Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Unveils the Surface Laptop, a Traditional Notebook That Is 'Better' Than MacBook Pro (engadget.com)

On the sidelines of Windows 10 S and affordable Chromebook-like laptops announcements, Microsoft also announced the newest addition to its Surface computing lineup. Dubbed the Surface Laptop, the laptop starts at $999, and is for everyone, the company claims, though the focus is on students and professionals. From a report: The Surface Laptop includes a 13.5-inch PixelSense display (Microsoft's branding for its unique screen technology) and a keyboard draped in Alcantara, a smooth cloth-like material. It's powered by Intel's most recent Core i5 and Core i7 CPUs, and it can pack in an SSD up to 1TB (that's notably integrated directly onto the motherboard). Performance-wise, Microsoft's Surface head, Panos Panay, claims the Laptop is 50 percent faster than the Core i7 MacBook Air while also being lighter. (Editor's note: Panos added that the Surface Laptop also outpaces the MacBook Pro on performance.) You can also expect up to 14.5 hours of battery life, thanks to Windows 10 S's battery savings and more efficient hardware. One thing you won't see on the Surface Laptop: Speaker holes or grills. Microsoft managed to fit the speakers behind the keys, which Panay claims delivers a more enveloping sound. Microsoft says it has also improved the standby time -- so much so that "you could go away on spring break and still have the same battery life when you returned."

247 comments

  1. No, it's just the same crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Quick check: Does it have a glare screen?

    [x] Yes

    [ ] No

    Conclusion: It's crap.

    1. Re:No, it's just the same crap by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Are there any capacitive touch matte screens? No.

      I hate glare, but you have to choose between contrast and no glare. You can get rid of glare by adjusting where you place the screen. You can't get that level of contrast with a matte screen.

    2. Re:No, it's just the same crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can't get that level of contrast with a matte screen.

      Bull-fucking-shit.

    3. Re:No, it's just the same crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Angry AC doesn't like it when his BS gets smacked down by logic

    4. Re:No, it's just the same crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clueless AC hasn't touched a computer newer than 20 years old.

    5. Re:No, it's just the same crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll give up high contrast anytime for being able to read the screen in the sun. What's the point of a laptop that you can only read inside rooms with fancy indirect lighting that minimizes glare? - That's right, the answer is, there is no point. Glare screens are crap, hence the surface is crap.

    6. Re:No, it's just the same crap by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Are there any capacitive touch matte screens? No.

      Who wants capacitive touch in a laptop?

      I hate glare, but you have to choose between contrast and no glare. You can get rid of glare by adjusting where you place the screen.

      ie. You have to use it in the dark.

      No, thanks. I bought _one_ laptop with a shiny screen. Never again. My list of specs now starts with "matte screen" and goes from there.

      --
      No sig today...
    7. Re:No, it's just the same crap by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      Angry AC doesn't like it when his BS gets smacked down by logic

      You talk as if we've never seen a matte screen before.

      Clues:
      a) The surface of the screen doesn't alter the underlying electronics.
      b) Contrast doesn't matter a hoot if 90% of the light coming from the screen is a reflection of the room.

      --
      No sig today...
    8. Re:No, it's just the same crap by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Who wants capacitive touch in a laptop?

      Not me personally unless it converts to a tablet.

      You have to use it in the dark.

      No - you just have to use it at an oblique angle to any non-diffuse light. It's a choice - nobody's saying you have to go with it. But matte screens, by diffusing direct light, prevent deep blacks altogether. Just look at a matte screen when it's off - not black, just a medium grey. By definition, they diffuse light from every angle.

      tl;dr I wouldn't buy a glossy laptop screen, but they still have a purpose.

    9. Re:No, it's just the same crap by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      I saw a glare screen on a colleague's laptop once. Made me cringe. It's on top of my list of things to avoid as well. And glare+touch means you will be constantly wiping thumbprints off the screen. No thanks.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    10. Re:No, it's just the same crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just look at a matte screen when it's off - not black, just a medium grey.

      As opposed to a glossy screen which looks like a fucking mirror.

  2. Obligatory:Intel CPU Backdoor Report (May 1 2017) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Aka I FUCKING TOLD YOU SO.

    Newest update: On May 1st 2017, under pressure from the Vault 7 leak, Intel released a "Critical" security bulletin INTEL-SA-00075, admitting Intel Core CPU from 1st gen to 7th gen (2006-2017) all share the same critical vulnerability.

    The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.

    What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:

    TL;DR version

    Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.

    The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.

    30C3 Intel ME live hack:
    @21m43s, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.
    [Video Link] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
    [Quotes] Vortrag:
    "DAGGER exploits Intel's Manageability Engine (ME), that executes firmware code such as Intel's Active Management Technology (iAMT), as well as its OOB network channel."

    "the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker. Our presentation consists of three parts. The first part addresses how to find valuable data in the main memory of the host. The second part exploits the ME's OOB network channel to exfiltrate captured data to an external platform and to inject new attack code to target other interesting data structures available in the host runtime memory. The last part deals with the implementation of a covert network channel based on JitterBug."

    "We have recently improved DAGGER's capabilites to include support for 64-bit operating systems and a stealthy update mechanism to download new attack code."

    "To be more precise, we show how to conduct a DMA attack using Intel's Manageability Engine (ME)."

    "We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."

    Backdoor removal:
    The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
    Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.

    Decoding Intel backdoors:
    The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.

    If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).

    Useful links:
    The Intel ME subsystem can take over your machine, can't be audited
    REcon 2014 - Intel Management Engine Secrets
    Untrusting the CPU (33c3)
    Towards (reasonably) trustworthy x86 laptops
    30C3 To Protect And Infect - The militarization of the Internet
    30c3: To Protect And Infect Part 2 - Mass Surveillance Tools & Software

    1. Introduction, what is Intel ME

  3. I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by bit+trollent · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's kinda funny how despite the way Apple brands itself as innovative and user friendly, but Mac users are still stuck using a mouse on icons and menus while Windows has a touch-friendly interface.

    Keep spending big on antiquated technology Apple users. Maybe one day the ghost of Steve Jobs will give you a touch screen and claim it's a revolutionary invention...

    1. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Touch screens on laptops and desktops are terrible. Plus some people do real work and not just consume content.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    2. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have no problem with a touchscreen on a laptop as long as I'm not forced to use it.

      And if it adds any cost to the laptop, I'm likely to pick up the cheaper version without it.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate touchscreen PCs. A convertible is one thing, but if I can't use it as a tablet it's no use for me personally. I could not care less if Apple ever releases a touch screen. The touch bar is gimmicky enough, although I do dig the addition of TouchID.

    4. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by DaHat · · Score: 0

      I miss having a touch screen laptop. Despite claims of gorilla arms, it's pretty useful for individual one off moments which happen more often than you think, which really boosts productivity.

      Ex: you are pointing to your screen to discuss a topic when you want to highlight something... I stead of using the touch pad and relocating the cursor... Or finding your mouse and doing the same you simply touch and drag your finger over the spot you are already focused on.

    5. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Plus some people do real work and not just consume content

      So that rules out any Apple products for you.

    6. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a communicable disease. Please keep using touchscreens!

    7. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by oic0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And leave a smear on your screen. My eyelid twitches when people touch my screen to point at stuff.

    8. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by ColdWetDog · · Score: 0

      I'd rather they have a touch screen than the idiot touch bar. Just bought a Surface Book - Interesting device. Actually, sort of (depending on the application, YMMV, DO NOT taunt Happy Fun Ball) works as a tablet. No USB-C port which is perfectly OK for now as I own zero USB-C things.

      Fast, fair battery life, OK but not Apple-level build quality - at least for touch and feel, we'll see how it holds up. Even Windows 10 can be wrestled into a not being all that annoying.

      Given Apple's direction these days, I might end up as a Microsoft - hardware shop.

      What a long, strange trip it's been.....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Maritz · · Score: 1

      I'm a communicable disease. Please keep using touchscreens!

      That's your big reason not to use touch screens? You don't think keyboards face a similar but noticeably worse situation with respect to this?

      Even by slashdot standards that's pretty stupid.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    10. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by omnichad · · Score: 1

      OS X has Launchpad, which is designed to be touch-friendly despite no OS X systems coming with a touch screen. Nobody uses it, so you may not remember it.

      Windows does not have a touch-friendly interface unless you only use "modern" apps. They don't adjust the size of the drop-down menus on regular apps when you're in tablet mode - something they could do if they lied to the program about the size of the screen to make room (I assume - I don't do Windows GUI development).

    11. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

    12. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by DaHat · · Score: 1

      While I often do slap hands away from my non-touch monitors at work, a well designed screen can make smudges less likely/visible. Plus, your average desktop monitor is more likely to develop a film of dust which makes previous touches more visible, something which is not as common on a laptop which gets a good bit more movement.

      Oh how I miss my old Lenovo Carbon Touch X1... and how much I hate the glossy & smudge attracting MacBook Pro I have today.

    13. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that a keyboard with your hands resting on it doesn't invite someone to start touching.

      A touchscreen provides a nice inviting means for a third party to walk up and make with the touchy-touchy.

    14. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      It's never been a consideration for me, but now that you mention it, this laptop appears to be covered in fur. I imagine that will pick up some general yuckies over time.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    15. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is that you also disagree with all touchscreen phones, right? You're fine with your trackpad / rollerball interface because you're afraid of smearing the screen?

      It's the same thing -- you're touching the screen in both cases, neither of which you NEED to (there are other input methods)..

    16. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hated Launchpad when it came out. Then I got my next Mac which had a large enough trackpad to use the four-fingered pinch to initiate Launchpad. Now, despite having all my favorite applications pinned in the Dock, I tend to start things via that gesture and Launchpad, usually typing the name of the application rather than finding it to click on it.

    17. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by rickb928 · · Score: 2

      I thought so until I got one at work. Damn, it's useful.

