Slashdot Mirror


GUBA makes Usenet search easy as Google

ChipGuy writes "Despite the growing popularity of p2p networks,Usenet is the real treasure trove of multimedia content including vintage cartoons, westerns and popular television shows. Nearly two terabytes of data is added everyday to Usenet. GUBA, a seven year old San Francisco company is making it easier to find the information on Usenet through the browser. Its like " Google for Usenet," says this report."

253 comments

  1. Google for usenet? by selfabuse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So.. they've invented deja/google groups?

    1. Re:Google for Usenet? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Isn't that Google Groups?
      I think google groups is just for text, whereas this new thing is just for binaries.

      Does seem like they're riding coat-tails by mentioning google though.

    2. Re:Google for Usenet? by tuffy · · Score: 1

      Google Groups don't do alt.binaries. I presume this (paid) service does, like a whole lot of other binaries Usenet providers.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    3. Re:Google for usenet? by eln · · Score: 4, Informative

      As a long time connoisseur of porn^H^H^H^Hobscure films, I can tell you that Google Groups does not provide access to binaries.

    4. Re:Google for usenet? by marcop · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you tried newzbin or audiofind?

    5. Re:Google for usenet? by stupidfoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      binsearch.info kicks ass and is free, unlike newzbin

    6. Re:Google for usenet? by BarryNorton · · Score: 1
      From http://docs.newzbin.com/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#H ow_do_I_download_from_Newzbin.3F:
      you cannot download from Newzbin with a few exceptions. The only available files for download are NFO files and NZB (Message-ID) files, which allow you to set up a queue in your Usenet client to download files automatically. The reason why we do not provide any other downloads is: We are an information based resource and do not exist to provide you with the content of Usenet, merely the information of what is currently on it.
    7. Re:Google for usenet? by BarryNorton · · Score: 1
      Likewise, from http://binsearch.info/faq.php#c5
      Can I download files using this site?

      We merely index the content found on Usenet, and do NOT offer any files to download. You need a newsreader and newsserver to download files.

    8. Re:Google for usenet? by specialkp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh no! Now KDE, Gnome, AND Google will be obsoleted! What is this world coming to... GORM and GUBA are taking over.

    9. Re:Google for usenet? by joranbelar · · Score: 1

      binsearch.info kicks ass and is free, unlike newzbin Newzbin is free too, for basic access. But yeah, I understand, it's tough to afford the exorbitant 25p per week that newzbin asks for premium access.

    10. Re:Google for usenet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      paying for to pirate is awesome

    11. Re:Google for Usenet? by wizkid · · Score: 1

      Google used to be a great search engine for UseNet. As of late, thier new group interface has screwed it up royally. Ow Well. Back to yahoo groups, which sucks also.

      I remember the good old usenet days. Chestering a news group feed, cat'ing and uudecoding files, etc. Now days, it's 99.99% CRAP!

      --
      I take no responsibility for what I say. Even though I'm never wrong :)
    12. Re:Google for usenet? by fraktus · · Score: 1

      The very small fee asked to subscribe to Newzbin is well worth the advantages. You can use Newzbin for free if you accept to open your newsreader to manually download the files you saw on Newzbin.

      Really I am not affiliated to them but the interface is so cool with so many things you can tune to your preferences that it's really a nice help if you are a news hunter! They even have Watchdog that can send you a mail when a particular topic occur in the news!

      Maybe binsearch was just slahdoted by beeing cited here but it was so slow when I checked it that it's unusable, in the same time I grabbed a few shows from Newzbin :-)

      --
      In cyberspace nobody knows you're a cat!
    13. Re:Google for usenet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... how would a news connoisseur go about downloading stuff from newzbin :~P ?

    14. Re:Google for usenet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No this is for porn. URDX does the same thing and its free

    15. Re:Google for usenet? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      ou can use Newzbin for free if you accept to open your newsreader to manually download the files you saw on Newzbin.

      IF and ONLY IF you have access to a binary news server.

    16. Re:Google for usenet? by fraktus · · Score: 1

      My provider in Belgium has a nice news server that is part of the standard package, just the retention is only a few days but it's ok to get the latest us shows here in Europe :-)
      Too bad they removed the mp3 newsgroups 2 months ago, I wonder why :-) but all the tv shows and movies are still there.

      --
      In cyberspace nobody knows you're a cat!
  2. Google groups by WTBF · · Score: 0, Redundant

    And what is google groups exactly?

    Usenet right on google, and it is searchable.

  3. That's great... by Barondude · · Score: 0

    as long I can find porn easier. :)

    --
    "That's the sort of blinkered, philistine pig ignorance I've come to expect from you non-creative garbage."-Monty Python
    1. Re:That's great... by sheriff_p · · Score: 1

      In fact, when you unsubscribe from the service, you get asked for a reason, which gives the fairly standard (as some of you will know) options of:

      * Spouse found out
      * Card was used by a minor

      and others :-)

      +Pete

      --
      Score:-1, Funny
    2. Re:That's great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man, shouldn't you be out sargin? you fucking chode.

  4. SSSHHH!!! by TomatoMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    ontday alktay abouthay usenethay!

    --
    -- http://frobnosticate.com
    1. Re:SSSHHH!!! by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      All we need left in this crazy digital world is for the law & order to find out about it...

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    2. Re:SSSHHH!!! by Otterley · · Score: 1

      What makes you think they don't already know about it?

    3. Re:SSSHHH!!! by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      Because no one is enduring heavy lawsuits by any large industries due to it.

      Of course that doesn't mean they don't know about it, but maybe not enough of them know enough about it?

      They haven't reached critical lawsuit mass.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    4. Re:SSSHHH!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I does seem to fly below their radar for whatever reason, and it's an easier target (go after the newsfeed hosts).

    5. Re:SSSHHH!!! by gripped · · Score: 2, Informative

      We sometimes hear of so called 'scene' topsites that well connected 'pirates' have access to.

      Surely the commercial newsfeeds could in fact be regarded as 'Pay as you go' topsites. How they get left alone to profit from rampant copyright theft is beyond me.

      Not that I care. I download films from my own ISP's newsserver, which is one of the few left in the uk to have a decent binary newsfeed.

      I'm sure the only reason they keep it going is that its cheaper for them to supply as much of their customers warez requirements as possible, on their own backbone, than it is for everyone to be seeking the stuff on the wider net.
      Still find it weird that its allowed to go on though

    6. Re:SSSHHH!!! by Cerdic · · Score: 1

      Like I always tell people:

      First rule of Usenet: Don't talk about Usenet Second rule of Usenet: DO NOT talk about Usenet

      --
      Advice for my fellow geeks: before seeking out that threesome you dream of, you might see what a TWOsome is like first.
    7. Re:SSSHHH!!! by Traiklin · · Score: 1

      All we need left in this crazy digital world is for the law & order to find out about it... Law & oder: Special Internet Victems Unit. they could have Metallica on there crying about how people are stealing their music, the head of the MPAA on saying they are theives and they are doing their damndest to make ANYTHING video related be only approved by the MPAA (how much do you want to bet if that passes the RIAA will do the samething for anything that plays music?). they could get different music and movie starts to appere on the show each week. wait scratch that, since they would want about 10 mill to even show up on the show (and 3mill to be mentioned) they would have to cancel it after one episode, How do the actors and musicians manage to live on only 30 mill a year? it must be hell.

    8. Re:SSSHHH!!! by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      Hahaha! No kidding. Honestly I can't believe usenet has made it thus far without any major lawsuit news ripping thru the media.

      It can only be a matter of time...

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
  5. How does this differ from other UseNet Archives? by ewanrg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At $14.95 a month I don't really see how this place is any different than Easynews or UseNext. Doesn't seem like all that new an idea, and certainly the price doesn't lead me to believe I'm any better off than these other services.

    Is there something that reading the article and checking out the site didn't make obvious?

  6. You know... by metaomni · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I thought that Google Groups was... you know... USENET groups on, well, Google.

  7. won't last by j1mmy · · Score: 1

    looks like much of the "content" they index is pirated material.

    it also costs money to use their service.

    1. Re:won't last by DigitalRaptor · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, because Easynews and the hundreds of companies like them were shut down so fast for the exact same thing.

      Oh, wait. They weren't.

      --
      Lose Weight and Feel Great with Isagenix
    2. Re:won't last by Carraway · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, because Easynews and the hundreds of companies like them were shut down so fast for the exact same thing.

