Slashdot Mirror


Why Exercise Boosts Brainpower

aditi sends us a report from Reuters on research indicating that exercise boosts brainpower by building new brain cells in a brain region linked with memory and memory loss. Quoting: "Tests on mice showed they grew new brain cells in a brain region called the dentate gyrus, a part of the hippocampus that is known to be affected in the age-related memory decline that begins around age 30 for most humans. Researchers used magnetic resonance imaging scans to help document the process in mice — and then used MRIs to look at the brains of people before and after exercise. They found the same patterns, which suggests that people also grow new brain cells when they exercise."

331 comments

  1. Ballonee by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

    I nevar work out and my brane wurks as well as ne1 elses!

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Ballonee by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Ok...I'm off to the gym this afternoon after work!!

      Now....I gotta try to remember where the hell the gym is??

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Ballonee by Unnngh! · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This being slashdot, the parent post was probably not intended as a joke...

    3. Re:Ballonee by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows that programmer's brains run on Diet Coke.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    4. Re:Ballonee by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      I'd thought it was Pitr Cola...

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    5. Re:Ballonee by 10Neon · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know how you feel! I wouldn't know where my local gym was either if it wasn't next to a steak house and a KFC.

      --
      The Guide is definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
    6. Re:Ballonee by Yaro · · Score: 1

      Isn't the funniest part of this the fact you've been moderated "Informative" ?

  2. AHA! by Poruchik · · Score: 4, Funny

    That explains Schwartzenegger! (Doesn't explain Stallone though).

    --
    $signature =~ s/$signature//;
    1. Re:AHA! by errxn · · Score: 4, Funny

      It also explains most of the posts on /. as well.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    2. Re:AHA! by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      Hey, Stallone is an artist. Sample Artwork

    3. Re:AHA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It also explains most of the posts on /. as well.
      I'd assume that most /.ers exercise with just one arm.

      Since they only get half a workout, then I guess you're right: half-wits.
    4. Re:AHA! by jerkychew · · Score: 1

      Stallone wrote and starred in an Oscar-winning movie. I think you have to have a few brain cells to pull something like that off - What have you done that's so smart?

    5. Re:AHA! by Poruchik · · Score: 1

      What have you done that's so smart? Made sure I never watched Rocky 5 or Rocky 6?

      --
      $signature =~ s/$signature//;
    6. Re:AHA! by ozbird · · Score: 1

      (Doesn't explain Stallone though).

      Growth hormones - he's facing court in Australia (delayed for six weeks) for illegal importation of 48 vials of Jintropin.

    7. Re:AHA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ADWIAN!!! ADWIAN!!!

    8. Re:AHA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you misread the have more brain cells. That probably explains Stallone's bid head. Which is not related to the intelligence.. you should study, read or stay informed to be smart...

      ---- George The Mouse Columbia University Medical Center NY

    9. Re:AHA! by ultracool · · Score: 1
  3. Ya, I'm not so sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Why are so many "body builder" types so dumb then? No, not all of them, I know. But there's at least a pattern there...

    1. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by Tokimasa · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm sure it's just not exercise, but exercise + education that makes a person not "dumb". But compare the same person with and without exercise, the one with will perform better on brain tests.

      --
      --Thomas J. Owens
    2. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why are so many "body builder" types so dumb then?

      They're not "dumb", but they're also not necessarily the intellectual type. From what I've seen, the reason for that is that your intellectual spends too much time in an introverted state to worry about the world around them. Regular exercise is not engaging to their internal senses, so they tend to find it "boring". The more extroverted types get their engagement from the world around them, and thus find pleasure in physical activity.
    3. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by svendsen · · Score: 1

      I believena person who does not understand their bodies and how to maintain them (exercise, eating right, etc) cant be all that smart :-)

    4. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by Spazntwich · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see some scientific evidence your generically termed "body builders" are dumber than an average population sample.

    5. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by RootWind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would suspect it is because they don't actually try to actively use their minds? (assuming this is entirely true) For instance, giving someone who doesn't exercise anabolic steroids would not turn them into a strong person.

    6. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Please list the number of Nobel prise winning Boxers.

      Ok, list the number of them that can name all 50 states and count without looking at their hands and feet.

      sorry, but most atheletes, specifically the pound each other type are not the brightest. I've never met a smart rugby player, But they are handy in a brawl.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by svendsen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They aren't talking about Atheletes, as there job is to be good physically over mentally. They are talking about getting basic exercise so we dont have a fat useless society.

      My fiance is in the science world and of the ones we know (a ton mind you) they all do some sort of exercise. Yet of all the IT people I know (again a lot) maybe 1% actually do anything.

    8. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by TMarvelous · · Score: 1

      FTFA: "They recruited 11 healthy adults and made them undergo a three-month aerobic exercise regimen." Bodybuilding isn't very aerobic.

      --
      http://www.worldsoccerbars.com
    9. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by inca34 · · Score: 1

      Brain damage is cumulative. Boxing as a profession is not advisable.

    10. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      >> Why are so many "body builder" types so dumb then?

      The governor of the state of California would like to have a word with you.

    11. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Body building is not aerobic - read the article...

    12. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by thewils · · Score: 1

      It's the 'roids. They build up the neck muscles so much that blood has a hard time reaching the brain.

      --
      Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    13. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      They reap what they sow. They invested a large amount of time, effort, and money into their body to "body-build" and as a result they're big and strong. Those who invest their free time, effort, and money into intellectual pursuits are going to be better informed, and possibly more intelligent. And there's no reason people can't diversify into both mental and physical disciplines.

    14. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      My grandfather was a golden-glove boxer, and fought on a PT boat in the Pacific during WWII.
      He was one of the smartest people I have known. He could recite long passages from Greek poetry (like the Illiad, etc.) from memory. The breadth of his knowledge has been an inspiration to everyone who knew him. Ignorance is a choice, as is physical weakness.

    15. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by Rycross · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There aren't any nobel prize winning boxers because they are devoting their time to boxing and not to science. I'd suspect you could find some nobel prize winners that work out.

    16. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never met a smart rugby player, But they are handy in a brawl. I haven't met many either, at University they were usually the ones starting the brawls. But I feel I should point out that in the city where I live (Bath, UK - where Rugby is the big sport) there is a former England rugby player who is now a surgeon - Jonathan Webb (in fact he was a surgeon at the same time as being an England player) So they do exist, probably more so than many big sports due to the Rugby Union being fully amateur only 12 years ago.
      Coincidentally, we also have an Olympic gold medal winning modern pentathlete, who also now happens to be a doctor (Steph Cook.)

      [Posting anon due to mod points used in this discussion]
    17. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Politicians need charisma, not brains. See the current president for an example.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    18. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I'd love to see some scientific evidence that the sun is going to rise and set on thursday, but for now I'm willing to take both on an abundance of first-hand experience.

    19. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by bogjobber · · Score: 1
      sorry, but most atheletes, specifically the pound each other type are not the brightest.

      Sure, but most *people* aren't particularly smart. Since most sports don't necessitate having a large amount of intelligence, you see a range similar to what you'd find in the rest of society. It has nothing to do with athletic people being stupid, it's just that intelligence doesn't influence your success in sports as much as in "regular" society. Even looking at different sports you are likely to find large differences. In baseball, where intelligence gives you a significant advantage, you are more likely to find extremely smart people than in something like sprinting, where intelligence doesn't give you an edge at all. In football (American), for instance, the offensive lineman tend to be more intelligent than the running backs, because their job is more dependent on it.

    20. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by tempestdata · · Score: 1

      are you actually implying that bush has Charisma?

      --
      - Tempestdata
    21. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      To some people- yes. Not to me or you, but to the common people, especially in the South and Midwest, he has a "one of us" type charm- he's not polished, sophisticated, or smart. They see that as a plus, not a minus.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    22. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by Big_Al_B · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, I remember reading about a study that indicated genius level processing in peak performing athletes. For example, an NFL quarterback can identify 3 - 5 potential receivers, track their viability, and decide how to execute a play in under a second--while avoiding defenders.

      I would argue that such ability takes a level of intelligence that, if applied to other pursuits, would be widely recognized as remarkable.

    23. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      There aren't any nobel prize winning boxers because they are devoting their time to boxing and not to science. I'd suspect you could find some nobel prize winners that work out.

      To refine that, look at it statistically.

      Lets define 'really good looking' as someone that is the best looking out of 500.
      Lets define 'really smart' as someone that is the smartest out of 500.
      Lets define 'really strong' as someone that is the strongest out of 500.

      To have all three, you are now at 1/1500, and that is assuming that good looking, smart, and strong are completely evenly distributed and they don't interfere with each other.

      Now, how many nobel prize winners are there walking around?

      To be extremely gifted in one area is rare. to be extremely gifted in two areas, is more rare, to be extremely gifted in three areas is even more rare, etc, etc.

    24. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are so many "body builder" types so dumb then?


      I know it's anecdotal, but in my experience body builders tend not to be as sharp as power lifters and olympic lifters. Read some literature from the latter of those two groups.. some of the research these folks put into their craft is impressive. Many of them hold doctoral degrees.
    25. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Um, wow. Talk about generalizations. Boxers get beat in the head for a living and generally start poor and uneducated (usually why they are boxers) so that doesn't make a very good comparison.

      Many professional athletes are very smart and have just focused in their sport. Look at someone like Michael Jordan. Great athlete, business man, and probably knows more about basketball and running the triangle offense than you ever will. Look at someone like Payton Manning. He can walk up to the line of scrimmage recognize a defensive patten in seconds and make audible adjustments on the fly. Keep in the mind the rest of the team on the field is also making the same adjustments based on what they see and what he is shouting out.

      Personally, I lift weights regularly and am very athletic. I also have a job designing software systems and am getting my masters in CS. I'm no genius, but don't think I'm stupid either.

      Were you beat up as a kid?

    26. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by aesova · · Score: 1

      Asking for a list of Nobel prize winning boxers might be quite like asking for a list of physicists with Olympic gold medals. How about a list of slashdotters who can name 192 countries in 10 minutes? http://andys.org.uk/countryquiz/

      --
      If bullshit were music, you'd be a brass band.
    27. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      To have all three, you are now at 1/1500, and that is assuming that good looking, smart, and strong are completely evenly distributed and they don't interfere with each other.

      One in 125,000,000 (500 * 500 * 500)

    28. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by The+Famous+Brett+Wat · · Score: 1

      Regular exercise is not engaging to their internal senses, so they tend to find it "boring".

      That's why I suggest DDR-style dance games as a form of exercise. They engage the brain as well as the body.

      --
      proof, n. A demonstration that a conclusion is implied by certain premises and axioms.
    29. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      maybe you're biased. Dolph Lundgren (baddie in Rocky 4) got a PhD in Chemistry IIRC! see! they're all clever, bastards! *sulks*

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    30. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by the_mushroom_king · · Score: 0

      Village idiots can be quite entertaining, except when they are running the country.

      -- TMK

    31. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call it intelligence as much as high specialization.

      And it is quite evident in any human activity - system engineers who can identify a problem within a second of taking a glance at some printout come to mind...

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    32. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      I think Constitution is his only strong stat... all the others seem to be dump stats...

      (burn, karma, burn ;) )

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    33. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by shihonage · · Score: 1

      As a typical introvert, I had a lot of problems finding the right sort of exercise. I started and quit jogging more times than some people have quit smoking. I went to the gyms - the first time I managed a year, the second time - two weeks. It was simply too boring to sustain my interest.

      Finally, 7 years ago, I've found Aikido (http://www.aikidofaq.com/) . Aikido works for me on several levels:

      * I can attend up to 6 times a week (up to 2 hours per day) for a low-impact cardiovascular/aerobic workout
      * It "takes the crust out of joints", or, more literally, prevents RSI.
      * It prevents back problems related to bad posture in software engineers.
      * This is important - it has DEPTH, which appeals to my introverted personality. It is a mindful study of wide range of interesting technique - technique perception of which changes as one's skill level improves. It is NOT BORING. This is KEY to an introvert sticking with an activity for a long time.

    34. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by TuringTest · · Score: 1

      But compare the same person with and without exercise, the one with will perform better on brain tests.

      I wonder how you will manage to get a person that both exercises and not exercises at the same time :-P

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    35. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by hansonc · · Score: 1

      Put them in a box with a cat?

    36. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and they don't interfere with each other. Which according to this article is an invalid assumption - so the rest of your post was pointless.
      Besides, the GP just implied that there'd be a few Nobel Prize winners that worked out, he didn't say they'd be top athletes.
    37. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by BlackEmperor · · Score: 1

      Plus getting punched in the head for a living doesn't exactly help. I would think that head trauma negates all the positive effects of exercise in this instance.

      --
      "all broken things dream of repair" - chris letcher
    38. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Anecdotical as it might be, but you can find a Nobel laureate body builder.


      Translated from the Spanish Wikipedia:

      When Santiago was 21 [...] he decided to enrol in a gym in Zaragoza, where he started doing body building. He paid his fees by giving anatomy lesson. He got very fond of this sport, to the point of becoming one of the best body builders in Zaragoza.
    39. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll hope that GPP is either good looking or strong, I guess ;-)

    40. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks for the link -- that's the coolest quiz ever. I'm beating my head both for my first (poor, to my standards) result, and the fact that this guy created that quiz before I did!

      I'm always asking my dad to look at a textbook and mark off how many countries or capitals I can name, and I must be fucking retarded to never have thought to make it into a web quiz; that was a killer idea, and it should have been obvious to me. oh, well - it isn't the first time someone's thought of something before I have (or stolen my idea, for that matter).

      nevertheless, I'm sure what everyone in the entire world is most interested in is how I, the most important slashdot user ever, fared:

      I successfully named 94 countries on my first try. I was very tired (I should have been to bed an hour ago), and a bit out of it, but that wasn't too bad for my first go round.

      I did mis-spell one country, and I knew atleast five that it didn't accept for various reasons (slightly different naming convention, e.g.).

      looking at the list of countries I forgot, too, I knew all but maybe 5-10 of the countries listed, and I had thought of some of them earlier today, so I was more than disappointed that I did not get those, but I will give it another shot, and I expect to get somewhere around 120.

      with a little practice, I'm sure I'll be hitting 150 or 160, and hopefully more.

      thanks.

    41. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by Sobrique · · Score: 1
      Use the same person, and alternate the pattern of exercise.

      I notice when I've been 'slacking off', my sleep, alertness and general health patterns get worse. As does my concentration span. If I spend a month of 'fairly enthusiastic' gym-going, then this changes.

    42. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by Builder · · Score: 1

      Please list the number of average americans who can name all 50 states... I don't think exercise is the main problem here :)

      As for rugby players, I work with a couple who are incredibly bright.

    43. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shouldn't confuse a skill with intelligence. A particular skill may or may not require intelligence to execute, but just because someone is good at something doesn't make them intelligent. It makes them good at something. Relabeling every innate attribute that people have as intelligence doesn't advance us very far in my opinion.

