run HL6 will not be free from AOL with your membership. Yet, I do agree with your basic premise - the cost of some cheap hardware often is worthwhile overhead for a long term subscriber.

    3. Re:This sounds familiar by suitepotato · · Score: 1

      Fast forward to 2005: The cost of hardware has dropped substantially, and Linux has matured enough to be useable for the average person.

      What color is the sky in this alternative universe you speak of and how can one get there?

      Knoppix LiveCDs may work for the average person, but beyond that, nope. Not happening. Getting Real Player installed and working, Windows Media and Quicktime compatibility, Java and Flash to work work, etc. are more often than not things not for the average person.

      This is why Windows still leads the pack for the average person:ease of use. Double-click, check boxes, click some more, it's installed. No ./config, no yum search vlc, no any nonsense.

      Compare the installation of nVidia drivers on FC3 versus Windows. Try from Gnome or KDe and oops, you can't do it with X running. Okay, where exactly is it documented on how to kill X and go to straight command prompt? Better Google and hope you don't ask the wrong people who will belittle and bully you because you aren't as l33t as they are.

      Easy enough for entry-level natural-born-techies, maybe. Not for average middle of the road users who can't even manage to stop asking where the "any" key is.

      --
      If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    4. Re:This sounds familiar by BrianH · · Score: 1

      I said useable, not ideal. Besides, a product like this is going to be targeted at users who want to "use the Internet", and not much else. If people have a need for a more powerful PC, the odds are that they either already own one or they wouldn't use this one in the first place.

      Linux actually represents a great platform for building a dedicated Internet PC. By stripping K or Gnome down to a minimalist interface with only a few generic links for "Email", "Web", "IP Phone", and "Instant Messaging", you can actually provide the low end, untrained user with an experience superior to that found on a Windows equipped PC.

      --

      There is nothing so pathetic as seeing a beautiful young theory roughed up by a tough gang of facts.
    5. Re:This sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      PeoplePC is still very much alive. The company I work for manages a section of their television advertising and I assure you, they are doing just fine.

    6. Re:This sounds familiar by evilviper · · Score: 1
      the business model of dial-up and "free" computers didn't pan out then. What has changed?

      Well, the price of hardware has gone down significantly. Hardware has gotten fast enough that most people don't care if their computer is top-of-the-line, so a commodity computer is perfectly acceptable. Linux is also less expensive than Windows.

      But besides that, their plan is significantly different. Earthlink is charging $2 more per/month above their normal dial-up price, and they still require you to pay all but ~$100 of the cost of the hardware... So, in the worst case (if you cancel Earthlink service imediately after the 12 months is up), you only come out $75 ahead. They probably make about that much profit over 1 year from a normal dial-up subscriber.

      So, it's only a good deal if you are currently paying $15+ each month for dial-up, or are already an Earthlink dial-up subscriber (in the latter case you're probably exempted).
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:This sounds familiar by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Knoppix LiveCDs may work for the average person, but beyond that, nope. Not happening. Getting Real Player installed and working, Windows Media and Quicktime compatibility, Java and Flash to work work, etc. are more often than not things not for the average person.

      The average person doesn't use that, in Linux *or* Windows. The average person uses a web browser, webmail (so not even the mail client is that useful) and a word processor. Maybe a spreadsheet.

  19. This is the ultimate test of desktop Linux by G4from128k · · Score: 1

    It will be interesting to see if Earthlink/Xandros keeps selling this unit (or ones like it) in perpetuity. If Earthlink can make money on a low-dollar, low monthly subscription Linux desktop, then it proves that Linux is ready for the masses. With the high cost of tech support calls, any technology that is not drop-dead simple becomes a money-losing nightmare for the provider.

    I'm going to watch this experiment carefully because, if it succeeds, then Linux desktop share should climb significantly.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  20. A Deal? Hrmmm by matth · · Score: 1

    So let me get this straight.. I pay $263 to Earthlink to save $150 from microtel? Hrmmmm.

  21. Yum, yum, free beer! by rhu · · Score: 2, Funny

    It worked so well for PeoplePC and freepc.com. They'll be losing money on every unit, but heck, they'll make it up on volume, right?

    What the mom-n-pop's-mom-n-pop crown really need is a machine that skips the os and boots straight to Yahoo!

