Yes I do know the numbers. I'm thinking of something like this. Sure, people would think it an eyesore, but technically speaking, skyscrapers fall into the same category, but people are used to them.
I agree. A "gas station" could consist of a giant wind turbine which directly drives a compressor. Obviously the tower would have to be extra high in an urban environment, to avoid the turbulence at low elevations.
I'm not a super fit person, but I'm averaging 27 km/h on a 29 km round trip cycle commute. This is in metro Melbourne area, so not too hilly, but not flat either.
If you know what detailed and accurate specs are, then you'll just have to sit down and write them. Bear in mind that this will involve a lot of interviewing of the prospective system users, to discover and document what they do now, and figure how best to implement it in your new system. I hope you've budgeted for this process in your estimate.
If you set your mirrors wide enough, you don't end up with any blind spot. Next time you're in the car, just note the duplication/overlap of visual information between the three mirrors.
I think you'll find it is return on captial that holds up these sort of process plant additions. I worked on a catalyitic hydro desulfurisation (CHD) unit installation at on of XOM's refineries. If you have to spend $80 million or so on an additional process that doesn't add any meaningful value to the product, then you won't spend that money till the government tells you to.
Additionally, when you're running a 50 y/o clunker of a refinery, with a book value of about $300 million, then any additional new process unit will substantially increase the captial employed, so if you can't increase throughput, or significantly increase the value of your product, then your return on captial takes a big hit.
Except the 60 on your speedo is not necessarily the 60 on my speedo. Speedometer error is the reason why people shouldn't get self-righteous about speed limits.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes I do know the numbers. I'm thinking of something like this. Sure, people would think it an eyesore, but technically speaking, skyscrapers fall into the same category, but people are used to them.
I agree. A "gas station" could consist of a giant wind turbine which directly drives a compressor. Obviously the tower would have to be extra high in an urban environment, to avoid the turbulence at low elevations.
FORTRAN is a cancer. Not yet in remission, either.
But a tank full of liquid petrol/gasoline can't dissipate its entire compliment of energy instantaneously.
I'm not a super fit person, but I'm averaging 27 km/h on a 29 km round trip cycle commute. This is in metro Melbourne area, so not too hilly, but not flat either.
I have it in my brain that muscles are approximately 17% efficient (food calories in v mechanical work done)
It would be good, 'cause it would turn them into x-windows
And since you are one of the people in your area, what does one make of that?
So one US government administration is trying to save civilisaiton, and the other US administration seems hell bent on destroying it.
MPAA are people too... ...I think.
Who will own the copyright to the apology video?
Perhaps you might like to elaborate on your aversion to Ubuntu in this situation?
But if you drum up enough supporters to finance and execute your policy, then [oversized violin], we'd have to send you too!
Does the RIAA know about this?
And Hollywood movies are not fungible? They all seem the same to me
If you know what detailed and accurate specs are, then you'll just have to sit down and write them. Bear in mind that this will involve a lot of interviewing of the prospective system users, to discover and document what they do now, and figure how best to implement it in your new system. I hope you've budgeted for this process in your estimate.
If you set your mirrors wide enough, you don't end up with any blind spot. Next time you're in the car, just note the duplication/overlap of visual information between the three mirrors.
And since most "black box" flight recorders are actually bright orange, it makes one wonder what colour they'll choose.
I think you'll find it is return on captial that holds up these sort of process plant additions. I worked on a catalyitic hydro desulfurisation (CHD) unit installation at on of XOM's refineries. If you have to spend $80 million or so on an additional process that doesn't add any meaningful value to the product, then you won't spend that money till the government tells you to.
Additionally, when you're running a 50 y/o clunker of a refinery, with a book value of about $300 million, then any additional new process unit will substantially increase the captial employed, so if you can't increase throughput, or significantly increase the value of your product, then your return on captial takes a big hit.
These projects are "stay in business" projects.
Slashdot. Where you sit and read about other people wasting time...
Frist Post!
It's snappy iiifff yooou coome frommm ouuutbaaack Queeeenslaaand.
And with GRUB, you can dual boot vi & emacs.
Don't do your DoS attacks from Sweden or the UK.
Except the 60 on your speedo is not necessarily the 60 on my speedo. Speedometer error is the reason why people shouldn't get self-righteous about speed limits.