Slashdot Mirror


Earth Microbes May Survive On Mars

Vicissidude writes "New Scientist is reporting that terrestrial microbes who hitch a ride to Mars on spacecraft may be able to survive under special circumstances." From the article: "...Mars's thin atmosphere allows such intense ultraviolet radiation to reach the planet's surface - triple that found on Earth - that any life inadvertently carried on the spacecraft is thought to be wiped out quickly...However, the bacteria were able to stay alive if they were shielded by just 1 millimeter of soil during the tests, which ran for up to 24 hours. Under such a protective coating, the bacteria could survive - and potentially grow - under the high Martian UV flux if water and nutrient requirements for growth were met."

142 comments

  1. Planting life? by bagel2ooo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So does this mean that if we are able to find suitable water deposits but either not enough life for it to foster or none at all, that we would be able to plant certain bacteria that would be able to start a green house effect to vent off ice caps into atmosphere and "seed" life on Mars?

    --
    ( o ) one could say I'm rather baked
    1. Re:Planting life? by Detritus · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem is holding on to that atmosphere. Mars has weak gravity and a weak magnetic field. That allows light atoms and molecules to escape into space, and it's aggravated by the solar wind.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:Planting life? by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I assume that "triple the UV that reaches Earth" is a mistake, as that would make it close to Australia -- and somehow, judging from pesky Aussies blabbing around on /., there is no massive dying there -- but, selecting species that can survive the radiation is not that hard. We have bacteria that can survive both at temperatures of nearly +100 degrees and -60, we have bacteria that don't need oxygen, we have those who can live in a chloric atmosphere. We wouldn't even have to do any direct genetic manipulation other than simply selection.

      This goes for surviving the UV. Getting water is something we are already able to do -- even if we don't have it in ready form, oxygen and hydrogen come in plentiful supplies. And for the nutrients, just take some protists with you. Heck, they most likely will be able to use the UV for photosynthesis.

      Terraforming Mars is more a matter of a huge engineering project, as the technology we need is already discovered.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    3. Re:Planting life? by treff89 · · Score: 1

      Or we could deposit some organisms from our own planet which can survive under tough conditions - cockroaches being an example - and watch the scene fold out from there. Of course, no-one wants a planet inhabited entirely by cockroaches, it sounds like some sort of bad sci-fi B-movie,

    4. Re:Planting life? by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

      Sure, in about 50-100 years, when we send the first manned missions to Mars, they'll get to our probe landing sites and find the microbes have turned into huge slug-like creatures, just like in Star Trek: The Search for Spock.

      However, turning Mars back into a living world may not be possible. Most tectonic activity that fuels this planet is gone from Mars. I don't believe there are any active volcanoes, and it is likely that Mars will remain a dead world. No internal heat == No possibility to put a proper atmosphere in place. Sure, you could try to dump gasses on the planet. Will it work? I don't think so.

    5. Re:Planting life? by KiloByte · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Right, this means that in a period of million years the atmosphere we put on Mars will be mostly gone.
      And the terraforming we're talking about will take what, 100-1000 years? When the atmosphere escapes into space, we can simply repeat the process (assuming no maintenance on the way).

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    6. Re:Planting life? by Cygnus78 · · Score: 1

      You just need one bad-ass gravity pump.

    7. Re:Planting life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This all sounds like a violation of the Prime Directive to me. At least until we can ascertain with better certainty whether or not living organisms currently exist on Mars.

    8. Re:Planting life? by aliquis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except what is lost is lost, so the amount of water molecules, oxygen, hydrogen and so on will become less all the time.

    9. Re:Planting life? by JDevers · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Cockroaches may be hardy compared to most other higher life forms, but compared to many bacteria they have one foot in the grave and the other 5 on a banana peel the moment they hatch. The simple fact that they are eukaryotic means they are very fragile life forms with fairly rigid life requirements. Cockroaches aren't all that much more rad-hardened than us. They have the same potential problems as we do (direct DNA damage) and the same repair mechanisms so most of their "resistance" is as a species, not an individual. They are small, tend to live in places that would shield them somewhat from any sort of radiation, need very small amounts of food and water to live, the food they need can easily come from leftover human trash, and they reproduce prolifically. These things together make them a very hardy species, but without O2 they die quite quickly.

      There are MANY bacteria (including some of the best survivors) which need no gases to live. There are bacteria which need nothing but Fe2+ or elemental sulfur, water, and an inorganic carbon source to live. While the vast majority of life that you and I see every day uses the standard aerobic respiration of glucose or photosynthesis to survive, there are definitely a lot of other core catabolic processes at the bacterial level.

    10. Re:Planting life? by treff89 · · Score: 1

      True. Prokaryotes are obviously the way to go. However, the main reason I didn't mention bacteria (apart from a brain fart) was that there is no real commercial/marketing/public interest in a planet of bacteria; obviously, biologists would be in their element but what's the gain? "Bacteria can live on Mars... ... ...great!"

    11. Re:Planting life? by failure-man · · Score: 1

      But wouldn't that take like, all the earth's money?

      We're not trying to move stars around, just hold some stupid air to a dippy little planet. A weak-ass gravity pump would probably suffice.

    12. Re:Planting life? by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Well we've got an asteroid belt right there. Plenty of mass and probably a good amount of water too. Perhaps we could devise some low-energy method to nudge a planet's worth of that mass into Mars. We should probably think about doing that before we send too many people there, since slamming a planet's worth of mass into the planet would tend to render it somewhat more inhospitable...

