You obviously have never been outside of America. If you want to talk about lack of tolerance, go to Africa or Asia, people that share the same language, country and culture kill each other over feuds that sometimes have been running for so long, nobody even remembers why they started.
It's also terrorism, terrorism doesn't have to have a political motive attached to it, some people are just psychopaths.
And obviously there are people making a political statement about it (Clinton regards the NRA) but we've had all sorts of presidents and lawmakers and incidents in all sorts of states and other countries with or without all sorts of gun laws.
You shouldn't be in the field of software development. Whoever uttered that statement should be fired from any programming related job.
It does require a special sort of insight (eg. being able to keep track of state and thinking much more abstractly about computers than what you're used to) which can be both acquired or natural but is only improved by practice but it's by no means impossible to think about code and what it will end up doing. In most cases, programmers have thought about ways the program can fail (eg. buffer overflows) and either think it's no big deal (it will never get connected to the Internet) or have to give up finding solutions for it due to lack of time or funding.
68%? Seriously, even the "worst" possible statistics within the US are ~50%. But overall population is ~37% which is pretty much on-par with the rest of the world: https://www.researchgate.net/p...
Look at your own stats and learn about statistics, you picked the outlier, Finland and Sweden who have very similar systems as Norway (they're neighbors after all) have equal and higher recidivism rates than the US. The UK is another outlier but on the other end of the spectrum.
Analyze the statistic, the rest of the world has an average recidivism rate of ~37% and I know the prisons in European countries, even UK and the Netherlands are a lot cushier than the US. Within the US, the Federal prisons have a lower recidivism rate than State prisons.
Then there is also analysis that says most of those statistics in the US are overblown because of faulty methods: http://journals.sagepub.com/do...
We're talking several ships in the ocean simultaneously, not sure if you've noticed but that's not the vicinity of your house, one of the boats is probably the length of your entire street and the boats probably can't see each other (distance of at least 14km between them).
You need at least 2 antenna's, one for each frequency GPS uses (1.2 and 1.5GHz).
How will you reposition a GPS signal for the area of a small city with the SDR? GPS has fairly decent signal discrimination (it kind of has to) and you need to be able to imitate not one but at least 3 around the poles if not 5 or more elsewhere separate GPS signals to be able to reposition a thing and it knows how to ignore 'bad' signals. Additionally, fixed GPS systems on boats have somewhat directional antenna's so you need to have a lot more power to be able to influence those.
They kind of expected one or more satellites to go haywire in their lifetime and non-consumer equipment is also built on the premise that other things in it's vicinity may go haywire.
People with higher access to outside society also tend to live in lower security or state prisons because they've done less serious things whereas hardened criminals end up in out of state federal prisons.
In Europe you even have in-cell phone and entertainment systems but recidivism statistics are the same.
I highly doubt that access to family has anything to do with the choice of being a career criminal or they wouldn't end up in prison in the first place.
The US military is the only entity that can control GPS signals on such scale. If you did with a spoofed signal, you'd need a rather powerful antenna given the range and someone would notice and even able to calculate its position.
The US military controls the satellites and have reduced accuracy or even blacked out signals in war zones like Iraq. Russians have their own "GPS" and thus no need to spoof it, especially not in Russian territory. The only people that have any benefit of black ops in Russian territory are Americans.
You're looking too far, this is a publicity stunt to appease the masses. If you want to avoid the SEC, all you have to do is make sure to hire a particular lawyer firm that has ties to the current SEC administration and then the investigation deadlocks. You know, like this.
The Russian Tea Room is in the same space as Carnegie Hall - what are the musicians not telling us about that waltz. Russian Embassies in Australia - what goes on down under?
Although burning oil for fuel may be coming to an end in the next 50 years, there are many other uses for oil and there will be many enthusiasts still. So they won't have today's revenues but they have enough oil to supply current usage for another 100 years, if that use drops, that only extends how much they have.
With a system that's designed to only stay "alive" for ~120 hours in standby and has ~20 hours of low-power (like FM radio) usage. Puerto Rico is facing months of power loss, I'm pretty sure very few of the iPhone/Android devices on the island are powered at this point.
If you want people to listen to FM radios, provide them with them with one that doesn't require power, you know like a crystal radio, you can get them mass-produced under $0.50 - so for less than 1 year of Ajit's salary, you can provide the ENTIRE island of Puerto Rico with radios.
In most cases the camera will either point up at a ceiling or point down at some surface. Your cell phone also has an incentive not to spy on you - power consumption would make it unmarketable.
The US has certain protection laws, they don't specify specifically "where" it has to be hosted, but they do require US companies to cooperate with investigations and demands from the government *regardless* of "where" it is hosted.
The EU, well, that ended up being a law without any teeth to it. The EU can demand its information laws to extend to the US or other locations, but it knows damn well that it can't enforce those laws outside it's borders.
