Slashdot Mirror


Post-Katrina Images on Google Maps

breadiu writes " Satellite imagery of New Orleans taken on Wednesday, August 31st is now available on Google Maps. Enter 'New Orleans' in the search field at the top of the page, or drag and zoom the map to the area. A red 'Katrina' button will appear at the top right of the map, next to the existing map buttons. Older images for the area are still available too - click the "Satellite" button to switch to those."

448 comments

  1. However, by whatthef*ck · · Score: 5, Informative

    Unfortunately, post-Katrina images for only about half the city are available.

    1. Re:However, by Awperator · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what's going on with the black portions?

    2. Re:However, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Top Secret. I could tell you but I would have to kill you.

    3. Re:However, by daviqh · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Maybe the next half will be up tomorrow...and did you see the (I think) superdome. They weren't kidding when they said the roof was ripping off!

      --
      Microsoft is like...no, it's much worse.
    4. Re:However, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's kinda annoying that the Tulane campus isn't included. I'd like some idea of how much damage it sustained.

    5. Re:However, by wdr1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's a beta.

      -Bill

      --
      SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
    6. Re:However, by Attar81 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you're correct - Do a search for "superdome, new orleans"

    7. Re:However, by mistermicro · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, only half the city is still above water..

    8. Re:However, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Maybe the next half will be up tomorrow
      The next half of the city or of the images?


      *risks the ticket to hell to see all the ice there created by /. switching to CSS*

    9. Re:However, by adpowers · · Score: 2, Informative

      The images have been up for a couple of days now and haven't changed. If you want to see a large collection of Katrina images, download Google Earth and go to http://earth.google.com/katrina.html.

    10. Re:However, by ralphart · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From the image that were cut off, it appeared as though cloud cover masked portions of the city at the time the photos were made. Of course that's pure speculation on my part, based on a small amount of evidence.

    11. Re:However, by lildogie · · Score: 1

      > Maybe the next half will be up tomorrow...

      The first half was up at least two days ago, when our friend, who used to live in Violet, called from his refuge in Covington. He wanted me to describe the arial view of Violet, but the Katrina pictures were the same then as now: just the New Orleans metro area, and not much of St. Bernard's parish, Violet or Chalmette.

      But we already know: Violette is gone now.

    12. Re:However, by peeon · · Score: 3, Informative
    13. Re:However, by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative
      Maybe the next half will be up tomorrow...and did you see the (I think) superdome. They weren't kidding when they said the roof was ripping off!
      They may not have been kidding - but they certainly were exaggerating. All that was ripped off was the waterproofing membrane, the roof beneath is structurally intact.
  2. google earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone checked if they have updated google earth as well?? I find better detail on google earth.

    1. Re:google earth by Jamu · · Score: 1

      The basic images in Google Earth haven't been updated. If there is a similar 'Katrina' button to the one in Google Maps in Google Earth then I didn't find it.

      --
      Who ordered that?
    2. Re:google earth by dillon_rinker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You're saying that we have here the 21st-century version of an old-school newspaper scoop. (Note to hard-core slashdotizens: a scoop is the news reporters' version of "FR15T P05T!".) The company whose public databases are most rapidly updated to reflect reality can scoop its competition, drawing to itself customers who seek the latest information. (Note to non-native speakers of English: in that sentence, "latest" means "newest." Stupid, I know.) Were I a vice-president at google, I'd create a division that hired aerial photographers after any natural disaster, military attack, industrial accident, etc. solely to ensure that Google Maps stays current. (Note to readers from google.com: reply to this post if you want to hire me to implement this great idea.)

    3. Re:google earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linked (bold and in red) from the front page of google earth for a week http://earth.google.com/katrina.html . No points for you Sherlock.

    4. Re:google earth by dschl · · Score: 4, Informative
      It's been available on Google Earth since at least Sunday or Monday, from the Keyhole BBS. You had to download a file which gave you a layer showing a red dot at the centre of each satellite image, and when you clicked on the dot, it would then download each image separately for an approx 1 mile by 1 mile area. Google Earth also allowed you to see all of the images for other areas, including places like Gulfport and Biloxi. Complete devastation, nothing left but matchsticks.

      Also, Katrina images have been available on Google Maps since at least Saturday, as I was browsing it Sat afternoon. Kudos to Google - with that kind of speed, they should be running FEMA, too.

      --
      Slashdot - the place where you can look like a genius by restating the obvious
    5. Re:google earth by Tyger · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to the Google Blog you can get Google Earth overlays related to the hurricane here.

    6. Re:google earth by mferrare · · Score: 1

      Download what? I can't see any red dots on my google earth and there doesn't seem anything obvious in the keyhole layer to indicate it.

      --
      Why would anyone want to use a text editor that is not vi?
    7. Re:google earth by kahanamoku · · Score: 1

      then you'd make google earth a Pay-Per-View service, and "cha-ching"... you're microsoft!

      --
      ----- Concentrate on promoting more than demoting.
  3. that by 834r9394557r011 · · Score: 0

    and everyone and their grandma is looking at them now.

    --
    w00t
  4. It's had this for days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't believe it, we slashdotted Google...

    1. Re:It's had this for days by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Cool; I got here when I googled slashdot.

  5. Cemeteries by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A lot of my memories of visiting New Orleans included visiting the great cemeteries there. St Roch and St Vincent De Paul both look flooded. Obviously the living people in the city are more important, but the great landmarks still have a lot of meaning.

    1. Re:Cemeteries by dillon_rinker · · Score: 4, Informative

      One of my memories of the Great Flood of '93 is that cemeteries situated in the flood plain were inundated for weeks. Airtight coffins, lighter than the mud around them, floated to the surface and were washed away. Entire cemeteries were lost.

    2. Re:Cemeteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      parent comment deserves the "scary" tag

      oh wait this isn't fark, move along, nothing to see here.

    3. Re:Cemeteries by sbergman2 · · Score: 0

      Yes, New Orleans holds much history. The loss in life (and note that I do not say human life; The flood did not discriminate based upon species) was great. But part of our history was lost as well. To be honest, I have felt a bit guilty about worrying about buildings and historical landmarks in the face of such suffering and personal loss. But the history is just as irreplaceable.

    4. Re:Cemeteries by NereusRen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Re:Cemeteries (Score:3, Informative)

      That was a little *too* informative... I guess there's no 'gross' mod :-).

    5. Re:Cemeteries by pestilence4hr · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought that's why in areas like this, they buried people above ground in cement tombs. Prevents the tombs from floating away in a flood.

    6. Re:Cemeteries by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      But would "Gross" be a negative or positive modifier?

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    7. Re:Cemeteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, the Great Flood happened way before '93, man! You must be several thousands of years old if you lived through that stuff.

    8. Re:Cemeteries by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      But would "Gross" be a negative or positive modifier?

      It would be a negative, but won't affect your karma.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    9. Re:Cemeteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that's why in areas like this, they buried people above ground in cement tombs. Prevents the tombs from floating away in a flood.

      That's what we did do, until we built a drainage system of sufficient capacity to lower the water table to 2m below ground.

      At my grandfather's funeral at Lakelawn Cemetary (I think), in Metairie near N.O., I could see a puddle of water in the grave. No, it had not recently rained.

  6. OMG!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You slashdotted google! =-O

  7. Surely this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is corn?

    "SLASHDOT: Proudly at least 12 hours behind the rest of the world for far too many years now you come to mention it..."

  8. Odd story about Katrina victims. by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I work at a retail store in California, about 40 miles from Sacramento.

    The other night, I had a couple come in, claiming to be from New Orleans, showing me an ID as evidence. They looked pretty poor and in dirty clothes, and the ID was correct.

    They kept barraging me with questions asking for handouts... wanted a $100 tent for free, et cetera et cetera. I gave them the number to the local red cross chapter.

    Has anyone else experienced refugees from the gulf coast in their area? What in the WORLD were they doing here.. no idea heh.

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
    1. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by daviqh · · Score: 1

      I guess they just grabbed some $ and flew out as far away as they could.

      --
      Microsoft is like...no, it's much worse.
    2. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I live in a pretty small college town in California (about 10 miles for Sacramento), and the University just accepted 300 transfers from University of Tulane...people are starting to spread out through the country.

    3. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by w98 · · Score: 3, Informative

      My church is helping The Dream Center here in Los Angeles to house about 300 people relocated from New Orleans, give them job training (some of them will have jobs ready when they arrive).

    4. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Tekgno · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or used an old ID in order to capitalise on the sympathies of others.

    5. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just speculating...the ID may have been correct, but maybe they moved to california a year ago.

      It's disheartening to entertain a pessimistic possibility like that but I'm pretty sure that kind of thing happens on a regular basis. I think you did the right thing by referring them to Red Cross. They are in a position to evaluate this couple's predicament more carefully and have much greater resources for truly assisting their legitimate hardship.

    6. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by merreborn · · Score: 1

      Having spent a year in retail, a few things in your story throw up 'professional scammer' alerts in my mind.

    7. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by faedle · · Score: 1

      We are told here in Portland, Oregon to expect about 1,000 refugees, to be transported here by bus.

      I gather that some effort is being done to relocate people in scattered areas, so that one region does not have to bear the brunt...

    8. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by biojayc · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm from the houston area, and there are thousands of refugees there. The church I go to there is a red cross center right now, and a few of the families there said they were leaving to california to find work, so I know some people are heading that way.

    9. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought the same at first.

      Until when I went outside to have a smoke...

      They had a very new van (rental looking) full of stuff, I mean full. A dog, cat, looked like everything they had...

      Something tells me they weren't lying. But you can't go around asking for handouts.. have to go through the right channels.. people can't just give away company merchandise like that heh

      --
      Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
    10. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by klui · · Score: 1

      Why would people be going to California finding work? Companies are trying to move out of California.

    11. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by QuaZar666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I myself am in Austin, and while we did get some of the people from New Orleans, we haven't gotten as much as Houston, or San Antonio has gotten. I am still waiting though for some of the homeless people here to carry signs saying that they lost everything due to the hurricane. Like I said hasn't happened yet, but I'm sure some of them will do.

    12. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by jd · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Portland, Oregon is apparently going to absorb 15,000 refugees in the near future. I've no idea what impact trying to cope with that sort of scale of influx is going to have.


      Hey, I agree they need housing, support, etc, and I've no opposition to everyone doing what they can. But it sounds to me that the current plan of action is based more on looking good than doing good. Large population migrations of this kind impact everything from culture through to the economy. You can't just throw tens of thousands of people around the country and hope for the best.


      (Well, you can. Germany did, when it unified. Damn near destroyed West Germany, with zero benefit to East Germans. Virtually all the problems in the Middle East are due to mass population migrations. In fact, virtually all long-term problems in history have been because of mass population migrations.)


      The day it became obvious that Katrina was going to hit Category 5, work should have started on getting ready for an inevitable refugee crisis. They didn't, ok, so they should be working on long-term impact assessments NOW, and working on making sure that further harm isn't done.


      Of course, they aren't. Right about now, they've bugger all idea of what the long-term consequences are. What about health consequences? I doubt the refugees have been checked in case of contageous diseases. I am pretty certain that people who left under their own steam, after it became obvious that rescue wasn't on the way, haven't been checked. The risk probably isn't great, but it's certainly not zero.


      There are other risks. More than a few of these people will be armed, all of them will be suffering from PTSD, none of them are likely to have the money needed to get adequate support. That's a very high-risk combination, particularly as grudges may well be carried for the lack of support and the perception of abandonment. To make things worse, there WILL be resentment towards the refugees by other Americans, especially in areas where the "ideal" of absolute self-support is a religion. Violence seems certain.


      After the draining, there'll be further stresses as refugees try to return home - or are pushed into doing so. Even after draining is complete, the entire region should be decontaminated and then checked for subsidance, prior to anyone trying to live there again. The reality is, that isn't going to happen. In turn, that means that there is a risk of death by disease or structural failure.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    13. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by smidget2k4 · · Score: 1

      The college I go to, Western Michigan University, just accepted a couple thousand transfers from colleges down there and they arrived by plane yesterday.

    14. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Tyger · · Score: 2, Funny

      Great, they will move to California just in time for our next big earthquake. Where do they plan to go after that, Colorado for the blizzards? Another coastal city for the tsunamis?

    15. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm at a small Catholic college in *New Hampshire*, and five refugees just transfered here.

    16. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by sessamoid · · Score: 4, Insightful
      They had a very new van (rental looking) full of stuff, I mean full. A dog, cat, looked like everything they had...

      Dude, it's California. Do you know how many "van people" I have parked outside my house that match that exact description with out of state plates? Lots of people seem to live out of their vehicles in California, b/c the weather's so good.

      They had the cash to pay for the gas to get all the way to California in a van, and they want a free $100 tent? I don't buy the story, but then again I'm pretty cynical and jaded.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    17. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have a rather large (around 2,000) contingent of refugees in our area. Most of them look like they are still in shock about losing all of their possesions. The local Wal-Mart pharmacy is doing the right thing and giving the refugees a free month's supply of their perscription medicine. All seem grateful for whatever help they can get and I haven't heard of anyone "barraging" for handouts.

    18. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      refugees?

    19. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Mard · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I work at a Kmart in Niceville, Florida (just north of Destin, 40 minutes east of Pensacola) in the panhandle. The number of refugees in our city is astounding, and I've heard of several families coming to Kmart and asking either the service desk or checkout employees for handouts. I've spoken with people from both Biloxi and New Orleans, and it's upsetting that there is very little I can do for those who will be returning home; our area is out of gas, out of gas cans, out of air conditioners, out of battery powered fans,... you get the idea.

      This city was hardest hit, since I've moved here, by Ivan last summer. Everybody lost power, some people in city limits had no power for up to two weeks. I personally had no power for five days, and the heat and humidity get to working on you while the storm is still blowing outside...and it only gets worse from there. Although I truley fill for those who lost their homes or worse from Katrina, I also can't imagine the suffering of the hundreds of thousands who are still without power in this insane southern-sun heat. It's a difficult situation for everybody, and I hope that the supplies my area recieved post-Ivan haven't been forgotten for those who may not have been so bad off, but still need help this time around (ICE!).

      At first I was planning on volunteering, but I'm just a scrawny geek, not to mention young (20). Perhaps I'll go over in about a month to relieve those who are there now, perhaps I'll just donate part of each paycheck to the Red Cross; I still haven't decided (though I have donated). Something tells me that I have plenty of time...Pensacola and other areas in the panhandle of Florida are still recovering from Ivan nearly a year later. I expect we'll be cleaning up from Katrina for much, much longer.

      Our area may have been spared Katrina's wrath, but some of us will have scars none the less. For people on the gulf coast and all across the southeast, this is just the start of things to come; now comes the problem of how to deal with the sudden homeless crisis.

      --
      DRM = Digitally Restricted Media. This is a viral sig, pass it on.
    20. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 4, Informative

      really? I could have sworn that refugee was derived from refuge. refugee meaning someone that's seeking or taking refuge.

    21. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by chemistry · · Score: 0

      Thank you! Nice to hear someone looking at it from their (New Orleans) point of view. I have family in the Biloxi MS. area. Everyone is alive. One house that had bad damage, but totally fixable. I live in upstate NY now and it really seems that most people are indifferent to the whole thing. Not to say they don't care...just seem to be indeferent.

    22. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calling them "Americans" is pointless, as it is far too generic. Calling them "survivors" completely fails to capture the fact that they are looking for refuge. "Refugee" does have a connotation of "seeking shelter in another country", but you have not suggested anything more useful.

    23. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mods:
      This post not a troll - it's informative. Did you even look at the links?

      OP:
      Keep up the good work.

    24. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is they left before the hurricane and are simply tourists from New Orleans.

    25. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen anybody, but I've heard that the Red Cross is dropping a LOT of victims here in Central Ohio... (in fact, all over Ohio, from what I've heard...)

    26. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. You are correct. Let's setup concentration camps, mein freund.

    27. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by enigmax01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am not trying to be over critical, but they are not refugees. Everyone refers to them as such, so let me offer a dictionary defenition. refugee - One who flees in search of refuge, as in times of war, political oppression, or religious persecution. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=refugees Wikipedia ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refugees

    28. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by damiam · · Score: 3, Informative

      It sure sounds to me like they're fleeing in search of refuge. The "as in" clause is providing examples, not limiting the definition to those factors only.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    29. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Low+Key · · Score: 5, Informative
      I just wish people would stop misusing the word refugee. These people are evacuees, not refugees. Take a look here.

      Under international law, refugees are individuals who:
      • are outside their country of nationality or habitual residence;
      • have a well-founded fear of persecution because of their race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion; and
      • are unable or unwilling to avail themselves of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.
      It bothers me a lot that people are casting a shadow over the true meaning of such a powerful word. While unfortunate, the people who left LA, MS, and AL are not refugees.
    30. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Merriam-Webster maybe you have heard of them? Refugee

    31. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by vinlud · · Score: 1

      Hey, I agree they need housing, support, etc, and I've no opposition to everyone doing what they can. But it sounds to me that the current plan of action is based more on looking good than doing good. Large population migrations of this kind impact everything from culture through to the economy. You can't just throw tens of thousands of people around the country and hope for the best.

      Rant rant rant, but what is your alternative for those refugees? Doing nothin'? This is a frickin disaster area, everything but saving lives is secondary.

      Also, comparing your fellow countrymen/refugees with the situation in Germany, which was utterly, completely different as it is also in the Middle East, is simply crazy.

      --
      Repeat after me: We are all individuals
    32. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Most people in poverty have some savings but with gas prices like this they would not last long.

    33. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by srleffler · · Score: 1
      Note the 'to a foreign country or power' in the definition you cited.

      I call them refugees myself, but the definition you cited certainly does not support this. I guess technically they are 'internally displaced persons'.

    34. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by srleffler · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I think people are using the term more informally. Yes, legally a 'refugee' is someone who has left their country fleeing danger (not necessarily political persecution). Colloquially, though, these people are certainly refugees in the sense that they are fleeing disaster and need refuge.

      It seems to me that a large part of the problem is that some people feel that being a 'refugee' is something shameful, or that it is somehow impossible for an 'American' to be a refugee. Such bigoted attitudes are inexcusable.

    35. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by srleffler · · Score: 1

      Your citation does not support your own point. These people are certainly fleeing in search of refuge. While they don't fall into any of the cases cited as examples, they still fit the definition.

    36. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by patternjuggler · · Score: 1

      In fact, virtually all long-term problems in history have been because of mass population migrations.

      This seems like a stupendously uninsightful theory of history implicitly supporting serfdom or for more heavily regulated travel between states and countries, but I guess the later comments sort of moderate this by suggesting that government should do more to provide for the welfare than simply reacting to immediate and obvious dangers.

    37. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Adam9 · · Score: 1

      Miami University (in Ohio, we were here first, damnit) accepted 7. They already started class last Friday.

    38. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by coyotejoe76 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have seen this happen in Houston. A homeless guy outside of a convenient store claimed he was from New Orleans and needed some money to get to a Red Cross shelter. The store clerk notified me and everybody else that gave him the benefit of the doubt that he lives in Houston and has for a long while.

      It sucks that people would take advantage of people's generocity in such dire circumstances.

    39. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by LordBlackadder · · Score: 1

      Our state (TN) is finding everyplace it can to house the refugees. My city alone has 15,000 refugees needing shelter - not including the ones staying with area relatives. They're everywhere. Our govts are finding every way they can to house these refugees. I have worked all of my life to move into my "dream home" - I moved in last week. My neighborhood is very prosperous with the average home size > 4000ft2 and price > $600k. Somehow the govt has placed an extended family of over a dozen people in a vacant house stuck in probate. Churches have completely furnished the home. These are people that were in housing projects last week - and they are receiving more "entitlement" than ever before. Crime has already skyrocketed in the area. I hate to show a "not in my backyard" attitude - but isnt there a more suitable housing solution like the many closed schools, empty warehouses, vacant office parks, and vacant area hospitals?

    40. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by IdolizingStewie · · Score: 1

      Ignoring the poor state of most closed public buildings, the warehouses at least would be no better than the arenas most of the evacuees are being housed in now. I spent quite a bit of my weekend volunteering at the Astrodome, which is the biggest single shelter in Houston, if not the nation, and the lack of privacy in such a place is appalling. Having everyone sleeping in one big room on cots mere feet from one another in every direction has to be a last resort. Ask any college student how quickly disease spreads in close quarters. These are much closer quarters with probably worse diseases to spread.

      Re your mention of crime, I know several of my classmates have given up apartments in that area of town because the crime rate has gone up, but from my experience dealing with most of these people I would venture a guess the crime is in large part locals who see an opportunity in the confusion and entrance of a large group of suspect individuals.

    41. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      Some may be evacuees, but many are not that passive. Survivor may be the best word, especially for the ones who take charge of their own "rescue" and don't wait passively for the politicians and other "leaders" to get their acts together.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    42. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      Refugees in most cases need protection from something or someone. Evacuees get evacueted. Survivors make it through a difficult or dangerous situation, sometimes with help, sometimes on their own. These people, most of them survivors, simply need a place to stay and a job to do. They aren't all poor, a week in the same clothes in soggy conditions will make all the classes look the same. The ones accustomed to work will need jobs, incomes, etc, just as much as treatment for PTSD and other conditions they may have acquired.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    43. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by swillden · · Score: 4, Informative

      Portland, Oregon is apparently going to absorb 15,000 refugees in the near future. I've no idea what impact trying to cope with that sort of scale of influx is going to have.

      They should send some of them to Utah. We're supposed to get around 2000 and so far we've gotten almost half of them. The state set up a 1-800 number people could call with offers of donations of money, food, clothing and housing. The hotline was running for just over 24 hours but has been shut down because they've been buried in offers. They've had to turn away nearly half of the volunteers who showed up at Camp Williams (Utah Army National Guard base where the evacuees are being house temporarily) because the volunteers outnumbered the evacuees and they had nothing for them to do.

