Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Taps Bloggers to Promote Longhorn

Tim writes "With Beta 1 of Longhorn less than two months away, Microsoft is looking at a new marketing tool to help promote its new Windows: bloggers. According to BetaNews, Microsoft's "Team 99" evangelism effort will be composed of bloggers that will become Microsoft's voice to the masses. Robert Scoble said Team 99 was once secret, but has been revived and Microsoft is now accepting nominations. It's nice to see Microsoft recognizing the power of blogs, but the move is likely going to draw accusations that Redmond is trying to buy off bloggers to hype Longhorn."

415 comments

  1. Weird names by maotx · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Longhorn...Team 99....how do they come up with these unusual names?
    My favorite quote FTA (and I'm not making this up):

    "Longhorn got its name from the bar that's between Whistler and Blackcomb up in British Columbia. 99 is the road you drive from my house to get up to the Longhorn bar. So, Team 99 is the team that'll take us to Longhorn's launch," he said.

    And people make fun of Linux names!

    --
    I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
    1. Re:Weird names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The difference is; when a Windows product is released to the masses it has a real name. When a Linux product is launched to the masses it retains whatever stupid code name that it originally had. Or rather it was given a stupid code name as it's REAL name.

      We all know that coders are fond of stupid code names, but such stupidity should generally not be foisted on the standard user of the product.

    2. Re:Weird names by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'll take Sarge or Woody over Bob or Clippy any day.

    3. Re:Weird names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That bar now has a case for sueing for copyright / trademark inringment...

      MS said they stole the name from a bar.

    4. Re:Weird names by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Whats wrong with calling it a mouse?
      Or is that an urbanlegend?

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    5. Re:Weird names by lilmouse · · Score: 5, Funny
      "And people make fun of Linux names!"
      • Ubuntu - Humanity for others - in my OS?
      • Gentoo - I know there's something about a cow involved
      • Mandrivel (Mandriva? Condrake?) - Ok, Mandrake was at least a cool name, but come on
      • Slackware - at least they're honest!

      Note I didn't even get to any of those lesser distributions with funny names...

      Even better, those are the names of the distributions - some have funny names for their versions, too!

      So, yes, people make fun of Linux names.

      --LWM

    6. Re:Weird names by Taladar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Gentoo is some penguin species.

    7. Re:Weird names by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, now that bar has a case for 'defamation of character' as well... in five years, I bet I will be scared of drinking in a bar called the 'Longhorn' due to worries about the roof leaking, the stools having random stuff on them from the last person who used them, the prices being high, and an uneasy feeling that the whole structure was so unsound it could fall down on my head - oversized supporting timbers and all - at any time.

    8. Re:Weird names by aichpvee · · Score: 0, Troll

      My Linux has a real name, like 8 or 9 or 10. What the fuck is an XP again?

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    9. Re:Weird names by circusboy · · Score: 1

      or for that matter "Tiger"

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    10. Re:Weird names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a Linux 10? Damn... And here I thought we were still on version 2.something...

    11. Re:Weird names by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1
      ...it has a real name. When a Linux product is launched to the masses it retains whatever stupid code name that it originally had. Or rather it was given a stupid code name as it's REAL name.

      What's in a name? A rose, by any other name, would smell as sweet.

      All the descriptive names are taken.

      I'm distrustful and disdainful of marketing practices that dumb down a product's appeal. Changing a product's name to be "real" (or in other words, focus-group vanilla) makes my teeth itch.

      P.S.: I find it ironic that you posted as Anonymous Coward. But what's in a name?

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    12. Re:Weird names by caluml · · Score: 4, Informative

      Gentoo is a type of penguin. I found this out when I went to Bristol zoo to see the albino penguin there - which is very rare. I emailed Linus to ask if we should destroy this monstrosity, but he said that it was allowed to be different. So it lived.

    13. Re:Weird names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eXPerimental...

    14. Re:Weird names by Stormwatch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Slackware could be a reference to the pursuit of Slack, the central belief of the Church of the Subgenius.

    15. Re:Weird names by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      I thought gentoo was the creature from star trek who was a living machine. they had to get that aging hippie/environmentalist in there to communicate with it.

      to me this fit the name perfetly.

      Im kind of disapointed its just a mutated penguin.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    16. Re:Weird names by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      Just don't tell your mom you got Woody.

    17. Re:Weird names by caluml · · Score: 1

      No, the albino penguin is just something coincidental and rare. But while I was there, I saw that a type of penguin is the Gentoo penguin. And it stuck in my head.

    18. Re:Weird names by soupdevil · · Score: 2, Funny

      All the descriptive names are taken.
      So says "RealProgrammer." Now that's irony.

    19. Re:Weird names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I emailed Linus to ask if we should destroy this monstrosity, but he said that it was allowed to be different. So it lived.

      Thanks to the GPL, such forks are allowed.

      Note, that had Penguin DNA been some sort of proprietary code, yes, this probably would have violated the license. And no, I'm not looking for "funny", this is indeed how biotech is turning out, with patents on genome sequences.

    20. Re:Weird names by jafac · · Score: 2, Funny

      Longhorn?

      More like LONGWAIT.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    21. Re:Weird names by drsquare · · Score: 0

      Well then that begs the question: What the hell is Whistler and Blackcomb? And yeah, at least they change them for the final release, whereas Linux software is left with the immature codenames like 'gimp' and 'thunderbird'.

    22. Re:Weird names by covertbadger · · Score: 1

      What's in a name? A rose, by any other name, would smell as sweet.>

      Ob. Simpsons: Not if its name was crapweed. Or stench blossom.

    23. Re:Weird names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the quote is:
      "That which we call a rose by any other name would not smell as sweet."

    24. Re:Weird names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And people make fun of Linux names!

      The difference is, they won't release it as Longhorn.

    25. Re:Weird names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But while I was there, I saw that a type of penguin is the Gentoo penguin. And it stuck in my head.

      Nasty beaks on those things. Did you manage to get it out and if not did the zoo keepers let you leave with it or do you live there now?

    26. Re:Weird names by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 1

      Actually, Longhorn is the codename AFAIK.

    27. Re:Weird names by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      Clicky Gentoo Penguin.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    28. Re:Weird names by kernelfoobar · · Score: 1

      Whistler is a mountain and a city in BC Canada. Whistler Blackcomb Ski Resort

      BTW: Whistler is going to be one of the venues for the 2010 Winter Olympics.

      --
      Here we go again!
    29. Re:Weird names by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      Whistler is XP, Yukon is supposed to be SQL 2003 which is now SQL 2005.

      I think Blackcomb is slated to be after Longhorn.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    30. Re:Weird names by alw53 · · Score: 1

      When I worked at Data General, the coders called the new OS "AOS". Then the marketing department renamed it "IRM" for "Intelligent Resource Management". That was till Roland Findlay started drawing pictures of IRM's (kind of like worms with arms). After that the marketing geniuses backed down and the product was released as AOS.

      So, programmers don't have a monopoly on silly names.

    31. Re:Weird names by alc6379 · · Score: 1
      Even better, those are the names of the distributions - some have funny names for their versions, too!

      Exactly. There's no way I'm using any OS called "the hoary hedgehog release":
      http://www.ubuntulinux.org/504Released

      Not trying to troll here, but don't people pronounce these things? I'm not using an OS whose name sounds like a morally-loose member of the Insectivore family.

      --
      I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
    32. Re:Weird names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that might not faze her, but definitely do NOT install woody in your mom's system.

    33. Re:Weird names by Garlik+II · · Score: 0

      And Debian? Sarge, Woody, Potato, Sid, Etch... fun?

    34. Re:Weird names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Highway 99 to Whistler is continually shut down from slides and accidents. The name Longhorn is suitably named...

      By the way the "Squamish 5" brought the whole highway down one time and that could easily be symbolised by Oracle, Linux, Apple, IBM and Sony.

    35. Re:Weird names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >>All the descriptive names are taken.
      >So says "RealProgrammer." Now that's irony.

      That's right: it's a pseudonym :-).

      (RealProgrammer, posting as AC)
    36. Re:Weird names by drsquare · · Score: 2, Funny

      So what's with all the mountain/skiing references? I know rich people like skiing, but this is a bit OTT. Knowing Windows security, it's a wonder they're not named after viruses. "Windows HIV-edition, coming in 2008".

    37. Re:Weird names by jonnystiph · · Score: 1
      Slackware could be a reference to the pursuit of Slack, the central belief of the Church of the Subgenius.

      I don't know where you would get that idea!

      --

      If we don't make light of everything, we are just stumbling in the dark - Blank

    38. Re:Weird names by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I know you're joking, but Longhorn isn't the official release name; it's just an internal codename. Since it's not marketed under that name, there could be no trademark infringement.

      Aside from that, the name would have to cause confusion for consumers. Most sane persons wouldn't confuse a bar with an operating system, although I'm sure now that I've said that someone will come up with some comparisons.

    39. Re:Weird names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > # Gentoo - I know there's something about a cow involved

      Perhaps you are thinking of TuCows (TwoCows):

      The Ultimate Collection of Windows Software.

    40. Re:Weird names by lilmouse · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who read Gentoo's webpage? There is clearly a discussion about a cow there! Why they're talking about a cow is beyond me, with a name like Gentoo, but whatever.

      --LWM

      PS (Thanks for the penguin bit, guys!)

    41. Re:Weird names by BRSQUIRRL · · Score: 1

      At least it is better than the U.S. military's typical code names for operations, which always sound to me like something a 10 year old boy would come up with -- "Operation Exploding Falcon", or "Operation Maximum Destructive Weasel". Maybe it is just me?

    42. Re:Weird names by SunFan · · Score: 1

      "Blackcomb" is the rumoured project name for the OS after Longhorn.

      Microsoft has already bet the farm on Longhorn, and it'll be ho-hum to the max. Odds are Longhorn will be Microsoft's last major OS effort.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    43. Re:Weird names by G-funk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You've been dying to use that one, haven't you?

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    44. Re:Weird names by dustmite · · Score: 2, Informative

      In some parts of South Africa (same country as Ubuntu is from, incidentally) "gentoo" is a slang word for a prostitute.

    45. Re:Weird names by lheal · · Score: 1
      From Romeo and Juliet, Act 2 Scene 2.
      Juliet: Tis but thy name that is mine enemie.
      Whats Mountague? It is nor hand nor foote,
      Nor arme, nor face, nor any other part.
      Whats in a name? That which we call a Rose,
      By any other name would smell as sweet:
      So Romeo would, were he not Romeo cald,
      Retaine the diuine perfection he owes:
      Without that title Romeo part thy name,
      And for that name which is no part of thee,
      Take all I haue.
      --
      Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    46. Re:Weird names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, Xtra Power!!!

    47. Re:Weird names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to get technical about it, Thunderbird and Firebird /weren't/ codenames, they were the actual names. Actually, if you want to look at it, the 3 main products of the Mozilla Foundation outside the scope of the Suite (Camino, Firefox, and Thunderbird) have had a common naming convention up until very recently. Camino was formerly known as Chimera, Thunderbird was formally known as Minotaur, and Firefox was formally known as Phoenix, then renamed to Firebird, and finally to it's current incarnation. Initially, each was named after mythical creatures, and then were renamed after types of automobiles, now, the naming structure is sort of fragmented, especially with Firefox being the king shit in the eyes of Mozilla right now. I hope this explains it somewhat for you, but you are wrong about it being a codename. (Just as an aside, Phoenix is /still/ the codename for Firefox, and is used all over referring to it in its current incarnation).

    48. Re:Weird names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XP: ex-pee (was pee earlier)
      XP: extremely pukeful.

      Blech.

    49. Re:Weird names by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      And that is better.... how?

    50. Re:Weird names by kernelfoobar · · Score: 1

      Probably because, since Microsoft HQ is in Washington state (near BC), they spend more time skiing then securing their OS...

      --
      Here we go again!
  2. First "Comparison to GW" Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

    1. Re:First "Comparison to GW" Post by numbski · · Score: 2, Funny

      2K

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    2. Re:First "Comparison to GW" Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm, XP?

    3. Re:First "Comparison to GW" Post by slavetrade55 · · Score: 1

      2K3

  3. great by geoffspear · · Score: 1, Troll

    Now Microsoft's stealing ideas from politicians, too.

    --
    Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    1. Re:great by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      Now Microsoft's stealing ideas from politicians, too.

      Yeah, I was expecting the New York Times to sue bloggers for plagiarizing their business model, but then I remembered that so much of the New York Times is plagiarized to begin with that they wouldn't stand a chance.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    2. Re:great by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      Blogging is like usenet, without the peer review.

      "OMG SHUTUP YOU LOZER U KNOW NTHING!!!!"

      Seriously, if you discover a blog through Google then to me the knowledge contained within is 100% without merit. Blogs work well when an established persona uses it to communicate without a media filter. Using them to advertise is weak since they're not a 'pull' medium but a 'push' medium...and if the owners lose their credibility, the blogs themselves become worthless.

      So, I would go and read Bill Gates' or Linus Torvalds' or Darth Vader's (I'm joking!) blog, but I wouldn't read the blog of a 'group of 99' member.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
  4. How much are they offering? by bmalnad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are they handing out shares of stock? I'll gladly make up a few favorable reviews for a hundred shares.

    --
    Free Scotland!
    1. Re:How much are they offering? by MisanthropicProgram · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know, you have to wonder. If you gave a shitty review, would they let keep your Longhorn 99 or whatever status? I'd be more than happy to start a blog to promote MS products if they paid me! Then I can buy that Mac I've always wanted!

    2. Re:How much are they offering? by wackywendell · · Score: 1

      The way Linux and Apple and Google are doing while Longhorn isn't looking good to a lot of these bloggers...stock shares might be a bad idea.

    3. Re:How much are they offering? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, that sentence made no sense whatsoever.

    4. Re:How much are they offering? by KillShill · · Score: 1

      trading one kind of user lock-in for another..

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    5. Re:How much are they offering? by ZeroPost · · Score: 1

      I think what he's trying to say is that stock shares in Microsoft might not be such a good thing, since apparently he believes MacOS and Linux will outperform Longhorn.

      I'm not quite sure how Google fits in there, though.

  5. A little bit of history by Raul654 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft doesn't have the best record in this area, having been caught astroturfing numerous times. At least when you read an 'official' blog, you are aware that you are getting cooperate propaganda.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:A little bit of history by imroy · · Score: 1

      Yep, Astroturfing is what came to my mind as well. Just business as usual at Microsoft...

    2. Re:A little bit of history by Speare · · Score: 1
      At least when you read an 'official' blog, you are aware that you are getting cooperate propaganda.

      Heh, a somewhat appropriate typo. I think you meant "corporate" propaganda, but "cooperate" points to the conspiracy involved.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    3. Re:A little bit of history by br0ck · · Score: 1

      True marketing genius would be if the BetaNews and Slashdot post were both results of successful astroturfing. Now thousands of developers are actively discussing MS' next OS which sounds like a bang up marketing job to me. Is 'astroturfing blogger admits promoting astroturfing amongst other bloggers' really even barely newsworthy?

  6. Shills by teiresias · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whoever is part of this "Team 99" will be consider shills and rightly so. There's one thing using the Internet to express your point of view. It's quite another to extol a companies product for their backing.

    If this group was treated as an unbiased reviewers, I'd have more sympathy but as it is, it seems just another corrupted media.

    --
    -Teiresias
    1. Re:Shills by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 1

      I agree. Reading this: ...the move is likely going to draw accusations that Redmond is trying to buy off bloggers to hype Longhorn.

      is like saying "going out and shooting people is likely to draw accusations that you're a murderer."

      Likely. Duh!

    2. Re:Shills by JPelorat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Eh.. anyone with a positive outlook on Longhorn is gonna get called a shill (especially here), their contract status with Microsoft notwithstanding.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    3. Re:Shills by caluml · · Score: 1

      I can just imagine the spam now:

      Dear Internet User!
      To celebrate the upcoming launch of Longhorn, we are asking bloggers to talk favourably about it in their blogs.
      Microsoft has some cool technology (Google) that will enable them to find your entries, and the best one will win $1000000!


      Bill Gates

      PS. This is not fake! A friend of mine tried it, and got a check
      PPS. If you don't forward this email in the next 60 seconds, you will have bad luck all day, and your crush will hate you forever.

    4. Re:Shills by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If this group was treated as an unbiased reviewers, I'd have more sympathy but as it is, it seems just another corrupted media.

