Slashdot Mirror


Building the Interplanetary Internet

sighted writes "Internet pioneer Vint Cerf, now a Google VP, is leading a NASA effort to create a permanent network link to Mars within the next two years. As Cerf outlined in a recent talk, the 'InterPlaNet' protocol is designed to handle the delay caused by interplanetary distances. A signal traveling between the Earth and Mars can take up to 20 minutes."

334 comments

  1. I guess astronauts..... by 8127972 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... need online pr0n too.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:I guess astronauts..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All these references to porn are really getting on my chimes!

    2. Re:I guess astronauts..... by SkyDude · · Score: 1

      ... need online pr0n too.

      Well, there's no American Idol there, so why not?

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
    3. Re:I guess astronauts..... by Vexorian · · Score: 1, Funny

      No american idol? I knew astronaut was the perfect carrier choice for me!

      --

      Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
    4. Re:I guess astronauts..... by pinkstuff · · Score: 1

      bring on the 3 breasted women pr0n...

    5. Re:I guess astronauts..... by evilgiu · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our 3-titted martian mistresses ;-)

      --
      It's not easy being green.
  2. Screw that by elhondo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Martian porn takes too long to download.

    1. Re:Screw that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ``signal traveling between the Earth and Mars can take up to 20 minutes.''

      That means any Martian server has only 20 minutes to prepare for any /. melt down.

    2. Re:Screw that by NewWorldDan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Martian porn takes too long to download.

      It's worth the wait, dude, trust me. If you like what you see in Tokyo or Bangkok, just wait until you see the freaky shit out of Mars.
    3. Re:Screw that by sprag · · Score: 2, Funny

      Its always too long to wait for tentacle porn!

    4. Re:Screw that by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Martian porn downloads plenty fast enough. The problem is the 40 minute lag by which time you've lost interest,

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    5. Re:Screw that by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm, chicks with three boobs!
      /me drools

    6. Re:Screw that by Tablizer · · Score: 1


      Martian p0rn takes too long to download.

      It's all those tenticals

    7. Re:Screw that by ssyladin · · Score: 1

      How appropriate given today's Sinfest cartoon (somewhat safe for work)

    8. Re:Screw that by HedRat · · Score: 1

      Not to mention all the new M.O.L.'rs we'll have to put with.

    9. Re:Screw that by eMbry00s · · Score: 1

      Only the latency needs to be high. This means it'll take 20 minutes to request something, but after that it might aswell be fiberlicious hot steamy martian sex.

    10. Re:Screw that by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Yeah, one on the back...for when you're dancing.

      --
      What?
    11. Re:Screw that by rudeboy1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I know you're kidding, but it underscores the point Cerf is trying to make. In standard TCP/IP, any download is a 2 way conversation, with the receiving party verifying all packets. A mutation of the current UDP model would do just as you say, where you would get long streams of unverified data from one source to another, with a simple acknowledgment packet at the end. The problem lies in possible transmission errors, of which there are many. If they go optical, (which I can't even fathom, but I suppose I don't know everything about optical open space comms) the slightest piece of debris in the signal path will cause packet corruption (making fault tolerance a central concern). If they go RF, well, there's a metric butt load of natural RF interference in space. That satellite is gonna need some big rabbit ears to pick up a whole stream without problems.

      Ok, I know I get an A for effort and an F for sense of humor, but I wanted to cover the issue. sue me.

      --
      Raging in an online forum won't do anything for the world around you. To see change, you must take action.
    12. Re:Screw that by eMbry00s · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm surprised I hadn't thought of that. Heh, I feel like I'm the silly one now.

    13. Re:Screw that by SultanCemil · · Score: 1

      Of course, there'd be no way for them to *know* the slashdot meltdown was coming. (And yes I got the joke, just trying to help some poor, unfortunate Martian webmasters)

      --
      Cemil.
  3. From Ask Slashdot 2027 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    My parents recently moved my family to Mars. I'm an avid gamer, but I'm now having a hard time playing online games as my ping is frequently 20 minutes or more. I've added 8 CPUs to my network card, but it hasn't helped the situation any. I'm wondering if anyone has found any solutions to this problem? I'm looking into using wormholes or possibly bending space-time in some other way, but I'm just not sure where to direct my efforts. I really miss playing Doom XV online, and I hear Duke Nukem Forever will be out soon, so any help would be appreciated.

    1. Re:From Ask Slashdot 2027 by maztuhblastah · · Score: 5, Funny

      Doom XV online

      Fuck online... come on down to Lab 6 and play for real!

      -Andrew Hackman
      Union Aerospace Corporation

    2. Re:From Ask Slashdot 2027 by AndresCP · · Score: 1

      I guess it's time for the government to bust out that Ansible project they've been sitting on since the first Bugger War.

      --
      "Just because you're eloquent doesn't mean you aren't a fucking crackpot." -Wavebreak
    3. Re:From Ask Slashdot 2027 by jimstapleton · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nahh, wormholes and bending space time are too complex.

      What you need is a good old fashioned tachon transmitter/reciever. They send signals faster than light, and best of all, the faster the signal, the lower the energy required.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    4. Re:From Ask Slashdot 2027 by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      I heard the Killer NIC can lower your ping times.

    5. Re:From Ask Slashdot 2027 by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Have you Upgraded to Microsoft Primus II for your operating system? It uses Quantium physics and has a reliable stack for the "spooky action at a distance" that actually is stolen from BSD 64.2 but nobody seems to care.

      Give it a try it only needs 640 terabytes of ram.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:From Ask Slashdot 2027 by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      My parents recently moved my family to Mars.

      Mars aint no place to raise kids. In fact, its as cold as hell. And all that math, they don't understand.

    7. Re:From Ask Slashdot 2027 by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      Only if you use 399000000000BaseT cable

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    8. Re:From Ask Slashdot 2027 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure you have unplugged your modem for at least 25 minutes before trying again.

    9. Re:From Ask Slashdot 2027 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm looking into using wormholes or possibly bending space-time in some other way, but I'm just not sure where to direct my efforts. Pinging google.com [64.233.187.99] with 32 bytes of data:

      Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=-8ms TTL=239
    10. Re:From Ask Slashdot 2027 by ppc_digger · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, 640 terabytes should be enough for anybody.

      --
      Of all major operating systems, UNIX is the only one originally meant for gaming.
    11. Re:From Ask Slashdot 2027 by Grave · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Possibly the greatest off-topic on-topic post on Slashdot ever.

      Possibly.

    12. Re:From Ask Slashdot 2027 by slide-rule · · Score: 3, Funny

      And that version will probably also (still) have the annoying dialogs as well:

      "A spooky action has occurred. Cancel or allow?"

    13. Re:From Ask Slashdot 2027 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you been keeping up?

      Vista fixes this.

    14. Re:From Ask Slashdot 2027 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was your age, we had 6TB and were greatful for it.

    15. Re:From Ask Slashdot 2027 by jasonwea · · Score: 1

      You should consider upgrading to Monster ethernet cables. They did wonders for my latency.

    16. Re:From Ask Slashdot 2027 by IdahoEv · · Score: 1

      Bubble: Your IP/WormTP space-time tunnel has been formed successfully. ... click ... ... later ...

      Bubble: A new space time anomaly has been connected. ... click ... ... later ...

      Bubble: Your new spacewarp has been configured and is ready for use. ... click ... ... later ...

      Bubble: Linksys Etherwarp X45J: A network wormhole is unplugged.

      Damn!

      --
      I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    17. Re:From Ask Slashdot 2027 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that version will probably also (still) have the annoying dialogs as well: "A spooky action has occurred. Cancel or allow?"
      We're talking about quantum based communications here ... "Cancel and allow".
  4. How exactly is this news? by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Other spacecraft have talked back to earth continuously. What exactly makes this work new?

    --
    Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
    1. Re:How exactly is this news? by Washizu · · Score: 3, Informative

      "leading a NASA effort to create a permanent network link to Mars within the next two years"

      --
      OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
    2. Re:How exactly is this news? by yincrash · · Score: 2, Interesting
      from the article

      "We are working on standardising the protocols to enable spacecraft communicate and share information across the solar system," Cerf said while delivering a talk on the 'Future of the Internet'. "Communication between a rover operator on Earth and a rover on Mars, via a relay orbiter, can't use standard Internet protocols end-to-end. That problem is at the root of a lot of the design work we're doing for the IPN... As part of the NASA Mars mission programme, the project aims to have by 2008 a well-functioning Earth-Mars network."
    3. Re:How exactly is this news? by skoaldipper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think this is news now since one node of the future IPN is scheduled to be functional by 2008. The article doesn't specify in what way though; albeit a new orbiting satellite (gateway) around Mars, or just reprogramming some existing Mars mission device already deployed (to test the IPN protocol).

      I like pretty pictures and diagrams. So, I found a good presentation by Cerf back in 2000 which outlined these challenges and why we need the IPN.

      --
      I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
    4. Re:How exactly is this news? by peragrin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am actually surprised no one has done this before. The Nasa people can figure out specifics, but a number of comm satellites in mars orbit, plus an number in ours to act as relays to mission headquarters.
        Your talking about maybe a dozen total communication relays, and then every probe sent to mars would only need to be able to reach orbit saving lot's of power for other tools and test equipment.

      Charge the ESA, russia, or anyone else a bit of cash for relay use, and help pay for it.

      Just hope they don't lose their wi-fi connection and you have to go their to reboot the machine.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    5. Re:How exactly is this news? by Orange+Crush · · Score: 1

      At present, spacecraft must use high-powered transmitters and beam signals directly to Earth. Sprinkling a network of repeaters throughout the solar system will enable future missions to use lower powered transmitters and achieve higher bandwidth. It will also allow more flexibility with regards to spacecraft orientation as antennae no longer need to remain pointed at the Earth. There's also the benefit of better fault-tolerance using Internet-style routing--parts of the network can fail without interrupting the data. This no doubt will mean significant cost savings when designing future missions that can take advantage of this network, so the cost of deploying it could very well pay for itself in the long run.

  5. Priorities by Phisbut · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Parts of this planet we live on don't even have access to a broadband Internet connection, and now they want to plug Mars on the network? Talk about priorities...

    --
    After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
    - The Tao of Programming
    1. Re:Priorities by petabyte · · Score: 1

      Parts of this planet we live on don't even have access to a broadband Internet connection, and now they want to plug Mars on the network? Talk about priorities...

      Well, isn't it always about the last mile? :)

    2. Re:Priorities by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because we all know that we can't do both at the same time ....

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:Priorities by dcskier · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Parts of this planet don't have broadband yet for economic reasons, this is more of a technical problem to solve. Apples and Oranges.

      It makes sense to be looking and working towards the future, this sounds like an interesting project.

    4. Re:Priorities by Washizu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What are you doing to connect rural societies? You're just sitting here commenting on slashdot! Talk about priorities...

      --
      OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
    5. Re:Priorities by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Well, isn't it always about the last mile? :)

      Except here we're talking about the last 2.7 AUs of conjunction.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    6. Re:Priorities by truthsearch · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, hey, hey! There is NO higher priority than posting to slashdot!

      That's why no work is getting done in my office right now.

    7. Re:Priorities by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      For many of those countries, having broadband internet is not exactly a top priority. When it starts with:
      -avoiding war areas.
      -securing clean food and water supply.
      -having access to decent medical services and education.
      -getting a job that pays more than the poverty level. ...
      then even slow internet is a luxury that comes way behind a decent home, clothes, meat, a vehicule, electricity, a TV...

    8. Re:Priorities by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      Except here we're talking about the last 2.7 AUs of conjunction.

      Right!!! If NASA pulls this off, then I can take that argument to my local phone company. I'll convince them that if NASA can connect a line like that, then the phone company should have no problem getting DSL or FIOS lines to me.
    9. Re:Priorities by Paulrothrock · · Score: 3, Informative

      I live within a half mile of one of the most expensive schools in my state (Franklin & Marshall). Almost all of the kids drive brand new cars, many of them luxury cars. They're able to pay for high speed broadband and would spring for 10Mbps symmetrical connections even if they cost $100/month, just because Mommy and Daddy would pay for it. Because of the population density, a few last-mile (more like last-fifteen-feet) runs would make whoever did it tons of money.

