Far better to get a 410-mile range Rivian plug-in electric off road truck, with optional added 400 mile battery, with it's winch and design for rugged mountain and forest use. It's built in Michigan.
But if you're city folk, and will rarely use it, go for the Tesla SUV.
I really don't think you understand how EU rules are implemented. It is possible that Google doesn't either. Maybe they think they can throw lawyers at the problem or accountants, and it will just go away. They need to change their business practices. Nothing less will work.
It also is correlated with your increased fire risk, and ours. Rains and snow cause plant growth and floods. We're used to it up here, but you can expect it to keep increasing in places where the infrastructure isn't there to handle it. We have salmon swim across our highways (literally over them), houses pulled into raging rivers, that kind of thing. Expect more of that in Cali.
(caveat: my siblings live in Cali, and are impacted by some of these events)
I know the PR people say they're responding, but a number of countries, including Canada, say FB isn't cooperating, or at least not in any measurable way.
To be frank, once it's sent, you can't always stop it, whether we're talking smart dumb bombs (active once they leave the plane), cruise missiles (active once they're in a specified region), or drone swarms. Combat is always messy.
I know in TV series and movies there's always a kill switch that works right up to the end, but that's not how things actually work.
It in fact is saying that systems will be developed to override, but if they can not be engaged (eg interference weather hacking) the mission will continue.
Once the bot swarm is live, it's on live fire in the target zone, will complete the mission, and return to the marshall point (which is frequently an airplane where they rendevous and then disable).
The Command and Control units have kill switches, but they're basically Abort The Mission signals. A human decides the mission is go, arms the flight, and it's kind of like any other missile or remote control device, it completes the firing pattern.
If your mostly going for espionage for high tech and military secrets it doesn't make sense to spread a net too wide, unless your really sure you can never be caught. It would be better to have the hidden functionality but generally leave it off, until you identified some set of devices you wanted to exfiltrate data from.
Very correct. The only time you go for wide net is when it's hard to get in, and you turn someone to activate it who is inside, or to set up a repeater/translator.
Next thing you know, you'll tell me that power lines can be used to provide high speed internet to devices, and it's relatively simple to use any USB device to do things, just like your keyboards as well as your microphones and cameras, even when you think they're off.
Slashdot Mirror
Far better to get a 410-mile range Rivian plug-in electric off road truck, with optional added 400 mile battery, with it's winch and design for rugged mountain and forest use. It's built in Michigan.
But if you're city folk, and will rarely use it, go for the Tesla SUV.
I really don't think you understand how EU rules are implemented. It is possible that Google doesn't either. Maybe they think they can throw lawyers at the problem or accountants, and it will just go away. They need to change their business practices. Nothing less will work.
You don't grok EU accounting. I get that. It's not prescriptive, like US accounting. It's inclusive.
Just stop the behaviour. Stop trying to find shortcuts that let you continue the behaviour you know they're being fined for.
Weasel words won't work. Lawyers won't work. Ceasing the behaviour itself will.
If they do stop the behaviour, the fines will stop.
I stand by my correct interpretation of the law.
Just a thought.
Sure they state how to stop their behaviour.
The literal fine says what it's for. Just stop doing that. All of it.
You're trying to think of ways for corporations to not stop their behaviour, but to find a loophole. There aren't any loopholes.
You have to stop the behaviour for them to stop the fines.
If you don't stop the behaviour, you can't stop the fines.
It also is correlated with your increased fire risk, and ours. Rains and snow cause plant growth and floods. We're used to it up here, but you can expect it to keep increasing in places where the infrastructure isn't there to handle it. We have salmon swim across our highways (literally over them), houses pulled into raging rivers, that kind of thing. Expect more of that in Cali.
(caveat: my siblings live in Cali, and are impacted by some of these events)
But hey, you n00bZ think that 2K of RAM is small.
Our snowpack is 70 percent of it's normal state.
There is a cost to everything.
I was on ARPA before it was open
I know the PR people say they're responding, but a number of countries, including Canada, say FB isn't cooperating, or at least not in any measurable way.
Hadn't even noticed until someone mentioned it yesterday in passing.
Maybe this is something old people care about?
I stand by my statement.
This activity is an express violation of the Privacy rights embedded and explicitly described in both the Canadian and Washington State Constitutions.
Period.
Seriously, that explains why so many Ivy League crews are so bad.
Seize their assets.
To be frank, once it's sent, you can't always stop it, whether we're talking smart dumb bombs (active once they leave the plane), cruise missiles (active once they're in a specified region), or drone swarms. Combat is always messy.
I know in TV series and movies there's always a kill switch that works right up to the end, but that's not how things actually work.
It in fact is saying that systems will be developed to override, but if they can not be engaged (eg interference weather hacking) the mission will continue.
Once the bot swarm is live, it's on live fire in the target zone, will complete the mission, and return to the marshall point (which is frequently an airplane where they rendevous and then disable).
The Command and Control units have kill switches, but they're basically Abort The Mission signals. A human decides the mission is go, arms the flight, and it's kind of like any other missile or remote control device, it completes the firing pattern.
Nothing better than using a PAC to do the robocalls.
Make sure you get his five burner cells we're not supposed to know about. And all his kids.
If your mostly going for espionage for high tech and military secrets it doesn't make sense to spread a net too wide, unless your really sure you can never be caught. It would be better to have the hidden functionality but generally leave it off, until you identified some set of devices you wanted to exfiltrate data from.
Very correct. The only time you go for wide net is when it's hard to get in, and you turn someone to activate it who is inside, or to set up a repeater/translator.
Nope, Chrome works fine on our lab's Linux blades
Why would we downgrade them to Windows 10?
Quite a few successful ops involved giving people fans and other devices. My fave involved a lava lamp, of all things.
Next thing you know, you'll tell me that power lines can be used to provide high speed internet to devices, and it's relatively simple to use any USB device to do things, just like your keyboards as well as your microphones and cameras, even when you think they're off.
oh
wait
it is
That's called anarchy my friend, and it leads to cannibalism, which is a definite no no.