    44. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by IvanTheQuiteNasty · · Score: 1

      It was "only" a M.Sc. degree. If he had a Ph.D he might have won against Rocky...

    45. Re:Ya, I'm not so sure... by br0d · · Score: 1

      I'd wager most people's "evidence" consists of high school resentment for the cliquish sort who obsessed on athletics and ignored academics. "I got picked on" is neither double blind nor peer reviewed data. Common sense tells us that the main reason athletes seem dumb is because "form follows function" and so they don't need to be academically intelligent, just kinesthetically. It's the same reason caribou don't have saber teeth. Elite sports are so competitive that most of the pros in thinking roles ARE actually quite near genius level intelligence, or at least above average, because they could not compete otherwise.

  4. Exersize Is Good For You? by ranton · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, who would have thought that exersize actually improves your body in some way?

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    1. Re:Exersize Is Good For You? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heresy!

    2. Re:Exersize Is Good For You? by ranton · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmm, looks like I need more time on the treadmill because my spelling in that post was just horrible.

      --

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    3. Re:Exersize Is Good For You? by cmdr_beeftaco · · Score: 1

      This just in... exercise gets your blow flowing.

  5. Back to Locke by Kelson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So here we are, once again, with Locke's ideal of a sound mind in a sound body.

    The challenge for computer geeks: finding a way to merge exercise with mostly-sedentary hobbies and jobs. Perhaps it's a job for mobile computing: Set a tablet PC in front of a treadmill, and read Slashdot while running?

    1. Re:Back to Locke by svendsen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The really sad thing is you only need 30 mins of exercise a day and cut back on junk food to lose weight, be healthy, etc. The amount of excuses I hear is pathetic. Walk, bike, lift, get into a sport, etc. Problem is so many people think the virtual world is a better place to be.

    2. Re:Back to Locke by Garret_Duran · · Score: 2, Funny

      Peddle powered Interwebs. The faster you peddle the more bandwidth you're allowed to use. Pirates would be the fittest people in the world!

    3. Re:Back to Locke by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      How about DDR or EyeToy?

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    4. Re:Back to Locke by TrappedByMyself · · Score: 4, Funny

      I prefer furious masterbation

      --

      Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
    5. Re:Back to Locke by Rycross · · Score: 1

      Or Wii and Wii Sports. I'm doing an experiment with that right now. I figure, its probably not as good as running, but its something thats easier for me to stick to. And if its not that great, I can at least develop the exercise habits and move into something better.

    6. Re:Back to Locke by svendsen · · Score: 1

      Dear lord no. Technology does not need to be used to solve this at all. Put your kids (or yourself) into something which not only helps you lose weight, but meet new people, help you learn something new and useful. sports, walking, biking, etc.

    7. Re:Back to Locke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The challenge has already been beaten. It's called the Nintendo Wii.

    8. Re:Back to Locke by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Does furious boost your IQ more than non-furious?

    9. Re:Back to Locke by Rogerborg · · Score: 1, Funny

      -1, redundant; we've already had a post about Wii Sports.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    10. Re:Back to Locke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have lost about twenty pounds using DDR as my primary form of aerobic exercise. It helps because it is fun and after I get the blood pumping then I can lift weights, etc. Narrow minded judgment ftl.

    11. Re:Back to Locke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's pretty simple: While exercising, just try to solve some problems in your head. Maybe search for primes or try to develop an algorithm or an equation for whatever you're interested in.

      But then again, you always do that, don't you? That'ld explain that silly look in your eyes.

    12. Re:Back to Locke by hab136 · · Score: 1

      The challenge for computer geeks: finding a way to merge exercise with mostly-sedentary hobbies and jobs.

      Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
    13. Re:Back to Locke by Rycross · · Score: 1

      And what if they've tried sports, walking, biking, etc, and found it so boring that they had a lot of trouble sticking to their exercise? Why is it bad that they can integrate exercise with something they love, and make it easier to stick to it. The best kind of exercise is the kind you actually do.

      Personally, if I could, I would just ski all the time for exercise. Damn seasonal sports. Of course, being in the flat state of Illinois doesn't help either.

    14. Re:Back to Locke by the+dark+hero · · Score: 1

      So here we are, once again, with Locke's ideal of a sound mind in a sound body.

      It's not just Locke that figured this out. Some of our greatest thinkers, warlords, martial arts masters, etc. have come up with the same conclusion. If this serves as "scientific proof" to something that has been known for ages then lets hope more people will get off their asses.

      --
      You constantly struggle for self improvement - and it shows.

      Hooray for bad Engrish on fortune cookies

    15. Re:Back to Locke by dreamt · · Score: 1

      Set a tablet PC in front of a treadmill, and read Slashdot while running? While thats better than nothing, its still probably not as good as getting in front of that treadmill without reading. Odds pare pretty good that your heart rate isn't going to hit the 65%-85% range that you would get without needing to concentrate at looking down at a steady object with small print. It always kills me to see people on the treadmill, elypical, etc reading away and barely breaking a sweat.
    16. Re:Back to Locke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is amazing is how DDR can lead you to new people!

      The machine was broken at the arcade, so I convinced no less than three girls to use my metal arcade pad at my house! That was a fun night!

    17. Re:Back to Locke by Spacezilla · · Score: 1

      Maybe it is? Either way, you probably shouldn't tell other people how to live their lives. :)

      I'm pretty fit, I bike a lot, but I don't expect other people to, because that's their decision, not mine. :)

    18. Re:Back to Locke by svendsen · · Score: 1

      Then i would say the person may have some mental issues. I am being serious and not trolling. so every sport they hate (walking, biking, lifting, martial arts, swimming, running, etc, etc.) but the only one they love happens to be a video game? sorry i dont buy it at all.

      Do something which requires social interaction, learning useful skills and knowledge about their body, etc. O

      Also you hope what they choose to do can also teach them the fundamentals of exercise...DDR can not do this.

      usually when someone tells me they have tried everything and didnt like it, I can name 5 things they haven't tried.

    19. Re:Back to Locke by shmlco · · Score: 1

      "Personally, if I could, I would just ski all the time for exercise."

      Skiing is primarily an anaerobic sport, unless you're talking about cross-country or unless you're the type who's constantly falling down and trying to get back up.... ;)

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    20. Re:Back to Locke by Rycross · · Score: 1

      More of the second.... ;)

      But my heart rate goes up when I ski. There's a lot of movement in it.

    21. Re:Back to Locke by shmlco · · Score: 1

      iPods and Audible audiobooks make a great combination in that regard.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    22. Re:Back to Locke by dave562 · · Score: 1

      Nutritionists have figured it out too. I read something not too long ago about a study where they found out that the body will not actually use calcium to rebuild bones without exercise to put strain on the bones.

    23. Re:Back to Locke by Dancindan84 · · Score: 0

      The challenge for computer geeks: finding a way to merge exercise with mostly-sedentary hobbies and jobs. WoW on the Wii. Problem solved.
      --
      "Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much." - Oscar Wilde
    24. Re:Back to Locke by Rycross · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Swimming and biking require social interaction? Aside from sports, a lot of exercise is primarily solitary. How many useful skills do you learn from exercise and sports really? How does using a video game to exercise preclude you from learning about your body or the fundamentals of exercise?

      I don't get your opposition to using video games as an exercise tool. It seems to be more emotional than rational. Are you suggesting that there's somehow less value because you are exercising in a private place using technology?

    25. Re:Back to Locke by MasterGwaha · · Score: 1

      HOLY SHIT! I nearly spit out my tea GWAHHAHAHAHAHA!

    26. Re:Back to Locke by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2

      The virtual world is a better place to be. I can seek out people of common interests. I can block people who are jerks. I'm judged by my ability to form cogent arguments rather than my appearance or speech.

      But, really, there's no reason you ever have to leave the virtual world. Most podcasts are about an hour long, which is plenty of time to get enough exercise. Plug in your earbuds and go for a walk. Turn around halfway through and do this three times a week. No need to leave the virtual world, and no need to turn into a lardass.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    27. Re:Back to Locke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get your opposition to using video games as an exercise tool. It seems to be more emotional than rational. Are you suggesting that there's somehow less value because you are exercising in a private place using technology?

      I think he is opposed to masturbation which is the only reason to use technology in a private place.

    28. Re:Back to Locke by Copid · · Score: 1

      It always kills me to see people on the treadmill, elypical, etc reading away and barely breaking a sweat.
      Well, those people are definitely burning calories and contributing to weight loss, but I agree, if they're able to go faster and actually work toward fitness they definitely should.
      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    29. Re:Back to Locke by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      "Either way, you probably shouldn't tell other people how to live their lives. :)"

      Do as I say, not as I do?

      He's just exercising free speech. Some might even consider telling someone what they believe is best for them to be a moral imperative. If I believe the box has a bomb in it, I'd probably tell the guy not to open the box. He's free to open the box, maybe even prove me wrong by showing that the box is empty. It's just advice after all, whether or not it's welcome.

    30. Re:Back to Locke by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I see most people at the gym as being very solitary too. Many people will look at you weird if you go up to them and start talking to them at the gym. Especially if it's someone of the opposite sex. I say that as long as you get exercise, it really shouldn't matter what you're doing. Myself, I like to bike ride, but even riding with someone else tends to be very solitary. You don't go for a nice leisurely ride and spend the whole time talking to the other person. Usually you just ride, and then talk when you are taking breaks.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    31. Re:Back to Locke by Spacezilla · · Score: 2, Funny

      Free speech? I'm disappointed. Why not play the "think of the children" card instead? That seems very popular around here these days. :)

    32. Re:Back to Locke by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      The only sport I was able to stick with through high school was marching band. (And if you don't think that's a sport, you try running fifteen yards in five seconds while blowing a horn, facing front, and dressing lines.) Am I supposed to go out and start a marching band to get some exercise?

      I think finding a sport you "love" is overrated. Finding a sport you can tolerate is better, then adding things you love to it. I hate walking and running, but I do it anyway because it gives me alone time to listen to the podcasts to which I'm subscribed.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    33. Re:Back to Locke by Rycross · · Score: 1

      As a biker would you say that its very good exercise? Does your heart rate get up? I'm kinda eying it for the spring to fall months as something I might want to get into. I remember loving biking around as a kid, but I don't recall myself ever getting a good workout from it.

    34. Re:Back to Locke by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      " It helps because it is fun and after I get the blood pumping then I can lift weights, etc."

      I actually do the opposite, and you might look into it.

      I do my weight training FIRST, use it to burn my glycogen stores, and then I do my aerobic activities. With the glycogen mostly depleted, you seem to go into fat burning mode faster when you start the aerobic exercise phase if you do it in this order...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    35. Re:Back to Locke by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      Because video games are inherently bad?

      Most just get their 30 minutes of cardio by just running around by themselves. So what if they get it from a video game. The running itself isn't teaching them anything about their body, that's something seperate. DDR's a social activity if you make it that way, same with running.

      Exercise is good. Socializing is good. And having them play DDR as a starting point for fitness is good too. Who knows? Maybe after they've shed 10-15lbs on the DDR mat they'll be fit enough to find themselves enjoying a sport rather than feel emasculated and intimidated by everyone else at the gym(One of the more popular reasons I hear from people).

    36. Re:Back to Locke by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      Well how about that article that featured on /. recently about using people like hamsters to power the gym lights? Perhaps we need laptops that require you to exercise for a set time to charge your battery =D.

    37. Re:Back to Locke by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Swimming and biking require social interaction? Aside from sports, a lot of exercise is primarily solitary. How many useful skills do you learn from exercise and sports really?

      Tell that to the people taking self-defense classes. I'd count self-defense a useful skill.

      In addition, because of the nature of self-defense, it almost requires socializing. You can't partner with anyone if you don't trust them. And learn self-defense without a partner is only a little better than learning how to dance.

      By the way, I consider martial arts an exercise, not a sport. Sports have rules. If you need to defend yourself, following and breaking rules become a trivial matter. Of course, that's a completely different debate.

      I'd also count swimming a useful skill. If you're out in the ocean fishing and happen to fall overboard, regardless whether you're wearing a life jacket or not, knowing how to swim may be the difference between you surviving and not.

      Just because you can't conceive of a use for the skills you gain from exercise and sports doesn't mean there are none. Forget knowing self-defense--if someone were to break into my home, suddenly, all that time exercising becomes useful. Quite frankly, I'd rather be fit (whether to fight or flight) than not.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    38. Re:Back to Locke by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      Does your heart rate get up?

      Yes, just before you get run down by an SUV.

      Biking is great. Coexisting with cars is challenging,
      which kills the enjoyment for me.

      This is not a rant against car drivers in general.
      There are plenty of idiots operating both bikes and cars.

    39. Re:Back to Locke by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Your heart rate gets as high as you want it to. I see lots of people going for leisurely bike rides where they don't even break a sweat. Now that's better than nothing at all, but I myself wouldn't consider it exercise. Also, try to bike on areas where there's hills. This works very well at increasing your heart rate. If you really try to push yourself, and actually do it as exercise, it can be a great workout, even if you can't find good hills.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    40. Re:Back to Locke by LandruBek · · Score: 1

      It sure can get your heart rate up, if you pedal hard. If you go up a steep hill, or go fast (25-30 mph), or into a headwind, you'll have no choice but to get your heart thumping. It's aerobic and it works quads, calves, and hip flexors, if you pedal right. It's also fun -- my favorite sport. It's not ideal exercise, but probably no single sport is.

      --
      $META_SIG_JOKE
    41. Re:Back to Locke by Rycross · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are these skills so valuable that we have to put down other forms of exercise (such as using video games) as not being sufficient. After all, one of the acceptable exercises listed was walking. You can probably get more out of Wii Sports than you can out of walking if you put effort into it. And walking doesn't give you considerable skills.

      Skills may be a bonus, but I don't see them as earth-shattering things. Maybe you can run faster, or swim a little bit better. Its not going to help me in my everyday life. Maybe if there's an emergency. But I don't see it as a reason to put down other forms of exercise.

      Basically, what I'm trying to say is that I think all this "OMG video games as exercise? WTF" reaction is more emotional than logical. People have no problems with people doing rowing machines, treadmills, or bicycling machines, but use a Wii to work out and suddenly you're lame. Thats not rational. It shouldn't matter how I get my exercise as long as I do.

    42. Re:Back to Locke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he said 30 minutes. not 30 milliseconds.

    43. Re:Back to Locke by LandruBek · · Score: 1

      Swimming and biking require social interaction? Aside from sports, a lot of exercise is primarily solitary.
      They sure don't require social interaction, but exercise doesn't have to be solitary. For those fortunate enough to be able to join a bike club, or a swim club, or something like that, I can tell you it is way fun: you get to work out alongside others (maybe better than you, or worse than you -- it doesn't matter) and encourage each other as you make progress. As a geek, I love swimming and biking as a change of pace; it's healthy and makes me feel good. When I don't feel like working out, and inertia threatens to make me skip, it's the thought that I'll get to see my friends that spurs me on to get out of the house. I like spending time with non-geek friends and listening to their voices, and sometimes I even get to tell them about Linux, EFF, and what NP completeness is. :-)
      --
      $META_SIG_JOKE
    44. Re:Back to Locke by svendsen · · Score: 1

      "I don't get your opposition to using video games as an exercise tool. It seems to be more emotional than rational. Are you suggesting that there's somehow less value because you are exercising in a private place using technology?".

