Slashdot Mirror


PK'ing Banned in China For Minors

Evoluder writes "Just saw this over on worldofwar.net as it appears to apply to WoW as well. A story at interfax.com says China just passed a law prohibiting minors from playing games that allow players to kill each other (i.e., player killing)." From the article: "Minors should not be allowed to play online games that have PK content, that allow players to increase the power of their own online game characters by killing other players...Online games that have PK content usually also contain acts of violence and leads to players spending too much time trying to increase the power of their characters. They are harmful to young people."

170 comments

  1. Jack Thompson's Chinese now? by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ;) Seriously, this is ludicrous. You might as well ban dodgeball be....oh....nevermind..

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  2. Let's hope... by SolarCanine · · Score: 1, Redundant

    ...that this leads to a new period of enlightenment in China where Hot Coffee is okay, but the rest of GTA:SA is disdained. ;)

  3. Out goes... by diamondmagic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There goes BZFlag.

  4. Re:this is a violation of freedom of speech by Mythrix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    China has a declaration of independence?

  5. Age check by DarkFencer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From the article:

    hina's Ministry of Culture (MOC) and Ministry of Information Industry (MII) have also ordered the country's online game operators to develop identity authentication systems that prevent minors from playing games These authentication systems would require all players to first enter their Citizen ID Card numbers before being allowed to play games that allow Player Kills.


    At least we see how they will check for age. Citizen ID Card. That just makes me shudder.

    Regardless though, will they have seperate servers for 'minors'? Or will those who are minors (based on the authentication) be unable to be flagged as PvP? Either idea has advantages and disadvantages, but it does sound like it will create difficulties for Blizzard and its competitors that operate in China.
    1. Re:Age check by Fr05t · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "At least we see how they will check for age. Citizen ID Card. That just makes me shudder"

      Oh you don't own a Social Security Number card?

    2. Re:Age check by DarkFencer · · Score: 1

      Oh, I know they are somewhat alike, but its just the semantics of "Citizen ID Card".

      Also, thankfully I've never been required to use my SS number for anything but a bank/credit account and tax-related things.

    3. Re:Age check by Fr05t · · Score: 1

      It's my understanding it's more or less a SSN+Birth Certificate, and access to it can only be demanded by a law official with good reason. (Not sure how this will effect them using it for online age verification)

      It replaced the Resident ID card, and extended the min. age to 16 - with this change laws were passed to further protect the rights of citizens privacy and restrict 3rd party access to the information on the card.

      So it's basically the same unified national ID card Europe, Canada, and the US will have in the next year or 2.

    4. Re:Age check by ubera · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Blizzard categorise their servers and greatly limit PvP on some World of Warcraft Servers. It would presumably not be too difficult to create a server mode completely without PvP.

      Players will still be able to cause each other's characters to die by bringing hordes of monsters down on them, but that can be prevented by banning it in the T&C.

      --
      But what is the SIGnificance?
    5. Re:Age check by thesp · · Score: 1

      If Citizen ID card makes you shudder, what about ID Card or perhaps Entitlement Card? They'll be reality in the UK in a few years, if our lords and masters get their way...

    6. Re:Age check by Stargoat · · Score: 1
      Nope. It can be demanded by your workplace. It can be demanded by the train conductor. It can be demanded by the crooked cop who sees you walking and wearing less than fresh clothes.

      If you do not have one, say you are a second child, you cannot go to school. You cannot have a job. You cannot get government benefits.

      Is is not the same unified national ID card as western countries.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    7. Re:Age check by happylight · · Score: 1

      Dude, you play any Chinese or any Asian online games for that matter, they ask for your ID number.

    8. Re:Age check by Scherf · · Score: 1

      Players will still be able to cause each other's characters to die by bringing hordes of monsters down on them, but that can be prevented by banning it in the T&C.

      Just for clarification: In WoW that's not possible since a mob that has been chasing you will go back to its usual position, without caring about what's on his way, as long as nobody attacks it (i.e. its aggro range is zero). Only then it will attack other players again (i.e. its aggro goes turns back to default).

      Even though that's pretty unrealistic (which the game isn't meant to be in the first place), it's preventing exactly that kind of lame PKing.

  6. Wow, Blizzard is "fucked" by rbarreira · · Score: 1

    After this and their enormous profits on China, there goes a big part of their WoW revenue... I guess it won't be a BIG problem for them, but it may be a "big" one...

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    1. Re:Wow, Blizzard is "fucked" by Brainboy · · Score: 1

      How much of Blizzard's Chinese $$ come from minors, do you think?

      --
      Just a guy with an opinion
    2. Re:Wow, Blizzard is "fucked" by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Probably much...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    3. Re:Wow, Blizzard is "fucked" by Fr05t · · Score: 1

      With a market as big as China I'm sure Blizzard will put some kind of age verification on the PvP servers. Not sure what they would do about Battle grounds though.

    4. Re:Wow, Blizzard is "fucked" by interiot · · Score: 1
      Realistically, what portion of their enormous profits are from minors? How many families are wealthy enough to afford to pay an hourly fee soley so their kid can play the game?

      Though there are tweaks that Blizzard could make to the game. I suppose minors could be prevented from playing on the WoW PVP servers. But I don't see how they could credibly remove the PVP flag from normal servers, since there's that whole, you know, horde vs alliance thing that's kind of hard to fix. I suppose at the worst, you'd be able to have alliance walking around inside Orgrimmar but not able to hurt anything, and everyone would instantly realize that they're a teenager. But that'd still be bizarre.

      Maybe simply removing the Honor system from minor players would be enough to fall within the letter of the law, since it then provides no benefit for minors to kill other players?

    5. Re:Wow, Blizzard is "fucked" by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      Realistically, what portion of their enormous profits are from minors? How many families are wealthy enough to afford to pay an hourly fee soley so their kid can play the game?

      The fee in China may not be the same as the one here? And, those without some form of credit card can play in Internet cafes.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    6. Re:Wow, Blizzard is "fucked" by arootbeer · · Score: 1

      Easy enough. There are chinese realms; you implement an age verification system on those realms, and allow minors to only play on servers that don't allow PvP. You also make minors registering accounts in non-chinese realms a violation of TOS, and let the government chase them from there.

      You can turn PvP off by not letting players on PvE servers get flagged; might not even have to remove the honor system, it just won't mean anything.

    7. Re:Wow, Blizzard is "fucked" by mconeone · · Score: 1

      It's not just PvP servers, in PvE you can still fight other players through duels or by flagging yourself for PvP. ANd then there's the battlegrounds...

    8. Re:Wow, Blizzard is "fucked" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the TOS for the game, you need to be over 18 to play...

    9. Re:Wow, Blizzard is "fucked" by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 1

      But I don't see how they could credibly remove the PVP flag from normal servers, since there's that whole, you know, horde vs alliance thing that's kind of hard to fix.


      I can think of an easy way to do it.
      Split the servers into horde and alliance servers.
      On an alliance server, people are only allowed to play alliance.

      -- Should you believe authority without question?
    10. Re:Wow, Blizzard is "fucked" by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      What percentage of players are minors? Judging from player behavior I'd have to say at least two-thirds.

