Slashdot Mirror


IT Students Contract Out Coursework To India

An anonymous reader writes "Students studying computing in the UK and US are outsourcing their university coursework to graduates in India and Romania. Work is being contracted out for as little as £5 on contract coding websites usually used by businesses. Students are outsourcing everything from simple coursework to full blown final year dissertations. It's causing a major headache for lecturers who say it is almost impossible to detect." The irony, of course, is that if they actually get jobs in the sector, this will be how they actually work anyway.

642 comments

  1. Just deserts... by blahplusplus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... this is what you get in a competitive society where anyone will do their damndest to avoid poverty.

    1. Re:Just deserts... by ettlz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are there deserts in India? I'm sure there aren't any in Romania.

    2. Re:Just deserts... by apodyopsis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really?

      I would of phrased that another way.

      ..this is what you get in a society when everybody believes that they deserve everything and yet everybody is unwilling to do any hard work.

    3. Re:Just deserts... by phoenix_nz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What I don't understand is how could you possibly hand in a postgraduate dissertation which you didn't write.

      Undergrad stuff, sure. There you have a few hundred students to a professor/lecturer. But postgrad?
      My supervisor had exactly one student doing postgrad - me. Sure, some supervisors had up to 20 students, but still they knew exactly what those students were capable of. Someone handing in work that isn't theirs can't happen in such a situation

      So maybe this isn't the result of "a competitive society where anyone will do their damndest to avoid poverty," but instead the result of an extremely bad student to supervisor ratio.

      The solution? I guess either pay more money to Universities to get more lecturers, or FLAMEBAIT make courses harder so that only few students survive END FLAMEBAIT.

    4. Re:Just deserts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget to account for lazyness. Writing a dissertation is a lot of work, maybe a student easily capable of writing whatever he submitted didn't quite feel like actually writing it and rather spent $200 (£100) on outsourcing and another $100 at the pub. Actually, I kinda like that idea... *ticks Anon box* harhar

    5. Re:Just deserts... by jeiler · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Um ... whoosh?!?!

      --

      If you haven't been down-modded lately, you aren't trying.

      Sacred cows make the best hamburger.

    6. Re:Just deserts... by sticks_us · · Score: 5, Funny

      What I don't understand is how could you possibly hand in a postgraduate dissertation which you didn't write....

      I agree, however, my Ph. D. adviser once offered to write my dissertation for $3,000, which at the time (being a poor student), was a ridiculous amount of money (and immoral to boot).

      In retrospect, I should've taken a loan and paid him to do it, it would've been easier and far more ethical than actually writing it myself.

      --
      "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it." -- Donald Knuth
    7. Re:Just deserts... by Danse · · Score: 1

      ... this is what you get in a competitive society where anyone will do their damndest to avoid poverty.

      I guess something had to trickle down in this economy... turned out to be the ethics :)
      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    8. Re:Just deserts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >..this is what you get in a society when everybody believes that they deserve everything and yet everybody is unwilling to do any hard work.

      Funny, I would have said this is what you get in a society that values a piece of paper over hard work.

      You can work 10x harder, 10x faster, and 10x smarter than the guy next to you, but if you didn't finish high-school/college/university, you won't get the better job.

    9. Re:Just deserts... by jeiler · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think ettiz was speaking of a ecological desert, not an after-dinner dish. Though it would have (IMO) been funnier if someone corrected him with some Romanian version of apple cobbler or what have you. :D

      --

      If you haven't been down-modded lately, you aren't trying.

      Sacred cows make the best hamburger.

    10. Re:Just deserts... by Caldrak · · Score: 1

      I don't agree with this practice because I believe that the whole point of getting a degree is to gain the knowledge by doing the work. That being said, this definatly qualifies under the "work smarter, not harder" philosophy.

    11. Re:Just deserts... by wattrlz · · Score: 1

      That's what you get in a colonial society where everyone will do their damndest to avoid work.

    12. Re:Just deserts... by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      It sounds more like a logical result of capitalism in general.

      If the same work can be done abroad for far less (assuming you also include the associated "hidden" costs), this is a good business decision, in which everyone profits.

      The work gets done to a presumably acceptable standard, so the "client" profits.
      The student only has to pay a small fee compared to what he would be getting paid, and only has to invest a minimal amount of time in the effort, so therefore he profits.
      The worker in India receives work that he otherwise wouldn't have, and is paid a wage that is considered competitive in his own country; he profits.
      Through this sort of trade, India continues to build up their economy, and train an educated workforce; the state therefore also profits by these acts.

      Is this necessarily a good thing for the UK and US? Possibly not. However, given the presence of cheap, talented labor, it's a very easily predictable outcome of a capitalist society.

      If anything, these guys should be given Management degrees, as they have proven themselves to be very shrewd in that regard. The issue over whether or not they should be given IT degrees is somewhat debatable. Although they've demonstrated no competence in their own field, they have demonstrated the ability to complete the work anyway.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    13. Re:Just deserts... by Slashidiot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That last bit is the way things work in some other places, like Spain. Not in all universities, sure, but for example, speaking from experience, studying Civil Engineering in Madrid works like that. For starters, the undergraduate courses are a minimum of six years, plus the final project. And on the first year, with 400 new students, they separate by means of exams that only around 10 people pass, out of 400. On the easier subjects (like algebra), almost 40 to 50% people pass. This way, the result is that it takes an average of 8 or 9 years to finish (to those who finish, that is around 40% of the initial 400), but people are very well prepared to work under stress, and work hard.

      So the idea is that if you get to the end of it, you might not know a lot about actually being a civil engineer, but you certainly have proved that you can work hard.

      --
      Tis women makes us love, Tis Love that makes us sad, Tis sadness makes us drink, And drinking makes us mad.
    14. Re:Just deserts... by trolltalk.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree, however, my Ph. D. adviser once offered to write my dissertation for $3,000, which at the time (being a poor student), was a ridiculous amount of money (and immoral to boot).

      In retrospect, I should've taken a loan and paid him to do it, it would've been easier and far more ethical than actually writing it myself.

      If you think that's ethical, you deserve whatever shit life hands you.

      What you should have done was gotten the offer on tape, and reported him/her. This would have served the purpose of leveling the playing field, so that those who are ethically corrupt and financially flush (funny how the two seem to go hand-in-hand a lot of times) don't have an unfair advantage.

    15. Re:Just deserts... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Actually, planning a project with many developers to take care of each of their own
      parts of the project is more like project management, outsourcing to India is more business
      logic, so these people are getting ahead of themselves or studying in the wrong field!

      I know many are just too lazy, but if that person is already predisposed to thinking this way, they will be the Van Wilder's of tomorrow, helping us all get those material "things" we need
      or helping us find our missing talents in ourselves.

      I have to hand it to that guy that used to live in our college dorm, ANYTHING we needed he had an answer for or could help us find... answers to questions or tests, pirated softwares to help us with our projects, hard core parties to help us socially or just to relax, these guys play a special part in our society.

    16. Re:Just deserts... by westlake · · Score: 1
      ... this is what you get in a competitive society where anyone will do their damndest to avoid poverty.

      The median household income in the U.S. is $46,000.

      I haven't much sympathy for the Geek who fakes his credentials in order to enter the job market at a much higher level.

    17. Re:Just deserts... by turtledawn · · Score: 1

      http://recipes.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Romanian_Desserts

      Apparently no Romanian meal is complete without a dessert! (I was really hoping they had sand tarts in Romania, but no such luck..)

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
    18. Re:Just deserts... by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I know ettiz was talking about a desert, but I was making sure nobody thought that it was a joke based on a misspelling by the OP.

    19. Re:Just deserts... by Tom · · Score: 1

      FLAMEBAIT make courses harder so that only few students survive END FLAMEBAIT. Seriously, that's how it works.

      I went to a private university, very well respected over here because business knows that if you come from there, you're worth your grades.

      They do merciless culling after the first semester. In my year, we were 104 when we started. At the end of the first semester, there's a special test. If you don't pass that test, you can't go on into 2nd semester. We were 28 after the test.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    20. Re:Just deserts... by rahvyn · · Score: 1

      Agreed - way to much of the entitlement mentality in this country - this is a prime example...

    21. Re:Just deserts... by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would have said something more like:

      ... this is what you get in a competitive society where everyone is taught that "work" is an evil thing to be avoided at all costs.

      That assumes we're talking about the US of course. We Americans are really proud of our work ethic, yet we teach our children that work is evil, struggling is stupid, and the ideal situation is one where everyone is handed everything on a silver platter.

      Really, if you look at what's being taught by parents and by the public school system, that's one of the chief messages we send to our kids. It wasn't until I got into college (a small private college) that I realized that there was actually value in the work itself. That sometimes (particularly in education) end-result (i.e. good grades and eventually a degree) isn't the most important thing.

      I mean, you listen to people talk, and they talk about how college is great because it opens so many doors, and a college diploma provides so many opportunities. That's all backwards. College is great because it is, in itself, a great opportunity to learn how to work your ass off in a grown-up environment, but before consequences really come into play. If you're not working your ass off, you're missing out on the best opportunity college can provide.

    22. Re:Just deserts... by Amouth · · Score: 1

      in IT that is slowly changing as large compaines are realizing that good talent isn't alwasy the person with the paper - if you look at job postings for IT now days they will say "x paper" or experience

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    23. Re:Just deserts... by sticks_us · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you think that's ethical, you deserve whatever shit life hands you.

      What you should have done was gotten the offer on tape, and reported him/her. This would have served the purpose of leveling the playing field, so that those who are ethically corrupt and financially flush (funny how the two seem to go hand-in-hand a lot of times) don't have an unfair advantage.

      Well, I don't think paying someone to do it is ethical, but I also believe a lot of dissertation work gets done under shifty circumstances (or, at the very least, requiring an inordinate amount of humiliation, degradation, and ass-kissing). So I guess it becomes a "lesser of two evils" thing.

      As for getting it on tape--you're 110% correct. I kick myself to this day for not having a portable recorder.

      --
      "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it." -- Donald Knuth
    24. Re:Just deserts... by prelelat · · Score: 1

      I guess in the end the student should have to defend their code at that level. They should be asked why they chose to do things a certain way and questioned on their methods. If they can resonably explain it I guess it's not a total loss but I would suspect that if you are not taking the time to do the work your self you probably can't justify on the spot what you did.

      I knew cheaters in school too people would give them a cruch to ride on. One day everyone got fed up and didn't help then one day we had a lab exam(write set number of programs in an alloted time) it was stressful enough for someone like me I was a good programmer these guys didn't even bother showing up for it and were hoisted from the program.

      The answers are out there for these classes by having in class testing of skills and progress. I was in a collage with a small class size of 30(there were cheaters in university too but it was only ever caught by a computer comparing code you could still change spacing to get past it at the time) it would be harder in a university setting of 100 or more students(not so much in grad classes). There are ways to determine if these people are able to write the code, but a professor doesn't have time to implement these checks, it would have to be done by an RA maybe a TA but I doubt they want to go and administer lab exams and then have to go and read through 100+ students code.

      Anyways I agree.

    25. Re:Just deserts... by zifn4b · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ..this is what you get in a society when everybody believes that they deserve everything and yet everybody is unwilling to do any hard work.

      I disagree. I think what's happening is that society is becoming wise to common business practices. They realize that businesses have absolutely no loyalty to their employees. The employees at a company are merely a means to generate shareholder value. Make no mistake, they will cut your benefits, lay you off, not follow through on promises if it's in the interest of their bottom line.

      State and Federal governments are really no different. For the most part, they placate the masses just enough to move their own agendas forward whether they're in your best interest of not.

      This is raising a generation of people that see no reason not to cheat the system because they watch corporations and government do it all the time. They wonder why they should uphold a standard of honor that no one else is and have it be at their own expense.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    26. Re:Just deserts... by rufus+t+firefly · · Score: 1

      I mean, you listen to people talk, and they talk about how college is great because it opens so many doors, and a college diploma provides so many opportunities. That's all backwards. College is great because it is, in itself, a great opportunity to learn how to work your ass off in a grown-up environment, but before consequences really come into play. If you're not working your ass off, you're missing out on the best opportunity college can provide.

      Stupid ... modpoints ... expired ... yesterday.
      --
      "He may look like an idiot, and talk like an idiot, but don't let that fool you. He really is an idiot." - Duck Soup
    27. Re:Just deserts... by MrMr · · Score: 1

      his is what you get in a society when everybody believes that they deserve everything and yet everybody is unwilling to do any hard work.
      You do not approve of the American dream?

    28. Re:Just deserts... by digitalderbs · · Score: 1

      That should have been :

      <flamebait>make courses harder so that only few students survive</flamebait>

      That's exactly what happens to comp sci students that graduate without learning the material.

    29. Re:Just deserts... by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thar_Desert - mostly lying within Rajasthan.

      --
      "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
    30. Re:Just deserts... by Sesticulus · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm confused, did something change? Historically they went into management.

    31. Re:Just deserts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "You can work 10x harder, 10x faster, and 10x smarter than the guy next to you, .."

      AS someone without a degree, but makes more money then his MIT counter part, I have to disagree.

      A piece of paper is nothing but a way to make initial contact.

      Motivation and networking win every time.

      I am posting AC because prudence is also important.

    32. Re:Just deserts... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's not changing, it's always been that way.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    33. Re:Just deserts... by ouachiski · · Score: 1

      Yes but here is my predicament, without the paper how do you get the experience.

      --
      sorry for my comments, I'm drunk
    34. Re:Just deserts... by johndmartiniii · · Score: 1

      You must have meant "post-colonial."

      --
      If you don't know what you're doing, you can't make mistakes.
    35. Re:Just deserts... by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 5, Insightful

      College is great because it is, in itself, a great opportunity to learn how to work your ass off in a grown-up environment, but before consequences really come into play. If you're not working your ass off, you're missing out on the best opportunity college can provide. That's the dumbest thing I've heard all day. If this is the best opportunity that college can provide, there's no reason to go. Get a job! Then you can not only learn how to work your ass off in a grown-up environment, you can get paid for it too!

      The point of college is to gain an education and grow intellectually. Learning how to get stuff done is certainly part of it, but it's not the only, or even the biggest, part of it. If that's all you need then there's no need to pay for the experience.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    36. Re:Just deserts... by jeiler · · Score: 1
      --

      If you haven't been down-modded lately, you aren't trying.

      Sacred cows make the best hamburger.

    37. Re:Just deserts... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      But if the same person has been writing all the undergrad papers, would the supervisor really know what you where capable of?

      Or randomly quiz people on the papers they turn in.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    38. Re:Just deserts... by girasquid · · Score: 0

      He has a point here. I managed to get a programming job about 8 months out of high school with no papers - but it was a very lucky break, and I only got in because I knew their accountant. More and more businesses(at least around here) are looking for that piece of paper, and won't even look at you without it - experience be damned.

    39. Re:Just deserts... by SombreReptile · · Score: 1

      Only cultural ones

    40. Re:Just deserts... by gv250 · · Score: 2, Funny

      My high school math teacher announced, on the first day of class, that he would be willing to take a bribe to give an 'A' to any student.

      His price? Significantly more than the present value of all his future earnings for the rest of his life.

      I'm not sure if the lesson was one of consequences (you can lose your job for cheating) or math (what is the P.V. of a series of payments?).

    41. Re:Just deserts... by aztracker1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, personally I have been doing a *LOT* of reading on those areas that I want to work in... I look for personal projects that can take advantage of newer, or newly learned technology. Participating on FLOSS, or even volunteering with a non-profit agency works as well. Getting a super low-level grunt job, and taking on extra responsibilities is probably the best potential for a foot in the door.

      I'm now pretty well off in my field, but it takes hard work, and time one way or another... it's not impossible, or even all that hard to get your foot in the door. To be honest though, it takes about as much time to gain "experience" as you would have taken going through college, but after 5+ years or so, it balances out.

      The other aspect is truly understanding what it is you are going to be doing. For programmers it comes down to not just knowing your language(s) of choice, but knowing something about software design. Reading "Learn X in 24hrs" isn't enough, reading up on RAD, or Agile principles is equally, or more important. Understanding data models, etc... Starting off with a good basic understanding of a given language is generally enough to get you in the door somewhere.

      In interviews, if you don't know something, don't pretend you do. Say you don't know it, if you can speculate, state that what you are saying is speculation. Then move on to the next question. The fact is nobody can possibly know everything, especially in IT, as the entire base of knowledge and/or techniques grows exponentially. You're better off having a good base of knowledge, at least exposure, or knowledge of different systems, and the ability to learn and adapt quickly. IT is as much thinking around problems as it is working through them.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    42. Re:Just deserts... by GospelHead821 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It bears mentioning that, because of the global nature of many corporations, the work that most people do is impersonal and uninspiring. Assembly line structures may be efficient ways to generate wealth but I have grown tired of our society that defines value in terms of wealth.

      I can certainly sympathize with somebody who sees hard work as evil, if his work provides value for somebody he never sees and is measured based upon the amount of wealth that it generates. That really is evil, in my opinion.

      --
      Virtue finds and chooses the mean.
      Aristotle, Ethica Nichomachea
    43. Re:Just deserts... by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      I mean, you listen to people talk, and they talk about how college is great because it opens so many doors, and a college diploma provides so many opportunities. That's all backwards. College is great because it is, in itself, a great opportunity to learn how to work your ass off in a grown-up environment, but before consequences really come into play. If you're not working your ass off, you're missing out on the best opportunity college can provide. Yes, let's only teach competition instead of cooperation. It's not as if we were an advanced species or anything. We can drop below the societal level of apes. What do we care?

      If we drive fast enough maybe that cliff will just go away.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    44. Re:Just deserts... by stupkid · · Score: 1

      "This is raising a generation of people that see no reason not to cheat the system because they watch corporations and government do it all the time. They wonder why they should uphold a standard of honor that no one else is and have it be at their own expense."

      I share your perspective. Based on my experiences I would say this is exactly the issue. Why behave righteous when nobody truly values such attributes? Sure, folks give it lip service, but at the end of the days results are what is expected.

      This is another thing with modern culture. Our minds are tuned to break things down into the core objectives and what why to complete those goals in the most optimal way (i.e. video game mind set). I suppose this is just a part of the moral mine field presented by the current reality.

    45. Re:Just deserts... by RobBebop · · Score: 1

      FLAMEBAIT make courses harder so that only few students survive END FLAMEBAIT.

      According to a discussion on World of Warcraft yesterday, if they do exactly the opposite it can lead to students enjoying it SO MUCH that they will never want to stop. Also, why stop at Ph.D when they can invent a new maximum degree called the Worldly Master's Degree? After 4 years for a B.S., 2 years for an M.S., 5 years for a Ph.D, and 7 years trying to get their W.M.D., the kiddies will be close to 40 years old and ready to spawn the next generation of non-achievers.

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    46. Re:Just deserts... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      How does that follow from what I said? I wouldn't equate "working cooperatively" with "being lazy" or anything. Maybe you would?

    47. Re:Just deserts... by celle · · Score: 1

      The only thing that worries me is the students have to pay more to get abused even more, the really good job better be guaranteed and pay really well. What's next bsdm in class?

    48. Re:Just deserts... by nine-times · · Score: 2

      If you just want to say that someone can do something bad with the product of your work, or that it's possible for workers to be alienated in some way, I wouldn't disagree.

      My point about work isn't whether it's "evil" in the sense that the devil is "evil", but that people treat it as an "evil", or a "bad thing". It's like, if you ask someone to work on something, you're punishing them. As though we would be best served by avoiding work whenever possible.

      I'm not in favor of working stupidly or inefficiently, but some kind of "work" is essential for a healthy psyche. It actually isn't good for people to have nothing to do, no goals to achieve. It's often bad for people to take the "easy way out", and failing to "try your best" for an extended period of time will make a person deficient in a number of ways.

      Work is good. Work is healthy. Having accomplished something after a lot of work with bring about the most satisfying feeling you'll ever feel in your life. And we're depriving ourselves of that by considering people "lucky" who can sit around on their ass without a care in the world.

    49. Re:Just deserts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ..this is what you get in a society when everybody believes that they deserve everything and yet everybody is unwilling to do any hard work.

      Totally agree!

    50. Re:Just deserts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'd phrase it "would HAVE". "Would of" doesn't make any fucking sense, don't you think about what you write?

    51. Re:Just deserts... by Crazy+Taco · · Score: 1

      ..this is what you get in a society when everybody believes that they deserve everything and yet everybody is unwilling to do any hard work.

      I would also add that this is what you get in a society where morality, integrity, and honesty are increasingly going the way of the dodo.

      The best way to counter this is to do more testing, and make the tests worth more. I had a number of comp sci classes in college where homework was worth 10% of the grade and you could work on it with anyone. The whole stated point of the homework was to learn the material in whatever the best way was for you, which would hopefully allow you to pass the tests, which were justly worth 90% of your grade.

      --
      Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
    52. Re:Just deserts... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The defense is supposed to take care of anyone who cheats, even if the supervisor is too busy or incompetent to catch them beforehand.

      Maybe these grad students are at DeVry or the University of Phoenix.

    53. Re:Just deserts... by nine-times · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's the dumbest thing I've heard all day. If this is the best opportunity that college can provide, there's no reason to go. Get a job! Then you can not only learn how to work your ass off in a grown-up environment, you can get paid for it too!

      And then, because there will be consequences, you'll be incredibly limited in what you can do and which sorts of work you can try out. Once you're saddled with all those consequences, you really will have to focus on accomplishing things and not screwing up. You'll have to focus on the end-results specifically. And because you don't have experience and don't know how to work correctly, an awful lot of the fun work is going to be kept away from you because you can't be trusted to do it.

      College, on the other hand, is the perfect place to gain the experience of working in a wide variety of contexts on a wide variety of tasks. In my job, if I'm not a good presenter, then any decent boss will keep me away from presenting. A college class that involves presentations is going to be my best opportunity to work on presentations and get good at them before it matters.

      I have never met anyone who doesn't screw up royally on their first job, and sometimes that sort of thing can virtually ruin a career. If you do it right, college can be like being your own boss, running your own projects, and working in the way that work really should be done.

    54. Re:Just deserts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure there is a dessert in India. Called Thar.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thar_Desert

    55. Re:Just deserts... by Calinous · · Score: 1

      We have both kinds.
            There are ex-sand lands where forests were planted during the communism - and were cleared, and are now reverting to desserts.
            Also, we have the other kind :p

    56. Re:Just deserts... by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      I call BS on that.

      I have plenty of experience but I've just started gathering Cisco certs so that I can have some job portablility.

      I will say that I am learning things as I go - it's not a complete waste of time, but I do object in principal to paying Cisco to tell me that I can do the job I've been doing all this time, and to have to regurgitate the mantra that Cisco is the only reasonable approach to offering DHCP, VOIP, caching etc. Much of the learning material is a thinly veiled sales pitch.

      Anyhow - actually being able to do things comes a poor second to having paper qualifications in US business today. I know of several excellent colleagues that I have out-earned because I had better paper qualifications than they did, and of several idiots with PhDs that out-earned me. I'm not talking about the hiring stage - I'm talking about long-term employees that simply were on a fast or slow track career depending on the paper they hung on their wall.

      OK I'll stop ranting now...

      --
      Nullius in verba
    57. Re:Just deserts... by jonatha · · Score: 1

      [M]y Ph. D. adviser once offered to write my dissertation for $3,000, which at the time (being a poor student), was a ridiculous amount of money (and immoral to boot).

      In retrospect, I should've taken a loan and paid him to do it, it would've been easier and far more ethical than actually writing it myself.

      Easier I can see.

      How "far more ethical"?

      --
      The SCO lawsuit makes me wish my company were in Utah. We need a new building.
    58. Re:Just deserts... by immcintosh · · Score: 1

      And what's more, I don't know how things work in computer science, but in the humanities (at least where I went) you generally have to sit in front of a panel of professors and actually PRESENT post-grad dissertations. You don't have to just write it, you have to sit there for a few hours proving you know every nuance of what you claim to be talking about.

    59. Re:Just deserts... by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      I appreciate you explaining it to us. I never would have guessed in a million years that that is what he would have meant.

    60. Re:Just deserts... by 5of0 · · Score: 1
      I'm guessing (hoping) that English isn't your native tongue - in that case, consider this a friendly grammar lesson:
      <nazi domain="grammar">

      I knew cheaters in school too. People would give them a crutch to ride on. One day everyone got fed up and didn't help, and then one day we had a lab exam (write set number of programs in an alloted time). It was stressful enough for someone like me, and I was a good programmer. These guys didn't even bother showing up for it, and were hoisted from the program.

      The answers are out there for these classes: having in class testing of skills and progress. I was in a college with a small class size of 30 (there were cheaters in university too but it was only ever caught by a computer comparing code - you could still change spacing to get past it at the time). It would be harder in a university setting of 100 or more students (not so much in grad classes). There are ways to determine if these people are able to write the code, but a professor doesn't have time to implement these checks - it would have to be done by an RA, maybe a TA, but I doubt they want to go and administer lab exams and then have to go and read through 100+ students' code.

      </nazi>
      Sorry, but that middle paragraph (sentence, more like) just made my head hurt.
      --
      You all have Oo.o and Firefox, so get World Wind.
    61. Re:Just deserts... by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      You can work 10x harder, 10x faster, and 10x smarter than the guy next to you, but if you didn't finish high-school/college/university, you won't get the better job. Oh, you'll get the better job if you meet the qualifications, you just won't get paid as much as your coworker who does the same work in the cube next to you who did happen to get a degree.
    62. Re:Just deserts... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      it would've been easier and far more ethical than actually writing it myself.
      Why is that? Did your advisor die from some untreated illness for which he could only have afforded treatment if you had paid him $3000?

      Or would you have spent the time saved on something so productive and beneficial to mankind that it would have outweighed your cheating?
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    63. Re:Just deserts... by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

      I have never met anyone who doesn't screw up royally on their first job, and sometimes that sort of thing can virtually ruin a career. If screwing up on your first job can ruin your career then it's probably a relatively high-end job that you take after you get a degree. You're not going to ruin anything by screwing up a job you get at the age of 18.

      If you do it right, college can be like being your own boss, running your own projects, and working in the way that work really should be done. If the experience of being your own boss is what you're after, start a business. Even if it fails spectacularly I guarantee you that it will be cheaper than paying for school, and the experience you gain will be vastly better because it will be with something that actually matters.

      I spent five years in school getting a BS and MS. I sure as hell didn't go to learn how to work. I went to get an education, and that's what I got.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    64. Re:Just deserts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FLAMEBAIT make courses harder so that only few students survive END FLAMEBAIT. Woah, you still flame in basic? You should start outsourcing - I hear C++ programmers are cheap in India.
    65. Re:Just deserts... by Garrick68 · · Score: 1

      I thought college was just an excuse to have a party with blackjack and hookers?

    66. Re:Just deserts... by prelelat · · Score: 1

      Nope English is my first language, I do know the rules, I just don't go back and proof read my work. If it's something I think is important I will go through it again, most of the time I just throw down my thoughts. Usually my thoughts are run on sentences/ramblings that make no sense. Typically I only post thoughts on posts I don't think people will read; I kind of use it as my own venting ground.

      Typically my posts are still better than that, but this isn't the first time I've been accused of English not being my first language. It won't be my last because frankly I don't care about the grammar nazis.

    67. Re:Just deserts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually there is a desert in Romania in the southern part, called "Oltenia's desert". Nothing impressive, but quite close to a desert.

    68. Re:Just deserts... by bryce4president · · Score: 1

      5 years of experience far outweighs 4 years of college. There is an old saying that goes "I learned more in my first 4 months at work that I did in 4 years of college." Sure, I went to school for computer science and mathematics. I programmed in C++, Python, VB, HTML, Javascript and other math related languages. Now I'm doing database driven programming on the iSeries. I never saw a single line of RPG IV code or CL code when I was in college. But where I live, that is in demand. And a year into the job I know more than if it had been my main focus in college. Why? Because I'm doing meaningful work and not just busy work examples that most colleges push on their undergrad students.

      CS programs need to not only teach basic theory (the reason why I could pick up new languages fast) but also real world industry examples and projects. Academia and Industry just aren't as closely related as they once were.

    69. Re:Just deserts... by ewtrowbr · · Score: 1

      college taught me how to work hard, by making me compete with other students way smarter than me.

    70. Re:Just deserts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In regards to your /flame; I did undergrad work in South America and the actul status quo was that courses were deliberately hard to pass, let alone get a very good grade. And there were very strict requirements in how you could maintain your status as a student; to the point that out of about 550 people starting (this was en Engineering college); only about 20-30 actually graduated. Disclaimer: I was one that graduated, and not necesarily because I was more intelligent than others, I just knew how to get things done efficiently and effectively/end disclaimer. The result to this day is that I can't be more thankful in that they taught me how to think creatively and in a way that you shoot holes to your own ideas to make them bullet proof. Later on, I did a couple of Master in the US (one in Computer Science), and it was a walk in the part, as they say around here.

    71. Re:Just deserts... by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

      And to think, if you had gotten a job at the Kwik-E-Mart instead, not only would you have been competing with co-workers way smarter than you, but you would also have been making five bucks an hour doing it!

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    72. Re:Just deserts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was a given, quit being a bean counter and use your common sense, quit
      wasting hard drive space with telling us the obvious..

    73. Re:Just deserts... by DeadDecoy · · Score: 1

      One of the advantages of being in school however, is that you have more experienced professors to guide you through starting your own business or projects. It seriously saves a HUGE amount of work having someone provide insights as to what will and will not work and the reasons behind that. It is also particularly useful to be guided in terms of what you should learn as the professor may have more insight as to what materials have content and what materials are merely hype.

      Yes, it is possible to not go to school, and develop valuable experiences, nut I believe that the resources offered at academic institutions, if used properly, can offer more effective opportunities for growth.

    74. Re:Just deserts... by sticks_us · · Score: 1

      Eh, not sure how interesting this might be, but since you asked...I was in a bad program, rife with corruption, turf wars, vendettas, etc.

      "Success" would've meant participating in their schenanigans to a degree that would have probably meant compromising my own standards.

      The only real option was to leave, which I did.

      --
      "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it." -- Donald Knuth
    75. Re:Just deserts... by Brad+Eleven · · Score: 1

      Damn, no mod points. I went off on a mission to prove IPU wrong and discovered that "just desserts" is, indeed, improper usage.

      Alert moderators are right to mod me offtopic, of course.

      The word "dessert" comes from the French desservir, "to clear the table," literally "un-serve" (des + servir)and therefore refers only to the last course of a meal and has nothing to do with the French construction de "completely" + deservir, "to serve well".

      Etymology from http://www.etymonline.com./ Surely these French verbal constructions are from Latin.

      --
      "Press to test."
      (click)
      "Release to detonate."
    76. Re:Just deserts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the whole point of college was to get drunk and laid before I had to join the life long grind for minium wage!

      Only a Sadastic religous zealot would invent the Prodestant work ethic!

    77. Re:Just deserts... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      You can work 10x harder, 10x faster, and 10x smarter than the guy next to you, but if you didn't finish high-school/college/university, you won't get the better job.
      If you're that smart and hard working, why didn't you finish high school and university?
    78. Re:Just deserts... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I sure as hell didn't go to learn how to work. I went to get an education, and that's what I got.

      Oh, yeah, and I bet you got a really great education by *not* working, right? You just sat around, putting in no effort, doing jack, and the education was just transfered to you while you passively sat around, went to frat parties, and got drunk (or whatever you did while not putting effort into your classes).

      Right?

    79. Re:Just deserts... by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why is this site full of such dumbfucks? I mean, seriously. You could find a higher average intelligence in an ant farm.

      Where did I say that I did no work? Oh that's right, I never said that. You just made it up, then acted like I said it because, I dunno, you're a total jackass.

      I worked hard in college, but that was not why I was there. I was there to get an education. The work was a necessary component, not a goal.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    80. Re:Just deserts... by XHIIHIIHX · · Score: 1

      This is untrue. Never heard of ebay? Work 10x harder and 10x faster and you'll retire long before that corporate sucker.

    81. Re:Just deserts... by emilper · · Score: 1

      there should be a once in a lifetime opportunity to mod somebody higher than 5 ... I would have used it now, for a +1 Damn' True

    82. Re:Just deserts... by emilper · · Score: 1

      You got an education ? Lucky you, I only became an expert at passing exams, even after some 3 years of postgrad studies. At the end of that I quit the academia (used to have a job as "research assistant", arround here it's a permanent job you can retire from if you're unlucky or dumb enough) and switched to something else that I learned in my free time.

    83. Re:Just deserts... by emilper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My high school physics teacher showed us once, with practical examples, that he knows a lot more ways to cheat than we do. Even showed us a few very effective ways we did not know and could not have imagined without special technical knowledge. That day was the last time I attempted to cheat in school ... was 13 at that time.

    84. Re:Just deserts... by rk · · Score: 1

      I think the relations between academia and industry you are talking about have never been as close as you think. Your experiences could be mine if you set it 20 years ago, replace RPG IV with RPG III, and iSeries with System/38 (CL apparently will always be with us).