      But they don't. Why? Because the only two carriers in the city (Comcast and Verizon) are already making tons of money giving sub-par service, and there's no other competition to force them to innovate thanks to our wonderful state government. I can't even get Embarq because Verizon has the CO locked down, and Embarq isn't my "local carrier."

      If the state government got rid of the monopolies on cable and phone lines, we'd see some movement.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    10. Re:Priorities by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's probably political as much as economic. Many countries have government-granted monopolies for their phone companies, and these lumbering monopolists have little reason to change the infrastructure.

      Add to that the class of nations run by people who find it convenient to keep the populace ignorant (China, Saudi Arabia, North Korea, etc), and you have a practically insurmountable problem, no matter how much money is diverted from NASA to broadband connections for the unconnected.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    11. Re:Priorities by Stween · · Score: 1

      IPN is closely related to Delay Tolerant Networking (DTN), which has more potential applications than just interplanetary networking. There's a whole bunch of uses for this stuff that can include real-life sensor networks, healthcare scenarios, emergency situations, and periodic shipping of data to isolated communities. Many situations where you either don't have a network connection, or you can't guarantee a network connection, can make use of some of this stuff.

    12. Re:Priorities by Macka · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Amazing isn't it. As a UK citizen I used to think that America was this democratic utopia of free trade, where healthy competition between companies resulted in the best deal for customers anywhere. I mean, your prices are so much lower than ours, so it must work right?

      I remember first becoming aware that things weren't quite right when (several years ago) I read about the dysfunctional state of the cell phone network across the USA, and the fact that I could send SMS messages to come people, but not to others because of interoperability's between network vendors. Then I learned about the draconian restrictions the cell phone networks place on their customers, like multi-year tie in clauses and crippled phone functionality.

      But the scales really got knocked from my eyes when the California blackouts happened in 2000, caused by Enron's manipulative energy trading. People died because of that. What a mess!

      Now I read about this. What went wrong guys? Capitalism was never supposed to be as f*cked up as this.

    13. Re:Priorities by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      I haven't read the article, but I'm sort of guessing they're not planning to run fiber or copper cables to Mars.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    14. Re:Priorities by Paulrothrock · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Capitalism isn't supposed to be anything except profitable. It's not supposed to provide services well. It's not supposed to interoperate well. It's not even supposed to keep people alive. It is supposed to maximize profits by any means necessary.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    15. Re:Priorities by inviolet · · Score: 1

      Parts of this planet we live on don't even have access to a broadband Internet connection, and now they want to plug Mars on the network? Talk about priorities...

      Have you considered the reason why some countries are fantastically wealthy, safe, and comfortable, while their next-door neighbors wallow in hungry squalor? Never mind the flukes -- can you see an overall pattern?

      Hint: it's all about the social pattern established there. Some patterns create better incentives than others. By now, only a fool or a liar can fail to see the benefit of market-driven economies (even allowing for their frequent ugly hiccups).

      NASA, as a facility for transferring federal money to specific congressional districts, is committed to the wrong sort of social pattern. After all, its very survival requires it to support any pork-barrel scheme that benefits it... or at least, to remain mute on a subject that no one should remain mute on. And so NASA cannot seriously advocate for free-market social patterns, as would be needed to bring broadband to the masses you quietly scream your love for.

      In fact it was only last year that NASA offically reversed its policy of criticizing private space ventures. The times, they're a changin' for the better.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    16. Re:Priorities by Lord+Lemur · · Score: 1

      I call Bull Shit on you. Unconnected people may purcase satalite feeds. Cost prohibitive, however it isn't a technical hurdle. They have the option even if it isn't realistic.

    17. Re:Priorities by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you ever been out to the rural parts of your country? Here in Bavaria(which was a part of West Germany) broadband is FAR from universal. Ditto for cell phone signal. Some towns just don't have it, and someone at Deutsche Telekom told me that they pretty much never will. The "fact" that broadband and cellphone coverage is "universal" in western Europe is nothing but a myth. Europeans just refuse to admit their system isn't perfect either. Probably just because they like feeling sanctimonious, but thats just my opinion.Also, in all the time I lived in the US I NEVER had a problem with sending SMS messages. I don't know what carrier you were using, but obviously you didn't do your research.

      And if you want to talk about negligence killing people, how about the heat wave that hit France in 2003? Many of those deaths were preventable, but French labor law prevented physicians from working longer hours. So going too far in the opposite direction kills people too.

    18. Re:Priorities by mahmud · · Score: 1

      Parts of this planet we live on don't even have access to a broadband Internet connection, and now they want to plug Mars on the network? Talk about priorities...

      Yes! Let's scrap all basic research, because some people don't have Internet! Some people will always be worse off as long as there is any improvement anywhere, it takes time to catch up, simple as that.

    19. Re:Priorities by kv9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What went wrong guys? Capitalism was never supposed to be as f*cked up as this.

      slashdot wisdom

    20. Re:Priorities by mahmud · · Score: 1

      Free market will never bring much benefits to the poorest people, because they have nothing to reciprocate with for the infrastructure, services and the content. It's called market failure. This is exactly were government steps in with subsidies for infrastructure development, education, and public internet access points. Functional free market is the sign that the solution worked, not the solution.

    21. Re:Priorities by mahmud · · Score: 1

      2,2s/were/where Sorry.

    22. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Capitalism isn't *meant* to be anything. It's not a system, it's a consequence of peoples individual actions, which is its main strength. Problems begin when it gets messed about with.

    23. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What went wrong? The direct cause of rolling blackouts is regulated electric prices. If it's not cost effective for utility companies to build new capacity, they won't bother.

    24. Re:Priorities by Millennium · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What went wrong guys? Capitalism was never supposed to be as f*cked up as this.

      You answered your own question: the capitalism got f*cked up. Capitalism only works as long as there is competition in a given market. When a company achieves monopoly status, it loses its incentive to improve, stagnation rears its head, and eventually ugly stuff like the things you've mention occur.

      What's been going on more recently is not so much an issue of true monopolies, but more like a series of agreements between companies that allow them to act as though they were monopolies even if there's more than one in the market. About a hundred years ago we used to call these agreements trusts. This is where the term "antitrust legislation" comes from: a set of regulations aimed at stopping this sort of anticompetitive behavior, thus keeping monopolies and trusts from usurping the power of the markets. It's one of the points where regulation really can be a useful tool of capitalism.

      Unfortunately, recent administrations have been less than zealous enough when it comes to enforcing these regulations. Bush the Younger is not the only one to blame for this, though he's certainly the latest one in the bunch. Clinton wasn't so good about it either (the Microsoft trial notwithstanding), nor was Bush the Elder, and while Reagan had his moments most of those were relatively early in his tenure.

    25. Re:Priorities by dascandy · · Score: 1

      Keeping people alive isn't as profitable, is it? Capitalism works - for getting money, not for a working world.

    26. Re:Priorities by Grave · · Score: 1

      What, you mean we should multi-task? What do you think this is, Vista?

    27. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually there is support for increasing the speed to rural areas. http://wireless.fcc.gov/outreach/ruralvision/index .html However, I would tend to believe the reason for not increasing the broadband speeds is more politically motivated. These companies want to restrict access on their connection to allow them to generate more revenue. Giving end users more bandwidth would weaken their arguments against network neutrality. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_neutrality

    28. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is supposed to maximize profits by any means necessary. Wrong. It is supposed to maximize profits within the bounds of the law. Allowing people to die in order to make a few bucks is illegal in any civilized country I think...
    29. Re:Priorities by Grave · · Score: 1

      Have you been outside of the city? In other parts of the state, the alternative is a very slow Verizon connection or a small-time cable company with HORRIBLE connection speeds. You might think you have it bad there, but really, there are places in the state with much worse options than Comcast and Verizon. In fact, when I moved from the southern part of Lancaster county into the city, my Comcast connection doubled in speed because there was more bandwidth being offered up. Now that I'm out of PA, the options are still pretty limited. But my Comcast speed has doubled again (being in one of the most expensive to live in counties in the country has at least one perk).

      I agree that state governments should do more to encourage competition, but many of the alternatives that exist are not able to offer better or faster service. Verizon and Comcast have the capital to directly compete, and when Verizon decides to roll out FIOS on a wider scale, Comcast is going to uncap their bandwidth in a big way.

    30. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So RTFA!

    31. Re:Priorities by khallow · · Score: 1

      But the scales really got knocked from my eyes when the California blackouts happened in 2000, caused by Enron's manipulative energy trading. People died because of that. What a mess!

      That's because the electricity market was screwed up. There are plenty of other examples of how government privatized things badly (eg, when Russia privatized all those state industries in the early 90's). Blaming it on "capitalism" is likely blaming the USSR on "communism". It's just a bunch of bad decisions by unaccountable people.

      The irony here is that you are right when you are complain that capitalism isn't supposed to be like thing. It's not capitalism.
    32. Re:Priorities by deviceb · · Score: 1

      parts of this planet are even more worthless than the lifeless Mars. Leave the stragglers behind..

      keep pushing forward. -they don't call it the human race for nothing

      --
      Kill your TV
    33. Re:Priorities by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      No, this isn't vista. Vista won't run properly on a 6 billion node super computer, with each node capable of processing multiple input sources and having its own discreet memory units. Knowing the creator (see nick), I can only assume its running some form of protein/electro/chemical based OS.

      Now back the the program coppertop.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    34. Re:Priorities by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1

      What went wrong? The direct cause of rolling blackouts is regulated electric prices. If it's not cost effective for utility companies to build new capacity, they won't bother.

      This is the direct, diametrical opposite of truth. I.e. a lie.

      Enron's ability to manipulate California's energy system into the ground was the result of California deregulating the energy industry. In any other state, the state government would have had the ability to interfere where corrupt business practices start costing human lives. But because of the mentally retarded like yourself, California didn't have that ability any more.

      For thos of you out there who really didn't follow the whole Enron thing, there's a documentary out there called "Enron, the smartest guys in the room". It can be found through a number of well-seeded torrents, if nothing else.

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    35. Re:Priorities by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Parts of this planet we live on don't even have access to a broadband Internet connection, and now they want to plug Mars on the network? Talk about priorities... Last I checked, NASA isn't tasked with providing broadband access to the world. On the other hand, it *is* their job to communicate with craft throughout the solar system.

      Talking about priorities, it looks like NASA's got theirs right (at least, WRT IPN vs global broadband).

      If you want to complain to someone, try your local government, you local global volunteer organization, or your local multinational communications corporation. Complaining to NASA would be like complaining to AT&T because your local diary injects cows with bovine growth hormone.
    36. Re:Priorities by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1

      NASA, as a facility for transferring federal money to specific congressional districts, is committed to the wrong sort of social pattern. After all, its very survival requires it to support any pork-barrel scheme that benefits it... or at least, to remain mute on a subject that no one should remain mute on. And so NASA cannot seriously advocate for free-market social patterns, as would be needed to bring broadband to the masses you quietly scream your love for.

      Every time I think I've seenthe dumbest thing ever said about NASA, someone proves me wrong.

      NASA is an institution of the executive branch of the federal government. No different from, say, the army. Would it ever occur to complain how the army isn't clamoring for high-speed internet in rural areas? I hope not, because that is quite frankly not the army's job. "The army" is a bunch of guys that the government pays to do certain jobs for them. They have a certain small leeway in how to do the jobs, but that's it. And NASA is no different.

      Any one soldier, any one officer, any one platoon, any one small or large group of members of the army may or may not have any one opinion on broadband internet and its importance in the grand scheme of things. So may any one (or any group of) NASA employees. But they all do this on their own dime, in their private time. Because their job is to do whatever the White House tells them to do within the limits of choice of operational strategies, technological engagement, scheduling, budgeting, and assumption of risk granted to them. That's it.

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    37. Re:Priorities by inviolet · · Score: 1

      You are confusing NASA's de jure function with its de facto function.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    38. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add to that the class of nations run by people who find it convenient to keep the populace ignorant (China, Saudi Arabia, North Korea, etc),

      You accidentally left the USofA off your list.

    39. Re:Priorities by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      If the state government got rid of the monopolies on cable and phone lines, we'd see some movement.

      How do you suppose they do that?