    11. Re:Wow, Blizzard is "fucked" by guaigean · · Score: 1

      I really don't see this as an issue at all. Most children that play MMORPG's play on their parent's accounts, or on their own account with their parents. MMORPG's are surprisingly more familay inclusive than other genre's. Because of this, I don't see there being a huge decline, as many of the parents will still play.

      Additionally, with 3.5 million players, losing even 500,000 minors isn't going to crush Blizzard. Hell, they are having a hard enough time hiring enough people to keep their servers up in the first place due to such high demand. It might be a nice break for the admins.

      --
      Microsoft Sucks, F/OSS Rocks. I get mod points now right?
    12. Re:Wow, Blizzard is "fucked" by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      From a nation with 300,000,000+ teenagers? Enough to fret over.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    13. Re:Wow, Blizzard is "fucked" by Brainboy · · Score: 1

      It's a country with 1,306,313,812 people, or sayeth Wikipedia. I think Blizzard can deal with the loss and handle targeting the 18-35 market in China.

      --
      Just a guy with an opinion
  7. Say what? by Vo0k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of few things in their censorship thing they got right.
    I really don't understand why boobs are so no-no and killing is okay.

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    1. Re:Say what? by Descalzo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you look at boobs in a game, the effects are way more similar to the effects of seeing real boobs. Seeing someone die on a game is very different than seeing someone get gunned down in real life. Just ask someone who's witnessed a drive-by or been to war. They start sweating and their heart-rate increases when they start talking about it. The video game death is out of our heads in minutes. I still talk about the time my roommate and I had someone get murdered in our apartment building. I never talk about the time we almost saw someone's boobs.

      --
      I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
    2. Re:Say what? by XFilesFMDS1013 · · Score: 1

      Because boobs lead to sex, and sex is bad. Except for the continuation of the species part of it.

      Oh, and the part about how sex is really, really fun.

    3. Re:Say what? by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sex is bad because, sexual union is an important part of happiness. Happy people don't buy things. Same with marijuana.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    4. Re:Say what? by Reignking · · Score: 1

      Except for the continuation of the species part of it.

      No, even that is bad in China -- one child per family!

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    5. Re:Say what? by cahiha · · Score: 1

      No, even that is bad in China -- one child per family!

      That's why the Chinese should seriously investigate cybersex--it's sex without the biological consequences.

    6. Re:Say what? by imr · · Score: 1

      As much as i a agree with your point, it's not about killing per se, but killing of other player that increase your character attributes as in mmorpg, since it leads to obsessive behaviors, they say.
      It seems coming more from a psychological standpoint than from a moral standpoint.

    7. Re:Say what? by XFilesFMDS1013 · · Score: 1

      Plus the demand for tissues should give a giant boost to the American economy!

    8. Re:Say what? by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If you look at boobs in a game, the effects are way more similar to the effects of seeing real boobs.

      In other words, not much effect at all, and what little there is is probably good for you. In my opinion, seeing real boobs is perfectly normal among healthy human beings. The fact that seeing them on screen is a bit like seeing them in real life is hardly an argument for censoring them, is it? That would only make sense if the effect was harmful, and in all honesty, I think it's actually beneficial to be used to seeing boobs in ordinary, non-abusive situations, to the point of it not being a sensitive thing.

      Seeing someone die on a game is very different than seeing someone get gunned down in real life. Just ask someone who's witnessed a drive-by or been to war. They start sweating and their heart-rate increases when they start talking about it. The video game death is out of our heads in minutes.

      Do you think that's a good thing, that images of suffering leave your head quickly, even if they're very realistic? That you've become insensitive to portrayals of violence? That's not innate from birth, you know.

      If you show a young child realistic images of murder and brutality - the nasty stuff, not mere brawls - they're upset by it. Older children less so, and all the more if they've seen plenty already. Don't you think extensive exposure to violent imagery might have something to do with the extent of that desensitisation?

      It's easy to think that semi-realistic killings in games, by the time your old enough to enjoy them, aren't bothersome because you know they aren't real. And that murder and brutality in films aren't real, so they're ok. But desensitisation goes in deeper than that. Notice you don't break out into a sweat when seeing real brutal violence and murder on the news, either, even when it's much more horrific than what you have personally witnessed.

      If you'd hardly ever seen a dramatic portrayal of killing as you grew up, if you hardly ever witnessed such images, then as an adult you'd be shocked and outraged when you saw it happen. You might be more motivated, in a way that's more deeply-ingrained than just overcoming fear and apathy, to prevent it from happening, to intervene. Think about that. Imagine if the world were full of people with that sort of motivation.

      For an adult example: remember the first video beheading from Iraq? People were shocked. If another one came out now, peoples' collective response would be much more muted.

      Isn't it something of a tragedy to become insensitive to portrayals of suffering, while hypersensitive to portrayals of pleasure and bodies and things like that whether real or not?

      Often these debates centre around the way dramatised violent imagery might cause violent behaviour (the evidence is inconclusive), or the bother the imagery might cause to people seeing it.

      It's easy to neglect the obvious, down to earth and undeniable effect: See a lot of something, whether good or bad, and you become insensitive to those types of images. Isn't it something of a tragedy that we grow up insensitive to portrayals of the most awful experiences, yet hypersensitively angsty over glimpses of the pleasures we're too frightened to admit are daily, happy, good occurences for many healthy people everywhere?

      I still talk about the time my roommate and I had someone get murdered in our apartment building. I never talk about the time we almost saw someone's boobs.

      Guess seeing boobs isn't a big deal then, neither real nor dramatised. So why's it such a big deal?

      -- Jamie
      "Chinese people are my friends"

    9. Re:Say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my roommate and I had someone get murdered in our apartment

      Should I call the police or have you served your time already ?

    10. Re:Say what? by Descalzo · · Score: 0
      "In other words, not much effect at all, and what little there is is probably good for you. In my opinion, seeing real boobs is perfectly normal among healthy human beings."

      I guess that boobs are censored, then, because a majority disagrees with you, or at least a voting majority or an oral majority, the only kind of majority that counts as far as these things go.

      Another thing that your post made me think of was the fact that WoW and games like that don't seem to depict nearly the realism that porn can. It seems a lot harder to show realistic death than realistic boobs. (Insert implant joke here)

      Anyway, thanks for your response.

      --
      I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
    11. Re:Say what? by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 1

      It is such a big deal BECAUSE seeing them is natural.

      Sexuality is a very natural thing. It's wired into us.

      Seeing death is not.

      Now, because we are built to accept sex and find it to be a good thing, when we see sex (or sexuality) in an improper context, it is not necessarily given the same protective reflex as something else.

      See also: Diabetics and Twinkies versus someone who has problems digesting fiber and their brussel sprouts.

    12. Re:Say what? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Because people don't become obsessive or compulsive over Tetris or Scrabble or reading or writing or drawing or music or television or movies or comic books or religion.

    13. Re:Say what? by imr · · Score: 1

      Obsessive toward crushing the other one.
      Tetris or Scrabble or reading or writing or drawing or music or television or movies or comic books or religion don't require you to enter that kind of state of mind.
      I'm not saying there are necessarly right or wrong, just that they have a point, and that it is not a moral point.

      ... on second thought, there are some ways of interpreting and teaching religions ...

      By the way, there is also the physiological point, that isnt often adressed, and I'd like more researches put into that. there was a japanese study once, that I read about here on /., that spoke about the effects of intense video gaming on the brain alpha waves.

      disclaimer: I'm a gamer, I play a lot.