      Smear isn't a problem, the glass does a terrific job of not showing it, and when I do see it, I also see glare and reposition anyways.

      I bounce between touch and mouse easily - whatever works best at the moment.

      So good I bought a Surface Pro for myself. Excellent.

      The only annoyance is reaching for non-touch screens...

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    18. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      "I have no problem with a touchscreen on a laptop as long as I'm not forced to use it."

      If by "I have no problem with a touchscreen on a laptop as long as I'm not forced to use it." you mean "I have no problem with a touchscreen on a laptop as long as I'm not forced to use touch.", then you have no problem.

      Next.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    19. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While we're on the subject - no, it's not my BIG reason - it just happens to be one that I find humorous.

      Using your fingers to touch a screen instead of interacting with a mouse is like replacing a scalpel with a fucking kitchen knife.

      Fingers are clumsy, imprecise input devices, and the fact that Microsoft acts like it's a fucking revolution and hires shills to attack Apple tells me they're every bit as pompous and conceited as Steve Jobs.

      Touch screens work great for phones. But they're not a replace-all solution for user input. Some of us require precision, and don't have toothpick sized fingers with sub-pixel hot-zone accuracy.

    20. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 0

      Instead of using the touch pad and relocating the cursor... Or finding your mouse and doing the same you simply touch and drag your finger over the spot you are already focused on.

      Thanks for explaining how a touch screen works. :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    21. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      No, I mean so long as the GUI is set up to work with a keystrokes (best) or mice/touchpads so I don't have to move my arms and poke the screen. Apple and Chromebook touchpads show how much of the touchscreen advantages can be had on the touchpad (pinch to zoom, rotate, swipes, and especially scrolling). If the GUI makes significant compromises to accommodate touch, then I am being "forced to use it".

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    22. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like windows 8?

    23. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same. On my Mac mini I never used it. Got a MacBook Pro now I use it all the time.

    24. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      OS X has Launchpad, which is designed to be touch-friendly despite no OS X systems coming with a touch screen. Nobody uses it, so you may not remember it.

      Windows does not have a touch-friendly interface unless you only use "modern" apps. They don't adjust the size of the drop-down menus on regular apps when you're in tablet mode - something they could do if they lied to the program about the size of the screen to make room (I assume - I don't do Windows GUI development).

      Launchpad is keyboard friendly. Click the icon, start typing the name of the program. After you are 2 or three characters into typing it, it filters the many icons down to the one program you are looking for. It didn't need to take over the whole screen, it works similarly on Windows 10. Click in the corner, start typing, click on the program you were looking for, but windows 10 does take over the screen while you do it.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    25. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because Apple haven't gone batshit insane. They understand that a PC is not a phone, something that Microsoft still can't comprehend.

    26. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to use a shitty touchscreen Windows laptop that somebody brought into my work last week. The trackpad was so fucking awful. I guess they figured since it has a touchscreen it's ok to make the mousepad totally useless junk. The touch screen is so shitty to use, you can't scroll the screen without accidently highlighting shit, or having cortana thing popup. I'm like damn i guess all those nutty people who say Windows peaked at 7 are right.

    27. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TouchID to unlock sounds useful, but my laptop is always closed and hooked up to a monitor, so I was like "looks cool but until they release a usb-c keyboard with touchbar and touchid it doesn't add value for me, not worth paying" and then I got an Apple Watch. All I have to do is sit down at my desk and it automagically logs me into macOS. after you get used to that it's a chore to have to sit there typing in a password every time you go to get coffee for five minutes.

    28. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by crtreece · · Score: 2

      simply touch and drag your finger over the spot

      which then copy/pastes, or drag/drops something that you didn't want pasted/moved.

      --
      file: .signature not found
    29. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying it's not keyboard friendly, but it is touch friendly. No matter how friendly it is, I don't think anyone uses it.

      I didn't realize it had search filtering - kind of odd that it's a completely separate interface to Spotlight.

      Click in the corner, start typing, click on the program you were looking for, but windows 10 does take over the screen while you do it.

      Windows 10 only takes over the whole screen in tablet mode or if you manually set the start menu that large. It's Windows 8 that always takes over the whole screen.

    30. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by omnichad · · Score: 1

      To me, that's not as easy as keeping my hands on the keyboard and pressing CMD+Space to open Spotlight to launch apps. Going back and forth between keyboard and mouse that often is a productivity killer.

    31. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait until he hears about doorknobs.

      And in the Dark Times they had these things called public phones.

    32. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Apple haven't gone batshit insane. They understand that a PC is not a phone

      In fairness, Apple actually makes a phone that they can compare to a PC: Microsoft has always failed at this, so you can see how they might be confused.

    33. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I really tried to drink the Kool Aid and use 8 when it came out. I put up with it for a whole year before giving up and reinstalling 7.

      Yes, that's exactly what I mean.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    34. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by BLToday · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself with regard to Lauchpad. I use it constantly for launching apps (mostly different utilities) not on my dock. I don't want to overload my Dock with tons of icons I can barely see. Three finger to launch Launchpad, start typing name of app, hit Return once the correct app is selected. I find that quicker that Spotlight or going to the Application folder.

    35. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather they have a touch screen than the idiot touch bar.

      apparently HP, Dell, Lenovo, ASUS, and Acer don't exist in your brain-dead world

      Given Apple's direction these days, I might end up as a Microsoft - hardware shop.

      apparently Linux doesn't exist in your brain-dead fantasy world either

      too bad for you, there are so many choices in the REAL world

    36. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Nobody statistically speaking - there are outliers - good job on that. If hands are on the keyboard, Cmd+Space is quicker than a three-finger swipe. I don't know if that was a default shortcut or one that I set, but it's quick.

    37. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      I thought so until I got one at work. Damn, it's useful.

      Smear isn't a problem, when I do see it, I also see glare and reposition anyways.

      "Reposition"?

      This word 'work'. I don't think it means what you think it means.

      --
      No sig today...
    38. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drastically different things retard. You like to exaggerate? Change words? Lie? That's how you assholes reason. Some broken logic where one unrelated thing means something else.

      No one said phone. Only your retarded liar mind has said that. There are 30+ comments here only on the subject of laptops.

      Imagine trying to talk to this freak. I feel sorry for his parents. His gay lover gender bender (because of retarded thinking his mind is broke) - don't like phone smudges? Well then now he is gonna need his own bathroom.

      Freaks. Fucking freaks. Can't even think critically. No logic. Jumping to conclusions. Twisting words. You are a coward feminists too? Burn in hell.

    39. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      'work' in this context means 'where i am employed'. I received this laptop at work, that is, as part of my job.

      It meant exactly what I intended it to mean. You may want to reset your typo filter level. There was no typo in my sentence.

      ps - glare has afflicted nearly every monitor I've used for over 27 years, even the 'non-glare' ones. It happens.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    40. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Even Windows 10 on my Surface Pro 3 happily works as expected when the keyboard is attached. When I forced it into Tablet Mode, changing it back was trivial.

      Windows 10 touch laptops work just fine with keystrokes and non-touch pointing devices in my experience.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    41. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      "Using your fingers to touch a screen instead of interacting with a mouse is like replacing a scalpel with a fucking kitchen knife."

      "Touch screens work great for phones."

      So you're telling me that the smaller the screen, the better fingers work. No, actually, you're telling me that smaller screens need touch interfaces because they are on devices that have no other surface or input device. Not about the small screen, tiny little UI elements, or fat fingers.

      And you're telling me that when my laptop is in full on tablet mode, without a keyboard or mouse, the bigger screen would still leave me with fat fingers.

      True, but it still works, pretty well. Bigger screen just makes it easier.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    42. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I try to eat some chips or something before I touch people's screens.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    43. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really tried to drink the Kool Aid and use 8 when it came out. I put up with it for a whole year before giving up and reinstalling 7.

      Yes, that's exactly what I mean.

      8 was a complete mess. 8.1 was lipstick--I also would rather have used Win7 (or Win95) than Win8.x. But give 10 a go.

    44. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I won't have much choice when next I need to upgrade my computer :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    45. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with a touchscreen on a laptop as long as I'm not forced to use it.

      I do. It requires a glossy, reflective display.

    46. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude - you have fucking lost it...

      The only person I see who can't think critically is the one whose brain exploded when his arguments are applied to the cell phone touchscreen he uses every day.

      I'd tell you to think about it but you have clearly lost it and have spent too much time thinking about this already. You probably even used your phone's touchscreen once before you even posted that comment.

    47. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

      I like launchpad too, but yeah, not many people use it.

      --
      Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    48. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      8.x was OK after installing Classic Shell. 10 never added anything. The "returned start menu" is a shrunkdown version of the 8.x start screen. Classic shell gave a usable start menu to 8.x (able to see the nested folder version of the start menu).

      10 still has an identity crisis. Half the control panels are Desktop control panels, half are metro. 10 also makes you lose control of updates, telemetry, etc. It forces Cortana on you.

      It took 10 to make 8.x look good. At least you get the under the hood improvements without losing all control of your computer.

    49. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I prefer matte as well - but it's not a deal killer for me.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    50. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 8.1 + Classic Shell is superior to Windows 7 and Windows 10.

    51. Re:I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No - it works great for phones because phones were designed to have a relatively small number of large touchable icons to "do stuff".

      You need to make a call? Press a giant fucking icon. Need to text someone? Press a giant fucking icon and then use a keyboard where the letters are... you guessed it... giant fucking icons.

      Interacting with a laptop or desktop computer is designed to provide, and utilize, a much greater degree of precision.

      I'm not going to precision artwork or CAD work on a god damned phone. Get over yourself.

    52. Re: I'm a PC and I have a touchscreen by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Nothing giant on any phone I've used. Not even the 5 1/2 inch screen.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  4. Priced about $700 too high by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >> laptop starts at $999

    Seems like it's priced about $700 too high. About three years ago, I was happy to shell out about $300 for a Windows 8 tablet with Office preinstalled and a bluetooth keyboard. It was just fast enough to run Civ5 in tile mode through Steam.

