Slashdot Mirror


IBM Provides Access to Blue Gene On Demand

neutron_p writes "IBM's world renowned Blue Gene supercomputing system, the most powerful supercomputer, is now available at new Deep Computing Capacity on Demand Center in Rochester, MN. The new Center will allow customers and partners, for the first time ever, to remotely access the Blue Gene system through a highly secure and dedicated Virtual Private Network and pay only for the amount of capacity reserved. Deep Computing Capacity on Demand will service new commercial markets, such as drug discovery and product design, simulation and animation, financial and weather modeling and also a number of customers in market segments that have traditionally not been able to effectively access a supercomputer at a price within their budgets. The system enables customers to obtain a peak performance of 5.7 teraflops."

146 comments

  1. 5.7 teraflops by FTL · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Amazing supercomputer. It's /.ed already...

    What's 5.7 teraflops in more familiar units? Like SETI@home workunits/day? By my calculations that's 1.5 workunits every second. Give or take. By comparison the entire SETI@home network is currently running at 67 teraflops.

    --
    Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
    1. Re:5.7 teraflops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Amazing supercomputer. It's /.ed already...

      So is /. as well:

      404 File Not Found

      The requested URL (articles/05/03/12/1341228.shtml?tid=231&tid=136) was not found.

      If you feel like it, mail the url, and where ya came from to pater@slashdot.org.

    2. Re:5.7 teraflops by Roguelazer · · Score: 3, Informative

      And F@H has 187 TeraFLOPS. However, random companies cannot use SETI@Home or Folding@Home for drug research, can they? :P

    3. Re:5.7 teraflops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing supercomputer. It's /.ed already...

      Yeah, because you know they're using it for the web server.

    4. Re:5.7 teraflops by hobobeaver · · Score: 5, Informative

      Blue Gene actaully runs at 70.72 teraflops (http://www.top500.org/lists/2004/11/), and not 5.7.

      --
      wtfsig?!11
    5. Re:5.7 teraflops by temponaut · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The article means 5.7 teraflops peak performance for a customer. Perhaps they are throttling the cpu per customer to 5.7 max? You know; 5.7 should be enough for everybody!

    6. Re:5.7 teraflops by PxM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem with that metric is that SETI@home has such as high lag time between nodes (data gets sent every few hours or so) that you can't really compare it with a supercomputer for most tasks. It would be better to say SETI@home is running at N*X where N is the average user count and X is the FLOPS/user. Other companies are already selling distributed computing time.

      --
      Free iPod? Try a free Mac Mini
      Or a free Nintendo DS, GC, PS2, Xbox
      Wired article as proof

    7. Re:5.7 teraflops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can see that e-mail already...

      Hey Pater... What's happening?

      I'm going to need you to come in on Saturday.. So if you could be here around 9, that would be great. Oh, Pater.. we're also going to need you to come in on sunday. We've lost some URLs this week, and we need to kind of play catch-up.

    8. Re:5.7 teraflops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be insufficient for simulating your mom.

    9. Re:5.7 teraflops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    10. Re:5.7 teraflops by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      Of course not, only researchers.

      The public isn't big on subsidizing drug companies that are already profitting billions on medicine for their grandparents.

      Of course, you knew that ;)

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    11. Re:5.7 teraflops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    12. Re:5.7 teraflops by Kafka_Canada · · Score: 1, Funny

      yeah, but it'd only take one or two flops to stimulate your mom

      --
      Fuck it
    13. Re:5.7 teraflops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Blue Gene is both a specific 70 TFLOP (soon 360 TLFOP) customer system and a product.

      The product is 5.7 TFLOP/rack.

    14. Re:5.7 teraflops by Al+Mutasim · · Score: 1

      How about neurons? Hans Moravec estimates a neuron at 1/1000 MIPS (http://www.transhumanist.com/volume1/moravec.htm) . There's no good conversion from MIPS to teraflops, but say 2 FLOPS/instruction to give 5.7 teraflops as about three billion neurons. If a human brain has 100 billion neurons, this is 0.03 human brains. Plus or minus an order of magnitude. Hardware only.

    15. Re:5.7 teraflops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd expect that someone would actually aspire to be a fucking nerd. Much more enjoyable than being a non-fucking nerd. And I speak from both camps! :-)

      And, yes, I (not the original poster), think there are aliens out there. Not to dis "folding", but there are plenty of notable astrophysicists and cosmologists who believe the same.

    16. Re:5.7 teraflops by hobobeaver · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the parent seemed to imply that the Seti@Home network was faster, or was just comparing the Seti@Home network to Blue Gene. Agreed that 5.7 teraflops is enough for anyone though.

      --
      wtfsig?!11
    17. Re:5.7 teraflops by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      ^familiar^trendy

    18. Re:5.7 teraflops by Monster+Zero · · Score: 1
      The Blue Gene/L system scales from 1 rack (5.7 teraflops) to 64 racks (~360 teraflops). This artical refers to a single rack - thus 5.7 teraflops. The systems on the top500 list are (#1) 16 racks at 70 teraflops (700MHz processors), (#8) 4 racks at 11 teraflops (500MHz processors).