      If you RTFA, it appears that they're well aware of the drubbing they took from their last showing to a handful of bloggers, and are expecting the annointed "team 99" crowd to expressly do more of the same, as they get feedback from the wider community. If the software is crap, what possible good will it do MS to pump up demonstrably false notions about the presence or absence of a feature, only to have it turn out not to be true when everybody gets to look at the release? They seem to be going to a lot of trouble to announce, well in advance, that they're going to skip over certain features, or delay others. The bloggers will be an echo chamber for some of that, and a feedback channel. Other than the NDA (which presumably these folks will actually read before signing!), I don't sense any means by which MS would be able to make someone convey a better impression of the OS than they've personally experienced. I work with an MS partner (our firm sells accounting apps and does large scale systems integration, among other things), and we play very much the same role - we scream at MS when end users scream at us, and we preach the solutions when we're comfortable with them ourselves.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:Shills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      anyone with a positive outlook on Longhorn is gonna get called a shill

      Only because there's no other reason why anyone would express one.

    6. Re:Shills by tbone1 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Eh.. anyone with a positive outlook on Longhorn is gonna get called a shill (especially here), their contract status with Microsoft notwithstanding.

      Shill!

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    7. Re:Shills by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Technically any person who advocates for any corporation is a shill. Some are paid shills other shill voluntarily but they are shills nevertheless.

      I honestly don't know why any human being would volunteer to act as a PR agent for a corporation but that's just me. I am sure people have profound reasons for it.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    8. Re:Shills by veg_all · · Score: 1

      If the software is crap, what possible good will it do MS to pump up demonstrably false notions about the presence or absence of a feature, only to have it turn out not to be true when everybody gets to look at the release?

      Oh, I don't know. Seems to have worked just fine so far.

      --
      grammar-lesson free since 1999. (rescinded - 2005)
    9. Re:Shills by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      That presupposes all corporations are always participating in deceitful and/or duplicitous behaviour, and that is simply not true.

      Shill != generic PR agent, it has a specific and negative definition.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    10. Re:Shills by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If i come across an application that I like, solves my problems, and works for me, then I will and *do* spread the word for that app and recommend it when others are looking for a similiar solution. If that app happens to be a paid for closed source project by a for profit company, then by Slashdots standards, Im being a shill.

    11. Re:Shills by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Oh, I don't know. Seems to have worked just fine so far.

      Considering the flack they get, I'd say it really hasn't worked for them at all, and that they've learned from that. Again, I say this as someone who works with one of their biggest business software partners - they really do get it (that they can't just BS about what they're going to release), because it costs them huge amounts of loyalty in the consulting ranks, and that shapes the direction of the adoption of their big ticket accounting products (not that anyone on Slashdot ever talks about Great Plains, Solomon, or any of the rest of that universe!).

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    12. Re:Shills by killjoe · · Score: 1

      I certainly understand that impulse. But there is a difference between saying I like this product and yelling it from the rooftops. I like my car and if somebody asked me what kind of car to get I would tell them that I enjoy mine and have never had any troubles with it. Does that make me a shill? No.

      What would make me a shill? If I hung out at bulletin boards badmouthing other cars, or defending the car maker against people who say they have had bad experiences with my car maker or model then I would be a shill.

      I like my jacket, I like my shoes, I like my car, I like my TV. I don't hang out on web sites and sing the praises of those products to the world and I don't "defend" them against anonymous people who don't like them.

      --
      evil is as evil does
  7. Mistake by dtfinch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a good idea to recruit bloggers to advertise your product.
    It's not a good idea to publicize that you're doing it.

    1. Re:Mistake by Fuzenix · · Score: 1

      ^^^^ Bing-fucking-o I keep hearing the bad russian accent from the first xXx movie/// Vee, are Anarchy 99. Vee will promote zis OS for de Masses...vee vill call it...Silent Death.

    2. Re:Mistake by ssj_195 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It never ceases to amaze me how, despite its vast wealth, Microsoft somehow manages to hire the absolute worst PR department in the world. Whether they are threatening to sue penniless Biochem students who have broken none of their laws or EULAs, flagrantly inventing people and their pro-microsoft testimonials, or making thinly veiled threats to whole countries about what will happen if they switch to Linux, their cack-handedness and lack of any kind of sophistication, subtlety or sensitivity simple boggles the mind.

      Having said that, per your original point - the PR nightmares that stem from being caught astro-turfing are worse than if you publicly announce that that is what you are doing in advance. It's still a really dumb idea, though. Oh well.

    3. Re:Mistake by bananasfalklands · · Score: 2, Funny
      Love to see those blogs.

      Well "Today it only bluescreened me 120 times so its a solid MS product."

      Giggle...

      --
      Send Peter Clifford Francis Macrae comdoms to 23 Bedford St, St.Neots, PE19 1AX, England
    4. Re:Mistake by Halo1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If you read the blog post of the Microsoft exec handling this, you can read:
      Now, before today, Team 99 was secret. I've learned from my messups with Jim Allchin's dinner not to do secret stuff anymore. Make everything transparent. Transparency is good.
      --
      Donate free food here
    5. Re:Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think off all the people who own websites, bloggers would be the most trustworthy:

      Joe Blogger:
      "I got this Longhorn thing today... my computer always ran slow but HOLY SHIT it takes like 10 minutes to boot up... and where's my clippy? I wish Apple would have given me a free copy of Tiger."

      Generic PC Magazine or Site:
      "Longhorn is the greatest thing ever made. Microsoft gave us free copies so we all gave them hummers in our office. Did I mention I'm a total sellout who gives anything that's given for free a great review? I wonder why no one trusts me."

    6. Re:Mistake by drsquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Worst PR department? They've managed to keep a relatively clean reputation despite releasing countless shitty, worthless operating systems. Even their latest and greatest XP is full of flaws, and needs constant service packs to prevent it falling to pieces. Yet people will be queueing up to buy this next one. Sounds like a great PR department to me. This blogging thing will probably be a success.

    7. Re:Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you read the blog post of the Microsoft exec handling this, you can read:
      Now, before today, Team 99 was secret. I've learned from my messups with Jim Allchin's dinner not to do secret stuff anymore. Make everything transparent. Transparency is good.
      And funnier than hell, you also read
      All will need to sign NDAs cause there are things in Longhorn that we don't want to leak out
      a few lines down! That's the fastest flip-flop I've ever seen from a Microsoft exec!!!
    8. Re:Mistake by learn+fast · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, how many gmail invites did you request or give out via your blog?

      Just an observation that most bloggers I know or read were ingeniously suckered into giving gmail free advertising.

    9. Re:Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's true, but you've got to look through the history of some of the PR hiccups they've made and simply wonder at how anyone could possibly have thought they were a good idea. Although it's possible that some of the decisions were made without running them through the PR department first.

      Also, I get the feeling that outside the realm of PHBs and the techno-illerate, Microsoft are one of the most despised companies in the world.

    10. Re:Mistake by jcr · · Score: 1

      They've managed to keep a relatively clean reputation despite releasing countless shitty, worthless operating systems.

      Not in my neck of the woods...

      Maybe I hang out with more sysadmins than you do.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    11. Re:Mistake by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      If that's the case Windows ME is rock solid. It never gets as far as being able to bluescreen whenever I try it.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    12. Re:Mistake by SunFan · · Score: 1

      Yet people will be queueing up to buy this next one.

      They probably won't. The ramp-up to Longhorn will be slower than that for Windows XP, simply because XP was a whole new generation of "good enough". Even my family is still split between Win 98 and XP. I probably will never get XP, unless I needed it for testing software. No one has the latest version of Office. It's expensive and Office 97 is "good enough" (and I've moved to StarOffice).

      For this next round, Microsoft will most certainly be competing against themselves, possible more than they will be against Linux and Apple.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    13. Re:Mistake by grcumb · · Score: 1

      "Just an observation that most bloggers I know or read were ingeniously suckered into giving gmail free advertising."

      I take it, then, that "suckered" means: independantly evaluated and, found to be in a class of its own, recommended to others who rely on our expertise?

      Seriously, I take your point. The invitation scheme was a direct play on the typical geek's sense of 133TN355. But, in fairness, Google took the hardest road. Geeks are usually far harsher judges than just about anyone else. Google asked that they evaluate and recommend their service with virtually no overt attempts to influence that judgement.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    14. Re:Mistake by fafaforza · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People will be queueing up to get Windows because there is still no other alternative, not because of marketing. Macs, albeit having a great OS, come at a premium price, and are still slow in comparison (try as he might, my boss just couldn't use Mail.app for email - way too slow, and locked up trying to handle to load).

      And Linux is not desktop ready yet. If most people think configuring Windows should be left to the experts, what will they think when they're faced with arcane version numbers of this thing everyone calls the kernal (sic). And to burn CDs and DVDs, I have to add the what line to my bootloader what? Vertical and horizontal sync rates to change my refresh rate? You gotta be kidding me.

      There's also the fact that Windows is well established and ingrained in all corners of computing: the most software is made for Windows, and everyone else uses Windows. Windows won the OS was at a critical time when general computing was taking off, and having gathered all that market share right at the root of the evolution, it will take a lot of things coming together in order to amount to a significant change.

    15. Re:Mistake by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a great PR department to me.

      No, there are other dynamics at play here.

      Like sheer unadulterated dominance of the desktop computing market, for one.

      If you're powerful and collect a lot of money without much argument, then it doesn't matter if people think you suck.

      Exhibit A: US federal government.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    16. Re:Mistake by learn+fast · · Score: 1

      It wasn't just geeks, it included most of the most popular political blogs as well.

    17. Re:Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and needs constant service packs to prevent it falling to pieces.

      I don't think 2 service packs for Windows XP constitutes "constant".

    18. Re:Mistake by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Mail.app _slow_? I became a first-time Mac buyer when I bought my Dad an eMac (so I wouldn't be lumbered with constant support calls). I found the responsiveness of this low end Mac as least as good as the HP d530s we use at work, and it cost the same (and had a monitor included in the price). I've found mail.app no slower than any other email application I've used.

      Indeed, I liked OS X so much after setting up my Dad's eMac, I got myself a PowerBook instead of the PC laptop I was planning on buying.

    19. Re:Mistake by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 1

      The main reason for this problem is not that there's no alternative, but that Microsoft has choked the market so badly that any 'alternative' has to be interoperable with their most obnoxious software. It's lame, it sucks, but it's the way they do business. And that's why people hate it.

      Linux is more desktop-ready every year, but since the bar for Linux is so much higher on a usability standpoint it will probably not reach the bar for absolute acceptance for another three or four years.

  8. Free Advertising by afra242 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Well, it is free advertising and people would rather read blogs for an opinion on a product, than read some flash-ad. I know I would. Especially with the open-source world, that's how I hear about the latest and greatest Linux/OS X apps...

    1. Re:Free Advertising by geoffspear · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It's not free advertising, and it's not opinion.

      It's paid-for advertising maskerading as opinion. It's misleading and unethical, and incredibly stupid of them to admit they're going to do it.

      I, for one, after reading this, wouldn't trust the opinion of anyone who says in their blog that they like Longhorn; who's to say whether they actually used it and thought it was good, or if Microsoft paid them to lie about it?

      All this does is create an environment where you can assume that bad reviews are probably objective, and that good reviews are quite possibly just advertising.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    2. Re:Free Advertising by Strudelkugel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Shocking! Shocking! A blogger might have an agenda? Next thing you know, there will be gambling in the casino, and prayer in the church...

      --
      Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
    3. Re:Free Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like slashdot isnt one big astroturf playground for linux zealots - they are just too stupid to take money for it ;)

    4. Re:Free Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Microsoft's misleading and unethical marketing has been going on for quite a long time.

      Take this example:
      Circa 1994, I am in a Phoenix, Arizona computer store named Software City on 7th St. A female walks in and asks a sales person which word processor she should purchase. The sales person offers Word (even those WordPerfect was the leading program at the time and far superior in functionality).

      The female says thank you and tells the sales person that she was from Microsoft Corporate and then gave the sales person gift certificate for offering Microsoft Word first.

      Was the better product offered? No. Was the sales person rewarded for giving the Microsoft view? IMHO, yes.

    5. Re:Free Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, after reading this, wouldn't trust the opinion of anyone who says in their blog that they like Longhorn; who's to say whether they actually used it and thought it was good, or if Microsoft paid them to lie about it?

      Unless of course, Microsoft threatens to sue the blogger, perhaps then I will take notice.

      http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/27/18 23211&tid=201&tid=109&tid=17

    6. Re:Free Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All this does is create an environment where you can assume that bad reviews are probably objective, and that good reviews are quite possibly just advertising.

      Nope, not that simple at all. For example, the Slashdot editors post bad reports about Windows but I've heard that they're paid by something called the Open Source Technology Group. Bad reviews are just as likely to come from shills as good reviews; they're just shilling for the other side.

    7. Re:Free Advertising by drsquare · · Score: 1

      You see, most people won't read this slashdot article, nor will they have heard of the 'Team 99'. As far as they're concerned, if a blog praises Microsoft, it's a valid opinion. This is the difference between the real world and Slashdot.

    8. Re:Free Advertising by learn+fast · · Score: 1

      All this does is create an environment where you can assume that bad reviews are probably objective, and that good reviews are quite possibly just advertising.

      What makes you think they won't shill people out to give bad reviews to competitor's products?

      In any event, while it may make you trust reviews less, the average person is never going to notice the difference.

    9. Re:Free Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and vice versa!

    10. Re:Free Advertising by mugnyte · · Score: 1

      I, for one, after reading this, wouldn't trust the opinion of anyone who says in their blog that they like Longhorn...

      So you trust the opinions of other bloggers?

      Look, there are NO valid assumptions about the validity of ANY personal content, or even a most one-off commercial content.

      It's not until the power of the internet as a facilitator for *groups* does truth start to appear, and even then there's no guarantee and no clear path on how it'll appear. And when I say "truth", I mean only Historical Record, not philosophical endeavors.

      The Lewinski scandal was Drudge's first break, and some say his last. But it's just a "first" when the story wasn't interesting until *multiple sources* began to corroborate the initial story.

      I read a lot of stuff online. I can't trust everything I read. But like most people, I don't try to validate it either. I keep an attitude of "if this is true, it's certainly interesting to me."

      Getting to Longhorn, why CARE about a paid blog media outlet? Lots of better-informed, independently-verifiable sources are going to be hammering on the software - once out. Until then, just read whatever with a grain of salt. MS doesn't have a perfect OS any more than they did last time - it just a collection of features that most FOSS users can already collect and integrate on their own.

      Longhorn's Release is a giant media and consumer event, not a huge technical one. Confusing that is going to just waste people's breath.

      mug

    11. Re:Free Advertising by Fiver- · · Score: 1

      That's okay, most people don't read blogs either.

    12. Re:Free Advertising by bit01 · · Score: 1

      Shocking! Shocking! A blogger might have an agenda? Next thing you know, there will be gambling in the casino, and prayer in the church...

      Stop trying to rationalise. If it is clear in the ad that it is paid advertising then no problem. If they push paid messages while pretending to be normal consumers then they are liars.

      The difference between known-paid advertising and stealth lying is important. If it wasn't marketers wouldn't be continuously trying to find ways to trick consumers.

      Truthful communication is easy. Marketers/advertisers like to pretend it isn't.

      ---

      Repetitive advertising is noise and compromises free speech.

  9. MS is innovative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    They just created Astro-blogging!

  10. Astroturf, Anyone? by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There was an article posted less than a week ago about PR companies harnessing bloggers.... Gee, maybe Microsoft DOES read Slashdot.

    1. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by pieterh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hah! Microsoft have been astroturfing Slashdot for ages.

      It's quite noticeable, but not very effective. There are a number of users who post straight-out pro-Microsoft comments without any hint of irony. Such as "people hack IE only because it is popular", or "Microsoft make excellent software".

      Then, there are the astro-moderators, who will mod-down obvious anti-Microsoft comments. These are quite common but usually get hammered out in meta-moderation.

      Lastly, there are the trolls who take delight in disrupting the serious ongoing conversations at Slashdot. I'd not be surprised to discover that some of these are sponsored by Microsoft.

      Yes, Microsoft reads Slashdot.

    2. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Gee, maybe Microsoft DOES read Slashdot.

      That's a LIE!!! We never...
      [Connection reset by peer]

    3. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by iplayfast · · Score: 1

      Yes I've noticed this too. Somedays it seems very blatent, that either the (pro Microsoft) person has been totally brainwashed, or is being paid to spin a bad news story.

      Of course, what proof do you have for it, other then the sneaking suspision.

    4. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by jericho4.0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll second this. Some pro-MS comments seem straight out of a brochure, and I have a really hard time imagining someone with technical knowledge actually saying what they say.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    5. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by snorklewacker · · Score: 0, Troll

      Right, anyone who isn't in line with the slashbot groupthink MUST be a paid shill of Microsoft. Or perhaps you're just being trolled. And have lost. Badly.

      Maybe mods are tired of seeing the same old canards and have marked them down as redundant or more appropriately overrated

      Get over your paranoid persecution complex. You simply aren't that important.

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    6. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by zulux · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Such as "people hack IE only because it is popular",

      I'll ad another:

      The "XP is only crashes becuase of all the different hardware it supports" astroturfer.

      the completly miss the fact that FreeBSD, NetBSD and Linux support most of the x86 hardware that XP does --- AND PowerPC AND Sparc AND Aplha AND Mips etc....