  22. Button Stealing by Zoc_All_Alone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's a little unnerving when I view their website and realize they stole their "Customize It" buttons from Dell.

    1. Re:Button Stealing by m85476585 · · Score: 1

      I guess not hiring graphics designers keeps prices down. They could have at least changed the color!

    2. Re:Button Stealing by syukton · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's important to qualify "stole" here.

      Their sizes are identical. 1423 bytes.

      Did a "save as" with firefox.

      >fc /b img.aspx.gif icon_customize_it.gif
      Comparing files img.aspx.gif and ICON_CUSTOMIZE_IT.GIF
      FC: no differences encountered

      img.aspx.gif is from the Dell Home website. The other is from Microtel.

      hmm.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
  23. 2.0 ghz Sempron 2200? by bombshelter13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Under 'processer', it says 'AMD 2.0GHz Sempron Processor 2200+'.

    Do even a tiny ammount of Googling, and you will see that the Sempron 2200+ is a 1.5 ghz chip. So, this means one of two things... either A) they're blatently lying about the clockspeed, or B) they're pre-overclocking the chips... which is the case?

    If they're saying it's equivelant to a 2.0 ghz Intel chip in speed (which most AMD fans, myself included, would agree with), that's one thing. If they're pre-overclocking the chips, that's another (which some people will support, and others won't)... but in either case, they should be clearer in what they're saying and doing, since the way they're saying things now is somewhat suspicious.

    1. Re:2.0 ghz Sempron 2200? by rpozz · · Score: 1

      I would imagine it's just another cock-up confusing the processor model with its clock speed.

    2. Re:2.0 ghz Sempron 2200? by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      Try clicking on the link "customize" then the details of the processor change to 1.5Ghz. The price also changes... from $69.99 to "Price after discount $219.99 USD"!!!

  24. Typical OSS procedure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not testing before releasing

  25. Even the Windows versions come with OpenOffice by Rob+Y. · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Some nice things about these boxes:

    They're actually cheaper with Xandros than with XP. Not by much, but I guess that means they're actually paying Xandros and not Microsoft.

    They all come with OpenOffice. Even the versions with WinXP. And MS Office is clearly listed as a (very) pricey option.

    This makes it very clear that, even for users not ready to adopt Linux, there are big cost savings to be had by adopting OOo.

    Now if all vendors would start offering Firefox and OOo on their boxes (with or without WinXP), that might make a real splash.

    --
    Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    1. Re:Even the Windows versions come with OpenOffice by xiando · · Score: 0

      Would it really make any difference what the vendors offer? Vendors are stupid not to include OO and Firefox in their pre-installations as it does not cost them anything at all to bundle free software. But I do not see the big point for users. Users have the Internet. If they can not afford the Internet then they are not buying new computers (=whitetrash), and those who have the Internet can just download OO off da net.

    2. Re:Even the Windows versions come with OpenOffice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The target market in question here is "users who have the Internet, but are too clueless and/or lazy to download those things, or even know that they'd be good things to download".

  26. Zapple Aelots ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple Zelots ...
    CANT HANDLE The TRUTH !!!

  27. Good move, Linux = $$$ by xiando · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. Get customer to sign up and get a cheap computer
    2. Get customer hooked on your service and *SUPPORT*
    3. Years go by
    4. ???
    5. Profit !!!

    Linux is not that easy to use and they will surely need to provide some support, but the profit in having the customer this hooked on your support is probably worth it.

    1. Re:Good move, Linux = $$$ by SatanMat · · Score: 1

      Linux is not that easy to use


      Not quite... Linux is VERY easy to use... it gets tricky when trying to tweak, twist, configure, or get otherwise midieval...


      Using a properly configured box is easy, "grandma click this thing for the internet, and here for your email" -- see easy!


      but you are half correct, Support is the goldmine.

  28. I want some of that by overshoot · · Score: 1
    If you've got $21.95/month for dialup, but don't have an extra $2-4/month for DSL from your phone provider (or $20/month from your cable provider),

    I want some of what you're smoking.

    $30/month for DSL (on top of POTS) but that only applies if you use one of the LOC's partner ISPs -- which often doesn't include Earthlink.

    For cable, you're looking at $40/month for basic cable plus the same $30/month, except this time you have to use the cable company as your ISP, so Earthlink is locked out altogether.

