I wonder if you could make a fair use argument - I presume they aren't distributing the whole work only a modified binary, is making multiplayer work transformative?
Seems like you could have each classroom with its dedicated wifi access point and give the teacher a switch to toggle internet access, limit it to sites, etc. Doesn't help with cellular connections obviously.
I suspect the older webcams would have been easily fooled by a picture of your face whereas the newer devices like Windows Hello or now Apple's Face ID have varying degrees of protection from it.
Much like Tesla fanboys you're mixing reliability and the functionality of a product. They can test one, they'd need a crystal ball to predict the other.
Man, you didn't even bother to read the summary. It actually starts with predicted reliability, they base their predictions on the brand's recent history, the model history and easy/difficult things the car is doing. In this case they pointed out while the X is unreliable, most of the unreliable parts aren't features on the 3 and since the S has edged up to average reliability (which took years) the 3 while entirely new isn't overly complex.
What? Consumer Reports takes no money from companies, and they buy any car they review. They also pay for press cars, and don't do full reviews on any car they don't own. In short, don't talk about things you don't know about.
Offline mode in progressive web applications uses a Service Worker, a form of Web Worker that can act as a proxy for the hostname it's hosted on. Without a Service Worker, an application is more likely to show you the error message "There is no Internet connection" if you try using it on a laptop or tablet while riding the bus.
Don't progressive web applications already have their own spec? Move web workers to it.
Or must all applications with an offline mode be native and therefore OS-specific?
Didn't everyone go down the packaged web applications several years ago and abandon it? I don't think the issues last time around are fixed by skipping the packaging step
Current laptops don't look much like those from 5-years ago, let alone 10. My laptop from even 5-years ago had a huge bezel and was very thick compared to what I have today, plus all the keyboard layout changes, large trackpads, etc.
Curved screen corners annoyed me momentarily, then I realized that real estate was pretty irrelevant. If its needed for yields or manufacturing it seems fine/shrug
Not really true - phones have been pretty necessary for decades. Everything from emergency services to scheduling appointments or contacting customer support.
2 - USB Type-C has nothing to do with speed its just another connector like A/B/micro/mini.
The problem here is that Intel co-opted the USB Type-C connector for Thunderbolt. Likely (3) is caused by manufacturers avoiding adding standard USB ports that won't function with devices plugged into other ports. Unfortunately not only are the devices are incompatible but the fucking cables are too. In short fuck Intel for Thunderbolt for a sub-par standard no one needs and is breaking the universe.
Qualcomm also has quick-charge which is incompatible with USB power delivery.
Add-ons do have advantages, they can be more selective and block based on paths, they can hide DOM elements and they can block based on context (e.g. 3rd party)
Exactly how is Firefox shitting on you? By using less memory than other browsers? By dropping an ancient system to modify the UI?
Edge would never find any marketshare on other OSes any more than Safari on Windows did. There is no compelling reason to use it, its not the fastest, its not the most secure, its dev cycle is tied to OS releases so it always lags on features.
Slashdot Mirror
The number of broken screens I see it seems like normal use ;)
I wonder if you could make a fair use argument - I presume they aren't distributing the whole work only a modified binary, is making multiplayer work transformative?
Seems like you could have each classroom with its dedicated wifi access point and give the teacher a switch to toggle internet access, limit it to sites, etc. Doesn't help with cellular connections obviously.
$200 a month is pretty steep, in Ontario we have access to Teksavvy with 250/20 for $90 unlimited.
No different than tech, journalists covering the topic have no background in it.
I'm guessing you mean US city? Amsterdam famously wired the city - https://arstechnica.com/tech-p...
Interesting point with Amsterdam is they wired the city but do not operate an ISP
You missed (c) the city will pay the money, but the corporations won't actually roll out fibre.
I suspect the older webcams would have been easily fooled by a picture of your face whereas the newer devices like Windows Hello or now Apple's Face ID have varying degrees of protection from it.
Much like Tesla fanboys you're mixing reliability and the functionality of a product. They can test one, they'd need a crystal ball to predict the other.
Cockoo cuckoo...
Man, you didn't even bother to read the summary. It actually starts with predicted reliability, they base their predictions on the brand's recent history, the model history and easy/difficult things the car is doing. In this case they pointed out while the X is unreliable, most of the unreliable parts aren't features on the 3 and since the S has edged up to average reliability (which took years) the 3 while entirely new isn't overly complex.
How do you know that Jimbo the Baggage Handler's new laptop isn't working?
What? Consumer Reports takes no money from companies, and they buy any car they review. They also pay for press cars, and don't do full reviews on any car they don't own. In short, don't talk about things you don't know about.
Offline mode in progressive web applications uses a Service Worker, a form of Web Worker that can act as a proxy for the hostname it's hosted on. Without a Service Worker, an application is more likely to show you the error message "There is no Internet connection" if you try using it on a laptop or tablet while riding the bus.
Don't progressive web applications already have their own spec? Move web workers to it.
Or must all applications with an offline mode be native and therefore OS-specific?
Didn't everyone go down the packaged web applications several years ago and abandon it? I don't think the issues last time around are fixed by skipping the packaging step
I presume these are using web workers as they don't lockup the UI? How many legitimate uses of web workers are there, couldn't we just disable them?
Maybe w3c should drop them from the browser spec entirely.
More like rife.
Current laptops don't look much like those from 5-years ago, let alone 10. My laptop from even 5-years ago had a huge bezel and was very thick compared to what I have today, plus all the keyboard layout changes, large trackpads, etc.
Curved screen corners annoyed me momentarily, then I realized that real estate was pretty irrelevant. If its needed for yields or manufacturing it seems fine /shrug
You're assuming that the physical buttons would be part of the bezel - they wouldn't, they'd be in addition.
Not really true - phones have been pretty necessary for decades. Everything from emergency services to scheduling appointments or contacting customer support.
2 - USB Type-C has nothing to do with speed its just another connector like A/B/micro/mini.
The problem here is that Intel co-opted the USB Type-C connector for Thunderbolt. Likely (3) is caused by manufacturers avoiding adding standard USB ports that won't function with devices plugged into other ports. Unfortunately not only are the devices are incompatible but the fucking cables are too. In short fuck Intel for Thunderbolt for a sub-par standard no one needs and is breaking the universe.
Qualcomm also has quick-charge which is incompatible with USB power delivery.
I have a better analogy - its like competing in athletics while taking performance enhancing drugs.... oh wait.
Add-ons do have advantages, they can be more selective and block based on paths, they can hide DOM elements and they can block based on context (e.g. 3rd party)
Exactly how is Firefox shitting on you? By using less memory than other browsers? By dropping an ancient system to modify the UI?
Edge would never find any marketshare on other OSes any more than Safari on Windows did. There is no compelling reason to use it, its not the fastest, its not the most secure, its dev cycle is tied to OS releases so it always lags on features.
Yes I do. Go re-read his quote and consider my post as a response to it.
is hostile to consumers.