    For dev machines I can build my own laptop (with RAM + SSD) for cheaper than $1K too, and $1K should be mostly graphics cards if it's invested in a desktop. And educational institutions on budgets are already using "disposable" Chromebooks and Android tablets that can be had for a hundred bucks so it seems unlikely Microsoft has a viable product for K-12. So again...what do you get for a $1K Surface?

    1. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How can you build your own laptop for less than $1000. ?

    2. Re:Priced about $700 too high by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      >> How can you build your own laptop for less than $1000

      1) Start with a solid chassis (multi-core CPU and large LCD) that's a few years old (used).
      2) Max out the RAM (new)
      3) Replace whatever drive's in there with SSD (new)
      4) Load up a Windows OS (from your dev license pool, so free)

      I built my main dev laptop (a four-year old Dell Latitude with hardware upgrades) that way for about $750 all in. I love it, and if it falls apart tomorrow, then it will cost me less than a day's work to acquire the same again.

    3. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The title of this story calls it "a traditional notebook", but it can't run any software--the only alleged advantage of using a Microsoft OS.
      What is there in this device to attract any users at all? Every criticism Microsoft has made against Chromebooks applies to this, only more so; their software catalog is even smaller. And the price is insane.

    4. Re:Priced about $700 too high by omnichad · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's called (mildly) upgrading a stock laptop. Don't call that building a laptop. You usually only have to remove a panel or two.

    5. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're an idiot.

      Also nice not having to include the cost of an OS sure that's one way to do it, if you have a KMS server or access to TechNET.

    6. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you didn't build shit you fuckwit.

    7. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> laptop starts at $999

      Seems like it's priced about $700 too high. About three years ago, I was happy to shell out about $300 for a Windows 8 tablet with Office preinstalled and a bluetooth keyboard. It was just fast enough to run Civ5 in tile mode through Steam.

      For dev machines I can build my own laptop (with RAM + SSD) for cheaper than $1K too, and $1K should be mostly graphics cards if it's invested in a desktop. And educational institutions on budgets are already using "disposable" Chromebooks and Android tablets that can be had for a hundred bucks so it seems unlikely Microsoft has a viable product for K-12. So again...what do you get for a $1K Surface?

      It's not targeted at you as a consumer. Most people can't buy an old laptop and upgrade the components.

      Which is what you said you were doing, not "building a laptop".

    8. Re:Priced about $700 too high by ezelkow1 · · Score: 1

      yea its definitely priced too high. I recently bought an acer switch alpha 12 for 480$ which has twice the ram and ssd space as the base model of this and a non-gimped version of windows. Plus its a 2in1 so it has a touchscreen for a reason

    9. Re:Priced about $700 too high by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      >> you're an idiot. Also nice not having to include the cost of an OS sure that's one way to do it, if you have a KMS server or access to TechNET.

      Yes, I get free Windows OS licenses as part of a wider developer license.

      And yes, if you're a decent developer on ANY platform, you shouldn't be paying rack rate for use of the platform. Mature commercial platform providers (whether OS's, DB's, PaaS, etc.) know that developers like me add a shit-ton of value to their ecosystem by writing the apps that organizations actually use, so the smart ones incentivize us to stay on their platform by reducing the costs of living in their world.

      See also: sponsored athletes in (sport).

    10. Re:Priced about $700 too high by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 0

      >> Most people can't buy an old laptop and upgrade the components. Which is what you said you were doing, not "building a laptop".

      From Google search of "definition of build":
      BUILD: construct by putting parts or material together over a period of time.

      English, do you speak it? :)

    11. Re:Priced about $700 too high by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Funny

      I build my own cars, too, and for half the price of a new one.
      1) Start with a solid chassis (strong engine and drivetrain) that's a few years old (used).
      2) Put new wheels on.
      3) Sweet ground effects.
      4) At least 3 bobble heads, depending on how I'm feeling that day.

      Soooo much cheaper than the exact same thing new. Didn't even need to go to school to learn how to build cars - I guess it's just a gift.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    12. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly adding RAM or swapping an SSD out isn't building anything, there has never been a real way to "build" a laptop the cases and form factors are all custom so you can basically pick between about 2 parts.

    13. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not saying there aren't ways to get valid keys for free, near free, or cheap if you have an employer that provides those services however, to claim that you can ignore the licensing costs because you personally have access to keys isn't reasonable to justify not having to include it in the price, when I was building computers for people they would always complain about the licensing costs of windows since it would routinely add 20% to the cost of the PC.

      Good for you wow a free key amazing. I have access to KMS server so my keys are valid and free to but you just can't make a blanket statement that you shouldn't have to factor in that cost.

      Also TechNET pro is like 600 + 499 / yr after that and a one time non-OEM windows 10 pro key is only 199 which is a way better deal.

      Please list the parts you're buying for less than 1K that you are BUILDING into a laptop, and I don't want any ebay links to 5 year old dell XPS that you are adding RAM to. New build laptop from scratch please. I call some serious bullshit.

    14. Re:Priced about $700 too high by rickb928 · · Score: 4, Funny

      No blower? Cold air intake? Boost controller? NoX? Remap?

      Wimp.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    15. Re:Priced about $700 too high by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      To get all that I just roll down the windows while driving home from the dentist.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    16. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's called (mildly) upgrading a stock laptop. Don't call that building a laptop. You usually only have to remove a panel or two.

      Don't sass him. He is also a senior software engineer!

      Do you know how much time on stack overflow it takes when you are a software engineer? More time than you have buddy. Leave technology to the professionals.

    17. Re:Priced about $700 too high by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Yeah swapping laptop parts is just like swapping an engine.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    18. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations on your Slashdot Idiot of the Day award.

    19. Re: Priced about $700 too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word you are looking for is "upgrading".

      The laptops already built. You are just upgrading parts in it.

    20. Re:Priced about $700 too high by crtreece · · Score: 1

      BUILD: construct by putting parts or material together over a period of time.

      Parts list:

      1. Used laptop
      2. More RAM for used laptop
      3. SSD for laptop

      You seem to not be getting the concept that your process would be better labeled as upgrading, especially when compared to building a PC from a motherboard, case, power supply, RAM , SSD, graphics card, etc.

      --
      file: .signature not found
    21. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You upgraded a used laptop. You didn't build anything.

      Assuming your developer skills are similarly inflated, I'm guessing you make the free screensavers that are used as bait to deliver the malware trojan du jour.

    22. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

      That's still not building. You're thinking of refurbishing.

    23. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BUILD: construct by putting parts or material together over a period of time.

      You didn't construct anything. It came pre-constructed, and you simply swapped out a few parts.

      If you have to resort to contorting definitions that you googled, you already lost.

      Wanker.

    24. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Really set yourself up on that one. I get your point about it not being worth the money, but you went a little far.

    25. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Solandri · · Score: 2

      All of you are wusses. I fabricate my own car components in my Gentool workshop, then assemble them to build a car. If the optimum airflow happens when the blower fan is spinning at 1347 RPM, I fabricate the part so its most efficient turning speed is 1347 RPM.

    26. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> I love it, and if it falls apart tomorrow, then it will cost me less than a day's work to acquire the same again.

      I'm not too good at math, but $700/day is more than $1000 after roughly 2.2 days. You should rethink your strategy.

    27. Re:Priced about $700 too high by real+gumby · · Score: 1

      To be fair, "building" a tower PC is just snapping together lego bricks as well. It's all about your choice of brick.

    28. Re:Priced about $700 too high by omnichad · · Score: 1

      If your tower already had a motherboard, CPU, and RAM, how much building are you doing? And towers at least come with standard sized motherboard screw holes - no such thing in laptops.

    29. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow /. has a reading comprehension problem. Go back and re-read the summary.

    30. Re:Priced about $700 too high by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      The turbo will spin appreciably faster.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    31. Re:Priced about $700 too high by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      The cheapest model of which is $599 (retail, but let's compare apples to apples huh?). But since you said "2x the memory", you must have been talking about the core i5 / 8GB model. That one is $699.

      So you were only off by ~30% in your price quote.

    32. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually its priced about $998.00 to high! Anything that runs the Windows 10 spyware/virus is only worth about $1.00!

    33. Re:Priced about $700 too high by ezelkow1 · · Score: 1

      seeing as how I bought it, i know what i paid and I know what the specs are, so no, Im not off. Besides even if your going by retail and want to compare apples to apples the 8gb surface laptop is 1299, again overpriced compared to 699 retail of the acer

    34. Re:Priced about $700 too high by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      You are right. the 4G/128G i5 Asus is $629. Still $150 more than you quoted though. And it has a smaller screen.

      You can't compare the first-day retail price of this new device with the discounted sale price from wherever you bought your Asus. Want me to find a laptop from 2 years ago that's cheaper than your Asus then claim you got ripped off? Why not?

    35. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yes, if you're a decent developer on ANY platform, you shouldn't be paying rack rate for use of the platform.

      Wow. You truly are an idiot. I mean a just jump off a bridge to improve the gene pool level of idiot.

    36. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool, I built my own own house. I just bought a slightly used house and upgraded a light fixture.

      I built a house and never even studied architecture.

      Damn, but you're an idiot.

    37. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well if you need apple (for deving) you can't work around macbooks. Otherwise a 100 USD pinebook should be enough (for facebook, browsing, mail, whateva).
      If you're a gamer or work for ILM then you will need a properly built tower anyways.

    38. Re:Priced about $700 too high by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Seems like it's priced about $700 too high.

      Then you are delusional. Or can you show me an example of a $300, no ... fuck it I'll be generous, show me an example of a $600 laptop that is faster than a top of the line Air, the same size and weight, with a photo grade IPS display, SSD, blah blah blah?

      I'll wait.*

      *No I won't.

    39. Re:Priced about $700 too high by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Just a normal car, not an alienware car.

