She has no idea how to buy technology and will inevitably waste the money.
Buy a laptop that can be serviced remotely. A decent lenovo T series or Dell is a reasonable machine. She will be thrilled that she is receiving a new machine and won't be subject to decision fatigue from shopping for technology. Your time is a one time investment in setting up your infrastructure so your second employee will be practically zero setup time and they won't be wasting your time and money shopping for a different laptop.
Take control of your infrastructure to save resources for business activities.
You forgot to mention that through Intelligence sharing agreements with Australia all Apple products can be easily taken off the iPhone despite Apples massive bilboard, which is essentially bullshit.
But let's not factor Law into Apples brainwashing fantasy.
Hahaha, yes. Incidentally "emergent property" = "Poof and it was there! Nobody knows how or why!" It is just a scientific way of saying "we have no clue".
So, to use a much simpler example, a physical computer is the physical model of all the software can run on it?
No, it is a substrate upon which potential software runs. It is not useful in and of itself but as a tool that demonstrates the existence of layered "concept complexes".
Sorry, but these simplistic models break down completely when taxed by actual complexity.
Obviously because it is not a model, it is an analogy offered to move from a rock analogy to the idea of concept complexes in concrete form. I don't use them in my book as anything other that an oversimplification that introduces concept complexes. I built an abstract model of consciousness as a tool for resolving mental health issues that includes the appropriate concept complexes for the reader to use. In and of itself it is not the focus of the book but a backdrop for understanding the machinations of psychological abuse so that healing can occur.
My point here is that humans are extreme concept complexes and there is no analogy that can be drawn that is of much use in building an understanding of humans as beings.
The brain is the physical model of the mind, as presented through the senses and mind of an observer. Just as a rock our physical model of how it is to observe/interact with a rock, rather than a non-interacting rock in itself.
Yours is a rather obvious conclusion based on the limitations materialism. Your perception is that the brain is also one thing, when it is not. The reptilian and mammalian brain are separate from the neocortex. Prioritising activation of these primitive complexes over the neo-cortex, as in the case of amygdala activation stressing the hypothalamus pituitary adrenal axis, will very quickly illustrate to you that the mind and brain(s) are two distinctly separate entities.
Your analogy of a rock is poor. I would suggest instead considering a computer which, whilst still a primitive example, is closer in complexity to a brain yet distinctly separate from the software running on it.
If you believe mind is some nebulous other thing which the brain, try having a brain injury. Or just a swift knock on the head.
I have had, and recovered from a mid level brain injury. The impact was bad enough to give me a very clear indication that the mind and brain are two very separate things. Despite massive pain when trying to cogitate my consciousness was unaffected, furthermore other aspects of "mind" became, and remain available even after I have fully recovered. Neuroplasticity is a wonderful thing.
See how well the brain damage describes the state of your consciousness then.
You are confusing consciousness with cognition, which are again different complexes. As for describing the state of consciousness, I have just finished writing a book where I propose a simplified model for consciousness and the complex substrates that surround it leveraged from my experiences of brain injury that provided the fulcrum for understanding that which had been previously hidden.
The final limitation of your thought form being that you also consider consciousness to be the same thing as mind. I would ask you to consider your consciousness from the perspective of dreaming and ask you if awareness of your sense of self changes? It is clear to me that during sleep my brain still exists and that unconsciousness has claimed my mind only to return when I wake. So the unconscious "mind" occupying the brain during sleep certainly differs from the conscious "mind", yet awareness of self remains across both states, a paradox not considered by a materialistic model.
Whilst my own work is an abstraction of reality the model was developed as a tool to assist in overcoming psychological abuse. At almost 200,000 words across four volumes the psychiatrists, psychologists and other professionals who have assessed my work have encouraged me to publish it. With humility I can say that the extreme cognition required to overcome the covert psychological abuse of the sociopaths I had the misfortune to encounter teaches you a great deal about this subject.
