I am talking about radionuclides not radiation, in the context of internal as opposed to external radiation exposure. You're ignoring toxic man-made elements, no-one ever got internal radiation exposure rocks on the ground and there is a big difference in toxicity between Strontium 90 and potassium in bananas as an example.
Your points all refer to external radiation exposure and are either a transparent attempt to re-frame my points into the limits of your understanding or an attempt to manipulate the reader.
Anyhow, uranium is water soluble.
As is plutonium. Especially in chloride form when exposed to seawater. You're misleading people into thinking that solubility leads to dilution where in reality it is the basis for bio-accumulation into the foodchain. You appear uneducated on the mechanisms of this and bio-concentration and ignore that the ocean is a dynamic and living environment.
Fukushima was the only recent event which created a bunch of those short-lived isotopes, so we know that if we detect radiation from those isotopes, that they must have come from Fukushima.
Fukushima is an ongoing event, the disaster is still uncontrolled as it is releasing 400 tons of radionuclide laden water into the ocean *everyday*. Everything in your post appears to be an attempt to mislead people into underestimating the seriousness of this continuing disaster by attracting them with explanations that require very low levels of cognition to absorb.
The reality is that this is a very complex nuanced subject that demands careful study to be able to glean an understanding. When this is combined with the suppression of information (as the Japanese governments have legislated) and agents of misinformation then it is little wonder that people are confused and unable to effectively form opinions that lead to actions that can resolve the situation.
There is nothing benign about four nuclear reactors, in an earthquake and flood zone releasing toxic radionuclides into the ocean and trusting that the situation will be resolved by the same group who got us into this mess in the first place.
Fukushima also threatens US agriculture and thus is an international issue which requires the international community to step in and resolve as the Japanese government is lacking any effective sovereignty in the matter.
One day we might get some independent data on the amount of radionuclides in Japanese fisheries considering the amount of radioactive effluents the ongoing Fukushima disaster is putting into their food chain.
I suppose it is easy to get them yourself, just buy a bit of Japanese fish and a Geiger counter, or send it to a lab for more precise measurements.
It would close to impossible to detect a microgram of pu-239 in a head of lettuce, which is a fatal dose if absorbed in chloride form. Sending all of the food you eat to a lab to check it is devoid of radio-isotopes is also clearly tedious and impractical.
People were critical of the level since (just like you) people can't seem to fathom how a nuclear disaster didn't irradiate the oceans
As you seem unable to tell the difference between radiation and radionuclides and clearly are uninformed about the mechanisms of bio-accumulation whilst mis-characterizing my point I am going to presume that you simply don't know what you are talking about.
Clearly, you do not know the difference between external and internal radiation exposure and how that would occur.
One day we might get some independent data on the amount of radionuclides in Japanese fisheries considering the amount of radioactive effluents the ongoing Fukushima disaster is putting into their food chain. I wouldn't be surprised if they know all this and opening up options for themselves.
The volcanic region made seafood a rich harvest for Japan and now they have poisoned it. Bio-accumulation of radionuclides in the food chain is real no matter how much Japan suppresses information. It will continue to poison the Pacific until we take the clean-up effort away from TEPCO and make it an international issue that we address with maximum priority to stop it spreading any further.
On the topic of using Systems Analysis techniques to resolve psychological abuse from Sociopaths.
Those people are on the cusp of being anti-social or what we commonly know as psychopaths and they use an array of psychological techniques to abuse high functioning people with high I.Qs. It was the most sobering experience because my own personal experiences with someone who liked to make the people around me suffer, until I figured out how they play their game.
I recruited a small team of psychiatrists and psychologists to review what I wrote, which they called genius and I called utter desperation. The book is 650 pages and 180,000 words. With the material I supplied the psychiatrist they were able to give me a professional opinion that I was dealing with a Narcissistic Sociopath by simply reading the behavioral analysis.
If there is a Christmas gift I can give to all/.rs is that sociopaths are more common than you would think and that once you address the system of abuse they install into you everything in life changes for the better. It seems to release massive amounts of fluid intelligence. I developed such a system to use on myself because the psychiatrists we good at telling me what was wrong, but not what to do about it . Well I did.
This is the first time I've ever done anything like this and I wouldn't have a clue how to publish the system I've developed. I hope that no one here has the misfortune of experiencing a Sociopath, especially a Narcissistic one, however I want people to know there is a way out of their abuse system.