    40. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Altrag · · Score: 1

      To be fair, that's not the comparison he was making. He was comparing the difference between swapping an engine vs swapping the wheels against the difference between swapping a laptop hdd vs swapping the motherboard.

      In both cases, the car example is more work. Primarily because cars are heavier. But if you have the appropriate tools and knowledge (correct jacks, wrenches, etc) then changing out a car's wheels or even its engine is mostly only a handful of bolts -- not entirely dissimilar to changing out PC parts once you factor out the weight issue.

      Of course there's a major difference -- you can fix your engine if you know what you're doing. If your motherboard breaks you're stuck replacing it. Even if you're good with a soldering iron, you're still stick replacing entire components.

      Hell, you could potentially even put in an incompatible engine in your car if you're good enough with welding in plates and drilling bolt holes and whatnot to ensure the new engine doesn't rip everything apart. In comparison, there's absolutely no way you could say repin your Intel motherboard to accept an AMD CPU. No matter how smart or careful or well-equipped you are, that's just not really possible.

    41. Re:Priced about $700 too high by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Yay for improperly closing my tags! And failing to hit preview, of course..

    42. Re:Priced about $700 too high by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Assuming you're not serious, you sir at are the troll of the year~!

  5. And it's way more humble too by goombah99 · · Score: 0

    I think someone here is compensating for a small package.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:And it's way more humble too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know Microsoft war originally named after Bill Gates' "package"?

  6. MacBook Pro, or MacBook Air? by deep44 · · Score: 1

    The title claims better performance than a MacBook Pro, but the summary references a MacBook Air. There's also no link to the actual article?

    1. Re:MacBook Pro, or MacBook Air? by deep44 · · Score: 1

      Ahh, links added, title changed, and editor's note added to justify mentioning MacBook Pro.

    2. Re:MacBook Pro, or MacBook Air? by TRRosen · · Score: 4, Funny

      hmmm 50% faster than a air and faster than a Pro thats 100% faster than an air? Im guessing this performance is measured in m$ programs.

    3. Re:MacBook Pro, or MacBook Air? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's faster at burning through your pants. But don't worry, you can always soak the cloth keyboard with coffee to keep it from catching fire.

    4. Re:MacBook Pro, or MacBook Air? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can only imagine how god damn grody a cloth keyboard would get after a couple months, fucking ewww.

    5. Re:MacBook Pro, or MacBook Air? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just through it in with your laundry.

  7. gaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    could this new surface place the new Quake game?

  8. What are those strange holes? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Why is the side covered in weird rectangular holes?

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
    1. Re:What are those strange holes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Those are "speed holes", it makes it faster.

    2. Re:What are those strange holes? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      No, it adds lightness.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:What are those strange holes? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      They weren't courageous enough to remove the USB A ports.

    4. Re:What are those strange holes? by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      This is the response to Apple rounded corners.

  9. It runs Windows 10s by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's freaky when they even copy the number of an apple. However I'm going to wait for the Next edition, dubbed NE1, which I hear will be labeled as
    10S NE 1

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:It runs Windows 10s by Streetlight · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why didn't MS just call Windows 10 S Windows RT? Sounds to me that's what it is. This OS can only run APPs from the Microsoft Store, which makes it a non general use OS. So I smell a failure in process?

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    2. Re:It runs Windows 10s by PingSpike · · Score: 1

      When this iteration of Metro fails it will be renamed again taking naming DNA from the previous two versions. Windows 10 RTS. The name is an acronym for its intended life cycle, first you buy it thinking it'll run your existing Windows software and then Return To Store for a refund.

    3. Re:It runs Windows 10s by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting on Windows RG. We are getting there all be it slowly.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    4. Re:It runs Windows 10s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >...non general use ...

      Yes, but they're hoping, (forcing), the trend of a somewhat walled-garden. Apple drops drives, ports, features and the crowd goes wild. (but that's because they offer a working solution). MS is hoping their new flagship unit, which will only work with MS App Store (tm) stuff, will get the same accolades of 'bravery' and 'shaping the future by limiting it'.

      We shall see.

    5. Re:It runs Windows 10s by Quarters · · Score: 1

      It's similar but different. S can only use apps from the store. That doesn't limit it to just UWP apps, though. There are ways to get Win32 apps packaged and distributed on the store. 10 S will also run those. RT could only run (forget the name of the precursor to UWP) apps if they were compiled for ARM. It was a much more limiting experience.

    6. Re:It runs Windows 10s by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Windows RT? Sounds to me that's what it is.

      Windows RT's failure wasn't that it could only run apps from a store, it was that it could only run ARM apps. And there were none. Even Office RT was an abortion that didn't even include an email client and was restricted to student use only.

      Windows RT's other main failure was timing. It came out in a time of laptops. I'm not sure it would be as much of a failure now in a world of do everything in your web browser, download your apps from a store, locked down iPads, Tablets, and Chromebooks.

      It is non-general use, but It would be premature to call it a failure given the general success of non-general use OSes from all other vendors.

  10. UEFI and/or Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, considering Lenovos are great as soon as they have no MicroSquish and run Linux instead, I wonder if this can run one of the Penguin distros too.

  11. That's cute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me guess. Windows 10 only? *snicker*

    1. Re:That's cute. by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      Wonder if Windows Server 2016 would work on that thing.

  12. Alcantara Keyboard by SniffTheGlove · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Alcantara Keyboard... yuk!

    And that is a selling point?

    1. Re:Alcantara Keyboard by the_skywise · · Score: 2

      Yeah I've not figured out the hype on that stuff. I checked one out at the microsoft store and couldn't figure out what made it $30 better than the other keyboards.

      Might as well have it sold by Ricardo Montalban - "And this keyboard is made with rich corinthian leather!"

    2. Re:Alcantara Keyboard by shadowrat · · Score: 2

      I imagine that cloth is going to be pretty gross after a couple months. it takes a good deal of scrubbing with alcohol to rid my current non porous laptop of the weird films and cultures that develop. At least it's a wipe off surface.

    3. Re:Alcantara Keyboard by Luthair · · Score: 1

      On the upside, you have a spot to wipe your cheetos fingers on.

    4. Re:Alcantara Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh, it's because it's a high performance machine, dummy! Didn't you know high end sports cars come with alcantara roofs, and steering wheels, and gear levers, and... ?

    5. Re:Alcantara Keyboard by Quarters · · Score: 1

      It's the same stuff the TypeCovers for the Surface 3 / Pro 3s and Surface 4 / Pro 4s. I've had one on my Surface Pro 3 for about 2 years. They're amazingly durable. It doesn't gather dirt and grease like you'd think. A wipe with a damp cloth every now and again is more than enough to keep it looking good.

  13. What about other specs? by XSportSeeker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    RAM? Discrete graphics? Oh wait, it comes with Windows 10S... the rebranding of RT. Nevermind. It's worthless.

    1. Re:What about other specs? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Where do you see that? Windows S for their educational machines, not their consumer/business line.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:What about other specs? by omnichad · · Score: 0

      It's a very expensive Chromebook. It's being marketed at this event for education where they want it locked down tight. I doubt that this is the only OS choice if it hits the wider market.

    3. Re:What about other specs? by squiggleslash · · Score: 0

      Oh never mind, I didn't click through, yeah, weird they'd be running S on this thing. I don't see many schools rushing out to buy their students $1,000 laptops.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:What about other specs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Students, not high schools. Why are you posting; everything you say shows a lack of basic understanding.

    5. Re: What about other specs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      High schoolers are students. Did I miss something m?

    6. Re:What about other specs? by mridoni · · Score: 1

      It can be upgraded to Windows 10 Pro, for free until Dec. 31st, 2017, or paying US$ 50 after that.

    7. Re:What about other specs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Windows "S" is for "sucks".

      FTFY

    8. Re:What about other specs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an Intel machine, it runs Win32 apps packaged with project Centennial, and buyers can upgrade to Windows 10 Pro for free until 2018 if they find themselves limited by Windows 10 S.

      What's RT about this?

    9. Re:What about other specs? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Oh wait, it comes with Windows 10S... the rebranding of RT. Nevermind. It's worthless.

      Yeah about as worthless as the Chromebooks which sell around 2million / quarter.

  14. Does anyone at MS actually USE Apple products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing the answer is "No."

    I've had my 2013 MBPro since Jan 2014. Zero issues. Longest uptime was 144 days which I hit before upgrading to Sierra. Compare: I have a Dell Win10 PC that crashes when I unplug my mouse or it goes to sleep with an Arduino plugged in.

    Yeah, Surface is a nice UI, no question there, but the underlying OS is still fucking buggy garbage. Apple could learn from that UI. Nice affordances on everything, well, until you hit a Win95 dialog, which lurk a few clicks below just about every interface item.

    1. Re:Does anyone at MS actually USE Apple products? by Maritz · · Score: 0

      Longest uptime was 144 days which I hit before upgrading to Sierra. Compare: I have a Dell Win10 PC that crashes when I unplug my mouse or it goes to sleep with an Arduino plugged in.

      Longest uptime? On a laptop? Uh, OK.

      Your Dell story is fascinating. I have one that has never crashed, as far as I can recall. That's anecdotes for you eh. "Compare" indeed.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    2. Re:Does anyone at MS actually USE Apple products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just had someone complain to me a brand new M B P. Slow as fuck, and all she did was configure the mail program; she regrets not being able to refund it (and is stupid enough to think that upgrading the 256GB to 512GB drive even had a chance at solving the problem.).

    3. Re:Does anyone at MS actually USE Apple products? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      My 17" MacPook Pro (not using it often right now) running 10.6.x also had uptimes around 100 days and more. I basically restart a laptop only when an OS upgrade demands a restart.

      At my current customer I have to use a Windows 10 laptop. I hate it.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re:Does anyone at MS actually USE Apple products? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Why do you have a laptop if you're using it as a portable. Or do you mean you let it sleep between movement?

