Yep, and letting someone like Pinterest or Facebook decide what is the truth sounds very legit. I can imagine the smoking is hazardous claims being shut down because the experts said that smoking was not harmful to your health. Just because some expert somewhere says it is safe, we are just supposed to believe them? Even when it comes out that it was not effective and the number of injuries caused by the vaccine is not actually counted, because that would make it look bad? Even when the experts themselves (Doctors telling us to take the vaccines) have no real expertise in the matter and are just repeating what someone else told them? It's turtles all the way down until you get to the poisons they want you to take.
Yes, but all of Einstein's clocks are light beam based. So he says that the speed of light is affected, and time is also. But the time he is measuring is only the time it takes for light beams to travel around in a clock. So it seems to be circular reasoning to me. If you build a clock that rotates, like when the perpendicular line from the base to the peak of Mount Everest rotates completely around the earth one time and points at the same star, it does not change due to gravity. In fact the base and the peak would be at different time speeds, even though it is one object.
In the end, I don't see how you can say light speed changes, so the change it light speed means time also changed. If the speed changed, then time didn't, or vice versa, you can't say one is caused by the other but the other causes the one also.
But, you seem to believe in a magical injection fairy. Same thing, other side of the coin. The stuff you are told is not the whole truth, but you believe it because it comes from your priests (doctors, scientists). You sweep the lies that have been exposed an unworthy, but keep on believing the new lies.
And yet, you want to tell other people what they are and are not allowed to do to their own bodies. I think you do not understand what owning someone means, since it seems you want to own everybody else.
It should also be a crime to state falsified hypothesis as a fact to force other people to risk their lives. The Herd Hypothesis is an untested hypothesis that has been shown in studies to not, in all actual reality, be a fact. So you want to use a false assumption as the basis for forcing others to possibly die or suffer harm. Lets kill the Jews and gays next, there are false reasons I'm sure you can come up with that it is better for society if we do that!
Only the company's claims would ever amount to 97% effectiveness. In the real world, once the lies are accounted for, it is closer to 45% effective. And the number of vaccine induced injuries are under reported by an order of magnitude. Once the truth is talked about freely and the pressure to vaccinate using lies and made up statistics are stopped, then people might start to believe the "experts" again.
Sprint did the same thing with a fake version of 4G that was actually using the 3G network. The old Samsung Epic I had would boot up with big 4G swirling text, but it was the same thing AT&T is doing now. Perhaps they are actually upset about them being copied.
You also don't hear about eggplant crime in those countries. That does not mean they don't have any crime though. Don't get tricked by fake statistics, and gun stats are one that are vastly faked left and right.
And exact words in the title don't find the movie you are looking for. Plenty of completely unrelated stuff shows up though. I had to use google to get the full title of an Amazon Prime made show to get their search to find it once I put the full title in. Parts of the title were not enough. I have seen this happen many times, their interface and search is that bad. Plus, there is nothing good to watch there just like the article says. Netflix is my goto for watching TV, Amazon Prime is a waste of space and I never even fire it up unless it is to actually rent something with real money.
Actually, it would seem you are the uninformed one here. I know what I have read about CRISPR in news articles. Have you read anything about how it works, or do you just think it is all sunshine and roses?
He participated in a company discussion. It was the snowflakes that leaked the memo out of the company that should have been fired. If someone asks you for your opinion, I guess you should not ever give it when you work for a company like that one.
The mere fact that Monsanto does not allow scientific studies on their GMO's is quite a damning fact also. How can anyone be well informed when the only information we can get is from a biased source.
I am starting to think that the scientists in this study are the ones suffering from the Dunning–Kruger effect. They know a lot about the scientific method, so they end up thinking they know more than they do. Such as why people are opposed to GM, or why it must be safe even when the priorities of the corporation creating it are skewed.
Yes, we aren't insects. But you seem to forget that there is more bacteria in us than there is us in us. If you choose to eat a food that kills bacteria very effectively, but doesn't hurt human cells. you can still end up harmed because your gut biome has been destroyed. Of course Monsanto knows what their product does, they just don't want you to know what it does.
GMOs are generally considered indistinguishable when digested by the target animal from the non-GMO product. So, you eat GMO corn, and your body won't be able to tell it from non-GMO corn.
Except that the livestock fed GMO food have a higher rate of miscarriage. I guess it isn't in an official study since nobody is allowed to do studies on Roundup.
Only if you believe the lies told by Monsanto and the news media. The truth is that the genes that get spliced in are not accurately controlled and many trials are needed before the get one that worked out the way they wanted.