      The difference here is GUBA is shouting from the rooftops that they're hosting copyrighted files. Easynews, Giganews, etc., all kept it relatively obscure, just saying "we index all of Usenet" which was understood by smart users and generally ignored by everyone else. Now all of the basic users who are just now figuring out how Bitorrent works are going to say, "Wha? I can get music and movies on Usenet?" and, frankly, where the basic users go, so goes the RIAA.

    3. Re:won't last by DigitalRaptor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The real difference is that P2P has a source, a bottleneck. You can shut down one group or one server and the problem goes away.

      Usenet is almost as distributed as email, and just as old.

      Shutting Usenet down will be like trying to catch a fart in the wind. You may get some of it, but you'll never get all of it, and it won't be easy.

      --
      Lose Weight and Feel Great with Isagenix
    4. Re:won't last by operagost · · Score: 1

      Can't say I've put much effort into catching farts; although, I've been quite successful at letting them go.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:won't last by DigitalRaptor · · Score: 1

      Let me assure you the analogy was entirely hypothetical... :}

      --
      Lose Weight and Feel Great with Isagenix
    6. Re:won't last by macrom · · Score: 1

      Usenet, I think, will still remain the bastion of "smart" users for some time. Downloading files has gotten easier with servies like Newzbin, but there's still more involved than your typical P2P client. You still need to learn to use PAR and RAR files, and for most "basic" users, the concept of rejoining and decoding files is a bit far-fetched. Again, the software packages make it easier, but most people that I teach to use Usenet for file download end up saying, "P2P is much easier".

    7. Re:won't last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just as napster has centralized servers so does usenet.

      Think how much bandwidth and space you need to run a usenet server. If you are wondering, last time I checked giganews has 410Tbytes of data on their drives. Shut down top peers that actually handle alt.binaries, and that are high quality, and you will effectively kill file sharing through usenet.

      on the other hand, if usenet loses its file sharing benefits, maybe the 'me too' crowd will dissappear, and so would tbe spammers... and the comp. would be fun to read again.

    8. Re:won't last by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Right, but this service puts a searchable web interface on it. So you go and search "multimedia" and clicky to download the video. It's an interface to a binary archive. You don't need a news client.
      Check it out, you can even download (or watch online via flash):

      a sample episode of the Simpsons

      Gee I bet they're licensed to distribute that.
      I've noticed they are not including music, movies and software groups. Just the multimedia, music videos and TV ones. I guess they are trying to avoid the MPAA and RIAA's attentions.
      Yeah, that'll work... not.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    9. Re:won't last by macrom · · Score: 1

      I've been a Usenet junkie for a long time, even before I figured out you could get files and such. GUBA must have seriously evolved, because last I saw them they were basically a fast web-based portal for porn pics.

    10. Re:won't last by poptones · · Score: 1

      No, the servers were not shut down... but those servers mean nothing if no one POSTS, and many forces HAVE been cracking down on posters in the last several months.

      And let's not forget how MANY governments have taken to requiring filtering on certain groups. This pressure HAS worked to essentially shut down those groups even if it just means the participants have been forced "underground" to encrypted groups, the net effect is the same: speech is silenced, ideas are marginalized, liberty is supressed.

      Usenet may be growing overall, but the content has become much more homogenous, much more spam laden, and in many ways is nothing but a shadow of its former glory.

    11. Re:won't last by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1
      Usenet is almost as distributed as email
      That might have been true once -- maybe still, for text groups -- but not in today's alt.binaries.* world. To run a decent binaries server requires massive bandwidth and storage, and as a result, binary Usenet has become concentrated in fewer and fewer servers. Many ISPs -- if they still offer Usenet at all -- now outsource to one of a handful of services. So if these services are taken out by the *AA, Usenet could be crippled as a file-sharing medium.
      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  8. Advert? by Tim+C · · Score: 5, Informative

    GUBA is a pay-for service, yet for some reason the summary neglects to mention this. Call me cynical, but when something as fundamental as that is missed out, I start thinking "advert".

    1. Re:Advert? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He points out that the company has tens of thousands of customers who pay $15 a month for their service, and have helped the company grow organically and become solidly profitable.

    2. Re:Advert? by crow · · Score: 1

      Yes, there are a number of stories here where the referenced site would likely have been willing to pay for the story. However, if you look at the pages for actually advertising on /., there is no reference to buying an article.

      My guess is that this is another case where the editor thought it was interesting, so he posted it. Sure, this site is based on user-pays model, but it's not really different from a advertiser-pays site getting plugged when the editor thinks it's interesting.

    3. Re:Advert? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 0

      He isn't saying they bought the article. He is saying it looks like they submitted the article.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    4. Re:Advert? by fafaforza · · Score: 0

      And you thought writing software to index headers, keeping that data in a database, maintaining the hardware and software, and running the servers in a datacenter would all trickle down to the consumer at no cost? Maybe your level of cynicism should get a nudge up.

    5. Re:Advert? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      http://www.binsearch.info/ is the best one around

  9. Before everyone says "it exists already" by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It looks like this is for all the binary content on Usenet (pics, music, pics, programs, wavs, ummm, pictures, and of course, pr0n, pr0n, warez, pr0n, pr0n, warez .....

    1. Re:Before everyone says "it exists already" by Luscious868 · · Score: 1
      It looks like this is for all the binary content on Usenet (pics, music, pics, programs, wavs, ummm, pictures, and of course, pr0n, pr0n, warez, pr0n, pr0n, warez .....

      Why in the world would you ever use a service like this? You know they are probably doing some kind of logging. I'd rather use a usenet service that doesn't. There are many available.

    2. Re:Before everyone says "it exists already" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who are you kidding? Everyone logs.

    3. Re:Before everyone says "it exists already" by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the logs would end up taking nearly as much space as the Posts.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  10. Usenet is like Fight Club... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...in that it doesn't exist. Now go away!

  11. Pirated Material by matth · · Score: 1

    This is interesting. As I am looking at what they seem to have indexed it seems that most of it is all material which holds some sort of Copyright. I have to wonder about the legality of this service. I realize that they are not actually holding the videos and files on their machines, but it still makes you wonder how long they will be around.

    1. Re:Pirated Material by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 0

      Indeed. I suppose the various multimedia usenet newsgroups could be used for all sorts of purposes, but in practice almost everything posted seems to be copyrighted.

      I've always wondered why the RIAA doesn't go after this. I appreciate the structure of usenet means that the newsgroups can't be shut down, but surely they could sue ISPs and posters based in the US. Is there some technical or legal reason, or is usenet just too far away from the mainstream?

    2. Re:Pirated Material by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      "I realize that they are not actually holding the videos and files on their machines"
       
      Actually, they are/i holding them on their machines. They get by with it for the same reason that your ISP gets by with having a router that has a bit of memory to hold a packet queue even though packets in that cue might contain bits of copyrighted works that their customer is downloading. It is also the same reason that Slashdot couldn't get sued (provided they removed it if notified) for a user posting a comment full of copyrighted material.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    3. Re:Pirated Material by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      They might be headed for trouble with "pirated" binaries, which Google avoids by not carrying binary groups. As well, when I post my own material to binary groups, I'd be cheesed to know that they're turning around and selling my stuff as their content. I hope that they're going to honour x-no-archive flags.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Pirated Material by pegr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've always wondered why the RIAA doesn't go after this. I appreciate the structure of usenet means that the newsgroups can't be shut down, but surely they could sue ISPs and posters based in the US. Is there some technical or legal reason, or is usenet just too far away from the mainstream?
       
      Two words: Common Carrier. It's the same reason the phone company can't be held liable for obscene phone calls. As long as you carry everything without blocking, you can be (legally) ignorant of what's there. The poster, however, can still be held liable. And posters have, in fact, been prosecuted for their usenet postings, generally for illegal content though, not copyright violations...

    5. Re:Pirated Material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no. The DMCA provides a specific safe harbor for service providers that route or cache material. Slashdot can get sued if they are notified of the material and fail to remove it. Do a search for Netcom, or read the Grokster decision as Netcom is mentioned there. Whether the content is contained on their servers or not is irrelevant. Napster didn't fair so well even though they tried to argue that they were a service provider. This is clearly a case of secondary infringement because of vicarious liability. I am guessing that GUBA has gotten their knowledge of copyright law from Slashdot, because they seem to have designed their business plan based on typical myths propogated around here.