    14. Re:Say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, seeing death is completely unnatural. I mean it's not like people put their dead relatives in a box on display for a week or two before putting them in the ground. Turning on the news doesn't show yet another car accident, or plane crash, or terrorist attack. People don't get killed in their own neighbourhoods, thinking it's safe to walk the street at night. People haven't been incorporating aspects of the afterlife into their funeral proceedings for thousands of years, before human history was even recorded.

      Oh, wait...

      What a stupid fucking argument. Did you even think before you posted that gem, or were you too busy looking at porn?

    15. Re:Say what? by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 1

      I said that seeing death is not wired into us as sex is.

      Things happening frequently makes them natural and instinctual?

      I suppose, then, that anything happening frequently makes it natural and instinctual. Score one for genetics!

      I fail it, for IHBT.

  8. Could they also ban by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gold farmers!!!

  9. Restraint? by interiot · · Score: 1

    I'm really curious... Why do the Chinese leaders have the self-restraint to not ban games altogether, but they don't have the self-restraint to ban games with PK elements? Obviously they have the power to do either of these things. Are some of the chinese leaders avid gamers, and therefore recognize the value of games? Does the lure of foreign investment provide at least some influence on the leaders to not be so heavy-handed, but at the same time the leaders think that banning minor-PK isn't heavy handed? It's just kind of a weird decision to make, IMHO.

    1. Re:Restraint? by Nytewynd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While it is messed up, at least it makes a little bit of sense. They don't want to ban games like Tetris, but they do want to ban games like Counter Strike. Maybe there is a little truth to the fact that kids shouldn't be playing games with realistic killing of other people. I don't think games lead to violence more than anything else, and don't support this policy, but it makes a lot more sense than flipping out about a boobie while you let kids do drive bys.

      --
      /. ++
    2. Re:Restraint? by Fr05t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know Communists aren't just out to ruin every body's fun. My guess is the reason they don't ban all games is because it provides entertainment and leisure for their population (and takes up little space), plus there really isn't a good reason to.

      I might not totally agree with the reasoning for banning PK games, BUT that doesn't mean I'm right - I do understand the logic behind it.

    3. Re:Restraint? by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      I don't think counter strike would qualify to be banned. If you kill somebody, you don't get any advantage for your online character.

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    4. Re:Restraint? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      It does not seem that weird a decision to me (in the context of the Chinese government ).
      Games are a healthy distraction that can keep people from worrying about bigger problems ,however they would most likely not want any minors to get any ideas about growing in power and violence .
      When they are past that age , things tend to have less influence on a persons character.
      I think they are more than likely not banning this type of game for the minors because of the violence, more the fact it could be used to subvert them (in the view of the Chinese officials) .
      Also I would imagine that if many in the west had their way , similar legislation would be past here.

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    5. Re:Restraint? by interiot · · Score: 1

      Ahh, that makes sense, thanks for explaining it that way. The Chinese government sometimes seems very difficult to understand by westerners. In the US, I think we're used to thinking of most communist leaders as completely nuts, but China is clearly not nuts, since they've been able to foster an environment where their economy can grow very quickly (even while maintaining a fairly rigid social policy).

    6. Re:Restraint? by interiot · · Score: 1
      Western leaders might think about banning games like the recent Grand Theft Auto game, where it clearly has a very large amount of violence compared to other games. They might even think about wanting to ban games like Counter Strike, but they'd have such a huge backlash I doubt they'd succeed.

      But I don't think western leaders would ever try to ban PVP RPG's... casting fireballs at people and running around with 50 pounds of armor on is clearly a fantasy. Maybe if there were a series of incidents where school children got their heads cut off with swords, but any attempt like that is likely to be very unsucsessful, and more humorous than anything.

    7. Re:Restraint? by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      If you kill somebody, you don't get any advantage for your online character.

      Killing someone gets you money, allowing you to purchase better guns and armor for the next match. And, more importantly, killing the enemy team is the only way to defend from your own death, which would seriously disadvantage your character.

    8. Re:Restraint? by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      Even thats debatable, as all it takes is a sv_restart 1 or map change and your 'character' is no more. No matter how much you play you cant increase anything persistant except your own skill/knowledge of the game, nothing in the game itself changes on a permanent basis. You could play for 24 hours straight (as many nerds have) and then get dominated by any pro who hasnt played in a week but is still better than you.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    9. Re:Restraint? by blueZhift · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is important to note that video games and other forms of mass entertainment are an important element of maintaining control over a population. So to ban all video games with violent elements would leave too many of the wrong people with too much time to be upset about how the government is screwing them over. Gaming can be a very powerful opiate against social unrest as long as the games are free of subversive political content. The foreign investment money is good too, but the need to keep people reasonably happy and not thinking about revolution is far more important.

      Banning minor-PK probably has some deeper elements that just old fashioned morality. China's one child policy has created a generation of, to put it mildly, spoiled brats. They are often referred to as little princes and princesses because the parents dote on them so much, particularly boys. For such a population to grow up PKing could be socially disruptive and dangerous to the government trying to say no to a generation that's not accustomed to hearing that. A generation of PKing minors might just get the idea that they could gain real power by knocking off those currently in charge! Now why would anyone believe that?

      Oh, I should also note that games with explicitly sexual content would also be banned, as pornography is illegal in China. So boobs (bare ones at least) would not be okay either.

    10. Re:Restraint? by cahiha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do the Chinese leaders have the self-restraint to not ban games altogether, but they don't have the self-restraint to ban games with PK elements?

      If you think of the Chinese leaders as the right wing of the Republican party, you aren't so far off: these people are socially conservative and pro business. When those principles are in conflict, it is unpredictable which one wins. In this case, they found a compromise that isn't all that different from the US or other conservative Western nation.

      One difference is that the Chinese leadership is less constrained by pesky democratic and legal principles, so they can act faster on their whims; but should a US party achieve a filibuster-proof margin in the US, we may be heading that way, too.

    11. Re:Restraint? by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      I'd like to add that the chinese military, same as the US military, does not want people thinking of what really happens in a real war, such as team killing, weapons jamming at the moment an enemy is aiming at you, and vehicles killing people by running them over, etc. They want to romanticise combat, making it seem as thought you get killed only if you do something wrong like not following orders. In reality, there are plenty of ways of dying in war that have nothing to do with what you do or don't do.

      Remember, the Chinese military's strength is absolute numerical superiority. If they can't get the youngsters to fall into rank at 18, they lose that, and they become more vulnerable.

      Go find out why there's no blood and gore and wounded screaming in a pool of blood in America's Army the game. (there's plenty of blood and gore and screaming wounded in the real US army, just not on CNN).

      There is another angle which FidelCastro alluded to.

      China is portrayed in the western media, as well as by its government, as a united block. It is not. It is a country with 1.3 billion people with different religions, ethnicities, languages, and economic backgrounds. It should not be surprising that there could be factional fighting in China; as there have been many times in the past (see the 20-50 million deaths in the Taiping Rebellion (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiping_Rebellion) in the 1850's, as well as the turbulent times from 1900's Boxer rebellion and the time of the warlords (which Chiang Kai-shek put an end to at the head of the Kuomintang, fought against the Japanese in WWII, then moved to Taiwan when the Communists took over. His goal in Taiwan being to retake the mainland -- see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiang_Kai-Shek).