    5. Re:Does anyone at MS actually USE Apple products? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      What is the difference between a portable and a laptop in our times?
      Yes, my laptop is never switched of, it sleeps.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  15. huh? by TRRosen · · Score: 1

    So its a high power laptop that can't run any software that would need high power? A high end Chromebook makes no sense at all. Easy to see why the surface series has less sales than apples accessory division.

    1. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Maybe you don't know what's in the Microsoft store. There certainly are apps which will use a decent amount of resources. There is a lighter version of Photoshop, Autocad, and several video editing apps. Microsoft is still dumb to lock it down though.

  16. Non-starter by Bill+Hayden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A $1000 laptop that can only run Windows Store apps? Somebody at MS is getting fired.

    --
    Protect your browser with the Force Safe Search add-on
    1. Re:Non-starter by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      As I said in a previous post above, I smell a failure in process. Does Windows RT by any other name smell so sweet?

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    2. Re:Non-starter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fired? hah! they're getting promoted! the next guy that comes up with a way to market "windows 365" and not make it look like a greedy money grab will get a seat next to him.

      welcome to the beginning of the end, and the next step in locking down windows in preparation of a subscription-only windows.

      the free software projects better quit bickering and splintering and learn how to work together on one or two solid projects of each type if they want to take advantage of the next windows-based shitstorm (10 itself being the first).. otherwise it will be apple and google that reap all the benefits and free software will all but fade away. this is your chance. don't fucking blow it.

    3. Re: Non-starter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is way to easy to divide and conquer the free software movement. I would argue this was complete by about 2003-ish. It doesn't even take a deep conspiracy: just donate to, or give a platform to, or publically mention, a deviant build. In a couple years everything is all dicked up.

      I have never met, in person, anyone who fits all of these:
      1) Uses Linux
      2) Uses the same flavor of Linux I do
      3) Uses the same desktop that I do

      I don't use a super obscure Linux, or a super obscure desktop. But zero people match exact.

    4. Re:Non-starter by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      I'm still bitter that they re-branded WinCE.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    5. Re:Non-starter by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      A $1000 tablet that can only run App Store apps? Someone at Apple is getting a raise.

    6. Re:Non-starter by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      It's an Intel machine, it runs Win32 apps packaged with project Centennial, and buyers can upgrade to Windows 10 Pro for free until 2018 if they find themselves limited by Windows 10 S.

      What's RT about this?

      Besides education consumers love the fact that students can't install software and is a feature to them. THe appstore ensures a malware free educational experience. Of course regular 10 can be configured the same through group policy.

    7. Re:Non-starter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $900 of that $1000 was for the logo on the back.

    8. Re:Non-starter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be silly, of course there will be promotions and huge bonuses given between the management team. After a two years and few billions wasted they will write off this idiotic scheme too. Perhaps their next iteration is a $2000 laptop which only runs MS's spyware and fullscreen ads?

    9. Re:Non-starter by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Does Chrome OS or iOS or Android? We have been desensitised to running desktop applications.

    10. Re:Non-starter by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      For a small price you can run non windows store apps, it's just what it initially ships with.

      Mind you I wonder how many people will actually upgrade. I mean really this thing will run everything ChromeOS does and will actually have a full Office suite available too.

  17. Slashdot by JWW · · Score: 1

    ..... this post brought to you by Microsoft.

    Wow, shill much?

  18. How's this better hardware-wise than a MacBook Pro by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A MacBook doesn't need to be connected to the Internet to work, I get 30 days of standby/suspend/sleep time on battery, and MacBook Pros and Airs already are i5 or i7. They say it's faster, but only because of cloud computing: the destroyer of open source. Also, good luck getting any work done without the internet and enjoy having no control over your software and Window$ spyware. There's also no way you'll be able to install Linux on it either. If I have $999 to blow on a laptop, I'll get a System76 or a Thinkpad off of Amazon. Hell, I might just buy a bunch of Raspberry Pi's and put them together.

  19. wow by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    I cant top looking at that fabric covered keyboard and thinking how NASTY that's going to be within a single report writing session

    1. Re:wow by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      The fabric covered keyboard on my Surface Pro is years old and not nasty at all. And it's not because of me.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  20. "Not Better" than MBPro by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1

    If its primary OS is a Microsoft OS, that doesn't fit the description of "better" in my book.

    Windows was the primary reason why I jumped ship to OSX/MacOS so I'll stick with that OS, thank you very much.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
    1. Re:"Not Better" than MBPro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it has software people want to use already there and working, and not hoping that company xyz eventually ports product abc over sometime within the next 5 years

    2. Re: "Not Better" than MBPro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read the article? It is a mobile OS like chrome book. Not full fledged windows. A lot of apps are not in the AppStore and this can only run MS AppStore apps.

      ApPers ApP!! Hehe I had to sorry.

    3. Re:"Not Better" than MBPro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may be right but name the software? I've only run into one type of application that I wanted that I couldn't find on OSX when I switched nearly 5 years ago and that hole has since been filled. I'm sure there are other software out there worth considering in this scenario but none from my chair.

  21. Better than the MacBook Pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it still run on Windows? If so, it's not better than the MacBook Pro.

    1. Re:Better than the MacBook Pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it still run on Windows? If so, it's not better than the MacBook Pro.

      I fuck'n love the fruit's paradigm of "Let's hide everything behind voodoo and mysterious keystrokes!" Yeah now that's usability. Want to find something in launchpad? Just start typing--so fuck'n intuitive without a cue of any sort that I'm supposed to do that. And the utilities part, gag, the CLI in McOS is even more out of date than their fucking hardware. My 2010 vintage Lenovo with OpenSUSE 42.2 running KDE way outperforms my 2015 vintage McBookPro. Sure the Mc is fine, if all you do if F-Book, youtube, and run crappy Office applications.

      And McOS is the second worst UX out there, fortunately Ubuntu is killing Unity--the absolute worst UX. Then there's Gnome that's a close runner up to the fruit but fortunately they're lagging behind.

      Seriously the Fruit has made Windows a positive user experience, throw in cygwin and Directory Opus and it's not bad. Then once the Linux services get working properly, windows will be nice.

      Here's something that UX assholes just don't fucking get, It's my computer, don't hide shit from me, let me use it the way I want to use it.

  22. performance vs battery life by v1 · · Score: 1

    I get the feeling they are testing those two things separately. If you have your computer set to performance and the competition set to battery, naturally your computer will perform better. (for a few hours anyway) And vice-versa. You can't have highest performance AND best battery life at the same time without some incredible hardware, which I doubt this can live up to.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:performance vs battery life by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Well, you can, if you reduce the amount of work the system has to do.

      By restricting it to the Windows App Store they've removed all useful work from the system entirely, so it's not a surprise it'll do fuck all very quickly forever.

      It's still doing fuck all useful.

    2. Re:performance vs battery life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think? I've never had the feeling that a Ford F-150 is going to be towing 3000 lbs while getting 25 mpg. Usually economy and power are rated separately. In fact, I'm actually trying to think of anybody who has ever advertised both together.

  23. Targeted at education market by kelarius · · Score: 1

    At $999, I can buy 4 (or more) chromebooks, which are more than adequate for pretty much all education needs. Way to read your market there, Microsoft...

    --
    Personally I'd rather have my idiots at home glued to the TV than out doing idiotic things
    1. Re:Targeted at education market by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      RTFA. This is NOT their education offering. That's a different animal.

      On the sidelines of Windows 10 S and affordable Chromebook-like laptops announcements, Microsoft also announced the newest addition ...

  24. Less Features IS A Feature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is not being able to detach the keyboard a benefit? Why not buy a Surface w/ detachable keyboard? So I should over-pay even more for a laptop b/c it has the name of the worthwhile(SLIGHTLY LESS OVER-PRICED) tablet?

    Pass!

  25. Re:How's this better hardware-wise than a MacBook by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    A MacBook doesn't need to be connected to the Internet to work, I get 30 days of standby/suspend/sleep time on battery, and MacBook Pros and Airs already are i5 or i7. They say it's faster, but only because of cloud computing: the destroyer of open source. Also, good luck getting any work done without the internet and enjoy having no control over your software and Window$ spyware. There's also no way you'll be able to install Linux on it either. If I have $999 to blow on a laptop, I'll get a System76 or a Thinkpad off of Amazon. Hell, I might just buy a bunch of Raspberry Pi's and put them together.

    It looks like MS is playing the "you can centrally manage the machines and only approved MS Store software can be installed so you don't have any security issues..." to school districts. They would presumably always have wireless access so using cloud based programs is not an issue. tI would guess MS will offer substantial "discounts" for volume buys. As for Alcantara, it'll be interesting to see how that stands up over time in a school environment. I'd also love to see teh data backing up the faster than Macs claim. After all, my $4 calculator is faster than the new Surface (if all I am doing is adding 2 numbers).

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  26. Can you load Linux on it? by HannibalRex · · Score: 0

    Mildly interested if I could replace the OS with something that works, not M$ crap.

    1. Re:Can you load Linux on it? by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      Mildly interested if I could replace the OS with something that works, not M$ crap.

      Comparable laptop cost: $499
      Upcharge for Microsoft logo: $500

      Why exactly would you want to pay money to have a Microsoft logo on your linux box?

  27. and the problem is... it runs Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would not touch a windows machine with a 10 foot pole. Gosh, windows is so bad... Give me a unix-like environment and then I can manage. Linux or Mac, windows... NO NO NO NO NO.

  28. Better article from Ars... by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...is here. Honestly, I can't see the point of putting an i7 in these. If you're doing anything that's pushing all the cores, the heat generated will force it to throttle down, unless the newest chips have become way more efficient than previous gens. Would be interesting to see a shoot-out between the i5 and i7 models.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    1. Re:Better article from Ars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They need the high speed processors to run the antivirus programs.

    2. Re:Better article from Ars... by PingSpike · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about the unnecessary cores. Since they didn't mention what specific i7 its safe to assume its one of the many bait and switch dual core i7. When it comes to advertising, what isn't said means much more than what is explicitly stated.