      What we need are more companies running their own cable lines. That would give us more competition. In Boston several neighborhoods are already served by two cable companies. The state will probably just fuck it up more. What we need are more RCNs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RCN_(company) (except without going bankrupt due to poor aquisitions in the .com era)

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    40. Re:Priorities by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Wrong. It is supposed to maximize profits within the bounds of the law. Allowing people to die in order to make a few bucks is illegal in any civilized country I think...

      only if you get caught and don't make the appropriate payoffs^W contributions

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    41. Re:Priorities by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yes, that was intentional - I cannot think of a country with fewer restrictions on free speech. Even hate speech is protected.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    42. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, talk about pedantic.

      Sure, "capitalism" isn't "supposed" to do anything but maximize profit.

      But the reason we use capitalism isn't that it maximizes profit. It's that, while maximizing profit and allowing human beings to maximize profit, it also allows society to function in the creation of goods and services that people want, force prices lower and allocate labor to the tasks society as a whole wants. It's that capitalism is efficient.

      And, in so doing, it requires a significantly greater amount of freedom than the previous, more authoritarian methods. Which people like.

      If it's not doing the functional, efficiency stuff, and hopefully encouraging greater freedom, then what good is it?

    43. Re:Priorities by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      Cable and POTS are old technology that are nearing the limits of effectiveness. Fiber optic is the future, and can handle huge amounts of data. Comcast and Verizon were given monopoly control over their lines to encourage them to run the lines. We shouldn't make the same mistake with Fiber Optic lines. Enforce common carrier status and have the state pay Verizon or whoever to run the lines. I think Utah's UTOPIA system (where the state runs the lines and leases access to service providers) is the best solution.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    44. Re:Priorities by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      They're able to pay for high speed broadband and would spring for 10Mbps symmetrical connections even if they cost $100/month

      Your tone of voice implies that it's possible to get these connections for less than $100/month -- is that true or am I misreading? I'm paying $65/mo for 2M/128k with 10gb cap.

    45. Re:Priorities by balloonpup · · Score: 1

      As someone who used to work for RCN (in their Springfield, MA office that was the once much spiffier JavaNet), I'd say we don't need more that are the likes of them. In a number of their markets, they (I'll say were here, as I worked there before the bankruptcy and it's been awhile) were just like the standard cable companies. They were the local monopoly, had subpar service (One-way cable modems that weren't even DOCSIS. 14.4k up, huzzah! Poor quality on the TV side, etc.), and wouldn't let anyone in to compete, just like everyone else. I think that any telecom that can get into a market will just do what the others have done -- move to shut everyone out. Clearly *something* else needs to be done.

      (However, I will admit that in the Boston market, they're quite okay...)

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
    46. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      within the bounds of the law.

      Government interference@!@#!@# You are the cancer that is killing capitalism!!@@%!@$!@

    47. Re:Priorities by inviolet · · Score: 1

      Free market will never bring much benefits to the poorest people, because they have nothing to reciprocate with for the infrastructure, services and the content. It's called market failure.

      That is not the actual meaning of the term 'market failure'. And government intervention into market failures has nothing to do with welfare or social class.

      But to answer your general idea: it depends on your definition of 'poorest'. You'll find that very few people genuinely have "nothing to reciprocate with", if by that you mean no ability to generate an income even at 100% effort.

      A broader answer to your objection is this: social systems generate wealth (and hence raise the comfort level of everyone, including the poorest) insofar as they incent individuals to pursue wealth creation. Now that we've conducted a century of bloody experiments, it is clear that self-interest (meaning: the chance to get rich through effort) is the only incentive that works reliably, works long-term, and favors the buildup of trust between strangers.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    48. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, for economically disadvantaged countries that's true.

      However, in much of the US, broadband is equally unavailable. I live in a rural area a few miles outside of a small city (pop. 13,000). The suburban areas have been wired for broadband (both cable and DSL) for some time. When we moved here 3 1/2 years ago, the only high-speed option was satellite. A year after we moved in, IDSL (144Kbps) became available. About a year ago, we finally got 1.5Mbps ADSL. Even analog cable TV is unavailable at any price, much less digital. And this is not some remote area, it's fully developed as it's going to be (2.5 - 10 acre lots).

      I'm not complaining - just pointing out that unavailability of broadband on this planet isn't limited to the third world.

    49. Re:Priorities by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      You can get 100Mbit symmetrical connections in Japan or South Korea or Sweden for around $50/month. So with the proper architecture, $100 for 10Mbit would be possible in the US.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  6. ob. Python by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Ah, I see you have the machine that goes..."

    (20 minute delay)

    "...ping!"

  7. Doom Server by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 1


    While the latency would make it almost impossible, I would love to play a game of Doom on a Martian server.

    --
    Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
    1. Re:Doom Server by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 1

      Unless you were there. Doomcon 2010: On the surface of mars.

      --
      Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
    2. Re:Doom Server by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Why bother? Just bring along the modified paintball guns, and reenact your favorite scenes.

      (I call dibs on the Cacodemon costume. I'll bring along a couple HL2 players as Lost Souls.)

    3. Re:Doom Server by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      LAN gaming, and the live action version. Gimme my boom stick.

    4. Re:Doom Server by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      "almost"? Have you ever seen what Doom does online? Doom sends EVERYTHING over the network. Newer games at least have decent netcode.

    5. Re:Doom Server by linkedlinked · · Score: 1

      Unless you were there. Doomcon 2010: On the surface of mars. Yeah, it's a 9 month flight out there, though, so buy your tickets soon!
  8. Ping by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pinging marsbase.com [1.55.123.1] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 1.55.123.1: bytes=32 time=1199990ms TTL=1200000
    Reply from 1.55.123.1: bytes=32 time=1199997ms TTL=1200000
    Reply from 1.55.123.1: bytes=32 time=1200030ms TTL=1200000
    Reply from 1.55.123.1: bytes=32 time=1200017ms TTL=1200000

    Ping statistics for 1.55.123.1:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 1199990ms, Maximum = 1200030ms, Average = 1200016ms
    1. Re:Ping by Coffee+Warlord · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We have a colony on Mars, but we're STILL using IPV4. God help us. :)

    2. Re:Ping by mikkelm · · Score: 1

      What's with the TTL? Interplanetary routers? That's pretty ambitious!

    3. Re:Ping by Steve+Cox · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From the presentation on IPN I saw a few years back, it appears that you wont be pinging marsbase.com..... they actually fancy adding a couple of levels to get some real TLDs.....

      ping marsbase.com.mars.sol

      When I saw the .sol in the presentation I was pretty impressed... theres a little bit of future proofing in that one....

      Steve.

    4. Re:Ping by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      no just stupidity. YOu do no need more hops for greater distances.

    5. Re:Ping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tracert marsbase.com

      Tracing route to marsbase.com [1.55.123.1]
      over a maximum of 30 hops:

          1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.48.1
          2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms my.router [192.168.67.1]
          3 * 22 ms 23 ms router277.nasa.gov [123.243.23.241]
          4 231321 ms 231321 ms 231321 ms moon.colony.net [111.241.161.51]
          5 23132121 ms 23132121 ms 23132120 ms uplink.halleys.comet.net [101.245.161.5]
          7 2313211243 ms 231321241 ms 2313212144 ms marsbase.com [1.55.123.1]

      Trace complete.

    6. Re:Ping by jandrese · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing he plans to fill up the entire galaxy with 802.11 routers and use them for net connectivity.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    7. Re:Ping by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sorry, guy. "Sol" is not the name of Earth's sun, in spite of linguistic etymology.

      I named it "Freeda" last year. And no, that's not a misspelling.

      It's true. Earth is in orbit around the sun Freeda.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    8. Re:Ping by IPFreely · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you just know that everyone will want a .sol domain no matter where they are. I means, seriously, who would want a .beta.cancer or a .apus domain?

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    9. Re:Ping by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ping marsbase.com.mars.sol.milky
      Now it's really future-proof

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    10. Re:Ping by mr-mafoo · · Score: 1

      dag nab it, you got there first!

    11. Re:Ping by LarsG · · Score: 1

      So, who will be in charge of the galTLDs?

      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
    12. Re:Ping by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      Probably some corporate hack who's donated a lot of money to some political candidate in the US and doesn't really understand the total coolness of solar system wide TLDs.

    13. Re:Ping by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I hope that by the time we need a .milky, we don't need keyboards. Neural jacks FTW!

    14. Re:Ping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's impossible to future-proof in this way. The "sol" designation is pointless if you ask me. Are they going to name another "mars" in a different solar system? I think not.

      Are they going to name another "Sol" in a different galaxy?

      Is there going to be another Milky Way in a different universe?

      Is there going to be another Universe-A in a different dimension?

    15. Re:Ping by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      FTTMSRITMDLMAO. (Falling to the Martian Surface, Rolling in the Martian Dust, Laughing My ... well, you know.)

    16. Re:Ping by kabocox · · Score: 1

      ping marsbase.com.mars.sol
      When I saw the .sol in the presentation I was pretty impressed... theres a little bit of future proofing in that one....


      so will that mean all earth based websites will need earth.sol tacked on at the end? I think that NASA needs to come up with an IP spec that includes the computers GPS location. Um, currently GPS as far as I know just applies to Earth. NASA need to come up with a scheme of mapping the entire solar system for gps addresses.

      If I'm pinging myspaceprobe.org.asteriodbelt.sol from myhomecomputer.ar.us.earth.sol how the hell would all the intermediate hops know where in the asteriodbelt that my probe is? I can easily see them keeping track of the infrastructure orbiting planets or moons incase I was ping something at myprobe.europa.jupiter or myprobe.mimas.saturn, but if I'm sending a myprobe to some orbiting rock in sol, how would they narrow it down? Just wait one day they'll have to worry about myprobe.intransit.alphacenturi or some such.

    17. Re:Ping by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Naw, I hear the very best blog on the InterStellarNet is htj://newsofthegalaxy.northcontinent.iv.tau.ceti

    18. Re:Ping by Bob-taro · · Score: 1

      Well, it's not like Mars will use up many addresses.

      --
      Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
    19. Re:Ping by MavrickA · · Score: 1

      I know this is a joke, but the 20 minutes figure is 1-way, so the ping times would be roughly double what you've stated. With both planets at aphelion and mars in conjunction with the sun, the ping time would be a minimum of 2,677,361ms (44 minutes 36.4 seconds) discounting slowing of light through the atmospheres of both planets.

    20. Re:Ping by darkstar949 · · Score: 1

      Depends on how the specification is written - it would make more sense to allow something like mars.com to resolve locally at the planetary level until you add on another qualifier like mars.com.mars or mars.com.earth to indicate which planetary URL you wish to resolve.

    21. Re:Ping by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      With IPv6 we probably have enough IPs to address billions of people on every planet in the galaxy.. Soo I'm not too worried. :)

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    22. Re:Ping by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine that if you omitted earth.sol (or mars.sol), it would be smart enough to say "Ooh, you mean the amazon.com ON EARTH."

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    23. Re:Ping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so will that mean all earth based websites will need earth.sol tacked on at the end?

      Unlikely. My understanding of DNS is that any domain name without a terminating dot is not parsed as a FQDN. So if your host's domain-name is set as "foo.com.", and you look up "www.google.com", it will first look up "www.google.com.foo.com.", and when that fails, it will look up "www.google.com.". Replace "foo.com." with "earth.sol." and you're good to go.

      If I'm pinging myspaceprobe.org.asteriodbelt.sol from myhomecomputer.ar.us.earth.sol how the hell would all the intermediate hops know where in the asteriodbelt that my probe is?

      If you were to ping my IP address, "all the intermediate hops" would not have to know where my computer is. Only the terminal router does. Each router ONLY has to know how to get one hop closer. Thus, if you have a probe in the asteroid belt, presumably you'd register your probe's location with some central asteroid belt server, and get it added to the routing table.

      Someone better versed in networking can correct me on these points :)

    24. Re:Ping by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      I'm going to put in for exclusive rights to be the registrar. Let's see....

      *.mercury.sol
      *.venus.sol
      *.earth.sol
      *.moon.earth.sol
      *.mars.sol
      *.jupiter.sol
      *.saturn.sol
      *.uranus.sol
      *.neptune.sol
      *.pluto.sol ---- wait, scratch that.