Whilst intelligent, this thread lacks the wisdom required to delve deeply into this subject based on the limitations of the scientific model which itself is a product of mind as inadequate as my own pithy offerings. I cite the oft quoted When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail as the encultured materialism that science offers to those who attempt to evolve their own mind.
Well, since all attempts to model a human mind conventionally
Have their been any realistic attempts to model a brain?
The brain and mind are not the same thing. The brain is a physical structure and the mind is a different thing. There are plenty of incomplete models of the brain whilst modelling consciousness has been the occupation of philosophy for thousands of years. Science based in materialism forms the theory of consciousness as an emergent property of matter so any discussion is already precluding matter as an emergent property of consciousness because science can't explain it.
Also the discussion is limited by the concept of a human being only having one "mind" and what happens to it when we sleep. What about neuronal material distributed through the body, for example the digestive system has enough of this to make a brain the size of a cat how does that affect the model.
Science maybe able to explain the brain however it is out of its depth when it tries to discuss the mind and like a monkey with an iPad when it comes to discussing consciousness.
One thing is for sure, we're an arrogant species looking for answers that require humility.
I don't know about super conductivity, however simple electrical conductivity in the brain seems to be a factor in mental health. An existing test, called a Hair Tissue Mineral Analysis can reveal your base reaction to stressors be it flight, fight, fawn or freeze when your Amygdala takes control. People with personality disorders can affect the mineral balance of the brain by taxing those resources with their behaviors and abusive techniques.
After discovering that I made a effort to make sure that the mineral balance of my brain was attended to. For me that was ensuring magnesium intake was adequate whilst balancing Zinc and potassium intake, YMMV. From that sleep improved, I felt less stressed and other people's emotional states had less of an effect on mine. I was doing a lot of other work as well however all of that in conjunction has led to a much more relaxed and clear thinking version of myself. Well worth the effort.
I haven't read the paper yet so my apologies if this is OT.
Culture is a subset of our species, therefore the stories of culture are a subset of the stories of our species.
You did NOT say "The Old Testament is a subset of the memories of our species in story form."
That's the only point I wanted to address.
That is an acceptable criticism as I had an unexpected lunch offer with friends while I was posting and did not have the opportunity for proper proofreading.
But I will look into the latest flood myth theories, thanks for the prompting.
You're most welcome. May I suggest that an investigation of Randal Calson's work on cataclysmic geology of the US is a great place to start. All the best to you Mr AC.
Just because flood myths are common (at least as common as floods) doesn't mean the Chinese one has anything to do with the Biblical flood.
Which is you making an Assertion fallacy. To directly answer the haste and red herring components of your assertion, more and more evidence is surfacing that the flood myths are memories of a global calamity that happened during the Younger Dryas. Evidence for which is glacial oxygen samples and geological evidence.
I would suggest you investigate these areas and revise your knowledge to make it more current.
Likewise, the "stories" of our species preserved in the Old Testament are irrelevant to Chinese culture and history. I'm sure when they first got ahold of a bible, they wondered how they had managed to have forgotten so much./s
Culture is a subset of our species, therefore the stories of culture are a subset of the stories of our species. Generally I enjoy sarcasm if it is intelligent, however you attempted to be sarcastic whilst having the paradigm reversed which makes your chase of the lowest form of wit a parody of your own point.
You have added very little of value to this conversation Mr AC, this may be a good time for you to stop.
> The Old Testament is the memories of our species in story form.
That might be news to the Chinese...
There are common elements in religious texts that suggest calamity. Flood myths are a very common occurrence and thus unlikely to be "news to the Chinese".
I'm hardly an expert on biblical matters (more of a fan of the Flying Spaghetti Monster myself, may sauce be upon Him)
When Dawkins made this quote it made ignorance fashionable. It requires significant amount of intelligence and effort to decipher that the messages in the Bible are mythological and architypical. To decode the messages in the New testament is a shortcut to developing an understanding of human nature much in the same way a domain diagram describes the design of software behavour.