      *BSD and Linux manage to be stable, why can XP??? Hmmmmm...

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    7. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by AaronBrethorst · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I do at least... :)

      --
      No, but I used to work for Microsoft.
    8. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I have a really hard time imagining someone with technical knowledge actually saying what they say.

      I dunno, I've seen people that stupid. They usually have overview of microsoft technologies only, nothing else.

    9. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, x86 platform is very crappy - there is large amount of hardware that is out of spec or outright broken, but sold as good - it is almost as bad as "audio ram". Sometimes it is wonder, that on some computers anything runs at all.

      If you don't want crashing computer, be responsible for your purchases and do research before shelling the bucks. It doesn't matter if you intend to run WXP or Linux, you will not waste your time on hardware problems.

      PPC/Sparc/Alpha platform manufacturers have (or had) much higher standards for components than some PC OEMs.

    10. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You want to see real shills and moderation abuse? Check this out.

      You don't need cash when you have Kool-aid.

    11. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by snorklewacker · · Score: 1

      Then, there are the astro-moderators, who will mod-down obvious anti-Microsoft comments. These are quite common but usually get hammered out in meta-moderation.

      Your paranoid babble currently stands at +4. Where's your evidence?

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    12. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by VoidWraith · · Score: 1

      Since Microsoft is from the US, and in the US we treat collective nouns as the singular, a Microsoft Employee is more likely to say "Microsoft makes excellent software."

    13. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by OldSchoolNapster · · Score: 1, Informative

      I have two computers, both dualbooting Windows XP and Mandrake Linux. One is unstable in both OSs, with Linux so unstable that I can't even get through five microsoft astroturfer conspiracies on slashdot before the web browser crashes for seemingly no reason. The same computer has stability problems under XP, but is markedly more stable than Linux.

      My new computer (payed for by perl/solaris internship at a major telecom company for those who love to question my skills) runs both operationg systems flawlessly. Doesn't crash in Windows (ever), doesn't crash in Linux (ever). I know that by saying this I am opening myself up to astroturfing accusations (the groupthink is strong with this bunch) but you people deserve at least a taste of non-zealotry inspired babble. When you accuse those who hold different opinions than yours of astroturfing you just make yourselves more unappealing. Notice I said yourselves, not your operating systems. Just because you are a bunch of self-important, self-rightous, foaming at the mouth zealots doesn't mean Linux isn't great software:-)

    14. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by orin · · Score: 1

      Waitasec - you are saying that MS pays people to write posts and moderate on Slashdot? What a cool job! Getting paid to fart about on Slashdot - it sounds like the ultimate job! As you seem to be the expert on this and have inside knowledge - Can you tell me where to sign up?

    15. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      riiiiiiighht....

    16. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by sexecutioner · · Score: 1

      I agree, but I don't think Apple's completely innocent either. I've read so many blatant up front fan-boy style posts about Apple stuff that sounds like it _must_ have come straight from their PR department.

    17. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by theCoder · · Score: 1

      Have you checked your RAM? Bad RAM could easily cause massive instability in both OSes. There's no reason why either Linux or Windows should crash so quickly. Try Memtest86 or its successor/fork Memtest86+. A quick test is to copy a large file and then md5sum both versions. If the MD5s are different, you may have bad RAM.

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    18. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by dcam · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I write code for Micorosft platforms.

      I'm not sure how much of this is actually directly related to Microsoft. You will find people who espouse views that a plain wrong in any group, largley because that is all they know. So if all you know is microsoft, then you will tend praise microsoft products over other products. The fanboys will do Microsoft's work for them. The same way the intel fanboys do.

      The reverse also happens. Every now and again someone posts a comment saying that SQL Server is just Sybase. This is an area in which I have some experience and knowledge. I happen to know that, while there is an element of truth, it is flat out wrong to say that SQL Server == Sybase. Last time I posted a correction of this, I got a bunch of comments saying I had no life etc...

      No doubt you now think that I am Microsoft astroturfer.

      --
      meh
    19. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know someone who is pro-MS. I sincerely doubt he's receiving any mony from them, given his [lack of a] lifestyle. He hates Linux because he hates people evangelizing it, and beacuse "Life is too short to waste on open-source shit."

      It's amazing that he believes this stuff, and I honestly can't find the motive. It seems that he has actually convinced himself that he likes Microsoft, the company, Bill Gates, and most of their software. He doesn't use any form of anti-virus or firewall, because "no one will ever come after me."

      Knowing this guy, I could believe that not all pro-Microsoft comments here are straight from the horse's mouth. But, I'll second this anyway, because I can't believe that Microsoft doesn't astroturf Slashdot. They'd be stupid not to.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    20. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      Bad RAM, 99% chance. Note that if you do have bad ram, you can tell the Linux kernel to remap your memory.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    21. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by hkmwbz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "It's amazing that he believes this stuff, and I honestly can't find the motive."
      Your friend isn't the only one who is getting fed up with open-source zealots. I personally prefer to use the software that works best for me, regardless of whether it is FOSS or not.

      But it seems that some FOSS supporters just can't resist the chance to spread FUD and lies. For example, here's the editor of MozillaNews, no less, accusing Opera of lying. When people point out his contradictions and errors he refuses to retract his false statements, but instead bans people or he removes their comments.

      When I see crap like this, and it isn't all that uncommon, I get this sinking feeling that FOSS is attracting too many zealots. They are doing the community a disservice by pushing people away. People like your friend.

      I don't like Microsoft or Bill Gates, but I continue to use Windows. That's what I'm used to, and even though I've installed lots of different Linux distributions, including Slackware back in the days before you had menus or a GUI to configure X, I find myself sticking with Windows. With 2000 and XP, Microsoft has produced stable operating systems, and they work well for me. Yet FOSS zealots continue their jokes about bluescreens, etc.

      Now, anyone who has read my comments will see that I actually flame Microsoft shills on Slashdot. I'm not a zealot either way. I use Windows because I can't be bothered to switch over, and 2000/XP actually works well for me. I also play games every now and then, and Windows is the only realistic alternative for people like me. But I hope SCO is beaten to a pulp by IBM in the court room, and that Microsoft gets slapped around hard for their anti-competitive practices.

      I also use Opera, and I'm getting annoyed with the FUD and lies spread by Firefox zealots. So yeah, I can understand where your friend is coming from.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    22. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      If you need evidence, just look around. I, too, have noticed that there are certain outspoken Microsoft apologists posting on Slashdot.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    23. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by Momoru · · Score: 1

      Holy crap!!! You're right!!! How could anyone possibly legitimately like Microsoft products?!?!! Why with almost 900,000 registered users here, I find it impossible that there would be any people not paid by Microsoft that would actually support their products!!! Nevermind that most people who read this use IE and run Windows...undoubtably Microsoft is paying them to do so.

    24. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by spruce · · Score: 1

      PARENT IS NOT A TROLL

      People DO hack IE because it's popular.

      That's a reasonable statement. That doesn't explain all the holes in IE, but it's true it's hacked because it's a popular platform.

      And the rest of his points are valid too.

    25. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Don't expect unbiased moderation on Slashdot. Notice how the original poster complained about shills moderating down anti-Microsoft posts. Now we see Linux shills moderating down anti-zealot posts. The worst part is that I'm not surprised by this at all.

    26. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by spruce · · Score: 1

      I'm not surprised either. It's just frustrating because it makes me interact with Slasdot much less because I know I'll get bitch slapped for making reasonbale statements.

    27. Re:Astroturf, Anyone? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      I understand why someone would get annoyed by zealots. I don't understand why they would actively refuse to try alternative software, or actually believe that Microsoft innovates because they like their customers. Actually, Microsoft doesn't innovate and never has, and only implements things properly when the competition gets dangerous.

      I, personally, seem to have the magic touch -- Windows blows up in my face. I mean, I like XP, and I like how fast it is from a fresh, clean install -- right up until I actually add some software, at which point it slows to a crawl. Plus, my Fluxbox is now so customized that I actually feel crippled on anything else -- Windows or Mac.

      So, I use Linux for practical reasons too. I agree they don't apply to everyone equally, but at least I can say I've tried everything, and I know what works for me.

      But this friend, I can't get him to touch anything open source. He'd actually rather use a pirated Trillian than Gaim, and not because he's tried the latter. I've had other people make fun of me for being a zealot, and I was for awhile, but this is the one person I know who actually prefers Internet Explorer -- everyone else only uses it because they want to see IE-only sites.

      Because of this and more, I find him a zealot, not just for Microsoft, but for being completely lazy in one's computing habits -- a sheep. He's the kind of person who probably believes that Saddam Hussein ordered September 11th, but worse, he'd have a whole zealot-ish rationale about why he only ever watches Fox News and how it's better than all the other shows he's never seen.

      And, because of that, I believe that it's very hard to measure who has more zealots, but Linux zealots hurt the community more, because we must be at least five times as good in every way to attract people, including having no zealots and tons of helpful people in IRC.

      I think we're doing quite well, considering.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  11. Likely? by JohnTheFisherman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... It's nice to see Microsoft recognizing the power of blogs, but the move is likely going to draw accusations that Redmond is trying to buy off bloggers to hype Longhorn."

    That's a safe bet - MS could release a patch for XP that cured cancer and they'd still be accused of doing something underhanded. ;)

    1. Re:Likely? by justforaday · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, because while the patch cures cancer, it'll end up giving you syphilis instead...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    2. Re:Likely? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except now that you are free of cancer, your liver fails to work and your heart beats irregulalry.

    3. Re:Likely? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because the patch would be exploitable by a variety of other ailments, you would have to authenticate with their server that your cancer was genuine, and the EULA would be extended to cover your body and all its outputs.

    4. Re:Likely? by strider44 · · Score: 1

      You're seem to be portreying Microsoft as the victim here, but how else can it be construed other then buying off bloggers to hype Longhorn? They are buying off bloggers to hype Longhorn, that's the entire point of this excersise.

    5. Re:Likely? by JohnTheFisherman · · Score: 1

      I'm not portraying anyone as a victim here, it's merely a joke. You have to admit, it's kind of funny how humorless anti-MS zealots will bash MS and jump to conclusions about almost ever....uh....oh never mind, you wouldn't find it funny.

    6. Re:Likely? by strider44 · · Score: 1

      ironically I got +5 funny for the last comment I posted (I think it was the last, perhaps second last). Perhaps it was all the anti-astroturfing comments that popped up above.

      I am, however, no anti-MS zealot.

  12. Accusations? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can only hope its more than that and they'll try to buy off every blogger. Man I could use some more cash. I mean come on.

    Unfortunately this will be just for the big boys. Gonna have to start watching Wheaton's site. With all the vet bills and mac troubles lately I expect his next release from O'Reilly will now be "Lovin' Longhorn" or something like that. Don't blame him a bit.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  13. Bile Blog by the+MaD+HuNGaRIaN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I move to nominate the Bile Blog.

    signed the MaD HuNGaRIaN

    Do I hear a second to that motion?

    1. Re:Bile Blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that nomination

      -The Clown Puncher

  14. How many Slashdot accounts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've often wondered how many Slashdot accounts are operated by paid shills and their ilk.

    1. Re:How many Slashdot accounts? by Lohrno · · Score: 1

      Who would profit from that? Sun? IBM? I doubt MS would gain much from it either as there are many zealots here. (On all sides of the fence really) I can't really think of a good reason for Slashdot to be a good place to pay people off...Sure it gets a lot of visitors but I doubt you are going to change anyone's mind by posting here.

    2. Re:How many Slashdot accounts? by justforaday · · Score: 5, Funny

      *looks around and slowly raises hand*

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    3. Re:How many Slashdot accounts? by kingjosh · · Score: 1

      17,342

    4. Re:How many Slashdot accounts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Just one. Username : Anonymous Coward

    5. Re:How many Slashdot accounts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many of those are paid shills and how many are their ilk?

    6. Re:How many Slashdot accounts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, that's why all those F/OSS groups are poor - they spend all their money hiring bloggers.

    7. Re:How many Slashdot accounts? by kingjosh · · Score: 1

      Oh . . . I lied. First, they started out with 25 shills, but that wasn't enough. Shortly thereafter, the number of shills went to 400 - but many shills weren't doing their jobs, so they had to get more shills to watch over the other shills. Which brings us to today, there are officially 31337 shills on /.!

    8. Re:How many Slashdot accounts? by northcat · · Score: 0

      Probably paid by Apple.

    9. Re:How many Slashdot accounts? by KillShill · · Score: 1

      let me put the answer to you this way:

      they should rename this site to SHILLdot.

      the shills were out in full force on that story yesterday... i'll let you guess which one.

      hmm, i'm craving pizza and pasta right now....

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  15. Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Good stategy, except that vast majority of bloggers use Macs.

    1. Re:Umm... by DanCentury · · Score: 1

      Maybe in Cupertino. If you claimed the "vast majority used Firefox", you'll be warm, but you'll still be wrong. Blogging is now mainstream, and the mainstream uses IE on Windows.

      Scoble uses Firefox, BTW.

  16. This is gonna be great! by msjacoby · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this situation has serious potential for century-scale big PR hackery. Down in history. Down.

    1. Re:This is gonna be great! by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Actually, Longhorn is going to be the most advanced operating system of its kind. It fulfills users dreams for power and organization and will allow businesses to control and deploy everything they could want.

      Longhorn will also verify users with trusted computing, so that you know everyone is telling you the truth.

      >>There is no "Ministry of Truth"--this has been officially dismissed at the "Ministry of Honesty" as 100% un-true.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  17. If they are like most blogs by L.+VeGas · · Score: 1

    I knitted the cutest sweater for Snowball, and I hear Longhorn's cute, too.

  18. Steps to win... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step 1. Release Screenshots to Bloggers
    Step 2. Claim screenshots were never supposed to be online
    Step 3. Hire hitman to kill blogge^D^D^D^D^D^D^D^D^D^D^Dsmile at bloggers.
    Step 4. Realize no bloggers like Longhorn anymore
    Step 5. Use Hellgate to summon demons from the ether.
    Step 6. Train demons for blogging.
    Step 7. ???
    Step 8. Profit!

  19. Don't forget... by donnyspi · · Score: 1

    In your blog entries, just make sure you remember the (R) after the word Microsoft and the TM after the word Windows or Microsoft(R) will sue you...heh.

    1. Re:Don't forget... by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Windows
      So sue me.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    2. Re:Don't forget... by aichpvee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, you're supposed to write it "Microsoft® Windows®".

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    3. Re:Don't forget... by legojenn · · Score: 1
      When I went to the link, I read this: The name Microsoft is synonymous with high-quality computer software and hardware products and services.

      Is there another Microsoft®?

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    4. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There must be, because the Microsoft I know is synonymous with low-quality computer software and hardware products and services...

  20. So.... by hanssprudel · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    Are Team 98 the ones who astroturf on Slashdot then? (You know, the ones moderating this down.)

  21. Is this the same Microsoft... by hazee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    that just the other day was reported as threatening people who posted screenshots of Longhorn?

    Which is it to be? Do they want it publicised or not?

    No, let me guess; only favourable publicity.

    1. Re:Is this the same Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Why is this modded up?

      Microsoft had a legitimate reason for not allowing those screenshots to be displayed (something about unregistered patents if I remember corectly).
      If I'm not mistaken even some of the guys putting the screenshots up later acknowledged Microsoft had a legitimate reason.

      I don't get it, do you guys realy think Microsoft is so stupid/evil that they will give up free publicity just to prevent someone who wants to see the longhorn pics from getting them, for no good reason?

    2. Re:Is this the same Microsoft... by RetiredMidn · · Score: 1
      that just the other day was reported as threatening people who posted screenshots of Longhorn?

      Which is it to be? Do they want it publicised or not?

      No, let me guess; only favourable publicity.

      The logical conclusion of this is that a screenshot of Longhorn is considered inherently unfavo[u]rable...

      On second thought, yeah, OK, that makes sense.

    3. Re:Is this the same Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Microsoft had a legitimate reason for not allowing those screenshots to be displayed (something about unregistered patents if I remember corectly).
      This bit just ruptured my ribcage. Hilarious stuff!
    4. Re:Is this the same Microsoft... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      You're correct, it's the Microsoft that doesn't allow recent Longhorn shots to be posted anymore (and retroactively force webmasters to pull old ones), and the same Microsoft that doesn't allow users to download the latest build to try it out, and the same Microsoft that started backporting formerly exclusive Longhorn techs like Avalon/Indigo/WinFX, and the same Microsoft that pulled WinFS from Longhorn, and the same Microsoft that... baah, I give up.

      But one thing do I know -- if I were a blogger, even if I was a Microsoft fan, I would have no clue on what to be 1) allowed and 2) able to blog about regarding Longhorn.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  22. Longhorn Rocks! by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 5, Funny
    Longhorn is the best operating system I have ever used. It is a snappy and feature rich envrionment that allows me to leverage my work schedule and makes leisure time a joy. I don't know what I ever did without it.