      Not only that, several hundred jobs have been offered, and over 1000 families have offered to provide 6-12 month "intermediate" housing, all in less than 24 hours since the request was announced. Utah only has 2.5 million people, but I think we can absorb far more than the 2000 that the US government has planned to send us.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    44. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by jd · · Score: 1
      Heh. South Carolina IS a concentration camp, so I guess we could move them all there. It would force the State to actually develop something akin to a social program and they might actually have to put money into the CARTA bus service for a change.


      Actually, the best thing is to figure out the TOTAL cost of the migration (factoring in the necessary additional social services that will be required, on top of all the other costs), then give each State sufficient extra funding to cope with its share of the burden, DEMANDING that the States actually use that funding for that purpose and no other.


      Probably the best way to actually move such a large number of people will be by train, as trains can carry a very large number of people a long distance. Ok, so provide Amtrak with the extra capital to (a) put that number of extra trains in service and (b) rent the necessary space on the tracks.


      Unemployment, hopefully temporarily, is going to increase in all States as most of these people won't have jobs. Ok, calculate the net amount the unemployment systems would have to pay and put that much extra into them. Medicare costs within each State are likely to rise too, so apply the same logic there.


      Most of the population being moved is likely, as I said, to suffer from PTSD. It shouldn't be too hard to get the typical cost of decent mental health care, temporarily relax the rules on what medicare can support and add that cash reserve in as well.


      I've never been in the military, but I do know that most militaries around the world absolutely demand and expect a functional supply-line. If an army marches on its stomach (to quote Napoleon) then don't expect a civilian population to do any less. If you don't provide for them, they will deplete the resources that exist and (in the end) everyone will suffer. There simply won't be enough of a support system to go round and it will end up failing everyone.


      That, to me, is the worst of all possible worlds.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    45. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by swillden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My neighborhood is very prosperous with the average home size > 4000ft2 and price > $600k.

      So, what you're saying is that you have room in your house and have invited some of them to come live with you until they can get back on their feet, right?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    46. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by jd · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I firmly believe that welfare programs should provide support when other systems fail. Here, we have the worst possible failure - a complete and total collapse of ALL infrastructure for a gigantic area.


      No, I do not believe controlled migration is a good idea. What I do believe is a good idea is supported migration. If an area is going to suddenly face meeting the needs of N extra people, then it should be able to acquire the resources needed to support N extra people. Once integration is complete, everything should balance itself out. Until it does, however, you can't expect the newcomers to survive on hot air and vaporware.


      My concern is that we're going to get a lot of mass migrations with absolutely zero backup. No support, no supplies, no resources of any kind. If that is indeed the case, it will be a disaster for those who have been displaced and a catastrophe for everyone else.


      It is time the Federal Government woke up and smelled the coffee. There are no "Get Out Of Crisis Free" cards in real life. This is going to cost, and it is going to cost a lot. It is going to require considerably more planning than has been done, to get things to function smoothly, and is going to be a logistical nightmare without some damn good experts developing a way to do this effectively.


      With the airlines on the edge of bankrupcy, Greyhound slashing services to and beyond the bone, Amtrak contemplating suicide and most of the military in Iraq, HOW are the people going to be moved around the country in anything like a meaningful timeframe?


      The answer would seem obvious enough - all of these have the means to move the population, they just don't have the money. It would be trivial for the Government to pay Greyhound to move every single unused bus to an evacuation point and carry the people around the country. They could pay Amtrak to do it. The airlines aren't short of capacity, they're short of cash.


      Is this happening? So far, I've not heard of a single extra dime going towards paying for the mass exodus.


      What happens when they get to where they're going? Who is going to pay for their shelter? For the uninsured or the elderly, where is the extra money for medicare going to come from? And for those insured by companies based in a flooded-out area, nobody is going to take an insurance card from a company that might never reopen so what are they going to do?


      My gripe is that there is a great deal you need to do to get this kind of operation to work well, rather than to end in a disaster for all concerned, and that the Federal Government isn't doing any of it. If they're going to get bugger all support, they would probably be better off building a refugee camp and relying on aid from the Red Cross and other organizations that will, at least, come through for them.


      As of the political situation right now, the choice is between being camped in dismal conditions but at least getting basic needs met, or being ferried to God-Knows-Where (assuming the Federal Government even bothered telling God), finding the social services simply don't have any extra cash, and ending up homeless on the street.


      My personal preference would be for the Federal Government to fund social programs adequately (for a change) and for the evacuees to have living conditions worth the living.


      My biggest concern is that right-wingers generally don't believe in social programs at all and may well prefer people homeless on the streets to being visible in a camp.


      My next-biggest concern is that the right-wing may attempt to use the disaster to prove that social programs aren't needed. (If you don't need extra money for an extra ten or hundred thousand, then maybe you don't need any money at all.) With this Government in particular, but America in general, fearing the worst in politicians seems to be a generally good idea.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    47. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are people seeking refuge. Hence, "refugees".
      Quit whining.

    48. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      The day it became obvious that Katrina was going to hit Category 5, work should have started on getting ready for an inevitable refugee crisis.
      That would be about 9PM CST - about five hours before the outer reaches of the storm reached land.
    49. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by gsfprez · · Score: 1

      >Portland, Oregon is apparently going to absorb 15,000 refugees
      >in the near future. I've no idea what impact trying to cope with
      >that sort of scale of influx is going to have.

      all i can say to that is..

      holy shit you have GOT to be kidding. Do you also worry about the impact that your new hat is going to have on your hairdoo?

      regards,
      Southern California/Northern Mexico

      --
      guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
    50. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

      Not to sound cold, but you did the right thing. In this day and age when you have people abusing what humanity is left in this world. Also besides helping them out the redcross will do more than giving them so free stuff.

      --
      This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
    51. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Angostura · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, but the definition of something under international law is not the same as the definition of a word.

      At it's simplest a refugee is simply someone who has fled their home and is seeking refuge. There is - or should be - no stigma in being called a refugee.

    52. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are apparently illiterate.

    53. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by roseblood · · Score: 1

      Jobs for folks from the Big Easy just waiting for them in LA.

      Not to be xenophobic or anything, but what about jobs for unemployed Los Angelenos? (Los Angelians?)

      There will be a huge labor market in the flooded areas as manpower will be needed for the recovery. Maybe I need to move to the flood zone to get work.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    54. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Zibblsnrt · · Score: 4, Insightful
      A lot of the objections to using the word "refugee" to describe the Katrina refugees seem to boil down to the idea that Americans can't be refugees, since refugees are those other people. It's pride, not grammar, which is at stake.

      While I've seen some people with legitimate objections (even though I don't really buy the validity of a highly politically-motivated redefinition of a word which has been in use for a long time indeed), most of the complaints I've heard about the word really do boil down to that. It's not objection to the word; it's denial that it's being applied to us, something which feels like an insult when it really isn't anything more than a simple statement of fact.

      -PS

      --
      "All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke
    55. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by arturs · · Score: 1

      (Well, you can. Germany did, when it unified. Damn near destroyed West Germany, with zero benefit to East Germans. Virtually all the problems in the Middle East are due to mass population migrations. In fact, virtually all long-term problems in history have been because of mass population migrations.)


      You sure do know what you're talking about, right?
      You know what the Eastern part was before and after, yes?

      That's one of the biggest exaggerations i've ever seen.
    56. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by beezly · · Score: 1

      No, that is a person seeking asylum. Refugees are people seeking refuge.

    57. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Refugee: One who flees in search of refuge.

      Refuge: Protection or shelter, as from danger or hardship.

      Idiot.

    58. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by jd · · Score: 1
      I seem to remember forecasts predicting it the moment it bounced off Florida and into the Gulf of Mexico. IIRC, that was a day, maybe two, before reaching land again.


      Even with five hours, though - it takes four hours and 18 minutes to fly from the UK to the US. All on-call emergency responders in the US (outside of Alaska) could have raced the hurricane and beaten it by 40 minutes.


      FEMA claims they had 50 rescue helicopters on standby. Where on standby, I don't know, as nothing happened in the first four days after. But assuming they did, what was to stop them renting a whole bunch more from the oil companies? They've plenty of helicopters for getting to and from the oil rigs, and they were not doing a whole lot at the time.


      In short, this should have been handled a LOT better BEFORE there was a disaster. And I'm not convinced the local authorities were much better - the superdome was an odd choice for last-ditch evacuation point and apparently didn't even have supplies to patch the roof when it ripped in the storm.


      Even in the evacuation before the hurricane struck, things were not going well. Some old folk died on a school bus from dehydration. Excuse me, but there should have been qualified nurses on board and plenty of fluids. Dehydration was inevitable and should have been dealt with by proper planning. (In fact, I'm not pleased with the use of a school bus, either. They couldn't have commandeered a bunch of RVs or a Greyhound? School busses aren't built with geriatric patients in mind.)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    59. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by jd · · Score: 1

      I generally don't try to wear 15,000 hats at the same time. And Southern California is partially a case in point. (Only partially, as 99.9% of social services aren't available to illegal immigrants. So scale what problem you perceive Southern California as having up by a factor of 1000, then apply that to all the States that don't have large numbers of quadrillionaires supporting it.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    60. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by pfafrich · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the good samaratan story from the bible.

      --
      There are four sorts of people in the world: fools, lunatics, idiots and morons. - Umberto Eco, Foucaut's pendulum.
    61. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1
      These people are evacuees, not refugees. Take a look here.
      Wiktionary has a broader definition.
    62. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      Read your definition again.. Got it? No? Let me spell it out...

      O-N-E I-N S-E-A-R-C-H O-F R-E-F-U-G-E

      I think you'll find that having your home and city destroyed by a natural disater would cause you to seek refuge...

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    63. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      no he won't because he has a NIMBY attitude.

      Even though he hates having it, he still has it...

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    64. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 0, Troll

      "what about jobs for unemployed Los Angelenos? (Los Angelians?"

      What about when these guys decide they don't want to work anymore? They'll move back into housing projects and start living off welfare again, only this time in YOUR state.

    65. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 1

      " Most people in poverty have some savings but with gas prices like this they would not last long."

      And what exactly do you base this statement on?? Ohh, yeah, the infallible "Slashdotter's assumption" study done last year. Sorry, I don't accept that as evidence. Please try again.

    66. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 1


      "all of them will be suffering from PTSD"

      Didn't you hear? All generalizations are wrong.

    67. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Council · · Score: 1

      I recall the advice of one person on a meterological/tropical weather board I frequent. This was when it was becoming clear that Katrina was going to hit NO and the formal evacuations were starting. She said

      "People are asking where they should go, and whether they should avoid going north for fear of the storm 'following' them. My answer? Denver. I am not kidding. Get on the road and drive north and west until you see mountains. Then find a Red Cross center. The further you get from Louisana the less overwhelmed the relief facilities are going to be." (paraphrased)

      So it's not as much about going really far from the storm as it is about getting away from the other refugees.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    68. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the word has been redefined over the years into something that no longer has any definition.

      Refuge is defined http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=refuge as:
            1. Protection or shelter, as from danger or hardship.
            2. A place providing protection or shelter.
            3. A source of help, relief, or comfort in times of trouble. See Synonyms at shelter.

      So I guess we'll just call them "People taking Refuge" ?

      Sorry, but it just seems odd to me that people in 3rd world countries were called refugees when the tsunami hit on Boxing Day this past year. http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2005-02-06-tsu nami-maternal_x.htm

      No one seemed to care about the use of the term then. Oh wait, they were in poverty! It's ok to call them that then. Spare me.

    69. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by tresstatus · · Score: 1

      I work as Loss Prevention in a Nashville area Wal-Mart. We've had problems here with them shoplifting. We had a door greeter stop one of them a few days ago. The "customer" had redeemed her Red Cross voucher and then went into the ladies clothing department. She stuffed her shirt full of bras and the door greeter stopped her on the way out.

      --
      stephen
    70. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Portland, Oregon is apparently going to absorb 15,000 refugees in the near future.

      My advice would be to hire a lot more cops. Trust me on this one.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    71. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by mbbac · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Most Americans think the word refugee is derogatory because they associate it with those miserable brown, yellow, and black people in far flung parts of the globe. Claiming that there is something wrong with calling these people refugees is what is really offensive.

      They're seeking refuge. They're refugees. Get over it.

      --

      mbbac

    72. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      most of the military in Iraq

      Most of the military is not in Iraq. I realize that this goes against your pre-conceived notions but if you are going to speak as an authority (or try to) get your facts straight.

    73. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      I work at a Kmart in Niceville, Florida (just north of Destin, 40 minutes east of Pensacola) in the panhandle. The number of refugees in our city is astounding, and I've heard of several families coming to Kmart and asking either the service desk or checkout employees for handouts.

      It sounds like the number of con artists in your area out to exploit easy marks is pretty high too.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    74. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by g0at · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude. They are people seeking refuge. Hence, refugees. Chill.

      -b

    75. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by borawjm · · Score: 1

      You say this as if it is a bad thing. I mean, wouldn't you be doing the same thing if you had nothing? I know I would.

      Besides, shouldn't our goal be to reduce the poverty level in the US? If the city goes back to the way it was before then we have accomplished nothing.

    76. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by aftermath09 · · Score: 1

      Anyone saying that Americans are stupid or ignorant should read parent's post. (note: I am not American ;) This person seems to be very perceptive. Although it's a very socialist point of view, it demonstrates the importance of a strong social net in times of crisis. if you were running for office, I'd vote for u! kudos.

    77. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by gmuller · · Score: 1

      Well, It seems somebody has been watching entirely too much news. You know, the stuff on TV that tells to you what you're supposed to think and say, and how you're supposed to feel about an issue. The TV says I should be outraged about Federal response to the hurricane, that must be my right.

      "It would be trivial for the Government to pay Greyhound to move every single unused bus to an evacuation point and carry the people around the country. They could pay Amtrak to do it. The airlines aren't short of capacity, they're short of cash."

      Did you just say it would be TRIVIAL to for the government to pay for all of this. Get your head out of your butt, Its not trivial to pay for any of this, whether the federal government is paying for it or not.

      "Is this happening? So far, I've not heard of a single extra dime going towards paying for the mass exodus. What happens when they get to where they're going? Who is going to pay for their shelter? For the uninsured or the elderly, where is the extra money for medicare going to come from? And for those insured by companies based in a flooded-out area, nobody is going to take an insurance card from a company that might never reopen so what are they going to do?"

      Well, maybe I'm wrong, maybe you haven't been watching enough TV, if you had you'd have seen the exorbitant amounts being funded for this disaster. You know, somewhere around 13.8 bn + so far...theres a few dimes in there I assure you.

      I don't live in New Orleans, but I've known for years that if a Hurricane ever came anywhere close to it, we were gonna have problems like this. It is the responsibility of the state and local governments to plan for disasters in their areas. Prevention and preparation should have been a focus for the officials in New Orleans and Louisiana long ago, not immediate remedy from the Feds in the event of disaster.

      gmuller

    78. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Most Americans think the word refugee is derogatory because they associate it with those miserable brown, yellow, and black people in far flung parts of the globe.

      Unless you have some (statistically sound) data to back that up, please use "I" instead of "Most Americans".

      Thank you.

      They're seeking refuge. They're refugees.

      This part you got exactly right.

    79. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by karrot · · Score: 1

      Is this Red State redistribution? How will this change Oregon's and other state's red/blue status in the 2006 and 2008 elections?

    80. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember forecasts predicting it the moment it bounced off Florida and into the Gulf of Mexico. IIRC, that was a day, maybe two, before reaching land again.

      That's 'forecasts', not 'obvious' as you specified in your original message - and hurricane forecasts as notoriously unreliable.

      Even so, it was high Cat 4 within a couple of hours and low Cat 4 by the time the main storm hit New Orleans.

      Even with five hours, though - it takes four hours and 18 minutes to fly from the UK to the US. All on-call emergency responders in the US (outside of Alaska) could have raced the hurricane and beaten it by 40 minutes.

      And all of those on-call emergency responders would have become refugees or casualties had they flown to New Orleans then... (First assuming that such responders, if they existed at all (which they don't) were actually standing by at the airport. What do you think they could have done in 40 minutes with nothing but what they can carry in their bare hands? (Never mind the fact that the US doesn't have any such first responders.)

      In the real world, responders come in after the disaster - flying them into the disaster area beforehand just adds to the body count. Also, before providing relief, they have to see to their own food, water, shelter, etc... Again, otherwise they just add to the body count. Furthermore it take time to establish those support bases, determine where the worst needs are, prioritize according to those needs and the equipments/personell on hand...

      None of this is anywhere near as simple as you seem to think.

      FEMA claims they had 50 rescue helicopters on standby. Where on standby, I don't know, as nothing happened in the first four days after.

      Nothing happened in the first four days? ROTFL. Only in some fantasy version of the past week. Here in the real world, the helicopters were scattered and working hard across a vast area - there is much more involved here than New Orleans remember.

      But assuming they did, what was to stop them renting a whole bunch more from the oil companies? They've plenty of helicopters for getting to and from the oil rigs, and they were not doing a whole lot at the time.

      Before the hurricane, they were moving workers from the rigs with those helicopters. After the hurricane, they were moving workers and inspectors back to the rigs. They weren't available.

      In short, this should have been handled a LOT better BEFORE there was a disaster.

      That's the belief of folks without an inkling as to the problems and complexities involved, or with a political axe to grind.

      And I'm not convinced the local authorities were much better - the superdome was an odd choice for last-ditch evacuation point and apparently didn't even have supplies to patch the roof when it ripped in the storm.

      Let's see - you have an extremely large and strong building, on higher ground, within walking distance of a large number of the population. Here in the real world, that's a prime choice for a shelter. So far as the roof goes - how in hell is anyone supposed to patch a roof two hundred feer in the air? Get real.

      Even in the evacuation before the hurricane struck, things were not going well. Some old folk died on a school bus from dehydration. Excuse me, but there should have been qualified nurses on board and plenty of fluids. Dehydration was inevitable and should have been dealt with by proper planning.

      And where is the magic wand kept that allows a private organization, or any organization, to summon nurses from thin air? (Especially on such short notice.) Here in the real world, a hundred odd patients were saved, at the cost of four lives - a dammed impressive accomplishment.

      I'm not pleased with the use of a school bus, either. They couldn't

    81. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by babbage · · Score: 1

      <half-facetious> Of course, the obvious problem there is that they'd be stuck in Utah. </half-facetious>

      I'm sure Utah is a lovely place with lovely people, but I'm also pretty sure that it's a drastically different culture -- teetotalling button-down rural red-state Mormon on one side, drunken easy-going urbane blue-city Catholic on the other. That's stereotyping a bit, for which I apologize to both sides, but I think there's something to it -- I'm just not sure how well the hosts or the guests will get along together.

      More importantly -- far more importantly -- a lot of these people don't want to be that far from home. Otis Air Force Base on Cape Cod was ready to take on 2000 refugees up until today, but now they're saying that few if any are actually going to show up. The main reason is simply that most people don't want to be that far from friends, family, or home -- even if that literal or figurative home isn't something they can ever go back to. Moving to Massachusetts, even if only for a few months, could feel like an admission that they can never go back to their homes, their belongings, and their memories, ever again.

      If the long-term situation in New Orleans really is as bad as it seems to be, then I'm sure it's inevitable that there will be an exodus of people away from the city and from the region. But that's a painful step to take, and it may take a while before a lot of the people affected will be able to come to terms with this change. The collective trauma on the American psyche could prove to be far more painful from Katrina than it ever was from 9/11 -- then, we had an event that hurt a few thousand people in a few eastern locations, but this, in addition to killing at least as many people, looks ready to scatter hundreds of thousands of shell-shocked people all over the country. It could take decades to recover from this, if we ever do.

    82. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The German reunification wasn't all bad. If you think living next to the border for WW3 for 2 generations and then getting to see family youdidn't think you could ever see is a good package, then it isn't too bad. As for the East, NOT living under the East Germany Secrete Police (1 in every 5 persons was an agent. That's every family and group of friends infultrated) is good enough.

    83. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by swillden · · Score: 1

      I'm just not sure how well the hosts or the guests will get along together.

      Well, so far both are getting along very well. Many of the evacuees are saying that they're probably going to stay permanently. Time will tell, of course. The shine will certainly wear thinner. My point was that even with the perhaps-greater level of cultural friction, I think it would be better to send a few more here and avoid flooding other areas with more people than they can handle.

      More importantly -- far more importantly -- a lot of these people don't want to be that far from home. Otis Air Force Base on Cape Cod was ready to take on 2000 refugees up until today, but now they're saying that few if any are actually going to show up.

      That's very interesting. At least with the evacuees that we've received, the story is rather different. They were basically loaded on planes in Houston, and didn't even know where they were headed until they were entering the aircaft.

      The collective trauma on the American psyche could prove to be far more painful from Katrina than it ever was from 9/11

      Rationally, it should be. Katrina did more damage and almost certainly killed more people (obviously we don't know the death toll yet). But I've always thought that our response to 9/11 was excessive.

      looks ready to scatter hundreds of thousands of shell-shocked people all over the country. It could take decades to recover from this, if we ever do.

      I'm not sure what it means to "recover". I'm sure there will be permanent effects. I'm not at all sure that a lot of those won't be good. For example, although I'm personally a teetotalling conservative (though not "button-down"), I think the infusion of a few hundred -- or even a few thousand -- mostly-black Cajuns would do the state some good.

      And I *really* hope the two evacuees who are chefs carry through on their plan to set up a New Orleans-style Cajun restaurant carry through... I don't drink, but I've always loved to go eat in N'awlins. They'd do well, too, I think. Utah has a more eclectic taste in restaurants than you might expect. I think that has a lot to do with the Mormon missionaries who spend a couple years in other parts of the world and learn to appreciate different foods, then bring their expanded tastes back home.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    84. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by srleffler · · Score: 1
      I mostly agree with you, but I still think 'refugee' is the term that best captures the level of desperation in this situation. These people need a lot more than a place to stay and a job to do. They have lost everything they own from their homes to the clothes on their backs, and in some cases have lost family members as well. The thing I don't like about calling them 'survivors' is that it suggests that the horrible experience is over. For these people, their misery is not yet over, and I do not want to see us label them 'survivors' and then forget about them. These people are going to need a lot of help to get back on their feet.

      I don't think this country has yet begun to appreciate what it is going to mean to have so many displaced people needing help. We are all going to be dealing with this for quite some time yet.