      Back to Fidel: The chinese government does not want young chinese to think that team killing is "part of the game" since, in their case, team mates would be chinese. So no chinese killing chinese. Because once they think it's OK to kill chinese, then the pawns are set for internal armed struggle (civil war) and since there is a strong and growing sense that China is important in the world, and that the Communist government is, well, a little backward, the people on the street might think that not blindly following the government and exercising a little violence to show the world that China "has arrived" would be a good thing. For a fine example of that, refer to the Chinese protests at the Japanese embassy on April 9, 2005 (see http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Chinese_rioters_storm_ Japanese_embassy_in_Beijing)

      Of course, over violence by chinese youth against the Chinese government would trigger a brutal crackdown, and international media would use that to portray China as a military dictatorship, thus undoing the many years of work to appease the west.

      It would also strengthen the position of the military supporters within the Chinese Communist party at the expense of those who wish to extend greater economic and political rights in order to better compete with the west and against India (who currently has cheaper labor).

      All in all, I can say that this is not a decision based on morals, but rather a potentially very clever political move.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

  10. Next step by zeda · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ban noobs.

    1. Re:Next step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how did you get started in the game.. So far as I know you have to be a noob to become 'leet...

      Hmm, hmm??

      Great logic there genious.

      Go to your cave and suck your twinky.

    2. Re:Next step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU nublet!

    3. Re:Next step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You start off as a newbie, which is something totally different. A noob is someone who's been playing for a while, but still has no fucking clue.

    4. Re:Next step by servognome · · Score: 1

      So far as I know you have to be a noob to become 'leet...

      No you get into beta, that way once the game is officially out, you're already leet.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    5. Re:Next step by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      there is a big difference between newbs and noobs. newb = new player learning the game

      noob = barely literate fucktard who doesn't care about learning to play right and instead bitches about all the good players 'hacking' because they fail to understand game elements and are uninterested in learning.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  11. Long history of PK in games of all kinds by foniksonik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Chess, Checkers, Mahjong, etc. etc.

    The goal is to beat or kill your opponent, 'nuf said.

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    1. Re:Long history of PK in games of all kinds by Rahga · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Chess, Checkers, Mahjong, etc. etc."

      Mahjongg doesn't include any violence at all. Single-player games just have you remove the tiles, while the multiplayer game is about collecting groups of tiles under rules similar to Canasta.

    2. Re:Long history of PK in games of all kinds by Mythrix · · Score: 1

      I dunno, Mahjong played with money can be a real killer for your opponents' wallets.

    3. Re:Long history of PK in games of all kinds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Young kids playing chess or checkers are gaining something from playing those games where as killing the same 10 monsters over and over to get level 60 isn't doing anything to help them.

      "Online games that have PK content usually also contain acts of violence and leads to players spending too much time trying to increase the power of their characters. They are harmful to young people."

    4. Re:Long history of PK in games of all kinds by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Whoops, sorry I was thinking of GO, which is a war strategy game... my mistake.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    5. Re:Long history of PK in games of all kinds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the Triad. Thousands have been killed over Mahjong debts.

  12. In other news... by rmjohnso · · Score: 1

    In other news, China denied that Chinese society's emphasis on having male children was harmful to the future of the country. It's so obvious that PK'ing is so much more harmful to society than not having enough women for men to marry and reproduce with. I believe the last figures I saw put the male:female ratio at 4:1.

    Letting the Chinese government dictate morality and what is best for children is like saying the engineers for the Yugo could teach all of the other car makers how to make a better car.

    --
    "Extremism in the pursuit of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue." --Barry Goldwater
    1. Re:In other news... by PhilHibbs · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the CIA World Factbook:

      Sex ratio:
          at birth: 1.12 male(s)/female
          under 15 years: 1.13 male(s)/female
          15-64 years: 1.06 male(s)/female
          65 years and over: 0.91 male(s)/female
          total population: 1.06 male(s)/female (2005 est.)

      I don't know where that 4:1 figure came from, it's totally preposterous. How could such a ratio come about? Infanticide may happen occasionally, but not in 3 out of 4 female births.

    2. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say let them keep selecting males over females... In a few generations the genetic diversity will be so diluted that the problems with China will solve themselves... We just need to pass a few laws prohibiting non-chineese from breeding with chineese... absurd? to be sure. But then again, so are lots of the policies in China (to wit: the male v. female which is based upon a limitation of how many children a couple can have).

    3. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to have some interatial breeding with a chinese girl..

      woops, did i say that?

    4. Re:In other news... by 1c3mAn · · Score: 1

      China isnt that heartless actually.

      Specifically, there is a law in china that in rural communities that if a girl is born first that the parents are allowed to have a second child in order to have a chance of having a son to inherit the land that they had been farming.

      Though 2 children is the limit unless there are other circumstances. Also the chinese love twins. It is a common chinese wedding congratulation to wish the couple to receive twins.

      Anyways, in such regard the communist system just works better. They need the strict system to dicate those family planning laws.

      Iceman

    5. Re:In other news... by william_w_bush · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they see people kinda differently.
      a: men are supposedly more industrious
      2: less kids (they have a bit of a problem with that you know)

      stupid, but surprisingly practical in a completely evil sort of way.

      --
      The first rule of USENET is you do not talk about USENET.
  13. What's the difference? by seestuffgo · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Wow, unbelievable.

    It's interesting that we find censorship of boob'age or swear words to be completely socially acceptable, but we balk at the idea of censoring PK'ing in games.

    Who gets punished for breaking the law - the person playing the game, or the company who let it happen?

    1. Re:What's the difference? by xtracto · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's interesting that we find censorship of boob'age or swear words to be completely socially acceptable, but we balk at the idea of censoring PK'ing in games.

      Yeah... that makes you think which goverment is more stupid, the Chinese for banning games promoting killing and anti human practices or a country where this natural thing which all of our moms and dads did and we will ALL do sometime called SEX is banned?

      And of course the leaders of that country are busy killing people and invading some other countries... I think someone should show these leaders what sex is about :) maybe that is the problem...

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    2. Re:What's the difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and we will ALL do sometime called SEX is banned?
      You must be new here :)

    3. Re:What's the difference? by Descalzo · · Score: 0
      "Who gets punished for breaking the law - the person playing the game, or the company who let it happen?"

      How about punishing the person who broke the law? You want to punish more people, extend the law to punish the enablers.

      --
      I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
    4. Re:What's the difference? by Mad_Giggler · · Score: 1
      And of course the leaders of that country are busy killing people and invading some other countries... I think someone should show these leaders what sex is about

      If this is in reference to the US government, you have a short memory of China's human rights record.

    5. Re:What's the difference? by Kahless2k · · Score: 1

      ...which all of our moms and dads did and we will ALL do sometime called...

      Thats it.. hand over your geek license!

  14. Re:this is a violation of freedom of speech by FidelCatsro · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    First off , We don't want those Nuts in Europe (we already have a fair few) ,Second I don't believe Chairman Mao passed any Free speech legislation , nor have his successors

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  15. Re:this is a violation of freedom of speech by durtbag · · Score: 0, Redundant
    this is a violation of the declaration of independince and shouldn't be able to be a law. if they dont like it they ought to move to FRANCE.

