Slashdot Mirror


IRobot Looj Gutter Cleaning Robot Review

justechn writes "Many of us have seen robots in the movies and wondered how long it would take for them to become a reality. Some of my favorites when I was a kid were Short Circut and Runaway. iRobot is a company that is striving to bring some of that technology home today. Their most popular and well known product is the Roomba vacuuming robot. The Roomba is great, after I finished my review of it and sent it back I went out and bought one. It does its best work picking up pet hair. They just came out with another robot called the Looj. The Looj is used to clean the rain gutters that go around your roof. If you have ever had to do this by hand you know how much of a pain it is. This robot uses a 3 stage auger to break up clogs and sweep all the debris out of your gutter. It is also water proof so you don't have to worry if you have water in your gutter, just don't stand below it when it is cleaning or you will get sprayed." Read on for the rest of justechn's review. "The Looj does not move on it own like the Roomba does, instead there is a remote control that controls the direction that the auger spins and the direction that the Looj moves (forward and backward). Because it requires constant human interaction I am not even sure I would classify it as a robot, rather it is more like a remote controlled car.

I recently got my hands on one and put it through my gutters. It did a fairly good job. I did have to go over some spots more than once to get all the leaves and dirt out, but in the end my gutters were a lot cleaner after it was done.

The price is also very good. At $99 for the base model it is cheap enough that you can pick one up just to play around with. The more expensive models only give you extra batteries and augers, so you are not missing anything if you go with the base model.

I only found two things about the Looj that I did not like. First, it will not turn corners, it is way too long and not flexible. Second, if you want it to move you have to constantly hold down the forward or backward button. As soon as you let go, it stops. If you could lock in the movement then you could do other things like move your ladder to the next corner while it was cleaning."

168 comments

  1. Link by psergiu · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    1. Re:Link by Divebus · · Score: 1

      Oh sure. NOW this comes out after I just finished that ugly job. Next year.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    2. Re:Link by plover · · Score: 1

      Watched the video in your link. Apparently the announcer is confusing a "three stage" auger with their "three paddle" auger.

      --
      John
    3. Re:Link by Half+a+dent · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Three stage", "three paddle"... but is it three laws safe?

    4. Re:Link by mrroot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I watched the video and it only shows it cleaning dry debris out of a gutter. But most gutters (or at least mine) tend to have soggy, caked-up gunk in them, not just dry leaves. How often do you have to use this thing? I mean I clean out my gutters about 3 times a year right now, only when they get really full. But if I had this thing I probably would have to do it MORE OFTEN because it probably won't work as well on a gutter that is packed full of leaves. I would rather do a big job a few times a year, than do a smaller job say 10 to 15 times a year.

      A better idea would be to create a new kind of gutter. Maybe one that could be manually (or automatically) tilted over to dump out all of the debris, instead of trying to clean it in the upright position.

      --
      I Heart Sorting Networks
    5. Re:Link by socsoc · · Score: 1

      That sounds good, why aren't gutters just slightly lower than flush with the eaves and on a hinged system? Each straight section could lock at the end and be titled over. More expensive ones could be locked less frequently and have seamless gutters going around the corners. After cleaning, maybe with a hose nozzle for the troublesome parts, just upright it and lock it into place.

      mrroot, when you launch this into an ipo, please let me join your newsletter.

    6. Re:Link by cojsl · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "But most gutters (or at least mine) tend to have soggy, caked-up gunk in them"

      I recall a home improvement show (This Old House?) testing the Looj. They placed a section of gutter on the ground and filled it with various debris, then ran the Looj through it. The Looj didn't deal with the heavy caked gunk very well, losing one of its tracks at one point. It did not come across as very impressive. I recall the host didn't recommend it. Can't find a video unfortunately

    7. Re:Link by Vexar · · Score: 1

      Gutters are overrated unless they are hooked up to a cistern. Just let the water run off the roof. If you have an entry door, get one of those metal "v" bars and attach it on the roof ahead of the entry. I use a hose with a pressure nozzle (like what you get when you buy Blue Coral car wash detergent) and a ladder. Speaking of which, my gutters are clogged again, and I really should get either rid of them or clean them. Or, I heard there are these gutter sleeves that also work.

    8. Re:Link by srvivn21 · · Score: 2, Informative

      A better idea would be to create a new kind of gutter. Maybe one that could be manually (or automatically) tilted over to dump out all of the debris, instead of trying to clean it in the upright position.

      Or perhaps a perforated gutter cover that lets the water in but keeps the debris out. Like this. Or some other method of preventing clogged gutters, like a curved cover that water will follow, but leaves will not like this.

  2. $99 just to play around with by MiKM · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The price is also very good. At $99 for the base model it is cheap enough that you can pick one up just to play around with.

    For most of the world, $100 is not something you can just spend on a whim. Then again, it might be for the people who buy iRobot products in the first place.

    1. Re:$99 just to play around with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The price is also very good. At $99 for the base model it is cheap enough that you can pick one up just to play around with.

      For most of the world, $100 is not something you can just spend on a whim. Then again, it might be for the people who buy iRobot products in the first place.

      For most of the Slashdot crowd it is.

    2. Re:$99 just to play around with by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 4, Interesting

      To be fair, I suspect the target market for this is "people who own their own house". For this demographic, $100 is probably reasonable.

      Then again, there's a product advertised in New Zealand called "Gutter Witch/Gutter Wand" - the idea is you use the "wand" to reach the gutters (it's basically a long stick, nozzle and hose), and the "witch" to open up the drain pipe without making a mess to pull out the leaves flushed away by the wand. This seems much more sensible, but I still want a Looj ;-)

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    3. Re:$99 just to play around with by Bloater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lots of people who own their own homes would take a lifetime to earn $100. However they don't have gutters on their homes :)

    4. Re:$99 just to play around with by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      I tried something like that once. It was a log rod with a hook on the end, so you can stand on the ground (for lower gutters) or on a ladder and just run it along the gutter.

      Unfortunately, it must have been a cheapo one because the hook on the end and started spinning everywhere, getting me real soaked in the process. Not fun when it's nearly freezing outside!

      In the end, none of these gadgets work as well as a standard garden hose with a normal trigger-style nozzle while standing on a ladder.

      If cleaning your gutters is enough of a problem to have to resort to little R/C gutter cleaners, perhaps a Gutter Helmet would be a better purchase. Never clean your gutters again.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    5. Re:$99 just to play around with by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      Touche! I suspect a large part of the target demographic includes people like me - people who live in a downstairs apartment yet still really, *really* want one of these robots ;-)

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    6. Re:$99 just to play around with by f2x · · Score: 1, Insightful

      For most of the Slashdot crowd it is.

      When it comes to the Slashdot crowd, you've generally got the "haves" and the "have mores". Computers, peripherals, and ISPs ain't cheap, you know.

      And those fortunate enough to own their own house should probably consider prevention rather than maintenance. There are a lot of really novel gutter systems out there today that prevent debris from getting into gutters in the first place.

      This just takes an age old problem and makes it quixotic.

      --
      Blessed with all the brains that God gave a duck's ass, and twice the charisma.
    7. Re:$99 just to play around with by Shawn+Parr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Then again, it might be for the people who buy iRobot products in the first place.

      My wife and I purchased a Roomba two years ago. While on the surface it may seem like an extreme and silly purchase, the reality is that we were sick of buying cheap vacuums that tended to break down a lot and/or where a pain to use*. The Roomba was the second cheapest option we considered, and from the first time we started it we knew it was exactly the right decision.

      *This specificlly refers to a Dirt Devil vacuum that had a fancy swivel feature with little casters that turned out to be worthless. After running about three times they didn't properly swivel anymore.

    8. Re:$99 just to play around with by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      Yep. I could buy one on a whim, but only because I have apartment living money.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    9. Re:$99 just to play around with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Owning your house is economically very very sane, as long as you're not in debt to start with.

