Latency is mostly the speed of light from the location to the surgeon. Which is why modern telepresence surgery robots have a buffer to handle that and complete operations locally with guidance from an assistant. The question is more how much information is presented to the surgeon over the pipe, and at what speed it's resolved for imaging. Imaging files are pretty huge, at least the ones I've seen.
You remember the surgical robot in that SF movie Ender's Game? That was one of the surgical robots here on campus. It actually exists.
Actually, there are multiple 40 Gbps ports around campus at places like the UW, so if you lived in one and did research, 10 Gbps is not that fast. We even have three 100 Gbps ports. It's useful for remote telepresence surgery, for example.
Not sure where you got this 100 year figure, but I'd think critically about that if I were you. CO2 is a very stable molecule. Plants are not good at sequestering CO2 since they die, rot, and emit CO2 and other greenhouse gasses (unless biochar or another carbonization method is employed). The biosphere exchanges carbon with the atmosphere, but the amount in circulation doesn't change quickly. Formation of CaCO3, Oil, coal, and some other carbon-containing inorganic materials subtracts from the carbon being exchanged between atmosphere and biomass , but these are accumulated in the crust by geological process involving plate tectonics, so they are extremely slow. I think conservatively (and a quick google search confirms) that it will take 1000's of years (perhaps 10's or 100's of thousands) of years for CO2 to return to a level closer to where we started before the industrial revolution unless we intervene somehow. Assuming we eventually quit *adding* to the CO2 in the atmosphere.
Recent 2015 textbook for ENVIR 450
Effectively, assuming new creation, effect is 100 years, NO2 is 10-20, methane circa 10.
Slashdot Mirror
next thing some stupid CEO will try to push this out worldwide, and will be the first up against the wall when the AI revolution happens
Tim Cook probably buys from Amazon and has them deliver his groceries to his personal chef and deliver packages by drone to his mansions.
Seriously.
Cash is less traceable and causes you to spend less than non-cash alternatives.
Apples are great to eat and make hard cider with. I recommend ice cider, it's yummy.
Not the computer firm that has become Evil. That Apple is Rotten.
Latency is mostly the speed of light from the location to the surgeon. Which is why modern telepresence surgery robots have a buffer to handle that and complete operations locally with guidance from an assistant. The question is more how much information is presented to the surgeon over the pipe, and at what speed it's resolved for imaging. Imaging files are pretty huge, at least the ones I've seen.
You remember the surgical robot in that SF movie Ender's Game? That was one of the surgical robots here on campus. It actually exists.
Actually, there are multiple 40 Gbps ports around campus at places like the UW, so if you lived in one and did research, 10 Gbps is not that fast. We even have three 100 Gbps ports. It's useful for remote telepresence surgery, for example.
You have to go five levels deep in the menu to opt out.
In real countries, you have to separately sign and date any opt-in that gives away your privacy, and the default is No.
Seriously, you thought we weren't going to illegally and unconstitutionally spy on you in your own country?
And a few other acquisitions that weren't profitable
We do actually have small usable fusion reactors, they were developed at the UW. And then started military use.
What?
You didn't think we'd license it to you, did you?
They're really expensive, and our idea of small is the size of a walk-in closet, or a mudroom. But they're much smaller than fission reactors.
Think about it. Rich flyers in Uber flyers, and an armed drone intercepts and requires they give up all their bitcoins or it explodes!
Ain't it wonderful!
Make people work in open spaces with no walls, exposed pipes and ducts, and then act all surprised that it's too noisy?
Oh, and could somebody clean up the poo their dog leaves behind. It's not funny.
Which, as we all know, is a protected usage.
Sadly, I'm a bit lazy about finishing the parody versions, but aren't we all?
I just bought a 64GB SE from an Apple store this weekend, so you are wrong.
You must live in NYC or SF then. You can't buy one and walk out of the store with it at most Apple stores in the USA.
Well, then there's the inverter. But the panels, yes. Unless you have one of those old pre-2000 houses.
And if you buy the latest Android, you can use it to toast s'mores!
How much did you say it cost again?
You must have read the wrong price ...
Like I said, the key to being fashionable is realizing nobody cares about your excuse to waste $1000. that could buy you 10 solar panels, for example.
Which would power your house. If you didn't waste mortgage money on $1000 watches you don't need that are unfashionable.
I know. But it's not advertised here, and they have to mail it to you, can't just buy it in a physical Apple store
The actual weak points are physical.
You're doing it wrong.
Back in my mil days, they could already fire enough Russian missiles to take out the Puget Sound area 500 times over.
It's like saying you have a giant monster truck but there's nowhere to park it.
Big missiles mean small hands, if you get what I mean.
Hated the iPhone 6 and 7, so I bought the Asia-only iPhone 5 SE with 64 memory.
Small, fast, long battery life, fits in my pocket.
Fashion is knowing that nobody wears watches anymore. And big phones are a sign you're wasting cash.
It's the only solution, in the song of Fire and Ice!
Ha! I'm getting the full spectra vision mod done in Bioengineering next week!
Not sure where you got this 100 year figure, but I'd think critically about that if I were you. CO2 is a very stable molecule. Plants are not good at sequestering CO2 since they die, rot, and emit CO2 and other greenhouse gasses (unless biochar or another carbonization method is employed). The biosphere exchanges carbon with the atmosphere, but the amount in circulation doesn't change quickly. Formation of CaCO3, Oil, coal, and some other carbon-containing inorganic materials subtracts from the carbon being exchanged between atmosphere and biomass , but these are accumulated in the crust by geological process involving plate tectonics, so they are extremely slow. I think conservatively (and a quick google search confirms) that it will take 1000's of years (perhaps 10's or 100's of thousands) of years for CO2 to return to a level closer to where we started before the industrial revolution unless we intervene somehow. Assuming we eventually quit *adding* to the CO2 in the atmosphere.
Recent 2015 textbook for ENVIR 450
Effectively, assuming new creation, effect is 100 years, NO2 is 10-20, methane circa 10.
In case you thought you were safe, all of this is tied into the facial recognition systems.
Wear hoodies. Use reversible layered clothing with dazzle patterns.
Use burner phones.
Use a voice mod and talk in a different pitch and pattern than usual.