Not that I agree with the filter in any way whatsoever, but there is a difference between an unrated game and a game that has been refused classification.
Profit or no, damages should include what the licence is asking for. In the case of Thomas, $24, in the case of Atari, code. In the case of infringement for profit, the revenue generated by the infraction should be added to the damages.
In addition to these damages, there should be a punitive fine that is large enough to make the infringer think twice before infringing again, but small enough to not mean financial ruin.
Yes it is required. There is no requirement for a publisher to release changes to public domain code. Without copyright law, the world would be like the BSD licence, but without the attribution.
but we have documents that are more than 2000 years old. There is no guarantee that we'll have our digital works 2000 years from now
And 2000 years ago there was no guarantee that those works would survive for 2000 years. And there's no guarantee that your Kodachrome photos will survive for 2000 years either. Chances are neither they nor the digital ones will, unless you make something people actually care about, in which case the digital is more likely to survive, since it is simple to copy and convert.
And this is exactly what should be happening. The carrier can develop technologies such as these to differentiate themselves from their competition, instead of relying on phone manufacturers. There is no reason they couldn't have done this without the iPhone. Phone manufacturers would much rather add features such as these to their phones, instead of the current situation of having to remove features because the networks demand it.
Every time someone chats with a friend about the day's news, a poor, helpless newspaper loses money. And God kills a kitten.
Win-win!
cup holders can be purchased at higher levels, or stolen if you are a rouge character
Damn commies!
If it is more interesting to have a bot play instead of you all the time, then the game simply sucks.
Who said it was more interesting?
In the end, they are just politicians. Highly corrupt, brutal politicians, but politicians nonetheless.
You could have just left it as 'they are just politicians'.
I wish MS would step in and stop them from ruining otherwise decent laptops.
As much as I hate all that crap, I wouldn't wish that in a million years.
Afraid of zombies in red jackets dancing if you fail to finish the project?
It's like you read my mind! Zombies are psychic are they?
Go to bed early, next to a window facing East. Wake up in sunlight.
I live at the South Pole you insensitive clod!
I can't say I trust them enough to not let malware through.
Not that I agree with the filter in any way whatsoever, but there is a difference between an unrated game and a game that has been refused classification.
Will they be blocking violent movies too? What about violent books and song lyrics?
I wouldn't put it past them, no.
Why are you apologising to Russia, when the country in question is Ukraine?
My views.
Neither are OK.
Profit or no, damages should include what the licence is asking for. In the case of Thomas, $24, in the case of Atari, code.
In the case of infringement for profit, the revenue generated by the infraction should be added to the damages.
In addition to these damages, there should be a punitive fine that is large enough to make the infringer think twice before infringing again, but small enough to not mean financial ruin.
Yes it is required. There is no requirement for a publisher to release changes to public domain code.
Without copyright law, the world would be like the BSD licence, but without the attribution.
iD Tech 5 is is supposed to be able to do large outdoor spaces just fine.
No matter how bleeding edge Ubuntu may seem, it is very unlikely that Canonical would ship a Beta version or Release Candidate of Firefox
8.04 shipped with Firefox 3 beta 5.
but we have documents that are more than 2000 years old. There is no guarantee that we'll have our digital works 2000 years from now
And 2000 years ago there was no guarantee that those works would survive for 2000 years. And there's no guarantee that your Kodachrome photos will survive for 2000 years either. Chances are neither they nor the digital ones will, unless you make something people actually care about, in which case the digital is more likely to survive, since it is simple to copy and convert.
What do we do when all you can see are wind turbines wherever you look?
The same thing you do when all you can see are power lines wherever you look?
You mean the Safari that uses the open source WebKit for rendering?
xmarks, adblock plus, ietab, flashblock, kallour and stylish are all working. Don't know about firebug.
half the post is in the subject line?
And this is exactly what should be happening. The carrier can develop technologies such as these to differentiate themselves from their competition, instead of relying on phone manufacturers. There is no reason they couldn't have done this without the iPhone. Phone manufacturers would much rather add features such as these to their phones, instead of the current situation of having to remove features because the networks demand it.
If you spin around twice you will walk right into it.
letter to grandma in Word ... are all manually written and manually edited.
Clippy writes my letters for me.
KOTOR 2 was even worse
And was made by Obsidian, not Bioware.
Because there are millions of Wii gamers itching to play your game.