Slashdot Mirror


15 Years of Microsoft Bob

harrymcc writes "Microsoft Bob — still synonymous in the tech industry with 'embarrassing flop' — shipped fifteen years ago this week, on March 31st, 1995. When the Windows interface featuring animated cartoon helpers was announced, it was hyped to the heavens and briefly accepted as a breakthrough that showed where software was going. Instead, dismal reviews and poor sales killed it after only a year on the market. At Technologizer, we're marking the anniversary with a complete look at how it came to be and why it failed so resoundingly — and how Microsoft tried again with Office's 'Clippy' and other attempts to revive the basic idea."

191 comments

  1. Oh great... by sixteenraisins · · Score: 4, Funny

    And to think, I was *this* close to actually forgetting about this miserable piece of shit.

    Thanks, Slashdot. \:

    --
    When you're not looking, this sig is in Latin.
    1. Re:Oh great... by piripiri · · Score: 3, Informative

      There you are, take some screenies in your face.

    2. Re:Oh great... by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Probably would have succeeded if it had been released during the Windows 3 years. Believe it or not, I think BOB was superior to that piece'o'crap.

      Then again, what wasn't better than Windows 3? MacOS System 6/7 or Amiga Workbench were both better. Hell even Commodore=64's GEOS was better.

      "I minimized my Word doc, and now I can't find it. Where'd it go?" - "It's behind the program manager." - "Grrrr."

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    3. Re:Oh great... by c++0xFF · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How long must keep bringing up such a miserable piece of junk and humiliating Microsoft?

      Forever. And often. They need some humility.

      We should do the same for other companies -- Apple needs some humility, too.

    4. Re:Oh great... by edittard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It looks like you're trying to get a first post. Would you like me to:

      * Help you with a template

      * Waste your time so you fail it

      * Just bugger off

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    5. Re:Oh great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 3.1 and Central Point PCTools desktop. Perfect match.

      The shortcut on the desktop was removed when you kill the original. Even Windows 7 still doesn't do it...

      Did I mentionned OS/2 had it too... ?

    6. Re:Oh great... by Aklyon · · Score: 1

      only some humility? Both need to be smacked down off their respective high horses, to start. not just that miniscule amount of humility you call 'some'.

      --
      I reserve the right to have a physical object so I can sell it later, and recover my money.
    7. Re:Oh great... by jellomizer · · Score: 0

      Apple needs some humility, too.
      Like the..
      Newton,
      Apple ]I[,
      iTV...

      Apple has plenty of screw ups.

      I think Linux zealots really need some humility far more then Apple or Microsoft ever does.

      Any failure on their part they will blame...
      Stupid Users, Closed Source Drivers, Microsoft Evil All powerful dominance, Hardware manufactures, the Government of X state/country.... All but the fact that in a lot of areas linux is pathetically lacking.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:Oh great... by FrankHS · · Score: 1

      I preferred DOS and Desqview to windows 3.1.

    9. Re:Oh great... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did I mentionned[sic] OS/2 had it too... ?

      No, but you might remember that OS/2 was only half of an operating system. ;-)

    10. Re:Oh great... by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      I still have both of my copies. One I turned into a clock. That face with glasses was perfect for a clock face. The other, I'm not sure where it is.....probably in a box somewhere.

    11. Re:Oh great... by uassholes · · Score: 1

      I guess whatever it's "pathetically lacking" I don't need. I had never heard of Microsoft Boob until recently because in 1995 up to the present I've been using Unix and Linux because of what "Windows" was pathetically lacking, and still is.

      To each their own.

    12. Re:Oh great... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      It WAS released during the (very end of) the Windows 3.1 years.

      Windows 95 came out in August, 1995.

    13. Re:Oh great... by Belial6 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So, who should be humiliated? Bill , who got to spend the proportional equivalent money on Bob as you would for a Big Mac, and got to bang the Unit Manager?

      Or Malinda, who used it as part of a successful step in sleep her way to being one of the richest people in the world?

    14. Re:Oh great... by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But to be fair (and I hate to even seem to be nice to BOB, as I'm old enough to have given it a spin and boy did it suck) it was 1994 folks, and lots of tech did sucketh back then. And at least it wasn't as bad as driveby Comet Cursors or those damned Geocities pages that would drag shit behind you cursor and turn your PC into a slideshow.

      But if you want to rag MSFT there are a lot worse fuck ups to point out, such as WinME (the only OS that could make win98SE look rock solid) or Vista (you seem to want to smack me: cancel or allow?) or the RRoD (have friends working on their 3rd and 4th x360s) instead of bringing up an OS from the age of dinosaurs.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    15. Re:Oh great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple needs some humility, too. Like the.. Newton, Apple ]I[, iTV...

      Apple has plenty of screw ups.

      I think Linux zealots really need some humility far more then Apple or Microsoft ever does.

      Any failure on their part they will blame... Stupid Users, Closed Source Drivers, Microsoft Evil All powerful dominance, Hardware manufactures, the Government of X state/country.... All but the fact that in a lot of areas linux is pathetically lacking.

      What a troll you are.
      You couldn't find any fitting situation for Linux and jumped to attacking its users.

    16. Re:Oh great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok here is an Apple one.... eWorld! or PPC clones

    17. Re:Oh great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest iPod for Apple.

      "No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.".

    18. Re:Oh great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again, what wasn't better than Windows 3?

      Um... Windows 2 and 1?

      Of course if it's 3.1x, you can fix it with Calmira. Go ahead and laugh, but it helped me get the last life out of a 486 Thinkpad with only 8mb. If there'd been a 16bit browser that could handle CSS, I'd have kept it for even longer.

    19. Re:Oh great... by MillenneumMan · · Score: 1

      Egad that is harsh. Of course, being married 16 years and being parents to three kids doesn't automatically qualify them as a successful marriage but at this point I would think you could assume that their motivations for a relationship went much further than getting laid.

    20. Re:Oh great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long must keep bringing up such a miserable piece of junk and humiliating Microsoft?

      For as long as its annoying dog remains in the Windows file search

    21. Re:Oh great... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Harsh? Yes. Unfair? Maybe.

      To be fair though, I would say that more marriages than not start out with trying to get laid, and then move beyond that. That includes the 16 year marriage.

    22. Re:Oh great... by HenryKoren · · Score: 1

      "those who forget the lessons of the past are doomed to relive it"

    23. Re:Oh great... by R3coiler · · Score: 1

      You mean Slashdot's Idle section?

    24. Re:Oh great... by bonch · · Score: 1

      Apple went through over a decade of being told it was dying. I think it's earned some arrogance to come this far in spite of naysayers who were still active as recently as five years ago.

    25. Re:Oh great... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Apple is in the boat of undead companies. They had a success that got them so much cash reserves that they wont really ever die. Microsoft is also in this same catigory as well as many other tech companies from the 80s and 90s.