    Please, oh please, tell me this is a joke.

    --
    itadakimasu
  16. Totally bizarre by j-turkey · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this is due to my lack of understanding of Chinese culture, but I find this to be completely bizarre. Who writes these laws? Are there a bunch of bureaucrats in China who are former gamers that are making up these laws? Is China making stuff up in order to meet some kind of a quota for new laws? Where do they come up with stuff like "Online games that have PK content usually also contain acts of violence and leads to players spending too much time trying to increase the power of their characters. They are harmful to young people." Would there also be a problem if kids were playing online tennis, and their tennis character would gain increased stats by beating other players in tennis matches?

    I'm reading that acts of violence in video games are marginally OK (because it's OK to kill NPC's), but spending too much time trying to increase the power of a character is what pushes the issue over the edge. Am I missing something huge here? Did I just wake up in the twilight zone?

    --

    -Turkey

    1. Re:Totally bizarre by Linus+Torvaalds · · Score: 1

      I'm reading that acts of violence in video games are marginally OK (because it's OK to kill NPC's), but spending too much time trying to increase the power of a character is what pushes the issue over the edge. Am I missing something huge here?

      Yeah, you left off the most important part of the quote:

      ...that allow players to increase the power of their own online game characters by killing other players

      It's not the fact that they are increasing the power of their characters that is the issue, it's that they are doing it by killing something that represents an actual person playing the game.

      I don't really see a big deal in that, it's only pixels, but I have to admit, it makes a lot more sense to ban pixellated violence than pixellated sex.

    2. Re:Totally bizarre by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1
      I don't really see a big deal in that, it's only pixels,
      No, it's specifically pixels that represent other actual players, and that have a direct impact on the other player, that they are concerned about. Half-life is OK, counter-strike is not.
    3. Re:Totally bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is I can totally see the US Congress comming up with the same law for the same reasons.

    4. Re:Totally bizarre by cahiha · · Score: 1

      Who writes these laws?

      The same kind of social conservatives that write similar laws in the US. The kinds of people who get all pushed out of shape about GTA, withdraw its rating, and try to remove it from the market. Incidentally, Germany pretty much bans PK for all ages...

    5. Re:Totally bizarre by j-turkey · · Score: 1

      I hear what you're saying...but it's still pretty nonsensical to me. Killing other players is OK, but if your character becomes more powerful by doing this, it somehow becomes more harmful. Where do they get this stuff? Do they cite any studies, or is this just another conjecture by a bureaucrat that is stated as fact?

      I'm also wondering about non-RPG's...like Command and Conquer: Generals, where you are rewarded for the experience gained from killing your opponent's armies by gaining rank, which allows access to certain abilities. Would that also apply?

      --

      -Turkey

    6. Re:Totally bizarre by Linus+Torvaalds · · Score: 1

      Killing other players is OK, but if your character becomes more powerful by doing this, it somehow becomes more harmful.

      No, you're still twisting it out of context. This is a blanket ban on killing other players. It doesn't matter whether your player gets more powerful or not, that was merely a short description of the typical scenario.

      It's like reading the sentence "Getting drunk, getting into your car and driving home is bad" as specifically saying that driving home when drunk is bad, above and beyond driving anywhere else. You aren't reading it right.

    7. Re:Totally bizarre by j-turkey · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it is out of context. If this is the case, it all seems much more outargeously silly. The problems that they cite are with players being rewarded for PK'ing, and they cite this happenning in MMORPG's. Fortunately, the article states that regulators will have a very difficult time enforcing this new law outside of Internet cafes.

      --

      -Turkey

    8. Re:Totally bizarre by cprice · · Score: 1

      Like the frickin morons in Washington do any better?

    9. Re:Totally bizarre by j-turkey · · Score: 1
      Like the frickin morons in Washington do any better?

      Bureaucracy is bureaucracy. It's all sucktastic.

      --

      -Turkey

    10. Re:Totally bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps this is due to my lack of understanding of Chinese culture, but I find this to be completely bizarre. Who writes these laws?

      The concept is very similar to a common Western practice: we have a system of institutionalized censorship of movies, to protect children who are considered too young to see certain things. In some western countries, there is a government approved "film board" that rates movies; in others, there are culturally based market pressures than ensure a rating system remains in place. Sex, extreme violence, or other "taboo" subjects are typically forbidden to be shown to minors. There are also various laws forbidding "corruption" of minors in western countries.

      China is doing the same thing, but with video games: just as we forbid children from viewing violent movies, so that they won't learn violence, the Chinese government forbids games where kids murder each other, so that kids won't learn murder. The concept is pretty much the same: there's not some exotic, eastern philosophy at work here. It's just the old "censorship for the good of the children" argument we all know and love.

      There's still lots of censorship in the USA. Due to historical religious taboos, showing certain body parts in public will result in being arrested. Certain sexual practices are banned in various states. For example, within this decade, "fornication" (sex between two unmarried people) was a still crime in Oklahoma [1]. Many states have the notion of "corruption" of a minor, by exposing them to adult concepts "too soon". And so on, and so on, and so on...

      In short, there are accepted forms of expression, and cultural tabboos everywhere: and the US is no more immune than the rest of the world in this regard.
      --
      AC

      [1] "Fornication" was still illegal in Oklahoma when I last visited in 1998. At that time, it was being selectively enforced to prevent homosexual activities, and the law itself was being legally challenged as discriminatory. I don't know if they've repealed the law since then or not.

  17. Well by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 2, Informative

    A lot of people saying this is ludicrous, and as much as I agree, the game ratings boards, PEGI - BBFO etc all rate PK games above 15 years of age usually, unless its non graphic and isn't violent

  18. Irony? by mikearthur · · Score: 1

    I'm glad China is making sure the outrageous practise of killing people in online computer games is being stopped. This sick practise leads people to perform disgusting acts like firing polygons at another polygon in order to cause them to die with a burst of red sprites! If people do too much of this they may feel the need to let people express their own spirituality, sexuality and have acceptable human rights. Thank goodness they have their priorities in order! THINK OF THE CHILDREN!

  19. Re:this is a violation of freedom of speech by Fr05t · · Score: 1

    The frightening thing is it may or may not be a joke.

  20. That's very communist! by zanderredux · · Score: 1
    Now, the Chinese government forays the gaming industry and wants monopoly on PKing.

    Does it get more communist than this? :^P

  21. can they be more hypocrite than this? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

    "They are harmful to young people."

    They drove tanks over those young people only years ago when they protested, and now they suddenly care about their well being? Oh please. This has "hidden agenda" written all over it in big fat neon sign letters.

    If they care so much, are they going to make a certain square a tank-free area?

    1. Re:can they be more hypocrite than this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've got countries pretending to offer peace that bomb other countries to oblivion, invade them and make a general mess...

      They can go on with their peace mission as soon as they stop being so belligerant...

    2. Re:can they be more hypocrite than this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They drove tanks over those young people only years ago when they protested, and now they suddenly care about their well being?

      That's not unusual for governments: even the US government has killed innocent protesters.

      In fact, politically, social conservatism ("ban sex and violence") is often associated with repression of political expression ("ban student protests", "get tough on radicals"), both in the US and in China.

