One day you're going to look at all the mass shooting that happen in America and realise that the mental health issues that drive people to do that are created by the psychologist working to turn you into a compliant little consumer.
If you knew anything about the way Australia is used as a test market for the US then you would understand why you should pay attention.
Guns in society didn't stop any of this from becoming enforced law.
Perhaps you were not reading the legisations that were passed after that happened. Both major parties aggregated the parliamentary voting system to knobbe the power of independent parties, new censors ship laws, scrapping of telephone intercept warrants laws, introduction of restrictions on the right to free association, removing legal liability for soldiers shooting Australian citizens.
I suggest you don't know what you're talking about.
There are still many guns in Australia
Whilst I agree that it has reduced harm, it has still been used as a political instrument. Civilians do not have access to semi or full automatic weapons only single shot weapons. Even that is heavily licensed and regulated.
The question isn't weather reducing guns would have reduced harm, the question is if improving mental health would have reduced harm.
Now you know how you will be treated once you relinquish control of your firearms.
Once they took them from us in Australia, laws like this came soon after. I get it that gun control is a major issue, however I don't think the kids calling for that understand the complexity of mental health issues that drive people to kill, nor do they understand the complexities of the force of the people equalizing the force of the state supported by the US constitution.
Seeing laws like this makes me support gun control less and less. State tyranny is the ultimate tyranny. Beware.
They're the cvs of the legal system. This one isn't checked in yet. Thanks for posting the link to the bill.
Weird that I see no comments and browser opens a post window first.
it's pretty obvious if we did have an alien visitor who would be the supreme power. There won't be any comforting provided; they'll be shitting their pants like the rest of us.
Aliens coming here would see just how peaceful we are and say "Hey, let's go visit the highly evolved primates on #0422, they are so welcoming!" but since there is no such things as Aliens with technology millions or billions of years ahead of us and it's not possible that they've always been here, this discussion is just a theory.
Uh, let's try and not assume why an alien species might be visiting us. Chances are when WE finally have to leave our planet, it will be because we fucked it up beyond repair. Those visiting us might have suffered from the same damn fate.
Obviously for the steak - WHAT DO YOU THINK CATTLE MUTILATIONS ARE! and why would *we* leave. Anything that happens now is a problem for future generations, so we will be ok, I'm sure they'll sort it out!
Not according to damn near every movie we've ever written on this subject. Fight to the Death comes to mind here as to what governments would do.
How dare you! The US military has been the greatest force for peace, period. If they knew about UFOs and alien civilizations they would tell us all because it is the right thing to do. They have all of our best interests as their Number One priority. They don't want to have control, they don't have any hidden 'interests' they need to protect. The US Military is a humane organization and to our knowledge they have never hurt anyone on purpose that didn't deserve it.
Do you think all those nuclear missiles pointing at targets in other countries are there to be used, they're MAD about peace, so what alien *wouldn't* want to come and visit? They can see WE'RE A PEACEFUL RACE.
But now we have a new emperor, Emperor Xi Jinping. Ruler for life.
Um, there are no 'N's in that name, it's spelled: Xi Jipig and it's pronounced with a french accent, Ze Gi Pig.
Any leader in any country that attempt to change the constitution of said country without a vote from the people should be immediately eject from power. My 2cents
If there is an alien civilisation that has arrrived here recently creating all these weird booms that would mean all of those in control or our government wouldn't be the supreme power on our planet and who will comfort us from scary things?
Worst of all they would have to answer to a more technologically advanced race for being assholes and fucking up the planet we live on. I don't think anyone wants that so even if it is true we should just make up as many reasons as we can so we don't have to answer for anything.
UFOs and aliens are a figment of our imagination. I know, for absolute 100% sure that there is no such thing, I've checked everywhere I go and I haven't seen anything in my city, even on my phone. Obviously anyone who has seen something like this must be falsifying there experiences.
People should not forget, if an alien civilisation came here, the government, military and all the oil companies would be the first to relinquish control, hold hands with us all and sing 'Kom By Yah', therefore aliens and UFOS don't exist.