      As it stands Apple can pay everyone on its staff, rent and standard expenses just with the interest it makes on it's cash reserves. Any successful product is just a bonus.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    26. Re:Oh great... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Well, as KDE and Gnome are even further down the imitation chain than MS, it will certainly “please” you, that we will soon see GBob and KBob, presented as the latest and greatest from their teams. ^^

      (I love Linux, but I hate its desktop environments. Because: Go find me a single feature that is not either an imitation of MS [which itself obviously is an imitation of the original, good idea], with a highlight on the worst ideas [example: single-click-interface!], or even worse. I still can’t find one...)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    27. Re:Oh great... by ailnlv · · Score: 1

      you just lost the game

    28. Re:Oh great... by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      How long must keep bringing up such a miserable piece of junk and humiliating Microsoft?

      Forever. And often. They need some humility.

      We should do the same for other companies -- Apple needs some humility, too.

      yeah but you dont get half the mod points...

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    29. Re:Oh great... by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      grrr I clicked "just bugger off" and the popup just kept coming back again!

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    30. Re:Oh great... by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      I'm terribly sorry that KDE and GNOME are attempting to cater to the majority. I shall get them to cease all work immediately and instead focusing on pleasing you. just you.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    31. Re:Oh great... by rueger · · Score: 1

      Windows 3.1 and Central Point PCTools desktop. Perfect match.

      Sad to think that CP Tools eventually came to be that great bloated mess that is Norton Super Mega Ultimate Anti-Everything Utilities Suite.

    32. Re:Oh great... by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      You insensitive clod, I ran a WinME installation that /was/ rock solid (I only had to reboot about once a month and never had to reinstall in the two years I ran it).

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    33. Re:Oh great... by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      You sir (or ma'am) need to be modded +5 funny (:

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    34. Re:Oh great... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I can actually tell you why you were able to do that, when so many (like myself) wanted to gouge our eyes out to escape the pain...WDM drivers. You see if you ran WinME with WDM and ONLY WDM drivers? it was VERY stable. in fact I have a customer that is STILL running it for an old copy of Xres and it is solid as a rock.

      Sadly what happened IRL was that most folks who got an OEM WinME box ended up with a hodge podge mix of WDM and VxD drivers, and that road led to mucho badness. My machine, which BTW is sitting in a closet waiting on a new funky HP PSU after a decade of solid service running Win2K, was so reliable in its BSODs that you could actually set your watch by it. 4 minutes after getting to desktop it would BSOD every. single . time., no matter if you launched programs or not.

      but in the end you were one of the lucky ones to have all WDM or VxD drivers (VxDs would work, just not as stable, as long as you did NOT mix them with WDMs!) whereas thanks to cheap OEMs refusing to pay to have drivers rewritten most of us got to experience Windows Mistake Edition and believe me it was NO fun!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    35. Re:Oh great... by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Coolness (:

      The only reason I stopped running it is because I wanted to upgrade to the next version (which I couldn't, wound up getting a better computer and getting a "better" version of Windows, then ran back into the waiting arms of Linux).

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  2. First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Leave BOB alone, you meanies!

  3. Bob Who? by Bob_Who · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...Oh yeah. I always wondered what the heck everyone was talking about.....

    1. Re:Bob Who? by catd77 · · Score: 1

      Are you sure your actually a nerd?

    2. Re:Bob Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow - That was a huge WHOOSH.

    3. Re:Bob Who? by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      I didn't know about Bob until a few years ago, and I was around during the Windows 3 days. However, I was a wee lad at the time, and my family never had the latest and greatest, so we ended up skipping straight to 95/98 after Win 3.1.

      Most of my problems involved cursing Compaq (those computers were shit, but cheap) and trying not to get caught downloading internet porn over a 33.6k modem. Net Nanny was super easy to get around, CyberSitter was much tougher.

      Ah goodness, the days when a 50mb game demo would take 6 hours to download. Nostalgia galore.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    4. Re:Bob Who? by socceroos · · Score: 1

      50Mb game!!?!??! 6 hours?!?!?!??!!!!11ELEVEN!!!11

      When I grew up, downloading a 5mb game took 20-36 hours. You had to hope and pray that the download wasn't interrupted in any way. It invariably was...

  4. Hey by kiehlster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I enjoyed Microsoft Bob very much, as a child. The post-modern room was amazing. I spent hours playing around with that program, so it has sentimental value to me you insensitive clod.

    1. Re:Hey by istartedi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, that pretty much sums it up. You enjoyed it as a kid. Trouble is, it was marked to adults.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    2. Re:Hey by Stargoat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have several adult users who would have loved to have Microsoft Bob. As it was, there was very cranky people well I changed to Office 2007 and they lost their Paperclips or Kitty Cat or whatever the heck they had. These cranky people are not knuckleheads, but rather accountants, loan officers, and other people who like a touchy-feely PC.

      The problem is not that Microsoft Bob was marketed to adults, but rather it is IT guys who buy software for organizations. A PC is a tool and like all tools, works best with the fewest necessary peripheries. IT guys recognize this. They have no use for Bob and they feel (perhaps rightly) that their users should have no use for Bob and Bob like programs bring no real value.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    3. Re:Hey by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Funny

      These cranky people are not knuckleheads, but rather accountants

      You and I have wildly diverging opinions of accountants...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:Hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I remember correctly, Ibelieve Packard bell had something similar. It was a multi room house. The den had a dictionary, encyclopedia, thesaurus, etc. The living room had a few games, etc. I liked it, if only you could add more stuff to it easily.

    5. Re:Hey by Stargoat · · Score: 1

      These cranky people are not knuckleheads, but rather accountants

      You and I have wildly diverging opinions of accountants...

      If that's the case, where do you classify HR workers?

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    6. Re:Hey by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      These cranky people are not knuckleheads, but rather accountants

      You and I have wildly diverging opinions of accountants...

      If that's the case, where do you classify HR workers?

      Accountants of humans are more despicable than regular accountants because they inflict their accounting on a "personnel" level ;-)

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    7. Re:Hey by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      If that's the case, where do you classify HR workers?

      I've never met one that wasn't a moron. Some were nice, most were in the 'think they're all powerful, but don't know how to check email' group of morons. They always need a week of training to do a search in Peoplesoft. They always needed 2 hours of voicemail training, the idiot sheet, and would still call on how to change their outgoing message. They always needed written & verbal instructions (twice) on how to do a save as to rtf so that those without Word could open their files.

      Morons.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    8. Re:Hey by westlake · · Score: 1

      A PC is a tool and like all tools, works best with the fewest necessary peripheries. IT guys recognize this. They have no use for Bob and they feel (perhaps rightly) that their users should have no use for Bob and Bob like programs bring no real value.

      A tool works best when it is designed for its users.

      The user who found value in BOB or Clippy was not the geek in IT - and not the poster to Slashdot.

      He won't be attracted to the GIMP by its name or its GUI - whatever horsepower is to found underneath.