      Both of these systems are prototypes for the full 64-rack system that is being installed at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, currently at 16 racks with another 16 being turned online soon.

      IBM recently announced (like within the past week or two) the single rack system as a stand-alone product.

  2. Yeah, just wait... by farmhick · · Score: 4, Funny

    until all the Road Runner customers jump on it, and the bandwidth goes to hell. My three-d real-time animation of last week's blizzard with slow to a crawl, and then I'll probably get a pop-up advising me to switch to that other supercomputer the Japanese made last year.

    Man, I hate when that happens.

    --
    I have to stop wasting so much time reading Slashdot. It's interfering with my crystal meth addiction.
  3. Google? by macpulse · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder if Google will compete with this when they release their supercomputer grid/cluster to the world.

    --
    I feel more like I do right now than I did a while ago.
    1. Re:Google? by karvind · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Very possible. But I wonder how does the bandwidth between the processors will compare for the two cases (and will determine what kind of supercomputing applications can be run on them) ? Blue gene is custom designed ( each chip = two processors, four accompanying mathematical engines, 4MB of memory and communication systems for five separate networks). On the other hand google uses commercially available servers and hence may be able to offer the service lot cheaper.

    2. Re:Google? by jacksonj04 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      IIRC the Google grid is mostly incapable of general computing, for reasons such as memory being allocated in 64mb blocks.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    3. Re:Google? by 1tsm3 · · Score: 1

      Google's supercomputers are built for very very spefific tasks. So I don't think google will be able to offer something similar to this. Google's supercomputers could be compared to a very large private SETI@Home network (SETI@work?? :)).

      --
      -ItsME
    4. Re:Google? by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      >may be able to offer the service lot cheaper.

      It'd better be cheap 'cause it'll certainly suck - either their supercomputing or the search engine. You can't do both low-latency supercomputing and fast response web search and webmail.

      They could, of course, add more servers and balance the load between their current and their new (HPC) services, but their current workloads must be pretty consistent (say, growing 0.3% a day) so they would really need dedicated HPC boxes.

      Besides, there's not much in their current technology that lends itself to running HPC workloads - it doesn't sound like they use fast interconnects or HPC-like software, they only have a bunch of servers (and Google File System, which is unrelated to HPC anyway), that's all. Maybe they could uptake huge dataset uploads, but I don't see how would that constitute any on-demand HPC service.

  4. Mind in the gutter by thank-u-for-sharing · · Score: 3, Funny

    IBM Provides Access to Blue Gene On Demand.
    I would be interested if Penelope Cruz is wearing them!

    --
    The problem is the users
    1. Re:Mind in the gutter by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Correction: It'd be interesting if Penelope Cruz *wasn't* wearing them.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  5. If I get a good tax return by 3770 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll buy some time to run this program

    int main() {
    for(;;) fork();
    }

    --
    The Internet is full. Go Away!!!
    1. Re:If I get a good tax return by jrift · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm more interested in the amount of games available for it. Solitare will never have looked so good!

      --
      Don't Panic
    2. Re:If I get a good tax return by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      what about global thermo nuclear war?

    3. Re:If I get a good tax return by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about a nice game of chess?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:If I get a good tax return by jrift · · Score: 1

      I hear that the root password is 'joshua'

      --
      Don't Panic
    5. Re:If I get a good tax return by ginotech · · Score: 1

      remember, the only winning move is not to play.

    6. Re:If I get a good tax return by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      that would be 'Joshua5' of-course

    7. Re:If I get a good tax return by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course...

    8. Re:If I get a good tax return by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      and no-one can talk to a horse, of course...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  6. IBM advertising ? by MosesJones · · Score: 1

    financial and weather modeling and also a number of customers in market segments that have traditionally not been able to effectively access a supercomputer at a price within their budgets.

    A signed up member of IBM's marketing department. It sounds a slightly odd slashdot line.

    Nice advertising though, and an interesting proposition.

    The mainframe is dead... long live the mainframe

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:IBM advertising ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The mainframe is dead... long live the mainframe

      You have obviously never worked at any large company.

  7. First SUN, and now IBM... by JawzX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Who's next to offer "pay as you compute" access to supercomputer level systems? Apple? HP? Toshiba? Hitatchi? Is this going to be a new market segment or just a flash in the pan? Are companies going to begin outsourcing computer time? Are there going to be giant compute centers in India housing huge systems crunching numbers for companies that would have planed to invest in a lower level super computer for inside use? Will this kill supercomputer/supercluster sales or drive them up?

    An interesting development for sure.