Human beings still happen to be the most complex creatures on this planet that we are aware of and to deny oneself spiritual development is to deny ourselves mental evolution. If you knew your Flying Spaghetti Monster existed it would impose on your free will and defeat the point of giving you the choices to evolve you are given in this experience we call life.
This perspecitive is offered to you with humility as my experiences show me to be as niave and prone to the manipulation by evil. One may say there is no evidence that god exists, however there is plenty to suggest that satan does.
but I seem to remember some pretty harsh passages about homosexuality in the old testament,
The Old Testament is the memories of our species in story form.
while I can't immediately recall Jesus having voiced any clear opinions on the matter.
It's bullshit, though I haven't read all of the Bibles book. I've seen one passage about man laying with man leading to the obvious conclusion of no children. It has very little to say on the subject, from my readings.
The problem with obtaining insurance is not due to nuclear being unsafe. It's due to a quirk of statistics.
The Price-Anderson act was establish because nuclear wasn't safe enough to insure according to professional risk assessors due to the impact of an accident. The very fact that the P-A act still exists shows that those professionals still see it an un-insurable.
It doesn't matter if someone believes Trump acts suggesting he may have mental conditions --- so long as he is capable of discharging the powers and duties of his office:
It's more about the emotional reactions and rash courses of action he maybe inclined to take whilst under the influence of the disorder.
the president stays in control. People disliking or thinking his mannerisms strange, or disapproving of his decisions does not constitute inability to discharge the powers and duties of the office.
Well that the thing really, who is in control. They exist on a spectrum and some world leaders are more or less susceptible to manipulation. Putin, for example, who is an "ex"-KGB agent who are trained in techniques to manipulate those people.
The standard the Constitution sets is Trump stays in control for his term, unless someone persuades Trump to voluntarily step down,
I don't think it would be constructive to pursue ending his term. Though the problem might be getting rid of him considering his declaration of running for the next term was done was within a week after he became President. Which mean the press have to treat him differently.
The alternative is persuading The Vice President + a Majority of the Principal Executives to make a written declaration ----
No, thank you.
but if Trump has any capacity at all, he can immediately make a written declaration reversing that action, and Only A 2/3 Majority of the House + a 2/3 Majority of the Senate can find the president unable to discharge the office ----- That's an action that requires a much higher bar and greater majority of congress involved in agreement, than even impeachment requires.
Indeed. It means is that the US has a President who looks like he's be had by other world leaders and erratic at other times. Despite that, Trump is not a dumb man, he knows what he is doing however the amount of cognition he requires to do it means he doesn't have a lot cognitive capacity left for being the President of a large and complex country like the US.
Worse is when they cross over into being a sociopath.
This is an ongoing disaster, the destroyed reactors are still in an earthquake and flood prone area. TEPCO has proven itself completely corrupt, incompetent and incapable. It is in the interests of all Pacific nations to resolve and this issue demands an international response to control and contain it. It is clearly worse than Chernobyl.
Safety of the foodchain cannot be assured anymore and this problem will continue to get worse until the Fukushima reactors are bought under control.
Good work though. You moved the goal posts so far your original post doesn't make sense anymore. I mean since you only seem to care about bio-accumulation rather than the final safety of what you catch I assume all that stuff about being a rich harvest for Japan is irrelevant, poisoning is irrelevant, and somehow...
There is no "final safety of what you catch". Now you take your chances that Japanese Fisheries and US Agriculture is poisoned with radionuclides from the Fukushima reactor. That is why we need to get proper information and have an international effort to control this ongoing disaster.
Both radioactivity and radionuclides are referenced in the standard that Japan put out.
Do share.
you mentioned your concerns about the food chain several times yet seem to not care about the standards that govern it.
As you have refused to supply a link, when asked, to what you are talking about I can only presume these standards are in your imagination.
Your thought process is truly strange. Have you considered donating your brain to science?
The ad hominem attack is the retort of someone without an argument or capacity to reason. However to answer your question sincerely the brain is only the hardware upon which the mind resides. The reason it is strange to you is because you have been deceived out of your ability to think for yourself so when you see someone able to think for themselves it is a strange and uncomfortable experience for you.