      Dunno about USA but realestate in Europe is a worthwhile investment, on any scale.

    10. Re:$99 just to play around with by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      But most of us reading /. aren't most of the world. Most of us have nice $500 computers that are 2-3 years old max along with a small collection of older computers sometimes acting like a server or etc. Most of our phones are smartphones, we have high-speed internet, some of us even own Macs. Just about the only thing us /.ers don't like paying money for is crappy software.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    11. Re:$99 just to play around with by Gyga · · Score: 1

      The US is going through a small/medium housing bubble/crisis/weekly-euphemism. All tied into some loan problems we are having.

      --
      I don't preview or spellcheck.
    12. Re:$99 just to play around with by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's the same - though with a slight lag - in the UK and New Zealand. I'm not completely sure I agree with the AC's point about investment, but if you're buying a house to live in it has to be better than renting over the long term. Even with the sub-prime crisis and property prices falling, buying a house and living in it has to be better than giving money to a landlord, money that you won't see any part of and is only useful while you continue to live in the landlord's house. Falling house prices should be seen as an opportunity - at least for people who are still able to get mortgages...

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    13. Re:$99 just to play around with by LoudMusic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The price is also very good. At $99 for the base model it is cheap enough that you can pick one up just to play around with.

      For most of the world, $100 is not something you can just spend on a whim. Then again, it might be for the people who buy iRobot products in the first place.

      But if you own a house with gutters that need cleaning, you likely have more disposable income as well. Or you've gotten yourself into bigger trouble than needing your gutters cleaned.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    14. Re:$99 just to play around with by QuantumRiff · · Score: 2, Informative

      My uncle bought one. His shop he uses for his business has 6 RV sized garage doors across the front, plus office and storage space. I'd guess about 150' long total. Front and back have gutters. He mentioned that the $100 tool saved him money on the first day. There are oak trees all around his shop. (it only took 2 hours the first time.. now its down to 30 minutes or so) because of the height of the gutters (about 20 feet off the ground) its a royal pain to move that big of a ladder.. Now he puts the ladder at one end, sets the robot in the gutter, and moves the ladder to the end to collect it..

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    15. Re:$99 just to play around with by Skater · · Score: 1

      I dunno. I just cleaned my gutters today, and it took me perhaps 30 minutes. Of course, I have a single-level house so that's probably helping (a 6' ladder is all I need), and it's not a huge house.

      I would like to have something better though. My neighbor has gutters that have a ledge over the top of them so water can get in but little or nothing else. And they have a lifetime warranty: if they ever get clogged the company will come out and clean them for free. He's had them for quite a few years and hasn't had a problem.

      But this robot doesn't really seem like a good solution to me. It's not that hard to reach in and grab the leaves/pine needles and toss them in a bag. I imagine $100 could buy something to protect at least one of my gutters from getting leaves/needles in there in the first place (or at least reduce the amount).

    16. Re:$99 just to play around with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got my Looj yesterday and used it today. It worked like a champ and I had to move my ladder twice (opposing corners). I got it for $69 from a site whose name sounds like 'b00t' and after using will probably always have one (or something like it). I live in NE Ohio, own my home, have trees and a roof with a steep pitch so this wasn't a toy for me.

      Important notes to prospective buyers:
      1) RTFM
      2) Use common sense when using. It's not a tank. If it hangs up, reverse and let it spin the crap out before proceding
      3) RTFM

    17. Re:$99 just to play around with by eclectic4 · · Score: 1

      If you live in the US, you are completely ignoring tax benefits of owning a home. It makes renting when your household income is large enough look like you just don't like money, or you REALLY don't want to mow your own lawn.

      And yes, to those that own a home w/gutters can probably afford $100.

      --

      "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
    18. Re:$99 just to play around with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yes, to those that own a home w/gutters can probably afford $100.

      I'm guessing you don't live in California. Some of us single younger folks, although smart with our money and not with ARM or anything crazy, are having a tough time. Maybe I shoulda saved up and moved to Kentucky...

    19. Re:$99 just to play around with by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

      I bought a cheap house before I started my degree. I've lived here for nearly six years. If I had stayed at my old apartment, I would have paid out $36,000 - more than the purchase price of my house. Even if I sold my house for a nickel, I'm still ahead. I'm one of the lucky few whose home has appreciated in value, due to some basic, but much needed, repairs. Based on the current value, when I move out in a few months, I'll be roughly $60,000 ahead of my alternative-universe apartment-dwelling self.

      So, for the long term planner, (cheap) houses are the way to go.

      --
      Fnord.
    20. Re:$99 just to play around with by plantman-the-womb-st · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The answer would be gutters made of a memory metal, normally gutter-shaped, but apply a current and they go flat and tilt allowing you to hose them from the ground until the next jolt is applied when they go back to being gutters.

      --
      Say bad words about my book, in cold oatmeal, or I shall sue!
    21. Re:$99 just to play around with by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      >To be fair, I suspect the target market for this is "people who own their own house" ...and most of the slashdot crowd lives in the basement of people owning a house.

    22. Re:$99 just to play around with by Skater · · Score: 1

      SWEET! Now that would be cool.

    23. Re:$99 just to play around with by nametaken · · Score: 1


      I'm glad someone mentioned that the Roombas are not expensive. In the way of vacuum cleaners, they're quite inexpensive.

      I have one, and I've never regretted it (I'm not wealthy). I could see someone having a regular vacuum to deal with the few areas the roomba can't clean well (90deg corners and tight spots) but if it runs more often than you'd otherwise vacuum manually, it keeps your place very clean.

      LOVE my Roomba, and I haven't even tinkered with it. ;)

      PS - The little bonus is that you WILL engage in a little bit of ridiculous personification.

    24. Re:$99 just to play around with by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      You're evidntly lucky enought to live somewhere where cheap houses exist. A fucked-up one-bedroom flat on a nasty concil estate will cost you £60k ($120k) in all but the very crappiest parts of the UK. Something you might want to live in (not big or nice, but at least in a reasonably safe area) is well over £100k virtually everywhere. The average age of a first-time buyer in the UK is now in the 30s. When the average price of a home is 7x the median salary home ownership simply isn't an option for huge chunks of the population.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    25. Re:$99 just to play around with by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

      Don't assume that my house is big or that my neighborhood is safe :)

      I do live in a suburban area, and not in the city. I am under the impression, though, that in most areas the cost of rental is proportional to the cost of housing, at least at the lower end of the scale.

      But also, you don't have to buy the house outright to benefit from this plan. If you can get a loan for the house, you can still do this, although on credit. You'll still come out ahead as long as you know how to manage your accounts.

      --
      Fnord.
  3. What's the advantage? by cavtroop · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...if you are already up there with a ladder, so you can manually move the Looj around corners etc? Scooping out the leaves is trivial at that point - the real PIA is getting out the ladder, and going up/down and moving it from side to side. Doesn't seem like this performs and real useful activity?

    1. Re:What's the advantage? by Xavier+CMU · · Score: 1

      I'm going to have to agree, this is one of those products that is kind of doomed to end up on an infomercial. You have to be incredibly lazy or just plain physically incapable for this to be useful at all, how much time are you actually saving yourself if you have to get the robot out and the ladder every time you want to clean your gutters? The only way I could see a product like this being useful is if it would just automatically keep your gutters clean.

    2. Re:What's the advantage? by skiingyac · · Score: 3, Funny

      Imagine you have a 300' long roof. With the Looj, you climb up the ladder at one end of the roof, hold down "forward", and carry your ladder to the other end of the roof, climb up, and collect the Looj. According to their website it cleans 60' in 10 seconds, so that seems like a lot faster & less work, if you have a large roof. So it may be best for businesses/condos/etc.

    3. Re:What's the advantage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on how long your gutters are. If you have to keep getting up and down on the ladder, then it may make sense, especially if you've got to go up two stories to get to the gutters each trip.