Or the article you linked to refers to it as cite-note 13 instead of 14. It doesn't change that you're lying to twist the truth to suit your political agenda.
The direct injection I mentioned was that of experiments performed on dogs, not the accident at Los Alamos.
Every other line in your post refers to 'people' or 'healthy workers' but the one line referring to pu injection was about injection into dogs, not injecting into humans. I suggest you were attempting to mislead people into believing that 22milligrams of pu was injected into humans.
What citation 14 says is For example, the LD 50 (30) for dogs after intravenous injection of plutonium is about 0.32 milligram per kilogram of tissue. Assuming this animal dose also applies to humans, an LD 50 (30) by intravenous injection for an average human of 70 kilograms would be about 22 milligrams.
So, it's an assumption and they didn't actually inject 22 milligrams of pu into people as you attempt to claim.
When it was injected into people they were breaching ethical standards and not informing the patients what they were doing by injecting Five micrograms into a patient. That's 4400 times less than what you claim, and 22000 times less than the established standard.
So if you aren't lying, you'd be perfectly comfortable having 22 milligrams of pu injected into you intravenously, wouldn't you?
Your Nuclear Ideology, is just that. Where you can't find facts to fit your narrative you either make them up or you twist the truth and lie. You left out the part that it was injected into dog, you left out the part that it was an assumption and implied 22 milligrams was injected into humans.
You were attempting to propagate your Nuclear Idealism. You were attempting to mislead people into believing something false and even my error with the poorly constructed links to the citations doesn't change that.
The only error I made was what you were lying about.
In July 1945, Wright Langham insisted that the 5-microgram standard be reduced
by a factor of 5 on the basis of animal experiments that showed that plutonium was
distributed in the bone differently, and more dangerously, than radium. Thus, the
maximum permissible body burden for plutonium was set at 1 microgram.
That's because they began to understand that assessing the lethal dose of plutonium is far more complicated than just swallowing or injecting purified plutonium. Do we find purified plutonium in the environment, no we don't because it's man made. Once plutonium gets into the environment that is when it forms other compounds that are more readily absorbed and organically bound in the body.
These are the salient details that you haven't communicated.
I suggest the thing you are missing is these studies all refer to purified plutonium. They don't cover the oxide or chloride of Plutonium which can be organically bound *inside* the body.
You don't expect the body to digest pure iron, it's ingested as an oxide, the same is true for plutonium. You can't ignore important details as if they don't exist. That just implies you have a political agenda.
The important thing to remember about isotope decay is it is the inverse of Euler's constant when it is unbound and four times that when it is organically bound. This suggest that a lot more alpha/beta/gamma radiation is absorbed when a radio-isotope is organically bound in the body.
It seems to me that you are attempting to mislead and manipulate people and I'd suggest your posts are more nuclear PR than information. If I can see through it, anybody can.
Remember that the 22 milligram lethal dose for plutonium is for direct injection into the bloodstream, not how much is eaten.
Wow - you just lie with impunity - there was no direct injection into the bloodstream. In the citation for the source of the very article you cite the information comes from a well known accident at Los Alamos and refers to external exposure, not to internal exposure.
fox latin america is the worst. It's just horrible. They cut scenes off shows, and at the end, squeeze the credits to the side and fast forward them. All to show more ads.
And even worse, BIG, HUGE LETERS with countdowns:
29 DAYS, 2 HOURS AND 30 SECONDS UNTIL THE SEASON PREMIERE OF THE WALKING DEAD.
That sign is up for the whole month, taking about 10% of the screen.
When the walking dead season premiere is up, the sign is changed:
WALKING DEAD SEASON PREMIERE.
fox latin america is the worst. It's just horrible. They cut scenes off shows, and at the end, squeeze the credits to the side and fast forward them. All to show more ads
It's like looking at crazytown when I see it and people pay for it? Ironic that you mentioned the Walking Dead, I wonder how many people are being zombiefied in front of commercials right now?
We should be invoicing these companies for our time, but they figured out a way to turn that around so people pay money for ads. People convinced that it's a good way to spend their time however people have spent their time to earn money to pay for ads that consume their time. No one is buying time.