Your "arguments", indeed your entire method of arguing relies on pre-digested ideas that you have picked up from the abundance of propaganda that the Nuclear Industry's PR machine produce to make it easy for useful idiots to waste the time of people who actually can think. Only you can decide if this condition is permanent for you.
I don't blame you for utilizing these conceptual packages however it is a sign that you are easily manipulated out of the pre-conditions for original and critical thought.
the only adverse act he cannot prevent is the legislative act of impeachment as provided for by the constitution.
To build on what you have said, I believe the constitutional amendments you refer to are in the 25th amendment to the U.S constitution. However IIUC original provision for this already exists in the US Constitution itself and has not been completely superseded by the 25th amendment.
This thread suggests that President Trump is mentally ill and it is clear that he shows behavioral signs of a cluster B personality disorder as defined by the DSM (maybe both version 4 and 5). However I'd also point out the same could be said for any politicians simply because it appears to be a common issue within western society.
That said, the alternative is a VP who appears much worse so I do not think it would be wise to dislodge Mr Trump from office using these mechanisms.
Slashdot Mirror
Why wait for the engineers to build it in, why not just include it as a feature from the start?
Or does that only work for privately held companies?
This is the point of Australia's Assistance Access bill that the US can access via intelligence sharing arrangements.
She has no idea how to buy technology and will inevitably waste the money.
Buy a laptop that can be serviced remotely. A decent lenovo T series or Dell is a reasonable machine. She will be thrilled that she is receiving a new machine and won't be subject to decision fatigue from shopping for technology. Your time is a one time investment in setting up your infrastructure so your second employee will be practically zero setup time and they won't be wasting your time and money shopping for a different laptop.
Take control of your infrastructure to save resources for business activities.
Hilarious!
You forgot to mention that through Intelligence sharing agreements with Australia all Apple products can be easily taken off the iPhone despite Apples massive bilboard, which is essentially bullshit.
But let's not factor Law into Apples brainwashing fantasy.
Hahaha, yes. Incidentally "emergent property" = "Poof and it was there! Nobody knows how or why!" It is just a scientific way of saying "we have no clue".
Exactly!
So, to use a much simpler example, a physical computer is the physical model of all the software can run on it?
No, it is a substrate upon which potential software runs. It is not useful in and of itself but as a tool that demonstrates the existence of layered "concept complexes".
Sorry, but these simplistic models break down completely when taxed by actual complexity.
Obviously because it is not a model, it is an analogy offered to move from a rock analogy to the idea of concept complexes in concrete form. I don't use them in my book as anything other that an oversimplification that introduces concept complexes. I built an abstract model of consciousness as a tool for resolving mental health issues that includes the appropriate concept complexes for the reader to use. In and of itself it is not the focus of the book but a backdrop for understanding the machinations of psychological abuse so that healing can occur.
My point here is that humans are extreme concept complexes and there is no analogy that can be drawn that is of much use in building an understanding of humans as beings.
methinks alcohol, weed and LSD are more fun then a knock on the head to get the point across?
These are simply impairments of perception.
The brain is the physical model of the mind, as presented through the senses and mind of an observer. Just as a rock our physical model of how it is to observe/interact with a rock, rather than a non-interacting rock in itself.
Yours is a rather obvious conclusion based on the limitations materialism. Your perception is that the brain is also one thing, when it is not. The reptilian and mammalian brain are separate from the neocortex. Prioritising activation of these primitive complexes over the neo-cortex, as in the case of amygdala activation stressing the hypothalamus pituitary adrenal axis, will very quickly illustrate to you that the mind and brain(s) are two distinctly separate entities.
Your analogy of a rock is poor. I would suggest instead considering a computer which, whilst still a primitive example, is closer in complexity to a brain yet distinctly separate from the software running on it.
If you believe mind is some nebulous other thing which the brain, try having a brain injury. Or just a swift knock on the head.