      I'll have to charge extra for *.uranus.sol. Who wouldn't want to register something like: stickitin.uranus.sol

      Layne

    25. Re:Ping by ravenoak · · Score: 1

      It would depend on if "marsbase" is property of a commercial entity if we go by the original intention (AFAIK). Most likely it would be marsbase.${COMPANY}.com.mars.sol.milky, or marsbase.${TL_GOVERNMENT}.gov.mars.sol.milky

    26. Re:Ping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ping marsbase.com.mars.sol.milky.universe3.turtleShell

    27. Re:Ping by JoshWurzel · · Score: 1

      .sol seems pretty silly. Do you think we'd travel outside our own solar system and discover an inhabitable planet only to give it the same name as one in our own system?

    28. Re:Ping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod up pleez, let's start a movement to name the sun "Freeda". Don't let it die!

    29. Re:Ping by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      That could be dangerous. After all, the terrorists hate Freeda...

    30. Re:Ping by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      No, I think you need marsbase.com.mars.sol.milky.universe.human

      Just in case we find a way to break our brains out of the jar and delve into another existence.

    31. Re:Ping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been a while since I've done the math, but if I remember right, with IPv6, we'd have millions of IP address per particle in the known universe. Of course that doesn't solve the problem of ROUTING to every particle in the known universe :P

    32. Re:Ping by organgtool · · Score: 1

      I'm still using Arpanet, you insensitive clod!

    33. Re:Ping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well shit.

      elping marsbase.com.mars.sol.milky.mx

    34. Re:Ping by pha95mlb · · Score: 1

      I think you mean marsbase.com.mars.sol.zz9.pluralz.alpha.

    35. Re:Ping by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      ... you wont be pinging marsbase.com..... they actually fancy adding a couple of levels to get some real TLDs.....

      That's not how DNS works. First, the "com" domain is intended to be universal, not associated with any particular location. Second, you can't keep someone from putting whatever A RRs they want in the DNS zones for their domain. Whoever controls the marsbase.com domain can easily make it resolve to a Martian IP address. Some of the names in my domains resolve to IP addresses assigned to hosts far away from me.

      Besides, we all know how well the geographically heirarchical domain systems worked out in practice. Remember org.city.st.us? The "us" registrar pushed that idea hard for years before finally giving up.

    36. Re:Ping by Ernesto+Alvarez · · Score: 1

      ping marsbase.com.mars.sol.milky
      Now it's really future-proof


      Or so you say, I wouldn't want to be the poor bloke that has to fix everything because you didn't research things thoroughly and your solution is just an stopgap measure.
    37. Re:Ping by TheBAFH · · Score: 1

      ping marsbase.com.mars.sol.milky.universe1

      Better safe than sorry...

      --
      http://www.grcrun11.gr - MUDA tribute
    38. Re:Ping by mgiuca · · Score: 1

      Er, does this mean I have to login to www.slashdot.org.earth.sol? That could be slightly inconvenient for most (if not all) Internet users...

      (Sorry... InterPlaNet users).
      (Oh god, that is awful).

    39. Re:Ping by I_Wrote_This · · Score: 1

      Who says the Universal Name Service will use "sol" and "milky"? I'm sure the French will object even if the rest of the universe doesn't.

  9. uucp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    uucp. done.

  10. Open protocol by everphilski · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This would be a protocol that would bind in with TCP/IP. Former space missions used protocols invented by the companies that built the hardware, not necessarily a common framework. This should change all that...

    1. Re:Open protocol by Leif_Bloomquist · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, the majority (at least recently) use CCSDS

    2. Re:Open protocol by everphilski · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You validated my post. Most, not all, use CCSDS. And while you can do IP over CCSDS (or at least they have a redbook describing it) it hasn't been done, so far as I can tell. And layering a protocol within a protocol isn't the best solution out there, IMO, you might as well do it right and come up with an IP for space.

    3. Re:Open protocol by beckerist · · Score: 1

      Yesssss! My very own Star Trek Communicator!

    4. Re:Open protocol by beckerist · · Score: 1

      Wow, apparently there are already problems with this protocol (data loss being the most prevalent.) Let's try that again:
      Yesssss! Finally, something that gives me an excuse to make my very own Star Trek Communicator!

    5. Re:Open protocol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he didn't validate shit, except that you were wrong. What is it with you idiots spieling off then trying not to admit you fucked up when it's stunningly obvious to everyone.

      Shut up now, cunt.

    6. Re:Open protocol by mikkelm · · Score: 1

      Actually, he did validate his point.

      It's stunningly obvious that you're incapable of logical deduction without having it spelled out, but please keep your frustrations about that to yourself.

    7. Re:Open protocol by The_Moops · · Score: 1

      He gave a talk sponsored by my CS department in 2005, and he briefly mentioned this at the end, like last 10 minutes. Summary of talk: Me and my buddy invented the Internet, it got pretty popular, and BTW, I'm building a network to encompass the solar system. As for it binding in with TCP, what do you mean exactly? TCP gurantees that no data gets lost in transmission, and passes up to the next layer in the stack or wherever. Isn't that what any protocol in the stack does? You pass TCP a sttream of bytes, and it's good at getting it to another host with the two promises I mentioned above.

  11. can't wait ... by GlitchyBits · · Score: 1

    Martian v1agra for free !


    More seriously, what's the point of getting the internet working on an interplanetary scale when we are heading to a bandwidth dead end on that good old earth internet ?

  12. So P2P now means planet-2-planet ;) by Marbleless · · Score: 5, Funny

    Forget Sealand, build a torrent server on Mars and see what the MPAA does :)

    --
    --I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.
    1. Re:So P2P now means planet-2-planet ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

    2. Re:So P2P now means planet-2-planet ;) by GlitchyBits · · Score: 1

      The problem with p2p is that you still share content while downloading, they would still be able to trace you.

    3. Re:So P2P now means planet-2-planet ;) by Loconut1389 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But if the US gets there first, will we claim the whole planet? Its not like there's contintents.. So- will we claim all of mars, or not? If so- then it might be considered a territory of the US and MPAA still would have reign/rights.

    4. Re:So P2P now means planet-2-planet ;) by fmobus · · Score: 1

      Nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure. dear mods you just missed a clear Alien 2 reference. Parent is funny, not off-topic.
    5. Re:So P2P now means planet-2-planet ;) by PieSquared · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Outer Space Treaty says no.... but will that really hold when people start trying to develop commercial interests outside earth? It doesn't deal with private industry very well, pretty much saying their gov't is responsible for them.

      Moreover I have to assume that eventually people will actually begin to *live* on mars. First just to work, sending money back, but eventually bringing families over and having kids and such... and at that point they'll start thinking about making a new country. And then what... as a country outside earth would they have a right to have a military presence, something forbidden to countries who signed the outer space treaty?

      Basically I'm saying that someday it'll fail, the only question is how soon. Legally we can withdraw from it with one year warning, which is plenty of time to still be first to mars by decades, probably.

      --
      Does a line appended to your comment give your post meaning in and of itself, or only in relation to those without?
    6. Re:So P2P now means planet-2-planet ;) by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      Brings "no taxation without representation" to a whole new meaning. I suppose as long as there were delegates who could meet via video-message (I assume live chat would be worthless at 20 minutes away), it wouldn't be without representation, but the liklihood exists to say that "we're X million miles away, what do you know about what's going on here?".

      it will present interesting philosophical questions when we do colonize another planet/moon.

      So it's ok to claim land for your country on earth, then militarize and defend it, but it's not ok to claim all of Mars? Ok, so we have to share then- how much? Divide things up evenly among the 200 some countries in the world (is that number still valid?) or divide proportionally by current land-mass ownership? What if a country gets absorbed, do we get their land on mars? Should mars have its own countries? Amarsica? Extra-Planetary Europe?

      It will be interesting to see.

  13. IP Over Astronaut Avian Carriers w/Jetpack? by Adeptus_Luminati · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have a feeling they're going to title this protocol: RFC 1149-I (I for Interstellar / Interplanetary)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carrier s

    Adeptus

    --
    No trees were killed in the making of this post; however, many trillions of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
  14. imagine: gww://google.com by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    The Galaxy-Wide-Web!!! And imagine the texting fun! Free VoIP Calls from Phobos and Deimos!

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    1. Re:imagine: gww://google.com by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Not to be pedantic, but that would more likely be http://gww.google.com.../

    2. Re:imagine: gww://google.com by plastic_grass · · Score: 0

      Only if we assure that the Interplanetary network is neutral. Did I just open a can of worms?

  15. Spam? by ganiman · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that there will be spam on Mars too? Or maybe we'll get spam from the martians! Damn, time to write some better spam filters...

    --
    geek n performer who performs morbid or disgusting acts, as biting off the head of a live chicken
  16. 20 minutes! by alcmaeon · · Score: 2, Funny

    A 40 minute ping really sucks for gaming and means no one is going to let you play.

  17. Deja vu by tiltowait · · Score: 1

    Sounds like an old joke I read somewhere.

  18. So Who Pays When by aquatone282 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    . . . the server goes up in smoke after 1.5 billon /.ers all try to connect at once?

    --
    What?
  19. It's easier by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Parts of this planet we live on don't even have access to a broadband Internet connection, and now they want to plug Mars on the network? Talk about priorities...

    It's called picking the low-hanging fruit. There's no Verizon on Mars so putting in a good Internet connection should be pretty easy.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:It's easier by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not aware of any places except maybe near the North or South Poles where people don't have access to two-way satellite Internet like DirectPC.

      Yes, ping times for games might be crappy, but downloads are quite speedy once you get going (though "chatty" stuff with lots of small messages like Peer-to-Peer also can suck.)

      Again, it's economics. I suppose you'll be able to find political hack whiners claiming $80 a month is a "huge ripoff, the gubmint must get involved"; nevermind the investments made to bring it in at that price rather than billions, millions, or even thousands a month.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:It's easier by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I'm not aware of any places except maybe near the North or South Poles where people don't have access to two-way satellite Internet like DirectPC.

      Have you ever actually used one? Everybody I know who has one (dozens of people) hate it. VPN is unusable, web surfing hurts (try doing AJAX with 3-6 second response times) and ssh is break-out-the-modem time. As you mention, games are unplayable.

      The once case you do cite, downloads, is OK, though a bit slow.

      Oh, and the entire network can crash for hours to days at a time.

      And nobody in the class of folks I mention above would complain about an $80/mo bill for a good internet connection.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:It's easier by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's getting subscribers and currency exchange that'll be a bitch.

      http://www.neopets.com/~Fruzia

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  20. \. mars by kj_in_ottawa · · Score: 1

    Great now we can start DoSing planets. You just had to put a link up on \.
    kj

    1. Re:\. mars by iago-vL · · Score: 1

      Hmm, backslashdot.. interesting concept!

  21. What is the maximum latency for communication? by jmagar.com · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I wonder what the acceptable max latency could be for 2 way communications. We have become quite used to having near immediate mode communications, and computer networks are possibly dependant on it. At what duration in time does distributed computing fall down? What is the maximum time to live on a TCP packet?

    I'll be keeping an eye on this to see how they address these sorts of issues. Also, does this not relate to RFC 1149? Certainly the latency issue is common.

    1. Re:What is the maximum latency for communication? by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      I wonder what the acceptable max latency could be for 2 way communications.

      Months or years. Keep in mind that people used to communicate over long distances via hand-written letters, and that was the only option.

      If you mean semi-realtime communication (sitting and waiting for an answer) most people won't put up with latencies longer than a minute or so. While you're waiting for a reply you can go do something else, and at that point, you might as well just be using email.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    2. Re:What is the maximum latency for communication? by jandrese · · Score: 3, Informative

      The maximum TTL on a TCP/IP packet is 256 (I'm pretty sure it's unsigned). Of course that means absolutely nothing in this context because the TTL is only decremented (by one) when your packet goes through a router (it's designed to reduce the damage caused by routing loops). That said, there are timeouts in the TCP 3 way handshake that make setting up a regular plain vanilla TCP connection with Mars impossible unless you can figure out a way to exceed the speed of light. That's why you have to switch to IPN on the long hop to Mars and run applications that don't care about 20 minutes worth of delay. The applications are really the hardest part, you either have to set up fancy proxies or specifically build your application to handle long delays.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:What is the maximum latency for communication? by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      Technically, TCP/IP functions at any latency. You can do asynchronous communication with any amount of latency - your FTP session (assuming the server on the end doesn't close the session) will run just fine, provided you've got big enough TCP window sizes. Of course, the initial SYN-ACK three way handshake will take an hour with 20 mins each way, but writing a download manager that copes and just gets on with it wouldn't be too hard. You would have to configure the remote server appropriately though, since most firewalls and hosts work in seconds for establishing a TCP/IP session. If I recall correctly, the default on checkpoint firewall was 50s to establish the SYN-ACK. And you beat me to it on posting the RFC1149 reference. So much for my attempt at cheap karmawhoring.