      But he will find a welcoming environment in Second Life - and may just discover that his college or university has an outpost there: Academic Organizations in Second Life.

    9. Re:Hey by dcollins · · Score: 1

      It looks like you're trying to write an English-language forum post. Would you like me to:

      * Change "marked" to "marketed"?

      * Change "For all intensive purposes" to "For all intents and purposes"?

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    10. Re:Hey by Matrix14 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, Bob was pretty cool when I was a child. I used to spend hours arranging things in imaginary rooms.

      Now I code.

    11. Re:Hey by istartedi · · Score: 1

      The former. Neither spellcheck nor my hasty eyes would catch "marked" since it's a perfectly cromulent word. I plainly meant "marketed".

      This leads to the question, "Does Clippy really know everything about grammar?".

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    12. Re:Hey by einhverfr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Looking at the screenshots, I think there were some fairly cool ideas in Bob which the industry could learn from. Like many MS products thought I can say "Great ideas! Terrible Implementations!"

      I particularly like the way it seems to have been designed to mimic paper-and-pen methods for doing things. Even if the approach was childish and gimicky, it looks like some of the basic UI decisions were in the right direction, if implemented badly.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    13. Re:Hey by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Just to note: That was to describe some of the apps. Navigating around the system seems poorly thought out....

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    14. Re:Hey by mrboyd · · Score: 1

      I'm more annoyed by the fact that when we request a specific profile they always screw up the selection.

      >> We didn't send you the CV of the ex NASA lunar lander rocket designer because he didn't have word and excel on his CV. You need a technical profile right? So let me do my job and call this guy who sold his bakery six month ago but he has made his own website and the shape of his C and D indicate that he's a strong team player.

    15. Re:Hey by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you weren't playing The Sims?

      Here's a quick way to tell: If you saw something catch on fire, it was probably The Sims, unless somebody else tried to use Bob, and smashed a whiskey bottle over the monitor out of frustration.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    16. Re:Hey by dcollins · · Score: 1
      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    17. Re:Hey by Bill+Dog · · Score: 1

      Screenshot(s)

      I actually liked the 3rd one there. Maybe because I worked on it back in the day. With Simply Village you could just sit and watch the virtual people come and go and the birds flying around and veg.

      --
      Attention zealots and haters: 00100 00100
  5. Quotes? by globalsnake · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So anyone no if the quote is by the local handlers, or is it the torture of the day? Makes you feel nice and warm inside these saves get paid to torture american citizens.

    1. Re:Quotes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but this is slashdot. No one no's (noes?) anything here.

  6. it failed because it's bullshit technology by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bullshit technology is defined as tech that appears to be doing something useful but you end up wasting more time with it than you'd ever save.

    BOB is bullshit technology. Voice recognition for the longest time has been bullshit. It's rapidly becoming more useful. Blackberries and the like for business needs can be useful but often becomes bullshit technology when people use them ineffectively.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:it failed because it's bullshit technology by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bob's just a ripoff of Magic Cap. Once again, Microsoft with embrace, extend, extinguish.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    2. Re:it failed because it's bullshit technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      tech that appears to be doing something useful but you end up wasting more time with it than you'd ever save.

      Sounds like Slashdot.

    3. Re:it failed because it's bullshit technology by c++0xFF · · Score: 2, Funny

      Searching around I found Apple's Cyberdog a web browser with a similar (but not nearly so pervasive) interface.

      For once I'm grateful for the "extinguish" part of Microsoft's philosophy.

    4. Re:it failed because it's bullshit technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that depends on how you define useful. Just because you don't find something to be useful doesn't mean somebody else won't. Also, that seems like more of a problem with misuse of technology rather than useless technology. Not that I disagree with your assessment in this particular case.

    5. Re:it failed because it's bullshit technology by oldhack · · Score: 1

      "Bullshit technology is defined as tech that appears to be doing something useful but you end up wasting more time with it than you'd ever save."

      All of us who implemented status bar are guilty. Oh, you know it's true - it shoots from 0 - 99.999% in 2 second, and then hang for 5 minutes for the last bit.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    6. Re:it failed because it's bullshit technology by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      If I recall correctly, Cyberdog could have been what firefox became. A basic browser with a rich plugin base. Unfortunately, it came at Apple's nadir and no one built any plugins besides Apple.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    7. Re:it failed because it's bullshit technology by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      For once I'm grateful for the "extinguish" part of Microsoft's philosophy.

      I'll drink to that. For much of 1995 I was coding COBOL at a site with a number of Data Ganeral machines running AOS/VS2. At the time I thought this was purgatory (the COBOL part, anyway - Data General was actually OK) but screenshots I saw of Bob later made me want to puke.

    8. Re:it failed because it's bullshit technology by schon · · Score: 1

      Well, that depends on how you define useful. Just because you don't find something to be useful doesn't mean somebody else won't.

      No. Sometimes (such as is the case with Bob), use can be objective.

      As an example, Bob allowed you to protect your valuable files by requiring a user to type a login password.

      But being as it was supposed to be helpful and user-friendly, when logging in, if you typed the password incorrectly three times it assumed you had forgotten it and helpfully offered to change it for you.

    9. Re:it failed because it's bullshit technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I honestly thought that Microsoft at least produced original software even if it failed. We take it for granted that all of their successful software are ripoffs of competitor software. I still don't think I've heard of a precedent for Songsmith.

    10. Re:it failed because it's bullshit technology by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Cyberdog had some serious problems. It was based on OpenDoc, which made it a resource hog by the day's standards. Also, most absurdly, files saved from it couldn't be opened by non-OpenDoc apps. I actually liked Cyberdog back then, but thinking about those issues... good riddance!

    11. Re:it failed because it's bullshit technology by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > tech that appears to be doing something useful but
      > you end up wasting more time with it than you'd ever save.

      Oh, like PowerPoint.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  7. After Bob was cloned by genghisjahn · · Score: 2

    he (they) went on to a great career as a downsizing consultants. If you ever hear about a "meeting with the Bobs", better get your resume ready.

    --
    Sorry about the mess.
    1. Re:After Bob was cloned by toastar · · Score: 1

      he (they) went on to a great career as a downsizing consultants. If you ever hear about a "meeting with the Bobs", better get your resume ready.

      Pffttt...

      After Meeting the bob's I got a promotion!

    2. Re:After Bob was cloned by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      he (they) went on to a great career as a downsizing consultants. If you ever hear about a "meeting with the Bobs", better get your resume ready.

      Although in this case, the project manager of Bob was Melinda French--now known as Mrs. Bill Gates.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    3. Re:After Bob was cloned by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      I told those fudge-packers I liked Michael Bolton's music!

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    4. Re:After Bob was cloned by jhylkema · · Score: 1

      Although in this case, the project manager of Bob was Melinda French--now known as Mrs. Bill Gates.

      In other words, she stayed in on her back. Normally that dismal a failure causes a project manager to be shown the door, but because of who she was sleeping it, she could do no wrong.