    85. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by srleffler · · Score: 1

      Oops. I did read the definition too fast. My bad.

    86. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by patternjuggler · · Score: 1

      (assuming the Federal Government even bothered telling God)

      I heard they revoked His security clearance a few years back, so probably not... :)

    87. Re:Odd story about Katrina victims. by bcmm · · Score: 1

      I guess technically they're IDPs as they haven't crossed international borders, but I think "refugee" is good enough for day-to-day usage.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  9. Wow that's creepy by TWX · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is one of the creepiest things that I've seen in a long time. It reminds me of the before and after pictures from New York and similar stuff from coastline around the Indian Ocean.

    Maybe such high resolution pictures of the disaster region will spur people into getting the authorities to do things like pay for the renovation of land features to reduce the effects of natural disasters, rather than divert the money to other projects, leaving victims high and dry (or in this case, low and wet).

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Wow that's creepy by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      You realize that New Olreans was barely hit by the hurricane compared to most of Missouri, right?

      Most of the NO damage was human-caused.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    2. Re:Wow that's creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying humans caused the massive flooding? ...Gods I wish there was a (-1 Dipshit) mod

    3. Re:Wow that's creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you build a sandcastle on the beach and the waves wash it away, do you blame the ocean?

    4. Re:Wow that's creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't build a sandlecastle on the beach, so you're still a dipshit. I hope the next meteor hits you squarely in the balls, if you have any.

    5. Re:Wow that's creepy by JDevers · · Score: 1

      You mean Mississippi, right?

    6. Re:Wow that's creepy by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 1

      Mississippi, dude.

      --

      To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

    7. Re:Wow that's creepy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You do realize that New Orleans was FLOODED BY THE ADACENT LAKE FOR DAYS, in addition to the hurricane, right?

      What kind of insane bullshit compares the damage from the hurricane passing through both New Orleans AND Mississippi, with the tiny damage even possible by the few humans left standing after the HURRICANE AND FLOOD?

      I'm sure that you didn't realize that your words do have meaning, though. The "human-caused" damage to New Orleans was done by the politicians who ignored the plentiful warnings and pleas for better engineering. The Army Corps of Engineers who let it happen, though it wasn't their request - that's orders they shouldn't have followed without a fight.

      And people like you, spreading bullshit about the hurricane damage, and the people of New Orleans. You're a sick bastard who's kicking the people of New Orleans while they're down, not even around to defend themselves. I'm not going to pretend New Orleanians weren't tough, often criminal, even without a catastrophic disaster destroying their city. But you should be glad none of them are watching you type that bullshit, or you'd witness firsthand some real human-caused damage.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:Wow that's creepy by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> to do things like pay for the renovation of land features to reduce the effects of natural disasters

      Good idea. If you were to magically "renovate" all the swapland that's been destroyed in the last 100 years, there'd be a lot more flood absorption of the lowere Mississippi.

    9. Re:Wow that's creepy by Skidmarq · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I flew over this morning on a flight from Houston to Orlando. While NO certainly looks bad (even from 39K ft), Mississippi simply looks to have been wiped clean. The only anology I can think of for what the MS coast looked like from altitude is brown static. In many areas, there was no obvious structure or pattern at all aside from the occasional series of bridge columns where functioning bridges used to be.

      --

      "I don't think I ain't" -Thompson's Corollary to Descartes

    10. Re:Wow that's creepy by dabraun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps by 'human caused' he meant the damage caused by people building levees and trying to live below sea level - virtually guaranteeing that something like this would eventually happen.

      I love New Orleans - but doesn't the whole idea of living on the gulf coast below sea level seem the slightest bit ... dumb?

    11. Re:Wow that's creepy by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Ding ding ding ding! We have a winner.

      That's exactly what I was making reference to. Well, that and the incompetence of the Mayor of NO and the governor of LA.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    12. Re:Wow that's creepy by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      No, they built a city on the coast below sea level. So his metaphor wasn't quite strong enough, you're right.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    13. Re:Wow that's creepy by tftp · · Score: 1
      I love New Orleans - but doesn't the whole idea of living on the gulf coast below sea level seem the slightest bit ... dumb?

      Cities and whole countries exist in such conditions, because that's where they are. Netherlands, for example. How do you move a large city, and where to?

    14. Re:Wow that's creepy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here we have revealed the bare Bush blame-game talking points. In pure essence. First, try to say the New Orleans damage wasn't bad. Then, blame the "human-caused damage" on the humans, the New Orleanians. Then, when a rational person is outraged by your gibberish, spin it into some kind of impossibly parsed meaning, and swerve into blaming the Democrats, governor of LA and mayor of New Orleans.

      Next you'll spout that "no one anticipated that the levees would break".

      You certainly won't be quoting the fact that LA Governor Blanco asked Bush for, and was told she was getting, military assistance, days before the event. Or that she was offered NM National Guard (from Democrat Governor Richardson) before the event, but the required Bush admin approval didn't arrive until 4 days after the disaster. Or the huge relief ship that's been bobbing offshore since the disaster, waiting on the Bush admin go-ahead.

      Or that the mayor isn't responsible for the levees or most other crisis management: Bush and his hirelings are. Or that Bush can send in the military legally, even if the governor or mayor didn't. Or that he could have sent them in anyway, even if it were illegal, to save everyone, and no one would have said anything. Or even if anyone did say anything, he'd get off. Or even if he didn't get off, that's what leaders do: they sacrifice to save their people.

      You didn't mention that Bush heard about the devastation, and went to California to make a political speech instead. Or that he went golfing on Friday, as Gulf Coasters continued to die.

      Nah, why would you tell the truth? You're a ghoul, to whom thousands of Americans dying are just a chance to lie about politics. You are a subhuman pig. When the floods rise in Sioux Falls, you better hope that your government comes to the rescue. Or maybe you're just depending on your rifle to keep you dry. You probably worship Bush because you hate the government, ignoring how they subsidize your paycheck at the nursing home, and are happy about the way he's proving the rightwing theory that "government can't do anything right". You are a dangerous fool.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    15. Re:Wow that's creepy by ksheff · · Score: 1

      So it was Bush's fault that the mayor didn't follow his city's own evac plan and use the city's buses before they were flooded? That he was shipping people to a location w/o food, water, or portable toilets? I'd like to see the article that says Blanco asked for assistance when you say she did. The news articles I've read indicate that she didn't request help from the multi-state National Guard compact until Wednesday of last week (not surprisingly, a guy I know in Ohio was called up that day because of it). Why did she have so few of their own NG troops in the city? They were still squabbling over who would be in charge late as Saturday. That's what the mayor was referring to when he said Blanco "needed 24 hours to think it over". Yes, there were screw ups by every level of govt in this situation. However, that doesn't exempt the local & state from their responsibility. The Feds tell everyone not to expect aid for 72-96 hours and to plan accordingly. I guess the locals ignored that too.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    16. Re:Wow that's creepy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I have taken appropriate action under state law and directed the execution of the State Emergency Plan on August 26, 2005, in accordance with Section 401 of the Stafford Act. A State of Emergency has been issued for the State in order to support the evacuations of the coastal areas and the remainder of the state to support the State Evacuation and Sheltering Plan."

      - LA Governor Blanco, letter to President Bush and FEMA, August 28, 2005.

      The hurricane struck on August 29, and the city flooded on August 30. A week later, and federal support is still just arriving.

      I find it hard to believe that this is the first you are hearing of these facts, which are simple, indeed intuitive. Instead, I believe that you'd rather repeat the lies Bush is saying to cover his ass from this unforgiveable failure.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    17. Re:Wow that's creepy by orthogonal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...I was making reference to.... the incompetence of the Mayor of NO and the governor of LA.


      Here's the simple take-home point:

      Do you think your city, your family and loved ones, will be safe when it is your city that needs to be evacuated?

      With Katrina we had several days' notice of a disaster -- and you use that to blame Mayor Nagin and Governor Blanco.

      But the next terrorist attack will give no warning. The attacked city will be relying entirely on FEMA -- there'll be no Nagin, no Blanco for apologists to blame.

      Some four years after September 11th, both FEMA and the Department of Homeland Security have demonstrated that they can't protect Americans -- indeed, their leaders in abject and total failure can only blithely deny news footage we're seeing with our own eyes.


      The fundamental purpose of any government -- as any conservative will tell you -- is the protection of its citizens.

      In the last four years, our "leaders" have ignored crucial evidence preceding the September 11th attacks, have failed to get those responsible, have been willingly fooled by colossally bad intelligence about WMDs in Iraq, have fired those who correctly predicted we'd need far more troops to avoid a quagmire in Iraq, and have now let thousands of your fellow Americans die from their incompetence and lack of preparedness.

      Our so-called "leaders" have repeatedly failed to uphold their end of the social contract. One "understandable" mistake after another -- and no one's been fired except whistle-blowers and those who were in retrospect proven right in their predictions.


      How many more mistakes rewarded by Presidential Medals of Freedom will you tolerate? How many more Americans must die from sheer incompetent failure at the highest level of government before you find your anger?

      How much longer will you trust your life, your children's lives, and your country's future, to the "protection" of these miserable failures?

      How much longer?

    18. Re:Wow that's creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless of the timing, it's hard to get federal aid when your national guard is on the other side of the planet, along with the lion's share of it's working equipment.

    19. Re:Wow that's creepy by Poppa · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's sickening how you people will promote your partisan politics when people are suffering. Just another excuse for Bush-Bashing. It gets rather tiresome. You guys lost the last two elections, get over it.

      I suppose the Mayor has no responsibility in this? The fact that they ignored their 1000 page evacuation plans? Knew that there were thousands of people that have no way to leave, ignored their plans to use any available methods of transportation to move those people? Left them behind while legions of school buses remained in their lots to be covered by the flood? Required the sick and elderly to walk to the Dome and had insufficient food and water knowing that a Cat 5 hurricane was possible?

      They knew full well how bad things could get. Instead of being prepared, they (and you) blame the Feds.

      This shows how inefficent a bloated bureacracy is. And you want them to manage all of your health care?!! It is amazing to see how well private people, churches and disaster organizations have been helping.

      Sure, there were mistakes made. But instead of promoting your partisan politics we should be working together to help these people.

    20. Re:Wow that's creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are a stupid fuck

    21. Re:Wow that's creepy by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      have been willingly fooled by colossally bad intelligence about WMDs in Iraq

      Who exactly in the administration was "fooled" with respect to WMD? They knew what they were doing, it was a part of their game plan and a publically stated goal of The Project for a New American Century. WMD, genocide, freedom, liberation, democracy, whatever buzzword it took to get the public on the same side as their investors, they were willing to use it. They looked at the clouds (the inteligence) and saw whatever images they wanted you to see.

    22. Re:Wow that's creepy by Tarwn · · Score: 1

      Ah blame and some fairly horrible name calling. I'm going to ignore the last paragraph and hope that a little more info will help your point of view.

      The governor declared a state of emergancy on the 26th and sent a letter to Bush on the 27th requesting that he also declare a state of emergancy. The letter contained general information about how she was coordinating various groups to handle the crisis as well as the inclusion of FEMA Emergancy Response Team A, that she notes is already on route. Link to letter

      Bush declared a state of emergancy the same day he received this request, as has been posted in multiple articles on the internet form various media sources.

      In various arguments I have seen some number like 40% of the National Guard in LA being sent overseas, this leaves 60% ofthe National Guard in the state under the control of the governor. Note that while several state-level departments are listed with their responsibilities, the national guard is left out.

      The damage was bad, I will not argue with that, it is a fact. I will not get into whether human-caused damage was the fault of humans, other than to mention that every hurricane I lived through I remember some minimal amount of looting occurring. If we were to remove 60%+ ofthe population, than uddenly those looters not only apear to be a larger percentage of the population, but tey have a lot farther they can rome befoe running into resistance. Add the general mayhem of the time and thefact that so many people were in shelters and it makes what was likely a small number of looters seem like a much larger percentage of the population. Although I did find it interesting tat the commisioner of police was quoted saying tat they had arrested 3 looters already by 7:30 the morning of the 29th, less than 1.5 hours after landfall. I'd post the link but unfrtunatly I can't remmber which ofthe "Katrina" news links it was (wasn't any of the 5 I just re-read :P)

      I haven't found a link to an article were the governor asked for aid, in fact thats the first I have heard of it (having in fact heard that Bush offered aid but was turned down). I'll add that to my rumor stack for now. Interesting to note that the golf playing is already in that stack too, as I have read articles that state that but also articles that refute it and claim he was at a medicaid convention and not playing golf.

      As far as the Levees go, it depends on what you mean when you say responsible. If your talking about the work being done by the Corps of Engineers, I think you will find that getting behind on projects is one of the things they do best. They have a habit of starting projects at a faster rate then they finish them. Bush has been reprimanding them for years for their backlog of projects, that have reached a financial need that is about 7 times that of their annual budget (budget is generally $4bil, backlog is about $27 or $28bil - Found in the Federal budget documents foor 2004 and 2005 for Corps). On top of that, the rumors of an additonal study that they wanted to do are true. There was another study they wanted to do, unfortunatly it was estimated to be completed in 2008.

      Additionally, the Levees were Cat 3 level protection.
      National Geographic had a dgood piece on this with some interesting interview quotes: linkie linkie

      I'm going to cut this short, despite having lots of stuff left. As you can tell, I'm not blaming anyone with this, just trying to clarify the facts for the people that want to wantonly blame Bush for everything, despite what the facts say.

      One additional comment. I do not agree with a large number of decisions that Clinton made when he was in office. However, having read and seen interviews with him recently, I have to say I was proud of the way he spoke about this situation. He did not rant and rave. He did not (as CNN implied, despite the interview being posted in the same article) blast the current administration. Instead he

      --
      Whee signature.
    23. Re:Wow that's creepy by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 1

      The support is just arriving, or it has been arriving, it can't be "still just arriving"

    24. Re:Wow that's creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Some four years after September 11th, both FEMA and the Department of Homeland Security have demonstrated that they can't protect Americans -- indeed, their leaders in abject and total failure can only blithely deny news footage we're seeing with our own eyes."

      You're being too generous. Seriously. The head of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff, claimed that the event was a surprise, for example: that overtopping the levees was not expected. That's utterly ridiculous.

      Given that the levees were engineered for a Category 3 hurricane, and this was very well known among local politicians, scientists, the press, and the general public for years earlier, everyone who cared about the issue knew it was a disaster waiting to happen, and many of the details of how it might unfold if a Category 4 or 5 hurricane arrived in the right spot were also well known, and are scarily prophetic if you read them now.

      Chertoff -- the supposed head of the effort to deal with the event -- has demonstrated the kind of cluelessness that could only be paralleled by announcing he had no idea a nuclear bomb could cause so much damage, days after the event! He's clearly ignorant of his job, which is a fatal flaw for the head of an organization that is supposed to handle emergencies, and is supposed to be keeping politicians informed enough to make the hard decisions.

      To cast it in the only terms that seem to matter to the people in power, Chertoff should have been on the phone last weekend before the storm talking directly to Pres. Bush and telling him that: A) this hurricane is on track to be exactly the catastrophe that people have been predicting there for many decades, and B) if improperly handled, there could be serious political repercussions for Bush's presidency (the latter being the only thing that might wake Bush up from the kind of stupor that had him contininuing on his way to the next political speech elsewhere in the country).

      It's as if somebody credible called the federal government to tell them there was a high chance of a nuclear bomb being dropped on the New Orleans area in the next couple of days, yet Bush still kept his speaking appointments. What the hell were he and all his advisors thinking?

      I know the people on the ground are working very hard, but it could have been more effective sooner if the effort wasn't so headless at the start.

    25. Re:Wow that's creepy by asadsalm · · Score: 1

      Bush *MIGHT* be technically right be blaming New Orleanians, BUT the truth is that the Bush administration has cried "Wolf" too many times by scaring the general public and raising the scare-tactic threat level on every instance they could.

      Now when the threat was imminent, the public was confused as to how they should have reacted to defend their lives. And the irony is that this time the "enemy" was the terrorists...

    26. Re:Wow that's creepy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'm glad you're sickened. Maybe you'll need some help. And die when you didn't get it. After all, you've been paying $3TRILLION a year for Bush's "bloated bureaucracy". He's the "outsider president", right? He's been running the country with "emergency preparation" his top priority since 9/11/2001, right?

      Calling the president a failure when he fails isn't partisan. He's everyone's president, even if half of us didn't want him. Defending him despite his failure is partisan. You're spouting the essential Republican hack job: accuse your enemy of exactly your own bad actions, when only you are doing them. You're a raving lunatic.

      Yeah, after 9/11, everything changed. NOTHING CHANGED. You subhuman Republicans are stil talking shit about "bloated bureaucracies", as you build your own bureaucracy, bloated beyond belief.

      BLOATED? Look at the bloated bodies floating in New Orleans. Then look at how Bush assumed total responsibility for responding to the disaster. Then rip out the burnt nerves in your brain that let you say that he's not responsible for those bloated corpses.

      And then look in the mirror. Because your apologies for Bush, your votes for Bush, your inhuman lies and ghoulish unconcern at Bush's legacy of death and destruction, all make YOU responsible for this disaster, too.

      In a catastrophe, bad things happen. All at once, everything DOES change. People who were wrong for years get a chance to do something right. But you and your demented zombie army can't even get right when a catastrophe destroys a major city in your country. You are disgusting.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    27. Re:Wow that's creepy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0

      You can go choke on your "shame". Everything you say in your post backs up what I said in mine. You want more evidence that LA Governor Blanco did her job, and Bush screwed up his (killing thousands across the Gulf Coast)? You got it.

      You go off on the Republican defense "now's not the time for long criticism, now's the time for doing something to help". In a 10 paragraph Slashdot post. What have you done to help anyone in the destroyed Gulf Coast?

      You "hope that something positive will come out of reviewing what went wrong", but you don't want to "review" what went wrong. It's totally obvious: 50 million Americans voted for Bush, let him take responsibility, let him fail, and now some of them, like you, are covering for his screwup.

      "Plenty of time later"? The people in the media, and people like me posting when we take a break from our real work (including coordinating relief for Katrina victims), have time to criticize right now, when people are paying attention. White House spokesman Scott McClellan doesn't have anything else to do other than answer questions from he press - even if the answers are "we totally screwed up" - but he of course prefers to put them off to another day, which never comes. Next month, some other Republican smokescreen will come along, either another disaster or another PR stunt, and we won't be focused on this problem.

      If we don't get rid of these criminals now, we never will. And people like you are to blame. You might not like the blame, but you've earned it.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    28. Re:Wow that's creepy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      When something large arrives slowly, with most of its arrival yet to come, that beginning trickle is "still just arriving". Like a 2 mile freight train that's pulling into a depot, only its first hundred yards already in the yard: it's still just arriving. Arrivals occur within a window, and the arrival of help in the Gulf Coast has just begun - the arrival is far from ending.

      The phrase also uses "just" in the sense of "only": the help is arriving, but it's not helping as much as it will when it's done arriving.

      The phrase uses "still" both in the sense of "actually at this late time", and also in the sense of "even considering indications to the contrary".

      So, in points of fact and style, that phrase is completely accurate.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    29. Re:Wow that's creepy by Tarwn · · Score: 1

      If my post had truly backed up yours, I doubt you would be attacking me at the moment.

      I can't see my post now, but I believe I was speaking in support of a quote from Clinton, whom I believe is still a Democrat.

      You "hope that something positive will come out of reviewing what went wrong", but you don't want to "review" what went wrong - Err...I hope I don't have to explain whats wrong with that statement...

      Just as I have a right to be ashamed of the people expending more energy blindly attacking, you have every right to believe I am to blame or that I have earned the blame.

      I do not claim to be a Republican, I do have views that do not agree with them, but I do have many views that do. What I find interesting is that one of us made an opinion based off research and one of us is parroting the beliefs or facts as reported from a single partisan source. If some of my sources or views do not agree with what mainstream "Republicans" are saying, than so be it. I am more comfortable drawing an opinion from a wide collection of sources and thought than from a single party line or source. ...I'll leave off the Winston Churchill quote

      --
      Whee signature.
    30. Re:Wow that's creepy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0

      *You* are the one obsessed with partisanship? Who cares what Clinton says now, except to people he convinces to help victims. As far as I can tell, he supported the levee efforts while president, but I don't really care. Getting rid of Bush and the people destroying our country with neglect NOW is what's important. Your "backing Clinton" when he backs up the "federal government", his life's work, which covers for Bush, is meaningless. Yet another covert partisan ploy on your part.

      I attacked the totally irrelevant or irresponsible things you said. Because they were stupid and counterproductive. I guess it's more of that shame that you're focused on that keeps you from saying you're Republican, while you vote for them. The mask is ripped off. Just like the mask of "now's not the time", which probably comes from some infant trauma by your parents telling you "maybe later" when they meant "no". That kind of denial doesn't cut it, not when this disaster is still being managed by the incompetent punks who are sticking around only to skim the huge relief money now flowing through their office.

      You blew it. You called yourself "Independent", but you backed the Republicans. You saw them exacerbate this disaster, instead of relieving it, and you pumped your time on partisan spin. While complaining about people wasting time on partisan spin.

      I asked you what you've done to help. You haven't responded. I can only assume that you've done nothing but spin for Republicans. You are welcome to all the shame you can absorb.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    31. Re:Wow that's creepy by loqi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I find interesting is that one of us made an opinion based off research and one of us is parroting the beliefs or facts as reported from a single partisan source.

      I'd like to point out with my powers of hindsight that one of the sources of this information is the Louisiana government.

      If some of my sources or views do not agree with what mainstream "Republicans" are saying, than so be it. I am more comfortable drawing an opinion from a wide collection of sources and thought than from a single party line or source. ...I'll leave off the Winston Churchill quote

      Is it smug in here, or is it you? If you gather information from a "wide collection of sources" and they're not all in agreement, do you just throw your hands up in the air and moan "who's to say", or do you use that 3-pound lump of blood and tissue in your skull to connect that information, look for patterns, draw your own conclusions? If you were honestly drawing an opinion from a wide collection of sources, and you were interested in relevant action instead of saving face, you'd be blaming Bush too.