    6. Re:Pirated Material by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Hey dumbass, about slashdot I said, "(provided they removed it if notified)." And then you go on to correct me by saying, "Slashdot can get sued if they are notified of the material and fail to remove it." Wow, way to be redundant.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  12. If you need porn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Just consult HTGFP [htgfp.com] (How To Get Free Porn ebook).

  13. All I need.. by LilGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

    is NewZbin.

    God bless the creators.

    --

    You're nothing; like me.
    1. Re:All I need.. by GoodOmens · · Score: 1

      newzbin rocks!

    2. Re:All I need.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God bless the creators.

      NewZbin was created by Intelligent Design? Be careful, the /. crowd hates that.

    3. Re:All I need.. by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      You're saying you don't believe that the creator was an intelligent designer? True, there were probably more than one, but still, I'd say they were rather intelligent.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    4. Re:All I need.. by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      Newzbin doesnt archive everything posted on usenet, so you might be missing out on a lot of stuff. The only way to achieve a full archive would be through some sort of an automated process, as opposed to human editors newzbin relies on.

    5. Re:All I need.. by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      You're right, the system is far from perfect. But it certainly works well for what is needed.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    6. Re:All I need.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for your support of Intelligent Design. Evolution (and by that I mean the Gnome application) is a tool of the devil.

      Those in the Kansas prefecture welcome your support.

    7. Re:All I need.. by ramseypawlik · · Score: 1

      I agree. Newzbin is the way to go. I browsed GUBA and really don't see how they are going to compete at that price. The selection available is nothing compared to Newzbin and other usenet searches but I can say that the interface is nicer.

    8. Re:All I need.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Acctually, from what i understand, they do have an automated index of all files posted to the binary groups they follow. you can access this by searching for "files" rather then "posts"...

      "posts" are just a listing of the files that logically belong together, and are compiled by the human editors of which you speak...

      by searching for "files" you lose out on the nicely grouped posts, so you have to select the relavent files yourself, but you can find stuff that hasn't been "posted" by the editors yet...

    9. Re:All I need.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree, but mostly because I'm nearing release of my own program (yay ncurses) for leeching usenet, that has Very Low Memory footprint and doesn't rely on .nzb files to figure out what a set of posted files is.

      And then of course on oct 2, they released version 5 of newzbin pro, which supposedly 'fixes' their memory issues.

      Imma cry.

    10. Re:All I need.. by Jules+Mercuri · · Score: 1

      Posts view (with all the files neatly organized, NFO'd and such) is hand-edited... but Files view, to my knowledge, is not. Files view is a bit messy, though, so as far as usability goes Guba may win. I love newzBin to death anyway.

    11. Re:All I need.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot:

      http://nfonews.com/

  14. Outfuckingstanding by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So much for flying under the [RI|MP]AA's radar. I just can't wait until they start issuing subpenas and crapflooding the MP3 and multimedia groups.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Outfuckingstanding by idontgno · · Score: 1
      So much for flying under the [RI|MP]AA's radar.

      Sheesh. I guess I was reading too fast, but for a while I was wondering "WTF's RIMPAA?"

      Anyway, back on-topic. Yeah, it's sorta amazin' isn't it. They're archiving and cataloging usenet groups which are self-identified as "gigabytes of copyright violations", and they're trying to make teh big moneez at it. Yup, thanks for screwin' up another network motherlode by stripmining it, ya putzes.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:Outfuckingstanding by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      Many, many services are already doing this, and the content holders are already well aware of Usenet. Just try posting a text message in a movie group from your DSL or cable line. You'll get a nice letter in a few short weeks warning you that one more such stunt and you're at the mercy of the content holders.

    3. Re:Outfuckingstanding by thisislee · · Score: 1

      I still doubt the average computer user can handle usenet. It's easy, but nowhere near as easy as napster or bt. As long as it's not overly widespread, they probably won't bother much.

    4. Re:Outfuckingstanding by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Any evidence of this? Seems like a strange tactic for posting non-infringing material.

    5. Re:Outfuckingstanding by Sancho · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The content owners know about this already. Two, maybe three years ago, I heard about a massive piracy ring going by the name of SD6 that operated on IRC and USENET. Seems that some of their members started getting C&Ds and other legal threats from the content owners, and they shut down their entire USENET group (knowing full well, of course, that the group itself would not disappear--but they apparently stopped all USENET operations).

      So they know it's there. If they aren't actively working to stop it now, it's probably because your average user isn't going to be able to download thousands of messages, reassemble them into files, and (if it's a movie file) reassemble THOSE into the mpeg. Bittorrent is much easier as it's a single installation and then just clicky-clicky on the link to start downloading your file.

      I'm sure they'll go after USENET eventually, after they've dealt with all the larger threats. But for now, I imagine you are safe. They may go after this company that seems to be caching and indexing the files, but I doubt they'll go after USENET itself for awhile yet.

    6. Re:Outfuckingstanding by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      The second rule of fight club is never post through your ISP. Anonymous posting is what Giganews or EasyNews is all about.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    7. Re:Outfuckingstanding by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      SD6 was a high-quality TV-capture group that split off from alt.binaries.multimedia, as alt.binaries.multimedia.SD6, when their leader "Silent Bob"'s ego got the better of him. They specialized in posting things like "Alias", "The O.C.", etc. Silent Bob had a temper and a huge ego. They got like ONE C&D and he pulled the plug on the whole newsgroup. Kinda too bad, their captures were real nice.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    8. Re:Outfuckingstanding by British · · Score: 1

      So I take it their website is/was creditdauphine.com?

      Well if they broke up I'll just get my warez from The Covenant.

    9. Re:Outfuckingstanding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sd6 was ripping lots of tv and hbo content. i think hbo are the ones that went after them.

    10. Re:Outfuckingstanding by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Really?

      Try this sample link:

      an episode of the Simpsons

      If clicking to download the avi file is too hard you can click "Watch now in Flash!".

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    11. Re:Outfuckingstanding by thisislee · · Score: 1

      umm. Usenet's fucked. I completely misunderstood the service being offered. I just thought it was a way to discover content that you would have to then find threw normal newsgroup programs.

    12. Re:Outfuckingstanding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the mercy of content holders for two text messages? The poor judge will die of laughter.

  15. Key word: "MULTIMEDIA" by schon · · Score: 4, Informative

    And what is google groups exactly?

    A way to search *text*

    Usenet right on google, and it is searchable.

    Except that it doesn't include pictures, music, and videos. Try searching google for alt.binaries.sounds.mp3 and see what you get.

    Although I have a hard time picturing how these guys are gonna stay alive once the MPAA/RIAA finds out about them.

    1. Re:Key word: "MULTIMEDIA" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I don't understand is why the big newgroup hosting services haven't been forced to remove the music/vidoe/warez groups...

    2. Re:Key word: "MULTIMEDIA" by schon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it's because they want to maintain common-carrier status.

      If they start examining (and then restricting) what people post, then they open themselves up to lawsuits when they miss.

      Besides, would it really stop anyone - people could just move the stuff to a different newsgroup.

    3. Re:Key word: "MULTIMEDIA" by value_added · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And what is google groups exactly?

      A way to search *text*

      Dear Lord. If you're going to offer a response to someone that thinks the intarweb happens in their browser, maybe provide a linky that is more meaningful? Sorry, kids, Google Groups is nothing but a pretend front end to something else, and not a very good one at that. At least Microsoft hosts their microsoft.public hierarchy, though it's ludicrous the way in which they pretend it's something they invented and fill full with content.

      As for indexing content on usenet, this has been done for quite some time. The more comprehensive (scariest) approach seems to be taken by the folks at Microsoft, evidence enough of why real names/email addresses should never be used. Also, there's sites like this one that people can use if they're so inclined. Whatever.

      Personally, I think most web interfaces suck for searching, but only slightly less than downloading 500K headers in a binary group looking for something ... interesting. What would be ideal if Easynews et al. could just offer a big text dump of any group that could be grepped locally without the clicking and advancing page by page nonsense. Either way, publicity is Not a Good Thing for usenet, which has for years been A Really Good Thing. It's easy enough for anyone to create a new group and migrate there with everyone else (ad infinitum), but that's hardly a welcome idea.

    4. Re:Key word: "MULTIMEDIA" by schon · · Score: 1

      If you're going to offer a response to someone that thinks the intarweb happens in their browser, maybe provide a linky that is more meaningful?