    1. Re:First SUN, and now IBM... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      India can only provide low-cost and -priority services. They don't even have reliable power there. You can tell how much companies care about something when they outsource it to india - it's pure proof that they don't care about providing tech support.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:First SUN, and now IBM... by beswicks · · Score: 1

      Offering Supercomputer access on a pay for time spent basis is nothing new, even my computing department does it if you want to use the 'Big Machines'.

      It would be FAR more interesting if someone like http://www.distributed.net/ started offering commercial clients access to 'super-clusters' made of everyone on the internet who can dedicate some processor power and get paid in return. Of course they would need to work out a bunch of problems but it would be cool.

      And then I could finally start to make back some of the money I spent on this bloody computer.

    3. Re:First SUN, and now IBM... by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      That's old news too though. Zombie'd hosts are rented out for spamming and DDoS every day unfortunately.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    4. Re:First SUN, and now IBM... by tomjen · · Score: 1

      If you build enough supercomputers, build your own eletricity grid and power plant aswell.

      --
      Freedom or George Bush
    5. Re:First SUN, and now IBM... by SunFan · · Score: 2, Informative


      Sun is offering a vanilla Solaris environment that pretty much anyone is familiar with. Is IBM able to deliver a vanilla RHEL/SuSE Enterprise environment on BlueGene? There is a slight difference between a custom-built supercomputer and a rack of standard Opteron and SPARC servers. It seems the other IBM services listed at the bottom of the article are more in-line with Sun's offering.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
  8. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I can compile Gentoo in under a day.

    1. Re:Finally by Eternal_Flame · · Score: 1

      I've done that wth a P3, this thing could rip through gentoo in a matter of minutes

      --
      ~You laugh because I'm different, I laugh because I'm insane~
    2. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you would spend more time typing and transfering files than you would compiling!

  9. SUN by A.K.A_Magnet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It reminds me of what SUN was talking about in this.

    Jonathan Schwartz must be happy to see that finally, his idea of selling cpu time is being realised (and how much he loves IBM ;))

    Anyway, even if, I guess, the price will be lot higher than Jimi Hendrix (and that's something), the few people getting access to some of the best performing supercomputers is really nice.

    To sum up : nice business plan.

  10. Gotta love IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I remember when a friend of mine working at IBM when they were in the process of chosing the name told be that he was pushing the "Blue Gene" name to piss off creation "scientists" and other religious nuts who don't believe in genes and the fact of evolution and speciation in the DarwinOS-style fashion. Just wait before "Dr." Richard Paley (a teacher of "Divinity" and "Theobiology" at Fellowship "University") will write another idiotic crackpot bullshit in his "Evolutionism Propaganda" column. Let me quote: However, these propagandists aren't just targeting the young. Take for example Apple Computers, makers of the popular Macintosh line of computers. The real operating system hiding under the newest version of the Macintosh operating system (MacOS X) is called... Darwin! That's right, new Macs are based on Darwinism! While they currently don't advertise this fact to consumers, it is well known among the computer elite, who are mostly Atheists and Pagans. Furthermore, the Darwin OS is released under an "Open Source" license, which is just another name for Communism. They try to hide all of this under a facade of shiny, "lickable" buttons, but the truth has finally come out: Apple Computers promote Godless Darwinism and Communism. People like "Dr." Richard Paley makes me proud to be an atheist, and the humor of IBM's and Apple's developers only keeps reminding me about it.

    1. Re:Gotta love IBM by Nine+Tenths+of+The+W · · Score: 4, Informative

      People like "Dr." Richard Paley makes me proud to be an atheist, and the humor of IBM's and Apple's developers only keeps reminding me about it.

      The joke's on you. The website is a parody.

      --
      Slashdot: News for Nerds, Stuff that matters only to them
    2. Re:Gotta love IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parody? No, my friend. Landover Baptist is a parody. Betty Bowers is a parody. OBJECTIVE: Christian Ministries is not. Compare their merchandise. Read their articles. Christian Ministries is even trying to shut down Landover Baptist. Trust me, I wish it was a parody but it is not. Christian Ministries is one of the websites that are parodied by Betty Bowers and Landover Baptist. Unfortunately, some of the christian fundamentalist websites are for real. That is why we need parodies, to expose the real ones. Saying "oh, it must be a parody" is easy. Many dangerous things look like parodies. For me every website of scientology, homeopathy or acupuncture and touch healing looks like a parody, but are they? Or maybe you could somehow support your claim?

    3. Re:Gotta love IBM by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      Please, this subject has been rehashed a million times. OBJECTIVE:Christian Ministries is beyond any reasonable doubt a parody site, it's just much more subtle than some of the others and some of the material contained therein has been repeatedly mistaken by real Christian fundamentalists as being sympathetic to their cause. Which is why you will see some of the "Dr. Richard Paley" essays linked to or discussed around legitimate fundie websites. I assure you that doesn't mean anything.