      Yes. A person is more likely to stick with any exercise where there is social interaction. Gym is a great example. New people who start and go by themselves are very likely to stop going. Something like 75% of people who join after New years stop going after a few weeks. However when you look at people who join the gym and go with friends they are much more likely to stay because A) they have friends going b) they have a workout partner c) and have someone to kick their ass. Look at a lot of those cardio callses and you will see a lot of people talking before and after, thats what gets people going back. Lifting is much more fun and you get more out of it with a partner or two (spotting, people can push you, etc). I could go on but you get my point. Oh want to learn about your body, eating, proper warm up, etc. gym will teach you for free, want to learn even more, take martial arts you can learn a lot about treating injury.

      Now lets compare this to DDR. What's motivating them? Do they have the support network? How are they learning about nutrition, stretching, etc. Technology is not the answer to the exercise issue. Technology is not the answer to everything. I am not against technology I have BS and MS in the computer field, and being in that field I see how out of shape it is, the excuses, and what works and doesn't work.

      The social interaction part, the ability to get skills that will apply to something to the real world, learning a lot about your body, is what will help people in the long run. I think DDR will be a quick fix fad that will do no one any good.

      And I just don't preach i do. Form 15 years of martial arts of all styles, soccer, track, lifting (I bench 275), racquetball, power walking with my fiance, biking, etc. And yet I am still an IT geek. I'm not saying everyone has to be nuts like me, but I seriously wonder about people who complain even about 30 mins of power walking.

    45. Re:Back to Locke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, based on your spelling and punctuation, perhaps you're not doing it quite furiously enough...

      -TUAC

    46. Re:Back to Locke by svendsen · · Score: 1

      All depends on how you push yourself. On weekends I bike 30 miles or so with a large group and our routes are very hilly. Great leg and cardio workout. Sometimes htough we do a lot of flat biking (60 miles) just to burn fat and dont work on the cardio as much.

      And it is social, even as serious as we are we will still talk about sports, technology, tv, etc (excluding the kills or we would die).

    47. Re:Back to Locke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering this guy is posting to /., what do you think the odds are, that he is not 300 pounds and eating cheetos?

    48. Re:Back to Locke by magicchex · · Score: 1

      Because all non-geeks don't read eh?

      You're a fucking anti-social asshole aren't you? You make your ilk look horrible and I'm sure they really appreciate it.

      --
      How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
    49. Re:Back to Locke by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      I recently read that the half hour a day thing was started by doctors just to convince people to do SOMETHING, and a study showed it to have negligeable effect unless it was VERY strenuous exercise.

    50. Re:Back to Locke by svendsen · · Score: 0, Troll

      "Maybe it is? Either way, you probably shouldn't tell other people how to live their lives. :)".

      Used to think that until i worked at an HOM. Most expensive problem in this country relating to healthcare...obesity and all its side effects. The top 5..all lifestyle choices (obesity, smoking, alcoholism, etc). So if my rates are going up cause of that you bet I am going to say something :-)

    51. Re:Back to Locke by General+Wesc · · Score: 1

      Now lets compare this to DDR. What's motivating them?

      It's fun.

      If that's not a good motivator, I don't know what is. (And, actually, DDR is often done multiplayerly.)

    52. Re:Back to Locke by svendsen · · Score: 1

      Yes its fun cause you can play and stop and let others jump in at the arcade right?

      Lets talk about it has exercise. You need 30 mins of non stop exercise to get the proper workout. Assuming you have a friend then yes you two could do it together. What if you had a 3rd? SOL because you will have to wait 30 mins if doing it right.

      Now how much fun will it be if you cant stop for 30 mins?

    53. Re:Back to Locke by Rycross · · Score: 1

      Now thats a lot more sensible position than what you started out with, and thats what I was looking for. You make some good points and I agree.

      But, my position is still that something is better than nothing. Everyone has different social situations, and different resources available to them. If someone is using DDR to work out, they should be encouraged. They shouldn't be told that they should do a "real" workout. If someone feels that DDR is their best option, then they should be encouraged in that regard.

      Its very hard to say, "Well that guy playing DDR would be better off walking, biking, or going to the gym." We don't know his circumstances. Maybe he doesn't have a gym in his area. Maybe he doesn't have bike paths, or a convenient area to walk. Maybe he's tried those things before, and finds that its easier to stick to DDR. Maybe its just easier for him the other way.

      Exercising is hard enough for a lot of people, and they don't need people making it harder for them, or criticizing their chosen methods. I think putting someone down for looking towards video games as a solution is more likely to make them give up than choose another "real" exercise.

    54. Re:Back to Locke by bastion_xx · · Score: 1

      You're right. The best way to make those 20-40 minutes of aerobic activity work is to actually push it.

      I read while on the elliptical or stationary bike. It doesn't take much to hit and sustain the 85% max heart rate, so I do like to otherwise use my time. My normal schedule is start off with Ask a Ninja for the first 3-5 minutes (warm up), then on to fast songs (hard rock, punk, etc) since I hate the pre-endorphin rush I normally experience round minute 20 our so. Then either stick with the tunes or slide into a pod cast or two. DLTV works on some equipment where I can lean the iPod without it flying to the ground.

      Great practice and stamina building for the more enjoyable activities. If I could only play WoW while doing this, it would be a true FTW!

    55. Re:Back to Locke by EvanED · · Score: 1

      To each his own.

      New people who start and go by themselves are very likely to stop going. Something like 75% of people who join after New years stop going after a few weeks.

      Studies also show that people who never start going at all are also very likely to stop going.

      However when you look at people who join the gym and go with friends they are much more likely to stay because A) they have friends going b) they have a workout partner c) and have someone to kick their ass. Look at a lot of those cardio callses and you will see a lot of people talking before and after, thats what gets people going back. Lifting is much more fun and you get more out of it with a partner or two (spotting, people can push you, etc). I could go on but you get my point.

      (BTW, your hidden assumption that DDR can't or isn't done with friends is itself total BS.)

      What's motivating them?

      Personal fitness? Maybe they are uncomfortable with their bodies and don't want to be with other people. Maybe it's very inconvenient to get to the gym. (For instance, not that this is a reason I don't go, but I don't have a car and am a 25 minute walk from the gym. If I were to go there, by the time I arrived I could just turn around and go home and have gotten a decent workout! It wouldn't be weightlifting or anything, but the point is that it may not be convenient.) Or maybe it's too expensive.

      Or maybe it's just *fun*. Personally, there are some sports I like. For instance, ultimate frisbee. But you can't really just say "I'm going to go play ultimate frisbee" unless you have several friends who are also up for it whenever you are. But I don't really like running or anything like that. That's the clincher for most people. I don't think most people actually like exercise. They like the benefits of it, they like maybe some sports, but I don't think most people like the exercise itself. But it's very easy to like DDR, and more to the point, I think that a lot of the people who are most likely to dislike exercise are more likely to like DDR. And if you like something, you don't need much motivation to do it.

      Connected to this is that DDR provides explicit goals. If you're running, what are your goals? Be able to run for a little longer or a little further than you did a couple weeks ago? If you are doing it with someone, you can say that you want to have more stamina than them. They are goals, but they're a little more abstract than, say, DDR. It provides both immediate goals (pass this song) and long term goals (I want to be able to do this song on heavy) that are very concrete. Of course, the down side is that they are not necessarily directly related to athletic goals.

      For my part, I'm not horribly out of shape. I can hold my own at some sports (say ultimate) with other non-serious players, and I've off and on tried to do some running. But for almost an entire summer, I used DDR as a workout, and it was the most committed to that sort of thing I've ever been. (Then I moved back into a dorm room and didn't have space for the pad and was busy with school, so it became a "special occasions" thing only.)

    56. Re:Back to Locke by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      I hit the exerbike for an hour a day (or run, weather permitting). When I'm on the bike, that's when I catch up on television shows I watch - TIVO and other time-shifting techniques are great. I can't really read, as I'm really faux-hauling ass while I exerbike. When I run, I pop in a book-on-tape for some subject I'm interested in (never fiction) or listen to news/podcast stuff.

      When I play console games, I stand and hop around.

      Also, when I have opportunities to walk or take stairs, I do so. I also usually skip condiments like ketchup/mustard/mayo on food (they add a LOT of calories).

      So, the upshot is that all my time "exercising" is really spent doing other stuff that I really enjoy while I happen to be moving around. Being fit is *much* easier if you just get into good habits rather than turning it into an "event."

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    57. Re:Back to Locke by vitaflo · · Score: 0, Troll

      Really it's easier than that. It's just a numbers game. Take in less calories than you expend. That's all there is to it.

    58. Re:Back to Locke by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      finding a way to merge exercise with mostly-sedentary hobbies and jobs

      This fits resistance training perfectly. In between workouts you need rest so sedentary is good. In addition to all of the normal health benefits, resistance workouts also help to fix any postural problems that develop from sitting at a desk all day.

      After working on complex problems all day with my brain jumping through hoops it's actually very relaxing to go do something as simple as a dead lift. See weight, pick weight up, put weight down. :)

    59. Re:Back to Locke by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      But, really, there's no reason you ever have to leave the virtual world. Most podcasts are about an hour long, which is plenty of time to get enough exercise. Plug in your earbuds and go for a walk. Turn around halfway through and do this three times a week. No need to leave the virtual world, and no need to turn into a lardass.

      I tried this for a while- chop wood in winter, walk in spring, summer and fall- it didn't help. I'm still gaining around 5 lbs a year and am currently 100 lbs above my ideal BMI.

      No amount of exercise will help if you spend 9 hours a day in front of a computer for your job.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    60. Re:Back to Locke by FoeQueue · · Score: 1

      Um, I've lost 20 lbs since January 4th. I'm in front of a computer at least 12 hours a day (minus weekends). I work out 6 days a week, 45 minutes a day. Oh yeah, I cut out junk food, processed foods and high bad fat foods. Just got in the BMI range for "normal" at 210 lbs (I'm tall). It can be done. I sat on my butt and ate bad. I get off my butt and eat good and it comes off.

      Amazing how that works.

    61. Re:Back to Locke by RicoX9 · · Score: 1

      Half hour a day is fine even if it's moderate stress. The other half of that equation is diet. You can eat like a pig and work yourself near to death and lose weight. You can show some moderation in your diet, and still get good effects from moderate exercise.

      I'm a case in point. I lost 50lbs last year. I was swimming 5 days a week, 1500+ yards a day, and being VERY good about my diet. I got to a point where I decided to see if I could do 10,000 yards in one week (haven't done that much since I was competitively swimming in HS, when I did a lot more). I did 10,600 yards that week, but damaged my shoulder in the process.

      Since then, I cannot swim as much as I'd like to. My shoulder lets me know quickly if I'm overdoing it. I've put weight back on that I'd like to lose, but it's hard to do gimped.

    62. Re:Back to Locke by smackt4rd · · Score: 1

      I think video games are fine for exercising, but there are quite a few useful things you can learn from exercise and sports, though. Yoga pops into my mind as one example. It's really useful beyond just the physical workout aspect. (Stress management, mental clarity in challenging situations)

    63. Re:Back to Locke by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The key to that is "eat good" more than the exercise. I don't have TIME to exercise AND eat good- and if it's a choice between gaining weight and having to break the ice to go to the toilet, I'm going to choose chopping wood over eating right. I need food that is convient- that I don't need a fork and knife to eat.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    64. Re:Back to Locke by Malc · · Score: 1

      Running is essentially a selfish, narcissistic activity. Especially if you're the partner to somebody who doesn't run. Spouses that train for marathons do so with a supportive partner (hopefully).

      Have you ever thought that perhaps something like marathon training has many of the features of planning a software project? For many people, it has to be planned out carefully over a long period of time. It has to be timed correctly. There are lots of hiccups along the way that could affect the schedule.

    65. Re:Back to Locke by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      I need food that is convient- that I don't need a fork and knife to eat.

      Eating good isn't that hard. Just a matter of cheap, good, convenient - pick 2. I'm busy working also and end up spending more on food than probably anything else I regularly buy. My health is important to me though, and I don't like wasting the 3-4 times/week I'm in the gym by eating crappy food.

      The other option I used to do is pick a day like Sun. and cook meals for the whole week. You basically make you're own TV dinners for the entire week and then you get to eat cheap and good. Surprising how little a big pack of chick breasts cost...

    66. Re:Back to Locke by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Problem is that most people half-ass it in the gym the way they do through life.

    67. Re:Back to Locke by hawkfish · · Score: 1

      Locke's ideal of a sound mind in a sound body
      With all due respect to you and Mr. Locke, I think it is a bit older than that.
      --
      You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates
    68. Re:Back to Locke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you fuck them? That's even more exercise for ya.

    69. Re:Back to Locke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The key is to just consume reasonable amounts of calories.

      Don't drink caloric beverages of any type. Don't snack. Eat single serving sized meals and you'll weight fairly painlessly.

      Most single serving sized meals are only about 500-600 calories. I'm also a vegetarian, so some of my meals may be in the 300-400 range. Even being completely sedentary, that's significantly below my required number of calories.

      As a person stuck in front of a computer all day too, I actually find I have to occasionally snack to keep from losing weight if something interrupts my normal meal schedule. I was on a pretty intense project at work for a couple months and accidentally lost about 15 lbs.

      If you are having trouble losing weight, most likely you are simply eating too much. Track it some day, make an effort to drink only water rather than flavored drinks. Check the serving size of meals, you may be eating 2-3 times more than you should for each meal. Look at the calories of any snacks you consume, your snack may be a full meal's worth of calories. It isn't hard, it is just easy to overeat if you aren't paying attention.

    70. Re:Back to Locke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      skip condiments like ketchup/mustard/mayo on food (they add a LOT of calories).


      Only mayo does. Ketchup and especially mustard are negligible. But ditching mayo is a good idea -- I've dropped 8 pounds since getting rid of that on my usual lunch sandwiches, while changing nothing else (yet).
    71. Re:Back to Locke by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      >Perhaps it's a job for mobile computing:

      Yes: Mount a gadget on a propeller head cap so it dangles right in from of your face. Better than a carrot! And you aren't limited to a treadmill and can go outside.

    72. Re:Back to Locke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, you could always play Wii Sports.

    73. Re:Back to Locke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a sure recipe for death. If you live for many months or years taking in less calories than you burn, you will eventually die of starvation. All your muscle matter would be burned up for fuel first and you'd have a painful unpleasant death.

      take in as many calories as you expend, on average, and you'll be fine. as long as you get some excercise as well.

    74. Re:Back to Locke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Set a tablet PC in front of a treadmill, and read Slashdot while running?

      Can I set a tablet PC in front of a treadmill, and read Slashdot while furiously masturbating?