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    13. Re:Planting life? by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      How fast would it lose atmosphere, assuming the pressure and composition were suitable for humans? If it takes millions of years, redirecting the occasional ice asteroid to burn up in the atmosphere (say, every century or millenia) might be enough.

    14. Re:Planting life? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Venus has lower gravity than earth, higher mean velocity molecules (higher temp) and very little magnetic field. Yet its atmosphere is hundreds of times thicker than earth's. Why should mars be any different? (other than the fact that if it had an atmosphere once, it's gone now...) How much of mars' original atmosphere blew away vs. was absorbed in the surface? (If there was significant oxygen, it's all trapped in the soil now as oxides.)

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    15. Re:Planting life? by JDevers · · Score: 1

      True, but bacteria are far more capable of actually terraforming the planet. It would be a situation where you bootstrap the system and then put the simple to us but complex in the absolute form that people can still relate to up so that the public get interested.

    16. Re:Planting life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the only reason earth still has an atmosphere is because it's still coming out of the ground.

    17. Re:Planting life? by Blethrow · · Score: 1

      Also, they are post-mitotic with the exception of the germline. So, if you dose them with rads the tissue is damaged but keeps on going, and does not enter apoptosis, or 'cellular suicide' as many human tissues would. They will be rendered sterile though, even given a relatively low dose.

    18. Re:Planting life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The simple fact that [cockroaches] are eukaryotic

      wtf is eukaryotic?:

      A single-celled or multicellular organism whose cells contain a distinct membrane-bound nucleus
      [eu- + Greek karutos, having nuts ...]


      Ok, now I know why they are called cockroaches. But I still don't know what that has to do with microbes on Mars.

    19. Re:Planting life? by JDevers · · Score: 1

      I didn't think about that advantage, you could still set up a "breeding ground" that is shielded and allow the "workers" to do the toiling. Much like an ant colony...

      On a side note, if in 40-100 years we are able to take some of the lessons learned by R. durans or the like and apply them to engineered species, then we can talk about sending higher life forms pretty much anywhere.

      Imagine quintuple redundancy at the chromosome level with built in error detection and correction at such a high level. How that would work with sexual lifeforms is well beyond my ability to forecast, but with a truly engineered species we would have a lot of leeway.

    20. Re:Planting life? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, compared to cockroaches ;)

    21. Re:Planting life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? WTF is "inorganic carbon"? That's an oxymoron of the highest degree, equatable with "Army intelligence" or "Jumbo Shrimp".

  2. Isn't it strange... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Isn't it strange how the Martians brought us here before they were annihilated, and now we're sending life back to that planet?

    1. Re:Isn't it strange... by shawb · · Score: 1

      That really wouldn't be that strange. I imagine it would be the end goal of sending us here in the first place. Along the lines of panspermy, but on a more local level.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  3. Exploition for Terra-Forming by kiljoy001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Could this be a way to terra form mars for colonzation over a long period of time ?

    1. Re:Exploition for Terra-Forming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No we Earthlings have had it with the Environment. From now new planets are all about the other big E-Entertainment. The only use this will have is on the new Survivor:Mars series. My bet is on the skinny blond model microbe or the ex-fireman turned tree-feller microbe.

    2. Re:Exploition for Terra-Forming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me ge this right.

      Earth lifeforms can survive on mars*

      *when they are protected from the nasty environment there.

      great story.

    3. Re:Exploition for Terra-Forming by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Why? do we plan to not visit for 10000 years?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:Exploition for Terra-Forming by capt.Hij · · Score: 2, Funny

      You betcha! After 6000 years the life will come to worship us as their creators just as we worship the dude from Jupiter who terra-formed earth. It's like having your own pet, but they can feed themselves! It would be the best of both worlds.

    5. Re:Exploition for Terra-Forming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Earth lifeforms can survive on mars*

      *when they are protected from the nasty environment there.


      Yes, Earth lifeforms can also survive on Earth, when protected from the molten core by a thin layer of dirt and protected from the vaccuum of space by a thin layer of air and protected from solar radiation by a thin layer of air and, for humans, when protected from the oceans by another layer of dirt.

      Surprise, surprise, things only survive when not directly exposed to things inimical to them.

    6. Re:Exploition for Terra-Forming by Kyojin · · Score: 1

      No, Mars has insufficient gravity to support an atmosphere thick enough for humans to breathe.

      Yes, we could grow plants there and live in biodomes or something harvesting crops in space suits.

    7. Re:Exploition for Terra-Forming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, if you're willing to wait a few billion years. Achieving results faster than that will require a more focused approach.

    8. Re:Exploition for Terra-Forming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No, Mars has insufficient gravity to support an atmosphere thick enough for humans to breathe.

      There's the problem then; your humans need adjusting.

    9. Re:Exploition for Terra-Forming by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Why bother doing it this way?

      The best way imo, is to strap a very high isp rocket to phobos and slow down that mofo until it collides with mars. Although that might cause some problems in the short term by creating a small asteriod belt around the planet which would make landings dangerous... but that could be dealt with, with some kind of gigantic space fly swapper, or sending a smaller asteriod to impact mars which would end up picking up a lot of the particles, but woudldn't send them back up.

    10. Re:Exploition for Terra-Forming by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1

      No. As far as I know (read this from a link from the Wiki Article on Terraforming which I can't find right now), unfortunately Mars doens't have enough gravity to hold the gasses in the atmosphere needed for our type of life to survive. They would just escape into deep space. In order to pad the planet to acceptable gravity you'd need to almost double the size of the planet.

      According to that article, Mars is much better Paraterraformed, used as a jumping off point for other planets, or used as raw materials for other terraforming projects.