    It also follows the long Microsoft tradition of providing an innovative product that people not only want to use, but actually look forward to using.

    Longhorn truly completes me. And I say this as a former Linux power user for the last twenty years. Really. Now I know that Linux blows and it has nothing to do with that bimonthly check from Redmond. Nothing. Really.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Longhorn Rocks! by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      You do realise that M$ will probably use that quote in the official Longhorn publicity; What users say about Longhorn:
      " Longhorn is the best operating system I have ever used [etc.]"

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    2. Re:Longhorn Rocks! by IMightB · · Score: 0

      You also have forgotten to mention that you've been using it for the past 5 years....

    3. Re:Longhorn Rocks! by killjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are doing it all wrong. YOu have to say something like this...

      "I really like linux but lets face it it's not ready for grandma. Nobody wants to compile a kernel just to make a game work and besides gimp is not nearly good as photoshop. Oh and autocad doesn't run on linux.

      Windows used suck but it's never crashed on me since 2000 came out and let's face it XP has solved all the security issues with windows.

      I love linux and sometimes its fun to spend five hours messing with config files but I use windows when I just want to get things done. "

      The trick is to pretend you like linux while saying bad things about it.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    4. Re:Longhorn Rocks! by JonXP · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't tell if you're joking or not. That's just about how I feel about desktop linux.

    5. Re:Longhorn Rocks! by KillShill · · Score: 1

      no the trick is to pretend no OS has any faults whatsoever.

      the right tool for the job...

      or use whatever the heck you want.

      but ultimately Free software will BE the future.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    6. Re:Longhorn Rocks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, look at the user name! Come on Mr. Shill, be discreet!

    7. Re:Longhorn Rocks! by JonXP · · Score: 1

      I was JonXP long before Microsoft (kinda) stole my good name in 2001, thankyouverymuch. Still a sore spot with me.

      *laments missed copyright oppurtunities*

    8. Re:Longhorn Rocks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are either from SCO or the future, if you have been Linux power user five years longer than Linus.

  23. Secret, my ass! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has been astroturfing for years. This is no different!

  24. An interesting strategy.... For other companies.. by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

    I've always found using the public to spread the word other then traditional means to be interesting... Although I don't thik MS is a company that can get away with it w/o being accused of "taking advantage" of the public or some other evil MS scheme.... But then again, this is slashdot, and computer geeks are pretty biased towards MS......

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  25. translation by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 2, Funny

    "let's use this blog thing for marketing"

  26. what's new by brajesh · · Score: 1

    isn't this what PR firms are doing for years. Pual Graham writes in http://www.paulgraham.com/submarine.html
    blogs are pretty much the natural evolution of the phenomena.

    --
    Left sigs long time ago!

    --
    95% of all sigs are made up.
  27. Sure, I'll blog about Longhorn ... by Buran · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... and how much more I prefer working on my Mac. I don't outright refuse to use Windows - I've used all three major platforms - I just honestly and simply do prefer OS X. Lack of security headaches is a large part of that. MS still hasn't been able to keep the crackers out. When they totally redo their OS to be more secure, I'll feel more comfortable about using it.

    1. Re:Sure, I'll blog about Longhorn ... by MrWim · · Score: 1
      I've used all three major platforms

      Gnome, KDE, what's the other?

    2. Re:Sure, I'll blog about Longhorn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most awesome sig EVER!

    3. Re:Sure, I'll blog about Longhorn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...hasn't been able to keep the crackers out"

      And THAT is why I moved out of Georgia.

    4. Re:Sure, I'll blog about Longhorn ... by drsquare · · Score: 3, Funny

      I bought my OWN iPod. Get off your lazy asses, you cheapskates. It's not THAT hard.

      Actually, it IS. Have you seen the price of those things? You need to be like a millionaire to buy one. For what you get for your money, they should be about £50. Although it doesn't matter to me, I stole mine from some kid who wasn't exactly being discreet about the fact that he had one. Note: change the headphones. They look awful and showy, and just lead to muggings.

    5. Re:Sure, I'll blog about Longhorn ... by Buran · · Score: 1

      A window manager is not a platform.

    6. Re:Sure, I'll blog about Longhorn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GNOME and KDE are not Window Managers.

    7. Re:Sure, I'll blog about Longhorn ... by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

      x86, PowerPC, and SPARC, I think.

    8. Re:Sure, I'll blog about Longhorn ... by Emetophobe · · Score: 1

      You stole yours? That's pretty low.. The 20gb model I got last christmas cost $400 Canadian. I used to make $325/week when I was 14 at a local golf course making $8 an hour. It's really not that hard, stealing from people because you're too lazy to save up is pretty damn despicable. Someone would have to pry my ipod from my cold dead hands if they wanted to steal it from me.

    9. Re:Sure, I'll blog about Longhorn ... by Buran · · Score: 1

      I think we've been trolled. :p

    10. Re:Sure, I'll blog about Longhorn ... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Well, you were rich. I make 200/week in a full-time job, and most of that is taken up with bills and living costs. At 14 you can save it all up, but some of us have to pay rent and taxes. There's nothing bad about stealing. It's only an ipod, it's not like the victim's life was ruined by not having it. He probably had rich parents who bought him a new one to shut him up complaining about it, he was only about 12 or so, there's no way he paid for it himself. Also it provides more employment and profits for the people who make ipods. So no-one loses really. Stealing isn't always bad.

    11. Re:Sure, I'll blog about Longhorn ... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Let's ignore the fact that the grandparent was very tongue-in-cheek; your reply was less so. If it contained some flippancy, it was still clear you basically meant what you said:-

      There's nothing bad about stealing. It's only an ipod, it's not like the victim's life was ruined by not having it.

      Actually, some people's lives *are* ruined by the experience of crime, and your answer smacks of off-the-cuff superficiality masquerading as "logic"; oh, it's not essential, so it doesn't matter that much.

      Yeah, some kids are greedy, superficial little gets. Maybe that kid was one of them; would it justify holding a knife to his throat to get the iPod? Or maybe it was a major birthday present? Who knows?

      Oh, *you* do. Of course.

      Some people are going to take the experience of crime more badly than others, and viewing it in cold terms of "loss of $x" is complete bullshit.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    12. Re:Sure, I'll blog about Longhorn ... by orin · · Score: 1

      I dunno - a lot of posters seem to think that you can make money from MS by supporting Windows on Slashdot. That would pay for your iPod pretty quickly.

    13. Re:Sure, I'll blog about Longhorn ... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I didn't hold a knife to his throat, what the hell are you talking about. I just took it out of his hand and ran off. Nothing traumatic, nothing to ruin his life, just a simple 'grab and run'. A birthday present? Someone who gets ipods for his birthday has VERY rich parents, and maybe this counts as a sort of socialist wealth-redistribution. Maybe I'm actually making society a better place by moving down the money?

    14. Re:Sure, I'll blog about Longhorn ... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Actually, I figured you were just replying to the grandparent; I didn't realise the great-grandparent (or third cousin second removed) that was the origin of this was started by you.

      So, I'm trying to figure out if this was meant to be funny, or just modded that way.

      Anyway, a 250 pound iPod is hardly dirt cheap, but it wouldn't be horrifically expensive for an 18th (or possibly 16th) birthday present. Any other birthday; yeah.

      But I'd consider 'VERY rich parents' to be those buying a 3-series BMW for their kid's 18th.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  28. how about Jeff Gannon? by mojoNYC · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    he's good at toeing the company line, and can be had pretty cheap these days!

  29. Another reason to despise blogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    good god. another reason to despise blogs.

    Am I the only one who thinks blogs and bloggers the most over-hyped thing to come along in years?

    1. Re:Another reason to despise blogs by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      No, I can't stand them either; most are extremly badly written, and about as intresting as watching paint dry

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    2. Re:Another reason to despise blogs by willfe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I couldn't agree more. It was a great idea until it got renamed from "journaling" to "blogging" (that term still makes me cringe), and until the angst-ridden teens got hold of the idea. I still write one, but at least I spell-check the damned thing and try to keep the "angst" to a minimum. But I don't spam it all over the place or plaster it full of ads (Google text ads are as far as it'll ever go) either.

      There are some well-written ones buried amongst the mountains of drivel (I'd like to hope mine is one of the better ones), but finding them is a true bitch. You generally don't want to read about someone's personal life unless they can make it sound more interesting with good writing. "I shampooed my dog today" is boring. "My dog made sure I took a bath too as I washed his filthy carcass today" is better. The boring minutes of a person's day aren't worth it unless there's some good humor or "educational" value mixed in. "I wrote neat code today" versus "look how much faster and smaller this Python snippet is than the equivalent in PHP" will start flamewars and keep people interested.

      --
      Read my stuff.
  30. Remember "Team OS/2" by aquarian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in the day, there was "Team OS/2," perhaps the first internet astroturf campaign. It worked a little (at Microsoft's expense) but not enough. I bet Microsoft remembers though!

    1. Re:Remember "Team OS/2" by plsander · · Score: 1

      Team OS/2 was the OS/2 fan's group...

      No way, shape, or form supported by Microsoft, since by that point MS was well into the Windows over everything mode.

  31. Yeah, but will you be allowed to make screenshots? by nweaver · · Score: 1

    Will you be allowed to make screenshots?

    Oh, FYI, the "pull these for patent reasons" is bogus. They already HAD their public disclosure, the clock is now ticking on anything in there they would want to patent. So its a bogus excuse for the "The UI is still 1AM3"

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
  32. Absurd by Medgur · · Score: 1

    I nominate http://www.girlsarepretty.com/
    Somehow I think that Prettygirl is the only person who could really capture the value of switching to a cosmetic makeover of Windows XP.

    1. Re:Absurd by drsquare · · Score: 1

      What the fuck is that site? Is it trying to be funny or something?

  33. Time of Death: 10:30 AM EST, 2 May 2005 by Bob9113 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "It's nice to see Microsoft recognizing the power of blogs, but the move is likely going to draw accusations that Redmond is trying to buy off bloggers to hype Longhorn."

    Blogging was nice while it lasted. Corporations are quickly going to flood the channel with paid content. If you think the PR machine is powerful in major media, which has lots of people looking for bias, has some regulation, and which does not see $10,000 as any more than pocket change, think what's going to happen to blogs over the next five years.

    Suppose Coca-Cola offered to pay Joe Blogpack $2,500 to do a column talking about a dead rat found in a storage container at a Pepsi bottling facility, how quickly do you think he would jump? Do you think he would care if the story is true? And if he did, would he have access to the resources to find out if it's true? Suppose news.google.com is running 200 links to other bloggers who didn't take the time to fact check - our honorable Joe Blogpack checks his facts against the tainted stories and even thinks he's doing the right thing.

    1. Re:Time of Death: 10:30 AM EST, 2 May 2005 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corporations are quickly going to flood the channel with paid content.

      What channel? TCP/IP port 80?

      There is no channel. Welcome to 1997.

    2. Re:Time of Death: 10:30 AM EST, 2 May 2005 by faust2097 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Suppose Coca-Cola offered to pay Joe Blogpack $2,500 to do a column talking about a dead rat found in a storage container at a Pepsi bottling facility, how quickly do you think he would jump? Do you think he would care if the story is true? And if he did, would he have access to the resources to find out if it's true? Suppose news.google.com is running 200 links to other bloggers who didn't take the time to fact check - our honorable Joe Blogpack checks his facts against the tainted stories and even thinks he's doing the right thing.

      And this, kids, is the difference between 'reporting' and 'journalism'. We've just had our standards lowered by the willingness of our mainstream media to report anything - rumors, opinions, lightly edited press releases, as "news" and run on to the next hot topic and pray that you don't change the channel during the ads.

      Blogging isn't going to replace journalism because of these exact problems. Blogging might do a lot of harm to the mainstream US news media but it's their own damn fault for abandoning true journalism and resorting to showing the same video clip everyone else has, just 2 minutes earlier and with more sensationalistic or opinionated commentary.

      "The news is just a TV show, get past it" - Dilated Peoples
    3. Re:Time of Death: 10:30 AM EST, 2 May 2005 by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      I agree. People like blogs as an alternative to the obvious biases of the mainstream press, e.g., writing favorable reviews about a product to get more advertising from the product's manufacturer.

      However, it's becoming quite clear that blogs aren't anymore trust worthy than traditional journalism. And once the public becomes aware of that fact, blogs will die a pretty quick death.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    4. Re:Time of Death: 10:30 AM EST, 2 May 2005 by bushidocoder · · Score: 1
      Why does everyone always think in such binary terms - Blogging is never going to replace traditional media and journalism, but that doesn't mean one has to disappear. Personally, I think blogs are a fantastic supplement to journalism, so long as people remember which is which.

      I don't think blogging is going to fade in the slightest - today's bloggers aren't paid to do what they do, and very few are trying to change the world. They exist because opinionated people and depressed 16 year old girls like talking.

    5. Re:Time of Death: 10:30 AM EST, 2 May 2005 by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 1

      It's also possible that some high quality bloggers will develop personalities and let them be part of their blogging and continue to be trustable due to having actual character rather than cotton-candy personalities like real news reporters have grown to. This story has convinced me to start a blog, damnit, and I'm going to be freaking ME. Disagree, dislike, whatever, but I'm going to be honest and as knowledgable as possible.

    6. Re:Time of Death: 10:30 AM EST, 2 May 2005 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Internet was nice while it lasted. Corporations are quickly going to flood the channel with paid content. If you think the PR machine is powerful in major media, which has lots of people looking for bias, has some regulation, and which does not see $10,000 as any more than pocket change, think what's already happened to the 'net over the last 5 years.

      I could go on....

    7. Re:Time of Death: 10:30 AM EST, 2 May 2005 by phasm42 · · Score: 1

      [blockquote]And this, kids, is the difference between 'reporting' and 'journalism'.[/blockquote] I wish this was emphasized more -- I hear it every now and then, but I never heard it when I was growing up. There are a lot of people who have not had the difference explained to them (myself included), and with the increasing popularity of reporting over journalism, the distinction is becoming more and more relevant. Sensational reporting is naturally attractive, I don't think there's any changing that, but the value of fact-checking and analysis needs to be taught. I'm afraid a generation of bloggers is going to grow up unaware of this, and it's not really their fault -- they simply haven't been taught.

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    8. Re:Time of Death: 10:30 AM EST, 2 May 2005 by corblix · · Score: 1
      Blogging was nice while it lasted. Corporations are quickly going to flood the channel with paid content.

      Of course they are, but it doesn't matter. Read the good ones. Link to the good ones. Link to the ones that link to the good ones.

      The net has always been full of crap. Blogs are no exception. The Next Big Thing (tm) will not be an exception either. But we get to choose what we pay attention to, and we get to point others to quality as well.

      So why complain? If people want to waste their time reading average quality blogs and saying how lousy they are, I suppose they can do that. But I don't. I read blogs that are worth reading.

    9. Re:Time of Death: 10:30 AM EST, 2 May 2005 by snorklewacker · · Score: 1

      Suppose Coca-Cola offered to pay Joe Blogpack $2,500 to do a column talking about a dead rat found in a storage container at a Pepsi bottling facility, how quickly do you think he would jump?

      Hell, some folks might do it for free, which would probably be better for Coca-Cola since it would be perfectly deniable. The word "blowback" mean anything to you? Can you imagine what would happen to Coke if and when their shenanigans came to light?

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    10. Re:Time of Death: 10:30 AM EST, 2 May 2005 by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      It could go that way, or it could go the other - that once a blogger is shown to be corrupt, that the traffic tails off.

      Often, when someone or something gets 'bought', the attitude changes. I can think of great little companies that got bought and became dull. What made them great goes. People reading blogs are mostly not Joe Sixpacks. They are people seeking out something other than a press release, something closer to the bone.

      I've read blogs that are basically PR, and they are soulless. Soul in companies is in the little things, in decisions made because they feel right, not because someone has done the math. People sometime try to do things that appear like real buzz, and it falls flat.

      Will people be able to sniff that the content doesn't seem to add up? My guess is that it will just read a little bit dull, because opinions not founded in the heart can be like that.

      That said, even discredited journalists on a subject get read. I can think of computer journalists who I just won't read, but other people have cited to me at work. Even when I explain why their opinion counts for shit, they still won't listen.

    11. Re:Time of Death: 10:30 AM EST, 2 May 2005 by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      The net has always been full of crap.

      Been true since UseNet was new.

      Read the good ones.

      Good advice then and now.

    12. Re:Time of Death: 10:30 AM EST, 2 May 2005 by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Suppose Coca-Cola offered to pay Joe Blogpack $2,500 to do a column talking about a dead rat found in a storage container at a Pepsi bottling facility, how quickly do you think he would jump? Do you think he would care if the story is true?