Both are obvious. It's a gamble between cost of hardware, liability and if the thief is prepared to out themselves as a thief to explore the possibility of liability.
That liability is only limited to worst possible iterations of this trap so I can't imagine the inventor being dumb enough to expose himself to any liability. At least he made a good joke out of why he covered up his address.
Sometimes, you just want to have a good friend who is a shrink and wordlessly leave his business card.
If they recognize their emotional issues as a problem they have to deal with. They seem to have a skill for manipulating people and they can do a lot of damage to an organization with these kinds of stunts. The only way I've been able to deal with those people is to deal with my own emotional issues so that I wouldn't respond to manipulation easily and become one of them.
After that they simply come across as a teenager with an adult's body. It's pretty ugly.
Under no circumstances should they be engaged in a way that causes you to waste time thinking on their behalf. That is allowing yourself to succumb to their form of psychological abuse.
They will also frustrate you more by simply refusing every alternative you offer until you snap. Then they use that to a) claim that it proves they were right, b) attack your character and c) feel themselves superior to you.
It would seem we have encountered similar circumstances.
This is wise advise because those people try to trap capable people's intellect with double bind scenarios. This is because their mental illness traps them into low levels of problem solving and they're only able to communicate emotionally. Their traps are designed to force capable people into experiencing their reality and suffer the emotions they, themselves, suffer.
Geez, now we're having to police acroyms, because someone might read something into one and be snowflake offended?
It's a way of getting people to waste their time and energy trying to come up with other options that don't offend them. The answer with people like this is to put it back on them. If you don't like the acronym "Weboob" come up with one that doesn't offend you and still describes what the project does. Their goal is to frustrate you until you finally tell them to where to go, at which point they can turn around and say you're unwilling to co-operate.
Have no doubt requests like this are a sign of mental illness in the same way Rorschach tests are used to identify anti-social people who only see sexual images in the random patterns. Instead their, quite abused, minds see only sexual connotations in the acronyms in an attempt to be morally superior to those who created the acronym.
The mistake is to allow oneself to be drawn into expending mental energy on their behalf. Simply accept their criticism and ask them to come back with a minimum of five suggestions for you to choose from as an alternative name. Chances are they won't come back, however if they do then simply pick the name you prefer and move on. Under no circumstances should they be engaged in a way that causes you to waste time thinking on their behalf. That is allowing yourself to succumb to their form of psychological abuse.
Feeding into this mentality by attempting to come up with an acronym that won't offend someone who wants to be offended is enabling the behavior and, quite frankly, is as offensive as the original request because it validates and propagates the abuse.
This is what narcissism looks like, it's a loser's mentality. Don't feed it.
>civilizations can rise and fall in the amount of time that those radio isotopes have decayed through their daughter products.
Oh come off it. Chernobyl is already safe enough that flora and fauna in the region are flourishing in the absence of humanity. So what, 30 years between an absurdly enormous nuclear disaster resulting from total incompetence on every level, and the site becoming an accidental wildlife preserve? That's a far cry from the tends of thousands of years+ anti-nukes are always whining about.
Well go help clean up Fukushima. Oh that's right you're full of it and you don't know what you're talking about.
It turns out that radiation is quite common, so all organisms are at least somewhat durable against it.
Another moron that doesn't know the difference between radiashun and radionuclides, is too mentally limited to attempt to understand bio-accumulation in the food chain and continues to ignore the difference between internal and external radiation exposure.
I'm still using Facebook as much as before, which is 0 because I don't have an account.
ok good, a least you are not a hypocrite - Apologies if I was a bit harsh there however it seems like there are a lot of people prepared to join outrage culture without doing anything to change the situation. I too have never signed onto FB.
Radioisotopes decay but the Internet never forgets.
This is a belief system that is being subverted and used against us. Our truth is that it is gradually being used as a tool to enslave us. I'm more inclined to believe that everything on the internet is a lie until it can be aligned with what is known to be true.
Unfortunately, the more self-serving we are the more effective the lies become.
Actually that's not a great analogy, in privacy terms this is even worse than the quasi-sabotage of Chernobyl, but the damage is worse than Chernobyl, Fukushima and Kyshtym combined.
No, it isn't. Privacy laws can be revised however civilizations can rise and fall in the amount of time that those radio isotopes have decayed through their daughter products.
Everyone involved in this should be banned from working with personal information for life, and a concrete sarcophagus should be built over Facebook HQ.