    4. Re:What's the advantage? by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, it seems like you'd need to go up the ladder a lot less - once or twice at each corner instead of down-move-ladder-2-metres-up.

      But yes, I can think of easier ways to clean your guttering. I mentioned a long hose and an opening on your down-pipe in an earlier post; another alternative I've seen is simply to insert a long plastic bristle affair along the length of your guttering; the bristles let water pass into the gutter but leaves get stuck on top and break down before they can clog the down-pipe.

      But, and this is a big but, I still want a Looj. If only so I can lean against the fence with a beer and proudly inform the neighbours that I'm supervising the gutter-cleaning robot...

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    5. Re:What's the advantage? by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      Well the problem is you can only reach so far, so you have to keep going up and down the ladder and move it bit by bit all around the house. With this you just have to reposition the ladder 4 times or however many corners your house has, so it does save quite a bit of work.

      This is what I want though, although it seems like it wouldn't be too hard to make one at home: http://www.irobot.com/sp.cfm?pageid=338

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    6. Re:What's the advantage? by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Exactly. Arms are only so long. With this, you can stand at one end and clean out the entire stretch of gutters. Think of it this way:

      Assume a 40ft stretch of gutters. You might precariously have a 5.5-foot reach per trip up the ladder. Safely, and to make the math easier, figure 5 feet of gutters per trip. That means 8 trips up the ladder per side of the house. 16 trips at two stories per climb is 32 stories -- the equivalent of a moderately-sized skyscraper.

      Besides, with less reaching and climbing, it's a hell of a lot safer.

    7. Re:What's the advantage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you might get some entertaining stories out of it if the robot started to willfully rip up your roof shingles and deck, under instructions of "Vicky" to prevent humans such as yourself from destroying the planet through rampant fossil fuel consumption.

    8. Re:What's the advantage? by ThreeGigs · · Score: 5, Funny

      carry your ladder to the other end of the roof, climb up, and collect the Looj.

      You go right ahead and move your ladder.

      I'll stay where I am and just hit the reverse button :-)

    9. Re:What's the advantage? by Wescotte · · Score: 1

      According to their website it cleans 60' in 10 minutes, so that seems like a lot faster & less work, if you have a large roof.

    10. Re:What's the advantage? by iksbob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed... If I were on the design team, I would have pushed for a method of lifting it up to the gutter... A simple hooked pole and a loop on the robot's body would be fine. Of course, you would need some method of triggering it once it was up there... Maybe a two-way remote that would alert the operator when it reaches the end of a run?

    11. Re:What's the advantage? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      What they should do is put a bit eye-loop on top and make a hook stick. Then you could just put it up in the gutter without even getting out a ladder.

      Sounds like an obvious accessory to me.

    12. Re:What's the advantage? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      300' long roof? Uhm ... then we're definately past homeowners, and I suspect businesses have little problems paying someone to do the cleaning for them. Hell, they might even have proper equipment for staying on the roof.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    13. Re:What's the advantage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to their website it cleans 60' in 10 seconds...

      10 minutes.

    14. Re:What's the advantage? by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You might precariously have a 5.5-foot reach per trip up the ladder. Safely, and to make the math easier, figure 5 feet of gutters per trip. That means 8 trips up the ladder per side of the house. 16 trips at two stories per climb is 32 stories -- the equivalent of a moderately-sized skyscraper.

      What?
      Unless you have a 60 degree New England style roof, there's no reason you can't walk around on your roof with a hose and an old broom handle to clean out the gutters.

      Then again, I like having a reason to walk around on roof tops.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    15. Re:What's the advantage? by skiingyac · · Score: 1

      Well I know our condo association pays close to $2000 a year to have the gutters cleaned. Somehow I think the bill would be more than $100 cheaper if this thing was used & actually worked.

    16. Re:What's the advantage? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      The house I'm living in now has 2 gutters for the entire house and they're each straight from end to end. Something like this would require me to set up the ladder 2 times total. And have the bot handle the rest of the job.

      Houses with more gutters or a more complicated set up are going to require more work to clean.

    17. Re:What's the advantage? by skiingyac · · Score: 1

      You go right ahead and move your ladder.

      I'll stay where I am and just hit the reverse button :-)

      You go right ahead and wait for it to come back, carry it DOWN your ladder, carry it AND your ladder to the next corner, and carry it back UP your ladder, smart guy.

      I'll just carry my ladder to the next corner and wait for it to arrive so I can help it around the corner. :p

    18. Re:What's the advantage? by hedwards · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You shouldn't ever walk around on a roof, it causes a lot of wear and tear and damage to the roofing material.

      And even if you do, most houses have pitched roofs, even a relatively minor pitch is enough to make it extremely dangerous to do. OSHA requirements dictate that a fall of 6" is sufficient to require serious fall protection. I can't recall the last time I saw a house that wasn't that tall.

      Granted you don't have to follow guidelines if you're doing your own house, but it's still a really bad idea.

    19. Re:What's the advantage? by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Heh - I live in a colonial-style house in New Jersey, and the roof is pitched sufficiently that it's pretty scary to walk on. It's not bad when it's dry, but combine that with water, and it's a slip-n-slide-o-fun 30 feet off the ground.

      I enjoy a good walk on the wild side as much as anyone else, but that whole falling to my death part, it's just not me. So far I've managed to avoid dying, but I'm at the point in my life where I'll leave the tempting of fate to the youngsters.

    20. Re:What's the advantage? by Nossie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      so is crossing the street in NYC ..

      get over it, it's called life

    21. Re:What's the advantage? by RabidMoose · · Score: 1

      Correction: You would need to put the ladder up 4 times total. Let's say your house faces North. 1) Setup on NE corner, run robot 2) Setup on NW corner, pickup robot 3) Setup on SE corner, run robot 4) Setup on SW corner, pickup robot

    22. Re:What's the advantage? by Prune · · Score: 1

      Not all products on infomercials are bad. Stainz-R-Out for example is one of the best things I have purchased, period.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    23. Re:What's the advantage? by Gyga · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1) Setup on NE corner, run robot. Run robot in reverse. Pickup robot
      2) Repeat on SE corner

      --
      I don't preview or spellcheck.
    24. Re:What's the advantage? by RabidMoose · · Score: 1

      Your "reverse" button is too advanced for me.

    25. Re:What's the advantage? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone who's never tried it....

      Most of my gutters are only accessible by ladder from one or two points, the rest of the ground is too uneven, soft, covered in fragile landscaping, or blocked by larger plants/trees.

      Yeah, I would have designed the houses differently too - but economic reality is such that I didn't have the time (or desire) to custom build my homes, so I'm stuck with what's available on the market - and gutter design elegance is pretty far down the priority queue.

    26. Re:What's the advantage? by Sheafification · · Score: 1

      I've been on more than a couple roofs as a kid (legally even). IMHO it's less dangerous than walking on the sidewalk in the winter. All the roofs around where I live have shingles that are extremely rough - think sandpaper. Unless the roof has water pouring off of it, I'd find it very hard to slip.

    27. Re:What's the advantage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      im in a split level and can climb onto the 1 story roof from my window and just put this thing in the gutter of the 2 story part from there. seems like this thing might be worth getting for me.

    28. Re:What's the advantage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GP wasn't talking about your safety, but rather you messing up the integrity of the roofing shingles. Yes, the sandpaper ones aren't made outta titanium.

    29. Re:What's the advantage? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      According to their website it cleans 60' in 10 seconds

      60' in ten minutes.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    30. Re:What's the advantage? by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 1

      I can't recall ever seeing a house that wasn't at least 6 inches tall, either.

    31. Re:What's the advantage? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Most of my gutters are only accessible by ladder from one or two points, the rest of the ground is too uneven, soft, covered in fragile landscaping, or blocked by larger plants/trees.