      Oh yeah, of the modern things you mentioned, only C++ existed at the time, and it was much different (and not taught at my school) then. :-)

    85. Re:Just deserts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      welcome to the world of affirmative action and no child left behind

    86. Re:Just deserts... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Are there deserts in India? I'm sure there aren't any in Romania.

      There aren't any desserts in Romania either. Communist dictator Nicolae Ceauescu labelled desserts bourgeois and counter revolutionary. Recipe books were burned and the chefs executed. Fat people were hounded through the streets by mobs chanting "WHO ATE ALL THE CAKE? WHO ATE ALL THE CAKE?"

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    87. Re:Just deserts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thar Desert, 140,000 sq. mi

    88. Re:Just deserts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have gone to a better University .. mine was in the top 100 research but it really depended on your advisor. Some really cared about their students learning and most really cared about their research. The former did not get tenure as a rule and the latter did. You could learn at lot but ... There was always a couple of foreign students wanting a slot foreach one available. In most depts, the profs wanted experienced grad students to start their PhD work. 2-3 years for grad school in Russia, India or China and you were ready to start the PhD here. One of my advisors recruited exclusively this way. Made it real easy for these guys to fly thru the coursework and pump out the research. A friend in the Math Dept compared their grad courses against those of an Ivy in New England. Our public university was missing all the first year and most of the second year grad courses. Especially the Master's courses - no need for those pesky students wanting to learn.

      But we had a real good sports stadium and team -- that's what real important to a university.
      Go Huskies !!!!!

      WTF.........

    89. Re:Just deserts... by JeffSchwab · · Score: 1

      Huh? You think not doing your own homework is a way to avoid poverty? My experience has been that the folks who actually take the time to learn the technologies are the ones who eventually make the most money from them.

    90. Re:Just deserts... by Irvan · · Score: 0

      >..this is what you get in a society when everybody believes that they deserve everything and yet everybody is unwilling to do any hard work.

      Funny, I would have said this is what you get in a society that values a piece of paper over hard work.

      You can work 10x harder, 10x faster, and 10x smarter than the guy next to you, but if you didn't finish high-school/college/university, you won't get the better job.

      yeah.., we do the hard way, and the smiley guy takes everything.

      --
      'sometime the moron called himself as idiot'
    91. Re:Just deserts... by kraut · · Score: 1

      > You can work 10x harder, 10x faster, and 10x smarter than the guy next to you, but if you didn't finish high-school/college/university, you won't get the better job.

      Of course if you're that good, why didn't you get a degree in the first place, or pick it up in nightschool?

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    92. Re:Just deserts... by bryce4president · · Score: 1

      Yeah, CL is a pain in the arse, but at the same time rather helpful. Just enough to be useful sometimes, but not useful enough to be used all the time. Its really rather strange.

      Where I went to school I had professors that were mathematicians for GE, and programmers for IBM and the likes. And then I had other profs that I would call "institutionalized" profs. Who never saw a day of industry but had all the answers.

      It would be interesting to see if the rates of professionals entering academia as profs has decreased over the last 25 years... I have a feeling that it has.

    93. Re:Just deserts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeez, the profs get the grad students to do all their busy work, leaving them free to attend classes, conferences and dept meetings, now the undergrads are learning by example and getting offshore consultants to complete their projects so they are free to attend classes, tutorials and get to the cafeteria before all the tater tots are gone. Go figure.

    94. Re:Just deserts... by robinsc · · Score: 1

      The Thar desert In Rajasthan,India has camels and all....

      --
      Linkedin http://in.linkedin.com/in/robinsaikatchatterjee
  2. Pathetic by kmsigel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have always written programs because it is fun and rewarding. That was true in middle school, true in high school, true in college, and true now (I'm close to 40). When it's not fun I'll stop doing it. How is paying someone else to write your programs fun? How is it rewarding? It's not; it is just pathetic.

    1. Re:Pathetic by phpmysqldev · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We always got quizzed and had to explain our logic, etc after turning in a major project. Just because you can produce a working program doesn't mean you understand the concept, outsourced or not.

    2. Re:Pathetic by snl2587 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Really, this is nothing more than an indicator that some people going into programming are clearly in the wrong field.

      That being said, I don't know anyone personally who is becoming a programmer for any other reason than they really enjoy it. Kind of sucks if you don't.

    3. Re:Pathetic by darthflo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let's see...
      Earn, say, $5000 per Month working on something for two months.
      Pay, say, $3000 for that project to be done in India or wherever.
      Make $7k (per concurrent employment) while at the same time programming whatever you feel like whenever you feel like it. Sure sounds like a ton of fun.

    4. Re:Pathetic by v1k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How long before your contract realizes they too can send it to India and get it done for $3000, leaving you with $0?

    5. Re:Pathetic by Drakonik · · Score: 5, Funny

      Really, this is nothing more than an indicator that some people going into programming are clearly in the wrong field. Clearly, they belong in management.
    6. Re:Pathetic by TheLink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They might not want to manage the outsourcee, etc.

      --
    7. Re:Pathetic by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just because you can produce a working program doesn't mean you understand the concept, outsourced or not.

      Yes, agreed. But there's a difference between logical reasoning and understanding and actual implementation.

      Basically you're saying, in this context; "I understand the logical approach. So there's no need for me to put time in implementing it. A monkey without any sense of logic could produce a program with the same output."

      So you'd like someone, who you value "unable to understand the deeper underlaying logic", to write your program representing the way you understood the problem and how it could be solved?

      It's to me also a very troubling progress; people being trained to become programmers or who will have to program, but already ,before being skilled enough or having any experience, have the attitude "oh, I can outsource it!". Once those end up in the industry, what are those worth? "I can't be bothered with it. Let them outsource it"... And everyone throws their arms in the ari "oh noes, were are our jobs going?"

      Having done alot of projects "in the real world", it's rarely who put the project together who are the ones brainstorming how to make it fit more logcally without breaking the design. Those "finger in air"-documents, created by those with a simular attitude, without practical "hands on" knowledge *think* it's all fitting as a glove. But once you try to implement it you're bumping into alot of surprices and burning money with heaps.
      Ideally someone with alot of practical knowledge should lead these sorts of projects just for this reason. But where are you at when you're even not willing to gather a bit of experience, because it seems "unnecessary"?
      It's a combination of experience and skill (ability to logically understand the whole), to verify your analysis into practice, link back and evolve in your skillsets that help you to be better at what you do.

      I've stood at both sides in projects, and it's also not as straightforwards to come up with something that works perfectly. It all might be very logical, it's not definite and bringing it into being, you always have a surprice here and there.

      There's never perfection and you never know enough, each day I still learn and finetune my skills. If you're starting to outsource your potential even before you can assign yourself a certain title, it's a bit of a dubious thing to do.

      It reminds me of this engineer, taking huge pride in a job well done after his equations and calculations were all perfectly done, with added whitenoise buffers calculated to the point he felt he could be pleased with himself and nothing could go wrong. The moment his creation came into being, he spent weeks finding the "sweetspot" to make it work. His clash with the "pure theory and logic" and the actual world were a tough lesson.

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    8. Re:Pathetic by mmkkbb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Never, because you charge $5000, kick back $1000 to the guy who signs the paycheck, and send it to India for $3000, pocketing $1000. This is not a new phenomenon, and is probably in every ethics textbook and training course.

      --
      -mkb
    9. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These entrepreneurial kids need to go to my school. We just turn in whatever crap we want and we get an A regardless. Yeah, I used to bust my ass over my assignments, but now that I have the system down, I realize I only need to turn it in, regardless of quality.

      It helps that most of our faculty are part time, and are at risk of losing their jobs this year, so they want to make their classes look the best. The school is trying to even out the ratio of full time to part time faculty.

      Education in [My Home Town] - a new low in America!

    10. Re:Pathetic by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      Earn, say, $5000 per Month working on something for two months.
      Pay, say, $3000 for that project to be done in India or wherever.
      Make $7k (per concurrent employment) while at the same time programming whatever you feel like whenever you feel like it. Sure sounds like a ton of fun.

      You forgot the time and expense of properly doing the initial spec so that someone in India actually can attempt to code it, and the rewrite because what you got back wasn't what you asked for, and the biggie: what are you going to do when they resell what they wrote for you to others for half-price as a "proven, packaged solution".

      Also, you'll need to give them your clients' test data ... somehow I think that sending that off to a place that you don't have legal leverage via the local courts is a deal-breaker.

      I once contracted to do a complete rewrite from scratch of an employee database for one of the countries' country's largest transporters, including 30,000 drivers' abstracts (including such delicate info as arrest records). There is no way that anyone but an idiot would send that out of the host country. Heck, I even gave the source code to the company rather than keep it myself, just to be safe.

      Some things just cannot ever be outsourced to other countries.

    11. Re:Pathetic by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      Yea, and good luck understanding the program with some of the spaghetti code you get from paying bottom dollar.

    12. Re:Pathetic by FictionPimp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How is this different then me starting a company, getting hired by another company to make X for 5000.00 and paying my workers 3000.00 for actually doing it?

      The difference is my workers are not local but in india. So the same reason companies don't snipe workers from local business is the same reason they won't just go straight to india.

    13. Re:Pathetic by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 1

      In college, almost all of our major projects were of the form "make an interpreter/compiler". This was very boring, uninspired, repetitive, and in general an unrealistic representation of real world projects. I like programming. It wasn't fun. It wasn't really rewarding. In fact, I think it was pretty pathetic.

    14. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We always got quizzed and had to explain our logic, etc after turning in a major project. Just because you can produce a working program doesn't mean you understand the concept, outsourced or not. Unfortunately, in my classes that's not the case. My classes have been made up of programming majors who hate to write code. They all copy-and-paste each others' code, turn it in, and the instructor doesn't ask any questions about it.

      It also doesn't help that the "instructor" comes in hungover and in lieu of teaching, she basically has people type code along with her, without explaining any of the theory. She also just gives us powerpoint slides.

      I've pretty much been teaching myself programming on my own.

    15. Re:Pathetic by kmsigel · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you made a poor choice of college and/or major.

      I made a compiler *in* the compiler class (what else would you expect?). I made a game in object oriented programming class. I made a game in digital hardware class (assemble discreet components to make a simple MCU and then write firmware for it). I made graphics rendering software in graphics class. All were challenging and fun. All helped make me the programmer I am today.

    16. Re:Pathetic by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      Please, no! Even worse than an "I've got my MBA" manager would be an "I've got my CS degree (but I don't really know *anything* about CS)" manager.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    17. Re:Pathetic by suggsjc · · Score: 1

      I'm the same way and completely agree that its pathetic as well. That said, what if they were just outsourcing the work outside their major/interests? Pathetic still that they can't/won't/don't do *all* of their own work, but on a certain level *if* they were doing it to be able to concentrate more on what they did enjoy it at least shows some creativity.

      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    18. Re:Pathetic by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

      I met a lot of people like that in college. Strangely, I've never met any of them in the workforce. My guess is that either the all go into giant faceless corporations producing incredibly boring and inconsequential stuff, and thus I never interact with them, or at some point they realized that they didn't want to do this for the rest of their life and switched to some other field.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    19. Re:Pathetic by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      It's been my experience that code quality is not directly related to cost. Because of the attitude espoused at the top of this thread, software is one of the areas where people do over-deliver just for the personal satisfaction of it. Unlike in almost any other transaction other than scoring a nymphomaniac hooker, you can get more than you pay for.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    20. Re:Pathetic by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Heh... that's true for you, obviously. But I wouldn't try to apply that reasoning to everyone, unless you want to come off as arrogant and unyielding in a belief that your personal experiences should be shared by ALL comers.

      I started out learning to program years ago, writing my own computer bulletin board system in BASIC. I actually sold a few copies of the resulting product, and enjoyed maintaining it for several years after that.

      But technology constantly changes, and before long, nobody was coding anything useful in BASIC anymore. Meanwhile, I got further and further into the enjoyment of actually *using* the software made by others.

      No man is an island, as they say ... and I quickly discovered that OTHER people had FAR better ideas in their software than I would have ever though to code on my own, if I was writing a given app myself.

      I went back and tried to learn C programming in college, and HATED it. I got slightly past coding the "Hello World" stuff, and got a headache trying to keep all the logic straight with recursion, pointers to variables, etc. etc.

      These days, I enjoy troubleshooting computer hardware, doing network support and administration, and finding software packages that are a "best solution" to someone's problem. I don't want to code another line, if I can help it - yet I don't think that's "pathetic" at all.

    21. Re:Pathetic by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      I guess I understand what you are saying, but I have also had the case where the code was just a mess. That it would be better to start over than to try and figure out what the guy did to try and fix the problems.

    22. Re:Pathetic by kmsigel · · Score: 1

      If you are taking a programming course and you are so uninterested in programming that you pay someone else to do the work for you then that is pathetic. I stand by my post. It would be the same for a course on any topic. If you don't do the work yourself, why are you there?

      It sounds like you don't like to program *and* you aren't taking a programming course. What's wrong with that? Nothing. It would only be pathetic if you took a programming course now and paid someone to do the work for you.

    23. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I have always written programs because it is fun and rewarding. That was true in middle school, true in high school, true in college, and true now (I'm close to 40). When it's not fun I'll stop doing it. How is paying someone else to write your programs fun? How is it rewarding? It's not; it is just pathetic." - by kmsigel (306018) * on Thursday June 26, @10:10AM (#23948591) Agreed, 110% - These students are just shooting themselves in the foot...

      I say this, simply because this IS going to show itself on the job, in their lack of "hands-on" expertise, probably nearly right away, should they even be able to get thru their initial interviews (most probably won't due to their practicing such shenanigans)...

      (I mean, today, compared to say, when yourself & I began this field (I am 44 yrs. of age now (well, close to it))? There is such a wealth of open source code out there, let alone the fact these kids have prebuilt components of various kinds (OLEServer libs, ActiveX controls, VCL controls, you-name-it), that they should NOT have to do such things... yet, as we can see? They apparently do).

      Dumb...

      APK

    24. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Any CS major caught doing this should immediately be transferred to the Management program !!!

    25. Re:Pathetic by RembrandtX · · Score: 1

      How is that any different from the 5000 lines of spaghetti code I will be forced to write over two days myself, instead of spreading it out over 5 Indian contractors.

      People very seldom outsource purely because of money, normally its done because its a cheaper way to get speed.

      --

      --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
    26. Re:Pathetic by blhack · · Score: 1

      I have always written programs because it is fun and rewarding. That was true in middle school, true in high school, true in college, and true now (I'm close to 40). When it's not fun I'll stop doing it. How is paying someone else to write your programs fun? How is it rewarding? It's not; it is just pathetic.

      Yes. You are a programmer.

      The unfortunate thing, is that the majority of CS majors are not. They're people who saw how many zeros can precede the comma in a programmers paycheck. Because of this, programming classes in University are teaching to the middle of the class (idiots who are trying to control their restless leg syndrome and "peace-out" as soon as possible so they can hit the big game with their brahs).

      Its really sad, and its the reason I dropped out of school (I now have a job that I love doing what I love [programming]).

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    27. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, the reason is obvious nowadays:
      students are pushed for results, whatever the means to obtain those results, and this sadly become cultural...

      it is a real social issue, i agree, but let's look at the society around those students, they do the exactly same things.

      students are just mimicking a general social feeling, in my imo

    28. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think most people use this to SUPPLEMENT their studies/homework. The smart cheaters use it as research material. In other words they grab what they need and rework it if they use it.

      Only dumb people use it as is. And sooner or later those people get caught.

      I do NOT agree with it, but I understand why it happens. Most kids are not stupid. They see the good paying jobs of their parents or older siblings being outsourced. They know their degrees have been DEVALUED by corporations.

      Their logic (yes it is faulty) is that since companies have DEVALUED their degrees and their chosen field why should they approach tech with any more loyalty than employers do. They ask why should they toil for hours and hours while the business majors are out partying and having fun when a business grad has a better future than they do.

      It is sad, but corporations deserve some of the blame. These kids are just emulating the actions of the adults around them.

    29. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all Indian programmers are not stupid. They are smart enough to take away jobs from people in the West. They have been doing it for years now and companies sure want more of them so they must be doing something right.

      Second, most students write spaghetti code anyway.

      Thirdly, most college/university programming assignments are trivial. Their won't be much for the student to interpret.

      Finally, 99% of these kids don't just turn the code or papers in as is. They usually rewrite them or use them as reference material. Only a very small (dumb) minority of students turn the work in as is risking getting caught. I would wager that 99.9% of cheaters never get close to being caught.

    30. Re:Pathetic by azgard · · Score: 1

      Having done alot of projects "in the real world", it's rarely who put the project together who are the ones brainstorming how to make it fit more logcally without breaking the design. Those "finger in air"-documents, created by those with a simular attitude, without practical "hands on" knowledge *think* it's all fitting as a glove. I agree with that. I would force developers to take all the jobs needed in SW development, on rotational basis, depending on how skilled they are. So everyone would be, once in a while, coding, designing, testing, writing documentation and fixing bugs (level 2 support).

      In my job, small team in a large American SW company, I am to certain extent allowed to do that (although I am doing mostly development now), and it proves very beneficial. The people who design the stuff are coding it along with me, and really helps to test it properly if you know the guts, so we assist QA too. My boss, who is manager, but former programmer of the product, would like to code too, if he wouldn't be buried in the meetings and other stuff.

      I feel lucky, but it's sad that companies mostly don't get this.

    31. Re:Pathetic by emilper · · Score: 1

      mmm ... what school did you go to ?

    32. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually heard a story about someone who did similar 'outsourcing', a guy who apparently had 3 jobs in BMC (the Mumbai Municipal Corp.) as a sweeper. Only, he didn't actually do them himself but paid others to do his shifts.

      Of course the sums & profit margins involved were way lower :) Btw, a lot of bribery and using contacts is involved even in applying for low level govt jobs in India so I guess the 3 'sub-contractors' probably just didn't have the capital to get the job directly themselves.

      Heard this story a long time ago, maybe 4-7 years back - no idea even if it really happened, though seems quite believable to me.


      Posting anonymous as I modded a couple of other comments.
    33. Re:Pathetic by kmsigel · · Score: 1

      MIT

    34. Re:Pathetic by emilper · · Score: 1

      oh, right

    35. Re:Pathetic by TimSSG · · Score: 1

      You are so right; my last manager/project leader once said he learned how to code in Java in a week long course. Note, by his standards he might be right. If being able to do an hello world; is all that is needed. But, he was not able to do programing specs that were usable by the coders. How many CS managers how are rotten are there? As an percentage, my has been between 3 long term managers 2 good ones and one rotten one. Had several others for too short a time to reach conclusion. Talking to others my rate of 1/3 bad is very low; is this true? Tim S

    36. Re:Pathetic by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I have always written programs because it is fun and rewarding

      I've always outsourced my work because it is fun and rewarding.
           

    37. Re:Pathetic by MrMickS · · Score: 1

      When I was studying CS at University, back in the mists of time, for some of the final work a working program wasn't necessary. What was necessary was to demonstrate that you understood the underlying principles and made decisions about the approach to follow in a logical manner. Implementation was important but not the be all and end all.

      In my working life I've only come across a few projects that have devoted as much time to the design and approach as we were taught. Those projects were about the only ones that came in on time and on budget. The ones that concentrated too much on implementation, without spending time proving the approach, have generally been poor.

      I guess what I'm trying to say is that having a working program is by the by. What's important is to show working and understanding. The only way you aren't going to be doing yourself, and potential employers, a diservice is to do it yourself.

      Ironically I think that this approach to obtaining degrees will help drive outsourcing in the wider world. It doesn't take many people doing this to start to build an impression in employers minds that local degrees aren't of value. This removes one of the reasons that they might oppose outsourcing.

      Over here in the UK we are in a situation where the entire education system is in meltdown due to an overreliance on the funding that follows students. From the time pupils start school through the end of first degree, at some colleges, the emphasis is on getting the maximum number of people to pass at X grade or above rather than teaching them. This has led to a number of very dubious practices including artificial grade inflation. The point of the education, to impart knowledge, has become secondary to getting pupils to get particular grades.

      --
      You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
    38. Re:Pathetic by bittersmart · · Score: 1

      My source code printouts came back with comments like "you're obviously not smart enough to have thought of this yourself, you should document your sources".

      Now I'm 35. In the real world, I'm usually not quizzed on my skills. Most interviewers don't know jack about computers let alone programming, so what good is my knowledge?

      99% of the code I have ever written has been unpaid. At least unemployment was never boring.

      I hate my life.

      Kids: Don't learn programming as a career. It's not worth it. Learn a trade, learn how to drive a bus, do something that society actually needs.

    39. Re:Pathetic by Nicolay77 · · Score: 1

      Also, you could fix things if the outsourcee fucks up the development, and management never needs to know about it.

      Nevermind that management by definition can not fix things.

      --
      We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
  3. An excellent argument... by slk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is an excellent argument for the practical interview; instead of just asking questions, have somebody actually show you what they know.

    Mind you, this is also a good argument for forcing students to show their intermediate work (design, etc) and to do said intermediate work with pen and paper. It's a lot harder to outsource something that would be in the wrong handwriting and have to be Fedex'd from India.

    --
    ERROR: Null .sig, core dumped.
    1. Re:An excellent argument... by AmIAnAi · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is an excellent argument for the practical interview; instead of just asking questions, have somebody actually show you what they know.

      I recently interviewed a couple of Masters graduates who both claimed to be profficient in C. Their accademic background and work experience gave no reason to doubt this. However, when confronted with a practical test, both made fundamental errors and struggled with the more complicated questions.
      --
      Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
    2. Re:An excellent argument... by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I like the idea, but requiring people to handwrite papers probably wouldn't do much to stop the whole thing. You could easily get the guy in India to show all his work, scan it, and send the files to you. Then all you have to do is copy it verbatim. I knew a girl who had a professor who insisted that papers be handwritten, saying something about curbing cheaters. Really, it made people more likely to cheat, because of the increased time it would take for them to write it out by hand. I think most people in her class just wrote the whole thing on the computer, which made editing easier, and then copied out the final product. The whole process just makes it harder on the honest students. I think that a good solution, is to place way more emphasis on exams or other more verifiable means of grading students.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:An excellent argument... by realxmp · · Score: 1

      Except then you have a lot of students like me whos handwriting is like that of a spider. There was a reason our lecturers required every bit of coursework submitted to be typewritten. You'd also have to make special arrangements for all the students with dyslexia and dyspraxia (surprisingly common in the tech field) who would then have to do the coursework under controlled conditions so as to have the same supposed security of those who handwrote the coursework. Vivas (practical interviews) also test an important skill of being able to verbally communicate to an audience what you're actually thinking, a vital workskill.

    4. Re:An excellent argument... by Dolohov · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Eh, this is common, and not necessarily indicative of a lie. I've written a lot of C code in my time, but for the last four months my job has had me writing only Java -- if someone were to sit me down to do a practical C test, I'd probably do pretty poorly after being out of it (and thinking in OO mode) for so long. If you're getting people just out of their Masters, you're getting people who had to stop what they were doing and write a Master's thesis, which seems to me like a similar obstacle to proper thinking.

    5. Re:An excellent argument... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Anyway, can you imagine handwritten assignments in Comp sci? Have you seen the handwriting of the average CS geek?

      My wierd liberal-arty background puts me in the top tier of CS handwriting (erratic but occasionally legible) but the fast majority of my peers fall into the average bracket (incomprehensible scrawl), and there are plenty who sink to the darkest depths (febrile 2 year old, epileptic with dyslexia) from whence no meaning can be derived.

      If it weren't for keyboards, none of us would be able to convey our ideas in written form.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    6. Re:An excellent argument... by v1k · · Score: 1

      >Anyway, can you imagine handwritten assignments in Comp sci? Have you seen the handwriting of the average CS geek? Maybe they can type it instead.

    7. Re:An excellent argument... by mo^ · · Score: 1

      I am studying computing with the UK's "Open University". Recently discovered to my dismay that my final exams wereall hand written.

      This included creating upwards of 40 methods per question and scripting small OO programs..

      So taking errors and crossings out into account (amazing how hard it is to write clearly and legible when doing angled, square, or squiggly brackets) would leave me with 100 lines of writing where only 70 or so were not crossed out.

      Fuck knows how they mark this stuff..... Also, being used to using an editor tehre is no testing to ensure that minor syntax errors (capitalization etc) are avoided.

      --
      bah!*@%!
    8. Re:An excellent argument... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and there are plenty who sink to the darkest depths (febrile 2 year old, epileptic with dyslexia) from whence no meaning can be derived."
      They end up becoming managers.

    9. Re:An excellent argument... by wattrlz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If that is the case then it isn't a well-designed practical. Anybody who knows a language should be able to read some code and solve a few problems. You can't expect many interviewees to be able to churn out work up to company standards at the interview, and you shouldn't be looking for that unless you don't allow people any time to come up to speed.

    10. Re:An excellent argument... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I was a teacher, I would do everything possible to avoid having to grade and read handwritten essays. I know this sounds like a hyperbole, but I would honestly rather read 12pt Times New Roman than some peoples handwriting.

      ..okay, that is a lie. I would mandate a sensible typeface, and give extra credit for using DejaVu Serif or Gentium.

    11. Re:An excellent argument... by Godji · · Score: 1

      I agree with you until your last sentence. If it weren't for keyboards, we would all have to handwrite much more, and eventually learn to do it properly. My own handwriting, for instance, was perfectly fine before I practically stopped using it. Now it is horrific.

    12. Re:An excellent argument... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd have to find more verifiable means, because not everybody tests well.

      I just finished a class where the midterm was worth 30%, the final was worth 50% and quizes were worth 20% of my grade. Each quiz was one question and the midterm and final had two questions each. Basically 80% of my grade was based on four problems. I had two friends who were able to solve the same problems I could while studying, but are now forced to retake the course because they did poorly on the final. Then again maybe this was just a poorly designed class.

    13. Re:An excellent argument... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      That's the whole reason I got into computers in the first place. In grade 7, I started using my computer to do every assignment I could, because my writing was just so terrible. Once you start doing a lot of assignments on computers, you start to get comfortable using them, and my curiosity grew from there.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    14. Re:An excellent argument... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      You might want to try a more suitable writing instrument. A mechanical pencil with a ton of extra lead, and a Mars plastic eraser was all I ever used for exams.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    15. Re:An excellent argument... by raddan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Also, the problem domain in C *really* influences the style of code. And by style, I don't just mean do you write braces on the same line or next line, I mean:
      • Do you rely on the preprocessor for common constants and macros?
      • How many system facilities do you need to use?
      • Are you going to attempt an object-oriented approach?
      • Who else is reading your code?
      • What is the expected lifetime of the program?
      The answers to these questions and many more can dramatically affect how a program in C is put together. I thought I was a pretty good C programmer until I recently started having to do some systems programming. It's like a completely different language now.
    16. Re:An excellent argument... by suggsjc · · Score: 1

      This is like the "game" between drm and hackers. They can put up roadblocks but they will eventually be "cracked." What is stopping the students from outsourcing the original papers and then outsourcing (locally) the "handwriting?" Furthermore they could just using some of the really great "handwriting fonts."

      The problem isn't stopping the act of cheating, its stopping the underlying desire/incentive to cheat. If all it takes to get a degree is to have papers turned in on time for 4 years, then you get magically get paid more because you can put a piece of paper on your wall why not outsource? Your increased income will surely offset the outsourcing costs. But if you are in a job/industry where you actually have to use/perform using your "learned" skillsets *OR YOU GET FIRED* then I think the incentive to actually learn/develop will be maintained.

      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    17. Re:An excellent argument... by BertieBaggio · · Score: 1

      At my uni (also in the UK), examiners are only allowed to mark what is written in ink. So it's pens for everything - not just prose, but diagrams, calculations, graphs, etc as well.

      --
      If all you have is a grenade, pretty soon every problem looks like a foxhole -- MightyYar
    18. Re:An excellent argument... by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      And if it weren't for the automobile, we'd all be experts with buggy whips.

      OK, OK, I'll turn my music down and get off your lawn.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    19. Re:An excellent argument... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      I agree and would go one step further.

      Back in the day in college I had this real dick of a professor (he also happened to be the chair of the program, not good). Anyway the one course he taught was C++. Now this program was for (GIS, Geographical Information Systems), so the students came from a multi discipline background, though probably about 1/3 were former CS students/grads.

      Now having already taken C++ in a CS degree in University, I didn't need this mickey mouse stuff. So after attending the first lecture (which was horrible, EVERYTHING off of an overhead which was littered with mistakes... this guy also has a PHd somehow). I decided I would be better served to spend my time elsewhere. I still went to all the labs and completed all my course work, going into the exam I had a 87%.

      Now it comes time to write the exam (which was worth a lot, I forget now, but 40-60%). We get in there and he hands out the exam. It is basically 3 problems. He wants handwritten code to solve each problem. We are told we cannot use our textbooks, or anything else. Now it is one thing to test for known solutions to problems, but to make up complex problems and expect someone to code by hand using pencil and paper in my mind is stupid.

      Does anyone in any reality ever do this? I know when I code, I leverage old programs I have written, look up obscure syntax I haven't used in awhile in the text book, found examples of particular parts in the program to try and integrate, use bug finders, the compiler, etc... I could see if you are working and all you are doing is C++ then you could probably pound something out that is reasonably free of errors.

      Anyway in the end he gave me a 10%. 10%! It was ridiculous. Then upon seeing some of the trash that others wrote, I asked him to go over my exam with me. (He way of correcting was just an X, no comments) When I sat down with him, he refused to explain how a certain passage was wrong, or even how he marked. He would only say that it was "wrong". CS should not be marked subjectively (though there is some style involved). Now remember he is the chair of the program, so the only place I could appeal would be like the dean of the entire school.

      I ended up passing the course and the program anyway as my other mark was so high so I didn't bother with an appeal. However afterwards I found out my overall mark was a 79.9 and that I needed to get a 80% to get a full year 5 credits at my home university (they have a joint thing going on). I had to then fight with my university, to which to this day I don't think they give me credit for (despite them saying they would after I got a letter from the chair of the University Dept.). Thats a full year of university. Thats a lot of money. Now I did graduate, and I ended up have a ton too many credits anyway, however it was something I could have used towards a 2nd degree, or masters, or on to professional graduate school or something I am sure.

      Personally I think he was just being a dick and want to make an example of a smartass student and he knew he had the power to do so.

      So the moral of the story is, if the chair of the dept is teaching one of your courses, no matter how stupid you think he is, or his teaching ability, or how easy the course work is, attend every frikin' calls, smile, kiss ass, and don't do anything to get his ire, as you may regret it down the line.

    20. Re:An excellent argument... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like the idea more exams. It is not realistic of the sort of environment where people will actually put their skills to use. Passing exams is completely different skill to coding. Some people are better at it than others. Having more exams can lead to some of the best coders, getting a poor grade, because they have terrible exam technique.

    21. Re:An excellent argument... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Funny

      It was that way where I was (in the US); doesn't help that I'm a wordy bastard either. I used to resort to writing in script because my cursive is more legible than the bastard hybrid of print and cursive I normally write in.

      That's relative though. I had a prof complain about the cursive, so I switched to my "default" handwriting, and then he complained about that, despite my habit of writing the uppercase and lowercase alphabet on the top of the first page of every blue book, as a decryption key. The only thing my writing has going for it is that my default font size is about 16pt, so at least it's big.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    22. Re:An excellent argument... by squiggly12 · · Score: 0

      Spot on! I have a hard time reading my own damn handwriting so I don't know how someone else could.

    23. Re:An excellent argument... by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      I'd take a geek's erratic printing over a cursive scrawl any day. Most of the cursive writers I know draw shorthand versions of characters and forget the proper D'nealian transitions, turning entire pages into seas of identical vertical squiggles. Even the authors can't read their own writing, yet that never stops them from touting the superiority of their script over any crude printing.

      Princeton's WordNet defines language as "a systematic means of communicating by the use of sounds or conventional symbols". If that's true, the CS majors I associate with understand language better than the English majors.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    24. Re:An excellent argument... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is also not practical given that a code should be run to detect bugs (unless the prof can read and interpret code in his head with 100% precision). However, the point is the prof wants more than just electrons or easily duplicated disks. May I suggest reverting back to punch cards with a puncher whose shape is issued/registered to a specific student? Those without the puncher during a weekly inspection can be assumed to have them shipped to India.

      Dip on the UFO shape.

    25. Re:An excellent argument... by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      ... and use a custom font made from their own handwriting.

    26. Re:An excellent argument... by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      If it weren't for keyboards, none of us would be able to convey our ideas in written form. ur rite! kbrds mke it ez fr evrybdy 2 undrstnd us now. LOL ROFLMAO!
    27. Re:An excellent argument... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pen and paper!!! That would be to easy, have them stand at a blackboard nakid, and recite every though that runs through their head, that way we can be sure they are not terrorists... sorry lost track.

    28. Re:An excellent argument... by Stringer+Bell · · Score: 1

      "Show you what they know" could mean lots of things, but I'm going to go off on a marginally related topic for a second. Bear with me.

      I'm surprised at the number of people who think the best (or only) way to interview applicants for programming jobs is to make them write code by hand.

