Re:This is dangerous, stupid, and illegal (in CA)
on
Linux Based CarPC
·
· Score: 1
If you have something connected the the ignition so in ON,START it stops the screen showing any but the above but on ACC or OFF you can show any thing, then that is legal
FIREFOX
3 less critical (including one only for apple ) and 1 moderately citical (part fix)http://secunia.com/product/4227/
IE
6 Not critical
6 less critical
4 moderately citical
Part Fix
5 Not critical
1 moderately citical
1 Extremely Critical
http://secunia.com/product/11/
Also have a look at the amount of Extremely Critical vulrabilites in both
10 IE Vs 0 Firefox
Hang on what was your point again?
Why should there be public roads. I'm sure all the poor people without cars can walk to where there going while the people with cars spare a few pounds from their massive salaries, there's no need to take even more from the poor.
So I send spam with a link to my page with a CPM ad on it and I get 1 million hits - 1,000M X 10c CPM = $100.
And who knows someone might even sign up.
Here is a list of things that won't run under Limited Account
Outlook Express (Managed to get thunderbird working though and now runs in it's own account)
Word Clipart comes with a read-only database error (Tried Open Office. The other users don't like it)
Quite a few games also don't run as limited user.
So I had to bite the bullet and make the other users Administrators.
quote
Whoever willfully, knowingly, and without authorization:
end quote
But does an open conenction (E.G) http give authorization.
If it dosen't then it looks very much like entrapment
RTFA
The best-known stealth brand may be the military's B2 stealth bomber, whose main contractor, Northrop Grumman, has fought Mr. Stoller to something of standoff. In 2001, the company paid Mr. Stoller $10 and agreed to abandon its trademark applications to use "stealth bomber" in spinoff products like model airplanes and video games. In return, Mr. Stoller agreed not to oppose Northrop's use of "stealth" in aircraft or defense equipment.
Re:Private and public are not mutually exclusive
on
Open Source Molecules
·
· Score: 1
Sorry. I did not know that.
Re:Private and public are not mutually exclusive
on
Open Source Molecules
·
· Score: 1
I did not have sexual relations with that woman
Translation
He had sexual relations with an other person
Probaly because you can remove it from Apple (I not sure if you can but I think you can) but with windows you can not remove it without breaking the computer.
From a post which they say they RTFA.
* No tax money would be used for the Minneapolis wireless network, which would be paid for, built, owned and operated by the winning bidder on the city's proposal. (webhead04)
Slashdot Mirror
If you have something connected the the ignition so in ON,START it stops the screen showing any but the above but on ACC or OFF you can show any thing, then that is legal
I talk to my local telstra person.
It no longer exists and the people that could get it are angry as telstra has taken everthing back
Would the realse of tabbed browsing for IE have any thing to do with this?
From what I hear (slashdot so use a grain of salt) you play the kid who gets the crap beat out of him.
Sorry not clear. The thing would might it legal.
Australia is better.
Install a thing to stop it showing anything but
->Vechiles diagnotist.
->Navagation
->dispatch (Taxis,fire trucks etc ONLY)
-> couple of others things as well
So when the car is stoped (IN ACC) you get your movies but turn the engine on and no more movies
FIREFOX 3 less critical (including one only for apple ) and 1 moderately citical (part fix)http://secunia.com/product/4227/ IE 6 Not critical 6 less critical 4 moderately citical Part Fix 5 Not critical 1 moderately citical 1 Extremely Critical http://secunia.com/product/11/ Also have a look at the amount of Extremely Critical vulrabilites in both 10 IE Vs 0 Firefox Hang on what was your point again?
Why should there be public roads. I'm sure all the poor people without cars can walk to where there going while the people with cars spare a few pounds from their massive salaries, there's no need to take even more from the poor.
Finally a case that is not from australia
Sorry. Most of the time when I get to the stories there are lots of posts. this one there were none so I had to do it.
Would this be a case of Emergent Behaviour? My First , First Post
You have to do that for a mission.
So I send spam with a link to my page with a CPM ad on it and I get 1 million hits - 1,000M X 10c CPM = $100. And who knows someone might even sign up.
Here is a list of things that won't run under Limited Account Outlook Express (Managed to get thunderbird working though and now runs in it's own account) Word Clipart comes with a read-only database error (Tried Open Office. The other users don't like it) Quite a few games also don't run as limited user. So I had to bite the bullet and make the other users Administrators.
Except for the atlatis shield (STARGATE: Atlatis refrence)
quote Whoever willfully, knowingly, and without authorization: end quote But does an open conenction (E.G) http give authorization. If it dosen't then it looks very much like entrapment
From what I hear when the children don't get the game they want the parent will them come and get it from them.
RTFA The best-known stealth brand may be the military's B2 stealth bomber, whose main contractor, Northrop Grumman, has fought Mr. Stoller to something of standoff. In 2001, the company paid Mr. Stoller $10 and agreed to abandon its trademark applications to use "stealth bomber" in spinoff products like model airplanes and video games. In return, Mr. Stoller agreed not to oppose Northrop's use of "stealth" in aircraft or defense equipment.
Sorry. I did not know that.
I did not have sexual relations with that woman Translation He had sexual relations with an other person
Probaly because you can remove it from Apple (I not sure if you can but I think you can) but with windows you can not remove it without breaking the computer.
From a post which they say they RTFA. * No tax money would be used for the Minneapolis wireless network, which would be paid for, built, owned and operated by the winning bidder on the city's proposal. (webhead04)
Well what about parks can't they be provided by private companies as well?
What is probley happening here is INetUser thigns of Luddite diffrently as danila.
You have to register to view NYT stuff. or you could you bugmenot.com or firefox combined with the firefox extenstion