AI researchers are too close to the problem. If you are at the cutting edge of X, and have tried and failed to solve X a thousand times, naturally you see X as unsolvable. But step back. Some other guy is bypassing it. Decade by decade, machines are getting better at doing stuff. Eventually they WILL either get our abilities, or make our unique skills irrelevant
Except, I heard that all the improvements in AI capabilities has come about from CPU improvements. The computers are more powerful, so the same AI we had 50 years ago can do more now. But there has been no real improvements to the AI algorithms itself. So, when computer power hits a plateau, so does the strength and capabilities of AI. So maybe the researchers who are close to the problem actually know what they are saying.
Plus, using sunscreen all the time ignores the effect the chemicals in the sunscreen can cause. Some of them are cancer causing also, so block the sun so you don't get cancer, but end up with cancer anyway because you used too much sunscreen! Catch-22 anyone?
Just for everyone's info, this AC is wrong and an idiot. I see farmland being made into residential suburbs all the time where I live. Once it is converted, it ain't coming back to farmland again. And we are talking prime prairie land too.
But we have food. Too much actually. In all my long years Iâ(TM)ve never seen a food shortage.
Perhaps that is because after the last food shortage, the government implemented the subsidies to ensure that farmer's don't go out of business trying to sell stuff at below value. So the very thing you are complaining about is what prevents another food shortage.
That is like asking if a note pad is not relevant. It's a tool that you can use how you want. Perhaps you are using it wrong, so it has no value to you anymore. I don't do social media, no Facebook account or that stuff. I do use Linkedin to keep track of people who I have worked with. I don't add "friends" or recruiters, or message people or anything else. I just make a list of the people who I know. I was told that networking was important, but I don't find that easy. And trying to remember all the people that I have known in the past using contacts, a text file, Excel, etc. would be harder and less accurate. It works for keeping track of people you know, that's it, that's what it is good at.
The laws of supply and demand don't apply anymore. Can you actually buy what you want? What you want can probably not even be built because some corporation holds a patent hostage
I disagree - the laws of supply and demand still apply. You can buy whatever you want, but due to lack of demand, what you want may be really expensive - If you really want it, you can buy the patents, maybe buy some politicians, and pay to have what you want produced.
so you have to instead buy their inferior, spyware riddled crap
Demand isn't about what you (or I) individually want to buy, it's about what the market as a whole wants to buy. You may not want to by spyware riddled crap, but spyware riddled crap sells well because most people (the market) don't care about the spyware and most people find that the lower price (as enabled by the presence of the spyware) is preferable to paying a higher price for a product without the spyware. If enough people want to purchase and are willing to pay for systems without spyware, systems without spyware will be produced.
Or did some soda corporation decide that it's not in their interest to offer the flavor you want and they bully the local cornerstore into not offering any competing sodas if they want to get the discount they need to stay competitive?
Perhaps the soda flavors that are available are the flavors that the majority of people want to buy? Granted soda manufacturers advertise to generate demand and sway consumer opinion, but if enough people wanted a particular flavor, those people could pay to advertise as well.
I agree that it sucks to be in the minority on the demand side, because it means that I can't buy what I would like to at a reasonable price, but that doesn't mean that supply and demand is dead, it means that it is alive and well.
To me, it looks like you missed the point. Yes, the soda flavors we want are made and sold. I like Mountain Dew. Why is it that I can't get Mountain Dew at McDonnalds? Is it because McDonnalds customers don't, in general, want Pepsi products? No! It is because of back-room contracts that disallow McDonnalds from selling competitors products. Or when Microsoft forced the computer makers to sell everything with Windows or they would be breach of contract. That is inherently against the free market.
Plus, capitalism is based on an informed purchaser. When the malware and spyware is bundled into the computer, do people really understand what they are buying, or are they un-informed?
yet another reason to use ISO 8601 date formats, no one is confused if you say 2001-09-11
How did that help? It is still between the month being 9 or 11.
I use the military style. 11 SEP 2001. No confusion at all possible. All months are three letter abbreviation.
And that is $75 every couple of years just from batteries that loose their charge capability. All rechargeable batteries degrade over time. A wire doesn't.
The products that Apple makes have always struck me as overpriced and unprofessional
Especially how most of the iPhones I see people using have cracked screens. If you make such a pretty object so fragile that they are often broken but still being used because it's too expensive to fix, then that beautiful image you are trying to portray is just ruined. Apple phones look like crap because they are most often cracked.