    4. Re:What is the maximum latency for communication? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think first and foremost, you'd need 2 machines set to identical time synchronizations. One on Earth, one on Mars, which all communications are checked against for message time verification. After that, its just a matter of creating the intended comm's package size/format, for data to be structured around.

      It sounds strange but, you really need the server on Mars to be set to an Earth timezone, as we are 'Homebase', and already set up for 24hr clock. I don't think we want to reprogram the Mars server for a 30+hr clock, communicating with its point to point thats on a 24hr clock.

      Hell, they couldn't get metric to standard correct. What makes you think they can get interplanetary comm's right?

    5. Re:What is the maximum latency for communication? by Sobrique · · Score: 1
      Doesn't NTP have 'latency tolerance' built in? At least the clock synch part's easier...

      The 'which timezone' should people be quoting just got a whole lot worse though. What's the GMT offset again?

    6. Re:What is the maximum latency for communication? by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Insightful

      GMT offset of Mars... let's see, carry the one... I'd say about i ?

    7. Re:What is the maximum latency for communication? by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      This will prompt development of personal proxies, computer programs that will simulate YOU and provide the same or similar answers like you would if you could interact in real time. The person on Mars would IM the proxy and get a response. The conversation would then be sent to you on Earth. With the 20 minute delay you would then review the results and concur or send a revised response. Assuming they are good enough the proxies response would not get revised that often if at all.

      Of course some people would be easier to simulate than others. :)

    8. Re:What is the maximum latency for communication? by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      Granted, it's just ICMP, which is as dumb as packet communications can get, but here are some fun numbers from ping. (Correct me if I'm wrong in the way I start this. I know the answer is right, but not necessarily the setup.)

      Ping uses two bytes to increment elapsed time. When it reaches FFFF FFFF, the counter rolls over in current implementations (This was a bug in Win98. A ping that ran too long would crash, that's how I figured out the memory size for the register.)

      All totaled you've got 4294967296 milliseconds to work with. (Surprise, surprise, that's 2^32)

      Divide that by 1000 = 4294967.296 seconds.
      Divide that by 60 = 71582.7826666666 minutes.
      Divide that by 60 again = 1193.046471111111111 hours.
      Divide that by 24 = 49.7102696296 Days.

      So long as you can get the response packet back to the source in under 49 days, pretty much any version of ping should accept it and give the proper output.

      There's more robustness in there than the guys that did the RFC 1149 implementation realized. I wish I could understand how they dumped out the packets in the first place, I wanted to try it for myself (albeit with paper airplanes) as a demonstration tool.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    9. Re:What is the maximum latency for communication? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I wonder what the acceptable max latency could be for 2 way communications [in space]

      No....wonder....Shatner....put....pauses.....in... ..his....words

    10. Re:What is the maximum latency for communication? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with most above but would like to elaborate. Proxying would be key, it would be ambitious but not impossible to mirror hundreds of sites one way, two way mirroring would prove much more complex due to latency issues and authority. Instead, mars users would have to give up any sort of instant communications with earth servers, and deal with the 20-minute delay. Earth people could do the same with Mars servers. While we've become used to rich content, a 1gbps link would be capable of syncing tens of thousands of websites at the text level, with room for on-demand transfers of rich content (E-mail, etc). With how cheap storage space is, it would be surprisingly practical to "mirror the internet" if you confine yourself to plaintext representations of limited scope. (3TB / $1k or so at today's prices).

      Nasa's done a lot of work with one-way data loss prevention, but it's likely that more work could be done. With high bandwidth, and the long delay, it would probably be quite easy to design a packet scheme for high loss-tolerance. This is (hopefully) where google's work will go, not just designing catchy naming schemes. Some interconnectivity between the encoding and the packetizing might also help with efficiency as well as loss prevention.

      Instant communications would have to be done away with, but like another poster said, humanity has done without them for millennia, so this would not be an issue. Traditional E-mail (not over IP) would work fine, simply send someone an E-mail, come back in an hour, and read their response - not the end of the world, as it's faster than any common form of long-distance communication prior to the 50s/60s/70s (depending on distance, IE, transatlantic, etc).

      FTL communications would then become a much hotter area of research, although delay would likely lessen, not go away (so, 2 minutes versus 20 minutes), still making IP an issue. Even if the physics pans out, the likelihood of establishing a Casimir vacuum all the way from here to mars (or even a substantial-enough portion of the distance to impact time), or creating a functional data transmission device based on quantum entanglement or anything similar within the next 100 years is low.

      I would hope someone lucky enough to go to mars would have higher priorities than bitching about being unable to update their MySpace more than 3 times an hour, or Instant Messaging everyone they know.

    11. Re:What is the maximum latency for communication? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The applications are really the hardest part, you either have to set up fancy proxies or specifically build your application to handle long delays.

      I vote we just stick with UUCP. It handles batching, slow/high-latency links, and remote execution.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:What is the maximum latency for communication? by VWJedi · · Score: 1

      Why would the GMT offset be the same for all of Mars? Different parts of the planet would have different local times, so if it were inhabited, it would probably be divided into timezones. Unfortunately, a martian day (24.6 hours) is not the same length as an earth day (24 hours). For a given location on the martian surface, if "local noon" today is noon GMT, "local noon" tomorrow will be about 12:40 GMT.

      If I recall correctly, Kim Stanley Robinson solved this problem in his Mars Trilogy by adding that extra time just after midnight every night. (Similar to the way we start/end DST every year.)

    13. Re:What is the maximum latency for communication? by Kijori · · Score: 1

      Surely that would just end up being a conversation between two proxies?

      I'd love to see what a proxy trained on my conversations would come up with... although getting arrested when it said something I'd meant jokingly to the police would be a downer.

    14. Re:What is the maximum latency for communication? by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      I think time should be measured in UTC everywhere, even on earth. People will get used to having lunch at 04:00UTC.

      On Mars, they can either stick to a 24 hour cycle, or choose to update their local "noon" each day - ie the Martian newspaper can print "Noon today is 19:23UTC".

      The benefit to this is that everyone can co-ordinate easily. The galactic teleconference at 13:30UTC will be easy to plan, unfortunately those Martian bastards are slow to respond and always bringing up old material.

  22. And all the astronauts will be on WoW by nightsweat · · Score: 1

    Complaining about the lag.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    1. Re:And all the astronauts will be on WoW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [19:05 Guild][Marsadin]LFM Mana tombs
      [19:05 Guild][Earthlock]OMMMMGGGGG LAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGG!!!!!!!
      Earthlock has gone offline
      Earthlock has come online
      [19:25 Guild][Earthlock]OMG Did you get lag just then?
      [19:45 Guild][Marsadin] Nope, must have been a blip.

    2. Re:And all the astronauts will be on WoW by Blyss73usa · · Score: 1

      Its fine lrn2play. Although I imagine that downloading the patch through the Blizzard downloader will literatally take forever....

  23. Don't re-invent the wheel. by Sobrique · · Score: 1

    RFC 1149 already documents how IP can be implemented with high latency low reliability environments. You don't really need to be re-inventing the wheel. Although I'll admit, a spacegoing pigeon would present an engineering challenge, so you might just want to stick with something a little more conventional like radio. But you can probably adapt the latency part...

    1. Re:Don't re-invent the wheel. by mhall119 · · Score: 1

      RFC 1149 already documents how IP can be implemented with high latency low reliability environments. You don't really need to be re-inventing the wheel. Although I'll admit, a spacegoing pigeon would present an engineering challenge, so you might just want to stick with something a little more conventional like radio. But you can probably adapt the latency part...
      How would putting the pigeon in a radio help?
      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
  24. Latency Bright Side by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

    On the bright side, the latency of someone on Mars playing against someone on Phobos isn't that bad.
    According to google: (2 * 6 000 kilometers) / the speed of light = 40.0276914 milliseconds
    Which is better than what i get playing with people in the US from Israel.

  25. The next story on SlashDot... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 0, Troll

    The next story on SlashDot will be:
    "Google Announces Plan to Cure Cancer"

    Random VP quoted as, "Fuck, why not? We're burning money on every other non-competency we can think of too."

    Hey editors: how about a limit on the number of vaporware PR pieces from any particular corporation in any given week.

  26. You'll need the nVidia 88800000 GPU card.... by StressGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    With dual Quantum-Nano processors, just open the holo-window dialog box and set the video refresh to -20 minutes. Make sure you avert your eyes from the dialog box when making the change, however, since once it's measured, it ceases to exist.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  27. not on the galaxy wide web ;) by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    Let's hope they cache in the asteroid belts.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  28. problem is, you keep getting anoying responses for by oldwarrior · · Score: 0

    messages you have not yet sent. Worse than space-spam.

    --
    If it were done when 'tis done, then t'were well it were done quickly... MacBeth
  29. quantum link, 0 ping F.T.W. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quantum link, instant transmission of data. No need for a medium (cable).

    Come on.. i want 0 ping to mars... start working scientists.. chop chop!

  30. Reply from the Martian MPAA... by StressGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    OHHHH!....that makes me VERY ANGRY!!! (huff huff huff)....Very Angry INDEED!!!!

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  31. Re:problem is, you keep getting anoying responses by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

    no, time just progresses backwards for the tachyon, it doesn't travel back in time on our existance. Message sent: 11:30, message recieved 11:31, travel time for us: 1 minute, travel time for our tachy friend: -1 minute.

    --
    34486853790
    Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
  32. News Flash by JrOldPhart · · Score: 1

    (United Press Interplanetary) 2009
    The MPAA and the RIAA have teamed up in an attempt to
    eliminate the Martian servers via saturation bombing
    the surface of Mars.
    These servers are hosting
    illegal copies of "Rocky XLVI" and "Oceans Fifty Four"
    along with re-re-remakes of many other of the Hollywood cash
    cows.which are hosting

    --
    Nothing is foolproof, fools are too ingenious. - Murphy
  33. Re:problem is, you keep getting anoying responses by Trigun · · Score: 1

    So my ping time won't absolutely suck?

  34. Big cache? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't the obvious answer be to have a big cache on Mars, that refreshes itself at night/periodically during day, so that they can have access to stuff fast locally, and with 20-minute delay for "sync with earth"?

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Big cache? by kahrytan · · Score: 1

      How many hard drives would that take? The Internet has terabytes of information and growing rapidly everyday. By the time they could do a massive cache server, It would need more then 1 petabyte of space.

      --
      \
    2. Re:Big cache? by probityrules · · Score: 1

      That's why Google is working on it. They already cache the entire Internet - and then replicate it three times. Adding a new location and replicating it one more time shouldn't be that big of an issue for them.

    3. Re:Big cache? by vidarh · · Score: 1

      Presumably you wouldn't cache the entire internet. Bandwidth would be far more of an issue than storage. A petabyte can be stored in less than 2K drives today, and 2K drives + servers to access them via would easily fit in 20 racks with room to spare, unless you have a shitload of people hitting them. By the time you have a colony large enough to warrant a cache that size you could presumably fit it on far fewer drives.

  35. I'm kicking martian players out of my guild. by wooden+pickle · · Score: 1

    We have a couple of druids who are just horrible healers. I thought it was because they recently moved to Mars, but it turns out they're just feral specced.

  36. Current limits of technology by Valdez · · Score: 5, Informative
    Now, IANACG, so check my math. ;)

    Mars is, roughly, between 50 and 250 million miles away from earth, depending where we are in our solar orbits. Recently, the closest it's been in a long while is nearly 35 million miles (back in 2003 according to the Intertron)... but the distance swings rapidly as we race around our orbits... it can go from 40 million to 200 million in the space of a few months. I'm using 50 million as a rough average for the sake of illustration.

    Given the speed of light, as fast as we think we can go, is *only* 670 million mph... that means the fastest one way trip we think anything can do is still going to take 4.5 minutes... it'll be better when it's closer (just over 3 minutes) and worse when it's on the opposite side of the sun (22 minutes)... and remember thats just one way!