What do you personally do? Do you write to a congress critter expressing your outrage? Do you read proposed bad laws and try to stop them from passing? Did you lobby your representatives to work in your interests?
No, you just keep whining and hoping someone else will defend your freedom and rights. Get used to disappointment, I've been doing it for 25 years now. Analysing hundreds, sometimes thousands, of pages of law which are basically converting our democracies from a covert to an overt police state. The AssAccess Bill passed recently in Australia gives all five eyes countries access to Facebook and everything else via intelligence sharing arrangements.
What's that got to do with this? You're a product delivered to whoever will pay for your information so they can market or do what they want with it. Facebook offers an API for the task. You didn't value the information when you gave it away and now you're outraged because a company who obvious business model is to sell access is deriving value from it. What did you think would happen if you gave up all your data about who you associate with, it's so naive and you're only now realizing what a commodity information about yourself is. No one cares, tommorrow's another day and FB will still be selling you data in another 12 months time.
when are you guys going to FINALLY make good on your promise to delete this crap from your lives?
I never joined facebook and found that the friends I make are the ones I share an interest with. The other thing I've found is that when I see people I haven't seen for a while there is plenty to talk and ask them about themselves.
Talking about cutting out things I cut TV out back in 2013, I do binge watch Netflix occasionally with my wife though. Cutting out commercials dropped a noticeable amount of stress in my life, they're a waste of attention.
The point I'm making is that, from someone who was never interested in the first place the only thing I feel like I'm missing out on from FB is maybe missing the opportunity to find old friends that I lost touch with.
On the plus side, I find I get a lot done because I don't have things stealing my attention.
What rights you do you think you have that block facial recognition tech in a private concert at a private venue, where you already consented to the photo/video recording of your likeness?
My image is not my identity. I do not consent to the use of my identity and people's identities were clearly being used to scan for certain identities. Can you show me in the terms and conditions of purchasing a ticket where that consent was given for the use of identity for anything other than completing the purchase of a ticket?
Perhaps you can tell me where in the article that consent was sought whilst they were viewing Swift preparing? Was it on top of the screen perhaps saying that facial recognition was being employed to determine the identity of people attending. Were they even given the option.
Whilst I don't have a problem with my image being used the issue is how my identity is being used.
There are other bands out there that have a different message. Swift is a pawn providing the justification to use this technology on the people who attend concerts. Association with a particular type of pattern of thought from a group of individuals is great marketing information. Besides that, why just spy on people when you can change the way they think?
This is the beginning of the tiresome patterns of events that continually attack our rights, in western countries, of free speech and free association. At the same time in this case. For us all, technology is either a gift that can greatly enhance our lives or used to enslave us.
There seems little respect for either the free speech or the technology that enabled the net, if I may use that archaic reference to the intertubes, which has been taken over by empty minded narcissistic assholes. I mean that the net has been taken over by people who demonstrate some of the traits of that personality disorder, like attention seeking and false personas, that has allowed this memetic (I do mean meme grammar nazis) mind virus the appurtenances to spread like wildfire throughout our world.
The interwebs give us a good idea of the mental health of our world and Swift is playing that game that of being special enough to have to impose her reality on everyone who comes to her concerts, who are too shallow to care about their rights that were hard won. This is the cost of apathy, it puts more power in the hands of sociopaths who think that freedom is the dangerous idea that it is for them because it shines a light on their atrocities.
I'd rather walk around in the city as a free human Ms Swift, may I simply suggest you hire adequate security as opposed to undermining your fan's rights to free association and your colleagues right to free speech.
I hope that there are enough conscious human beings who can see through the barrage of bullshit used to justify the constant condescending vomitous "concern" for our welfare in a first world democracy where fighting for freedom was upheld and respected as the very reason our democracies exist.
It seems some don't believe the populous deserves the freedom and free will music produces in our culture.
Same reason everywhere has bees but mead isn't commonly drunk.
I like beer, I like wine but mead is just a awesome special treat, it's so fucking good I just don't have an adequate vocabulary to express its goodness.
Absolutely try a decent mead if you have a chance.
Slashdot Mirror
I am talking about radionuclides not radiation, in the context of internal as opposed to external radiation exposure. You're ignoring toxic man-made elements, no-one ever got internal radiation exposure rocks on the ground and there is a big difference in toxicity between Strontium 90 and potassium in bananas as an example.
Your points all refer to external radiation exposure and are either a transparent attempt to re-frame my points into the limits of your understanding or an attempt to manipulate the reader.
