They're all quad core machines. 18 of 'em have 2 quad core processors, and the other 4 lack the extra processor but get more RAM.
It's sorta like, there's 22 guys. 18 of 'em ain't missing nothing, but the other four only have one nut but have more endurance. Though the analogy is a bit off.
Even if someone was responsible, chances are they'd just get promoted.
For example, a coworker was telling me about a supervisor she had. Didn't show up at all to work. What happened? She got hired somewhere else, with a pay raise, and a glowing review from her boss.
Why? Because it's easier to pass someone to some other place than to fire them (paper work, have to document their ineptitude, etc. etc.).
The lady that didn't show up at all, at her new job, somehow managed to embed hundreds/thousands of SSNs in an email she sent out to a student body. Wasn't fired for that, either.
Personally, I'd be a little bit more gracious.
"any guy caught urinating in public should not be allowed to use his penis for a period of 6 months, or for the remainder of his life, whichever is shorter."
Imagine the piss you'd take at the end...
Now, which one of these (http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Pentagon_military_analyst_program#Program_participants) would you happen to be?
My thinking, though, is that if you hire a military analyst, you're going to want somebody that knows it inside and out. Most likely, these are the guys that have been in the military, and likely have some stock in military contractors.
It's like sending your tax return to the IRS in a clear envelope with your name birth date and SS # showing. Ah, shit. My mother's maiden name and bank account number are showing too. I'm boned, aren't I?:(
Just plan STUPID! Well I already knew that.
Apparently you missed it when he said, "Not that I'm equating Wales with Hitler, just using an extreme case to make my point."
What's really sad is that when we talk about the head of SCO or Microsoft, we require much more evil before we start throwing rocks than we do for Google or Wikipedia I think most people start throwing rocks at Google because the unofficial official motto of Google is "Do no evil".
Note (not that you'll pay any attention to it): I'm not trying to take a side, one way or the other. Just pointing stuff out (and my brief analysis).
Actually, given the fact that his family has "succumbed to constipation," I'd say that he's restricting the throughput of the toilet. It'd be my guess that he's using the "Allow/Deny" feature of Vista, and it's taking a long time for the screen to pop up.
Slashdot Mirror
They're all quad core machines. 18 of 'em have 2 quad core processors, and the other 4 lack the extra processor but get more RAM.
It's sorta like, there's 22 guys. 18 of 'em ain't missing nothing, but the other four only have one nut but have more endurance. Though the analogy is a bit off.
is THE anonymous Coward
Yes! All those heretical programmers should burn! Burn them, burn them alive! It's THEIR fault I defaulted on my loan!
It's suddenly getting warmer in here...
Ahhhhh, Bush fire. That would be pretty funny, seeing him running around, flapping his arms, screa... oh, wrong bush...
I'm hoping it's just licensing issues that's causing them to not be able to offer the "many more titles".
And backing up a copy of the movie would be irrelevant with this service, as you could watch it at any time, as many times as you want.
That is, if they continue to stay in business (and they likely will).
Wasn't a Google employee who supplied the wrong IP, it was an Airtel employee who gave the wrong name.
You actually paid for "up to xxx Kbps"
Maybe because, were you to become interested in a religion, and thought about converting, you'd want to know what you were getting into?
Or, at least, have the ability to know what you were getting into. When there's hidden knowledge, you can't possibly know what you're getting into.
It's like a newspaper. A lot of the slant comes from what they choose to report, and what they choose what *not* to report.
It's a hell of a lot less noticeable, but a hell of a lot more effective.
Even if someone was responsible, chances are they'd just get promoted.
For example, a coworker was telling me about a supervisor she had. Didn't show up at all to work. What happened? She got hired somewhere else, with a pay raise, and a glowing review from her boss.
Why? Because it's easier to pass someone to some other place than to fire them (paper work, have to document their ineptitude, etc. etc.).
The lady that didn't show up at all, at her new job, somehow managed to embed hundreds/thousands of SSNs in an email she sent out to a student body. Wasn't fired for that, either.
Because they were/are challenged?
Personally, I'd be a little bit more gracious. "any guy caught urinating in public should not be allowed to use his penis for a period of 6 months, or for the remainder of his life, whichever is shorter." Imagine the piss you'd take at the end...
So the real reason for Oregon wanting to push this law through comes out...
in Windows! .... or not.
Now, which one of these (http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Pentagon_military_analyst_program#Program_participants) would you happen to be? My thinking, though, is that if you hire a military analyst, you're going to want somebody that knows it inside and out. Most likely, these are the guys that have been in the military, and likely have some stock in military contractors.
RAID-1 arrays and dual-head cards with two screens is hardly the masses.
No, looks like you're in the right field...
Well, the article is around a year old, but at that time they had ~70% of the mp3 player market share.
http://www.macsimumnews.com/index.php/archive/apple_has_723_percent_of_mp3_player_market_in_february/
My guess is that it's probably risen a bit in the past year, too.
Note (not that you'll pay any attention to it): I'm not trying to take a side, one way or the other. Just pointing stuff out (and my brief analysis).
Actually, a public school teacher. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1094835/posts
Actually, given the fact that his family has "succumbed to constipation," I'd say that he's restricting the throughput of the toilet. It'd be my guess that he's using the "Allow/Deny" feature of Vista, and it's taking a long time for the screen to pop up.
Is that close to 30% of Windows users, or 30% of all web browsers?
Who's to say Hoover was wiretapping at the same time this guy was working at Bell?
If Firefox is the light-weight relative, then SeaMonkey must be a 2 ton obese gorilla...