Slashdot Mirror


Your Chance to be an Astronaut

codewarrior78411 writes "NASA posted a hiring notice for new astronauts Tuesday, on usajobs.com, seeking for the first time in almost 30 years men and women to fly aboard spacecraft other than the shuttle. The agency is seeking 10 to 15 new faces for three to six-month missions aboard the international space station." Requirements include 'Must be a U.S. citizen between 5-foot-2 and 6-foot-3 in height (to squeeze into Russia's three-passenger Soyuz capsule)' 'At least a bachelor's degree in engineering, a biological or physical science, or mathematics' 'three years of relevant professional experience' and most interestingly 'Vision correctable to 20/20. For the first time, the space agency will consider applicants who have undergone successful refractive eye surgery.'

302 comments

  1. (this joke will appear a thousand times) by pzs · · Score: 5, Funny

    Must be willing to wear a diaper on long drives?

    Peter

    1. Re:(this joke will appear a thousand times) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I nominate George W Bush. We can leave him out there.

      Wearing the diaper on his head counts right?

    2. Re:(this joke will appear a thousand times) by eniac42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      (sigh).. Must be able to convert feet to meters..

      --
      "A nation that forgets its past is doomed to repeat it." - Churchill
    3. Re:(this joke will appear a thousand times) by rbarreira · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also, must be able to drink a lot of alcohol?

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    4. Re:(this joke will appear a thousand times) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must bring own beer.

    5. Re:(this joke will appear a thousand times) by dascritch · · Score: 1

      Must not be former-astronaut senator anymore

      --
      (Sorry my bad French) Je fais parler les Guignols de l'Info. Le pied, quoi.
    6. Re:(this joke will appear a thousand times) by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Must not care about frittering valuable resources away on pointless flag-waving exercises to keep the pork-hungry defence industry and adolescent males (of all ages) happy that the world of Star Trek is only a matter of working out the engineering.Or as the Register just put it:

      Nobel-winning boffin slams ISS, manned spaceflight
      'Infantile fixation on putting people into space'
      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    7. Re:(this joke will appear a thousand times) by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 4, Funny

      The days of launching chimps into space are long over.

    8. Re:(this joke will appear a thousand times) by eniac42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Must not care about frittering valuable resources away on pointless flag-waving exercises to keep the pork-hungry defence industry and adolescent males (of all ages) happy that the world of Star Trek is only a matter of working out the engineering.Or as the Register just put it: Nobel-winning boffin slams ISS, manned spaceflight 'Infantile fixation on putting people into space'

      There is something in that - certainly the Shuttle & ISS have been very poor value for money. It would have been way better to just keep Apollo going (maybe on a slower budget). Skylab was already going and there were full-on lunar bases ready-to-go based on Apollo hardware - and if rolled out slowly, for far less money/year than the Shuttle/ISS boondongle..

      There is real science that could be done still by a manned lunar/mars base - but yes, sending a $1 billion-a-throw Shuttle up so we can run school-science-fair experiments on a $100 billion ISS doesnt really cut it. At this time, just setting up X-prize type funds seems the cheapest way to push development..

      --
      "A nation that forgets its past is doomed to repeat it." - Churchill
    9. Re:(this joke will appear a thousand times) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, the old false dichotomy strawman ad hominem attack! Won't work this time!

    10. Re:(this joke will appear a thousand times) by vwjeff · · Score: 1

      I'm 6'6".

      Dam

    11. Re:(this joke will appear a thousand times) by phulegart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So going from one cave to the next is ok. Going from one house to the next is ok. Going from one city to the next is ok. Going from one continent to the next is ok. But work toward going from one planet to another... HELL NO???

      If you have a better plan than the one in action involving space stations and the craft they are using (poorly) to make this happen, then by all means, put it into action. Otherwise, shut up. It's not like private enterprise isn't getting involved. It is. If you are one of those people who thinks that the development of the bicycle, the automobile, the boat, and the plane were all great ideas, but we should stop when crossing the boundary of space, stick with living in the basement.

      I'm holding out for the security guard position on a space station.

      --
      "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -D. Adams
    12. Re:(this joke will appear a thousand times) by jamstar7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, John Glenn already had his second ride.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    13. Re:(this joke will appear a thousand times) by routerl · · Score: 1

      Ah, but I have already had my chance at being an astronaut! Oh, all those 49 years ago... I remember it as if I were inventing it now...

      I was hand picked from my squad in the air force to fly a Jupiter into low orbit, landing in the South Atlantic. "Reflexes", they told me, "are key". I had trained, and was prepared. But then, on December 12, that damnable Friday, my C.O. came down to the barracks with news of minor budget cuts. Some damn higher ups decided that cutting the pilot's insurance was the best way to save money so close to launch. No insurance, no pilot. Their solution: "send a monkey, or something". Damn Gordo. How I coveted those 8.3 minutes of weightlessness you experienced.

      Stupid monkey.

      --
      Trust me, kids; don't drink and post.
    14. Re:(this joke will appear a thousand times) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dam Good one Hoover!
    15. Re:(this joke will appear a thousand times) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'At least a bachelor's degree in engineering, a biological or physical science, or mathematics'
      I guess that counts out all the 'affirmative action' non-whites who somehow managed to get their way into space in the past...

      Political correctness taken to its limits.

      Can anybody here SERIOUSLY imagine an all BLACK NASA?
      Are you kidding me?

      But remember... the Joo-box says "We're all equal" over and over again...
      Meanwhile, Amerika is obviously rapidly turning into a third world shithole, and yes, Mexicans and blacks ARE more criminal and less intelligent than whites...

    16. Re:(this joke will appear a thousand times) by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

      So going from one cave to the next is ok. Going from one house to the next is ok. Going from one city to the next is ok. Going from one continent to the next is ok. But work toward going from one planet to another... HELL NO??? That's right. There are fundamental differences between moving different distances on the same planet, and moving to different planets. And colonisation... don't get me started!! ;)

      If you have a better plan than the one in action involving space stations and the craft they are using (poorly) to make this happen, then by all means, put it into action. Otherwise, shut up. You misunderstand -- I don't think we can, or should try, to colonise other planets. At a stretch, I can conceive of circumstances where putting a small crew on Mars could be useful and cool and in some sense "worth it". (I don't think we're there now, not when NASA are cutting science budgets on existing, funded rovers or other unmanned missions.

      If you are one of those people who thinks that the development of the bicycle, the automobile, the boat, and the plane were all great ideas, but we should stop when crossing the boundary of space, stick with living in the basement. That is what I think, exactly. (Not so sure about the jet turbine though. Mass air travel is, let's say, a double-edged sword.) Just because we can do something doesn't mean we should do something.
      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    17. Re:(this joke will appear a thousand times) by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      It's not like private enterprise isn't getting involved.
      We should make absolutely sure that consigning space exploration to private industry is really the best thing for us.

      Since many people are waking up to the shortcomings of "free-market" capitalism, it might be worthwhile to continue at least some public funding of space exploration, just in case. Efforts to put health care, education, and national security under the control of private industry have proved to be less than ideal. Giving the future of mankind over to the profit motive may not be the best idea.

      I'm just saying we ought to think it over carefully.
      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    18. Re:(this joke will appear a thousand times) by hawk · · Score: 1

      nah, they've never been very interested in *that*.

      hawk

  2. Damn it! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    I knew I should have taken a mathematics/computer science double major. *sigh*

    OTOH, it could only be said marginally as to whether my vision is correctable to 20/20 or not, so I might've failed the vision test.

    Anyway, $60K (which is probably what you would get with no astronaut experience) isn't much of a salary these days.

    1. Re:Damn it! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2

      I would pay myself to do it.
      Hell, I think I would give an arm and a leg willingly to do it (lower weight, more chance I can get a seat)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Damn it! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And just what constitutes 'relevant professional experience.'? Most NASA astronauts retire from NASA. Where are these experienced astronauts going to come from? Former Soviet Bloc countries?

    3. Re:Damn it! by click2005 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've watched every episode of Star Trek, Stargate and Lost in Space. I'm sure that qualifies as experience.

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    4. Re:Damn it! by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Economists refer to the additional amount you must pay someone to take on unpleasant work, compared to work requiring similar skills, as the "compensating differential". For astronauts, that compensating differential is negative, because people find it thrilling to work as an astronaut and demand less than they ordinarily would.

      Of course, that should mean that under US tax law, the amount people would pay to be an astronaut counts as imputed income on top of the 60k salary, and therefore should be taxed, but whatever.

      (Btw, I think someone commented a while ago that NASA used to have a warning that said something like, "If you want to be an astronaut for the money, don't bother. If you just want a lot of money, go work for a NASA contractor.")

    5. Re:Damn it! by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't think a Psych degree counts... so I'm out of the running; I won't even belabor the fact that I'm not in any kind of shape for it. And no, $60K isn't a lot considering the work an astronaut does. Most astronauts spend their lives trying to make money other ways, with mixed results. The Mercury 7 were blessed in the beginning by having their exclusive contract with Life magazine that supplemented their income, and due to their fame, they received more than their fair share of perks. I don't think astronauts today have it quite so good, which is a shame.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    6. Re:Damn it! by dougmc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And just what constitutes 'relevant professional experience.'? Well, just look at what most astronauts over the years did before becoming astronauts. I seem to recall a lot of military pilots doing it, for example.

      Though my guess is that they're less looking for `Top Gun' types of guys and more for the brainy scientist guys -- but guys who are physically fit too. And so relevant professional experience would probably mean doing brainy scientist sorts of things. I imagine the military still has a lot of people like this ...

      Though in general, if you want a job, apply -- even if you don't fit all their qualifications exactly. I doubt this is any different -- though I imagine that they won't be hiring many people who merely have bachelors degrees. I'd expect them to pick PhDs instead. Especially if I'm right about the sort of people they want.

    7. Re:Damn it! by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      Of course, that should mean that under US tax law, the amount people would pay to be an astronaut counts as imputed income on top of the 60k salary, and therefore should be taxed, but whatever.

      Sadly it doesn't work in the other direction.

    8. Re:Damn it! by jnik · · Score: 1

      If you just want a lot of money, go work for a NASA contractor.
      I wish!

    9. Re:Damn it! by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1

      Geek factor 9: ENGAGE!

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    10. Re:Damn it! by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      Forget the "correctible" bit if you're thinking laser ablation of the cornea - its not worth it. The results aren't permanent, and as your eyes age, you'll end up needing glasses or contacts anyway, so even if you got hired, by the time they find a mission for you, you will no longer be able to qualify anyway ...

      This has GOT to be the stupidest thing they've done in a ... oops, this is NASA ... scratch that last bit.

    11. Re:Damn it! by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Of course, that should mean that under US tax law, the amount people would pay to be an astronaut counts as imputed income on top of the 60k salary, and therefore should be taxed, but whatever.

      So what if you volunteer to do something for free because you just want to do it? Isn't what you're saying tantamout to putting a tax on having fun?
      =Smidge=
    12. Re:Damn it! by trolltalk.com · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I've watched every episode of Star Trek, Stargate and Lost in Space. I'm sure that qualifies as experience."

      Stargate takes away points. You need stuff with real rocket science, so you'll know what someone means when they say "They've gone plaid!"

    13. Re:Damn it! by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you are interested, I wouldn't discount any degree. Especially one in Psychology. With all this talk of extended missions, having an onboard psychologist might not be too far fetched.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    14. Re:Damn it! by RockoTDF · · Score: 1

      Well if you have an MS or a PhD is an area like physio, neuroscience, or Sensation and Perception I bet that would count as a biological science.

      --
      There is more to science than physics!

      www.iomalfunction.blogspot.com
    15. Re:Damn it! by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Though my guess is that they're less looking for `Top Gun' types of guys and more for the brainy scientist guys What, you mean all those hollywood space movies with ragtag teams of heroes were wrong!?