      He would when he got his ass royally sued in court. And Coca-Cola would also when he blabbed all at his trial.

      Result, everyone knows if they repeat garbage like that, they'll get taken to court for libel, lose the case, and have everything they own wiped out.

      If Coca-Cola backed them up with funds/lawyers, it would be *blatant* what Coke were up to, all over the papers, and in addition to the bad publicity, they'd probably end up paying horrid amounts to Pepsi.

      In short; if your idea happened, it would last 5 minutes and then stop. Except it won't, because even though I've never stuck my fingers in an electrical outlet I know it'll hurt like hell, so I don't need to do it once to be dissuaded from doing it again.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    13. Re:Time of Death: 10:30 AM EST, 2 May 2005 by KillShill · · Score: 1

      no the "mainstream" media is dying because it has abondoned truthful reporting a long time ago.

      but until now, there was no way for anyone else to have a "press"

      and since freedom of the press is only granted to those who own one... well you can see why people are excited.

      now if only those shills on /. and other sites could stop trying to belittle/insult/invalidate "blogs" as a news source... then we'd have a better informed public.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    14. Re:Time of Death: 10:30 AM EST, 2 May 2005 by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      You can never flood a flood, with the number of blogs continuing to grow no corporate voice can't dominate because it simply can't afford to pay enough people to outnumber the millions of independet bloggers that will appear.

      Of course fake computer generated blogs (numbering in the thousands and in multiple languages), reinforcing each other is something you could expect out of microsoft, but it won't take long for them to be recognised and publicly declared and ignored (not that wont stop them from trying it). There will be some paid multi-bloggers (more than one site) and well as existing bloggers who have some readership but it won't last. It is all just another sign of deperation where they still believe yet more BS marketing will make up for past, present and the to be expected, future abuses.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  34. You said "leverage"! by pieterh · · Score: 2, Funny

    That gives you away.

    Also, you forgot to mention:

    - how incredibly secure Longhorn is, compared to Linux (measured by patches released so far)
    - how Longhorn is considerably cheaper than Linux
    - how Longhorn promotes industry standards (such as MS Office)
    - how Longhorn runs in a smaller footprint (if you balance your PC on one corner).

    Secure, cheap, standard, efficient! That's the message you're supposed to be spreading.

    You can get your check anyhow. Usual address, I take it?

    1. Re:You said "leverage"! by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      Shadow Wrought
      Have Blog Will Travel, Ltd.
      9598 Shilling Circle, Apt #2K
      Bumsqueak ND, 02003

      Marketingspeak used to just be funny. After reading 1984 however, the concept of making words so obtuse that they lose their meaning and create mindlessness is downright frightening. I can only write so much of it in parody before my brain hurts.

      It would have been really fun to write out a longer entry using those additional (I guess in this genre they are called "talking points") but it would've hurt too much;-) I also would have liked to work in "ubiquitous."

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    2. Re:You said "leverage"! by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Marketingspeak used to just be funny. After reading 1984 however, the concept of making words so obtuse that they lose their meaning and create mindlessness is downright frightening.

      Of course, the irony is that the system it serves is more like the intentional dumbing-down seen in 'Brave New World' than the brutal repression in 'Ninteen Eighty-Four'.

      OTOH, it could be said that in BNW, superficial distraction was a means to an end for controlling the population, whereas in real life, the population is controlled in order to support the system producing the superficial distractions (i.e. consumerism).

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  35. Shut the fuck up you little turd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Funny that you assholes say, "IT'S COPYWRITE INFRINGEMENT, NOT STEALING!"; but are say quick to say "M$ STEALS IDEA FROM APPLE!", followed by "MOD PARENT UP!"

    Fucking rashdots.

    1. Re:Shut the fuck up you little turd by geoffspear · · Score: 0, Troll
      Actually, I don't say that.

      I'm happy to use the word "stealing", or any other word for that matter, to mean any of the various things it's taken to mean by speakers of the English language.

      I believe any native speaker will understand "you stole my idea" to mean that I had an idea and they used it, too, not that they committed the crime of larceny or the tort of conversion. I understand "you stole that movie" can mean, in context, either that a copy of the movie was copied in contravention of copyright law, or that a DVD of the movie was shoplifted from a store. It doesn't bother me in the least.

      Furthermore, I wasn't claiming MS stole a product feature from Apple; rather I was humorously comparing Microsoft's marketing practice with the practice of political operatives in hiring bloggers to espouse their views and/or endorse their candidacies. In either case (stealing features or stealing ideas), I don't think Microsoft's behavior is particularly bad qua stealing. In the latter case, however, I think that the actual idea they're stealing is unethical for both a corporation and a politician, and I wish they'd both stop. In the former case, I have no problem with Microsoft using features found in Apple's software.

      As for you anonymous morons who lump alol slashdot readers together and assume we all share the same opinions: you're reading slashdot. therefore, you must also share the same opinions, and are being quite hypocritical when you denounce people who, by your logic, you must agree with on every imaginable topic.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    2. Re:Shut the fuck up you little turd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll probably think twice about modding your own bullshit up now that meta-moderating it.
      Insightful? Yeah right. *click*

  36. Once again... by stubear · · Score: 1, Troll

    ...slashbots read what they want to read and interpret the article through their monochromatic lens. This is NOT underhanded shilling of the products, it's a way for Microsoft to distill comments from the community to learn how to better improve Longhorn, and I quote "All will need to sign NDAs cause there are things in Longhorn that we don't want to leak out, but they'll be your proxies. They'll tell us where we're screwing up, what we're doing well, and will be world's top authorities on Longhorn." The reason they want bloggers is becasue bloggers provide a two-way communication between the community of users and Microsoft. Bloggers will take the comments from their sites, distill them into meaningful suggestions for ways to improve Longhorn and Microsoft can then in turn provide these very same bloggers with access to updates on Longhorn to report back to the community of users. Simple enough but as usual slashbots prove they are dumber than your average bear and could do the world a favor by shutting up unless they themselves have something meaningful to add to the discussion.

  37. ~800,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More or less 800,000. Sure there are a couple thousand legit accounts but, the vast majority belong to trolls and astroturfers.

    The fact that there are so few legitimate users makes the regular slashdotting of most sites all the more pathetic.

  38. How about this? by LibertineR · · Score: 2, Funny
    "If you are still thinking about buying a computer from Apple, dont do it until you try Longhorn from Microsoft."

    "You will feel much better about that Mac, once you realize that you could have waited a lot longer for a lot less."

    Now, where is my money?

  39. Hey, check this out! by Nanite · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, looks like MS is going to add paid shill bloggers to their list of paid shills that they use to spread propoganda. There's one in every popular message board, blindly praising MS for everything they do. It's usually easy to pick them out, they just sound fake, and never rationalize anything. I have to wonder what just how many people MS pays to pretend they like everything MS does. After all, I can't imagine anyone doing that for free.

    Kinda reminds me of the way McDonalds pays rappers for rapping about the big mac. MS will pay you for writing propaganda about longhorn in your blog. Is nothing sacred?

    --
    God is real unless declared integer.
    1. Re:Hey, check this out! by hsmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh I can just imagine 50 Cent and Big Tymers throwing "Longhorn" and "Microsoft" in their tunes when they sing about "bling bling"

      Listen to my DRM on my Dell pimpin' my Longhorn straight outa Redmond

    2. Re:Hey, check this out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I can just imagine 50 Cent and Big Tymers throwing "Longhorn" and "Microsoft" in their tunes when they sing about "bling bling"

      You honestly think that 50 Cent, author of such penis-inspired ditties like "Magic Stick" and "Candy Shop", will toss the lyrics micro and soft into his songs?

    3. Re:Hey, check this out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      No, they're too busy destroying a generation of civil rights advancement to care about Microsoft.

  40. No more gay support from Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That makes me sad. :-(

    But thinking about Gannon keeps me erect. :-)

  41. Here's a Novel Idea... by stlhawkeye · · Score: 1

    ...instead of marketing the hell out of your product by artificially fluffing up support and enthusiasm for it, why not just actually make a superior product that people will naturally get excited about on their own? Then you don't have to hire people to pretend to be excited about it.

    --
    "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
  42. So what? by pangel83 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot has been doing the same for Linux

    1. Re:So what? by kbmccarty · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Slashdot has been doing the same for Linux

      People are getting paid to hype up Linux on Slashdot? Funny, they must have forgotten to mail my check...

      --
      - Kevin B. McCarty
    2. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot has been paying bloggers to promote linux ?

    3. Re:So what? by Megaweapon · · Score: 1

      People are getting paid to hype up Linux on Slashdot?

      Yup.

      --
      I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
    4. Re:So what? by menace3society · · Score: 1

      Wait, people get *paid* for trolling Linux here? Fuck, and I've been doing it for free this whole time...

    5. Re:So what? by Dark+Coder · · Score: 1

      Your check is proverbially in your mail.

      You have already received it in form of a viral GPL software found through out your Linux, FreeBSD and Windows platform.

      Enjoy!

  43. Re:Of course... by symbolic · · Score: 1


    The licensing terms would be so prohibitive as to render it useless.

  44. Misread the title by trurl7 · · Score: 1
    Perhaps I've read too much Patrick O'Brian (author of the Aubrey-Maturin novels), but I read the title as "Microsoft Taps Buggers To Promote Longhorn" (for those not in the know, expressions such as "grass combing bugger", apparently abounded in the 18th century Royal Navy).

    Not only did that sound wrong, but even somewhat surprising in view of the recent story about Microsoft and the gay rights bill i.e. recent discussion

  45. Longhorn is Dying by markv242 · · Score: 0, Redundant
    It is now official. Netcraft confirms: Longhorn is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Longhorn community when IDC confirmed that Longhorn market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that Longhorn has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Longhorn is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be the Amazing Kreskin to predict Longhorn's future. The hand writing is on the wall: Longhorn faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for Longhorn because Longhorn is dying. Things are looking very bad for Longhorn. As many of us are already aware, Longhorn continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

    64-bit Longhorn is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time 64-bit Longhorn developers Relph Slenson and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: Longhorn is dying.

    [...]

  46. This isn't too surprising by joepez · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This tactic isn't anything new. About a year and a half ago I was working with a publisher and this was just one of our tactics to promote a game. We were placing information about the game in select blogs (as well as actively tracking embedded keywords) across sites to monitor our game's buzz.

    What we were doing wasn't all that sophisticated (we had an evangelist program as well, which who were far better than us at promoting our messages). There were several viral advertising firms out there that were posting in fake blogs, in real blogs, on multiple forums using fake ids, etc.

    While you could argue that viral marketing of this sort is unethical or at least questionable, it really is no different than paying people to walk around with your product in public. Online viral marketing, and placement in a blog, is just another form of PR placement.

    Of course there is an ethical question to be answered if blogs are truly a form of news protected by the laws and practices of journalists. If that's the case than these blogs are practicing yellow journalism, which would then throw into question their role as independent journalists (then again if you can find me a 100% untainted all the time news source these days I'd be pretty impressed (especially if they have over 100 readers)).

    1. Re:This isn't too surprising by sdsichero · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be "walking around with your product in public and raving to everyone around them about it"?

    2. Re:This isn't too surprising by BabyPanther · · Score: 1

      A person logging in using a fake identity to sound knowledgable is unethical. Paying for placement in movies should be disclosed in the credits. PR/Advertisers just need to disclose such payments and stop being sneaky about it.

      It's simple. If you are a publically traded company, then payments for endorsements etc... should be publically filed with the SEC. I'm not even concerned about actual payment amounts, although that might tell an investor how out-of-control a company has become with their PR.

      If a business is too embarrassed to disclose the individuals that they paid off, then maybe that should be a hint that it was probably an unethical move!

    3. Re:This isn't too surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Driv3r?

  47. As 100,000 blogs are created just for this... by brontus3927 · · Score: 1

    Hell, if Microsoft is going to pay me to say nice things about Longhorn in a blog, I'll start a blog up today and rant about how great it is.

  48. Indeed, leverage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Compared to Linux, Longhorn is an extensible paradigm shift in operating systems that is designed to facility business agility while improving new customer acquisition. Offering the most secure federation based authenticity validation system Longhorn improves the value proposition while streamlining your business processes and enhancing shareholder value.

    Longhorn r0x0rz and Linux sux0rz.

    1. Re:Indeed, leverage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Good, but needs more "synergy".

  49. bloggers and MS by DarkSkiesAhead · · Score: 1


    Why is it "nice" to see that Microsoft is "recognizing the power of blogs"? Was the blogging world hurting before now due to lack of respect from Redmond? Were bloggers stinted by a lack of support from Microsoft? No, bloggers did just fine without showing up on Microsoft's radar, thank you.

  50. Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They implemented a strategy a few years ago to promote Windows CE PDAs, inviting the editors of numerous Palm enthusiast websites to Redmond for all-expenses-paid wining and dining. Several sites immediately dropped their Palm bias. One site, PalmGuru.com, disappeared to be replaced by PocketAnywhere.com, though as I recall the change also had something to do with Palm rattling a sabre about trademark infringement --- something they later recanted, but the damage was done.

    Now whether the Palm enthusiasts succumbed to bribery or whether they genuinely and objectively liked what they saw in Windows CE I can't say. But for several years at least Microsoft has been aware of the power of the web for astroturf-style marketing.

    Opinions can be bought, and who has more buying power than Microsoft? Be careful not to believe everything you read.

  51. Dude! You forgot!!!! by CdBee · · Score: 1

    Sue (TM) is owned by SCO (R) !!!

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  52. I don't know what you're ... by MisanthropicProgram · · Score: 5, Funny
    talking about. Microsoft (TM) makes the best software on the planet - ever - they don't need paid shills at all. The quality and excellence of Microsoft products are second to none! Such as

    Microsoft Office

    Microsoft XP

    Microsoft Flight Simualtor

    and any other Microsoft products out there!

  53. Will Blog For Cash... by feloneous+cat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And of course Microsoft's notorious "Mac to Windows" switcher website was the one the took the cake. What took them down was using a stock photo... Sheesh!

    I mean, really. How hard is it to find ONE photogenic woman in a company the size of Microsoft? Hell, Apple used a LOT of folks in their ads... And they didn't look like models either (nor did their words sound like PR text).

    Yup, look to a LOT of "Longhorn allows me to do things the way that make me more productive" blah blah blah...

    --
    IANAL, but I've seen actors play them on TV
    1. Re:Will Blog For Cash... by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Yeah because lines like "My PC wasn't Plug-n-Play it was Plug-n-Get Mad" don't smack at all of a marketing copy writer. Nor the smuggly delivered "I saved Christmas".

      I mean it's not like OSX or Mac adds ever exhibits any problems. They JUST WORK. All the time. Constantly and consistently. Not subject to any of the complication that case computers to misbehave. And we all know that the Just Work line sure isn't marketing spin. Apple wouldn't ever use marketing spin to promote its products.

      I mean there is no way something like iPhoto could destroy Christmas.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    2. Re:Will Blog For Cash... by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Having had my quotes "ahem" edited by a Large Blue Corporation's advertising team, it's easy to see how some of the switcher ads sounded like they were purely made up by marketing. In reality, someone took out the "ums" and "errs" (except in Ellen Feiss's case), and tightened the grammar in the process.

      The Mac switchers were probably just incoheret from relief.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    3. Re:Will Blog For Cash... by SlowEmotionReplay · · Score: 2, Funny
      How hard is it to find ONE photogenic woman in a company the size of Microsoft?

      ..or just use one of Bill G's android love slaves.

      Come on, you know he has them... A computer nerd with a gazillion dollars!

      I mean really, what would the average slashdotter do if they were in his shoes?

      Maybe I'm just confusing reality with this.

      http://www.tvtome.com/tvtome/servlet/GuidePageServ let/showid-17591/epid-349683/ (under "Cultural References", Mike Sorayama)

    4. Re:Will Blog For Cash... by Herr_Nightingale · · Score: 1

      Hell, Apple used a LOT of folks in their ads... And they didn't look like models either (nor did their words sound like PR text).

      Ellen Feiss was totally hot, stoned *and* covered in hot grits, as I recall.. made for a very memorable advert. w00t!

    5. Re:Will Blog For Cash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah because lines like "My PC wasn't Plug-n-Play it was Plug-n-Get Mad" don't smack at all of a marketing copy writer. Nor the smuggly delivered "I saved Christmas".

      Uh, I presume you're referring to the "Switch" campaign. See, the thing was -- those *weren't* written by copy writers. Sure, they were edited, but the "big deal" about those ads is that they *were* switchers. For a while, Errol Morris (the director, whose documentary films have always consisted of people's own words) had some unaired ones on his site -- he said that they avoided airing the ones they made with famous-ish people (Dan Clowes, Doug Rushkoff) because they people didn't believe them -- but they were 100% from their own words. Most of the people in the ads were found by word-of-mouth contacts.