    5. Re:After Bob was cloned by derinax · · Score: 1

      Although in this case, the project manager of Bob was Melinda French--now known as Mrs. Bill Gates.

      In other words, she stayed in on her back. Normally that dismal a failure causes a project manager to be shown the door, but because of who she was sleeping it, she could do no wrong.

      You nailed the one, single reason we're still talking about Bob. I recall she was also responsible for Microsoft's "Magic School Bus" properties as well, which weren't particularly successful either. She showed off Bob to the luminaries at the Allen and Company conference in '95, and I recall the deathly silence in the room.

      If this Slashdot article could be boiled down to one fact, this would be it.

  8. My Mom Liked Clippy by Petersko · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think the problem with Clippy was that he was ten years too early. If the little fellow was around today he wouldn't get nearly as much abuse. People are more used to the wizard idea now, and to being guided through tasks.

    Back then the average user was (I suspect) more technically knowledgeable - the PC as appliance wasn't entrenched. So everybody felt a little insulted when Clippy stuck his nose in their work.

    So yes, my mom liked Clippy. If you actually needed his help he was reasonably helpful.

    1. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by Threni · · Score: 1

      Also, he was never any help whatsoever. Nowadays the possibility exists for proper context sensitive help that actually works, rather than just clumsily taking you to a page in the static html help documentation based on the last word you typed or whatever.

    2. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by Deathlizard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree that it was ahead of it's time.

      If you could replace Clippy with Hatsume Miku, Japanese sales of Office would go through the roof.

    3. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the problem with Clippy was that he was ten years too early.

      It looks like you're trying to do some work, would you like me to interrupt?

      I had a college friend who called me in a panic once, she had a paper due the following day and Clippy had popped up and WOULD NOT GO AWAY. It completely prevented her from continuing with her work. I drove there, and found the option to get rid of that monstrosity buried in some deep menu so she could continue after that wasted hour... Clippy should have been the focus of a class-action lawsuit that would have put MS out of business as a warning to others, if there was any justice in the world.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem was a cost/benefit problem too. It required lots of HD space and good hardware to run. Back then HD space was at a premium and good hardware wasn't cheap. But what was the gain? Most people using computers back then didn't really need it. And it really didn't do a whole lot after all that. The wizards today are focused on doing what you need specifically at the moment. Bob was a wizard for the whole OS.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    5. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by Thorwak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It could tell you answers to really basic things (How do I print a document?), but more advanced questions usually gave an amusing answer at best. Still, I agree with the GP Clippy could be useful for the complete novice.

      The problem, if you ask me, was that the average PC was too slow at the time so the computer would almost freeze for several seconds and perhaps even swap parts of Office to disk. The frustration of this happening whenever "It looks like you're writing a letter" of course made most ppl hate the whole thing.

      Oh that reminds me :)
      Helpful Clippy

      --
      Connection closed by foreign host.
    6. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nonsense. Bob and Clippy and that annoying little dog are derided because they're so irritatingly, cloyingly, adorably cute. It's bad enough having your intelligence insulted by an obtrusive "wizard" that isn't, but the OMG PONIEZ!! aspect is just the last straw.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    7. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure people would hate Clippy just as much now. Microsoft and just about everyone else misdiagnosed the "Clippy Problem"--the problem wasn't the format (a little animated character) or what they were trying to do (wizards) it was that the software seemed to make its guesses about what you were doing completely at random and then inserted itself in the most annoying way possible. We wouldn't have minded an animated charater/wizard as long as it wasn't popping up like a Vibrant add shouting "I think you're typing a letter! Do you want help with that?"

      See this cartoon (youtube) for a perfect example of all that Clippy was.

      --
      Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    8. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the problem with Clippy was that he was ten years too early. If the little fellow was around today he wouldn't get nearly as much abuse. People are more used to the wizard idea now, and to being guided through tasks.

      Back then the average user was (I suspect) more technically knowledgeable - the PC as appliance wasn't entrenched. So everybody felt a little insulted when Clippy stuck his nose in their work.

      They're still not getting this stuff right. Last week I had to help someone from another department with a mail merge. Office 2007, oh joy. Now there's the usual problems with the wizard not seeing the data source from excel because it doesn't like characters used to name the worksheet or it wants/doesn't want to see a named range, that kind of thing. But the problem here is that the addresses wouldn't line up right in Word. The problem was that Word wanted the address in an invisible text box and it defaulted the address block outside of that box. So I had to go manually cut the address block, then click around on the screen until I highlighted the box, thus revealing it, and paste the block in. I can't even begin to fault my coworker for being stumped on this one. It's the kind of problem she shouldn't be encountering.

      I'll go back to the car analogy. Early cars were fussy and demanding. You either had to be a mechanic who enjoyed twiddling with them or hire a mechanic to twiddle it for you. Cars these days have gotten far more reliable. You take it in for maintenance when you're told to and the car won't suffer unexpected failures, they just frickin' work. You don't need to know about timing belts and spark plugs and carburetors vs fuel injection. You just have to have some common sense. Don't drive your car in loose sand. Don't drive through flooded streets. Don't take corners too sharply. People will still make these mistakes but it's not the fault of the car or the engineers.

      Software hasn't reached that point yet, not universally. Certainly there have been many improvements across the board. But there are still areas that are, frankly, embarrassing. Microsoft deserves a good portion of the blame simply because they are so huge and influential but they aren't alone.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    9. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by nmb3000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I had a college friend who called me in a panic once, she had a paper due the following day and Clippy had popped up and WOULD NOT GO AWAY.

      I have to say I find that unlikely considering that the Office assistant does not steal focus away from the program you're using and that moving it out of the way is as difficult as clicking and dragging it to the side of the screen. And the deep, secret menu to get rid of it? Right click and choose "Hide".

      Every time this topic comes up, it seems like the people most vehemently against Clippy and MS BOB were the people who never actually even saw or used them. They just see that it's fashionable to hate them and jump on board.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    10. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Nice made up story

      100% true and accurate. She had green eyes, too... *sigh*

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    11. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I had a college friend who called me in a panic once, she had a paper due the following day and Clippy had popped up and WOULD NOT GO AWAY.

      I have to say I find that unlikely considering that the Office assistant does not steal focus away from the program you're using and that moving it out of the way is as difficult as clicking and dragging it to the side of the screen.

      Couldn't type anymore, Clippy demanded something, I forget the details, but just closing him didn't work: as soon as you tried to type again he'd pop back up. I had to go find the way to permanently disable him somewhere.

      Trivial for us, workstopper for art chicks. And that's the rub: while it just annoyed us, he was meant to help those less savvy users but they were severely inconvenienced by it.

