You should start lying to her about it;) No frankly the difference is honesty. You could, for example, lie to her and try to convince everyone else she has Alzheimer's that would get her to shut up and allow you to conceal your mistake.
Nah, I don't think he made that big a leap at all, it was kind of insightful actually. He might not be 100% right, but I don't think he's that far off.
"Science credibility bubble" - my ass. From a fracking journalist no less. What an asshole. Journalists get paid for making shit up, not the other way around.
no the average blue collar idiot is not that smart. the average blue collar idiot hasn't even got a vested interest in the end result. Seriously, why would the average blue collar idiot even care about a corporation that is no longer allowed to pollute anymore? hell, isn't science backtracking a bit by telling the corps they can use CFCs and then screaming about the destruction of the world?
no the average blue collar idiot is complaining about what the corps complain about because they give the easiest answers. Economists, Scientists, Businesses, and Politicians are butting heads. The average idiot is weighing in on subjects that are completely above their heads. It's not much wonder at all that some scientists are loathe to explain discrepancies that will be easily misinterpreted and used as political ammunition for an army of, frankly, blistering morons to go second guessing people that have very little incentive to admit they fucked up in the first place.
Sheeeit!
Anyways, let's say global warming isn't caused by pollution. Isn't it enough to say that 9 out of 10 scientists agree, smokestacks are bad for our health. Just like it's enough to say that 9 out of 10 Doctors agree that smoking is bad for you.
That's the point right there. The details of the problem aren't anyone's fucking business except the professionals. Business said, "well shit - these details don't fit our business model, let's try to discredit everyone that brings this up and fight tooth and nail for every little scrap of deceit we can pass off as expert opinion because we can't figure out a new business direction."
The problem is that business is rigid and inflexible otherwise they wouldn't be using the law to go toe to toe with every professional who says "reality fucks with your business." First and foremost businesses need to get out of the habit of suing people the second they fuck up their business model. RIAA, Cigarettes, climate control, the list goes on and on.
Daniel Henninger of the WSJ can suck my dick. Science isn't dying, journalism is you punk ass drama king. Maybe you should sue the Internet you fucking twat.
Who's funding the trips to Tahiti? Not the politicians they're paid for by the corporations. So, who is funding these trips to Tahiti, it can't be Al Gore, no I'm not buying it. The money bags are on the other side of the argument.
Re:It was the blurst of times.
on
Monkeys With Syntax
·
· Score: 1, Flamebait
Fuck you, you shriveled dick worthless shit for brains moderators, I've got a god-damned point.
Nope, some how I get modded down and el HanzoSpam is given a pass. Brilliant.
how about:
"Religious Freedom" - the freedom to bitch slap religious people.
"Human Rights" - The right to fuck the right, right in the ass.
I mean come on, that "Social Justice" shit isn't even witty. It's the adult on the Internet equivalent of saying "no your stupid". It is JUST hateful. That's it, nothing else, HanzoSpam is simply not very good at developing or communicating his political views and so s/he resorts to threats of violence. WEAK, WEAK, WEAK!!!
Like I give a rat's fucking ass about being moderated flamebait. This "liberal hate" bullshit is sick and fucked up. You fucking retarded piece of shit. You claim government is evil and too big and corporations are teaming up with senators to take your stupid piece of shit rusty bb guns away, then you've got the nerve to claim your politicians are better than the others because they say they're for small government. Are You Shitting me? You fucking moron, of course corporations and politicians are going to tell you what you want to hear before they dump megatons of toxic shit in your drinking water and raise your taxes to pay for the cleanup. You stupid fucking cunt.
Where do you get off claiming all government problems are liberal?
Except new people would have higher UIDs, suggesting that you're parsing the original post's meaning rather than the actual written word. This would be your intuition at work rather than your reading comprehension.
Re:It was the blurst of times.
on
Monkeys With Syntax
·
· Score: 0, Flamebait
Damn homie that's pretty clever! Did you think of it all by yourself? It's kind of like this word I remember as a kid - shart, it means when you shit/fart get it? Your definition for a phrase though is pretty unique. It's almost as good as shart, it's just not as funny, creative, or intelligible. Keep trying though I'm sure one day you'll come with something that could feasibly be accredited to a dimwitted 10 year old.
"Which brought out the typical "grr, copyrights are bad! information wants to be free!" responses that we've all come to know and love. That's who my reply was directed at. What's the problem here? "
I must have felt this attitude was biased.
Anyways, fine, cite our founding fathers as much as you want. I think it's really really fucking cliche. Sometimes it's warranted, but really don't you think the copyright/patent changes are being made on the assumption that new technologies change shit?