      Eventually, they stopped the TV ads because people (like you) couldn't believe that a company would put some of it's actual users on TV. But they were.

    6. Re:Will Blog For Cash... by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Actual users sure. Coached and edited? Of course.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
  54. I don't see the value by symbolic · · Score: 1


    They will be primarily preaching to the choir as far as users go, so I guess their role is to convince people that they need to upgrade. This ought could be an interesting experiment, if not a humorous one.

  55. One might say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that your sig, describing semi-abusive use of the mod system, incites people to mod you down. Yes I'm ACing this for a reason, and that reason is too many people like you ! You do not drag quality up by stamping contributors faces into the mud

  56. This Is No Different Than Usenet! by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

    Many major companies already mantain a presence on the newsgroups doing exactly what MS is proposing. Some announce their affiliation and some don't. How are bloggs any different than newsgroups other than the webpage owner hosting ads?

  57. Microsoft buying bloggers? anti-blog them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buying bloggers for advertising is about as low as it gets. We should start a huge blog campaign against them and their hype, FUD, and lies!

  58. Blogging down the tubes just like print media by crush · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At last we have a nice concrete example of a large corporation admitting that they're going to spread their propaganda through blogs. It seems like only a couple of weeks ago that I was reading an article about how blogging was the new trusted, untainted source of information as compared to magazine articles. Hmmm, I said to myself, that doesn't seem very believable. Looks like journalists for traditional print-media might get a second chance after all as being some sort of independent voice.

    1. Re:Blogging down the tubes just like print media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it was Microsoft's intention to raise the print media's relative credibility (which they have already paid good money for) by lowering the credibility of bloggers.

      Then again, maybe they are just desperate to find anyone that will say something nice about them.

    2. Re:Blogging down the tubes just like print media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "At last we have a nice concrete example of a large corporation admitting that they're going to spread their propaganda through blogs."

      Wasn't that exactly what Sun did with Tim Bray? It's been very open e.g. http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/05/02/ Policy

    3. Re:Blogging down the tubes just like print media by AlienRelics · · Score: 1

      They've been doing this for many years. I recall Microsoft employees getting flushed out of Amiga forums many, many times.

      Not that the Amiga community -needed- anyone to disrupt them... :'/

  59. One thing's for sure... by Winterblink · · Score: 1

    ... Microsoft can bank on Slashdot "promoting" Longhorn up to, and after its release. :)

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  60. Good For George Good For Bill by Ranger · · Score: 0, Troll

    Hey, if the Republicans can hire bloggers to promote their agenda, then Microsoft can hire them to promote their products. Besides fake bloggers are cheaper to hire than real journalists.

    bet this gets modded to troll. everytime I bash M$ I get modded down. so mod me down you bastards!

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    1. Re:Good For George Good For Bill by amightywind · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hey, if the Republicans can hire bloggers to promote their agenda, then Microsoft can hire them to promote their products. Besides fake bloggers are cheaper to hire than real journalists.

      The democrats have been able to safely ignore the blogsphere because they already have the 'mainstream media' shilling for them. That has been the case for 40 years. A major contributing factor to the growth of blogs in political discourse has been liberal hegemony over the traditional press. Thankfully, with the ascent of Fox News and the passing of the stalwart network news anchors this is no longer the case. To paraphrase Condi Rice, "The New York Times and Washington posts are still outposts of yellow journalism", however. I guess you mean them when you say 'real journalists'.

      --
      an ill wind that blows no good
    2. Re:Good For George Good For Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You could get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl"

    3. Re:Good For George Good For Bill by Politburo · · Score: 1

      A major contributing factor to the growth of blogs in political discourse has been liberal hegemony over the traditional press.

      Of course, this theory conveniently ignores the fact that many large political blogs are liberal, and that a liberal candidate (Dr. Dean) was at the forefront of the whole 'blogging' movement. It also ignores the 90s. You know, that whole thing where the press dutifully followed GOP with the idea that Clinton's transgressions were a big deal? Oh, right, the nation didn't give a shit and still gave Clinton huge approval numbers, while the Senate acquitted him.

      To paraphrase Condi Rice, "The New York Times and Washington posts are still outposts of yellow journalism", however. I guess you mean them when you say 'real journalists'.

      Suffice to say, we have vastly different opinions of Dr. Rice and the validity of her opinions. When she said to Sen. Boxer (paraphrase), "Do not impugne my integrity," I said in response "What integrity?"

    4. Re:Good For George Good For Bill by Ranger · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, with the ascent of Fox News and the passing of the stalwart network news anchors this is no longer the case.

      That's a news channel! Oh my God! I thought Fox was a parody! And who said I liked liberals? They are bunch of loser crybabies. Conservatives on the other hand are loving, wise, peaceful, benevolent, brave, and trustworthy.

      --
      "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  61. Bill Gates' blog... by node+3 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not worth my time [April 20th, 2005]

    Today at the airport I saw a $100 bill, but left it lying there. It's just not worth it.

    [Post a comment] [Trackback]

    Sweetest Thing [April 25th, 2005]

    Bono stopped by for a visit. You can never tell what he's thinking though. I think that's why he wears those sunglasses. Ballmer kept trying to iChat me like every five minutes trying to talk with Bono, but I didn't didn't want to completely negate the Bono's coolness, I know how he can get when he's excited.

    [Post a comment] [Trackback]

    Tiger Fever! [April 29th, 6:31PM]

    Just installed Tiger (waiting for the FedEx truck was *torture*!). I can't believe how great it is. I can't stop hitting F12. Oh, and Spotlight! I'll post a more in-depth review later. Until then, check out the one at Ars Technica, it's really good.

    [Post a comment] [Trackback]

    1. Re:Bill Gates' blog... by mav[LAG] · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not worth my time [April 20th, 2005]

      Today at the airport I saw a $100 bill, but left it lying there. It's just not worth it.


      Bzzt. Bill is the kind of guy who would pick it up and put it in his pocket. In Bob Cringeley's Accidental Empires there's a good example of this sort of thing where he waits in line at a 7-11 to get his discount stamps and gets ribbed by the cashier to the tune of "come back when you make your first million."
      Bill was already a billionaire by then.

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
  62. Yup by Greyfox · · Score: 5, Informative
    Back before Linux hit it big they were caught paying reporters to write favorable articles for Windows in the face of competition by OS/2. Particularly amusing was their attempt to look like they had a grass roots movement like Team OS/2 by bringing Microsoft employees to the '95 Atlanta COMDEX to pose as "Team Microsoft." I don't know what's more amusing; the fact that Microsoft has always had to pay people off to try to appear like they too have grassroots support or that they've been caught at it pretty much every time they've tried it.

    Microsoft marketing, if you're reading this, these marketing ploys just make you look pathetic. Stick to what you're good at and play up the heartless corporation aspect of your corporate image. Honestly...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Yup by leonmergen · · Score: 1

      Microsoft marketing, if you're reading this, these marketing ploys just make you look pathetic.

      Remember, it only looks pathetic to the people who know their geeky stuff, and well, it's not like those kind of people are really influenced by those marketing ploys...

      --
      - Leon Mergen
      http://www.solatis.com
    2. Re:Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Remember, it only looks pathetic to the people who know their geeky stuff, and well, it's not like those kind of people are really influenced by those marketing ploys...

      This one even looks pathetic to a layperson.

      Even the popular press understands that

      Astroturf == fake commercial grass roots
    3. Re:Yup by McGiraf · · Score: 1

      "I don't know what's more amusing; the fact that Microsoft has always had to pay people off to try to appear like they too have grassroots support or that they've been caught at it pretty much every time they've tried it." How can you know about the times they did not get caught?

    4. Re:Yup by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      No it's not that, it's because every time there's been a grassroots movement promoting Microsoft products, it's turned out that the company was paying the folks to say what they did. At least I can't recall one where that wasn't the case. One could potentially make an argument for the "journalists" over at Cnet but last time I checked, Microsoft buys a lot of advertising from them. On the other hand, I see a lot of Microsoft advertising here on Slashdot too and everyone here seems to hate them. Go figure.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    5. Re:Yup by dangitman · · Score: 1
      or that they've been caught at it pretty much every time they've tried it.

      ... or have they? If they didn't get caught, how would you know how many times they've done it? Seems they've only been caught a few times.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    6. Re:Yup by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      So I'm not the only one who read the writeup and thought, "Hey, Cnet is changing their name!"

      I'm just amazed at the volume of breaking/headline news stories they've been running lately related to Longhorn. IMO the last "newsworthy" story about Longhorn was when it was revealed it would be released at the end of '06.

    7. Re:Yup by KillShill · · Score: 1

      by definition, all corporations are heart-less.

      MS is just more heart-less in comparison.

      the lesser of many evils is still evil.

      FREE(dom) software/hardware or bust.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    8. Re:Yup by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
      it's because every time there's been a grassroots movement promoting Microsoft products, it's turned out that the company was paying the folks to say what they did
      That is why I commented on the sudden lull in pro-MS posting and trolls. It happens periodically, and then they pop back all at once with a new theme. The pause reminds me of the quiet at the start or end of a project when the money runs out, hasn't started yet, or everyone is stuck in meetings (online or in person).
      --
      Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  63. curiously by circusboy · · Score: 1

    which happily will cure your malaria...

    stupid bit of OT trivia, syphilis is a cure for malaria.
    source, a good read, the history of quinine is particularly fascinating.

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    1. Re:curiously by NTiOzymandias · · Score: 1

      other way around. malaria cures syphilis, not vice versa.

      obviously you have no experience in contracting live-threatening diseases through acts of absurd stupidity.

    2. Re:curiously by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      From here.

      In its 1993 paper, the C.D.C. said no clinical trials had ever proved malaria treatment worked and anecdotal reports on syphilis patients called it unpredictable.

      Dr. Lurie said malarial cures had been ''relegated to the status of leeches.''

      Although I hear leeches are making a comeback.....

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    3. Re:curiously by snorklewacker · · Score: 0, Troll

      Speaking of malaria ...

      Of course, since it's associated with Bill Gates, it must be a bad thing, right?

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    4. Re:curiously by covertbadger · · Score: 1

      Dr. Lurie said malarial cures had been ''relegated to the status of leeches.''

      Although I hear leeches are making a comeback.....


      Rubbish, that's just a plant by PR companies representing leech-manufacturers who want you to think leeches are coming back...

    5. Re:curiously by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      I hope you're wrong, I bought stock.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    6. Re:curiously by circusboy · · Score: 1

      no, thankfully.

      was it the other way around?

      as I recall the way hobhouse had it in the book was that the cure for the one disease in question was to have sex with a west-african virgin, as they were carriers of the other disease, and there you had your cure... I didn't think that malaria was an std, so I was pretty sure it was that way around. And as the chapter of the book was about the hunt for artificial quinine as a cure for malaria... (and as a result the modern petro-chemical industry!)

      It has been quite some time since I read the book, so my memory may fail me, but I'm pretty sure...

      Of course he was retelling a folk cure from a couple hundred years back, so the accuracy of the original bit from the book may indeed be questionable.

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    7. Re:curiously by circusboy · · Score: 1

      I understand that leeches are quite popular in the limb-reattachment area, they apparently are very good a sucking up the internal bleeding. (somehow I recall a show that is supposed to attract the budding young scientist by grossing them out describing it in some detail.) Smithsonian or SciAm had a thing about it at some point...

      and to finish they apply the maggots to deal with the necrotic flesh...

      mmmmmm maggots!

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
  64. Pfft... old news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That M$ asshat Paul Thurott has had his head up Uncle Billy's anus for years due to years of ass kissing, while trying to make it appear like true journalism.

  65. Bloggers? by digitalchinky · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They could well employ a million of them, but what good are they if I never read their prose (that is if you could call it that)

    I may well be the only one doing it, but I seem to automatically tune out to anything mildly looking like a 'web log' - in the new age sense of the custom at least. CTRL-w.

    Same old story really, if I want it, I'll look for objectivity, not the rational (or insane) ravings of an opinionated and payrolled microsoft voice. (or any other corporate entity)

    1. Re:Bloggers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They could well employ a million of them, but what good are they if I never read their prose (that is if you could call it that)

      Giving a serious answer to your rhetorical question... Google PageRank still falls for this trick, so regardless of whether or not any person at all reads them, Google rankings will still make microsoft look good (assuming more of these blogs link to Microsoft instead of Novell/Mono :) )

      This is merely a Google-spamming campaign Microsoft's doing.

    2. Re:Bloggers? by orin · · Score: 1

      Tell me - how does one recognize objectivity on the Internet? It isn't as though there is a formula that you can apply to a text and reach the conclusion "this is objective". A text may "appear" balanced because it includes select arguments from both sides of an issue - but that doesn't mean that the text is balanced. It is relatively simple to write an argument that appears balanced but is actually quite unbalanced. An excelleng writer can produce an argument for almost anything that appears objective even to the experienced reader. *Most* slashdotters, having avoided the humanities like the plague during their education, aren't trained enough to perform a proper objective analysis of a text. I'm betting that you really couldn't tell an objective article praising longhorn from a well written one that wasn't objective.

    3. Re:Bloggers? by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Google PageRank still falls for this trick

      I seriously doubt Microsoft is in need of a PageRank boost, or the miniscule effect a bunch of incestuous bloggers would have on the same.

      Blogging, and bloggers, is one of the most grossly overrated technology realm currently - everyone seems to imagine a world of hyper-influential bloggers who'll gesture a certain way and the sheep will follow (such as "Longhorn really is l33t!"). This is so absurdly incorrect, and fails based upon a couple of simple fundamentals of blogs.

      -The only people who read a given blog are the people who already agree with it. Liberals aren't out reading the conservative blogs, and hippies aren't reading The Man's blog. Windows developers aren't reading a Linux kernel developers blog. These blogs have zero influence outside of the already converted.

      -Blog readers have an enormously short patience. If someone doesn't honour the prior fundamental, and decides to do something other than gently assure their readers that they're the smartest, more righteous people's on the Earth, their readership will go elsewhere.

      This isn't sour grapes, and I'm not yet-another "why do these people think anyone wants to hear them"er, I'm just saying it like it is - blogs are just an bunch of incestuous chatter of trackbacks and circle jerking.

  66. No problem here by dan_the_heretic · · Score: 0

    Don't have to worry about anybody blog-whoring MS products here at Slashdot.

    Do we?

    --
    I don't like big words..., does that make me anti-semantic?
  67. desperate people do desperate things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see subject

  68. Bloggers vs. other 'traditional' outlets by jtpalinmajere · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How is paying bloggers to hype a product any different than paying a traditional advertising company (or companies) to hype a product. If anything, using bloggers *could* have backlash not usually induced by traditional advertisers.

    Day 1: Microsoft hires blogger x for Longhorn adverts/hype.
    Day 8: Microsoft unsatisfied with blog commentary.
    Day 12: Microsoft pulls funding citing services paid for not provided.
    Day 15: Blogger now blogs to anti-hype Longhorn out of spite.

    Now, I'm sure that Microsoft will be using the medium in a way that probably won't bite them in the butt later on, but the possibility still exists. With traditional advert companies, losing the client means simply losing an account. With blogging, losing the client means making an enemy in many cases.

    All that to say, "Why is this even a story on /.?" Oh wait, its an open invitation for more Microsoft bashing. We at /. can be quite pitiful sometimes, really.

  69. Still another note from Bill Gates by PenguinBoyDave · · Score: 1

    Dear Longhorners, If the bloggers fail to promote Longhorn, please use the Slashdot forum to spread the word. I understand they love us there. If that doesn't work, please contact every LUG and try that route. Until we rule the world, Bill

    --
    I'm not a troll, but I play one on Slashdot.
  70. Micro-Management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this the same Microsoft that made bloggers take down screenshots of Longhorn?

  71. capitalism/commercialism is dirty indeed by johansalk · · Score: 1

    Yet another attempt to turn a counter-culture to an over-the-counter culture.

  72. Sorry by MrRoarkeLovesTattoo · · Score: 1

    I thought it said Foghorn Leghorn. I was hungry.

  73. This is stupid by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now people will assume that any blogger that says nice things about Longhorn is being payed to do so... even if they aren't!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:This is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Unpaid Longhorn Blogger: "Now, the best feature by far is the 'Shut Do' button, which very intuitively leads the user to...uh, let me click on it first...oh yeah, the shutdown dialog box."

      Blog Comment: "You loser, you were paid to say that!"

      Unpaid Longhorn Blogger: "No! I really really like the button! I mean look at the conciseness of it, and the beauty of the ellipses! It's absolutely stunning!"

    2. Re:This is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is slashdot. The zealots will assume that anyway. Remember - Apple is our ally. We have allways been allied with Apple. We are at war with Microsoft. Microsoft has always been our enemy.

  74. Consider the Source by $criptah · · Score: 1

    I never buy or try anything that is mentioned in somebody's blog. Hell, I don't even read blogs. There are better ways of wasting my time.