  4. I can see it now... by spungo · · Score: 2, Funny

    'Martian Yoghurt' from Muller - the choice of the extraterrestrially cultured.

    1. Re:I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eat shit, cunt monkey!

  5. Oh! by rimmon · · Score: 1

    Baceteria can survive and grow if the right conditions are available. News at 11.

  6. Bad News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GWB will probably have NASA include a bunch of anthrax on board and then say that Iran got there before us and we now have to send troops there. Hey on 2'nd thought, maybe it is not so bad.

    1. Re:Bad News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahhahhaha you get it guys?! it's a stupid /. political joke?!

      idiot

    2. Re:Bad News by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 1

      another stupid /. political joke:

      In the year 3 billion A.D., after the Martian microbes have had a chance to evolve into an intelligent life form and invented a Martian internet, they will have a discussion on whether or not life exists or ever existed on Earth. Some probe will go there and find evidence of a large number of nuclear explosions having occurred 3 billion years in the past and killing all the life that was present on the planet. Some martian will then write a science fiction novel about an evil leader, known only as "W", who built up a massive stockpile of fission-based weapons, then used them against all the other people of Earth, which he considered "threats to security" but ironically he ended up killing everyone including himself and his own people. Nobody will take his story seriously because it will be seen as being too absurd to have any chance of being true, and the Martians will go on believing that asteroids triggered the explosions, or something.

      --
      Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
  7. Finally, some sense from scientists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    terrestrial microbes who hitch a ride to Mars on spacecraft may be able to survive

    Religious leaders of the world: do not panic about your potential loss of relgious power over your flock! Our comments are expressly designed so that you can claim that any life found on any other planet was transported from earth within a wad of gum that an engineer stuck to the bottom of one of the landers.

  8. UV resistant cultures by dukerobinson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bacteria can be grown to be resistant to nearly anything, within reason, given enough generations. It seems that if we wanted to seed Mars with life, we could take a suitable microbe, expose it to martian level radiation until 99% of the organisms are eliminated, then allow it to regrow, then expose to radiation, regrow, and continue this process until the UV is no longer harmful. The nutritional substrate would have to be something similar to that found on the martian surface, of course, but it really does not seem that far fetched to me. the real concern would be, do we want to seed mars with life before we are certain that there is no native microbial life?

    1. Re:UV resistant cultures by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      It might be useful to look at the top of Mt. Everst to see if there are bacteria that would do the job wonderfully. But yeah, sending bugs there makes no sense. Not yet.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:UV resistant cultures by Timesprout · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I love this 'seed mars with life' statement. Putting bacteria up there is not seeding the planet with life, its seeding it with little eating machines with no guarantee they will do anything except consume all the resources they can.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    3. Re:UV resistant cultures by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      "do we want to seed mars with life before we are certain that there is no native microbial life?"

      Um, sorry but f*ck the native microbial life. Survival of the fittest.

      --
      Deleted
    4. Re:UV resistant cultures by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Informative

      "little eating machines with no guarantee they will do anything except consume all the resources they can."

      Yes, that's pretty much what life is. The next stage is to add something that consumes the bacteria.

      --
      Deleted
    5. Re:UV resistant cultures by compm375 · · Score: 1

      Survival of the fittest.
      Sure you say that now, but you won't be laughing in several billion years when the Martians take over the Earth!

    6. Re:UV resistant cultures by Timesprout · · Score: 1

      Sorry mindlessly eating and reproducing until there are no resouces left and you die only qualify as a very limited form of life for most people (unless you are a very fat woman obsessed with having babies).

      Yes, that's pretty much what life is. The next stage is to add something that consumes the bacteria.

      Right, cos it always works out so well when we introduce new species to an enviroment here on earth. Life as we know it evolved from a massively complex series of interdependencies here on earth, not from chucking a few bacteria and bacteria eating creatures together and hoping for the best. Obviously its not necessary to recreate the entire evolutionary process to terraform mars but there is a lot more to it that 2 parts bacteria, one part oxygen 3 parts water if it is to be sustainable.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    7. Re:UV resistant cultures by hashwolf · · Score: 1

      "Putting bacteria up there is not seeding the planet with life, its seeding it with little eating machines with no guarantee they will do anything except consume all the resources they can."

      Hmm... but what eats can get eaten!
      I'd certainly want to have food available if I'm going to be colonizing Mars.

      I'd also want to have some nice girls around in order to do that... but that's another story.

      --
      - "They misunderestimated me."
    8. Re:UV resistant cultures by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Putting bacteria up there is not seeding the planet with life, its seeding it with little eating machines with no guarantee they will do anything except consume all the resources they can.

      I thought that would be called "colonizing" Mars.

    9. Re:UV resistant cultures by WurdBendur · · Score: 1

      We won't be very happy when they feel threatened and attack back. We should start building a space armada, just in case those bacteria aren't defenseless enough.

      But we should at least try to figure out what's out there and see what we can learn from them. You never know: The next penicillin may be a little martian.

      And only then may we kill them all.

      --
      SCISNE? ANUS SIMIAE!
  9. In other news... by weavermatic · · Score: 1

    Batman can defeat any opponent as long as he has time to prepare.

  10. This already happenend on the moon.. by KingofSpades · · Score: 5, Informative

    ..when the Apollo 12 crew brought back a camera from Surveyor 3. Some microorganisms survived a few years on the moon. See a nasa page for details.

    1. Re:This already happenend on the moon.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Surveyor 3 camera is on display in the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C.

      More details one this is available on chapter XI of the analysis report in PDF.