      Why? Because maybe if enough people had blamed Bush and his administration of hacks back in 2001 instead of "uniting in the face of disaster", Bush would have learned that ignoring warnings and facts until they've generated a crisis for you isn't acceptable conduct for the president of the United States.

      --
      If other reasons we do lack, we swear no one will die when we attack
    32. Re:Wow that's creepy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Moderation +1
          40% Insightful
          40% Overrated
          20% Interesting

      I noticed that the creepy guntoting Bush worshipper crawled off into the woodwork after I called him on his savage bullshit. But then the TrollMods crawled out from the rotten underbrush.

      Slashdot should allow "Overrated" mods only on highly modded posts, like +4 or +5. Otherwise, it's just a way for unaccountable anonymous TrollMods to suppress posts they don't like, rather than argue with them. Which is typical of creepy guntoting Bush worshippers.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    33. Re:Wow that's creepy by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've read that. It's too bad what she's asking for is just money after the hurricane blows on through. This has nothing to do with notifying the mult-state compact.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    34. Re:Wow that's creepy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      She asks Bush to declare LA an "expedited major disaster". And notes she has made her disaster declarations. Those are required for Bush to allow "foreign" National Guard to enter her state. And simplifies his sending in troops if the local responses are overwhelmed, as she notes she expects. That's a lot more than just asking for money. That's asking for help. Which arrived way too late.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    35. Re:Wow that's creepy by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Read the Stafford Act and then re-read her letter. This is a request for funding. Stafford requires the Feds to pick up at least 75% of the costs and up to 100% for impoverished areas (which is noted in her letter). That's why for each activity the state is engaging in is listed with an estimated cost as well as the estimated costs for categories they would qualify for which results in a $130M request. That is the resources being requested. You don't order up $30M worth of engineering battalions and $25M worth of military police! The primary reason for disaster declarations: free up Federal cash. That was signed for LA on the 28th and other states, even though they weren't hit, have received disaster declarations later because they are housing refugees.

      This is NOT a request to the multi-state aid compact for National Guard troops from other states. That was not sent until Wednesday acording to the Post. The Feds just can't barge into a state with troops and neither can NG troops from other states. Hell, they are being very cautious with respect to what the regular Army troops are doing there to make sure they don't violate Posse Comitatus. Another interesting tidbit is that the Red Cross (and others) announced today that the state of Louisiana restricted them from going into New Orleans before the evacs even started. That's a funny way of accepting help.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    36. Re:Wow that's creepy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Washington, not Baton Rouge stopped federal assistance from arriving on time to assist New Orleans and the Louisiana Gulf Coast. That order I showed you does request lots of money - which gets spent on all of the assistance that Lousiana deploys. I don't know why you think that a devastating hurricane/flood doesn't require (only 20%) more money for engineers than police, considering the vast destruction. And I don't know why you think that ordering the money isn't essential to the effort. If she hadn't ordered the money, would you be complaining that she was "stingy", or "expected to fix everything for free"?

      I spoke this past weekend with a former Red Cross board member who's still involved, here in NYC. She told me that the Red Cross wasn't actually prepared or ready to help, they couldn't just go in the way people expect. So they've got people from FEMA to the press saying they were prevented by various governments, to cover their ass. Meanwhile, FEMA did stop all kinds of assistance from assisting, despite their actual policies - from a "battalion" of 1000 local boatsmen (with 500 boats in tow) which the Jefferson Parish Sheriff (who is the boss of the parish) brought back with an escort, to Al Gore's passenger jets that he called in on a favor from an airline. Then there's the Bataan, which could have saved many lives if used. And Bush has the power to send in all kinds of troops and assistance even without the state actions which were done, if communications were so bad that he didn't realize that prerequisites were complete. Instead, he didn't even leave his vacation for days longer, and first took care of some political work in California while people were drowning.

      The list like this is very long. It's being reported all over the place. I don't know exactly which "Post" you're reading, but the facts are everywhere. The governor did all kinds of things she was supposed to do, the Feds did not, and thousands of people died as a result.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    37. Re:Wow that's creepy by ksheff · · Score: 1

      The amounts I listed for the engineering and police were the amounts in the original request for disaster funds. That's what the link that you posted to was: a request for funds. That's it. A request for funds isn't a request for troops from other states. As the article you linked to showed, LA officials didn't start that process until the middle of the week. The LA governor did do what she was supposed to do...eventually. That's why everything was late.

      If the Red Cross officials wasn't prepared or didn't have people and supplies in the area, why did they announce to the press that they were turned away from NO and told to wait a day by LA officials? The President is also limited by Posse Comitatus in what he can do. He either has to wait on the state governor or for Congress to act.

      I was referring to the Washington Post and yes the facts are everywhere. More and more it's looking like the citizens of Louisiana got the response they deserved from their famously corrupt and incompetent state and local governments.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    38. Re:Wow that's creepy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You'll say anything to hang on to your corrupt Republican grip on power.

      Louisianans "deserved" what they got? You deserve a stake through the heart.

      Try reading the National Response Plan that Bush, DHS and FEMA all screwed up. Killing thousands of Americans. I hope you're next on the order of people killed by Bush hypocrisy. I'm tired of hearing your lies about how Bush needs all the power, and none of the responsiblity.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    39. Re:Wow that's creepy by ksheff · · Score: 1

      You need to improve your reading comprehension and go fuck yourself while your at it. I never said that the Feds didn't screw up or any of the other BS that you referred to in this section of the thread (or past a couple paragraphs of any of the articles you linked to). Everyone seems to forget that the state and local officals are ones primarily responsible for the safety of their citizens and are the ones in charge of responding to disasters like this. The role of the Feds is to support the locals in doing their jobs. The state and local officals fucked up big time, but it's somehow the all Feds' fault? Come on.

      No, I don't want the Feds to have the power to send troops into any state and usurp state and local power at will. Apparently you and the rest of the Bush-haters do because that's what they would have had to do to respond any faster than what they did. That's a worse precedent than any of the BS with the Patriot Act. People are responsible for the roles that they play in the system. Brown resigned because of FEMA's screw ups and Bush is taking responsiblity for the Feds' role and the response will be evaulated to fix what went wrong. Are Blanco and Nagin doing the same? Not that I am aware of.

      If a group of people have a history of electing inept, corrupt, and/or incompetent people for their leaders and then depend solely on them for their survival, then yes, they deserve what they get. If you feel that govt needs to be your nanny, I feel sorry for you because you will be royally fucked over someday. It's not a question of if, but when.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    40. Re:Wow that's creepy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The Feds are primarily responsible, and don't even need local approval to go into catastrophes like Katrina. Even if the governor perhaps doesn't approve, which she did, in advance of the storm. She approved NM Guard assistance before the storm, too, but it took 4 days for DC to process the paperwork.

      So you go fuck yourself. You're some sick bastard, to say New Orleanians "deserve what they get" for electing inept, corrupt, incompetents, who did their job. While you suck Bush's cock as he bungles his way through another catastrope killing Americans without reason, without plan. You are truly demented that you are sticking to your script while Americans die. You are already fucked over, "royally", by your own King George.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    41. Re:Wow that's creepy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      And stick the evidence of Chertoff's miserable failure up your ass, too.

      Or maybe you'll be pleased to read how Bush called R-MS Governor Barbour several times, but D-LA Governor Blanco couldn't even get Bush to return her calls during the catastrophe. Maybe that's why you suck up to these lethally incompetent partisans: you think they might cut you in on the booty, instead of leaving you to drown.

      You're running cover for murderers now, rightwing asshole. Enjoy it while you can. Because none of these Neros hears all the hard work you're doing - you're just as expendible as the next schmuck.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    42. Re:Wow that's creepy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Just keeping you posted on how Bush is responsible for the Katrina Catastophe that killed so many of your fellow Americans "who deserved it".

      Turns out that Bush declared an emergency, for which he and the Feds were primarily responsible, on 8/27/05, as Katrina approached the Gulf Coast. He declared the emergency only in the parishes not on the Gulf Coast. After the storm hit, on 8/28/05, as the city flooded, he declared an emergency in the Gulf Coast parishes, but only to the extent that money would be spent - not on Federal coordination of relief efforts, for which he had already assumed legal authority, which was his job.

      Oh, and you probably haven't bothered to face the truth that DHS chief Chertoff was the person responsible for mobilizing the Feds, but failed to do so while thousands were killed by his negligence. Chertoff himself seems not to have realized he was responsible, so why should you care?

      I know you don't care, that you'll be jizzing yourself tonight when Bush repeats the empty lies that he's "taking responsibility" for the failed Federal response to the catastrophe on TV. Of course, he's taking responsibility in the sense of avoiding responsibility, because anyone responsible for the murder of thousands of Americans, and abandonment of hundreds of thousands of others, should be fired, and probably hanged.

      And while you're going all-out to fuck yourself, why don't you ask Cheney for some advice: he's the expert. You're in pretty grim company.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  10. Only a few parts of the city are updated by vectorian798 · · Score: 1, Informative

    The central parts of the city are still as before. Not much to see, move on...

  11. Particularly... interesting by mcc · · Score: 5, Interesting
    1. Re:Particularly... interesting by irn_bru · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's a shame that Google AdWords(TM) can't respond to a crisis as fast as George W. I really don't fancy a stay in the Holiday Inn Downtown at the moment, thank you very much...

    2. Re:Particularly... interesting by Coneasfast · · Score: 3, Informative

      btw, to get rid of those location pointers (A, B, C, D, etc):
      just clear the search field and press enter.

      too bad google doesn't make this clear, would be nice to have a button to do that.

      --
      Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
    3. Re:Particularly... interesting by TheSkyIsPurple · · Score: 1

      I just don't get it... the after shot looks like the file is almost a negative... I can't quite make out what happened.

      Is there water everywhere?
      Is that mud and gunk on the streets where they seem to disappear?

      Looks pretty nasty around there, I just can't make out exactly how

    4. Re:Particularly... interesting by ArcticCelt · · Score: 1

      No need to blame Google for this. The way that Google AdWords(TM) work, its the person who made the publicity who needs to react and I guess that he is kind of overwhelmed by many other things right now or maybe even dead. It's like saying : "It's a shame that the Internet can't respond to a crisis and remove those web sites of destroyed commerce's. The owners of each web site needs to react, not the TLD. Anyway I agree with you that it`s looki verry creepy to read those publicities

      --

      Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
    5. Re:Particularly... interesting by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it took quite a beating. In fact, CNN just announced (in the second paragraph as I write this) that it is more damaged that previously thought, and will probably have to be demolished.

      I didn't know how badly it was damaged last week, but at the time I certainly wondered if it would have to come down simply for psychological reasons. The New Orleans residents who suffered so much inside it while their city died would probably never again be able to set foot inside or even look at it from the outside without getting upset at the memory. Frankly, just seeing the video clip from inside as the roof material was being torn off made me shudder-- I can't imagine what it must have been like to be in there at the time, wondering if the place was going to collapse.

      ~Philly

    6. Re:Particularly... interesting by kevmo · · Score: 1

      The listing on the map wasn't AdWords. It was the result of a search for locations with "Superdome" in their name. Holidy Inn Downtown Superdome was just one of those results.

    7. Re:Particularly... interesting by tftp · · Score: 1

      Yes, mud and water are clearly visible. You can see what sections of the city are still dry; most are under water, though.

    8. Re:Particularly... interesting by James+Lewis · · Score: 1

      It is easy to missinterpret that picture. Half of the roof isn't missing. Just the white skin of it blew off, and apparently there were a few "small" holes. Check out the story and picture here.

  12. Just like the government... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This post is a week late...

    too soon?

  13. It is amazing by 834r9394557r011 · · Score: 1

    To see the amount of damage caused over such a large area. You can see where the water is draining from neighborhoods back into the river. I saw it near the Galvez st warf.

    --
    w00t
  14. Re:Repeat! by stephenMF · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's not a repeat, but I've known about this for several days (almost a week). Maybe I saw it on Boing Boing or even Google News.

  15. Old News by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I was looking at Google Earth like last weekend and they had the Katrina button there. Take a look at the superdome. Wow.

  16. Rant by EinarH · · Score: 1, Funny
    As someone actually living in the North, I have problems understanding what all the Main Stream Media fuzz is about. People keep complaining about the governmental response despite the fact that living in New Orleans is entirely voluntarily. Back in the days when I was a kid and the hurricanes hit our home we were all by our self. No Police, no coast guard, no FEMA and no National Guard. Why do people expect that to be different today? Today as we barely pay tax we can't expect assistance every time a drop of rain falls.

    I see mislead people on the Internet complaining about how global warming, but last time I checked out that theory it turned out that the number of hurricanes is not 100% directly related to global warming. The other day I heard a smart scientist from a credible and well founded institute present reasonable evidence against the global warming scam by using high quality PowerPoint slides. And those mad scientist that belive that there is a connection are the same people that refuse to see all the corporate benefits of cheap oil. Especially to the Gulf Regions and the private industry. Without oil in the Gulf Regions New Orleans would have been nothing today. Oil fuels the economy in the area, most people live in a sea of opportunities, the wetlands are thriving with new ecosystems that keep growing and even black gay liberals can get a job in the Mardi Gras festival.

    The Bush administration is taking a lot of heat this week from leftist journalists that refuse to see how the Presidents action is strengthening the region through increased oil prices and new fertilizers made of dead niggers. Most of the companies in the Gulf earn good money these days as the American economy keeps on moving. The President has made some tough choices in order to increase the wealth of this country. And as we all know, it works great compared to the losers in Europe. The privatization and minimization of our ineffective government is necessary if we want to keep our vibrant economy. I notice how some people keeps ranting about the decision to (de facto) include FEMA into DHS. These people are doing their country a disservice by intentionally ignoring the good intentions behind the reformation. As outlined in the Republican convention last year we know that the threat from terrorists is much more urgent than the risk of a hurricane. Centrally planed bureaucratized rescue efforts are also much less effective compared to smaller faith based organizations. While the incapable government is stumbling smaller organization such as Operation Blessing are thriving even in chaos. Additionally we can now see how the Presidents strategy of letting the market deal with the disaster is actually helping the economy and the heroic man. Many businesses will get contracts in the rebuilding process, something that will increase the economic output of the region and create new wealth. We can also see how free enterprises can exploit problems in the area and turn the into gold mines that automagically benefits the poor and huddled masses in the region. This is the famous trickle down economy at work folks.

    When victims in a moment of anger express their grief about how the government handled the evacuation remember that these people had the chance to leave for several days. By looking at how New Orleans developed after the organized official evacuation we can see that many of them where either in a persistent vegetative state, to high to think rationally or they where thinking about how they could exploit the situation. These hoodlums and ragheads are destroying the city and the only thing the federal government should be involved in is putting them down for good by using the Army so small business owners can rebuild our infrastructure. Looters that break into private property for food and medicine ought to be shot with the .50. Why should the federal government waste limited resources on helping these people that contribute nothing to the Electoral College and the Economy overall? The federal government did

    --

    Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    1. Re:Rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      By your extremist views of, i guess it would be darwinian survival, we should not have medical care because it will weed out those who are too sick to continue populating this earth with healthy (e.g. rich) people.

      Not only that, but you make it seem as the market will correct such natural disasters and such...

      1) In economics, there are things that are out of the scope of expected inputs which lead to crazy outcomes, these are called externalities...some externalities would include terroist attacks, new revoulutionary technological processes, and um....yeah, natural disasters.

      2) when externalities occur, there really should be some sort of market adjustment measures taken.

      3) america does not exist, nor does anyplace else, in a "perfect" market economy where the market will make the proper adjustments and correct itself.

      4) and shit, if republicans (or democrats) were so into the market economy and faith in it's power to correct itself, why do we have so many crappy lobby groups asking for protection, (a few examples in the south...textiles, agriculture, oil)

      Then you go to quote the Bible?

      I may not be a deeply religous person, but i don't think God/Jebus/Allah/whatever would share your views about giving a big ol' "fuck you" to poor people.

      BTW nice rant...n.

            1. Violent or extravagant speech or writing.
            2. A speech or piece of writing that incites anger or violence

    2. Re:Rant by Thnikkaman · · Score: 1

      Everyone calm down. The post is a little thing called 'satire.' Take a deep breath, look up the definition, and then read the post again.

  17. Not on Google Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was under the impression that Google Earth was fed by the same source as Google Maps, but after doing a lot of fly-throughs from Google Earth, I don't see anything that suggests post-Katrina images.

  18. Six Flags Under Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They're gonna kill me for the bandwidth this uses, but I managed to find a picture of Six Flags (a series of large theme parks for you non-USians, second only to Disney's stuff) after it was hit. It looks pretty disturbing to see rides halfway submerged.

    Six Flags:
    http://www.ecsis.net/~gregday/park.jpg

    Park Map:
    http://www.ecsis.net/~gregday/map.pdf

    The rest of the NOAA aerial images taken from a Cessna:
    http://ngs.woc.noaa.gov/katrina/KATRINA0000.HTM

    But I warn you, it's very creepy.

    1. Re:Six Flags Under Water by mrklin · · Score: 1
      Coral cache for the Six Flags picture:

      http://www.ecsis.net.nyud.net:8090/~gregday/park.j pg

    2. Re:Six Flags Under Water by jemenake · · Score: 2, Funny
      I managed to find a picture of Six Flags (a series of large theme parks for you non-USians, second only to Disney's stuff) after it was hit. It looks pretty disturbing to see rides halfway submerged.
      However, the log-ride is still operational, with over 4,000 new circuits you can ride through.
    3. Re:Six Flags Under Water by magicchex · · Score: 1

      (a series of large theme parks for you non-USians, second only to Disney's stuff) And second to Cedar Point. And Disney probably falls below both Cedar Point AND Six Flags.

      --
      How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
    4. Re:Six Flags Under Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it's about time they soaked the worst of the vomit from the 'coaster seats.

    5. Re:Six Flags Under Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disney: Better than some Six Flags, worse than others.

      Cedar Point: Kicks Disney's ass, but it's not really a theme park. It's an amusement park. There's a difference.

      Don't forget Busch Gardens (The one in Tampa friggin' ROCKS) and Universal (Islands of Adventure is the best theme park I've been to in my life...).

    6. Re:Six Flags Under Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you equate theme park with coaster park, then yeah, Cedar Point kicks _everybody's_ ass. Whenever someone says "blah blah best coaster park blah blah" there's an implied "... except for Cedar Point..." :)

    7. Re:Six Flags Under Water by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Wow, that is really creepy. For those wondering, the big ride on the upper right is a huge wooden coaster, which was very rickety and thrilling.

      From the top, just before the plunge, I could see the big white building with the NASA logo in the distance. I remember thinking, "Oh cool", and then falling into sheer terror as the coaster began its plunge.

      The big area in the center used to be a pond where people used to ride boats. There were lots of koi and other fish in there, I guess they're scattered everywhere now. The straight white thing next to the center used to be a bungee ride that took you over the water. I guess I won't get a chance to ride that now :P

      Apparently the NASA facility where they build the shuttle's fuel tanks has been damaged. Hopefully it is not too bad, but it is very wierd seeing places you have been underwater like this. I know these aren't as important as the people whose lives have been ruined, but it doesn't quite sink in like seeing places where you have such great memories with friends inundated like this.

    8. Re:Six Flags Under Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (a series of large theme parks for you non-USians, second only to Disney's stuff)

      For you USians, there are "Six Flags" theme parks outside US (Belgium, Netherlands and maybe other places). But it's been rebranded to StarParks I think.
    9. Re:Six Flags Under Water by Crazy39648 · · Score: 1

      I am a season pass holder for Six Flags New orleans. I am looking for pictures of Six Flags New Orleans after Katrina hit. I went to this websitehttp://ngs.woc.noaa.gov/katrina/KATRINA0000 .HTM, but I never could find it. I went to New Orleans & Lake Ponchatrain. Could someone please give me a clue to which block to click & where to click like New Orleans & Lake Ponchatrain. I would appreciate it.

  19. wow... I just realized... by Retalin · · Score: 1

    thanks to Google maps... the Earth really is flat.... and black... and slashdotted....

    --
    Regards, Ryan McAdams
    1. Re:wow... I just realized... by daviqh · · Score: 1

      At least Google has enough bandwidth to handle the Slashdot Effect.

      --
      Microsoft is like...no, it's much worse.
  20. Much better pictures by Kredal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    can be found at NOAA's site, at http://ngs.woc.noaa.gov/katrina/KATRINA0000.HTM

    The pics were just taken off the plane and thrown on a server. North isn't always up, and the pictures aren't very well labeled. You pretty much have to know what you're looking for before you can make sense of the pictures. But they are much better quality than that of maps.google.com.

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    1. Re:Much better pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are better pictures of the entire region that Katrina affected (i.e. not just New Orleans). It would seem that Mississippi was hit considerably harder than New Orleans, which is somewhat surprising given the press coverage. Most structures on Biloxi's coastline are totally gone.

    2. Re:Much better pictures by drinkmorejava · · Score: 0

      They're not oriented properly, but if you notice the pattern of how they were taken, it's not too bad. Also, there is an Excel file if you download a picture package that includes the GPS coordinates. You can use something like MSN mappoint to get the Lat and Long of an address (It's in the address bar after you submit and address, try googling it)

    3. Re:Much better pictures by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      For those of us who aren't in the US.. what's the link to the city that got hit?

      I clicked on a few of the boxes but no idea where I'm looking so I keep ending up with uninhabited bits.

    4. Re:Much better pictures by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the link. Could you give me a more precise timestamp than "August, 2005"?

    5. Re:Much better pictures by scrotch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I found my house on this map yesterday and was able to confirm that my house still exists and was probably dry through this whole mess. I am incredibly pleased and fortunate.

      An earlier post seems to wonder whether anyone from New Orleans would be in California. Remember that it's been more than a week since those of with cars and somewhere to go got out of the city. I've been to Fort Worth, TX, Richmond, VA, and am in Cleveland tonight. I'm putting a lot of my little remaining money into the oil business to help them get through this crisis. It's not hard to get a long way in a week, even with high gas prices. People are going to wherever they have any family or any hope of getting somewhere to stay for a while.