      Then why have gutters on that part of the house? I thought that the purpose of gutters was to catch the water that would run down on walkways. Why gutter all around, especially in places where the water would simply fall on landscaping?

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    32. Re:What's the advantage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A six inch fall?
      How tall are the people on your planet?

    33. Re:What's the advantage? by Gnavpot · · Score: 1

      You go right ahead and wait for it to come back, carry it DOWN your ladder, carry it AND your ladder to the next corner, and carry it back UP your ladder, smart guy.

      I'll just carry my ladder to the next corner and wait for it to arrive so I can help it around the corner. :p


      Don't you have gutters in two directions from each corner? I have in my house, at least.

      I would think that using the reverse, you only have to be at two corners. Without using the reverse, you have to be at all 4 corners. (On a rectangular roof of course).

    34. Re:What's the advantage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's six *feet*, not six inches - assuming we're in construction. It's four feet if you're in general industry.

      Really, six inches is just untenable... "Ready belay, Harry, I'm going downstairs!"

    35. Re:What's the advantage? by fbjon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it's called bad risk assessment.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    36. Re:What's the advantage? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Personally, I agree - wrap-around gutters are just making work for the homeowner. However, free-falling water can excavate the soil around the foundation, splash up on wood siding, and cause other mischief. My solutions for this would include placing gravel or brick along the drip=line, not putting wood siding that low to the ground, etc. But, when dealing with a home as-built.......

    37. Re:What's the advantage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the summary it mentions forward and backwards buttons.

    38. Re:What's the advantage? by skiingyac · · Score: 1

      In our condos, we just have gutters on 2 sides of the roof, but the condo buildings are often at 90 degree angles with each other, and with each group of buildings, the buildings aren't more than 5 feet apart, with some actually touching. So basically you have some number of corners/gaps that you'd have to help it around.

      It depends on your roof (and the speed of the robot) whether using reverse would make sense.

    39. Re:What's the advantage? by cooley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree completely that it's relatively safe (or at least, enough fun that I don't care how safe it is), but those shingles aren't meant to be walked on. A new roof is pretty damn expensive, let alone if you don't notice the damage right away and water gets inside (and causes other destruction) before you have the roof replaced.

      --
      Just then the floating disembodied head of Colonel Sanders started yelling Everything You Know Is Wrong!-Weird Al
    40. Re:What's the advantage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OSHA requirements dictate that a fall of 6" is sufficient to require serious fall protection

      Oww, my hip. Damn you kids putting 6" risers on my front porch. And get off my lawn!! *shakes stick menacingly from the ground*

    41. Re:What's the advantage? by Binkleyz · · Score: 1

      Well, I personally recommend using a (gas powered if possible) leaf blower and just blowing the leaves and the nasty gunk that the Looj cannot deal with. Yes, that means getting up on the roof and doing it, but the Looj (which I bought last year and have used exactly twice, since it doesn't really do that good of a job...) just doesn't have the power to get that gunk out, and when it throws a tread (which it will, I promise), you'll still have to get up on the roof to retrieve it. I suppose you could just leave it there forever, which is probably just as good, but that's just plain annoying.

      So, I guess the distillation of what I think is: Use a gas powered leaf blower. If you don't have one, spend the $100 on that, and hey, it blows leaves on the ground too!

    42. Re:What's the advantage? by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't ever walk around on a roof, it causes a lot of wear and tear and damage to the roofing material.

      You aren't a roofing contractor, are you?

      "Mam, I'd like to say your new roof will last another 20 years, but with all the running around on it the roofers did while completing it, they completely wore 75% of it out. Would would you like us to come back and install the new one?"

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
  4. Why even get out the ladder? by John3 · · Score: 1

    http://www.smarthome.com/31262.html

    We also sell them in my hardware store but I don't want to link to my own site and crash the server. :)

    They work great, just wear rain gear when standing underneath while using it.

    --
    "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
    1. Re:Why even get out the ladder? by v1 · · Score: 1

      I look at that picture and that is sooo unrealistic. Clean gutter, user standing directly below, with dry clothes and groomed hair.

      That's just NOT going to happen. For most gutters that need cleaning, you can use that, but you'd better go out there with a cap and raincoat.

      I go after mine with a hose, but I have several problems. First, I have a mesh over the top of my gutter to keep the umpteen leaves from my large bertch out of it, and it still collects an amazing amount of seeds and grit from my shingles. The west side of my house is unfortunately higher than the east, and it's a bit wobbly on the ladder at that height on that end of the house, front and back.

      So I wouldn't mind a better solution, but I don't think that's the complete answer. I try to not get too wet cleaning the gutters, but it's almost unavoidable with a hose. I can't imagine waving a wand with a nozzle that points in MY direction is going to improve on that.

      Fortunately both downspouts are on the tall end, so I work my way from the other side, and use the jet to push the crud down toward the spout. But it's almost inevitable that I will have to go to the end to remove the large wad of decaying leaves/seeds etc that are now plugging the opening to the downspout.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:Why even get out the ladder? by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      Because lots of people own 2-story homes. 2 of my 4 gutters are at a height of 22' or so. That wand only goes to 6'.

      And operating one on a ladder would be, well, interesting. :)

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
  5. Executive Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of my favorites were R2-D2, Johnny Five and and the Looj Gutter Cleaner!!!

    I is a awesome writer of advertisments.

  6. No Brainer. by jpellino · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you have a house, you have likely spent $99 on far worse things.

    If all I have to do to clean the gutters is put the ladder at each corner once - I want this.

    I suspect many of the "why bother"s have never actually cleaned gutters by hand. You basically go around the house trying to find a stable spot for the ladder every so often. Every so often is defined as your own wingspan plus how brave you are either side of an extension ladder. Scoop, fling, repeat. Chase leavings with hose or bucket. For even a smallish 24'x36' house, this is tedium with the added risk of a broken arm.

    OK - the wand looks interesting but you're standing under the slop.

    iRobot is in Somerville, MA. And here in New England the fall leaves aren't as bad as the muck made of spring tree flowers and seeds (maple and oak).

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:No Brainer. by tarogue · · Score: 1

      I suspect many of the "why bother"s have never actually cleaned gutters by hand.

      Actually, I live in New England too (NH) and I clean my gutters by hand. A hose, with a good nozzle can spray pretty much all the crap out for a lot less than $100. And with a Federal house, that's 4 gutters on the house, 3 more on the el, and 3 on the little stick-y out bit with the door.

      The Looj would be more work than I want to bother with, thanks.

      --
      Life sucks, but death doesn't put out at all. -- Thomas J. Kopp
    2. Re:No Brainer. by penguinboy · · Score: 1

      They're in Bedford now (not that it makes any difference season-wise).

    3. Re:No Brainer. by jpellino · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's "Bed-fid" for those of you who don't talk right.

      --
      "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    4. Re:No Brainer. by dreamer-of-rules · · Score: 1

      Scoop, fling, repeat. Chase leavings with hose or bucket. For even a smallish 24'x36' house, this is tedium with the added risk of a broken arm.

      You're adding a lot of work for nothing. Wait until it rains to clean the gutters, then you won't need to waste the water or the effort to chase the leavings. ;)

      --
      Everyone is entitled to his own opinions, but not his own facts.
  7. Still waiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still waiting for the one called the Spooj which will, um, unclog my pipes as it were.

  8. Just $1.4 million for the house by heroine · · Score: 1

    Now all I need is $1.4 million for a house. Maybe iRobot would provide a free house to do a Looj Cutter review with.

    Considering most of the money on this product is made in Asia, they should think of an easier name.

    1. Re:Just $1.4 million for the house by Vectronic · · Score: 1

      "Considering most of the money on this product is made in Asia"

      Yet it's an American company, so I doubt that if they outsource to Asia, that they are doing it because its more expensive to make them in Asia.

      I'll agree that the name, is well frankly retarded. Although when searching "looj" it's not exactly a common name, so that could be a benefit.