      I'd much rather hire someone whose skills need considerable development but has an excellent work ethic than hire a lazy coding wizard. (Of course, this assumes you're interviewing for a lower-level position, where most of my interviewing experience is.)

    29. Re:An excellent argument... by Bat+Country · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, we had hand-written panic-mode program design tests where we were asked to write somewhat esoteric structures on most of my CS tests.

      If the answer is illegible, you don't get a grade.

      You'd be surprised just how legible the handwriting of even the worst scrawler becomes when it's a pass/fail situation hinging on their penmanship.

      --
      The land shall stone them with the bread of his son.
    30. Re:An excellent argument... by Bat+Country · · Score: 1

      How often are you called upon in your daily work to write code without the benefit of a compiler to remind you you've screwed up?

      I'd say most people who haven't worked with C in a while would miss some of these "practical" test questions, especially ones related to memory management.

      That doesn't indicate that A) they don't know what they're doing, or B) they wouldn't remember rapidly everything they'd "forgotten" the moment the compiler started spitting out errors at them.

      --
      The land shall stone them with the bread of his son.
    31. Re:An excellent argument... by Ahnteis · · Score: 2, Informative

      >>So the moral of the story is, if the chair of the dept is teaching one of your courses, no matter how stupid you think he is, or his teaching ability, or how easy the course work is, attend every frikin' calls, smile, kiss ass, and don't do anything to get his ire, as you may regret it down the line.

      This moral translates well into many careers! :)

    32. Re:An excellent argument... by Godji · · Score: 1

      And your point is?

      Of course keyboards are more efficient and are the way to the future. But TFC was about handwriting in particular, and not about what writing technology is best.

    33. Re:An excellent argument... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been a long while, but I had a technophobe teacher in high-school about 20 years ago. They said all charts and graphs had to be handwritten?

      Result? I purchased tracing paper and somehow learned to handprint in monospaced fonts. :-D

    34. Re:An excellent argument... by Reapy · · Score: 1

      Seriously. I almost quit java forever when I had a class that had me hand writing it all out, just for the simple fact alone all the god damn class names were so long with 5 million .'s between them. System.out.println(" for fucking out put, jesus christ! And the names for window listeners and god knows what else. I was going to blow my brains out! I failed tests because my hand crampped up and I ran out of paper room writing stuff down.

      Luckily years later I've now given java its due, and can see how it is an excellent tool for many jobs out there. But man, handwriting java is not for the faint of heart!

    35. Re:An excellent argument... by AmIAnAi · · Score: 1

      Anybody who knows a language should be able to read some code and solve a few problems. You can't expect many interviewees to be able to churn out work up to company standards at the interview

      The test in question did not involve writing any code, or require an understanding complex algorithms. It is a well-designed test of the language fundamentals. I do not even expect candidates to get every question exactly right. It soon separates those who understand the principles, but are a bit rusty, from those who have limited practical experience.
      --
      Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
    36. Re:An excellent argument... by XHIIHIIHX · · Score: 1

      iaaksdl kjnownaad wahtasgfas youfasd meansdfaa

    37. Re:An excellent argument... by story645 · · Score: 1

      I think that a good solution, is to place way more emphasis on exams or other more verifiable means of grading students. I have a friend who hides books in the bathroom during exams and cheats that way. (And yeah, I don't know what the prof. is thinking letting anyone leave.) During my chemistry final, my calculator broke and I had to share with someone else-could have easily cheated if I'd been inclined to do so. There are also tons of old exams floating around, from professors who don't really change 'em. It's almost as easy to cheat on "verifiable methods" as at anything else. It's just annoying to have to work with those people later on 'cause they don't know anything.
      --
      open source modern art: laser taggi
    38. Re:An excellent argument... by PuckSR · · Score: 1

      I am an EE, but when I was in college I had a CS professor who required that we handwrite our code.

      It was only for in class exams, but it would frequently be a page or two of code(C++)

      Do you have any idea how easy it is to make a mistake handwriting code?
      You think regular writing is more prone to error when it is handwritten, just imagine all of the little syntax stuff you could screw up.

      The ; was the death of me....

    39. Re:An excellent argument... by MtHuurne · · Score: 1

      I had several comp sci professors with excellent handwriting. It's no coincidence they were trained by Dijkstra though.

    40. Re:An excellent argument... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Maybe my memory is incorrect, but can't you just import system.out.* so you can just type println when you want to output to the console?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    41. Re:An excellent argument... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The key is to have the students turn in storyboards and transaction flows before the full project is due. Most outsourced companies do not have this type of training and would make the student work harder in getting the work completed than just doing it themselves.

    42. Re:An excellent argument... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When interviewing people for programming positions, I tend to ask design and algorithm questions.

      On the whiteboard write a program that does $QUESTION_HERE. Use an existing language or make up any syntax or functions that you need. I'll have you explain any syntax I don't follow and fill in any functions that I think are worth filling in.

      At least one of the components of the design will require a basic data structure. If they recognize it and name the function appropriately, I generally don't even have to ask about implementation since they'd obviously be able to use a template class or look it up.

      If they can do that, I might ask a simple syntax question for whichever language they claim most recent just as a spot check to see if I should trust the rest of the resume.

      Grilling someone on detailed syntax isn't really useful. IDEs and compilers catch it and may even write parts of it for you.

      The practical test is just a computer set up however you'd like with net access to look up any questions you have. You aren't going to work in an isolated box so no point in setting up the test that way. However if you get to the practical part, we're pretty confident you can do it.

    43. Re:An excellent argument... by richardpaulhall · · Score: 1

      I had a CS prof who was famous for her difficult tests. At least 1/3 of the class could not finish in one period. So those student would follow her to her next class and they would finish their exams standing up. This was NOT a solution for me as her next class also had their exam the same day and I was taking both classes. So I wrote like a man possessed. The next week everybody got their graded exams back, except me. She told me the could not read more than a few words from either of my exam blue books. She had two high school daughters. They found by blue books impossible to read. Her husband was a Sanskrit scholar. After an hour in his study, he emerged stating, "I am nearly certain they are written in English." I had to sit down with her and read my answers. "Oh my, once you tell me what you wrote, now I can see the words clearly!"

    44. Re:An excellent argument... by anpe · · Score: 1

      • Who else is reading your code?

      How don't quite get how this influences your code?

    45. Re:An excellent argument... by raddan · · Score: 1

      You will alter your style depending on your audience. Sometimes (e.g. with free software), you know others will be reading it, so you make things as clear as possible. I don't just mean commenting-- I mean, you define symbolic constants for readability, you make variable declaration explicit, you make your code less compact, you don't rely on side-effects, etc. On the other hand, if there is a small audience, or that audience's technical proficiency is known, and you need something working quickly, you just write something out quickly without worrying about how it looks. Perfect examples of where this happens is something like Perl, where you can write extremely terse code (Perl is very expressive), but which is very difficult to read, sometimes even for the guy who wrote it.

  4. So talk to the student? by Toad-san · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the coursework / dissertation seems out of line with the student's "normal" performance .. hey, take five minutes (with the work in front of you, not in front of him), and ask him a few questions about it.

    How long will it take to determine he doesn't know squat about what he turned in, eh?

    1. Re:So talk to the student? by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      It might be hard to tell if the student in question outsourced all of his work for the term.

    2. Re:So talk to the student? by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 1

      If the coursework / dissertation seems out of line with the student's "normal" performance .. hey, take five minutes (with the work in front of you, not in front of him), and ask him a few questions about it.

      I had a similar situation while teaching an advanced algorithms course at the 400-level. There were two submitted homeworks that were spot on with the (supposedly unpublished) solution key. I called both students in separately to quiz them a bit. The first one turned out to be genuine -- the student not only flawlessly explained his reasoning, but could replicate it on a similar problem while raising interesting questions at the same time (he was a ph.d. student). The second one couldn't even begin to explain his tricky dynamic programming solutions, and subsequently got an F on the course.

      The problem isn't with the ones that are clearly cheating or not. It's the ones in the middle -- the fairly competent students who pose the biggest question about plagiarism. And unfortuantely, most students lie in that big central hump in the distribution.

      --
      An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
    3. Re:So talk to the student? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a decent CS student, and half the time I don't even know what I did to make the damn thing work so quizzing me on it would show a false positive on cheating.

    4. Re:So talk to the student? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long will it take to determine he doesn't know squat about what he turned in, eh? As a TA who has done exactly that, it is not as easy as it would seem. It is extremely difficult to tell the difference between a shy student and a student searching for answers. And an accusation of cheating is devastating to a student so you have to be absolutely sure.
    5. Re:So talk to the student? by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that. I sweated over nearly every project I turned in an I knew *exactly* how it worked. Sure, on the bigger assignments I may not be able to tell you every class I wrote but you better I believe I could tell you how it worked.

      That was the nice thing about programming classes - as long as you did the assignments you almost never had to study for the tests. After spending hours going over the code you didn't need to waste time memorizing it. You'd learned it just by doing it.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    6. Re:So talk to the student? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then what? In the UK, it's been a long time since the professor can mark a student zero just because something seems a bit dodgy. If the student owns up, fine. But if the coursework is correct, and the student claims it as their own, there is astonishingly little you can do. Mark it down? Student raises a complaint, gets the mark reinstated.

      Unless, of course, you are also moonlighting as a coder for hire and wrote the answer yourself. Handy way to supplement that academic salary, and helps you keep track of who is cheating this week.

  5. Well... by Comatose51 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, they might as well start early and get into the practice of out-sourcing.

    "£100 for postgraduate dissertations."

    Seriously!? If those dissertations are any good, we might as well go directly to the source and hire those guys to do R & D for us.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    1. Re:Well... by RMH101 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Any good? No, but they'll be just about acceptable and they're cheap: which as any Finance Director knows, will be good enough for a couple of years, whilst he writes on his CV that he's saved X million USD and the company turns to crap around him.

      You mean there are companies that *don't* do this?

    2. Re:Well... by vidarh · · Score: 1

      Sounds low. 3-4 years ago I had people reporting to me who worked in Bangalore. At that time the going rate for a reasonable software engineer there was around $15k, and it's been rising rapidly (at the time it was increasing around 15% year over year).

    3. Re:Well... by XHIIHIIHX · · Score: 1

      I've outsourced a lot of work on the web. For $300 you can get $10,000 worth of US programmer programming done.

    4. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You mean there are companies that *don't* do this?

      Most companies used to keep their top thieves under control. This was back when the top rate of personal tax was like 95%, so there was little incentive to make (i.e. steal) a multi-million-dollar salary.

  6. Universities~=Corporate america by COMON$ · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I see this as a direct result of the overloading of the Universities. When you have a prof teaching classrooms of 400 students, checking for cheating becomes practically impossible. I went to a smaller university where the ratio was significantly smaller. The profs could tell if another student wrote your code by style. That and in my university you had to comment like a mad fool, which depending on who you outsourced to might be a dead giveaway.

    I recently read one of Feynnman's books and as odd a character he is, I think he hit the nail on the head when talking about how teachers today simply dish out information and the students memorize. This has lent to a society where students know they are going to forget the courseload in a month so why not have someone else do the work for you. College is all about the piece of paper now adays anyway so you can get a higher paying job. At least that is the way the universities seem to present themselves in their advertisements.

    You want to keep students from outsourcing? Push them harder, teach rather than have them memorize, administratively, get more teachers. Universities should be hard, people should drop out, if you are not passionate about the subject then head to Vo-Tech. I want universities to go back to learning institutions rather than the factories they have become.

    --
    CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    1. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by kellyb9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sir, you are dead on. Just to add a little bit, I feel as though colleges have become far to lenient with who they are letting in. The standards have dropped much lower because it's becoming nearly impossible to find decent work without a B.S. in something. Colleges need to raise their standards. There are simply far too many areas of study where doing the bare minimum will afford you a decent grade. It almost seems that you need to go on with your education anymore to learn anything useful.

    2. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by BlowHole666 · · Score: 1

      I had a select handful of teachers at the university that I went to who actually taught the students. Too many of the other teachers were concerned about their grants or their book sales to care about an undergrad class. I swear I learned more from an underpaid teacher at a local community college then I ever did from a teacher with tenure at a 4 year university. They need to change the universities so teachers are required to teach and grants and whatnot for research is an afterthought. But yes I know that will never happen because a university is a business :(

      --
      I smoked pot once. But I DID NOT inhale. Will you hire me?
    3. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by legoman666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are simply far too many areas of study where doing the bare minimum will afford you a decent grade. I am proof of that. I don't do jack shit and managed a 3.5 last quarter. Now I'm cooping and I still don't do jack shit and make 18+/hour. It's great.
    4. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are really only stating the catch 22:

      Making it hard for people to graduate
      Leads to people complaining that there aren't enough educated people

      This debate will go back and forth for a long time. Either dumb down the courses so more people can get into the "more smarter jobs for america" or make them harder so we have truely intelligent people but "not enough smart people in america".

      Either way lazy people are going to cash in, but let's face it, it's becoming human nature to be lazy.

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    5. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Oxy+the+moron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And so the dominoes continue to fall. Look even more closely at K-12 public schools. You want to talk about "simply dish out information and the students memorize?" That's what the typical K-12 education is right there. This is part of the problem with standardized tests at this phase in a student's life. In K-12, you should be taught how to think and problem solve as the basis for later in your education. Instead, we consider it progress if they know when the war of 1812 was fought. After all, getting answers "right" improves standardized test scores. Knowing why it was fought, its ramifications, and what we need to learn from it doesn't do anything to bring more $$$ into the school system.

      Then you can go even farther back and look at how parents don't teach their kids anything until they get to school (after all, it's the school's job!) and the problem just keeps getting worse.

      America has become a society where education just isn't valued. I could go on and on...

      --

      Proudly supporting the Libertarian Party.

    6. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What does it matter if they raise their standards? Cheating doesn't start in college. Those that cheat at the university level have cheated at the high school level, at the middle school level, in extracurriculars, etc. Which means that unless they are detected somehow, they will always be what collegiate institutions consider the cream of the crop.

    7. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by v1 · · Score: 1

      That and in my university you had to comment like a mad fool, which depending on who you outsourced to might be a dead giveaway.

      I could come up with dozens of comical comments you might find made by Cheetan or Suthrik to raise an eyebrow when reviewing "your code" but I'll let your imagination color the page instead.

      I'd personally demand they don't put a single line of comment in the code, that would have to be a dead giveaway.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    8. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Watching someone who is current TA for a University professor, all I can say is, They really don't give a fuck. Of the 15 of so professors she interacts with daily, 1 like teaching students. The other consider students a nusance/pests, and the part of there job that sucks and they have to do. Cause once they finish teaching that course, they can go back to the real reason they are at the university. Research (ie: there own..).

      It's pretty hilarious actually, cause 4-5 of the teachers are having there TA and RA re-do there research to make it look nicer (without putting there name on it).

      This is her 3rd University, and apparently they've all been the same.

    9. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by COMON$ · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The purpose of a university is not to graduate people, the purpose of a University is to EDUCATE people. This idea of dumbing down courses does no one a favor. There are vo-tech colleges for people who cant handle universities. Not that they are not hard, but they are vo-tech, they are meant to crank out one trick horses as fast as possible.

      Leads to people complaining that there aren't enough educated peopleA piece of paper does not mean you are educated, especially if all your classes were dumbed down so you didn't actually retain any useful knowledge. This is why the system does not work. The fact that you seem to be on the down the courses so more people can get into the "more smarter jobs for america" thought path is really really sad. Essentially you are saying we need a bunch of sub par people in the "smart jobs" so we should give them the same credentials as much more capable people so we can fill a seat....that is just assinine and makes credentials worthless.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    10. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Seakip18 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I fought tooth and nail at times to get my C.S. Degree. I didn't realize it at the time, but our professors would actually get us to think out the wrong solutions then point on the failure in our logic. We'd then analyze how the code failed and think about how we would do a better job. The learning it enforced pulled the weaker students out and kept the ones who wanted interested.

      --
      import system.cool.Sig;
    11. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Colleges need to raise their standards.

      That, sir, is discrimination.

      Discrimination is just another word for racisim.

      Racists are morally equivalent to holocaust and global warming deniers.

      Please report to the nearest re-education camp immediately.

    12. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by COMON$ · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Exactly, I think there was a90% dropout rate in our program. I tutored later on and I firmly believe it is because the CS profs made us THINK and rationalize. Sure they would show us algorithms for best practices, but we had to understand the Big Oh of each search method to apply it to our programs. We learned that you learn more from making mistakes and 20 hours writing a bad method than you do getting it right the first time.

      It took me forever to write a 100 line program in C++ when I first started my freshman year. By my senior year I could write the same program in 15 minutes, to the frustration of the students I was tutoring. But I learned sooo much from those mistakes that it is ingrained in me to enjoy failing because the path to the solution rewards so much more than the solution itself.

      This is my beef with other educational programs, where they just give you the solution and have you memorize the anatomy of a cat, or chemical formulas rather than helping the students to figure it out themselves.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    13. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Guanine · · Score: 1

      EXACTLY, GUYS! I agree completely. In fact, I recently read an absolutely excellent article about these college "degree factories". The title: The Disadvantages of an Elite Education -- good good stuff in that article; meshes perfectly with the sentiments expressed here. Let me know what you think!

    14. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by zotz · · Score: 1

      "CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?"

      With lasers? Don't tell me that have lasers too!

      all the best,

      drew
      --
      http://packet-in.org/
      Packet In - Libre Music, sometimes Gratis

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    15. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by mario_grgic · · Score: 1

      When it comes to gaining knowledge there is no such thing as cheating. You may get a peace of paper that says you know something but that only goes so far. In the end it is all leveled out and those who can't cut it are dropped off anyway (only much later in life rather than in school).

      For the majority of people in the world these days the only thing they have is their time and knowledge (and almost everyone who is not born with the silver spoon in their mouth lives off of those two). So these people are cheating themselves really.

      --
      As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
    16. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      Either way lazy people are going to cash in, but let's face it, it's becoming human nature to be lazy. It's always been human nature for people to be lazy. It's just that our parents used to slap us around and make us work hard. They taught us self-discipline and the value of hard work. Now no one has parents. The divorce rate is something like 50%. The parents that aren't divorced both work. Either way, kids are raised in day care centers and at school. Parents don't even see their kids enough to teach them anything. Kids learn to do just enough to get through school and stay under their parent's radar - a.k.a. how to be lazy without anyone hassling you.
      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    17. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by randamuko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't agree with Vo-Tech's breeding the lazy or a place for people who don't care to go.

      I go to a Vo-Tech and I get a good education in Network Administration, I am just not rich and entitled to attend a University public or private. My parents make no money, I am a single parent who has to work full time and barely make it. Spending $500+ per credit is obscene and completely not doable for someone in my position.

      For example, my boyfriend's parents are loaded, he goes to the local state university. I go to a local tech college. In the 2 years it will take me to get my degree I will not have spent as much as he does in ONE semester. That is rediculous. Besides, from the people I know in HR they don't so much look at WHERE you got the degree just that you HAVE one. I am pulling 4-5 classes a semester, working full time and taking care of my kid and I think I'm working my ass off. So you may call me lazy for going to a Vo-Tech, I call you pompus for going to a university.

    18. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know I've said this about high school many times. It used to mean something to have a high school diploma. The importance of a high school diploma is so diluted now that people have to get a BA/sig. AA to have the equivalent to what a high school degree used to imply. This is just the trend continuing. I can't really come up with a solution though, short of a VERY expensive one. But the upshot is screw no child left behind, some of these kids aren't ready for the real world and no amount of teaching to the test is going to fix that. What needs to get through to the US at large is the importance of basic competence, how to go about learning something new on your own (or how to figure out who to ask when necessary) and basic ethics. Outside of that the rest is vocational specialization.

      -sk

    19. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by J-1000 · · Score: 1

      Although I agree that a battle must be waged against those who fraudulently exploit universities for personal gain, it would be a little sad to me if the only recourse were to make all universities a grueling gauntlet of overload. An area of study should be something the student is passionate about and enjoys, and it's difficult to enjoy something that sucks the life out of you through an extreme level of work that only elite students can handle.

      Type A personalities shouldn't be the only people getting degrees. Let them get the Harvard and MIT degrees, fine, but I hope, for the sake of people with a more average degree of talent and work ethic, that there will always be learning institutions willing to teach the rest of us. Learning should be for the masses, not just for the elite.

      And don't get me wrong. Universities shouldn't be a cakewalk, and they shouldn't create scenarios where people can cheat to achieve a degree. I agree with the above comment calling for practical interviews. Students should be challenged, and professors should be aware of their students' growing level of expertise.

    20. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But this is never going to happen because universities are more interested in raking in the most money. If course work becomes too hard and students begin to drop out, the money supply dwindles for all those "necessary" upgrades.

    21. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have an issue with the point you are making, but I just want to point out that I believe "catch 22" doesn't mean what you think it means.

      That's all.

    22. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by jmauro · · Score: 1

      Preverse incentives with educational funding leads directly to the preverse outcomes you indicate. The only suprising thing is that people are shocked by it.

    23. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by moexu · · Score: 1

      But I learned sooo much from those mistakes that it is ingrained in me to enjoy failing because the path to the solution rewards so much more than the solution itself.

      Thank you for your comment; it's one of the most insightful things I've ever read on Slashdot. I still struggle with a fear of failure and getting a different perspective is extremely helpful.

      --
      "Seek first to understand." - Socrates
    24. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a TA in a Romanian university. The exactly same things happen here also. So I wonder were do our students outsource their work, because they do. Most of them get out of our caring hands without knowing how to sort a table, so to speak.

      An interesting phenomenon that I see happening is that many good coders and smart students tend to drop out or to do very poorly in classes. They work already (some in companies some taking jobs on rent-a-coder -- perhaps doing their classmates' jobs). I think this is because nowadays the universities are so boring and dull, utterly dull.

    25. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by sallgeud · · Score: 1


      You seem unaware of the massive quantities of educational everything for zero-day children all the way through their teens. It's possible you're simply not a parent. Being a parent myself, and knowing dozens of other parents personally... I can say for certain that educating children before pre-school and K-12 is a huge priority among most of them. And these aren't your elite rich types... though we are in a middle-class middle-american town... the cities may be different.

      Just looking at the revenue for things like leapfrog, baby einstein, etc... I'd say more and more parents are focused on teaching their children. But I'd also agree it's more about memorization than problem solving and other valuable skills like reason.

      This may be why homeschooling is becoming more and more popular each year.

    26. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir, you are dead on. Just to add a little bit, I feel as though colleges have become far to lenient with who they are letting in. The standards have dropped much lower because it's becoming nearly impossible to find decent work without a B.S. in something. Colleges need to raise their standards.
      Oh boy, here we go with the "standards are falling" meme. As far as your objection to who they let in... university science courses require you to have a good foundation in math and a survey foundation in the basic biological and physical sciences which all students have. If they don't, then they get remediation and will be on the five year program or they will get washed out. But more importantly, from a more general standpoint, the idea that university standards are falling is entirely erroneous. How can you assert that academic standards have fallen when these disciplines are essentially very new? Take CS and molecular biology as examples. The C programming language was just established in the early 1970's; Watson and Crick just found out the inheritance is passed through DNA in the 1950's. As these disciplines emerge, figuring out exactly what is a reasonable curriculum that is both rigorous and is humane to the student should be an ongoing process. Even in pure mathematics, results are emerging and being added to the curriculum and new disciplines are appearing as more predominant. Do they throw out the requirements in the older disciplines? No, because they are foundations for these new disciplines. This would really indicate that standards are actually going up. And finally, even for those students who get through a good program with good grades, the opportunities they are finding in the real world don't seem to justify all of the hard work they are putting into the process. There are physicists out there who are doing business administration and clerical work. I know unemployed mathematicians who are extra-ordinarily well versed and should be properly employed but can't find a reasonable opportunity. So to reiterate, standards are not falling and students are often working extremely hard for opportunities that don't really exist. Making sure that all students can do pointer arithmetic is a great thing, but making sure that they can have an opportunity outside of writing HTML should be the reward they get for meeting high standards.
    27. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't agree with Vo-Tech's breeding the lazy or a place for people who don't care to go. I go to a Vo-Tech and I get a good education in Network Administration, I am just not rich and entitled to attend a University public or private. My parents make no money, I am a single parent who has to work full time and barely make it. Spending $500+ per credit is obscene and completely not doable for someone in my position.
      There will always be a long line of people to tell you that you are worthless. That is part of life. People are callous and self-righteous. Just filter them out.
    28. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Oxy+the+moron · · Score: 1

      I mostly agree with you. For the reference, I'm the father of four children. :)

      First, allow me to say that I also know lots of parents personally. Those parents that I know also are into making sure their children get education prior to being in school. I would also say that my family and my friends' families fall into the "middle-class middle-american" description. We live in Indianapolis, FWIW.

      The problem is that, in a class of 30 students, my kids and my friends' kids will make up something like 10%-20% of the class at best. This means that they will enter the K-12 environment and immediately be ahead of the others. That 80% will get the attention (gotta prop up those scores!), and, thanks to their parents' apathy, probably won't excel in class anyway because their parents just want them out of their hair and into free baby^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H school.

      I'm not just pulling this out of thin air, either. Many of our friends are teachers at local schools. One of them is a teacher at what is supposedly the best school in the district, and even she says this is how things are on a day-to-day basis. I realize that isn't necessarily a national trend, but that's how things are here. It's a very scary reality.

      And yes, it is a large part of why we are very heavily considering homeschool after this summer.

      --

      Proudly supporting the Libertarian Party.

    29. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      Im sorry that you misread my post. I have a lot of friends who have graduated from vo-tech and they were difficult programs. Depending on the vo-tech and university you are comparing the prices will vary. But if you read my post you will see Not that they are not hard, but they are vo-tech, they are meant to crank out one trick horses as fast as possible.

      That being said, I know a lot of people with families going back to school who aren't entitled either, some have 3 kids and are taking out 42K a year in student loans just trying to make it by every year, I have an amazing amount of respect for them. And if you read my previous posts, you will find that I fully agree that in many areas a Vo-Tech is much better because universities just aren't doing their jobs.

      I also have 2 friends who attended vo-tech that are going back for a 4 year engineering degree because they hit the ceiling quickly. IT is unique in that you don't even need a degree to do very very well. That may change in 10 years though. My advice to most new tech people is, unless you have a genuine interest in the humanities and the college atmosphere, VoTech and certifications will get you a lot further than a BS. A BS in CS will give you a different perspective on the IT world but it will be harder to get an IT job with just a CS degree.

      But I do stand by the vo-tech one trick pony. That is what vo-tech is designed for, take out all the fluff of a university, give someone trade experience and knowledge and send them out the door. It is a fantastic way to learn a trade. Universities, should never teach a trade in my opinion, they have other purposes.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    30. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Macrat · · Score: 1

      The purpose of a university is not to graduate people, the purpose of a University is to EDUCATE people.

      Funny. Most universities seem to be more interested in acquiring researchers in order to build up their patent library.

      Even sports programs get more funding at a university than anything as unimportant as education.

    31. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Either way lazy people are going to cash in, but let's face it, it's becoming human nature to be lazy.
      I was going to write a dissertation to debate your point, but decided to post this instead.
      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    32. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      Sports programs also generate more funding at universities than pretty much any other area. Check out UNL for a good example, and they have a phenomenal educational program I hear.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    33. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Belegothmog · · Score: 1

      College is all about the piece of paper nowadays anyway so you can get a higher paying job. This is true. I know a math/stats professor, now retired, who taught at a university where he was not permitted to fail any student. It didn't matter if the student failed to attend class all quarter, no one was to fail. The school's rationale was pretty much as you have stated: if a bachelor's degree is necessary to get a decent job in the US, then it would not be fair for them to deny any student that piece of paper. The school felt it was their purpose to provide that piece of paper.
    34. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No the University system is not designed to educate, but make money off of research. Make no mistake research is the ground focus and students are secondary, and in the case of grad students, free labour to work on the research projects.

    35. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is true. I know a math/stats professor, now retired, who taught at a university where he was not permitted to fail any student.
      Most schools in my region do strict curves around a C+ and they roughly give out as many F's as they do A's, not counting withdrawals. Coming from that background, I don't believe that any accredited school has a policy of not failing any students, so if you don't tell us what school, I'll just assume that you are not being honest.
    36. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, maybe it isn't that standards are falling (which can be demonstrated by entrance ACT/SAT scores going down in many universities.) so much that universities and colleges are passing students that shouldn't be passed, are changing curriculum to make it easier to pass, and are allowing for more chances on probation to get a student to graduate or pay for at least one more semester. I am not blowing this out my ass, sit down with any prof who has taught over the last 30 years, heck even sit down with any HS teacher they will tell you Something is very very wrong.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    37. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Belegothmog · · Score: 1

      Coming from that background, I don't believe that any accredited school has a policy of not failing any students, so if you don't tell us what school, I'll just assume that you are not being honest. Just because you don't like the comment doesn't mean it isn't true. I have reasons for withholding the name which, believe it or not, don't have anything to do with the truth of the statement.
    38. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

      I've been curious about that statistic (50% divorce rate) and went looking for some more facts. Assuming these statistics are reported correctly:
      http://www.divorcemag.com/statistics/statsUS.shtml

      Percentage of children under 18 years of age living with both parents (2002): 69%

      Percentage of children under 18 years of age living with mother only (2002): 23%

      Percentage of children under 18 years of age living with father only (2002): 5%

      Percentage of children under 18 years of age living with neither parent (2002): 4%

      That doesn't address both parents working of course, or lack or parental concern.

    39. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      Depends on your definition of education. I would say that research is education. More "students" should be working on research projects for their undergrad degree rather than just taking classes. They would learn more, faster, and retain it much better if they had to learn by research than rote memorization.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    40. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you don't like the comment doesn't mean it isn't true. I have reasons for withholding the name which, believe it or not, don't have anything to do with the truth of the statement.
      Okay there liar. If you were being honest you would just name the college or university.
    41. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by poached · · Score: 1

      You comment is just smug, but I don't know how to refute it. I didn't go to a four year college.

      I think if you want to learn you have to do it yourself. Going to classes, or attending school don't make you learn. You learn by questioning things, thinking, and being your own researcher. But you go to school because there are things people have already figured out and all you have to do it absorb it and build on it. Think about how inefficient it would be if you had to reinvent rules of physics or a new computer language just so you could get on to what you want to do. Schools are there to disseminate knowledge, so a factory model isn't really all that bad.

      If you really want to do some original thinking, find a job that allows for that, or go to grad school. Hell, even grad school now-a-days I'm not so sure are promoting original thinking, but mostly just grad students doing work for their professors and then write about it later.

    42. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      I don't see where we disagree. Except on the notion that re-inventing the rules of physics is just said wrong. Maybe you mean re-discovering the laws of physics? In my calc classes learning how to derive equations is a part of the teaching process. Sure you could just memorize the equations and a lot of people do that but they get frustrated rather quickly.

      Standing on the shoulders of Giants is great. However, it is in the process of getting to the solution that you learn the most. Memorizing the answers wont get you somewhere new. Understanding processes does, knowing fundamentals does. A University should teach this. Yes in my CS classes we learned how to write a new computer language so we could write a program to do what we wanted. Because of that learning process I am relatively language independent.

      However, I assume that since you find my original post smug you already have a bias against university people. Passing judgments on programs you have little knowledge of.

      If you knew even a little about the educational process you would know that memorization does not work. It never has, application of principles does. You have to use knowledge and tie it to more than one memory for it to be ingrained.

      Therefore research and application is the BEST way to learn. Which is what you said later in your post which contradicts your earlier assumption that a factory model would work best. The factory model fails in that you, being someone who experimented and researched on his own, is light years ahead of your fellow paper carrying University grads, even the MS students.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    43. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      On a lighter subject, check the book out called "Surely your Joking, Mr Feynnman" It is a great book that reasserts the idea that being curious is much better than rote memorization.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    44. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      ugh, I think I just threw up a little ;)

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    45. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      I will second the parent, MOST schools find this kind of behavior despicable, but the schools do exist. A lot of High Schools do this as well and has been in the press the last 8 years or so. Administrators get grants and funding on how well their students do, so they fudge the grades, sometimes the teachers dont even know this is done. My wife was an Instructor at a local college and was phoned up by a counselor at the school to give one of her students a passing grade just because the student needed to graduate and the class had little to do with her major. She didnt do it of course, but my dad (a HS teacher for over 30 years) can vouch for people whose jobs were in jeopardy because they wouldnt change grades. Other teachers who found out grades had been changed by the principle later, tons of horror stories....all thanks to the fantastic "No child left behind".

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    46. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with all what y'all have said about University...as I am a Univ prof and am continually criticized for doing exactly what you suggest...university leadership is basically invested in looking the other way on activity such as this.

    47. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think about 1/2 or more of the students that were in my freshman class had dropped out by the time we were juniors. The administrative types didn't like it that much since that also represented $$$ leaving, but the faculty believed was necessary if you were going to want a degree worth a damn.