Slashdot Mirror
Yep, and letting someone like Pinterest or Facebook decide what is the truth sounds very legit. I can imagine the smoking is hazardous claims being shut down because the experts said that smoking was not harmful to your health. Just because some expert somewhere says it is safe, we are just supposed to believe them? Even when it comes out that it was not effective and the number of injuries caused by the vaccine is not actually counted, because that would make it look bad? Even when the experts themselves (Doctors telling us to take the vaccines) have no real expertise in the matter and are just repeating what someone else told them? It's turtles all the way down until you get to the poisons they want you to take.
Yes, but all of Einstein's clocks are light beam based. So he says that the speed of light is affected, and time is also. But the time he is measuring is only the time it takes for light beams to travel around in a clock. So it seems to be circular reasoning to me. If you build a clock that rotates, like when the perpendicular line from the base to the peak of Mount Everest rotates completely around the earth one time and points at the same star, it does not change due to gravity. In fact the base and the peak would be at different time speeds, even though it is one object.
In the end, I don't see how you can say light speed changes, so the change it light speed means time also changed. If the speed changed, then time didn't, or vice versa, you can't say one is caused by the other but the other causes the one also.
But, you seem to believe in a magical injection fairy. Same thing, other side of the coin. The stuff you are told is not the whole truth, but you believe it because it comes from your priests (doctors, scientists). You sweep the lies that have been exposed an unworthy, but keep on believing the new lies.
And yet, you want to tell other people what they are and are not allowed to do to their own bodies. I think you do not understand what owning someone means, since it seems you want to own everybody else.
It should also be a crime to state falsified hypothesis as a fact to force other people to risk their lives. The Herd Hypothesis is an untested hypothesis that has been shown in studies to not, in all actual reality, be a fact. So you want to use a false assumption as the basis for forcing others to possibly die or suffer harm. Lets kill the Jews and gays next, there are false reasons I'm sure you can come up with that it is better for society if we do that!
Only the company's claims would ever amount to 97% effectiveness. In the real world, once the lies are accounted for, it is closer to 45% effective. And the number of vaccine induced injuries are under reported by an order of magnitude. Once the truth is talked about freely and the pressure to vaccinate using lies and made up statistics are stopped, then people might start to believe the "experts" again.
Sprint did the same thing with a fake version of 4G that was actually using the 3G network. The old Samsung Epic I had would boot up with big 4G swirling text, but it was the same thing AT&T is doing now. Perhaps they are actually upset about them being copied.
You also don't hear about eggplant crime in those countries. That does not mean they don't have any crime though. Don't get tricked by fake statistics, and gun stats are one that are vastly faked left and right.
And exact words in the title don't find the movie you are looking for. Plenty of completely unrelated stuff shows up though. I had to use google to get the full title of an Amazon Prime made show to get their search to find it once I put the full title in. Parts of the title were not enough. I have seen this happen many times, their interface and search is that bad. Plus, there is nothing good to watch there just like the article says. Netflix is my goto for watching TV, Amazon Prime is a waste of space and I never even fire it up unless it is to actually rent something with real money.
Actually, it would seem you are the uninformed one here. I know what I have read about CRISPR in news articles. Have you read anything about how it works, or do you just think it is all sunshine and roses?
He participated in a company discussion. It was the snowflakes that leaked the memo out of the company that should have been fired. If someone asks you for your opinion, I guess you should not ever give it when you work for a company like that one.
The mere fact that Monsanto does not allow scientific studies on their GMO's is quite a damning fact also. How can anyone be well informed when the only information we can get is from a biased source.
I am starting to think that the scientists in this study are the ones suffering from the Dunning–Kruger effect. They know a lot about the scientific method, so they end up thinking they know more than they do. Such as why people are opposed to GM, or why it must be safe even when the priorities of the corporation creating it are skewed.
Yes, we aren't insects. But you seem to forget that there is more bacteria in us than there is us in us. If you choose to eat a food that kills bacteria very effectively, but doesn't hurt human cells. you can still end up harmed because your gut biome has been destroyed. Of course Monsanto knows what their product does, they just don't want you to know what it does.
GMOs are generally considered indistinguishable when digested by the target animal from the non-GMO product. So, you eat GMO corn, and your body won't be able to tell it from non-GMO corn.
Except that the livestock fed GMO food have a higher rate of miscarriage. I guess it isn't in an official study since nobody is allowed to do studies on Roundup.
Only if you believe the lies told by Monsanto and the news media. The truth is that the genes that get spliced in are not accurately controlled and many trials are needed before the get one that worked out the way they wanted.