      However, the name of a product doesn't make the money it makes isn't worth as much.

  9. Obliq. by phreakincool · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our robotic gutter cleaning and making our lives easier, overlords.

    1. Re:Obliq. by WelcomeOurOverlords · · Score: 0

      Damnit, I didn't register this username *not* to be the first one to post that!

  10. Does not play well with branches and by microcars · · Score: 4, Informative

    old mucked up gutters that you neglected.

    I bought one of these when they first came out last fall and liked playing with it, but unless you regularly use it to clean your gutters, you will find that it gets bogged down in heavy mucked up areas.

    These tend to be right in the middle of the run and I have to get on the roof or move the ladder to free it up.

    and if you have a valley that feeds into a gutter that gets clogged with small twigs and branches, fugedaboutit.

    That being said, it is fun to use and works pretty much as advertised you just have to approach heavy obstacles slowly and go back and forth like you are drilling through it.

    My gutters a really a pain to clean and just knowing I can go play with the Looj makes me more likely to drag out the ladder and clean them more often.

    --
    I like microcars
    1. Re:Does not play well with branches and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      old mucked up gutters that you neglected.

      I bought one of these when they first came out last fall and liked playing with it, but unless you regularly use it to clean your gutters, you will find that it gets bogged down in heavy mucked up areas.

      These tend to be right in the middle of the run and I have to get on the roof or move the ladder to free it up.

      and if you have a valley that feeds into a gutter that gets clogged with small twigs and branches, fugedaboutit.

      That being said, it is fun to use and works pretty much as advertised you just have to approach heavy obstacles slowly and go back and forth like you are drilling through it.

      My gutters a really a pain to clean and just knowing I can go play with the Looj makes me more likely to drag out the ladder and clean them more often.

      Just replace the augers with blades. It'll also deal with any pesky squirrels that get in the way.

  11. Looks stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does this thing do when it encounters one of the gutter supports? I've typically gone up/down the ladder a few times a year, but my latest idea is using an attachment for my leaf blower that blows the crap out of the gutter... yeah it goes all over and it's a mess, but it works from the ground.

    I follow up with a little treatment from the hose and we're done... There's also attachments for pressure washers that blast out gutters from the ground too...

  12. Gutter by Kamineko · · Score: 4, Funny

    The people who designed this need to get their minds out of the gutter.

  13. Just get gutter covers by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 1

    Or you can just get gutter covers. When I moved into my house 3 years ago, I cleaned the gutters out once, decided it sucked and got gutter covers. Each cover was less than a buck and we got enough for the whole house for less than the price of a Looj. Sure, it was a bit of extra work to put on the covers, but it's just a one-time investment and I've never had to clean gutters since.

    1. Re:Just get gutter covers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Likewise -- here in Minneapolis gutter covers work well once you find the correct ones. First ones we tried were clogged by maple seed "helicopters". The covers come in a variety of hole configurations, snap in easily.

  14. Dry is good, wet not so much by Tin_Wisdom · · Score: 2, Informative

    I got one of these off a Woot the other month. It performed as advertised on the vast amount of dry crap on one side of my house. It tossed all the (slightly damp) leaves and twigs out quite nicely. Yes, I still had to get up on the ladder once to put it up there, but I didn't have to climb down, move the ladder three feet, climb back up, rinse and repeat -- the looj probably saved me a good hour.

    Unfortunately, the other side of the house was worse with the gutters containing standing water and a kind of vegetable soup. The looj didn't have any problem being submerged, but it was pretty much ineffectual. It simply showered me with foul-smelling water and pushed the mush ahead of it until it got stuck. I ended up doing that side by hand.

    So if you use the looj a couple times a year and on non-flooded gutters, I think it's a good little tool. It keeps me off the roof, and that's easily worth a C-note to me.

    1. Re:Dry is good, wet not so much by waterwingz · · Score: 1

      Don't you think that the fact they are constantly selling these things off cheap on woot.com tells you a lot about how effective they are are ( or are not ) ?

      --
      . waterwingz
    2. Re:Dry is good, wet not so much by socsoc · · Score: 1

      Woot.com sells a lot of iRobot stuff. Conspiracy theories aside, Woot's target demographic are geeks with disposable income and how better to snag them than with robots? Roomba, Scooba and recently Looj.

      BTW, everyone that has knocked the name, I'd think it's a play off of luge, cause gutters are similar to luge track. Feel the rhythm! Feel the rhyme! Get on up, it's bobsled time! COOL RUNNINGS!

  15. First Robotics by rodney+dill · · Score: 1

    You can see some good First Robotics matches at The blue Alliance under the match archives. This year Simbotics, ThunderChickens, and Robowranglers won the World Championship.

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
  16. Need reliable and cheap robots by Simonetta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The USA needs reliable and cheap robots. Reliable because they are complicated, expensive, and difficult to fix because there aren't many people who are expert with robotics technology.

        Cheap because the USA is shares a border with a country that millions of people who are ready, willing, and able to come here and work for about $40-$50 a 8-10 hour day. Any robot that we buy has to be able to do productive work for eight hours a day and cost less than $50 a day for energy, maintainence, and pro-rated purchase cost. Americans will continue to use Mexicans for robot work as long as it's cheaper to use Mexicans than it is to use robots.

        Some things robots must do because it is unethical to induce humans to do them, such as mine-field clearing. Sure you can force some poor black kid with three 'po-session' convictions to go out and dig up mines with a spoon. But it is unethical and quite possibly immoral to do so. Historically, ethics and morality have never stopped people from doing evil things (they contract it out to people who are further down on the social-class ladder). But those days are passing as more people realise that the evil ways of the past can not continue, regardless of how convienent it was.

        Oh, you are just such a racist! I hear you saying. Well flip the switch on your politically-correct-conditioning circuitry for a while. Let's drop the labels and talk straight for a few minutes.

        Yes, there are millions of poor Mexican peasants in the USA working at a half or third of standard American pay. This is because NAFTA allowed American agri-business like Cargil with huge US government subsidies to flood the Mexican agricultural economy with corn so cheap that the Mexicans couldn't afford to live by growing it. And because NAFTA allowed American bio-industries like Monsanto to replace traditional Mexican corn with patented bio-engineered varieties that the Mexican farmers couldn't afford to buy. People aren't coming here from Mexico because they want to. They come because they have to, or starve. So stop modding me down and calling me a racist. It's a complex subject and the best thing that you could do to help solve it is not stand on the border with a gun, but study and master conversational Spanish (and even one of the pre-Columbian Central Mexican Indian languages (that are spoken by thousands of immigrants who don't speak Spanish very well), that is -if you're up to a serious intellectual challenge, C++ is nothing compared to it) so you can just talk to people and find out what the situation is really like without having it filtered first by the creeps in the news media. Whew! So stop modding me down!

        Yeah, back to robots. We can grow a lot of food but a lot rots on the vine or ground. Especially fruit crops here in the Cascadian Republic of the former United States. We need cheap, dependable, solar-powered, and very advanced agricultural robots. Japanese ones are too expensive. Detroit robots are meaningless to us, we have no use for stationary automobile frame welding machines that cost a half-million dollars. We need a machine that can roll along the ground in the field, find the strawberries, pick the strawberries without destroying the mother plant, place the strawberry in a container with others, and move this container to a pre-set centralized location. We need thousands of these machines all working at the harvest. Then when the strawberry harvest is over, we need people who can reprogram them for the next crop.

        What it would be ethical for us to do is to retrain all the millions of Mexicans that have been impoverished by misguided government and corporate policies to be our cadre of advanced agricultural robotics technicians and programmers. They know the crops and the harvests and would be willing to learn the software and electronics involved. What? Just turn a million Mexican peasants into robotics engineers? You laugh? Now who a racist?