      [rant]All software needs a "leave me the fuck alone" button to disable all the "helpful" features, like auto completion, or the bane of my existence: That "feature" that selects more than what you select. If I ever find the person who coded that, I'm breaking every finger they have.[/rant]

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    12. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by GarryFre · · Score: 1

      The trouble with Clippy was that people ended up consulting it after getting frustrated trying to figure out how to do something. Cute is not amusing when you're pissed. This reminds me of when I was trying to teach programming to groups of people over the net by releasing lessons users could read. At that time I was into trying to add too much humor into programming, but ended up just distracting from the content with my juvenile humor. I didn't understand that then, I do now. I'm afraid though that my lessons would just end up incredibly boring.

      --
      www.Migrainesoft.com - Computer giving you a headache? We can fix that!
    13. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by scamper_22 · · Score: 1

      Actually. I always like clippy. It sure beat going through the pointless windows help file.

      Rather, clippy was there and I could type in whatever I wanted and he would point me to the right part of the help.

      But yes, the fact that clippy could interrupt you was a problem. Clippy could see the future, he could have learned a lot from Google.

      Google provides a simple natural language text box search (as clippy did), but Google largely stays out of your way... it offers suggestions without being in your face.

      Yes, mock my comparison of Clippy and Google :P

    14. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or the bane of my existence: that "feature" that selects more than what you select. If I ever find the person who coded that, I'm breaking every finger they have.

      Let me know if you need someone to hold them down while you go to work..

    15. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by mrsurb · · Score: 1

      Oh how I love it when a thread wanders off the stated topic and the poster's Oedipus complex appears...

    16. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by tibman · · Score: 1

      ah! the highlighting thing.. Why would any programmer do that? Autocompletion does not bother me when it doesn't cause delay or interpret a tab/space/return as a selection. Also windows needs built-in focus on mouseover.. i shouldn't have to click on a window first before using it.. i'm looking at you, Excel. Makes using dual monitors less useful.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    17. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by tsa · · Score: 1

      Oh boy that movie was just about as much fun as Clippy was.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    18. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      All software needs a "leave me the fuck alone" button to disable all the "helpful" features...

      Amen to that. And just to be fair, OpenOffice.org is just as guilty as MSOffice. That stupid Help Agent (lightbulb icon) that crops up by default is seriously irritating. Yes, I know I can disable it (and I have) but I shouldn't have to.

    19. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by shadowfaxcrx · · Score: 1

      Perhaps. I've always thought that the problem with Bob, aside from the "this is for kindergartners, right?" design, was that most of the people who needed it didn't need it because they were using Macs. Bob came out not at all long after the Win 3.11 era, which as we all know was really the DOS 5 era. A good number of PC users were used to fiddling around in DOS, and so the idea of needing a little dog to hold their hand through saving documents was absurd.

      Nowadays, Windows is so pervasive that, again, if you own a PC, you're probably using Windows (and if you're not, then you're on some flavor of Linux and most certainly don't need any interface help), and probably have been for years. Again, little cartoons reminding you where the file menu is, would be redundant.

      --
      "I disagree with you" does not equal "flamebait."
    20. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by BrokenHalo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      they just frickin' work. You don't need to know about timing belts and spark plugs and carburetors vs fuel injection. You just have to have some common sense.

      Unfortunately, modern cars seem to make these conditions mutually exclusive. They are designed for people who have no common sense, and discourage its use.

      In the days when we had to double-declutch through every gear and make allowances for iffy brakes or steering, no-one had any expectation that talking on the phone while playing a bouzouki were compatible with driving safely.

    21. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Why would any programmer do that?

      Because most of the time, when people start selecting a word, they want to select the whole word.

    22. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by jbengt · · Score: 1

      I think the problem with Clippy was that he was ten years too early.

      Nah, the problem was that it was not very helpful, though it was intrusive.

    23. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by loners · · Score: 1

      on windows XP get tweak-ui and activate the X-Mouse feature (in the Mouse section)

      Dont know about the later versions of windows.

    24. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by drxenos · · Score: 1

      One thing you can do, which is what I ALWAYS do, is go into add/remove programs. For office, there is an entry to completely uninstall ALL the animated helpers!

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
    25. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't be the only one that thought of hacking the Office suite (or at least patching it) so that the office assistant "hide" was replaced with a much more emotionally in-line "F*** OFF".

    26. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by t33jster · · Score: 1

      Please record his tortured screams. It would be the first good reason to buy a CD in a LONG time.

      --
      Take off every 'sig' for great justice.
    27. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BullFUCKINGshit they do. That's a goddamned lie.

    28. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    29. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I ever find the person who coded that, I'm breaking every finger they have

      Eh, that guy is just a coder collecting a paycheck. The HCI person who thought that was a good idea, now that person is the one who needs to be hooked up with electrical pads to their genitals that zap them when they make a mistake on a 200 page document that needs editing and correction.

    30. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      Definitely one of my favorite computer program parody cartoons ever (Though, I'm not sure how many there really are)

    31. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because most of the time, when people start selecting a word, they want to select the whole word.

      So why throw in spaces and crap like that as well?

    32. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup.
      Actually, I thought the little cat was kinda cute (you could select other characters than Clippy) but after long time use I realised that the Office assistant didn't actually add any value that wasn't available (or could have been easily made available) under existing help menus. Then you start to think that it's just taking up space, kind of like a virtual pet. I decided I didn't want a virtual pet, and that as far as virtual pets go, the Office assistant wasn't particularly impressive.

    33. Re:My Mom Liked Clippy by ZoCool · · Score: 1

      Actually just one year too early. As was usual then, and probably still now (I stay regressively in Office vX) the year after the release of Win the Mac version of the latest Office release came with a Mac version of clippie in Excel. That little ol' Mac 128 with legs can still raise a smile if I leave it out to play. I'll never forget the first time it sat down, bored with entertaining itself by turning into a Rubic's Cube and solving itself, and nodded off, 'head' in lap, being totally ignored - until the sudden loud noise of something being dropped cause work to stop and my confused look around, to eventual discover the little Mac flat on it's back on screen, fast asleep. ROFL squared. Done with great humour, and very responsive to your style of work as to what it things it got up to. But then, I guess I'm officially an ancient these days. Someone did knew how to code in that dept. And yes, 'he' would offer contextual help, albeit not always of any great use. p.s. sorry about the blob of text - it's so long since I've done one, that I've forgotten how to do a hard return on the Mac keyboard.

  9. Don't Forget Melinda Gates... by nweaver · · Score: 5, Funny

    How did she meet Bill?

    She was Unit Manager for Microsoft Bob...

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:Don't Forget Melinda Gates... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      How did she meet Bill?

      She was Unit Manager for Microsoft Bob...

      Bill: Well hello there, how'd you like to manage my unit? *strikes pose*

    2. Re:Don't Forget Melinda Gates... by Daltorak · · Score: 4, Informative

      How did she meet Bill?

      She was Unit Manager for Microsoft Bob...