    48. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You comment is just smug, but I don't know how to refute it. I didn't go to a four year college.
      Yes the original poster is just a self-righteous POS. I'm not sure why anyone is paying attention to him other than they want to believe that they all had to work so much harder in school than "these damn kids today." What a bunch of douche-bags.
    49. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you have the situation reversed.

      Its not that you need a BS to get a decent job that forces universities to be BS factories (which they are).

      Rather, a BS is required BECAUSE universities are BS factories.

      The BS factory is the cause, the BS requirement for a good job is the result. After all, every has one... regardless what its actually worth on the job.

      What kinds of jobs are these anyway? Office Space/Dilbert jobs in a cubicle farm. That's what waits for recent BS grads in one for or another right out of school and there is all sorts of competition to get them because the one thing you need after school is done is experience and a lab doesn't compare to the real world even though in THEORY, theory and practice are the same.

      Real world experience IS the continued education you speak of.

    50. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 1

      Well you might know when the war of 1812 was fought, but do you have any idea how long the Hundred Years' War lasted? No cheating by looking up the answer...

      --
      McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
    51. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by TimSSG · · Score: 1

      87 years if I recall correctly. I used to ask it in a list of trick questions. Tim S

    52. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      we consider it progress if they know when the war of 1812 was fought. After all, getting answers "right" improves standardized test scores. Knowing why it was fought, its ramifications, and what we need to learn from it doesn't do anything to bring more $$$ into the school system.

      Exactly! The "problem" is that interpreting the cause and results of such events often involves subjective and cultural viewpoints. Objective "clinical" tests don't really prepare one for a subjective and chaotic world in which students must eventually navigate.
           

    53. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by DrEasy · · Score: 1

      And there's no incentive in catching the cheaters and failing them:

      - There's pressure from upper management in universities to reduce failure rates, because each student dropping out costs the university in lost tuition fees.

      - The prof doesn't feel like arguing with the students and his uni rep or filling out the paperwork.

      - It's become a "Law & Order" system where the onus is on the prof to provide undeniable proof of cheating. The prof is expected to conduct detective work instead of worrying about doing what he should be doing: teaching.

      - In multi-section classes, the prof who ends up having a higher overall grade average and passing rate is perceived as the better teacher.

      - The prof doesn't want to get angry negative biased anonymous feedback on ratemyprof.com

      - then there's the parents, etc etc.

      Of course if tuition fees were low or negligible, the pressure would be back on the student to perform, as the university would have nothing to lose in getting rid of the cheaters.

      --
      "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
    54. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn right. It's because universities, over much of the world, have been turned into market-oriented players in the knowledge industries, and, crucially, students have been constructed as the customers. Universities have been lined up to increase their enrolments, which means get more customers. Which you don't do by being demanding, or by making people think. Tough on those students who actually want to be extended, tough on old farts like me who didn't adapt and retired early from teaching.

      Markets aren't perfect, people.

    55. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue is not who universities are letting in, but who they are washing out. High school educations are too variable and application forms too limited to really be reliable indicators of which students will work out in a specific university discipline. Universities should focus on raising the quality of their instruction and evaluation rather than raising the bar arbitrarily at admissions.

    56. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

      It comes down to a fairly major education tenant:

      Do everything in your power to give everyone the opportunity to achieve the same expected level of success-- but never, ever do this by lowering the expectations!

      Having trouble factoring for x? Here's a lesson. Here's the prof's extra help time table. Here's the TA's times, too. Here's a peer tutor. Here's Dr. Math dot com.

      Take factoring out of the curriculum? No.

    57. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      I don't think that the GP poster was implying that trade schools are for the lazy -- just that they fill a different function than a University should.

      If I go to ITT tech, I expect to learn how to write code or do some network admin stuff or whatever. If I go to a university, I'd expect to get a well rounded education with an emphasis in a particular subject.

      The problem is that too many people confuse a university for a 4 year trade school, where you have some pesky 'core' classes to snore through on your way to your degree and big money. If that's a person's attitude, then they're not right for a university.

      Unfortunately, at least when I was finishing my degree, that attitude was the prevailing outlook for a shockingly large percentage of my classmates. Few of them had any respect for learning for learning's sake whatsoever.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    58. Re:Universities~=Corporate america by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 1

      You're right, it is a trick question, very good. :-)

      Unfortunately, both for you and for those who fought in the war, it lasted 116 years, not 87. :-(

      --
      McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
  7. their work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At my place is common practice to have code review and sharing of the design decision with each team member. What would those student to, phone back to india to ask for clarification?

  8. Read the Copyright by dk90406 · · Score: 5, Funny

    (C) Copyright Alexander Gromikov in the code is a big hint, if the students name is Ken Smith.

    1. Re:Read the Copyright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey it worked for zuckerberg!

    2. Re:Read the Copyright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was a TA for CompSci 101 exactly that happened: a couple of students handed in a homework that had another students name as the author in the comments. They didn't even bother to read the code they were copying...

    3. Re:Read the Copyright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alexander Gromikov is NOT Indian

    4. Re:Read the Copyright by glebd · · Score: 1

      No, but he might be the Russian the Indian out-outsourced the work to.

    5. Re:Read the Copyright by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

      (C) Copyright Alexander Gromikov in the code is a big hint, if the students name is Ken Smith.

      You laugh, but...

      My fiance teaches high school. She's a science teacher, but for her first year she was also given an "Introduction to Computers" course. How to use a mouse and do stuff with office suites.

      One of the first projects was to make up a bunch of data, put it in Excel, and run a few functions on it. It was an individual assignment. Because she had a ton of marking to do, I helped her mark some of the assignments.

      Something about the first few of them struck me as odd. The fonts were all the same, and we're the Excel standard font. OK, maybe some students all like the same font. All the data was the same. Odd, since it was made up-- but not outside of the realm of possibility. They all had the same error in one cell. Stranger still, but-- well, students make mistakes.

      Then I scrolled up. You see, the worksheet was just over a screen long. And Excel remembers where you scrolled to when you close a document. All of them were scrolled down, leaving the top row off screen. I scroll up on Student X's sheet, and there's his name in cell A1.

      I do the same with the other files-- and what do you know. There's Student X's name. On each of them. They hadn't bothered to scroll up past the default view to change the name of the person they copied off of.

      My finance told them all they could either take the 0, or she could discuss the anomaly with their parents and the admin. No one tried to cheat after that.

  9. Want proof?! by wmbetts · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". - stolen from Dan C alt.os.linux.slackware
  10. Clever but self defeating by sjbe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That will work until the have to sit down for an actual test or later when they try to hold a job. Might get the cheaters through a class but it's hard to hide a lack of training in the real world. I'm always astonished at the effort people put in to avoid work.

    Of course I would blame the professors too for designing a course where such cheating is practically possible. There are definitely ways to make this sort of cheating much harder. In class tests and in class assignments are among the more obvious methods.

    1. Re:Clever but self defeating by rwxrwx · · Score: 1

      I agree, and because of stuff like this going it is ruining the IT world and IT job market. You get these young 'professionals' who think they know everything but when shit hits the fan they don't know jack.

      I remember when you went to get a degree in computer sciences it was because you were interested in the field ,now must 'students' are just seeing $$ signs.

    2. Re:Clever but self defeating by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Might get the cheaters through a class but it's hard to hide a lack of training in the real world.

      That's what managerial positions are for.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    3. Re:Clever but self defeating by BlowHole666 · · Score: 1

      Yep. All of my mangers are dumb shits. The company I am working at has been around since 1983 and they still do not have version control on their software. I told they hey lets get some version control, they told me I did not know what I was talking about.

      --
      I smoked pot once. But I DID NOT inhale. Will you hire me?
    4. Re:Clever but self defeating by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Funny

      That will work until the have to sit down for an actual test

      I saw that in real life. A friend on my dorm floor who had to take a token CS class for his major decided to "outsource" the lab assignments to me. The first week he asked me to do the assignment, I said "Sure, here you go", and whipped out the "Hello World" in 20 seconds. The next week I did his insertion sort in 2 minutes. This went on for a couple more weeks.

      About halfway through the semester, when he got something annoying like a balanced red-black tree, I said "Sorry, I'm too busy to tackle that one right now". Of course, by this point he had learned jack shit by not doing any of the work. He didn't finish the rest of the assignments, bombed the tests, and ended up having to take the course again the next semester. In the end it was a big hit on his GPA, he'd wasted many hours of redundant lecture time, and he had to eventually do all the work on his own anyway.

    5. Re:Clever but self defeating by sjbe · · Score: 1

      Might get the cheaters through a class but it's hard to hide a lack of training in the real world. That's what managerial positions are for. I realize you are (probably) making a joke but management has its own skill set which is every bit as demanding as engineering. An unskilled manager is at least as obvious as an unskilled engineer and potentially a lot more damaging to the organization.
    6. Re:Clever but self defeating by sjbe · · Score: 1

      Yep. All of my mangers are dumb shits. So why are you still working there? Are you trapped into working for "dumb shits" for some reason?

      The company I am working at has been around since 1983 and they still do not have version control on their software. I told they hey lets get some version control, they told me I did not know what I was talking about. So if it is truly needed and they won't use it why are you still there? If they are a company that has been around since 1983 without version control that makes me wonder how critical your product is to their success.
    7. Re:Clever but self defeating by BlowHole666 · · Score: 1

      So why are you still working there? Are you trapped into working for "dumb shits" for some reason? Because I am paying for my wifes' masters degree, and I can get away with reading slashdot all day and doing minimal work for average pay.

      So if it is truly needed and they won't use it why are you still there? If they are a company that has been around since 1983 without version control that makes me wonder how critical your product is to their success. We sell this software for 20-40 million a pop. The company is just managed piss poorly but yet still people purchase the product and take it up the ass from my company. Got to love corporate America.
      --
      I smoked pot once. But I DID NOT inhale. Will you hire me?
    8. Re:Clever but self defeating by fprintf · · Score: 1

      You must be a manager!

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    9. Re:Clever but self defeating by Shajenko42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Seems like this would be a better strategy for dealing with your enemies than your friends.

    10. Re:Clever but self defeating by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well yeah, I learned something from that episode, too. After that, I turned down requests from people wanting me to whip off programming assignments, and I told them that they'd end up better off if they just forced themselves to work through it.

    11. Re:Clever but self defeating by sjbe · · Score: 1

      You must be a manager! You must never have been a manager!
    12. Re:Clever but self defeating by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I've felt that way ever since I started seeing ??? Tech school, and make millions doing web design in the late 90's... more recently it's branched out a bit, I see "Game Programming" as a big tech school advertisement... it's all circular... If a person is only in it for the money, most of the time, they won't do as well...

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    13. Re:Clever but self defeating by catmistake · · Score: 1

      apparently you are using the word 'friend' in a manner most are unfamiliar with...

      I had a friend rely on me for the same thing... only difference is I got him the 'A.' There is nothing I can't ask from him now. So how are you and your 'friend' keeping up?

    14. Re:Clever but self defeating by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      What did you do, sneak in and take his final exam for him?

    15. Re:Clever but self defeating by catmistake · · Score: 1

      hey, fyi, I made all that up... but I think you missed the point. Life is short, grades are pointless, and at the end the only thing anyone values is family and friends.

    16. Re:Clever but self defeating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many students who are surprisingly good at taking tests.

    17. Re:Clever but self defeating by joleran · · Score: 1

      You mean mastery of office politics? Excuse me if I don't give you the same respect as people who can actually do things.

  11. Indubitably by JoshOOOWAH · · Score: 5, Funny

    My karma's gone way up ever since I started outsourcing my comments.

    1. Re:Indubitably by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dear Sir,

      We will have your obligatory Futurama reference done by next Tuesday. Please transfer the funds to the aforementioned offshore bank account.

  12. Impossible to detect? by RogueyWon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How can this be impossible to detect? I remember that when I submitted my MA dissertation (a 50,000 word piece about Roman military history), I had a three hour viva on it, where two senior members of the faculty and an external examiner asked me a huge range of questions about not only the subject matter itself, but the processes I'd gone through in researching and writing my dissertation. I know for sure that if I hadn't written the thing myself, there was no way I could have made it through that. Even my significantly more modest undergraduate dissertation (a snip at just 10,000 words) was subject to a 45 minute viva, before a similar panel. Again, if I'd paid somebody else to write it, I'd have stumbled within the first five minutes.

    It seems here that "impossible to detect" actually means "impossible to detect without using tried and tested methods that are just too tiresome and/or expensive to use". Admittedly, viva scrutiny isn't possible for every single assignment, but I really would hope that any institution worth its salt would be subjecting final year dissertations to this level of probing. Maybe this doesn't apply in IT courses? I'd find that very surprising, but maybe somebody else with more relevant experience could shed some light.

    1. Re:Impossible to detect? by cerelib · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are making the bold assumption that those professor read your work well enough to detect a lie.

    2. Re:Impossible to detect? by introspekt.i · · Score: 1

      Viva scrutiny is hardly necessary (though it would be cool :-) ). Simply require a 3-5 page written report detailing every turned in homework assignment or project. Then on top of that randomly choose a set of students from the class and interview them about their work to ask why they did this, that, etc. with their code. Granted you could outsource your report writing, but I have a feeling that outsourced programmers may have a bit more trouble writing essays in the local tongue..making it easy to point out who is engaging in what.

    3. Re:Impossible to detect? by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wondered this as well. My MA defense was tough enough. My Ph.D. qualifyings and dissertation defense were grueling (not to mention that face time I had leading up to it with my advisor and committee). No way you can fake that or just BS your way through it (unless a computer science graduate degree works WAY differently).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Impossible to detect? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      Can we outsource the viva voce examination to India too?

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    5. Re:Impossible to detect? by gatzby3jr · · Score: 0

      Even just doing a basic walkthrough of code can shed light on whether not someone has or has not written code.

      For my last operating systems project (not even a dissertation or final project, just the last one of the semester), the TA's were instructed to go over each students code with the student and have the student walk them through the code and what it did. The person in front of me didn't even know where the code began, but insisted that it was his code. Once he found the main function, he had no idea where it went after that (and still insisted that it was his code).

    6. Re:Impossible to detect? by Sciros · · Score: 1

      The presentation I did for my MPhil thesis (NLP processing, Uni. of Cambridge) was the equivalent of what I used to do at science fairs when I was 15 or 16. I guess I did make it clear enough that I knew what I was talking about and that I did the work, but it wasn't anywhere near the pressure or scrutiny of a viva. Vivas were reserved only for people who failed the presentation epically. Though to be fair, our supervisors were busy people, and I suppose anyone who can't be bothered to do his/her own research wouldn't have made it into the program anyhow.

      --
      I like basketball!!1!
    7. Re:Impossible to detect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the grilling you on paper, as they're going thru it. Because they couldn't be bothered to read it ahead of time.

    8. Re:Impossible to detect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It almost certainly won't work for a PhD or Masters, the only way it might work is if you out source the grunt work, finding papers, implementing code, writing bits etc but you'll still have to understand it yourself. However for a bachelors degree you might well get away with it.

    9. Re:Impossible to detect? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I did a degree in Systems Analysis (an IT course) and our final year undergraduate dissertation was subject to a viva. There was *no* cheating.

      Then again it was 12 or so years ago so the class numbers may have been smaller then (we had 80 start on our degree course, and about 40 finish).

    10. Re:Impossible to detect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to mention that face time I had leading up to it with my advisor and committee

      No shit. Undergrad, I had no viva or defense. But I had many meetings with my advisor, discussing approaches (& flaws) in my work. What kind of rank (in the sense of "stinking") institution gives out Masters without some level of faculty involvement? Oh wait, I know the answer to that question, and to prove it, I have about 100+ resumes from Masters candidates applying for my little summer internship.

    11. Re:Impossible to detect? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      Bingo. One of my profs at the UK uni I went to (who in fact ran the whole department) said to my face that he doesn't read students code. In fact he seemed outraged at the very idea.

      I discovered this because we got set a programming assignment. We had to solve some problem (I forget what) using three different approaches. The requirements were pretty low, for instance, random search was one allowed algorithm. We also had to explain what our approaches were. This was a 4 week assignment.

      I handed in three working algorithms with the explanations in (very long) comments in the classes for each algorithm. Another guy I knew handed in 1 implementation that compiled but didn't work and 1 implementation that didn't compile. He got 80% and I got 10% (a fail), because he "explained" his method in a Word document that he printed out and handed in to the prof, whereas I was foolish enough to assume said prof would read the code I submitted.

    12. Re:Impossible to detect? by httpcolonslashslash · · Score: 1

      If someone wrote it in India it wouldn't be that hard to detect. The grammar and spellings used in India are not exactly same as in US. The writing style is also very different. You can edit the spelling like colour and neighbour but you have to rewrite the whole thing before submitting it.

    13. Re:Impossible to detect? by Helios1182 · · Score: 1

      Nope, a CS PhD is pretty much Hell as well.

    14. Re:Impossible to detect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had taken an engineering graduate quantum mechanics course. Only 6 students and 1 prof. The homework was burdensome, and the prof would call each student in after grading the assignments and let you deduce some hard part on a whiteboard in his office.
      A guy was grilled because he wasn't good at algebra even he did his homework after discussion with others.

    15. Re:Impossible to detect? by JamesP · · Score: 1

      Yeah, probably this moron of a teacher got kicked out of industry because even though he could explain it beautifully in a "word document", he never made his hello world program compile.

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    16. Re:Impossible to detect? by suggsjc · · Score: 1

      unless a computer science graduate degree works WAY differently
      Yes and no. To some extent, CS (like mathematics) can be considered an absolute science. You either have a correct or incorrect answer. Yes, you still go through intermediate steps to arrive at the final solution which can be achieved through more than one method/algorithm. Yes, there are also other "human factors" like code style, comments, etc. Yes, a quick quizzing about those underlying principles/step can probably identify cheaters.

      However, I think that the article is talking about undergraduate level courses which (in general) are graded less stringently that graduate and above assignments like what you are talking about. I went to a (well-respected) private university, and while you could probably get away with this for some aspects of CS101, the finals were actually written. You had to analyze code, and determine the output. As the courses got more advanced, so did the student/professor interaction. All of this makes me (and hopefully my employers) appreciate the fact that my degree is actually worth more than all of these "pay $X and attend for 4 years" knockoffs.
      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    17. Re:Impossible to detect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Story telling of research done by yourself is very different to comp sci. You were using a high level human language.

      Comp Sci uses high level computer languages - very simple beasts really. Everything comes down to yes or no.

      You can describe a computer program by reading the code I find. In reading a 30 page program for an hour or so, you can describe what it does in about 4 minutes and a whiteboard of sketches.

      I don't think computer science should be a degree at a university. Should be a trade with hands on experience and one day a week of dry theory. Much like what today's trades do.

      You want to keep jobs in , make the young people cut their teeth on a trade, learning, using standards based technologies, making money from the get-go.

    18. Re:Impossible to detect? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      I don't think he was ever in industry to be honest. He used to lecture Maths at Oxford (what a surprise).

  13. good! by speedtux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's causing a major headache for lecturers who say it is almost impossible to detect.

    Maybe those lecturers should assign coursework that can't be done by a rent-a-coder in India.

    To put it differently, if you're going to a university where the assignments can be outsourced to India for $10, you aren't learning the material you need in order to be globally competitive. Your best bet is to just leave.

    1. Re:good! by mikael · · Score: 2, Informative

      Our final year assignments were based upon writing device drivers for bits of hardware (network cards, stepper motors, analog sensors), and writing multi-threaded applications (eg. heart-rate monitor system - thread 1 read data in from the sensor, thread 2 displayed the graph, thread 3 performed critical levels checking/alarm, thread 4 maintained an event log).

      Since work could only take place in that room on a dedicated trusted server, and the students had to leave the work in a particular directory, it would be hard for any student to outsource the work.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:good! by speedtux · · Score: 1

      Since work could only take place in that room on a dedicated trusted server, and the students had to leave the work in a particular directory, it would be hard for any student to outsource the work.

      Which only goes to show that some stupid final year projects, unfortunately, cannot be outsourced.

      Writing device drivers and multi-threaded programming is simply not appropriate for a university degree. Or did you attend a trade school?

    3. Re:good! by mikael · · Score: 1

      It was one of many course modules that the department taught (as well as computer graphics, signal processing, AI, software engineering, hardware engineering, mathematics, statistics, parallel processing, algorithm analysis), which just about every university Computer Science department offers, whether they are red-brick, ivy-league, campus or city-centre.

      You seem very defensive about the concept of universities using data auditing to check for cheating. Are you in the business of offshoring course assignments?

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    4. Re:good! by Takumi2501 · · Score: 1

      To put it differently, if you're going to a university where the assignments can be outsourced to India for $10, you aren't learning the material you need in order to be globally competitive. Your best bet is to just leave. True enough, but if these people actually cared about what was in their best interest would they be cheating in the first place?
      --
      Sent from my computer.
      Now GET OFF MY LAWN!
    5. Re:good! by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      I always hated that crap. University hardware is always overutilized, and forcing me to use their machines and their environment when I have equal or better equipment at home is absurd.

      I had a RDMS class where we were required to do all the work on this POS server; can you imagine working on databases with a bunch of amateurs crushing the machine with the most hideously malformed SQL imaginable?

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    6. Re:good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe those lecturers should assign coursework that can't be done by a rent-a-coder in India.

      The Indian is probably a working professional who already has a degree. What exactly makes you think he'd be less capable than a western undergrad?

      you aren't learning the material you need in order to be globally competitive

      Some people just need a diploma to evade narrow-minded filters in human resources.

    7. Re:good! by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      True for master thesis work, but for introductory courses that doesn't really hold up. You have to start with the simple stuff, no way to avoid that. Students that try to avoid doing the simple work will just shoot them self in the foot at a later stage, maybe too late to recover the damage. Happened at my Pharmacy faculty, where teams of two could work together at least up onto the 5th year, after which they had to do final exams individually. The couples where one weak student had relied on the better one all those five years would be in deep shit.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    8. Re:good! by vidarh · · Score: 1

      can you imagine working on databases with a bunch of amateurs crushing the machine with the most hideously malformed SQL imaginable?

      Sounds like good preparation for the real world.

    9. Re:good! by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Where do you work that anyone can throw whatever garbage queries that they want to run on production hardware? I've been working with databases out here in the real world for a decade, and I've never dealt with that sort of situation anywhere else.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    10. Re:good! by AioKits · · Score: 1

      Maybe those lecturers should assign coursework that can't be done by a rent-a-coder in India. An assignment that tracks the amount of hamburgers that can be made from assorted breeds of cattle?

      *HIDE*
      --
      "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    11. Re:good! by speedtux · · Score: 1

      You seem very defensive about the concept of universities using data auditing to check for cheating.

      Huh? Where have I said anything against that "concept"? Go ahead and audit all you want. But a bad education remains a bad education even if the assignments are audited.

      which just about every university Computer Science department offers, whether they are red-brick, ivy-league, campus or city-centre.

      Sure, all universities offer embedded systems courses. However, the good ones don't give you even a passing grade merely for writing a device driver and some multi-threaded code.

      Are you in the business of offshoring course assignments?

      That's a retarded question even if you merely mean it rhetorically.

    12. Re:good! by speedtux · · Score: 1

      You have to start with the simple stuff, no way to avoid that

      Well, he said "final year". But "simple" doesn't mean "coding" in any case.

      The couples where one weak student had relied on the better one all those five years would be in deep shit.

      Students are adults. If they want to waste five years, that's their business.

    13. Re:good! by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      I see your overloaded DB server and raise you a "web app development on the lecturers laptop".

      A class of 60 people in teams attempting to run the web apps they had to write on a Mac laptop. Hilarity ensued.

      Nobody was told where the Tomcat logfiles were either, so once I found them I had to deal with other students code dumping 500 line backtraces into it every few seconds (didn't work? why not hit reload and try again!).

      This led to an interesting bug. Well, it would have been interesting if we didn't have to fix it under time pressure. Part of the web app involved charts. I decided to use a free Java charting library, it was actually pretty good but what I didn't know is that it used AWT to do some aspects of text handling. AWT of course is based on native graphics APIs and on MacOS X there are some restrictions on which UNIX users can access the font rendering system. My lecturer ran tomcat, and then logged out but in such a way that Tomcat was still running. This caused the text API inside JFreeChart to throw an "access denied" exception, which was caught and thrown away but silently corrupted some internal state and broke our app.

      Best thing - he logged out during a 10-minute gap between two workgroup sessions that were held in different rooms. Imagine how delighted we were to find that our app, which worked perfectly, had managed to stop working in the time it took for us to walk across the campus!

    14. Re:good! by mikael · · Score: 1

      My course certainly didn't give a qualification simply for writing two pieces of software. They were two courseworks out of an entire syllabus of twelve subjects and on average five courseworks for each subject, which required reading research papers as well as the standard textbooks.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    15. Re:good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, people could have cheated on the other stuff?

      What exactly are you trying to say?

      You make no sense.

    16. Re:good! by Tano · · Score: 1

      Actually, i don't know if that's so correct...

      Ever think that maybe some of those rent-a-coders have learned to code because they liked it, and thus are just as good as enthusiasts here ?

      Or you think that only people in the first world are capable of reaching the "higher levels" of IT, and the rest are exclusively on a tech support level ?

  14. University by Kamineko · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At my university (I mentioned it in a previous Slashdot post), most module projects have to include a presentation describing the work, with time for questions.

    It's cruel, but I think it's quite funny when folks can't readily describe what they did*. It gets quite Phoenix Wright-y at times.

    * It's not funny when you're nervous and can't think of a way to articulate how you designed a complex system, but it's usually easy to tell the difference.

    1. Re:University by Kamineko · · Score: 1

      Which is strange, because you don't really need to cheat to get anywhere in my course. It could be said that the course itself is cheating, in a fashion.

    2. Re:University by thermian · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Indeed, it is extremely easy to tell when someone is nervously forgetting from someone who has no clue. I've assessed presentations where the student who has quite obviously worked hard has lost their nerve and started blathering, and others where a pseudo confident fool talks a load of crap that reveals they didn't do the work.

      As for exactly how you can tell. In my experience you can usually tell because the student who is genuine but too nervous tends to know their system so well they get themselves completely mixed up over their presentation, explaining things out of order and getting confused.

      The lying student tends to be far too shallow in descriptions, and avoids low level detail. I even had one who's presentation was only linked to his slides in that they were both in the same room. It was hilarious.

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    3. Re:University by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My stuff was readily apparent because I tended to get bored with student level coding and add "easter eggs" for the auto-tester.

      Basically the way it worked was you submitted your program, and they ran a piece of test code that threw data at it and checked the responses. It tried various combinations of data to see if your program worked to parameters, and threw the right errors with bad data.

      What I did was add a random factor to my error handling so that after a certain number of failed tests it would throw an occasional curveball, which wouldn't be reproducable to the automation, so it would flag it for a TA, who would then add a snide remark and knock off a point or two if they were in a bad mood. (As an example, One of the early stupid programs was to build a simulated "Tamagotchi" and they were supposed to starve to death if you didn't feed them; 9 times in 10 mine would, but the 10th time they would have a cage match (if there was more than 1) and the winner would eat the loser. The death match code was 8 times as long as the rest of the program.)

      The testing program also checked for cheating, by parsing the code and checking it against all other submitted code. The one time I got flagged for cheating (someone swiped my code off a printer, and wasn't smart enough to notice my widgets) my traditional wonky output was "proof" enough for the prof to clear me with only a couple of questions.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    4. Re:University by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have seen one instance where two people in the class gave an overview, word for word of the exact same code claiming they both wrote it not realizing they were the same. Another in the class had every second line deleted from his code (because he annoyed the wrong person) and never once noticed when giving his presentation.

    5. Re:University by Gazzonyx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem I have with explaining stuff is that I usually work on projects constantly at school, four at a time, all in different languages. If you ask me a question off the top of my head, you'll likely get, "well, the layout is like this, and this interfaces that, and... no, wait! I pulled that layer out a few days ago, it conflicted with a blocking race condition. It raises an exception... erm, that's my ADA project... throws an exception..."

      At the end of stumbling through it, you'll likely look at a design feature and say, "well, why didn't you just do X" and I'll recoil in horror as I realize I'll have to tell you that it never occurred to me, although in retrospect, that's really a much simpler... no, wait, that'll have the same issue as the interface I threw out last week.

      If you think I'm cheating, you should see me ask a girl out on a date. I'm really talented, but incredibly awkward. The best way to get a design out of me, and know for a fact that I created it, is to give me a white board and let me draw out the program as a diagram. I usually do it in ASCII art in my comments, too. It makes more sense that way, anyways. And it skips a good deal of questions that would send me off on a tangent detailing why I was in the situation that I had to do Y.

      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    6. Re:University by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

      How can each student make a presentation if there are 300 students in a class, or even 30? This begins to take on the excitement of a sales presentation.

  15. i can do it faster and better than any indian by peter303 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have pride in my intellectual prowess. Its inconceivable I'd cheat this way. I have to show off to the teacher how smart I am.

    1. Re:i can do it faster and better than any indian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will go out on a limb here and say that it's most unlikely that you are more intelligent than every Indian.

      That being said, it would be great if these students managed to motivate themselves similarly, through actual or perceived intellectual superiority, and do their own freakin' coursework rather than get someone else to do it!

      /Indian...
      //does not condone the act of these students...
      ///or the unethical people over here supporting them

    2. Re:i can do it faster and better than any indian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile your professor "outsources" his grading to the apathetic Indian (or Chinese, or sometimes American, &c.) TA who will run a few scripted tests and check off which outputs compared correctly to the reference, before summing up the checks and recording some points in the gradebook.

      Any other bright ideas? There are ways to show off, but doing well on HW alone isn't worth much more than the grade in many cases (not most, but many). Think: final project, &c.

    3. Re:i can do it faster and better than any indian by maxume · · Score: 1

      Yes, but can you do it longer and harder?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:i can do it faster and better than any indian by Kamineko · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it surreal if the code was done by the same guy who ends up doing the grading?

    5. Re:i can do it faster and better than any indian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops. Yes, it would surreal. It would surreal all over the place. It would also BE surreal.

    6. Re:i can do it faster and better than any indian by QuantumHobbit · · Score: 1

      Sadly this is usually the case. I've only once had TA who actually looked at our code and gave feedback like "good design" or "needs better comments", and he gave up and resorted to scripted tests halfway through the semester.

      If your going to show off, make sure you aren't too dependent on the professor noticing. I took a polymer processing class where we used some really crappy finite element software. The software didn't give anyone in the class the correct answer, so I decided to write my own finite element code in C++. Long story short, the prof scrapped the assignment since no one else could get a good result. He looked at my report and said, "Well, it looks like this works". He had no idea what I did because he didn't program.

    7. Re:i can do it faster and better than any indian by catmistake · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have pride in my intellectual prowess. Its inconceivable I'd cheat this way. I have to show off to the teacher how smart I am. That seems to be a common theme among the posters here... each one immenantly confident in their skills, and each smarter than everyone else. Surely, you and they are all self-deluded, self-absorbed and arrogant. I, for one, never make mistakes myself, and always find simpler solutions to problems than anyone else... although I used to think as you and they do... years ago... but I have overcome these lame social self-awareness issues and now I am perfect in every way.
  16. Contract cheating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is called as contract cheating. "Clients" use freelancing websites (like elance.com etc.) to put up work (in this case assignments, mini projects etc.) which are then given to the lowest bidder. A lot of small to medium companies in India work on such projects.

  17. I did that and it worked out great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I interviewed a couple of grads and one said he'd outsource the work to India. I hired him on the spot because that's the correct answer! Because, I can't find any excellent IT folks here so I have to go overseas.

    Why yes! I recruit for IBM, Intel, Bank of America, and many many other large corporations.

    1. Re:I did that and it worked out great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because, I can't find any excellent IT folks here so I have to go overseas. This should be especially true now that they are doing so much IT homework in India.

  18. Not a good idea by Zelocka · · Score: 2, Informative

    Anyone in the IT field that has dealt with outsourced code knows that it's generally buggy and poorly written and requires a lot of debug time on the company side. It's not likely that annoying college students are going to get good quality especially since they likely won't know the difference if they are using a service like that anyway.

    I guess outsourcing would generally work for simple assignments, but frankly it would take more time to find someone to do it then it would to do most coding assignments in the first place. Add to that the fact that you will have tests on the subject both in class and in interviews so doing this is not a good move long term anyway.

    Now if it was English papers...

  19. How difficult would it be... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    ...to design a test that could be administered under secure circumstances that would demonstrate clearly whether the little twits actually knew anything about the stuff they allegedly had covered?

    If you wanted to be REALLY nasty, you'd then match up marks on the exam with marks on course work and use that as the basis to take a close look at the cases where there was a large discrepancy.

    And then, of course, I nice, public Academic Misconduct hearing.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:How difficult would it be... by SwordsmanLuke · · Score: 1

      So what would you do about cases like my brother? He's a physics major and he has an IQ over 150, but he suffers from an anxiety disorder that makes his test performance terrible. Normal homework assignments on the other hand, he can usually do in his head. I understand what you're getting at, but I don't think that witch hunts are ever a solution.