    75. Re:Back to Locke by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      "I prefer furious masterbation"

      What did your penis ever do to you?

      *looks*

      Well, that explains your fury. *badum-ching*

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    76. Re:Back to Locke by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 0, Troll

      I don't have TIME to exercise AND eat good - I need food that is convient- that I don't need a fork and knife to eat.

      I used to think that way - I decided back in October that I needed to fix my priorities and that there was very little more important to me than my health and the health of my family. It's been a re-adjustment, but with Ray Kurzweil's advice and a few hours a week of cooking I'm down 40 pounds (30 more to go) and feeling much better. My knees don't hurt, I'm skiing again, and my toe nails are white again. I realize, in retrospect, I was causing serious harm to my body, and I only get one.

      I don't want to be preachy, and I fully support everybody's right to do whatever they want to their own bodies (just don't ask me to pay for it, OK?), but make sure you're evaluating it consciously and not out of habit (I was).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    77. Re:Back to Locke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You DO have time to work out. 9 hours a day still leaves you with what, at least 5 free hours?

      I work 70 hour weeks but still work out every other day.

      And yes, I even go out on the weekends and sleep 8 hours a night. There's a lot of hours in a day.

    78. Re:Back to Locke by Drysh · · Score: 1

      Locke copied that phrase. "Mens sana in corpore sano" is from Juvenal (Roman poet) who probably stole the idea from Thales of Miletus ("Who is healthy in body, resourceful in soul and of a readily teachable nature.")... O good days when there was no copyright.

    79. Re:Back to Locke by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      Funnily enough, I got rid of my TV. And don't miss the blasted thing. Freed up quite a lot of time. Although if I'm honest, I tend to spend most of the 'free time' gaming and socialising, rather than exercising, but I do still have enough time to make it to the gym several times a week.

    80. Re:Back to Locke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer furious masterbation

      ...And as a result my hairy palms prevent me from spelling correctly?

    81. Re:Back to Locke by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Not when you're a parent of a Cerebral Palsy child, but yes, a single person should be able to do all that. I did when I was single and young.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    82. Re:Back to Locke by sallgeud · · Score: 1

      If all that matters is your BMI.. let me recommend dysentery

    83. Re:Back to Locke by MoUsY+spell-checker · · Score: 1

      That's why cycling as a way of transportation (as opposed to cycling just for the sake of it) can be more strenuous exercise than working out at the gym for the same amount of time. You can't half-ass it if you want to get to your destination, and if you want to give up halfway and catch public transportation, you'll either have to find somewhere to leave the bike or push it along to your destination.

      --
      ~The MoUsY spell-checker: so balanced that I'm unbalanced.~
  6. So if I go jogging by pfortuny · · Score: 3, Funny

    I will develop some mouse cells in my brain?

    What's the catch? Have I missed something?

    Do I need more jogging?

    1. Re:So if I go jogging by Rick.C · · Score: 1
      I will develop some mouse cells in my brain? What's the catch? Have I missed something? Do I need more jogging?


      I depends on whether you jog on two legs or four.

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    2. Re:So if I go jogging by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      mmmm.....cheese :)

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    3. Re:So if I go jogging by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Do I need more jogging?

      Try doing it on a wheel.

    4. Re:So if I go jogging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if your goal is a piece of cheese.

  7. No ONE reason exercise boosts brainpower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    All regions of the brain benefit from the increased blood flow and do all body systems. The metabolic adaptations are also universal to most body systems.

    The meditative state that many exercises induce are also beneficial.

    1. Re:No ONE reason exercise boosts brainpower by rapidweather · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bicycling for exercise:

      When I started bicycling, outdoors, each day I would tackle the same hill, and see how long it took to get up there, and back down. Used one of those handlebar bicycle computers. Going up, when it got hard, lots of cuss words were appropriate to the pain and extreme effort. That in itself did not boost brainpower, the same ones seemed appropriate on each assent. Soon, I varied the ride, going other places in the same outing. Looking for some more hills, where I could exercise my verbal skills where needed. Eventually, over thousands of miles, I could easily ride 50 miles in a day, not along one road (boring), but all over the place. I lost weight, and felt healthy, at least. It is dangerous to bicycle, I broke my leg once. When I could, I just bicycled with one leg, after mending a while. That helped the circulation overall. I did notice that the leg muscle disappears when you are laid up with a broke leg.
      When you bicycle, it is important to at least think that you are doing a lot, and are "setting some records". The bicycle computer helps with that, If your average speed goes down on a certain course, you are getting better at it. To shave time off that average takes a lot of planning, and you cannot falter. So, you think your are doing something. Perhaps while you are bicycling, some teenagers come along and try and outrun you. You keep up with them, and soon they tire, as they are not trained.
      For all of this, you need a good bicycle, well maintained. I broke that leg because the gears slipped, were too worn, apparently, and I was applying a lot of pressure to the pedals. Not all bicycle shops fix your bike right, some just hire kids, don't replace needed parts either. Any doubt, replace a 4000 mile bike with a new one, don't take chances. You'll know when a bike is a good one, take a short test ride. There won't be any doubt, and you'll be happy to take it home with you today.
      I fixed up my mountain bike with special easy-rolling tires, and "police" inner tubes, that won't go flat. Those inner tubes are so thick, they look like they belong on a motorcycle.

  8. FTA by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Exercise generated blood flow to the dentate gyrus of the people, and the more fit a person got, the more blood flow the MRI detected, the researchers found."

    However, if your gym looks like this one shown in the article, I think the blood will flow elsewhere

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:FTA by ranton · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me? The gym I went to in college makes that picture look conservative. Made going to the gym just a little bit more enjoyable. Many women wear more clothes on the beach than they do in the gym. Thank god for that.

      --

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    2. Re:FTA by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      Heh, I can remember when my college gym re-organized. All of the guys were very disappointed that the butterfly machine was no longer directly in front of and facing the leg abductor.

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    3. Re:FTA by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      "Many women wear more clothes on the beach than they do in the gym. Thank god for that."

      I really think that is a double edged sword though. Some people shouldn't be naked in the privacy of their own homes.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  9. That explains it! by decipher_saint · · Score: 3, Funny

    That explains all those pro-quarterback particle theorists! "Gauge bosons are like running backs right? They gotta take the elemental forces of the universe to the end zone."

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:That explains it! by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Funny

      That explains all those pro-quarterback particle theorists! Well, just imagine how stupid some jocks might be if they DIDN'T work out!
      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    2. Re:That explains it! by Romicron · · Score: 1

      If they didn't get hit around so much, they'd have that sort of brain capacity. Doesn't help that for every brain cell they generate, they lose 100 each time they get sacked.

    3. Re:That explains it! by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      That explains all those pro-quarterback particle theorists!

      No, not particle theory, complex analysis.

    4. Re:That explains it! by maxume · · Score: 1

      Or all those insanely rich particle theorists.

      (I'm not sayin' money is better than prestige, I'm sayin' maybe they have different priorities)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:That explains it! by xPsi · · Score: 1

      And just imagine what kind of contributions to science Stephen Hawkings might have made if only he could work out like Arnold!

      --
      i\hbar\dot{\psi}=\hat{H}\psi
    6. Re:That explains it! by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Someone mentioned Frank Ryan already, though my favorite player was Rhodes Scholar Steve Young

    7. Re:That explains it! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      That explains all those pro-quarterback particle theorists!

      Some of those guys are seriously smart. They can analyze a chaotic system with dozens of elements, form a plan, and place a ball precisely where it needs to be several seconds in the future, based on the outcome of these variables, in a second or two.

      Sure, there's lots of practice, but my brain could never accomplish this.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  10. Too Late For You And Most SlashDotters! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the average SlashDotter can hardly do more than roll out of bed in the morning and fetch a beer from the fridge, I guess all of you are f**ked!-))

  11. This proves what I suspected all along... by negated · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...Stephen Hawking benchpresses bulldozers when no one is watching!

    1. Re:This proves what I suspected all along... by slothman32 · · Score: 1

      There is a cartoon, I think Farside, about sloths.
      It says, "What sloths do when no one is around."
      In then shows a picture of a sloth dancing and "dadada" from music.

      --
      Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
    2. Re:This proves what I suspected all along... by x2A · · Score: 1

      I saw him competing in robot wars once...

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    3. Re:This proves what I suspected all along... by LouisZepher · · Score: 1

      On which end of the remote though?

    4. Re:This proves what I suspected all along... by x2A · · Score: 1

      Both! Well, guess it's not really a "remote" then...

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    5. Re:This proves what I suspected all along... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5, funny

  12. No brainer by twifosp · · Score: 1
    This sounds like a no brainer to me. The brain needs oxygen to make chemical and electrical reactions. The brain will get the most blood circulation, thus carrying the most fresh oxygen, during and after exercise. Furthermore lots of exercise promotes a healthy cardiovascular and central nervous system. Something that can only improve the brain.


    I know that after I complete a heavy lifting routine or a good cardio work out, I feel great for the rest of the day. I think clearer. I don't feel any craving for caffeinated beverages. I focus more.


    I can't find the study, but I read a story about a study that said exercise produces the same effect that energy drink ingredients provide to the brain. While that might be true in some fashion, I've never consumed an energy drink that gave me as good of feeling as a post work-out. I do consume sugar free energy drinks from time to time, I think they can be a good pick me up when you are low on sleep or just feel drained. Of course, that's in moderation. Drinking one every day will build a tolerance and you'll just be throwing money down the drain. Of course, drinking a good cup of stout tea will do just about the same thing.


    I would love to see a study where a bunch of similarly talented gamers (that relied on critical thinking and reaction, not like an MMO) were divided up. One group would exercise, and one group would not. I would be willing to bet that after a month, the group that would exercise would have increased in skill and results over the group that did not.

    1. Re:No brainer by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      Also, regular exercise lifts depression, increases testosterone levels among males reduces risk of heart disease.

      Y'know, It's almost as if humans evolved to exercise regularly.

      --
      Deleted
    2. Re:No brainer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the group that exercised would quit gaming :))) they would probably find real world physical games more appealing to humans.

    3. Re:No brainer by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many people could get off of their anti-depressants and anti-anxiety meds if they just got regular exercise.

      My personal favorite is road biking. Low impact, saves gas, produces its own breeze and there's the added excitement of being chased by snarling dogs (there are a pair of black and tan coonhounds that can keep up for a short while and one magnificent-looking german short haired pointer that can even catch me from behind).

    4. Re:No brainer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exercising fucking sucks. Running sucks because I live in a shitty neighborhood and I'm not fast enough to run away from the negros. 10 minutes on a treadmill and I'm ready to shoot myself out of boredom. Screw exercising. You know what I did? I put an ad in craigslist offering a free hand in moving. I can carry a 300lb wardrobe by myself bare handed down 6 flights of steps and barely break sweat. I can move heavy shit 12 hours straight man. I swear I'm turning into superman.

  13. stoners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    this explains why only some stoners get stupid, the lazy ones....
    i personally have a good paying job and i exercise, but i'll be damned if i ever pass a drug test.

  14. Science! You gotta love it. by w33t · · Score: 3, Funny

    So if I couple the above article with this one then I can only assume that I am supposed to exercise and smoke a whole lot of pot while I do it.

    1. Re:Science! You gotta love it. by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      If only the two weren't mutually exclusive...

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    2. Re:Science! You gotta love it. by Bat+Country · · Score: 1

      Yes, eat a hash brownie, then go swimming...

      Just don't forget to wait 30 minutes.
      Your brain will cramp up.

      --
      The land shall stone them with the bread of his son.
  15. simultaneous death/regrowth? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

    Some folks run themselves to exhaustion- especially with the kick at the end of a long race. It just seems like brain cells -must- be dying when you run so hard you fall flat on your face- so does this regrowth offset that? How much?

    1. Re:simultaneous death/regrowth? by Daishiman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      High performance sporting is not healthy. Repeat: NOT healthy. I've been training for marathons with an Olympic athlete who consistently runs 42K in under 2 hours 15 minutes. He needs to take a continuos stream of dietary supplements and run 25 kilometers daily, use special cushioning on all his footwear to compensate for the deformation that the impact of running produces, and keep an extremely strict dietary regimen, not to mention constant sports massages to keep himself from cramping as well as a myriad of other things.


      Being a professional means pushing your body to extremes it was not meant to take. We're not built to run such distances at those speeds.


      Remember though, that only applies to the 0.001% of the population that plays professionally and has masochistic tendencies. Your average slashdotter should get off its ass and at the very least walk a half hour daily. I know that ever since I started running in the morning my day feels much better than before, and indeed I do feel sharper.

    2. Re:simultaneous death/regrowth? by fossa · · Score: 1

      Can I bug you for some sources on that? I've skimmed the abstracts of a few studies on, for example, Finnish ex-Olympic athletes, and didn't see anything like "elite level running is definitely bad", just "they didn't really have more knee pain than non-elites, but may have more visible damage". Contact sports did not fare as well as running. A study I've seen on recreational level runners suggests that it does not accelerate osteoarthritis compared to non-runners, but I'm curious to see anything about elite runners. Thanks

    3. Re:simultaneous death/regrowth? by BlackEmperor · · Score: 1

      He needs to take a continuos stream of dietary supplements and run 25 kilometers daily, use special cushioning on all his footwear to compensate for the deformation that the impact of running produces, and keep an extremely strict dietary regimen, not to mention constant sports massages to keep himself from cramping as well as a myriad of other things.


      Uhm every runner I know uses special cushioning in their footwear, we call them running shoes. Almost all marathon runners use dietary supplements, Gatorade, and eat healthy diets, Pasta anyone? I just wish I could afford constant massages :)

      Seriously I understand your point, but it's a bit alarmist. Most people can train easily in the region of 100km a week without any side affects (other than rotten toenails), and for the average joe that kind of mileage is normally not required, unless you're going for an ultra marathon.
      --
      "all broken things dream of repair" - chris letcher
    4. Re:simultaneous death/regrowth? by Daishiman · · Score: 1

      My source is my trainer: Oscar Cortinez, one of the fastest Argentine runners. He has a website. Check it out and ask him.

  16. The balance of nature by Lexor · · Score: 0

    Makes sense to me. Meatheads need the brain power, geeks are usually too smart for their own good.

    I am once again in awe of the delicate balance of nature.

    --
    Regards, Lex
  17. Stallone isn't dumb by gatorflux · · Score: 5, Informative

    Stallone is an accomplished script writer and a damned good businessman. Take a look at the deal he struck when he wrote and sold Rocky to the studio (he basically retained the rights to future sequels). Stallone has been able to fly under the radar because he sounds uneducated when he talks (due to an injury sustained at birth, if I remember correctly).

    1. Re:Stallone isn't dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Something to do with forceps during delivery at birth. It paralyzed one side of his face.

    2. Re:Stallone isn't dumb by x2A · · Score: 4, Funny

      "It paralyzed one side of his face."

      Wow, that happens to me too whenever I watch any of his films!

