That begs the question of how long it will be before a large number of repliess along the lines of "languages evolve" "if people use it to mean that then that's what it means" or "so what, I understood it" will arrive.
The point is, the answers don't have to match the questions as long as you know what they are.
...and can remember them. I locked myself out of a bank account I hadn't used for some time because I'd given false answers on the security questions then forgotten them.
Life has been found in extreme conditions on Earth, where it wasn't previously thought to be possible. As for photosynthesis, I don't see a reason why on a planet with different illumination a chlorophyll substitute with a different absorbtion band wouldn't evolve.
you can be goddamned sure that everywhere else where there is some sort of ethnic Russian minority or some pro-Russian Slavic population we're not likely going to be able to have as much luck.
And there are quite a lot of those, in part due to Stalin's habit of moving people around. Add the Baltic states to your list.
there may be a bunch of other intelligent beings on other planets living sort of like we are right now, perhaps even communicating electronically and debating topics like this.
You're suggesting that *intelligent* life would have something like slashdot or, $deity help us, usenet?
You don't have to disprove them all. Otherwise you'd have to prove that dew isn't formed by sad elves with green jackets crying on the lawn. Or elves with red jackets. Or gnomes with green jackets and red hats and only one leg...
The range of hypotheses needing to be tested isn't infinite - it's informed by and based on the obsevation. Otherwise we'd be here all week.
7) Hot dog vendors: because their integration with the public means they could *potentially* introduce weaponized pathogens into large populations unnoticed.
I think they already do that, just not intentionally.
That begs the question of how long it will be before a large number of repliess along the lines of "languages evolve" "if people use it to mean that then that's what it means" or "so what, I understood it" will arrive.
Perhaps he spent 999,995 bucks on a feasibility study from McKinsey?
The conclusion being, to cut a long story with lots of barcharts short: "maybe".
Unlike 90% of the people who use the word, you spelled it correctly. Otherwise it wouldn't have made you a musician.
BSOD? And this time, B doesn't stand for blue...
You appear to have misspelled "perl".
But it's different for him - he's a better than average driver. But then isn't everybody?
Lucas is his own biggest fan. So the "like" is redundant.
But they didn't do that at the beginning, when they were winning.
That's no moon...
Admiral Akbar: It's a trap!
George Lucas: Shut your trap!
...and can remember them. I locked myself out of a bank account I hadn't used for some time because I'd given false answers on the security questions then forgotten them.
Rarity is relative. Even if there are lots and lots, because the galaxy is big, they'll most likely be very far apart, for the same reason.
They won't be very common where we are or can get to.
Antarean or Europan?
I've had enough of these motherfucking gas giants in this motherfucking solar system!
Life has been found in extreme conditions on Earth, where it wasn't previously thought to be possible. As for photosynthesis, I don't see a reason why on a planet with different illumination a chlorophyll substitute with a different absorbtion band wouldn't evolve.
Colmore said "not suggesting every possible idea and disproving them one by one."
And you disagreed with him.
But now you say it's only the testable ones. Which is it, then?
They are if you have an automatic elf camera and a gnome trap.
You're too kind, I would have tried to sell him a bridge.
And there are quite a lot of those, in part due to Stalin's habit of moving people around. Add the Baltic states to your list.
You're suggesting that *intelligent* life would have something like slashdot or, $deity help us, usenet?
You don't have to disprove them all. Otherwise you'd have to prove that dew isn't formed by sad elves with green jackets crying on the lawn. Or elves with red jackets. Or gnomes with green jackets and red hats and only one leg ...
The range of hypotheses needing to be tested isn't infinite - it's informed by and based on the obsevation. Otherwise we'd be here all week.
I think they already do that, just not intentionally.
And was that the case?
If this, if that. If my aunt had wheels, she'd be a '57 Chevy.
Right ... these would be the same guys that like to eat great Britsh recipes while drinking fantastic American beer?
I kind of got the idea into my head that "Lenovo" sounds like a kind of shampoo, and now I can't get rid of it. Any suggestions?
They just found the gene for being a tard.