      Sidenote: damn I hate those stuck-up characters in those movies.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    16. Re:Damn it! by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> And just what constitutes 'relevant professional experience.'?

      Being a space cadet.

    17. Re:Damn it! by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      Well, for a scientist, engineer, or mathematician, I'm imagine it means they aren't fresh out of college. That is, they have 5 or 10 years of real world experience in their non-astronaut field of study.

    18. Re:Damn it! by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

      Anyway, $60K (which is probably what you would get with no astronaut experience) isn't much of a salary these days.

      I'm sorry, what profession are we talking about again? Accountant? Desk jockey? Bartender?

      Nope. Sorry. ASTRO NAUT. Fly in space, and get PAID SOMETHING to do it. It's stuff like this that makes me agonize over my history degree.

      Like a guy said before, some folks would near give an arm and a leg for this....plus, what COULDN'T you do afterward? Unless you're a crazy diaper-wearing creepo, having a resume that consisted of nothing other than a photo with you in a spacesuit opens quite a few doors.

    19. Re:Damn it! by necro81 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I hear that becoming a senator commands a higher salary.

    20. Re:Damn it! by Hubbell · · Score: 1

      My vision uncorrected (I assume this means glasses/contacts) is 20/600 in my left eye, 20/500 in my left eye.

      Being blind fucking sucks :(

    21. Re:Damn it! by Billosaur · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True, but astronauts are notoriously wary of doctors and psychologists, because they are the two people whose office you can walk into an astronaut and walk out grounded. And can you imagine being a psych specialist on a Mars mission, being cooped up with the crew for 90+ days, them knowing part of your job is to evaluate their mental state? Of course you'd have to have other functions, because the cost of a Mars mission will be high enough that no one will be able to justify the cost of sending a psychologist along solely to monitor the crew.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    22. Re:Damn it! by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 4, Funny

      Day 45: All he does is write in that little notebook. Why Why Why who. No. ...

      Day 75: I think Dr. Evers knows about my connection with the galactic federal space donkeys. Operation F. Y. C. may have to be accelerated. ...

      Day 83: Mishnog's suggestion to use the vacuum of space to preserve the meat was a success!

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    23. Re:Damn it! by Hatta · · Score: 1


      Anyway, $60K (which is probably what you would get with no astronaut experience) isn't much of a salary these days.


      I'd do it for free.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    24. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just plain dicrimination. If I want go into space and weigh 300lbs, demand extra junk food snacks, soda, popcorn, music, dvd's, magazines, and more rocket propellant to compensate for weight, gravity, and thrust ratio to help me watch the Astronuats do their JOBS; then I should able to it, right?! So who do you think will represent me in court, LOL!

      With all joking aside, why should a janitor onboard a space vessel have to know higher Mathematics and Rocket Science to clean out the waste bins, toilets, dust Jefferies tube's?! Scenarios Please!???(I'm just playing but seriously).

    25. Re:Damn it! by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 1

      I'm too tall. :(

    26. Re:Damn it! by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      Hrm... Interesting enough I fit all the criteria save "relevant experience" depending on what that means. I also currently work for a company in the aerospace industry that makes a lot of parts for NASA...

      ... though the one thing I am lacking is the desire to actually be an astronaut...

    27. Re:Damn it! by khallow · · Score: 1

      I don't think astronauts today have it quite so good, which is a shame.

      Why should astronauts these days have those kinds of perks? The Mercury 7 did more and took far more risk. I realize that astronauts remain among the best that humanity has to offer, but my take is that the astronaut core, through no fault of their own, simply doesn't do that much.
    28. Re:Damn it! by jank1887 · · Score: 1
      "what profession are we talking about again?"

      Scientists and Engineers. 2006 reported average engineering starting salaries: $45-55K
      from College Journal / Engineering That's for people that just got their BS. Add 1-2 years experience, add $2-3K, or about equal to someone fresh out with an MS. MS with 1-2 years exp, add on another $2 (total, +$4-5K). Finally PhD and 1-2 yrs experience, add $10k (total +$14-15K).

      My guess is NASA will be able to pick from a pool of MS/PhD candidates, each with many years of technical experience. But relative to what they'd be making in other employment, they'd be taking a paycut. Could be a significant paycut. Get a guy with a wife and a few kids, a mortgage, car payments, and looming kids' college bills, and any paycut can hurt quite a bit.

      Then again, if you're going to go through a mid-life crisis, this is a hell of an option. Most people settle for the $50K sports car, but a paycut to go into space would count, too.

    29. Re:Damn it! by dougmc · · Score: 1
      `Vision correctable to 20/20' might just mean 20/20 vision with glasses.


      Which would indeed be a first. A lot of things like this have traditionally required 20/20 vision -- no glasses, no contacts, and no surgery on your eyes to correct vision permitted.

      I'm guessing that you're not likely to get to fly the Shuttle or anything like that (they probably DO want `Top Gun' types, or at least commercial jet pilots), but if you ever do go into space (and most astronauts don't) then you'd probably doing experiments and the like. And for that, it's OK to need glasses. It's probably OK to need glasses if you're flying the Shuttle or a fighter too, but there's always the chance they'd fall off and that could lead to a very expensive mistake ...

    30. Re:Damn it! by securityfolk · · Score: 0

      Oh, now you've done it. My wife is an avid Stargate fan, and she's gating over right now to kick yer butt! ;)

    31. Re:Damn it! by malilo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Though my guess is that they're less looking for `Top Gun' types of guys and more for the brainy scientist guys -- but guys who are physically fit too. I'm getting a phD in astrophysics and I compete in triathlons... But I'm not a guy ;)
      --
      "sometimes he felt that his whole life was a dream, and he wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it."
    32. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Are you single? ;-)

    33. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though in general, if you want a job, apply -- even if you don't fit all their qualifications exactly.


      Appropriate Slashdot quote at the bottom of the page:

      All most people want is a little more than they'll ever get.


      Hmm... If your average Slashdot IT Geek applied:
      Pros
      • Proven ability to sit long periods in small spaces
      • Ability to speak in front of people with neither the inclination or intelligence to understand what you do
      • Familiar with broken, out-of-date equipment from lowest bidder
      • Maintenance of same
      • Can follow detailed technical specifications
      • Computer literate
      • Loves to get away from people

      Cons
      • Middle aged
      • Overweight to borderline obese
      • Proven ability to nitpick and argue over every detail
      • Loves to get away from people
    34. Re:Damn it! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Congratulations. Of course, people like you are something of a rarity. Sounds like you should apply.

      BTW--I live in Florida and work in aerospace, so if you do go to work as an astronaut, look me up!

    35. Re:Damn it! by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      My wife is an avid Stargate fan She just likes drooling over Richard Dean Anderson :)
      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    36. Re:Damn it! by dougmc · · Score: 1
      From wikipedia --

      Guy may mean:
      * Informal term or address, often for a man or boy originated shortly after the execution of Guy Fawkes; the plural form "guys" is often used without regard to gender
      You'll note I used the plural form ...
    37. Re:Damn it! by dougmc · · Score: 1

      Congratulations. Of course, people like you are something of a rarity. Sounds like you should apply. What, educated, brainy (assumed), and athletic?


      Not as rare as you might think. Lots of well educated people participate in strenuous sports of some sort.

      Or are you referring to the `not a guy' part ... there's a few of those out there too.

      BTW--I live in Florida and work in aerospace, so if you do go to work as an astronaut, look me up! The jobs appear to be in Houston ...
    38. Re:Damn it! by Hucko · · Score: 1

      What!!? Why are you here?? Did you take a wrong turn on the internet?

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    39. Re:Damn it! by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      Then what are you? It's not like actual women are on slashdot.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    40. Re:Damn it! by Mr.+Dop · · Score: 1

      I don't think a Psych degree counts... Depends on your type of degree; Clinical Psychology, Physiological Psychology, or Experimental Psychology count.
    41. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, just look at what most astronauts over the years did before becoming astronauts. I seem to recall a lot of military pilots doing it, for example.

      Those days are long gone. "Relevant experience" is more like a Phd in "Space Biologie | the impact of muscle changes in a zero gravity environment", or "3 years on creation of next-gen space suit, 2 years in yeast studies in low gravity and 5 years in space mechanics specialty in reverse weight movement to compensate natural human forces in zero gravity space environment".

      Most astronauts have a public CV available. Very impresive and pre-space years usually riddled with "relevant experience" research or applicable space tools builds.

  3. vision? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    20/20 correctable?...

    So they should.

    If the astronauts experience sufficient G's to blow out their surgically corrected eyeballs then they're dead anyway.

    1. Re:vision? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      One requirement they left out....

      NO diaper fetishists....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  4. height discrimination! by syrinx · · Score: 2, Funny

    Must be a U.S. citizen between 5-foot-2 and 6-foot-3 in height

    As a 6'4" person (that's 0.384 rods for those of you not used to measuring in feet!), I think I am going to sue for height discrimination.

    First I find out that government safety regulations in cars only apply to people 6'3" and under, and now this...

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    1. Re:height discrimination! by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not discrimination because you need to be under a certain height in order to fit through certain passage ways and into certain rooms. Since that requirement is objectively tied to be ability to perform the job, it cannot count as discrimination to place that height maximum as a requirement.

      This is just like how it's absolutely impossible to do any kind of engineering-related task whatsoever without a 4-year degree from an accredited engineering program, and therefore employers are 100% justified in making that a requirement for engineering jobs and why it's not discrimination and is legal under the ADA and relevant employment law. [/can't say with straight face]

    2. Re:height discrimination! by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      "As a 6'4" person (that's 0.384 rods for those of you not used to measuring in feet!), I think I am going to sue for height discrimination."

      I'm sorry, but anyone taller then 6'3" is considered a statistical abnormality within the current human race ; therefore cannot be factored into the Earth's exit strategy. That and it's a "Ha Ha" from the shorter folks for whom you've all been making fun of.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    3. Re:height discrimination! by BiloxiGeek · · Score: 1

      Go for it, but since they likely don't have a space suit that will properly fit, you get to fly in only regular clothes. Don't worry though, pressure leaks hardly ever happen.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, For you are crunchy and go well with ketchup.
    4. Re:height discrimination! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am 6'6" perhaps we can seek class action status for the suit. I have correctable 20/20 vision and an engineering degree but I am denied based upon height!

    5. Re:height discrimination! by sgt+scrub · · Score: 2, Funny

      I TOTALLY Agree! I'm a short, fat, balding, middle age, heavy drinker and smoker AND they won't even take ME! I mean WTF!

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    6. Re:height discrimination! by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I would imagine there are also weight limits. I'm 6' 4" too, but at about 280 I would probably lose on that fact as well. Would a computer science degree count?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    7. Re:height discrimination! by Chapter80 · · Score: 1
      Actually it IS discrimination, it's just not illegal discrimination.
      From Dictionary.com:

      treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person or thing based on the group, class, or category to which that person or thing belongs rather than on individual merit
      It's completely legal, and expected, that you discriminate in the hiring process. I try to discriminate against stupid people, for example.
    8. Re:height discrimination! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who is 6'6" (198cm) I sympathise with you plight. Perhaps you could
      call yourself 'disabled' and sue under the ADA act :-)

    9. Re:height discrimination! by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Prepare to be sued by stupid people.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    10. Re:height discrimination! by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

      The legal term is "bona fide occupational requirement". The onus is on the employer to demonstrate that it's legit, but in this case it is.

      Airline flight attendants have similar height requirements, for similar reasons. They must be tall enough to reach the overhead storage bins, but not so tall that they keep bumping their heads on things.

      ...laura

    11. Re:height discrimination! by trollboy · · Score: 1

      as a 7'er, I'll join in on your suit too, while we're at it, lets get after that standard US 6'8" doorway. And celingfans... my life is like a Hellraiser movie with spinning blades at eye level. And where's my size 20 spaceboot?