Come to think of it saving money has also become a lot easier since I stopped and it makes me wonder just how much our attention is worth if they go to all this effort to capture it? Maybe its like worship, imagine the scene, the Goddess Med-ia, she is pretty, shiny, jealously demands all of our attention, then her beautiful form approaches you, as she reaches out to touch you...breaks for commercial
I stopped watching in 2013 because the ads are just too in my face. I started playing a game of, flick the ad off before the message so that I got the art work but not the message until I realised the shows kind of sucked as well.
The shows that didn't suck I didn't watch because of the ads and waited until they were re-runs that I could binge watch without commercials.
I think it has had a positive impact on my mental health as well, I feel a lot less stressed since I stopped watching all that crap.
I lost my hearing back in '84 to spinal meningitis. I now have a cochlear implant to hear things. I'm curious if these waveforms would bother me because my hearing isn't "natural."
That's a really good question, short answer is I don't know but I could have a guess.
Push comes to shove, I can either connect a music source in-line, which blocks all external sound, or just turn my CI off. Would that be a useful defensive mechanism?
I bet that feature comes in handy sometime;)
I think it will depend on three factors: 1. the microphone will have a non linear response in a limited range, 2. the circuitry of the device and 3. the frequency spectrum it offers you.
I think that these devices are mainly aimed at you being able to hear other people so the audio spectrum would be concentrated around 3-4khz where human speech roughly resides so therefore I suspect you would be pretty safe from those sorts of attacks. However if the frequency response is extended and the device produces a harmonic you might perceive it but not it's effects. That's my guess.
I finished reading this paper, fascinating. The spectral analysis is very similar to what I saw, I think my HF drivers and DACs are a bit better and can produce higher outputs (not that you need it) than what they have and also the distance *between* the drivers is a factor as well.
My method was different than what they were using because I was trying to understand perception to make things sound pleasing not to destroy people. That said, the paper concludes it wasn't on purpose and if you think about it, that's reasonable. I'd imagine there was a lot of pressure and focus on those diplomats it's not unreasonable to conclude there was a bunch of equipment in that room causing all sorts of unwanted interactions.
Why would an IMD product be more harmful than any other audio signal of normal intensity and spectral content? That question needs to be answered before this theory can be taken seriously.
Standing waves. I've been spending the last three years working in this space with audio processing, before I even open the paper I said to myself "I bet intermodulating waveforms" is a factor and there it was on the second page. I will most certainly read this whole paper however I thought I'd share some of my experiences that were a by-product of what I was trying to understand.
Out of curiosity I tried the experiment on myself and a few friends and found that if you hit the right frequency with a person, they will practically hit the roof and run away if they have any form of Tinnitus. I did a spectral analysis of the waveform and the best I can describe it is like audio teeth, waveforms with a specific Q, amplitude and frequency separation. I could'nt see anyone handling more than a few seconds of it, I have no doubt you would be very sick in much less than a minute.
If there were two devices they would cancel AND reinforce certain audio spectrum within the human hearing range thus you would get a combination of modulating and standing waveforms would be *really* disorientating, anything more than 5watts at that frequency range would be nasty. Just moving around in the room would make it oscillate.
It's not just humans and please don't hold this against me, I love dogs too, but not when they bark until 5am and sleep all day while I am driving down a freeway fatigued. Complaining to neighbors doesn't work but an intermodulating waveform oscillating between 23k and 25k works in under 10 seconds. No neighborly confrontation required.
The last thing I found is that it doesn't have to be actual damage to your hearing to produce the effect. I have my hearing tested often, I know exactly where the damage is and the effect is not necessarily related to damage.
A final point though is wind turbines. I think the effect is the same however it is intermodulating infrasound with very long waveforms relating to the characteristics of the turbine blades in different turbines interacting with each other. I would not live near these devices any more than living next to a main road, it will slowly make you sick.
Obviously my pithy experiments aren't controlled so I'm interested in what this paper has to say, maybe it can answer some questions I have.