    2. Re:This already happenend on the moon.. by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Funny

      And this is why we need a proper ticketing and validation system, including using ticket conductors an all space flights to prevent these freeloading micro organisms taking advantage of our space travel. Saying its not cold enough here on earth at this time of the solar cycle is no excuse to just secretly jump on the next moon mission that come along.

      If you need to get off planet do it under your own power ya grubby little micro cheapskates.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
  11. surprise! by brickballs · · Score: 1

    "...may be able to survive under special circumstances."

    well, heck, you could say that about just about anything.

    --
    "What does slashdotting mean?"
    "You've never heard of slashdot?"
    "I know it makes websites not work."
    1. Re:surprise! by ZigMonty · · Score: 1
      Yes, humans are able to survive under special circumstances too...

      Like if those circumstances involve being in a space suit, for example.

  12. More than just microbes, tardigrades by Ray+Alloc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Tardigrades are incredibly resilient lifeforms, which may very well survive on Mars, it's a kind of "over-evolved" 0.1 mm beast, you can find everywhere.

    1. Re:More than just microbes, tardigrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting adn incredibly resilient indeed, but "you can find everywhere" is a bit overstated. From your link: "They always live in water: in the oceans and in ponds but most typically in small droplets of water bound by mosses or lichens." which means while they seem to thrive in just about any environment with even drops of water here, the chances on mars are small.

  13. Water by datadriven · · Score: 1

    if water and nutrient requirements for growth were met.

    Since they haven't found water yet this shouldn't be a problem.
    1. Re:Water by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 1

      There's lots of water on Mars, in the ice caps. While it's likely that it's mostly frozen, I'm not sure that'd be an issue for some bacteria.

  14. hitchhiking microbes = terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "terrestrial microbes who hitch a ride to Mars on spacecraft"

    I don't understand how terrestrial microbes can slip through security so easily as to hitch a ride to Mars, and on spacecraft of all things. Obviously we need better security.

    This calls for more RFID funding, I say. Mark of the beast time buddy boy!

    1. Re:hitchhiking microbes = terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're only terrorist microbes if they crash the lander into the Face...

  15. the best defense... by moviepig.com · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...terrestrial microbes who hitch a ride to Mars on spacecraft may be able to survive...

    Remember in H.G. Wells's The War of the Worlds how our germs were Earth's last best defense against the invading Martians? Good to know we're developing a first-strike capability...

    --
    Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
    1. Re:the best defense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      great you ruined the movie for me too thanks!

    2. Re:the best defense... by banuk · · Score: 3, Funny

      actually that was Tom Cruise's doing

    3. Re:the best defense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is this H.G. Wells person?
      The War of the Worlds is a Spielberg movie, you idiot.

    4. Re:the best defense... by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1
      Remember in H.G. Wells's The War of the Worlds how our germs were Earth's last best defense against the invading Martians? Good to know we're developing a first-strike capability...
      So you're suggesting that NASA has discovered oil on Mars!
  16. We should be doing this *now* deliberately by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    We should be doing this *now* with *every* mission to mars. Planting bacteria, microbes anything that can survive in the environment. If necessary doing a bit of genetic manipulation to create species which can survive there.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:We should be doing this *now* deliberately by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      No... we definetly should not.

      Not at least until we know more about mars's previous biosphere and if one currently exists.

      Doing so now prematurely would probablly make future generations call us "The Generation that destroyed Mars"

    2. Re:We should be doing this *now* deliberately by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Not at least until we know more about mars's previous biosphere and if one currently exists."

      Bugger Mars's previous biosphere.

      Have you never seen a lion eat a gazelle? How about a chimpanzee tear apart a monkey. Sharks eating seals, starfish eating coral, ladybirds eating aphids.

      Life kills and eats other life *all* the time. If you can't survive, your genes aren't good enough to exist. Any existing life on Mars doesn't deserve to live if it can't compete with Earth microbes.

      If everyone worried about what future generations might think, nothing would ever happen.

      --
      Deleted
    3. Re:We should be doing this *now* deliberately by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 1

      Which completely destroys the very reason we want to check out Mars in the first place.

    4. Re:We should be doing this *now* deliberately by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      I want a big house on Mars, somewhere to go on holiday. You might care but I really don't care about bacteria, Martian or not.

      --
      Deleted
    5. Re:We should be doing this *now* deliberately by syukton · · Score: 1

      "Life feeds on life feeds on life" -- Maynard of Tool

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    6. Re:We should be doing this *now* deliberately by aaqubed · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If you can't survive, your genes aren't good enough to exist.

      Unfortunately, that's not true at all. Re-read Origin of Species - it is not the "best" genes that survive, but the ones most specifically adapted for a particular environment.

      --
      Need help - license plate reverse lookup. NY plate CSE-2960. Guy almost hit me, blamed me, pissed me off.
    7. Re:We should be doing this *now* deliberately by karstux · · Score: 1

      Let me guess... you're american. No, really, before we go and plant an ecosystem on Mars that will most certainly destroy the present one, we should research the planet as thoroughly as possible. It may offer essential scientific insight into matters such as the genesis of life itself - a chance we should not readily throw away.

      --
      Don't whistle while you're pissing.
    8. Re:We should be doing this *now* deliberately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm the great great great grandparent, ie the one who said planting bacteria on mars is a stupid idea.

      I'm also American... Really, don't be an idiotic troll.

    9. Re:We should be doing this *now* deliberately by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      "Let me guess... you're american."

      You guessed incorrectly. Which is an especially poor guess because you could have clicked on my URL to find out exactly where I come from.