      --
      Any plan which depends on a fundamental change in human behavior is doomed from the start.
    2. Re:How difficult would it be... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's why I said, "take a close look at the cases where there was a large discrepancy." I didn't advocate using such a discrepancy to create a presumption of guilt.

      Your brother's situation would easily bear scrutiny. The losers wouldn't.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. Here's one way to nail them by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    Simply setup operations in these countries to accept work from potential students. Once submitted follow the reverse path to the culprit, then punish the dude and dismiss him, then publicize it. Sounds simple to me.

    1. Re:Here's one way to nail them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could probably outsource that whole operation.

    2. Re:Here's one way to nail them by girasquid · · Score: 0

      This sounds like a pretty good idea to me - you'd probably easily catch students who were cheating, especially if you made sure to bid lowest(students are cheap, generally). It might not work out so well after a while, as students who had been caught might start to drop the name and warn other students - but it could work for a little while.

  22. Dissertation Topic by AutopsyReport · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are you suggesting my upcoming dissertation about the Kwik-E Mart might be read suspiciously?

    Thank you for ruining my idea! Please come again.

    --

    For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

  23. let them do it I say by thermian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    After all, if they think that all they need is the degree certificate in order to get a decent career in IT, then their stupidity leaves the field clear for those of us who slaved over a hot dissertation for months on end.

    I have met such morons before, usually they end up in the lowest wage positions, or drifting from one shit job to the next.

    When I was an undergrad in CS four years back, there were girls on my course offering sex in return for completing their programming assignments. I never took one of them up on this offer. To this day I have no idea why....

    --
    A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    1. Re:let them do it I say by trongey · · Score: 1

      After all, if they think that all they need is the degree certificate in order to get a decent career in IT, then their stupidity leaves the field clear for those of us who slaved over a hot dissertation for months on end.

      I have met such morons before, usually they end up in the lowest wage positions, or drifting from one shit job to the next.

      I have met such morons before, usually they end up in management, drifting from one board seat to the next.
      There, fixed it for ya.
      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    2. Re:let them do it I say by Target+Practice · · Score: 5, Funny

      When I was an undergrad in CS four years back, there were girls on my course offering sex in return for completing their programming assignments. I never took one of them up on this offer. To this day I have no idea why....

      If they're anything like the majority of the girls in my CS program, I have an idea why.
      --
      There's a 68.71% chance you're right.
    3. Re:let them do it I say by ztransform · · Score: 4, Funny

      When I was an undergrad in CS four years back, there were girls on my course offering sex in return for completing their programming assignments. I never took one of them up on this offer. To this day I have no idea why....

      Lack of a clean user interface?

    4. Re:let them do it I say by Eoika · · Score: 2, Funny

      If they're anything like the majority of the girls in my CS program, I have an idea why. At least you have girls in your CS program.
    5. Re:let them do it I say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So that's what interfaces in Java are for :)

    6. Re:let them do it I say by vikstar · · Score: 4, Funny

      maybe you do aswell... don't let the facial hair fool you.

      --
      The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.
    7. Re:let them do it I say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was an undergrad in CS four years back, there were girls on my course offering sex in return for completing their programming assignments. I never took one of them up on this offer. To this day I have no idea why....

      Simple.. your making it up...

    8. Re:let them do it I say by jonatha · · Score: 1

      When I was an undergrad in CS four years back, there were girls on my course offering sex in return for completing their programming assignments. I never took one of them up on this offer. To this day I have no idea why....

      Clearly I need to go back to school....
      --
      The SCO lawsuit makes me wish my company were in Utah. We need a new building.
    9. Re:let them do it I say by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      I see them everyday on the Microsoft campus during lunch rush. They're usually surrounded by 12 male MS employees.

      A couple years back, 2 of them got into a knife fight in a restaurant over a girl.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    10. Re:let them do it I say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you missed out. I did peoples first year computer science assignments for money, beer and sexual favours. It was great, and the best part is since I was doing every assignment a dozen times I could bang them out in minutes.

    11. Re:let them do it I say by SanguineV · · Score: 1

      After all, if they think that all they need is the degree certificate in order to get a decent career in IT, then their stupidity leaves the field clear for those of us who slaved over a hot dissertation for months on end.


      That's great until a whole lot of them from your university do it and you can't find employment because potential employers have been burned by these students before.
    12. Re:let them do it I say by Fireshadow · · Score: 1

      SanguineV makes a point. My two cents is this is why you always turn cheaters in. Two very different reasons. There are those who live by the following statement. "I will not lie, cheat or steal nor tolerate those who do." The other is those who are interested in self-preservation.

      --
      "It's one thing to talk about the poetry of machines. Quite another to listen to it for yourself."
    13. Re:let them do it I say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly that situation happened to me, although she was actually having sex with me first. (either a poor bargainer, or she just liked sex a lot.) She was extremely attractive, just not a great student.

      I declined to have anything to do with completing her CS homework (this was all senior level), although, naive boy scout that I was, I offered to tutor her in everything.

      Rejected by me, she went on to two other people to get her projects done, one a professor, another a graduate student. The professor was later fired (I have no idea what the reason was), and the graduate student went to get his PhD and to to be moderately prominent in the field.

      No real point to the story, it's just that I noticed last month that the second fellow became an editor at a major journal and it's been on my mind. The sex was fantastic, and then I did the right thing. Kind of a fun episode in retrospect, although it was all anguished college melodrama at the time.

  24. Where's the Problem? by trongey · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I know this doesn't fit the traditional view of how schoolwork gets done, but I've heard a rumor that sometimes things change. It's not that much of a change anyway: people have been getting other people to do their homework for as long as there have been schools. Technology has just provided ways to make it more efficient.

    If this is really growing as fast as they suggest then maybe the educators need to look at why so many students don't see any value in doing the work themselves. My daughter is majoring in a field that she loves, but she's absolutely hating school since she realized that at least 80% of her coursework is geared toward creating more academicians.

    On the other hand, with the outsourcing the student gets experience in a valuable business skill instead of spending a bunch of time doing something he'll never have use for after college.

    --
    You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    1. Re:Where's the Problem? by rwxrwx · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, with the outsourcing the student gets experience in a valuable business skill instead of spending a bunch of time doing something he'll never have use for after college.

      While I can see your point in most of what you said , that last part is just BS. How can outsourcing someone writing some code if I would be learning to become a programmer be something I will never use?

      And secondly what business skills ? look on website , hire outsource coder, log into paypal transfer cash, get code , turn in coursework.
    2. Re:Where's the Problem? by trongey · · Score: 1

      How can outsourcing someone writing some code if I would be learning to become a programmer be something I will never use? What percentage of IT graduates are writing code? What percentage of IT graduates are involved in implementing some sort of outsourced work?
      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    3. Re:Where's the Problem? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Maybe the smarter ones do know enough to know if the coursework is good enough to hand in.

      And maybe they're intending to move to management ASAP. Then all they need to do is identify who can do the job well enough, and figure out how to convince their superiors it was good.

      The only difference is with outsourcing coursework they're being dishonest in pretending that they did the work.

      Then again... ;)

      --
  25. This Slashdot article... by rodney+dill · · Score: 4, Funny

    ....was actually outsourced to an India Contractor.

    (Unfortunately so is the moderation on the comments)

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
    1. Re:This Slashdot article... by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

      And the editing is outsourced to Romania.

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    2. Re:This Slashdot article... by jonatha · · Score: 1

      And the editing is outsourced to Romania.

      Surely not. They speak better English than that in Romania.

      I'm guessing Kyrgyzstan...

      --
      The SCO lawsuit makes me wish my company were in Utah. We need a new building.
  26. Rent A Coder, anyone? by BradleyAndersen · · Score: 2, Informative

    I used to do work on Rent A Coder, till I couldn't compete anymore. 5 years ago, you could get good money for writing simple projects for people (I didn't ask what the projects were for ;) ... now programmers abroad are doing the same coding for about 10 times less cost (my non-scientific observations on my project bids) than I can. This thing has been around a long time.

  27. Thank minimum wage by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Outsourcing in general is caused by the minimum wage. Companies are able to get cheaper labor outside the country, and we end up paying more through transport costs than we would if there was no minimum wage.

    1. Re:Thank minimum wage by arivanov · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who told you that this is outsourcing?

      Farming out homework is something that has been going on since the days when the only thing that was studied in Heidelberg was theology.

      There is nothing particularly new and surprising here except Internet enabling the homework to be farmed out further afield.

      Further to this, a f2f examination can determine if the homework is real or not real in a matter of seconds. So anyone bitching about the practice becoming more prevalent should actually bitch about tests and assignments replacing good old f2f examination.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:Thank minimum wage by HungryHobo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let me guess, you've never really been in poverty. The minimum wage exists for the same reason as usury laws. Desperate people get taken advantage of. Which is not ok. It's all very easy to prattle on about market forces and everyone being free to not take a job when you've never been in a situation where you need money to get to the end of the month without starving or ending up on the street. If you follow your logic forcing employers to minimum safety standards also makes it more profitable to set up somewhere without such standards. But the workers are perfectly free to work somewhere where they won't get maimed by the machinery. Right? No need for laws on working conditions. Personally I'm not mad on the idea of giving employers the chance to pay sweatshop wages. Outsourcing in general is not caused by the minimum wage.Outsourcing in general is caused by the existance of countries which lack of any kind of workers rights, minimum wage or safety standards.

    3. Re:Thank minimum wage by yuriyg · · Score: 1

      Ummm, no, you Ayn-Rand-reading, Ronald-Regan-worshiping economic libertarian. It costs less to outsource to India, China, etc., because their living standards are lower than ours. Just wait several (couple?) of years, and we, along with India and China, will start outsourcing to other countries.
      And so you'll know, minimum wage is there for a reason: so working people will actually be able to live, not just survive, on their wages.

    4. Re:Thank minimum wage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the minimum wage

      Well, except for the fact that nobody who wants employees has been paying minimum wage for some time now. Heck, even meatpackers pay illegal immigrants twice the minimum plus benefits.

      Don't let that stop you from going off the deep end though.

    5. Re:Thank minimum wage by blueg3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In general, outsourcing is caused by labor being cheaper in a different area.

      A minimum wage is one specific reason (not general) why labor might be cheaper in one area than another.

      Of course, unless you're implying that the minimum wage significantly influences the wages of workers who earn well above the minimum wage, much outsourcing (like IT outsourcing) isn't caused by minimum wage.

    6. Re:Thank minimum wage by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Minimum wage is not SUPPOSED to be a living wage. And every time you raise minimum wage, you actually CUT the pay of everyone else in the country. Why? Because inflation is keyed to minimum wage. And not everyone gets a raise when minimum wage goes up. And when mimnimum wage goes up, many new jobs are eliminated fromt eh private secotr, because small business can't afford them, so they do without and businesses fail or not.

    7. Re:Thank minimum wage by ArcherB · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Outsourcing in general is caused by the minimum wage. Companies are able to get cheaper labor outside the country, and we end up paying more through transport costs than we would if there was no minimum wage. As we all know from calling tech support based overseas, certain things get lost in translation:

      South park: Cartman: Did you write the essays?
      Mexican: Si, I wrote my essay back in mexico.
      Mexican2: And I wrote 2 essays, one wrote back "Hey thanks for writing, essay"
      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    8. Re:Thank minimum wage by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      Outsourcing in general is caused by the existance of countries which lack of any kind of workers rights, minimum wage or safety standards.

      Or environmental and social regulations. It is much easier to make cheap goods if you can pollute.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    9. Re:Thank minimum wage by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Don't blame the minimum wage in first world countries, blame the lack of minimum wage in third world countries.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    10. Re:Thank minimum wage by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Minimum wage is not that high, and most businesses outsourcing would not hesitate to keep those jobs within the country if they could hire locals actually AT minimum wage. The problem is that people over here demand more money for their services that people in other countries. That's pretty easy to understand, since it COSTS MORE to live over here than in other countries. $5.50 (I think that's minimum wage here now - not positive) here will put you barely able to survive (matter of fact, I doubt I could survive with my current bills), while the same amount of money in other countries will keep you living pretty good.

      And if we're going to point fingers, I'd do it at unions rather than minimum wage. They have their place (many companies were taking advantage of workers at the turn of the previous century), but they've also caused a lot of harm by essentially blackmailing companies into paying people salaries that are much higher than a particular job warrants. If a company is willing to pay $20 per hour for a particular job, but the unionists refuse to accept anything under $35 per hour for the same job, then suddenly outsourcing to another country at $8 per hour starts looking a lot more attractive.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    11. Re:Thank minimum wage by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Outsourcing in general is caused by the minimum wage.

      Maybe if we were talking about outsourcing at McDonalds? Last I checked, IT jobs are largely salaried positions, not an hourly wage one. Not only that, but they are largely exempt from overtime pay rules.

      I think in this case, your high horse is dead.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    12. Re:Thank minimum wage by TheAngryIntern · · Score: 4, Insightful

      funny how you're calling him out claiming he needs to provide evidence when you never provided any evidence that minmum wage causes outsourcing. You just stated your opinion on the matter.

    13. Re:Thank minimum wage by HungryHobo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have to prove that minimum safety standards make it more expensive to set up a buisness?

      People still need food/shelter to survive. it's true. Problem is that while getting rid of the minimum wage causes all those lovely efficient changes in the economy it also creates an underclass who get paid just enough to survive and nothing more.
      those who benefit most are the people at the top who's buying power is suddenly multiplied.
      You want an example? Pick some 3rd world countries with no minimum wage.
      How about this, give me an example, any example at all of a country with no minimum wage where it hasn't lead to horrible living conditions for a large chunk of the population.

    14. Re:Thank minimum wage by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      It is also much easier to pollute when you are sending that pollution into government-owned property, and the government does not care what happens to that property. If all property were privately-owned, it would be much more difficult for you to pollute without facing consequences from your neighbors.

    15. Re:Thank minimum wage by TheAngryIntern · · Score: 1

      that should be "minimum"

    16. Re:Thank minimum wage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhu. Riiiight. Keep on believing that, Sen. McCain.

      A typical American programmer makes somewhere in the neighborhood of 5-6x minimum wage, depending on the market. Exactly how does this imply that making it legal for McDonald's to pay less than $5.85 to burger flippers would affect outsourcing of software? Oh right. It freaking doesn't.

    17. Re:Thank minimum wage by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      pretty easy really.
      I buy a chunk of land, make a mint by quietly putting lots of nasty chemicals under that chunk of land in containers which will take say... 40 years to degrade.
      40 years later people start dropping dead from heavy metals in the groundwater.
      consequences?
      At this point I've been dead for 5 years from old age having died in a nice mansion.

    18. Re:Thank minimum wage by TheAngryIntern · · Score: 1

      "If it is simply that you're afraid of people in the US being paid pennies an hour, don't be. If the minimum wage were removed, people in the US who suddenly make pennies an hour still need food/shelter to survive, and the producers of that food and shelter will want their business, and so will lower costs to get that business - luckily for them they are able to lower those costs, because now they don't have to pay their labor minimum wage. So the people wanting food/shelter and the people producing food/shelter are both making less money. As for the unemployed - suddenly there are a lot more job opportunities. More work is done in the US, and the benefits of that work stay in the US." If you really think this is true, then you are very naive.

    19. Re:Thank minimum wage by rcw-home · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Minimum wage is not SUPPOSED to be a living wage.

      inflation is keyed to minimum wage.

      How can inflation be keyed to minimum wage if there aren't a significant number of people living on it?

    20. Re:Thank minimum wage by vidarh · · Score: 1

      "Will start"? Indian companies started outsourcing to China, former Soviet states and Africa years ago.

    21. Re:Thank minimum wage by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

      "an underclass who get paid just enough to survive and nothing more." And that is not the case now? People work for more money but everything costs more because the producers of those goods also have to pay their labor more.

      I would argue that it is actually worse now, because there are a huge number of people in the US who earn less than minimum wage, but they still have to pay the inflated costs for food/shelter that minimum wage creates.

      "How about this, give me an example, any example at all of a country with no minimum wage where it hasn't lead to horrible living conditions for a large chunk of the population."

      The problem is that government interference in the economy exists everywhere, so you're not going to find such an example. Is the lack of an example a refutation of what I have said? A rational person would say no.

    22. Re:Thank minimum wage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit. Outsourcing is caused by the higher cost of living here in relation to those countries we outsource to. Do you really think anybody here would be willing to write code for $2/hour if only that "pesky minimum wage" were removed?

    23. Re:Thank minimum wage by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      Because in all of those years where minimum wage does not go up, there is no inflation.

      That aside, yes it is true that wage increases overall do lead to inflation (more money available to spend will prompt higher prices) but at the same time, inflation necesitates wage increases. When the price level increases, workers are going to need higher wages to maintain the same standard of living so wages then go up as a response to inflation.

      --
      Bottles.
    24. Re:Thank minimum wage by HungryHobo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree that sometimes unions go too far.
      Particularly when they don't let anyone who isn't a member of the union do a job.

      In the town where I live there is a park.
      It's a mess.
      The local boyscouts decided to clean up the park.
      They got a permit from the local council.
      They started work.
      The council workers union decided that by cleaning up the park the boyscouts were potentially taking work away from union members and threatened to strike.
      The permit was pulled.
      No work was ever done.
      The park is still a mess...

      Of course there is a worthwile side to unions.
      If a union is asking too much then a company can just fire everyone who's on strike and replace them. if it's cheaper to give the union members better pay then it stands to reason that the union members were being undervalued up to this point.

    25. Re:Thank minimum wage by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      actually there are pleanty of examples but apart from the 3rd world examples they're countries where wages are set by a collective bargaining agreements, ie the countries have big unions which almost everyone is a part of.
      Which boils down in practice to the same things.

    26. Re:Thank minimum wage by Qzukk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If all property were privately-owned, it would be much more difficult for you to pollute without facing consequences from your neighbors.

      Yeaaaaah... no.

      What about all the pollution out there that lands on property that is privately-owned? I guess they're just too lazy to look at the little "From:" tags tied to the benzene rings or bits of soot to try and sue the corporations that released them.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    27. Re:Thank minimum wage by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

      Ad hominem.

    28. Re:Thank minimum wage by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      And so when local labor costs are legislated to a level that is higher than the market will bear, and the work gets sent elsewhere, how is that helping the people who can't get jobs?

      Yea, overseas labor exploitation sucks, but, you know what? The jobs that they'd be doing otherwise suck just as bad. You think they're dragging people kicking and screaming off their subsistence farms to force them to work in factories?

      In the long run, that money that gets pumped into the economies of those countries make it possible for the sort of liberalism that you're espousing to take root there. And that provides better conditions for them in the long run than misguided attempts to force conditions on labor markets in other countries.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    29. Re:Thank minimum wage by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 0, Troll

      You've created a fantastic hypothetical. Why should I consider it? Anyone can create an unlikely hypothetical for every situation. The point is not to account for every possibility where rights can be violated, but to stop government-forced rights violations.

    30. Re:Thank minimum wage by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would it not be outsourcing? Outsourcing refers to anything that you pay someone else to do instead of doing it yourself. It's only in bizarro-world Slashdot land that "outsourcing" has this ridiculously specific definition of "recent activities involving paying overseas software companies instead of using in-house programmers".

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    31. Re:Thank minimum wage by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes and no. It's like coal power; sure it's cheap electricity, but it's cheap mainly because the costs in terms of pollution and illness are unaccounted for.

      China is a great example of the dangers of ignoring the environment; hell, there is still an article on the front page of /. about it. Ftfa 16 of the top 20 most polluted cities in the world are in China. Sure, they produce cheap plastic crap cheaper than anyone else, but those costs will catch up with them and they will have to be paid.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    32. Re:Thank minimum wage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or their standard of living decreases (holding off on that video card upgrade?).

    33. Re:Thank minimum wage by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

      Nonsensical. "Living wage" has a specific definition which is not equivalent to "sufficient to survive". A living wage means that you have enough money to live at a certain standard of living while working a normal full-time job, and usually includes supporting a family. Lots of people survive on minimum wage by living below this standard, supporting fewer dependents, or by working more than full time.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    34. Re:Thank minimum wage by CheShACat · · Score: 4, Funny

      nothing particularly new and surprising here except Internet enabling the homework to be farmed out further afield. And cheaper! In my day I used to get at least £20 for doing assignments ;) If the Romanians had been undercutting by that much when I was at Uni I would have starved :(
    35. Re:Thank minimum wage by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      You know you live in a fantasy world.
      Such a situation isn't fantastic at all.

    36. Re:Thank minimum wage by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      Oh I agree to an extent. Although the regulatory body can just lower the minimum wage. And after the horrors of the industrial revolution behind us you'd think we could do something to help prevent people in countries which are starting to go through the same thing from having to endure the sort of conditions the poor in our own countries suffered in years past.

    37. Re:Thank minimum wage by Mr.+Beatdown · · Score: 1

      Lots of people on minimum wage also support themselves by cohabitating and reducing per person fixed costs by dividing them and taking advantage of the economies of scale.

      --
      My fellow Americans, let's restore the death penalty for child rapists. Let's do it . . . for the children.
    38. Re:Thank minimum wage by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      *"with" not "after"

    39. Re:Thank minimum wage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. Businesses do not fail because the minimum wage goes up.

    40. Re:Thank minimum wage by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Don't blame the minimum wage in first world countries, blame the lack of minimum wage in third world countries.

      But isn't taking the lowest common denominator for the best ? It must be true, I read it on /. !
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    41. Re:Thank minimum wage by Stew+Gots · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Refute it or accept it. Or just walk away.

      States with no minimum wage (but must follow federal wage): Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee.

      Poverty rate: Alabama (7th), Louisiana (2nd), Mississippi (1st), South Carolina (10th), Tennessee (11th).

      Are these your idea of vibrant economies? Shouldn't they be rolling in money from all those outsourced jobs?

      More than 20 state pay HIGHER than the federal minimum wage. Now YOU find reputable evidence that they have lost significant numbers of jobs? Did their hotels close? Is everyone now mowing their own lawns? Did the fast food industry collapse?

    42. Re:Thank minimum wage by smidget2k4 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, such situations happen quite regularly. Very often front companies are set up to buy land, dump hazardous waste, and then disappear into the night.

    43. Re:Thank minimum wage by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Conversely, the minimum wage helps retain a basic standard of living in the United States if jobs that are truly not profitable in our country are moved out of the country. People don't have access to all the facts, so you can get yourself into a situation where people can't make a truly rational choice for products and everyone just chooses cheap, unreliable, unsafe products on their extremely low wages. So absolutely we can get rid of the minimum wage and other government controls, but that's the equivalent of choosing to be a third-world country.

      What is your position on unions? I've noticed that people who promote the things that you do being intensely anti-union despite the fact that the only way that workers can effectively demand higher wages and better working conditions you folks claim they could if they want is, well, collectively.

    44. Re:Thank minimum wage by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Why even get a permit in the first place? Why not just all agree to go pick up the trash? You need a permit to pick up trash in your own neighbourhood? When I was in highschool, we used to pick up trash, like all the trash along every street in the town, in order to fund the school outdoors club. We used to do this every spring. I think you could have drummed up enough interest even if we weren't getting funding. I think it make the whole town look a lot cleaner.

      The problem with unions, is that most of the time (all the time?), it's cheaper, or less destructive to the business, to keep them, even if you have to pay them way more than they are worth. This is mainly because it's completely unfeasible to rehire, and retrain hundreds or thousands of workers, in any reasonable amount of time, without completely killing your business. And nothing stops the new employees from starting a new union anyway.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    45. Re:Thank minimum wage by mikael · · Score: 1
      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    46. Re:Thank minimum wage by mikael · · Score: 1

      There was a similar story in the UK - some local residents living in a safe low-crime low-property tax rural coastal village decided to give something back to society by doing voluntary work to clean up the beach. They were warned not to do so, as there was already a person employed by the council to clean the beach, and collecting the driftwood was his perk (having a beach-side garden decorated with driftwood was a desire of many retirees).

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    47. Re:Thank minimum wage by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      What about the other side of the equation? If you can't run a business without hiring three part time workers instead of one full time worker with health benefits, your business sucks and you ought to go bankrupt. Why does everybody just dump the responsibility on the workers who are just trying to make enough money to eat and not have to take their children to the emergency room for basic health care? One way or the other, people will mostly get food to eat or mostly get health care, but in the end it comes down to businesses paying a living wage or government providing handouts. And somehow a giant system of government handouts is more conducive to "capitalism." I don't think so, it's conducive to "getting mine."

    48. Re:Thank minimum wage by DataBroker · · Score: 1

      And when mimnimum wage goes up, many new jobs are eliminated fromt eh private secotr, because small business can't afford them, so they do without and businesses fail or not.


      You specify small business; but, it's actually all businesses. Take McDonald's (large business) as an example. It used to be that McD hired someone whose only job was to fill soda cups. They paid minimum wage and the person stood there all day filling soda cups. Minimum wage went up and McD's said "well, it's now cheaper for us to install those soda dispensers than it is to keep the soda guy". So in went the soda machine and out went the guy (theoretically to welfare).

      Now a point to remember is that McD already had invented the soda machine (or bought the rights) prior to minimum wage going up. It was just cheaper to have the guy. So you now have to ask yourself: Does McD already have an automatic-burger-flipper ready and waiting for the time that paying minimum wage exceeds the price of the machine?

      Apply the same theory to all minimum wage positions and you'll see how unemployment can (theoretically) increase with each pay raise that's supposed to help the minimum wage worker. Using that logic, increasing minimum wage actually increases unemployment, which then increases the tax burden on the employed.

      This comment now approaching trolling, but I have to now say that (according to the theory) politicians pushing a minimum wage increase are actually pushing for higher unemployment -- it looks good to uneducated constituents though. Side note: Democrats historically advocate higher minimum wage because it benefits "the people".
    49. Re:Thank minimum wage by operagost · · Score: 1

      Usury laws might as well be "useless" laws. Most lenders are incorporated in South Dakota or Delaware, where their usury laws basically don't apply to banks. A bank incorporated in DE could raise your VISA's interest rate to 30% and you basically wouldn't be able to do anything about it.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    50. Re:Thank minimum wage by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      What? You mean, like, a prof actually talking to a student? Maybe even long enough to test him?

      You haven't seen a university from the inside lately, have you?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    51. Re:Thank minimum wage by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Man, you're not supposed to agree, you're supposed to start telling me that tariffs are the answer! Then I can rip you up for forcing the poor consumer to pay more, etc, etc.

      Oh well, there goes my economics flamewar.

      Agree that it sucks that other countries have to suffer through the same mistakes we did. I don't know how we could help them get past it though.

      The problem with sending foreign aid is that it gets stuck at the top, and the poor never reap enough benefit to coalesce into the sort of middle class structure that is a requirement for real change.

      In my mind it's more about fair working conditions rather than western wages, but, again that goes to the individual countries labor laws, and too many of them are only too glad to sell out their citizens to bring in foreign investment.

      (Aside: I hold this same view regarding immigrant labor in the US; no minimum wage, but give them the same OSHA protections and ability to sue that american workers get...It'll enforce ethical treatment, while allowing local companies to benefit from cheap, willing labor. Of course, this always brings the job protectionists out of the woodwork...God forbid the dirty Mexicans steal our x-mas tree cutting and chicken processing jobs).

      And I'm solidly opposed to "legislating morality" in the form of requiring businesses to adhere to this or that business practice; those sorts of laws almost always end up causing more trouble than good.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    52. Re:Thank minimum wage by Vancorps · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are also ignoring history which states otherwise. Why do you think minimum wage laws and unions were formed in the first place?

      Losing minimum wage has shown itself to send a whole populous down into poverty. You need only look at the average income of an American over the last 100 years to see that when you make more money your quality of life goes up. More people today are making more money and enjoy a much higher quality of life than my grand parents did during the depression.

      Parent was correct in calling your naive, either that or willfully ignorant.

    53. Re:Thank minimum wage by ElleyKitten · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Outsourcing in general is not caused by the minimum wage."

      You're going to have to provide some evidence to support this. If the whole purpose of business is to make money, and companies can make more money by paying less to workers, then it is obvious that the minimum wage is going to drive jobs away. That would be true if most of the most of the jobs outsourced would pay minimum wage in America. Let's think of some common jobs that are outsourced - programmers, call centers, factories - their American counterparts make 2-3 times the federal minimum wage on the low end (yes, factory workers make more than min wage - do you think anyone would work in a factory if they could work at a less dangerous job for the same amount of money?). Outsourcing didn't happen so that companies could pay $1 an hour instead of $5, it happened so that they could pay $1 an hour instead of $20. Removing minimum wage won't bring those jobs back, because it's not going to make American programmers take $1 an hour. The only way to make America compete with 3rd world countries on wages is to make America a 3rd world country.
      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    54. Re:Thank minimum wage by celle · · Score: 1

      "Minimum wage is not SUPPOSED to be a living wage."

      Yes it is, that's the whole point of it otherwise who needs it? It exists to prevent tight-ass employers from ripping off workers on their work, which in my experience they will do at every opportunity. And raising the minimum wage, as rare as it happens, doesn't eliminate very many jobs, employers just pass on the cost. If those jobs were eliminated, maybe they should be anyway since it's obvious the people that have them are starving as pointed out by the near impossible mandatory minimum wage increase. Oh and look around, inflation isn't just keyed/caused by the minimum wage level.

      Now take your off-topic crap somewhere else.

    55. Re:Thank minimum wage by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Counterexample: I'm some big corp, you're... well, you. I dump my junk on your farm. Now go sue me, if you dare. The person that sues bears the burden of proof. Can you prove I did it? It was some nondescript van tossing those drums from a guy I hired. I had some lackey pay him in cash, so even if you can find him, nothing will point to me as a company.

      Do you dare suing me? Because the countersuit is on you before the ink on your suit had time to dry.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    56. Re:Thank minimum wage by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Correlation is not causation. I know, it's overused, but still. I will use anecdotal evidence myself since I don't trust statistics. Here in Ohio, we just had the minimum wage raised after November. At my university, all the student workers received a pay raise to the new minimum. Oddly enough, at the same time the price of everything on campus (food, books, tuition, housing, etc) also increased in price, presumably because of the increased cost of labor.
       
      So what's the point? Increasing the minimum wage just accelerates inflation. That's all it does. Companies aren't going to get any additional value out of workers making minimum wage, so why should they pay them more. If they have to pay them more, they will raise their prices to maintain their profits. When the price of everything goes up because of minimum wage, the dollar will be less valuable, and the people making minimum wage are still in the same amount of poverty because their increased pay has exactly the same buying power as before, maybe less.
       
      It's time we let economics decide pay, and NOT the government. If you want the government to be involved, have them set safety and non-discrimination restrictions. Make the marketplace fair and safe, but don't try to tell companies what labor is worth.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    57. Re:Thank minimum wage by pegdhcp · · Score: 2, Insightful
      When I started to give some courses in my old school -which fortunately did not last much- first thing I realized was that it was unbelievably easy for the instructor to see what is going on, during classes, during exams, and naturally home works and/or assignments etc. Any teacher who want to help the development of his/her pupils, just needs to watch them and _really_ read their papers.

      "The problem is definitely getting worse, it is hard to detect, the number of these sites is spreading all the time and it is impossible for us to monitor all of them." If these gentlemen in the FA want to do their job correctly, maybe it would be better to concentrate on their students, instead of these cheating sites. I agree with them it is not possible to track all sites. I had a friend who established a publishing company by using his income from his "home work helper" site. It is one of the hidden (still) sectors of the Internet, like book selling before Amazon's success.
    58. Re:Thank minimum wage by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

      He says you're naive because your argument sucks, not that your argument sucks because you're naive. By the way, you suck.

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    59. Re:Thank minimum wage by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

      And if they are caught they will face punishment, just like any other criminal. I don't see how this addresses the current situation. There is always fraud in any system. It is not the responsibility of the government to account for every possibility, but to apply the punishment when the crime is uncovered.

    60. Re:Thank minimum wage by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

      How does this address the subject of the discussion? There are always going to be cases of criminal activity in any system. Those criminals can be brought to justice and face the consequences. That is the sole purpose of the government.

    61. Re:Thank minimum wage by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

      "Why do you think minimum wage laws and unions were formed in the first place?"

      My personal opinion? People who were making less than that amount thought they would be getting extra money, and voted for candidates who would give them that result. That is quite often how candidates get elected - whether through tax cuts, tax refunds, services funded by selective taxation (cigarette tax comes to mind), and other government manipulations of the economy. A candidate can gain a lot of support if he basically tells people that he's going hand them extra money. What people don't realize is that any benefit is temporary because everyone else is also seeing these benefits, and in the long-term it is detrimental, as we are seeing now - jobs shipped overseas en masse.

    62. Re:Thank minimum wage by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why? Because inflation is keyed to minimum wage.
      That's a myth.

      Even the Cato institute doesn't buy cost-push inflation:

      Some opponents of the minimum wage argue that it aggravates inflation by pushing up the costs of individual businesses. [4] Those businesses, unwilling or unable to absorb such costs, pass them on to consumers in the form of higher prices. In this view, any artificial increase in labor costs can produce so-called cost-push inflation.