China and Russia are the only ones that are actually standing up to the corporations. China knows it has a market the corporations can't ignore, so it can demand pretty much anything and they make sure the corporation knows that playing in their market means they'll have to grin and bear while providing the lube.
Are you sure about that? As a citizen, I've had to deal with credit rating agencies in Europe and they seem to work pretty much the same way. Most of them are public, and there's some private ones too.
Only the Nordic countries have a public negative-only rating system but private systems have slowly become available since they joined the EU.
Cloudflare is big, it has hosting in a lot of major ISP's network. What Cloudflare does is when it notices a DDoS attack from a particular segment, it shifts the traffic to the closest originating ISP and then it only impacts the ISP which at that point is going to be motivated to getting the 'bad traffic' off their network whether that is by pressuring smaller ISP's or simply cutting them off.
Miniature chopper does major damage to military chopper.
The military is flying things that can't withstand the equivalent of a rock being thrown at it, you'd think they're a bit more robust for flying in military action.
Why is it evil, it's the stupid consumers basically paying $1-5 for a bottle of tap water which costs $0.01 from your own tap. You probably use several cubic meters of water (3-5000 gallons) per month for $20 which is basically $20-50,000 worth as a bottle in a store, get a bigger meter, you get a bigger discount.
- The police can't compel you to provide evidence against yourself. They can find methods to 'crack the safe' but if by doing so, they destroy the contents, that's "their" fault, hence why they clone your devices before looking for evidence.
- If YOU destroy the evidence, then you can indeed be brought up for impeding the investigation and destroying evidence, in as much as they can prove the evidence was there to begin with and that there is no other evidence that can be used in it's place. In order for you to be charged though, they would have to know the evidence was there in the first place or have a witness to the fact that the evidence was there. Usually witness accounts aren't well accepted without evidence but if you destroyed evidence, it's more commonly accepted.
- You cannot be charged without evidence even if you have destroyed it. They can substitute evidence for proof of the evidence existing and you destroying it, they can't just say that you were the shooter on the grassy knoll because they suspect you destroyed the evidence of being the shooter.
It's unlikely that a single piece of evidence makes you walk free though so destroying the evidence is counterproductive.
Slashdot Mirror
You obviously have never been outside of America. If you want to talk about lack of tolerance, go to Africa or Asia, people that share the same language, country and culture kill each other over feuds that sometimes have been running for so long, nobody even remembers why they started.
It's also terrorism, terrorism doesn't have to have a political motive attached to it, some people are just psychopaths.
And obviously there are people making a political statement about it (Clinton regards the NRA) but we've had all sorts of presidents and lawmakers and incidents in all sorts of states and other countries with or without all sorts of gun laws.
You shouldn't be in the field of software development. Whoever uttered that statement should be fired from any programming related job.
It does require a special sort of insight (eg. being able to keep track of state and thinking much more abstractly about computers than what you're used to) which can be both acquired or natural but is only improved by practice but it's by no means impossible to think about code and what it will end up doing. In most cases, programmers have thought about ways the program can fail (eg. buffer overflows) and either think it's no big deal (it will never get connected to the Internet) or have to give up finding solutions for it due to lack of time or funding.
68%? Seriously, even the "worst" possible statistics within the US are ~50%. But overall population is ~37% which is pretty much on-par with the rest of the world: https://www.researchgate.net/p...
Look at your own stats and learn about statistics, you picked the outlier, Finland and Sweden who have very similar systems as Norway (they're neighbors after all) have equal and higher recidivism rates than the US. The UK is another outlier but on the other end of the spectrum.
Analyze the statistic, the rest of the world has an average recidivism rate of ~37% and I know the prisons in European countries, even UK and the Netherlands are a lot cushier than the US. Within the US, the Federal prisons have a lower recidivism rate than State prisons.
Then there is also analysis that says most of those statistics in the US are overblown because of faulty methods: http://journals.sagepub.com/do...
We're talking several ships in the ocean simultaneously, not sure if you've noticed but that's not the vicinity of your house, one of the boats is probably the length of your entire street and the boats probably can't see each other (distance of at least 14km between them).
You need at least 2 antenna's, one for each frequency GPS uses (1.2 and 1.5GHz).
How will you reposition a GPS signal for the area of a small city with the SDR? GPS has fairly decent signal discrimination (it kind of has to) and you need to be able to imitate not one but at least 3 around the poles if not 5 or more elsewhere separate GPS signals to be able to reposition a thing and it knows how to ignore 'bad' signals. Additionally, fixed GPS systems on boats have somewhat directional antenna's so you need to have a lot more power to be able to influence those.
They kind of expected one or more satellites to go haywire in their lifetime and non-consumer equipment is also built on the premise that other things in it's vicinity may go haywire.
People with higher access to outside society also tend to live in lower security or state prisons because they've done less serious things whereas hardened criminals end up in out of state federal prisons.