      I haven't asked for anything from any retail stores or anywhere else, but then I'm in a better position than many are. I will, however, shamelessly mention that I lost my job and am looking for temporary work right here on the slashdot...

    6. Re:Much better pictures by IdolizingStewie · · Score: 1

      http://ngs.woc.noaa.gov/katrina/089I30C_KATRINA.HT M Try this one. The eye came ashore here. Several small artsy communities here pretty much don't exist any more. My aunt lived about a quarter of a mile from the water and all she found once it was over was a few pieces of Waterford crystal she'd wrapped in bubble wrap and stuffed under the couch cushions. No sign of the couch though. I think she found that like half a mile away. Turns out a 22 ft storm surge does quite a bit of damage.

    7. Re:Much better pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      See http://ngs.woc.noaa.gov/katrina// for an explanation: The date of the photography can be derived from the first 3 characters of the image name. Image names beginning with 243 were acquired Aug 30, 2005, those beginning with 244 were acquired Aug 31, and so on.


      So an image like http://ngs.woc.noaa.gov/storms/katrina/24427024.jp g/, which makes NO look like Venice, was taken on August 31.

    8. Re:Much better pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the NOAA pictures are much better. Take a look at this one, which shows the main breach of the levee on 17th St. Canal:

      http://ngs.woc.noaa.gov/storms/katrina/24425580.jp g

      (Warning: the photos are almost 4k x 4k pixels, and the ground resolution is about 37 cm / pixel.)

    9. Re:Much better pictures by unitron · · Score: 1
      " I'm putting a lot of my little remaining money into the oil business to help them get through this crisis."

      Ain't we all, brother, ain't we all.

      You should have goten a +5, Funny just for that line, by the way.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  21. *thwack* by Chris+Burke · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Bad troll! No cookie!

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:*thwack* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it struck me as a pretty good troll, honestly.

  22. Amazing america by TractorBarry · · Score: 0, Troll

    Isn't it amazing that America, the country that can bomb anywhere in the world within minutes, can't get something as simple as bottled water, food and medicine to its own citizens within days ?

    Is it any wonder that the poor buggers in Africa never get any help ?

    "Bob" bless 'em one 'n' all.

    --
    Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
    1. Re:Amazing america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it certainly helped that the tsunami victims weren't actively shooting at the rescuers, unlike here in the good ol' USA.

    2. Re:Amazing america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not amazing - the dickheads think that the ability drop bombs is more important than looking after their own people.

    3. Re:Amazing america by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      It seems like there must have been a breakdown in communication somewhere. I remember reading on a news site as the storm was subsiding, someone important (governor I think) quoted as saying "we were lucky." At that point, mention had been made about the roof blowing off the Superdome, but little seemed to be known about the flooding. A couple hours later, all the reports are focusing on the levy breaches.

      PS - the only bombs we can get anywhere in the world in a couple minutes are the ones we most hope to never use.

    4. Re:Amazing america by Sjobeck · · Score: 0

      OH my dog, you are right. I had not thought of that.

        Those poor people were trying their best to take care of each other & some of us are trying to get a couple more diagonal inches of telelvision.

    5. Re:Amazing america by bxbaser · · Score: 1

      I think the problem of slow aid resulted from the thought that the water would subside the next day or so.
      Also the media was really only reporting the looting which to me and probably the rest of the world looked as that was the major problem.
      After a couple of days with the water still there then the images of the suffering started to appear on the news.
      My thought on day 1,2 and 3 wasnt to get the people help it was WOW thats crazy down there.

    6. Re:Amazing america by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      Bombings are offensive moves and are planned. Reacting to a hurricane is a defensive move and, to do it right, requires even MORE planning.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    7. Re:Amazing america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    8. Re:Amazing america by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Well, the major flooding downtown didn't happen until the levees broke. This didn't happen right away, as it was due to huge amounts of rainfall, not the storm surge or wind damage.

      For a little while, it seemed like NO was spared much of the destruction... which might be part of the reason some of the response teams were told to stand down.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    9. Re:Amazing america by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "My thought on day 1,2 and 3 wasnt to get the people help it was WOW thats crazy down there."

      Of course, it's not your job to think to get the people help. Those people whose job it was, and still is, have got some 'splainin to do.

      Anyone responsible for disaster relief who looked to the news for their primary information, should be canned. Preferably in a sardine processing facility.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  23. Helpful views by Durango_44 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The company I work for has two franchised, retail stores in the New Orleans area--one on the riverfront downtown, and another in the Metairie area, north of the main town. These satellite images have provided us with the first comfirmation of the damage, and are remarkably useful (in our case, the stores appear to be dry 48 hours after Katrina's passage). The executives were delighted to see this, and earned the IT group some nice brownie points... There is a similar link on the Denver Post site today. The images are from the same company, and for the same date and time, but are markedly different in color from the Google images. Does anybody know why?

    1. Re:Helpful views by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      These satellite images have provided us with the first comfirmation of the damage ... The executives were delighted to see this

      WTF? Were they dancing and singing? "Yay! Destruction! Yay! Insurance!"

    2. Re:Helpful views by w00d · · Score: 1

      The buildings may be intact, but they've probably been picked clean by the looters.

  24. Two interesting things by inio · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1. The new imagery goes in one zoom stop furter than the regular imagery. A sign of things to come?
    2. The new imagery doesn't have any obvious copyright notices. Did they skip this step or is there a new invisible watermark?

    1. Re:Two interesting things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the images were originally provided by NOAA, you can do whatever you like with them.

      It'd be particularly dickheaded (and illegal?) for them to try and copyright whatever manipulation went into stitching the images together.

    2. Re:Two interesting things by Tyger · · Score: 3, Informative

      1. I was reading a google maps API forum thread where someone suggested allowing better zoom so people could better identify houses there, the answer was that they would get to it, and apparently they have.
      2. If I had to hazard a guess, I'd say most the images they had to pay for, so they own rights to and responsibility to protect. However, the flood images were probably pieced together from freely downloadable NOAA images, so they have no such rights or responsability.

    3. Re:Two interesting things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming these pictures were taken with the Google satellite...
      'nuff said..

    4. Re:Two interesting things by divisivemind · · Score: 1

      NOAA did this in a plane. 1.2ft/pixel is much better than commonly available sat shots. You give Google too much credit.

      --
      Blog: http://richardrandomrants.blogspot.com/
  25. How about finally acknowledging by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Interesting

    that there are some places people should not live? Instead of throwing billions at a problem that will occur again it might be best to treat the city as we treated people along the Miss.

    Move them.

    While the mess in New Orleans is bad too many people are ignoring the devastation caused in Miss. and the surrounding areas.

    The port area themselves are not affected as the city proper was. We can try to improve the wetlands. We can even hopefully undo the system underwhich the sediment of the Miss is forced into the sea instead of being used to rebuild the area naturally.

    The real fact is, New Orleans has always been on borrowed time. I would prefer very much to spend the money to insure that the victims forever are high and dry.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:How about finally acknowledging by Trepalium · · Score: 3, Informative
      Besides the fact your post is quite cold-hearted, New Orleans is hardly alone. Perhaps you know of a little city called Grand Forks that was severely damaged by the Red River flood of 1997. Or perhaps the cities sitting along the Mississippi river that got flooded by the flood of 1993 should've been left to rot? How about the earthquakes that always seem to rip LA apart?

      Frankly, there aren't many places that are immune to natural disasters. I may not have to worry about hurricans, earthquakes or tsunamis where I live (Winnipeg, Manitoba), but I do have to worry about the occasional tornado, ice storms, flooding of the Red River, and blizzards. Life on this planet just isn't safe.

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    2. Re:How about finally acknowledging by eean · · Score: 1

      Well, you can see not all of New Orleans was destroyed. Just having a no-rebuilding policy seems sensible. Because yes, a city below sea-level in an area with hurricanes is not sensible.

    3. Re:How about finally acknowledging by AAeyers · · Score: 1

      Frankly, there aren't many places that are immune to natural disasters.

      Welcome to Duluth, Minnesota. Hurricanes, tsunamis and earthquakes are impossible, it is on a steep hill overlooking Lake Superior, so flooding is impossible, and there has never been a recorded tornado. But in Minnesota we don't consider ice storms natural disasters.

      That was a big one though.

      --
      "For Great Justice."
    4. Re:How about finally acknowledging by avdp · · Score: 1

      Well, you're correct that probably most places in this country are exposed to some sort of disaster (hurricane, earthquake, tornadoes, forest fire, etc) BUT there is a need to mitigate risks a bit. Building a city a few feet under sea water is bound to be a disaster at some point or another. Now this was done a few hundred years ago, so whatever caused the to do it, I guess they had to live with it. But with the city pretty much destroyed, should we rebuild it??? I am not taking a position either way.

      You think it's cold hearted to suggest anything but rebuilding, but why? The same thing happened after the tsunami in Asia. Many communities are being rebuilt further away from the sea. Why not? It's just good common sense - if you have a significant exposure to disaster, and you have the opportunity to address the problem (you have to pretty much rebuild anyway) why not do it? In the case of New Orleans, I am not taking a position either way - it should be studied.

      Personally, as far as Hurricanes are concerned, I just don't get it. Year after year you see big chunks of Florida and other states destroyed to the ground. Year after year, it gets rebuild. And year after year it's same shoddy wooden construction. What's up with that? Why doesn't the government (state or federal) impose some construction standards for Hurricane areas? My wife is from Taiwan, they get hit by typhoons (same as a hurricane) all the time, plus the eartquakes. And you know what? Construction is all brick, concrete, steel, etc. Very little destruction, very little death. ( I know, in New Orleans it's not the hurricane per se that did the most destruction, it's the breach of the levies caused by the hurricane. This was just a side rant)

    5. Re:How about finally acknowledging by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of the Great Plains and Great Basin are pretty much immune to natural disasters.

      There might be a tornado, ice storm, blizzard, but thats it for hundreds of thousands of square miles.

    6. Re:How about finally acknowledging by nettdata · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but, well... it's DELUTH.

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    7. Re:How about finally acknowledging by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1
      Perhaps you know of a little city called Grand Forks that was severely damaged by the Red River flood of 1997.

      Yes, and big chunks of Grand Forks were MOVED. The people were told not to rebuild there. Taken from the article you linked:
      What were once entire neighborhoods are now covered by grass and trees, part of an extensive area of parkland called The Greenway.


      --
      resigned
    8. Re:How about finally acknowledging by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Don't come whining to us when your house is washed into the lake by a mudslide :)

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    9. Re:How about finally acknowledging by thesolo · · Score: 1
      Instead of throwing billions at a problem that will occur again it might be best to treat the city as we treated people along the Miss.

      Firstly, tell that to the people of the Netherlands. Their largest cities all lie below sea level, and they're doing just fine. Of course, they invest money in making sure that they are, in fact, able to prevent flooding.

      Which conveniently segues me to my next point: funding.

      From the article I just linked:
      The administration of President George W Bush cut the $27.1 million budget requested by the Corps of Engineers for improving the levees in 2005 by more than 80% to $3.9 million, although Congress finally raised the grant to $5.7 million, compared to $10 million in 2001.

      The $100 million 2005 budget requested by the Southeast Louisiana Flood control project was slashed to $16.5 million by Bush and Congress finally awarded $34 million to the scheme, compared to $69 million in 2001.
      So there's a major problem right there. This was identified back in 2001 was a major problem. Hell, I have a copy of Scientific American sitting right next to me from 2001 talking about how New Orleans was a disaster waiting to happen. We should have been upgrading their pumps & levees in preparation for this kind of natural disaster. Instead, the Bush Administration cut funding from that area and redirected it towards the war in Iraq. This addresses the last thing you said, about how you'd prefer the US to spend our tax dollars. I personally would have preferred them to be spent preventing this disaster, instead of going towards Halliburton and Iraq.

      And, a third point. Let's say, for sake of argument, that I agree with you (which I do, to an extent). New Orleans will be rebuilt, not for closure or a feat of triumph, but for yet another word: shipping.

      New Orleans is one of the largest seaports in the world. In fact, it's also the 4th busiest, and receives over 130 metric tons of cargo per year. The companies who use it and depend on it will make sure that New Orleans, at least part of it, returns in some way, shape, or form. And where there is business, there are people. It might be months or years, but people will return to New Orleans, even if the city itself is never the same again.
    10. Re:How about finally acknowledging by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 1

      > But in Minnesota we don't consider ice storms natural disasters

      Really? Apparently Duluth suffered a "disaster" in 1999 due to severe storms. I wouldn't be suprised if such declarations were reasonably common.

      http://www.fema.gov/news/event.fema?id=374

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    11. Re:How about finally acknowledging by RFC959 · · Score: 1

      Year after year you see big chunks of Florida and other states destroyed to the ground. Year after year, it gets rebuild. And year after year it's same shoddy wooden construction. What's up with that?


      Well, heck, if it's just going to get destroyed every year, why would you put a lot of money into it? Ha ha only serious, as they say - there's some truth to that logic, but really, I suspect that "big chunks of Florida" do not get "destroyed to the ground" "year after year": there's some damage in parts of Florida every few years, you just don't hear about the other times and places because "Today, there was not a hurricane in Florida" doesn't sell newspapers.



      Why doesn't the government (state or federal) impose some construction standards for Hurricane areas?


      Do you have some particular evidence that there aren't any? Just asking.
    12. Re:How about finally acknowledging by tftp · · Score: 1
      receives over 130 metric tons of cargo per year.

      It's only two railway cars. I can carry that much over a year in a donkey cart, or in my backpack even :-)

    13. Re:How about finally acknowledging by AAeyers · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, an inch of ice isn't a disaster. Sure, nobody has power for a few days, but it happens almost every year. We're used to it.

      --
      "For Great Justice."
    14. Re:How about finally acknowledging by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Instead of throwing billions at a problem that will occur again it might be best to treat the city as we treated people along the Miss.

      Firstly, tell that to the people of the Netherlands. Their largest cities all lie below sea level, and they're doing just fine.

      They have no choice, the country is already heavily populated for it's size and land is valuable. Moving housing would destroy needed farmland etc.

      New Orleans is one of the largest seaports in the world. In fact, it's also the 4th busiest, and receives over 130 metric tons of cargo per year.

      Just don't build residential areas there and you'll minimise the risks. The industrial buildings will have handled the conditions better than housing. All you need is a rail/road/bus network linking the docks with the housing on higher ground.

      Basic sim city stuff! ;-)

    15. Re:How about finally acknowledging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Move them.

      Well, we were thinking the same about our army in Iraq, but look where that has brought us, they are knee-deep in the dead too :-/

    16. Re:How about finally acknowledging by astrodawg · · Score: 1
      Frankly, there aren't many places that are immune to natural disasters..... Life on this planet just isn't safe.

      Some places, however, carry considerably more risk than the rest. A city near the sea that is below sea level should be considered one of the most dangerous areas of them all. We can't run from all disaster, but we can try to stay away from the worst.

    17. Re:How about finally acknowledging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So where else do you think people should not live?

      California? Hawaii? Tornado Ally in the Midwest? How about the Asian sub-continent? All Caribbean islands?

      Living in a city susceptible to natural disaster is the same as living in a city full of Assholes. You learn to live with it, and deal with the consequences.

    18. Re:How about finally acknowledging by iabervon · · Score: 1

      If you look at the French Quarter, you'll see that it's dry while the areas down the hill from it are flooded. The original city is basically fine; the flooded areas are all the low-income housing that's close enough to serve the city. It's a tough situation, because it means the working class either gets screwed over in disasters, or their housing in more stable areas needs to be subsidized (or, ideally, they get cheap mass transit from out of town somewhere less ritzy but at least dry), or there aren't any waiters or store clerks. But, on the other hand, there's plenty of New Orleans left that isn't likely to just be abandoned at this point (things would have been different if the levee had broken during the storm, in which case the water in the city would have been 10 feet deeper, flooding even the rich parts).

    19. Re:How about finally acknowledging by ksheff · · Score: 1

      It was a disaster waiting to happen when Carter cut the requested amount funds for the Corps of Engineers in the 70s as did every President since. Not to mention that the pumps are about 100 years old.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    20. Re:How about finally acknowledging by kelnos · · Score: 1

      I'm no fan of Bush or his administration, but why does this need to be the federal gov't's responsibility? Why didn't Louisiana work harder to put up the money? What about the city itself? So maybe the people that live there would have to pay some extra taxes, but nothing comes for free. If you want to live in a high-risk area like that, you have to pay for the infrastructure that protects you.

      --
      Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
    21. Re:How about finally acknowledging by authalic · · Score: 1

      What, you don't know Grand Forks? The wild, shirtless lyrics of Mark Farner! The bong-rattling bass of Mel Schacher! The competent drum work of Don Brewer!

      --
      "I'll die before I surrender, Tim"
    22. Re:How about finally acknowledging by tyahand · · Score: 1

      Maybe Louisiana shouldn't let other states use their port, then? I'm sure all those landlocked Middle States would get along just fine shipping their goods overland to California or something. If you want to live in a low-risk area that's not self-sufficient, you have to pay to use other peoples' infrastructure.

    23. Re:How about finally acknowledging by pfafrich · · Score: 1

      Instead of throwing billions at a problem that will occur again it might be best to treat the city as we treated people along the Miss. Move them. Yes Los Angeles should be moved due to earthquake risk!

      --
      There are four sorts of people in the world: fools, lunatics, idiots and morons. - Umberto Eco, Foucaut's pendulum.
    24. Re:How about finally acknowledging by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 1

      Hurricanes happen every year in the Gulf, but apparently NO wasn't used to it. ;-)

    25. Re:How about finally acknowledging by avdp · · Score: 1

      I have some evidence that if they are any decent construction standards for hurricane resistent housing, they are completely inadequate. Just look at any pictures from after any hurricane that shows these wooden construction houses turned into matchsticks (usually with sobbing resident in the yard).

      From Western Pennsylvania here (as close to a disaster free area as there is such a thing) I just feel numb from the endless cycle of destruction pictures from the hurricane zone. For the life of me, I can't figure why people don't move, or build bunker-like houses. I assure it would take me a single incident of destruction to learn that lesson.

    26. Re:How about finally acknowledging by Nimey · · Score: 1
      Besides the fact your post is quite cold-hearted
      What, you think decisions like this should be made on the basis of emotion?
      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    27. Re:How about finally acknowledging by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      I was asking myself the same question, how much do we really want to spend to rebuild some place that doesn't seem to be cut out for human habitation? Then a co-worker sent me this article:

      New Orleans: A Geopolitical Prize

      By George Friedman
      September 01, 2005 22 30 GMT -- The American political system was founded in Philadelphia, but the American nation was built on the vast farmlands that stretch from the Alleghenies to the Rockies. That farmland produced the wealth that funded American industrialization: It permitted the formation of a class of small landholders who, amazingly, could produce more than they could consume. They could sell their excess crops in the east and in Europe and save that money, which eventually became the founding capital of American industry.

      But it was not the extraordinary land nor the farmers and ranchers who alone set the process in motion. Rather, it was geography -- the extraordinary system of rivers that flowed through the Midwest and allowed them to ship their surplus to the rest of the world. All of the rivers flowed into one -- the Mississippi -- and the Mississippi flowed to the ports in and around one city: New Orleans. It was in New Orleans that the barges from upstream were unloaded and their cargos stored, sold and reloaded on ocean-going vessels. Until last Sunday, New Orleans was, in many ways, the pivot of the American economy.

      For that reason, the Battle of New Orleans in January 1815 was a key moment in American history. Even though the battle occurred after the War of 1812 was over, had the British taken New Orleans, we suspect they wouldn't have given it back. Without New Orleans, the entire Louisiana Purchase would have been valueless to the United States. Or, to state it more precisely, the British would control the region because, at the end of the day, the value of the Purchase was the land and the rivers - which all converged on the Mississippi and the ultimate port of New Orleans. The hero of the battle was Andrew Jackson, and when he became president, his obsession with Texas had much to do with keeping the Mexicans away from New Orleans.

      During the Cold War, a macabre topic of discussion among bored graduate students who studied such things was this: If the Soviets could destroy one city with a large nuclear device, which would it be? The usual answers were Washington or New York. For me, the answer was simple: New Orleans. If the Mississippi River was shut to traffic, then the foundations of the economy would be shattered. The industrial minerals needed in the factories wouldn't come in, and the agricultural wealth wouldn't flow out. Alternative routes really weren't available. The Germans knew it too: A U-boat campaign occurred near the mouth of the Mississippi during World War II. Both the Germans and Stratfor have stood with Andy Jackson: New Orleans was the prize.

      Last Sunday, nature took out New Orleans almost as surely as a nuclear strike. Hurricane Katrina's geopolitical effect was not, in many ways, distinguishable from a mushroom cloud. The key exit from North America was closed. The petrochemical industry, which has become an added value to the region since Jackson's days, was at risk. The navigability of the Mississippi south of New Orleans was a question mark. New Orleans as a city and as a port complex had ceased to exist, and it was not clear that it could recover.

      The ports of South Louisiana and New Orleans, which run north and south of the city, are as important today as at any point during the history of the republic. On its own merit, the Port of South Louisiana is the largest port in the United States by tonnage and the fifth-largest in the world. It exports more than 52 million tons a year, of which more than half are agricultural products -- corn, soybeans and so on. A larger proportion of U.S. agriculture flows out of the port. Almost as much cargo, nearly 57 million tons, comes in through the port -- including not only crude oil, but chemicals and fertilizers, coal, concrete and so on.

    28. Re:How about finally acknowledging by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      New Orleans is on quite possibly the single best location in America to build a seaport.

      That is why it WAS our biggest.

      That's why it's such a huge area. That's why there are so many casualties. This is, quite possibly, a bigger hit to the economy of the US - and the world, than the September eleventh attacks.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    29. Re:How about finally acknowledging by kelnos · · Score: 1

      And I'm sure "they" do pay to use the port: docking fees, leasing piers, etc., etc. As I said, nothing comes for free.

      My point isn't necessarily that the federal gov't shouldn't help, it's just that I've seen a lot of ill will thrown at the feds for not sufficiently preparing for the disaster, when it seems that the more local sources of preparation were not used to their fullest extent either.