      And if you're going to offer a response criticizing a response, you may want to read the original post, which clearly indicated that he already knew what usenet is.

    5. Re:Key word: "MULTIMEDIA" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you're going to offer a response to a response criticizing a response, maybe you should ignore the troll.

    6. Re:Key word: "MULTIMEDIA" by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      "Personally, I think most web interfaces suck for searching, but only slightly less than downloading 500K headers in a binary group looking for something ... interesting."

      Newzbin is a great resource for searching binaries. You can search "posts" which are manually added groups of files (so you don't see a million rar files), or you can search for files. At least you can find out which group something... interesting is posted in before you download those bojillion headers.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
  16. Wow... more advertising on /. by Daytona955i · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you have an internet connection, you probably also already have access to newsgroups. Buy NewsRover and search 'till your heart's content. (And you don't need to pay $14.95/month to do it)

    Since others will probably mention google groups, I'll just mention that google groups doesn't search for binaries whereas this is geared towards a binaries search. If this service was free I would probably use it. But it's not so I'll continue to use my new reader.

    1. Re:Wow... more advertising on /. by abb3w · · Score: 1
      Since others will probably mention google groups, I'll just mention that google groups doesn't search for binaries

      More exactly, Google Groups does not carry nor index the any of the alt.binaries.* heirarchy groups... which is where most of the multimedia (...pr0n...) is carried.

      A pity Usenet is so spam infested nowadays... not that the signal-to-noise ratio was ever that great, even before the green card incident.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    2. Re:Wow... more advertising on /. by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      People pay for Usenet services because they're own ISP's service has crappy retention of binary files. Given how huge the Usenet feeds are now, that's not really surprising.
      This service adds a web interface for Usenet. It lets you not only search, but just click to download the file. No downloading of headers, no using par and rar to fix and unpack. You can even view the videos via flash straight off the site. It's the most blatant copyright violation I've seen in a net service in years.
      Go browse through and see for yourself.
      Oh yeah and for searching the binary groups Newzbin is quite decent.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    3. Re:Wow... more advertising on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My old collection of usenet downloads is full of spam by the newsrover jerks. Don't support them!

  17. BugMeNot on GUBA by JesseL · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have never seen a site with so many bad usernames from bugmenot. They must be automatically removing them.

    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    1. Re:BugMeNot on GUBA by radish · · Score: 1

      That might be something to do with it being a subscription service, whereas BugMeNot is for avoiding registration on free sites.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  18. Worst. Advert. Ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    GUBA is a commercial porn site that masquerades as a Usenet archive. It's been around for years, and certainly isn't as comprehensive as Google Groups. The linked "report" is just a blog post.

    Any particular reason why this got posted? Did the editor get free membership in return?

    1. Re:Worst. Advert. Ever. by Liam+Slider · · Score: 1

      Yeah this seems like Slashdotted-spam to me. I've known about GUBA for years, and it's not exactly revolutionary. Nor is it remotely Google-esque. Especially given it's increasingly higher priced subscription access. The only way I'd expect this to be in any way newsworthy for Slashdot would be if they went free...which they haven't, and won't.

    2. Re:Worst. Advert. Ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and if thats what u want try http://urdx.com/

  19. gung'f svar, ohg... by 187807 · · Score: 0, Funny

    qbrf vg unaqyr ebg13?

  20. Not good for porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For anyone who's wondering this really isn't that good for porn. It's too slow and awkward, and getting it to display anything in series is next to impossible.

    www.giganews.com and Binary News Reaper are your friends!

    *carefully checks 'Post Anonymously'*

  21. Smart. Real Smart. by rudy_wayne · · Score: 2, Informative

    Let's start a business that publicizes the terrabytes of warez on Usenet. Yeah, that's a real smart move.

  22. Been around for a while by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is this news? This site has been around for a long time. Why now on /.?

    --
    Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

    http://financialpetition.org/
    1. Re:Been around for a while by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1

      Because GUBA is trying to make a splash as being the first to offer porn for the iPod. Apple doesn't sell porn videos in the iTunes store, so GUBA wants to meet the demand. In a reasonably clever marketing move, though, rather than sell them by the video, they'll sell all-you-can-eat access for $15/month, counting on the desire for continuous novelty on the part of porn consumers to keep them coming back. There's a boatload of porn in the Usenet archives, and you will never run out of new stuff to watch.

      Also, a lot of the stuff posted on Usenet is fairly small files, and the big stuff (movies, etc.) is broken up into bite-sized chunks, perfect for downloading to an iPod.

      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    2. Re:Been around for a while by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
      ...counting on the desire for continuous novelty on the part of porn consumers to keep them coming back.

      Izzat a double entendre in your pocket, or are you just glad to see me?

  23. And here I thought... by sterno · · Score: 3, Informative

    Funny me, I thought that google for usenet was Google.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  24. Sure its pay.. by cowmix · · Score: 1

    However.. a cool feature they have is how they transcode all video clips into Flash format.

  25. Easynews Global Search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  26. Mod parent down: "Not Newsworthy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's just one of many commercial USENET-binary services.

    Yawn.

    Mod main story down: Not newsworthy

    1. Re:Mod parent down: "Not Newsworthy" by numbware · · Score: 1
      Mod main story down: Not newsworthy

      Oh, you must be new here.

      --
      I'm going to go create my own technology news site, with blackjack and hookers. You know what? Forget the news site.
  27. Ssssssh!! by Weaselmancer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    They're watching.

    Cripes, Taco. I can understand wanting to tell the world about this, but did you have to put P2P and multimedia in the summary?

    What were you thinking?

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  28. Not Worthwhile by staticdaze · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't see any worthwhile features offered by this service for the $15 per month that you would pay. All of the major usenet providers (Giganews, Easynews, and Newzbin are just a few that I have experience with) offer similar search services. Not only do they include images and video (which, so far, is all this GUMA service would provide), but also every binary posted to Usenet. Why would you pay an extra $15? For the video conversion features? (which is actually kind of neat, but I'm sure most people can simply download and play any videos they find if they want to see them).

    The other problem is that the article does not mention who actually provides the content. Will GUMA be hosting their own NNTP servers? What kind of retention will it have, and can it compete with the 55+ days offered by the big providers?

    Maybe, just maybe, some potential customers would be those who just heard of this "Usenet" and want a famailiar interface to it all. But sooner or later, they should realize that they can get so much more for little to nothing in extra costs per month.

  29. great if you want 100 groups to choose from by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    most of the groups seem to be missing, if i wanted to pay it would be a better choice to go with a proper usenet provider that indexes ALL the groups (giganews etc etc) and does not remove groups that it does not agree with the politics of, GUBA seems to provide only a very tiny censored subset of Usenet, which isnt really the idea

  30. goolge groups? by minus_273 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    i thouhg google groups was google for usenet.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  31. Re:How does this differ from other UseNet Archives by SoCalChris · · Score: 2, Informative

    The difference, according to this article is that they don't allow you to search for, or download MP3s or videos over 70 minutes.

    I think I'll stick to EasyNews. It's cheaper, they don't log what I download, and they have an awesome web based search taht works well with FlashGot.

    Also, after reading the linked article, their CEO sounds pretty clueless. They are blocking the MP3s because the RIAA has been so agressive about enforcing copyright, but will be leaving on TV shows because "the TV guys seem to understand the Internet..." I'm giving them a month or so before they're sued into oblivion.

  32. Hmmm DejaGrokster DejaKazaa by blueZhift · · Score: 1

    Hasn't the idea of promoting a service based on access to a lot of copyright protected material placed on the internet illegally been bashed and trashed soundly in the courts? I just don't see how a service like GUBA which charges for access can avoid being sued out of existence by *AA. They really cannot claim not to know that much of the material is protected by copyright. Of course, Google can't claim that either, but Google doesn't charge a fee for access and doesn't promote said material as a reason to use their services.

    1. Re:Hmmm DejaGrokster DejaKazaa by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Google also does not give access to binary groups.

  33. warez search by mikkom · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What a nice concept, provide a high quality warez search for fixed monthly fee.

    Doesn't anyone else see any legal problems with their business plan?

    1. Re:warez search by stinerman · · Score: 1

      While it may be illegal, just about every ISP under the sun offers Usenet access. Speakeasy caps me off at 1GB per month per account (which they outsource to Giganews).

      It seems to me that Usenet, so long as it goes unnoticed by the powers that be, will be the safe haven for such content.