      There are several problems with the notion of cost-push inflation. The primary error in this analysis is that it confuses a shift in the structure of relative prices with a general rise in the level of prices. If the labor costs of businesses are increased and they succeed in passing on the costs to consumers in the form of higher prices, they will have managed to change the structure of relative prices at the expense of businesses that are unable to raise their prices because of more-intense competition. This is quite distinct from a general increase in the level of prices, which would be possible only if the real supply of money was increased.

      Many firms, however, may be unable to pass on their increased costs to consumers. It is consumers who ultimately determine the price of any good on the market, and they may decide that a business's product is not worth a higher price. Producers cannot force consumers to buy what they produce, and businesses cannot always arbitrarily increase the prices of their products simply because the government has arbitrarily increased their costs.

      This fact has important implications. If a business cannot simply pass along its new labor costs, it must somehow absorb them--by eliminating workers rendered unproductive by the new minimum wage, by replacing labor with more-productive machines, or by cutting back production. Those jobs not eliminated will be more demanding, as employers will use fewer people to produce the same amount of work.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    63. Re:Thank minimum wage by ericspinder · · Score: 1

      And every time you raise minimum wage, you actually CUT the pay of everyone else in the country. Why? Because inflation is keyed to minimum wage

      That's a myth; There is no correlation between inflation and minimum wage increases.

      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    64. Re:Thank minimum wage by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 0, Redundant

      "You need only look at the average income of an American over the last 100 years to see that when you make more money your quality of life goes up."

      And as average income has shot up, likewise the value of the dollar has dropped and taxes have increased. The amount of money you make simply represents how much you produce. To make more money requires producing more. Any increases in production over the last 100 years are likely attributable to technological advances, not to some arbitrary wage floor introduced in the '30s.

      "More people today are making more money and enjoy a much higher quality of life than my grand parents did during the depression."

      And you need look no further than government manipulation of the economy for the cause.

    65. Re:Thank minimum wage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      At my university, all the student workers received a pay raise to the new minimum...at the same time the price of everything on campus...also increased in price.

      You probably have had your nose in the books but everyone has been paying more since last November not just your college town. Take a look at the price of oil then and now and think about how that might translate into higher prices for everything you mention.

      Increasing the minimum wage just accelerates inflation.

      Except there have been hundreds of studies done on the minimum wage and nothing even close to acceptable proof of that. If the minimum wage had kept pace with inflation since it was first passed it would now be around $11/hr. As it currently stands, increases in the federal minimum wage does nothing to most local economies because no one would work for it anyway. In my area, beginning jobs at Wendy's pay $2/hr more than the current minimum.

    66. Re:Thank minimum wage by robthebloke · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, I've personally recieved e-mails from students asking for help from the UK, US, Spain and pakistan to name but a few. I actually submitted some of the funnier ones here

    67. Re:Thank minimum wage by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by legislating morality? Aren't you effectively doing that when you allow them to sue or when you enforce ethical treatment?

    68. Re:Thank minimum wage by hairyfeet · · Score: 1
      are you actually serious,or just trying for a funny tag? You ACTUALLY think companies would LOWER their prices just to appeal to the peasants for food/shelter? Did you ever hear Tennessee Ernie Ford's "16 tons"? That is what you would have. Why do you think those subprime loans with such predatory interest and balloon payments were targeted at the poor?


      You entire argument is based on the premise that a corporation will take LESS profit on something that they know the peasant HAS to have to survive,because...why? Where is the peasant going to go? Down the street to the land owner doing the same thing? And if you actually believe it would keep jobs here think again. Because the corps would say "you are hurting my bottom line by not allowing me to dump my waste in the rivers and build smaokestacks that blot out the sun,which country B will allow. So I am out of here".


      If anything in this case we need to pass a "fairness act" that states that countries that exploit their workers,allow their companies to poison the land and sky,should not be allowed to sell here,or should have to pay a "fairness tax" equal to the damage they are doing to the host country. Because otherwise we are punishing those companies that actually DON'T poison the air,water,and land my making them compete with those that do. Or do you REALLY think we would be better off living like the Chinese,where there are some of the most poisonous cities in the world,and where living anywhere near one means you and your entire family are almost certain to die a horrible death from cancer.


      Is that REALLY what you'd want for your family? Although I'm sure if you're high enough on the corporate ladder you won't have to live there with the dying peasants. You'll just have to work hard enough to get that high before you lose TOO many kids to cancer. But that is my 02c,YMMV

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    69. Re:Thank minimum wage by Vancorps · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Where are you getting these insane ideas? Have you ever visited a textile mill? People were dying in sweatshop housing going further and further into debt while trying to get ahead. They were fed the bare minimum and endured extremely dangerous conditions.

      OSHA was created because of several large fires at textile mills which killed hundreds at a time. These conditions weren't limited to textile mills but they were the beginnings of America becoming a manufacturing powerhouse around the turn of the last century.

      You'll note despite the minimum wage being established in particularly Lowell Massachusetts in 1912 that the state became a one of the largest producers of textiles. Similarly when minimum wage was introduced nationally in 1938 that the United States as a whole became a world leader. Minimum wage doesn't take all the credit, the war had a lot to do with it but when a larger percentage of your population becomes consumers everyone wins.

    70. Re:Thank minimum wage by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

      Lots of claimed correlations, no evidence of causation.

      "when a larger percentage of your population becomes consumers everyone wins"

      Can you elaborate on what you mean by this? I take it to mean that when people produce less and consume more, everyone wins. Surely that's not what you mean because that's obviously false.

      And noone has yet to address the fundamental problem with such regulations - how do they justify the rights violations that come with it? Forcing anyone to do with their lives and property other than they wish is a violation of their rights as human beings. Any gain that results from such endeavors is not justified - ie, the ends do not justify the means.

    71. Re:Thank minimum wage by lenester · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up, insightful. Previous arguments have lumped together minimum wage and worker safety laws, but parent reveals an important distinction.

    72. Re:Thank minimum wage by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

      Umm, so what you are trying to say is "if you are poor and get paid minimum wage, kill yourself because you are fucked no matter what", right?

      Seriously, the low pay people get screwed hard... and maybe a fraction of them actually deserve it. The rest are just normal people who can't get out of a rut. Increasing minimum wages doesn't cause them to be poorer, that's BS.

    73. Re:Thank minimum wage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Small ones do, frequently.

    74. Re:Thank minimum wage by jmhoule314 · · Score: 1

      on the other hand anecdotes + conjecture == causation.

    75. Re:Thank minimum wage by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      You probably have had your nose in the books but everyone has been paying more since last November not just your college town. Take a look at the price of oil then and now and think about how that might translate into higher prices for everything you mention. How exactly does the increase of oil increase the cost of housing, if I may ask. Don't change the subject to something most people will agree with. Your second point doesn't cite any specific studies, and even if they did your final point I'd agree with. The "minimum wage" that people will work for in your area are set by the market, not the government. If people decide that it's not worth their time to work unless it's 2 bucks above what the government says, than that's the minimum wage. There is no need to regulate something if the free market can set the price.
      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    76. Re:Thank minimum wage by Brad+Eleven · · Score: 1

      Nor did IPU provide any evidence of having been in poverty. Further, the argument is moot, since the definition of poverty hasn't been defined.

      But hey, we're in the fifth or sixth derivative discussion of the original topic. Like dozens of coats of paint, the original has become almost completely unrecognizable.

      --
      "Press to test."
      (click)
      "Release to detonate."
    77. Re:Thank minimum wage by mazarin5 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know it's been prevalent for as long as I've been freelancing. The end of the spring semester is always a time to pick up quick cash. Suddenly, there are 100 people who need trivial work done, desperately need it in less than 48 hours, and have seemingly inexhaustible funds with which to buy my services.

      I always make sure to include excessively thorough comments and a boilerplate explanation of the basic algorithm, so they can defend their work if necessary. I would like to think that they learn the subject after all.

      --
      Fnord.
    78. Re:Thank minimum wage by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Except you want to make it not a criminal offence, and much easier to get away with.

      But well done on trolling an entire thread for hundreds of posts. That takes some doing.

    79. Re:Thank minimum wage by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Then maybe a higher minimum wage will eliminate a lot of pointless jobs, so people can do something more useful. If it wasn't for an increase in minimum wage, maybe that guy would still be there filling cups up.

    80. Re:Thank minimum wage by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Why do you think minimum wage laws and unions were formed in the first place?
      "The last year in which the black unemployment rate was lower than the white unemployment rate in the United States was 1930. The next year, the first federal minimum wage law, the Davis-Bacon Act, was passed. One of its sponsors explicitly stated that the purpose was to keep blacks from taking jobs from whites. No one says things like that any more - which is a shame, because the effect of a minimum wage law does not depend on what anybody says. Blacks in general, and younger blacks in particular, are the biggest losers from such laws, just as younger and minority workers are in Europe." -- Thomas Sowell
    81. Re:Thank minimum wage by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

      "Except you want to make it not a criminal offence"

      No, I don't. Pollution that does damage to anyone's life or property is a violation of their rights, and any polluters should be brought to justice for their crimes. Of course those people who dumped pollutants in Italy should be punished.

      "But well done on trolling an entire thread for hundreds of posts."

      Ad hominem. Also, it's not trolling when you believe it to be true. Or are you just going based on the moderation? Does majority determine reality for you?

    82. Re:Thank minimum wage by mikael · · Score: 1

      This story demonstrates that HungryHobo's argument is not hypothetical but real. Although the story demonstrates that the perpetrators or their descendents will be held accountable. And that they will still suffer financially as nobody will do business with them for ruining the economy.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    83. Re:Thank minimum wage by emilper · · Score: 1

      The declared reason for which "minimum wage" exist might be the same as for "usury laws", but the effect is that those without enough skills to justify a higher wage are denied the opportunity to work and acquire those skills.

      "Minimum wage laws" => high youth unemployment

    84. Re:Thank minimum wage by haagmm · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. I made beer money doing this sort of thing back when i was in school

    85. Re:Thank minimum wage by emilper · · Score: 1

      "Losing minimum wage has shown itself to send a whole populous down into poverty." -- care to give an example ?

      "minimum wage" is not "minimum guaranteed income" to be paid by the government if you can't find work at a higher wage. Minimum wage laws say only this: "employers are forbidden to pay their employees wages below `minimum wage'". If the greedy employer can not afford, decides it's not worth or simply does not want to pay the minimum wage, those whose skills are not worth paying a wage above that minimum don't get jobs.

    86. Re:Thank minimum wage by emilper · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "Why do you think minimum wage laws and unions were formed in the first place?"

      Unions were formed in the first place to deny the right to get a job to those not in the unions. Since those in strong unions could not be fired that easily, the minimum wage laws worked fine for them, but not for those in weaker unions or not union members. This happened the same in Europe and US.

    87. Re:Thank minimum wage by emilper · · Score: 1

      "Have you ever visited a textile mill? People were dying in sweatshop housing going further and further into debt while trying to get ahead. They were fed the bare minimum and endured extremely dangerous conditions."

      Do you have any idea what the work in a textile mill, or in a mine, entailed ? Do you think starving and tired people were able to do that work ? Do you know that all those "starving" people were eating pretty good, owned or leased a home with more than one room, and were able to send their children to school even during the 1850s ? You read way too much Dickens.

    88. Re:Thank minimum wage by emilper · · Score: 1

      heavy metals buried somewhere ? Can you tell me the address so I can buy that chunk of land ? Those nasty heavy metals must be worth a fortune now ...

      160 years ago having petroleum close to the surface made that piece of land worthless. Not so now ...

    89. Re:Thank minimum wage by emilper · · Score: 1

      India is already outsourcing to Rumania (or at least trying, since wages are bigger in .ro), and China is outsourcing to Vietnam.

    90. Re:Thank minimum wage by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      Not everyone makes minimum wage and as a result it's impact on the price of goods is going to be less than the increase in it. The point of minimum wage is to decrease the gap in income between groups not to somehow magically make everyone rich.

    91. Re:Thank minimum wage by ppanon · · Score: 1

      Can you elaborate on what you mean by this? I take it to mean that when people produce less and consume more, everyone wins. Surely that's not what you mean because that's obviously false. It's related to the multiplier effect. It's why Henry Ford paid his employees well enough so they could buy his cars. And it's also why supply-side economics are fundamentally flawed.

      There's no point in producing more if there's nobody to buy the product. If you want to grow an economy, you have to cultivate the supply and the demand. If you don't pay your workers enough, their disposable income drops and the market for everything other than basic needs shrink. So unless you own real estate or produce food, a low minimum wage is not in your interest because fewer people will be able to buy your product.

      And noone has yet to address the fundamental problem with such regulations - how do they justify the rights violations that come with it? Forcing anyone to do with their lives and property other than they wish is a violation of their rights as human beings. Any gain that results from such endeavors is not justified - ie, the ends do not justify the means. Well, if everyone thought the way you did, you'd quickly get a chance to re-evaluate your position when the revolution came and you had your back to the wall. Crime and violence (including war) have steadily declined in Western countries over the last century as the standard of living has improved. People who have something to lose are less willing to risk it than people with nothing. It's in everybody's best interest to make sure that class divisions don't get too big and, fortunately, (most of) the people who are in control in the West understand that better than you do.
      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    92. Re:Thank minimum wage by Stray7Xi · · Score: 1

      Umm everything's gone up in price since November. The dollar is dropping rapidly, fuel costs and food costs are rising.. which causes other things to go up in price.

      It's not your state, it's the country and that includes states that the minimum wage hasn't changed.

    93. Re:Thank minimum wage by catagras · · Score: 1

      Good news guys, Indian Software Firm Outsourcing Jobs To US http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/07/1314258

    94. Re:Thank minimum wage by krunk7 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm a capitalist. As a capitalist I'm a staunch adherent to free & fair market competition. The existence of unions is essential to this equation. The reason being that a business, especially large business, is essentially a business union.

      There must be a counterweight to this collusion for any market to remain healthy. Even Adam Smith recognized this:

      People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. Adam Smith

      "...or to lower wages." Is easily added to this observation as the spirit of quote is that that trade unions (*cough* corporations) will always try to maximize profits. This is not a bad thing, but we must allow workers to form their own groups and counter balance this force with one of their own: To maximize individual profits and ensure safe conditions.

      The real travesty is not out sourcing, but the lack of penalty (financially) for a business model that takes advantage of states or nations that do not adhere to these essential principles of a free & fair market (and worker) equality.

      However, Adam Smith's advocacy of a living wage and unions did not stop there.

      "It is but equity...that they who feed, clothe and lodge the whole body of the people, should have such a share of the produce of their own labor as to be themselves tolerably well fed, clothed and lodged." -Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, 1776

      Of course, the cunning slashdotter libertarian may respond "but what is 'tolerably'? Should everyone have a TV and a computer? Let the market decide!" Our estimable Father of Free Market Capitalism did not stop here, but made absolutely clear what "tolerable" should mean:

      By necessaries I understand not only the commodities which are indispensably necessary for the support of life, but what ever the customs of the country renders it indecent for creditable people, even the lowest order, to be without. A linen shirt, for example, is, strictly speaking, not a necessary of life. The Greeks and Romans lived, I suppose, very comfortably, though they had no linen. But in the present times, through the greater part of Europe, a creditable day-laborer would be ashamed to appear in public without a linen shirt, the want of which would be supposed to denote that disgraceful degree of poverty which, it is presumed, nobody can well fall into, without extreme bad conduct. Custom, in the same manner, has rendered leather shoes a necessary of life in England.

      If, as we oft hear, we are now in a global economy and so boundaries between economies should be torn down, then so too should the boundaries of "tolerable" existence be destroyed as well. If a company wishes to sell its goods to the Western nation's, it is by the standards of those that these outsourced workers "feed, clothe and lodge" that their income should be determined.

      One may pose the rebuttal that this would negate the benefit of outsourcing, but is utter hogwash. First, let's investigate what is meant by "tolerable existance" by posing a simple question (I borrow this from John Cassidy, New Yorker Economist, paraphrased for brevity). "What lack of affluence would such a society, in general, view as a point of shame?" In Western society, most would consider the inability to afford a television a rather embarassing state to be in...one can be had for a mere 100 American dollars or even less. By this metric, we should pay outsourced workers an amount capable of producing this level of success in their own economies, which is quite a bit less.

      Thus, out sourcing to nations for cheaper labor is not an inherently bad thing. However, when this is done with the aim of abusing lax labor, environmental, and other measures necessary for the worker to enjoy a level of success seen in the nation doing the sourcing, i

    95. Re:Thank minimum wage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly does the increase of oil increase the cost of housing, if I may ask.

      It looks like someone already answered but how did you landlord heat your house all winter? How many local landlords had their adjustable mortgages reset to higher rate this year? For how many of a dozen other reasons did they pass on increased costs?

      your second point doesn't cite any specific studies, and even if they did your final point I'd agree with.

      You are college educated and I assume perfectly capable of doing your own research. This is just a casual discussion. I'm not defending my thesis here. If you are interested the material isn't hard to find. Knock yourself out

      If people decide that it's not worth their time to work unless it's 2 bucks above what the government says, than that's the minimum wage.

      Your original contention was that the minimum wage caused inflation. I was merely pointing out that in most places it isn't even a factor at its current levels. It makes for the occasional photo op for pro or con politicians that want to pretend they are doing something (or preventing economic collapse) but in reality it has been irrelevant for decades.

      You are right that in some sense the market dictates the wage at which people will work. However, at the low end, markets are not that hard to manipulate. It's been no secret that certain industries (e.g. meat packing) have imported many thousands of people illegally to keep wages down. A minimum wage at least keeps employers from driving wages completely into the ground.

    96. Re:Thank minimum wage by rcw-home · · Score: 1

      Nonsensical. "Living wage" has a specific definition

      Market forces don't concern themselves with market definitions.

    97. Re:Thank minimum wage by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. You could charge £20 to do it yourself, or £10 to outsource it but still guarantee it would be done.


      Or charge £20 and pay £5 to get the work done

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    98. Re:Thank minimum wage by doode · · Score: 1

      Yes, f2f (face to face) is obviously impractical but it would work well, I think. What about good old fashioned consequences? You know, as in "consequences for your actions". It's what is missing from the justice system and it's what is missing from much of the parenting these days. I wonder if countries or universities that employ stiff penalties for plagiarism have as large of a problem as those that don't. BTW, the article cited in the original post is well supplemented by, yet again, Wikipedia ==> www.wiki-surf.com/Contract_cheating

    99. Re:Thank minimum wage by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

      Yes... so? Your post assumed that few people live on minimum wage because minimum wage is not a living wage. I demonstrated why this is false, thus your post's conclusion is false.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    100. Re:Thank minimum wage by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Why do you think minimum wage laws and unions were formed in the first place?


      "The last year in which the black unemployment rate was lower than the white unemployment rate in the United States was 1930. The next year, the first federal minimum wage law, the Davis-Bacon Act, was passed. One of its sponsors explicitly stated that the purpose was to keep blacks from taking jobs from whites. No one says things like that any more - which is a shame, because the effect of a minimum wage law does not depend on what anybody says. Blacks in general, and younger blacks in particular, are the biggest losers from such laws, just as younger and minority workers are in Europe." -- Thomas Sowell

      Actually I suspect labour rights in general tend to have this effect, that they priviege the 'in group' in society and hurt the 'out group'.

      Consider a country with at will employment and no minimum wage. Immigrants will be able to take low pay insecure jobs and compete with the locals. The immigrants will tend to integrate too.

      Now if you introduce the minmum wage and job security it makes employers think harder about hiring people. This will hit immigrants much harder than it hits people who are more established in the job market. This is not because recent immigrants are worse people, more that employers are less likely to trust them than someone they share a background with.

      If you look at somewhere like France or Sweden, both of which have cultures which tend to make it very hard to fire someone and where employees have extensive rights, they both have very high unemployments rates amongst immigrants. The USA with its tradition that employees can be fired rather easily does much better - immigrants tend to find jobs and integrate.

      It's rather ironic of course, since people in favour of labour rights tend to be in favour of rights for immigrants. But if you compare more socialist/social democratic countries to capitalist ones it is striking that the socialist countries are actually caste based society where the people in the secure jobs tend to be native born and the unemployed tend to be immigrants.

      If you measure societies' ability to integrate immigrants socialist countries actually do much worse than capitalist ones. The problem is made worse actually by the idea that immigrants have a right to come to these countries as asylum seekers which socialist countries tend to regard as something only racists question. Letting in large numbers of people who have no chance of integrating is dangerous, I think it caused the riots in Paris. Plausibly somewhere like Malmo in Sweden could have the same problem.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    101. Re:Thank minimum wage by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      Yes I have, it appears that you haven't or only visited ones in the south. Source

      Women were the primary labor in the textile mills, they did indeed starve and certainly didn't lease any homes.

    102. Re:Thank minimum wage by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      Thank you for replying, I didn't get a chance to make this same statement earlier as I actually had some work to do. Gotta love this biz, quiet all week then 30 mins before I go on vacation bam!

      Your explanation is right along the lines of my thought process. I had assumed that everyone understood that prosperity for all is a far more effective method of achieving peace. Riots in New England in the 1850s were definitely not uncommon as a direct result of wage and labor issues.

      I guess since I grew up there I just take that information for granted. I visited Lowell in school to learn about all these issues, that might be why I don't think unions are inherently evil although many have certainly gone too far.

    103. Re:Thank minimum wage by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Arguing is not trolling.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    104. Re:Thank minimum wage by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Then maybe a higher minimum wage will eliminate a lot of pointless jobs, so people can do something more useful. If it wasn't for an increase in minimum wage, maybe that guy would still be there filling cups up.

      No one forced him to take the job, but if the job is eliminated he is being forced to leave it. Isn't it better for everyone that he's filling cups than getting fired and claiming welfare?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    105. Re:Thank minimum wage by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Often being laid off is a necessary kick up the backside to make you go for something better. Paying people to fill cups is no better than paying people to spin cotton when there is technology to do it. It may hurt in the short term, but who today wants to go back to working in cotton mills?

      That's the problem with having no minimum wage laws: there's no incentive to automate and modernise as cheap labour is easier in the short term.

    106. Re:Thank minimum wage by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Often being laid off is a necessary kick up the backside to make you go for something better. Paying people to fill cups is no better than paying people to spin cotton when there is technology to do it. It may hurt in the short term, but who today wants to go back to working in cotton mills?

      So if your boss told you that all jobs of your type were going to be outsourced you'd thank him for the kick up the backside to make you get something better?

      LOL! Why don't you go and punch your boss right now if getting fired would be so great.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    107. Re:Thank minimum wage by WhiteHorse-The+Origi · · Score: 3, Informative

      In Asia, plagiarism is common. It is a HUGE problem. I bet most University graduates in Asia plagiarized their thesis and other work. It's sooo obvious, just look at their publications and read their books. It's like they just took someone else's book and shuffled the chapters, changing a few words here and there. They submit it, it passes the automated plagiarism detector, and poof! they're a goddam genius!!! PhD! Woo!

      Then you ask them a simple question that's in their field and they have no clue. But you said in your thesis... Or What was your thesis about?

      From what I gather, many of these students go to US universities, get their degrees there and come back to Asia and make top dollar. The universities just turn a blind eye and take as much money as possible. It's sad but true.

    108. Re:Thank minimum wage by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      That's why there is more than one minimum wage where I live. From for 15 to 17 year olds the minimum wages is much lower than for others. When you hit 18 you're entitled to a higher wage than a 17 year old. People with more than a certain number of years in a related field also have a higher minimum wage. it's not that hard to deal with this.

    109. Re:Thank minimum wage by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

      "If you want to grow an economy, you have to cultivate the supply and the demand."

      It is not everyone's goal to grow the economy. Maybe some economists and others see it as an overarching goal, but you cannot justify violating everyone's rights in the name of a goal that they don't subscribe to. If it is your goal to help grow the economy, then you can help make that happen by spreading the knowledge and persuading businesses to pay their workers more (just as you assert Ford did; you can even use him as an example). If your reasoning is solid and convincing enough, they'll agree.

      What you should not do is force everyone to accept this goal at the expense of their rights, through government regulation.

      I think for you to have a case you would also have to show that the average "lowest wage" could not also be increased by workers simply rejecting employment from employers who offer too little. If a worker agrees to work N hours for X pay, then why the need for legislation to get more money to him. He agreed to those terms. If enough workers strike or refuse employment from low-paying companies, those companies will have to offer more money to get employees.

      "If you don't pay your workers enough, their disposable income drops and the market for everything other than basic needs shrink."

      And if such a "problem" becomes widespread, prices will drop as the workers producing those basic needs are also "not getting paid enough". Then your workers have more disposable income.

    110. Re:Thank minimum wage by emilper · · Score: 1

      Yes, tell that to a PhD that is looking for a job after his chosen subject went out of fashion while he was writing the thesis. That's only one example.

      Where I live (not US) the "minimum wage" used to be very low until last year, then the gov-t decided to raise it, and the result was having youth gangs back in the streets beating each other and innocent bystanders silly, after some 10 years of peace and quiet.

      Minimum wage laws make sense when there is collusion between employers to cap the wages. If the labor market is free, it leads to either unemployment or to the increase in undocumented workers.

      Minimum wage law only raise the barrier for entry in the labor market: those that cannot be fired due to agreements with the union or because they have skills that are in demand stand to gain from minimum wage laws. All the others lose.

      That was what made the Socialist of the 1900s so perplexed: while the leadership (made of middle-class people) wanted to improve the welfare of all the working class, when it came to coordinating their actions with the unions they discovered that the unions were more interested in denying employment to non-unionized workers. Around that time the unions fought ("fought" as in "beat up", not as in "debate") more often with non-unionized workers than with the police. The "non-unionized" workers were immigrants (from other countries, other cities or impoverished farmers) or members of weaker unions. Creative history writings by leftist historians tell about "pinkertons", "strike breakers" and other enemies of the working class, but those "enemies" were themselves of the working class, just not lucky enough to get accepted into a strong union, so had to appear to side with the employers: if employers managed to bring in enough strike breakers to replace their existing unionized workers, it means there were about as many non-unionized workers as there were members of labor unions.

    111. Re:Thank minimum wage by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

      You don't trust statistics but you'll trust a single meaningless anecdote? And you're in college? God help us all.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    112. Re:Thank minimum wage by anpe · · Score: 1

      Seconded, I've helped "writing" a thesis on economy in south-east Asia. The work basically consisted in getting a thesis produced the previous year, and adding the current year to figures, tables, etc.
      The text would be left as-is, ready for the next year.

    113. Re:Thank minimum wage by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      Most programmers are not near the minimum wage, yet that function still gets outsourced. Minimum wage was not propping up wages for programmers, so how can you claim it had any affect?

      The reason for outsourcing is that short term focuses business "managers" see a way to increase their short term profit, never mind the middle or long term effects on the company or the economy they participate in.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    114. Re:Thank minimum wage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Louisiana, and things are just cheaper here. Our minimum wage is lower because it doesn't need to be at the level it is in a state like California.

      The unemployed make us a poor state, not the minimum wage workers.

    115. Re:Thank minimum wage by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      So you want dumping dangerous waste to be a crime?
      What happened to no regulation?
      Regulation on say dumping toxic waste is simply the application of minimum safety requirements with punishments for companies which do not comply.
      unless you want to wait till people start dying before complaining about improper storage or dangerous material.

    116. Re:Thank minimum wage by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      This is mainly because it's completely unfeasible to rehire, and retrain hundreds or thousands of workers, in any reasonable amount of time, without completely killing your business. And nothing stops the new employees from starting a new union anyway.

      and why shouldn't this be included in the value of the employees? I hear the opposite argument all the time that employees can just move company even though that lumps in lots of other things like moving house as "value to the employee".

  28. And business will adapt ... by bestinshow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Simply put, when I'm in a position to hire myself - in the next few years - I'll simply not hire any person who graduated after 2005 unless they've actually got real world experience under their belt and even then they'll have to get technical describing their work, what they did, etc. That, or they went to a top-notch university that I can trust to have avoided such behaviour.

    So basically, it will screw all students including the honest ones.

    Note that increasing costs in India, etc, mean that outsourcing will get less desirable over time. Of course, if the home-grown talent cheated their way to a degree (and mark my words that each time you hire a graduate and they're rubbish and know nothing, that university will be discarded on future applications) then outsourcing might be the only way to go, even if it's not any cheaper.

    1. Re:And business will adapt ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir have hit the nail on the head. A university's reputation is only as good as its graduates.

      I started my CS degree at North Carolina State University and I found out right away that they have a strong sense of quality control. They did not want a substandard student to graduate.

      After a couple of years going part time I had to transfer to another city and a smaller school in the North Carolina system. I did not find the same sense of quality control there. The reputation of each school matches the quality of its graduates. Unfortunately I graduated from the lesser school.

    2. Re:And business will adapt ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll simply not hire any person who graduated after 2005 unless they've actually got real world experience under their belt and even then they'll have to get technical describing their work, what they did, etc

      If you include Free/Open Source software development as 'real world experience' then I wholeheartedly agree.

      If not, please discuss why. :)

    3. Re:And business will adapt ... by bestinshow · · Score: 1

      Oh, open source development is great. You can look at their code by simply downloading it, and then you can ask them about the innards just to ensure that they did actually write it themselves. In addition they are likely to actually enjoy coding and not just do it as a job to bring in the money, so you may hopefully get higher quality work, quicker, from that person.

    4. Re:And business will adapt ... by baggins2001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know why everybody thinks that this is a recent problem. This has been going on at least since 99.
      And at some of the major schools in the land. There were at least 2 schools in the North East where this was happening at that time.
      We hired one, knowing full well he had engaged in this practice. We didn't care. We were outsourcing our work back then, not because it was cheaper, but because it was the easiest way to find people at the time.
      There have always been group projects in school where people could skate through. This was going on back in the 80's.

      --
      He who said 1,000,000 monkeys on 1,000,000 typewriters would eventually type the great novel, never saw an AOL chat room
    5. Re:And business will adapt ... by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      "Simply put, when I'm in a position to hire myself - in the next few years..."

      Be careful about that. Later, when you're in a position to fire yourself, there might be fightin' words exchanged.

    6. Re:And business will adapt ... by Tano · · Score: 1

      ...I'll simply not hire any person who graduated after 2005 unless they've actually got real world experience under their belt and even then they'll have to get technical describing their work, what they did, etc.

      Try giving those people a practical exam at the interview, and request code samples - explained to you in detail at the interview - even a fresh grad would have tinkered around with code if he really really likes what he's doing.

      It would make the interviewing process a bit longer, but i kinda believe you will get better employees and somewhat better satisfaction from it.

  29. Simple Answer by introspekt.i · · Score: 1

    Simply stated, coursework in CS must become more writing intensive (if it currently is not..your mileage may vary at your institution). Students must be forced to explain their thinking, verbalize their understanding, and convey the concepts to the instructor and other students. The day when curricula asks students to 'do', 'mimic', or 'repeat' rather than to 'know' and 'understand' is the day curricula undermines itself. Unfortunately, this day has already come for many academic institutions around the United States.

    Note: I'm not saying all academic institutions in the US (or anywhere else for that matter) are ruined or busted. There are stellar schools that are still keeping on keepin' on.

  30. nothing new... by gorehog · · Score: 1

    And in other breaking news students have started paying other students to write PAPERS for them!!!

    Seriously, for as long as I can remember students have been using "paper writing services." Yes, this predates the internet. I'm sure many slashdot readers have been paid to do someones work for them. And yes, this predates the internet.

  31. A self-correcting problem by MikeRT · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just wait until they get interviewed for a position where they can't do this. Pretty soon, they'll either have to learn to do it themselves or get fired.

    Oh, and if they do continue this sort of thing without the company's approval, there are all sorts of wonderful civil actions that can be taken against them by their employer. Like... exposing trade secrets to unauthorized personnel, distributing company intellectual property to those without authorization...

    God help them if they go to work as an engineer for a government contractor. They'll have the Inspector General or the FBI busting down their door with an arrest warrant if they're not very, very careful.

  32. Does this show how useless a Degree is? by pillageplunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been in IT for 27 years, having started out by learning Keypunching via the Military. Branched out to PC's in 1982, taught myself whatever was needed to perform the various jobs I've held over the years. Now I find myself working as a Software QA lead...and interviewing folks who are out of college who have no idea how to configure an XP system to set up two different printers on a network. And these fools have Bachelor Degrees?
    So, having a degree is worth what? It doesn't appear its worth the paper its printed on. These same folks outsourcing their coursework are the next generation of Enron II...no ethics, no sense of pride in a job well done as they havn't even done it.
    Nice to see the Secondary skills I've maintained in the Construction and Plumbing trades will still be needed...these fools will probably be the ones trying to cut a sheet of plywood using their leg as a saw-horse...assuming they can figure out how to USE the saw.
    At least the good news is they'll have a good rapport with the Tech support folks, having dealt with so many of them during college.

    --
    "Work is the curse of the drinking class" Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Does this show how useless a Degree is? by DeeQ · · Score: 1

      IMO a degree shows nothing about what they have learned it shows they have the capability of learning. They could very quickly figure it out using the critical thinking skills they are supposed to have learned. They skip over some easier things in schools to try to get people to really learn to use critical thinking to figure out how to solve the problem in front of them.