  22. Lineage ][ by maskedbishounen · · Score: 2, Informative

    Makes sense. From my understanding of how the Linage ][ Chinese (or was it Korean?) servers work, there's an age limit. If you're over 18, you get to play on the adult servers (includes PvP); everyone else can play on the kiddie servers (PvE only!). In another slightly-interesting note, they recently took out a simple in-game dice game as folks were using it to gamble real world money.

    --
    "An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good program."
    1. Re:Lineage ][ by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      There will never be a government opressive enough to eliminate Chinese gambling. Even eliminating smoking would be easier.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  23. SS number by Descalzo · · Score: 0

    ... or college. Everywhere I've gone to school uses my SS number to identify me.

    --
    I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
    1. Re:SS number by DarkFencer · · Score: 1

      Most colleges are starting to completely phase out SS numbers, except with regards to Financial Aid (at least FAFSA/PELL still need it).

      We are doing so at the college I work at now as well.

  24. Obligatory Pun by slughead · · Score: 2, Funny

    PK'ing banned in Peiking!

    Funny that a country that a country that kills demonstrators would have such a problem with virtual killing.

    1. Re:Obligatory Pun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just don't understand don't you? Yes yes, your post was a joke but you still don't understand. Do don't see any difference between goverment killing people and people killing people? Maybe Chinese goverment does.

  25. Stuck in the middle with ... anything I want! by Crumplecorn · · Score: 1

    In America, violent content will eventually get you sued for making people shoot other people etc.
    Companies are attacked by stupid legislation.

    In China, such content is censored/regulated to prevent this from happening in the first place.
    Consumers are attacked by stupid legislation.

    Here in Europe, well, everything seems to be trundling along nicely. :-D

    1. Re:Stuck in the middle with ... anything I want! by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here in Europe, well, everything seems to be trundling along nicely

      unless you say something deemed to be hate speech by the powers that be, in which case you can be arrested and or fined.

      Everyone's fucked just not always in the same hole

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:Stuck in the middle with ... anything I want! by Crumplecorn · · Score: 1

      I was only talking about games....

  26. Gold farms? by SeekerDarksteel · · Score: 1

    Mayhaps the reason the Chinese government does not just ban all video games, or video games with pk elements, is because they know there is a significant influx of foreign money due to gold/item farming in mmorpgs which are a significant portion of games with pk elements.

    --
    The laws of probability forbid it!
  27. China bumper sticker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More boobs less bombs

  28. Idea for Blizzard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comply. Take out the advancement for PKing. Add a big advancement for joining the secret Falun Gong guild. That'll piss off the bureaucrats nicely.

    1. Re:Idea for Blizzard... by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and next thing you know, the chinese government bans WoW in china and blocks all the IPs for the servers in the great firewall, thus loosing blizzard big $$$ in revenue.

    2. Re:Idea for Blizzard... by kmmatthews · · Score: 1

      So? It's thier perogative. Just because your moral code works in one way does not invalidate all other moral codes.

      --
      feh. stuff.
  29. Simple Solution for Blizzard by @madeus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If PvP is the only problem and they do desperately want to cater to under 18 year olds, all they'd need to do would be to not implement the PvP servers (or the Battlegrounds) and remove the flag that you get when you attack a city guard (or similar NPC) that normally makes you targetable by players. That should be very simple indeed to do.

    I'll say this though, I'd pay good money never to have to play with some of the evil brats I've met in MMOG's.

    1. Re:Simple Solution for Blizzard by flipperboy · · Score: 1

      I'll say this though, I'd pay good money never to have to play with some of the evil brats I've met in MMOG's.

      No kidding. I'd like to see Blizzard implement a age limit for some servers. Failing that, I'd like to see guilds that enforce an age limit somehow.

  30. Re:this is a violation of freedom of speech by MrCopilot · · Score: 1
    this is a violation of the declaration of independince and shouldn't be able to be a law. if they dont like it they ought to move to FRANCE.

    Please, oh please, tell me this is a joke.

    Ethno-Centric GeoPolitical Ignorance (TM) is Bliss.

    --
    OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
  31. Um... by Phleg · · Score: 1

    So this pretty much bans any multiplayer game other than Dr. Mario?

    --
    No comment.
    1. Re:Um... by Deadguy2322 · · Score: 0

      I don't know about that, Dr. Mario has you killing viruses.

      --
      Check out my foes list to see who is so retarded that they can't use the signature line!!!
  32. I'm Teleporting you to Hell! by Washizu · · Score: 1

    The day killing someone in a game becomes illegal will be the day developers introduce the ability to teleport another player's soul to hell.

    --
    OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
    1. Re:I'm Teleporting you to Hell! by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      i think UT could actually argue out of this, as UT is, if you pay close attention to the storyline, set in a holographic combat arena so you are actually metagaming a character in a VR tournament whose purpose is to entertain millions of people and make monet for the liandri corporation, like a sports game but the sport involves guns.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  33. Limited Play Time too by Reapman · · Score: 1

    Sounds like from reading the article the government is enforcing (or trying to) how long you play these games with builtin timers. Sure we might have some crazy law's on this side of the pacific, but man. Imagine being a game developer having to put in "government issued code" like this... yesh.

  34. A word on China by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    China is not entirely the "Evil Communist Empire" it is made out to be. As with any communist society or decocratic for that matter you get people in power who are "out for their own agenda".

    Corrupt politicians are possibly the ones behind these bans, though we may not know the reasons why they want these games banned. China has always had a strong belief in Confuciousism, and Buddism (in some parts) .

    The idea of banning this type of game perhaps is thought to undermine the morality and identity that the Chinese people would like to teach the next generation.

    As the world evolves and China presses forward into the technological future, it must be struggling to retain some of it's traditional beliefs and ideals. This is also a country that for centuries kept it's ways and traditions secret to the outside world until Chairman Mao took over around the 50's.

    The country and it's people have a rich history, I'm am sure that this is just a step that those in power within the Chinese government see as a way to protect Chinese identity, and preserve thier culture for the future.

    Without a history, we have no future.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    1. Re:A word on China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Without a history, we have no future."

      And yet how many textbooks in the PRC mention the Cultural Revolution. Not only has the Cultural Revolution been redacted from history in the PRC, but the Cultural Revolution itself destroyed much of traditional Chinese culture. There's a reason why Taiwan has a better collection of ancient Chinese artifacts than exists on the mainland, and it isn't because they took it all with them...

  35. What PK'ing means by Tweak232 · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those of you who don't know what PK'ing is...

    PK'ing usualy takes place in MMORPGs (Massively Multyplayer Online Role Playing Games), although there are several other genres in which this happens (FPS, Tps, Paper and pencel RPG, et al), this article is mostly aimed at MMORPGs, WOW(world of warcraft), Ever quest, et al. PK'ing is when you kill a virtual character, with your virtual character, and the virtual character that you killed is controlled directly by a human.

    and he said pwnt n006, and it was good

    1. Re:What PK'ing means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't think this was about the violence, I thought it was more related to the pressures & addictions of PvP.

      It's incredibly addictive to level. It's exhilirating to beat an opponent. This to me seems more like they don't think minors can handle this i.e. turn it off after a given time (kind of self evident with the average playtime being 10.9hrs).

      Having played lots of MMO's, it's not surprising in the least. There should be a health label on these things or something.