    Whenever you read a blog, please consider the source. Every freaking blog that I've seen so far was a useless piece or garbage or somebody's opinion that could be questioned. People like one thing and dislike the next. Honestly, it does not take a genius to write something cute and then post it everywhere as if it were the truth. I can replace every freaking blogger with a small shell script, if you will.

    Experience is what I am interested in. My experience, not yours. When Nissan 350Z came out, everybody was cuming all over their pants. Blogs of enthusiats were everywhere, forums raved about the car. Finally, I test drove it myself. It was a freaking nice ride, but my soul chose an underpowered RX8 for the car. Were bloggers right or wrong? I do not know. What I know is the fact that ultimately, a consumer will decide what is worth buying. Same will happen with Microsoft or any other entity that puts a lot of emphasis on blogs. Just look at what happened to Dean: he raised money, he was successful at the beginning, but then the country chose a different candiate. It is not where you begin, it is where you end up.

    I predict a lot of fuzz about Longhorn. Everybody loves publicity: IBM brags about Linux, Apple tells nice stories about people who switch, Wal-Mart is helping our environment (apparently I am missing out on that one). However, the final decision will come after somebody who is goigng to use the product. In this case, let's talk about the OS a year after its release. Let's hear it from sys admins who spend 24/7 working on their servers. How about scientists that use big ass clusters to compute something? What about an average home user and her experience with malicious attacks? For now, bragging about an OS that nobody actually used is pretty low.

    1. Re:Consider the Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, I don't even read blogs

      Psst. You're reading/commenting in a blog right now.. That's right. /. is nothing more than Taco's big 'ol blog. He just decided to use his own software, rather than some cooking-cutter shiat.

  75. A question by tbone1 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Just what is the reward for whoring Longhorn in a blog? If it's a free iPod, I am so there.

    --

    The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    1. Re:A question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, this'd be just one more thing that Steve would bitch about MS copying them.

    2. Re:A question by legirons · · Score: 1

      "Just what is the reward for whoring Longhorn in a blog? If it's a free iPod, I am so there."

      A free* Microsoft media player. That plays WMA files only.

      * Free as in "freedom to innovate"

  76. Hehe by JPelorat · · Score: 1

    Poostabber!

    --
    Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  77. frantic by planetfinder · · Score: 1

    This blog-marketing and the recent Longhorn media blitz is in response to the release of OS X Tiger, a platform that has maybe 3% of the market. Can anyone make sense of this paranoic response ? A few people are switching to Macs but it isn't because of Tiger so Microsoft needs to calm down and concentrate on making a decent product if that is possible for them. I can't speak for XP because I haven't used it enough. NT 4.0 was an OK product but Win 98 should have been the basis for a class action law suit. So I switched. SUSE 9.2 on my cluster, OS X on desktops and laptops, Win XP chained in the corner for dire emergencies.

    1. Re:frantic by ssj_195 · · Score: 1
      This blog-marketing and the recent Longhorn media blitz is in response to the release of OS X Tiger, a platform that has maybe 3% of the market. Can anyone make sense of this paranoic response ?
      I think it might be because Apple, a hardware company that spend a fraction as much on their software as Microsoft have, have, according to some well-publicised accounts, produced an OS that is so far ahead of Microsoft's efforts (in terms of Just Works-ness, security, eye-candy, technology, and bundled productivity applications) that it's simply embarassing. Coupled with Apple's mind-share due to the roaring success of the iPod, and the release of the Mac Mini which is relatively affordable (although apparently much more costly per performance than x86 boxes) and the lacklustre reviews of the recent Longhorn developer reviews, the situation has put Microsoft on edge slightly. Remember "not a single sale lost to Linux?" I imagine that extends to Macs, also.

      PS

      Despite the excruciatingly fan-boi-ish tone of the above, I don't actually own any Apple products.

      PPS

      Oh, and Steve, if you're reading - can you let me know when my Powerbook ships? kthx

  78. You got it. :-) by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Why else do you think the Slackware penguin smokes a pipe? :-)

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  79. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  80. can you spell by BlindRobin · · Score: 1

    Payolla ?

  81. Microsoft begins Operation Bloghorn by cruiserparts · · Score: 1

    ..... and ships Tiger to "Team 99," hoping the crack team will tell them what features to include in Longhorn 2009.

  82. Linux isn't proprietary... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... the fact that Slashdot hypes it up is hardly surprising. If anything burns Microsoft it is that Slahsdot, a ton of other geek sites on the net and an army of bloggers hyped up Apple's OS.X 'Tiger' a proprietary OS without Apple having to pay them off.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
    1. Re:Linux isn't proprietary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well, do you think it's coincident that Microsoft announced this blog-thing within three days since Mac OS X Tiger was released?

      This is just a ploy to dim Tiger's limelight.

  83. Origin of Longhorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Longhorn is Bill Gates' nickname for himself that he likes to use when trying to pickup chicks at product releases.

  84. baby down the well by Senor_Programmer · · Score: 1

    Look at Longhorn, he's acting all funny!
    What's that Longhorn, is there something wrong?
    Why are you mooing?
    You want me to follow you?

    wino can't get kikin chikin open

    Look at Longhorn, he's acting all funny!
    What's that Longhorn, is there something wrong?
    Why are you mooing?
    You want me to follow you?

    linux won't install on new SUX2000 69bit NinSonSamDellFuLG box

    Look at Longhorn, he's acting all funny!
    What's that Longhorn, is there something wrong?
    Why are you mooing?
    You want me to follow you? .....

  85. Obligatory Response by Erbo · · Score: 1

    How much did Microsoft pay you to say that? Approximate dollar figures will do...

    --
    Be who you are...and be it in style!
    1. Re:Obligatory Response by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

      Truth be told I'm a junk food junkie. they promised me my mailbox would be full of spam everyday if wrote nice things about them. The wierd thing is, my mailbox is empty, but my AOL account cxertainly seems to be popular. Oh wow, looks like I can get super rich helping out this poor Nigerian. Gotta go!

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    2. Re:Obligatory Response by Ninja+Penguin · · Score: 2, Funny

      As a representitive of Chief Nze Akpamgbo I wish to personally extend my deepest gratitude towards you for undertaking this most secret venture and assisting my associate in his endeavor. You may rest assured that we are currently proceeding with utmost caution and discretion to protect you, our valued assistant in this matter, and to ensure that this transaction is completed in a manner which will provide maximum benefit for all parties.

  86. This Is The MS Response To Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By creating these 'blogs' Microsoft is attempting to use the concepts behind Open Source (i.e. word of mouth that thing X is great and open invitation to be involved).

    By creating these artificial communities around products (try finding an MS product without a blog nowadays), they respond to corporate questions of 'what about this open source thing ?' by saying, sure we have that - just look at the blogs. Corporate drones don't see through the blatant plug-fests - the very presence of the 'blog' is enough to convince them the 'open source thing' is there and its OK to keep sending the checks to Redmond since they have their finger on the pulse.

    The strength of Open Source is also its weakness - the distributed nature allows evolution of great products, but these are only really appreciated by those with the technical understanding to make a solid assessment. Corporate buyers will always rely on soft fuzzy marketing speak. Unless OSS advocates get on this bandwagon properly, they will continue to be out manouvered big time.

    So - where are the slick blogs around OSS ? Lets of people need to get cracking and take the lead otherwise the community approach will be blacked out by the signal to noise ratio caused by the supposed 'blogs' which are nothing more than marketing hype and viral marketing campaigns.

  87. Outsourcing opportunity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't bring myself to say anything good about Windows, but I'd be happy to hire a team of bloggers in India or China to promote Longhorn1999 or whatever it's called, and keep half the profits myself.

  88. Once secret = Astroturfing by njfuzzy · · Score: 1

    So, this team used to be a secret, but is now official. In other words, MS has taken their astroturfing efforts and tried to legitimize them. Wonderful.

    --
    My Photography - http://ian-x.com
    The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
  89. Oooh, Oooh! Me!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nominate me! I wanna be an unpaid shill for a corporate convict.

  90. This could get interesting real quick by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    I have to wonder, will MS use of blogging give "blogging" per se any further credibility with mainstream journalism?

    --
    C|N>K
  91. Just F-ing fantastic by zappepcs · · Score: 1

    Not flamebait, but I can see this leading somewhere really nasty...

    If Microsoft admits to using bloggs to spread their marketing messages, how long before some high minded idiot in government suggests that such things should be subject to the same regulations as infomercials?

    Just one more stepping stone toward regulating the Internet and how consumers use technology in order to protect consumers from the real villains, all done by way of restricting personal freedoms instead of prosecuting the bad guys!

    Just 2 cents worth...

  92. Put your servers where your mouth is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For every single one of those blogs, announce the moment it is hosted on Longhorn. If there is downtime, we'll notice. Of course, there's nothing wrong with downtime to install new beta releases, I presume that will be announced too.

    Very simply, when they are done right blogs provide immediacy, an individual's authentic voice, and a certain amount of transparency because of their unfiltered nature. Not only do I have no problem with bloggers writing about their beta experiences with Longhorn, I think its a great idea.

    Will these people be free to voice any opinions they may have without fear of retribution? Can we, their readers, ever be sure of that? Convince us.

  93. Um, wait a minute... by willfe · · Score: 1

    Didn't Microsoft just recently get upset that someone posted screenshots of a recent build of Longhorn? Why would anyone suddenly jump at the chance to get a DMCA-style shutdown of their blog just to review a damned Longhorn beta?

    Wish they'd make up their minds. A guy who (misguided or not) seems to run a legitimate Windows fan site (ye gods, that's insane :) gushes about their product and the company slams him down for it. What happens when some blogger with no love for Windows (I fit in this category, though I won't bother pirating/running the beta because I don't give a rat's arse about Windows releases nor will I review it for them) jumps on this "team" and decides some new "feature" sucks or finds a critical, egg-smeared-on-face kind of bug and writes about it?

    Free speech sure ain't looking too healthy these days...

    --
    Read my stuff.
  94. Likely?-Prostitute Ports and Open Sockets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Yeah, because while the patch cures cancer, it'll end up giving you syphilis instead..."

    I don't think I want to know how you caught syphilis from your computer.

  95. * I think... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    ....that this is nothing more than Microsoft attempting, once again, to buy off bloggers in an effort to astroturf their propaganda. Oh wait... did someone already say that? ;P

    *Hint: This is what's called a joke

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  96. It's all about the Pentiums, baby! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  97. Ohhh yeah... by SkyLeach · · Score: 1

    I'll let microsoft pimp me out on my blog! Then just like a good ho I'll call all my tricks and tell 'em I just gave 'em CIV (Computing Immunodeficiency Disorder).

    --
    My $0.02 will always be worth more than your â0.02, so :-p
    1. Re:Ohhh yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CIV (Computing Immunodeficiency Disorder)

      Man... this would have been unfunny enough *before* you messed up the acronym.

  98. "No secret stuff anymore" "sign an NDA" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Now, before today, Team 99 was secret. I've learned from my messups with Jim Allchin's dinner not to do secret stuff anymore. Make everything transparent. Transparency is good. [...]All will need to sign NDAs cause there are things in Longhorn that we don't want to leak out, but they'll be your proxies.

    WTF!!!!! They won't do secret stuff, but they legally obligate their volunteer shills to do secret stuff!!!! That's very funny.

    Remember, you can't spell propoganda without NDA.

    1. Re:"No secret stuff anymore" "sign an NDA" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Remember, you can't spell propoganda without NDA.
      "Without nda, it's just propoga."
    2. Re:"No secret stuff anymore" "sign an NDA" by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Remember, you can't spell propoganda without NDA.

      Pffft! I see people do it on /. all the time.

  99. Can you say.... BlogHorn.... by rmallico · · Score: 0

    that was my .02 to this...

    --
    sig goes here!
  100. Farking bloggers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tell ya, every time I hear about a "blog", or a "blogger", it conjures-up the image of some farking hippie sipping on a latte in a coffee shop while pining about all of the evils in the world.

    Makes me pine for a cop with a riot shield, a can of pepper spray, and a metal baton...

    N.

  101. Yes, the Bob distro by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    That's how I've always thought of it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  102. last call by SethJohnson · · Score: 4, Funny



    On the plus side, Last Call won't mean the end to your drinking at this bar. After they lock the doors, I'm sure there'll be windows or some other back entrance that can be easily opened back up.

  103. Utlimate trolling opportunity by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Slashdot has been training an elite force of trolls for years, craftily capible of saying something that appears to be one thing on the surface but then is really something else underneath.

    It is time, Troll Force, to spring into action! Surely among your ranks is one who can manage to get him/her/itself into the Turf100 group, and do the troll of your lifetime from within - all while being paid!

    If that is not one of the Greater Hacks, then I don't know what is.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  104. Team 86 by krray · · Score: 1

    I am now forming "Team 86" to attempt to cancel this campaign.
    All /. entrants are welcome.
    Team X (OS) is alive and doing well also.

  105. bloggers being bought off? by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    No way. It's not like we haven't seen this happen several times already.. "Oh, yeah, I took $$ for that political piece.."

    The "blogosphere" seemed to overlook many cases of paid-off bloggers because it was too busy in its perpetual circle jerk.

    1. Re:bloggers being bought off? by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      Heck, there was a guy here in Indianapolis named Robin Miller who (allegedly) was doing this thing as a fulltime "respected" journalist. It was when the split in open-wheel racing happened between the CART circuit and the IRL circuit. (Allegedly) Robin was on the CART payroll and making more money from that than for reporting on open wheel racing in the Indianapolis Star. And think about it, most sports people know nothing about open wheel racing, so if they have to make a comment on it, who would they call? How about that guy in Indianapolis who's been covering this forever?

      Nothing new. H.L. Mencken wrote about this happening in his early days as a reporter (1899-1905) on the Balitmore Herald. And nothing he said made me believe it was a new phenomenon then.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  106. The reason was that they weren't relatives by crovira · · Score: 1

    You find that PR people (ab)use their relatives a lot.

    Remember all those people who are on those 'infomercials' who all looks like their family tree doesn't fork. Well the roots and rotten too (and different colors from the rest of their hair.)

    Im waiting for the 'sincere' voice of one of those QVC or HSN shills trying to lure the unsuspecting, the gullible or the deficient to buy the crap.

    Hey, Bill G. needs all your money NOW!

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  107. Wasn't "Ninety-nine" Maxwell Smart's partner by NZheretic · · Score: 1

    Would you believe Longhorn has all the features promised? No, Ok, would you believe that most of the new proprietary features will not lock you further into Microsoft's vendor trap? No, Umm, well how about that Longhorn will run on your typical current Windows 2000 PC? Uhh, your going to be taking a closer look at Apple's Tiger OSX and the new Linux distributions as a replayment for Microsoft's lack of choice, aren't you, yes.

  108. Indeed. by FatSean · · Score: 0

    I can't stomach blogs...well it's not the blogs themselves, but the losers who feel as if they need to have a blog.

    --
    Blar.
  109. Its always the same race ... by crovira · · Score: 1

    between the liars (PR and other 'spin' meinters) and the gummint trying to keep the fuckers honest.

    And who keeps the gummint honest? (The media? Bwahaha! :-)

    My advice is "Don't buy anything without a refund policy."

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  110. They are doing it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Redmond is trying to buy off bloggers to hype Longhorn!

  111. Microsoft PR, please read by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 1

    From reading the blog I see you want to invite a representative group to evaluate your work. Technically that is a good idea, but currently it suffers from some weaknesses.
    Let's first assume you want more than just fanboys drooling, you want to evoke the feeling that you're actually listening to other opinions and impress the heck out of your "foes". If that assumption is false then any further interest by current non-MS-users is futile, go stick with Thurrott and his kin. If it is true, then there are two major problems:

    1. Selection of participants. Shun any known fanboys at all costs, have some people with known anti-MS-but-fair reputations show up. Go get Torvalds, Cox, Raymond, Parens, and other OSS people (Other Companies people might have a corporate interest to uphold) and their best friends to show up (Actually read about their opinions first, otherwise you'll screw up and invite Free Software people, like Stallman, who cannot, under any circumstances, endorse any proprietary doings, for example). If those people are allowed to play with your new toy a few days, and openly voice their opinions and suggestions, THEN you'll impress the heck out of everyone.
    2. NDAs. As pointed out in the blog itself, secrecy is bad, so don't f**king do it, ok? Have everyone allowed to say whatever they want afterwards, including screenshots, etc. Surly, that won't sound positive only, maybe even harshly negative (Though I actually doubt that), but noone would be able to say you're still the evil empire...

    In short, if you invite fanboys, then don't expect anyone but fanboys to believe them.

  112. No, see... by abulafia · · Score: 3, Funny
    The way it works is, go to "start", select "drinking", in the dialog that pops up, select "stop", wait for the pink elephants to finish their dance, and then go to "go home".

