> Since the port number is communicated on an encrypted session, it doesn't have access to that information. So how does this work in a secure environment? The paper doesn't mention any mean for the server to communicate with the network which port its listening on.
I assume that mosh relies on stateful firewalls allowing outbound UDP packets. So, given that the ssh channel allows handshaking, here's what I guess happens:
- Client C connects to Server S through ssh. - Server S picks a port P, and sends a dummy UDP packet to C:P. This packet won't reach C, but any stateful S-protecting firewalls make note of the packet S:P to C:P and know that a packet C:P to S:P should be allowed. - Client C starts exchanging packets with S, both using port P. After the first C:P to S:P UDP packet, any stateful C-protecting firewalls now will allow S:P to C:P packets.
Of course, I might be completely mistaken:)
After all, a connection is defined as the (local ip, local port, remote ip, remote port) tuple.
The site is asking its (hopefully human) visitors what will be the output of a given computer program? If I understood correctly and this is what you're saying, then I can't understand what's the difference to some HTML saying “what's the sum of eight and eleven?”. It would be better if they gave a short listing with a couple (possibly random) substitutions, insertions, deletions and the compiler/interpreter's error output, asking the wannabe visitor to fix the code (in the s/old/new format:). This way, when the spammers break the scheme, they'll have advanced the error-correcting capabilities of computers and they'll be worthy of admission:)
I presume by “real world” s/he meant “outside the US of A” (and, obviously, a we-drive-on-the-left-side-of-the-road-because-our-ancestors-used-to-wield-swords-in-their-right-hands-while-horseriding country).
There's no point discussing pixel shapes on CRTs. The monitor settings allowed the user to take almost any input resolution and shape it to the CRT's physical dimension ratio.
> Exceedingly horny women who look at porn regularly are and always will be the minority, regardless of empowerment, and prevalence and or societal acceptance of porn. And even those few porn-watching women, do watch the porn till the end in the secret hope that the starring couple will get married on-screen.
Actually, it's Big Bang: the Prequel. Sources close to $DEITY have revealed that since the beginning of time our universe was intended to be Episode 2.
Of course she applies in my example, don't pretend to be stupid; she's but one point in the statistics (you need to understand that "not many of them" does *neither* mean "absolutely no grandparent needs a beastly machine" *nor* "absolutely no grandparent runs Steam", so your answer is kind of useless in the discussion).
Unless you really suggest that grandparents that *use Steam* on *non-beastly machines* is a *significant* portion of Steam users? And, to get back to your previous post, do you really suggest that the intersection of the set A="people running the firefox web browser" and set B="people running Steam" is a *significant subset of A* in order to validate your point? Is that your point?
Different user groups. As an example: lots of grand parents browse the internet; not many of them need beastly machines with lots of RAM to run 3D games. So, what's your point?
> The gravitational energy from pumping the water up the hill is several orders of magnitude less than the energy of separating the water into hydrogen and oxygen. If you really want to use sunlight to pump hydro
GP did not suggest "pumping the water up the hill"; instead, they suggested to let the hudrogen float up to the top of hills through tubes, then burn (still on high ground) said hydrogen, store locally the exhausts until cool enough, then let the water flow back downhill.
> Not only that, but is it even possible to orbit the Moon, which has a very low gravity? Anything with the mass of at least a proton can have other, lesser masses orbit around it. From a different angle: what do you think Michael Collins was doing while Armstrong and Aldrin went for a pee on the Moon?
Slashdot Mirror
OIC. Deep Thought was overclocked, then. That's why we know the answer, but we still haven't run the computation.
> 192.168.102.252/21
This is meaningless. 192.168.102.248/21 would be correct. Was that an intentional error on your part?
> psuedo
Us nuerotic cleuless ueropeans prefer to type "pseudo" in liue of "psuedo". I believe the game "Cleudo" is at blame for your mistake.
> Since the port number is communicated on an encrypted session, it doesn't have access to that information. So how does this work in a secure environment? The paper doesn't mention any mean for the server to communicate with the network which port its listening on.
I assume that mosh relies on stateful firewalls allowing outbound UDP packets. So, given that the ssh channel allows handshaking, here's what I guess happens:
- Client C connects to Server S through ssh.
