F-Spot, The default photo editor that comes with Ubuntu 8.04, was quickly discarded. [FOSS]
Picasa, Really liked the application overall. I crop all my photos to the golden ratio of 1.62:1, so this limitation is unacceptable. [NOT FOSS]
LightZone, very similar to both Aperture and Adobe's Lightroom. Costs $200 and is not open source. No online support forum. Bibble, very fast and it only costs $130. It does not however have any photo-management capabilities. No tagging, project management, or meta data editing. [NOT FOSS]
Raw Therapee, raw photo processor, free. It does not, however, run on Mac OS X. Does not manage projects. And it does not work with anything but raw photos, so it will not allow for processing jpegs or tiffs
Qtpfsgui, another useful application. HDR tool for Ubuntu Linux, Macintosh, and Windows.
The result:
There isn't an all-in-one package that will do the trick, but by combining Ubuntu's file manager Nautilus for project management, Raw Therapee for raw processing, and the Gimp for non-raw processing, just about everything I do in Aperture can be done on Ubuntu Linux using free and open source solutions.
Which is strange, because you don't really need to cheat to get anywhere in my course.
It could be said that the course itself is cheating, in a fashion.
At my university (I mentioned it in a previous Slashdot post), most module projects have to include a presentation describing the work, with time for questions.
It's cruel, but I think it's quite funny when folks can't readily describe what they did*. It gets quite Phoenix Wright-y at times.
* It's not funny when you're nervous and can't think of a way to articulate how you designed a complex system, but it's usually easy to tell the difference.
Slashdot Mirror
Thank you for that piece of information. Stand by while I steal your garage with your car in it.
Is this alternative moon rocket going to aimed at an alternative moon?
That's okay. Nobody really knows how to program the PS3 anyway.
You're still 210 megawatts short though.
Cut it out! No amount of magic spells are going to mitigate this damage!
An Amiga? :)
I bet the guy even had the Healing Touch.
F-Spot, The default photo editor that comes with Ubuntu 8.04, was quickly discarded. [FOSS]
Picasa, Really liked the application overall. I crop all my photos to the golden ratio of 1.62:1, so this limitation is unacceptable. [NOT FOSS]
LightZone, very similar to both Aperture and Adobe's Lightroom. Costs $200 and is not open source. No online support forum.
Bibble, very fast and it only costs $130. It does not however have any photo-management capabilities. No tagging, project management, or meta data editing. [NOT FOSS]
Raw Therapee, raw photo processor, free. It does not, however, run on Mac OS X. Does not manage projects. And it does not work with anything but raw photos, so it will not allow for processing jpegs or tiffs
Qtpfsgui, another useful application. HDR tool for Ubuntu Linux, Macintosh, and Windows.
The result:
There isn't an all-in-one package that will do the trick, but by combining Ubuntu's file manager Nautilus for project management, Raw Therapee for raw processing, and the Gimp for non-raw processing, just about everything I do in Aperture can be done on Ubuntu Linux using free and open source solutions.
Screw that, I voted for GLADOS.
MEDUSA is troublesome. That won't work! You can't block the sound out once it's inside your head.
Children have much more plasticine than adults.
Fixed that for you.
Find this comment and more at DogDude's web site!
That's not bricking. That's nowhere near bricking.
Well as long as she's not hurting anyone, etc. Just keep an eye on her, okay?
Remember there's lots of clinics and other services that can help you if a situation develops.
Like one gigantic till receipt!
A Nintendo DS with 'thousands of cores' would be hiiiiiiii-larious to program for, I tell ya.
Where the hell have you been getting that from!?
I watch Magnum PI while fixing computers, does that make me qualified?
The people who designed this need to get their minds out of the gutter.
Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition.
Huh, that's a new one.
"Were jamming, jamming, and I hope you like jamming too"
People actually use the word 'actionable'?
Wouldn't it surreal if the code was done by the same guy who ends up doing the grading?
Which is strange, because you don't really need to cheat to get anywhere in my course. It could be said that the course itself is cheating, in a fashion.
At my university (I mentioned it in a previous Slashdot post), most module projects have to include a presentation describing the work, with time for questions.
It's cruel, but I think it's quite funny when folks can't readily describe what they did*. It gets quite Phoenix Wright-y at times.
* It's not funny when you're nervous and can't think of a way to articulate how you designed a complex system, but it's usually easy to tell the difference.