      "we should research the planet as thoroughly as possible"

      That argument is one for never doing anything. Perfect knowledge is impossible, a futile quest and a fearful excuse for stagnation. Life on Mars will offer no more insight to the genesis of life itself than life on Earth which is many orders of magnitude more abundant. Terraforming Mars using life from earth on the other hand would offer many insights into the evolution and colonisation of the planet.

      --
      Deleted
    10. Re:We should be doing this *now* deliberately by karstux · · Score: 1

      Okay, I apologize for the "american" assumption - it was an uncalled-for troll. (It would have fit with the cliché, though.)

      "Life on Mars will offer no more insight to the genesis of life itself than life on Earth which is many orders of magnitude more abundant."
      Life on Mars may or may not have evolved independently from life on earth. If it has, then Mars may well be our only chance to study truly alien life-forms - which would almost certainly prove to be an insightful and worthwile venture.

      I know that Jupiter's Europa is also a possible candidate as a host for bacterial lifeforms, but it isn't anywhere near as accessible for study as Mars is. Losing Mars' aboriginal ecosystem (such as there is) would be a lost chance.

      Finally... the terraforming of Mars will take many generations. You won't be able to buy a holiday house there anyway - so there's no real reason to rush it. The best we can hope for is an opportunity to visit Mars and see it in its present, desolate state - which I do not find to be devoid of beauty, either.

      --
      Don't whistle while you're pissing.
    11. Re:We should be doing this *now* deliberately by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 1

      Of course we cannot achieve perfect knowledge of everything, but two stones will always be greater than one.

    12. Re:We should be doing this *now* deliberately by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      Thank you for that revealing demonstration of the difference between civilization and barbarism. "Devil's Advocate" can be an extremely effective rhetorical device.


      Of course, if you're serious, then you wouldn't mind if I came over to your house and murdered you and your family -- because after all, by your logic if I'm physically capabable of doing it, then I have every right to do so and you have no right to live.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    13. Re:We should be doing this *now* deliberately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 1967 COSPAR treaty on Planetary Protection expressly forbids this. Planetary Protection is taken very seriously at NASA and other space agencies - Japan complied to the treaty for MUSES-C, ESA complied for Beagle, the USSR says that they complied during their Mars missions, but who really knows - and any mission that targets a body in the Solar System must have a Planetary Protection Plan. For a destination like the moon or Mercury, it is just a short paragraph saying why we don't need to do much. But Mars, Europa or Titan (for instance) the projects will need to do much much more. This will include determining if the landing destination might have water (or a liquid organic like methane for Titan), reducing the bio-load on the spacecraft going to those places, determining contaimination probabilities, etc.

    14. Re:We should be doing this *now* deliberately by blue_adept · · Score: 1

      Thank you for that revealing demonstration of the difference between civilization and barbarism. "Devil's Advocate" can be an extremely effective rhetorical device. Of course, if you're serious, then you wouldn't mind if I came over to your house and murdered you and your family -- because after all, by your logic if I'm physically capabable of doing it, then I have every right to do so and you have no right to live.

      Do you drive a car? Do you have any idea how many ants you run over? What gives you the right to murder those ants? Just because you are bigger? Just because it's more 'convenient' for you to get to work faster that way? barbarian! And lets not forget, those those ants are a LOT more complex and intelligent than microbes.

      --

      "Is this just useless, or is it expensive as well?"
    15. Re:We should be doing this *now* deliberately by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      What gives you the right to murder those ants?


      Accidentally killing a small number of individuals of a species is not at all the same thing as intentionally destroying the entire species. Your analogy is false.


      And lets not forget, those those ants are a LOT more complex and intelligent than microbes.


      How do you know so much about Martian microbes that you feel qualified to make that judgement?

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  17. Not just spacecraft: also meteorites by colonist · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not just spacecraft: Earth microbes can hitch a ride to Mars on meteorites, too.

    Just as meteorites from Mars are found on Earth (eg. in Antarctica), meteorites from Earth may reach Mars, and these meteorites may carry microbes. Some scientists think there's an exchange of biological material between the two planets.

    The Mars rover Opportunity recently found an iron meteorite on Mars.

    1. Re:Not just spacecraft: also meteorites by Mudcathi · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea, sounds just like how people spread colds - I suggest we call this the "Planetary Sneeze Theory"

      --

      "He who throws mud, loses ground." - proverb

    2. Re:Not just spacecraft: also meteorites by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      I always find this idea strange. I mean, I suppose it's possible, but if you look at all the effort it takes NASA to get a rocket off the ground, all that lift and all that jet fuel, just to get off the ground, and you're telling me that a rock covered in bacteria is just going to fall off the planet and land on mars? Yeah, sure ;)

    3. Re:Not just spacecraft: also meteorites by at_18 · · Score: 1

      Rocks are expelled by high-energy events like erupting volcanoes and asteroid impacts. It doesn't happen every day, and the numbers are quite sparse, but rocks from the Moon and from Mars have been positively identified on the Earth's soil.

  18. Nice caveat... by MosesJones · · Score: 1

    under the high Martian UV flux if water and nutrient requirements for growth were met.

    These appear to be pretty large caveats on feasibility.

    Sort of like saying (ala Dan Quayle) that people can survive as long as there is water, an atmosphere and enough food.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Nice caveat... by jangobongo · · Score: 1

      >>under the high Martian UV flux if water and nutrient requirements for growth were met.

      >These appear to be pretty large caveats on feasibility.


      That was my thinking also. Plus, there are certainly enough ifs there:

      ... if the microbes happen to survive a trip to Mars,

      ... if if a Mars rover fell off a cliff or a spacecraft broke open in a crash so that microbes inside might find a toehold for survival,

      ... if they were shielded by just 1 millimeter of soil,

      ... if water is available where the microbes end up on Mars,

      ... and if nutrient requirements for growth were met.