- Server S picks a port P, and sends a dummy UDP packet to C:P. This packet won't reach C, but any stateful S-protecting firewalls make note of the packet S:P to C:P and know that a packet C:P to S:P should be allowed.
- Client C starts exchanging packets with S, both using port P. After the first C:P to S:P UDP packet, any stateful C-protecting firewalls now will allow S:P to C:P packets.
Of course, I might be completely mistaken :)
After all, a connection is defined as the (local ip, local port, remote ip, remote port) tuple.
The site is asking its (hopefully human) visitors what will be the output of a given computer program? If I understood correctly and this is what you're saying, then I can't understand what's the difference to some HTML saying “what's the sum of eight and eleven?”. :). This way, when the spammers break the scheme, they'll have advanced the error-correcting capabilities of computers and they'll be worthy of admission :)
It would be better if they gave a short listing with a couple (possibly random) substitutions, insertions, deletions and the compiler/interpreter's error output, asking the wannabe visitor to fix the code (in the s/old/new format
Translation: “I can't bother to RTFA, tell me the tl;dr version”.
I presume by “real world” s/he meant “outside the US of A” (and, obviously, a we-drive-on-the-left-side-of-the-road-because-our-ancestors-used-to-wield-swords-in-their-right-hands-while-horseriding country).
There's no point discussing pixel shapes on CRTs. The monitor settings allowed the user to take almost any input resolution and shape it to the CRT's physical dimension ratio.
1280x1024 is not 4:3, it's 5:4 (more square).
Yes, just Mercury Rising would be accurate enough. Or: (Parts of) Mercury Rising.
I dare not even consider how sleazy a metaphor Monster Cables would be, then.
The thing is: you replied "Um, yes it is", while you meant "Um, sometimes it is".
> Exceedingly horny women who look at porn regularly are and always will be the minority, regardless of empowerment, and prevalence and or societal acceptance of porn.
And even those few porn-watching women, do watch the porn till the end in the secret hope that the starring couple will get married on-screen.
Actually, it's Big Bang: the Prequel. Sources close to $DEITY have revealed that since the beginning of time our universe was intended to be Episode 2.
"most MP3 players don't support flac without rockbox" is a superset of "stuff that needs iTunes"; they're not equal.
GP said "most don't", you said "some do"; both correct.
The atoms might be at least 4.5 billion years old, but not *every* molecule of water is of that age.
It seems more like the average selling price for Raz models sold will be $100/pi.
Of course she applies in my example, don't pretend to be stupid; she's but one point in the statistics (you need to understand that "not many of them" does *neither* mean "absolutely no grandparent needs a beastly machine" *nor* "absolutely no grandparent runs Steam", so your answer is kind of useless in the discussion).
Unless you really suggest that grandparents that *use Steam* on *non-beastly machines* is a *significant* portion of Steam users? And, to get back to your previous post, do you really suggest that the intersection of the set A="people running the firefox web browser" and set B="people running Steam" is a *significant subset of A* in order to validate your point? Is that your point?
Different user groups. As an example: lots of grand parents browse the internet; not many of them need beastly machines with lots of RAM to run 3D games. So, what's your point?
> I remember escaping the bear a few times. Nothing happens afterwards though.
Was it a bear or a yeti?
> It's "slick vs. stick." It'll be what every kid wants for Christmas.
My kids aren't into science friction.
The end of the world was rescheduled for 20-11-2011.
> The gravitational energy from pumping the water up the hill is several orders of magnitude less than the energy of separating the water into hydrogen and oxygen. If you really want to use sunlight to pump hydro
GP did not suggest "pumping the water up the hill"; instead, they suggested to let the hudrogen float up to the top of hills through tubes, then burn (still on high ground) said hydrogen, store locally the exhausts until cool enough, then let the water flow back downhill.
Don't joke about these; I've heard that TMBG have lost at least thirty drum machines so far.
> Not only that, but is it even possible to orbit the Moon, which has a very low gravity?
Anything with the mass of at least a proton can have other, lesser masses orbit around it.
From a different angle: what do you think Michael Collins was doing while Armstrong and Aldrin went for a pee on the Moon?