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    3. Re:Stallone isn't dumb by be951 · · Score: 1

      Well, you have a point, but this wasn't all that smart.

    4. Re:Stallone isn't dumb by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Have you ever heard his mom Jackie Stallone talk? Two of her specialities are "rumpology" and "psychic dogs". He must've missed getting her genes somehow.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  18. How dare you sir by Fifty+Points · · Score: 4, Funny

    I walk my virtual dog around Second Life every day you insensitive clod!

    --
    I'm in between insightful sigs right now...
  19. Next Week by 2names · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Just watch...next week they will announce that they interpreted the data in reverse.

    How do I know this?

    Because 99% of the really smart people I've met in my life are big, fat, dope-smoking UNIX guys who think a treadmill is a place where corn is ground up to make tires.

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    1. Re:Next Week by x2A · · Score: 2, Insightful

      hmm, my experience is the oposite... the smarter people tend to be skinny. The fat ones are often at most very good at the one thing they sit on their ass doing all day.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    2. Re:Next Week by thc69 · · Score: 1

      treadmill is a place where corn is ground up to make tires.
      This is so funny that it almost made me choke on my peanut butter sandwich.

      Yes, that's right, I said peanut butter sandwich.
      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    3. Re:Next Week by metlin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really?

      Funny, 99% of the really smart people I know play sports in some form or the other (adventure sports, martial arts, traditional sports, running etc) and don't really believe in sitting down and spending every waking hour doing something related to their area of expertise.

      In fact, the *really* smart people I know tend to have a life (family, friends, sports, parties) and usually, it is the wannabes that I know who tend to fit the profile that you describe.

      And I have found out that a combination of good workout and good diet often helps me concentrate better and sleep better.

      For instance, cut yourself off from high sugar, caffeine and soda, eat salads and run 5 miles a day for a month and see how much your productivity increases. You'll find that you can do more, you sleep better and feel a lot healthier.

      Besides, sports are a great way to get rid of your frustration. For instance, I do a lot of rock-climbing, and nothing to make you feel better than an eight hour straight climbing session out there.

    4. Re:Next Week by RockModeNick · · Score: 3, Informative

      But man, work up to 5 miles a day. You'll burn out and die if you go right to that, start with half a mile, and increase over a few months. As someone that went from a tech school background to running 3 miles every day(until sciatic nerve problems stopped me), I can say for sure your atrophied legs will want time to get started.

    5. Re:Next Week by EinZweiDrei · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bravo, and hear-hear.

      TFA doesn't strike me as terribly new. "Healthy body, healthy mind" is as old as the hills. If one has the discipline or talent to become truly -- truly -- outstanding in one thing, be it marathon-running or chess, that tendency towards success will cross over into other areas of their life. There is a sort of halo effect at work here. Be fucking exceptional at one thing, and start being pretty good at everything else.

      Leonardo da Vinci could purportedly bend horseshoes, a feat considered a mark of skill among strongmen. Incidentally, most of the great 'golden-age' strongmen -- Sandow, Inch, Saxon, etc. -- were extremely aristocratic and well-spoken.

      I absolutely aspire towards perfecting both mind and body. The further I bring the one, the more I seem to pull the other with it. Fritz Zwicky, the first physicist to theorize dark matter, would often intimidate his colleagues by doing one-arm push-ups. I'll never rock the science world as did Fritz, but in learning to do one-arm push-ups myself [a point of pride], I've learned a lot as a Physics student.

      Go figure.

      --
      Perhaps life really is full of possibilities.
    6. Re:Next Week by Delkster · · Score: 1

      The way I see it, the article doesn't really even claim that exercise would make anyone smarter. What hits me as more interesting is that perhaps it might have some effect on memory decline that comes with age.

      From TFA:

      Tests on mice showed they grew new brain cells in a brain region called the dentate gyrus, a part of the hippocampus that is known to be affected in the age-related memory decline that begins around age 30 for most humans.

      With that said, my experience isn't really even the same as yours. I've seen smart people both among those who exercise and those who don't. I don't think the two are directly correlated.

      However, many people who do exercise would seem to be more productive (which I don't automatically equal with being smart). I don't even claim to know what kind of causality there is, though, if any.

    7. Re:Next Week by AzureWrathHal · · Score: 3, Informative

      "For instance, cut yourself off from high sugar, caffeine and soda, eat salads and run 5 miles a day for a month and see how much your productivity increases. You'll find that you can do more, you sleep better and feel a lot healthier."

      I don't know about you, but five miles a day eating salads and I'd feel a lot like killing myself.

      I don't spend a few hours every day exercising so I can eat rabbit food.

    8. Re:Next Week by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Besides, sports are a great way to get rid of your frustration. When I was an undergrad, I used to do re-enactment. Nothing is better stress relief than going out into the park for an afternoon and hitting people with EN45 spring-steel swords. And nothing improves the concentration more than trying to ensure that they don't do the same to you...

      These days I play badminton, and it's similar, but I generally hurt a lot less the next morning. I can also recommend yoga; after an hour and a half of yoga in the afternoon my productivity jumps.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:Next Week by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Oy vey...5 miles per day? My knees are already about to implode from my 8 years of skateboarding in my youth.

        I guess there's always lots of swimming!

    10. Re:Next Week by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good point. 5 miles day on salads is a recipe for disaster. Even if you're trying to lose weight you don't want to put yourself into that high of a caloric deficit. A better idea is just start eating healthier foods. No more fast food, cookies, chips, etc... Instead eat lots of veggies, unprocessed meats, unprocessed carbs, and some good fats. You'd be surprised how much of the good food you can eat before you hit your calorie target.

      Also, 5 miles/day isn't required to lose weight. In fact, if losing weight is your primary goal sprints are far more effective both in weight loss and time (although taking someone who truly is sedentary and moving them straight to sprints is dumb too). Add in some resistance training and you're on the path to looking and feeling healthy.

    11. Re:Next Week by smbarbour · · Score: 1

      For instance, cut yourself off from high sugar, caffeine and soda, eat salads and run 5 miles a day for a month and see how much your productivity increases. You'll find that you can do more, you sleep better and feel a lot healthier.
      Reminds me of a joke I read:

      A 40 year-old man goes to the doctor for a physical. After performing all of the tests, the doctor tells him that he is perfectly healthy and will live to be at least 115 years old, but he wants to ask him a few questions before he leaves.

      Doctor: Do you smoke?
      Patient: Nope
      D: Do you do drugs?
      P: Nope
      D: Do you have frequent, unprotected sex with strangers?
      P: Nope
      D: Do you eat red meat?
      P: Nope
      D: Do you limit your sugar?
      P: Yes

      D: Why the hell do you want to live to be 115 then?!
    12. Re:Next Week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, 99% of the really smart people I know play sports in some form or the other (adventure sports, martial arts, traditional sports, running etc) and don't really believe in sitting down and spending every waking hour doing something related to their area of expertise.
      You are very lucky to know at least 100 really smart people. How does the fat & really smart one relates to the others in terms of intelligence?
    13. Re:Next Week by johansalk · · Score: 1

      You know, there's more to life and smartness than knowing UNIX, doncha think?

    14. Re:Next Week by BlackEmperor · · Score: 1

      Why is sprinting better than walking for weight loss? You burn the same amount of calories walking 400 metres as you do sprinting the same. Walking just takes longer.

      --
      "all broken things dream of repair" - chris letcher
    15. Re:Next Week by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Nope...sprinting burns many more calories. Google HIIT

    16. Re:Next Week by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      I miss having people to attack with blades.

      When I was younger, I used to train with my sifu. In college, I helped train duello style fencers. Now I don't have anyone to play with, so I have to train alone and it's really hard to get motivated.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    17. Re:Next Week by BlackEmperor · · Score: 1

      Sprinting obviously burns more calories but for a shorter period of time and over the same distance the number of calories burnt by the slow and fast person will be roughly equal.

      This has been the traditional view for some time but maybe recent research shows otherwise, I dunno. However, the article you reference reeks of snake oil.

      --
      "all broken things dream of repair" - chris letcher
    18. Re:Next Week by metlin · · Score: 2, Informative

      I merely mentioned salads as an example of healthy food. You could eat grilled chicken salad for lunch and other lean foods which are rich in protein but are not calorie and fat heavy and stay healthy. In fact, you'd be amazed at the variety of salads that are available that are quite healthy and can sustain your body's needs. Hitting that calorie mark would be surprisingly hard.

      Secondly, I was mentioning 5 miles/day not to lose weight but to stay in shape - I run to improve my stamina (I'm a climber) and to me, running helps improve my endurance. And running is just one example. Quite obviously, just running is not going to do everything (and if you have bad joints, might even be a bad thing for you). A combination of weights-training, running and aerobic sports is usually a good idea.

      But for someone who fit the bill that the OP described, eating salads and running regularly is a good way to get the body started on the fitness path (eating good food is healthy for you and running regularly and will tire you out, helping you sleep better and feel fresher). Cutting down on sugar (Splenda is your friend!) and caffeine usually makes your body feel a lot healthier, too (you can always pamper yourself to the one cup in the morning, which will wake you up a lot more than if you are always hooked on coffee). And I won't go into the kind of harmful stuff that sodas contain.

      I was merely describing where I'm at - I run about 5 miles a day and for the most part eat salads (I also happen to be a vegetarian, so it's a lot easier for me).

    19. Re:Next Week by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Google HIIT (High Intensity Interval Training) and looked at the article linked. Sprinting burns more calories while doing the exercise and leads to an increased caloric usage for up to 48 hours after exercising. It also depletes a different glycogen store which leads to sprinting targeting fat more than steady state running (again read the article I originally linked or google HIIT).

      If you don't want to read my link or google HIIT just trust me when I say I've switched people from steady state running to HIIT and they drop lbs like they never have. It really is that good. The only downside is that it's hard as hell. Someone needs to get their GPP up before even trying.

      There is even some newer research that is pointing to people who run a lot for distance can actually gain fat in their legs. It's the bodies way of adapting and storing energy close to where it's needed.

    20. Re:Next Week by Philotic · · Score: 1

      I find that you don't even need to stick to a strict exercise regiment and wait a month to begin to feel/notice the effects of a good workout. I work in restaurants, where I am running around and lifting heavy things for 12 hours straight. At the beginning of my shift my brain feels slow and fuzzy, but as blood is flowing throughout the night, I become much more sharp and alert. I'm sure if I exercised regularly I would have that feeling much more often.

    21. Re:Next Week by BlackEmperor · · Score: 1
      Your article has references that reference nothing. I don't see any research there. Besides I'm too lazy to look up the research myself cause I'm a skinny runner who doesn't need to lose weight :)

      Perhaps you can post links to actual research, rather than this dodgy website.

      There is even some newer research that is pointing to people who run a lot for distance can actually gain fat in their legs.
      That sounds ridiculous, maybe a miniscule amount, but I run ultra marathons and have never seen people with fat legs at the start line :). Besides even the skinniest of runners have enough "fat energy" to last them longer than they could run afaik. Please post links to actual research preferably by people who know what they are talking about.
      --
      "all broken things dream of repair" - chris letcher
    22. Re:Next Week by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      There's two things that exercise does, that's useful. One is increasing calorie usage, which allows one to 'balance' pie vs. exercise. The other is it strengthens muscles. Walking and running may be about the same for making your legs stronger, but one thing it's not better at is your heart - increase your heart rate to 100, and it'll serve to improve the healthiness of it.

    23. Re:Next Week by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia has lots of links to actual research papers showing the advantages to HIIT when it comes to fat loss. Since you seem to have a hard time using a quick search I'll even post them.

      One study concludes:

      In conclusion, this study showed that moderate-intensity aerobic training that improves the maximal aerobic power does not change anaerobic capacity and that adequate high-intensity intermittent training may improve both anaerobic and aerobic energy supplying systems significantly, probably through imposing intensive stimuli on both systems.


      Another study also concludes:

      These findings show that high intensity interval exercise produces improvements in body composition, fitness, and acute RMR compared to low intensity steady state training.


      Sadly, I can't find the original study I read which talked about glycogen stores and HIIT. If you like to run marathons, then go for it. If you want to burn fat and achieve an athletic look HIIT is the more effective method.

      Another study here. Page with a summary of a lot of studies here.

      I think it's pretty clear that people who are still doing steady state for fat loss are missing out.

    24. Re:Next Week by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Skinny or fat has nothing to do with intelligence... Heck for some people no amount of working out will ever make them skinny.

      My personal example would be that as a kid I was into gymnastics and swimming. I would have still been considered to have 'childhood obesity' as they 'medically' term it now... Even today I practice martial arts and weight lift (free weights) and I weigh around 300... & before you start I don't eat an abnormal amount of food either...

      I call BS on 'obesity' = 'dumb'.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    25. Re:Next Week by x2A · · Score: 1

      Exceptions don't prove the lack of a trend.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    26. Re:Next Week by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      No but stereotyping is a sure way to end up with more of your stereotype as people will live down to your expectations...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    27. Re:Next Week by deuterium · · Score: 1

      I don't think that people necessarily exercise to feel good, but because they already do feel good. There is certainly a correlation between the two, but not causation. Depression is a perfect model for this. Depressed individuals experience psychomotor retardation and early fatigue (exercise makes them feel bad), so they're disinclined to exercise. After treatment, when their energy returns, they become more active. Physical activity is a lagging indicator, as it requires a certain level of preexisting health.

    28. Re:Next Week by x2A · · Score: 1

      and ignoring basic observation is a great way of ignoring the causes of problems allowing the problem to grow further.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    29. Re:Next Week by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Sigh... 'Basic Observation', huh?

      Well unfortunately that is a subjective and faulty method of doing more than making educated guesses...

      Not that this whole thing is incredibly subjective anyways ('measure' 'intelligence' for me), but you are relying on unscientific methods to conduct your 'survey' and concluding based on these biased methods (that you created) that your results are the only results possible. Evidence otherwise is rejected as 'faulty' or 'exceptions'. Btw something which has 'exceptions' doesn't make 'fact' status .

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    30. Re:Next Week by x2A · · Score: 1

      "but you are relying on unscientific methods..."

      Really? Are you sure it's just unscientific speculation?

      (apologise for including a fox news link, I think my point stands nonetheless)

      "to conduct your 'survey' and concluding based on these biased methods (that you created) that your results are the only results possible"

      My survey? Biased methods? That I created? All those articles aren't quoting me you know! I wasn't even alive for the 1958 study!

      "Btw something which has 'exceptions' doesn't make 'fact' status"

      Did I say 'fact' or did I say 'trend'? (problems with vocabulary recall?) I think you'll find it was the latter (and here's the link to my post if you're in doubt)... although, it is a fact that there is a trend, as the numerous research projects have shown. The fact that there are exceptions is what makes it a trend, not a law.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  20. Is clicking a mouse exercise? by dpreformer · · Score: 1

    Mouse clicking - let's get it added to the 2008 Olympics!

    What country has the fastest double clicker? Position mouse on link and click in under 40 mSec!