      What would be the odds of all those requirements being met? Not impossible, but certainly improbable with just probes.

      But, I've alway felt that where ever humans go, they change the environment whether intentional or not. If humans go to Mars, just their being there will influence whatever location they are in and quite possibly begin a terra-forming process inadvertantly.

      --

      Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
  19. Thinking thin by camcorder · · Score: 1

    That's actually possible only if the harmful environmental conditions are only UV lights on Mars. There can be several other non-earth problems that prevent living things to survive on Mars. Time should have shown those scientists that creating a population is such a hard thing that you need thousands of conditions to match together for a single colony to evolve or even survive.

  20. This Just In.... by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 3, Funny

    Earth Microbes placed on Mars appear to be stuck in a sand dune.

    --
    News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
    1. Re:This Just In.... by Mudcathi · · Score: 1

      Dunes?! Perhaps over several hundreds of generations, these microbes will morph into giant, toothed worms...

      --

      "He who throws mud, loses ground." - proverb

  21. did anyone else get the feeling... by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

    that these bacteria are going to be evolving quite fast. i mean, in the early earth stages, there was no ozone layer to protect us from the sun's radiation, and bateria evolved quite rapidly into animals we have today (if you believe in evolution). maybe if we send single cell bateria over to mars, in a couple million years, we may see intelligent creatures!

    1. Re:did anyone else get the feeling... by tantrum · · Score: 1

      you're dumb, which would not be strange if troll-bacterias used very short time to evolve into full fledged human trolls.

      The rest of us used a few billion years until we figured out how to combine two cells into a multicelluar organism

    2. Re:did anyone else get the feeling... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
      ...that these bacteria are going to be evolving quite fast?

      No.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  22. Destroy all martian life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one thinking about how the colonists in the early age of American colonization whiped out entire tribes of Indians by bringing diseases with them? Isn't it possible that we have already put certain dangerous germs on Mars that are now whiping out life forms that we haven't discovered yet? Perhaps NASA should desinfect the probes prior to launch and make them germ-resistant or something. Like the cellphones...

  23. mutation and return of life to earth... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    don't we have enough problems with our own viruses mutating, now we gotta send them to another planet where they can mutate so we can pick them up later and bring em back...

    actually I just wondered why nobody on /. has thought of that yet..

  24. Life is more ... interesting by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    Life is the most powerful force in the universe.

    Gravity? Kid stuff. Kinetic energy? Boring. Electromagnetic radiation? It's for pussies.

    Life is the force of non-being wanting to be so much that non-being converts to being.

    Adam was made from mud, right? And what exactly made that mud get up and dance? Never mind the bronze-age cosmologies, let's just say that Life is more ... interesting than mud.

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:Life is more ... interesting by AirRaven · · Score: 1

      Just remember- Mars can't be terraformed. The gravity is too low to retain a sufficient atmospheric pressure to make it "Terra-like". There isn't enough water. It's too cold. It has too weak a magnetic field. Life could survive there unprotected at a stretch- but we couldn't.

    2. Re:Life is more ... interesting by vidarh · · Score: 1
      That is a short sighted view. While getting Mars to the point where it can sustain human life with no other assistance may be infeasible, terraforming can still be immensely beneficial. Consider how large parts of the earth humans can't survive on without artifical stuff such as warm clothes and shelter - including areas where it routinely gets below -40 to -50 degrees celcius in the winter.

      Terraforming doesn't have to mean we can all walk around in shorts and t-shirts and marvel at the nice weather.

      Getting Mars to the point where heavy, clunky EVA suits can be replaced with lightweight suits that don't need to be hermetically sealed, and getting the athmosphere to a point where a human can survive for minutes rather than seconds without a separate oxygen supply, or so that leaks in a habitat are a nuisance rather than catastrophic would all mean a tremendous difference in quality of life in a Mars colony, as well as long term sustainability.

  25. Cool... by sw155kn1f3 · · Score: 1

    Now let's fly over there and find out ;-)

    --
    - Arwen, I'm your father, Agent Smith.
    - Well, you're just Smith, but my father is Aerosmith!
    1. Re:Cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfunniest sig ever.

  26. Hell, they survive on the moon! by alw53 · · Score: 1

    According to Bill Bryson's "A Short History of Nearly Everything", streptococcus was found on a lens cap brought back from the moon.

  27. Streptococcus is alive and kicking on the Moon by da007 · · Score: 1


    This article describes how Streptococcus was found living on the flag we planted with the Apollo 12 mission. I would assume that atmospheric conditions and UV radiation levels are very similar to those found on Mars.

    1. Re:Streptococcus is alive and kicking on the Moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I was just looking for that exact article. I know It was featured on slashdot a while ago but I can't seem to find the post.

      Interesting...

    2. Re:Streptococcus is alive and kicking on the Moon by SPY_jmr1 · · Score: 1

      In the same manner, your powers of deduction are very similar to those of Sherloc Holmes.

  28. About terraforming Mars by houghi · · Score: 0

    Some people arealready thinking up how to terraform Mars. How can we start terraforming Mars if we are not even able to terraform Terra.

    Let us first find a solution for the polution and changes going on here before we fuck up other places.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:About terraforming Mars by vidarh · · Score: 1
      How can we start terraforming Mars if we are not even able to terraform Terra.

      That's just an astonishingly silly statement... Earth has vast amounts of different forms of life, as well as a complex athmosphere that combined makes it incredibly hard to make beneficial adjustments that doesn't have bad side effects. Mars has no known life, and hardly any athmosphere, and noone currently living there to be affected by mistakes.