  29. Re:How's this better hardware-wise than a MacBook by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I'm wondering if they're comparing to Macbooks running Windows. Bootcamp drivers are crap, so it's not a great comparison. My Air runs OSX much more efficiently than Windows.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  30. Re:wtf by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 3, Informative

    This infomercial is a frickin joke. 999$ USD for an entry level Core i5 laptop with Windows on it is an insult to our intelligence.

  31. THIS is what hardware has become. by geekmux · · Score: 5, Informative

    "The Surface Laptop includes a 13.5-inch PixelSense display..."

    No one attaches a 13.5" display to their desktop and boasts about it. I'd sure as hell give up an hour or two of battery life for some actual real estate. Let me guess, that "monster" screen also has 4K capability too, for some pointless marketing reason.

    "...a keyboard draped in Alcantara, a smooth cloth-like material.

    Obviously a critical "Pro" feature. I always wanted my keyboard to feel like drapery.

    "... it can pack in an SSD up to 1TB (that's notably integrated directly onto the motherboard).

    Translation: Fuck You consumer. You'll pay factory price for upgrades, and like it, bitch. (Tell me again how this is notably better than Apple's Fuck-You hardware model?)

    "You can also expect up to 14.5 hours of battery life..."

    Translation: You can expect to get up to 4 hours of Netflix binging.

    "Microsoft managed to fit the speakers behind the keys, which Panay claims delivers a more enveloping sound."

    Translation: We spent a billion dollars on behind-the-keyboard R&D for the earbud generation.

    THIS is what hardware has become these days; a fucking fashion shitshow for hypes sake. Thanks Apple, for starting this trend.

    1. Re:THIS is what hardware has become. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "... it can pack in an SSD up to 1TB (that's notably integrated directly onto the motherboard).

      Translation: Fuck You consumer. You'll pay factory price for upgrades, and like it, bitch. (Tell me again how this is notably better than Apple's Fuck-You hardware model?)

      This is much more harmful than merely locking you into first-party pricing. Your data are accessible only as long as all the circuit boards they are wired to also work. No recovery by removing the SSD and attaching it as a secondary drive to another computer.

    2. Re:THIS is what hardware has become. by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      THIS is what hardware has become these days; a fucking fashion shitshow for hypes sake. Thanks Apple, for starting this trend.

      I'm sorry, but I have to beg to differ. SGI and Sun (remember them?) did fashion computers long before Apple did.

      Just do a Google image search for "SGI Indigo", "SGI Crimson", "SGI Terzo", "SGI Onyx", "SGI Prism", "SGI Fuel".

      Or the Linux Networx LS-X...

      Or take a talk down memory lane and check out the Cray-2, which had a waterfall...

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    3. Re:THIS is what hardware has become. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      THIS is what hardware has become these days; a fucking fashion shitshow for hypes sake. Thanks Apple, for starting this trend.

      I'm sorry, but I have to beg to differ. SGI and Sun (remember them?) did fashion computers long before Apple did.

      Just do a Google image search for "SGI Indigo", "SGI Crimson", "SGI Terzo", "SGI Onyx", "SGI Prism", "SGI Fuel".

      Or the Linux Networx LS-X...

      Or take a talk down memory lane and check out the Cray-2, which had a waterfall...

      Yes, I remember SGI. I worked on SillyG hardware and Sun "pizza boxes" back in the day. The considerable difference here is Sun and SGI were not mass-marketing their hardware to freshman students, or sitting in local malls with free financing.

      I also remember when Apple marketed the "portable" Apple II (IIc), so marketing like this is hardly new for Apple, and it does pre-date most of the SGI/Sun marketing gimmicks.

      I give Cray a pass on the waterfall. The design practically demanded a waterfall to cool the damn thing.

    4. Re:THIS is what hardware has become. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No one attaches a 13.5" display to their desktop and boasts about it.

      I have a 10" additional display attached. What of it? There are use cases for small additional screens.

      Translation: Fuck You consumer

      Or maybe you can't fit a removable SSD in a laptop that thin. This isn't fuck you, it's giving the customer what they want. If you want a desktop replacement go buy a desktop replacement.

      Translation: You can expect to get up to 4 hours of Netflix binging.

      Why would you advertise a Netflix binging figure on a device designed for students to work in class? Also the SP4 gets about 5 1/2 hours in Netflix binging and it wasn't advertised as 14.5h battery life.

      Translation: We spent a billion dollars on behind-the-keyboard R&D for the earbud generation.

      THIS is what hardware has become these days; a fucking fashion shitshow for hypes sake. Thanks Apple, for starting this trend.

      Yes. Thankyou Apple. Because of you I no longer lug heavy lumps of electronics around with me everywhere I go. Because of you I now have the choice of getting something paper thin or thick as a brick. Thanks for adding yet another choice to the market. It's a shame you can't fix idiots who think that just because this product doesn't suit them everyone else should fall in line.

    5. Re:THIS is what hardware has become. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      No one attaches a 13.5" display to their desktop and boasts about it.

      I have a 10" additional display attached. What of it? There are use cases for small additional screens.

      That additional display came at an additional cost. Likely higher than just building a laptop with a reasonable display size. The end user is carrying it around in a backpack or bag for a couple of hours a day with plenty of breaks in between, not hiking up the Himalayas. A 16" display would have likely added ounces to the overall design.

      Translation: Fuck You consumer

      Or maybe you can't fit a removable SSD in a laptop that thin. This isn't fuck you, it's giving the customer what they want. If you want a desktop replacement go buy a desktop replacement.

      Clearly Bendgate didn't highlight the issue clear enough that razor-thin anything isn't always better. The end result is an overly fragile design built with nothing but proprietary bullshit that you can't upgrade. Ever. Say I want a Macbook. Any new models built differently? No. All new models are built the same way. No other option but to pay the vendor directly for upgrades at time of purchase. Yeah, I'd say that pretty much spells out Fuck You Consumer.

      Translation: You can expect to get up to 4 hours of Netflix binging.

      Why would you advertise a Netflix binging figure on a device designed for students to work in class? Also the SP4 gets about 5 1/2 hours in Netflix binging and it wasn't advertised as 14.5h battery life.

      My statement was meant to be both a pun against the claimed 14+ hour battery life (which almost always falls short with any real work), as well as highlight a common use of laptops today. Regardless of what it's designed for, we know what it will be used for.

      Translation: We spent a billion dollars on behind-the-keyboard R&D for the earbud generation.

      THIS is what hardware has become these days; a fucking fashion shitshow for hypes sake. Thanks Apple, for starting this trend.

      Yes. Thankyou Apple. Because of you I no longer lug heavy lumps of electronics around with me everywhere I go. Because of you I now have the choice of getting something paper thin or thick as a brick. Thanks for adding yet another choice to the market. It's a shame you can't fix idiots who think that just because this product doesn't suit them everyone else should fall in line.

      You have choice? That's a laugh Speaking of falling in line, you will soon see how the no-upgrade-option-sealed-box-razor-thin model of proprietary design that Apple started will take over the entire market. This is but one example of it. Soon, all other vendors will follow. You want razor-thin and proprietary? Fine. I do not. The real problem is choice is being removed faster than external connections. I remember the days of lugging around 10-pound "bricks". Nothing is that heavy or bulky anymore. The point here is there used to be a happy medium between function and fashion. A reasonable design. Acceptable thickness. Upgrade options available. Now fashion and greed have taken over, for the sake of driving profits via proprietary design, forcing the consumer to accept it, or accept it, which is bullshit. Apple set the bar with their latest "Pro" designs. Everyone else is merely following that model due to the profit margins Apple has demonstrated.

    6. Re:THIS is what hardware has become. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The end user is carrying it around in a backpack or bag for a couple of hours a day

      How do you know what the end user does? Personally I frigging hate backpacks and for most of the day I carry my device around in a notepad satchel (note the old type of notepad, since this device is the same size).

      Clearly Bendgate didn't highlight the issue clear enough that razor-thin anything isn't always better.

      Bendgate highlighted that with thin devices you shouldn't dedicated a large portion of the cross section to a weak button. Bendgate also highlight a massively blown out of proportion media coverage. As much as I like to heap shit on Apple, very few devices actually broke in the grand scheme of the number that were sold. But really you're just too fussy. There are plenty of devices that suit you, but you don't want them. You want a Macbook custom made for you.

      You have choice?

      It may surprise you that Apple and Microsoft aren't the only two hardware companies out there. How this surprises I don't know.

      The real problem is choice is being removed faster than external connections

      Yes by adding new devices with new form factors to the market while all previous form factors are still available choice is clearly being removed. Got it.

      *worlds slowest and most retarded clap*

      Apple set the bar with their latest "Pro" designs. Everyone else is merely following

      It sounds like you're new to the internet so let me help you: http://www.google.com/ Click this link and do a search for what you would like. You'll find a lot of laptops nothing like the Macbook Pro out there.

    7. Re:THIS is what hardware has become. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      The end user is carrying it around in a backpack or bag for a couple of hours a day

      How do you know what the end user does? Personally I frigging hate backpacks and for most of the day I carry my device around in a notepad satchel (note the old type of notepad, since this device is the same size).

      Spoiled users constantly bitching about the size and weight of laptops drove the marketeers to sit in a room yelling "LIGHTER!" and "THINNER!" over and over again, until the Engineering/Design department did actually achieve shoving 20 pounds of shit in a 5-pound bag. The end result is a thin-as-paper proprietary design that can hardly be repaired if damaged, and often must be replaced instead. And all for saving a pound or two. Consumers need to stop bitching, because 99% of them are in fact not counting every gram of weight on their bodies as if they're hiking a mountain. THAT was my point.

      Clearly Bendgate didn't highlight the issue clear enough that razor-thin anything isn't always better.

      Bendgate highlighted that with thin devices you shouldn't dedicated a large portion of the cross section to a weak button. Bendgate also highlight a massively blown out of proportion media coverage. As much as I like to heap shit on Apple, very few devices actually broke in the grand scheme of the number that were sold. But really you're just too fussy. There are plenty of devices that suit you, but you don't want them. You want a Macbook custom made for you.