    1. Re:Need reliable and cheap robots by Nethead · · Score: 1

      You racist... if I only had the mod points! You sound like a yakamaniac.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    2. Re:Need reliable and cheap robots by Nethead · · Score: 3, Funny

      http://www.freshplaza.com/news_detail.asp?id=10153

        Robots may have future in apple orchards

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    3. Re:Need reliable and cheap robots by buswolley · · Score: 1
      Unemployment is the cure, not the disease.

      from Ruby the Galactic Gumshoe

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    4. Re:Need reliable and cheap robots by 1stpreacher · · Score: 1
      "Mexican agricultural economy with corn so cheap that the Mexicans couldn't afford to live by growing it."



      a quick post to note that NOW is the time to grow corn... From reuters "...Corn prices hit a record at the Chicago Board of Trade in overnight screen trading on Friday at $8.25 per bushel in the July 2009 contract..."


      Funny to me how bad nafta was when corn prices were to low. and now nafta is bad because corn prices are to high...

    5. Re:Need reliable and cheap robots by nicklott · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am missing something here? Wouldn't a much cheaper solution to your "problem" of too many mexicans be to stop subsidising agri-business and make US farmers compete at international prices? The guiding hand and all that..

      BTW if you want cheap and reliable iRobot is *not* who you're looking for.

    6. Re:Need reliable and cheap robots by mad_minstrel · · Score: 1

      1. Plant strawberries.
      2. Buy thousands of robots to do your bidding.
      3. Hire thousands of Mexicans to whip them.
      4. Ask the Mexicans to save the presets.
      5. Fire the Mexicans.
      6. Preset robots to kill any rebel Mexicans.
      7. Profit!

      --
      May the source be with you.
    7. Re:Need reliable and cheap robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok. I'll do it. I'll work on it full time. Who's got the money?

    8. Re:Need reliable and cheap robots by Poppa · · Score: 1


          Yes, there are millions of poor Mexican peasants in the USA working at a half or third of standard American pay. This is because NAFTA allowed American agri-business like Cargil with huge US government subsidies to flood the Mexican agricultural economy with corn so cheap that the Mexicans couldn't afford to live by growing it. And because NAFTA allowed American bio-industries like Monsanto to replace traditional Mexican corn with patented bio-engineered varieties that the Mexican farmers couldn't afford to buy. People aren't coming here from Mexico because they want to. They come because they have to, or starve.

      This doesn't make sense. How can a market be flooded with cheap corn and also be too expensive for the people to buy?

    9. Re:Need reliable and cheap robots by a_real_bast... · · Score: 1

      Because imported corn can be too cheap to compete with, so you lose your farm. Try and buy even cheap corn when you've just had your livelihood foreclosed on.

      --
      You're making me think. You won't like me when I'm thinking.
    10. Re:Need reliable and cheap robots by Poppa · · Score: 1

      We shouldn't be subsidizing corn. Market economics should be the driver. Their government should have done more to protect their farmers.

      Most of their people reap the benefits, though. Corn is a staple in their diet and low corn prices help their budgets.

      But I wouldn't hold it against the Democrats for negotiating NAFTA. NAFTA has helped the mexican people more than it has hurt.

    11. Re:Need reliable and cheap robots by a_real_bast... · · Score: 1

      I don't see how, sorry. Could you point me toward an article or something?

      --
      You're making me think. You won't like me when I'm thinking.
    12. Re:Need reliable and cheap robots by Vexar · · Score: 1
      Okay, I won't call you a racist, but I will call you a sociologist. Try living near that border without a gun sometime. See what happens to your home, your dog, your family on a picnic. The folks running the border are committing an imprisonable federal offense, and many of them are content to also commit misdemeanor theft and the occasional violent bit. When they drive a car, they are doing so without a valid Driver's license (although Californians will legalize anything if it is provocative enough). Here's a fun fact: Identity Theft is being heavily used by illegal aliens. Still like that business model, Sociologist?

      I have a co-worker with whom I share many traits, including the fact that he's on Slashdot. He happens to be from Mexico. He is well-educated and hard-working. What he tells me about scares me though: the "Manana attitude." In Mexico (just Mexico here, not the rest of Latin America), there is this attitude of laziness and apathy abound. It breeds crime. Crime is an easy living, with certain risks. When I was in college, I was required to read a book for my Ethnic Studies class. It was an auto-biography that described a young man who crossed the border illegally, worked hard, but still fell into a life of crime, and eventually made some sort of life for himself after that.

      The same swarthy millions of trespassers that work in the ADM/Cargill fields harvesting our food, you want them to learn a new skill? One that requires literacy and an advanced degree? Wow. Socialize the cost of college education, and expect who to pay for it? This is the same people group that is too busy to be bothered with learning English, despite all the other immigrants to the US being obligated to do the same. Build the robots, build a fence, deport the trespassers, and arrest the criminals. If Mexico wants to compete in the world market for something, Mexico can do something about it. The USA does not need to provide welfare for every hand that sticks out, asking for a freebie. Government is not efficient or smart about charity. Leave charity to the charities.

  17. I hate ladders by domanova · · Score: 1

    Horrible wobbly tippy things
    So I used to use a top-rope from the chimney, and a jumar.
    As long as you don't break the tiles, all is fine

    --
    Down with categorical imperatives
    1. Re:I hate ladders by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      How do you get on the roof then?

    2. Re:I hate ladders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His friend down the road has a trebuchet. The landing's a little rough, but hey ... no ladders!

  18. Check your clearances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got one and despite having printed out the test template to check gutter clearance, it still gets hung up under some of the support spikes. Check your gutter size carefully before ordering.

  19. Poor choices... by Monkey_Genius · · Score: 1

    "Some of my favorites when I was a kid were Short Circut and Runaway."
    When you had so many others to choose from...

    --
    I've got your sig, right here.
  20. Not impressed by religious+freak · · Score: 1

    I'm sure a lot of hard R&D went into this, but something you've still got to get on a ladder multiple times for? C'mon.

    Am I the only one who thinks home robotics is a VASTLY under-developed market? Yeah, I know how tough AI is, but I still get the nagging feeling we could be doing so much better if someone made a hard run for it. Seriously, look at Windows -- the damn robots don't have to be perfect, they just have to be ok.

    Back in the late 70's & 80's the mantra was a computer in every home, today it should be a robot in every home... but I have yet to hear a single person step up and so much as declare it. Imagine the publicity in simply DECLARING such a thing...

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  21. battery issues? by drew30319 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have both the Roomba and the Scooba and while I was initially pleased with both, I've been less than happy with battery life. Although iRobot states that the rechargeable battery will last for "hundreds of cleaning cycles" that hasn't been my experience, with the batteries for each dying far short of that mark.

    Before the batteries did die I was very happy with the performance of these "robots." But ultimately would not recommend either until either the batteries last longer or the price drops for replacements ($80 for the Scooba battery & $70 for the Roomba). I just checked, and the Looj battery is available for $30 so it may be a non-issue for some.

    Obviously YMMV but thought I'd give you a heads up!

    --
    JAGga.me ----> Producing video games addressing emotional health and wellness issues affecting teens.
    1. Re:battery issues? by REden · · Score: 1

      who cares about battery life.. you run the Looj 3-4 times a year. Just recharge and go. If the battery dies before you get all your gutters done, start again tomorrow.

      The $100 (woot just had it for $69) cost can pay for itself in one cleaning. (If you would pay to have it done)

      --
      --- If it's worth doing, it's worth doing in Perl!
  22. They Break Too Easy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Every 6-12 months I check in on the "Roomba" lines, whether just vacuums, or wet mops, or other kinds like this new "gutter cleaner". They all look pretty cool, and the idea is good. But every time I check with people who actually have them, I confirm that they break really easy. They wear out, or they can't take the kind of hard bump that most moving appliances have to take.

    At $99, replacing them once or twice every couple-few years is a little expensive, compared to a $250 vacuum that lasts 5+ years. And when they break, there's the whole hassle of getting a new one.

