With the advent of the web and email we can diseminate our work to our colleagues and perform peer review all without the intervention of a journal.
Speaking of which, I notice you use ZWiki; check out WikiTeX, which, in addition to plenary AMS, supports Feynman diagrams, graphs (Graphviz) and plots (Gnuplot).
[I] would happily volunteer to round up suitable brains for future digestion.
Which reminds me of 1HenryVI, actually, where an enflamèd Talbot exclaims o'erlooking Orleans:
Frenchmen, I'll be a Salisbury to you: Pucelle or puzzel, dolphin or dogfish, Your hearts I'll stamp out with my horse's heels, And make a quagmire of your mingled brains.
"Plagiarist of the Century" quoth the sensationalist headline; more credit is due, in any case, to certain now-anonymous Italian physicists: Olinto De Pretto comes to mind, et alii.
No, I don't really believe it... but I really just read this somewhere.
As I can attest from driving on the Autobahn, nothing beats regular and sanitary rest stops; but that's typically the result of responsible government, and the Germans gleaned their road-making most nearly from the Romans.
Being an Apple Distinguished Educator, I'd wager you have some evangelical, that is, proselytical interest; that's fine, but let's have the cards on the table.
Rather the phrase means that the state of concern is null, as it can not be further decreased with "could not care less"[.]
Until you establish the notion of negative care, or disregard; which is to say, "could care less" means: "the limit of care as care approacheth negative infinity" or, equivalently, "the limit of disregard as disregard approacheth infinity."
What you have, however, is freely no neutral stance, but a passionate negative one; and passionate negativity may indeed approach care.
Slashdot Mirror
I'd say downers and uppers.
Revolution is partially a privilege of space and resource.
"Plagiarist of the Century" quoth the sensationalist headline; more credit is due, in any case, to certain now-anonymous Italian physicists: Olinto De Pretto comes to mind, et alii.
"Illogical" might have sufficed, and been clearer to boot.
Thus the 's' in 'thinks': the third person is "thinking", and I am in the dative.
I've already taken to using it; AL2.0 is beta, but charming and unobtrusive nevertheless.
[A]nybody know the html entity code for the set
inclus[i]on operator?
Try the following:
Entity Numeric Semantic
------ ------- ---------------------
sub ⊂ Subset of
nsub ⊄ Not a subset of
sube ⊆ Subset of or equal to
none of which, alas, are recognized by Slash.
Until you establish the notion of negative care, or disregard; which is to say, "could care less" means: "the limit of care as care approacheth negative infinity" or, equivalently, "the limit of disregard as disregard approacheth infinity."
What you have, however, is freely no neutral stance, but a passionate negative one; and passionate negativity may indeed approach care.