      Actually, other than the Scientology debacle, has anyone gotten in hot water over copyright violations by posting to Usenet?

  34. Read Only?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen a number of comments on Slashdot over the years reminiscing about the good old days of USENET. What an awesome collaboration tool! I can honestly say that I never would have advanced in my career if it hadn't been for the content and availability of members of USENET. And it was fun!

    That said, it's dying a slow death, soon to be almost completely relegated to read-only status. Google Groups is trying an "embrace an extend" of the old USENET hierarchy with a newer one, but somehow it just doesn't do it for me. Maybe it's the web interface ("AJAX" notwithstanding), maybe it's the centralized architecture, maybe it's the SPAM/unauthenticated/unrated nature of the NNTP protocol, maybe it's the inability to search archives from within USENET, maybe it's a combination of all of them.

    Regardless, there is one thing for certain, we need a USENET 2.0 way, way, way more than a Web 2.0.

  35. Free news servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  36. Idiots by mbourgon · · Score: 1

    So, best case scenario - the studios buy an account, find all their stuff posted, let these guys know _and_ find the poster. Which will result in fewer things being posted, causing nobody to want the service... except the studios.

    Why not just try and sell the company to them in the first place and save the wasted time?

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    1. Re:Idiots by webmosher · · Score: 1

      Actually, several adult sites did just that, and specifically pursued lawsuits on anyone that posted their content on Usenet. I believe they still monitor common Usenet groups very closely.

      For the most part though, Usenet is not very easy for a typical home-user to use. While some Usenet apps are getting better at filtering and organizing the posting information, users still aren't happy about having to browse through 40,000 groups to find their favorite "stuff". BT, eDonkey, etc all offer search capabilities which makes finding content very easy. Usenet is also very transient in nature. As posts expire, content lapses out of scope and is no longer available until its reposted. Most ISP level Usenet access these days is lucky to have more than a week of retention on binary groups, so the transient nature of the data is further amplified. If you want higher retention, you'll probably end up paying for a dedicated Usenet provider.

      In general, I think Usenet stays under the radar because its just too hard for the average Joe to utilize.

  37. WTF?! Easynews has 100TB and a better search by mrgodzilla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's up with this ad for GUBA??

    Easynews kicks the crap out of GUBA and is cheaper. We have
    a better global search, carry over 100TB, bigger/faster gigE
    pipes, even unrar and thumbnail your svcd's!!

    So I ask, what's up with this ad?

    -- godzilla

  38. Better than Google Groups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turn safemode off, search for 'boobs'. Can Google Groups do that, eh?

  39. Newzbin has been about for a while... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reaks to me of spam. Newzbin have provided a free binaries group search for years now, and provide NZB files too.

    The only thing GUBA seems to add is a prettier interface. I don't think a prettier interface is required, myself.

  40. For the n00bs. by elgee · · Score: 0

    Usenet is a treasure trove of pictures of naked ladies (or men if that is your taste) and all sorts of porn.

  41. And there goes Usenet... by Necromancyr · · Score: 5, Funny
    Slashdot, is it your JOB to ruin EVERYTHING? Bittorrent, now this.

    I hate you guys. Just shut your dirty mouths.

    1. Re:And there goes Usenet... by adnausium · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anyone I have every told about Usenet (which is very few), I explained that it should be considered like joining "Fight Club". And what's the first rule of Fight Club?...

      --
      Don't ya hate it when the correct spelling of your favorite screen name is taken?
    2. Re:And there goes Usenet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>>And what's the first rule of Fight Club?...

      Don't bend over for the fine soap???

    3. Re:And there goes Usenet... by Bustbang · · Score: 1

      I totally agree.

      When I saw the headline I felt blood rush to my face and could only yell "shut your whore mouth up" to my monitor.I felt like I was being attacked for a moment.

      I wish people would listen to that first rule.

    4. Re:And there goes Usenet... by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      "Oh no! My decades of illegal activies might have to come to an end! Damn you Slashdot!"

    5. Re:And there goes Usenet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah here here.
      fark.

    6. Re:And there goes Usenet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody who reads slashdot already knows about usenet.

    7. Re:And there goes Usenet... by handslikesnakes · · Score: 1

      Pretty much. Your point? I'd say the same thing if some stoner came up with magical glasses that could detect pot smokers.

  42. GUBA is "News"?! by webmosher · · Score: 2, Informative

    GUBA has been around for a long time by internet standards (1998 according to the WHOIS record). It has also been a pay site for as long as I can remember. I think they popped up about the time independent providers charging for Usenet hosting also appeared.

    Did they change their interface? Is it faster? Why is this new?

    There are other sites for finding recent Usenet binary postings. However, they all link to some level of intrinsically non-public binary information (just like GUBA, or BT for that matter). One would be better off looking for them on their own, rather than resourcing Slashdot for that information.

    1. Re:GUBA is "News"?! by Valegor · · Score: 1

      The only thing new that I have noticed as of late is that the porn is no longer the top searches displayed and does not show in the box of catagories when you log in. I took this to mean that thier long time focus on being used for gathering the porn of Usenet was switching to other media now. They do not appear to be providing anything new or changing thier service, just changing the aspect of it that they promote.

  43. So? by phpm0nkey · · Score: 1

    One more company trying to charge you for downloading pirated content. How is this newsworthy? Google excludes binaries from Groups because most binaries are porn and warez. They're clearly capable of the video indexing as well. This is just old technology put to illicit use.

    1. Re:So? by Bustbang · · Score: 1

      Google doesn't offer binaries because it is expensive.
      They would have to charge money to access that data.

      Lets say google offered binaries with a retention of 1 year (google text retention is 20+ years) with 2-3 terabytes of data added everyday that would be over 1 petabyte of space to host all that data. Don't forget redundancy so factor that in. Next they would have to deal with bandwidth. How many broadband connections could google serve at full speed and still turn a profit? You think google could serve 10 million broadband users downloading 50GB of data everyday for free?

      Giganews has the longest retention in the industry at 60 days,thats over 100 terabytes of data stored. Go see how much they charge a month for unlimited service.

  44. I like google too, because Bush = Failure by ViperG · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Go ahead I dare you. Type in " failure " (without qoutes)in google search and click im feeling lucky!

    --
    Black Sky
    2D Elite Inspired Game
    1. Re:I like google too, because Bush = Failure by Grey_14 · · Score: 1

      as far as I know it works with "miserable failure" too, (again without the quotes), see also, "french military victories", "anti-war peace protesters", "arabian gulf", check the wikipedia article on googlebombing for more.

  45. (obligatory) MAD TV Fight Club scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [all these sweaty, placid, and chubby geek men are gathered to hear that Brad Pit look-alike]

    "The number-one rule of the Fight Club is we do NOT talk about the Fight Club...for obvious reasons."

    "I came here for a new life."
    "I make and sell soap."
    "Thanks, my life has meaning now."

    [whinyning like girls and begin slapping with bent wrists]

    "owe!"
    "You're too tense."
    "Ahh! Ahh!"

    1. Re:(obligatory) MAD TV Fight Club scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mad TV is pretty fuckin far from obligatory

  46. An automated system to find porn. by doublem · · Score: 1

    Really, do we really need yet ANOTHER system for searching for porn and warez?

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  47. [Offtopic] Google Base accessible at by managedcode · · Score: 1

    base.l.google.com

  48. This isn't news, its an advertisement by 1_brown_mouse · · Score: 1

    Search for all the porn you want, only $14.95!!

    Thats not like google. They do it for free on google images.

    Any good news reader connected to your news server can do the same thing GUBA does.

    1. Re:This isn't news, its an advertisement by 1_brown_mouse · · Score: 1

      I have become part of the rable crying out:

      Ad! Ad! Ad! See the Ad?!
      Why should I pay when you can use AppX for free?!
      See the Ad?!
      Pay money for a service?
      How can that be?!

      ...
      Copyright GPL yadda yadda yadda

  49. Isn't that already covered? by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

    Hmmm...

    http://www.newzbin.com/ seems to have all this covered and for free.

    I'm writing a tool which will hopefully interface with newzbin - www.donutmonster.com - and run on several OSs.

  50. there are more like that one... by quacksalber · · Score: 1

    ... except they are free:

    http://www.newzsearch.com/
    http://www.newzbin.com/
    http://alt.binaries.nl/


    just to mention some...