    Even if we plant a colony on mars, you won't be seeing ms ping times between earth.sol and mars.sol until there a breakthrough in our understanding of physics and we figure out how to go faster than the speed of light.

    For those who didn't want to bother to read this post, if you want to play Halo XXV on a Mars server, you'll need to figure out a way to communicate with that installation at superluminal speeds.

    1. Re:Current limits of technology by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      if you want to play Halo XXV on a Mars server, you'll need to figure out a way to communicate with that installation at superluminal speeds.

      AS GOOD AS SOLVED.

    2. Re:Current limits of technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a potentially a little worse unless you have a deep-space relay satellite network (at a place like Mars/Sun L3 or L4) to handle periods of Earth/Sun/Mars conjunction, sometimes nearly 3 weeks of blackout.

      http://www.esa.int/spacecraftops/ESOC-Article-full Article_par-40_1093589522422.html

    3. Re:Current limits of technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those who didn't want to bother to read this post, if you want to play Halo XXV on a Mars server, you'll need to figure out a way to communicate with that installation at superluminal speeds. Or be on Mars.
    4. Re:Current limits of technology by deblau · · Score: 1

      This situation starkly demonstrates the difference between ping times and bandwidth. The ping time may be 20 minutes, but two computers can still exchange data at high bandwidth. If Earth sends 1200 Mb in a one-second burst, and if Mars can receive that burst 20 minutes later, the effective bandwidth is 1200 Mb / 1200 seconds = 1 Mb/s. That's not too bad.

      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
    5. Re:Current limits of technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if they have some friends on mars ? ;)

  37. What a fun project! by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I had a friend who was doing some consulting for a company that wanted to offer satellite based internet connectivity. When they first tried out the system, things took forever to download, despite the fact they had many Meg of bandwidth. Each picture that loaded involved a separate TCP/IP connection, which takes several back and forth messages to establish - which was sluggish because of the latency going to the geosynchronous satellite. (This was several years ago, and all the vendors have very sophisticated understanding of the issues).

    With a twenty minute delay, the standard practice of resending dropped packets becomes more prohibitive (the send/NAK/resend would take an hour!), so you'd have to make the encoding redundant enough so that most errors could be recovered by the receiver - without doubling the bandwidth. Oh, it would be fun!

    Ok, I'll go back to writing documentation now. >sigh

    --
    It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
    1. Re:What a fun project! by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      so you'd have to make the encoding redundant enough so that most errors could be recovered by the receiver - without doubling the bandwidth. Oh, it would be fun!

      That's what coding theory and forward error recovery is for. Reed Solomon coding has been used for space missions before, and they're the same codes used to make sure your CDs and DVDs play even when they're scratched. They can add any percentage of redundancy desirable, even dramatic over redundant messages for very noisy channels, or just a few percent for light noise.

    2. Re:What a fun project! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UUCP solved this kind of problem a long time ago. I expect a network connection to mars would look and act a lot like a UUCP feed.

      Hoping engineers will learn about the solutions that came before, before re-inventing them poorly..

  38. ob Sealab 2021 by servognome · · Score: 2, Insightful

    come on down to Lab 6 and play for real!
    Lab 6 is jerks!
    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    1. Re:ob Sealab 2021 by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lab of the year... Bah! Total suck lab!

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
  39. Maybe by Quixote · · Score: 1

    we can ask him how to build a better Slashdot search engine also? dupe!

  40. So, this means by kimvette · · Score: 1

    So this means that the SLA will state that an acceptable ping time to the backbone is 40 minutes?

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  41. InterPlaNet? by alexmcmorris · · Score: 4, Funny

    InterPlaNet? When the time comes is Pluto going to get shafted again?

    1. Re:InterPlaNet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like Pluto does the shafting...
      It's what holds Neptune behind Uranus

  42. Sweet! Amazon Women on the moon! by hellfire · · Score: 2, Funny

    We can test it by using it on the moon first, and use it to download porn of Amazon women. I bet there will be plenty of volunteers to test that out.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  43. Don't worry by pato101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They are going to use MAT (Mars Address Translation)

  44. Standardization... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The one small step for man, one giant leap for hackers...

  45. More lawsuits by Marvin01 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hear that Google is already getting sued by the Martians over copyright violations.

  46. Re:problem is, you keep getting anoying responses by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

    That depends on how much energy you put into the tachyon emitters... If you put in enough to drain your cities power grid, then it'll suck like normal radio signals... If you put in an amount that would take a year to drain an AA batter, then no.

    --
    34486853790
    Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
  47. Re:Let me be the first to say it... by bonvondies · · Score: 1

    ah, you must not be using the ansible correctly. noob.

  48. Instant messaging? by pfortuny · · Score: 0

    I wonder what the name will become?

    Delayed Instant Messaging?

    Uninstant Messaging?

    20-minant Messaging?

    Please we ****need**** instant teleporting before our conversations get muddled in THE WAIT.

    "Oh, I was chatting with John, but he got asleep during THE WAIT"

    Or THE DELAY. At least that would be a *real* problem.

  49. Bandwidth usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think of how the bandwidth will be used:

    15% people pinging so they can point to the person next to them and say "look at this". Then posting to slashdot.
    60% spam.
    20% porn
    4% web browsers. From all those thinking they are doing something really unique by letting it run for long enough to display something. Then posting to slashdot.
    1% useful email/file transfers.

  50. fuel; sample return by bcrowell · · Score: 1

    It's silly to be talking about Mars bases, etc., when we haven't even done a sample return mission yet. A sample return could go a long way toward settling the question of whether there's actually microbial life on Mars.

    As this stuff gets more complex, it totally makes sense to do anything you can do to cut down on the complexity. If landers only need a low-power radio, and a low-gain antenna, in order to talk to a permanenet orbiting comm satellite, that's a big reduction in complexity.

    Another logical step would be to establish fuel depots of liquid oxygen, on the surface and/or in orbit. You've got free solar power, and in orbit it's really easy to get things cold enough to keep oxygen liquid. Otherwise any mission that's going to come back to earth needs to carry the fuel for the burns on the return leg, and that increases the mass you need to send to Mars, which increases the fuel requirements even more.

  51. talking without delays using quantum entanglement by PermanentMarker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just an idea why not used entangled atoms to bypass this distant problem?.
    As far as i know there is no limit on distance, changes in one atom happens at the same time on the other atom altough they are on different locations. Thats a quantum physic property

    But i'm not sure if information can be passed trough this method (wel hack thats worth investigation)

    --
    I know you're out there. I can feel you now. I know that you're afraid. You're afraid of us. You're afraid of change.
  52. Ivan Yefremov imagined it 6 decades ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ivan Antonovich Yefremov (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yefremov) a Russian paleontologist and S.F. writer imagined it six decades ago in his famous novel Andromeda(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andromeda:_ A_Space-Age_Tale). I read that book as a child in the sixties in translation and I loved it; upon reading it I figured out that communism was not so bad after all (despite what everybody told me). If I remember correctly Yefremov called it 'The Great Galactic Circle' and was a network connection among different civilizations all over the galaxy.

    1. Re:Ivan Yefremov imagined it 6 decades ago by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      a network connection among different civilizations all over the galaxy.


            Great. I can't wait until some aliens from Andromeda turn up on our doorstep 100,000,000 years from now demanding their c14Li5 and v1Agr4...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  53. So This Means AOL Users by Skeetskeetskeet · · Score: 0

    Won't notice a difference in their connection?

    --
    Yeah, my karma sucks....but so do the mods.
  54. Interplanetary Spam by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    But will Mars have an open mail relay for me to send Vigr1@ and refinancing spam to the rover?

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  55. Legal question by CPNABEND · · Score: 1

    Is it against the law to score free bandwidth from that network, too?

    --
    My wife doesn't listen to me either...
  56. Need the communication network by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    A communication network of sats were planed for Mars. W's budget killed it. I have been thinking that perhaps a system of nanosats could handle the comm, as well as provide a simple GPS and other sensors (different sats carry different sensors, some could carry simple camera, etc). The interesting thing is that the same thing can be used for the moon to enable comms anyplace on the moon esp while traveling on the backside. This is because the Martian atmosphere is thin enough that even a slow uhf radio would work.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  57. uucp, USENET, 747 - all good analogs. UDP by davidwr · · Score: 2, Informative

    UUCP and USENET were good analogs, with "latency" usually being "less than an hour" or "less than a day" but sometimes "less than a week. Heck, there was one outfit that got USENET feeds by TAPE every week.

    A 747 full of HD-DVDs or Blue-Rays has high bandwidth but terrible latency.

    Any reason UDP's "send and forget" with an appropriate application- and link-level protocol can't be used? Of course, this would only be useful for non-latency-sensitive applications, such as a scheduled "push" of data, where the schedule was set up ahead of time. Given the chances of error, it should also have lots of error-correcting bits at the link level and a delay-tolerant error recovery at the application layer.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  58. offsite backup hosting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the most mission-critical enterprise data, where not even the anihilation of earth can be allowed to disrupt operations!

  59. Different from SCPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a useless article; there's absolutely no technical data at all. How is IPN implemented? Does the protocol differ largely from SCPS (pronounced "skips") which is already a defined standard based on TCP/IP and in widespread use? http://www.scps.org/scps/ I expect a higher caliber article from a Slashdot post... oh yeah, nevermind.

    1. Re:Different from SCPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, that's exactly where InterPlaNet got started.

      From the site you referenced http://www.scps.org/scps/html/related_links.html:

      New Research Related to SCPS

      While the SCPS protocol suite enables terrestrial networks to extend into cislunar space, extending the internet to reach other planets requires new techniques. In 1998, DARPA funded the JPL/MITRE/SPARTA SCPS team to explore how an Interplanetary Internet might be designed. Dr. Vint Cerf joined the team, and a number of new concepts were explored.

      The primary challenge was in dealing with light-time delays to other planets - minutes or even hours could elapse between a signal and its acknowledgement. It soon became evident that if one could deal with minutes or hours of delay caused by interplanetary distances, the same techniques could be equally useful for dealing with delays caused by disconnection or other comm link disruption.

      In recent years, this work has been generalized and brought into the Internet Research Task Force as a Working Group on Delay (or Disruption) Tolerant Networking. For further information see: http://www.dtnrg.org/

  60. Aren't they already doing that? by jorgeuva · · Score: 1

    I saw somewhere that they are in the early stages of FTL transportation/communication up there. Server access is a bitch, though, because the admin up there is a real BOFH. I mean really FH.

  61. Unfortunately, Text Only... by Illbay · · Score: 1
    ...but that's very, very good news for NNTP!

    And so the "Net of a Million Lies" is begun.

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
  62. Re:talking without delays using quantum entangleme by kalidasa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because any energy you apply to either particle of an entangled pair disentangles them. There is no Royal Road to the Ansible through entanglement.

  63. now I'll.. by cassidyc · · Score: 1

    never get first post with a 20 minute lag.

    CJC

  64. Check out RFC 1149 (CPIP) by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

    Have you not read about the TSP/LP connection done using carrier pigeons? This has been used for Comp Sci teachers for years as an example of how network "layers" work such that TCP is over Ip is over the physical link and how you can swap out layers without effecting the other layers. It was purly just a teaching point, until a few years ago...

    Then it was done for real, using live birds to carry the data. I think they tried a Ping and maybe a telnet session. There is a real RFC written up on this. Note that the "time of flight" delays are on the same order for the pigeons as for the speed of light delays to mars. SO, this problem has been solved once.

    Actually, I think it's only TCP that needs to have a window adjusted due to the delay. The IP packets don't care how long it takes but the TCP layer will start doing re-transmits if acks don't come back within a window.

    "rfc 1149 was written. This rfc specifies a protocol for IP over avian carriers, CPIP (carrier pigeon internet protocol)." Read more at www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/

    1. Re:Check out RFC 1149 (CPIP) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      look at the date on the RFC you dumbshit

  65. Mars Attacks after being uable to cancel AOL acct. by woohoo76 · · Score: 1

    Mars attacked the earth today after their great overlord sat on hold for 6 earth hours waiting for an AOL rep. The problem was compounded by the time lag.

  66. yr.2027 - ping 20 min?? It must be Vista2 by Lukasz+(Qr) · · Score: 1

    What CPUs do you use Quad Core Trio Duo 7?

