This a crock. A calculation was done at the hight of the cold war and it was estimated that only a third of the worlds population would die in an all-out exchange with the soviet union.
If it costs less I find it more likely that the government will keep funding constant and just have more warheads. The weapon industry will surely lobby not to cut into their profits, and they have influence. "You don't want to give the terrorists a sign of weakness by reducing our military expenditure, do you?"
You are incredibly misinformed. Tens of thousands of nuclear weapons have been destroyed since the end of the cold war. Your assertion does not support this fact.
They will be replacing finicky expensive weapons with long-lasting maintinence free ones. The old weapons will be decomissioned ASAP. The USA has already destroyed tens of thousands of cold war nuclear weapons.
Perhaps this blocks the metabolism of alchol by the liver, and you just pee it out. I would be suprised if the intermediate oxidation product acetaldehyde is what damages the tissue.
I believe that this is how the antidotes for ethylene glycol work.
Maybe you should stop reading dig? Are you telling me that/. editors should monitor dig and not post stories found there? What if the story is not highly rated? What if it comes up on google news? What criteria should they use? Pretty dumb idea IMHO.
Well then he should suck it up... take no risks and let the TV/school raise your kids (for sure) because their parents are not around. Somehow my parents raised us with hardly any money and shitty breaking down cars. We didn't even wear seatblets .
Yeah will what't the chances the kids can afford to live in NJ? You might as well cut to the chase and move out now. I moved out of that materialistic shithole and have never been happier. People running around like nuts trying to make ends meet and all there is to do is go to the mall.
Yeah, like when I was a kid and wanted to sleep over my friends house my bitch of a mom would speak with the other parent to make sure that it was okay. How fucking intrusive was that?
Scenario-- It is ten oclock. Your kid asks you if he could spend another hour at his friends house for whatever reason. Because of this system you know that he is there and not in the front yard of some keg party somewhere... so you let him hang out a little longer. What is so bad about this?
Not really. If this is applied with some intellegence by the parents, it will give kids more freedom and flexibility as opposed to 'be home by 9:30 or else!'
Slashdot Mirror
This a crock. A calculation was done at the hight of the cold war and it was estimated that only a third of the worlds population would die in an all-out exchange with the soviet union.
If it costs less I find it more likely that the government will keep funding constant and just have more warheads. The weapon industry will surely lobby not to cut into their profits, and they have influence. "You don't want to give the terrorists a sign of weakness by reducing our military expenditure, do you?"
You are incredibly misinformed. Tens of thousands of nuclear weapons have been destroyed since the end of the cold war. Your assertion does not support this fact.
They will be replacing finicky expensive weapons with long-lasting maintinence free ones. The old weapons will be decomissioned ASAP. The USA has already destroyed tens of thousands of cold war nuclear weapons.
I remembered that on the way home... too much coffee and alcohol I suppose.
Perhaps this blocks the metabolism of alchol by the liver, and you just pee it out. I would be suprised if the intermediate oxidation product acetaldehyde is what damages the tissue.
I believe that this is how the antidotes for ethylene glycol work.
Yeah but don't discount that nice hearty dump you take after a couple of cups!
I have a pot before I leave for work, and have several during the day to maintain my 'vitamin c' level.
Maybe you should stop reading dig? Are you telling me that /. editors should monitor dig and not post stories found there? What if the story is not highly rated? What if it comes up on google news? What criteria should they use? Pretty dumb idea IMHO.
They are already doing this with diesel engines to increase oxygen intake.
http://www.transportation.anl.gov/pdfs/TA/99.pdf
obviously you are not familiar with the 'limb effect'
I am annoyed because apple's presence has driven up the prices of a 'happy ending'
I have been pining for a high paying mexican job myself. I just won't work for any yellow people.
Vectorization is more a feature of the fortran language, although you could argue that this just facilitates things for the compiler.
Your f'n crazy. Going to harbor freight is like disneyland for me. A cheap chinese tool works much better than no tool or the wrong tool.
It depends on what she was eating... truffles, or mc donalds?
That's Parkinsons, dumbass.
The problem with american cars is not the workers but when marketing/accounting people run the engineering department.
Well then he should suck it up... take no risks and let the TV/school raise your kids (for sure) because their parents are not around. Somehow my parents raised us with hardly any money and shitty breaking down cars. We didn't even wear seatblets .
Yeah will what't the chances the kids can afford to live in NJ? You might as well cut to the chase and move out now. I moved out of that materialistic shithole and have never been happier. People running around like nuts trying to make ends meet and all there is to do is go to the mall.
I will be a smug jerk. I rent a house for 1000 MO and drive a 8 YO honda civic, but I see my kids all the time.
caller ID?
Yeah, like when I was a kid and wanted to sleep over my friends house my bitch of a mom would speak with the other parent to make sure that it was okay. How fucking intrusive was that?
Scenario-- It is ten oclock. Your kid asks you if he could spend another hour at his friends house for whatever reason. Because of this system you know that he is there and not in the front yard of some keg party somewhere... so you let him hang out a little longer. What is so bad about this?
Not really. If this is applied with some intellegence by the parents, it will give kids more freedom and flexibility as opposed to 'be home by 9:30 or else!'
would you like me to remove it?