But, you didn't actually make that point. The length of copyrights or patents have little to do with the irony of so called "free market" advocates lobbying to regulate their customer base. Fuck, if you really think about it and read the thread again your argument for free and sensible patents and copyrights are much more in line with true capitalism over the bullshit our current regime of circle jerking CxOs try to pass off.
"I don't think that underlying concept has changed any in 250 years. If you have no patents then you have little incentive for innovation. If you have patents that last too long then you also retard innovation. "
you're a jackass. The discussion was about pseudo capitalists raping our IP system to the point you can't use a camera without risking a prison sentence. The irony is in the unregulators calling for regulation. Perhaps I'm not following your take on the subject, but I'm inclined to assume you weren't actually following the subject at all.
From the top, I'm defending pitchpipe's brilliant observation.
Seriously, STFU about what you think our forefathers would do. Fuck you, you don't know, fuck we have full blown shanty towns the size of the old colonies or larger (Detroit). You know what our forefathers would do? They'd burn you at the fuckin' stake the first time you microwaved a goddamned cheeseburger.
And as long as we're citing imaginary experts.
Cleopatra thinks you're a moron.
Napoleon agrees.
General Lee called to say were wrong.
and George Washington wants your mom's phone number.
Hey it's a good idea. Had we been on electric automobiles for the past 80 years the crossover between automobiles, portable computers, robotics, and space exploration would have been significant.
I don't think your question is wrong so much as it is just annoying. Frankly the answer is yes, there's enough resources to support the users that have FreeBSD on the desktop, otherwise, they wouldn't be doing it.
Oh good. For a second I thought you were going to put Panasonic in there. So many people recommend those pieces of shit without really knowing what they are talking about./sarcasm
agreed, anyways if someone else rats them out and he has left there isn't any guarantee someone else won't try to hang him out to dry - even after he's left. Get another job, rat them out, go to a competing business, rat them out, get out asap and call on your first day off of payroll.
bullshit. prison is for people that don't/can't follow rules. the government doesn't give a shit about anything other than the ability to make up their own rules, when people don't follow them, slammer time.
the rules themselves are arrived at through semi-consensus or at least some pseudo majority. this in itself doesn't mean a fucking thing except that the government is doing it's best to serve the people's wishes in order to stay in power. the opposite is the government removing your needs and desires in order to stay in power -> prison.
in the long run, law and order is a very good thing. give people the time and resources to think and produce and they will do really cool shit. leave them to kill each other over governmental seat and they produce shit.
"The familiar expression "steep learning curve" may refer alternately to rapid learning that is easy, or especially hard, or to steady progress that is increasingly difficult. Which is referred to needs to be clarified by context. The difference is specifically whether one is referring to the rate of learning or the rate of investment needed to learn. Typically for a steady rate of learning, the rate of effort or time invested first decreases and then increases without bound in approaching the limits of learning or perfection for a given subject and method. Originally it referred to quick progress in learning during the initial stages followed by gradually lesser improvements with further practice."
yea, I switched to online classes it was awesome, the instructor was obviously a M$ shill though, teaching a Microsoft 2007 Excel class instead of the "History and principles of spreadsheets and how excel is unoriginal drivel" like I had expected from a respectable four year university. I tried to point this out several times by listing all the features that M$ had stolen from other more worthy office suites, quoting wikipedia, citing the Openoffice.org features page, debunking logical fallacies other students used to defend M$, and pointing out that Gnumeric has etched a nice niche among scientific users, but she kept on coming back at me asking if I had read the text book, why I hadn't done the homework and other various trolls. eventually I got kind of fed up with the blatant fanboism I had to deal with on a daily basis and began just trying to get first post in the daily discussions. At first some of the Microtards were liek "what the hell does that mean?" I just laughed, and made some in soviet russia jokes. the next few weeks it was much the same until everyone started igoring me. So, I got creative, from editing wikipedia entries, stealing fellow student's login info (hahah noobS!), and DOSing the online classroom during tests!! It was wicked. Then I posted a goatse to the first post of the finals week discussion and there was like this uprising on that online forum. Sheeit. those lusres are just jealuous because thaey hav eto deal with that POS proprietary excel software all day no wonder they're so bitchy.
Anyways, I'm out on bail and back in my mom's basement managing one of my 250 beta projeccts on source forge right now.
Slashdot Mirror
How is that?
You should start lying to her about it ;)
No frankly the difference is honesty. You could, for example, lie to her and try to convince everyone else she has Alzheimer's that would get her to shut up and allow you to conceal your mistake.