  67. Re:talking without delays using quantum entangleme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't use that to send information faster than the speed of light, I can't really remember why though you could probably find info on it if you looked. I'm sure someone is working on it anyway.

  68. Disparity by cheftw · · Score: 0

    Mars: population = ~0 ,broadband = of course
    North Korea: population 23,113,019 (in 2006) , broadband = eh no

    --
    Always back up, never back down. ---- Think you're cool 'cos your uid is prime? Take mine, modulo the one digit integers
  69. "A Fire on the Deep" by Vernor Vinge by dpilot · · Score: 1

    They had a galactic IP network, and vignettes and excerpts were used throughout the book.

    It looked like Usenet, complete with headers.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:"A Fire on the Deep" by Vernor Vinge by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      It was also in the The Beyond where FTL worked, thus eliminating the delay issue.

  70. Hey, I wonder... by Illbay · · Score: 1

    ...if they'll start selling the lesser-used TLDs. I wouldn't mind being me@illbay.cen

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
  71. Anything can happen in 20 minutes by Soiden · · Score: 1

    MSN Messenger 11.5 Mars Edition On Earth... Earth User: So, how's everything in there? ...20 minutes later, on Mars... Mars User: Oh, just fine :) ...20 minutes later, the planet receives an invasion and everything's burned, the martians establish a colony and only the Mars User PC remains... On Earth... Earth: Oh, how nice.

    --
    Minti: What's that huge shuriken in your back?! Kin: It's the instrument of my victory.
    1. Re:Anything can happen in 20 minutes by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Anything can happen in 20 minutes

            Continental drift can't happen in 20 minutes...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  72. Re:talking without delays using quantum entangleme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to our current model of physics, no information can be transmitted faster than the speed of light. IIRC, the problem arises from the entanglement being destroyed when you observe the atom and the inability to make sure that you're measuring the right thing without communicating through some other means.

  73. Wait till US.gov gets involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I haven't read the article, but I'm sort of guessing they're not planning to run fiber or copper cables to Mars."

    No, but we can probably attach a fiber to the oil pipeline :)

  74. How will NTP work? by lohphat · · Score: 1

    NTP can handle lag to refine the local clock setting but what time standard will Mars adopt?

    I can see treating the whole planet as GMT then having some local time standard for min/hrs/days/years and having the local o/s translate GMT into the local standard.

    Will there be DST?

  75. I must have missed something by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    Is there a rule that says we must wire up planets one at a time and that we can only start on one planet after we've finished the previous one?

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  76. Only because you have wrong TCP window settings by wsanders · · Score: 1

    Since it takes 15 or 20 minutes for light to travel to Mars, the correct window size is something like 39482396347044987234982432948.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:Only because you have wrong TCP window settings by Busiris · · Score: 1

      Well that blows away my ITU G.114 delay budget of 150ms. No VoIP for Mars :)

  77. I can see it now... by BeProf · · Score: 5, Funny

    ATTN: The President/Ceo
    From: Martian Barrister Bob N'g'w'll'ac
    Utopia Planitia Law Firm
    Legal Practitioners
    Mars.

    Confidential Proposal/Investment Assistance.

    Greetings and love to you in the name of the most high Xenu from my beloved planet Mars. I am sorry and I solicit your permission into your privacy. I am Martian Barrister Bob N'g'w'll'ac, lawyer to the late Prince Grunthor eldest son of the late former Emperor of Mars late Warlord Xandor.

    My former client late Prince Grunthor died in a plane crash in the year 2094. Upon the death of my former client and unknown to the family that is currently under house arrest and undergoing prosecution in the hands of the present administration as a result of human right violation and looting of the planet's treasury by the late head of state Warlord Xandor.

    Before the death of my client he had deposited 90,000,000.00 Martian Mega-bucks with a secret security firm in two trunk boxes in my name, and I am the only authority to this fund which he was to transfer off world few days after he died in a plane crash.

    This fund was deposited with the security firm in my name because my client stole this fund from the planet's treasury and he did not want anyone to know that he is associated with the fund in question not until the fund is successfully moved off world.

    The security firm does not know the actual content of the trunk boxes, my client and I told them that the boxes contains old Martian artifacts to be delivered to a client off world via Interplanetary Courier Services. For now it is only you and I that is having knowledge of this fund, and the only assistance I require from you is to help me receive this fund in either Amsterdam, London or Spain depending on our country of agreement and possibly invest it abroad in your area of advice.

    This fund shall be disbursed accordingly as follows: 25% for the recipient (you) from the total sum(90MMMB). 2% for the courier officer in the country where you shall receive the trunk boxes. 5% set aside from the entire sum for expenses incurred by both parties in due course of executing this transaction (home and abroad). 68% for me.

    If you are not satisfied with the percentage sharing of the fund feel free to let me know. In compliance with this you are to immediately forward to me by mail the following: Your full names and address Confidential space phone and space fax numbers.

    With this information I will immediately commence all necessary documentation for a successful shipment of the first trunk box to your country of choice as all the modalities have already been worked out by me. I will also give you full details of this whole transaction which I have already perfected in due course.

    Please note that you are to treat this with utmost confidentiality willing or not willing to assist me in this transaction as nobody knows about this fund and I am still an active lawyer in this country.

    THE CHOICE IS YOURS, IF I WERE YOU I WOULD, BECAUSE IT WILL COST YOU LITTLE OR NOTHING TO ACHIEVE THIS AND THE BENEFIT WILL CHANGE YOUR LIFE FOREVER.

    Remain blessed in the name of XENU.
    Yours faithfully Martian Barrister Bob N'g'w'll'ac

    --
    You are attempting to read sigs. Cancel or Allow?
    1. Re:I can see it now... by mgiuca · · Score: 1

      Whoa...... mod this guy up... more! There's got to be a way to get to 6!

  78. Reasonable, but not a big deal by Animats · · Score: 1

    As a technical concept, this is reasonable, since NASA historically has used their own proprietary protocols, even between ground stations and on equipment buses. Spacewire is an example. In the early days of the space effort, this was necessary, but today, NASA tends to have people on staff re-inventing the wheel.

    But it's not a big deal.

  79. I predict success. by Zaurus · · Score: 1

    I predict that InterPlaNet will be a success as long as Blizzard puts a WoW server on Mars for the "locals."

  80. Forget it - you're in the Unthinking Depths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Silly human. Your hexapoidal locomotion dooms you to play with silly games in the Unthinking Depths.

  81. Yes but by vga_init · · Score: 1

    Will it run Linux?

  82. Slow, smart routers on Lo's highway? by mattr · · Score: 1

    Interesting problem, even if talk about an interplanetary internet has been around for years.

    There is a major difference with earthbound networks in that you may need to include a good amount of dynamic knowledge about things like orbit, revolution, local time, and the region of space a node is operating in. If the Earth is on the other side of the sun you presumably need to have nodes at trojan points - or maybe just one at the north or south solar pole - to relay. That point will be subject to solar storms too - more if you want it to be closer to earth and a shorter light speed hop. Maybe the routers need to know system geometry then, and be able to calculate when a station will be facing its antenna towards it by the time the signal it send reaches it.

    Perhaps Martin Lo's Genesis project would be useful for mapping slow paths for routers (all routers will be spacecraft in motion somewhere) which will require minimum power to keep them on a predictable course. Seeding his interplanetary superhighway (a major discovery that the solar system is filled with tube-like paths where gravity likes slow ships) with a sequence of router-equipped craft, might be the way we are going to roll out this network. The routers closest to earth will be more advanced and with the latest information about near-earth network and space activity, so perhaps the protocol should include the ability to be configured to weight favorably craft that are closer Earth for example.

    Though Vint or somebody has said they could run IP over carpet static, the only thing I can see that might be carried over is the idea of a URL and a domain name. But even so, for a spaceship moving between two planets, you don't really want to force it to logically belong to a planet. More like having it belong to a virtual controller (like the router for a fleet of satellites) that itself gets passed to different stations' jurisdictions if the fleet moves. I guess the problem I have is that it sounds like they are starting with the idea of an Internet that works hierarchically or like mobile phone cells. But then you have to go "roaming" when you move. In space, everything moves! And time? How can we even tell time when the earth is dragging its frame around with it. Okay we can all standardize on the sun or a star or something. It is so complicated that the only thing for sure is when that machinery gets far away it will be a pain to mess with it. This all has to be completely reburnable, reconfigurable, and idiot proofed so we don't run the risk of bricking the network before we figure out how to get it to work. This might be a good time to start thinking of how to control communications with a solar orbit spanning radio telescope, or those nanosatellite fleets people were experimenting with recently.

  83. Bad Ping by Wiarumas · · Score: 1

    Note to self: Avoid Martian Counterstrike servers due to bad pings.

    --
    I will bend like a reed in the wind.
  84. Risky by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    The more connected it becomes, the greater the risk of hackers driving rovers over a cliff, drilling into itself, or the like. Imagine the PR power to Al-quida of doing such.

  85. Mod up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was waiting for someone to reference OSC's work...

  86. Here's Where It can Be Beta Tested..... by SkyDude · · Score: 1
    In today's Sun Journal (Maine) just the place to beta the thing.

    Ah yup.....been to Maine

    --
    == First cross river, then insult alligator.
  87. Article is a little spare on details... by LionMage · · Score: 1

    ...and factually inaccurate to boot. Surprised nobody already noted that the article claims that JPL is in Houston, TX. (It's actually located in Pasadena, CA, and as far as I know there are no JPL satellite offices anywhere else.) You'd think that ITWire could do some basic fact checking, like checking JPL's web site.

  88. Don't underestimate... by ELiTeUI · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't underestimate the bandwidth of a transporter beam full of tapes !

  89. Re:talking without delays using quantum entangleme by Jerf · · Score: 1

    Here's a metric for you to use: If it were that easy, somebody would have done it.

    We're talking almost-guaranteed-Nobel Prize work here.

    Not to mention every damn time the speed of light comes up on Slashdot, somebody babbles about entangled particles. Again... if it were that easy, it would have been done.

    Google for why it's not possible.

  90. ALIENTP by trainsnpep · · Score: 1

    They should look at ALIENTP. I proposed it (and eventually developed and tested it) 2 1/2 years ago. Vint Cerf is SO behind the times.

    --
    --<Mike>--
    1. Re:ALIENTP by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I don't think you invented that. I mean, presumably, if they have asses, aliens have to wipe them too.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  91. Re:talking without delays using quantum entangleme by l4m3z0r · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not possible according to wikipedia:

    As a result, measurements performed on one system seem to be instantaneously influencing other systems entangled with it. But quantum entanglement does not enable the transmission of classical information faster than the speed of light (see discussion in next section below).

    and here:

    Although no information can be transmitted through entanglement alone, it is possible to transmit information using a set of entangled states used in conjunction with a classical information channel. This process is known as quantum teleportation. Despite its name, quantum teleportation cannot be used to transmit information faster than light, because a classical information channel is required.

  92. It will never work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately, the vast majority of routers in use today implement "martian packet filters" in their TCP/IP stacks...

  93. Re:talking without delays using quantum entangleme by mhall119 · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can transmit information this way, but not faster than light.

    The problem is that whenever you observe one atom, the super-position collapses instantaneously for both. That means the receiver needs to know that the sender has already measured the atom on the sending end before observing their atom on the receiving end, this would have to be done by a standard, non-FTL signal. You also have the problem of not being able to collapse the super-position into a specific value (say 0 or 1), so while the receiver would know what state the sender's atom is in, that state is a random value (0 or 1), so no data is actually conveyed.

    The first problem may be overcome with some time-based scheme, where the sender and receiver have syncronized clocks, and have agreed at what time the sender will measure his atom. The problem with random waveform collapse, however, would be harder to overcome, though I think the quantum computers in recent articles have managed to make it slightly less-random.

    --
    http://www.mhall119.com
  94. spam zombie farm on mars? by ohmantics · · Score: 0

    Oh great, now a spam zombie farm can be placed on another planet.

  95. Great.. by joshetc · · Score: 1

    Josh: does this
    Josh: mean
    Josh: I'll have to stop
    Josh: talking like this
    Josh: on aim
    Josh: ???