      --
      Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
  26. Engineering, Environmental Approach by toxic666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For those interested in reading on geological hazards, check out Engineering Geology, An Environmental Approach:

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0130 52770X/qid=1126049667/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl 14/002-0778082-8548014?v=glance&s=books&n=507846

    Not intended as flamebait (I contributed $100 to the Red Cross), but people just refuse to learn to move away from flood-prone areas, even after they are destroyed.

    The author survived the 1972 Rapid City flood in which 237 people were killed and adopted the philosophy of never rebuilding homes in the flood plain. Rapid City learned its lesson, and only commercial and industrial buildings are allowed in the flood plain. There are also a lot of parks and public use areas on the flood plain.

    Yet, the monetary amount of damage done by floods increases with time as people continue to develop flood plains and barrier islands. Folks, flood control structures fail too often to justify their cost to the country's taxpayers. It is a shame thousands died in New Orleans and we will again fail to learn our lesson.

    1. Re:Engineering, Environmental Approach by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Not intended as flamebait (I contributed $100 to the Red Cross), but people just refuse to learn to move away from flood-prone areas, even after they are destroyed.
      In the real world - it's just not that simple. Even if the move the entire population of New Orleans - within a few years, a decade at most, Newer Orleans will spring up in it's place. We still need a port at the mouth of the Missisippi and the people who work at the port will need housing, grocery stores, etc... In the real world factors other than safety determine where cities situate themselves.
      The author survived the 1972 Rapid City flood in which 237 people were killed and adopted the philosophy of never rebuilding homes in the flood plain. Rapid City learned its lesson, and only commercial and industrial buildings are allowed in the flood plain. There are also a lot of parks and public use areas on the flood plain.
      Rapid City could do that because the bulk of it's jobs in 1972 were not on the flood plain, but at Ellsworth AFB. (And pretty much, that's still the case.) Such a specific instance speaks little about the general case.
    2. Re:Engineering, Environmental Approach by Illserve · · Score: 1

      Your post is ignorant enough to be flamebait.

      NO is one of the most important deep water ports in the country. A huge percentage of our imports and exports goes through it.

      That's why it was built there, and that's why it's still there.

      Also you should be grateful for the cultural benefits that NO has given you in the form of music. It's earned its levees for that alone.

    3. Re:Engineering, Environmental Approach by evilviper · · Score: 1
      We still need a port at the mouth of the Missisippi and the people who work at the port will need housing, grocery stores, etc...

      And what would be wrong with bringing in large volumes of dirt to fill-in the bowl (putting it above sea-level) before constructing builtings? Sections of New Orleans already above sea level survived quite well.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:Engineering, Environmental Approach by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      And what would be wrong with bringing in large volumes of dirt to fill-in the bowl (putting it above sea-level) before constructing builtings? Sections of New Orleans already above sea level survived quite well.
      Nothing is wrong with it - but it will lull people into a false sense of security because it bandages the flavor of the month without providing any real protection.

      Currently people are all hyped about the flooding - but the reality is that less than 1% of the area devastated and less than 10% of the people in said area are in the flooded areas. The real issue is hurricanes. Certainly areas 'survived' - but then New Orleans didn't get the brunt of the storm. (Which hit to the east.)

    5. Re:Engineering, Environmental Approach by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Currently people are all hyped about the flooding [...] The real issue is hurricanes.

      I certainly can't agree with that. What's the largest number of people ever killed by a hurricane in the USA? The death-toll from the flooding isn't in yet, but it looks to be in the thousands. The flooding is the most serious issue. Hurricanes are terrible but not nearly so destructive, either in monetary terms, or in terms of fatalities.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  27. Re:Repeat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, great for you. I hadn't, its news to me, so way to jump the gun there guy.

  28. Re:google earth for Mac? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Is there anything that lets one experience this wonderful program on OS X?

  29. Convienently ignoring one major fact by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Federal Disaster Area declaration is nearly as large as the United Kingdom. How would you go about getting everything to everyone in a few days?

    Also in the US disaster preparedness and recovery are normally the venue of the States and localities. By tradition they are supposed to ask for aid. Supposedly, I cannot find the story right now, the LA Govenor asked Bush for some time before calling out the Guard. It is the State that "by tradition" orders the Guard, Bush respected that but sometimes I think traditions stink. There are 330,000 Guard members in the US currently. I would think more than a small percent could be moved provided the States will act.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Convienently ignoring one major fact by Secrity · · Score: 1

      National Guards are descendants of state militias. Unless they are nationalized, the Air and Army National Guards are under the control of the Governor and the President. At least some the Lousiana Army National Guard were on active duty at the time. It is possible that the Lousiana Army National Guard was nationalized and all of the members were solely under the control of the president, and not the governor.

    2. Re:Convienently ignoring one major fact by FhnuZoag · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Iraq is almost twice the size of the UK. And thousands of miles away...

      Besides, we don't need to drop water on all of Lousiana - just New Orleans. The City's area is about 1/500th the area of the UK, and 1/1000th the area of Iraq, and not all of that is flooded.

      But let's not get in the way of a good metaphor, eh?

    3. Re:Convienently ignoring one major fact by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      There're people across a good swath of the Gulf Coast there who are hurting, not just in New Orleans. The situation *might* not be as crucial there, since the population is more spread out outside of the city, but by no means is New Orleans the only place that needs aid.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    4. Re:Convienently ignoring one major fact by grendelkhan · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Also in the US disaster preparedness and recovery are normally the venue of the States and localities. By tradition they are supposed to ask for aid.
      After 1992 (and largely because of the lackluster response to Hurricaine Andrew) FEMA was raised to a cabinet level position to facilitate a better response. And FEMA was created in the first place to make this the job of the Federal Government, not State or Local, because the Feds have access to more resources.

      FEMA is now part of the Department of Homeland Security, and judging their response to this, aren't you glad a major city hasn't been attacked since 9/11?
      --
      Wu-Tang Name: Half-Cut Skeleton Get your own Wu-Na
    5. Re:Convienently ignoring one major fact by sparkz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Excellent point, IMHO.
      Given that there was a few days notice of Katrina, there seems to be no excuse for the way in which it has been dealt with by the richest nation on the planet.
      Had it been an unforseen terrorist attack, Dubwa would be blaming it all on terrorists... this just goes to show that the USA is too arrogant to defend itself against anything, and that Dubya isn't capable of dealing with his pretzels, let alone a nation.

      --
      Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
    6. Re:Convienently ignoring one major fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the National Guard is federalized (taking orders from the federal government rather than the state) it is subject to the restrictions of the Posse Comitatus Act.

      http://www.uscg.mil/hq/g-cp/comrel/factfile/Factca rds/PosseComitatus.html

      This restricts them from performing law enforcement duties. The Governor asked for a delay so they would be available to support the local police if needed.

    7. Re:Convienently ignoring one major fact by LauraScudder · · Score: 1
      FEMA is only there to help agencies follow contingency plans that state and local governments put into place. No one knows an area better than those who live there, so local officials are supposed to identify possible disasters and spend the money to develop plans for them. You might be interested in commentary by someone who works with the earthquake side of these plans. It includes such gems as:
      The federal government is not our Superman. This country has gone fifteen rounds to establish the fact that states have rights, and with great power comes great responsibility, thank you, Uncle Ben. With those rights that the state governments gained came the responsibility to PLAN before disasters occur.
      Clearly there was no plan for this scale disaster. Whatever FEMA's mistakes, producing a plan for a response is not one of them so the blame cannot fall squarely on their shoulders.
    8. Re:Convienently ignoring one major fact by vinlud · · Score: 1

      The Federal Disaster Area declaration is nearly as large as the United Kingdom. How would you go about getting everything to everyone in a few days?

      Well, afaik from the news the real disaster area (New Orleans) where people were really at risk in the days after Katrina is not that big. Maybe the hurricane affected an area comparable to the UK, the zone which needed the real effort is maybe a few square miles? (my best guess)

      --
      Repeat after me: We are all individuals
    9. Re:Convienently ignoring one major fact by IdolizingStewie · · Score: 1

      Umm, might I point out that the hurricane didn't even make landfall in Louisiana. Coastal Mississippi (what's left of it) is definately in the zone which needed the real effort. Check out Waveland, MS. Just because it doesn't make the news doesn't mean there isn't real effort needed elsewhere.

    10. Re:Convienently ignoring one major fact by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given that there was a few days notice of Katrina, there seems to be no excuse for the way in which it has been dealt with by the richest nation on the planet.

      So, let's see. If this were something that happened to a less wealthy nation, what would have happened? In matter of some weeks, there would be some pale shadow of the amount of support that was moving into the Gulf Coast area within hours. There has been significant destruction over 90,000 square miles, with people cut off from utilities and communication throughout that area.

      The National Guard has been been running non-stop relief flights and convoys into that entire area - and this is important, because those remote rural areas are the least able to connect to support. The people living in urban areas are easier to support, given their density, once you've got transportation lined up. That it only took from Tuesday until early Thursday for that to work, despite the huge problems, is actually pretty amazing. That doesn't sound so nice to the people that didn't get out of town, but it's worth mentioning that the town's mayor - who knows exactly where emergency support starts (locally) - explicitly told his local citizens that if they were to gather in the central stadium area, they were to bring their own food and water because there would be none immediately available.

      the richest nation on the planet

      Being the richest nation on the planet doesn't allow us to change the laws of physics (in terms of moving supplies, equipment, and people). But it's also worth talking about one of the key foundational aspects of US culture - and part of what allows the US economy to maintain its level of productivity and high employment. Specifically, the country has a long tradition of self sufficiency and localized culture. This extends all the way through how emergency services are planned (or not).

      Had it been an unforseen terrorist attack, Dubwa would be blaming it all on terrorists

      And, who would you blame for a terrorist attack, other than the terrorists that commit the attack? If you're in the "victims deserve the attacks they get" camp, then there's really no point continuing a discussion. Otherwise, that sort of leaves the attackers culpable. But since you're trying to draw some sort of connection between the aftermath of a colossal storm that impacted an area the size of many entire other countries, and think that somehow the president is in a position to stop it, or to tell the governer of Louisiana when and how to ask for help... well, you're missing the point. Come to think of it, why did the governor of Louisiana wait until Wednesday to authorize her state's guards to use private sector transportation to actually provide relief for her people? She'll have to answer to the local people that elected her. But I guarantee that if the federal government, in non-crisis circumstances, told the state governors that they were going to permanently muscle in and run the local preparation for things like storms, then there would be a huge mess, politically at the very least.

      this just goes to show that the USA is too arrogant to defend itself against anything

      Not quite sure how that follows - but I don't think, being a Brit, you're quite understanding the nature of a federal republic, or the strong powers (and responsibilities) that are given to the 50 states that make up the union. That has its strengths and weaknesses - and a state, like Louisiana, that is notorious for its local government corruption and weakness, is (quite literally, now, alas) stewing in its own juices. There are mechanisms in place for the federal government to displace the local governor's authority, but the constitution actually calls for findings of "insurrection" at the local level before we bypass the important responsibilities and powers that are reserved by the states.

      You may or may not have noticed the substantial response that New York's

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    11. Re:Convienently ignoring one major fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, let's see. If this were something that happened to a less wealthy nation, what would have happened? In matter of some weeks, there would be some pale shadow of the amount of support that was moving into the Gulf Coast area within hours.

      The amount of support moving into the Gulf Coast 'within hours' was the pale shadow.

      You might remember that tsunami, which affected less wealthy nations, and had a far greater scope of damage, far less warning, and ultimately, a far better response. It was devastating, but handled far better.

      We all know that there's bureaucracy and little fiefdoms to take into account... but it's sad that you're almost defending them in the name of 'state sovereignty'.

    12. Re:Convienently ignoring one major fact by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1
      The thing is, I don't get why the 'area the size of UK' thing has any meaning at all to the response times. The area affected (as opposed to the population affected) would only be a factor if they are having trouble finding survivors, or if they are trying to spread out aid evenly over the entire area, putting NO low on the priority list, or if we were having trouble traversing the distance.


      From my standpoint, that appears silly. Everyone agrees that there was no difficulty finding survivors. And anyone can see that trying to spread aid evenly is a silly and misguided idea. The fact that other smaller isolated communities may be in trouble, and scattered troublespots may need to be located shouldn't stop you from first rescuing what you can and sending aid within hours to the number one spot you know would need it. To use the Iraq analogy again, just because it's a big area doesn't mean we need to wait a week to bomb Baghdad.


      As for traversing the distance, well I can go the length of the UK in 8 hours by car. They have planes and helicopters. Go figure.


      It's obvious that the real bottleneck in the response isn't the area affected, but simple bureaucracy and incompetency. The area affected and intensity of the damage has just made that failure more obvious this time.

    13. Re:Convienently ignoring one major fact by ki4iib · · Score: 1

      The Federal Disaster Area declaration is nearly as large as the United Kingdom. How would you go about getting everything to everyone in a few days?

      I don't know. How WOULD we do that? That's hard. Maybe we should PAY someone to do it. Like, an Emergency Manager. We could have one in each county of a state.

      Only, one guy in one state might get overwhelmed in times of disaster, so maybe we could make a federal Emergency Manager...he could manage...ohhh, hell -- we could just call it the Federal Emergency Management Agency! Or, just FEMA for short.

      Oooh -- ooh!! And I know just the PERFECT guy to run it. His name is Michael Brown. He got fired from his last job organizing horse shows, but I just KNOW he'll do --GREAT!!--

  30. Outline of Rebuild Zones. by truckaxle · · Score: 1

    Great this map servers as a good first start on outlining the rebuild and no rebuild zones. Areas that are flooded don't rebuild; areas that are dry rebuild... maybe. Of course this would assume that humans are forward thinking and rational.

    I know there are those that think what about the cultural heritage or NO is the historical fabric of jazz and must be rebuilt at all costs. The question whose is going to pay those costs.

    1. Re:Outline of Rebuild Zones. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Ostensibly, in the long run, it's much cheaper to move the historic sections to a new locale.

      Will it be slightly different? Sure. But it will still be there.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  31. Please no jokes about my word choice by inio · · Score: 1

    Ugh, re-read my message. I didn't intend that as a pun, please don't try to make one out of it.

  32. Re:google earth for Mac? by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 1
    From the download page.

    "Apple Macintosh computers are not supported at this time (but we are working on it)."

    So, I'd say the answer is currently no.

    If you have access to a Wintel box, I'd really suggest you try it. It's extremely cool.

    --
    "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
  33. Re:WHY THE FUCK by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 1

    Not a troll. Truthful as can be

    They were speaking a different language I didn't recognize at ALL.

    Anyone who's been to the area care to elaborate? (they knew english well, too)

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
  34. Google exclusive! Not available anywhere else! by dillon_rinker · · Score: 0

    We have here the 21st-century version of an old-school newspaper scoop. (Note to hard-core slashdotizens: a scoop is the news reporters' version of "FR15T P05T!".) The company whose public databases are most rapidly updated to reflect reality can scoop its competition, drawing to itself customers who seek the latest information. (Note to non-native speakers of English: in that sentence, "latest" means "newest." Stupid, I know.) Were I a vice-president at google, I'd create a division that hired aerial photographers after any natural disaster, military attack, industrial accident, etc. solely to ensure that Google Maps stays current. (Note to readers from google.com: reply to this post if you want to hire me to implement this great idea.)

    1. Re:Google exclusive! Not available anywhere else! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would you rather have english use "earliest" to mean "newest" ?

  35. CNN and Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love that Wolf Blitzer uses the same Google Earth that we can at home. On "The Situation Room", he uses it all the time. A couple of days ago, he had images on Google Earth of Biloxi and other areas of the Gulf. Maybe Google put them there for CNN before the general public?

    Either way, even getting these images within a week is amazing. They weren't on Google Earth this morning for me, but since they are on Google Maps now, I'm sure they'll make it to the other soon. Very cool....

    1. Re:CNN and Google by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      I had overlays of New Orleans in the .vmz Google Earth format yesterday. Also had regular jpg images of flooded Chalmette from globexplorer.com on Saturday or Sunday.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  36. Living in dangerous places by wytcld · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can I take it as a given you are totally against humans living in space. Comets and depressurization happen.

    Or would you consider that living in space may be worth it both for the economic opportunities and the beauty? New Orleans was built where it was because of the economic opportunities of being near the mouth of a river that's major transportation for a large chunk of America. You don't choose to build major port cities where it's safest; you by definition have to build them by the ocean. When a river's as big as the Mississippi you have to build them in the muddy delta.

    So people shouldn't live where there's the economic opportunity of a port (or, likewise, of the Lagrange Points)? And all those upstream, or down the gravity well, should also do without the economic advantage of a good port?

    What about the people in the New Orleans area working the Gulf oil and natural gas industries. That's dangerous. Man, we shouldn't mine asteroids either, right? Everyone can just do without the energy, or the minerals, if the alternative is someone risking their lives in an inherently dangerous place.

    I really just want to know. It's hard to understand the new America, where people just shouldn't take risks -- even if those risks can serve to benefit a large part of the society and economy -- so when the risk goes bad the society, despite all the benefits its got from, in this instance New Orleans as a port and as a unique cultural incubator -- without which we wouldn't have either jazz or rock and roll, by the way -- why, let the poor fools drown. What were they thinking, living there?

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    1. Re:Living in dangerous places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People aren't sacrificing themselves liing in NO for the good of mankind. they get paid to live and work there. If the money you make isn't worth the flood risk, move.

      You gambled, you lost.

  37. Re:google earth for Mac? by Flounder · · Score: 1
    You'll get your OSX version as soon as us Linux users get a version.

    And, knowing Google, they're sure to have a port in works.

    --

    No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

  38. Re:WHY THE FUCK by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1
    They were speaking a different language I didn't recognize at ALL.

    Anyone who's been to the area care to elaborate? (they knew english well, too)
    Uh, that would validate their story entirely. Some people from Louisiana speak French creole. It sounds like... sortof hillbilly French. French spoken with zero French accent. Dunno where you might find recordings. And no, I've never been to the area. Just saw that one James Bond movie...
    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  39. If you zoom right in.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's made of cheese.

  40. Re:WHY THE FUCK by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 1

    See, I thought it was french at first, but it was spoken with NO accent like you said.

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
  41. Now they should modify Google Directions... by voxel · · Score: 0

    You can get from point A to point B much faster now that you can just cruze in a boat over the houses, you can use many of the roofs as ramps. Weeeeee!

    yes, this is insensitive! You insensitive clod!

    --
    Modesty is one of life's greatest attributes
  42. Re:WHY THE FUCK by jhobbs · · Score: 1

    To be expected. I have a buddy from Lousiana that didn't learn English until he joined the army. Imagine deep-fried southern laid over French and peppered with words that belong only to the local dialect.

  43. Re:google earth for Mac? by erehtsti · · Score: 2, Informative

    This should do it http://www.flashearth.com/ although you'll have to do your searches manually.

  44. Here are two levee breaches by Krellan · · Score: 4, Interesting
    1. Re:Here are two levee breaches by 32Na · · Score: 1

      Right near the levee breaches, see the interchange between highways 10 and 610: they are underwater with folks boating around the highway!

    2. Re:Here are two levee breaches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You beat me to it. For the sake of completeness, here's the third major levee breach.

      Wow, the houses are deeply submerged here -- right to the edges of the roof.

    3. Re:Here are two levee breaches by Krellan · · Score: 1

      Thanks for posting this! I had heard of a third levee breach, but wasn't aware of its location.

    4. Re:Here are two levee breaches by the+idoru · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, if you look at that second like you provided, the water is flowing back INTO the levee from the flooded neighborhood. I had heard that this was happening around Thursday or so. It's cool to see it in pictures.

  45. Holy shit! by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    Half the city's simply underwater, except for the rooftops. I started off in a reasonably unaffected part of the city thinking "hey, the damage doesn't look as bad from up here", then I scrolled to the left a bit and, damn. It's like I'm looking at Venice, if it were flooded.

  46. Re:WHY THE FUCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> French spoken with zero French accent.

    I never heard it explaned that way. Next time I go to France, I'm going to try that, just to piss those a-holes off.

  47. Incident of National Significance by Aexia · · Score: 2, Informative

    Also in the US disaster preparedness and recovery are normally the venue of the States and localities. By tradition they are supposed to ask for aid.

    They did, days before Katrina hit, Bush declared it a disaster, invoking the Stafford Act. At that point, the *National* Response Plan took effect and disaster management became federal responsibility, a "Incident of national Significance". That was 3 days *before* Katrina hit. A state of emergency was declared *before* Katrina hit. Martial law was declared shortly after. State and locals were asking for helping, the bush administration just wasn't listening.

    The locals did well with what they had. New Orleans, a city of half a million people, was 80% evacuated in two days before Katrina hit, which is astounding and most of the those that were still there were given shelter from the storm.

    Unfortunately, the cavalry from the feds didn't arrive in a timely fashion, despite repeated acknowledged requests for assistance.

    1. Re:Incident of National Significance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They did, days before Katrina hit, Bush declared it a disaster, invoking the Stafford Act. At that point, the *National* Response Plan took effect and disaster management became federal responsibility, a "Incident of national Significance". That was 3 days *before* Katrina hit. A state of emergency was declared *before* Katrina hit. Martial law was declared shortly after. State and locals were asking for helping, the bush administration just wasn't listening.

      What happened was a catastrophic failure of local and state government. Bush requested that the governor issue a mandatory evacuation notice. She said the needed 24 hours to decide. By the time she issued the mandatory evac order, the first feeder band from the hurricane was 8 hours away.

      Also, The Mayor of New Orleans ignored his own evacuation plan. It was the local government's responsibility, not the federal government, to have provisions to evacuate those who were not able (the mayor's evac plan called for the use of city buses, for example, which were left to be flooded in a parking lot). But, chances are the buses wouldn't have been able to be mobilized in time because he issued the order so late.

      People seem to be ignoring the fact that the New Orleans government was known to be corrupt, and as has been demonstrated, completely incompetent in handling a crisis. Maybe if they hadn't been using their Levee funding over the years to buy casinos, marinas, and private jets instead of building up the levees, they would have been more prepared (and more likely to get more funding from the feds).

