A security flaw in an Apple product? That's inconceivable!
Re:Wow big suprise US spending billions on defense
on
HAARP Amping It Up
·
· Score: 1
A reputable source? What a joke. Might as well ask the Iraqi information minister what he thinks.
But whatever. Someone stated something that attacked Bush, so much of the world will now believe it, no matter how inane and ridiculous it is. Like this absolute BS.
I don't really understand why the American public looks down at the UN.
Most Americans don't like the idea of a huge corrupt overpowered beauracracy that seems to do nothing but hold month long conferences at 5 star hotels to discuss the idea of having a conference to set the guidelines for a meeting.
The UN is a cesspool of ineptitude and it, at the very least, needs an enema of biblical proportions.
Or maybe we find it curious as to why countries like Libya should be appointed to head the UN Human Rights commission? Or why the only UN employee that has been fired for the Oil for Food scandal was just rehired so he could receive his full retirement benefits! That poor corrupt bastard was going to have to get a new job but now he can retire and live comfortably with money paid by you and me.
Or how the wonderful former head of the U.N. oil-for-food program, Benon Sevan, had a mysterious $160,000 deposit into one of his accounts. When asked where it came from, he stated his aunt had just given it to him as a gift. But before they could ask the aunt in question, she miraculously fell down an elevator shaft. I mean, for fucks sake, that's a scene straight out of a f'en movie.
They were against the use of force without convincing evidence. Turns out they were right.
About the WMDs? Perhaps, yes.
Over the years it has done a great job in many places.
Where and when? Korea? That war is still going on and you've got the worlds most insane dictator running half of it. Sending strongly worded letters don't count, nor does trying to pass resolutions condemning Israel....in a bid to limit Saddam's power, and save hundreds of thousands of innocent lives
Yes, they tried to, and failed. Saddam made billions during that time period in kickbacks and illegal oil deals. The only thing the sanctions hurt were the Iraqi people.
It's not perfect, of course, but it's always ready to take on the dirty jobs that no one else wants.
What would those be exactly? I think you're confusing the UN with NATO and/or the US.
What also works is having the son of one of the democrat candidates go and slash all the tires on the vans that the republicans rented to bring people to the polls. He was convicted of that.
Or in Washington state you just keep "finding" more and more votes until the Democrat governor wins. And when the margin of victory is around 120 and it's realized that there are at least 5000 invalid and illegal votes (including a number of people who voted for their recently deceased relatives (who voted democrat and have been convicted)) you just have a judge say "No big deal, the vote stands".
Or in Michigan where there is clear, wide spread voter fraud by the local democrat candidates... oh who cares, right? Even if they did threaten to kill the person who turned them in.
The ideal unit for that type of setup is a nice receiver. Run all your svideo, composite, component, digital audio connections to it, and then one set of video cables (composite, component, and s-video) to your TV.
I see that the most liberal of parties opposes what is effectively Free Speech and the party which brought us the Patriot Act is advocating the it.
Yes, who voted for the Patriot Act again? Oh... both parties? Interesting.
The left is in full support of free speech, as long as they agree with what you're saying. If not, then you're a racist, religious zealot, homophobe, or a myriad of other terms the left uses to marginalize the speech of those it does not agree with.
As far as this bill goes... who was against it? Oh... the MSM. Which party is beholden to the MSM? And which party does the MSM act as a organ of? It's no the ones who were in favor of this bill, that's for sure.
Slashdot Mirror
A security flaw in an Apple product? That's inconceivable!
A reputable source? What a joke. Might as well ask the Iraqi information minister what he thinks.
But whatever. Someone stated something that attacked Bush, so much of the world will now believe it, no matter how inane and ridiculous it is. Like this absolute BS.
why would a country like Libya be worried about the Human Rights commission?
Because they keep getting paper cuts from opening all the strongly worded letters.
Here's a nice little video, courtesy of the GOP:
Secretary of State Albright, President Clinton, Sandy Berger, Senator Biden, Senator Clinton, DNC Chairman Dean, Senator Rockefeller, Senator Reid, etc, on Saddam's WMDs
I don't really understand why the American public looks down at the UN.
...in a bid to limit Saddam's power, and save hundreds of thousands of innocent lives
Most Americans don't like the idea of a huge corrupt overpowered beauracracy that seems to do nothing but hold month long conferences at 5 star hotels to discuss the idea of having a conference to set the guidelines for a meeting.