In Europe you even have in-cell phone and entertainment systems but recidivism statistics are the same.
I highly doubt that access to family has anything to do with the choice of being a career criminal or they wouldn't end up in prison in the first place.
The US military is the only entity that can control GPS signals on such scale. If you did with a spoofed signal, you'd need a rather powerful antenna given the range and someone would notice and even able to calculate its position.
The US military controls the satellites and have reduced accuracy or even blacked out signals in war zones like Iraq. Russians have their own "GPS" and thus no need to spoof it, especially not in Russian territory. The only people that have any benefit of black ops in Russian territory are Americans.
You're looking too far, this is a publicity stunt to appease the masses. If you want to avoid the SEC, all you have to do is make sure to hire a particular lawyer firm that has ties to the current SEC administration and then the investigation deadlocks. You know, like this.
The Russian Tea Room is in the same space as Carnegie Hall - what are the musicians not telling us about that waltz.
Russian Embassies in Australia - what goes on down under?
You can, there is TianoCore, Libreboot, Coreboot.
Not like anyone even bothers, any bugs in UEFI are only important if you have access to the hardware.
The nights in the desert get pretty frosty, you can freeze to death in the Sahara (at night).
Although burning oil for fuel may be coming to an end in the next 50 years, there are many other uses for oil and there will be many enthusiasts still. So they won't have today's revenues but they have enough oil to supply current usage for another 100 years, if that use drops, that only extends how much they have.
With a system that's designed to only stay "alive" for ~120 hours in standby and has ~20 hours of low-power (like FM radio) usage. Puerto Rico is facing months of power loss, I'm pretty sure very few of the iPhone/Android devices on the island are powered at this point.
If you want people to listen to FM radios, provide them with them with one that doesn't require power, you know like a crystal radio, you can get them mass-produced under $0.50 - so for less than 1 year of Ajit's salary, you can provide the ENTIRE island of Puerto Rico with radios.
In most cases the camera will either point up at a ceiling or point down at some surface. Your cell phone also has an incentive not to spy on you - power consumption would make it unmarketable.
The US has certain protection laws, they don't specify specifically "where" it has to be hosted, but they do require US companies to cooperate with investigations and demands from the government *regardless* of "where" it is hosted.
The EU, well, that ended up being a law without any teeth to it. The EU can demand its information laws to extend to the US or other locations, but it knows damn well that it can't enforce those laws outside it's borders.
China and Russia are the only ones that are actually standing up to the corporations. China knows it has a market the corporations can't ignore, so it can demand pretty much anything and they make sure the corporation knows that playing in their market means they'll have to grin and bear while providing the lube.
God and his Plan has often involved natural disasters to wipe out the sinners. Why are you resisting him?
Can't expect trolls to know grammer and speling.
Are you sure about that? As a citizen, I've had to deal with credit rating agencies in Europe and they seem to work pretty much the same way. Most of them are public, and there's some private ones too.
Only the Nordic countries have a public negative-only rating system but private systems have slowly become available since they joined the EU.
Cloudflare is big, it has hosting in a lot of major ISP's network. What Cloudflare does is when it notices a DDoS attack from a particular segment, it shifts the traffic to the closest originating ISP and then it only impacts the ISP which at that point is going to be motivated to getting the 'bad traffic' off their network whether that is by pressuring smaller ISP's or simply cutting them off.
Miniature chopper does major damage to military chopper.
The military is flying things that can't withstand the equivalent of a rock being thrown at it, you'd think they're a bit more robust for flying in military action.
You would have to demand full insight into every US corporations' financial dealings. No corporation would go for that.
All donations are already traceable. However anyone can use shell corporations (e.g. PAC) to obfuscate the amount they give.
Why is it evil, it's the stupid consumers basically paying $1-5 for a bottle of tap water which costs $0.01 from your own tap. You probably use several cubic meters of water (3-5000 gallons) per month for $20 which is basically $20-50,000 worth as a bottle in a store, get a bigger meter, you get a bigger discount.
I'm pretty sure you don't know how the law works.
- The police can't compel you to provide evidence against yourself. They can find methods to 'crack the safe' but if by doing so, they destroy the contents, that's "their" fault, hence why they clone your devices before looking for evidence.
- If YOU destroy the evidence, then you can indeed be brought up for impeding the investigation and destroying evidence, in as much as they can prove the evidence was there to begin with and that there is no other evidence that can be used in it's place. In order for you to be charged though, they would have to know the evidence was there in the first place or have a witness to the fact that the evidence was there. Usually witness accounts aren't well accepted without evidence but if you destroyed evidence, it's more commonly accepted.
- You cannot be charged without evidence even if you have destroyed it. They can substitute evidence for proof of the evidence existing and you destroying it, they can't just say that you were the shooter on the grassy knoll because they suspect you destroyed the evidence of being the shooter.
It's unlikely that a single piece of evidence makes you walk free though so destroying the evidence is counterproductive.