  21. Note to everyone: doesn't mean stronger = smarter by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    Exercising causing a boost in long-term memory ability is not the same as making your IQ go up 20 points by going to the gym. Furthermore, sports/bodybuilding/etc don't have a high IQ requirement for entry, you basically just have to be able to put up with working out all the time. If pro football required a phd, then all pro football players would have a "phd" of some kind. It mostly requires being gigantic and being able to mentally retain some of the rules of football, so mostly that's what the players are mentally tasked with achieving.

    --
    stuff |
  22. Stallone... by smartdreamer · · Score: 1

    Maybe look at Rocky, you'll find the start of an answer.

    Boxing is a great sport for the mind.

  23. I'm screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, there goes any hope I had of getting new memory brain cells.

  24. Stephen Hawking? by jcarkeys · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    How do we account for Stephen Hawking then?

    1. Re:Stephen Hawking? by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      By actually bothering to read the summary, or TFA. If you already did, then you need more exercise.

    2. Re:Stephen Hawking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple, he is a dumb fucktard who should fucking kill himself.

  25. Advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an Advert for gyms! What they want is customers.

    This study was ordered just like those Windows vs Linux Studies.

  26. Next project... by Vexler · · Score: 1

    ...to write and construct an interface between my brain and Madden 2007.

    Minus the steroids, of course.

    1. Re:Next project... by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      Just rerelease the interface between your brain and Madden 2006, with a few new player names and possibly a new texture or two. Nobody will notice the diff.

  27. Smart Rugby PLayers by joshsnow · · Score: 1

    I've never met a smart rugby player, But they are handy in a brawl.

    OK, I know you're referring to pro sports people here, but still.I know two rugby players who program computers in their day jobs and play semi-pro rugger on weekends. Not only do they have technical skills, they're also great team players and natural leaders. So it seems to be with most people who play sports outside of work.

  28. This is why the Wii and DS keep you going by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One increases your Brain Age and lets you socialize with your pets (DS), the other lets you get exercise indoors (Wii).

    But in most scientific studies, the things that consistently help ameliorate the effects of aging are: mild to moderate exercise (even walking up stairs or parking 2 blocks away), a varied diet high in vegetables and fruits, drinking red wine (men) or grape juice (anyone), and more education.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:This is why the Wii and DS keep you going by nbritton · · Score: 1
    2. Re:This is why the Wii and DS keep you going by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Now, as someone who actually had a guest break the Wii strap, you can get them replaced free.

      My son and I never break them, but that's cause: a. we wipe our hands when they get sweaty; b. we don't overexagerate our movements; and c. we are not stupid.

      The funny thing about c. is that our guest who broke the wrist strap is in fact a Math geek (and scores higher on the PSAT and PLAN than my son who also gets A's in Math Honors). But common sense is not necessarily associated with brains.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  29. Amusing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the link!

  30. I can't exercise! by Pedrito · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dude, this sucks. A year and a half ago you guys said that cannabinoids induce brain growth and man, I've really been putting that theory to the test. But now you want me to exercise? I can't do both dude. And given a choice... I think I'll stick with the old news...

    1. Re:I can't exercise! by maxume · · Score: 1

      In all things, moderation.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  31. It depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it depends. Blood pressure is known for increasing the size of the brain, since it just expands. When the pressure lowers, the expansion is gone and goes back to normal. This counts for alcohol consumption as well.

    So, these researchers could measure the brain increase after alcohol consumption in comparison to exercise.

    How much time is there between the exercise and the measurement of the brain? If it within an hour, it could be the bloodpressure. If it is with 5 hours, it could be energy or other influences etc.

    I would like to know if the substance of the brain is increasing or is just the volume?

    - Unomi -

  32. Phew! by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

    Good to know that every time I go clubbing, I balance out the cells that get blown away by dancing!

  33. But that would mean by Drakin020 · · Score: 0

    That us IT guys are stuuuupid?

    Hell I sit on my arse all evening.

    --
    The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
  34. I better write this down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I better write this down. I am on my way to the kitchen, and I'll forget about it by the time I get back.

  35. more brain cells != more smarter by cwells · · Score: 1

    ".. new brain cells in a brain region called the dentate gyrus, a part of the hippocampus that is known to be affected in the age-related memory decline..."

    all obvious joking aside... the above is interpreted as improved memory that us old farts begin to lose
    around age 30. this isn't saying that working out makes you smarter or more intelligent. retards!

  36. Jocks and Intelligence by iluvovaltine · · Score: 1

    Please do not forget that not all exercise is created equal. Those meatheads who have arms as big as your torso may be doing horrible things inside their brains.
    Recent studies have documented cases of brain stem injury and subarachnoid hemorrhage with maximal resistive exercise. http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Effect+of+breathing+ instruction+on+blood+pressure+responses+during+... -a08012731
    So they pump and pump and their brains pop and pop. Just a note, to clarify some comments people are making in jest. Jest accurately! Lest we quest vapidly!

    --
    Die when you die -GG Allin
    1. Re:Jocks and Intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU. Read the god damned study you link to before you run your dicksucker. It doesn't say what you think (or claim) it says, but I suspect you're too lazy to be smart enough to understand it.

  37. Re:Note to everyone: doesn't mean stronger = smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the NFL level you need to be able to commit a playbook that as thick as the Manhattan phone book to memory.

  38. Now I get it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always wondered why the so-called "nerds" who post at /. don't know the difference between To, Too, and Two; Your and You're; Lose and Loose; or goatse and a hole in the ground!

  39. Re:Note to everyone: doesn't mean stronger = smart by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

    Guys (and gals, I suspect) who play sports professionally HAVE to be able to do several things: --Memorize mammoth playbooks/schemes. --Be able to overcome their instinctual training to mentally react to split-second changes in the game (the ball's supposed to come over my left shoulder...whoops, better adjust, it's over my right on this deep post route). Call this applied calculus....they don't do the math, but their bodies do the calculations. And often come up with good answers. --Know their bodies and physical limitations to almost the Nth degree. --Understand supplementation and food and what vitamins/minerals do what (enter steroids/hgh HERE). --Plus, they learn all this because of the desire to do THEIR work better. As much as you put into computers or engineering or drafting or whatever, they put into THEIR profession. Of course, the above doesn't apply to that idiot linebacker wannabe who bullied you in high school and now is cleaning your gutter, but hey, give credit where it's due.

  40. How many Geek Mice do you know? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Cross species generalisations are the basis of most of this kind of research, mainly because lab rats are cheap and sdon't complain when you kill them and copen them up to look for changes. But how much of it is really valid?

    Here's an interesting anecdote: Scientists were running rats through a maze with a reward system to measure how fast they learn. Rats soon learn the optimum path and get rewarded. COnclusion: rats are smart and learn. Now substitute in a ferret. Ferret searches maze and finds the food (hunk of rabbit). Next time the ferret does not go down that path of the maze. Conclusion: ferrets are stupid and don't learn. But if you know a bit more about ferrets, then you'd know that they know it is a waste of time to go down the same hole twice. They've either eaten or scared the occupants, so don't waste time.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:How many Geek Mice do you know? by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      In this case, however, nobody's comparing behaviours, but pure biology - cell growth in similar circumstances.

      Behaviour comparison is tricky grounds even within one and the same species, as any anthropologist and ethnologist will tell you.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
  41. Re:It has already been known that excercise boosts by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

    Hell, this shouldn't have been AC'd!

    --
    "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
  42. Re:Note to everyone: doesn't mean stronger = smart by maxume · · Score: 1

    There are about 30 teams in the NFL, with about 50 players on a team. That's 1500 bodies. Out of ~1 billion people, if you take the smartest 1% of the 1% that are the best athletes, you are left with a pathetic 100,000 specimens. The NFL takes the top 1% of that bunch.

    It doesn't work just like that, because, as you say, size is hugely important, but don't fool yourself into thinking that very many of those guys running around have less than very above average intelligence.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  43. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

    Didn't Gary Larson come up with this a decade ago?

    Something about scientists exercising their cerebellums in the morning.

  44. DDR < ITG by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 1

    DDR is too easy. The hardest songs top out at 10, and the average of the hardest difficulty over all songs is around 8.

    ITG tops out at 13, has hands/mines/rolls, and almost every song has an expert setting with a difficulty of at least 9. Plus, the average ITG arcade machine is of much higher quality than the average DDR machine.

    Besides that, everyone plays single...double is where it's at. It takes much more energy to move your center of mass back and forth across a distance of several feet than it does to stand in one position and turn.

    ITG FTW

    Disclaimer: Yes, that's me.

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
  45. Bike to work. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

    It's this simple: Bike to work.

    Ten years ago, I weighed 250 pounds. Today, I'm at about 175. (I don't keep accurate track anymore, but I do check every now and again.)

    I started by biking to school. On the first day, I had to stop about a dozen times. I didn't realize just how out of shape I had become. I stuck with it (the 4th day is the worst, since that's when you're the sorest.) and kept biking to school. I biked all the way through university, and I've been biking to work since graduating. (Electrical Engineering) I'm 30 years old and I'm in great shape. I don't take any drugs (including caffeine and alcohol).

    If you can't do that, bike part of the way. Bus to work and bike home. Walk during your lunch break. (I only get 30 minutes, and I try to spend 15 of that outside.)

    If you're concerned about being smelly, bike slower. Alternatively, bike to a nearby gym and shower/change there.

    Biking is faster than driving or busing:
    8.2 km between work and home:
    Bike: 45 minutes round trip. (22 to work, 23 home)
    Bus: 30 minutes to work, 1 hour home.
    Car: 20 minutes to work, 45 minutes home.

    At the annual "Bike to Work" week, the bikes routinely beat the cars in the "Commuter Challenge". You simply don't save time by taking your car.

    I save about $2000 a year by biking. I don't pay for car insurance or gas on a non-existent second car. Mind you, I did have to spend the money on a bike, bike clothes, armour, lights, etc. I did that after biking for a few years.

    I've got two kids. Buy the right kind of seat and you won't have "problems".

    I wear a dress shirt and nice pants at work.

    So get out of your car, get onto a bike, and get some exercise. Your brain will thank you for it.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    1. Re:Bike to work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>So get out of your car, get onto a bike, and get some exercise

      Don't tell me what to do, son.

    2. Re:Bike to work. by Ed+Corcoran · · Score: 1

      I bike to work, too. But it's only a 3 minute trip one-way, so it doesn't add up to much.

    3. Re:Bike to work. by xappax · · Score: 1

      I can't agree more, I'm a bike commuter too and I'm happy with it on so many levels. I also save a huge amount of money by biking, because I don't even bother with fancy bike gear - a $20 thrift-store cycle is all you need to get started! Some more things I like about bike commuting:

      - In the morning, biking helps wake me up and get my blood flowing, so I'm alert and in a good mood by the time I get to work.

      - Biking home in the evening is a major "de-stresser" (at least for me). Any tension or "fidgetiness" I built up at work melts away as I ride, as opposed to drivers who often become even more frustrated from traffic, etc.

      - Your commute becomes a sort of empowering personal game or challenge, because the speed that you get to work isn't decided by shit like speed limits, your car, gridlock, or other things you have no control over - it's determined almost entirely by how fit you are and how willing you are to push yourself. That makes it fun, but more importantly, it makes every trip an accomplishment to be proud of instead of a burden to be endured.

      - Personal benefits aside, I don't have to feel (as) guilty about contributing to US dependence on Saudi oil barons, global climate change, and one of the major factors for US involvement in the Iraq war, because I don't buy gas!

      Oh, and about the sweaty/clothes issue - I wear nice clothes in an office too, so I bring my clothes in a bag and take 5 min to sponge off and "quick change" once I get to the office. Works fine!

    4. Re:Bike to work. by Herz · · Score: 0

      Amen to that. I got caught up in mountainbiking and road biking though, so I can't really say I'm saving any money :). It's a great way to get in shape anyhow.

      --
      In vino vici
  46. Desk work by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1

    Most of us here have desk work for 8 hours/day - not counting 1-2 hours travel time on a bus. How do we get exercise in this situation?

    While I did find links to desk exercise websites, they are most frequently some simple stretches and not really much of an exercise.

    1. Re:Desk work by th3space · · Score: 1

      Provided that your environment (i.e. weather, location, crime-rate) permits it, you could try walking 30 minutes a day at lunch...just pack a change of clothes and swap them out in the bathroom (bring deodorant and a towel, too). Even low-impact walking can have a positive impact on your overall well-being.

      Before I changed positions and moved offices, a friend of mine (also a trainer) had suggested to me that, though it would look funny, getting a large exercise ball to sit on at work in lieu of a chair would help my balance and give my 'core' a decent enough, low-impact work-out. An added bonus would be that at lunch (or on a break), you could do some of the standard exercise ball exercises (leg lifts, crunches, etc), as they don't take up all that much room. The real kicker is whether or not you can deal with getting razzed by co-workers for caring about your body/health.

      I lucked out and live down the street from my gym, and am about 3 blocks from another branch at my new office, so even if I find myself working late, I can still at least get something done in the way of exercise.

      Hopefully someone else will have some decent suggestions, worse to worse, make friends with a trainer and nick some free advice! ;)

      --
      "How like you to drag your keyboard to a gun fight." - Aaron Bedard (BANE)
    2. Re:Desk work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Cycle to and from work. If that is not an option, maybe do exercise in your lunch break. I don't think you'll find anything that'll give you a real workout while sitting at your desk.

    3. Re:Desk work by fossa · · Score: 1

      Take a long lunch a couple times a week and go for a run. Work out in the mornings or after work (yes, I know this is tough on an 8 hour + 2 commuting schedule, but not impossible). Bike, run, or walk to work if cicrumstances are favorable. You mention the bus; is it possible to bike for say, 20-30 mins each way and then pick up the bus for the rest of the commute? Or just get out a few stops early and walk home? Get a friend to motivate you to play raquetball or tennis on weekends. 30 minutes of running (or presumably any aerobics) say two times during the week with two hour sessions on the weekends will do wonders (building up slowly is the key to injury prevention though; don't do too much too soon if you are just starting out).

      I've come to enjoy running over the years and have been grateful that someone taught me how to do it when I was younger. I know a lot of people say "running? ugh", but if I stick with it long enough to get "in shape", then it's amazing. I like it because there is so little equipment (I've even learned to go without shoes in many places); a gym is not required, but it doesn't matter what exercise you do as long as you find a way to stick with it. When I get lazy and stop exercising, I start to feel tired and even more lazy in a downward spiral. When I finally drag myself back to exercise, I feel better even if my schedule has less downtime because of it. It's definitely worth it for me.

    4. Re:Desk work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could turn off the TV and walk/run for 30 minutes. You could turn off your computer (assuming you are using slashdot at home) and walk/run for 30 minutes. Or, what I do is wake up 30 minutes early and walk 2 miles. As soon as I get home from work, walk another mile. Finally, 30 minutes before I go to sleep, I walk for 2 miles. My method is called "Get a Dog." In the last 6 months, my puppy has forced me to lose about 15 pounds. I'd post more, but I have to walk the dog.