      This isn't correct. MS Bob was released in 1995; Bill and Melinda met in 1987. She'd just joined Microsoft and was a programmer -- and by all accounts, a pretty good one at that. Plus, she's pretty hot, and she was 23 that year. Wouldn't you scoop up a girl like that, especially back then when women were still really rare in the field?

    3. Re:Don't Forget Melinda Gates... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irrelevant. She was the Unit manager of Bob, and killed a lot of good ideas because she assumes users are stupid and want to be spoon fed. PLus, no one would dare to speak against her ideas because of the giant rock on her finger.

      She was an adequate programmer.

    4. Re:Don't Forget Melinda Gates... by dcollins · · Score: 1

      "Wouldn't you scoop up a girl like that, especially back then when women were still really rare in the field?"

      Women are actually more rare in the field now than then. From Wikipedia:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_computing

      In the United States, the number of women represented in engineering and information technology peaked in the late 1980s. Since then, the percentage of women in the computing profession declined from 35.2% in 1990 to 28.4% in 2000.[1] Particularly in computer science, there has been a dramatic drop in women earning bachelor's degrees. A report from the Computing Research Association indicated that the number recently fell below 20%, from nearly 40% in the mid 80s.[2] A similar situation is observed in Canada, where the declination of women in computer science is apparent.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    5. Re:Don't Forget Melinda Gates... by gtall · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hi there, I see you are making a pass at a girl half your age. Would you like:

      * some helpful pickup lines 'cause, you know, you've been failing miserably up to now.

      * a butt lift so she won't have premonitions of your commercial with Jerry Seinfeld.

      * a personality adjustment so you don't act like a geek with a developmental disability.

    6. Re:Don't Forget Melinda Gates... by Maigus · · Score: 1

      They were engaged during the MS Bob project - I was there when she was showing off the ring. Strangely, we discussed bungee jumping. I used to make the joke that she lost use of her left arm having to carry that rock around all the time.

  10. BOB=horribly slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have BOB in a VM, and even running on todays kick-ass hardware, it's still un-usable, and slow...
    Makes me want HDOS back..

  11. Microsoft Bob? by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is he any relation to Baghdad Bob?

    Baghdad Bob: "No, there are no allied tanks rolling through Baghdad."
    *background shows tanks rolling through Baghdad*

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    1. Re:Microsoft Bob? by DikSeaCup · · Score: 1

      I so wanted marines to show up in the background going "Hi Mom!" when that guy was saying "There are no allied soldiers in Baghdad!"

    2. Re:Microsoft Bob? by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Really, that would have been awesome. (:

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  12. Not everyone suffered by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

    Being on the Microsoft Bob team worked out pretty well for project manager Melinda French.

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  13. Did I miss it? by Servaas · · Score: 1

    I read the article, nice step back in time, but other then a simple "I think it felt like it didn't treat the user maturely" no other reason are given to why it failed.

    1. Re:Did I miss it? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>no other reason are given to why it failed.

      Bad timing. BOB might have worked if it had not been overshadowed by Windows 95's mac-like interface (with finder, trashcan, and all). Win95 was so close to perfect as an interface, that even now we still use it's Start menu paradigm.

      BOB didn't stand a chance.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:Did I miss it? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      It failed because it didn't do anything useful, worthwhile, interesting, or popular. It did was allow you to play hunt-the-pixel (like in a "graphical adventure" game or one of those edutainment children's games made from popular licensed characters), only instead of showing you something new or interesting when you clicked on the right little part of the picture, all it did was launch some piece of software that you could have launched much more easily without Bob, by using, say, Program Manager.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  14. MS Bob and Windows NT by yuhong · · Score: 1

    It would have been interesting if MS Bob was implemented on Windows NT, particularly because of the multi-user and security features.

  15. Bad A.I. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bob is turning Artificial Intelligence into Annoying Inconvience ;-p

  16. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  17. It worked! by hilldog · · Score: 1

    From the article "Bob isn’t meant for the initiated. It’s designed for the millions of people who, each year, will start to use computers for the first time. Its interface should encourage exploration and its wacky characters may be just the comic relief that new users need to get over their initial phobias." So some stayed with their phobias and and remained mired in the Windows world where they expect the OS to think for them and others evolved out of the primordial mud and learned Linux. I used Bob briefly back in the day and felt insulted the first 30 minutes and there after every time I booted up a Windows machine.

    1. Re:It worked! by gznork26 · · Score: 1

      I tried Bob once, but it crashed the PC before I even got in the door.

  18. If you have Windows XP, you got a copy of Bob by aoshi73 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Nice story about MS Bob. Run a search on Bing for "History taking up space." Here is the direct link: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2008.07.windowsconfidential.aspx

    --
    http://nyewin.org http://nyexug.com http://nycsqlusergroup.com http://nylug.org
    1. Re:If you have Windows XP, you got a copy of Bob by 6031769 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Run a search on Bing

      It's always good to have a genuinely laughter-inducing moment before the end of the day. Thanks for this.

      --
      Burns: We're building a casino!
      McAllister: Arrr. Give me 5 minutes.
    2. Re:If you have Windows XP, you got a copy of Bob by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Informative

      No mod points today, so thank you. That was interesting, amusing and brief.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    3. Re:If you have Windows XP, you got a copy of Bob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice story about MS Bob. Run a search on Bing for "History taking up space." Here is the direct link:

      http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2008.07.windowsconfidential.aspx

      Article not quite right. The intent was not to fill the CD but actually to make sure the difference between retail, OEM, and volume versions of XP was more than just the few bits it otherwise would have been. At the time, before p2p networks, this made the delta too big for usenet and ungainly to host on your own FTP or web site.

  19. Died before its day... by hAckz0r · · Score: 1
    One reason Bob didn't sell is that it never made it to version 3.0. Most every product Microsoft has ever marketed was a flop until version 3.x where either the people woke up and realized its value, or Mr G found a way to entice the users to try it (i.e. twist their arms a little by preventing them from buying a machine without it).

    Actually this product was focused on a market segment (children) who don't generally buy computers in the first place. While many of them may be quick to pull out their plastic to make a purchase on a whim, what plastic they did have was kind of soggy and didn't carry much buying power. The high tech Mom and Dad who did think that their child should learn using expensive computer technology in those days didn't exactly fancy the idea of buying a 'cartoon like machine' for their children either.

    1. Re:Died before its day... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      And Microsoft sure as hell tried that.

      Bob was positioned to compete against Packard Bell Navigator and other similar vendor alternate shells, and Microsoft ultimately required that vendors only distribute Bob if they wanted to distribute an "easier" Program Manager replacement.

  20. Half-Life of Bob by aapold · · Score: 1

    It worked out pretty well for Gabe Newell, too....

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
    1. Re:Half-Life of Bob by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well that explains Steam. 'It appears that you are trying to waste some time on a game. Would you like to debug you network connection instead?'

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  21. You shall not pass! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    And we eventually pounded Clippy into oblivion through ridicule, satire and parody. We must maintain eternal vigilance against this threat. Hold the line, comrades! Hold the line!