  51. Who does actually host the alt.binary.* groups? by grumbel · · Score: 1

    From all the providers I had in the years nobody of them ever had the alt.binary.* groups available. So which provider actually do have them available and how are they surviving in todays times where sharing a little bit of music can get you jail time?

    1. Re:Who does actually host the alt.binary.* groups? by tweek · · Score: 1

      Commerical news servers. Pure and simple. I have an account that has different servers with different retention time for binaries servers vs. text only. I can download up to 1GB a day on each server.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    2. Re:Who does actually host the alt.binary.* groups? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      ISPs that do newsgroups typically don't do binary groups anymore, because the storage requirements (to say nothing of bandwidth) are way off the scale. Also, the capture and retention on ISP news servers are notoriously crappy. Some companies provide real (premium) newsgroup access as a paid service. Three of the very best are Giganews, EasyNews, and Newsfeeds.com. Try searching Google for "usenet service providers".

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:Who does actually host the alt.binary.* groups? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1
      DOH!

      Screwed up the links somehow. Giganews, EasyNews, Newsfeeds.com.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    4. Re:Who does actually host the alt.binary.* groups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verizon's newsgroup server (news.verizon.net) is quite good, especially for a commerical ISP. About two weeks retention in the binary groups, though they did have to drop three of the major hogs, one of which was the ps2dvdiso group, I believe.

      They're also having some bandwidth issues in terms of speed, but with nearly every binary group out there, two weeks retention, and unlimited download, it's great.

    5. Re:Who does actually host the alt.binary.* groups? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      So which provider actually do have them available and how are they surviving in todays times where sharing a little bit of music can get you jail time?

      You can't block usenet, nor can you block posters. It's a relay system, no one hosts the content. What this company is doing is slurping it of the news line and archiving it. There is no central authority on usenet, especially in the "alt.*" area.

      My ISP carries many of the binary groups, including some of the more iffy ones. Warez, filth, nothing blatantly illegal (though that sort of thing goes on on usenet anyway, some nasty stuff). It's down to the usenet provider which groups they carry, and how much space to give each ("retention"). Poor retention means missing posts, which is useless. You gotta pay for decent access to usenet, always have had to really, certainally in the last 5-6 years.

    6. Re:Who does actually host the alt.binary.* groups? by ashayh · · Score: 1

      Verizun does.
      If you're a DSL subscriber, you can access their Usenet servers. They host a LOT of content, although not everything and have decent retention @15 days.
      Roadrunner/AOL have content too, but a lot less than Verizun. Not sure about SBC. Comcast gives you a limit of 2GB per month for Giganews access, which has excellent content.
      And yes, a lot of the alt.binaries.* are there.

  52. All googled out by steve-qc · · Score: 2, Funny

    Slashdot keeps finding ever more creative ways to get the words Google on its front page. This story really has nothing to do with Google yet they managed to google it up.

    Really makes me wonder just how much Google stock did they buy anyway?? :) ....

    Google

  53. Re:How does this differ from other UseNet Archives by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    Apparently he doesn't realize that music videos are also covered by the RIAA...

  54. Slashdot : News for nerds. Stuff that pays. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, there are a number of stories here where the referenced site would likely have been willing to pay for the story. However, if you look at the pages for actually advertising on /., there is no reference to buying an article.

    Well, there wasn't a reference to buying an article on Fark either, and they were selling posts right and left (they still are, but now they admit to it).

    I would be surprised if this WASN'T an ad - there are better ways to get usenet multimedia and I'm sure Taco knows about 'em.

  55. Re:How does this differ from other UseNet Archives by randomErr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The ONLY differences between Guba and any other service is that it has a slightly better categorization system and a better looking design. Nothing to see here, move along.

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  56. Usenet is the anti-bittorrent by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

    BT is efficient. Data starts in one place, then spreads to interested parties, who share the burden of distribution.

    Usenet is wildly inefficient. Data is expanded into an messy ascii encoding, handed to and fro by copying-in-full between thousands of completely uninterested parties, to the order of gigabytes per day. Then the actual interested users download it, taking no part of the burden, quite possibly missing chunks with no way to retrieve them, copy yet again the original from the ascii encoding, log off and throw the encoded data away.

    It made sense when the only comms available to the average computer was intermittent dial-and-forward.

    Nowdays, especially for large binary data, it's beyond obsolete - it's silly.

    1. Re:Usenet is the anti-bittorrent by stinerman · · Score: 1

      True.

      Of course, your ISP's news server will likely be faster than your torrent. For instance, if I'm downloading ... um ... a DVD-ISO of my favorite Linux distro (that's the ticket!), I mightn't max out my connection on the torrent, depending on how many seeds there are and the size of their pipes, etc. Since your local news server is just that, local, you're pretty much guaranteed to max out your connection (unless your ISP throttles port 119).

      Its incredibly inefficient, but the average end user will find it faster than most P2P filesharing networks.

    2. Re:Usenet is the anti-bittorrent by nunchux · · Score: 1

      Nowdays, especially for large binary data, it's beyond obsolete - it's silly.

      You're correct, of course, but what's the alternative? If it was scrapped (not that something that has no real center or base of operations can really be scrapped) then whatever beast replaced it certainly wouldn't allow the complete freedom we have right now.

      Usenet's really just "one of those things." It's horribly inefficient, it takes some know-how and a lot of patience to access, but the rewards are worth it.

  57. Subscribe!? by anonymous22 · · Score: 0

    One thing the article forgets to mention: You can search, but you can't get. You have to pay $15 per month to access.

    --
    Anyone who runs is V.C. Anyone who stands still is well-disciplined V.C.
    Door Gunner, Full Metal Jacket
  58. Re:How does this differ from other UseNet Archives by harvardian · · Score: 1, Informative
    From the article you linked:

    Beginning this month, Guba will convert video files from Usenet into the format used by the iPod, known as H.264 .. and lets users stream small versions from its Web site.


    Does EasyNews do that?
  59. Google for Usenet? by Suppafly · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Isn't google like google for usenet?

  60. Revocation of license to manufacture similes by Otterley · · Score: 1

    Its (sic) like "Google for Usenet," says this report.

    We already have a Google for Usenet. It was called DejaNews, which was bought by--you guessed it--Google.

  61. Cuba did what? by yderf · · Score: 1

    Ok did anyone else read that as CUBA search easy as Google? Seriously confused for a moment.

  62. Gopher by ChrisBennett · · Score: 1

    In other news, an as yet unheard of seven year old company is launching a new service to quickly find content among Gopher servers. Gopher is a treasure trove of useful textual content. "It's like Google for Gopher," says the report.

    Now everyone is going to Gopher 2.0

    </sarcasm>

  63. slashvertisement! by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    anyone else wondering why this is posted on the same day this story is on msnbc?

    Search engine preps porn for video iPod
    Guba to convert video files into format used by Apple's player

    one can only wonder.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  64. Shhhhhhhhhh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Despite the growing popularity of p2p networks,Usenet is the real treasure trove of multimedia content including vintage cartoons, westerns and popular television shows.

    Can we please not mention this too loudly.

  65. Don't use Outlook Express for Usenet downloads... by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

    Outlook Express has newsreader capabilities but is absolutely horrible at downloading binaries. It's extremely slow for one thing, often pinning the CPU at 100% while "searching message for hyperlinks". It also requires you to manually select all the pieces of a file and move them into the correct order.

    This little program, on the other hand, is amazing. It automatically gathers scattered pieces together and shows at a glance whether all the pieces are present. There is a small learning curve with Binary Boy but if you use Usenet for downloading pr0^H^H^Hmedia it pays off quickly in the time you will save.

  66. Don't worry about the RIAA... by sweetnjguy29 · · Score: 1

    ...just download from the amateur home-made photo and movie newsgroups.

  67. All your base are belong to us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well we all know Google wants to "own" everything. Only they promise to not be evil about it.

  68. will they index... by nazsco · · Score: 1

    will they index RIAA's subpoenas?

  69. And there I was... by ChrisK077 · · Score: 1

    ... still thinking that Usenet is primarily a text based medium.

    But that's seems to be too much 1990s thinking these days, unfortunately. Discussion mainly happens in web forums. Yet, if you search for a particular piece of information, Google Groups search can be so much than having to trudge through gazillions of EBay "search results" when using web search.

    I think, it's very unfortunate, that Usenet is primarily seen as a distribution platform for (illegal) binary content.

