With version 9, IE will also support open standards nicely.
That's quite an assertion - unless by "nicely" you mean "barely", "feebly" or "tortuously". Given the fantastic history of standard compliance in Microsoft Internet Explorer, you'll forgive me if I don't hold my breath.
I think you are seriously underestimating the global mortality rate among tobacco users. It was about 3 million in 1990 and is likely to be even higher today.
Except that this occured in the United Kingdom where failure to disclose the passphrase is an imprisonable offence with an unlimited tariff (it's in the terrorism legislation). So no, don't try that one.
I have a lot of time for Paul Vixie, but in this particular case he has come up with a bad idea. This should absolutely not be handled in DNS. There are plenty of reputation-based schemes already in operation for per-protocol black or white listing which work as well (and as badly) as any such scheme can do. There is no need to drag it down to the core, polluting DNS with yet more protocol shenanigans as we do so.
DNS was always a simple protocol which did one job and did it well. Please stop trying to expand it to solve problems which have already been solved (by those who wish to do so) elsewhere.
For the first time in human history technological progress will be effectively shaped and limited by the concerted actions of big corporate interests and a political power scared of the populace they pretend to serve.
First time? Dude, where have you been for the last 10,000 years?
Browsers? They shouldn't care about DNSSEC either way, all of that should be handled by the local resolver. To be fair I'm presuming here that you mean web browsers as opposed to say DNS browsers.
All it requires is for someone with stacks of time and money to take a look at the SCO corporate profile and sue them on the basis that just about everything written on that page is a lie.
I mean, does anyone really think that SCO is a "leading provider of software technology", or that their "highly innovative and reliable solutions help millions of customers grow their businesses everyday". As we have just seen, "SCO owns all rights and ownership of the core UNIX operating system source code" is about as untrue as it is possible to get. As a bonus, such a legal action would certainly conclude faster than the 7 years this has been going on.
It won't surprise you to learn that Dr. Gasson's Lab at Whiteknights is only a few miles from Mr. Geller's residence in Sonning. If you want to find out what other idiocy the cybernetics department of the University of Reading have been up to, do a quick search for "Kevin Warwick".
Past performance would suggest so. However, it's enlightening to note that yet again Microsoft (and Apple for that matter) really hate other people's proprietary monopolies. I'm only really worried about how they're going to ruin HTML5 as a result of this (whether deliberately or accidentally).
Slashdot Mirror
... tell him he owes me a new irony meter.
Er, in what way do you suppose the solar wind is "renewable"?
I guess the folks with whom you communicate don't have voicemail, then.
xpdf.
Probably the Death Star since it's quite a bit bigger than an X-wing.
Oh, wait.
At last we are shown the Facebook business model. Who knew there were so many people to sue?
With version 9, IE will also support open standards nicely.
That's quite an assertion - unless by "nicely" you mean "barely", "feebly" or "tortuously". Given the fantastic history of standard compliance in Microsoft Internet Explorer, you'll forgive me if I don't hold my breath.
So, you've been to a recording of Jeremy Kyle, then? How was it?
I think you are seriously underestimating the global mortality rate among tobacco users. It was about 3 million in 1990 and is likely to be even higher today.
I think they mean "wirelessless". Note wirelessless != wired.
Except that this occured in the United Kingdom where failure to disclose the passphrase is an imprisonable offence with an unlimited tariff (it's in the terrorism legislation). So no, don't try that one.
I have a lot of time for Paul Vixie, but in this particular case he has come up with a bad idea. This should absolutely not be handled in DNS. There are plenty of reputation-based schemes already in operation for per-protocol black or white listing which work as well (and as badly) as any such scheme can do. There is no need to drag it down to the core, polluting DNS with yet more protocol shenanigans as we do so.
DNS was always a simple protocol which did one job and did it well. Please stop trying to expand it to solve problems which have already been solved (by those who wish to do so) elsewhere.
Standard-conformant XHTML 1.1 would be fine, thanks (and use less bandwidth, and be easier to fill in, and work on a character-cell terminal).
For the first time in human history technological progress will be effectively shaped and limited by the concerted actions of big corporate interests and a political power scared of the populace they pretend to serve.
First time? Dude, where have you been for the last 10,000 years?
True, but it winds up Adobe even more when you say you photoshopped it with GIMP.
Browsers? They shouldn't care about DNSSEC either way, all of that should be handled by the local resolver. To be fair I'm presuming here that you mean web browsers as opposed to say DNS browsers.
All it requires is for someone with stacks of time and money to take a look at the SCO corporate profile and sue them on the basis that just about everything written on that page is a lie.
I mean, does anyone really think that SCO is a "leading provider of software technology", or that their "highly innovative and reliable solutions help millions of customers grow their businesses everyday". As we have just seen, "SCO owns all rights and ownership of the core UNIX operating system source code" is about as untrue as it is possible to get. As a bonus, such a legal action would certainly conclude faster than the 7 years this has been going on.
It isn't hijacking if the previous owners let it lapse, it's just recycling.
It won't surprise you to learn that Dr. Gasson's Lab at Whiteknights is only a few miles from Mr. Geller's residence in Sonning. If you want to find out what other idiocy the cybernetics department of the University of Reading have been up to, do a quick search for "Kevin Warwick".
Past performance would suggest so. However, it's enlightening to note that yet again Microsoft (and Apple for that matter) really hate other people's proprietary monopolies. I'm only really worried about how they're going to ruin HTML5 as a result of this (whether deliberately or accidentally).
We have an abbreviation for that: it is "https".
The tune is monotonous, the rendition was monophonic. Not sure which the OP meant.
Hmmm. Would you care to explain what you think it is that CentOS would give you that RHEL doesn't?
s/Apple/Adobe/;
Run a search on Bing
It's always good to have a genuinely laughter-inducing moment before the end of the day. Thanks for this.