    5. Re:Desk work by anachemia · · Score: 1

      I have struggled with the same issue. The option I've found to be the most cost-effective and time-efficient was buying a mid-range elliptical trainer (about $400 to 500, equivalent to a year's gym membership) and fitting in a quick cardio workout first thing in the morning. I hop on the thing right out of bed, and doing it every weekday morning has helped make it a mindless, routine thing. Note that I am the furthest thing from a morning person or exercise buff, but this has proven to be a great lifestyle change. I have noticed a huge improvement in my energy level, memory, mood, and endurance.

      Note that I also tried joining a gym near work a couple of years ago, but hated the constant schlepping of clothes + towel + shoes to/from work and home all the time. The scheduling became difficult too - I leave work at 6pm, so hitting the gym after work meant catching the train & bus and arriving home closer to 8:30 PM. Needless to say I didn't keep that up for very long. It sounds like you are in a similar boat.

      Good luck, hope you find a workable solution that fits your routine!

  47. Brain cells, exercise, & smoking by Keith+Duhaime · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a marathon runner over the years I have noticed something with new runners that show up at our winter-spring clinics who have recently or are trying to quit smoking. The ones that stick with the regime (about 16 weeks) that it takes to prep for a marathon I have repeatedly told me that they lose their nicotine craving almost totally, and that the running seems to be a big part of it. These are people who were previously quite hardcore smokers for a number of years. Could it be that running (and other forms of exercise) that stimulates new brain cell production also rewires the brain from its nicotine addiction in smokers?

    1. Re:Brain cells, exercise, & smoking by QuantumPion · · Score: 1

      Based on anecdotal evidence, I say no. My room mate in college was a kinesology major and a major smoker. He routinely smoked WHILE exercising (especially hilarious smoking while jogging, ashing on bench pressers while spotting for them, etc).

    2. Re:Brain cells, exercise, & smoking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Former drug addicts say the same thing, and since nicotine would qualify as a drug...

      The truth is, exercise stimulates endorphins (sic) which creates a morphine-like effect in the brain ("Runner's high"). This is why exercise, particularly cardiovascular exercise is encouraged during drug rehabilitation.

    3. Re:Brain cells, exercise, & smoking by BlackEmperor · · Score: 1

      I've run a number of marathons and ultras, and actually used to smoke dope during training, just once or so a week. I felt it was really good for easing sore leg muscles after a long training run and just for general relaxation.

      And I've seen people on the starting line of 100km runs smoking cigarettes :)

      --
      "all broken things dream of repair" - chris letcher
    4. Re:Brain cells, exercise, & smoking by ioshhdflwuegfh · · Score: 1

      As a marathon runner over the years I have noticed something with new runners that show up at our winter-spring clinics who have recently or are trying to quit smoking. The ones that stick with the regime (about 16 weeks) that it takes to prep for a marathon I have repeatedly told me that they lose their nicotine craving almost totally, and that the running seems to be a big part of it. These are people who were previously quite hardcore smokers for a number of years. Could it be that running (and other forms of exercise) that stimulates new brain cell production also rewires the brain from its nicotine addiction in smokers? As a heavy smoker/complete non-smoker I can tell you how it works: You can jack up your nicotine addiction to any level you want: let's say two packs a day for months. When you want to stop, well, you stop completely smoking and after several days you are nonsmoker. Then, let's say after several months of not smoking a single cigarette, you can try this again. Naturally, at first you won't be able to smoke as much as before, but, as I said, that is only natural. This goes along well with doing many sports although I have not tried marathon, maybe it takes longer to get rid of addiction when you are a marathon runner, I don't know. Friend of mine told me from his experience that as long as he shoots the heroin only occasionally, there is no addiction whatsoever.
  48. And if you act now... by th3space · · Score: 1

    Getting exercise will actually increase your virility, boost your pheromone output and make you a little more dynamic in the bedroom, which then becomes a self-sustaining cycle, as love-making is a wonderful form of low-impact (if that's your style, of course) aerobic (and sometimes anaerobic) exercise!

    Geeks, nerds and dorks alike, lend me your ears! You too can have a hot, steamy social life for just 30 minutes a day!

    And as a free, no-cost-to-you-at-all bonus, if you act within the next few years, you may also greatly improve your chances of living a longer, happier and healthier life!

    (seriously, my fiance and I have experienced a significant boost to our 'love life' by going to the gym for a minimum of 30 minutes a day, five days a week...improving your diet doesn't hurt matters, either)

    --
    "How like you to drag your keyboard to a gun fight." - Aaron Bedard (BANE)
    1. Re:And if you act now... by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Sex as a form of exercise? Training for it? Are you out of your mind? Not all of us have a 'love life' you insensitive clod. I need to pay if I want sex. Maybe I get some action once every 3-5 years as a sex tourist. Being ugly really sucks. Time for a rousing game of Russian Roulette.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    2. Re:And if you act now... by dotpl · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to be like this.
      Did you know that most girls don't base their decision on whether to sleep with you or not on if you're beautiful or ugly? Well, now you know.
      I'm talking out of experience here, you don't have to look like brad pitt in order to get your shit together and get some freaky action.
      Look around the net, google for seduction, most specifically, speed seduction, and get ready for a life changing experience... Trust me, it really works.

  49. Workout by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1
    It's always funny to see how people that work-out assume that because it makes them feel good, it must make everyone feel good. This is usually followed up by some thinly veiled self-righteousness.

    People who don't exercise are often the way they are because exercise makes them feel HORRIBLE. Personally, I've tried to get into shape a number of times. But after three or four weeks of working out, I just can't take it anymore -- the pain, the exhaustion, the depression, the undirected feelings of anger, none of it. The worst part is the insomnia. I normally have trouble sleeping, but exercise -- no matter when in the day it takes place -- makes it much worse. Then some jock asshole tries to tell me that I'd be able to sleep better if I just got some exercise. That I'd feel happier if I just exercised now and then.

    I'm sure that more blood gets to my brain when I exercise, but that's not necessarily helpful. The distracting, unpleasant parts of the brain get stimulated too. Try taking an overdose of uppers and see how that makes you feel; not all stimulation is positive. Or consider how alcohol, a depressant, can make people MORE happy and energetic by depressing the parts of the brain holding the person back.

    1. Re:Workout by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      go for it a bit longer, then you start to get the endorfin kick (your body starts to release endorphines - you feel high and cool), that's why you get these training fanatics, they're on drugs - literary! ;-)

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    2. Re:Workout by twifosp · · Score: 1

      It's always funny to see how people that work-out assume that because it makes them feel good, it must make everyone feel good. This is usually followed up by some thinly veiled self-righteousness.

      Thinly vieled self-righteousness? Screw that mate. It's a statement of fact that I feel better after working-out. That's not self-righteousness. It's also a statement of fact that I used to not work out on a regular basis. I notice a huge difference in my quality of health and life now that I do work out. I'll never go back.

      Also, any Doctor will tell you that excercise is better than no excercise.

      People who don't exercise are often the way they are because exercise makes them feel HORRIBLE.

      If you are exteremly out of shape or have health conditions then yes, it might make you feel horrible. For a while. But eventually mate, I promise that'll pass. If you just feel sore, or have a hard time getting motivated that is one thing. If you feel HORRIBLE, enough to warrant putting HORRIBLE in all caps, and you are not exagerating, then you should see a doctor. Talk to your doctor about excercise and what he/she recommends. A doctor can give you a phsyical and determine if you have some kind of condition where excercise is not right for you.

      Trust me, there is a reason why people say "no pain, no gain". When you are out of shape, getting into shape is a tough up hill battle. But it's worth it in the end.

      See a doctor first. Then talk to a personal trainer. I will bet you 100 dollars that you could be in great shape in 6 months and feel better both physically and mentally. This isn't self-righteousness, this is human science and health.

      I'm not some jock asshole. I'm every bit as geek as you. Click this link to gain a new perspective on geek excercise. http://xkcd.com/c189.html

    3. Re:Workout by rollingcalf · · Score: 1

      "People who don't exercise are often the way they are because exercise makes them feel HORRIBLE. Personally, I've tried to get into shape a number of times. But after three or four weeks of working out, I just can't take it anymore -- the pain, the exhaustion, the depression, the undirected feelings of anger, none of it."

      That's usually because they go into it too hard too soon, like what you described with your pain and exhaustion.

      When I start working out after several months with no exercise, I go into it really gradually. For the first few weeks my workouts will have no more than 5-10 minutes of cardio, and 15-20 minutes of moderate weights. In and out of the gym in less than half an hour, just enough to break a sweat and just enough to have a tiny bit of soreness the next day. And no more than 3 workouts per week. Then I gradually increase the duration and intensity over the next 3-4 months so I'm doing 30-45 minutes of cardio and 60-90 of weights, 4-5 times per week ... no injury, no pain other than occasional mild soreness, no exhaustion or frustration.

      Similarly, my mother who almost never exercised in her whole life decided she finally had to get active. Her first workout was a quarter-mile walk. That's it. Then she built up to a brisk 3 miles over the following six months. No horror or exhaustion.

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
    4. Re:Workout by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1
      Believe, I've gone for long enough to get the endorphins to kick in. That's the only reason I can workout at all. But endorphins aren't the all-powerful feel-good drug that training fanatics make them out to be. They only make you feel good if there isn't much pain to begin with. Otherwise, all they do is make you feel cloudy-headed and just slightly less agonized and miserable. And as your body dumps more and more of them into your system, the endorphins can make you REALLY sick, not at all unlike their synthetic analogs, morphine and heroin.

      This is very important, so say it with me now: NOT EVERYONE IS THE SAME. What makes jock-assholes feel good will do just the opposite to other people. If I used the same kind of delusional logic that you're using, I'd go around telling people that they should avoid the sunshine in the morning, because it will put them to sleep. Indeed, if I don't keep my curtains closed, the sunshine will knock me right out. But thankfully, I'm not an idiot, and I realize that some people may respond differently than I do.

      I hate to throw around the insults, but you really are a moron. This is basic stuff; if you're old enough to operate a computer and type things, you're old enough to have noticed that people respond to things differntly.

    5. Re:Workout by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1
      When I was 18 and started college, I worked out at the gym 4 times a week for 8 months. I jogged, I used cardio machines, I did endurance training on the weight machines, etc. It never got any easier. Oh sure, I got stronger, and I could go further before I had to stop. But I felt just as bad the whole time. I still threw up if I ran for more than one city block. I even saw a doctor about it -- they said I was in great shape, low blood pressure, low body fat, etc. Eventually they put me on drugs to help with the insomnia and mood problems, which thankfully made me too lethargic to continue going to the gym. According to doctors, I have no real physical health problems, and any psychiatric problems I have seem to be grossly exacerbated by regular exercise.

      "No pain, no gain" has to be the stupidest expression ever coined by anyone, ever. Healthy people are usually born healthy, and stay healthy naturally. They find exercise easy and mostly painless. They gain despite a near-total lack of pain. Unhealthy people are born that way, and will feel awful for most of their lives despite a total lack of gain. I put myself through a great deal of pain, and ultimately gained nothing.

      Ironically, I recently found a much better way to stay in shape. 5 minutes of mild stretching and a prescription for a small dose of dexadrine. I'm fitter and happier than I ever was when I was working out, and can get whatever small amount of exercise I need just walking from time to time. So much for the miracle of working out.

      Now, since I've ALREADY taken your six month challenge (eight months, actually), I've seen the doctors, I've talked to the physical trainers, I win the bet. You can send the $100 to Mark Fairchild, 12 Stratford Avenue, Burnaby BC, V5B 4P5.

    6. Re:Workout by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1
      That's the thing: I have taken it past just a few months before. I worked out regularly at a gym for 8 months when I started college, arguably the healthiest point in my entire life. Even when I got to the point of being able to run five miles, I still usually threw up after running just a single city block.

      You're talking about healthy people starting a workout routine to improve their naturally good physical condition. I'm talking about naturally unhealthy people trying to deny their nature and torturing themselves to accomplish what could be better achieved with the occasional walk, like your mother (A walk is very different than a workout).

  50. Dying Brain by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1
    It DOES just seem like brain cells must be dying. Just like how when you run a car until the tank is dry, the circuitry all shorts-out. I mean, isn't it obvious? Parts of the brain die everytime anyone becomes exhausted!

    Huh...

    I think we know whose brain is really suffering from some cell-death.

  51. Social interaction != verbal communication by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1
    Granted, you *can* go weight lifting without anyone, but I would strongly recommend against it if you're serious about weight lifting. Also, you *can* go walking or jogging on your own, but it's more beneficial to have somebody with you to encourage you to continue or push yourself, and they can do that simply via body language.

    More seriously, studies have proven that sexual intercourse is more productive when done with at least one partner.

    1. Re:Social interaction != verbal communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time I start working out with some one, they puss out before I do. I don't mean running or weight lifting wise. Three weeks later they start missing it and it demoralizes me when they quit. I prefer to work out alone. Like most things, I perform better that way.

  52. you laugh, but... by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

    A lot of athletes, particularly quarterbacks, are quite inteligent and well educated...

    Consider, for instance, that two of the most dominant american marathoners of the 80's and 90's (Anthony Sandoval and Bob Kempainen) are now practicing doctors. The validictorian at my HS was on the cross country and tennis teams. One of the few people I know who has finished the UIUC chemical engineering program with a 4.0 was on the basketball team...

    Also, NCAA athletes have a better graduation rate than the general student population... link

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
  53. NOPE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love smacking you self important assholes in the mouth with this stuff.

    Ernest Hemingway

  54. Linked with memory? by glwtta · · Score: 1

    You are saying that exercising, bad enough in itself, also increases my chances of remembering the ordeal later? No thanks!

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  55. Oblig Simpson's Quote by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Homer entering "The Vast Waistband", a clothing store...

          Homer: I'm looking for something loose and billowy, something
                        comfortable for my first day of work.
    Salesman: Work, huh? Let me guess. Computer programmer, computer
                        magazine columnist, something with computers?
          Homer: Well, I use a computer.
    Salesman: [quietly, to self] Yeah, what's the connection? Must be the
                        non-stop sitting and snacking.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  56. Um, How about this one by Blappo · · Score: 2, Informative

    He seemed pretty smart.

    Edwin Hubble

    --
    Why are so many posts with factual errors modded up?
  57. Re: Stallone is an artist! by aesova · · Score: 1

    Is that Stallone in a firefighter costume?

    --
    If bullshit were music, you'd be a brass band.
  58. DDR ITG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The two scales aren't exactly comparable. Also, DDR's step patterns are generally more interesting than ITG's, and the mines are mostly just obnoxious (a few songs they're used well on). I like and play them both, but DDR is definitely the superior game.

    That said, double is definitely where it's at--single is almost a waste of time (though some songs are just more interesting on single. PARANOiA Evolution is one example--on single it's a classic, on double just kinda meh).

    (As for the video, good speed but you lose about a billion points for using the bars. Next time without external aid!)