I have had, and recovered from a mid level brain injury. The impact was bad enough to give me a very clear indication that the mind and brain are two very separate things. Despite massive pain when trying to cogitate my consciousness was unaffected, furthermore other aspects of "mind" became, and remain available even after I have fully recovered. Neuroplasticity is a wonderful thing.
See how well the brain damage describes the state of your consciousness then.
You are confusing consciousness with cognition, which are again different complexes. As for describing the state of consciousness, I have just finished writing a book where I propose a simplified model for consciousness and the complex substrates that surround it leveraged from my experiences of brain injury that provided the fulcrum for understanding that which had been previously hidden.
The final limitation of your thought form being that you also consider consciousness to be the same thing as mind. I would ask you to consider your consciousness from the perspective of dreaming and ask you if awareness of your sense of self changes? It is clear to me that during sleep my brain still exists and that unconsciousness has claimed my mind only to return when I wake. So the unconscious "mind" occupying the brain during sleep certainly differs from the conscious "mind", yet awareness of self remains across both states, a paradox not considered by a materialistic model.
Whilst my own work is an abstraction of reality the model was developed as a tool to assist in overcoming psychological abuse. At almost 200,000 words across four volumes the psychiatrists, psychologists and other professionals who have assessed my work have encouraged me to publish it. With humility I can say that the extreme cognition required to overcome the covert psychological abuse of the sociopaths I had the misfortune to encounter teaches you a great deal about this subject.
Whilst intelligent, this thread lacks the wisdom required to delve deeply into this subject based on the limitations of the scientific model which itself is a product of mind as inadequate as my own pithy offerings. I cite the oft quoted When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail as the encultured materialism that science offers to those who attempt to evolve their own mind.
Well, since all attempts to model a human mind conventionally
Have their been any realistic attempts to model a brain?
The brain and mind are not the same thing. The brain is a physical structure and the mind is a different thing. There are plenty of incomplete models of the brain whilst modelling consciousness has been the occupation of philosophy for thousands of years. Science based in materialism forms the theory of consciousness as an emergent property of matter so any discussion is already precluding matter as an emergent property of consciousness because science can't explain it.
Also the discussion is limited by the concept of a human being only having one "mind" and what happens to it when we sleep. What about neuronal material distributed through the body, for example the digestive system has enough of this to make a brain the size of a cat how does that affect the model.
Science maybe able to explain the brain however it is out of its depth when it tries to discuss the mind and like a monkey with an iPad when it comes to discussing consciousness.
One thing is for sure, we're an arrogant species looking for answers that require humility.
I just decided that I give very little fuck about other people and that improved my sleep tenfold
Perhaps they feel the same about you.
They don't need a tow truck. Teslas have a lot of low-end torque and a Model S or X could easily drag those pickups out of the parking spots.
Now that would be embarrassing.
Tesla owners are scared of guns. They would cry if they saw one.
They seem pretty fond of flamethrowers though.
I don't know about super conductivity, however simple electrical conductivity in the brain seems to be a factor in mental health. An existing test, called a Hair Tissue Mineral Analysis can reveal your base reaction to stressors be it flight, fight, fawn or freeze when your Amygdala takes control. People with personality disorders can affect the mineral balance of the brain by taxing those resources with their behaviors and abusive techniques.
After discovering that I made a effort to make sure that the mineral balance of my brain was attended to. For me that was ensuring magnesium intake was adequate whilst balancing Zinc and potassium intake, YMMV. From that sleep improved, I felt less stressed and other people's emotional states had less of an effect on mine. I was doing a lot of other work as well however all of that in conjunction has led to a much more relaxed and clear thinking version of myself. Well worth the effort.
I haven't read the paper yet so my apologies if this is OT.
You did NOT say "The Old Testament is a subset of the memories of our species in story form."
That's the only point I wanted to address.
That is an acceptable criticism as I had an unexpected lunch offer with friends while I was posting and did not have the opportunity for proper proofreading.
But I will look into the latest flood myth theories, thanks for the prompting.