    Why isn't there a version of these clever little slaves that cost twice as much, but last twice or three times as long without breaking?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:They Break Too Easy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Moderation -1
          100% Flamebait

      What kind of anonymous fool takes an honest, proportioned review to be "Flamebait"? Are you some kind of Roomba moderating 'bot?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  23. Your Goatsxe neighbor called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He wants to borrow your Looj.

  24. Mowing Lawns? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Does anybody have any experience with these lawn-mower robots?

    http://www.friendlyrobotics.com/
         

  25. Why not use wire mesh over the top of gutters? by Tetravus · · Score: 1

    Seriously, you put it on once and you're done.

    Water flows through the mesh and into your gutters, leaves and twigs are kept out.

    Is there something I'm missing here?

    1. Re:Why not use wire mesh over the top of gutters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Until the leaves and twigs form a nice layer over the mesh and block the water...

    2. Re:Why not use wire mesh over the top of gutters? by Ignis+Flatus · · Score: 1

      we have the mesh, but stuff still gets through. i just get on the roof with a water hose and spray them out once or twice a year. maybe a bit risky if you've got a steep or high roof, though. if you've got enough pressure in the hose, you could just move the ladder down a few times until you push all the gunk into the downspout.

    3. Re:Why not use wire mesh over the top of gutters? by waterwingz · · Score: 1

      At the end of the day, none of those gutter shield type things really work. Check out :

      http://www.leaffilter.com/gutter-guard-comparison.php

      They make fun of every system but their own. I'll bet you can find similar things about their system on the competitors sites.

      --
      . waterwingz
    4. Re:Why not use wire mesh over the top of gutters? by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Wow, theirs looks like the least effective system imaginable. It would just get covered in leaves. I suspect a good proportion of the water from a heavy rainstorm would just flow straight over that fine mesh even when it was clean.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  26. I own one, and like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife got me one for my birthday this year. We have a 30x60 pole barn on our property with gutters that constantly need cleaning else they overflow.

    Before it was an 3 hr ordeal to hike to the top of the latter 15 feet off the ground clean ~3' of gutter climb down move and repeat for all 120' of gutter on the barn...

    Now i set the latter up once, run it down and back and im finished! A 10 min job.

    Like others have mentioned it does need some back and forth jockeying in heavy debris but otherwise works great.

  27. Canadians by snikulin · · Score: 1

    ...Cheap because the USA is shares a border with a country that millions of people who are ready, willing, and able to come here and work for about $40-$50 a 8-10 hour day....
    ...Oh, you are just such a racist!...

    Since when mocking Canadians became a racism?!
    It's in our Constitution, you insensitive clod!

    ---
    no, i didn't read the parent

    1. Re:Canadians by nodrogluap · · Score: 1

      If want us to clean, dammit, you'll have to learn how to say things in our language: rain gutter = eavestrough.

  28. I have a gutter robot by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    A teenage son with a leafblower.

  29. Not for Older Homes by GoingLikeSixty · · Score: 1

    I live in a one store home with the "decorative gutters." They have a flat bottom and long runs. Perfect? Not by a long shot. The antenna kept getting hung up in the gutter brackets! Since the brackets are about every six feet, I was moving the ladder constantly. Since it just barely fit between the roof overhang and the gutter it was a booger to even get in the gutter. If it ran into anything lumby - acorn, small pine cone, it would ride up and even flip on it's side. It was a waste of money! It's underpowered. I'll probably pimp it out and use it on halloween to freak out the trick-or-treaters.

  30. Re:baby boomer SSI bailout club by scupper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...but robots won't have to pay into SSI to help keep it solvent for the baby boomers. America's next big crop is old human beings.

  31. I invented this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back when I was in grade school in the late 80's I entered an invention competition, and my invention was a gutter cleaning "robot" which was just a toy car with a squeegie attached to the front.

    All they've done is used tank treads instead, and made the squeegie spin!

    I won the competition at my school, but I didn't place in the regional competition. :(

    And I never bothered to improve on my invention after that, because even when I was inventing it I knew it was a stupid idea. But I guess if you have millions of dollars to spend on marketing, you can sell anything.

  32. I for one... by lunadude · · Score: 1

    ...welcome our gutter-cleaning masters.

  33. NAFTA to blame for illegal immigration? by drew30319 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, there are millions of poor Mexican peasants in the USA working at a half or third of standard American pay. This is because NAFTA allowed American agri-business like Cargil with huge US government subsidies to flood the Mexican agricultural economy with corn so cheap that the Mexicans couldn't afford to live by growing it. And because NAFTA allowed American bio-industries like Monsanto to replace traditional Mexican corn with patented bio-engineered varieties that the Mexican farmers couldn't afford to buy. People aren't coming here from Mexico because they want to. They come because they have to, or starve.

    I don't know where you're getting your info but I was living on the border before, during and after NAFTA's passage and I guarantee you that illegal immigration is nothing new. Additionally the maquiladora industry was thriving long before NAFTA was even a thought.

    --
    JAGga.me ----> Producing video games addressing emotional health and wellness issues affecting teens.
  34. Isn't calling this a "robot" a bit generous? by melted · · Score: 1

    It's just a simple, self propelled power tool, and a very narrowly specialized one at that. What makes it a "robot"?

  35. Got a Looj for a birthday gift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't work worth a shit. A damn shame - I hate cleaning my gutters.

    I have some mature trees in my area, though. Between the cottonwood relative and ash in the front yard and the maple tree down the street, my gutters stay full of debris year round. Maybe if I used it religiously it would work perfectly.

  36. Robots? by oodaloop · · Score: 1

    Many of us have seen robots in the movies

    What are these "robots" of which you speak? I have yet to see one of these in the moving pictures.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  37. I have one by REden · · Score: 1

    It works well if you have long gutters, otherwise you still move the ladder a lot.

    You don't need to move the ladder to the end of the gutter to pick it up. Simply run the Looj in reverse and bring it back to you.

    The key to running a Looj is do it *slow*. Forget the speed on the iRobot web site. If you run that fast it will flip over (usually recoverable by reversing the auger) or get stuck. You also don't need a lock in forward. I've gotten the best results inching it forward every few seconds.

    Yes it's slow (but not as slow as moving the ladder every 6'), Yes it's messy (all the stuff falls to the ground). But *IT WORKS*. My gutters were a mess, 1=2" of basically mulch!

    Now that the gutters are better, running the Looj next time should be faster.

    --
    --- If it's worth doing, it's worth doing in Perl!
  38. Why not simply put a cage over the gutter... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    AKA gutter guard, gutter strainer etc etc... Price from $2.39...
     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Why not simply put a cage over the gutter... by Megane · · Score: 1

      Or you can get gutters you'll never have to clean again. Sure, you won't be able to use geeky toys to clean them, but for $2000-$3000 you'll be able to forget about them completely. And it will probably increase the house value when it's time to sell.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  39. Robot? by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In what sense is this a robot? As I understand it, it moves back and forth along your gutter when you push the corresponding buttons. If this is a robot, then so is an RC car.

    A gutter cleaning robot would emerge from a pod at the top of your roof, and walk around with spider-like legs. It would first map out your roof and send a 3D map to your computer. You would then indicate on the map where it should dump the gutter contents over the edge, and it would go to work. It might take all day to clear out the gutters, but you would be free to leave it alone (after you got bored of watching it.)

  40. keeps the foundation dry by Somegeek · · Score: 1

    A properly functioning gutter system will greatly reduce the amount of water that reaches the foundation of the house, thus avoiding more serious issues. Keeping the walkways clear is mostly cosmetic.

    --
    And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    1. Re:keeps the foundation dry by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      A properly functioning gutter system will greatly reduce the amount of water that reaches the foundation of the house, thus avoiding more serious issues. Keeping the walkways clear is mostly cosmetic.