  22. Don't you mean 14 years AFTER Microsoft Bob by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since it only lasted a year on the market and quickly fell into disuse, I do not see how we've had 15 years of Bob.
    Instead, we've seen user interfaces and platforms change quite a bit in that time.

    1. Re:Don't you mean 14 years AFTER Microsoft Bob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 14th anniversary of its being gotten rid of.

    2. Re:Don't you mean 14 years AFTER Microsoft Bob by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      Since it only lasted a year on the market and quickly fell into disuse, I do not see how we've had 15 years of Bob.
      Instead, we've seen user interfaces and platforms change quite a bit in that time.

      Not 15 years of Bob, 15 years of the specter/memory/nightmare of Bob, that something so bad could ever have been taken seriously. These days when you design software, Bob is still seen as the lowest common denominator, the level below which no application can strive to attain, or not strive, as the case may be.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    3. Re:Don't you mean 14 years AFTER Microsoft Bob by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Bob is still seen as the lowest common denominator, the level below which no application can strive to attain, or not strive, as the case may be.

      It's level the average Web designer reaches effortlessly.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    4. Re:Don't you mean 14 years AFTER Microsoft Bob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the concept of cutesy, intrusive and bloated "help" has lived on. I consider The Ribbon in Office/Outlook 2007 the most recent incarnation that I have run into - it takes up screen space, and has me clicking all over the place to find stuff that was much more readily accessible for me with Office 2003 ("fortunately" I used Lotus Notes 6 and 7 for email before that for 8 years - never thought I would miss it ...). The only saving grace has been the discovery of how to use the Quick Access menu bar to consolidate functions I normally use the most into a single line menu bar - what a chore though to re-invent that interface, especially for all the different Outlook windows that "bob up".

      RO

  23. Like Java by GigsVT · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    s was announced it was hyped to the heavens and briefly accepted as a breakthrough that showed where software was going.

    Kind of like Java.

    Except Java's hype produced a cult that was so dead set on making a bad idea work that they actually did hammer it into something barely usable.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:Like Java by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Yeah and then Microsoft, Adobe and everyone else copied it.

      I don't see a ton of Bob clones on the market.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    2. Re:Like Java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flamebait??? Don't punish the guy for telling the truth!

  24. Clippy love by confused+one · · Score: 2, Funny

    Give Clippy some love. I thought he was actually kind of fun, in an occasionally annoying pops-up when you don't want him kind of way.

  25. One day too early by eulernet · · Score: 1

    Why didn't publish it on the first of April ?

    I'm pretty sure it would have been a success !

  26. RAM by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    IIRC, it required something like 8M RAM at a time when 4 was considered generous. Only power-users had that much RAM, and MS admitted that BoB wasn't for power-users.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  27. Collectible? by StoneLion · · Score: 1

    I have a pristine unopened box in my garage. I figure it'll be worth something someday. Anyone want to make me an offer? :)

  28. 100 bucks by geekoid · · Score: 1

    and i'll take it off your hands.

    I don't think you can get anyone to take it from you if you pay less.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  29. All you need to know about BOB... by Bemopolis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is that is inspired the creation of Comic Sans.

    Enjoy the licking flames of Hell, Robert.

    --
    "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
  30. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't simply reminisce about Microsoft Bob, contribute to the GNU clone!
    http://skralljt.info/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=47&Itemid=62

  31. "BOB" at the Las Vegas airport by StefanJ · · Score: 2, Funny

    I used to work a lot of trade shows. Comdex, CES, early multimedia trade shows.

    I attended the shows where Microsoft Bob was announced. The hype was amazing. Taxi had signs. The daily magazines they hand out had adverts.

    The funniest bit of promotion: Microsoft hired a limo driver, or at least a guy in a limo driver costume, to wander around the arrival concourse at McCarren. He was holding a big sign with "BOB" written on it.

    As in, Bob was arriving at CES (or whatever show that was)!

    Of course, as a Pope in the Church of the SubGenius, I knew the greatness of "Bob" all along.

  32. What happened to Einstein? by nemeosis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What happened to the Einstein helper?

    I loved that character. It was cute and tried to act intelligent. It was useful, and provided some animated relief humor to amuse my train of thought during long hours of working on Word documents or Excel spreadsheets.

  33. Fun rumor by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

    Rumor: Gabe Newell (founder, Valve Software) was once a project manager on Microsoft Bob.

    --
    GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  34. At least they tried by arugulatarsus · · Score: 1

    I know Bob is considered one of the worst failing designs for a ... whatever it was... ever. BUT, I applaud Microsoft for trying something new like that. They surely analyzed the market and thought this would solve a problem.The people here are not going to use bob, but for new users, maybe bob helped a bit.
    I kinda feel it's like bashing apple for learning about touchpads in the newton.

  35. Well, there isn't a single reason by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Bob failed for a lot of reasons, and they are all briefly addressed in the article which is after all not a book.

    • To demanding on hardware. And while they later claim that modern hardware WOULD be able to run bob, they forget that Bob would need a facelift. Bob will always need game like hardware because in essence, that is what it is. And who has game hardware? Right, people who know computers. Animated interfaces are beyond the "newbie" market.
    • It was not funny. If you look at the art work, it is dismal. The writing sucks and as said, it is clear it was not made by entertainers but by programmers. We all know what they think is funny. "cat /tin/can cat: cannot open /tin/can" snort. Now that is funny!
    • It is condecening. If you dare treat a 7 year old as a 6 year old, you will have made an enemy for life. For adults, only women could possibly want their hand hold like this. Men would punch your face in. They don't ask for assitence. Ever.
    • It was a closed environment. It wasn't compatible with anything, even MS own software.

    But ultimately, it just wasn't needed. People who really don't get computers, just don't do it. And those who do, will just either ask for real human help or muddle through. Microsoft Bob fullfils the need of nobody.

    Some might LIKE the idea, for their mom. But very few like it for themselves and then only because they are not actually using it. The proof? Nobody is using it. Go ahead, install it and try to find a market for it.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  36. Thanks for reminding me... by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    I still have the Microsoft Bob CD somewhere. If I get around to looking for it, I hope I can find it. I think it even came with stickers.

  37. Spelling nazi strikes again... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Since this thread is "Idle":

    The correct spelling is "minuscule".

    1. Re:Spelling nazi strikes again... by treeves · · Score: 1
      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  38. New title by ArundelCastle · · Score: 1

    Pimp My Blog: 15 Years of Reminding People About Microsoft Bob

    But seriously, even on the net this kind of history gets forgotten to time. So I say good job and it's comforting that there are enough hands to catch what falls off the edge of the web.

    (Also I nominate pimpmyblog as a recurring tag for any story where the submitter references his or her own site in any way. How else will we get a sweet leopard fur hat icon up there?)