      Wanting or needing to run OSX is not being "picky", it's called a requirement. Now go look at the new Pro line and tell me how I have choice anymore. I have two choices. Pay them money for a sealed box, or pay them a shitload more money for a sealed box with all upgrades purchased up-front at their markup. There is no DIY upgrade path anymore. There is no replacing a hard drive yourself if you want more space or it fails. There is no buying memory upgrades later when chip density increases and costs decrease.

      You have choice?

      It may surprise you that Apple and Microsoft aren't the only two hardware companies out there. How this surprises I don't know.

      It may surprise you that no other company supports OSX if that's what I want or need to run, thus driving me to a single vendor solution, which will cost me considerably more money than it used to, in order to outfit the hardware up front if I want it to actually last.

      The real problem is choice is being removed faster than external connections

      Yes by adding new devices with new form factors to the market while all previous form factors are still available choice is clearly being removed. Got it.

      *worlds slowest and most retarded clap*

      In the case of Apple, no. Previous form factors are not still available. Their last laptop that still supported a decent DIY upgrade path was released in 2012, and has now been removed from their product line. It's now a sealed box. Same with most of their all-in-one desktop line. You can't even upgrade the memory on a Mac Mini anymore. And they're touting all of this as the "future" of design. Save your claps for someone else.

      Apple set the bar with their latest "Pro" designs. Everyone else is merely following

      It sounds like you're new to the internet so let me help you: http://www.google.com/ Click this link and do a search for what you would like. You'll find a lot of laptops nothing like the Macbook Pro out there.

      Other form factors exist. OSX doesn't play nice with them, and pure greed coming from Apple has created a pain in the financial ass for the consumer.

      Yes, my issue is with Apple, and their

  32. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's more of a PSA letting us know what to avoid.

    Then again, anything with "Microsoft" or a Windows logo on it should already be a good indicator that the product is complete, absolute, irredeemably worthless garbage.

  33. Smells by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    Longer battery life AND better performance AND lighter than a MBP?

    Something smells really fishy. Microsoft has pulled sketchy stunts like this before, so only a fool would take this announcement at face value. I'll wait for some actual reviews before I'll form an opinion.

    It's using their newly released Windows 10S, so you can only install UWP and select windows store approved win32 apps. This is another massive alarm bell, and it's certainly not fit for "professional" use, no matter what they like to claim. There are more than plenty of "professional" applications which are not available in their app store.

  34. Re: wtf by fubarrr · · Score: 1

    Well, at least you should give them credit for finally getting the direction where the wind is blowing.

    Dell got bumper sales once Michael Dell got back into business and wrestled the helm from MBA flowchart warriors and people who were "product managing" company's products to death.

    See: XPS13 - the most sold high-end PC laptop. And they got there in just 2 years.

    Hey, even Chinese are leapfrogging old brands now: See Chuwi Surbook 13 - the name is ofcourse ridiculous, but see THEY GOT IT TOO. This is provably the one and only budget PC laptop worth buying on the market. You have apollo lake for the core, bur it comes with huuuge battery, best in class screen, and all benefits of 100% solid state/single chip platform.

  35. Re:wtf by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gets worse... not only is it underspec'd, but there's no info on durability (or more importantly, even the potential thereof).

    I've got a 4-year-old MacBook Pro that still performs just as well as most latest/greatest mid/high-end laptops, and I abuse the crap out of it. I wiped the disk and reinstalled exactly once - when I upgraded the disk from platter to SSD. Nothing (and I mean *nothing*) has ever given me cause to doubt the quality of the product, let alone its durability. Odds are nearly perfect I will keep it another year (maybe two?) before refreshing it. I also know that my particular scenario is quite typical among folks who own similar MacBook Pro laptops.

    So... can Microsoft credibly make the same claim?

    (There's also that stupid Spyware-by-default called Windows 10 on these new Surface laptops, but we won't go into that at the moment.)

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  36. PixelSense and Iris Plus GAWD! by cloud.pt · · Score: 1

    Oh I love the way branding goes these days, as if it wasn't enough to say it has "i5" or "i7" CPUs while omitting they're actually ULV CPUs. But claiming it to be more powerful than an MBP makes me digress, but I'm calling that BS since they started to compare it with a Macbook Air.

    But man, that marketing BS with the "PixelSense", "Iris Plus" and deceptive numbers like "3.4 Million pixels". So basically it's not 4k in 2017. It is less than a Dell XPS 4k (2y old, but ok, 15''), it is less than a Chromebook Pixel (a 4y device, a DISCONTINUED one at that!). It is also less than an MBP. So basically it is up-to-or-less-than par with the competition.

    Granted: it looks good; a ULV CPU will be decent enough for most; and so will WQHD (2560x1440). But that "Iris Plus", at first glance, doesn't convince, especially due to the fact the the real dedicated GPU contender we know on the Iris family is named Pro, you know the one used in soldered variants such as Gigabyte cubes and "cost-efficient" macs. I also have serious reservations about 50% performance of an MBA on what pretty much looks like a passive cooling solution. XPS15 and MBP (not the XPS13 though, don't know about the air, think not) all come with better BASE MODEL, dedicated GPUs. For getting that Intel-beefed-up-Iris you need to shell out for the i7 model (which, to be fair, puts it in the XPS15 price range).

    AH! And that SD Card teaser! Everybody on the youtube video was praising it, apparently it is just a sheet-thinned PSU connector. Well who knows, maybe MS decided to do what no other company wanted to do because they wanted to profit either from cloud-storage or the "more-storage-in-200-bucks-increments-variants". If they added an SD Card reader in a super-premium range device, they have probably discovered the best new feature of 2017.

    My precocious verdict is this will be like all niche products in the ultra-portable category: either M or C-Level word+slideshow machines, like the XPS13 or the the Surface Pro, or under-adopted, "almost-powerhouses" like the Chromebook Pixel.

      MS make me eat my words please.

    1. Re:PixelSense and Iris Plus GAWD! by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      i'm wondering if dedicated GPU's in laptops will eventually go the way of the dodo; once eGPU's via thunderbolt 3 gain a bit more traction, it will no longer really make sense to bother with integrated 3d video.

      i'd much rather save a few hundred bucks and not have a shitty geforce 'm" card, and instead use a desktop card of my choosing. it's upgrade-able, performance isn't quite as gimped due to heat/power issues, and laptop is lighter and cheaper..

      Looking at benchmarks the 960m card in my asus laptop is roughly 1/3 as powerful as the desktop 970GTX i have sitting in my closet collecting dust.

    2. Re:PixelSense and Iris Plus GAWD! by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      i'd much rather save a few hundred bucks and not have a shitty geforce 'm" card, and instead use a desktop card of my choosing. it's upgrade-able, performance isn't quite as gimped due to heat/power issues, and laptop is lighter and cheaper..

      They've been putting full-on "desktop" GPUs in laptops for some time now. All you have to do is pay for it and invest in a heat shield for your nuts.

    3. Re:PixelSense and Iris Plus GAWD! by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      eh, usually (at least what i've seen?) it's a mobile variant of a desktop card (such as the one i cited, 960m)

      but they add considerable cost, and i'd presume bulk due to cooling needs.

      basically give me a thin, sleek laptop with a proper i7 caliber CPU and whatever onboard intel bullshit it needs for 2d video.

      When i want to game i'd hook up an eGPU enclosure/dock. (yes there's a few on the market currently, but they're crazy expensive for what amounts to a pcie ->thunderbolt3 interface and janky as fuck power supply)

    4. Re:PixelSense and Iris Plus GAWD! by cloud.pt · · Score: 1

      1050gt/x and 1060gt/x 2017 machines are actually quite decent and get to be portable, and when you look at the model prices, you don't even need to go beyond the $1.8K marks. But granted, most models on these are either not as sleek (losing on cooling solution, which defeats the purpose), are way heavier, or get to be sleek with a half-decent cooling solution but cost loads more (case in point being the XPS15, the FHD models of course).

      There are some 14'' machines which also sport half-decent cooling and the 1050 range (gigabyte, msi are the usual suspects on such niche products, or razer if you go the extra $K), but the XPS15 really has no contender on the balancing act, especially considering you almost get the footprint of a 14'' with the signature quasi-edge-less display.

      eGPU is a nice paradigm, just not for me. I move around every weekend and I could not see me carrying a 5x5'' usb-c brick along with the laptop and its PSU, when I can just live very fine with the well above average 1050 soldered mobile card - I mean, a mobile 1050 is way close to 2014 high tier (not titans of course). But that's just personal preference.

  37. Re: How's this better hardware-wise than a MacBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The new Dell XPS 13 is good :) I swapped in an Intel wireless NIC (apparently late 2016 has Qualcomm so FOSS drivers there too) and it gives me 0 issues and about 8 hours battery. If you want a smaller, more portable laptop, choose this over a thinkpad. I had a T420 before this and the upgrade was substantial

  38. Who fucking cares? by xession · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Should this post have "AD" next to the title? This blatant advertisement counts for content now? Wouldn't even be at all shocked if this was written by a Microsoft employee.

    Here's my takeaway.
    • 1) The laptop is nice and thin, I'll give them that.
    • 2) Battery life sounds good.
    • 3) Touchscreen can be useful at times but I prefer an eraser tip. Nonetheless, this has been a key element of the Surface series.
    • 4) Inability to install your own mass storage: DUMB
    • 5) Carpetted laptop: DUMB. Now any accidental drips will last forever. Or even just hand grease. YUCK!
    • 6) Speakers behind the keys: DUMB
    • 7) Price point: DUMB. You can do a lot better for a lot less money. The 1TB version will set you back $3200! FUCK NO!
    • 8) Windows 10, obviously since its coming from Microsoft: DUMB.
    • 9) Weird ass resolution at 3000x2000: DUMB. Its nice and above HD but I'd expect HD content stretched to this weird size is going to look pretty shitty.