      Heck, look at this page, then look at the page it links to, become-a-christian.com. They clearly think they are being linked to by a parody site, and I think that even the creation scientists are now realizing they've been had by the OBJECTIVE site. The "campaign" against Landover Baptist is tongue in cheek like the rest of the site. If they ever exerted pressure on anybody to take down the LB site, it was only to create outrage and notoriety for themselves - part of the big hoax that is O:CM.

    4. Re:Gotta love IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is a parody, it's a fucking good one.

    5. Re:Gotta love IBM by VC · · Score: 1

      Is it really? maybe its the hangover, but my sarcasm detector was strangely silent as i read that page.
      Have you got any links/proof its a piss take?

    6. Re:Gotta love IBM by aspx · · Score: 1

      You could have fooled me. I live in Tennessee, and I have heard people say things similar to what is on that web site. Unfortunately they mean it.

    7. Re:Gotta love IBM by kristopher · · Score: 1

      Jokes on you, his post was a parody..

  11. Cryptography by n0dalus · · Score: 0

    Will businesses with virtually infinite money just use this to break encryption and destroy their competitors?

    1. Re:Cryptography by jrift · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested to know if this thing could actually crack modern encryption techniques in a reasonable length of time. Does anyone have any numbers on this?

      --
      Don't Panic
    2. Re:Cryptography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not powerful enough to break any current encryption schemes within a reasonable time.

    3. Re:Cryptography by stalefries · · Score: 1

      But wouldn't businesses with infinite amounts of money be the top dog already? And couldn't they just buy their competition?

      --
      -stalefries
    4. Re:Cryptography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Part of the point of cryptography is to make accessing information cost more than information is worth.

      Besides, it's illegal, and if that aspect doesn't phase you, this might be a more effective method of getting rid of your competition.

    5. Re:Cryptography by awolk · · Score: 1

      No, it can't.
      If you use a 256-bit key and you assume that the algorithm is perfect, ie you have to brute-force, then, due to the 2nd law of thermodynamic (you need a certain amount of energy no less than Tk, where T = absoulute temperature & k = Boltzmann constant to change a bit) you'd still not be able to, even theoretically if we used all the energy from all the stars, to make a counter go through all the sates up to 2^256. It'd take 32 years for out theoretical machine to count even the 2^219 first possibilities, and 32*2^37 years to brute-force our key.

      When/If quantum computers become reality, the complexity will 'only' be half the bits, ie a complexity of 2^128, but it is still pretty much unbreakable, as long as the algorithm is good.

    6. Re:Cryptography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blue Gene is not optimized for cyptography. But there are seveal three letter US government agencies that have many rooms full of supercomputers that are. I wonder how much 90's internet traffic is currently being bulk decrypted as we type?

    7. Re:Cryptography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you say is theoretically true, but in practice algorithms usually turns out to be a failure after around 10-20 years.

    8. Re:Cryptography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having bought a Dell computer at Wal-Mart, I can assure you that I know the ins and outs of crypto computing. The answer is yes, top dog companies have paranormal magic skills that let them conquer the world domination. And considering that other slashdotters are as smart as I am, they'll agree with me.

  12. Think about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Most researcher would love to have free access to this much cpu calculation power ...

    Instead of charging a fee on entry , why dont they take a percentage on the discovery ...

    And for fuck sake can we stop building this things to predict the weather , or its just a lame ass excuse to cover the paimenet made to somebody else and no one ask did it really cost that much , If I whant to know the weather I get my head outside , prediction are often more then not : wrong ...

    Compile the Gnu/Linux kernel in .1 seconds , nice ....

    Finding the sequence for a new aids vaccine.

    1. Re:Think about it by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      Some of the SC's around my place of work can sit idle for days sometimes. Pity really.

  13. /.ed by DaoudaW · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Too bad they don't use a bit a bit of it themselves... Of course if history is any indicator they probably thought the demand would only be about four customers world-wide. ;-)

    1. Re:/.ed by DaoudaW · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Jeez, who's moderating these days...and what do they think redundant means?

      Yeah, when I posted someone else had already posted that the Blue Gene website had been slashdotted. But if they read the rest of my post they'd of realized that wasn't the main idea in my post. My immediate thought when I saw that it was slashdotted was that they hadn't expected a high level of interest from the general public. They thought this would be pretty esoteric and limited to a few researchers who needed lots of processing power on an ongoing basis. In fact, if you're passing out 70 teraflops in 5.7 teraflop chunks you're only looking at around 12 customers. Sure some folks won't use a full chuck, but it still won't be more than maybe 50 customers.

      That reminded me of a feasibity analysis done at IBM in the late 1940s when IBM was developing their first computer. They stated that the worldwide demand for the machine was expected to be around four machines.

      Hence my post. And a sad day for slashdot when I have to explain an allusion to a very famous moment in computing history!

  14. just curious by bogaboga · · Score: 0

    What OS is it running? In case it's not Linux (chances are it isn't), can one slap Linux on it? How would it (Linux) perform? BTW, what distro would perform best?

