Orignal games:
Lummines
LocoRoco
Sequals:
Grand Theft Auto: Liberty City Stories,
Me and My Katamari
Metal Gear Acid 1+2
Syphon Filter: The Dark Mirror
WipEout Pure
Spin around in your chair then put your arms out and then back in. What happens?
Not sure about what effects but have a look at the mass of the earth compared with the counterweight.
And if you read the site you find he gets the graphs straight from the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Statistics website (just adding the video game timeline)
(Off-topic)
How do you get moonshell to paly movies (tried using their tools to get it to.dpg but it will not play saying the extension is not supported).
Is there a solar panel that can produce anything like 5kWh/m2/day?
At the 10% efficiency mark (Standed flat-panels are about 16% now I think. Although their is one product in develpment stage that is >30% and about grid-cost over it's lifespan http://www.greenandgoldenergy.com.au/) they would only be producing 500wh/m2/day. And you would use the 1st set of figuers 1298.63 km2 and 896,054.70 km2.
If it weren't we'd being doing it already?
The problem is the cost and load balancing (mainly during the evening and winter)
I read somewhere that no solar cell has ever produced more energy than was put into making it in the first place (think of mining and processing raw materials, then manufacture and delivery with finite life span). I may be wrong but I've seen that idea a few times, maybe you know more? Maybe the tech needs to improve but it will all take time. It's a question of EROEI
Most solar cells that I see are <3 years on EROEI
From reading a bit I see solar EROEIs run from about 1 to 10 for certain designs. So that is a net energy gain. Or emergy as it seems to be called. However keeping the dust of these things in the outback or desert may require enormous water use that would have to be factored in too.
That is a good point although couldn't you use a fan or alternativly you just leave the dust on reducing the efficency down
From http://uic.com.au/nip37.htm (In 2003-04 Australia's power stations produced 237 billion kilowatt hours)
237,000,000,000 / 1,825 = 129.86 km2 (1,000,000 m2 in 1 km2)
assuming 10% efficency =1298.63 km2
20-21 km wide circle ,.0169 % total area of australia
assuming 100% efficency =129.86 km2
6-7 km wide circle ,.00169 % total area of australia
Using projected (http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/world.html) worldwide energy (all include electricity and ransport) use in 2015 is 162,068,301,805,239 kilowatt hours (per year)
690 times the energy
10% efficency = 11.660% the area of australia , 896,054.70km2 , 534km - 535km circle 100% efficency = 1.166% the area of australia , 89,605.47km2 , 168km - 169km circle
Slashdot Mirror
it is actualy only 100k for japan at launch.
What about Project H.A.M.M.E.R. and Disaster: Day of Crisis.
Orignal games: Lummines LocoRoco Sequals: Grand Theft Auto: Liberty City Stories, Me and My Katamari Metal Gear Acid 1+2 Syphon Filter: The Dark Mirror WipEout Pure
Try it hlding a tennis ball and then let go off it.
From wikipedia
The earth is 5.9742×(10 to the power of 24) kg.
Assuming 1% mass is requied to slow down the earth then the mass would be
5.9742 x( 10 to the power of 22) kg OR
5.9742 x( 10 to the power of 19) tonns
Spin around in your chair then put your arms out and then back in. What happens? Not sure about what effects but have a look at the mass of the earth compared with the counterweight.
As far as I know they both use (well the most efficent process for each) is the same. Reverse osmoise
The other way of looking at that is this
1.You make lawnmowers.
2.I find a way of making the exact same lawnmower for free.
3.I've copyed your product and you don't get compensation.
Maybee they can't get ring-tones on their phones for free unlike 'free' CD's?
The Gamecube is more powerfull then the PS2 so the Wii must be more pwerfull then the PS2
I thought that the speed for internal HDD was about 200Mb/s
Unfortnatly it is made by rare (so no Virtual Console :-()
(This is in japan) 150,000+ each week for the DS vs 30,000 (40,000 in tle last week) for the PSP
The PS2 was actualy less powerfull then the GC.
The response to that is you can not then say 'that increasing CPU speeds has served to increase youth violence'
And if you read the site you find he gets the graphs straight from the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Statistics website (just adding the video game timeline)
No the xbox360 regualy outsells the gamecube now. (but not much more) http://forum.pcvsconsole.com/viewthread.php?tid=82 72&page=24
(Off-topic) How do you get moonshell to paly movies (tried using their tools to get it to .dpg but it will not play saying the extension is not supported).
actulay it is boinc boinc.berkley.edu. (seti@home was one of the first to move here)
Is there a solar panel that can produce anything like 5kWh/m2/day?
At the 10% efficiency mark (Standed flat-panels are about 16% now I think. Although their is one product in develpment stage that is >30% and about grid-cost over it's lifespan http://www.greenandgoldenergy.com.au/) they would only be producing 500wh/m2/day. And you would use the 1st set of figuers 1298.63 km2 and 896,054.70 km2.
If it weren't we'd being doing it already?
The problem is the cost and load balancing (mainly during the evening and winter)
I read somewhere that no solar cell has ever produced more energy than was put into making it in the first place (think of mining and processing raw materials, then manufacture and delivery with finite life span). I may be wrong but I've seen that idea a few times, maybe you know more? Maybe the tech needs to improve but it will all take time. It's a question of EROEI
Most solar cells that I see are <3 years on EROEI
From reading a bit I see solar EROEIs run from about 1 to 10 for certain designs. So that is a net energy gain. Or emergy as it seems to be called. However keeping the dust of these things in the outback or desert may require enormous water use that would have to be factored in too.
That is a good point although couldn't you use a fan or alternativly you just leave the dust on reducing the efficency down
Solar could provide much more energy then was actualy needed
t BeamAustraliaandNewZealand.GIF (5kWh/m2/day = 1825 kWh/m2/year
.0169 % total area of australia
.00169 % total area of australia
a .png
Using http://www.greenandgoldenergy.com.au/images/Direc
From http://uic.com.au/nip37.htm (In 2003-04 Australia's power stations produced 237 billion kilowatt hours)
237,000,000,000 / 1,825 = 129.86 km2 (1,000,000 m2 in 1 km2)
assuming 10% efficency =1298.63 km2
20-21 km wide circle ,
assuming 100% efficency =129.86 km2
6-7 km wide circle ,
Using projected (http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/world.html) worldwide energy (all include electricity and ransport) use in 2015 is 162,068,301,805,239 kilowatt hours (per year)
690 times the energy
10% efficency = 11.660% the area of australia , 896,054.70km2 , 534km - 535km circle
100% efficency = 1.166% the area of australia , 89,605.47km2 , 168km - 169km circle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Solar_land_are
Or are are you talking about a diffrent problem then land area?
waste water == wasted energy requied to pump the water
From my point of view they already are. Google buys badwith to get to you and you buy bandwith to get to Google.
This is actualy just America controling America's aprt of the Internet. No diffrent then China's firewall.
My brother actualy got 2 cards that were the same.
Well (the us version) is copyrighted until 75 years after the creater has died so yes copyright probaly would still be attached