  36. Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who doesnt see this as a big deal or even worth writing about.

    that is what is known as a community standard.

    i think its kind of stupid. but honstly. who gives a rats ass?

  37. Too easy! by dave-tx · · Score: 1
    In China, only old people are PK'ing.

    --

    >> "What would the robut do? Frame someone!"

  38. Finaly a way to level the playing field by Mooga · · Score: 1

    It had to be done. Those Asians were too good at Counter Strike for their own good!

    --
    ~ Mooga
  39. +1 Insightful. by nathan+s · · Score: 1

    Don't have mod points, but you have points here that are valid.:-)

  40. Re:Limited Play Time too by jonwil · · Score: 1

    Adding a "limited play timer" to just about any game would probobly not be a difficult task (especially given that you wouldnt need millisecond precision for it)

    Heck, I am sure that if they started doing it for western countries (with a parental lock password to unlock it), many people would be happy.

  41. Without PK ... by cylcyl · · Score: 1

    How do you decide tied soccer games?

  42. Meanwhile on the main page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have some people in the US that would like to pass laws to have Intelligent Design taught in schools but there are 0 posts on there about how this is trying to maintain "tradition" or preserve "US culture"

    But we're "misunderstanding" China?

    I don't think so.

    1. Re:Meanwhile on the main page by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      Just read the article on Intelligent Design, so you are compairing a culture, to evolution.

      How does the evolution of a culture compare to the creation and acceptance of a religious belief?
      Especially when that culture outdates that bielief by hundreds of years, if not a thousand?

      BTW, evolution is a theory, that has significant scientific data to support the theory. We have seen mutations in certain species.

      My belief, we evolved. There is proof to back this up.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    2. Re:Meanwhile on the main page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm saying the Intelligent Design belief has a basis in culture in the US.

      Just like making PK killing illegal has a basis in the culture of China (as you posited)

      It has nothing to do with whether or not evolution or creationism is fatual or not.

      My point is, one is OK because you like it, and the other is not because you DON'T like it.

    3. Re:Meanwhile on the main page by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      What I like or dislike is irrelevant to the subject. Is China wrong for banning these types of games? It isn't my place to say they are right or wrong.

      Why are they banning them in the first place? Who knows, I sure don't.

      Either way it has no effect on whether or not you and I can play Battlefield 2 together. So what have we lost? Is that bieng selfish? Most likely yes. Am I in a position to change Chinese govenrmental policy? Are you? Do other governments have the authority to change Chinese laws? Should they?

      I do find it interesting that one of the worlds leading producer and user of warez is actually considering this. How will they stop it?

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    4. Re:Meanwhile on the main page by RogueyWon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Remember, all cultures are valid and must be respected. Except Western Anglo-Saxon culture. That doesn't count. Chinese people *want* to be oppressed. That's their culture. Those students in Tiannamen Square? They *wanted* to be run over by tanks. Don't you get that? But don't even think about making me recite the pledge of alliegance in school. That's a violation of my rights.

      Remember, all women must have rights (including the right to kill unborn children, as we're not 100% sure they're really alive), unless they come from a culture that traditionally subordinates women. In which case, it's fine to treat them as property. In fact, don't listen to what they say, that's what they want deep down. The fact that, until 100 years ago, Anglo-Saxon culture treated women as property is not relevant; as we've discussed, that's not a proper culture.

      Remember, tyranny is bad. Really bad. Unless the tyrant doesn't like George Bush, in which case it's a legitimate expression of valid grievances.

      It's this strange web of nonsensical alliances of convenience that have shut the Left out of Government for so long. You've just managed to pick up on one expression of it.

    5. Re:Meanwhile on the main page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It isn't my place to say they are right or wrong."

      You DEFENDED their actions:

      "The country and it's people have a rich history, I'm am sure that this is just a step that those in power within the Chinese government see as a way to protect Chinese identity, and preserve thier culture for the future."

      Ergo, you took a stand that they were "right".

  43. Very simple explanation for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has nothing to do with morality, this has everything to do in making sure their next generation of citizens are not addicted to video games. They want their sheep..err.. citizens productive and happy with working for $1 an hour in a chip pre-fab plant, not thinking about how to get their shaman to lvl 60.

  44. *Shudder* by chrisbtoo · · Score: 1

    Having just seen Vo0k's comment above, I read that as "Nan boobs".

    I need to get out more.

    --
    Registering accounts later than some other chrisb since 1997
    1. Re:*Shudder* by Murasaki+Skies · · Score: 1

      You don't happen to be a Japanese WWII veteran, do you?

      --
      Waiiii!!!!!! I have bad karma!
  45. Two words: by keyne9 · · Score: 1

    rang rang.

  46. PKd in China by Eldorian1979 · · Score: 1
    I bet you anything some governmental figure was playing WoW... got PKd by a 12 year old and the 12 year old went on to taunt him by telling him he was PWNED.

    They showed that kid who's the boss in China, didn't they?

    1. Re:PKd in China by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

      They showed that kid who's the boss in China, didn't they?

      Yes.

      Tony Danza drives others to kill.

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  47. This sounds like it could be the US! Very scary by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

    This article would still be believable if it was the US, not China.

    That is truly scary.

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    1. Re:This sounds like it could be the US! Very scary by kmmatthews · · Score: 1

      No no, it's sex/nudity that the christian extremists can't handle, not violence. After all, these are the people behind the crusades.

      --
      feh. stuff.
    2. Re:This sounds like it could be the US! Very scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm...yeah. These are the very same people who went to the middle east to reclaim the Holy Land from the evil influence of Islam and-

      Oh, wait...

  48. Oh by DrSeudo · · Score: 1

    When I glanced at the headline, I first thought it said "TK'ing Banned in China For Minors." I thought, "Finally, some videogame legislation that's actually useful!"

    --
    A second decade of excellence
  49. They play? by mnkyboy · · Score: 1

    I didn't know they played to actually play these games anyway. I just thought they were all sweatshop players mining the gold for the rest of the world so we don't have to... or to practice our language skills with... hmm must have been my misconception or something.

  50. Citizen ID cards are coming by metamatic · · Score: 1

    According to a poll today, 66% of Americans think everyone should be required to carry a mandatory federal ID card.

    With the current bunch running the government, I'm sure that's only a matter of time.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:Citizen ID cards are coming by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1
      You have to quote the entire question if you want to get the survey's true meaning:
      Would you favor or oppose requiring all Americans to carry a national ID card as a means of preventing terrorist attacks in the USA? 66% favor / 33% oppose
      Who says this would help against terrorism? All this survey proves is that people are scared of terrorism. Duh.

      You'd get very different responses if the question were phrased:
      Would you favor or oppose requiring all Americans to carry a national ID card as a means of increasing government interference and control of your private life?
    2. Re:Citizen ID cards are coming by metamatic · · Score: 1

      So what? It's a given that the ID cards will be introduced as "a means of preventing terrorist attacks", even though there's no real evidence they would be effective at doing so. Hence the figure is relevant.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    3. Re:Citizen ID cards are coming by jandrese · · Score: 1

      The phrasing is very important, half of the people who read that survay saw:

      Would you blah blah blah to prevent terrorist attacks?