Anyhow, uranium is water soluble.
As is plutonium. Especially in chloride form when exposed to seawater. You're misleading people into thinking that solubility leads to dilution where in reality it is the basis for bio-accumulation into the foodchain. You appear uneducated on the mechanisms of this and bio-concentration and ignore that the ocean is a dynamic and living environment.
Fukushima was the only recent event which created a bunch of those short-lived isotopes, so we know that if we detect radiation from those isotopes, that they must have come from Fukushima.
Fukushima is an ongoing event, the disaster is still uncontrolled as it is releasing 400 tons of radionuclide laden water into the ocean *everyday*. Everything in your post appears to be an attempt to mislead people into underestimating the seriousness of this continuing disaster by attracting them with explanations that require very low levels of cognition to absorb.
The reality is that this is a very complex nuanced subject that demands careful study to be able to glean an understanding. When this is combined with the suppression of information (as the Japanese governments have legislated) and agents of misinformation then it is little wonder that people are confused and unable to effectively form opinions that lead to actions that can resolve the situation.
There is nothing benign about four nuclear reactors, in an earthquake and flood zone releasing toxic radionuclides into the ocean and trusting that the situation will be resolved by the same group who got us into this mess in the first place.
Fukushima also threatens US agriculture and thus is an international issue which requires the international community to step in and resolve as the Japanese government is lacking any effective sovereignty in the matter.
One day we might get some independent data on the amount of radionuclides in Japanese fisheries considering the amount of radioactive effluents the ongoing Fukushima disaster is putting into their food chain.
I suppose it is easy to get them yourself, just buy a bit of Japanese fish and a Geiger counter, or send it to a lab for more precise measurements.
It would close to impossible to detect a microgram of pu-239 in a head of lettuce, which is a fatal dose if absorbed in chloride form. Sending all of the food you eat to a lab to check it is devoid of radio-isotopes is also clearly tedious and impractical.
People were critical of the level since (just like you) people can't seem to fathom how a nuclear disaster didn't irradiate the oceans
As you seem unable to tell the difference between radiation and radionuclides and clearly are uninformed about the mechanisms of bio-accumulation whilst mis-characterizing my point I am going to presume that you simply don't know what you are talking about.
Clearly, you do not know the difference between external and internal radiation exposure and how that would occur.
One day we might get some independent data on the amount of radionuclides in Japanese fisheries considering the amount of radioactive effluents the ongoing Fukushima disaster is putting into their food chain. I wouldn't be surprised if they know all this and opening up options for themselves.
The volcanic region made seafood a rich harvest for Japan and now they have poisoned it. Bio-accumulation of radionuclides in the food chain is real no matter how much Japan suppresses information. It will continue to poison the Pacific until we take the clean-up effort away from TEPCO and make it an international issue that we address with maximum priority to stop it spreading any further.
That would be the honorable thing to do.
On the topic of using Systems Analysis techniques to resolve psychological abuse from Sociopaths.
Those people are on the cusp of being anti-social or what we commonly know as psychopaths and they use an array of psychological techniques to abuse high functioning people with high I.Qs. It was the most sobering experience because my own personal experiences with someone who liked to make the people around me suffer, until I figured out how they play their game.
I recruited a small team of psychiatrists and psychologists to review what I wrote, which they called genius and I called utter desperation. The book is 650 pages and 180,000 words. With the material I supplied the psychiatrist they were able to give me a professional opinion that I was dealing with a Narcissistic Sociopath by simply reading the behavioral analysis.
If there is a Christmas gift I can give to all /.rs is that sociopaths are more common than you would think and that once you address the system of abuse they install into you everything in life changes for the better. It seems to release massive amounts of fluid intelligence. I developed such a system to use on myself because the psychiatrists we good at telling me what was wrong, but not what to do about it . Well I did.
This is the first time I've ever done anything like this and I wouldn't have a clue how to publish the system I've developed. I hope that no one here has the misfortune of experiencing a Sociopath, especially a Narcissistic one, however I want people to know there is a way out of their abuse system.
I wish you all the best for Christmas.
Please excuse my typo in the subject.
Both are obvious. It's a gamble between cost of hardware, liability and if the thief is prepared to out themselves as a thief to explore the possibility of liability.
That liability is only limited to worst possible iterations of this trap so I can't imagine the inventor being dumb enough to expose himself to any liability. At least he made a good joke out of why he covered up his address.
Sometimes, you just want to have a good friend who is a shrink and wordlessly leave his business card.