The UN is a cesspool of ineptitude and it, at the very least, needs an enema of biblical proportions.
Or maybe we find it curious as to why countries like Libya should be appointed to head the UN Human Rights commission? Or why the only UN employee that has been fired for the Oil for Food scandal was just rehired so he could receive his full retirement benefits! That poor corrupt bastard was going to have to get a new job but now he can retire and live comfortably with money paid by you and me.
Or how the wonderful former head of the U.N. oil-for-food program, Benon Sevan, had a mysterious $160,000 deposit into one of his accounts. When asked where it came from, he stated his aunt had just given it to him as a gift. But before they could ask the aunt in question, she miraculously fell down an elevator shaft. I mean, for fucks sake, that's a scene straight out of a f'en movie.
They were against the use of force without convincing evidence. Turns out they were right.
About the WMDs? Perhaps, yes.
Over the years it has done a great job in many places.
Where and when? Korea? That war is still going on and you've got the worlds most insane dictator running half of it. Sending strongly worded letters don't count, nor does trying to pass resolutions condemning Israel.
Yes, they tried to, and failed. Saddam made billions during that time period in kickbacks and illegal oil deals. The only thing the sanctions hurt were the Iraqi people.
It's not perfect, of course, but it's always ready to take on the dirty jobs that no one else wants.
What would those be exactly? I think you're confusing the UN with NATO and/or the US.
Ughhh... stop reminding me about DNF. I keep forgetting about it.
And any self respecting Slashdotter should not need to have been told what Doom level that was.
What also works is having the son of one of the democrat candidates go and slash all the tires on the vans that the republicans rented to bring people to the polls. He was convicted of that.
Or in Washington state you just keep "finding" more and more votes until the Democrat governor wins. And when the margin of victory is around 120 and it's realized that there are at least 5000 invalid and illegal votes (including a number of people who voted for their recently deceased relatives (who voted democrat and have been convicted)) you just have a judge say "No big deal, the vote stands".
Or in Michigan where there is clear, wide spread voter fraud by the local democrat candidates... oh who cares, right? Even if they did threaten to kill the person who turned them in.
The ideal unit for that type of setup is a nice receiver. Run all your svideo, composite, component, digital audio connections to it, and then one set of video cables (composite, component, and s-video) to your TV.
Is one example (from Onkyo)
Some of the new ones even have HDMI support (but those are quite a bit more).
But you seem happy with the idea that all matter and energy was just sitting there in a tiny little dot until it just decided to blow up.
Yes, clearly that's the more logical thought...
Interesting claim. Link please.
I see that the most liberal of parties opposes what is effectively Free Speech and the party which brought us the Patriot Act is advocating the it.
Yes, who voted for the Patriot Act again? Oh... both parties? Interesting.
The left is in full support of free speech, as long as they agree with what you're saying. If not, then you're a racist, religious zealot, homophobe, or a myriad of other terms the left uses to marginalize the speech of those it does not agree with.
As far as this bill goes... who was against it? Oh... the MSM. Which party is beholden to the MSM? And which party does the MSM act as a organ of? It's no the ones who were in favor of this bill, that's for sure.
binsearch.info kicks ass and is free, unlike newzbin
42
Actually, analyzing the video streams would allow you to count cars. So, video cameras can count cars.
But, we haven't had a US vs UN Internet root control discussion for days now!
I believe it is MS SQL 2005 standard and Visual Studio 2005 pro. The only limitation is that they can not be sold. No timeout.
I'm signed up for the event in my city, but it's not until the middle of December.
The express products are actually going to be pretty reasonable. Around $49 a piece I believe.
XP is good software... for me to poop on!
Excuse me while I puke.
Makes me glad I didn't RTFA.
Here, this may help:
Web Economy Bullshit Generator
Actually, that would be 2 meter-seconds, not meters per second, which would be m/s.
Errhh... the other 15 discussions were mostly filled with anti-American tyrades that had little to do with the Internet.
Other than wanting to be a "team player" there is still no good reason for the US to give up control.
I just finished my last bottle of Harp at about 1:30 AM this morning while listening to Coast to Coast.
Is that close enough?
The funny thing is that I wasn't even responding to your post. My post was in response to sethadam1's. Toodles.
Maybe you should look up the definition of "phonics".
a method of teaching beginners to read and pronounce words by learning the phonetic value of letters, letter groups, and especially syllables
Hooked on Phonics would not teach you the difference between "useful" and "usefull".