Last I heard they were figuring out just how many instruments they can include to explore Uranus and the rings around it. First the rings and then and deep as they can go for as long as there is battery power remaining to keep all of the instruments going before it is crushed by the pressure of the most concentrated source of methane in the solar system. That's right, there is a lot of methane in Uranus.
If you're laughing now, you can just stop it - you're being juvenile. Exploring Uranus is a serious undertaking that many people are committed to and clever jokes about "hoping to see inside Uranus" are just unsophisticated. We're better than that here.
This explanation shows how ridiculous the concept of 'illegal bitcoins' are.
Well, I was making a point that there is no such thing as 'illegal bitcoin', it's stolen computer equipment that is application specific.
Which in turn shows how ridiculous the concept of bitcoin is. You don't own anything that someone (usually some government) won't help you keep, use, etc., because someone else will come to take it away from you in short order.
All I have is addresses in the blockchain that someone says is worth something relative to something else. Even if they are worth nothing I still have them. When they are worth something they are a problem for the banking system because no bank fees are earned. That alone is a good reason, but it turns out it's not the best reason.
Slashdot Mirror
Post something to slashdot instead of writing to a politician.
You're soooo cute.
One day you're going to look at all the mass shooting that happen in America and realise that the mental health issues that drive people to do that are created by the psychologist working to turn you into a compliant little consumer.
If you knew anything about the way Australia is used as a test market for the US then you would understand why you should pay attention.
But you just go on with your smug superiority.
Guns in society didn't stop any of this from becoming enforced law.
Perhaps you were not reading the legisations that were passed after that happened. Both major parties aggregated the parliamentary voting system to knobbe the power of independent parties, new censors ship laws, scrapping of telephone intercept warrants laws, introduction of restrictions on the right to free association, removing legal liability for soldiers shooting Australian citizens.
I suggest you don't know what you're talking about.
There are still many guns in Australia
Whilst I agree that it has reduced harm, it has still been used as a political instrument. Civilians do not have access to semi or full automatic weapons only single shot weapons. Even that is heavily licensed and regulated.
The question isn't weather reducing guns would have reduced harm, the question is if improving mental health would have reduced harm.
Now you know how you will be treated once you relinquish control of your firearms.
Once they took them from us in Australia, laws like this came soon after. I get it that gun control is a major issue, however I don't think the kids calling for that understand the complexity of mental health issues that drive people to kill, nor do they understand the complexities of the force of the people equalizing the force of the state supported by the US constitution.
Seeing laws like this makes me support gun control less and less. State tyranny is the ultimate tyranny. Beware.
They're the cvs of the legal system. This one isn't checked in yet. Thanks for posting the link to the bill. Weird that I see no comments and browser opens a post window first.
it's pretty obvious if we did have an alien visitor who would be the supreme power. There won't be any comforting provided; they'll be shitting their pants like the rest of us.
Aliens coming here would see just how peaceful we are and say "Hey, let's go visit the highly evolved primates on #0422, they are so welcoming!" but since there is no such things as Aliens with technology millions or billions of years ahead of us and it's not possible that they've always been here, this discussion is just a theory.
Uh, let's try and not assume why an alien species might be visiting us. Chances are when WE finally have to leave our planet, it will be because we fucked it up beyond repair. Those visiting us might have suffered from the same damn fate.
Obviously for the steak - WHAT DO YOU THINK CATTLE MUTILATIONS ARE! and why would *we* leave. Anything that happens now is a problem for future generations, so we will be ok, I'm sure they'll sort it out!
Not according to damn near every movie we've ever written on this subject. Fight to the Death comes to mind here as to what governments would do.
How dare you! The US military has been the greatest force for peace, period. If they knew about UFOs and alien civilizations they would tell us all because it is the right thing to do. They have all of our best interests as their Number One priority. They don't want to have control, they don't have any hidden 'interests' they need to protect. The US Military is a humane organization and to our knowledge they have never hurt anyone on purpose that didn't deserve it.
Do you think all those nuclear missiles pointing at targets in other countries are there to be used, they're MAD about peace, so what alien *wouldn't* want to come and visit? They can see WE'RE A PEACEFUL RACE.