AI researchers are too close to the problem. If you are at the cutting edge of X, and have tried and failed to solve X a thousand times, naturally you see X as unsolvable. But step back. Some other guy is bypassing it. Decade by decade, machines are getting better at doing stuff. Eventually they WILL either get our abilities, or make our unique skills irrelevant
Except, I heard that all the improvements in AI capabilities has come about from CPU improvements. The computers are more powerful, so the same AI we had 50 years ago can do more now. But there has been no real improvements to the AI algorithms itself. So, when computer power hits a plateau, so does the strength and capabilities of AI. So maybe the researchers who are close to the problem actually know what they are saying.
Plus, using sunscreen all the time ignores the effect the chemicals in the sunscreen can cause. Some of them are cancer causing also, so block the sun so you don't get cancer, but end up with cancer anyway because you used too much sunscreen! Catch-22 anyone?
Just for everyone's info, this AC is wrong and an idiot. I see farmland being made into residential suburbs all the time where I live. Once it is converted, it ain't coming back to farmland again. And we are talking prime prairie land too.
But we have food. Too much actually. In all my long years Iâ(TM)ve never seen a food shortage.
Perhaps that is because after the last food shortage, the government implemented the subsidies to ensure that farmer's don't go out of business trying to sell stuff at below value. So the very thing you are complaining about is what prevents another food shortage.
That is like asking if a note pad is not relevant. It's a tool that you can use how you want. Perhaps you are using it wrong, so it has no value to you anymore. I don't do social media, no Facebook account or that stuff. I do use Linkedin to keep track of people who I have worked with. I don't add "friends" or recruiters, or message people or anything else. I just make a list of the people who I know. I was told that networking was important, but I don't find that easy. And trying to remember all the people that I have known in the past using contacts, a text file, Excel, etc. would be harder and less accurate. It works for keeping track of people you know, that's it, that's what it is good at.
The laws of supply and demand don't apply anymore. Can you actually buy what you want? What you want can probably not even be built because some corporation holds a patent hostage
I disagree - the laws of supply and demand still apply. You can buy whatever you want, but due to lack of demand, what you want may be really expensive - If you really want it, you can buy the patents, maybe buy some politicians, and pay to have what you want produced.
so you have to instead buy their inferior, spyware riddled crap
Demand isn't about what you (or I) individually want to buy, it's about what the market as a whole wants to buy. You may not want to by spyware riddled crap, but spyware riddled crap sells well because most people (the market) don't care about the spyware and most people find that the lower price (as enabled by the presence of the spyware) is preferable to paying a higher price for a product without the spyware. If enough people want to purchase and are willing to pay for systems without spyware, systems without spyware will be produced.
Or did some soda corporation decide that it's not in their interest to offer the flavor you want and they bully the local cornerstore into not offering any competing sodas if they want to get the discount they need to stay competitive?
Perhaps the soda flavors that are available are the flavors that the majority of people want to buy? Granted soda manufacturers advertise to generate demand and sway consumer opinion, but if enough people wanted a particular flavor, those people could pay to advertise as well. I agree that it sucks to be in the minority on the demand side, because it means that I can't buy what I would like to at a reasonable price, but that doesn't mean that supply and demand is dead, it means that it is alive and well.
To me, it looks like you missed the point. Yes, the soda flavors we want are made and sold. I like Mountain Dew. Why is it that I can't get Mountain Dew at McDonnalds? Is it because McDonnalds customers don't, in general, want Pepsi products? No! It is because of back-room contracts that disallow McDonnalds from selling competitors products. Or when Microsoft forced the computer makers to sell everything with Windows or they would be breach of contract. That is inherently against the free market.
Plus, capitalism is based on an informed purchaser. When the malware and spyware is bundled into the computer, do people really understand what they are buying, or are they un-informed?
yet another reason to use ISO 8601 date formats, no one is confused if you say 2001-09-11
How did that help? It is still between the month being 9 or 11. I use the military style. 11 SEP 2001. No confusion at all possible. All months are three letter abbreviation.
And that is $75 every couple of years just from batteries that loose their charge capability. All rechargeable batteries degrade over time. A wire doesn't.
The products that Apple makes have always struck me as overpriced and unprofessional
Especially how most of the iPhones I see people using have cracked screens. If you make such a pretty object so fragile that they are often broken but still being used because it's too expensive to fix, then that beautiful image you are trying to portray is just ruined. Apple phones look like crap because they are most often cracked.