    Either way: pay for broadband, use another ISP, and pay Earthlink for online services. Approximate cost: $50/month.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:I want some of that by anagama · · Score: 1

      Approximate cost: $50/month.

      Your math is pretty good -- I get tired of listening to everyone slamming this deal because DSL is only a buck or two more. It isn't like everyone in the world has equivalent access.

      I can get a slow DSL (finally ... it's been years) for about $60/month or pretty quick cable for $55/month. In my case broadband is more than double the cost of this dialup plan (not even counting the value of the computer). Although I won't be trading my broadband away, there are tons of people who don't find it valuable enough pay close to $660/yr. Many people will look at this way: you get (slow) network access, a computer, and money left over to boot. For those without a broadband addiction who live in locales where broadband is pricey, it's people like me paying $660/yr who are the "idiots".

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    2. Re:I want some of that by aaronl · · Score: 1

      30$/mo for the phone line, plus 22$/mo for the dial up service. 52$ is very close to 55$ and to 60$! Don't forget the cost of the base line from the RBOC, cause that's the larger of the costs involved.

    3. Re:I want some of that by teslatug · · Score: 1

      I pay $25/mo for DSL (only 384Kb up/down but I just want constant on and it's faster than dialup). You need a landline too, but that's what I use anyway as I don't carry a cell.

    4. Re:I want some of that by anagama · · Score: 1

      Who doesn't already have a phone?

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    5. Re:I want some of that by aaronl · · Score: 1

      I don't have a phone. :) Quite a few people that I know don't, either. It's becoming rather common to ditch the high cost land-line and just go with an equal priced cellular. Mobiles often have a better set of services included (no cost long-distance, call id, voice mail, three way calling, etc) and you can take them with you if you want. When your land-line base cost starts being over 30$, there isn't much reason to have that *and* a mobile.

    6. Re:I want some of that by anagama · · Score: 1

      Try it this way. People who don't have quality broadband access are also those people likely to live in places w/ spotty cell coverage. So explain again why they will give up a landline for no phone service?

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    7. Re:I want some of that by aaronl · · Score: 1

      Because they gave up the land-line due to redundant cost or dislike of the provider. I know very few people that live in an area with spotty cell coverage for every cell provider, and you can see this looking at the coverage maps. Broadband coverage is also quite good now. There are many people who don't consider it because their dialup is "good enough". Most COs are wired for DSL now, and most cable providers offer internet service. There are some very good maps available at dslreports that will show you what is wired in your area.

    8. Re:I want some of that by anagama · · Score: 1

      It's a big country. There are plenty of places that don't have the network access you enjoy. There are vast stretches of the county I live in where cell coverage is non-existent and broadband is available only via sattelite. I live on the edge so I can get cable for $55/mo. In the last 6 months 256k dsl or some BS like that at more than $60 month has become available.

      If a person lives in an area with good access to everything, then yes, the earthlink deal isn't that great. But here is my point, for some people in certain areas, it is a great deal because they have no alternatives. Stop acting like your access to network services means everyone has equivalent access.

      People should say: this deal sucks for people who can get X, Y, and Z. However, a blanket "This deal sucks" is a myopic response. It sucks for you, it sucks for me, but it might be awesome for the guy living ten miles down the road.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  29. Earthlink + Skype? by sydsavage · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sure that skype is going to work great over Earthlink dialup.

  30. Re:Flame all you like.... by rpozz · · Score: 1

    It won't be the processor that'll be the problem, it'll be the motherboard. The motherboard will be a really cheap budget thing with everything onboard. Are they going to include a screen too? They must be making quite a nasty loss if they are.

  31. Numbers and IP addresses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dial-numbers and all the IP addresses needed to setup the dialup connection are available on the Earthlink website. Of course you need to be able to get on the internet somewhere to view those, but still, every library i've ever been to had free internet access. I've also never had any problem with getting the IP addresses of the DNS servers and such over the phone.

  32. Re:Flame all you like.... by rpozz · · Score: 1

    Should have RTFA. Appears like they are doing.

  33. My observation from the Future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someday you'll look back at this and will see how stupid you look, arguing about .5 ghz.

  34. Many winners in this one by wallykeyster · · Score: 1
    The hardware vendors offer an instant rebate when you sign up for a one-year Earthlink account, which means they get their money back from Earthlink (likely at nearly 100% of the discount). They also get significant exposure and advertising, mostly on Earthlink's dime (they probably pay a small kickback to Earthlink for each sell that includes the Earthlink service).