      --
      That which is not dead may eternal lie,and in strange aeons even death may die
    12. Re:height discrimination! by theMerovingian · · Score: 1

      Your conclusion is correct, although I might clarify that by saying:

      The government is allowed to discriminate against anyone. According to Constitutional jurisprudence, there are several "protected classes" of folks such as racial groups, people of a certain national origin, gender, etc.

      In order for the government to pass legislation regarding racial groups and persons of a certain national origin, the legislation must be strictly tailored to a compelling government objective, and there must not be a less restrictive method of accomplishing that objective. This standard of judicial review is known as strict scrutiny.

      In order to pass legislation regarding (biological) gender, the regulation must involve important governmental interests that are furthered by substantially related means. (intermediate scrutiny)

      For other non-protected classes of people, the government can pass whatever regulation it wants so long as it is a rational means to an end that may be legitimately pursued by government. (rational basis) Tall people would fall within this category, and thus the government can do exatctly as you say.

      As you can imagine, this get-up creates lots of interesting effects such as: the denial of marriage rights to homosexuals (not a protected class), affirmative action (somehow held to meet the strict scrutiny standard), everything related to Indian law (Indian tribes are a political entity rather than a racial group, and thus Congress has plenary power over them), and a number of other odd results.

      --
      "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    13. Re:height discrimination! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't tell the tone of your last line.

    14. Re:height discrimination! by zerocool^ · · Score: 2, Funny


      I TOTALLY Agree! I'm a short, fat, balding, middle age, heavy drinker and smoker AND they won't even take ME! I mean WTF!

      Dad?!?!?

      --
      sig?
    15. Re:height discrimination! by Like2Byte · · Score: 2, Funny

      I TOTALLY Agree! I'm a short, {{huff}} fat, balding, middle age, {{huff}} heavy drinker and {{cough}} smoker AND they won't even take ME! {{huff, huff, huff}} I mean WTF! {{heart explodes}}


      Fixed that for you.
    16. Re:height discrimination! by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      And we tall people will be laughing from the grave the first time you short people need help getting something from the top shelf.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    17. Re:height discrimination! by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the size of the Soyuz spacecraft return module is the real factor here in which the space station uses and an "lifeboat". The current Soyuz spacecraft was really designed for two people only and they added the third person for a possible mission to the moon in the 1960's but they didn't change the dimensions of the spacecraft. I seen the inside the of the real return module of Soyuz spacecraft and it small compared to the Apollo spacecraft. Most SUV's or even some large cars have more interior space than the return module of the Soyuz spacecraft. Since the return module of the Soyuz spacecraft is bell shaped with a circle on the bottom where the crew sit, the guy in the middle circle gets a large amount of space but he is the commander of the spacecraft usually a Russian and the two guys either side of the commander is in chord of the circle which is smaller and if they are over 6 feet tall they have to scrunch inside with their knees near their face. Normally the return module is filled with all of the stuff of the astronaut/cosmonaut that is going or leaving the space station if they are changing astronaut/cosmonaut for the space station so that module is like that of a college kid's Ford Focus filled with their belongings at the beginning of the school year to bring to the dorm. I hope they will increase the size limitations in the next generation of spacecrafts that Russia and US are developing so we can have a little bigger range of people that can go to space.

    18. Re:height discrimination! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm sorry, but we can't hire you. You're exactly one inch too tall for this office building."

    19. Re:height discrimination! by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      It's completely legal, and expected, that you discriminate in the hiring process. I try to discriminate against stupid people, for example.

      Your definition says:

      rather than on individual merit

      So if a maximum height was required (i.e., part of "merit"), and you discounted someone based on their individual height, that would not be discrimination. Just as not hiring a stupid person, if not being stupid was necessary for the job, would be discrimination.

      Discrimination would be not hiring men on the basis that men are taller on average.

    20. Re:height discrimination! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I mean WTF! {{heart explodes}}

      Fixed that for you.


      If that's your definition of fixing, I don't ever want to be broken. :(

    21. Re:height discrimination! by Chapter80 · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't call height a merit. Have you heard of people being commended for their excellent achievement in height?

      Dictionary.com again:

      Merit: something that deserves or justifies a reward or commendation; a commendable quality, act, etc.
      People discriminate on a daily basis, in hiring and in other daily activities. You may choose one restaurant over another, in a discriminatory fashion; nothing illegal about that: I might choose a sit-down restaurant over a fast-food joint purely because fast-food joints in general have poorer service or not the atmosphere I am looking for - and yet I have never been in THAT fast-food joint, so I am being discriminate. Discrimination in itself is completely legal and expected. Discrimination for the wrong reason is the only way it becomes illegal. And there are very specific reasons that are illegal.

      In the hiring process, I may discriminate against candidates who are late for the interview. Or ones who dress poorly. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that, and yet it has presumably nothing to do with their job performance (since I haven't seen their job performance; this is just an interview).

      Anytime someone shouts "That's discrimination!", I say (or think) "So! Discrimination is natural and good!" If mankind HAD to test the merit of every possible alternative prior to making a decision, we'd be in gridlock and get nothing done! Being discriminate is a sign of a good decision maker.

      Discrimination = Good, generally. Discrimination for the wrong reason = bad.

    22. Re:height discrimination! by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call height a merit. Have you heard of people being commended for their excellent achievement in height?

      You misunderstand "merit". It isn't some narrow thing like that, it means "ability required". What's required in one job is different to another job. You are taking the "A quality deserving praise or approval" definition too literally - try "Superior quality or worth; excellence".

      An astronaut who can fit into the spaceship does have greater merit than one who can't.

      You may choose one restaurant over another, in a discriminatory fashion; nothing illegal about that: I might choose a sit-down restaurant over a fast-food joint purely because fast-food joints in general have poorer service or not the atmosphere I am looking for - and yet I have never been in THAT fast-food joint, so I am being discriminate. Discrimination in itself is completely legal and expected.

      You are correct that not all discrimination is illegal - I was just pointing out that this example isn't discrimination in the first place.

      Your fast food example is indeed discrimination. But suppose you avoided it because you had visited the restaurant? Or supposing it wasn't a judgement on service, but because you wanted the style and food that you know the fast food restaurant hasn't got? (I don't have to actually try out the McDonald's to know everything about it - just like a company can rely on interviews or grades rather than employing them first.) These cases are not discrimination.

  5. I qualify by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm 5'11", a US citizen, have a degree in PC and web programming and another in web deisng (hey they need some IT staff up there, come on), my vision is perfect, and I'll show up to the tryouts in a diaper and carrying a knife. They'll have to hire me!

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    1. Re:I qualify by Aardpig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, I'm sorry, they wanted a degree in engineering, math or science.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    2. Re:I qualify by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 1

      A degree in web deisng? Did you demonstrate a good attention to detail and presentation?

      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    3. Re:I qualify by AndersOSU · · Score: 1
      Sorry, I first read that:

      A degree in web deisng? Did you demonstrate a good attendance and presentation?

      Which might be more accurate
    4. Re:I qualify by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      How is your web design in DOS 3.0 with Windows for Work Groups, and are you capable of swapping 8 bit ISA boards on a 8086 based box? -these are ESENTIAL skills aboard our high priced high tech Shuttle.

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    5. Re:I qualify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love it when you talk nerdy.

  6. One-way or two-way missions? by nmg196 · · Score: 3, Funny

    If the missions are one-way, I think my boss would be an excellent candidate. I'll even fill out his application for him.

    1. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by Sparr0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      An interesting philosophical question that I have posed in the past... Would you take a one-way trip to Mars? You get to be the first person to ever set foot on the red planet, your family is generously rewarded, and you take a suicide pill N months after landing when your food supplies run out.

    2. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

      An interesting question indeed. Maybe if I was old and grey and had already lived my life to the fullest, but otherwise, no.

      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
    3. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have actually specifically told my friends when it's come up in conversation that if, somehow, I was approached by NASA and they told me that I could got to Mars, that I would never be coming back, that I would die there, and that I would never see my friends and family again, and I had to leave right now with no time to say goodbye or get any of my things, I would absolutely do it, no questions asked. People have told me that's a stupid thing to think, or that I'm a jerk because I would leave everyone I know so quickly, but that's just the way it is. If I could go to outer space, my life's meaning would change so drastically that it wouldn't even be worth it to think in those terms to me, and I think to my friends and family as well. -Julius

    4. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What would be the point. To be the first person on Mars? I don't see that the rush to get a person on Mars needs to be so great that we consider a suicide trip. Mars isn't going anywhere in the next 50 years. I'd wager that anything we can find there, we could still find in 1000 years.

      It is one thing to consider a suicide mission that has some lifesaving purpose, but throwing lives away for a feather in your cap isn't worth it. It is definately not worth it when simple restraint and patience will result in an even more successful outcome:

      A manned mission to Mars and a return trip.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    5. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Insightful
      A guaranteed suicide mission would be worthless on a personal level (unless I had, say, terminal cancer or somesuch, then I'd certainly be game), but more importantly, it would be worthless on a political level. You don't send folks up to die, because the whole point of the exercise is two-fold:

      1) science / exploration

      2) getting ordinary folks to think "hey - that could be me/my kids up there someday! Cool!"

      The reason the Space Race was so popular in the '50s and '60s wasn't so much the 'Red Menace', but ordinary folks (kids chief among them) to fantasize about being spacemen and spacewomen. SciFi was a HUGE factor in having folks dream of space as a destination in the first place.

      Sure, the odds of, say, terraforming Mars in my lifetime is pretty much nil, but the ideas of adventure and exploration? Especially in a world that pretty much has had human eyes hovering over nearly every square hectare of it by now? It's a pretty damned cool idea.

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    6. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed!

      The word of the day is:
      11425eb06d0c4a7fb10484b1b394b30d

    7. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by Eponymous+Bastard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      and you take a suicide pill N months after landing when your food supplies run out.

      On those terms, no. If on the other hand you were to say: "and you take a suicide pill N months after landing if your food supplies run out." I'd do it. In a heartbeat. (Ok, I'd evaluate the mission first to see if that "if" is reasonable).

      Trying to establish a permanent colony on Mars would be worth it, I think. Being part of the pioneering group, facing challenges, working on something important and influential. Hell Yes, I'd try it. Going just so some government can claim that "they" were the first to put a man on mars, no.

      Having to take a suicide pill if all of our agricultural work fails, it should be a small risk compared to a micrometeorite strike, solar flare, orbital insertion failure, or once in mars, structural failure of the shelter, medical problems with regolith/mars dust, etc. I wouldn't like to depend on continued shipments from earth either

      The hardest part would be the lag. No beer and no internet make Eponymous something something...

    8. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by lems1 · · Score: 1

      Instead of taking the "suicide pill" why not take a mini-greenhouse with you and plant your own stuff in Mars! You will need to find water though, but you should be alright until the next visitors from Earth come to pick you up (40 years or so later)...

      just a thought... LOL

      --
      This sig can be distributed under the LGPL license
    9. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you like to go to mars?

      Right now? You probably won't be coming back i'm afraid, but you might.

      You would? Excellent! Step this way sir.

      Yes sir. Up the ladder.

      Now climb into the cannon.

    10. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lollorlololroflomgwtfbbq
      does it not bother you being such a retard? I suppose ignorance is bliss.

    11. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      "You don't send folks up to die, because the whole point of the exercise is two-fold:

      1) science / exploration

      2) getting ordinary folks to think "hey - that could be me/my kids up there someday! Cool!"

      I know parents who would gladly send their adult kids on a one-way trip to Mars just to get them the f**k out of the house sometime before they die.

    12. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by Chapter80 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Being born" is a suicide mission. When you were in the womb, if someone said to you, "If you go out there, you are going to eventually die," (which is true), would you choose to be born anyway? If you stay in the safe womb, presumably you'd eventually die. If you go out, you'll eventually die.