    1. Re:just curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      RTFA:

      IBM's other US based IBM centers in Poughkeepsie, NY, and Houston, TX as well as the European-based center in Montpellier, France are accessible to customers worldwide via a secure VPN connection over the Internet. Clients have on demand access to over 5,200 CPUs of Intel®, AMD Opteron(TM) and IBM POWER(TM) technology based compute power to run the Linux, Microsoft Windows and IBM AIX operating environments. The new center in Rochester, MN introduces over 2,000 CPUs of IBM PowerPC® based Blue Gene technology to run Linux based workloads.

    2. Re:just curious by Monx · · Score: 3, Informative

      BlueGene runs Linux

    3. Re:just curious by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Actually I want to know the performace drop when some tries to load Windows for Super computers on it, to run Doom3 at 10000 fps.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:just curious by jrift · · Score: 1

      If it does run Linux, I'd like to know how long it would take to run this: rm / -rf

      --
      Don't Panic
    5. Re:just curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " can one slap Linux on it?"

      can you ever really just slap on linux?

      really people, the install needs to be perfect!

    6. Re:just curious by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      that box that SGI made for NASA ran linux, that had (iirc) 1024 processors, so presumably linux does scale. i dont think they used out of the box distro anyway and the kernel was probably highly patched.

      How good is AIX for this kind of job?

    7. Re:just curious by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      [root@bluegene root]# rm -rf / --A few seconds later, a call from a client-- Why did my task just suddenly completely screw up?

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  15. Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This should come in handy the next time I forget my password.

    1. Re:Finally... by 0BoDy · · Score: 1

      um. . . for what? can't you find the 'forgot password link' or are you just unfamiliar with runlevel 1

      --
      Can I be a Luddite too?
    2. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will come in handy when I need to reboot my Windows XP machine .. ;)

  16. News? by The-Bus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it really news? They've had commercials running on TV for this for weeks, if not months. If they had commercials back then, that decision and announcement would've been done before. Why is this news now?

    Not that it's not a cool idea...

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:News? by mcaycedo · · Score: 1

      It appears that nobody here (except you) watch tv

  17. wonder if I can by Chris+Kamel · · Score: 4, Funny

    book some time to play doom3...

    --
    The following statement is true
    The preceding statement is false
  18. Tetris by Therlin · · Score: 1

    I really just want to play Tetris on it.

  19. I'd have said "If someone like him didn't exist .. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    ... we'd have to invent one."

    But one of us already did. B-)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  20. Doom III - More important than drug research by scottinflorida · · Score: 1

    "IBM's world renowned Blue Gene supercomputing system, the most powerful supercomputer..." The video card on it is crap.

  21. How much would you pay by karmaflux · · Score: 4, Funny

    for the best folding@home score you will ever know?

    --

    REM Old programmers don't die. They just GOSUB without RETURN.

  22. And can you imagine ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    ... a beowulf cluster of THOSE puppies?

    For starters, think of the size of the network pipes you'd need between them. (Image of a bundle of optical fibers the size of a watermain.)

    Awesome!

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  23. Re:Great, more drugs! by moonbender · · Score: 1

    Huh?! You're just out to get me!! Here, have some money!

    --
    Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  24. the system feels blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    35 comments and we sucessfully /.ed the worlds most powerful super computer.
    KEEP IT UP!

  25. Folding by varmittang · · Score: 1

    So are they going to be doing Folding@Home when no one is using it.

    --
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    12345
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    1. Re:Folding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Folding by Tore+S+B · · Score: 1

      So are they going to be doing Folding@Home when no one is using it.

      Trust me, with machines this expensive, the CPUs very rarely run idle. There's always another problem waiting to be solved.

      --
      toresbe
  26. How about a Beowulf cluster of these... by DaoudaW · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I know let's take my 5.7 TeraFlops, your 5.7 TeraFlops, and his 5.7 TeraFlops and run a Beowulf cluster...

  27. Huh! by 1tsm3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Did CowboyNeal just take over /. ?? 8 out of the 10 postings are his!!!

    --
    -ItsME
  28. I wonder, which APIs they support by mi · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Parallel Virtual Machine? Any of the Message Passing Interface implementations?

    Or does one need to re-write her/his software to use their own?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:I wonder, which APIs they support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It supports the Parrot Virtual Machine.
      It runs all code as fast as light(*).

      (*) Parrot Virtual Machine will not be completed until 2027.

    2. Re:I wonder, which APIs they support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I work at LLNL. BlueGene/L supports MPI, as well as a limited form of TCP/IP sockets.

    3. Re:I wonder, which APIs they support by laddhebert · · Score: 1
      Chunks of the environment are handed over to the customer and they install and run whatever they like. It might be one of the various scheduling tools out there such as LSF, openPBS, PBS, mpich,etc or something completely in house. To get an idea of what usually runs on these types of systems, check out the xCat home page or the xCat mailing list (or here).

