"many of which originally intended to help the poor who - as often - were missing out on an important part of modern society."
Because we all know the most important thing that poor folks need is internet access. You do realize that they already have this access if they chose to go to a library.
Don't believe the hype. A cert is only as good as the experience behind it. And even then the moment you get one it has begun it's shelf life. Most folks who are highly skilled have very few, if any, certs. Why? Because they are too damn busy to take them. I know when I hire someone with a cert, it really means that they passed a test. Without experience, I don't trust the cert. (minus the few upper level certs that require working experience)
The results from TFA stated that there were 1700+ respondents. That's 1700 out of how many tens of thousands of IT folks. Not what I would call an accurate slice of the work force.
And like any maturing work force, to garner higher value for you skills you must specialize. Specialization is where you'll get the most return. Companies are becoming more specific with the skills they desire. The jack-of-all-trades though nice to have is a crutch to the company and they are have long since realized this. They no longer want one person holding the keys to the kingdom. Too many of them were burned by their 'superstar' IT person who left and left them high and dry. It stinks, but it's true. The other option is to get into management. Yes it is away from the keyboard, but that is where IT upward mobility is at now.
As for your 70k for an MCP, I'm sure those who reported they have an MCP also have been in the field for quite some time and have plenty of other certs to go along with it.
"If you agreed to the contract you really dont have a right to bitch about it"
Obviously you don't follow popular culture and witness many an American sports stars who constantly want to change their current contract. Really no different. Times change, as do demand. Team ownership is basically paying a contracted person to catch/pitch/block/etc. Very similar to IT (though less in $$). So if they can demand a change to their current contract due to a changing market, why can't everyone else? Granted, they get paid millions of dollars and can hold out. Those of us in IT have a much more difficult time of 'holding' out to get a new deal and it usually involves accepting an offer from another company.
And if the market changes, and you can get more elsewhere, why not bitch about it. If you don't no one will.
Judge: "So who are you suing exactly?" Video Professor: "Anonymous." Judge: "Uh, clerk, who exactly is 'Anonymous?'" Clerk: "Well Your Honor, I read slashdot and the only 'Anonymous' I know are cowards." Video Professor: "They certainly are!" Judge: "Would 'Anonymous' please stand and be recognized by the court." One soul stands... Clerk: "Please sit down CowboyNeal."
Don't blame the Government. How many times have you heard "The Government should be run as a business to save my tax dollars." Well, over the last 10 or so years that has been the evolving fact. Government agencies want to go to monthly bills for their contracts so they can quickly cut a project if needed or desired. It is supposed to save you tax dollars I guess. Can you imagine the outrage of Joe and Jane Public if they heard on the evening news that there is a government agency with unlimited time lines and seemingly unlimited funding?
Give a full report to your local news station and let them know that this 'tax waste' is taking place. They love those types of fights.
And I do agree that the system is designed to frustrate a person so they will want to pay to get it over and done with. It's really not a system of 'justice' as one would think.
You have parking tickets. In other words, you've violated city code. So what's wrong with them taking some of your hard earned cash because you are a repeat offender of the code?
Most folks agree that many laws are present for apparent 'cash' value. (speeding, parking, red-light cameras, etc) But what needs to be realized is that there is no trickery done by the laws or officers who are pledged to enforce them, just to get your money. I mean, technically if you don't want them to take your money, don't illegally park, speed, or run a red light. It's that simple.
And the argument of 'but everyone does it' really doesn't work. That just means that the law enforcement folks can have their pick of the bunch, which gives the appearance of selective enforcement.
If you don't like the current set of traffic laws, do something about it. Contact your local, state, or federal elected official(s), and let them know you don't like certain laws or codes. You can also pay to challenge it in court. Or start a grass roots protests concerning these laws you disagree with and force the elected public officials to change them. Or run for office yourself with that as your platform.
Just remember, they only get your hard earned cash if you break those laws. If you follow them, you'll have nothing to worry or complain about.
Isn't the curing process for carbon fiber a few thousand degrees? Wouldn't fire have to be hotter then the curing process before carbon fiber would burn or smolder?
"As a 6'4" person (that's 0.384 rods for those of you not used to measuring in feet!), I think I am going to sue for height discrimination."
I'm sorry, but anyone taller then 6'3" is considered a statistical abnormality within the current human race ; therefore cannot be factored into the Earth's exit strategy. That and it's a "Ha Ha" from the shorter folks for whom you've all been making fun of.
"...sounds like it was pulled out of someone's ass. I don't deny that there's a problem, but what concerns me is that this "number" could very well become another excuse for the government to pursue "solutions" that are even more invasive than our current crop of 9/11-related idiocy."
Well, I heard that 9 out of 10 'Internet Specialists' say it's true.
Though the Russians are attempting to get back in the game, it is China who's fueling the Russians military machine now. China may be a challenge from a military standpoint, but not yet. It's cheaper and safer to fund the Russians and stay on the side lines.
The question is did the Cold War really suck. Sure it did in some areas, but was it good for the world? Third World Countries kept inline based upon alignment, and every Govt around the world had a 'fear' that they could hold over their residents. Yeah, that kind of sucks.