      On the contrary, terraforming Mars might provide useful data on the feasibility of controlling and "correcting" large scale climate changes that could help us better safeguard the climate on earth.

  29. Add Mass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just add mass to Mars until it has enough gravity to hold onto a suitable atmosphere.

    1. Re:Add Mass by Ramze · · Score: 1

      because that's easier said than done? It'd be a massive job just to put a ton of materials on Mars from Earth, much less enough to increase its mass to sustain an atmosphere. We'd have to build a system to pull rock from the meteor belt and hurl it at Mars, then pray that after the enormous expense we don't shift the orbit of the planet or alter its rotation too much. We're talking about an impossible task just due to the amount of resources it would consume to increase the mass of Mars -- not that it's a bad idea, I just don't see how it'd be feasable.

    2. Re:Add Mass by Ramze · · Score: 1

      meteor belt... lol. Sorry, I meant asteroid belt.

    3. Re:Add Mass by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      Adding a large amount of mass probably risks changing the orbit of mars noticably as well though. Most likely this would be in predictable ways, but the changes could be problematic.

    4. Re:Add Mass by karstux · · Score: 1

      About the correlation of planetary gravity and athmospheric pressure: Ever since the Cassini/Huygens mission, there's one thing that's been puzzling me to no end.

      Titan's mass is less than one tenth of the earth's. Yet it possesses an athmosphere much denser than ours - how can that be? According to Wikipedia, Titan has no magnetic field either. Might the tectonic/volcanic activity have anything to do with it?

      --
      Don't whistle while you're pissing.
    5. Re:Add Mass by kyle90 · · Score: 1

      There's also the fact that the asteroid belt has a mass of only about 2.3 * 10^21 kg, while Mars has a mass of about 6.42*10^23 kg. In other words, even if you flung EVERY SINGLE ASTEROID at Mars, the mass increase would essentially just be rounding error. The only way to increase Mars' mass substantially is to fling another planet at it (I'm looking at you, Mercury). Of course this would entirely defeat the purpose of making it more hospitable for life.

      --
      Real_men_don't_need_spacebars.
    6. Re:Add Mass by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Only if you ram them into it at high speeds.

      Gravity and inertia both increase as mass increases.

      Since the orbital distance is the balance between inertia and gravity it will not change.

    7. Re:Add Mass by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling that by the time we are considering flinging one planet into another, things on good old happy Earth are gonna be sucking pretty hard...

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    8. Re:Add Mass by Detritus · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to my astronomy teacher, when the Sun started fusing hydrogen, it blew out the light and volatile material from the inner solar system. That's why the inner planets are mostly rock and iron. When you get to Jupiter and beyond, the planets captured most of the light and volatile material. Titan's surface temperature is very low, so that helps reduce the rate at which it loses its atmosphere. Its atmosphere is mostly molecular nitrogen, which is a relatively heavy molecule. It may have already lost almost all of the hydrogen and helium that was in its early atmosphere.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    9. Re:Add Mass by shawb · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine two reasons:

      1) Titan's surface temperature appears to be about -178C (-289F). These temperatures mean that different gasses would be present in the atmosphere, although Nitrogen still appears to be the primary gas.

      2) Since Titan is further away from the sun, it experiences less solar pressure. Solar pressure would tend to blow an atmosphere away.

      Other possible contributing factors could be the age of Titan (can't verify right now... for some reason firefox isn't opening up new windows properly) and capturing some gases which were lost by Jupiter. I suppose the age would mainly affect the atmosphere due to, as you previously mentioned, techtonic activity. Oh, and titan may have a strong magnetic field helping hold the atmosphere in (or rather preventing ionic winds from blowing it away.) As Titan is techtonically active, one can assume that it has a molten core. This could set up a dynamo system similar to that hypothesized to creat the Earth's magnetic poles.

      Okay, I guess that ended up being a lot more than two reasons.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  30. Solution: by lxt · · Score: 1

    Inspired by Apple, you can now return your Mars Rover to NASA for recycling, plus a 10% decrease in your budget for next year! Everybody wins!

  31. bacteria are not people. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    "Sorry mindlessly eating and reproducing until there are no resouces left and you die only qualify as a very limited form of life for most people"

    I've heard of anthormorphising but with *bacteria*?

    Like it or not, life forms expand to fill their environment. That *is* life. Look at the red deer population in Scotland. The only predators now are man and their numbers have increased to the point that, yes, when they are not culled they die of starvation.

    Frankly I don't particularly care if bacteria die of starvation and a food chain has to start somewhere.

    --
    Deleted
  32. soil, or regolith? by subtropolis · · Score: 1

    That might be an important distinction. I know squat about soil (or regolith) though. Anyone care to comment?

    --
    "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
    1. Re:soil, or regolith? by shawb · · Score: 1

      Before life came about, the Earth was most likely regolith. If you got life to live long and reproduce for long enough, Mars would eventually have soil. Probably far different than our soil due to the massive differences in atmospheric and hydraulic profiles, but something would come about.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  33. Viking experiment problems by PxM · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When the 1976 Viking experiments detected possible signs of life, one of the suspects was bacteria from Earth. Since it was believed that life wouldn't surive the trip to Mars, the validity of this hypothesis compared to the idea that the bacteria is Martian (or the idea that it was a false positive due to nonliving sources) has been the debate of scientists for a while. We'll have to wait until someone recovers the Viking probes to know the true source of that possible signature.