      -L

      --
      Don't Panic.
  29. It's amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did not think it was possible: this Slashdot article about IBM on-demand clusters is even MORE BORING than the article on a motherboard accepting both AMD and Intel CPUs. I can't wait for the next one.

  30. Yeah... by 1tsm3 · · Score: 1

    When they outsource computing time to India, all the computers in the US are gonna get together and make a peaceful demonstration... They would pop up BSOD's just before you click save... And Linux will join in with "OOPs... I told ya not to piss me off..."

    --
    -ItsME
  31. Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Just wait until Google have capitalized on the Google bar's feature of "borrowing" CPU cycles when your computer when you're not using it (talk about grabbing candy from gullible people). Then they'll be able to compete with IBM and the others in super-/grid computing.

  32. 5.7 teraflops by Graabein · · Score: 1
    I know, I know, Moore's law and all that. Still, think about it....

    5.7 teraflops, that's just nuts. I mean, wow.

    Or maybe it's just me getting old, I remember when we were impressed by a VAX 785 upgrade to our 780.

    --
    And remember kids: Never trust a computer you can actually lift.
  33. Want to take it down? by gmuslera · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just ask it to make some tea

    1. Re:Want to take it down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget your blanket and peanuts.

  34. The market is ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I've heard Iran, North Korea and Al-Qaeda are showing a great deal of interest in buying CPU time. I think there's a big potential market out there.

  35. Computing Power Becoming a Commodity? by neomage86 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in the 19th century major companies had a 'Vice President of Power', like we have a VP of IT. Then, a few companies started making all the electricity in one place, and rolling it out to where it was needed. It's always more efficient that way (economies of scale, and diminishing marginal return can become negligble with proper managment).
    Do you think IT will become just another commodity like electricity or water?

    1. Re:Computing Power Becoming a Commodity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Power and water are commodities because one type of, say, 208V three phase is pretty much interchangeable with any other 208V three phase. While CPU time may be interchangeable (I've never seen a supercomputing center that worked well in general), *information* is just not interchangeable. One companies information is not interchangeable with commodity information from another company. In many cases (growing) information security is growing, and to secure that information you need information technology under your own control.

    2. Re:Computing Power Becoming a Commodity? by 0BoDy · · Score: 1

      in short: yes. don't you see it moving that direction. Just look at network atached storage, the new wizards in windos 2003 server, the way linux/Novell/IBM are moving to less configuration, more automation. eventually,function will be segmented and generalized, and there will be no need for VP of IT: the dell (insert name of competitors here) sales rep will be the "in effect" VP of IT. they'll sell the "solutions" that customer needs, and the customer will buy "solutions" to real-life BUSINESS problems.

      --
      Can I be a Luddite too?
    3. Re:Computing Power Becoming a Commodity? by Mignon · · Score: 1
      Do you think IT will become just another commodity like electricity or water?

      Funny that water, probably the ultimate commodity here on Earth, is being branded and costs more per gallon than gasoline.

      I'm no economist, but to respond to your question, I think the answer is yes and no: yes there could be a commodity aspect to it, but no, it won't be a commodity the same way electricity and water are.

      From the point of view of the rent-a-supercomputer customer, it's just like any other new system: I assume we're still a long way from having programs for super-computers that can compile (let alone run) right off the bat on any other super-computer. (I doubt anybody writes their super-duper non-parallel, non-linear modeling software in Java.) So to me, that doesn't really make it a commodity.

      At the consumer level, the way computing is getting to be a commodity is in how for many people a computer means "the internet" which means a web browser. Pretty much any personal computer can provide a browser that can access any web site nowadays. So for the web-only crowd, that's a pretty good approximation of a commodity.

      By that interpretation, if you've ever visited a web cafe or public library, etc. that provided internet access, you've used commodity computing.

      Same goes for public WiFi hotspots. In many places, the ability to get online (bring your own hardware) is a commodity thanks to all the hotspots. Note that "commodity" doesn't have to mean "no cost."

  36. + Funny by alex_ware · · Score: 1

    Sorry YOU deserved my last mod point.

    --
    If you have nothing useful to say post as AC.
  37. LAN party... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    hehe I'd like to rent this to bring to the next LAN party... I'd be the game server and no one would lag ;)

    hmmm it's pretty damn big though. I guess I'd have to bring the LAN party to it.

  38. Gamer's question by imnoteddy · · Score: 0

    What FPS games have been ported to Blue Gene? Are any of those multi-player?

    --
    No electrons were harmed creating this post, though some may have been subjected to electrical and/or magnetic fields.
  39. What goes around comes around. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is the same computing model as was used in large "computing centers" - such as those in universities - back in the 1950s-1970s:

    The machine you need is too expensive to buy yourself and then leave sitting around idle most of the time (like a pencil sharpener). So an institution buys and sets one up, and you rent chunks of its time. If the demand goes up the institution gets more rent and can buy upgrades.