Nah, I don't think he made that big a leap at all, it was kind of insightful actually. He might not be 100% right, but I don't think he's that far off.
"Science credibility bubble" - my ass. From a fracking journalist no less. What an asshole. Journalists get paid for making shit up, not the other way around.
no the average blue collar idiot is not that smart. the average blue collar idiot hasn't even got a vested interest in the end result. Seriously, why would the average blue collar idiot even care about a corporation that is no longer allowed to pollute anymore? hell, isn't science backtracking a bit by telling the corps they can use CFCs and then screaming about the destruction of the world?
no the average blue collar idiot is complaining about what the corps complain about because they give the easiest answers. Economists, Scientists, Businesses, and Politicians are butting heads. The average idiot is weighing in on subjects that are completely above their heads. It's not much wonder at all that some scientists are loathe to explain discrepancies that will be easily misinterpreted and used as political ammunition for an army of, frankly, blistering morons to go second guessing people that have very little incentive to admit they fucked up in the first place.
Sheeeit!
Anyways, let's say global warming isn't caused by pollution. Isn't it enough to say that 9 out of 10 scientists agree, smokestacks are bad for our health. Just like it's enough to say that 9 out of 10 Doctors agree that smoking is bad for you.
That's the point right there. The details of the problem aren't anyone's fucking business except the professionals. Business said, "well shit - these details don't fit our business model, let's try to discredit everyone that brings this up and fight tooth and nail for every little scrap of deceit we can pass off as expert opinion because we can't figure out a new business direction."
The problem is that business is rigid and inflexible otherwise they wouldn't be using the law to go toe to toe with every professional who says "reality fucks with your business." First and foremost businesses need to get out of the habit of suing people the second they fuck up their business model. RIAA, Cigarettes, climate control, the list goes on and on.
Daniel Henninger of the WSJ can suck my dick. Science isn't dying, journalism is you punk ass drama king. Maybe you should sue the Internet you fucking twat.
Who's funding the trips to Tahiti? Not the politicians they're paid for by the corporations. So, who is funding these trips to Tahiti, it can't be Al Gore, no I'm not buying it. The money bags are on the other side of the argument.
Fuck you, you shriveled dick worthless shit for brains moderators, I've got a god-damned point.
Nope, some how I get modded down and el HanzoSpam is given a pass. Brilliant.
how about:
"Religious Freedom" - the freedom to bitch slap religious people.
"Human Rights" - The right to fuck the right, right in the ass.
I mean come on, that "Social Justice" shit isn't even witty. It's the adult on the Internet equivalent of saying "no your stupid". It is JUST hateful. That's it, nothing else, HanzoSpam is simply not very good at developing or communicating his political views and so s/he resorts to threats of violence. WEAK, WEAK, WEAK!!!
Like I give a rat's fucking ass about being moderated flamebait. This "liberal hate" bullshit is sick and fucked up. You fucking retarded piece of shit. You claim government is evil and too big and corporations are teaming up with senators to take your stupid piece of shit rusty bb guns away, then you've got the nerve to claim your politicians are better than the others because they say they're for small government. Are You Shitting me? You fucking moron, of course corporations and politicians are going to tell you what you want to hear before they dump megatons of toxic shit in your drinking water and raise your taxes to pay for the cleanup. You stupid fucking cunt.
Where do you get off claiming all government problems are liberal?
Except new people would have higher UIDs, suggesting that you're parsing the original post's meaning rather than the actual written word. This would be your intuition at work rather than your reading comprehension.
Damn homie that's pretty clever! Did you think of it all by yourself? It's kind of like this word I remember as a kid - shart, it means when you shit/fart get it? Your definition for a phrase though is pretty unique. It's almost as good as shart, it's just not as funny, creative, or intelligible. Keep trying though I'm sure one day you'll come with something that could feasibly be accredited to a dimwitted 10 year old.
http://www.steroid.com/
Hey, yeah, that'll probably work!
You're funny.
"Which brought out the typical "grr, copyrights are bad! information wants to be free!" responses that we've all come to know and love. That's who my reply was directed at. What's the problem here? "
I must have felt this attitude was biased.
Anyways, fine, cite our founding fathers as much as you want. I think it's really really fucking cliche. Sometimes it's warranted, but really don't you think the copyright/patent changes are being made on the assumption that new technologies change shit?
you're taking this to the opposite extreme don't you think?