But now we have a new emperor, Emperor Xi Jinping. Ruler for life.
Um, there are no 'N's in that name, it's spelled: Xi Jipig and it's pronounced with a french accent, Ze Gi Pig.
Any leader in any country that attempt to change the constitution of said country without a vote from the people should be immediately eject from power. My 2cents
If there is an alien civilisation that has arrrived here recently creating all these weird booms that would mean all of those in control or our government wouldn't be the supreme power on our planet and who will comfort us from scary things?
Worst of all they would have to answer to a more technologically advanced race for being assholes and fucking up the planet we live on. I don't think anyone wants that so even if it is true we should just make up as many reasons as we can so we don't have to answer for anything.
UFOs and aliens are a figment of our imagination. I know, for absolute 100% sure that there is no such thing, I've checked everywhere I go and I haven't seen anything in my city, even on my phone. Obviously anyone who has seen something like this must be falsifying there experiences.
People should not forget, if an alien civilisation came here, the government, military and all the oil companies would be the first to relinquish control, hold hands with us all and sing 'Kom By Yah', therefore aliens and UFOS don't exist.
Mr Kaos is just a fear-monger troll when it comes to nuclear.
It's not my fault you are ignorant.
He calls everyone a liar, its easier than presenting facts of his own.
This is the first time I've felt the need.
Next will come a long list of scary sounding stuff, with actual risk information missing of course.
Thanks for coming atomicalgebra.
What you won't do is present one plausible scenario where a person internally takes on an unsafe amount of plutonium.
What SANE person would do that willingly.
What you won't do is understand bio-accumulation.
You're a liar blindseer.
No, you can't read.
Or the article you linked to refers to it as cite-note 13 instead of 14. It doesn't change that you're lying to twist the truth to suit your political agenda.
The direct injection I mentioned was that of experiments performed on dogs, not the accident at Los Alamos.
Every other line in your post refers to 'people' or 'healthy workers' but the one line referring to pu injection was about injection into dogs, not injecting into humans. I suggest you were attempting to mislead people into believing that 22milligrams of pu was injected into humans.
What citation 14 says is For example, the LD 50 (30) for dogs after intravenous injection of plutonium is about 0.32 milligram per kilogram of tissue. Assuming this animal dose also applies to humans, an LD 50 (30) by intravenous injection for an average human of 70 kilograms would be about 22 milligrams.
So, it's an assumption and they didn't actually inject 22 milligrams of pu into people as you attempt to claim.
When it was injected into people they were breaching ethical standards and not informing the patients what they were doing by injecting Five micrograms into a patient. That's 4400 times less than what you claim, and 22000 times less than the established standard.
So if you aren't lying, you'd be perfectly comfortable having 22 milligrams of pu injected into you intravenously, wouldn't you?
Your Nuclear Ideology, is just that. Where you can't find facts to fit your narrative you either make them up or you twist the truth and lie. You left out the part that it was injected into dog, you left out the part that it was an assumption and implied 22 milligrams was injected into humans.
You were attempting to propagate your Nuclear Idealism. You were attempting to mislead people into believing something false and even my error with the poorly constructed links to the citations doesn't change that.
The only error I made was what you were lying about.
What is the lethal dose of plutonium? I went to look it up. About 22 milligrams. http://www.newworldencyclopedi...
This is just plain false.
Here is a citation from The Human Plutonium Injection Experiments:
In July 1945, Wright Langham insisted that the 5-microgram standard be reduced by a factor of 5 on the basis of animal experiments that showed that plutonium was distributed in the bone differently, and more dangerously, than radium. Thus, the maximum permissible body burden for plutonium was set at 1 microgram.
That's because they began to understand that assessing the lethal dose of plutonium is far more complicated than just swallowing or injecting purified plutonium. Do we find purified plutonium in the environment, no we don't because it's man made. Once plutonium gets into the environment that is when it forms other compounds that are more readily absorbed and organically bound in the body.
These are the salient details that you haven't communicated.
I suggest the thing you are missing is these studies all refer to purified plutonium. They don't cover the oxide or chloride of Plutonium which can be organically bound *inside* the body.