      What's different about Mars? The original post didn't say the food would run out in less than 100 years.

    13. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      The implication was that it would be a relatively short time since he stated it in Months instead of Years. If the food wouldn't run out in less than 100 years, then suicide pills for lack of food wouldn't be necessary. I have a good expectation to live for another 50 years, and I expect that I can contribute more in 49 than I can in 1.

      What would you need to accomplish on Earth that would make a reduction of your lifespan to a fixed 10 months worthwhile?

      In my case, there are several things that are worth dying for, but fame is not one of them.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    14. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      In theory it could be possible to continue shipping food and water to you, very expensive, but possible.

      My guess is it will be much harder (and much more expensive) to send a spaceship that could land, pick you up, take off and make it back.

      You'd probably still die earlier than you would on Earth.

      I wouldn't do it, but I don't think it would be that hard to find people who would be willing to do it.

      I don't see the point though - might as well stick to robots for exploration. For human stuff, should work on building better space stations. I'm not sure if that space elevator thing will ever work or get built, but I suppose that's worth a shot too.

      --
    15. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by Garabito · · Score: 1
      Even if you had to go right now and not being able to ever see your family or friends again, you could say goodbye to them in a pre-recorded message, live from the space ship, or even better, from Mars. Not only to say goodbye, but also to explain them why you did it.


      I know this wasn't the point of your post, but still, just a thought.

    16. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by Chapter80 · · Score: 1
      Most people would think that the question implied that their life would be shortened. But with n=1200, n months would probably not be a shortened life for me.

      I suspect that the question was worded that way to lure you in, one way or another. For example, one might answer "For sufficiently large values of n, I'd do it". And so someone might say that if n=1200, they'd do it, but if n=10 they wouldn't. Then it's a matter of trying to figure out for what value of n (number of months of food supply) you'd be willing to go to Mars for.

      Personally, fame is not the reason that I would consider it. After all, what good is fame on Earth, when I'm on Mars (or dead)? But to advance human knowledge (which could, presumably, save lives), that might be worth it - for sufficiently large values of n.

      Then again, what the hell am I going to do on Mars for 100 years? Unless there's slashdot.

    17. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then again, what the hell am I going to do on Mars for 100 years? Unless there's slashdot.
      But the latency would be terrible ;)

      Heh, which was kind of my point. It would have to be a pretty necessary mission to require a one way trip to Mars.

      Though there are some interesting things you could do on Mars if you were there, by yourself, for 100 years. For instance, you could go check out what is under that rock... or that other rock... Make some footprints in the dust, that could be fun.

      My goal would probably be to go moderately insane, and send back messages of how I had organized the Martian populace and warned them about the intentions of Earth.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    18. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

      But you also get to be the first person to DIE on Mars, so that's, like, TWO claims to fame!

    19. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by dpilot · · Score: 1

      So let's change this a little into a meaningful thought experiment...

      * One-way mission to Mars (currently)
      * We don't have the technology to return you, but maybe in 5, probably in 10, almost certainly in 15 years
      * No suicide pills
      * Live in our best-effort living module for that period
      * As-possible (at least every-2-year launch window) resupply rockets from Earth

      Theoretically you *could* survive, even make it back in 15 years or less. Big problem would be unknown breakdowns, even with training, tools, spare parts, etc.

      What other parameters would you like? Number of people, etc...

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    20. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately life itself is a suicide mission, you just don't *know* when it will end, and nobody gets out alive. So you can either, at best, die a slow death at a ripe old age surrounded by family and the best medical care, just like many do, or you can be famous as the founder of the first graveyard on mars. And think of the line you have to pick up girls at the bar before leaving.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    21. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by banditski · · Score: 1

      Dude, I'm totally with you. Although I just got married a couple of months ago, so I have to renege on that claim now, but as a single guy I agree with you completely.

    22. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by tknd · · Score: 1

      So you're saying we didn't need to send couple $200 million dollar RC cars, but instead we could've just sent you?!?

    23. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by yet+another+coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is strange how averse many people are to the idea. I know of specific ancestors who boarded ships with vague notions of their destination and slim possibilities for return. Many families have similar stories.

      Considering that only a small fraction of humans live in central eastern Africa or wherever humans originated, leaving home to seek new lands with little hope of return is a historically common event. Of course, nobody yet has set out for a barren world many millions of miles away, but many have faced daunting journeys and long odds.

    24. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Get your ass to Mars (brrrdrrblip)...Get your ass to Mars (brrrdrrblip)...Get your ass to Mars (brrrdrrblip)...

    25. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      It is strange how averse many people are to the idea. Yeah, times have definitely changed. Records show that for a long time on the earliest European sea voyages to the new world, the average person wasn't going to make it back alive but they went anyway.

      Yes, I would go on a one-way trip to Mars, though I have no idea how I would explain it to my wife and children. I've dreamed of being an astronaut since I watched the Apollo guys do it on TV when I was in elementary school.
    26. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to muse over the possibility of something like this. Except, in my scenario, they give me one day to do whatever lasts things I want to do. It's an interesting excercise to think about what music I would want to listen to, what places I'd like to visit one last time, who I'd want to see and what I'd want to say... The thought-experiment usually devolves in me realizing I have too much here to leave behind.

    27. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      I know of specific ancestors who boarded ships with vague notions of their destination and slim possibilities for return. Many families have similar stories.

      Don't forget just how much life absolutely sucked back then. Think about it... the homeless guy with the cardboard sign that you pass every day on the way to work has a better life in many respects than a wealthy nobleman did in the Age of Exploration. Your ancestor's choice was simple: his life could suck at home, or it could suck somewhere else. His reasoning was that he might as well take the long shot at fortune, because his life damned sure wasn't going anywhere otherwise.

      As for me? I wouldn't even bother to grab a toothbrush first. But I can understand why many modern people would not agree to make the trip. We are too comfortable... and our modern opiates are stronger than religion ever was. (Hang out in a Chinese internet cafe full of WoW players if you want to see what I mean. You think any of those guys are willing to get on the boat to Mars?)

    28. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      I know of specific ancestors who boarded ships with vague notions of their destination and slim possibilities for return.

      I have relatives in Brazil, for the simple fact that when they were trying to get the hell out of Eastern Europe, they jumped on the first boat they could. Some went to the US, some went to Brazil. Enough resources (or not, as some stowed away) for a one way trip.

      However, there is a big difference between what was asked of them, and what the OP asked. This isn't a question of a slim chance for return, it is the 100% certainty of death measured in months.

      I would say that the 100% certainty of death was what drove many people onto the ships in the first place.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    29. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by hawk · · Score: 1

      >2) getting ordinary folks to think "hey - that could be me/my kids up there someday! Cool!"

      There are folks that would *drool* over the possibility of sending their kids on that one-way trip . . . :)

      hawk

    30. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I know of specific ancestors who boarded ships with vague notions of their destination and slim possibilities for return. Many families have similar stories.

      True, but most of them ended with "No, no, Fancisco.. I said mold! Paved with mold! Mama mia!"

      Sort of like the feeling after having unprotected sex with someone you just met. It seems like the best thing at the time, consequences be damned, but the next morning there's the inevitable "Oh man, WTF was I thinking?"

      That said, I'd go to Mars in a heartbeat, especially if I was among the first to go. Once there's a colony there, I think it would just become a grass is redder proposition.

    31. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by eh2o · · Score: 1

      Well if you want your family to be well off you could just buy life insurance and then kill yourself. If you want to be famous in addition, you could do the same but go on a killing spree and then kill yourself. So yeah, there are people who are willing to do that, but I wouldn't say that any of them are of sufficient mental fitness to serve as an astronaut for NASA.

      Furthermore the question is basically moot because it is quite simple to design a manned mission to Mars that includes a return vehicle with fairly low risk (really, it is).

    32. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1

      The Age of Exploration? Yes, but the story is not limited to that time and place. The Age of Exploration did not set out from east central Africa. The story has been repeated in many age throughout human existence.

      It is not always a matter of choosing emigration over squalor. Adventure has its appeal, and while the bulk of people might prefer to follow tradition, there always are some who buck it. For one of the immigrant ancestors, the family lore is that his life was good at home. He was being funded by a wealthy uncle to attend college. It was not his plan, though, and he took off.

    33. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1

      For some people, the desire for longevity is overriding, but that motivation is not universal. Many humans behave in many ways that are highly likely to result in immediate death. People jaw on and on about longevity and certain death when facing these questions, but it misses the point. There have always been adventurous individuals among us. The scale of the question posed is different, but I'm not so sure we're wired up to think so well about scale anyway.

      Despite medical advances, death remains 100% certain. Are you posting from a ship?

    34. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      An interesting philosophical question that I have posed in the past... Would you take a one-way trip to Mars? You get to be the first person to ever set foot on the red planet, your family is generously rewarded, and you take a suicide pill N months after landing when your food supplies run out.
      The answer is "yes", but only if I had been diagnosed with an incurable disease and had a life expectancy no more than a couple of months past the landing date.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    35. Re:One-way or two-way missions? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      What's different about Mars? The original post didn't say the food would run out in less than 100 years.
      Yes it did, it said "you take a suicide pill N months after landing when your food supplies run out." Maybe it was just badly worded, but it implies less than a year to me, as you wouldn't normally say "1200 months" when you meant "100 years."
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  7. I wouldn't... by tryfan · · Score: 3, Funny

    leave my job at Stargate Command for this!

  8. Here's my chance by pak9rabid · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here's my chance to show up that smug Inanimate Carbon Rod.

    1. Re:Here's my chance by CynicalTyler · · Score: 1

      As long as they don't send us to that terrible Planet of the Apes. Wait a minute... Statue of Liberty... that was our planet! You maniacs! You blew it up! Damn you! Damn you all to hell!

  9. Wo-ho! by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    Geeeeeeeks in spaaaaaaaaccceeeee.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  10. What about Color Blindess? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since I was a young boy I had always wanted to be an Astronaut and/or Fighter Pilot but because of my inability to distinguish between some hues of colors (violets and shades of red to green) I was told by the Navy recruiters that I could not be a pilot and/or astronaut. I had 20/20 vision at the time (since deteriorated... I blame my computing career on that).

    Anyways, it would be nice if NASA allowed Color Blind people to also fly and become astronauts.

    1. Re:What about Color Blindess? by Hanners1979 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anyways, it would be nice if NASA allowed Color Blind people to also fly and become astronauts.

      It would be nice until they ask you to press the green 'launch' button, and you press the red 'self-destruct' button instead. ;)

      (P.S. I'm colour-blind myself, so I figure I'm allowed to make bad jokes like that)

    2. Re:What about Color Blindess? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Most people don't actually understand that Color blindness is very rare, and that what people refer to is more often, a color recognition deficiency.

      It was a pain in the ass for me at the Academy, most people would look at me as if I had the plague when they found out I was 'Color Blind'.

      "Why did you even join the Air Force?".

      People seem to forget that missiles don't need pilots.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    3. Re:What about Color Blindess? by faloi · · Score: 1

      The trouble is that, in panic situations, people can't always be relied on to read (or read correctly) all the knobs and dials that go along with piloting. Muscle memory will help out some, but it might only get you in the general area. Sometimes you need other visual cues to get it right. Sure, fully configurable lights that would let the operator select whichever color scheme is easiest to distinguish would be nice, but a lot of the equipment you'll be dealing with isn't exactly modern. And getting something new to pass mil-spec and get retrofitted is probably enough of a budget and paperwork headache that people avoid it.

      --
      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    4. Re:What about Color Blindess? by rehtonAesoohC · · Score: 1

      "Hmm, why do they call it the red planet anyhow? Sure looks green to me!"