WWIII is inevitable, it's just a matter of time and who the primary combatants are. Personally, I see a battle between the borders of China and Russia for natural resources when the time comes. That should kick things off nicely around the globe.
They were crying because _his_ rights were violated, not because he was doing wrong. And just so you know or even care, standing up for a right is never convenient or easy. If you pick your liberty battles based upon your time schedule, then you'll end up losing them. Though I'm not one to speak, I'm as guilty of 'going with the flow' as are many others. Yes, it's a smoother ride, but I have no idea where it may take me.
Though I do thank folks like this who push back when I'm not willing to risk my own rear end for said battles.
"And I think that this kind of ass-backwards thinking is exactly what's going to result in the next Chernobyl. How about instead of spending all your time on clean-up and PR, put a little foresight into the management of the damn facility."
If every nuclear, coal, NG, or any other plant made public all of their accidents, mass panic would ensue. And we'd never get more nuclear power plants that are needed. Not that it's on the horizon either.
And to ensure that the article is quoted properly:
" including a leak that could have caused a deadly, uncontrolled nuclear reaction."
Yet there is not a shred of accurate information to determine how exactly this would happen.
"glovebox and an old elevator shaft, where the solution potentially could have collected in such a way to cause an uncontrolled nuclear reaction."
By repeatedly stating an "uncontrolled nuclear reaction" places in the minds of the reader a huge mushroom cloud. This is sensationalism and not accurate. Don't fall for it.
I'm not saying that issues like this should be hidden, but I don't think it necessarily for public consumption. Most folks probably can't handle the cold, hard facts of the world anyways.
"3. Re BSD jails: my understanding is that Zones provide many additional features, like the ability to set limits on the RAM usage, CPU usage and bandwidth for each zone. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong."
When a Zone has resources assigned to it, it will then be considered a Container. The Zone itself is based off of a BSD chroot jail though.
Slashdot Mirror
Can have a happy-happy, joy-joy day.
Describe 'works with windows.' Are you having a cluster of mix OSs or is one managing the other?
You have to figure that should another desktop start to take over that MS would just buy them.
"many of which originally intended to help the poor who - as often - were missing out on an important part of modern society."
Because we all know the most important thing that poor folks need is internet access. You do realize that they already have this access if they chose to go to a library.
Don't believe the hype. A cert is only as good as the experience behind it. And even then the moment you get one it has begun it's shelf life. Most folks who are highly skilled have very few, if any, certs. Why? Because they are too damn busy to take them. I know when I hire someone with a cert, it really means that they passed a test. Without experience, I don't trust the cert. (minus the few upper level certs that require working experience)
The results from TFA stated that there were 1700+ respondents. That's 1700 out of how many tens of thousands of IT folks. Not what I would call an accurate slice of the work force.
And like any maturing work force, to garner higher value for you skills you must specialize. Specialization is where you'll get the most return. Companies are becoming more specific with the skills they desire. The jack-of-all-trades though nice to have is a crutch to the company and they are have long since realized this. They no longer want one person holding the keys to the kingdom. Too many of them were burned by their 'superstar' IT person who left and left them high and dry. It stinks, but it's true. The other option is to get into management. Yes it is away from the keyboard, but that is where IT upward mobility is at now.
As for your 70k for an MCP, I'm sure those who reported they have an MCP also have been in the field for quite some time and have plenty of other certs to go along with it.
"If you agreed to the contract you really dont have a right to bitch about it"
Obviously you don't follow popular culture and witness many an American sports stars who constantly want to change their current contract. Really no different. Times change, as do demand. Team ownership is basically paying a contracted person to catch/pitch/block/etc. Very similar to IT (though less in $$). So if they can demand a change to their current contract due to a changing market, why can't everyone else? Granted, they get paid millions of dollars and can hold out. Those of us in IT have a much more difficult time of 'holding' out to get a new deal and it usually involves accepting an offer from another company.
And if the market changes, and you can get more elsewhere, why not bitch about it. If you don't no one will.
Judge: "So who are you suing exactly?"
Video Professor: "Anonymous."
Judge: "Uh, clerk, who exactly is 'Anonymous?'"
Clerk: "Well Your Honor, I read slashdot and the only 'Anonymous' I know are cowards."
Video Professor: "They certainly are!"
Judge: "Would 'Anonymous' please stand and be recognized by the court."
One soul stands...
Clerk: "Please sit down CowboyNeal."
Don't blame the Government. How many times have you heard "The Government should be run as a business to save my tax dollars." Well, over the last 10 or so years that has been the evolving fact. Government agencies want to go to monthly bills for their contracts so they can quickly cut a project if needed or desired. It is supposed to save you tax dollars I guess. Can you imagine the outrage of Joe and Jane Public if they heard on the evening news that there is a government agency with unlimited time lines and seemingly unlimited funding?
Give a full report to your local news station and let them know that this 'tax waste' is taking place. They love those types of fights.