  34. In the other news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot may have posted it last dupe

    Microsoft may opensource all its products

    Bush may have a brain-cell

  35. Terraforming via microbes.... by evenprime · · Score: 1
    One idea I've seen before is to genetically engineer microbes that
    • form spores; i.e. are drought tolerant
    • use the martian soil as a nutrient source
    • perform a modified form of photosynthesis
    Normal photosynthesis releases O2 into the atmosphere, but it requires CO2 in an atmosphere to work. The idea is to create a microbe that gets everything it needs from soil, is powered by the sun, but has minimal light requirements. This type of microbe could use the energy from the sun to break down the iron oxide in the soil and rock to release O2, thus helping to create a habitable planet. It is a long shot, and would probably take a few centuries even if it did work, though.

    The bigger problem is that the gravity on mars (which is only 38% of the gravity on earth) may not be strong enough to keep an atmosphere we can use on the planet; i.e. the mass of mars may be too small to allow it to be effectively terraformed.

    --

    "Weapons should be hardy rather than decorative" - Miyamoto Musashi
    I think that goes for OS's too
  36. Microbial ID Cards by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 2, Funny
    This is just another reason why microbes should be required to carry ID cards at all times. Microbial illegal immigration is crippling our economy and a burden on the tax payer.
    Our proposed Bill will create a score of new offences including failure to notify authorities about a damaged or defective card, refusal of a microbe to obey an order from the Secretary of State, failure to notify the Secretary of State of any change in cellular structure, failure to obey an order to mutate and providing false plasmids. Penalties range from mild exposure to radiation to two years solitary containment in an offshore government facility, with a maximum ten-year cryogenic imprisonment for possession of forged DNA.

    We will also introduce new laws to help catch and convict those microbes involved in helping to plan terrorist activity or who glorify or condone acts of terror. New control orders will enable police and security agencies to keep track of microbes they suspect of planning terrorist outrages including bans on who they can meet or form cellular colonies with, electronic tagging and mitosis curfew orders, and for those who present the highest risk, a requirement to stay permanently at home.

  37. Re:survival of the fittest by jstal · · Score: 1

    Survival of the fittest is a concept that helps us understand natural selection and biodiversity. It should not be used as an excuse to shelve public health issues here on earth or in any larger public.

    A much better guiding principle would be the Hippocratic oath: do no harm. Especially in space exploration, where we know so little about ramifications. We're still getting this wrong on Earth where we have much better understanding of the ecosystem---GMOs anyone?

  38. May Survive by jazman_777 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ah, that lovely word, "may". With the word MAY, everything is possible. Why, for all we know, unicorns MAY exist!

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    1. Re:May Survive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well yeah. They're living on Mars, covered in Millimeters of soil, of course.

      On a serious note, this is probably a "scientific" use of the word may, which roughly translates to "I don't see any reason why it wouldn't happen."

  39. Out of this world! by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

    That's taking the pet rock concept to a whole new level. You could make a million dollars! Patent it!

    --

    kurzweil_freak

    5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

    Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

  40. If i understand the article, by BigBossBert · · Score: 1

    Microbes may survive UV light if they are shielded from UV light... These researchers should be given a nobel prize!

  41. Re:survival of the fittest by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    No. A better guiding principle would be somewhere between do no harm and wanton harm. No harm to another ecosystem means never going there at all. You will squash, upturn, or otherwise kill something.

    We're getting this "wrong" on Earth because you cannot "do no harm" and survive. Even a cow rips up weeds and grasses and munches the insects, frogs and other little critters it incidentally picks up. Harm.

  42. Can... not... resist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "if water and nutrient requirements for growth were met."

    And if yer grandmother had wheels, she'd be a wagon!

  43. In other news scientists say Paris Hilton and.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nicole Ritchie, may be able to survive navigating themselves from Florida to California shielded only by their pink pick up truck, provided they are accompanied by a protective crew of camera men and a steady supply of cute boys.

  44. Pah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They Might Be Giants already knew this.

  45. bacterioforming by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    Just remember- Mars can't be terraformed. The gravity is too low to retain a sufficient atmospheric pressure to make it "Terra-like". There isn't enough water. It's too cold. It has too weak a magnetic field. Life could survive there unprotected at a stretch- but we couldn't.

    Agreed. Terraforming is a tedious stretch of the imagination.

    But bacterioforming -- the reworking of a planet to support bacteria -- that could prove interesting.

    Man is the measure only of himself, not of all things. Man will not inherit the cosmos. But the cosmos had better watch out, because Life is trying to spread itself everywhere, one way or another.

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
  46. uh-oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wondered about this a long while ago when I took my undergrad in microbiology. I'm surprised nobody worried about this before, but then again, the NASA engineers had much more to worry about than whether the spacecraft were sterile before they were launched. Certain types of bacteria (especially soil bacteria) can remain dormant for decades until there is enough water for growth, so this could indeed be a problem. Also I know from firsthand experience how quickly bacteria evolve and adapt to new environments. It's too late to undo what has bee previously sent, but hopefully next time something can be done to prevent this.

    Interesting that this is not the first time microbiology and space travel are related. In the 1960s NASA developed a new policy for the production of food for astronauts to ensure that they did not get food poisoning (imagine the effects of projectile vomiting and bloody diarrhoea in Apollo 11 ...). They introduced strict standards for the production and processing of the food and identified "critical points" in the process that needed extra attention where the growth or introduction of bacterial pathogens could be prevented. This system is known as HACCP (Hazard analysis critical control point) and is now standard for food production in north america and probably many other places too (it's been a while since I read up on it...).

  47. oh my... by operon · · Score: 1

    what kind of organism would survive the heat on the mars atmosfere entrance???? I think that carbonized organic matter could not reproduce.

    --
    ---- Where is my mind?