  11. Curious about the vision requirement. by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm a bit curious about the vision requirement. While I understand the need for good vision, what is the need for 20/20? The real work of flying the craft is usually left up to computers, and I'm not sure of what tasks couldn't be performed with adequate vision. I suppose one could argue about the docking operations with the ISS...

    Of course I may be coming at this from the wrong angle. Vision that isn't correctable to 20/20 is probably pretty bad to start.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    1. Re:Curious about the vision requirement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Think about contact lenses in an emergency. Glasses in space probably present their own challenges. Glasses in military flying present a challenge. Overcomable, but it's part of the field of vision that I loose.

    2. Re:Curious about the vision requirement. by Eponymous+Bastard · · Score: 1

      People's vision also tends to degrade over time. They are talking of 1 or 2 years of selection, plus 2 years of training before you even start. If you already need glasses, how is it going to be when you actually fly?

      Second, glasses and contacts would be bad during takeoff (doing 6Gs I think?). Also in zero-G, putting on and removing contacts might be a problem.

      Besides, if there is an emergency while people are sleeping and you need to evacuate or act quickly, you really don't want to wait for people to find their glasses or put on their contacts.

      Maybe once they start hiring hundreds of people, most of whom don't have mission critical-jobs, their standards might be lowered, but in the meantime I don't see why risk it.

    3. Re:Curious about the vision requirement. by sconeu · · Score: 2, Informative

      I seem to recall a shot of John Young at the controls of STS-1, wearing his reading glasses.

      Yep. Here it is.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    4. Re:Curious about the vision requirement. by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      I happen to be one of the few people in the world who can not have my vision corrected with some sort of surgery. I have terrible astigmatism and kerataconus (coning of cornea) in one eye. Even with contacts I can only get 20/35 in the 'good' eye and 20/30 in the 'bad' eye (with a $400 space age hybrid lens ;-p ). I can't even wear glasses as the distortion is too strong around the periphery and causes me nausea...

      So yeah... it's not a huge constraint on the general populace and a pretty good indication that there is some Fscked up stuff going on with someone's vision if they can't get it corrected to 20/20.

      That being said, there is a new stem cell therapy coming out for those with kerataconus that can correct it in lab rats and should be going to human trials soon.... I'm still not yet 30 so maybe if I get a degree in engineering and modern technology/medicine catches up with me... I could still be an astronaut... or I could just pay a couple million and go up anyways ;-p maybe a couple hundred thousand in a few decades?

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    5. Re:Curious about the vision requirement. by Eponymous+Bastard · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall a shot of John Young at the controls of STS-1, wearing his reading glasses. Interesting.

      Granted, John Young had flown 4 missions already, since the Gemini era (Gemini, Apollo command module and Apollo Lunar Module, having even walked on the moon). Even if his vision had deteriorated, he had a lot of experience to make up for it. Nasa probably wouldn't take that risk with a newbie pilot.

      I also wonder how the mission profile influenced the decision. STS-1 didn't include sleeping or having to take off glasses or contacts. And he was not the pilot on that mission or STS-9. Also, on the Shuttle, you don't get any way to evacuate during an emergency, like you might on the ISS.

      But still, You'd want your astronauts to start put in top physical form, even if thorough the years their body ages. I bet you he didn't use any kind of glasses during the Gemini era.
    6. Re:Curious about the vision requirement. by DougWebb · · Score: 1

      Also in zero-G, putting on and removing contacts might be a problem.

      You must not wear contacts, as least not the soft ones. They're always wet, so they stick to things (the case, your finger, your eye) using the surface tension. They're not going to float away unless you try to flick them away. There might be a problem with saline solution blobs getting loose, but with the disposable contacts, you generally don't even need to rinse them before putting them in, and I imagine the saline solution would stay in the case if you don't shake it around too much. Besides, you always see astronauts playing with floating blobs of fluid, so cleanup must be reasonably easy.

      Also, some people (including me) are able to sleep in the 'daily wear' disposable contacts for weeks at a time; when they first came out they were 'monthly wear', but the manufacturers have been backing off of that even as they've made them more porous to oxygen and less prone to drying out. I don't know if they're protecting themselves from lawsuits by stupid people who don't listen to their own bodies, or if they've just figured out that the more frequently people dispose their contacts, the more they spend on new ones. In any case, it's possible to wear the same contacts for the duration of a typical shuttle mission, and to change them just a handful of times for the duration of a typical space station sleepover.

    7. Re:Curious about the vision requirement. by patrixmyth · · Score: 1

      Correctable usually refers to having 20/20 vision WITH the assistance of corrective lenses. Whether or not Lasik (or name your eye surgery) is acceptable is a whole other issue, usually specifically listed in the medical requirements of a government position. Supposedly, the limits on corrective surgery for pilots related to concerns about the structural integrity of the lens during high g maneuvers. If the lens has been opened and healed back, then theoretically there could be a weakening that would be susceptible to damage. As more data has become available about long-term effects of eye surgery, many of these restrictions have been either removed or made "waiverable" based upon a competent medical review.

      --
      "Don't you know you're going to shock the monkey?"- Peter Gabriel
    8. Re:Curious about the vision requirement. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit curious about the vision requirement. While I understand the need for good vision, what is the need for 20/20? The real work of flying the craft is usually left up to computers

      Not really. Much of the [flying] work is mediated by computer, but all of it monitored by people - people who may have to make decisions, or take over from the computer entirely, based on what they see on the displays.
    9. Re:Curious about the vision requirement. by tknd · · Score: 1

      It's going to be pretty hard to adjust your glasses or fix your contact lens while you have a space suit on.

    10. Re:Curious about the vision requirement. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit curious about the vision requirement. While I understand the need for good vision, what is the need for 20/20? The real work of flying the craft is usually left up to computers, and I'm not sure of what tasks couldn't be performed with adequate vision.

      Not really. Much of the [flying] work is mediated by computer, but all of it monitored by people - people who may have to make decisions, or take over from the computer entirely, based on what they see on the displays.
       
      Then you need to consider reactions in emergencies such as evacuating the craft on the pad, or getting the hell away from it quickly once you reach the ground. Then there is operating experiments, reading manuals and checklists, etc... etc...
    11. Re:Curious about the vision requirement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, vision is intimately tied to your sense of spatial orientation (along with inertial sensation of your inner ear). In a weightless or dynamic environment, vision problems can potentially result in severe disorientation or even nausea. The results could range from inability to perform tasks to downright being a hazard.

      Think about it...do want the guy swinging around a 35,000 pound solar array at the end of the robotic arm right next to the tin can that's keeping you alive to have 20:50 vision?

    12. Re:Curious about the vision requirement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off, many astronauts wear glasses/contacts and do not have 20/20 vision, my dad being one of them. Most pilots for the shuttle already have 20/20 vision as they are pilots from the military. It says it must be correctable to 20/20, which not meaning you have to have LASIK surgery or perfect vision. If you wear contacts, its fine, you just have to have 20/20 vision with them in. This is the first time they are accepting those who have LASIK, which includes military pilots who got LASIK surgery in the military or before joining but were disqualified from being an astronaut because of LASIK.

    13. Re:Curious about the vision requirement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll need to correctly describe the shade of green the sexy space aliens are. Also, when you see that giant flying space cornucopia, you'll need to describe the glowing parts right. Not to mention reading the instruction booklets for all those weird space gambling/boardgames games you'll be playing.

    14. Re:Curious about the vision requirement. by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1

      Supposedly, the limits on corrective surgery for pilots related to concerns about the structural integrity of the lens during high g maneuvers.

      Not just high-g maneuvers, but rapid pressure changes. I scuba-dive and thus my eyes get to see all kinds of outside pressures and the changes in that pressure aren't always as gentle as they ought to be -- and I wouldn't dream of introducing an artificial weakness in the structural integrity of the eyeball. Now I've flown up to 18kft in unpressurized craft (yes, you'll need oxygen; no, you don't need a pressure suit), and here we're talking about an outside underpressure. Can you imagine what'd happen if one of these artificial break-lines ruptured? Not something I'd like to try...

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    15. Re:Curious about the vision requirement. by eh2o · · Score: 1

      Good vision is quite helpful for looking at very small things; for example soldering SMT components without the aid of a magnifying glass, reading fine print text and so on. Since the astronaut's tasks include running experiments they might need to be able to work with miniaturized components, read text on interfaces, graduations and other markings, etc. And a corrective lens can't restore both near and far sighted vision at the same time, and since it isn't very easy to "change glasses" in the middle of a spacewalk... I suppose they probably also require normal color vision, which excludes about 6% of the male population (and currently is not correctable).

    16. Re:Curious about the vision requirement. by eh2o · · Score: 1

      You could probably vacuum up the floating blobs quite easily... now that would make for some interesting housework!

    17. Re:Curious about the vision requirement. by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      They have the monthly replaceable ones, but since I started using contacts (fairly recently), I've only ever heard manufacturers advising you to just take them out at night anyway.
      The daily lenses are recommended to be used for no longer than 12 hours before being disposed of, so I've never wanted to use them for more than about 24 hours, and have never re-used them.

      Do you clean your lenses at all, or do you just leave them in for a few weeks? I must admit I've never really understood why the daily contacts are so bad if you reuse them.

    18. Re:Curious about the vision requirement. by DougWebb · · Score: 1

      I leave them in until they're uncomfortable. When I'm healthy, they can last for two months. When I have a cold, they might not last a day (I usually switch to my glasses.) After 25 years of wearing contacts, I know how to tell when they need to be changed: they feel dry or gritty and saline drops don't help, or I get a 'my contacts are too tight' headache and I have to take them out.

      If I take them out, I don't bother reusing them. Sometimes though, I'll take them out one at a time, clean them with saline, and put them right back in. I might have to do that after a spicy meal, or during the beginning stages of a cold, because my eyes are dumping junk out my tear ducts. (Did you know your tear ducts are one of your body's garbage dumps. More than two of your holes are used to get rid of waste...)

      I imagine the problem with reusing contacts is people who don't clean them properly. If you take them out and leave them sitting overnight in a case that wasn't cleaned properly, with saline that isn't sterile, then you can get bacteria growth which infects you when you the contacts back in. That's why I touch my contacts as little as possible, I'm careful about cleanliness when I do touch them, and I ditch them right away if they're going to be out of my eyes for more time than it takes to rinse them and stick them back in.

  12. No way by thegnu · · Score: 1

    I haven't even gotten around to impregnating some beezies. And the rest of my family's doing OK on the money. I think I'll let someone else kill him(her)self

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
    1. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I haven't even gotten around to impregnating some beezies."

      I think I see your problem.

  13. Pilot requirements :( by HexRei · · Score: 1

    "Pilot applicants must have at 1,000 hours at the controls of a fighter jet or in command of a larger jet aircraft. "

    In Freespace 2? But... But...

    1. Re:Pilot requirements :( by (H)elix1 · · Score: 1

      "Pilot applicants must have at 1,000 hours at the controls of a fighter jet or in command of a larger jet aircraft. "

      A thousand hours of flight time is a pretty typical amount before the insurance companies are willing to let you fly commercial aircraft - seems to be the amount of pilot time you need before they consider you a trusted aviator. You end up seeing a lot of pilots get their 'comercial' certification around 250 hours of flight time and do flight instruction (and work baggage lines) until they hit the magic 100-1200 hour window (depending on demand) where they can actually fly some of the more serious commercial aircraft. Seems to hold true for 'larger jet aircraft' to crop dusting.

  14. Salary by dlhm · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Salary kind of sucks for being strapped to a bomb....

    --
    Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit!
    1. Re:Salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      RTFA!

      fly aboard spacecraft other than the shuttle
    2. Re:Salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Salary kind of sucks for being strapped to a bomb....

      Do you want them to include 72 virgins as part of the deal?

    3. Re:Salary by EnsilZah · · Score: 2, Funny

      I live in Israel, people in this area do it for a much lower salary and much higher chances of successful detonation.