If they recognize their emotional issues as a problem they have to deal with. They seem to have a skill for manipulating people and they can do a lot of damage to an organization with these kinds of stunts. The only way I've been able to deal with those people is to deal with my own emotional issues so that I wouldn't respond to manipulation easily and become one of them.
After that they simply come across as a teenager with an adult's body. It's pretty ugly.
I appreciate you clearing that up.
Under no circumstances should they be engaged in a way that causes you to waste time thinking on their behalf. That is allowing yourself to succumb to their form of psychological abuse.
They will also frustrate you more by simply refusing every alternative you offer until you snap. Then they use that to a) claim that it proves they were right, b) attack your character and c) feel themselves superior to you.
It would seem we have encountered similar circumstances.
This is wise advise because those people try to trap capable people's intellect with double bind scenarios. This is because their mental illness traps them into low levels of problem solving and they're only able to communicate emotionally. Their traps are designed to force capable people into experiencing their reality and suffer the emotions they, themselves, suffer.
Thank you for mentioning what I neglected to add.
Geez, now we're having to police acroyms, because someone might read something into one and be snowflake offended?
It's a way of getting people to waste their time and energy trying to come up with other options that don't offend them. The answer with people like this is to put it back on them. If you don't like the acronym "Weboob" come up with one that doesn't offend you and still describes what the project does. Their goal is to frustrate you until you finally tell them to where to go, at which point they can turn around and say you're unwilling to co-operate.
Have no doubt requests like this are a sign of mental illness in the same way Rorschach tests are used to identify anti-social people who only see sexual images in the random patterns. Instead their, quite abused, minds see only sexual connotations in the acronyms in an attempt to be morally superior to those who created the acronym.
The mistake is to allow oneself to be drawn into expending mental energy on their behalf. Simply accept their criticism and ask them to come back with a minimum of five suggestions for you to choose from as an alternative name. Chances are they won't come back, however if they do then simply pick the name you prefer and move on. Under no circumstances should they be engaged in a way that causes you to waste time thinking on their behalf. That is allowing yourself to succumb to their form of psychological abuse.
Feeding into this mentality by attempting to come up with an acronym that won't offend someone who wants to be offended is enabling the behavior and, quite frankly, is as offensive as the original request because it validates and propagates the abuse.
This is what narcissism looks like, it's a loser's mentality. Don't feed it.
>civilizations can rise and fall in the amount of time that those radio isotopes have decayed through their daughter products. Oh come off it. Chernobyl is already safe enough that flora and fauna in the region are flourishing in the absence of humanity. So what, 30 years between an absurdly enormous nuclear disaster resulting from total incompetence on every level, and the site becoming an accidental wildlife preserve? That's a far cry from the tends of thousands of years+ anti-nukes are always whining about.
Well go help clean up Fukushima. Oh that's right you're full of it and you don't know what you're talking about.
It turns out that radiation is quite common, so all organisms are at least somewhat durable against it.
Another moron that doesn't know the difference between radiashun and radionuclides, is too mentally limited to attempt to understand bio-accumulation in the food chain and continues to ignore the difference between internal and external radiation exposure.
Fuck off idiot.
I'm still using Facebook as much as before, which is 0 because I don't have an account.
ok good, a least you are not a hypocrite - Apologies if I was a bit harsh there however it seems like there are a lot of people prepared to join outrage culture without doing anything to change the situation. I too have never signed onto FB.
Radioisotopes decay but the Internet never forgets.
This is a belief system that is being subverted and used against us. Our truth is that it is gradually being used as a tool to enslave us. I'm more inclined to believe that everything on the internet is a lie until it can be aligned with what is known to be true.
Unfortunately, the more self-serving we are the more effective the lies become.
Actually that's not a great analogy, in privacy terms this is even worse than the quasi-sabotage of Chernobyl, but the damage is worse than Chernobyl, Fukushima and Kyshtym combined.
No, it isn't. Privacy laws can be revised however civilizations can rise and fall in the amount of time that those radio isotopes have decayed through their daughter products.
Everyone involved in this should be banned from working with personal information for life, and a concrete sarcophagus should be built over Facebook HQ.
What do you personally do? Do you write to a congress critter expressing your outrage? Do you read proposed bad laws and try to stop them from passing? Did you lobby your representatives to work in your interests?