      But no. Have you ever noticed how Bush is taking the blame for this from every single angle imagineable?
      He was responsible for the global warming that caused the hurricane, he was responsible for not immediately sending in the military to take over law enforcement for a local government (which I'm sure wouldn't have been as much a problem if 1/3 of the local police force didn't walk off the job), he is being blamed for the guns in the hands of criminals, for the toxic chemicals in the water, for the gas panic, for the fact that most of the refugees in the superdome were black, for causing a shortage of personnel to to the Iraq war (which is clearly NOT the case given the numbers of troops currently in New Orleans right now), cripes... every single angle of this is being blamed on Bush even though things are pretty much the same way they've been for years and years and New Orleans is run by democrats.

      I guess some people are still bitter about the 2000 election...

    2. Re:Incident of National Significance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      state and locals were asking for helping, the bush administration just wasn't listening.

      Or, more accurately, it was listening. But that's all it seemed to be doing, nodding its head and agreeing, eyes glazed over, and then wandering aimlessly off.

    3. Re:Incident of National Significance by cryptoluddite · · Score: 1

      Have you ever noticed how Bush is taking the blame for this from every single angle imagineable?

      And it's about time, that.

      He was responsible for the global warming that caused the hurricane

      Bush cut alternative energy research and gave handouts to oil companies. He cut targets for efficient vehicles and ceded our leadership in fuel cells europe and asia. He allowed more pollution from power plants. So yeah, he's is partly responsible for the global warming.

      he was responsible for not immediately sending in the military

      Yep, he sure is. They're in Iraq, and they certainly didn't get in there very fast (ie not until FOX news even had to start calling it a damn shame).

      he is being blamed for the guns in the hands of criminals

      Bush did cut gun checks, so sure I guess he deserves a little blame for that one too.

      for the toxic chemicals in the water

      Bush cut funding for repairing and upgrading the levies. Bush also cut support for restoring wetlands, which act as a huge sink for the hurricane's power. So you are right again, he is to blame for this.

      for the gas panic

      We've been down a million barrels a day for 2 years due to Iraq being largely off-line. There's probably also a conspiracy to keep refinement low to jack up prices (hey it worked for Enron v. California why not try again?). but that's just idle speculation. So score another one for Bush.

      for the fact that most of the refugees in the superdome were black

      When your policies are to favor the have's and crap on the have-not's, then it ends up where the poor, of which a lot are black, don't even have enough money for a ride out of the city (or didn't even hear about it because they don't have cable, internet, etc). Cutting the estate tax, cutting the income tax (which people making 10k don't pay anyway) put more into the hands of the rich and less to the poor from goverment services. Raising the cost of drugs by not letting the government negotiate for a good price also makes the poor poorer. Etc. So score another one for Bush.

      for causing a shortage of personnel to to the Iraq war

      Nearly 50% of the guard is overseas, so yes this is another legitimate criticism of Bush.

      every single angle of this is being blamed on Bush even though things are pretty much the same way they've been for years

      Yeah five years of decline. It's catching up to the point where things are starting to fall apart all over. But you also forgot:

      * Diverting money from homeland safety to haliburtonesque cronies.

      * Ensuring us that Trent Lott will have a fabulous new mansion again.

      * Telling local new orleans people to go to the local underwater salvation army store to get clothers.

      * Saying nobody could have predicted a hurricane attacking us.

      * Appointing a show-pony manager, literally, as FEMA director.

      * Moving a proven effective FEMA from a self-contained disaster response into a giant spy and everything else agency.

      and years and New Orleans is run by democrats.

      Gee and you don't think that could have anything to do with it? I mean jesus, if you can't tell that Bush is being criticized for these things because they are true and Bush is responsible then there's really no words to describe how pathetic that is.

      Bush is a classic mis-manager. He focuses on one problem at a time at the cost of others. He takes a LOT of time off. He makes decisions on problems he doesn't remotely understand. He surrounds himself with yes-men and cronies. He doesn't fire anybody no matter how incompetent... nobody has been held accountable in his administration for any of the crap that's happened. He goes to great lengths to hide everything in case something bad gets out, instead of owning the problems and fixing them.

      But what can you expect? Bush literally failed at everything in his life except 'frater

  48. Re:Repeat! by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Funny
    So it's not a dupe. Give it time. In a few hours, it will be....

    :-D

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  49. Feature request... by Auraiken · · Score: 3, Funny

    Gah... can't... move.. damn clouds out of the way.

  50. Re:Repeat! by toddbu · · Score: 2, Funny

    All the king's horses and all the king's men, could put Pete ba..ck to..ge..ther... Oh, wait, wrong story.

    --
    If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
  51. MOD UP PARENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Original post missed one of the levee breaches.

  52. Different angle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the post-hurricane pictures are in a different angle than the pre-hurricane ones.

  53. and I submitted it 3 days ago and was rejected by papasui · · Score: 1

    2005-09-03 18:48:49 Katrina damage imagery added to Google Maps Guess I didn't meet the dupe quota for the day.

  54. 3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by jlanthripp · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Type that in the search box. Note the parking lot with about 200 school buses parked in it.

    Why didn't Mayor Ray Nagin mobilize those buses and get people out?

    They had well over a day's worth of warning. Each bus can hold 70 people normally (more like 100 if you pack em in like they normally do in less-developed nations.) That means each trip evacuates at least 14,000 people. Figure about 2 trips to Baton Rouge, accounting for 5 hours worth of driving in the evacuation traffic to Baton Rouge (normally a 2-hour drive), and of course almost zero traffic going back IN, plus loading/unloading time. There's at least 28,000 people saved using just the buses from that one depot, way more if you pack the buses tight.

    Problems finding drivers? Yell out "Who here has a driver's license? You! Get in the driver's seat, and we'll meet you in Baton Rouge."

    They could have at least gotten out the people who weren't capable of walking to St. John or St. Charles Parish (see my posting history for a LONG thread about that...)

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by x757x · · Score: 1

      then he'd have one less thing to bitch about later. major rule of politics, blame someone else first. alot of the things he said the feds should have done , he could have also. granted, alot of things couldnt be done also.

      --
      http://music.x757x.org/ - techno dj mixes for your pleasure
    2. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that I want to excuse Nagin's lack of leadership, but both east and west I-10 routes were heading out of New Orleans (google on "katrina contraflow").

      Another thing is that you have little idea of how difficult it would be to organize such an effort in that short of time. Granted, it could work had it been planned well in advance, but it wasn't, and people died.

    3. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by jlanthripp · · Score: 1

      What organization was necessary?

      Step 1: Grab a street map from any local convenience store and cut it into little sections.

      Step 2: Give one map piece and a set of keys to each driver.

      Step 3: Have each driver pick up as many people in his assigned area as possible and drive to Baton Rouge when the bus is full.

      Step 4: Have the driver go back to New Orleans.

      Step 5: Repeat Steps 3 and 4 until the storm is imminent.

      I'm not talking about mobilizing the National Guard or anything requiring a risk analysis. I mean an ad hoc, fly by the seat of your pants, git-r-done approach. Jabbar Gibson did it and he's a hero. Multiply that by 200, have the mayor sign off on it, and you have what I'm talking about.

      The traffic was only really bad as far as the I-55 interchange as late as 12 hours before the storm hit; after that point, that it was smooth sailing. An early start (say, when they first sounded mandatory evac) would have beaten the worst of the traffic, at least for the first trip.

      In any case, they definitely had time for at least one trip. After all, 3/4 of a million people in their cars had time for one trip.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    4. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by danheretic · · Score: 5, Informative

      Snopes to the rescue again!

      In particular:

      Whether this photograph truly represents a lost opportunity to have evacuated a substantial number of New Orleans residents ahead of Hurricane Katrina is difficult to assess. Such a claim presumes an availability of resources (e.g., experienced drivers, fuel) and workable logistics (e.g., sufficient means of notifying and getting residents to departure points, sufficiently clear roads for multiple trips out of town and back) that may or may not have been present. (There's no guarantee that all the buses shown in this picture were even in working condition.) And, given the particular geography of New Orleans, any such evacuation would have had to have begun well in advance of Hurricane Katrina to avoid exposing residents to the potential danger of being stuck in buses on traffic-clogged roads in the path of an approaching hurricane. Moreover, any type of evacuation effort would have incurred a substantial outlay of funds from local and/or state governments -- while everyone agrees with the advantage of hindsight that would have been money well spent, many taxpayers might not have been left feeling so enthusiastic about footing the bill for an unnecessary evacuation had Hurricane Katrina not proved so damaging.
    5. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by Crashmarik · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even Snopes requires critical thinking when reading.

      Such a claim presumes an availability of resources (e.g., experienced drivers, fuel)
      Louisana had 25% of the nations fuel refinery capacity and driving a bus is a skill but most people that can drive shift can do in a pinch.
      And, given the particular geography of New Orleans, any such evacuation would have had to have begun well in advance of Hurricane Katrina
      When are you supposed to evacuate ? After, during, when people are coming back to the city ?
      to avoid exposing residents to the potential danger of being stuck in buses on traffic-clogged roads in the path of an approaching hurricane
      As opposed to being in a city that is up to 20ft below sea level in places and with an aticipated 28 ft storm surge coming in.
      Moreover, any type of evacuation effort would have incurred a substantial outlay of funds from local and/or state governments -- while everyone agrees with the advantage of hindsight that would have been money well spent, many taxpayers might not have been left feeling so enthusiastic about footing the bill for an unnecessary evacuation had Hurricane Katrina not proved so damaging.

      That last bit is just sad. The state had been pre-declared a disaster area. This means the local govt only had to pick up 20% of the tab. How much is a casualty worth ? And yes some of those taxpayers might not have been enthusiastic about the bill, how enthusiastic are they now ? At the very least the hospitals should have been evacuated so they would have more room available for the predicatable and predicted casualties from the storm.

    6. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by ImaLamer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hey thanks for that input, and I'm glad to hear that you're a Republican/Conservative. How's that working out for you?

      But let me say that repeating everything Michelle Malkin says isn't exactly "original" commentary.

      Really, if you want to place blame - there is enough to go around. But let's be honest: FEMA failed in doing its job. The National Guard was stationed in the wrong country. The president took his time, doing fundraisers the day after impact. New Orleans and Louisiana are led by Democrats.

      Let me guess, you'll say Rudy Giuliani should run fro president or that he was "so great" or the "hero" of 9/11? Bull shit - he's a fucking asshole who make money off of all of this "preparedness" that we talk so much about. In fact, people like Rudy is exactly the reason that we weren't ready for this disaster. He makes so much noise about terrorism, and has drained everyone's budgets dry with these cries about the sky falling. Really, he just wants to make some money from these ventures.

      He's a fucking cock sucker you hear me?

      They could have at least gotten out the people who weren't capable of walking to St. John or St. Charles Parish

      Of course, you must know by now that the Parishes weren't letting people past the county line. Yes, this was after the impact, but they turned them back because they were "looters."

    7. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      driving a bus is a skill but most people that can drive shift can do in a pinch.

      Blame the lawyers. It's all about liability; if one of those buses crashed, they would be pilaged by the no-win, no-fees bozos. This decission unfortunately makes sense in the world we live in.

    8. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by jlanthripp · · Score: 1

      I am a conservative with some slight libertarian leanings. I am not a republican. Modern republicans are neither conservative nor libertarian.

      I don't know who Michelle Malkin is.

      There's plenty of blame to go around for the fuckups both before and after the hurricane struck. Some of it lies with Bush. Some of it lies with Congress. Some of it lies with Governor Blanco. Some of it lies with Mayor Nagin. Generally speaking, the blame for the fuckups immediately before and immediately after the hurricane struck rightfully go to the city and state governments, while most of the blame for the long-term fuckups prior to the hurricane, and a lot of the blame for the medium-term (strike plus 3 days to present) fuckups after the strike, rightfully go to the federal government. Even Aaron Broussard, destined for world fame due to his emotional breakdown on national television, deserves his own little slice of the blame pie.

      I'm just sick and tired of everybody heaping everything on Bush. To hear some of the fuckwits on TV tell it, Bush conjured up the hurricane, aimed it at SE LA, and withheld help on purpose, all in pursuit of some evil scheme to rid the area of poor urban minorities.

      Agreed, Rudy Guiliani is an asshat.

      There isn't a county line in the state of Louisiana. That's because the geopolitical entities below the state level aren't counties. They're called parishes. And they most definitely were allowing people past the parish line before the hurricane hit. A friend of mine who lives down there, whose first name is Tim (last name withheld of course), crossed several of them on his way out and again on his way back in to the town I used to live in down there.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    9. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by Crashmarik · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree but your'e overlooking one thing. It was an emergency area before the storm came in. This enables the gov't to take emergency measures without the usual fear of legal shakedown.

      On that same note marshall law could have been implemented after the city descended into chaos to restore order. My point is that the parasitism of the legal class is something that can and is set aside in times of crisis.

    10. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by danheretic · · Score: 1

      Such a claim presumes an availability of resources (e.g., experienced drivers, fuel)
      Louisana had 25% of the nations fuel refinery capacity and driving a bus is a skill but most people that can drive shift can do in a pinch.

      Say Louisiana had 25% of the nation's fuel refinery. (I don't know that that's verified fact.) Do you know for a fact that enough of it was concentrated in the city proper so the buses could fuel up? Or along the route? With the highways already clogged with traffic going out, would the buses be able to fuel up along the way?

      Yes, it would have made better sense to use buses instead of passenger cars to get people out of town. Unfortunately, for whatever reason, that wasn't done.

      As for the latter part of that comment, most people can drive shift in a pinch but CDL is a different story. And what if they crash? Throwing inexperienced Joe Schmoe into the driver's seat of a passenger bus has the potential to drag limited resources (police, ambulance, tow truck) away from critically needed areas.

      I would imagine that they might have called for volunteers school bus drivers to get people out. How many drivers would have responded is another question.

      That last bit is just sad. The state had been pre-declared a disaster area. This means the local govt only had to pick up 20% of the tab. How much is a casualty worth ? And yes some of those taxpayers might not have been enthusiastic about the bill, how enthusiastic are they now ? At the very least the hospitals should have been evacuated so they would have more room available for the predicatable and predicted casualties from the storm.

      You don't really have a good grasp of governing an area that is prone to threats of disasters, do you? We can armchair examine this all we want, but the fact is that this very unfortunate scenario that just happened is predicted every year. Yes, we weren't as well prepared as we could have been. Could we have prepared better? Maybe, maybe not. Hindsight is great.

      Questions you might ask yourself are: Are we better prepared for California wildfires this year? Are we better prepared for midwest tornadoes this year? Will we be better prepared for hurricanes in Florida and other southern states (where attention hasn't been focused) next year?

      And if the answer to any of those is "no", maybe you should ask yourself: "Why not?" (That's NOT a rhetorical question, btw.)

    11. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      I live in south florida. We are much better prepared to deal with hurricanes now than we were before Andrew. The proof of that statement is last year when we weathered 4 storms well. When I lived near the water I got out of the way to high ground every time. You can't play the percentages when losing once means your'e out of the game.

      The midwest has shown remarkable gains in tornado preparedness. Early warning systems, doppler radars and upgraded building codes.

      California I can't speak to I don't know. I do remember that during one of the recent major burns there was one house in one of the outstandingly high priced divisions that was still standing intact and perfect while the rest of the area was ash. The reason was the owner had built the house with an eye toward being fireproof. He had used heat resistant roof tiles and building materials. If california hasn't altered its building codes to reflect the reality of their state and if insurers and mortgage underwriters will support foolish behavior then they deserve what they get.

    12. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by jlanthripp · · Score: 0
      Such a claim presumes an availability of resources (e.g., experienced drivers, fuel)
      Anybody who can drive a pickup truck can drive a school bus. Most of them don't even have manual transmissions nowadays. As for fuel, they're parked within 100 yards of a parish-owned diesel pump that they use normally to fill the buses. Standard school board policy is to refuel the buses when they're returned to the depot, so they are likely sitting there topped off with fuel and ready to go.
      and workable logistics (e.g., sufficient means of notifying and getting residents to departure points, sufficiently clear roads for multiple trips out of town and back) that may or may not have been present.
      Driving around with a bullhorn will work in a pinch, and the roads were indeed passable, though they did have some massive traffic jams. I doubt it could have been much worse than I-10 always is just before a Saints home game though.
      (There's no guarantee that all the buses shown in this picture were even in working condition.)
      To suggest that all 200 buses in that photo, or even a significant portion of them, are out of commission, is ludicrous. I seriously doubt that even the Orleans Parish School Board is lax enough to have 200 nonfunctional buses sitting on the lot. At most, there's 2 or 3 of them that aren't in a sufficient state of repair to make it to Baton Rouge.
      And, given the particular geography of New Orleans, any such evacuation would have had to have begun well in advance of Hurricane Katrina to avoid exposing residents to the potential danger of being stuck in buses on traffic-clogged roads in the path of an approaching hurricane.
      As opposed to all the people who evacuated in their cars on those same roads, who didn't make it as far as Lutcher before the storm hit? Oh, wait...they made it to where they were going long before the storm arrived. In any case, a bus 40 feet above sea level on I-10 is a far better place to be than a wooden shotgun-style house 10 feet below sea level when a hurricane hits.
      Moreover, any type of evacuation effort would have incurred a substantial outlay of funds from local and/or state governments
      The place had already been declared a disaster area before the storm hit. The local government would have only been responsible for 1/5 of the bill anyway, and if I were in government, I'd rather spend a few thousand dollars than lose a few thousand constituents.

      The bottom line is that all the failures in government responses to this disaster, from the city level to the state level to the federal level, are at least partially, if not primarily, the result of bureaucratic inertia. There are tons of things that could have been done better before the storm hit, which would have mitigated the humanitarian crisis in its aftermath. The buses are just one example. If blame is to be assigned, let us assign it fairly and evenly, and not take the easy road of just blaming it all on the shrub.

      And let's not forget that since the storm hit, the area is inaccessible by conventional means. Helicopters are the only way to get to some areas, and there's only so many helicopters and only so much a helicopter can carry.
      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    13. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      The Hurricane disaster plan inplace for New Orleans stated
      that the primary means of evacuation was private vehicles (ie
      cars) and the secondary was to be city and school buses.

      The mayor left 400+ sitting in a lot when they could have been
      one way tickets to Baton Rouge.  Thats 60,000 people that
      could have been moved well away from the city and to the
      nearest real relief.

      Balls in your court Ray.

      Oh and to the Snopes people - Bush called the Governor on
      SATURDAY and told her to order the evacuation. But all Dems
      think Bush is a dope so why should she listen to him.  And
      that Natl Hurricane Center.. all Bush appointees too.

    14. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by patternjuggler · · Score: 1

      Some of it lies with Bush. Some of it lies with Congress. Some of it lies with Governor Blanco. Some of it lies with Mayor Nagin.

      Then get rid of all of them for a start. 'Partial' responsibility for the deaths of hundreds or thousands of people and tens of billions of dollars of damage is not something to shrug off with a lame 'but that other guy screwed up more than I did'. I don't care how much you suffered, how pure your intentions were, how much other people failed you, if you are in a position of leadership and fuck up this bad you should step down voluntarily, get fired, be impeached, and/or go to jail.

    15. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by squidsoup · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You really want to put this in perspective?

      In July, Cuba, which is by no means a world superpower, evacuated 650,000 people in anticipation of the category 4 hurricane Denis.

      16 people died.

      The US government has failed its people with catastrophic consequences. Any attempt to deny that is an insult to the dead, and the suffering, and quite frankly is just utterly preposterous.

    16. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by jlanthripp · · Score: 0
      There are 2 reasons a CDL is required for a school bus driver:
      1. School buses are designed for more than 10 passengers.
      2. School buses have a GVWR of greater than 10,000 pounds
      A school bus requires no special skills to drive, though they can be a bitch to parallel park. A healthy dose of caution is all you need to successfully drive a school bus. Jabbar Gibson apparently did just fine all the way from New Orleans to Houston, and I doubt he has a CDL.

      The buses are topped off from the depot's own diesel pumps when they're returned to the depot. Did you think school bus drivers pulled into the local Citgo station with their American Express cards at the ready?

      The Blue Bird Vision model has a 100-gallon fuel tank. Both models of Blue Bird All-American buses come standard with a 60-gallon fuel tank (100-gallon tank optional). Both the Vision and the All-American models have automatic transmissions as standard equipment. Assuming 5 miles per gallon, that's a minimum 300 miles of range. For a point of reference, a Freightliner at 60,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (that's twice the maximum GVW of a Blue Bird Vision) gets 7mpg on level ground.

      All the buses in that picture have more than enough fuel in them to get to Baton Rouge and back, and can be driven by anyone capable of driving a U-Haul.

      The use of school buses to evacuate residents is explicitly called for in Part II, Section B, Paragraph 5 of the Louisiana Emergency Actions Plan Supplement 1A. But the plan wasn't followed. People died. People are still dying. Because somebody, somewhere in the city and/or state government, couldn't be bothered to read the instruction manual for emergencies and do what it says.
      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    17. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by king-manic · · Score: 1

      In particular:

              Whether this photograph truly represents a lost opportunity to have evacuated a substantial number of New Orleans residents ahead of Hurricane Katrina is difficult to assess. Such a claim presumes an availability of resources (e.g., experienced drivers, fuel) and workable logistics (e.g., sufficient means of notifying and getting residents to departure points, sufficiently clear roads for multiple trips out of town and back) that may or may not have been present. (There's no guarantee that all the buses shown in this picture were even in working condition.) And, given the particular geography of New Orleans, any such evacuation would have had to have begun well in advance of Hurricane Katrina to avoid exposing residents to the potential danger of being stuck in buses on traffic-clogged roads in the path of an approaching hurricane. Moreover, any type of evacuation effort would have incurred a substantial outlay of funds from local and/or state governments -- while everyone agrees with the advantage of hindsight that would have been money well spent, many taxpayers might not have been left feeling so enthusiastic about footing the bill for an unnecessary evacuation had Hurricane Katrina not proved so damaging.