    You get a machine fast enough to do your too-big-for-humans computing task in a short time (so YOU don't spend most of your time waiting to do YOUR next piece of work, like a pencil sharpener). You only pay for the amount you use.

    Billing by CPU seconds, I/O volume, memory usage (fast and files), etc.

    In the '50s you took your work to the machine, by the '60s remote terminals were becoming available, by the '70s packet-switching networks were making machines available across continents.

    And also by about the '70s you were starting to see both comm and crunch becomming so cheap that, for ordinary jobs, accounting by the slice no longer made economic sense. Better use of money scattering (cheap) computers around and making them wait than only having a few and making (expensive) people wait.

    Paying for comm by usage metering never caught on (too bursty, wastes human attention worrying about the effect on the bill, ...). Just buy the size of pipe you need to keep from being bottlenecked at peak load and leave it mostly idle. (You'd end up doing that by proxy anyhow - eliminate the middleman.) Client-server computing models moved institutions to a similar model for crunch and storage. General-user timesharing services gave way to networking services with unmetered shell accounts, which gave way to pure networking services, as the cheapening of computation evolved the personal terminal from a special purpose keyboard/display/comm box, first to terminal emulation on a dumb computer, then to one application on a progressively more powerful (though still small and cheap) computer functioning as a full-blown network node.

    But there are still REALLY BIG jobs were the economics of a shared utility make perfect sense. IBM was once a primary provider of machines to such utilities within educational and business institutions. Now it's largely a business service provider. It seems approprate they should recognize the opportunity and use it as a way to make a profit by filling a gap at the high end of the computing market.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:What goes around comes around. by tigertiger · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually, today's supercomputing centers still operate in exactly that way - they buy a big computer, people apply for time on it, you submit your jobs, and the time gets charged against your account.

      The only difference is that, I think, all supercomputing centers at this time are government/university-funded, so there is no transfer of actual money in most cases.

      The really new idea in grid computing is not that many users share one machine, but many users many machines.

  40. They're not "building this [] to predict weather" by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And for fuck sake can we stop building this things to predict the weather [...]

    They're not building it "to predict weather". They're building it to do really large computation jobs.

    Predicting weather is just one canonical example of a really hard and really useful thing to do that can be done well by throwing enough crunch at it.

    Some others are fluid/aerodynamic modeling, chemical geometry modeling (especially protein folding and drug/receptor interactions), graphics rendering, mechanical structure and motion simulation, and subatomic particle interactions.

    You'll notice that, in the blurb, they mentioned commercial uses of all of those except for the nuclear engineering applications.

    Given that applied nuclear physics is heavily regulated worldwide, legal users are likely to be funded well enough to have their own machines, and governments get worried about such info traveling on open networks, IBM probably doesn't see much market for that service - or at least not much that they can sell into. B-)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  41. in other news by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Blue Gene runs Doom III with a comfortable 70 frames per second ;)

    1. Re:in other news by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and most of it's computing power is dedicated to parcing the code realtime to get around that hardcoded 60 frames per second Carmack put in...so 70 fps /is/ actually pretty impressive :P

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    2. Re:in other news by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1
      Yes, you got me chuckling ;)

      Nice call :)

  42. I wonder if Neil Diamond will write a song for it? by Brasstax · · Score: 1, Funny

    Money talks But it don't sing and dance And it don't talk As long as I can have you login to me I'd much rather be Forever in blue genes. Honey is sweet But it ain't nothing next to Big Blue's treat And if you'll pardon me I'd like to say We'll do okay Forever in blue genes Maybe tonight Maybe tonight by the drive array All alone you and i Nothing around but the sound Of my drives and your sighs Money talks But it don't sing and dance And it can't crunch As long as I can have you logged into me I'd much rather be Forever in blue genes And money is sweet But it ain't nothing next to big blue's treat And if you'll pardon me I'd like to say I'd like to say I'd like to say I'd like to say I'd like to say I'd like to say I'd like to say I'd like to say ERROR

  43. Will it be as good as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the ACS-1?

  44. On a related note... by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 2, Informative

    These guys offer open access to the Cray machines they have online. You have to get permission from them to do certain things but that's still a small price to get access to a cray.

    Not exactly the same thing as the article but definitely a way for the average joe to learn about supercomputers without building one himself.

    --

    "Bah!" - Dogbert
  45. When computers used to fill bowling alley rooms by suso · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, I remember my dad telling me that back in the early days of computing how computers used to be so big that they filled rooms as large as..... oh wait, Nevermind.

    Kinda looks like a bowling alley too.

    1. Re:When computers used to fill bowling alley rooms by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I remember my dad telling me that back in the early days of computing how computers used to be so big that they filled rooms as large as..... oh wait, Nevermind.