    Earthlink has a new twist to differentiate themselves, charges enough for the service to break even on the additional expense in the first year, and makes a nice mark up after the first year. They probably hope to lure the large and still growing segment of middle age people who just want to send email and get on the Internet occasionally.

    Even Xandros gets additional exposure for the non-free version of their OS. Given the fuzzy marketing write up on Microtel's site, what great aunt isn't going to agree that it's a great deal for only $20 more?

  35. Hrm. by Geekenstein · · Score: 1

    Can I consider Microtel a reputable company when they blatantly steal the "Customize It" button from the Dell website?

    1. Re:Hrm. by m85476585 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't seem like an accident. Google image searches for "customize", "customize it", "customize it green", or "customize site:dell.com" don't have it as a result. They have it as a atatic GIF image, but dell has some kind of dynamic image (/img.aspxs?p=)

  36. Arrow Keys? by jaal · · Score: 1

    Whats up with the arrow keys on the left side of the laptop? That's someting weird and not conventional.

  37. Re:Flame all you like.... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I got a check for $55.00 by accepting a decent desktop system (for it's day) and agreeing to a 12 month contract with Earthlink. And the system I got for less than free came with Windows (windows ME). So it used to be you could get a cheap computer without having to resort to running some weird OS.

    You aren't going to be playing games on a Linux box anyways, so honestly an AMD Sempron is massive overkill. Look at the Laptop offerings for that company. VIA C3 1.2Ghz .. now that's a system you really won't be playing games on.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  38. Checks calendar... by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 1

    Wait a minute. It isn't 1999! Wasn't PeoplePC or some other discount dialup ISP offering a service like this one back in the hey days?

    --

    ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
    1. Re:Checks calendar... by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      No this is some Earthlink person dusting off the previous campain and seeing what sticks PeoplePC= Earthlink- "toys"

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  39. Typical AMD marketing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    the Sempron 2200+ is a 1.5 ghz chip


    I must post this AC because any criticism of either Apple or AMD in /. will quickly get you modded down to the basement.


    When AMD invented this "+" marketing kludge, it became inevitable that people would confuse this with clock speed. The Sempron 2200+ is equivalent to an Intel 2.2 GHz chip, of course... in AMD's own benchmarks. I'm sure that Intel could make a benchmark where an Intel 1.5 GHz chip would be faster than an AMD chip with a 2.2 GHz clock (which would that be? A "Pluspron 5000+", perhaps?)

  40. AOLinux? by Darth+McBride · · Score: 1

    I think this plan has failed before with the PC hardware, but what about just the software?

    Imagine AOL with a custom distro of Linux. Keep in mind the enormous CD distribution that AOL has before you flame me...

    Most users do not differentiate AOL from the internet, so why not just dual boot into AOLinux. The average Joe would stop using Windows because they only use AOL anyway. This plan could work as long as it installed as a dual boot to allow people to continue playing games and using create-a-card software on the Windows partition. Better yet, get WINE working seamlessly so that they can use the kids educational/entertainment software. Most people I know would not dream of ditching Windows because they allow the PC to be a babysitter.

    What do you think? Could AOL, who probably doesn't have any fans here, sway the sheep to make a bunch of geeks' dreams come true?

  41. Earthlink is Evil by benspikey · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    DO NOT GIVE THIS COMPANY A DIME!! - THEY ARE THEIVES AND PROVIDE HORRIBLE SERVICE!!

    !!simply google earthlink + evil and view the results!!

    For EarthLink CEO Garry Betty, 2003 was a very good year. Betty took home almost $1 million -- $346,790 as a bonus -- for cutting EarthLink's workforce by one-fourth, leaving 1,300 people out of work. In January 2004, he announced 1,300 more job cuts.
    EarthLink not only victimized its employees, it also made them train the low-wage replacement workers and threatened to take away their severance pay if they spoke publicly about the situation.