  70. Hmmm. by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

    Seems like a slashvertisement to me...

    And their site - it ain't no friggin' google :)

    Google is free. Guba is bloody expensive.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  71. Followup, attn mods by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    Hey, not flaming I'm being serious. Quickest way to destroy a new technology is to put the spotlight on it and say "it helps you get copies of copyrighted media". Which the summary says, thusly:

    Usenet is the real treasure trove of multimedia content including vintage cartoons, westerns and popular television shows.

    If it wasn't for public statements like these, BitTorrent wouldn't be in any trouble. Right? So let's keep quiet about our old beloved Usenet so the *AA doesn't bring the hammer down.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  72. And that's OK. by bashibazouk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bittorent only works well if the content is popular. Try to download something old or obscure sometime. 5 megs, one seed and no leachers, and I supposed to wait 10 hours for the download? Now that's silly and wildly inefficient.

  73. Re:WTF?! Easynews has 100TB and a better search by cybrthng · · Score: 2, Funny

    Whats up with your ad?

  74. Thankfully... by RonaldReagan · · Score: 0

    Thankfully USENET is still too difficult for the average, shall we say, tarduser who wants free gifts of movies, software, and music.

    People especially seemed baffled by PAR files and other USENET arcana, which is good. As a Newzbin user myself, and a binary news reader user before that, it's a common occurance to find someone who has no idea how to use PAR files.

    As USENET is made simpler and simpler, and the tired and retarded masses descend on it, we know it's not gonna last forever. It's only a matter of time before it's cracked down on.

  75. Oh great... by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    Just when Usenetters thought they were safe from the unwashed hordes and had enough n00bs to deal with arguing over Yenc, Rar, and split files...

    As others have mentioned the RIAA and MPAA will no doubt be looking more at these areas now. I suspect the OSS community will get the demand they need to really get behind things like Tor, Privoxy, etc. as well as a resurgence of Mixmaster and Nym anonymous mail/usenet. There will be the usual arguments here and there about encryption and anonymity being G-d's gift to mankind or a sign of sure skullduggery.

    Great. Now I can listen to more useless arguing over JBN vs. Quicksilver again. Spammers finally finishing off Usenet as the really good old time posters leave due to that and n00bs for private boards and then Usenet will go down in flames for good. Pr0n will be no more on Usenet if it isn't spam because spammers post only commercial ad clips and pic and n00bs aren't brilliant enough or caring enough to post anything themselves. MP3s? Hah. They'll leave too. Old tv show trades posted openly? Thing of a long lost past.

    This is definitely going to backfire. Or if you're a committed tinfoil hat afficianado, then this is going to do exactly what it was designed to do: put the last nails into Usenet.

    I'm not an elitist, being in favor of people using Windows if they be not techies just so they can have an Internet experience too, but Usenet is to the net what Lynx is to the web. It's old, clunky, and esoteric and not for n00bs, especially the ones who don't want to learn and want everything done for them and complain endlessly. However, for those who are willing to learn to dance across a keyboard and memorize ten dozen exotic things, it can be a wonderful way of sharing information to those looking for it. n00bs don't belong there. There's too many as it is.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    1. Re:Oh great... by susasusesume · · Score: 1

      It's old, clunky, and esoteric and not for n00bs

      Esoteric? Usenet is not a food!

      (Brian: "A swing and a miss!")

  76. usenet providers by stopbit · · Score: 1

    you can also take a look
    here

    --
    ~insert tech sarcasm here~
  77. Overheard at RIAA by DistantShadow · · Score: 1

    Don't you all get it? IT'S A TRAP!! This was overheard at RIAA headquarters a few days ago (the names have been changed to protect the bastards).

    Joe: Hey Mike, I just discovered this GUBA thing. I can download all the porn I want for only $15 a month!

    Mike: Awesome! What else do they have?

    Joe: Dunno. I've only used it for porn so far. Let's check it out... HOLY SHIT! There's all kinds of pirated music on here! We gotta shut this down...but what about my porn?

    Mike: So, this usenet thing is pretty big, right? How can find every usenet provider?

    Joe: Good question...

    Mike: I have an idea. We can post a story on /. that praises GUBA. Then, sit back as we watch all the /. posters make comments like "GUBA sux, xyz is soooo much better". Once we have the names of all the competing usenet providers, we can swoop in and shut them all down.

    Joe: Excellent idea. Is it ok if I keep using it for porn until we have to shut it down?

    Mike: I don't see why not...

    Joe: Hey Mike, isn't that your wife? What's she doing with that cow???

    -ds

  78. Re:WTF?! Easynews has 100TB and a better search by LesPaul75 · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that Easynews has been around for ages. Easynews was kind of the "best kept secret" in the world of usenet binaries. This stupid slashvertisement for Guba is very unfortunate.

  79. Re:WTF?! Easynews has 100TB and a better search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All hail easynews! (no, really I love it)

  80. Easy way to get sued... by MrPerfekt · · Score: 1

    Advertising themselves as a search engine for all the copyrighted content on Usenet is not the best business plan. Only a matter of time before the MPAA/RIAA/TV Networks come down on them.

    --
    I just wasted your mod points! HA!
  81. webgoggles damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  82. Re:WTF?! Easynews has 100TB and a better search by Lostie · · Score: 1

    He might work for a rival news service (Easynews), but damnit he's right.

    Easynews compared to GUBA (and for that matter any other USENET provider) is like driving a porsche compared to eating a fresh, steaming turd.

  83. Guba? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GUBA? Isn't that Gastro's gountry?

  84. There is no usenet. by Jakyll · · Score: 1

    Submitter was just kidding RIAA MPAA and the rest of the Media! There is no such thing as usenet. Now go arrest a grandmother.

  85. Re:WTF?! Easynews has 100TB and a better search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BZZZZZZT! Try again, troll ass-clown. I have never once, in YEARS of using Easynews, seen its performance be anything less than excellent.

    Of course, that (and Usenet) may change now that the cat is out of the bag, thanks to this retarded Slashdot advertisement/article.

  86. Re:WTF?! Easynews has 100TB and a better search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love Easynews!

  87. Re:WTF?! Easynews has 100TB and a better search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Posting a comment is a little different than whatever GUBA had to do to purchase a front page advertisement on Slashdot.

  88. Internet's best kept secret - now down the toilet! by mlmurray · · Score: 1

    Damn! Now Usenet is no longer "under the radar". I knew this would happen eventually, but I was hoping for later rather than sooner.

    It was very nice knowing you, Usenet. You will be missed.

  89. Hello? Not unique. by mb101 · · Score: 1

    For people who use Google a lot, it's surprising that noone has found that this site is just one of a few. It's also smaller than some, and cheaper than some. Search for 'usenet binaries' on Google, and you'll find better services than GUBA.

  90. Combined with bittorrent by bitspotter · · Score: 1

    I'd download, transcode, index, and then *torrentize*, track, and seed the content. that might be worth paying $5-$10 a month for.

  91. All videos available in Flash by elambrecht · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can we at least get some props for transcoding all the videos into flash? You can always get the original (even from some other Usenet provider, you cheapskates), but if you just want to see the damn video without having to dork with different codecs or players, you can't beat it.

    Eric...
    (and no.. nobody at Slashdot got a free account for this post... but we'd be happy to hand them out.. ;-))

    1. Re:All videos available in Flash by nagora · · Score: 1
      Can we at least get some props for transcoding all the videos into flash?

      Er...No. What the fuck would I want with a Flash version of a video? What sort of retard wants to run their videos through Flash?! What even made someone think that was a good idea?

      Jesus, I keep Flash switched off for 90%+ of the time I'm on the web; I sure as hell don't want to start having to use it for ordinary files.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    2. Re:All videos available in Flash by klui · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just google for ffdshow and that will solve 99% of your problem with codecs.

    3. Re:All videos available in Flash by klui · · Score: 1

      Flash (or is it Shocwave, whatever, they're from the same company) is bad because you cannot adjust the sound other than changing your master volume. Lame. Why choose Flash?? Check out all those Flash pranks--they're there because you cannot adjust the sound.

  92. shut this place down by bxbaser · · Score: 1

    lets try to keep usenet obscure and hard to use.
    Ive seen every other thing come and go, the faster they go seems to be related to the ease of use.
    Lets go back the the days before par files and nzb files when usenet was hard work and dedication to actually download anything.
    Its been around this long lets try to keep it around longer.