  96. Ansible by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    The answer is obvious, somebody needs to hurry up and invent the ansible already.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  97. Agree by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

    Never mind the fact that it would take 4.39 years for a packet to arrive from our nearest neighboring star system! Server down? Oops, wait 4.39 years + 5 minutes to get a timeout, and then try again. And the slashdot effect would get pretty deadly, when a server will get hammered by slashdotters in Alpha Centauri years after the article has been on the front page.

  98. narrow namespace by gr8dude · · Score: 1

    When I saw the .sol in the presentation I was pretty impressed... theres a little bit of future proofing in that one....
    Hmm... let's see: .sol - three characters in length, 26 symbols to choose from... Yep, this is just enough for the gazillion of galaxies and planetary systems out there.

    The idea is nice, and I certainly love it. But this approach won't scale well, so another method will be needed eventually.
  99. Ticket #2027.2.22.45789 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sigh. ok, this is tech support.

    It sounds like your system is reverting to radio frequency transmission, you need to get your QEM up and running correctly before you can play real time. Didn't you RTFM?

    Do you have your QEM (quantum entanglement modulator) correctly connected? Is it plugged in?

    Go from the K symbol to Utilities to Hardware. Now, see if you can find if your QEM has been detected by your system. If not, you are doing to have to download the driver from Sourceforge the old-fashioned way. You can use this time for a snack break. The connection will take 35 minutes to set up day, at our current distance. And then you have the download to wait for.

    Once you have it, you will have to open a terminal and type ./qemdriver.scr and hit enter. You -did- save it to your home directory, didn't you?

    Assuming you have no dependency issues, it should install. At this point, you need to reboot.
    During the start-up screen, look to see if it loads correctly and your QEM is correctly identified.

    When you are fully booted, you need to go to K ->Utilities->QEMConfig, and follow the wizard carefully. This is important. If you do not follow the directions exactly, you may end up sending information into the past when you try to use your InterPlaNet connection. This has been known to happen from time to time. Some historical researchers have found that some of these incidents were taken as April Fool's jokes back on Earth in the old days. You really don't want to do that, it is embarrassing.

    Ok, if that doesn't work, call again.

    Goodbye.

    1. Re:Ticket #2027.2.22.45789 by sorcerersystems · · Score: 1

      what, and go on hold for another 20 minutes??

  100. Re:Sweet! Amazon Women on the moon! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Why go to the Moon when you can find Amazons in the Avocado Jungles of Doom? Well, except that Doom part... But in space, no one can hear you complaining about the worn-away portions on the tape resulting from overuse of pause.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  101. not a bug, but a feature by gr8dude · · Score: 1

    It is OK if you play turn-based strategies. In fact, this is not a problem at all for games that are not designed to be played in real-time. For instance, nowadays I have no time for games, but I would love to play one that doesn't take much time during the day and does not require me to be while(1) focused on it.

  102. Net sex of the future by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    [HungDude] enters chatroom BarsoomSex at 2:34:08AM

    2:04:12AM [HungDude] Anyone here?

    2:24:08AM [HungDude] Hello?

    2:44:55AM [HungDude] Dead in here.

    2:45:36AM [PrncssOfMars] I'm here!

    2:46:01AM [HungDude] Never mind. I came 39 minutes ago.

    [HungDude] leaves chatroom BarsoomSex at 2:47:22AM

    3:25:08AM [PrncssOfMars] Hello?
  103. Can't we all just get along? by smchris · · Score: 1


    You want to test communication with Mars _and_ be capitalist? CHARGE people: "This valentine/birthday wish/whatever was relayed via Mars" with an earth-based wrapper suitable for printing and posting on the cubicle wall. Sure. it would be a pointless gimmick but let's not say that like it's a bad thing.

  104. How to fix it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Calling Al Gore.......

  105. Because it was the California government, not Enro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which made the policies which led to the blackouts. Enron had its own severe and immoral problems, but the power shortage in California was government-caused.

  106. Damn by Warshadow · · Score: 1

    So I'm going to get kicked by BF2142 servers for having a high average ping of 1200000ms? That sucks.

  107. Boosters by infonote · · Score: 1

    I guess they will create a sort of booster to increase signal strength/speed or a sort of buffering system.

    --
    Visit http://www.kaizenlog.com
  108. Re:talking without delays using quantum entangleme by Vicsun · · Score: 1

    Quantum Mechanics isn't magic, and can't pass information faster than c.

  109. Design Docs by StaticEngine · · Score: 1

    Implement a generic solution to handle the packet loss when the sun is between the Earth and Mars. This solution should not rely on hardcoded values or tables. In addition, it should be easy to alter, in case the client wishes to change the orbital paramaters of either planet.

  110. Martian packets by Futaba-chan · · Score: 1
    The maximum TTL on a TCP/IP packet is 256 (I'm pretty sure it's unsigned).

    Sure, but that doesn't help if your packet gets rejected by the martian filter on the firewall....

  111. An update to RFC 1149 will be needed by ExRex · · Score: 1

    Probably some sort of encapsulation would be necessary.
    RFC 1149

    --
    The closer you are to the code, the happier you are. - Ancient Geek Proverb
  112. 20 Minutes? by Kingrames · · Score: 1

    "A signal traveling between the Earth and Mars can take up to 20 minutes."

    The signal could take much longer than that, considering that just about every other year, Mars and Earth are on opposite sides of Sol.

    Part of the project is going to involve creation of satellites around the sun between Earth's orbit and Mars's orbit which allow information to be relayed through them between the planets. I suppose 3 would be a good number. This should be an interesting story to follow.

    --
    If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  113. JPL?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't trust too much an article that states that the Jet Propulsion Laboratory is in Houston, Texas (instead of Pasadena, California) ...

    1. Re:JPL?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and they seem to have overseen the fact that there is a 'new' (March 2006) spacecraft around Mars. The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter has a much faster upload/download rate than Mars Odyssey.

  114. Bringing new meaning to BOFH's storage network by daverabbitz · · Score: 1

    With a 20 (40?) minute RTT, and a Gigabit (100M?) radio link, you could store a fairly large amount of data short term on the network. Wouldn't want to use it for anything critical though.

      20m * 60 = 1200 seconds

    1200s * 100MB / 2 (error correction) = 60000MB = 60GB

    hehehe.

    Stupid.

    --
    What could be better than a jet powered motorcycle? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8l6GTHLSWE
  115. Network redundancy? Five 9's? by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

    So if something like the sun gets in the way and blocks/distorts the transmission, can signals be routed through satellites put in place near Mercury or Venus? Given how rarely the first 4 planets line up, it could be five 9's. ;-)

  116. Forgot the formula. by H8X55 · · Score: 1

    Allowing people to die in order to make a few bucks is illegal in any civilized country I think...

    Except you forgot to apply the formula...

    number of people * chance their families will sue * average cost of out of court settlement = X

    if "few bucks" > X - who cares?!?
    if "few bucks" is less than X - issue press release pointing out good corporate ethics, and how many lives were saved, due to a policy to "wipe out corporate greed". insert video clip of CEO eating lunch w/ commoners.

  117. Re:talking without delays using quantum entangleme by Tancred · · Score: 1

    If it were that easy, somebody would have done it.

    Yes, but maybe it's possible but not easy.
  118. sorry, you can't pass info faster than light speed by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

    think of entanglement like this... you have 2 pieces of paper, one black, one white. You put them each into separate envelopes, then randomly send one of them to australia. At some later point you both open your envelopes. You know what you sent out based on what is in your envelope. Spooky action at a distance but still does not allow for information to be passed faster than light speed.

  119. Please explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why every topic must begin with 40-50 joke comments modded up to 5?

    1. Re:Please explain by SkyDude · · Score: 1

      why every topic must begin with 40-50 joke comments modded up to 5?

      Mostly just to honk off anonymous cowards........

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
  120. Mars is Laggy... by Maltheus · · Score: 1

    ...but Mars also needs women so this should help in a virtual kind of way.

  121. Weyland-Yutani by tholomyes · · Score: 1

    So that's how Weyland-Yutani responds so fast when you tell them you've caught a live acid-bleeding Alien... And here I was thinking a response from the evac team would take days!

    --
    When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
  122. Re:talking without delays using quantum entangleme by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

    Anyone else remember this one? http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/q uantum-world/mg19125710.900-whats-done-is-done-or- is-it.html

    I don't know the outcome of the retrocausality experiment, but if it was successful, you could possibly send your information 20 minutes back in time, transmit it at c, and get the appearance of real-time communications to/from Mars.

    Just put my Nobel in the mail.

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  123. UDP instead of TCP then? by toriver · · Score: 1

    Not that big a problem. Packets getting scrambled by solar radiation, though...

  124. A good start? by merikari · · Score: 1

    They could send 10 000 lawyers into the dead cold of space?

    Now that's the way to start colonization of space.

    --
    My other SIG is a Sauer.
    1. Re:A good start? by mgiuca · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? You want those lawyers getting their cold dead hands on that planet!!!!!!?

  125. Re:talking without delays using quantum entangleme by Scorchmon · · Score: 1

    So what you're telling me is we've found a faster than light transmission method of a pseudo random number generator seed? Sweet!

  126. Yes on the galaxy wide web ;) by Tim+C · · Score: 1

    http = hypertext transport protocol; www = world wide web therefore gww = galaxy wide web

    Remember, the protocol is (or should be) independent of the application...

  127. The problem lies in possible transmission errors, of which there are many.

    Can you say "Forward Error Correction"? (I KNEW you could!) This stuff has been under development at LEAST since Hamming, just after the end of WW II.

    Take a look at the guts of WiMax and WiFi, for just a sampling of the ways you can use a little redundancy to repair a lot of broken bits.

    From there handling interplanetary distances and channel conditions is just a matter of degree, not of additional breakthroughs.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  128. AGGH this Article is so Shallow!! by problemchild · · Score: 1
  129. Martian Buddy by gcnaddict · · Score: 1

    http://www.martianbuddy.com/ I won that contest.

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
  130. Scifi tackled this long ago by hcdejong · · Score: 1

    ISTR reading a story (by Isaac Asimov? ) where humanity was just starting to develop interplanetary space travel. Light speed communications proved a problem because the send-ACK cycle was so long. The solution was the 'mother-in-law' [1] mode, where both ends just keep sending information without waiting for axknowledgement from the other party.

    1: it's been too long so the details are fuzzy

    1. Re:Scifi tackled this long ago by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Either Asimov or Clarke, can't remember which. A classic story about asynchronous communication, so you'd think it would be Clarke, but the humor is more Asimov, which is why I can't remember which. Someone is stranded on Pluto, IIRC.

  131. my operands won't need any more memory to work by rogtioko · · Score: 1
    (640tb do the job for cpu caching in the volumetric gaming system that's going to be released in 30 years, glad Inputak decided to be realistic, or greedy, and make no hype for publicity so people wouldn't miss out on life. I plan to play the working title virtual planetics (based on competition which united states nations say is going to replace olympics) once I can download it here.

    Now that samsung's gone into building gaming systems among the many computing products they make, I don't think it'd be worth it for me on Mars to buy all the quadrabytes of switches in the machine because they'd take up valuable cargo payload capac. and space on a earth-to-mars transporter, since all I want to do is game on it. It's not storable memory, so it'd just be wasted for gamers. And even for those considering doing very light graphics developing with it, I think such a half way system is probably a waste because half way developers probably aren't as effective as real developers, so they'd be wasting cargo capacity that should be spent for professional machines.)Reception of plans for computer gaming systems in the future possibly...

  132. Re:talking without delays using quantum entangleme by mgiuca · · Score: 1

    The solution is obvious: move Mars closer to Earth. It doesn't matter how ridiculous an amount of effort it would take, or that it might seriously fuck up the cosmos: There's money to be made here!

  133. Re:talking without delays using quantum entangleme by mhall119 · · Score: 1

    It's not so much the amount of effort, but the amount of time. We could probably move Mars closer to the sun, even add an atmosphere to it, it would just take on the order of thousands of years. Maybe once we can extend the human lifespan to hundreds of years, we as a species can start thinking and planning on the order of thousands of years.

    --
    http://www.mhall119.com
  134. OF COURSE!!! by The_Moops · · Score: 1

    I think I have about an hour after lunch, that should be enough time to work out the kinks in your suggestion.

    1. Re:OF COURSE!!! by PermanentMarker · · Score: 1

      would be nice to know more about QM entanglement.

      --
      I know you're out there. I can feel you now. I know that you're afraid. You're afraid of us. You're afraid of change.