    1. Re:Earthlink is Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went through something similar. I was the outsourced call center guy. But the company built a center somewhere cheaper and I was supposed to train my replacements. So I stayed out drinking until 4am at clubs and bars, to be in at work to train at 7am, barely conscious... Anyways, the new people didn't know their heads from their ass and the project fell flat. I ended up not getting laid off because I was such a great employee (and no amount of training would have prepared their new workforce). But after that experience it took me a month to find a new job. Corporate life sucks. Who knows I may still get reduced to a begger on the street. But money ain't everything, and no shame working at McDonalds if you need some form of income. heh look at it this way, with new deals like this on the market you can afford a new computer and get internet access for a year (woohoo!)

  42. $50 handling fee on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget to add the flat-rate $50 shipping and handling fee to the REAL cost of this so-called deal.

  43. Re:Coc4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn! You almost got me that time!

  44. So, when can I expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...your stopping by and installing my broadband connection? Where I live you have a choice of dialup or tin can and string. How much are you asking for your service, and what is my transfer rate? Are there any caps? Really, I'm serious, when can you be here to install it, got my checkbook handy. It's nice that you want to give us an option,l but who is going to pay for it? the government, big business? they would have to charge us a thousand a month for years to break even probably if some business did it.

    There's theory then practicality. Wish in one hand, crap in the other.

    We "cling to dialup" because in a lot of places that's ALL there is, do you get it now, do you GET IT? No company is going to run any expensive wired solution to hit 5 houses someplace. They don't sell brand new 5 grand ferraris, they don't run broadband to every house, and *that's it*. Believe it or not, some places are "out in the country" where your food comes from, before it looks like your cheetos anyway. Accept reality, we do. It's a tradeoff, so we are thrilled to even get dialup, even at 20 bucks a month. A cheap computer thrown in would be great for a lot of folks.

    This wired "broadband is *not* going to happen unless some government does it, the capitalists just will NOT do it because it costs them money, they would never make any money. I can see their point, too, it's just reality. Maybe within a year ot two some wireless solution may happen, don't know. The same capitalists been pushing that chimera as well for years now, still don't see it. And guess what? There's millions of us, literally millions. The US is a big nation and it's mostly *not* heavy urbanized geographically,it's mostly rural, and most of the rural areas don't have broadband but they still have PEOPLE. This has been true like forever, as long as the net has been around. You can't get cable either, that's why you see so many satellite TV dishes, because it's the ONLY option, that or 1.5 fuzzy channels of analog OTA. Now 15 miles away, sure, you can get cable TV, and a choice of broadband, but a lot of us don't want to live downtown, even if town is only 20,000 people or something. Someone has to grow the food and timber for people, right? Let's accept that reality too, 'k?

    Gonna go AC on this one so you don't take it as a flame, (it's not, I am just steamed over the issue almost daily and I cringe whenever people say "just get broadband!!)Just don't want to discuss it anymore, just want to set the record straight. I know you are well meaning but it helps to just "get the facts" down. Dialup is going to be here for years and more years, because it works and there's no other inexpensive option.

  45. Hrm-Honest face. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Can I consider Microtel a reputable company when they blatantly steal the "Customize It" button from the Dell website?"

    Can I consider [Joe 'illegal filetrader' Smith] a reputable [person] when [he] blatantly steals the [mp3,video,book,game] from the [artist]?

  46. Slow by m85476585 · · Score: 1

    I have broadband, but their website is SLOW. Configuring a PC, it reloads every time you change an option. It must be hosted on one of their $70 computers as a server.

  47. Its cheap until... by m85476585 · · Score: 1

    You buy one of their monitors! They charge an extra $160 for a 15" CRT! You can buy a good 17" for around $100. I got one at a yard sale for $5 (The color red is broken. Sometimes it goes off and everything looks cyan, but it still works.)

    1. Re:Its cheap until... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I got 2 17" monitors from a company that didn't want them anymore. They are generic, no name monitors but they work nice. The company was glad that I saved them the cost of getting them recycled. I was happy to get them. Just recently I found a 17" NEC in a dumpster. Looks like hell, nice picture.

      Anyhow, you might want to check the cable on your monitor. A flaky connection, usually due to the VGA cable plug getting mashed between the back of a the PC and the wall is usually what's at fault for problems like you have with your monitor.

    2. Re:Its cheap until... by m85476585 · · Score: 1

      It seems like a bad connector on the back. The color red still appears on menus.

  48. Rural customers by theurge14 · · Score: 0

    Everyone seems to forget about the people who don't live in urban areas. Dialup is still many people's only option. There are still many places in this country where FM radio doesn't get to.