    4. Re:Salary by radarjd · · Score: 1

      The Salary kind of sucks for being strapped to a bomb....

      Anyone who cares that much about the salary is in the wrong business...

    5. Re:Salary by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      You mean, compared to the virgins waiting for the other ones in heaven?

    6. Re:Salary by Chineseyes · · Score: 1

      Especially since it is a bomb made from low bid parts and services.

      --
      I think the invisible hand of the market has its middle finger extended

      --A wise old fart named SC0RN
    7. Re:Salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, just 6 really hot women between the ages of 18 - 42.

  15. What? No computer science degrees? by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

    There goes my chance. Or does it count as a "physical science?"

    --
    It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
  16. OMG by Shinatosh · · Score: 1

    Well... I never thought I would say such a thing: Wish i was US citizen now! :(

    --
    :)
  17. Wrong country! by Bromskloss · · Score: 1

    Doh! Born in the wrong country for this one. :-(

    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    1. Re:Wrong country! by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1

      You could still become a naturalized citizen....

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    2. Re:Wrong country! by Bromskloss · · Score: 1

      You could still become a naturalized citizen....

      Yes, you are right. It would take quite a few years, though. Getting a green card takes apparently in itself a long time.

      --
      Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    3. Re:Wrong country! by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1
      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    4. Re:Wrong country! by Bromskloss · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily.

      Ah. I might actually go work there soon. Who knows, mabye that's where she is.

      --
      Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    5. Re:Wrong country! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Getting a green card in the case of marriage may not take long, but getting citizenship will still take awhile. My wife applied for citizenship this summer and received a note saying that they would schedule her interview within the next 365 days, and if she doesn't hear from them in that timeframe to contact yada, yada, yada.
      I imagine NASA would have filled the position by then.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  18. Where's my penis shaped ship? by monkeyboythom · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great. I have this sneaky suspicion that this cattle call will end up as network reality show contest.

  19. Criminals by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1

    To further challenge your morality, consider the prospect of selecting or requesting convicted criminals (in particular, death-row inmates). At what point does it start to seem wrong? Does their crime matter?

    --
    Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    1. Re:Criminals by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      At what point does it start to seem wrong?

      Right at the point where you hit submit and I read the comment. ;)

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  20. I wonder... by equimarginal · · Score: 1

    Do you think they could overlook the "three years of relevant experience" requirement? I'm an excellent oral and written communicator!

    --
    \zg
    1. Re:I wonder... by everphilski · · Score: 1

      Reference? Why, look at my posts on /. :)

  21. Re:So why the degree req'mt? by mcmonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why not instead start hiring ironworkers and folks who actually know WTF they're doing in high-up construction techniques? They're still (according to accounts) building the ISS, right?

    Maybe because this is the real-world NASA and not a Ben Afflec movie?

  22. Re:What? No computer science degrees? by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1
    Sorry, but the physical sciences are limited to:
    • Astronomy
    • Chemistry
    • Geology
    • Hydrology
    • Meteorology
    • Oceanography
    • Soil Science
    • Physics
    Computer Science (or at least a number of its subfields) may be classified as an applied science, especially as it applies to Information Science.

    Wouldn't you be more valuable on the ground, anyway?
    --
    Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
  23. You have been warned by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

    All the "space rendezvous" videos and images have been faked by the same company that faked the moon landing. They are good with Blender and the GIMP. Damned good.

    The truth is out there!

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
  24. Re:So why the degree req'mt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not instead start hiring ironworkers and folks who actually know WTF they're doing in high-up construction techniques? They're still (according to accounts) building the ISS, right?

    The typical new astronaut will wait 8-10 years for a first spaceflight, by which time the ISS construction should be complete.

    I'm actually surprised NASA is hiring, since they now have one fewer shuttle since 2003 and thus more astronauts than missions. I didn't read TFA but they're probably manning up for Project Constellation. Of course, there's no guarantee that a new hire will ever fly, especially if the program gets cut back or cancelled (google for Manned Orbital Laboratory for another famous such program -- only half of the 14 astronauts hired for MOL were able to transfer to the shuttle program).

    Some good advice I've heard for prospective astronauts is to go work for Burt Rutan or Richard Branson, and give NASA a pass.

  25. White men can't jump by null_session · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Your mother is an astronaut.

    1. Re:White men can't jump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mother wears space boots.

      It can't hurt to apply. My mother applied 30 years ago, but was rejected. We were all hoping!

  26. Re:What? No computer science degrees? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

    It's not like their control computers ever seize up.

    On a serious note, there isn't much that requires computer science skills up there. All the labs and simulators are on the ground.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  27. Re:(this joke will not appear a thousand times) by Nexus7 · · Score: 1

    Did they forget some requirements?

    Flammability?

  28. obUCB by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

    Filthy astronauts, driving their moon-buggies through our neighborhoods at all hours of the night, playing that theme from "2001" real loud on their cosmo-blasters!

    1. Re:obUCB by funkboy3 · · Score: 1

      Eat the cheeseburger, astro boy!
      Eat the cheeseburger, astro boy!
      Eat the cheeseburger, astro boy!

      --
      Love, Andy
    2. Re:obUCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't need no moon cheese babies!

    3. Re:obUCB by ShawmcBigdis · · Score: 1

      Next time you want to incite a riot, I suggest you choose an easier chant.

  29. Arrrrrrrgh by everphilski · · Score: 1

    Me be the first space pirate, dread pirate Everphilski. Arrrrgh.

  30. Re:What? No computer science degrees? by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1

    I totally agree.

    Computer By the way, Computer Scientists who are interested in getting involved with NASA should apply for an internship or co-op with the JPL.

    --
    Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
  31. What about the tilt-a-whirl requirement? by faloi · · Score: 1

    I can meet all the other goals outlined, but no way would I be willing to go the distance on the tilt-a-whirl (whirl and hurl?). I prefer my insides stay inside.

    --
    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    1. Re:What about the tilt-a-whirl requirement? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Ever go to the IMAX movie in the Air and Space musuem where they show how you can get disoriented? Sit you in a chair with a white polkadot umbrella surrounding your field of vision and then they spin it. With the IMAX screen I always got the feeling that my chair was spinning around.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    2. Re:What about the tilt-a-whirl requirement? by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      I can meet all the other goals outlined, but no way would I be willing to go the distance on the tilt-a-whirl (whirl and hurl?). I prefer my insides stay inside.

      Some of us actually pay for rides on that kind of thing. And if you're scared to ride NASA's merry-go-round, why are you even contemplating getting aboard a Soyuz?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  32. my big chance by bakamaki · · Score: 0

    Finally I get to drive a moon buggy and pound Tang. It's going to suck when I'm no longer able to eat solid food but those are the breaks. I'm tired of people being racist against astronauts!

  33. No guaranteed two way missio by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    I thought the original question was "would you go even if we couldn't guarantee that we could get you back" with the situation being that you would be sent there to settle (which implies raising a family there) with base expectation that you would be there for years and with the understanding tht NASA may not be able to develop the technology for a return flight.

    When put in this context it is similar to that of a pioneer going west to settle and grow communities.

    If this were the case, then I'd go in a heartbeat,

    myke

  34. Sorry /.'ers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the requirements:

    * Must be able to leave mothers basement for longer than the cook time of a Hot Pocket(TM)

  35. Re:So why the degree req'mt? by everphilski · · Score: 1

    The typical new astronaut will wait 8-10 years for a first spaceflight

    I'm actually surprised NASA is hiring, since they now have one fewer shuttle since 2003

    Shuttles go out of commission in 2010. Most likely a good number of astronauts are up to leave the service due to age/desire and/or the delay between now and constellation...

    Some good advice I've heard for prospective astronauts is to go work for Burt Rutan or Richard Branson, and give NASA a pass.

    Rutan sold Scaled to Northrop Grumman. While he's still a senior manager, one must wonder for how long. Burt isn't exactly young anymore. And being an astronaut for SS2 is basically the equivalent of a glorified airline pilot / space waitress, for 10 minutes at a time. Not denigrating it but suborbital and orbital are two different ballparks. It'll be nice when someone like Armadillo or Masten actually makes orbit accessible.

    Arrr!

  36. They could call it... by CatsupBoy · · Score: 1

    Who wants to be a MILLIONA.... er... 60 thousand-doller-ionaire!

  37. Re:What? No computer science degrees? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

    Good link. My degree was in computer engineering. What confuses people is when I tell them that I can't stand high-level programming. I was always more interested in the electrons than the bits.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  38. Re: Network Show by apt142 · · Score: 1

    There's an idea with some potential.

  39. Suggestions by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Informative

    Get a PhD
    Get your private pilots license
    Get certified in Scuba
    Run 10 miles a day, be in good physical shape
    Make sure you are comfortable speaking in public, and are fairly good at it
    Have diverse interests

    Now you've met the real minimum requirements...go have fun!

    FFWIW, I considered being an as-can, and know others who were attempting to get selected. Getting into the NBA is a bit easier than getting into to be an astronaut, statistically speaking.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Suggestions by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      Damn, I'm such a nerd it took me about a minute before I realized NBA is not some competing agency for which I was trying to figure out what the N and B stood for.

    2. Re:Suggestions by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Getting into the NBA is a bit easier than getting into to be an astronaut, statistically speaking.

      A bit? Each NBA team probably fields more players in a given year than NASA has active astronauts. How many NBA teams are there now?

    3. Re:Suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a US citizen graduating with a PhD in Electrical Engineering in 2009 from a top 10 US school. No pilots license. No scuba. Run 5 miles a day. I speak at conferences in front of hundreds of people. I am so applying to this.

    4. Re:Suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You considered being an ass-can?

    5. Re:Suggestions by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1
      Or to put it another way, and answer the question implicitly posed by the headline: your chances are effectively nil. Or null. Or undef, if you speaka da Perl.

      Seriously. 50 people a year in the UK win the national lottery, and the odds of a single ticket winning are so large as to be effectively infinite over a normal human lifetime (assuming you're not buying tens of thousands of tickets every week.)

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    6. Re: Suggestions by nbritton · · Score: 1

      You can use X-Plane to study up on orbital physics and escape velocity, you can even fly the space shuttle on Mars if you'd like... http://www.x-plane.com/features.html

    7. Re:Suggestions by metlin · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add -- get a job at NASA.

      Most of the people who end up as astronauts used to work at NASA in engineering or related fields. In fact, they mention quite explicitly that working at NASA usually increases your chances of becoming an astronaut (now, this may be PR to get more people to join NASA, but hey).

      Now, the pilots are a different story. The pilots usually have a different background (Air Force/Navy etc) but they too tend to be rather well qualified.

    8. Re:Suggestions by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      But everyone knows those NBA players only joined the NBA because of NASA's height requirements.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    9. Re:Suggestions by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Oops, forgot that one. At the time I was looking to become one, I did work at NASA as a principal aerospace engineer.

      I didn't have the PhD or the pilot's license (heh, still don't), but those were both reasonably obtainable.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    10. Re:Suggestions by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      Getting into the NBA is a bit easier than getting into to be an astronaut, statistically speaking.

      and they don't have that bothersome height restriction.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    11. Re:Suggestions by hawk · · Score: 1

      Get a PhD check

      Get your private pilots license doable

      Get certified in Scuba *yech* cold water!

      Run 10 miles a day, be in good physical shape awe, let's just forget it.

      Make sure you are comfortable speaking in public, and are fairly good at it Oh, maybe this is for me

      Have diverse interests err, lawyer, statistician, computational economicst with an undergradutate in physics with a philosophy minor, makes spectacular beer, . . . I'm in!

      hawk
  40. Tiny spaces by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1

    Given that you can freely rotate in zero-gravity, this would require that a room have no diagonal length of at least 190.5 cm. Are space station rooms really that small?