      Gene Amdahl - IBM's archetect for much of the mainframe era - was a lower-level worker at an early company before he went to IBM. (Honeywell, I think it was, or maybe Univac.) While working there he watched in amazement as a computer was designed and delivered to a research institution and it wouldn't fit through the doors. They had to tear out the wall of the basement to get it in. (Then they had to tear it out again to get it OUT when they retired it. B-) )

      One of the first things he decreed when he became IBM's archetect was the dimensions of the standard IBM "blue box" - the chassis module into which they built the pieces of all their mainframe products in decades. (Note that, unlike other vendors, it is NOT a standard multi-bay relay rack.)

      It's a couple inches narrower than the standard elevator door and a couple inches shorter than the depth of a standard elevator car. B-)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  46. does it run edlin? by Maow · · Score: 0
    ... I need to write a letter to my Mom ASAP.

  47. Hoax by Monx · · Score: 1

    For instance, an industry standard connection for peripherals is idiosyncratically retermed "FireWire" (or should we just be honest and call it "HellFireWire"?) while the familiar Recycle Bin is given its new cult name of "Trash Can".

    This site has been around for a while. It is well know to be a joke. It's not even very subtle, yet people still get taken in by it.

    There are even little clues like this:
    <META name="generator" content="Our Lord Jesus Christ, Who hath generated all">

    It's a joke.

  48. Any idea how much a BG/L cost? by grounded_roamer · · Score: 1

    My birthday is comming soon ...

  49. Re:They're not "building this [] to predict weathe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (http://www.llnl.gov/) purchased a BlueGene/L all for themselves. They are not predicting the weather, they are using to simulate our nuclear weapon stockpile performance (http://www.llnl.gov/llnl/missions/nwss.jsp).

  50. Someone already responded by varmittang · · Score: 1

    http://forum.folding-community.org/viewtopic.php?p =67420#67420

    --
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    12345
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
  51. It's for protein folding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And stuff like that. Nanotechnology research. Genetics. Anything that requires stupid amounts of CPU to simulate accurately (believe me, the scientists have no end of problems that they would love to apply massive CPU effort towards). I knew some guys who wrote the first filesystem for Blue Gene, years before it was actually built. Cool stuff.

    Also, IBM has been big on the idea of "Grid Computing" for a while now. Where you rent your CPU cycles from a utility company, and pay for as much as you use (like electricity or water). That lets the available CPU be shared around more efficiently, rather than everyone having their own desktop machines that usually spend 95% of their time idle.

    Personally I don't think Grid Computing will catch on anytime soon, but IBM is always forward-thinking about stuff like this. Who knows what the future will bring.

  52. Yea, but... by GuruBuckaroo · · Score: 1

    can I use to it compile my HL2 maps? Please?

    --
    Poor means hoping the toothache goes away.
  53. TIp to mods: by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Go watch the movie "War games." My post will make much more sense that way.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  54. How do you use a grid? by mnmn · · Score: 1

    Do they create a virtual machine of specific number of CPUs, and boot your choice of OS, and let you work on it, or to they take your (gasp!) Java apps and run them? How do you really use a grid?

    I had a list of kernel config options to try in Linux, and wanted to compile a kernel for each option. I thought a grid is great for it... maybe 30 CPUs for an hour should do it.. and didnt know if I can get multiple virtual machines too, say 2 of 15 CPUs each. But for Sun, the minimum amount was something like 1000 CPU hours to purchase, and little info was provided on how to run the thing or access it.

    Someone should have a poor man's grid, of a bunch of linux-running dual-CPU athlon64 machines, on which you could transfer your files and so whatever... just like dedicated servers, only for much smaller amounts of time.

    Hmmmm... ideas.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  55. Slashdot editorial system could do with by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

    some time on the IBM computer.Increasingly the time lag between stories being reported on major news sites and their being posted on /. is getting absurdly long.

    I read about this some time yesterday here

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/03/11/ibm_rent s_ bluegene/

    Come on Taco , Please do something to fix /. before it's too late.What with the Duplicates, the blatant Advertising ( a well known story poster everyone calls roland) , piss-poor editing , /. has become a parody of its former self.

    --
    Wanted : A Signature.
  56. Re:They're not "building this [] to predict weathe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, weather prediction could be quite useful to you if you were in the insurance business. In fact you couldn't insure your house with unknown risk.

  57. programming environment by convolvatron · · Score: 1

    does anyone know what one uses to program this thing? i found some references to ibm journal publications that are accepted, but not in print yet, and a low level (but nicely simple) message passing library. is it just nasty MPI?

  58. Zig Zag or Rizla? by rs79 · · Score: 1

    "...cannot use SETI@Home or Folding@Home for drug research, can they?"

    You're telling me when I go to somebodys place and their screensaver on their PC is looking for aliens that isn't drug research?

    Welcome, you must be new to earth.

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  59. Not the most interesting way... by r6144 · · Score: 1
    After a while you will just be repeatedly making a failed system call; nothing interesting will happen any more. Better use
    int main() {
    while (fork() >= 0) ;
    return 0;
    }
    in this way you have processes born and dying all the time.
  60. david b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    blue gene du du du i once met a girl named blue gene...