  49. Linux on the desktop by Dollyknot · · Score: 1

    Well there is more than one issue here, if Earthlink have done their sums right they might make it work, I'm surprised Vonage have not done the same thing. I do not think companies realise the freedom open source gives them, not because they don't have to pay the danegeld

    --
    It's called an elephant's trunk whereas it is in fact, an elephant's nose, a nose by any other name would smell as sweet
    1. Re:Linux on the desktop by Dollyknot · · Score: 1
      (Heh pressed the wrong button trying unsuccesfully to get /.'s html live link working, oh never mind. "Rudyard Kippling" wrote a nice poem about called "Dane Geld" So google for it. :)


      The real plus of open source software is, it lets hardware companies fine tune their hardware's far greater with opensource because they can actually read the sourcecode. This is because of the enormous benifit to the computer engineering science progress by having the source code that makes the devise operating with closed sourcesurce evlolve slower because the nature of the closed source is secret. If the source is not freely availabe in the 011company More tomorrow (very late and I'm falling aseap)

      --
      It's called an elephant's trunk whereas it is in fact, an elephant's nose, a nose by any other name would smell as sweet
    2. Re:Linux on the desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, can't wait to get an adapter from Vonage that I can plug into my dial-up landline and get a crystal clear VOIP out of it.

  50. Sorry not interested by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    This reeks of an Internet rebate scam. Buy a cheap PC for almost nothing, but be forced into a $22/month dial-up contract for a few years.

    How is this different than a $400 Internet rebate on an eMachines PC running XP Home, which costs $470, and is $70 after rebates, but you have to pay AOL/MSN/Earthlink $22/month for 3 to 5 years?

    Why don't I just pay $300 for a Linux PC, and then pick my own ISP for a much lower price per month?

    $22 for 12 months ends up being $264, plus $70 for the PC, makes $334 for a whole year. $792 for three years of ISP service at $22/month, $359.64 for three years of a $9.99/month ISP service. $432.36 saved by using your own ISP choice at the $9.99/month price. That money could easily go to pay for a nice PC running XP Home, a down payment on a Mac Mini, or a $300 Linux PC. Save even more after five years.

    Besides I got a $27.99 DSL ISP account going, why should I lock myself into a slower dialup service for just a few bucks cheaper? $5.99/month savings does not justify my being stuck with a slower Internet access account for a few years or so.

    I got a better idea, in fact I did it already, I spent $400 on parts from Newegg.com, built my own system, and installed my own DSL modem and DSL router, and I have a much better deal than this POS deal can offer me. Instead of a Septron, I have an Athlon XP, I have more RAM, faster CPU, bigger hard drive, etc.

    I am not going to fall for the latest and greatest Internet rebate scam.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Sorry not interested by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      You forgot One small detail If they offer the system THEY HAVE TO SUPPORT IT!! This is a NationWide Internet Service Provider having to support Linux.

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    2. Re:Sorry not interested by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Yeah my ISP supports Linux too. At least that is what I was told. I call up with a Linux issue, and they ask me if I have a Mac or PC. I tell them a PC, and then they ask me which version of Windows I have, and I answer that I have Red Hat Fedora Core 3, Linux not Windows. In which case they tell me that there is Linux support, but it is "best effort" and not "box to surf" or even a priority. This is help desk talk which basically means you have a minority OS, and will get the runaround unless you reformat and install Windows. You finally talk to a Linux expert, which tells you they cannot help you, to contact Red Hat or reformat and install Windows.

      Yes they have to support it, but that does not mean they will do a good job supporting it and most likely will pass the buck to some other company or suggest switching to Windows.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  51. Cancellation? by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    I couldn't find anything on Earthlink's site about it.. what happens if you sign up for the service, hate it, and want to cancel? What do they do then?

    I recall some similar deal with MSN years ago, and if people cancelled their service, they were hit with $300 early termination fees.

    So, is this really "Earthlink spreading Linux" or marketing drones saying "Hey, this Linux stuff is a nice and cheap way to lock in more customers!" ?

  52. Superior to Walmart's laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's for sure. There's a Type-II, along with everything else that the Walmart versions have, and it's cheaper because Windows Home isn't bundled with it.