    --
    Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    1. Re:Tiny spaces by nsayer · · Score: 1

      RTFA. It's not the station, it's the Soyuz capsule you use to get there, or leave in a hurry (if necessary).

  41. "Mission control.. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..I regret to inform you that our manned expedition to the Red Planet Mars has encountered a slight difficulty.."

    1. Re:"Mission control.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess, you couldn't find the red planet? I kid, i kid!

  42. Great Reality Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like a great premise for a reality show. With the sad state of affairs across the board (educationally and due to our nation's preoccupation with the "real lives" of everyone else), I'd be surprised if we didn't see "Who Wants to be an Astronaut" soon.
     
    Think of the hookups and ensuing hilarity (or conflict) in that crowd of alpha geeks.

  43. I'm in! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...oh wait. Is the space station between here and the kitchen or the bathroom?

    Nevermind.

  44. Finally! by rengav · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From the www.usajobs.gov site:

    ASTRONAUT CANDIDATE (NON-PILOTING BACKGROUND): 1. Bachelor's degree from an accredited institution in engineering, biological science, physical science, or mathematics. Quality of academic preparation is important. Degree must be followed by at least 3 years of related, progressively responsible, professional experience. An advanced degree is desirable and may be substituted for experience as follows: master's degree = 1 year of experience, doctoral degree = 3 years of experience. Teaching experience, including experience at the K - 12 levels, is considered to be qualifying experience for the Astronaut Candidate position; therefore, educators are encouraged to apply.
    I'm really glad to see that teaching experience is being considered "real" job experience for once. Looking at all the minimum qualifications, with 7 years of K-12 teaching, I qualify. I'm going to apply. Who knows, I might get lucky. Wish me luck!
    1. Re:Finally! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Funny, based on my experience the one group of professional who shouldn't qualify is teachers.

      What about the job makes them more qualified to go into space? I know, it's a tough job where you work half the time then anybody else in the same pay range.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've always thought highly of teachers. It just hasn't worked out so well for them in the past. Good luck!

    3. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When astronauts aren't... astronauting..., they're doing show'n'tell for endless busloads of kiddies. Teacher training is good there.

    4. Re:Finally! by fonik · · Score: 1

      Good luck! I meet all the requirements except for the degree. I'm still in college. If you make it, you've gotta post on /. from space.

    5. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately educators are considered here in Houston by much of the space community the largest idiots in the astronaut corp. While one can argue the merits of manned space flight and if it is just a publicity stunt or not-almost all in the know have no debate on the value of flying educators. It is basically a joke.

      That said NASA will most likely hire a few.

    6. Re:Finally! by vbraga · · Score: 1

      Good luck, rengav.

      --
      English is not my first language. Corrections and suggestions are welcome.
    7. Re:Finally! by jim_deane · · Score: 1

      With a master's and a couple of years teaching experience, I'm also planning to apply.

      I always thought I'd wait until I had a Ph.D....but this looks like as good a chance as any!

  45. Is the vision thing an age thing? by gelfling · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the vision thing is a quiet rejection of anyone over 40?

    1. Re:Is the vision thing an age thing? by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      Considering you'll have to train for years before you get into space, the body is in physical decline for most people by age 35-40, the intent is to make sure the candidates are still physically capably by the time they get into space.

      Rare is the athlete that can compete at a high level beyond the age of 40, even then, there is a noticeable decline. Michael Jordan, for instance, in his last two years could no longer dunk like he could at 35 much less 25, and scored 8 and 10 points fewer than his career average.

      I don't know insurance tables, but there's probably an increased likely hood of surprise physical ailments the older you get, and maybe this reduces the chance of difficulty on a mission.

      Spacewalks in bulky spacesuits and other physically demanding tasks are best left to those closer to their prime.

      There is also probably a cost issue at play. Astronauts recruited younger, can probably make twice the number of missions for the same amount of initial training, so it's more cost effective to employ younger astronauts who can be around for longer periods of time.

    2. Re:Is the vision thing an age thing? by Pchelka · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't think the vision requirement is an age thing. I read an article a while back that said older astronauts may be preferable because older people seem to handle radiation exposure better than younger people do. I couldn't find the original article I read but you can find something similar here. This article says:

      Those radiation limits vary with age and gender. For 30-year-old astronauts, the maximum allowable mission length for a female is set at 54 days and reaches 91 days for male spaceflyers, the report stated. By age 55, the total days in space max out at 159 days for female astronauts and 268 days for their male counterparts.

  46. woo by nomadic · · Score: 1

    Requirements include 'Must be a U.S. citizen between 5-foot-2 and 6-foot-3 in height (to squeeze into Russia's three-passenger Soyuz capsule)' 'At least a bachelor's degree in engineering, a biological or physical science, or mathematics' 'three years of relevant professional experience' and most interestingly 'Vision correctable to 20/20.

    Hey, I'm a U.S. citizen! Maybe they'll waive all the other requirements for me.

  47. Mass to orbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does weighing >300 pounds make me ineligible?

  48. Astronaut? Yes; Go into space? No by sircastor · · Score: 5, Informative

    On a radio show called "This American Life", the host Ira Glass interviewed a couple of Astronauts which revealed that most astronauts haven't been in space, and many aren't even scheduled for a flight. So if you enjoy meetings and lots of paperwork, sign up. Yes it gives you a chance to get into space (better than us normal ground-dwellers), but frankly, this isn't the dream that most want it to be.

    1. Re:Astronaut? Yes; Go into space? No by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      And anyone following spaceflight issues has known about this for years. Micheal Collins discusses it in Carrying The Fire (published in 1974), and virtually every astronaut biography and autobiography after the Mercury Seven touches on it.
       
      It always frustrates me how many soi-disant space nuts Slashdot has - and how damm few of them actually bother to get their information from other than the mass media.

    2. Re:Astronaut? Yes; Go into space? No by Arwing · · Score: 1

      Yah, but you actually get a business card with the title of "Astronaut".

  49. Re:What? No computer science degrees? by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but the physical sciences are limited to:
    • Astronomy
    • Chemistry
    • Geology
    • Hydrology
    • Meteorology
    • Oceanography
    • Soil Science
    • Physics
    Computer Science (or at least a number of its subfields) may be classified as an applied science, especially as it applies to Information Science.

    Wouldn't you be more valuable on the ground, anyway? You're absolutely right. I should definitely leave space exploration up to the Soil Scientists and Oceanographers.
    --
    It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
  50. 6'5" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    daaamn j00 father!!!!#@#!

  51. Re:What? No computer science degrees? by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1

    You seriously should, if returning Mars samples or exploring water flow on Mars are on your priority list.

    Space exploration is probably the greatest interdisciplinary field that we can pursue. Nearly every field will be essential to some part of it.

    --
    Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
  52. that isn't the only descrimination by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    "Must be a U.S. citizen" Damn it! They are discriminating against ILLEGAL ALIENS! Whoops...I meant undocumented workers...

  53. Are you kidding me? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    The number one way to get the ladies is "Hello, I'm independently wealthy." but slightly below that is "Hello, I'm an astronaut."

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Are you kidding me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The number one way to get the ladies is "Hello, I'm independently wealthy." but slightly below that is "Hello, I'm an astronaut."
      Yeah, that line works really well on the women at the sci-fi conventions... both of them.
  54. Re:What? No computer science degrees? by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

    Space exploration is probably the greatest interdisciplinary field that we can pursue. Nearly every field will be essential to some part of it. ...except Computer Science?

    Seriously, who's going to clean out the spyware on the ship's onboard web terminals? Or make sure the ship's Xbox 360's are updated correctly?

    Come on, throw me a bone here.
    --
    It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
  55. Why so stringent a vision requirement? by Jtheletter · · Score: 1

    Why is it 20/20? Does NASA really require every astronaut to be capable of landing the shuttle in an emergency? I just don't see why, if I'm the robotics engineer on board, I would need perfect vision to complete my tasks.

    Granted, you don't want people who can't function at all without glasses in case of emergency, glasses are broken/lost in space ;) etc. But what's the maximum line of sight on the space station, like 25 feet? If someone can see well enough I don't understand why perfect vision is required. Hell why not make the requirement correctable to 20/10 while we're at it, hyper vision only candidates. And a space pony.

    And also, my mother has undergone corrective laser eye surgery, so I know that it pretty much ruins one's night vision. Um, isn't space *really* dark? So it's ok if you can't see worth a damn in the dark/near dark, but not ok if you can read an instrument panel at 40 feet but not 50?

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    1. Re:Why so stringent a vision requirement? by WalkingBear · · Score: 1

      (humor on)

      It's for the ultra-secret black ops team stationed on the ISS to oversee the compound that Osama's been hiding out in somewhere in the deep woods of Nebraska. They need snipers for the Reagan administration's Briliant Pebbles system to drop rocks like the one that was live fire tested in Peru last week by the CDC.

      (/humor off)

      (sorry, been reading LiveJournal's political blogs again)

  56. Vision correctable by Late-Eight · · Score: 1

    "20/20. For the first time, the space agency will consider applicants who have undergone successful refractive eye surgery."

    I wonder does it matter what type of corrective eye surgery you have had, I only ask because I remembered this article.

  57. As a job, it sucks. by Animats · · Score: 1

    Being an astronaut isn't all that great. There are few flights, and you spend years waiting to be assigned to one. Meanwhile, NASA sticks you in make-work jobs, like "Lunch with an Astronaut. You spend a big chunk of your life on hold. That's the basic frustration of the job.

    The most successful astronauts are ones who work the system effectively to get good assignments during their downtime. One of the current astronauts spent a tour as an Undersecretary of State. It's a great career move for military types. Most astronauts are pilots; even those who aren't "pilot-astronauts" tend to be flyers. NASA encourages its astronauts to fly (the Original Seven lobbied for this), and has aircraft for astronauts to use. The astronaut corps is a pilot's club.

    NASA has 92 active astronauts right now. But they're getting older, and NASA needs some younger people.

    1. Re:As a job, it sucks. by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      You spend a big chunk of your life on hold. That's the basic frustration of the job.

      I'd get paid for doing almost nothing? What's the downside again?

    2. Re:As a job, it sucks. by 808140 · · Score: 1

      I'd get paid for doing almost nothing? What's the downside again?


      Clearly, you've never had a job where you really have to do almost nothing. It's boring and depressing. At my last job, a change in management and restructuring resulted in our team being orphaned for two months -- we had nothing to do and spent most of the day surfing the web. It may have gone on longer than two months, even... I don't know, because I quit.

  58. Why do you have to be a US citizen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems to me that you would be travelling entirely in Russian equipment. Mind you, that's much safer than American kit.

    Perhaps you ought to be a practicising member of the Communist Party?

  59. Re:What? No computer science degrees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, once we establish a permanent base on the Moon or Mars, there may be more scope for Computer Science: look at the theoretical work already done on "Interplanetary IP". Communications between a medium or long-term colony on Mars and Earth would be a priority, and there may be some scope for developing and testing improved network and communications technologies.

    Of course most of this is going to fall under Electrical Engineering as the physical layer is more important than the logical layers, so you're probably still not going to get to go into space.

  60. Re:What? No computer science degrees? by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 1

    CS falls somewhere in between engineering and pure mathematics. If they are taking engineers and mathematicians, I see no reason why CS wouldn't also work.

  61. Job Posting by allscan · · Score: 1
    Here is the actual posting http://jobsearch.usajobs.opm.gov/getjob.asp?JobID=62398554&AVSDM=2007-09-18+00%3A00%3A04&Logo=0&pg=3&jbf574=NN*&FedEmp=N&sort=rv&vw=d&ss=0&brd=3876&FedPub=Y&caller=/agency_search.asp.

    Take note that you need 1,000 hours flight time in a jet air craft. Good luck with that if you weren't in the military or fly commercially.

    1. Re:Job Posting by sr180 · · Score: 1

      Thats only a requirement for the piloting background. You dont need it if you dont have a piloting background.

