Its hard to see the point you're trying to make - the USA didn't bother doing anything until LA suffered serious smog problems and actively fights against it to this day. China at least has some excuses around cost, Americans (and other western countries like mine) have none. What should worry you is that countries like India are significantly hotter than the USA, what happens if the entire population gets air conditioning?
I agree, its been years since I watched one. I imagine its a tiny subset of the movie viewers who do more than file a movie under "looks neat" vs "zzz" from trailers.
Its also a cascading effect - if the vendor continues to support that software then third parties will also be expected to. Its already bad enough that we're forced to support old EOL browsers and JVMs, I can't imagine how much worse it would be if Oracle & Microsoft were still supporting them. The amount of productivity wasted supporting these luddites is astronomical.
The RIAA has the option to not upload their content to YouTube and to use Google's contentid system to block user uploads if they don't like the rates offered.
Except that isn't what is happening here. When a user uploads a video which Google's contentid system (which incidentally they had no legal requirement to create) recognizes copyrighted material, the creator has the choice to either block it or to monetize it. The RIAA is the party hypocritically accepting the rates (and uploading their own videos) but complaining about them.
There is no 'claim' the safe harbor explicitly makes them not liable for content uploaded by users. In fact YouTube goes above and beyond doing content-id and allowing the music industry to take revenue or block videos.
As the other person mentioned, guardians usually have the power to make decisions for their children. Even without that tell your kid, its a condition of the phone.
Its pretty much impossible to build a modern GPU without infringing on the patents of one of the existing players. Even Intel is stuck paying licensing fees from AMD or nVidia, its hard to see how Apple won't have to do the same.
They'll be sports when you carry the horse through the course or change golf so its like the biathlon. Until then they are no more sports than pool, snooker, darts, bowling or racing cars.
Slashdot Mirror
Its hard to see the point you're trying to make - the USA didn't bother doing anything until LA suffered serious smog problems and actively fights against it to this day. China at least has some excuses around cost, Americans (and other western countries like mine) have none. What should worry you is that countries like India are significantly hotter than the USA, what happens if the entire population gets air conditioning?
because they're "confusing"
They just want their devices to sit on a desk and look pretty. Not be sullied by using them to do something.
I agree, its been years since I watched one. I imagine its a tiny subset of the movie viewers who do more than file a movie under "looks neat" vs "zzz" from trailers.
Why does every other piece of software need to run on that platform?
Its also a cascading effect - if the vendor continues to support that software then third parties will also be expected to. Its already bad enough that we're forced to support old EOL browsers and JVMs, I can't imagine how much worse it would be if Oracle & Microsoft were still supporting them. The amount of productivity wasted supporting these luddites is astronomical.
The RIAA has the option to not upload their content to YouTube and to use Google's contentid system to block user uploads if they don't like the rates offered.
Safe harbor provisions means that they are not responsible for content users upload.
Except that isn't what is happening here. When a user uploads a video which Google's contentid system (which incidentally they had no legal requirement to create) recognizes copyrighted material, the creator has the choice to either block it or to monetize it. The RIAA is the party hypocritically accepting the rates (and uploading their own videos) but complaining about them.
There is no 'claim' the safe harbor explicitly makes them not liable for content uploaded by users. In fact YouTube goes above and beyond doing content-id and allowing the music industry to take revenue or block videos.
from software shipped 10-years ago with webcams.
Well, there is one particular side which attempts to tell others how to live based on their own personal religions...
As the other person mentioned, guardians usually have the power to make decisions for their children. Even without that tell your kid, its a condition of the phone.
At pwn2own someone(s) actually managed to break out of Edge and vmware - https://arstechnica.com/securi...
When the last one is always zero.
Its pretty much impossible to build a modern GPU without infringing on the patents of one of the existing players. Even Intel is stuck paying licensing fees from AMD or nVidia, its hard to see how Apple won't have to do the same.
They actually require that all their hardware be shredded, no extraction of parts. https://motherboard.vice.com/e...
They'll be sports when you carry the horse through the course or change golf so its like the biathlon. Until then they are no more sports than pool, snooker, darts, bowling or racing cars.
They smell money and want a piece. 'Student' gamers who don't get paid next?
Not like golf, equestrian and other activities which are clearly not sports are already put under the umbrella.
Isn't that what happened with bitcoin? Its an arms race.
Whether robots also have quotas and have been programmed to mislead customers into signing up for unnecessary services.
On the upside, you have a spot to wipe your cheetos fingers on.
I think it went away because people (not me) just went to social media and use that as their aggregator.
Seems like people who had selfies scraped could file DMCA takedowns as they would own the copyright to the images.
Really though, is this surprising? Seems like one could get most of these images from Facebook directly anyway.