No you need assitance from the GNU foundation - they have the lawyers (two law professors if i am not mistaken) and they would like to fry that company - then everybody would fear and respect the GPL.
I cannot understand why he wants so much security- those who want it for free, will get i sooner or later, and it is not like the storyline is new in any, according to TFA it is a 193* classic.
I doubt, that a crash in the US could take down most of the industrial world - sure the US is big, and it is going to hurt, but it is not big enough to kill everything.
A lot of software these days is heavely bloated. So a laptop like yours could properly only run old software, wich means that you will either have to buy a new one, or swich to something less demanding.
I did a little calculation on that one. Acoording to the linux counter, there are currently some 18 million world wide linux users (that is his guess anyway)
If that rate double per year, then 6 years from now we will have a total of 5,76 billion linux users.
Twenty years from now we will have 94371,84 Billion linux users.
If we take the registered linux users we will have 5,93 billion linux users in 13 years.
in tweenty years we will have 758,75 billion linux useres.
There are currently some 6,411,000,000 persons on earth
The growth is 1,4% per year.
So in 14 years, there will be more registered linux useres than there will be people on earth, which proves two things: 1)Statisics can be funny but should be taken with a grain of salt 2)Someone will suggest alien inversion.
Saying that P2P is an important network standard and therefore grokster cannot be held liable for what it enables with its software is the equivalent of saying that, since libraries are essential to the transmission of information, the government cannot request that the book "Practical Guide to Terrorist Attacks" be taken off library shelves.
Censorship is a bad thing even if it is for the public good.
true, but it takes time for a hash function to be proven secure - that is a lot of different people have to crypto analyse it to se if it can be craked.
Slashdot Mirror
[url]www.mailinator.com[/url]
I belive in the freedom of information.
The GPL is one way to ensure that freedom of information, there may be otherways.
P2P is one way of getting more free information, including some the current power horders dont want to have free.
If you take the freedom of information away from the GPL, you are harming my belives, an therefor i think you are wrong.
if you use p2p and copy someones nonefree info, you support my belives, and i support you.
It is rather simple, but many people miss it.
No you need assitance from the GNU foundation - they have the lawyers (two law professors if i am not mistaken) and they would like to fry that company - then everybody would fear and respect the GPL.
I cannot understand why he wants so much security- those who want it for free, will get i sooner or later, and it is not like the storyline is new in any, according to TFA it is a 193* classic.
If you build enough supercomputers, build your own eletricity grid and power plant aswell.
If you run solaris (hot swapable processors) it could be cool - AMD for work, intel to warm up your room? (or what ever intel cpus are good at)
I doubt, that a crash in the US could take down most of the industrial world - sure the US is big, and it is going to hurt, but it is not big enough to kill everything.
if he wants to have tax on bying items such as music. Not fair if he wants to tax bandwidth.
A lot of software these days is heavely bloated. So a laptop like yours could properly only run old software, wich means that you will either have to buy a new one, or swich to something less demanding.
I did a little calculation on that one. Acoording to the linux counter, there are currently some 18 million world wide linux users (that is his guess anyway)
If that rate double per year, then 6 years from now we will have a total of 5,76 billion linux users.
Twenty years from now we will have 94371,84 Billion linux users.
If we take the registered linux users we will have 5,93 billion linux users in 13 years.
in tweenty years we will have 758,75 billion linux useres.
There are currently some 6,411,000,000 persons on earth
The growth is 1,4% per year.
So in 14 years, there will be more registered linux useres than there will be people on earth, which proves two things:
1)Statisics can be funny but should be taken with a grain of salt
2)Someone will suggest alien inversion.
on most cell phone you can call 911 even if without the pin.
Saying that P2P is an important network standard and therefore grokster cannot be held liable for what it enables with its software is the equivalent of saying that, since libraries are essential to the transmission of information, the government cannot request that the book "Practical Guide to Terrorist Attacks" be taken off library shelves.
Censorship is a bad thing even if it is for the public good.
This program, created by xx in yyyy, is hereby placed in the public domain.
Agree see you on alt.binaries.picture.erotica
The danes support thiere monarchy too, and it is just as old as The british.
Other than main should return int, what are those bug prey tell?
--you thought it would take 20 million or so years. As it turns out, your estimate was several orders of magnitude too high.--
So it will only take them a thousand years? that i can accept too.
true, but it takes time for a hash function to be proven secure - that is a lot of different people have to crypto analyse it to se if it can be craked.
Try googling for whirlpool
You could hide it in the comments in the pdf file.
Well cant you chance a jumper, so that it is not posible to change the bios?
It is however large enough for a boot area -- hell you could even run dsl on it.
People still use jigdo
It is the best way to get debian.
I had the same thought, but i am afried IBM isn't big enough to win. Maybe they will still though.
Christiansborg
Prins Jørgens Gård 11
1218 København K
Telefon 33 92 33 00
Fax 33 11 16 65
E - mail stm@stm.dk
Against 80% percent of the people, and the will of the majority of the goverment, i dont think he could do it.
The royal house is only for show off these days, they have no voting rights etc.