      That being said some numskulls don't learn the critical thinking skills and could not set up the printers ;)

    2. Re:Does this show how useless a Degree is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't go to college to learn how to set up an XP system. I went to college to learn how to think logically and write quality software. They're not "fools" for not knowing that.

  33. start including American pop culture on the quiz by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    Q: Who won American Idol last year?

    A: I don't know

    Shit, that either means he's Indian or an American with taste.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  34. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a grad student, I was loaded with coursework, regular dept work for an asst'ship I had, an off-campus job, and more... I didn't have time to sit down and write a macro-assembler in C for an assignment.

    I'd written parsers, and the like before, and this wasn't going to be a problem, I just didn't have the time.

    So I found a buddy - had him code it for me for some bucks... Turned it in, the teacher checked off the assignment, all was well...

    What'd I learn from that experience? Delegate to get things done...

    Fast forward some years - I now also have an MBA and as a manager I need to delegate to get things done - there's not enough time in the day to handle it all. I needed a project completed, my teams were loaded - so I looked up my old pal - he needed a project, volia! Work's getting done...

    What professors fail to understand is that so much of what they're asking to be done is absolute rote crap that it's BORING... Also, it takes time, and that's not the only class/duty the student has - sometimes it's just impossible to get it all done...

    As for the dissertation - is it a PhD dissertation or some bullshit senior thesis? The way I understood things, the PhD dissertation was under the direction of a supporting prof and committee and one had to run just about everything past them, then compile the stats, then write the paper, then defend it in front of the committee... I'd find it hard to believe that an India-outsourced paper would pass muster...

    Some bullshit Senior Thesis on the Natural Harmonic Resonance of a Hostess Fruitpie might though (c.f.: I did write that for a class paper... made the whole thing up - turned it in. Prof read it, said "read it in front of the class and I'll give you an A")

  35. A fitting punishment for this heinous deed! by jeiler · · Score: 1

    Transfer them to the business school. Where they'll probably get extra credit for their managerial skills.

    --

    If you haven't been down-modded lately, you aren't trying.

    Sacred cows make the best hamburger.

  36. Minimum wage and other laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Funny, child labor laws, weekends, 40 hour work weeks, worker safety laws, and clean air/clean water laws do the same thing. These things all drive up the cost of labor and push down productivity.

    Maybe for the US to remain competitive, we should repeal those laws that prevent Americans from being truly competitive in the global economy. If it takes our kids working in coal mines 16 hours a day, 7 days a week, so be it. The first goal of American government is to protect the profitability of domestic and foreign businesses, and all these laws are standing in the way of this. /sarcasm off

    1. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "If it takes our kids working in coal mines 16 hours a day, 7 days a week, so be it."

      Pithy, frightening scenarios backed up by no evidence or rationale whatsoever should be disregarded no matter how frightening.

      "The first goal of American government is to protect the profitability of domestic and foreign businesses"

      Actually the first and only goal of the government should be to uphold the rights of its citizenry, but feel free to continue to mischaracterize.

    2. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      "Pithy, frightening scenarios backed up by no evidence or rationale whatsoever should be disregarded no matter how frightening. " and still you give no evidence at all yourself. How about this: history it's how things used to be when it was legal to put kids down a mine for pitiful pay.

    3. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 0

      "history it's how things used to be when it was legal to put kids down a mine for pitiful pay."

      But advancements in technology eliminate such a scenario in the present-day US. Like I said, no evidence.

      "and still you give no evidence at all yourself."

      I have been providing my rationale. Either refute it or accept it.

    4. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by PIBM · · Score: 1

      Why do you explain that many countries in the world are still exploiting children if the technology advancement were more profitable ?

    5. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by Quasar+Sera · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't know if it says more about me or about Slashdot that I took your comment seriously (and got seriously angry) until you stated explicitly that you were being sarcastic.

    6. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Maybe for the US to remain competitive, we should repeal those laws that prevent Americans from being truly competitive in the global economy. That would work. Of course, you'd almost certainly take a large standard-of-living cut too. Here's a better solution: enforce the laws for anyone wanting to sell you goods. If the people producing them are not paid at least US minimum wage, and do not work in a similarly safe and clean environment that US workers would have enjoyed then you do not get to sell the goods in the US. Globalisation works both ways.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by Stew+Gots · · Score: 1

      Actually the first and only goal of the government should be to uphold the rights of its citizenry, but feel free to continue to mischaracterize.

      What's astonishing is that you can say that with a straight face less than 24 hours after the FISA vote.

    8. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by DM9290 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "If it takes our kids working in coal mines 16 hours a day, 7 days a week, so be it."

      Pithy, frightening scenarios backed up by no evidence or rationale whatsoever should be disregarded no matter how frightening.

      "The first goal of American government is to protect the profitability of domestic and foreign businesses"

      Actually the first and only goal of the government should be to uphold the rights of its citizenry, but feel free to continue to mischaracterize.

      When something like the industrial revolution and political economics is so widely documented there is no need for anyone to waste time rehashing the evidence on some online blog for the amusement of people who are too lazy to do their basic homework. Why don't you get your head out of Thomas Pains ass and pay attention to the actual world.

      The poster was not saying what the goal of the American government SHOULD BE, he was saying what the goal of the American government ACTUALLY IS.

      If America was so concerned about protecting human rights, it wouldn't spend so much time trying to privatize absolutely everything, deny global warming, and try to impose democracy with a gun on others. And and don't forget about preventing non-coalition countries from bidding on reconstruction contracts in Iraq. No.. that's not essentially a scheme to raise the cost of reconstruction and increase profits for american companies at the expense of Iraqi citizens.

      --
      No one has a right to their *own* opinion. They have a right to the TRUTH.
    9. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

      They do not have the infrastructure to support that technology. They can import the hardware, but they need trained people to operate it. They need the power grid to keep it going. They also need people to monitor, repair, and generally maintain it. They need the equipment for that maintenance, and the replacement equipment. They can try importing it all, but the costs would be high because they would have to offer those people a lot of money to pull them away from their First World existence.

    10. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by c6gunner · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do you explain that many countries in the world are still exploiting children if the technology advancement were more profitable ?

      They don't have the capital to invest in the technology, while they DO have a surplus of labour. It's simple economics.

    11. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      If a machine costs less than having people do the same thing then they'll use people. and the great thing about electronics, the more units you build the cheaper each unit is. raise the minimum wage and encourage automation and suddenly rather than 1 or 2 companies looking for machines to do a job there's thousands and it stays cheaper to use those machines. And the best thing of all: those machines are then creating wealth and raising everyones standard of living.

    12. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by Stanistani · · Score: 1

      I have been providing my rationale. Either refute it or accept it. Actually, the poster has additional rights, to respond any way they choose. You don't define the limits of discussion.
    13. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      "If the people producing them are not paid at least US minimum wage" probably best to adjust this one for the local area. ie rather than the exact ammount of money in the local currency converted from dollars you use something liked to the cost of living there. Think minimum wage in america "$X per hour" X buys a certain ammount of say rice in america. Require that local minimum wages be enough to buy the same ammount of food in a local market. 5 euro will buy me a burger and coke here. 5 euro in eastern europe will buy me a 3 course meal.

    14. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      "history it's how things used to be when it was legal to put kids down a mine for pitiful pay."

      But advancements in technology eliminate such a scenario in the present-day US. Like I said, no evidence.

      Uh... you do realize that people still go down into coal mines to work? Now? in the US? If we got rid of child labor laws what technology do you think would prevent kids from working down there?
      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    15. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by operagost · · Score: 1

      What's astonishing is that you don't know the difference between the words "should be" and "is". Governments violate human rights every day, but those of us who read Locke know that it is not the proper way of things.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    16. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by fortyonejb · · Score: 0

      hear that wooshing sound? don't worry it will pass soon

    17. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Actually, I could see clean water laws increasing productivity. At least if you're dependent on skilled workers you can't easily replace when they get sick or have the shits due to drinking water I wouldn't dare swimming in.

      Not everything that increases your quality of life actually decreases your competitiveness. We have a law here that grants every office employee a work space with at least one window. No kidding. And behold, we have very few sick leaves due to depression and burnout, and generally a rather good work atmosphere (which again work against the former two).

      If you force people to slave away, they start to rebel. Even faster than they do when you force them into slave like employment positions.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    18. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it says more about the times we're in and that someone can actually say something like that without sounding like some slavedriver factory owner.

      Hell, I could see those words coming from politicians. But without the sarcasm flags raised.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    19. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hey everybody! Gather round! This guy read a BOOK!!!! An old one. By a famous author!

    20. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by Stook · · Score: 1

      The first goal of American government is to protect the profitability of domestic and foreign businesses, and all these laws are standing in the way of this.



      I would argue that the first goal would not include the profitability of foreign businesses.

      As a side note, while it's true that child labor laws, worker safety laws etc. drive up the cost of labor, those are a derivative previous costs in the form or lawsuits. You could remove them and drive down the cost of labor, but as soon as you do, some schmuck is going to sue someone for an unfit work environment and just drive the cost of doing business up again.
    21. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by Stook · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the idea of paying the same rate for goods and services doesn't work in a world with varying economies. What you run into with that is the increase of money paid to those companies or individuals creates inflation or even hyperinflation that will cause more harm to the economy than good.

      While I agree it would be great to be able to impose similar work ethics and standards on other economies, it's something they need to work out for themselves in a manner that works to fit their economy. We can certainly try to help them along though.

    22. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by Sapphon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the first and only goal of the government should be to uphold the rights of its citizenry. (Emphasis added)

      Bollocks. What about the provision public goods (e.g. national defence)? Market regulation? Wealth redistribution? Welfare isn't a "right", you know. What about representation on an international level?

      Your characterisation of a government's primary role may be (well, is) closer to the truth than that of the GP, but your oversimplification hasn't helped any.

      Pithy, frightening scenarios backed up by no evidence or rationale whatsoever should be disregarded no matter how frightening.

      Blanket rejections backed up by no evidence or rationale whatsoever should be disregarded, _because_ they lead to false rejections of scenarios that may be true. How about some critical thought here?
      --
      Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem.
    23. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 0, Troll

      "what technology do you think would prevent kids from working down there?"

      Responsible parents. Successfully raising children is a goal initiated by certain individuals. Whether they get to that goal is up to them entirely - not the public.

    24. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Responsible parents?

      What fairy-tale country do you live in? In the USA, "responsible adult" is a myth or an oxymoron.

    25. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

      So how does it become the responsibility of everyone else in the country if a person does not take responsibility for his or her own goals?

    26. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Maybe for the US to remain competitive, we should repeal those laws that prevent Americans from being truly competitive in the global economy. If it takes our kids working in coal mines 16 hours a day, 7 days a week, so be it. The first goal of American government is to protect the profitability of domestic and foreign businesses, and all these laws are standing in the way of this.
      Ah, a fellow Ron Paul supporter.
    27. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by drsquare · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That works both ways, and other countries could block US exports. For example Microsoft could be banned from selling Windows in the EU, as their workers work more than 35 hours a week and don't get 10 weeks vacation. And no US food exports either as it's produced with illegal Mexican labour.

      Hollywood would face problems showing their films in place where the activities of their mafia-like unions would be illegal. Your theory only works based on the assumption that the US has the world's best employment conditions.

    28. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      you do realize that people still go down into coal mines to work? Now? in the US?

      I hope that you also realize that modern coal mining has nothing to do with the hard, labor intensive work of yore. Coal mining these days is mostly about proper operation of machinery to slice off sheets of rock, process them, and then transport them to the surface for shipping. Companies wouldn't hire kids for the job even if they could. Kids would be far too likely to make a major mistake and put the company's investment at risk. (Not to mention lives. Contrary to popular belief, not ALL mines were run by greedy, heartless murderers.)

      If you are ever in the Chicago area, I highly recommend visiting the Museum of Science and Industry. They have an old coal mine there that they give tours of. They show both antique and modern methods of mining for coal, including the problems that regularly occurred before the advent of modern methods. You can even see the areas that had previously been dug out by both methods.

    29. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by ari+wins · · Score: 2, Funny

      No.. that's not essentially a scheme to raise the cost of reconstruction and increase profits for american companies at the expense of American citizens. There, I fixed that last line for you.
      --
      Don't worry if you're a kleptomaniac, you can always take something for it.
    30. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are unworthy!

    31. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by HiThere · · Score: 1

      When making predictions of future behavior, is dominates over should.

      Current behavior is a better indication that desired behavior. So is historic behavior.

      I'll agree that removing child labor laws should not result in children working long hours in dangerous and unhealthy conditions. I would, however, predict that it would result in exactly that result.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    32. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by emilper · · Score: 1

      Right ... your allowance is halved as of now. Time for me to become responsible.

      Signed,
      Pa'

    33. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

      No, you've got it wrong. The first and only goal of any government is to remain in power. If they have any other goals they are only secondary and in support of the first goal.

      In a democracy there is some hope for the peole because the government tries to keep people happy so as to affect their vote.

    34. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by ppanon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So that's why most clothing that is bought is made in North America and not in sweatshops in SE Asia or the Dominican Republica! Oh wait, it's the other way around and the NA/European clothing manufacturing industry sucks except for haute couture. I think there's something wrong with your argument.

      Yeah, open pit mining is more efficient at extracting some types of resources. But if you were trying to get coal a couple of Km down, and it was legal to use child labour at a fraction of the wages of adults without needing to worry about black lung protection, I think you'd find kids in coal mines again pretty quickly.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    35. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I hope that you also realize that modern coal mining has nothing to do with the hard, labor intensive work of yore. Coal mining these days is mostly about proper operation of machinery to slice off sheets of rock, process them, and then transport them to the surface for shipping.

      You've got to be kidding. I know nothing about coal mining, but even the season premiere episode of "30 Days" proves your statement wrong. It was fascinating. He would simply shovel coal off the floor onto the conveyor belt all day long (the grunt work jobs that newbies get).

      http://www.fxnetworks.com/shows/originals/30days/episodeguide.php#

    36. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by diamondmagic · · Score: 1

      No, the first and only goal of any politician is to remain in power. The first role of government is to protect the citizen's rights. Naturally, making sure the government doesn't collapse is a prerequisite to this.

    37. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes. After all, clothing manufacture and open pit mining are so alike! Hell, I bet if we got rid of those pesky child labour laws, NASA would be replacing astronauts with 2 year olds. They're just SO much cheaper, AND they don't take up nearly as much space! We could make rockets that were half the size! Just imagine the savings ....

      Seriously .... I don't mind too much if you start comparing apples and oranges, but at this point it's more like you're comparing apples and particle accelerators. At least stick to produce.

    38. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by ppanon · · Score: 1

      When you're doing below ground mining, many seams aren't very thick. If you've got smaller people running machinery that's proportionally sized, you don't need to waste as much time, energy and money digging out base rock for your tunnels along with the good stuff. While you may still have a lot of seams that are worthwhile using adult labour on, with reasonably small children half their height and equipment to match, a whole bunch of seams that aren't currently economical could become so. And when your workers only have a 3-5 year working lifetime, you don't need to worry as much about protecting them from things like black lung. So how much time does it take to train a miner, really?

      Doing maintenance on the equipment when the equipment breaks down would be your biggest problem since the kids wouldn't have the know-how or as much strength, but you need far fewer maintenance people than operators. Your operators don't have to be that educated with modern equipment, and kids are like sponges. If you don't worry about filling their heads with things like math, reading, writing, or history (you particularly don't want them learning history - seems to be working with you, BTW) then they can learn to operate that kind of machinery pretty quickly. I've heard it's not uncommon for young farm kids to be quite capable of driving the farm tractor around. Think how much more motivated candidate child miners would be if their food supply and entertainment time is tied to to how well they do on the precursor classroom time! Heck, you could even use some video games to teach them how to mine.

      Biggest bonus? Kids won't go on strike because they're easier to intimidate, and it would also be harder to organize them since they've got high turnover.

      So yeah, you're right the economic conditions aren't the same anymore, but that doesn't mean that somebody wouldn't find some way to profit from using child labour in mines or elsewhere even in our current technological environment. What the industrial revolution did teach us is that, if there's profit to be made in using child labour, no matter how unethical, demeaning, or dangerous, if it's permitted, somebody will do it. That is the parallel between overseas clothing sweatshops and mining: the sweatshops show it's a fundamental part of human nature and capitalism that hasn't changed in 200 years.

      Your argument is that techniques and equipment that evolved since mining with child labour was banned make using children for mining unfeasible. My argument is that if you make child labour legal again, we'll quickly find out how easy it is to adapt or create new equipment to make child labour economically feasible again. While my argument is based on the darker side of human nature, nothing you've proposed is a valid technical or sociological reason that invalidates that argument.

      Generally, history and current social symptoms like the mistreatment of illegal Mexican labour in the US support my argument. Ethically-challenged employers like vulnerable workers which are more easily exploited. In industries which only require a low skill level for most of its labour force, ethically-challenged employers clean up.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    39. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I don't see that this is a problem. I don't know anyone in the EU (and I live there) who works a 35-hour week (37.5 is standard for the civil service here, and 40 is more usual for other places, not counting overtime) and ten week vacations are things only teachers get. US and EU labour laws are quite similar, and in places where one is more strict than the other then some flexibility could be maintained. And if the result is an improvement in working conditions for US (or EU) workers, is this really a problem?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    40. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, it won't happen soon, as in Europe too, most of the toys, cheap clothes or fireworks (to name a few examples) are imported from china and no one in position of power is willing to ask what are the working conditions that come with such low prices.

      The only chance that MS Windows is banned from Europe would come from an IBM/SUN/Oracle/Adobe heavily sponsored campaign.

    41. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Bollocks. What about the provision public goods (e.g. national defence)? Market regulation? Wealth redistribution? Welfare isn't a "right", you know. What about representation on an international level?
      Your characterisation of a government's primary role may be (well, is) closer to the truth than that of the GP, but your oversimplification hasn't helped any.

      I get the feeling that the GP was specifically meaning to deny that provision of public goods (other than protecting peoples rights, which would include national defense), market regulation (other than in the Adam Smith sense of protecting peoples property rights), and wealth distribution are things that governments should be doing. There are a lot of people with that opinion out there, you know... they're called libertarians. Plenty of them right here on Slashdot too. Surprised you hadn't noticed.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    42. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by Sapphon · · Score: 1

      That may very well be the GGP's position, but that doesn't change my position: I still think it's bollocks.

      I'm quite sympathetic to many of the ideals of libertarianism, but some of the hard-line stuff just leaves me shaking my head. To pluck an example out of Wikipedia: "many [Libertarians] believe that the United States Food and Drug Administration shouldn't ban unproven medical treatments, that any decisions on treatment be left to patient and doctor only."
      Well, sure, that would be fine... if the patient and the doctor had perfect information. But they don't, so they can't make properly informed decisions about undertaking the treatment. "Will it kill me?" I dunno. "Will I grow antlers?" I dunno.
      That's the whole point of banning untested treatments: they get tested, and the information asymmetry reduces. Giving people the "right" to do stupid things doesn't seem very.. well, I think (some) libertarianists take it to far. I don't think it's societally efficient.

      --
      Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem.
    43. Re:Minimum wage and other laws by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "While I agree it would be great to be able to impose similar work ethics and standards on other economies, it's something they need to work out for themselves in a manner that works to fit their economy."

      Well, they can look for what fits to their economy all they want. But once they want to sell something on *my* markets then we are talking about *my* economy so there shouldn't be any problems to accept they must be playing by *my* rules... like "your goods shouldn't be produced by 12 hours-day workers". Please note I'm not trying to force them not to work 12 hours-a-day, after all, it's their economy and they know better what to do, I'm only stablishing conventions in order to go into *my* economy; they still can sell their good anywhere else (if accepted).

  37. It's about cooperation by OpenSourceNut · · Score: 1

    Education focuses too much on competition and not enough on cooperation

    Students get in Honor Code trouble all the time because they work to closely together..

    OK, but seriously.. this is a bit far.

    --
    I'm now in Poland: http://williamwnek
  38. Sign of the times... by sitarlo · · Score: 0

    These students will fit right into today's IT world. Lack of ethics, integrity, technical skills, etc... Heck, make 'em managers right out of school. They're obviously qualified.

  39. What does the student get out of this? by milgr · · Score: 1

    The point of coursework is to teach or reinforce material. If the student gets someone else to do the work for them, the point of the work is lost.

    When I went to college, I paid thousands of dollars a year to go to a university where I earn an excellent education. Why would I want to squander that opportunity by paying someone else to do my work?

    --
    Where law ends, tyranny begins -- William Pitt
    1. Re:What does the student get out of this? by sharkb8 · · Score: 1

      Because students are paying for a degree, not paying to learn something. Most of the CompSci programming taught in school is useless in the real world anyway. I started my first programming job while I was getting my EE degree. After working for a couple of years, I had recruiters calling me every day. However, even with some solid programming skills in all kinds of tech, many employers were only looking for a degreed programmer, and it didn't even matter what kind of degree. (I'm talking about you Southwest Airlines). Once I had my degree, all of the corporate programming jobs wanted to pay me as if I was a new graduate and didn't have 6 years of programming experience.

  40. Nothing new here by wcrowe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I first started coding (early 80s) it was on a mainframe which could only be accessed via the computer lab. Everyone closely guarded their user accounts, but when we compiled our programs, it generated a listing on a central printer. You would submit your program for compilation, then go hang out at the printer waiting for it to appear. Typically, a student would glance at the listing, note the compilation error, then toss the listing in the trash.

    It wasn't long before the more clueless, or lazier students figured out that they could get pretty far ahead in their projects by rifling through the trash bin and pulling out another student's listing which (mostly) worked.

    Those of us actually doing the work had no clue that this was going on because it was not unusual for someone to be digging through the trash bin for one of their own previous listings.

    I learned about this "dumpster diving" practice when one of my professors warned me that another student had copied my work almost verbatim. Fortunately this prof knew me and my "style" well enough to figure out what was going on. After that, I saved all my listings and only trashed them later off site.

    My point is that cheating like this among student coders is nothing new. There are always a few who are unable to make it on their own merits.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  41. sounds more like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    these sound less like IT professionals and more like business managers and political "scientists".

  42. !(Impossible to Detect) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope, sorry, it's not impossible to detect.

    Most of our new IT folks with their shiny new degrees get a nice entry level position into the internal IT helpdesk, level 1 support.

    Installing Windows, Rebooting Computers, Installing service packs, lugging desktops, and pulling cable.

    If they can cut the mustard there, they get cross trained with the web folks, doing php/sql and some code.

    If they can still cut it there, they can go into development as a junior coder.

    It takes time and patience, something they should have learned by themselves at university. If they don't stick with it, I don't want them.

  43. Colleges don't have a choice. by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They are not being lenient, they are acting out of fear of lawsuits and funding cuts.

    Lenient is the PC way of saying we're letting unqualified people in because they meet one quota or another. Lenient is PC for saying passing over better qualified students because they don't come with bonus money : read government funds.

    One thing that does amaze me is some of the larger "private" schools who are sitting on billions all the while bemoaning the fact that the government doesn't do enough to pay for quota groups to attend. BILLIONS. Their interest alone would pay for many thousands to have access to their schools but they prefer to sit on it.

    Sorry, the courts and congress have already decided that merit is not a valid measurement, especially if declaring one side having more offends another.

    The one great truth too many people want to ignore is that we are not all created equal. The law can state otherwise, "feel gooders" can cry all they want, the PC police can declare the sentence "hate speech" but fortunately nature doesn't care.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  44. Ridicolous by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    Coursework and diploma dissertations should be a work of creativity. And one takes pride on what he/she creates. I can't imagine a stranger doing a better job at anything I am supposed to do, than myself. Even if I am not a good coder (I am not), I'll take the time it takes and do things right.

    Besides, how can these not be detected? If Matthew Proofrock would hand in coursework with horrible English grammar and style, you'd probably raise an eyebrow and start asking questions.

    As for outsourcing final dissertations: if students are able to pull THAT off, the commission/panel is not asking real questions, but just being patronizing - "We don't want to embarrass our student on this day, now do we...".

    I am actually studying in a non-IT field (material science, micro/nanotech, electronics), and our homeworks all require a lot of creativity. Students that just follow the dotted line and don't give anything from themselves, have little chance of having their work accepted. I don't know if that's the case everywhere, but it is here in Helsinki.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  45. Re:I see a red door. by Elky+Elk · · Score: 1

    I find your ideas intriuging and wish to subscribe to your revolution

  46. Close to home by sxmjmae · · Score: 1

    A long ago class mate started a company in Canada to do just this. He even asked if cared to do freelance work doing assignments to help keep up with the demand. His rates where not cheap and he offered good coin to do the work. I never took the work as I felt it would be unethical.

    --
    My Sig indicates the end of the comment I posted.
  47. hahahaa whats so bad about it ? by unity100 · · Score: 1

    when they end up working with their graduate degree, what they will be doing is practically going to be THIS anyway ? working in a global corporation, trying to synchronize budgets, datelines, goals with teams scattered around the world ?

    if they can pull it off, thats fine in my book. i doubt what technology they are being made to study with those assignments are going to be there when they are working their 5th year in the field, but people and project management skills, do stay forever.

    1. Re:hahahaa whats so bad about it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because some of us still value fairness, intelligence and foresight. If they can't do it they should fail and leave. Do you want to work with these assholes?

  48. Outsource Dissertation Evaluations by repetty · · Score: 2, Insightful


    The follow up article, which hasn't been published yet, is the effect that outsourcing dissertation evaluations has had on the educational process.

    The most shocking revelation will be that these outsourced professors frequently evaluate their own papers, effectively double-dipping.

  49. Try putting some effort in Prof by sheepofblue · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The professors are pathetic. OOO we can't stop cheating OOO guess we will just keep turning out dunces....

    Why not randomly select some papers and ask some questions? If you really wrote it you can easily explain 90%+.

    I am sure there is a LOT of other methods if the instructor actually put some thought and effort into doing their job.

    So in essence we have slackers complaining that slackers are bypassing the training. Personally it sounds like the instructor is getting across how they work quite well, how ironic.

  50. A new reality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This has been going on for years. I had one group of students post my final project on RentaCoder.com about 5 years ago. Fortunately, the assignment was of great enough complexity that no-one was willing to bid on it. As a result of this incident I learned how out of touch some senior adminstrators at my college were with current reality. The incident reached the highest levels and the response was "how is this different than students passing cheat-sheets". One difference of course is that it might be a Russian or Indian Ph.D passing the cheat sheet and it can't be caught. They couldn't comprehend this.

    There are some protective measures that can be taken. Using test questions that exercise what is learned in assignments (perhaps by including questions that are stripped down analogs of assignments or projects)and by requiring that students must have a passing grade in the test component to pass the course helps a little bit. I had one student once hand me an assignment that I don't believe could have been written by even a gifted student. It had the signature of several years of professional practice. Her cousin was a senior programmer on Wall Street. She failed the course because of the test component (which included a grossly simplified version of the project).

    Unfortunately, I believe this is the new reality and extra effort is required to deal with it.

    1. Re:A new reality! by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      When I was teaching, I used to require random students to defend their work. Every student was guaranteed at least 6 assignment defenses over a 15 week semester. It was easy to see who was and was not doing their own homework and labs. I did something similar to what you are talking about as well. We had a test component, a lab component, and an independent work component. I required students achieve a passing grade in all three in order to receive a passing grade for the course, as well as successfully defend 6 assignments/labs.

      I had zero tolerance for cheating. I once had two students from different lab sections turn in a lab that had the same data out to three decimal places for a table of voltage measurements. Talk about stupid. Both of those students were ultimately expelled from the University for academic misconduct. It was difficult to obtain the expulsion. I had to argue and argue and argue until I was blue in the face to convince the administration that we could not set the kind of precedent that tolerates that kind of behavior. The administrators worried about swamping their offices with work that would result from a complete University-wide zero-tolerance policy, and the subsequent soiling of the University's reputation in the World. *sigh*

    2. Re:A new reality! by Shados · · Score: 1

      having to defend your work is definately the solution. That way you can still cheat, but backing it up is actually harder than if you didn't cheat in the first place (learning how the work was done by heart is a lot harder if you didn't do it =P )

      Problem is, even in high end universities, professors and TAs tend to be lazy-ish and prefer to do stuff such as having a batch script grade all the assignments in one go. And you'd have to hire more people to have it done at a greater scale (for all courses, etc), and of course universities don't want that, even at the current cost of tuition.

      In the end, it would solve so many problems...not only with school, but with our society as a whole... those cheaters who get away with it (and there's a LOT of them...) can really mess things up down the line.

    3. Re:A new reality! by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      What's even worse is that those cheaters are often praised for their "creativity" and "out of the box" thinking and are rewarded with fat salaries and managerial positions. Their "moral flexibility" is what companies want because they want people who will break the rules to get ahead - that will make the company more money in the short term.

    4. Re:A new reality! by Shados · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right up until they screw up the company itself the way they screwed the school :)

  51. impossible to detect? by whtvr · · Score: 0

    "It's causing a major headache for lecturers who say it is almost impossible to detect."

    Perhaps lecturers should stop outsourcing to India preparing assignments... ?

  52. Shameful by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    I actually studied in college, and enjoyed doing so. Well most of it, anyway.

    Apply yourself - you'd be amazed at what you are capable of.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    1. Re:Shameful by geekoid · · Score: 1

      They area applying themselves, just not in this direction.

      From a money standpoint, using the extra time to make contacts and build a large social network will probably pay off more in the long run.

      I find this to be expected, and the only way to curb it is for the school to fail these people, or throw them out of the school.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  53. Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A bit off-topic, I know, but where can I get this service? (not for student assignments) I'd like to talk with someone individually, rather than going through a placement company. Cut out the middleman, so to speak. Google does not seem able to answer this question.

  54. Sad... by neowolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And yet, most large corporations require a 4-year degree (or more) just to get into the interview process for a job, regardless of one's real-world experience. We can see from this how much a lot of those 4-year degrees are really worth.

    1. Re:Sad... by neowolf · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I meant to say "...at least some of those 4-year degrees..." I shouldn't imply that most are like that (which they hopefully aren't).

  55. Not the Toyota Way by Dr.+Hok · · Score: 1

    The irony of course is that if they actually get jobs in the sector, this will be how they actually work anyway.
    While this is most probably true, it doesn't justify outsourcing your course work (even though some readers might think so).

    I attended a course on Scrum by Craig Larman recently, where brought utterly convincing arguments for what he called the Toyota Way, which, amongst others, requires that managers are excellent workers, not just administrators. If you want to tell people to do something, and if you want to judge their work, you need to know just as much about their work as they do.

    That's one of the reasons why Toyota became the most successful car manufacturer in the world, and surely SW people can learn a lot from them.

    My company is actually far from it. Our managers can't really make informed decisions, and this just so sucks.

    --
    Say out loud: I'm an Aspie and I'm somewhat proud, I guess. Uh. Can I write an email in all caps instead? Hm...
    1. Re:Not the Toyota Way by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Except he's wrong.

      The reason Toyota is so successful is for cultural reason, not management ones...per se.

      This is typical, someone looks at a foreign company, gloms onto something that meets a preconceived notion, then declare that's the reason they are successful.

      Completely ignoring other facts, like why other companies are failing, or the mountains of successful project ran by people with no practical working knowledge of what their people do.
      Low level knowledge, like not understanding the detail of garbage collecting, or how to best move through a linked list.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Not the Toyota Way by Dr.+Hok · · Score: 1

      Except he's wrong.

      This is typical, someone looks at a foreign company, gloms onto something that meets a preconceived notion, then declare that's the reason they are successful.

      Completely ignoring other facts, like why other companies are failing, or the mountains of successful project ran by people with no practical working knowledge of what their people do.

      That's why I wrote amongst others. In fact, there are a lot more reasons for Toyota's success (you might want to google go-and-see or stop-and-fix). But these were not the issue here. My point is that managers who believe they can just manage anything and don't need to know the details of the work are just plain fools.

      And this is the result of thorough analysis, not a preconceived notion.

      --
      Say out loud: I'm an Aspie and I'm somewhat proud, I guess. Uh. Can I write an email in all caps instead? Hm...
  56. Can dissertations really be outsorced by smooth123 · · Score: 1

    I can understand how students can get code written by someone from India. But dissertations, Are these dissertations made to professors from "University of Phoenix". If out sourced work can generate dissertations, how come the people who write these dissertations for £5, do not publish their own work. If professors cannot differentiate between dissertations that undermines their credibility. If you are outsourcing the code that you need to write that means the person is just lazy, how much time does it take to type something into google, and find your answer, thousands of Indians that provide code do it exactly that way.

  57. Re:I see a red door. by QuantumHobbit · · Score: 1

    Yes, but keep in mind this would be a war of 1st world scrawny nerds against 3rd world scrawny nerds. I expect the violent overthrow would look something like the Star Wars kid on a massive scale. There would be broken glasses and dropped inhalers everywhere.