  39. Bob and Slashdot have a lot in common by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm reading through this thread, and in a couple instances wanted to read an abbreviated item. Now it used to be that clicking on those items just expanded them - pretty much what anyone would expect. Well, the Slashdot Powers That Be have apparently decided that, no, it makes more sense to take you to a new page that just includes that small thread segment in it. If you want to go on reading the rest of the thread, you have to go back to the previous page.

    Who in their right mind would think this is a good default to impose on people? It doesn't matter if you can turn it off - why is an annoying new behavior now the default?

    Seriously, did some of you guys work for Microsoft in the mid 1990s? Cuz I'm seeing about the same level of common sense being applied here as was shown by the Bob development team...

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  40. Two people matched in quality of thought? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember that Bill Gates married the product manager of Microsoft Bob.

  41. I'm shy you insensitive clod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She'd just joined Microsoft and was a programmer ... a pretty good one at that ... she's pretty hot ... she was 23... Wouldn't you scoop up a girl like that?

    No. I would glance at her when I'd think she isn't looking, I'd occasionally daydream about her, perhaps get myself involved in the projects that she is in and plan about asking her for a coffee... Then, after about a year of hesitation I would watch my boss "steal her" from me. I'd watch the two of them get rich together and be mad at myself for missing the boat as I grew old alone and became an alcoholist.

  42. Why 'Bob'? by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 2

    Anyone ever figure out why they picked the name 'Bob'? Why not 'Paul' or 'Bill' or 'Steve'? There has got to be a story behind it, like 'Google'. When Google was founded, the president of Yahoo was Tim Koogle.

    1. Re:Why 'Bob'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone ever figure out why they picked the name 'Bob'? Why not 'Paul' or 'Bill' or 'Steve'? There has got to be a story behind it, like 'Google'. When Google was founded, the president of Yahoo was Tim Koogle.


      Yea, there was this guy named Bob....

    2. Re:Why 'Bob'? by PPH · · Score: 2, Funny

      They named it after the character from Twin Peaks. The demon that went around possessing other people's souls.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  43. Without Microsoft's Failures . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there'd really be nothing to talk about.

    As for me, I have better things to do!

  44. Using a puppy to find files by Walter+White · · Score: 2, Funny

    It makes me feel so professional when an animated puppy helps me find files.

    Who does there branding? Mr. Rogers?

    1. Re:Using a puppy to find files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can go into the registry and turn off the stupid puppy and get a more complete search tool. If you install the free TweakUI, it has a setting for the same thing.

  45. Bob, eh? by ClippyHater · · Score: 1

    I hate Bob, too.

  46. The guilty programmer by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
    Is everyone forgetting the true reason it failed???

    It was coded by Melinda Gates....name sound familiar to anybody out there???

  47. evil bob by micromuncher · · Score: 1

    Bob, clippy, and any other gadget that imposes its will upon you by default is a bad idea. People hate being told what to do, especially when something grabs UI focus from you and makes a non-modal process a modal one. Rule No. 1 of UI design is let the user focus on the task. Distracting the user... what were they thinking? I have years of pent up Clippy hatred because my Office technology is stuck at 97 and 2000 (by choice.) First thing I always get to do is try and recall how to turn them off. BOB IS ABOMINATION! Please let it die. Take WGA next.

    --
    /\/\icro/\/\uncher
  48. IT'S A PERSON by ftide · · Score: 1

    "Microsoft Bob" are the tendencies of a person or people, not an artifact alone! It isn't corporate personhood either -- something SCOTUS and bigwig entrepreneurial types haven't sufficiently addressed as of right now. Figure it out yet, fat figurers? And Microsh*t it remains with regard to: .Xls files plus screwing SQL, Cisco routing and, I.E. version whatever they got out now . . .

  49. All praise Nass, Reeves, Maes, and Negroponte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's research supported these things? From the article, two Stanford professors, Clifford Nass and Byron Reeves. They had demonstrated that humans respond to social stimuli even if presented by non human entities. They promoted the idea that computer interactions had to have social, human aspects.

    After reading these social scientists' experiments, the Microsoft team attended seminars by Pattie Maes and Nicholas Negroponte. They then run off and implement Bob, Clippy, and other animated idiots.

    These tenured birdbrains led Microsoft (and a million Windows users) right down the rosy path...

  50. Most people want tools, not servants by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    Bob is an illustration of a mistake made by the powerful, the alpha males, the high-ranking. These are people who do not want to perform hands-on activities themselves or make things happen directly. They want to express themselves through their direction of other people. They do not want to play the violin, they want to conduct the orchestra.

    This is personality trait is not in itself good or bad. The same personality traits can enable a person to direct a group to achieve things that individuals cannot achieve by themselves, or it can result in tyranny.

    The point is, it is a _rare_ personality trait.

    Most of us _prefer_ to do it ourselves. We want tools, not servants. We want a car--one that becomes like an extension of our own body--not a chauffeur. We'd rather pop something in the microwave and have it in ninety seconds than watch a servant go scrambling and to try to get it to us in five minutes. We want something that acts on our intentions the way our hands do, not the way our office subordinates do.

    We want to be Superman, not Napoleon.

  51. Time for an "English Fundamentalist Movement" by shankarunni · · Score: 1

    Webster's is an abomination unto the Holy English Language - any dictionary that would allow "momentarily" as meaning "in a moment" rather than "for a moment" would be. Looks like others (Oxford) are also falling into this dangerous syncretism.

    Personally, I don't think I'd like to be in a plane that takes off "momentarily"..

    Only 1/2 :-).

  52. I remember Bob. by brackishboy · · Score: 1

    My best friend when I was around ten had a computer with Bob preinstalled on it. I had an Atari ST, and it all seemed rather over-simplistic to me- both systems seemed light years behind the Acorns we used at school.

    As I recall, my friend killed that system when out of curiosity he flipped the voltage regulator switch on the power supply to 110v :)

  53. Bob Marketing by Maigus · · Score: 1

    I've admitted it before, I worked on Bob.

    Bob was never marketed to IT buying groups. It was aimed at your typical consumer who was afraid of a PC. That's why the apps were: List maker (excel with only one column), Letter Writer (Write+/-), Something like Publisher, but not and Mail which instead of folders had an old fashioned letter desk interface where you composed and organized your mail.

    Bob was for your grandmother, your non-technical Mom / Dad, etc. The problem is that it only worked well on a P90, which was a $5k computer at the time which no grandmother was going to buy. We wrote it in VB as it was a Melinda Gates / Karen Fries project and Bill's obsession was VB for reasons. VB was never able at that time to achieve the visual performance required to make Bob work on a true consumer class PC - a 486/66 or actually lower at the time.

    We brought in the compiler team to try to optimize the performance without any real luck.

    IIRC, when it shipped it took 17 seconds to launch on a P90 and I could crash it in 3 clicks.

  54. Re:Praise "BOB" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Praise "BOB", Fuck Connie (Use protection, she's a floozy!)

    Hail Eris, for she is mischievous and angered by Hot Dogs!