And I do agree that the system is designed to frustrate a person so they will want to pay to get it over and done with. It's really not a system of 'justice' as one would think.
Well it sounds as though you have a crappy situation there in your city/town. I can understand your frustration.
"Thank you for shopping at DHS-mart."
It should be "Shop Smart, Shop DHS-Mart!"
You have parking tickets. In other words, you've violated city code. So what's wrong with them taking some of your hard earned cash because you are a repeat offender of the code?
Most folks agree that many laws are present for apparent 'cash' value. (speeding, parking, red-light cameras, etc) But what needs to be realized is that there is no trickery done by the laws or officers who are pledged to enforce them, just to get your money. I mean, technically if you don't want them to take your money, don't illegally park, speed, or run a red light. It's that simple.
And the argument of 'but everyone does it' really doesn't work. That just means that the law enforcement folks can have their pick of the bunch, which gives the appearance of selective enforcement.
If you don't like the current set of traffic laws, do something about it. Contact your local, state, or federal elected official(s), and let them know you don't like certain laws or codes. You can also pay to challenge it in court. Or start a grass roots protests concerning these laws you disagree with and force the elected public officials to change them. Or run for office yourself with that as your platform.
Just remember, they only get your hard earned cash if you break those laws. If you follow them, you'll have nothing to worry or complain about.
DAMMIT! That's what I get posting on /. while folks are yapping in my ear.
Isn't the curing process for carbon fiber a few thousand degrees? Wouldn't fire have to be hotter then the curing process before carbon fiber would burn or smolder?
It was an online survey!
"As a 6'4" person (that's 0.384 rods for those of you not used to measuring in feet!), I think I am going to sue for height discrimination."
I'm sorry, but anyone taller then 6'3" is considered a statistical abnormality within the current human race ; therefore cannot be factored into the Earth's exit strategy. That and it's a "Ha Ha" from the shorter folks for whom you've all been making fun of.
"...sounds like it was pulled out of someone's ass. I don't deny that there's a problem, but what concerns me is that this "number" could very well become another excuse for the government to pursue "solutions" that are even more invasive than our current crop of 9/11-related idiocy."
Well, I heard that 9 out of 10 'Internet Specialists' say it's true.
There has to be somebody with the keys to the Kingdom....even if it's RBAC'd. And sometimes those powers are abused or misused.
/., people sometimes break laws?
What's the next topic for
Though the Russians are attempting to get back in the game, it is China who's fueling the Russians military machine now. China may be a challenge from a military standpoint, but not yet. It's cheaper and safer to fund the Russians and stay on the side lines.
The question is did the Cold War really suck. Sure it did in some areas, but was it good for the world? Third World Countries kept inline based upon alignment, and every Govt around the world had a 'fear' that they could hold over their residents. Yeah, that kind of sucks.
WWIII is inevitable, it's just a matter of time and who the primary combatants are. Personally, I see a battle between the borders of China and Russia for natural resources when the time comes. That should kick things off nicely around the globe.
When one is designed with a 'glove slap' feature so I can really interact with folks without repercussions.
They were crying because _his_ rights were violated, not because he was doing wrong. And just so you know or even care, standing up for a right is never convenient or easy. If you pick your liberty battles based upon your time schedule, then you'll end up losing them. Though I'm not one to speak, I'm as guilty of 'going with the flow' as are many others. Yes, it's a smoother ride, but I have no idea where it may take me.
Though I do thank folks like this who push back when I'm not willing to risk my own rear end for said battles.
"f you have buffer overflow there will be a heap of unwanted behavior from your employees."
Too technical of a statement. You are not management material. Add some buzz words that you have not understanding of and you'll be a hit!
Use the budget Luke.
"Give me an interesting script and non-pseudo-scientific-gibberish over flashy special effects any day."
You mean like Hackers? Oh wait, you said interesting.
"And I think that this kind of ass-backwards thinking is exactly what's going to result in the next Chernobyl. How about instead of spending all your time on clean-up and PR, put a little foresight into the management of the damn facility."
If every nuclear, coal, NG, or any other plant made public all of their accidents, mass panic would ensue. And we'd never get more nuclear power plants that are needed. Not that it's on the horizon either.
And to ensure that the article is quoted properly:
" including a leak that could have caused a deadly, uncontrolled nuclear reaction."
Yet there is not a shred of accurate information to determine how exactly this would happen.
"glovebox and an old elevator shaft, where the solution potentially could have collected in such a way to cause an uncontrolled nuclear reaction."
By repeatedly stating an "uncontrolled nuclear reaction" places in the minds of the reader a huge mushroom cloud. This is sensationalism and not accurate. Don't fall for it.
I'm not saying that issues like this should be hidden, but I don't think it necessarily for public consumption. Most folks probably can't handle the cold, hard facts of the world anyways.
"3. Re BSD jails: my understanding is that Zones provide many additional features, like the ability to set limits on the RAM usage, CPU usage and bandwidth for each zone. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong."
When a Zone has resources assigned to it, it will then be considered a Container. The Zone itself is based off of a BSD chroot jail though.