Wait... do you honestly expect me to believe that you would turn down the chance to hit that fine piece of ass just because she might have been compromised by the CIA??? Please turn in your man card on the way out!
I'm pretty sure Hurd has a good case for a Restraint of Trade countersuit. Grab some popcorn, sit back, and watch. This is a pissing contest that only lawyers win.
A change in CEO does not mean a change in direction. Did you notice any change in direction when Fiorina was replaced by Hurd? Guess what, there won't be any change in direction with Hurd's successor either. The policies are put in place by the Board of Directors and the President carries them out. Then the Board blames the President for the bad policies, replaces the President, and the cycle repeats. Any real change in direction would require a change in the Board. Note that any remaining Hewletts or Packards were kicked off the Board a long time ago.
Larry has been sued for sexual harassment by more than one of his personal secretaries. Any female employees that had a problem with sexual harassment would have left a long time ago!
Shouldn't the copyright on something published in 1920 have expired by now?
"As a general rule, for works created after January 1, 1978, copyright protection lasts for the life of the author plus an additional 70 years. For an anonymous work, a pseudonymous work, or a work made for hire, the copyright endures for a term of 95 years from the year of its first publication or a term of 120 years from the year of its creation, whichever expires first."
120 fucking years?!? How exactly does having copyright extend much longer for works for hire (i.e. owned by a corporation) then for works copyrighted by the author himself encourage the creation of new art?
think they mean taking photos of the Earth by the reflected light of the moon, but even then you have a huge variance in lumens depending on the phase of the moon, so I'd assume a full moon. Of course, it would have been much more concise to just specify the actual light level required!
isn't a quad core 3.1 Ghz per chip with 20% logistic overhead faster? Yes, for problem sets that are well suited to parallel processing. No, for problem sets where every computation is dependent on the result of a previous computation.
No, by not doing that, they set themselves up for a countersuit for fraudulently suing them in the first place. Which may earn them a lot more money than their website does.
You either pay for the DLC, or you get your ass handed to you on a platter by the people that have payed for the DLC, but either way, it's your choice!
Slashdot Mirror
Wait... do you honestly expect me to believe that you would turn down the chance to hit that fine piece of ass just because she might have been compromised by the CIA??? Please turn in your man card on the way out!
Make him pay for the electricity and be done with it.
Sure, but bluescreening in the middle of a blowjob would be more than a little annoying...
Clifford, stop being such a Nass!
You forgot tweeting during sex. "OMG! I'm coming!"
They bring us free porn on a daily basis!
I'm pretty sure Hurd has a good case for a Restraint of Trade countersuit. Grab some popcorn, sit back, and watch. This is a pissing contest that only lawyers win.
Nah, East Swampmuck is a dump! West Swampmuck, on the other hand...
Money can't buy you love, but it can sure get you a bunch of sexy broads!
To say nothing of their ability to suck a golf ball through a garden hose!
A change in CEO does not mean a change in direction. Did you notice any change in direction when Fiorina was replaced by Hurd? Guess what, there won't be any change in direction with Hurd's successor either. The policies are put in place by the Board of Directors and the President carries them out. Then the Board blames the President for the bad policies, replaces the President, and the cycle repeats. Any real change in direction would require a change in the Board. Note that any remaining Hewletts or Packards were kicked off the Board a long time ago.
Larry has been sued for sexual harassment by more than one of his personal secretaries. Any female employees that had a problem with sexual harassment would have left a long time ago!
Shouldn't the copyright on something published in 1920 have expired by now?
"As a general rule, for works created after January 1, 1978, copyright protection lasts for the life of the author plus an additional 70 years. For an anonymous work, a pseudonymous work, or a work made for hire, the copyright endures for a term of 95 years from the year of its first publication or a term of 120 years from the year of its creation, whichever expires first."
120 fucking years?!? How exactly does having copyright extend much longer for works for hire (i.e. owned by a corporation) then for works copyrighted by the author himself encourage the creation of new art?
Wookiee the Chew sounds stupid. Yes, but "Chew the Wookie" would probably get filed in the Adult's Only section of the bookstore...
think they mean taking photos of the Earth by the reflected light of the moon, but even then you have a huge variance in lumens depending on the phase of the moon, so I'd assume a full moon. Of course, it would have been much more concise to just specify the actual light level required!
By the way, I have a VoIP phone from Cisco sitting on my desk right now: CISCO IP PHONE 7941 SERIES.
we could see sweet void phones from cisco Maybe a few VoIP phones from Cisco too!
It's terrorists, I tell ya! And remember, if you stop drivin' your Hummer, the terrorists win!
Wait... is reading before replying now required on slashdot? When did that start?
Are you sure you don't mean Custer's Revenge?
isn't a quad core 3.1 Ghz per chip with 20% logistic overhead faster? Yes, for problem sets that are well suited to parallel processing. No, for problem sets where every computation is dependent on the result of a previous computation.
No, by not doing that, they set themselves up for a countersuit for fraudulently suing them in the first place. Which may earn them a lot more money than their website does.
Paper money is backed by "The full faith and credit of the US government." It may not be much, but it is backed by something!
I... occasionally do crap on their farms. Well, I guess it's good fertilizer, but it does seem a bit rude.
You either pay for the DLC, or you get your ass handed to you on a platter by the people that have payed for the DLC, but either way, it's your choice!