You don't expect the body to digest pure iron, it's ingested as an oxide, the same is true for plutonium. You can't ignore important details as if they don't exist. That just implies you have a political agenda.
The important thing to remember about isotope decay is it is the inverse of Euler's constant when it is unbound and four times that when it is organically bound. This suggest that a lot more alpha/beta/gamma radiation is absorbed when a radio-isotope is organically bound in the body.
It seems to me that you are attempting to mislead and manipulate people and I'd suggest your posts are more nuclear PR than information. If I can see through it, anybody can.
Remember that the 22 milligram lethal dose for plutonium is for direct injection into the bloodstream, not how much is eaten.
Wow - you just lie with impunity - there was no direct injection into the bloodstream. In the citation for the source of the very article you cite the information comes from a well known accident at Los Alamos and refers to external exposure, not to internal exposure.
You're a liar blindseer.
You should but that's not the point. The solar on your roof costs a few lives per sq km of it. So many roof installations will kill so many people.
Gee, maybe they should invest in a safety harness like the roofers use.
fox latin america is the worst. It's just horrible. They cut scenes off shows, and at the end, squeeze the credits to the side and fast forward them. All to show more ads. And even worse, BIG, HUGE LETERS with countdowns: 29 DAYS, 2 HOURS AND 30 SECONDS UNTIL THE SEASON PREMIERE OF THE WALKING DEAD. That sign is up for the whole month, taking about 10% of the screen. When the walking dead season premiere is up, the sign is changed: WALKING DEAD SEASON PREMIERE.
fox latin america is the worst. It's just horrible. They cut scenes off shows, and at the end, squeeze the credits to the side and fast forward them. All to show more ads
It's like looking at crazytown when I see it and people pay for it? Ironic that you mentioned the Walking Dead, I wonder how many people are being zombiefied in front of commercials right now?
We should be invoicing these companies for our time, but they figured out a way to turn that around so people pay money for ads. People convinced that it's a good way to spend their time however people have spent their time to earn money to pay for ads that consume their time. No one is buying time.
Come to think of it saving money has also become a lot easier since I stopped and it makes me wonder just how much our attention is worth if they go to all this effort to capture it? Maybe its like worship, imagine the scene, the Goddess Med-ia, she is pretty, shiny, jealously demands all of our attention, then her beautiful form approaches you, as she reaches out to touch you...breaks for commercial
I stopped watching in 2013 because the ads are just too in my face. I started playing a game of, flick the ad off before the message so that I got the art work but not the message until I realised the shows kind of sucked as well.
The shows that didn't suck I didn't watch because of the ads and waited until they were re-runs that I could binge watch without commercials.
I think it has had a positive impact on my mental health as well, I feel a lot less stressed since I stopped watching all that crap.
I lost my hearing back in '84 to spinal meningitis. I now have a cochlear implant to hear things. I'm curious if these waveforms would bother me because my hearing isn't "natural."
That's a really good question, short answer is I don't know but I could have a guess.
Push comes to shove, I can either connect a music source in-line, which blocks all external sound, or just turn my CI off. Would that be a useful defensive mechanism?
I bet that feature comes in handy sometime ;)
I think it will depend on three factors: 1. the microphone will have a non linear response in a limited range, 2. the circuitry of the device and 3. the frequency spectrum it offers you.
I think that these devices are mainly aimed at you being able to hear other people so the audio spectrum would be concentrated around 3-4khz where human speech roughly resides so therefore I suspect you would be pretty safe from those sorts of attacks. However if the frequency response is extended and the device produces a harmonic you might perceive it but not it's effects. That's my guess.
I finished reading this paper, fascinating. The spectral analysis is very similar to what I saw, I think my HF drivers and DACs are a bit better and can produce higher outputs (not that you need it) than what they have and also the distance *between* the drivers is a factor as well.
My method was different than what they were using because I was trying to understand perception to make things sound pleasing not to destroy people. That said, the paper concludes it wasn't on purpose and if you think about it, that's reasonable. I'd imagine there was a lot of pressure and focus on those diplomats it's not unreasonable to conclude there was a bunch of equipment in that room causing all sorts of unwanted interactions.