But, you didn't actually make that point. The length of copyrights or patents have little to do with the irony of so called "free market" advocates lobbying to regulate their customer base. Fuck, if you really think about it and read the thread again your argument for free and sensible patents and copyrights are much more in line with true capitalism over the bullshit our current regime of circle jerking CxOs try to pass off.
"I don't think that underlying concept has changed any in 250 years. If you have no patents then you have little incentive for innovation. If you have patents that last too long then you also retard innovation. "
you're a jackass. The discussion was about pseudo capitalists raping our IP system to the point you can't use a camera without risking a prison sentence. The irony is in the unregulators calling for regulation. Perhaps I'm not following your take on the subject, but I'm inclined to assume you weren't actually following the subject at all.
From the top, I'm defending pitchpipe's brilliant observation.
http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1467386&cid=30329630
What the fuck are you doing?
I pretty much agree with the sentiment.
Seriously, STFU about what you think our forefathers would do. Fuck you, you don't know, fuck we have full blown shanty towns the size of the old colonies or larger (Detroit). You know what our forefathers would do? They'd burn you at the fuckin' stake the first time you microwaved a goddamned cheeseburger.
And as long as we're citing imaginary experts.
Cleopatra thinks you're a moron.
Napoleon agrees.
General Lee called to say were wrong.
and George Washington wants your mom's phone number.
Hey it's a good idea. Had we been on electric automobiles for the past 80 years the crossover between automobiles, portable computers, robotics, and space exploration would have been significant.
well siad!
Bob, you're an idiot.
I don't think your question is wrong so much as it is just annoying. Frankly the answer is yes, there's enough resources to support the users that have FreeBSD on the desktop, otherwise, they wouldn't be doing it.
Oh good. For a second I thought you were going to put Panasonic in there. So many people recommend those pieces of shit without really knowing what they are talking about. /sarcasm
You don't need a period after a quoted sentence that is properly terminated. Consecutive dots, are consecutive dots after all.
Let me just feel a tad bit more secure with my Google bar code rather than your Bing code.
agreed, anyways if someone else rats them out and he has left there isn't any guarantee someone else won't try to hang him out to dry - even after he's left. Get another job, rat them out, go to a competing business, rat them out, get out asap and call on your first day off of payroll.
bullshit. prison is for people that don't/can't follow rules. the government doesn't give a shit about anything other than the ability to make up their own rules, when people don't follow them, slammer time.
the rules themselves are arrived at through semi-consensus or at least some pseudo majority. this in itself doesn't mean a fucking thing except that the government is doing it's best to serve the people's wishes in order to stay in power. the opposite is the government removing your needs and desires in order to stay in power -> prison.
in the long run, law and order is a very good thing. give people the time and resources to think and produce and they will do really cool shit. leave them to kill each other over governmental seat and they produce shit.
I thought the same, but it makes perfect sense:
"The familiar expression "steep learning curve" may refer alternately to rapid learning that is easy, or especially hard, or to steady progress that is increasingly difficult. Which is referred to needs to be clarified by context. The difference is specifically whether one is referring to the rate of learning or the rate of investment needed to learn. Typically for a steady rate of learning, the rate of effort or time invested first decreases and then increases without bound in approaching the limits of learning or perfection for a given subject and method. Originally it referred to quick progress in learning during the initial stages followed by gradually lesser improvements with further practice."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_curve
yea, I switched to online classes it was awesome, the instructor was obviously a M$ shill though, teaching a Microsoft 2007 Excel class instead of the "History and principles of spreadsheets and how excel is unoriginal drivel" like I had expected from a respectable four year university. I tried to point this out several times by listing all the features that M$ had stolen from other more worthy office suites, quoting wikipedia, citing the Openoffice.org features page, debunking logical fallacies other students used to defend M$, and pointing out that Gnumeric has etched a nice niche among scientific users, but she kept on coming back at me asking if I had read the text book, why I hadn't done the homework and other various trolls. eventually I got kind of fed up with the blatant fanboism I had to deal with on a daily basis and began just trying to get first post in the daily discussions. At first some of the Microtards were liek "what the hell does that mean?" I just laughed, and made some in soviet russia jokes. the next few weeks it was much the same until everyone started igoring me. So, I got creative, from editing wikipedia entries, stealing fellow student's login info (hahah noobS!), and DOSing the online classroom during tests!! It was wicked. Then I posted a goatse to the first post of the finals week discussion and there was like this uprising on that online forum. Sheeit. those lusres are just jealuous because thaey hav eto deal with that POS proprietary excel software all day no wonder they're so bitchy.
Anyways, I'm out on bail and back in my mom's basement managing one of my 250 beta projeccts on source forge right now.
Fuck excel lmann!!1