You're most welcome. May I suggest that an investigation of Randal Calson's work on cataclysmic geology of the US is a great place to start. All the best to you Mr AC.
Association fallacy.
No. Nothing I have said fits the definition of an Association fallacy.
Just because flood myths are common (at least as common as floods) doesn't mean the Chinese one has anything to do with the Biblical flood.
Which is you making an Assertion fallacy. To directly answer the haste and red herring components of your assertion, more and more evidence is surfacing that the flood myths are memories of a global calamity that happened during the Younger Dryas. Evidence for which is glacial oxygen samples and geological evidence.
I would suggest you investigate these areas and revise your knowledge to make it more current.
Likewise, the "stories" of our species preserved in the Old Testament are irrelevant to Chinese culture and history. I'm sure when they first got ahold of a bible, they wondered how they had managed to have forgotten so much. /s
Culture is a subset of our species, therefore the stories of culture are a subset of the stories of our species. Generally I enjoy sarcasm if it is intelligent, however you attempted to be sarcastic whilst having the paradigm reversed which makes your chase of the lowest form of wit a parody of your own point.
You have added very little of value to this conversation Mr AC, this may be a good time for you to stop.
> The Old Testament is the memories of our species in story form.
That might be news to the Chinese...
There are common elements in religious texts that suggest calamity. Flood myths are a very common occurrence and thus unlikely to be "news to the Chinese".
I'm hardly an expert on biblical matters (more of a fan of the Flying Spaghetti Monster myself, may sauce be upon Him)
When Dawkins made this quote it made ignorance fashionable. It requires significant amount of intelligence and effort to decipher that the messages in the Bible are mythological and architypical. To decode the messages in the New testament is a shortcut to developing an understanding of human nature much in the same way a domain diagram describes the design of software behavour.
Human beings still happen to be the most complex creatures on this planet that we are aware of and to deny oneself spiritual development is to deny ourselves mental evolution. If you knew your Flying Spaghetti Monster existed it would impose on your free will and defeat the point of giving you the choices to evolve you are given in this experience we call life.
This perspecitive is offered to you with humility as my experiences show me to be as niave and prone to the manipulation by evil. One may say there is no evidence that god exists, however there is plenty to suggest that satan does.
but I seem to remember some pretty harsh passages about homosexuality in the old testament,
The Old Testament is the memories of our species in story form.
while I can't immediately recall Jesus having voiced any clear opinions on the matter.
It's bullshit, though I haven't read all of the Bibles book. I've seen one passage about man laying with man leading to the obvious conclusion of no children. It has very little to say on the subject, from my readings.
The problem with obtaining insurance is not due to nuclear being unsafe. It's due to a quirk of statistics.
The Price-Anderson act was establish because nuclear wasn't safe enough to insure according to professional risk assessors due to the impact of an accident. The very fact that the P-A act still exists shows that those professionals still see it an un-insurable.
It doesn't matter if someone believes Trump acts suggesting he may have mental conditions --- so long as he is capable of discharging the powers and duties of his office:
It's more about the emotional reactions and rash courses of action he maybe inclined to take whilst under the influence of the disorder.
the president stays in control. People disliking or thinking his mannerisms strange, or disapproving of his decisions does not constitute inability to discharge the powers and duties of the office.
Well that the thing really, who is in control. They exist on a spectrum and some world leaders are more or less susceptible to manipulation. Putin, for example, who is an "ex"-KGB agent who are trained in techniques to manipulate those people.
The standard the Constitution sets is Trump stays in control for his term, unless someone persuades Trump to voluntarily step down,
I don't think it would be constructive to pursue ending his term. Though the problem might be getting rid of him considering his declaration of running for the next term was done was within a week after he became President. Which mean the press have to treat him differently.
The alternative is persuading The Vice President + a Majority of the Principal Executives to make a written declaration ----
No, thank you.
but if Trump has any capacity at all, he can immediately make a written declaration reversing that action, and Only A 2/3 Majority of the House + a 2/3 Majority of the Senate can find the president unable to discharge the office ----- That's an action that requires a much higher bar and greater majority of congress involved in agreement, than even impeachment requires.