      --
      In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
  62. What NASA is looking for by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1
    A mathematician, a different kind of mathematician, and a statistician.

    And no potato chips, please. They're ruffled.

  63. Re:What? No computer science degrees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah they need someone who can code up a reel 133t webpage in a crisis!!! CS degree - what a waste of fuckin time!!!

    Yes I am an engineer!!!

  64. I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is begging for a reality TV show.

    "Who wants to be an Astronaut?" or "American Astronaut"

    A million geeks in line half of which wearing diapers, carrying knives, mace, and rubber hose. Comedy ensues.

  65. Flamebait? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1, Funny
    Cripes - who gave all the postdocs mod points this morning?

    /P

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  66. Correctable to 20/20 is old by ianalis · · Score: 1

    I've checked the requirements a few years back and IIRC the "vision correctable to 20/20" is already a requirement. That is, you don't have to have 20/20 vision and as I understand refractive eye surgery is not needed, eyeglasses will suffice.

  67. Re:So why the degree req'mt? by metlin · · Score: 1

    Well, at least things have begun moving in the right direction (that is, folks can have a shot at going to space without having to be a test pilot or a PhD first).
    Not really. If you look at the profiles of most astronauts, you will notice that a lot of them do indeed have PhDs and a lot of them are also qualified pilots.

    And in fact, why not? If you want the best of the best, why would you want to settle for something less? Besides, a PhDs are a lot more common these days - hell, at any half decent tech place, most people tend to have at least their master's degrees.
  68. Re:So why the degree req'mt? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why not instead start hiring ironworkers and folks who actually know WTF they're doing in high-up construction techniques?

    Possibly because "high-up construction techniques" typically involve heights at which gravity is still a major factor and air supply isn't. If you're not careful when building out on the 50th floor, you'll fall to your death rather quickly. You don't typically need anything special to breathe, though.

    Much of the building of the ISS takes place on the ground and the space shuttles just deploy the pieces. When the pieces are put together "high-up", the workers don't so much need to worry about falling as they need to worry about suit punctures, navigating in zero-G, drifting away from the site, etc. Stick an iron-worker in a suit in space and he won't know how to connect two pieces of the ISS together. He won't know to be careful of each screw lest it puncture his suit. He won't know half of the things that the astronauts know to stay safe and keep from getting himself killed.
    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  69. Re:What? No computer science degrees? by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

    Yes I am an engineer!!! ...who once had his flaxen-haired sweetheart stolen away from him by a dashing CS major, apparently. That'd have to be it -- the anger in your post makes little sense otherwise.
    --
    It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
  70. Job interview ? by Potatomasher · · Score: 1

    Are you kidding me ?! Can't I just pay $20 million or something ...

    --
    A million monkeys and this is the best sig they could come up with...
  71. NASA best years are behind them by mcguyver · · Score: 1

    A friend working as a test pilot in the military spoke about NASA recently. Said its best to wait for the private than take your chances with NASA. This coming from a guy who spent his whole life getting to where he is today, gambling away 10 years to maybe go up with a struggling agency is not attractive.

    1. Re:NASA best years are behind them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what does the N stand for?

      N - ?
      A - A
      S - Struggling
      A - Agency

    2. Re:NASA best years are behind them by Keebler71 · · Score: 1

      Stinkin? That you?

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
  72. another step for mankind by mr_musan · · Score: 1

    i do think this is a great thing soon we might be getting "off world" programming jobs instead of just off shore ;)

    shame they didn't include a computing degree this time.

  73. Re:What? No computer science degrees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It does if you're doing it right. Schwing!

  74. Not me by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

    I get claustrophobic and anxious just thinking about being in a large tin can with no way out for months at a time. Y'all go ahead. I'll watch.

  75. Do I see a new reality show on the horizon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who wants to be an Astronaut!

  76. What happens after the shuttle is retired? by dtjohnson · · Score: 1

    Nasa plans to retire the uber-complicated space shuttle and supply the space station via Russian Soyuz capsules. Under the Bush Administration foreign policy, our relations with Russia are not exactly improving. What happens, then, if there comes a day in 2012 or whenever when Russia just says "no, we are not going to fly any Americans to the space station." Then we can call the space station the Russian Space Station and maybe NASA doesn't need those new astronauts.

    1. Re:What happens after the shuttle is retired? by Xodmoe · · Score: 1

      What happens, then, if there comes a day in 2012 or whenever when Russia just says "no, we are not going to fly any Americans to the space station." Then we can call the space station the Russian Space Station and maybe NASA doesn't need those new astronauts.

      By then all of those Cantonese-speaking Engineering majors we have over here will have mastered enough Mandarin and some flight hours to bum rides on the next generation of Shenzhous going up. - TIMTOWDI

  77. I for one... by absolut_kurant · · Score: 1

    ...welcome our new Homeresque man-off-the-street overlords! Finally a thread where this tired old meme is on topic...

    --
    Yes.
  78. Virginia Dare by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1

    Just imagine being the Martian Virginia Dare. Someday centuries from now, bigots will idolize you and use your name.

  79. Non-pilots? by EgoWumpus · · Score: 1

    I assume they're not looking for pilots, given the desire that people have engineering or other science degrees. But I don't actually know... do most NASA pilots have those degrees? I know that back in the days of "The Right Stuff" you more or less had to be a superman, but recent news items suggest they have relaxed their expectations.

    --

    [Ego]out

    1. Re:Non-pilots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if most of their pilots have technical degrees, but a lot of them certainly do. I think all or almost all of the early astronauts did, plus all of them were military pilots.

      Remember in order to become an Air Force or Navy pilot you have to be an officer, which generally means having a four year degree. NASA has the luxury of picking the smartest and most disciplined from that group. You may think of astronauts as just having a lot of guts and patience, but they could generally hold their own in a math-a-thon, too.

      Advanced degrees are always a plus. Even for mission specialists (a separate category from pilots), having a pilot's license is a plus on your resume.

  80. MS in CS? by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if a MS in Computer Science would work...that's pretty close to math/logic.

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
    1. Re:MS in CS? by sohare · · Score: 1

      Theoretical computer science, at least, is mathematics.

    2. Re:MS in CS? by Mr.+Dop · · Score: 1

      I wonder if a MS in Computer Science would work...that's pretty close to math/logic. Yes it does accroding to TFA (TFJP maybe?):

      Applicants for the Astronaut Candidate Program must meet the basic education requirements for NASA engineering and scientific positions--specifically: successful completion of standard professional curriculum in an accredited college or university leading to at least a bachelor's degree with major study in an appropriate field of engineering, biological science, physical science, or mathematics.

      The following degree fields are not considered qualifying:
      --Degrees in Technology (Engineering Technology, Aviation Technology, Medical Technology, etc.)
      --Degrees in Psychology (except for Clinical Psychology, Physiological Psychology, or Experimental Psychology, which are qualifying)
      --Degrees in Nursing
      --Degrees in Exercise Physiology or similar fields
      --Degrees in Social Sciences (Geography, Anthropology, Archaeology, etc.)
      --Degrees in Aviation, Aviation Management, or similar fields So I dont see why not, heck the worst they can say is 'No'
      So why not? I have one, I did.
  81. Tee-hee!! by eliminohpea · · Score: 1

    Under Key Requirements: "Frequent travel may be required." I hope I'm not the only one who finds this amusing.

  82. They're not diapers. . . by jppatton1 · · Score: 1

    . . . they're Tinkle Togs! Like the astronauts wear! (Per Camp Lazlo.)

  83. Travel requirements by slapout · · Score: 1

    From the job description:

    The open positions require extensive travel on Earth and in space. Possible destinations may include, but are not limited to, Texas, Florida, California, Russia, Kazakhstan, the International Space Station and the moon.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  84. 6'4" by Scorchio · · Score: 1

    We can usher in a new era of leg reduction surgery...

  85. sounds dreadful by m2943 · · Score: 1

    A decade or more of sitting through government meetings and government training camps, being paid a lousy salary, in order to maybe make a few space flights to the stinky international space station, where you can then run a few experiments?

    Frankly, you're a lot better off making enough money in the private sector to buy your own flight into space.

  86. There is a reason. by Agarax · · Score: 1

    The only reason the space shuttle keeps going is that it is quite remarkable that for it's expense, the money is for the parts is distributed over a vast number of constituencies, making it far more attractive than something cheaper that would appease fewer senators.

    --
    Remember folks, slashdot doesn't have a -1 "disagree" moderation!
  87. Re:What? No computer science degrees? by zevans · · Score: 1

    Oceanographers presumably have a reasonable grasp of environments with 3 degrees of freedom, and low levels of apparent weight, and a harsh medium requiring special equipment for respiration and protection... ...or have I been reading too much Steven Baxter.

    --
    "... and more and more now there are all kinds of electronic goodies available" -- Pink Floyd 1972
  88. Re:So why the degree req'mt? by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1

    [..] Some good advice I've heard for prospective astronauts is to go work for Burt Rutan or Richard Branson, and give NASA a pass.

    And what exactly is making this "good advice"? NASA has actually sent people into low earth orbit. Something like 400 of them, at my last count. Neither Rutan nor Branson have ever done this, have ever even tried or have any kind of realistic plans in place of ever trying. Ever.

    And no, "I have a lot of money thus I'll just go and do it" does not count as some kind of "plan".

    Oh, and NASA has actually sent people beyond low earth orbit. And has realistic plans of doing it again. Which nobody else on the planet has done, and no private entity on the planet is even talking about ever trying even under the best possible future circumstances.

    --
    We're all born with nothing.
    If you die in debt, you're ahead.
  89. CS falls a lot of different places. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Depends on the university.

    In some CS is taught out of engineering, others Arts&Science (usually split off math) still others the business school.

    If I was going to major in CS I'd definitely avoid any University that taught CS out of business.

    You say CS is halfway between Math and Engineering. As Engineering is a perfect blend of Science, Math, Art and Business that would make CS just math heavy Engineering. Not what I recall (we EEs took more math then the the CS students IIRC CS didn't even take DiffEq).

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  90. Computers are tools. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    If you are a specialized tool maker don't expect much need to be out front, in an exploratory role.

    Anything that can be done remotely will be done remotely. NASA has plenty of call for CS, just not in flight.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  91. weight by symes · · Score: 1

    Requirements include 'Must be a U.S. citizen between 5-foot-2 and 6-foot-3 in height (to squeeze into Russia's three-passenger Soyuz capsule)' 'At least a bachelor's degree in engineering, a biological or physical science, or mathematics' 'three years of relevant professional experience' and most interestingly 'Vision correctable to 20/20. OK - so the height bit I'm ok on - what about width?
  92. Grumble, grumble height restrictions by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

    at 2.07 meters and 150 kg, I'll probably never get to outer space.
    Grrrr. Maybe, if I could find a way to put up a XXXL-Prize...
    Title the reality show "The Biggest Launcher"...
    Ah, well, back to dreaming...

    --
    Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
  93. Re:What? No computer science degrees? by eh2o · · Score: 1

    I personally like best the extremes -- at low levels you have extremely precise control and a small domain of responsibility, and at the very highest level of programing (e.g. mathematical modeling) you have only incidental concern for machine optimization, unlimited structural possibilities and again a small domain of responsibility.

    Its the mid-level and "glue" coding that sucks the most; that is where your manager wants the application to include everything and the kitchen sink, which in my experience leads to burn out.

  94. Obligatory... by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

    Reporter: Uh, question for the barbecue chef: Don't you think there is an inherent danger in sending underqualified civilians into outer space?
    Homer: I'll field this one. The only danger is if they send us to that terrible Planet of the Apes...

  95. Race to Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can see what it might be like to be an astronaut on the first human mission to Mars with the Discovery Canada series Race to Mars http://www.racetomars.ca/ (TV + free 3D video games == good times)