  58. Don't you just hate the immaturity of... by mario_grgic · · Score: 1

    interviewers these days. You are hiring someone with master's degree and asking them concrete questions in a single programming language?

    Why don't you instead try to gauge how good the person is at solving problems, how fast do they learn and find their way around in a strange situation etc. After all their degree was supposed to teach them is how to learn fast, research and to develop mental skills and world view.

    It should only be a matter of weeks or months to master any programming language for people like that.

    So what if someone with a PhD in nuclear physics or pure math does not know C, or technology X, or the architecture of your business software. They will learn it faster than anyone else, and that is the point.

    If you wanted brainless coder (if there is such a thing at all) you should not have interviewed anyone with a post graduate degree.

    --
    As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
    1. Re:Don't you just hate the immaturity of... by brian_tanner · · Score: 1

      Job interview != IQ test. Your post sounds like sour grapes because you know you're a smart person so you don't think you should have to be demonstrably "good" at anything (except thinking) in order to get a job. As someone who has been in CS grad school for 5 years, and is about to graduate with a Ph.D, I can tell you that most of these "PhD in X" that you put on such a pedestal are not good programmers, and further they have no desire to be.

      If you need to hire someone who is mad smart and will be a great programmer, you should check that they already have a passion (or at least an interest) in programming. If they've treated it like a chore so far, then they probably always will. These are exactly the people will not perform well on your "concrete question in a specific language" question.

      On the other hand, someone who likes to program and spends some of his/her free time reading books on design patterns and software project management strategies, etc will likely be savvy enough to brush up on the language before the interview and do just fine.

  59. Assocaites don't run overseas projects by blueapples · · Score: 1

    The irony of course is that if they actually get jobs in the sector, this will be how they actually work anyway.
    Um, no. If they get a job at all (which would be surprising since they will likely completely fail initial interviews if the interviewers are worth anything at all), and even if it is at a company that outsources development, their work will consist of things that are not farmed out. Therefore they will fail, junior/associate level developers are not in charge of overseeing overseas development.
    --
    www.blueapples.org
  60. Anybody remember plagarism? by johndmartiniii · · Score: 1

    Are we really that surprised? We've had this in the humanities and social sciences for years. Go to any university in the developing world. Students pay people to write all their papers and exams. I heard a story recently about a political science PhD candidate at Western Michigan University who was discovered to have plagiarized everything that he had ever written.

    --
    If you don't know what you're doing, you can't make mistakes.
  61. I know a Prof who works this... by starkadder · · Score: 0

    He checks the project-for-hire boards for assignments he hands out, and bids to do the homework for the student. The sweet part is that he has hard proof of cheating, and get PAID by the looser he's about to throw out of his class.

  62. That's the spirit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outsource the trivial course work and spend your time doing more interesting stuff like for example contributing to open source projects.

  63. Not true. Too many applicants = Higher stats. by Arakageeta · · Score: 1
    I disagree. It is becoming harder and harder to be accepted into a University-- please ask any college admissions counselor. (I am married to one and I have to hear about all of the national conferences.) This difficulty comes from the increased need to perform well on tests. Much of the difficulty is due to the shear number of applicants. Even top-notch *private* universities are resorting to a "pantyhose chart" (SAT vs. GPA) method to filter through the bulk of applications. These universities traditionally were known for a more "personal" examination of each applicant as a unique individual-- not a SAT/GPA ratio. Relief is coming though. The baby-boom echo is cresting this admissions cycle (or some such). There will be fewer applicants in the coming years.

    I think we can agree on one thing however: The reduction of an applicant to a statistic is detrimental to the creativeness of the student body. Many brilliant minds are surely passed over because the admissions office did not (or could not) take the time to look deeper.

  64. re: I actually agree, BUT it's more complicated... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    There's some sort of "balance" you have to strike when it comes to adjusting minimum wage.

    If you let it get too low, everyone else in the country gets a "pay cut", in the form of paying for more welfare programs and tax cheating.

    (You might be surprised how many low-income families just manage to survive, using a combination of 2 people earning near min. wage pay, claiming childcare tax deductions of people who aren't really their own kids, and collecting all the welfare benefits possible to claim.)

  65. Re:I see a red door. by cptnapalm · · Score: 1

    And the idle rich and poor would come together, in the spirit of harmony, to laugh and mock.

  66. It is to be expected and even aplauded. by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    I will be a benifit to your companies bottom line, I know how to keep costs down by out sourcing work and I have the experience to back it up.

  67. India and the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    the last few decades of computer science education in US/European universities gave the world..

    Unix, DOS, Linux, PCs, mainframes, supercomputers, C, C++, Fortran, Java, Perl, Python, Ruby..

    Last few years of IT in india (is it? I do not think it is Indian CS graduates doing all this - they, along with the rest of the brainy folks out there, are busy working for multinationals) gave the world..

    a few folks who will teach the rest of the world how to cheat, cheap.

    India, you have had 50 years of corruption. There are a lot of developed countries in the world that you can elarn a lot from, and improve your lot quite a bit. Why dont you learn how to develop your country infrastructure, and create/invent some products, software, medicines etc on your OWN instead of simply compying eveyrthing and also teaching the rest of the world your corrupt ways?

    How many of your software companies actually develop a product? Do not count the ones where ideas come from US/Europe multi nationals.

    How many of your pharma compnies actually develop a medicine instead of stealing something and filing patent lawsuits?

    How many of your IT grads resumes are actually true? I am not talking padding, but blatant lies involving false jobs, assignments etc.

    How many of your infrastructure projects see completion without 70% of the funds ending up in some private bank account?

    The developed world is not without faults, but they surely have done some things right to get where they are. Why dont you guys just learn something good from the developed world instead of teaching them your corrupt ways?

  68. It hurts everyone in the program... by strimpster · · Score: 1

    when this happens. If many students graduate from a program and have no clue about the subject matter, it begins to devalue the degree for the hard working students. I can recall many times students attempting to cheat in my Software Engineering undergraduate program at U of M - Dearborn. Some of the professors actually devised some pretty interesting ways of catching students who were cheating.

    I'll never forget one instance though. It was the final class of my Software Engineering II class and we had to present our final projects. One of the students was nervously typing away to finish making his presentation when he asked me what a labyrinth was to which I replied a maze. It was very obvious at that point that the student had ripped his project offline some how. The humorous part was when he began to describe his technology during the presentation where it was apparent he did not know the difference between Java and JavaScript. He talked about needing the JVM to run the JavaScript that it was written in. The teacher began to prod at him more about this since the student obviously did not know what he was talking about. The student began to get really nervous and also couldn't explain the inner workings of the software either. I don't know what happened with that, but I do know that I felt relieved that someone actually got caught cheating and embarrassed for it.

  69. Aw, EASY to detect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article header : "It's causing a major headache for lecturers who say it is almost impossible to detect."

    I would have though such activity would be extremely easy to detect, especially by a course instructor. Simply prepare a very comprehensive, challenging final exam based on the semester's coursework, then GIVE that exam at the end of the semester.

    Those students that fail are prime candidates for having outsourced their coursework during the semester. Those that pass the exam very likely put in the hours and did the work.

    Elementary, my dear Watson.

  70. Money? by denzacar · · Score: 2, Funny

    How is it rewarding? With money?
    You know... those little paper thingies with numbers and pictures of people on them, that you give at the store and they let you take things out of the store?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Money? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      You know... those little paper thingies with numbers and pictures of people on them, that you give at the store and they let you take things out of the store. You can also give them to women and they let you put things into the women.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  71. Summary is wrong by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    The irony of course is that if they actually get jobs in the sector, this will be how they actually work anyway.
    This is not how they will work. This is how their would-be boss will work. Their would-be boss will farm the work out to India and they themselves will be without a job.
    It would be awesome if the industry worked the way the summary states. That is, that I, as a programmer could take a portion of my salary and pay some Indians to do my job while I sit at home and drink Margaritas, but management is clever enough to see this happening and determines that they can just pay the Indians directly and not employ you at all, and then THEY can sit at home and drink margaritas while you mow their lawn.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    1. Re:Summary is wrong by RockMFR · · Score: 1

      Well this is the most disappointing thing I've heard in a long time. Why didn't anyone tell me this before now?

  72. But they have the tech to fool that test too... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Mind you, this is also a good argument for forcing students to show their intermediate work (design, etc) and to do said intermediate work with pen and paper. It's a lot harder to outsource something that would be in the wrong handwriting and have to be Fedex'd from India. Are we assuming now that those smart enough (which is not a lot) to "outsource" homework don't know how to read and write too?
    Or that they are incapable of copying the notes by hand?

    Oh... and since we are practicing the "practical interview" - why hire college graduates at all? We ARE assuming that their diploma is useless, right?
    Just get a bunch of kids fresh out of highschool instead.
    Or... wait a second... I have a brilliant idea coming up here...

    How about giving the jobs to those kids in India?
    They can walk the walk, let them talk the talk too.
    They will obviously pass the "practical interview", right?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  73. It's self-correcting.... by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Informative

    Home-grown talent that cheated their way into jobs either A) gets frustrated by their poor performance reviews and inability to succeed in their chosen field, and gets out, or B) actually learns to be competent over time (at the expense of whoever the sucker was who employed them first).

    I saw a lot of both A and B over the years, even with a few buddies of mine.

    EG. I once knew a guy who was pretty much your stereotypical "happy, go lucky, wanna-be beach bum" type. He got into I.T. as an entry-level coder using relatively high-level programming tools like "Powerbuilder". All he really did was minor code maintenance (such as, "Please change things so the clock time is displayed here, instead of here, on our screens"). He wound up scoring a support job at Oracle, earning at least 3x his former pay, with no real Oracle experience, all because he crash-course studied the thing for like 2 weeks after finding out he had an interview scheduled. Only REAL reason he wanted that job? He got to re-locate to Colorado, where he wanted to ski really badly. But his friendly personality and willingness to "cram" to know "just enough" to get by in a given situation got him through.....

  74. Finally, the mysterious "hidden" step is revealed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    1)Complete your own programming assignment
    2)Purchase outsourced assignment
    3)Approach girl 'A'
    4)Have sex
    5)Give girl 'A' outsourced assignment
    6)Approach girl 'B'
    7)Have sex
    8)Give girl 'B' same outsourced assignment
    9)Repeat

    That's got PROFIT!!! written all over it.

    Better yet, when they get caught handing in the same assignment and point the finger at you, you can just say, "I didn't write that. Look, the style is completely different!"

  75. Re:So talk to the student? Damn Straight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We had a senior design course teacher for EE at NCSU named Dr. Sutton (Satan). After receiving peer evaluations from 4 people stating one person did absolutely nothing for the project, he sat her down in front of the group and gave her basic concept questions from second year. When she could not answer them, or even show the equation for a simple voltage division, he told her she would never graduate until she could prove competency in person.

    Team Xerox only works until you have to put up or shut up...

    She shut up.

    Oh well, she was gorgeous, so she is probably a manager at a Fortune 500 by now.

  76. Atlas by Digital+End · · Score: 1

    Things like this always make me think of the leechers of Atlas Shrugged... and how they infect every area of society.

    That book killed my ability to forgive the stupid and the lazy who gave forth no effort to improve.

    --
    Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master.
  77. NOT if by that you mean just harder tests by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Colleges need to raise their standards. What will you get out of that?
    Less graduates per year, but boy will they be smart?

    Only trouble is... By the time they finish with college their jobs will be taken by those guys from India.
    Or by guys not as smart, but smart enough to do the job.

    "Harder criteria" just means that you will create a bottleneck at certain points - not create better graduates.
    If anything... it will just mean that in a year or two you will gather couple of hundred more students at those bottlenecks and you will either have no control over them and they will cheat their way through the test or you will have to lower the bar even more just so you could get some breathing room.

    If by "raising standards" you mean more and better teachers "per capita" - by increasing the number of teachers, not decreasing the number of students - you might be on to something.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  78. Comes out in the wash by icandodat · · Score: 1

    This is where the free market will shake out the losers. We had a guy at my company who spent nearly two years here and probably only wrote 100 lines of code. If my boss weren't such a nice guy he would have been gone in two weeks. The point is, in the free market if you can't perform you don't get paid. The sad part of this is these kids are screwing themselves both out of an education and a future revenue stream.

  79. Brings back memories by archammer2 · · Score: 1

    Ah, reading this article and the comments brings back memories of my grad school days as a CS major. Most of the professors could give a damn if the code we wrote was our own. However, there were a few professors that checked... with hilarious results.
    Prof: "Okay, and why did you do that?"
    Student #1: "Umm... well, we..."
    Prof: "You made the same mistake last year's students made... even after I told you multiple times over the last three weeks to watch out for it!"

    My code may have been crap, but I could at least explain why I did every line of code and every bad decision. It was crap, but it was my crap.

  80. Yeah but... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    It will all be CG violence in WoW or StarCraft2 or whatever will be the war-game of choice at the time.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  81. Irony? by spyfrog · · Score: 1

    "The irony of course is that if they actually get jobs in the sector, this will be how they actually work anyway."

    The irony of course is that after their graduation, they will see that their work already is outsourced!

    1. Re:Irony? by kilroy0097 · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the truth. Business models are already outsourcing anything information based that they can. Industry is slowly coming back due to gas prices and cost of transportation of goods but information transmission is free for the most part.

  82. They are only hurting themselves.. by cryptodan · · Score: 2, Informative

    because when they actually doing work related to their degrees they will not know the material and thusly will get fired. Its better to do the work yourself then pay someone else to do it.

  83. It's not the students, it's the "teachers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know how many professors I've had too occupied with their own research or simply too inept to teach the subjects they're paid to teach.

  84. Snotty Education. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    The problem with the Education is the degree of snottyness applied to it. Having a degree shouldn't be a requirement for any job however it would show that you have formally covered the topics.
    We should go to school as a way to formally learn about a topic. Not as a prereq for a job or get a higher degree just so you can teach at that level. Learning the information in a formal way would help getting a job but... It shouldn't be the deal or no deal for any job.
    But the education system has been geared up that Education = Higher Class.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  85. Easy Solution by BlueZombie · · Score: 1

    When caught, kick them out of Comp Sci and let them enroll in Business or Political Science I had a coworker one place I worked, that would take her programming assignments around the floor and find someone not to loaded down to "mentor" her in how to perform the task. We didn't catch on until later when we started comparing notes and realized that she was basically outsourcing her job to her coworkers for free. She was, of course, promoted to a management position.

  86. I hope they all got "A"s! by bradgoodman · · Score: 1

    And who says US students aren't learning valuable "real-world" skills in the classroom!?

  87. Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know smart people cheat too. And it's really impossible to catch a really smart cheater. Why? Well, most of these posts assumes the cheater just paid someone $5 to solve the problem and not have a clue about how to do it themselves. Where this really is impossible to detect is those that do understand the assignment and could do it in 8 hours or so, but has decided it's better for their life to pay someone else $5 to do most of it. I say most of it because say that Indian guy just did 7-10 hours of coding and actually did solve most of your poorly worded spec. Well, you being the smart cheater, spend maybe 10-20 minutes going through it inside and out commenting and knowing exactly what was done. $5 for 7 hours of prep work so you only have to spend 30 minutes to an hour actually learning improving it.

    I find all these complaints of folks outsourcing their Phd stuff to India truly funny. Why? How about you getting 10-20 actual Indian professors to write that many papers whose only real purpose is for you to use as source material in your end product? O.k. It wouldn't be quite that bad, but you'd basically be paying for them to publish something to be peer reviewed that you can use as a source. That's exactly how Phds work anyway... You could even say you just sponsored 10-20 Indian or Chinese grants... The trick would be timing so that their work would show up published a semester or two before you really needed it. The thing is that some one that smart certainly could spend the months required to hash out everything by themselves, but it could be much easier if you actually got experienced PHds to do most of the setup for you... Then you can look really impressive for quoting foreign Phds in obscure journals and know your subject.

    I read a post some one watching student presentations. Do you really want to know the one's that end up with the highest paid jobs? It's those that spend the absolute min time on tech and BS just right to the given audience. Professors are human and they reward good showmanship if it actually does fullfil their given requirements. Note you've got 10-15 group projects to watch and grade. All of the full the requirements to most extent. It's the showman ship that really sets one of from the other.

  88. DO the math by kcdoodle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I taught "Advance Application Development and Design" at Senior level at a major State University.
    We had 13 weeks, twice a week and a few holidays.
    So I got to see the student who did not skip class 24 times.

    In that time I gave 10 Quizzes, 2 Tests and 5 Projects to a usual 35 students.
    Quizzes and Tests were pretty easy to make, grade and prevent cheating.

    Projects are another thing altogether. Each student project takes about an hour to find, run, test, grade and provide feed back on. Each project can be turned in multiple time by students. When all the hours are calculated, I was making about $2/hr.
    Now you want me to see you separately? Sure, all you need to do is ask. No one EVER asked. I would even cruise the labs looking for my students so I could help. Only a few times was this fruitful.
    Because of rampant cheating, I started giving different, but similar projects to the students. A lot more student struggled, and more assignments were late, a few more failed, and my grading time was greatly increased.
    I got tired of students who feel entitled to a passing grade if they take a class, and who feel entitled to a good grade if the attend more than half of them, so I quit.

    When I was a student, I had a full time job and paid for school myself. Other student were joyous when an instructor canceled class. I, of course, was angry for not getting my money's worth.

    --

    - I live the greatest adventure anyone could possibly desire. - Tosk the Hunted
    1. Re:DO the math by MickLinux · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, well when I was in aerospace engineering, I had a GTA who gave lab assignments once every 2 weeks, with a "required set of sections" that made each lab take about 50 pages.

      Of course, everyone else just skipped the required sections, and put in "data" "results" and a short "conclusion". I did the full 50 pages, at about 1 hr per page.

      In addition, there were supposed to be professionally done computer printouts that (at the time) only Harvard Graphics could handle. Since Harvard Graphics was expensive, I was the only one who wrote his own programs to produce the graphs. Most others used a pirate copy.

      So I ended up spending 25 hrs/wk on these labs, turning them in 2 days late, while everyone else turned them in on time. The GTA kept delaying grading anything...

      At the end of the course, he graded all of them 90, regardless of content, minus 10 points per day late. So I got a D in the course, having damaged my other grades in an effort to do well in what I thought was a very important part of my education. The administration upheld the GTA, perhaps because they decided it would be impolitic to fail 90% of the class based on their work... ... and my pressure on the issue also ended up costing me recommendations...

      I think my story outdoes your story.

      But we live in the society we live in. Just desserts do come, but not always. C'est la vie.

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    2. Re:DO the math by aeoo · · Score: 1

      Oh man... I sooooo sympathize with you. This happened to me many times in my education so I eventually stopped giving a fuck and quit.

      The thing is, I found most professors don't give a damn about their job or students, have no passion for the field they are in, TA's don't give a damn either, other students don't give a damn, and if you happen to be the only one who does give a damn, you'll be severely penalized for it.

      After being penalized a few times for caring, I quit. I think the education system needs reform, and I don't mean just high schools. I mean the colleges in USA are falling apart. Maybe the University system just can't be made to work since it's so heavily institutionalize and therefore bureaucratic. Bureaucracy strongly interferes with genuine learning.

      I feel sorry you had to endure that bullshit. You are a rare craftsman who makes our world a better place and it's a shame our educational system had no place for someone of your caliber.

    3. Re:DO the math by ndg123 · · Score: 1

      Frankly if you knew your approach was (a) ethically right and (b) not achievable in the time allowed, you should have raised that immediately after the first lab was late in. So stuff you learned in college:- Life isn't fair. Organisations don't usually like people rocking the boat. The majority wins the day. A blind eye will be turned to commonly accepted immoral activity if it gets the job done faster or cheaper You can't throw labor at every problem however cheap it is. Following the instructions to the letter is not always necessary - look around and see what your peers or competitors are doing and read the acceptable standards in your environment. Sounds to me you got a pretty good education there. Good for you doing the full lab assignment - I don't understand why the rest weren't penalised if they were required. But as for the method of getting to the results, going off and writing your own programs to produce graphs when there is a commonly used tool available is just a waste of time. It smacks of inefficency and a narrow-minded view of the possible ways to get a job done. I guess in your case, the moral aspect coupled with the high software cost vs your income led you down that path.

    4. Re:DO the math by WhiteHorse-The+Origi · · Score: 1

      As a math teacher in high school, I catch cheaters almost every test. Almost all of my students copy homework and hand in identical assignments. This is ingrained in them from previous teachers. It's rampant.

      I do face-to-face quizzes and see 5 kids with 90% and 30 with 5-40%. I finally switched to electronic grading/testing with randomized question order and randomized answer order. It saves me a lot of hassle and identifies the cheaters rapidly.

      I don't give homework anymore. It's all done in class and closely monitored. Many students hate me but the bright ones finish early and have free time while I focus on the rest.

      I can't imagine this working at a university with classes of 100+ students. I remember 10 Saudis got expelled(almost) at my university when they got caught cheating. I guess they just took their money elsewhere and the professor was back-shelved. By the time I finished my Physics degree, there were only 5 people remaining. I had people try to copy my work and ride my coat-tails but I just told them I didn't know the answers so they went elsewhere.

      In the end, the bright kids went to grad school, the cheaters went into the private sector, and the minorities and women all got free rides whether they cheated or not or were bright or not.

      I also remember being the authority on computers for all the IT students. "What's extreme programming?", "What's a cluster for?", "Can I run Linux on Windows?" "What's that command to see the file permissions in OSX?" hehe

      As for doing extra work, it's up to the student to ask the professor what's an acceptable level of work. I took a lot of "C"'s unnecessarily because I killed myself trying to learn a subject I like, rather than focusing on my grades. Now I'm considered an "average" person even though I got a B+ in Quantum Mechanics II. Go figure...

      I was planning to GRE into grad school but they switched to a subjective essay grading methodology which means you have to know which position is popular with the graders on a wide range of subjects. Since I'm a dissident, I would score low.

      So... the end result is a Math teacher rather than a Fusion researcher and the people doing the fusion research haven't found anyone to copy lately so there haven't been any significant breakthroughs. Oh wait! They found ice on Mars! Whoopee! Oil and gas, oil and gas...

      Sorry LANL and DARPA, I hope you enjoy your minorities and women. :)

  89. Re:Not true. Too many applicants = Higher stats. by COMON$ · · Score: 1
    Ya that irks me as well. Brilliance is not a matter of memorization, which really is all that the SAT/ACT shows an ability to do. Some of the most talented folks I know were no where near 4.0. Hell, I had a 2.7 in college mostly because my memory is aweful, which is demonstrated by my ability to Ace things like CS courses, Physics, Advanced Mathematics and do very well in graphical design courses. I am what many would consider a very successful network administrator and my references will back up my exceptional behavior at my past jobs.

    But I say this because I know a TON of people just like me, who either dropped out of college, or just barely passed, but are some of the best and brightest in their fields. Memorization means jack in the real world, I document like hell because I don't remember and don't need to. However it is the easiest thing to grade in school so that is what they measure you on.

    --
    CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
  90. Where can I do this ? by lbalbalba · · Score: 1

    Ok, so im not really a developer, but I have been looking for some company to code a MUD in C for me, with a GUI builder included. Perhaps someone could enlighten me and explain to me just how I should go about outsourcing such a project ? As mentioned, Im not a developer myself so Im primarily interested in the actual usage of the finished application. Where to turn to and the estimated costs of such an endeavorement would be of additonal help

  91. Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most rich kids applying to university in the US were already paying university professors to write their essays for years. It has just been democratized.

  92. We never cheated and our school gets no respect. by Whoever · · Score: 0

    I went to a small school. The University of Idaho. 100% no bs... nobody cheated here from 2003-2007. You would have been caught. Maybe some incoming freshman would cheat. However, they would usually drop out of cs and pick a different major or they would be thrown out. After freshman year everyone was serious and by serious I mean serious nerds... I think I graduated with maybe ten cs majors max.

    http://bellspace.net/

  93. No man is an island by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1

    Forcing anyone to do with their lives and property other than they wish is a violation of their rights as human beings. Any gain that results from such endeavors is not justified - ie, the ends do not justify the means.

    What, not even if they're a psychopath, and what they want to do with their lives is kill people?

    Or, less extreme - what if they're a truck driver. They want to work an 80 hour week. Fine? Or do you think the chances of them falling asleep at the wheel and plowing through traffic is too high to be acceptable to the general public?

    1. Re:No man is an island by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1



      "What, not even if they're a psychopath, and what they want to do with their lives is kill people?"

      Did you even read what I said? "Forcing anyone to do with their lives and property other than they wish is a violation of their rights as human beings." If a psychopath forces anyone to do with their lives other than they wish, he has violated their rights................

      "Or, less extreme - what if they're a truck driver. They want to work an 80 hour week. Fine?"

      Yes.

  94. Skipping class is not a big deal by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I think you have some very good ideas to cut down on cheating etc.

    When I attended university, I regularly skipped classes if I thought I would not learn anything in that class. I could then use that time more productively.

    A friend and I buddied up taking notes: he took course A and I took course B. We still did the tests (one mid-term test per course) and both got good grades in both courses. I hardly learned anything from those courses but they were prerequisites so I had to take them.

    I think what I did was right because all I skipped was the drudge stuff of attending class.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  95. Give them what they deserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These kids shouldn't be kicked out of school or even reprimanded, they should just be awarded an MBA upon graduation instead of a computer science degree.

  96. actual websites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does anyone know where these kids are subcontracting work to? (i.e. which websites?)

  97. My experiences... by SanguineV · · Score: 1

    I think a fair portion of the blame for the problem should fall to the institution involved, both for the lack of proper examination and for creating/supporting a culture where it is acceptable.

    Examination
    I have been through a number of subjects at undergrad and masters level in CS where the marking encourages unfair behaviour. This includes:
    - group assignments where you lose marks if anyone doesn't do an equal part (even if they are incompetent, don't speak English, don't turn up, etc.)
    - group work where you all have the same mark no matter what
    - peer assessment where you can "fail" for doing something half the class can't understand.
    Then there is also marking systems that make no attempt to detect cheating,even simple things like two students submitting very similar work.

    Culture
    I have been at universities where the expectation is to pass as long as you do the barest minimum. Where someone who copies and pastes text off the internet into a report is allowed a week to "correctly cite your sources" before their mark is worked out. Subjects where the official marks is 0-100, but the real marks range from 45-85 with 45 being "didn't turn up or do anything" and 85 being "the top of the class without a single minor spelling mistake.

    Another cultural problem is in managing the expectations of the students. I have been in groups where the students all want to achieve excellent results... and groups where they just want a piece of paper at the end. Worst of all is the university where they accept large numbers of internation students at exhorbitant rates to gain funding. Naturally if an international student fails a course they appeal and are almost always granted some kind of special consideration and minimal passing mark. It has reached the point where some members of staff don't bother failing students any more because they know that the uni won't back them up anyway.

    Skepticism
    That said, I am skeptical that any university really can't tell in the case of a dissertation. My experiences with honours/masters level (ask me next year for PhD experiences) has been that you need to know your work in great detail not to be caught out by the interviewing panel and/or markers. And that assumes you aren't (un)lucky enough to have panel members who don't have some political agenda/issue with your work. :P

    Ultimately I strongly doubt any compatent professor could have a student work under them for 1 to 4+ years and not notice if they submitted work they didn't do. In such a case if/when it is found out I really think the supervisor should be help partially accountable!

    Finally,I realise I have come down quite hard on the uni/supervisor in my post. Obviously none of this can occur if the student doesn't attempt to cheat. But I do feel that the student should be encouraged to do their own work and "aided" by a system that rewards their own work while making cheating a risky and unrewarding option.

  98. Oh. . . So That's What It's Called? by gacl · · Score: 1

    So when i was in high school and the lazy rich kids that i saw there paid the smart ones to do their work for them. . . they were just "outsourcing"!?

  99. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem here is that by the time these students in the UK and US, will be totally unprepared when they reach their jobs in whatever sector they end up in they'll be so unprepared for whatever they'll be doing they'll likely end up on the street.

  100. This Reply by TornCityVenz · · Score: 1

    I've been outsourceing my replies to /. for about the last three weeks. (why do you think I bothered to start logging on?)

    --
    I Need someone to rebuild a Digitech Digital Delay pedal for me....for me...for me...for me.
  101. Stupid students by czbok · · Score: 0

    They just don't know the purpose of going to uni

  102. The problem will solve itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the people that is outsourcing today become in the future the people that grade the work.
    They can outsource that as well.... just imaging someone in Romania being asked first to write a complex piece of software and then a week after being asked to rate his own project!

  103. The down side is... by Genda · · Score: 1

    The downside is someone else is doing your heavy mental lifting for you. Laziness and expedience are only an asset if they make you smarter. This may help you win tody's battle, but it will almost certainly cost you tomorrow's war.

    I remember when calculators first came out. Having had traditional math, and gone the next levels to some more interesting mathematical thinking including number theory... studying the universe had context... Avagadro's Number had weight and meaning, Plank's Constant and the Speed of Light have relevance. The width of the visible universe actually means something and there are elegant ideas worth grasping here.

    Today kids take calculators for granted. Sadly they enter a number incorrectly and come up with a ridiculous answer to the question they thought they were asking, and they don't even notice the answer is ridiculous. Wrong by orders of magnitude, but their Pavlovian trust in the calculator and their lack of getting their hands (and minds) dirty in with the business end of numbers has them at great disadvantage.

    Someday, that you student will be competing in a world market against the young Indian Man who did his dissertation for him... who do you think will fair best???

  104. Be a rat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I first discovered Rent-A-Coder back when I was unemployed, it was immediately obvious that 95% of the projects up there were CS assignments/homework. The funny part was, that in my cases, the materials linked back to their professors' web pages, or were easily Google-able.

    So what did I do? I decided to be a rat - I contacted all of the professors that I could, and in one case, the professor himself did a sting operation by "bidding" to do the work.

    (Of course, I don't do this anymore given how I'm employed once again and the IT job market is as tight as it was in 1999.)

  105. Let them go for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell, I say let them go for it. It's all fun and games until you're fired from your first job for incompetence.

    Seriously, if you skate by through college like that, you're not going to survive in the real world. Its only a matter of time until you're outed for the incompetent moron you are and given the pink slip.

  106. Management Experience! by Giant+Electronic+Bra · · Score: 1

    LOL, lets be real, all the grunt work is going overseas. Nobody is going to be paying programmers in the US inflated wages to do work that someone better qualified and much cheaper can do over there in 10 years.

    So, if you REALLY do want to learn what you're going to have to know, then managing contractors is it, because that's all the jobs that will be left.

    --
    "Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem." -- Jefferson
  107. What's site? by origins · · Score: 1

    I wanna know what's site provide such a service,to CHEATING.

  108. Yeah, it's not new by namco · · Score: 1

    I know.

    I've been looking for freelance work on outsourcing sites and often you get "homework". Considering I've been to uni, I can tell how lecturers write their assignments and all these idiots just don't bother to reword them at all.

    But in the long run, it'll get back to them in the end.

    I can't see how it would be possible to keep track of all the outsourcing sites, since you seem to set a couple of new ones every so often. People have even asked for projects *ON* freelance sites to build more of them!

    The only interesting one around is Odesk, since they have the idea of bringing groups of programmers to a project, rather than relying on a single person or "company".

  109. Assignment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found a really blatant example on an outsourcing website. Nobody had accepted the job and the deadline was yesterday so I'm wondering if this student turned their attention to figuring out how to steal a classmate's code.
    ==

    I need this simple Java program written for me. If you are experienced I don't think this will take you very long.

    Your task in this assignment is to write a simple class definition for a vending machine. The class should have:

            * Attributes
                        o Soda count
                        o Money credit (how much money has been inserted)
            * Methods
                        o Add money
                        o Vend
                        o Restock
                        o Constructor

    For simplicity sake, you may assume that the machine can hold up to 50 of one type of soda; you may also assume that all sodas cost $0.65. When adding money, simply take in a floating-point number representing how much money to add (i.e. you do not have to manage different coins).

    Be sure to make sure that enough money was added to the machine before a soda is vended. Also, when a soda is vended, return the appropriate change (i.e. if more than $0.65 was added to the machine, then return the extra money). Again, don't worry about managing different kinds of coins â" just display the amount returned.

    When the machine is "restocked," just set the soda count to the maximum that the machine will hold.

    Once you have written the class, create a main/driver program that interacts with an instance of the class. Your program should present a menu of options to the user and process the userâ(TM)s choice; use creativity and object-oriented design in your solution

    **Must know how many hours you will need to complete. Need this by Monday June 30.

  110. I curse you with sucess by kcdoodle · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you were indeed successful in that lab class.

    You learned more than anyone else (including the lab instructor).

    I put a curse to you and all other readers.

    "May you succeed in some academic or programming project that you originally felt far beyond your capabilities. May you succeed so well that you are actually PROUD of your accomplishment. May this pride stay with you and make you try to repeat this success in all of your future projects. May you feel frustration when circumstances work against you and you fail. May the memory of your wonderful success make you quit jobs, create things, and learn every single minute you have left to you."

    CURSE YOU -- DAMMIT.

    --

    - I live the greatest adventure anyone could possibly desire. - Tosk the Hunted