Indeed. It means is that the US has a President who looks like he's be had by other world leaders and erratic at other times. Despite that, Trump is not a dumb man, he knows what he is doing however the amount of cognition he requires to do it means he doesn't have a lot cognitive capacity left for being the President of a large and complex country like the US.
Worse is when they cross over into being a sociopath.
The entire Fukushima Disaster was more a disaster because it was entirely preventable. Whether is is malfeasance or nonfeasance it is plainly criminal because it is quite plainly negligence. For anyone with any doubts please refer to The official report of The Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission.
This is an ongoing disaster, the destroyed reactors are still in an earthquake and flood prone area. TEPCO has proven itself completely corrupt, incompetent and incapable. It is in the interests of all Pacific nations to resolve and this issue demands an international response to control and contain it. It is clearly worse than Chernobyl.
I hope TEPCO's board rots in jail.
wtf does this have to do with Australians. Was this a bogan throwing a party or something?
I note that your attempt to deflect attention from the subject, which is bio-accumulation of radionuclides.
I note your attempt to deflect attention from the subject: Safety of the food chain.
Bio-accumulation of radionuclides in the food chain is real no matter how much Japan suppresses information. That's where we started.
Safety of the foodchain cannot be assured anymore and this problem will continue to get worse until the Fukushima reactors are bought under control.
Good work though. You moved the goal posts so far your original post doesn't make sense anymore. I mean since you only seem to care about bio-accumulation rather than the final safety of what you catch I assume all that stuff about being a rich harvest for Japan is irrelevant, poisoning is irrelevant, and somehow...
There is no "final safety of what you catch". Now you take your chances that Japanese Fisheries and US Agriculture is poisoned with radionuclides from the Fukushima reactor. That is why we need to get proper information and have an international effort to control this ongoing disaster.
Both radioactivity and radionuclides are referenced in the standard that Japan put out.
Do share.
you mentioned your concerns about the food chain several times yet seem to not care about the standards that govern it.
As you have refused to supply a link, when asked, to what you are talking about I can only presume these standards are in your imagination.
Your thought process is truly strange. Have you considered donating your brain to science?
The ad hominem attack is the retort of someone without an argument or capacity to reason. However to answer your question sincerely the brain is only the hardware upon which the mind resides. The reason it is strange to you is because you have been deceived out of your ability to think for yourself so when you see someone able to think for themselves it is a strange and uncomfortable experience for you.
Your "arguments", indeed your entire method of arguing relies on pre-digested ideas that you have picked up from the abundance of propaganda that the Nuclear Industry's PR machine produce to make it easy for useful idiots to waste the time of people who actually can think. Only you can decide if this condition is permanent for you.
I don't blame you for utilizing these conceptual packages however it is a sign that you are easily manipulated out of the pre-conditions for original and critical thought.
the only adverse act he cannot prevent is the legislative act of impeachment as provided for by the constitution.
To build on what you have said, I believe the constitutional amendments you refer to are in the 25th amendment to the U.S constitution. However IIUC original provision for this already exists in the US Constitution itself and has not been completely superseded by the 25th amendment.
This thread suggests that President Trump is mentally ill and it is clear that he shows behavioral signs of a cluster B personality disorder as defined by the DSM (maybe both version 4 and 5). However I'd also point out the same could be said for any politicians simply because it appears to be a common issue within western society.
That said, the alternative is a VP who appears much worse so I do not think it would be wise to dislodge Mr Trump from office using these mechanisms.
Or was this one of those spontaneous fire things from the pile of their carcasses?
No. This is what it looks like when Dr Manhattan from the Watchmen, farts.
Not at all.
I note that your attempt to deflect attention from the subject, which is bio-accumulation of radionuclides.
But you didn't bother to google did you, you just got caught up on one word.
Because it is an important word that demonstrates the lack of precision in your retort.
Both radioactivity and radionuclides are referenced in the standard that Japan put out.
Do share.