    If that makes sense, you're too drunk, and should go home.

    --
    I forget what 8 was for.
  113. Can anyone say "astroturf"? by egriebel · · Score: 1
    Yet another sign of Microsoft's continuing scorn for the consumer (individual and enterprise) when they are all but announcing an Astroturf campaign without any shame.

    Or, maybe that's just indicative of what a herd of dim-witted sheep consumers and decision-makers (PHBs) really are.

    --
    ACHTUNG! Das computermachine ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen.
  114. maybe some code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe Microsoft should look at some Programming tools / man power to help make Longhorn better?

  115. BULLSHIT MICROSOFT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone remember usenet postings in 1997 and 1998?
    Scary that they say they're gonna pay bloggers to promote their OS, but the scarier part is that's most likely a cover for using their own paid employees to pose as bloggers to push longhorn, chances are, they already utilized this and have had employees making public blogs that talk about everything else, and now will start spreading the "word"

    Eat shit, whores.

  116. Desperate by camcorder · · Score: 1

    I can imagine how Longhorn will suck and MS knows it , but didn't know situation is that much desperate. Good luck Microsoft.

  117. That was my point! by aquarian · · Score: 1

    Team OS/2 was the OS/2 fan's group...

    No way, shape, or form supported by Microsoft, since by that point MS was well into the Windows over everything mode.


    That was my point! Team OS/2 was a bunch of IBM people operating in an unofficial capacity, because they were frustrated by IBM's dropping the ball with OS/2 because they didn't want to go head to head with Microsoft. To Microsoft's chagrin, Team OS/2 was quite effective -- they pretty much had everyone believing the best way to run Windows 3.1 apps was under OS/2 Warp.

  118. Do you have a homoerotic fixation on MS? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Gonna have to start watching Wheaton's site. With all the vet bills

    My GOD! Wil Wheaton is so short of cash he's visiting a vet's instead of a doctor's?

    For his sake, I hope they didn't throw in a free neutering.

    I expect his next release from O'Reilly will now be "Lovin' Longhorn" or something like that.

    "Lovin' Longhorn"? Ahem... the guy's married! Whatever the rumours say, I don't think he's that way inclined....

    Don't blame him a bit.

    ....although going by this, it seems you might be? Hey... whatever floats your boat and all that nonsense. (^_^)

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  119. I nominate PJ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because she tells the truth. Oh wait, that wouldn't be good for Longhorn. Nevermind.

  120. The Crazy 99 by anandpur · · Score: 1

    Budd: You're telling me she cut through eighty-eight bodyguards before she got to O-Ren?
    Bill: Nah, there weren't really eighty-eight of them. They just called themselves "The Crazy 88."
    Budd: How come?
    Bill: I don't know. I guess they thought it sounded cool.

  121. Screenshots by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

    So when Team 99 bloggers post screenshots of Longhorn will MS sue itself into oblivion?

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  122. The possibility of real engagement. by argent · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was part of one of Microsoft's attempts at getting people who were active on the Internet involved. At the Pocket PC, Wireless, and Beyond shindig in 2000 Microsoft invited 35 people - mainly Palm users - who were active online to Redmond, gave them each a couple of Pocket PCs (and mailed them a couple more over the years), and asked for feedback.

    There was no NDA.

    There was no attempt to encourage people to be pro-Microsoft or even actively promote the product. I certainly wasn't, I was more than ready to highlight the shortcomings of the products, and they still kept me on their list and sent me units to try on.

    And most of all, they didn't just talk... they listened as well.

    Three things struck me:

    First, all the Palm users immediately got together and beamed all their contact info to each other. The Pocket PC users mostly didn't know how to do it, beaming was difficult and the handhelds were generally larger and less comfortable to use and even the Microsoft people on the handheld team didn't tend to have theirs with them.

    Second, getting the mail set up on the LAN they were demoing on was really hard. By the second try people were saying things like "this isn't supposed to be rocket science, and besides, we're all supposed to be rocket scientists".

    Third, the handwriting recognition was clumsy. It required a lot more strokes and a lot more tries to reliably recognise text, compared to Graffiti.

    The really amazing thing, the thing that made me a total fan of Beth Goza and Derek Brown was thet the next version of the Pocket PC software actually fixed all these problems. Not all the changes were improvements, and not all the problems we pointed out were fixed, but so many of them were I was stunned. In fact, since Palm replaced Graffiti with Jot the Pocket PC does a better job of implementing Graffiti than Palm OS does.

    Unfortunately, while they made many changes the Pocket PC still has all the deeper flaws that I wrote about back then. Oh well, this isn't about the Pocket PC. This is about Microsoft.

    What was key with the PPCWB shindig is that Microsoft set up a two-way discussion with us, and didn't try and control what we said in it or to other people. This wan't an "Astroturf" campaign, it was a real engagement with the community, and they got a huge win out of NOT creating a conduit for synthetic adulation.

    Microsoft's done it once. Can they do it again?

    1. Re:The possibility of real engagement. by tbarrett · · Score: 1

      It strikes me that this is the way any good engineer would want to go about things.

      We all have an attachment to the products and software we create and work on. We all want the software to be the best that we can possibly make it. Open discussion and critique with knowledgeable users is generally one of the better ways to go about this.

      As an aside I think that's one of open source's biggest draws. Everyone can contribute to making better software just by using it and talking about it.

    2. Re:The possibility of real engagement. by argent · · Score: 1

      It strikes me that this is the way any good engineer would want to go about things.

      Absolutely. Eating your own dogfood isn't enough. Eating your own dogfood is going to help you sell dogfood, but it's not going to help you when your customers are cats, when you're already selling all the dogfood there is to sell and you can't break into the cat market at all. What they did with us was fed their dogfood to people who preferred catfood, and watched us eat it, and asked us about it. And they came up with a product that cats like better.

      Eh, it's still dogfood, but it's good enough dogfood that in some areas it actually tastes better to a cat than catfood does.

      As an aside I think that's one of open source's biggest draws.

      Oh, yeh, that's right. You don't have to wait for the dogfood company to notice that you're not a damned dog. You can cook up your own catfood if that's what it takes.

    3. Re:The possibility of real engagement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...gave them each a couple of Pocket PCs (and mailed them a couple more over the years)...

      There was no attempt to encourage people to be pro-Microsoft or even actively promote the product.

      Microsoft has perfected the art of getting people to turn tricks for a t-shirt. At least you held out for the Pocket PC.

    4. Re:The possibility of real engagement. by argent · · Score: 1

      Yep, I'm a total Microsoft shill, I've never said one bad word about the Pocket PC, anything you find online that suggests I'm completely turned off by the design is a forgery, I never said it. If you run into the places I seem to have pointed out how much better a job PalmOS does at everything that a PDA is for, and that you can't rely on the Pocket PC to give you a secure place to store your most important data... hey, I was drunk, stoned, AND using a cellphone while driving.

      I don't know what happened, maybe Microsoft the company had an almost un-heard of breakthrough and let some of the people who worked there show their total commitment to keeping their word, but they did. Writing bad stuff about the Pocket PCdidn't get you taken off their list, which was really smart of them because it meant they got feedback on PPC 2002 from people who actively disliked PPC 2000...

      Pity about that reliability problem. :)

  123. Tiger effect by bananahead · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The release and very positive public arm-waving over Tiger OS has knocked a serious hole in the Longhorn marketing engine. They are faced with the problem of everything they are doing being a 'me too' statement now, instead of a 'new and innovative'. Serious discussions are taking place about how to recover from the rave acceptance of Tiger.

    And I am not even a Mac user...

    --
    A most overlooked advantage to owning a computer is if they foul up there's no law against wacking them around a bit.
  124. Book of Longhorn by bananahead · · Score: 1
    The original 'Book of Longhorn' (the official internal product specification ) was almost three inches thick. The second version (issued August 12, 2003) was about half the size and included a new small section called 'Out Of Scope Scenarios' that outlined what had been pulled from the release. The third Book of Longhorn (dated April 30, 2004) dropped the 'Out of Scope Scenarios' section because it got to big.

    The internal name is actually split into three: Shorthorn (Windows XP SP3), Longhorn (what will actually be released as 'Longhorn') and Longerhorn (the stuff, like WinFS, that will just have to wait another couple of years.

    It is truly pathetic that they can no longer create innovative solutions and actually release them. The best stuff comes out of Microsoft Research and will never see the light of day.

    --
    A most overlooked advantage to owning a computer is if they foul up there's no law against wacking them around a bit.
  125. They're copying Apple yet again! by Genevish · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the old EvangeList...

  126. Propaganda campaign for "It just works" = BSOD by shanen · · Score: 1
    I believe everything I read on the Web. Really.

    This tactical idea of rumor-based marketing by getting some bloggers to testify to Longhorn's wonderfulness makes perfect sense in that context.

    Whoops, I suppose I better clarify my statement. I really do believe everything I read on the Web. What I believe is that someone wrote it. (Actually even that belief is subject to some epistemological qualifications, such as that my computer and eyes are working properly, etc.) However, I do *NOT* believe in the sense of believing that it is true or even that it has meaning. I believe someone wrote it, and there is a context in which there were reasons why it was written. But true? Just for beginners, the author might be mistaken, though in this case the more obvious concern is that the author might be externally motivated by Microsoft. True? Sorry, I'm not going to believe it just because some blogger says so.

    I just had a BSOD a few minutes ago. That's one of Microsoft's Blue Screens of Death, just in case you're some kind of n00b. That's on Microsoft's current "latest and greatest" XP OS.

    I keep thinking about what has been reported as the marketing slogan for Longhorn: "It just works." If so, that would be the first time in the history of Microsoft. I really doubt it. Yes, I appreciate that Microsoft is sincerely trying to make better software, but they continue to make their software more and more complex, and I'd certainly wager that Longhorn will have bugs. (Actually, I've already won that bet--Microsoft has already begun patching Longhorn's bugs.) There will be lots of times when it will *NOT* just work. They are building their entire marketing campaign on a bald lie.

    Sadly, Microsoft is very much in touch with our times--just like Jeff Gannon/Jim Guckert is in touch with modern "reality". Truth is becoming a meaningless notion. Creating "proper" images and making money are apparently the only things that count.

    Sad to watch, though from a historical perspective I don't care that much. However, that's just my faith in truth and democracy. I think they are good, and therefore will ultimately prevail--but the current evidence is that the places where they prevail will be elsewhere than my beloved homeland.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  127. Sarcasm mode enabled by hypervinetest45 · · Score: 1

    Speaking as a Team99 blogger, I can assure you that we strive to provide unbiased...err...

    I'm sorry, what was I saying? I can't seem to think clearly with all this money on my keyboard.

  128. duh,, blogs! by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    Blogs are so overrated.
    Except from those who are in the the middle of a war, in the process of doing something really interesting or working on a project you have interest in.
    But for 99% of them I'd would say that they are a waste of time.

  129. Original inspiration from Paul? by rjung2k · · Score: 1

    Is there any truth that this project was initiated on the success of Project: Paul Thurrott?

  130. Unfortunately,main stream journalism can be as bad by NZheretic · · Score: 1

    The US Mainstream Media does not have a great reputation outside of the USA because of the lies they let pass during the last election.

  131. Is there anything wrong with this? by EdMcMan · · Score: 1

    It sounds vaguely familiar...

  132. Microsoft welcoming bloggers... by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ... but you may NOT post screenshots of Longhorn builds in your blogs!

    ... and you may NOT download and talk about the most recent Longhorn pre-beta build!

    ... and Longhorn's feature set is still mostly undisclosed, with major stuff earlier revealed to be backported into XP + 2003.

    ... and of course not just anyone can easily be allowed to get any insight in the actual development to be able to comment on that. Jeez, what were you thinking!


    So, what are Microsoft thinking bloggers should write about?

    "WOW I JUST SAW THIS NEW UI AND LONGHORN LOKS SO COL AND IT WIL KIK APLAS BUTT SO HARD!11!1!!1 WTF DID U HAAR ABOUT TEH NEW COOL DOT NET TECHS!!111!!1 WHAT F3ATURAS THERE PLANNIG?????!!?? OMG I HAEV NO IEDA YET BUT IMM SURA ITL B AEWSOM31111 OMG WTF"

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  133. Article submitter made typographical error by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    ...Microsoft's "Team 99" evangelism effort will be composed of bloggers that will become Microsoft's voice to the masses...

    That should read: voice to them asses

    Slashdot really needs to put more effort into catching this sort of stuff before it hits the front page.

  134. guerilla marketing is everywhere by dustmite · · Score: 1

    Most people still don't seem to realise this, but guerilla marketing has now long since become an everyday, "mundane" marketing activity that every large corporation does, all the time. It's dead-standard in the advertising industry that when you place a contract an agency, you also place a guerilla marketing contract as part of it. All decent ad agencies have a guerilla marketing division.

    Posting fake messages in forums like slashdot, and creating fake blogs and fake "fan" websites and so on are all totally commonplace, standard methods employed on a day to day basis by these agencies. This stuff is going on all the time; talk to anyone who works in advertising if you think it's just tinfoil hat stuff, you'd be surprised. When you really think about it, the chances that companies like MS are not posting fake comments here is pretty much zero. (I've also seem some pro-Apple posts here that seemed just a tad suspect to me.)

    If one is aware of it, it becomes easier to spot. They tend to follow a certain pattern, to maximise 'manipulation' of the reader. So they aren't usually blatantly pro-MS; usually they say something that sounds pro-OSS, to gain your trust, but then turn it around. E.g. a good one will look something like this: "I'm a big fan of Linux, and push it whenever I can, but we tried to migrate our company to Linux and it was a big flop because of the lack of a good calendaring app - we ended up switching back to Windows".

    I don't agree that these posts have no effect.

    Most people still don't seem to realise this, but guerilla marketing has now long since become an everyday, "mundane" marketing activity that every large corporation does, all the time. It's dead-standard in the advertising industry that when you place a contract an agency, you also place a guerilla marketing contract as part of it. All decent ad agencies have a guerilla marketing division.

    Posting fake messages in forums like slashdot, and creating fake blogs and fake "fan" websites and so on are all totally commonplace, standard methods employed on a day to day basis by these agencies. Anyone who thinks this stuff isn't going on is, well, naive, because when you think about it, the chances that companies like MS are not posting fake comments here is pretty much zero. (I've also seem some pro-Apple posts here that seemed just a tad suspect to me.)

    If one is aware of it, it becomes easier to spot. They tend to follow a certain pattern, to maximise 'manipulation' of the reader. So they aren't usually blatantly pro-MS; usually they say something that sounds pro-OSS, to gain your trust, but then turn it around. E.g. a good one will look something like this: "I'm a big fan of Linux, and push it whenever I can, but we tried to migrate our company to Linux and it was a big flop because of the lack of a good calendaring app - we ended up switching back to Windows".

    I don't agree that these posts have no effect. Companies wouldn't do it if it didn't have an effect. I think they definitely have an effect.

  135. Oops by dustmite · · Score: 1

    Something went a little wrong posting that one, sorry.

    Here's a bit more info on Astroturfing.

  136. Microsoft is acting like the GOP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...more so every day.

  137. Get over it, they all do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you remember that when the ipod came out the Mac Bloggers were out in full force fulling up /. with all the ipod nonsense.

    Big deal ipod. It is just a repackaged and remarketed cheep harddrive with low quality audio. The basic idea for it was created fifteen years ago with the first laptop with a sound card.

    So Microsuck now wants to do the same thing.
    Big deal. This is not news.

  138. Join Team 69! by KlomDark · · Score: 1

    Join up and blog away saying the absolute worst about Short Trumpet. (Micro Soft/Tiny Flaccid/Small Blowing Device, seems like a pattern here...)

  139. Astroturfing. by stealth.c · · Score: 1

    Let's call a spade a spade.

  140. I thought they were suing bloggers? by shaitand · · Score: 1

    Didn't we just read an article about bloggers getting sued by Microsoft for posting screen shots of longhorn? Will MS make up their mind already?

  141. I knew the was a reason behind MSN Spaces by maguirer · · Score: 1

    I just assumed Microsoft was going to begin randomly inserting positive review entries into their MSN Spaces subscribers. Those online casino, Texas Hold 'Em, and blackjack blog spam comments were actually Microsoft's first test of the technology.

  142. What's in the NDA? by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

    I'm curious as to what's actually in the NDA that the shills/astroturfers sign to join "Team 99"

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  143. Just another Windows....sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This hype is rediculous. Longhorn is going to be just another disappointing release of Windows that is just Windows XP dressed in a new suit. Microsoft is stuck in a rut and has been since 1995. Windows 95 = Windows XP + new start button. XP is a continual problem and I can't imagine with the MS track record that Longhorn will be any better. I have a 3GHz Gateway and I still hate the delays that crop up when there are permission errors or it gets into its all too common daze from hell. This kind of crap shouldn't happen. I think I'll get a Mac!