  93. Usenet Treasure Trove? by Xonstein · · Score: 1

    Anyone who has used both Usenet and Bittorrent knows that Usenet is for porn images and clips, Bittorrent is for everything else. The non-porn collection of video and image content on Usenet (and MP3 for that matter) is relatively small and completely random. Guba trying to sell itself to Google as some sort of 'multimedia redistributor' is some really done-up dot-com mumbo-jumbo. Anyone with geek cred uses usenetbinaries.com, they are like 3 times bigger than Guba and free.

  94. Hmm by talicni_tom · · Score: 1

    Advertizing paid warez search websites like this one on slashdot is just wrong.

  95. Re:Internet's best kept secret - now down the toil by Electric+Eye · · Score: 1

    Sad thing is, you're correct. I've been on Usenet since 1993. I love it and no one seems to know about it...until now. :-(

  96. great by tadd · · Score: 1

    another "story" thats really a fscking ad... bastards... i already have a newsfeed thankyou, unless this is free whats the point?

    --
    [what?]
  97. Craptastic! by PhoenixPath · · Score: 1

    Big deal.

    I get full usenet access, awesome retention and completion, web-interface or NNTP, global usenet search (text, binaries, you want it, you can find it), queues, auto-zip, autounrar (I can download the RAR or just the avi), thumbnails, image viewer for $9.98 a month through Easynews.com.

    So...?

    What makes this service worth $15 a month? I skimmed the site and it, well, sucked.

    None of what they offer seems to be new.

  98. !!! REQ: star wars 10!!! by Inda · · Score: 1

    WHERE'S STar wars 10??? why it not posted yet??? cmon GUBA where is it? i've paid my money now post it!!!

    Oh how I love thy Usenet.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  99. 2TB/day?! by dmccarty · · Score: 1

    Who came up with the "2 terabytes uploaded to Usenet every day" figure that the article throws around? Is that one of those astroturf'd numbers? Whose servers are storing 730TB/year for free?!

    --
    Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
    1. Re:2TB/day?! by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

      They aren't storing it for a year, it's usually more like a week. And a lot of news servers that have binaries and good retention times are not free.

      --

      ----
      All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
  100. Re:WTF?! Easynews has 100TB and a better search by looped · · Score: 1

    You're wrong. All connections are getting maxed out. I'm always at 7 megabit and apparently more and more people are maxing out 30 megabit. Problem now? No. Future problem? I doubt it based on the long history of Easynews and their stellar performance.

  101. "Google for Usenet"? by VisceralLogic · · Score: 0

    Let me know when they charge the same google does to search the web...

    --
    Stop! Dremel time!
  102. Already exists by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

    In fact, it has already existed for quite some time, and is just like "Google for Usenet"

    http://groups.google.com/

  103. Ah, the pains of non-mac users.... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 2, Informative

    At the risk of sounding like a salesman like the article, Unison on OS X is probably the greatest Newsgroup client by far. I've used clients on Windows, Linux, and OS X, and this is the only one I've found that takes the globs of files for a certain "file", and groups them. So you just see one item to download, and not a few hundred. Although you still have to wait for groups to download, this view is very similar to indexing services like Guba and newzbin in which you get a nzb file that gives a single thing to download a "file". I really don't get why others have not implemented a similar view in their clients.

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  104. Endless September II: This time its personal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *nt*

  105. Re:Internet's best kept secret - now down the toil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you stop talking about it, people will forget about it. GUBA isn't gonna do Jack to make anybody use usenet. And I'm not saying any more.

  106. I didn't know by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

    To tell the truth, I didn't know that I could get pirated copyrighted material on USENET as well as operating system development advice. Thanks Slashdot!

    Seriously, I'm too lazy to search through our local newsgroup server to find one that'll host binaries.

  107. shhhhhh by observer7 · · Score: 0

    Usenet is the real treasure trove of multimedia content shhhhhhh

  108. Others better and cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try Pictureview.com or diiva.com they are cheaper and carry more groups!

  109. Er:FFFUUU!!! by kcurtis · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't that be in ROT13?

    Um, I mean

    Fubhyqa'g gung or va EBG13?

  110. Just keep asking for it.... by drunkgoat · · Score: 1

    I keep hearing usenet in the news, it's as if the media is enticing the RIAA to do something. I mean in every article I read, they say something how it's better than P2P and that the RIAA hasn't touched it. Well so much for flying under the radar. Pretty soon usenet is going to be full of dummy files, dummy posts, and dummy p2p users. Usenet was the final frontier, 2006 will be the end as we know it.

  111. Re:WTF?! Easynews has 100TB and a better search by Rodness · · Score: 1

    Even though I'll be modded down for supporting Godzilla, Easynews.com really does kick ass. I've been using it for several years now and I'm extremely pleased. The global search alone is worth the price of admission, but there's tons of other useful stuff there too (put stuff in zip files before downloading, http and nntp interfaces, nntp discounts towards quota, etc).

    It's well worth the $10/mo. Don't knock it just because it's not free until you've given it a test drive.

  112. a fine foil for Google indeed by binarybum · · Score: 1

    hey, wow it is just like google except you have to pay a hell of a lot for it, oh and it fucking sucks.

    and since your usage will be tracked through your account, you'll probably end up getting sued someday.

    --
    ôó
    1. Re:a fine foil for Google indeed by CaptainTux · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's *not* "just like Google". It allows you to search binary groups which Google does not carry. Come on now, why not try actually *visiting* the site in question before trashing it and trying (and failing) to be witty about it?

      --
      Anthony Papillion
      Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
      "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
    2. Re:a fine foil for Google indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, turn the sensitivity up on the sarcasm detector...and RTF summary .

  113. Re:How does this differ from other UseNet Archives by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 1

    Actually...

    EasyNews has this neat AutoUNRAR feature that lets you stream rar'ed content (Long videos, TV shows, movies, usually all released to usenet rared up)

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
  114. Re:Internet's best kept secret - now down the toil by mlmurray · · Score: 1

    Stop talking about what? ;-)

  115. Re: paying... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're not paying to pirate. You can do that on your own without spending any money. What you are paying for is "advanced piracy-related services".

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  116. Re:How does this differ from other UseNet Archives by klui · · Score: 1

    Who cares if they're just transcoding?

  117. NewsLeecher by Daath · · Score: 1

    NewsLeecher has a built in SuperSearcher (accesses the net) that searches a HUGE amount of groups - Retention >50 days for the searcher. NewsLeecher itself is NSP-independent, so you are free to choose among the many good NSP's. GigaNews, NewsHosting, EasyNews etc etc.

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
    1. Re:NewsLeecher by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      I would definately recommend GigaNews. Very good news source! NewsHosting is awesome as well, just not quite the retention I like to see.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
  118. Re:WTF?! Easynews has 100TB and a better search by plazman30 · · Score: 1

    I am quite happy with Easynews. I recommend them highly.

  119. That's awesome! by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

    Now all we need is something worth searching for on usenet.

  120. Sample images appear to be targeting pedophiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Each of the pr0n links on their site feature a number of sample images that repeat for every day in the archive. These images appear to be carefully choosen as many feature borderline teens some of which could be substantially under age.

    A quick browse gives me the impression that they're reaching out to a questionable target market (pedophiles)! Even though everyone here knows 'child porn' makes it's way onto the usenet I think it's low that they're actually baiting pedophiles with that.

    Call me flaimbait if you want, but check it out for yourself. None of the other news gathering services used these tactics.

  121. Re:WTF?! Easynews has 100TB and a better search by Odocoileus · · Score: 1

    Wow, Easynews sounds great,I'm going to give easynews a try.

    --
    ...
  122. So what you're saying is... by Mudcathi · · Score: 1

    ... everyone who uses Usenet is an asshole? Why, sir, I quite resemble that compliment!

    --

    "He who throws mud, loses ground." - proverb

  123. Re:WTF?! Easynews has 100TB and a better search by davidu · · Score: 1

    Furthermore, Godzilla and the folks at EasyNews are known good guys with good business cred, good tech cred, etc.

    GUBA is not known to be run by good guys, quite the opposite actually.

    -davidu

    --

    # Hack the planet, it's important.
  124. all about the $$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love it when companies want you to pay for something that has existed for free for decades.

    This post == MARKETING

    Nothing to see here...move along.

  125. Re:WTF?! Easynews has 100TB and a better search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've driven the porsche. Tell us more about eating a fresh steaming turd.