    My overall rating, averaging it all together: DUMB.

    1. Re:Who fucking cares? by hackel · · Score: 1

      Who could argue with the iron-clad argument of "DUMB?"

  39. Can be upgraded to Full Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For free for this year, for $49 in the future.

  40. Re: wtf by fubarrr · · Score: 1

    Sorry guy, mustook the name. It's called "Lapbook." Chuwi's take on XPS class devices is this thing https://liliputing.com/2017/04...

  41. Re:wtf by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's even worse than that, they say it runs W10 "S" which is locked down to only** be able to install software from the MS app store.

    ** With MS's security history, anyone want to take bets on how long before this is blown wide open so you can install normal programs from anywhere?

    --
    To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
  42. They're dragging Windows RT out again? by ErichTheRed · · Score: 2

    I know they're trying to compete with the Chromebook, but I thought they learned their lesson with Windows RT -- very few use cases exist for an artificially limited device that can only run Store apps and, essentially, Office.

    It's obvious that Azure and cloud services are the way they want to go, but no one wanted the non-Pro Surface. Outside of education, why would anyone want this? Phone is dead, UWP apps exist but certainly aren't the only type of apps people use, and it seems silly to me to artifically limit a device using Windows 10 S.

    The ideal endgame for Microsoft is definitely having locked-down devices that are useless without paying subscription fees and consuming Azure services. They're going to be the new IBM and we're all going to be mainframe customers at some point.

    1. Re:They're dragging Windows RT out again? by avandesande · · Score: 1

      I guess they figure if they tack on an extra 700$ it will be competitive

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  43. Re:How's this better hardware-wise than a MacBook by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    Aye, agreed. The new Microsox _might_ be good but it isn't better than a MacBook Pro. In fact, it isn't even _as_ good as a MacBook Pro. In addition to the technical aspect there is also the fact that the MacBooks last so much longer than Windows machines and require less support. This is repeatedly shown in industry studies. We have MacBook Pros and PowerBooks (older version of MBP) that are over 10 years old and even over 15 years old and still performing their duties perfectly. When the top level users upgrade the machines pass down within our business and family because not everyone needs the latest and greatest. Meanwhile Windows machines have an average lifespan of about 2 years and a higher support cost.

  44. Re:wtf by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This infomercial is a frickin joke. 999$ USD for an entry level Core i5 laptop with Windows on it is an insult to our intelligence.

    Only if you compare it to the end-of-isle specials at Walmart.

    How much does a 14mm thick laptop with 14 hour battery life and a bit of style cost at Walmart? Oh, that's right, they don't even sell them!

    This is way cheaper than a similar size Macbook and better specced. Those Macbooks sell by the million. You can complain about a lot of things but the price isn't one of them. Not really.

    (and anybody who'd buy something with an Alcantara keyboard certainly won't be complaining about that)

    --
    No sig today...
  45. Re: wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit. I had a great Microsoft mouse some time in the late 90s.

  46. Re:How's this better hardware-wise than a MacBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This doesn't need to be connected to the internet to work. What the fuck are you talking about? The point of Windows 10s is that it's focused on the Windows App Store. And an upgrade to pro is $50 or it's free if you do it before the end of the year.

    Yeah, chromebook competitor...I haven't seen a 16GB i-7 chromebook that runs real applications hanging around. Get off Tim Cook's cock and actually research before you start talking bullshit.

  47. Re:wtf by chipschap · · Score: 1

    But the real question is will it run Linux?

  48. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've still got plenty of life left in it. Mine is 7 years old and is still doing great despite frequent travel and occasional abuse. It's missing a screw from the bottom (I have the screw, but it doesn't stay in anymore) and one corner has a fairly significant dent. All four plastic feet have long since broken off. Battery life is down to about 4 hours with everything running at full tilt. Still gets the job done.

  49. Spring Break? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    Microsoft says it has also improved the standby time -- so much so that "you could go away on spring break and still have the same battery life when you returned."

    Appealing not to people that will actually attend spring break since they hardly have money for gas and beer, rather, to people with fond memories of spring breaks past.

  50. Re:wtf by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    So... can Microsoft credibly make the same claim?

    I'll answer that for you: no, because no one actually has it yet, let alone has had it for 4+ years.

    P.S., your Macbook is about to catch on fire and burn, within the next several weeks. Can you credibly claim otherwise?

  51. Re:How's this better hardware-wise than a MacBook by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    My Asus G50VT is only 9 years old. Works perfectly,even now with Windows 10 on it. I didn't game on it much, so the video card is still 100%.

    My Dell E6440 is just shy of 4 years old. Works perfectly, but did get a hard drive replacement last year. Drive failures being essentially random nowadays, this is hard to blame on Windows, Microsoft, or Dell.

    Before this, I had a no name laptop that lasted 11 years, damn, but i hacked the power connector back on several times. My ThinkPad X41t lasted me 9 years and is still working fine in its new life literally velcroed to a wall 24x7, running some weird asterisk pbx and bbs stuff, now about 12 years old. The battery has to be toast.

    There are non-Apple laptops/notebooks out there doing fine for very long lives. Apple doesn't have a lock on hardware, just the foresight to avoid letting manufacturers build for them, getting caught up in driver hell. Well played, Apple.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  52. Re:How's this better hardware-wise than a MacBook by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    cloud computing: the destroyer of open source

    lol.

  53. Re:wtf by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

    I'll answer that for you: no, because no one actually has it yet, let alone has had it for 4+ years.

    Nota Bene: The Microsoft Surface line launched in 2012, or 5 years ago. ;)

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  54. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, the screen is 3:2, which for me is the best aspect ratio I've seen on a "normal" laptop, since I believe the 2007 Thinkpad T61 (although since the Surface Pro 3 there have been _convertibles_ with 3:2 too).

  55. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Out of the box you're free to download and install Windows Pro if you want to run non-MS-store programs. It's even mentioned in the keynote, if you can get through all the Jony-Iveish sumptuous design verbage.

    It seems to be very decent hardware. So much vitriol and misinformation in this thread makes me wonder if Microsoft will ever really recover from all the bad will that was generated during the Ballmer years.

  56. Re: wtf by vipw · · Score: 1

    that has an atom cpu and eMMC storage. it's crap.

  57. The Focus... by hackel · · Score: 1

    "The focus is on students and professionals."

    I've never understood this. These two groups couldn't have more different needs. Students need basic word processing and internet browsing. Professionals need all kinds of other things, such as virtual machines, high-end graphics software, video editing, etc. etc. Why do they always get lumped together? Is it just because students so often want to waste their time playing video games?

    1. Re:The Focus... by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      "The focus is on students and professionals."

      I've never understood this. These two groups couldn't have more different needs. Students need basic word processing and internet browsing. Professionals need all kinds of other things, such as virtual machines, high-end graphics software, video editing, etc. etc. Why do they always get lumped together? Is it just because students so often want to waste their time playing video games?

      You misunderstand. When computer companies say "professionals" in reference to laptops, they do not mean coders, techs, or people that use VMs. They mean people who fly around in airplanes in suits and give powerpoint presentations in other people's conference rooms. Their workload is perhaps even less intensive than a students.

  58. Re:wtf by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
    Yep. Still using our T61's at home (and a T61p in the office).

    And no chance of Windows 10 here.

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  59. Better than the MacBook Pro?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it runs Mac OS X, and NOT Misro$hit Windon'ts S? (S stands for "SUCKER!" hahah you can only run the shitwear WE let you... hahaahaha!!!)

    Microsoft. Shit software for morons.

  60. 1 question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can i hackintosh it ?

  61. Re:wtf by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    Yup. Sitting back with popcorn for that one. Two weeks maybe, to get Ubuntu booted on it? Then if the price actually gets closer to the Chromebook zone, I'd pick one up.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  62. Oh it runs Windows 10.... no thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate macs... I hate mac os. But they are still better than ANYTHING running windows 10. Sorry Microsoft. Start listening to your consumers who aren't retards and morons who have never used a computer.

  63. Re: wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea lets blame balmer for everything and forget nutella satays assault on compuer users privacy.

  64. Re:How's this better hardware-wise than a MacBook by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    The difference is, as shown by plenty of studies, while you have an anecdotal case of a Windows machine lasting four or nine years the vast majority of them only last about two years. The studies contrast this with Macs which last two to three times longer on average.

  65. Re:How's this better hardware-wise than a MacBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do those studies control for price? No shit a $250 asus is going to die sooner than a $1000+ mac.

  66. Re: How's this better hardware-wise than a MacBook by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    The Dell Latitude series has for the past 7-8 years far surpassed the 4 year life mark.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  67. Re:wtf by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    This appears targetted to low end (ie, students). But Macbook Air is not intended to be a low end laptop, and Macbook Pro is definitely professional grade. So their whole stance here is confusing; is this the cheap student laptop or a laptop to compete with the top of the line? If it's Windows 10 "S" then it's useless for professional purposes.

    If the claims turn out to be valid (actually competing with Macbook but at a cheaper price, smaller, better battery life), then this would be awesome to put Linux on. But I think there's a whole lotta marketing going on here which means treat everything as hypothetical until a real person gets ahold of one.

  68. Re:How's this better hardware-wise than a MacBook by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

    I have a MacBook 4,1 2008 and I just run Linux on it. Right now it's a distro I made that's using kernel 4.10 and latest software, so I can probably get another 5 years out of it if I wanted; only 5 because it's 32-bit, but I do have the PAE kernel installed for more RAM access if I need it, though with Linux I barely ever get about 2 GB of RAM.

  69. Re:How's this better hardware-wise than a MacBook by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

    The college I went used Windows but even then, they ran it on iMacs. I think they did it so that the IT department could free up their time for internet security (they had military students and homeland security majors there) and because they also took looks at student's computers for fixing if they needed it. You can guess which platform saw the most trouble, and it was a private school too, so the Windows to Mac ratio was a little off.