    The C3 puts out far less heat than the Pentiums and AMDs, although it's performance is hampered by the half speed SSE/MMX units. I wish I had the need for another machine. I'd pickup the C3, and slap another 512MB in it. Excellent little machines for college. I dunno how good the display is, though. It might ghost during movies.

  53. Needing Customers by Nuitana · · Score: 1

    Earthlink needs the business and is working hard to get customers every way it can. Don't know if they still own People PC, but they just recently bought Access-4-Free and Joi Internet from Hawk Communications. Customers from those providers would transfer to EarthLink by default if they didn't make the effort to cancel. I had Joi Internet and cancelled immediately upon receiving the news, as I had an experience with EarthLink a few years ago concerning billing that I would never again risk by giving them billing info. Anyone who would be happy with dial-up, as I am, has no need to pay $22 a month. I get it ad-free for $6.75 a month from an honest provider. Better to save and buy one's computer of choice. Reminds me of the AOL deal aimed at seniors and "Latinos", assuming that those customers had so little knowledge that they'd bite on a pretty bad offer.

  54. heh... by monkeyfamily · · Score: 1

    damn, and i just spent my mod points.

  55. It's not QUITE so bad as you imagine by monkeyfamily · · Score: 1

    It's only a one-year contract. Still not for me but not as gougeriffic as $792.

  56. So, when can I expect free broadband? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [I'm not the OP]
    Well I live in the capital city and can get broadband of several types. BUT I don't have it. Why? Simple, really. One I don't have the economics for it, and when push comes to shove I'll keep a roof over my head long before I'll invest in broadband. You can thank the economic downturn for that state of affairs. The other is that I didn't really use broadband that much. Some music, some iso's, a more pleasent experience. However since I was out making a living instead of siting on my ass all day browsing slashdot. I wasn't using the internet, or cable TV that much. certainly not enough to justify the bill I was paying.

    Now I have a cheap phone service, with cheap internet, and that's the way it's going to remain for a good while unless the boss or the OP wants to pay for an upgrade.

  57. $50 mandatory shipping fee? Feh by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

    Sure, the PC is $69 although upgrading it to be decent adds at least another $30, but the SINGLE shipping option is $50 flat-rate.

    So your $69 PC nearly doubles in cost.

    Is this a joke?

    --
    Sig for hire.
  58. $22/month for second landline. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, I have news for you. Most people on dialup DON"T have a second phone line. Nor is it really required. Theres the latest standard that allows you to suspend your session and answer the phone, and for those with older modems. There's a box you can buy at wal-mart that'll do basically the same thing. And that's ASSUMING that you're interested in being interrupted during your internet session (which BTW can be interrupted by an operator if it's really important).

    1. Re:$22/month for second landline. by aaronl · · Score: 1

      Operator interrupt doesn't always work. I know that from personal experience, as I've had two modems that an operator was completely unable to get to disconnect.

      I do know about the new standard, but that wasn't my point. If you don't have a land-line because you got rid of it in favor of a cellular, this does absolutely nothing to help you. Now you have to have the land-line to get dialup, so the cost is over 50$.

      Even with all that, DSL without phone service is getting more popular. For example, the majority of the people that I know don't have a land-line at all, and have either naked DSL or cable modem service.

      Perhaps things are just very different for people that don't deal with Verizon "service". In all the areas that I know people who have to deal with them, they would love to get rid of the line and be done with Verizon. Hell, I even know one person that cancelled their line because Verizon kept screwing it up quite often (service down more than not). Finally he got fed up with their bs and cancelled service and his DSL, went to order naked DSL, and was informed that DSL wasn't available in his area. So not only does that particular company screw up their equipment all the time, they lie to people too.

  59. Re:Flame all you like.... by word_virus · · Score: 1

    Yeah, they'dve had to pay me to use Windows ME, too :-).

  60. My two sence by chaos777b · · Score: 1

    The brief stats they give on there system are different from the ones give when you go to customize the system, (the base stats give) well that and
    "Operating System
    Xandros SurfSide Linux
    Anti-Virus Software
    Xandros Anti-Virus, 12 month subscription"

  61. But will it handle Japanese in 64M? by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is the question I need answered.

  62. Earthlink / Scientology by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

    Sky Dayton, founder of Earthlink, as well as other top brass and major shareholders, are members of the Church of Scientology.

  63. I've said it once, and I guess I'll say it again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EarthLink sucks donkey dicks. Enough said.