      I see, thanks. But wouldn't such gutters require the drains to be further away from the structure than the ~0.5 meter that we usually see?

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    2. Re:keeps the foundation dry by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      The drains aren't just holes in the ground. You'll either have a properly designed soakaway or the gutters will be connected to the main drains. It's not just about the foundations either. I don't know about aluminium siding, wood and other finishes, but brick walls certainly don't like water flowing over them - the get damp, the mortar crumbles and stuff grows on them.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  41. Perhaps if you didn't buy cheap vacuums? by wfolta · · Score: 1

    I wonder if you added up all of the cheap vacuums you burned through plus the Roomba, if you could perhaps have afforded a REAL vacuum cleaner.

    I love the Roomba from the geek perspective. Unfortunately, I don't believe it's HEPA, and to be honest I'm not sure how fine of particles it actually retains. I've generally found non-HEPA vacuum cleaners to be very efficient invokers of allergic responses.

    1. Re:Perhaps if you didn't buy cheap vacuums? by Shawn+Parr · · Score: 1

      As far as full on HEPA capabilities I can't really comment on that with any authority.

      However the Roomba we have is by and far the best performing vacuum we had ever owned. While I'm sure a $1000+ vacuum could 'suck more' (sorry couldn't resist), that was just out of our budget range. We were targeting an average around $300. We arrived at that number by talking with numerous people that had owned more than a few vacuums over their years, and most agreed that the $300 price point is where the best bang for the buck happens. Our biggest concern was performance and longevity.

      And do not discount the fact that with the Roomba you do not have to push the thing around on your own. It may seem decadent, but not having to waste the time and energy allows not only for you to do other things or vacuum while you are not home, but it also allows you to vacuum way more often. Many Roomba users suggest running the robot daily to really help keep things under control.

      And as far as fine particles, it has picked up everything we have asked of it within the boundaries of reason.

  42. Get a Dyson by hal9000(jr) · · Score: 1

    Don't buy cheap vacuums.

    We have two dogs and two cats. We finally broke down and bought a Dyson Animal a few years ago. A bit over $450. Seems pretty extravagant at the time. But it works extremely well, picks up all the dog hair and other crap.

    It is not good on throw rugs because it tends to lift them, so you have to be careful.

    1. Re:Get a Dyson by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Consumer Reports didn't like Dysons, if you care about such things. I bought a much cheaper Hoover Wind Tunnel canister vacuum a love it.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  43. Riitarded product name by tepples · · Score: 1

    I'll agree that the name, is well frankly retarded.

    Don't Wii know it.

    </sarcasm>

  44. Spend the $ for a really good vacuum cleaner. by ridgecritter · · Score: 1

    Two years ago, my wife and I coughed up ~ $600 for a Dyson vacuum cleaner, which was pretty much an unimaginable sum for a minor household appliance at the time. It's been worth every penny. Sometimes you really do get what you pay for.

  45. Worst customer service ever by Hohlraum · · Score: 1

    One of the worst customer service experiences I've ever had was with iRobot. I'm not going to go into details but basically our roomba broke after 3 months of use and it took them another 9 months to resolve the issue. 9 months.

    I will never purchase another product from them if it can be helped.

  46. What about unemployment? by inKubus · · Score: 1

    Implementing robots will result in a massive unemployment epidemic. See this article by Marshall Brian, the creator of How Stuff Works.

    You MUST take into account sociological factors when you're talking about a major robotic influx. The bottom line is that our economy is set up to use human labor right now. If there is not something in place to help people continue to work, perhaps at a lower rate (such as a 20 hour workweek limit, or something), all of the money will just flow up into the top 10% like it has been. It has to be on our terms, not the gigantic companies. Cargill already uses robotically controlled tractors to harvest the fields. But is it giving me, the average American, any additionaly leisure time? No.

    The opportunity is such that we can either have a permanent vacation, and the robots allow us to flower and flourish culturally, or it will be permanent enslavement and povery since the upper classes no longer have a use for us workers.

    And that was the problem with Marxism. Someone had to do the work, and they wanted to get more if they did more of their fair share. Well, if robots are doing the work, why can't we as a people collectively own them, and collectively enjoy the fruits of their labors; food, housing, etc. Granted some of those top 10% people will have to give up some of their power and come down to our level, but in this world of robots, any luxury can be had for almost nothing.

    Marshall Brain wrote a novel about it called Manna.

    If we had a real plan NOW to build a society of leisure based on robots that no one owns, I think it could be accomplished in a few decades. It would involve the formation of a large non-profit stock company where we all buy shares to get this thing built. It's not going to be totally simple, but it will be worth it.

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
    1. Re:What about unemployment? by neuromancer2701 · · Score: 1

      I think he overestimated the speed at which this technology would grow. That article was written in 2003-4, he predicts that they will be rampant by 2008 and I have yet to see one of these kiosk at a mainstream restaurant, granted I never go to McD. The closest thing that matches that is the sandwich ordering system at Wawa gas stations and that is pretty cool.

      I don't know if this is going to happen or not but countries adapt. Running around saying that this is going to cause massisive unemployment is on the edge of fear mongering. Why can't this be a good thing, a chance for a country to move past service based industry into a tech based industry. Guess I can't wait for my robotic overlords to be picking my stawberries.

      --
      "If you like Battlestar Galactica, you're probably a huge nerd." -Stephen Colbert
  47. Panasonic Professional - $50, lasts forever by StCredZero · · Score: 1

    The Roomba was the second cheapest option we considered

    I too love my Roomba. The Roomba Discovery is quite robust. It's also possible to repair! I know because I've done it. (Replaced the edge-cleaning rotary brush motor.)

    Panasonic makes cheap vacuums that hotels and other companies give their custodial employees. There's no fancy HEPA filter or any whizbang features. It's just a very cheaply but robustly made vacuum with a few basic attachments that are flimsy but really work. The first one I had lasted 12 years, which included a stint being used by a housemate working as a professional maid. The next one I bought was from a Fry's in Houston for around $50 new.

    If you have serious allergies and need a HEPA filter, go ahead and buy some fancy vacuum. If you just want a basic vacuum, I recommend you look for one of these. The attachments are flimsy and won't stand up to abuse, but the actual vacuum parts seem to be very robust.

  48. loo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think people that buy robots like these are loojers.

  49. Make it climb and I'm in. by slim · · Score: 1

    Like many other urban Britons, I have a flat in a moderately tall building (3 storeys in my case). Health and safety rules preclude ladders this tall, so basically any time maintenance is needed, you have to work from indoors or use scaffolding.

    It would be /really/ handy to have a remote control gutter cleaning tool (I hesitate to use the word robot) that climbs the inside of a downpipe in order to reach the guttering. Someone make it. I'll buy it.

    1. Re:Make it climb and I'm in. by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      I also live in a three story building. It has a reasonably flat roof though. Cleaning the gutters out would be impossible if it weren't for my insane 50+ year old neighbour who regularly risks life and limb climbing up out of a stairwell window and hoisting himself onto the roof for various reasons. He uses no safety nets or ropes, just climbs out the window and hangs over a 9 meter drop (thats about 30 feet for you USians) while he pulls himself up onto the roof. One day he's going to kill himself for sure, but until then I will enjoy my clean gutters! Am I evil for saying that?

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
  50. Shop vac! by myopic_bingemaster · · Score: 1

    I tried the metal guards, but pine needles like sticking in the.

    Now I use a Shop-Vac with 20foot of extensions and a 180 u bend on the end. Works well, and the extensions I got even have a side handle on them to help with hefting the tube up and controlling it.

    Now I don't bother with ladders...

  51. gormanwvzb by gormanw · · Score: 1

    If more folks had green roofs, they wouldn't need gutters. Green roofs improve the r-value by 20+%, as well as reducing storm water runoff. They also reduce fine particulate matter in the air and CO2. I have read about them at http://www.cleanerairforcities.blogspot.com/ Did I mention they also look great!?