  59. Interestingly, jogging apparently extends life... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    ... by about the amount of time you spend jogging (plus its share of your sleep time).

    Which means that, as is alleged for fishing, "God does not deduct from a man's alloted span the time spend jogging."

    So go ahead and jog. The time isn't wasted. B-)

    = = = =

    On the other hand, the alleged benefits of exercise in the brain are an increase in the count of cells in a section used for memory. Any bets on whether the added cells are only used to remember exercising? B-)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  60. Re:you laugh, but... OT by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

    Re: Your Sig. Perhaps your Grad Student buddy thought he wanted to drink a beer, and then on second thought decided not to?

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  61. Reason why Stallone sounds..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stallone has been able to fly under the radar because he sounds uneducated when he talks (due to an injury sustained at birth, if I remember correctly).

    I always thought the reason Stallone sounds the way he does is because he was an Italian kid growing up in a predominantly Irish crime-family part of Noo Yawk City.

  62. new mice by eneville · · Score: 1

    I for one personally welcome our new bigger brained mice overlords.

  63. Meanwhile, at the mouse lab... by autophile · · Score: 1

    (Imagine any "stereotypical scientist speech pattern" here)

    Mmm, yes, and now we move from our expensive brain imaging lab into our even more expensive mouse gymnasium. Yes, and here you can see our little locker room, with little lockers and showers for the mice, including some nice wood shavings. Here is the weight room with little freestyle barbells, and a full set of weights from 10 mg all the way up to 2000 mg! Here we can see our tiny little weight machines, the mice really love these, especially gnawing holes in the seat padding. Replacing the seat padding alone is a budgetary line item.

    Ah, here comes Reggie Mouse to do some exercises. Mmm, yes, he sure loves his treadmill! Look at his little feet go!

    --Rob

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
  64. Now I know why! by caffiend666 · · Score: 1

    One could presume that exercise grows new cells to replace cells damaged by the motion. Therefore, beating your head against a wall would contribute to the growth of new cells as well. Which would explain why I beat my head against a wall so often! Beating your head against a wall is not only a stress reducer, it's fun, it also contributes to your overall....wait. What were we talking about again?

    --
    Here's to losing my Karma Bonus again....
  65. Bullshit by mangu · · Score: 1
    a study that indicated genius level processing in peak performing athletes. For example, an NFL quarterback can identify 3 - 5 potential receivers, track their viability, and decide how to execute a play in under a second--while avoiding defenders


    And a cockroach can identify 3 - 5 potential cracks in the woodwork, track their viability, and decide how to run away in under a second -- while avoiding my foot. If you are able to redefine terms like that, everyone is genius-smart.


    It takes no special ability to follow the instructions given by the coach on how to play against the limited number of tactics used in football or other sports, all it takes is training. If athletes were truly intelligent they wouldn't need a coach, they could just read about it in a book and do it, the way people who are *really* intelligent do at mathematics, for instance.


    Intelligence means being able to adapt to *new* situations. People whose mental processing is at something that could be rightfully called "genius level" are innovators. They are bored by the strict and often illogical rules of sports. It's one thing to exercise for fun, it's an entirely different thing to perform a sport professionally, where success depends on how many hours a day you can keep doing and redoing exactly the same exercise just to be able to do it a fraction of a second faster than the other guy.

    1. Re:Bullshit by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      It takes no special ability to follow the instructions given by the coach on how to play against the limited number of tactics used in football or other sports, all it takes is training.



      Much the same could be said about programming and following the instructions your professor gives you in algorithm class.

  66. Re:DDR ITG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha, typical DDR response.

    The two scales aren't exactly comparable.

    The two scales are definitely comparable. At least, according to everyone at the arcade that I play at. And the other arcade I play at. And...you get the picture. Or are you trying to say that Pandemonium/Vertex/etc is not way harder than Paranoia/Max/etc?

    Also, DDR's step patterns are generally more interesting than ITG's

    Right, DDR's streams of 1/4 notes and 1/8 notes with the occasional 1/16 note tossed in, jumps in obnoxious positions, excessive double stepping...

    At least with ITG stepcharts you don't end up backwards if you try to alternate your feet.

    And, if you're talking about the prevelance of 1/16 notes in ITG, or the existence of 1/12 notes, 1/24 notes, 1/32 notes, or 1/64 notes, you could opt out of playing on expert. Or, do you absolutely have to play on the hardest difficulty? Even a lot of ITG players refuse to play hard and only play expert, and I think they're silly too.

    and the mines are mostly just obnoxious

    That was my first impression of them, too. But then I got used to them, and they definitely increase gameplay strategies. I hold this opinion even though I hit five mines in that video.

    I wonder how many people thought holds were obnoxious when Konami introduced them. To think, Konami took how long to introduce holds, and in two versions ITG had mines, hands, rolls, and scripted marathons. Yes, Konami failed the hardcore dance crowd...they failed us miserably. Roxor delivers, and they get sued out of existence.

    PARANOiA Evolution

    Paranoia always sounded like a bunch of noise to me. And the rest of DDR's selection for that matter is lacking IMO. Jpop, Jrock, and some techno trancy stuff. The selection from just two versions of ITG is way, way wider.

    (As for the video, good speed but you lose about a billion points for using the bars. Next time without external aid!)

    Ah yes, I love nobar whores. What's the difference between a nobarwhore and a barwhore? A barwhore doesn't care if you don't use the bar...

    Thank you, we all know doing it without the bar is harder than doing it with the bar. You probably also think it's a sin to use speed mods? What about different colored noteskins?

    I like how the default colors are not Vivid. And how the default speed is 1.5x. It suggests that the elitist attitude from DDR doesn't apply to ITG.

    By the way, I don't care about your compliment regarding speed. My goal isn't speed, but accuracy; compare 96% to 78%, which is the highest score on groovestats that's labeled nobar. Consider also that I had two misses, a way off, two dropped holds, and five mines, which would have probably been 98%

    Also, you probably didn't even notice the hands, or the fact that I didn't do them with my hands. You probably stopped watching as soon as you saw me using the bars. Which, using both bars on on double is harder than you think.

    Oh, for the record, sometimes I do play nobar. But only when using the bar would do little good for my score (8 and below)

  67. Whoop de doo... by JRHelgeson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thats like great and all, but when is somebody going to do something about how fat I am?

    --
    Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
  68. Nah, just support the Mprize foundation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why waste billions on wars, cosmetics, bling, etc. just support the mprize and their research on reversing aging in mice models and then humans (this could be done in about 10 to 15 years timescale). Nerds of the world have produce the computer revolution, lets use that computer tech to re-invent the world of biology (DNA technology) and develop new advanced biotech and nanotech tools to gain control of the DNA programming in our cells and improve/customize it (like an advanced version of MIT biobricks). After all, DNA is just an evolved version of an information technology based on evolution of DNA and RNA systems..
    Also, other cool web sites are www.betterhumans.com and http://ouroboros.wordpress.com/ just look up longevity research/news sites on google.

  69. Gee that happens to me to. by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

    Looks like a class action suit in the making.

  70. must be! by israel · · Score: 1

    That's why there so many professional athletes who are nobel prize winners.

  71. mice v/s humans by red+crab · · Score: 1

    This research yet again provides the conclusive evidence that humans are direct descendants of mice..

  72. Uf by ioshhdflwuegfh · · Score: 1

    Growing more brain cells by exercise? Great. When are they gonna come up with something useful?

  73. Ever read books by Laura Ingalls Wilder? by mendred · · Score: 1

    One of her "Little House" Books has a description of a red indian competing against horses on a race track and winning the race (this is around the 19th century i guess). Saying that humans aren't built for running long distances is baloney..rather you can say that our generation is generally less physically capable.

    If you want a sports example then take cricket..in the 1970s 80s, there were fast bowlers (bowling speeds of above 90 mph) who were really fast and they were springing all over the world..in the west indies there were such people sitting in the sidelines where they would have walked into any team today...yet today fast bowlers are by the far a lot fewer..

    I think as lifestyle improves humans become softer and less physically capable and this gets passed on to the next generation as well and so on.. eventually we will just be brains carried around by insects :) (I forgot which SF book thats from)

    1. Re:Ever read books by Laura Ingalls Wilder? by BlackEmperor · · Score: 1

      Hmm I'm not sure about your cricketing analogy. Maybe today, there is just more cricket played, leading to more fast bowlers breaking down.

      I also believe that with the restrictions on bouncers and the prevalence of ODI's, fast bowling is less of an asset then it was in the heyday of West Indian cricket. Most bowlers tend to favour line and length or fast swing bowling than all out speed and bounce. Control is all important in today's cricket, it's more a case of changing attitudes than changing bodies.

      And remember competitive sportsmen today are *raised* as competitive sportsmen, they don't take trips to MacDonald's during school lunch, they're training, and generally don't follow the couch potato lifestyle.

      --
      "all broken things dream of repair" - chris letcher
  74. Get an exercise bike or an elliptical by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    and put it in front of your computer.

    Watch DVDs while you use either. If your real inventive put the keyboard on the damn machine and attach a mouse pad. Then you play your world of warcraft and get a work out as well.

    I think installing some versions of linux will provide enough time for a work out too. Installing XP may make you into an Olympic athlete so I advise not doing it too much as people will wonder what your up to.

    PS: I use an elliptical and watch DVDs (good old geek stuff like Red Dwarf / Stargate / South Park / etc)

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  75. Choose your sport by Epeeist · · Score: 1

    See yourself as the intellectual type with sports being beneath you?

    Choose a sport that exercises both body and mind. You could try *cough* fencing for instance.

    Have a glance at http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=14786239 14238877457&q=sabre to see how it is done at the top level.

  76. Google HIIT? by Gkeeper80 · · Score: 1

    They're geniuses! All the benefits of high intensity interval training on an easy to use AJAX web page. They'll make millions!

  77. You mean: Why Boobs Exercise Brainpower ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe that's the title of an article about evolutionary biology.

  78. Re:DDR ITG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By the way, I don't care about your compliment regarding speed. My goal isn't speed, but accuracy;


    Speed's a pretty darn major component of accuracy at that level--while following the step patterns is definitely challenging, getting your feet (or other pressure-generating object) to the correct place within the time allotted is also difficult. It also happens to be the bit I'm struggling with at the moment, so it's what jumps out at me about your play.

    Thank you, we all know doing it without the bar is harder than doing it with the bar. You probably also think it's a sin to use speed mods? What about different colored noteskins?


    The thing is, by using the bar you're creating a subset of the entire game, with a number of balance and movement-related issues removed--it's simply different, less complex. Speed mods seem to me slightly unkosher (though not as bad), but noteskins is a non-issue IMO--difficulty in reading individual arrows has never seemed to me to be part of the game.

    Anyway, my issue with it is that it fundamentally changes the game.

    I wonder how many people thought holds were obnoxious when Konami introduced them.


    My anecdote says "no significant number", but I don't have a study or anything to back that up.

    The two scales are definitely comparable. At least, according to everyone at the arcade that I play at. And the other arcade I play at. And...you get the picture. Or are you trying to say that Pandemonium/Vertex/etc is not way harder than Paranoia/Max/etc?


    You may have parsed what I said incorrectly. It was intended to be read "the two scales aren't (exactly comparable)", not "the two scales (aren't exactly) comparable". As it happens, 13s are definitely harder than 10s. 12s to a lesser extent. 11s? Not so much in my experience. They're different scales, made by different people, even if one group did base their scale off the other one. As such, simply saying "ITG goes to 13!" isn't very useful.
  79. yep - you got it... by Sodade · · Score: 1

    When I used to smoke pot, I only did it while I was exercising. On the rare occasion that I did get high before watching a movie or something, I would go batty because I wanted to be outside hiking or something. For me, getting high reinforced exercise. If you get stoned and watch TV all the time, pot reinforces being a mental zombie.

  80. Re:DDR ITG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speed's a pretty darn major component of accuracy at that level

    I dunno, I've seen a lot of people try to make fun of me by stepping as fast as they can on a pad and thinking they're tough shit. It's not hard to move fast, but moving fast and accurately is indeed a challenge. I wouldn't hesitate to say that it's impossible to move with the accuracy that I had without the bar.

    Oh, and if you're having trouble with speed, try the flat-footed heel-toe technique. If you watch my feet during the video, you'll see that I'm not up on the balls of my feet, but instead I use my toes and my heels to hit the arrows. The amount of distance you have to move your feet decreases dramatically then, from about a foot to a few inches. In fact, with practice you can hit two arrows at the same time, if you place your foot in the right position; one arrow with the heel, and one arrow with the toe.

    The thing is, by using the bar you're creating a subset of the entire game, with a number of balance and movement-related issues removed--it's simply different, less complex.

    I beg to differ regarding a "subset of the entire game" and "less complex", but I will agree with "different". Bar technique is WAY more complicated than nobarwhores ever realize. For instance, when you first start using the bar, it's difficult to hit the up arrow, because most people tend to step shallow when they hold the bar.

    As far as removing balance and movement issues, if this is such a concern to you, I can add some lubrication to your pad. Then you can REALLY test your balance and movement.

    Additionally, the bar helps you torque your body back and forth, but you have to learn how to use it. And, sometimes, people don't hold the bar with both hands, but just one. Or they swap hands on the bar, back and forth. I've been known on double to grab the bar with one hand and push or pull me to the appropriate side and then let go, kind of like throwing yourself.

    Having to manage both your arms and your legs is way, way more complicated than just keeping track of your feet. Plus, I don't look like a drunk ballerina when I use the bar, and I don't almost hit the guy on the pad next to me while I flail my arms trying to generate the torque I need to turn with the stream.

    Speed mods seem to me slightly unkosher (though not as bad), but noteskins is a non-issue IMO--difficulty in reading individual arrows has never seemed to me to be part of the game.

    Speeds mods adjust the difficulty in reading individual arrows. They change the arrow density from more than a dozen on the screen at a time, down to a more manageable 4-8 arrows. It also becomes easier to discern whether that's really a gallop or a jump, with less mental time spent processing the amount of distance between two arrows.

    They also DRAMATICALLY help with accuracy, because now you can visually align yourself to the beat. You'll know if you're stepping early, because you'll see the arrow isn't all the way to the top. This is much harder with slow speed mods, because the arrow spends more time close to the top.

    I also think it's odd you consider noteskins a non-issue. I mean, if I had to choose what helps me the MOST, I would say colored noteskins. Second is speed mods, and third is the bar.

    Anyway, my issue with it is that it fundamentally changes the game.

    It gives you the OPTION of changing the game. Options are good. You can still nobar if you want, nobody is going to stop you and everyone will respect you for it. It changes the balance issues a lot, and gives you an edge. An edge similar to speed mods, properly colored noteskins, and flat-footing.

    IMO, ITG was designed with using the bar in mind. The Fantastic window is so much smaller than DDR's Perfect window that balance issues are far more pronounced. Sure, some people can pass Pandy single expert without the

  81. Not buying it by FrenchyinCT · · Score: 1

    If exercise builds intelligence, why is there such a surplus of brainless muscleman doofs in the world?