It's irrelevant who any of us would listen to. The government makes the laws and they listen to whoever has the most money. Sadly, that's probably Sony.
IMO, growing cancer rates can be attributed to the aging population.
Well it would be quite easy to find out. You could measure the incidence of cancer in lots of people of various ages now, and compare it against the incidence in people of the same ages in different periods in the past.
I'm surprised none of those so-called scientists thought of that. Can I have a Nobel prize now?
this would be illegal to talk about it, although the act itself is not illegal
That would make it rather difficult to bring a prosecution. Or are public prosecutors/district attorneys chosen on their miming ability where you come from?
Rather, it's my way of saying that this is my real name and I don't mind if you know it because I'm not going to be an asshole who is unwilling to back up what he says and/or admit when I'm wrong.
It seems the only person calling the MSU policy 'unconstitutional' is you. This us usually a matter determined by the courts, so it appears you are being a bit presumptuous.
I'm not qualified as a doctor. My opinion on whether someone is alive or not might not carry legal weight and I would have no authority to sign a death certificate.
However, if I observed that someone had been decapitated, my opinion that he was in a non-viable state would be correct.
Holding a qualification or being appointed to a position are neither necessary nor sufficient conditions to having the right answer. Shame on you.
My thoughts exactly. One might be considered a prank, and merit a slap on the wrist.
Thousands - in an apparently pre-planned and coordinated campaign - is abuse, nuisance and harrassment. Maybe barratry too. While we're at it, throw in conspiracy to commit all the above.
Slashdot Mirror
He was referring Pennsylvania, they'd never think of that.
But they pay less as a percentage of their income. If you have to spend all your income to survive, all your income is being taxed under that system.
Maybe so in fantasy land. In the real world, the government sends thugs to smack their heads in.
It's irrelevant who any of us would listen to. The government makes the laws and they listen to whoever has the most money. Sadly, that's probably Sony.
Sell at a loss but make up for it in volume. Is it 1997 again?
I believe they are usually referred to as "Indians".
Well it would be quite easy to find out. You could measure the incidence of cancer in lots of people of various ages now, and compare it against the incidence in people of the same ages in different periods in the past.
I'm surprised none of those so-called scientists thought of that. Can I have a Nobel prize now?
Mai jeneratian grue up withowt thum an wear all ockai.
The 21st amendment didn't do them much good. And the 26th looks like it wouldn't apply to them.
You're only supposed to move the ball, which ideally should be on top.
... but only if you're brother and sister. Which reminds me, anyone here from Alabama?
Thank you, I'm here all week - try the tuna salad!
That would make it rather difficult to bring a prosecution. Or are public prosecutors/district attorneys chosen on their miming ability where you come from?
Hmm. Not a nice image. Forget I said that.
[citation needed]
Sorry, couldn't help it.
I live in a rural one. I say in, more like near. You could call it a subrur.
Things are improving. Or at least, the rate at which they're going to hell is decreasing.
Hell yes. It's not like a truck, that you can just dump stuff on. What if someone sent an important internet and it got lost?
I'm not qualified as a doctor. My opinion on whether someone is alive or not might not carry legal weight and I would have no authority to sign a death certificate.
However, if I observed that someone had been decapitated, my opinion that he was in a non-viable state would be correct.
Holding a qualification or being appointed to a position are neither necessary nor sufficient conditions to having the right answer. Shame on you.
If you had email back in the day, then by definition that wasn't back in the day.
30 years old ... and they still haven't got laid.
[citation needed]
You appear to have misspelled "netcraft".
My thoughts exactly. One might be considered a prank, and merit a slap on the wrist.
Thousands - in an apparently pre-planned and coordinated campaign - is abuse, nuisance and harrassment. Maybe barratry too. While we're at it, throw in conspiracy to commit all the above.
You don't need a license to cut lawns. Actually, I'd pay to watch that.
I hope nobody takes that logic and uses it as justification for killing them and stealing their land!
You've clearly never used Office 2007.