If you cannot cope with information, do not try to.
That is what they should think: local elections cannot be legislated UNIVERSALLY. And... well, anyone with a camera and an internet connection can do it...
This way we would live in the best of the worlds, would we not?
Moreover, this would threaten Google, Microsoft and the great scientific publishers.
Actually, we could make it work on top of an emacs session. Pity that you need another OS to run emacs, but **it is emacs**, you know! and TeX, of course.
Problem with what is today called qc is that it is not cryptography, it is a safe signing algorithm.
So what if the eavesdropper makes the communication impossible just tainting each and every bit? As they are not safe, they are deemed worthless and the message needs to be re-sent...
This seems to me the problem. You have not built a safe channel, you have built an eavesdropper-aware channel, which is not the same.
Slashdot Mirror
Sorry but it is a simple design of a circuit which "could in principle" do it. Problem is to keep the atoms entangled and so on. FUD as of yet. Pedro.
Even though they are there.
Is this really scarily THE WRONG THING?
Pedro.
New?
:)
Should this not be existing since... 1990's
(probably before if some company is searching for Java programmer with 20 years' experience
Seriously, I cannot believe this is NEW: applets exist since so long ago. Am I missing something?
Pedro.
and semidesintegration time, will they update the number of atoms?
Just wondering.
Wow,
Being a mathematician, I find it difficult to even believe in numbers, let alone BRANES.
You call **that** SCIENCE?
BTW, what was there before the branes "crashed"?
I got it: a singular supermanifold!
Pedro.
This has already been filmed.
And a good one, that is.
www.horsesonmars.com
I am biased.
TeX
Metafont
ghostscript
You know, we people DO print out texts.
So this is another try to take useful technology out ... let me see.....
in the name of
SCIENCE
What the heck?
Where are the statistics, the standard deviations, the
chi-squares... C'mon I am getting tired of people trying
to make me afraid.
Of course 30% of the species are also going to disappear.
Maybe global warming is due to cellphones as well.
Unbelievable as it is.
Defective by design.
One should worry about that first of all. Remember NYC say four/five years ago?
Just in case. No Internet w/o electric current I guess.
Pedro.
You know what NOISE is, do you not?
Just so.
Quinquennial plans in steroids, doesn't it?
Ah, the advantages of living in a free country...
If you cannot cope with information, do not try to.
That is what they should think: local elections cannot
be legislated UNIVERSALLY. And... well, anyone with
a camera and an internet connection can do it...
As easy as that.
You can fine someone, but what happens if you do not
have a POLICE?
What Microsoft is doing: I am forbidden by the EU to
do this, but, the EU? Where are its policemen?
To me, that sounds the same as saying
"human language will never succeed".
OK, there may not be ONE and DEFINITIVE semantic web,
there may be MANY.
Better for the users. Like free market, you know?
Moreover, you can see the different languages both
as a problem and as a treasure. Depends on the point
of view...
I will develop some mouse cells in my brain?
What's the catch? Have I missed something?
Do I need more jogging?
Shall anyone come to his defence?
Or will this dissident simply be left to himself because
his dissension matches the Administration's thougt?
Just a thought.
/etc means etc's total crap uh?
How about developing an OS on top of TeX?
This way we would live in the best of the worlds, would we not?
Moreover, this would threaten Google, Microsoft and the great scientific publishers.
Actually, we could make it work on top of an emacs session. Pity that you need another OS to run emacs, but
**it is emacs**, you know! and TeX, of course.
Anyone joining the project?
Again.
Did I hear this piece of news before? The rythm rings a bell....
From the EU, a big cheers for this new waste of time and effort.
Have they paid **anything**?
I guess this "threaten" refers to XP and before? So old news again for Microsoft.
"We don't develop XP anymore or IE6..."
I wonder what the name will become?
Delayed Instant Messaging?
Uninstant Messaging?
20-minant Messaging?
Please we ****need**** instant teleporting before our conversations get muddled in THE WAIT.
"Oh, I was chatting with John, but he got asleep during THE WAIT"
Or THE DELAY. At least that would be a *real* problem.
Problem with what is today called qc is that it is not cryptography, it is a safe signing algorithm.
So what if the eavesdropper makes the communication impossible just tainting each and every bit? As they are not safe, they are deemed worthless and the message needs to be re-sent...
This seems to me the problem. You have not built a safe channel, you have built an eavesdropper-aware channel, which is not the same.
It also could not.
Where is the news here?
After all these years... Goodness! To prevent Fraud. I hope I am not "prevented".
News for nerds, stuff that matters.
Where?