Why would an IMD product be more harmful than any other audio signal of normal intensity and spectral content? That question needs to be answered before this theory can be taken seriously.
Standing waves. I've been spending the last three years working in this space with audio processing, before I even open the paper I said to myself "I bet intermodulating waveforms" is a factor and there it was on the second page. I will most certainly read this whole paper however I thought I'd share some of my experiences that were a by-product of what I was trying to understand.
Out of curiosity I tried the experiment on myself and a few friends and found that if you hit the right frequency with a person, they will practically hit the roof and run away if they have any form of Tinnitus. I did a spectral analysis of the waveform and the best I can describe it is like audio teeth, waveforms with a specific Q, amplitude and frequency separation. I could'nt see anyone handling more than a few seconds of it, I have no doubt you would be very sick in much less than a minute.
If there were two devices they would cancel AND reinforce certain audio spectrum within the human hearing range thus you would get a combination of modulating and standing waveforms would be *really* disorientating, anything more than 5watts at that frequency range would be nasty. Just moving around in the room would make it oscillate.
It's not just humans and please don't hold this against me, I love dogs too, but not when they bark until 5am and sleep all day while I am driving down a freeway fatigued. Complaining to neighbors doesn't work but an intermodulating waveform oscillating between 23k and 25k works in under 10 seconds. No neighborly confrontation required.
The last thing I found is that it doesn't have to be actual damage to your hearing to produce the effect. I have my hearing tested often, I know exactly where the damage is and the effect is not necessarily related to damage.
A final point though is wind turbines. I think the effect is the same however it is intermodulating infrasound with very long waveforms relating to the characteristics of the turbine blades in different turbines interacting with each other. I would not live near these devices any more than living next to a main road, it will slowly make you sick.
Obviously my pithy experiments aren't controlled so I'm interested in what this paper has to say, maybe it can answer some questions I have.
We're better than that here.
Have you met us?
Yes I have and I don't understand why probing Uranus with battery power instruments has been moderated funny.
WE NEED TO TAKE URANUS MORE SERIOUSLY PEOPLE!!
AI is funny, get over it!
Maybe it only thinks it's funny.
I was hoping to see inside Uranus. . . . . . . OKAY! It's been posted. Sorry folks, you're too late to make the joke now.
I don't know why you think that is a joke. It's called the Advanced NASA Atmospheric Lithographic Lidar Probe and it was designed to update us about the aerosols in Uranus.
Last I heard they were figuring out just how many instruments they can include to explore Uranus and the rings around it. First the rings and then and deep as they can go for as long as there is battery power remaining to keep all of the instruments going before it is crushed by the pressure of the most concentrated source of methane in the solar system. That's right, there is a lot of methane in Uranus.
If you're laughing now, you can just stop it - you're being juvenile. Exploring Uranus is a serious undertaking that many people are committed to and clever jokes about "hoping to see inside Uranus" are just unsophisticated. We're better than that here.
Programming isn't the hard bit, figuring out what the humans want, is.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs
Ironically, this is the reason why most entertainment is so boring.
This explanation shows how ridiculous the concept of 'illegal bitcoins' are.
Well, I was making a point that there is no such thing as 'illegal bitcoin', it's stolen computer equipment that is application specific.
Which in turn shows how ridiculous the concept of bitcoin is. You don't own anything that someone (usually some government) won't help you keep, use, etc., because someone else will come to take it away from you in short order.
All I have is addresses in the blockchain that someone says is worth something relative to something else. Even if they are worth nothing I still have them. When they are worth something they are a problem for the banking system because no bank fees are earned. That alone is a good reason, but it turns out it's not the best reason.
Programming isn't the hard bit, figuring out what the humans want, is.
Common IT customer complaint, when a product is delivered:
"Yes, that's exactly what I asked for . . . but it turns out, that it is not what I need."
Now that's the really difficult part . . . convincing customers that what they are asking for will not really help them . . .
. . . without losing the customer!
Thank goodness AI is here to help us with all the difficult problems!!!