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:Citizen ID cards are coming by Math,+The+Ancient · · Score: 1

      Would you favor or oppose requiring all Americans to carry a national ID card as a means of preventing terrorist attacks in the USA? 66% favor / 33% oppose

      This smacks strangely familiar on how SS cards came about.

      --
      If I really am talking out of my ass...explain it to me with respect so I'll at least pull my ears out to listen.
  51. Re:Limited Play Time too by Reapman · · Score: 1

    It's one thing for a game to add this (your right, it's easy I'm sure), it's another to have a law stating "tho shalt not play game xyz for longer then 2 hours per day, otherwise face a penalty of zyx"

  52. I think people are missing the real point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like people are most interested in the disparity between censoring boobs and censoring guns. I think they're missing the point

    "...that allow players to increase the power of their own online game characters by killing other players...Online games that have PK content usually also contain acts of violence and leads to players spending too much time trying to increase the power of their characters."

    It sounds to me like it's not the violence that the Chinese gov't is concerned about. It is about the youth learning to empower themselves. Learning that competition among their peers leads to becoming a more powerful person. This sounds more like an attempt to prevent a future Tienneman (sp) square by making sure children don't feel too independent. This is more about oppression and culture than people realize.

    1. Re:I think people are missing the real point by Grue · · Score: 1

      Mod this guy up, I think he has a major point.

      This is about removing access to games that promote ideas of competition and link power to individuals, not the state. Even if it's only virtual, it's still worrying the Chinese government.

      Why else would they focus so much on the word "power"?

  53. Know what else is harmful to youth? by ravyne · · Score: 1

    ...Oppressive Communist Régimes!

  54. Obligitory... by ravyne · · Score: 1

    In Communist China, Game bans you!

  55. What Exactly Defines PK'ing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Is it that the other player's hp hits 0 or the act of being able to attack another player? Developers could just incorportate a system where you never actually "kill" the other player, but severely wound them to the point that they must rest for a period of time. Gee, you've been knocked out, not killed.

    So how about MPK'ing another player? Seems to be a serious lack of understanding about...oh...the government is doing this...nevermind.

  56. Kill or swoon? by phorm · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember that in most of the earlier Final-Fantasy type games your characters would technically not be "killed" but rather would "swoon" (pass out) or something similar. I suppose this was so that when a character was permanently offed from your party then you couldn't use a 'life' potion or something similar...

    The online games could probably do something similar. You're not dead, just 'injured' until you can be recuperated. In fact, a military-game with more focus on Dr-Dodgeball style gaming could be rather fun...

  57. Australia by catprog · · Score: 1

    Finally a case that is not from australia

    --
    My Transformation Website
    Kindle Books http://www.catprog.org/rev
    Interactive CYOA http://www.catprog.org/st
  58. "Player Killing" in China by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > "Minors should not be allowed to play online
    > games that have PK content, that allow players
    > to increase the power of their own online game
    > characters by killing other players..."

    Yes. Children should learn to increase the power of their real-world character by killing other real-world people the good old fashioned, dictatorial way: by being the best at murdering and jailing your political enemies and rising to power, until, eventually, with excellent skills at murdering enemies and, hey, just a little luck, well over one billion people are under your thumbbbbbbbbbb!!!!!

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  59. Echoes of the future by Vektuz · · Score: 1

    That's the way the USA is headed. Just a heads up. What sound ludicrous now, sounds normal later.

  60. 'Adult Only Gaming' by @madeus · · Score: 1

    I was a bit worried that the phrase 'evil brats' was inflammatory but it was immediately what popped to mind.

    The behaviour of these kids astounds me, but I suppose revulsion at the errant behaviour of younger generations is not a new thing. I still can't imagine ever behaving the way some of them do though.

    Something like a '+18' flag on accounts (i.e. where someone has to enter a valid credit card number for the purposes of proving their age and certifying that the holder of the account is entitled to access adult content) and then allowing only them to play 'adult only' servers would not cure the problem of playing with 'lusers', but it would certainly reduce the scope of it.

    Obviously (before someone points it out) age /maturity is not the only factor - there are some great younger players and some socially backwards older players (but I still think it would be a good start, as regrettable as it would be for the more mature younger players).

    A more difficult to implement, but fairer and theoretically more effective approach would be to have some sort of in-game rating system, where players can rate the other behaviour of others. Perhaps this could be done in a way that ties it to the game - something like a 'faction rating' as in SWG (though that rated your popularity with a faction, rather than with other specific players).

    OT: As with quite a few other things (such as it's free market implementation) EVE online does this really well IMO. It gives you multiple ratings for others - based on your guilds and alliances rating of them (and their guild/alliance), the ratings of others against them and your own personal rating of that individual. You also get their ratings against NPC factions and their over all security rating.

    This sounds like a lot of information, but it's presented very clearly and concisely and leaves the player open to make a judgement about them based on available evidence and the circumstances (e.g. you might choose to be more cautious if they look a bit dodgy and you are out in low-security 'deep space' with a fat cargo hauler and you come across them when they are in a battleship or frigate).

  61. Chinese Gil Sellers???? by jameskojiro · · Score: 0

    Will this stop the chinese Gil sellers in FFXI from MPK'ing everyone in sight......?

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  62. Increase power? by Sierpinski · · Score: 1

    that allow players to increase the power of their own online game characters by killing other players...

    I know not all games are like this, but WoW doesn't 'increase the power of their own online game character' by killing other players. You get nothing directly from killing another player. No experience, no items from their body, no money. The only thing that you DO get is a kill point (an Honorable Kill (HK) point for players that are within a certain number of levels from you). Your contribution in that players death earns you Contribution Points. Those points are used to determine your rank (Private, Corporal for Alliance; Grunt, Scout, etc. for Horde).

    Advancing rank gives you access to items that other players normally don't have, like special insignias, weapons, armor, and some relatively useful trinkets.

    Also, some WoW servers are PvP, which means opposing factions can kill each other at any time, and some servers are PvE, which means PvP participation is strictly voluntary. If you don't want to PK, then you don't turn your flag on or attack another flagged player. (The only exception to this is when you have to kill a flagged NPC for a quest, and get flagged yourself, but that doesn't happen a lot.)

    Personally I think that private companies/organizations and the government need to stop regulating what the children see, and put that responsibility where it should be, on the parents. If you don't know what your child is doing with their time or money, then you're a bad parent. Get involved, get the facts. Don't jump to conclusions, yelling and screaming. Treat them like you'd want to be treated, with respect. As a parent myself, I've seen this work more often than it fails, and it has brought my children much closer to me than yelling and grounding them would have.

    (Don't get me wrong, there is still yelling and grounding, but not over stupid things like video games.)

  63. Mudding by Don+Tobin · · Score: 1

    I've been mudding since the original MUD in the mid 80s. All I have to say about this is that by the time I went to college in 91 I had PKed more mudders than could possibly be healthy according to this article.

    And hey - I turned out just fine!

    Maybe they are drawing a distinction that graphic games which remove the need for imagination can cause impressionable kids to imitate them. Of course by the line referencing them spending too much time to increase the power of their characters maybe they're equally concerned too many Chinese kids will grow up and try to create power hungry empires, drive fast cars, sleep with the female minority, and eat big macs . . .

    Screw you guys, I'm going home.

  64. PK by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    What point does the violence matter? Is Mortal Kombat blood bath worse than pokemon, or chess?