No, you just keep whining and hoping someone else will defend your freedom and rights. Get used to disappointment, I've been doing it for 25 years now. Analysing hundreds, sometimes thousands, of pages of law which are basically converting our democracies from a covert to an overt police state. The AssAccess Bill passed recently in Australia gives all five eyes countries access to Facebook and everything else via intelligence sharing arrangements.
What's that got to do with this? You're a product delivered to whoever will pay for your information so they can market or do what they want with it. Facebook offers an API for the task. You didn't value the information when you gave it away and now you're outraged because a company who obvious business model is to sell access is deriving value from it. What did you think would happen if you gave up all your data about who you associate with, it's so naive and you're only now realizing what a commodity information about yourself is. No one cares, tommorrow's another day and FB will still be selling you data in another 12 months time.
I bet you're still using FB now.
well, surprise surprise!
when are you guys going to FINALLY make good on your promise to delete this crap from your lives?
I never joined facebook and found that the friends I make are the ones I share an interest with. The other thing I've found is that when I see people I haven't seen for a while there is plenty to talk and ask them about themselves.
Talking about cutting out things I cut TV out back in 2013, I do binge watch Netflix occasionally with my wife though. Cutting out commercials dropped a noticeable amount of stress in my life, they're a waste of attention.
The point I'm making is that, from someone who was never interested in the first place the only thing I feel like I'm missing out on from FB is maybe missing the opportunity to find old friends that I lost touch with.
On the plus side, I find I get a lot done because I don't have things stealing my attention.
Except slashdot.
Whats paying for the services offered? Ads and the way the users interact.
Users are the product and the ads are the service they offer to their customers.
We don't have to sing kom by yah, just shut them all down and we'll never speak of it again.
What rights you do you think you have that block facial recognition tech in a private concert at a private venue, where you already consented to the photo/video recording of your likeness?
My image is not my identity. I do not consent to the use of my identity and people's identities were clearly being used to scan for certain identities. Can you show me in the terms and conditions of purchasing a ticket where that consent was given for the use of identity for anything other than completing the purchase of a ticket?
Perhaps you can tell me where in the article that consent was sought whilst they were viewing Swift preparing? Was it on top of the screen perhaps saying that facial recognition was being employed to determine the identity of people attending. Were they even given the option.
Whilst I don't have a problem with my image being used the issue is how my identity is being used.
There are other bands out there that have a different message. Swift is a pawn providing the justification to use this technology on the people who attend concerts. Association with a particular type of pattern of thought from a group of individuals is great marketing information. Besides that, why just spy on people when you can change the way they think?
This is the beginning of the tiresome patterns of events that continually attack our rights, in western countries, of free speech and free association. At the same time in this case. For us all, technology is either a gift that can greatly enhance our lives or used to enslave us.
There seems little respect for either the free speech or the technology that enabled the net, if I may use that archaic reference to the intertubes, which has been taken over by empty minded narcissistic assholes. I mean that the net has been taken over by people who demonstrate some of the traits of that personality disorder, like attention seeking and false personas, that has allowed this memetic (I do mean meme grammar nazis) mind virus the appurtenances to spread like wildfire throughout our world.
The interwebs give us a good idea of the mental health of our world and Swift is playing that game that of being special enough to have to impose her reality on everyone who comes to her concerts, who are too shallow to care about their rights that were hard won. This is the cost of apathy, it puts more power in the hands of sociopaths who think that freedom is the dangerous idea that it is for them because it shines a light on their atrocities.
I'd rather walk around in the city as a free human Ms Swift, may I simply suggest you hire adequate security as opposed to undermining your fan's rights to free association and your colleagues right to free speech.
I hope that there are enough conscious human beings who can see through the barrage of bullshit used to justify the constant condescending vomitous "concern" for our welfare in a first world democracy where fighting for freedom was upheld and respected as the very reason our democracies exist.
It seems some don't believe the populous deserves the freedom and free will music produces in our culture.
Indeed.
It's kind of like looking up at the avalanche and wondering if it is going to hit you.
Now so many entities are leveraging the value from the machines that were originally dedicated to their users.
We have a local mob here that make it from wild honey - nom nom nom. I am very impressed that you make mead!!!!!
Same reason everywhere has bees but mead isn't commonly drunk.
I like beer, I like wine but mead is just a awesome special treat, it's so fucking good I just don't have an adequate vocabulary to express its goodness.
Absolutely try a decent mead if you have a chance.
"Smartphone" ... Yeah, you look real smart.
They look like addicts and since we know how the brain reacts to them we know it's true.