      I agree, the flood damage didn't happen untils the dams and levies burst. Although they problbly knew it might burst, it's a big cost to explain away if they didn't. If I was in charge I wouldn't order a evacuation before hand.

      1- if nothign happened I'd be fired
      2- if something does happen they'll be too occupied to blame me
      3- if something does happen and they get around to blaming me, I have plausible deniability because I figure the dams and levies wou;dn't break. Then deflect bame to the dam and levie makers.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    18. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by jlanthripp · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, doing a bad job is neither illegal nor grounds for impeachment. Voluntary resignation would be an option, but at least for the shrub, it would be even worse than what we have now. Can you imagine it? "President Dick Cheney" *shudder*

      I didn't mean to imply that anyone should be allowed to shrug off his responsibilities and say "but that other guy screwed up too." Everyone involved in this debacle should be held accountable for their own actions. However, a burden shared is indeed a burden lightened. No one person can be called to account for everything that's gone wrong, and that's as it should be. When it's determined that someone failed in his duties in a specific way, that someone should face the consequences. Just please don't try to pile it all up on the head of the easiest target, that's all I'm saying.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    19. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by king-manic · · Score: 1

      I'm just sick and tired of everybody heaping everything on Bush. To hear some of the fuckwits on TV tell it, Bush conjured up the hurricane, aimed it at SE LA, and withheld help on purpose, all in pursuit of some evil scheme to rid the area of poor urban minorities.

      Bush is not responsible for every bad thing that happens to the US. Bush is also not responsible for the vast majority of the good things. Bush will eventually be responsible for running up a huge deficit and debt that will have to be paid off eventually. Bush will not be well liked once he steps out of office and the effects of his foriegn policy/economic policies are felt.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    20. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's probably right.
      He was definitely bitching on the radio, saying "god is watching", when he was complaining about Federal support.

      One has to wonder what were city officials doing, since nobody imagined that the levees might fail. It is the local authority's responsibility to prepare for such events, since they know their city best; if the need be they should ask for more resources, but then need to actively direct those resources, since simply bringing in people who are not familiar with the terrain, is just like bringing a bunch of tourists.

      Anyhow, nice to see the buses on a sat-image. First time I've seen them was on the BBC here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4216508.stm.

    21. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by jlanthripp · · Score: 1

      Amen to that, brother! I voted for the shrub in 2000. I was sorely disappointed. I'm a moderate conservative with some slight libertarian leanings, and I thought I was voting for a moderate conservative.

      A conservative doesn't run up a deficit. A conservative American doesn't send his nation to war, even if it's for a good cause, unless the target nation has actually attacked the US first, and certainly doesn't engage in the fundamentally flawed practice of "nation-building." A conservative doesn't pass the single largest entitlement expansion since FDR. A conservative doesn't run roughshod over the first, second, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, ninth, and tenth Amendments to the Constitution.

      However, in this case, as much as he's been screwing up the response, I don't think the overall situation is primarily his fault. Apart from the near-universal bungling by people at all levels of government, there's the timing of the storm, the fact that the levees didn't burst until after it passed, the environmental aspects that have been building for 130 years, ad infinitum.

      I voted for the shrub in 2000. I voted for Badnarik in 2004.

      Hey, I was at the polls already, and couldn't in good conscience cast my ballot for either the oil-monkey frat-boy or the overprivileged two-faced Herman Munster lookalike, so what the hell, might as well vote for the only other option presented...

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    22. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheesh, how many 'maybes' are in that paragraph from Snopes? Maybe no gas, maybe not *all* of them worked, maybe not all of them had drivers, maybe mayve maybe.

      Just has the feel of an argument grasping at straws, which usually happens when politics intervene, and you want to have the blame fall in a particular place

    23. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just so you know, a typical school bus is rated to fit 70 children. You'll be lucky to get 40 average people in one, let alone adults carrying the personal belongings one typically evacuates with.

      I found this out the hard way when a naive driver, just off her route taking home some elementary school students, came to take the high school hockey team (20 guys) to a game. She figured that her bus was rated to hold 40+, so 20 guys would be no problem. The bus ended up fitting the hockey team and some of their gear; the rest had to be loaded onto the coaches' cars and driven separately.

      The problem with this idea is that it just wouldn't work very well. People who could evacuate by car already did. You would pretty much only be carrying those who could not drive, and picking them up is not nearly as simple driving around looking for them on the street.

      Hell, it takes an hour to do a typical school bus's morning pickups, and that's when the driver knows where to find the kids, the kids are already on the street waiting for the bus, and the route doesn't go more than a couple miles from the school. Keeping in mind that the ones who haven't already gotten out of town are probably eldery or poor with lots of children, can you imagine how long it would take to find all of the people who couldn't evacuate, give them time to get ready, and load them on the bus?

      What do you do when you get to Baton Rouge? Drive around until you run out of gas? Find a hotel with a few dozen empty rooms? Drop them off at the city limits?

      My guess is the 200 buses would evacuate 5000 people to who-knows-where. Maybe it would be better than nothing, but I can understand why they didn't attempt it.

      dom

    24. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      You really want to put this in perspective?

      In July, Cuba, which is by no means a world superpower, evacuated 650,000 people in anticipation of the category 4 hurricane Denis.

      The link Wikipedia gives as a reference fails to support the claim. Do you have a cite?
    25. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      The US government has failed its people with catastrophic consequences. Any attempt to deny that is an insult to the dead, and the suffering, and quite frankly is just utterly preposterous.
      You do know that disaster response is the function (by law) of the states? You do know FEMA, the National Guard, etc... etc... exist to assist the state when the states ask? You do know that it's the state and local goverments who are responsible under the law to perform disaster relief coordination?

      The Governor of Louisiana didn't activate her National Guard units until after the hurricane had passed. The Mayor of New Orleans sent thousands of people to a city owned and provided no food, and no water. (He also had to be practically ordered to evacuate.) Both of them spent more time on Tues-Thurs preening before the cameras than they spent carrying out their responsibilities to their citizens. Niether of them seemed to have carried out their statutory and moral responsibilities worth a damm.

      What's insulting to the dead is individuals like yourself who willingly lie about their pain and suffering to further political ends.

    26. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by squidsoup · · Score: 1
      From the same article, which you didn't read evidentally:
      In Cuba, more than 600,000 residents were moved from their homes to government shelters or other locations in anticipation of Dennis. [4] In Haiti, officials evacuated residents along the coastline, but noted that many were not obliging
      and also from the same article
      In Cuba, Hurricane Dennis left 16 people dead and $1.4 billion in damages when it roared through the island, flattening houses and downing trees and powerlines. Relayed reports from Cuban meteorologists stated that a gust up to 149 mph (239 km/h) was detected at Cienfuegos, 85% of the power lines were down and extensive damage to the communications infrastructure had occurred. Dennis was the worst hurricane to strike Cuba since Flora in 1963.
    27. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

      This may not have been a picture of a lost opportunity to evacuate before, but it certainly is a picture of a lost opportunity to evacuate after.

      The author neglects to consider the possibility that they could have rounded up bus drivers to just take the (working) buses out of the floodplain -- not filling them with passengers and not taking them out of state, etc. Just out of the floodplain. Then they could try to bring them back in, afterwards. That'd be a much cheaper pricetag for the taxpayers in the event of less damage, and it seems likely that, being out of the floodplain, at least a few would have been around to pick up survivors.

      Let's say you only had 10 busdrivers. Let's say they shared a bus back to the lot, even. If they took 10 trips, and stayed away on the last trip, they'd have saved 91 buses. I don't know how big the floodplain extends beyond where they are, either, but I'm guessing they had enough time and drivers into getting "a lot" out, if not "the lot."

      Of course, if you tell me these are actually on high ground, away from the flood plain, I'm going to say, okay, never mind. :) Maybe they could have thought of a higher place, maybe not.

    28. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by squidsoup · · Score: 1
      and from CNN:
      Already, as the storm moved across the island from southeast to northwest, 10 people were killed, Cuban President Fidel Castro told his countrymen in a television address. Some 600,000 people in coastal areas had evacuated to shelters and high ground.
      I'm sure uncle google can provide you with more if you have a look.
    29. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by benito27uk · · Score: 1
      During 2004, Cuba evacuated 1.3 million people out of the way of hurricane ivan (a category 5 hurricane).

      The head of the United Nations International Secretariat for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR), Salvano Briceno states "The Cuban way could easily be applied to other countries with similar economic conditions and even in countries with greater resources that do not manage to protect their population as well as Cuba does,"

      "From an early age, all Cubans are taught how to behave as hurricanes approach the island."

      According to the UN/ISDR, Cuba holds an annual two-day training session to help people prepare for hurricanes.

      Two days before a hurricane strikes, entire communities of people -- all versed in interpreting information from the Cuban Institute of Meterology -- begin implementing emergency plans. Local authorities assist the most vulnerable people. Transport is organised and hospitals and schools are converted into shelters.

      Quotes taken from Reuters: http://www.alertnet.org/thefacts/reliefresources/1 09577329151.htm

    30. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by insignificant1 · · Score: 1

      I think some context is important:

      http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/09/02/nagin.transcript/

      The mayor, in this trascript, begs for buses from the Federal government, asks that Greyhound buses be sent from across the country and refuses public school buses because... well... it's the federal government, and now we're talking coaches, not public school buses! (No consideration of what is fastest; the Fed is NOT omnipotent and Greyhound buses may well be further away than the school buses.) He lays a great deal of blame on others for their response... and so I feel that he also invites criticism if he shows hypocrisy. That's one thing, no matter what side of an issue you are on, that you are always vulnerable to attack for.

      And it is rather sad that you would say "Snopes to the rescue again!" and then simply quote Snopes, as if this alleviated the need to actually analyze the situation for yourself.

      The Snopes quote you give is completely inconclusive, has no greater insight into the situation, and raises certain irrelevant doubts with -less- evidence than the picture gives. Some of the questions asked are valid... but none are answered by Snopes, which is necessary to evaluate the validity of the criticism offered by the picture. Just raising a question goes nowhere.

      While assumptions are necessary to both condemn the city's efforts or to assume the city was powerless (as well as condemning/approving of the Fed's response), it is a reasonable assumption to believe that the school systems had working buses with which to transport children to the various schools across N.O.. That happens in every city across the US and it was time, at least where I live, for school to start again.

      Next, there was opportunity enough for the vehicle-owning population to get in their cars and go to higher ground. Why would buses on the same roads be especially risky?

      In all, I think there were a lot of opportunities missed, and this was likely one of those opportunities. Hopefully all will learn from the situation and especially people will understand better, rather than blame, those people who actually CAN NOT leave in the same manner as healthy, vehicled, and moneyed folks can.

      For more discussion on the buses, check out the following link:

      http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Controversy_over_wheth er_New_Orleans_Mayor_failed_to_follow_hurricane_pl an

    31. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      From the same article, which you didn't read evidentally:
      It seems you didn't read either - I asked for a cite other than Wikipedia.

      Ignorant asshole.

    32. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by squidsoup · · Score: 1

      I provided one (The CNN item), after realising that I probably misinterpreted what you were saying . No need to be unpleasant.

    33. Re:3901 Metropolitan Street, New Orleans, LA by patternjuggler · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, doing a bad job is neither illegal nor grounds for impeachment.

      I'm sure if you investigate deeply enough to figure out exactly why they did a bad job you will find something illegal or impeachable. When something minor happens, people will close ranks keep their mouths shut about what they and those around them are doing wrong, but when there is huge public pressure to produce scapegoats (though I don't really mean to imply the negative connotations of that word) then many people will step forward and say their boss or whoever did all kinds of things wrong. Nobody will be able to hide behind all the secrecy allowed for the war related disasters of recent years.

      However, a burden shared is indeed a burden lightened. No one person can be called to account for everything that's gone wrong, and that's as it should be.

      That's my point. But this burden is so huge that even spread across many people I would still say there's enough that they do not belong in positions where they are responsible for protecting people.

  55. Any Images of the School Bus Fiasco?? by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

    Are there any Google images of the Ray Nagin Memorial Motor Pool.

    Or are the Google images 'sanitized' like most of the MSM coverage?

    --
    resigned
    1. Re:Any Images of the School Bus Fiasco?? by LauraScudder · · Score: 1

      Check it out here. LGF got a higher res picture though.

    2. Re:Any Images of the School Bus Fiasco?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice link to a right-wing hate site. i wonder if there's any images of the choppers on the ground while Bush held his photo-op?

    3. Re:Any Images of the School Bus Fiasco?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Any Images of the School Bus Fiasco?? by jlanthripp · · Score: 1

      While the second pic is indeed of the school buses, the first pic is a fleet of cargo vehicles, most likely Ryder trucks.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    5. Re:Any Images of the School Bus Fiasco?? by bbdd · · Score: 1

      here's one from the ground

    6. Re:Any Images of the School Bus Fiasco?? by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty weird response. Albeit it's pretty difficult to defend the 'locals' who didn't even TRY to evacuate anybody with all those school busses.

      If those were busses under Federal control, that photo would have been on the front page of every paper in America by now.

      --
      resigned
  56. Re:google earth for Mac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And, knowing Google, they're sure to have a port in works.

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHAHHAHHA!

  57. Before and after photos by Jchrome · · Score: 1

    If you happen to have a copy of Google Earth Plus (which uses pre-Katrina satellite photos), I suggest running it and searching for New Orleans, then open up a browser tab or window and compare it with the new Google maps of the city. The before and after images are a sobering contrast.

    1. Re:Before and after photos by fikx · · Score: 1

      Or you can just switch between the two buttons ("Satellite" and "Katrina" ) in the google maps web page. The positioning is the same there and gives an eerie comparison...

      --
      AB HOC POSSUM VIDERE DOMUM TUUM
  58. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    There are overlays available. And instead of asking, why didn't you go to the Google Earth web site and find out for yourself? Then you could have told the rest of us.

  59. Re:FEMA criminals by jlanthripp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The City of New Orleans had its chance. They let 200 school buses sit idle while people died in their homes.

    The State of Louisiana had its chance. They called up the National Guard after the fact, knowing it takes at least 48 hours to gather a unit together and issue equipment under the best of circumstances, and knowing that after the storm hit would be far from the best circumstances. For those who don't know, the states' National Guards, apart from those units called up to be federalized for foreign military action, are under the command of the Governors of the several States, not the President of the United States.

    Sure, FEMA fucked up. Bush fucked up. But that's not the end of the story. The City of New Orleans fucked up. Orleans Parish fucked up. Jefferson Parish fucked up. The state of Louisiana fucked up. The level of ineptitude we've seen surrounding this disaster is astounding. No one body is capable of reaching that plateau of incompetence. It takes the federal, state, and local governments, working in dissonance. In short, it takes teamwork to fuck things up to this degree.

    Local and state governments are pointing fingers at the federal government for failure to fund levee reinforcement and gutting of FEMA -- and the federal government will of course be pointing fingers at the local/state governments for having no clear plan for short-term evacuation, rescue, and aid. And they'll both be right. But the voting public will see only the most visible elements, like Aaron Broussard crying on Meet the Press and Geraldo Rivera crying on Fox News.

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  60. Bullshit! Get a dictionary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who flees can be considered a refugee.

  61. Don't forget Google Earth by Snaller · · Score: 1

    For better overview and more options, don't forget Google Earth:

    Damage assement, see it at a glance

    NOAA overlays updated as new info comes in.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  62. learn from Venice by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    Which leands to an interesting question: why not learn from venice, keep the city flooded, and build concrete and stone structures, one on the other, always staying above the waterline?

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    1. Re:learn from Venice by Hobbex · · Score: 1


      What do you think a Cat 4 hurricane would do to Venice?

  63. Much better pictures of levee breaches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the link. I found higher-res shots of the levee breaches:

    Breach 1
    Breach 2
    Breach 3

    Someone else linked to the Superdome, I believe; I also found the convention center (I think).

    (Warning: images are very large.)

    1. Re:Much better pictures of levee breaches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction: a better picture of Breach 1.

  64. Google Maps is great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can see my house! Oh, bugger...

  65. Nice, but... by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately neither of them show my house. It's in a black area on Google Maps and it is squarely under a cloud in the linked site.

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  66. Furthermore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These google images, and even the noaa.gov ones posted below, were taken a considerable amount of time AFTER the storm hit. These images show most of the area to the west of the city as high and dry, although if you look carefully enough, a little muddy. I was a few miles west of the city throughout the storm (in fact am still here atm) and right after the storm hit, you couldn't see ANY streets around where I am.

    The well-defined canal in this http://maps.google.com/maps?q=new+orleans&ll=30.01 6137,-90.166147&spn=0.008984,0.014473&t=e&hl=en view was more like a lake and the only canals around here were the streets in residential neighborhoods. The floodwater lingered here for a day or two before they manages to get the pumps turned on. (The necessary pump operators were allegedly evacuated across the lake to the north of us.) I expect that the google (etc) pics were taken when _(insert the party that you hold personally responsible here) _ figured out that there was a serious, serious natural disaster going on down here and sent helicopters/planes/satellites to take some pictures.

  67. health consequences by subtropolis · · Score: 1

    There are very real fears that many of those who have been evacuated from New Orleans may be carrying Hepatitis A. A quarter of those affected may not show symptons. Anyone involved with housing or giving work to evacuees should help them to get themselves tested.

    --
    "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
  68. Scathing Editorial from Keith Olbermann on MSNBC by squidsoup · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This is simply stunning - the most succinct and eloquant summation of the situation this far.

    http://media.putfile.com/OlbermannSwings

    From the opinion piece:
    Most chillingly of all, this is the Law and Order and Terror government. It promised protection -- or at least amelioration -- against all threats: conventional, radiological, or biological. It has just proved that it cannot save its citizens from a biological weapon called standing water.
  69. minus the entire cemetary lost thing by DarkTempes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    that happens during a normal heavy rain/flood ;)

    they just take the coffins and bury them again lol

  70. obiligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing to see here, move along....

  71. The federal level was totally unprepared by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    Well if that is your outlook:

    http://www.swingstateproject.com/2005/08/katrina_p roves.php

    and shameful self promotion:

    http://www.mintruth.com/blog/index.php?p=315

    I think there is totally a case to be made that FEMA, once the worst agency in the federal government, and then corrected to be one of the best, had no plan, did nothing and continues to be a wedge between real humanitarian outreach and people who need it. Regardless of the local response the Congress and the President failed to fund projects that could have prevented or mitigated the disaster we now see. If the American government can't afford a feat of that size then I question our decision to go to war. Which, the National Guard was sent, by the Pentagon, to Iraq with their equipment. There is no doubt in my mind that if the state had those troops they could quell the violence and bring people out by the truckloads.

    If the levees were funded we wouldn't even be this interested. The general American public would donate, but not on the scale that people are giving today. Now Halliburton defaults to running the rebuilding project because of the Superfund that got them into Iraq. I say that these new levees and public works projects should be built by temporary corporations formed for and disbanded after the project. That is how we built things in the past, and we no doubt have the people willing and some out of work.

    This devestation has a great opportunity for the American people to come together now and rebuild all of the areas affected. I say give to Habitat for Humanity before you give to the Red Cross. Employ people who aren't already, from all over the country, and teach them those skills. Everyone in every industry could get down there and do work, and possibly build a city that is ahead of it's time (of course without changing their nature).

    The federal government needs to respond by putting the rebuilding effort on a volunteer for pay basis. Organize the entire effort and get people on the ground. Even the efforts to pump the water, get people who have idle time to work. It's a great economic booster. It would go down in history, Bush should sign on. His name will be on the History Channel in 30 years for two reasons.

  72. Re:FEMA criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about.... "Don't live below sea level!!!"

  73. sucks to be you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The refugees that were parasites in NOLA will just stay in Portland. Hire more police. You will need them.

  74. A story from inside N.O. people should read by cicho · · Score: 1

    "As we approached the bridge, armed Gretna sheriffs formed a line across the foot of the bridge. Before we were close enough to speak, they began firing their weapons over our heads. This sent the crowd fleeing in various directions. As the crowd scattered and dissipated, a few of us inched forward and managed to engage some of the sheriffs in conversation. We told them of our conversation with the police commander and of the commander's assurances. The sheriffs informed us there were no buses waiting. The commander had lied to us to get us to move.(...)"

    " Unfortunately, our sinking feeling (along with the sinking City) was correct. Just as dusk set in, a Gretna Sheriff showed up, jumped out of his patrol vehicle, aimed his gun at our faces, screaming, "Get off the fucking freeway". A helicopter arrived and used the wind from its blades to blow away our flimsy structures. As we retreated, the sheriff loaded up his truck with our food and water.(...)"

    http://www.emsnetwork.org/artman/publish/article_1 8337.shtml

    --
    "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
    1. Re:A story from inside N.O. people should read by jlanthripp · · Score: 1

      It's a long-established and well-known fact that the biggest gang of armed criminals in the New Orleans area wears badges. This story is no surprise.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  75. That's weird...this site is not googlefart.com by OsirisX11 · · Score: 1

    need i say more?

  76. The images are in the public domain by dfm3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    2. The new imagery doesn't have any obvious copyright notices. Did they skip this step or is there a new invisible watermark?

    Because the images were taken by NOAA and are freely available on the National Weather Service Website, I think the images are in the public domain. In fact, from the same website where the original (and higher resolution) images can be found, I dug up this disclaimer:

    The information on government servers are in the public domain, unless specifically annotated otherwise, and may be used freely by the public...

  77. I gave my alternative, but by jd · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It may not have been entirely clear so I'll restate it. The first priority is to provide the very best possible accomodation to those evacuated. You are correct, all other concerns are secondary to saving lives.


    While that is taking place, physical and mental health experts need to do a thorough check on the displaced population and provide the absolute level-best treatment where treatment is required. This, to me, also falls into the category of saving lives.


    ALSO while that is taking place, economists, sociologists and any other relevent experts need to be running impact forecasts to find the absolute best way to place the displaced population to minimize stress on both those displaced AND those whose areas are being moved into.


    ALSO while that is taking place, politicians need to beef up funding for those States people are moving into, so that social programs can accomodate the extra population. (This will involve more than just shifting funds around, as these people will need MORE per person than those who are already settled. This means a serious cash injection.)


    They should also give a cash injection comparable to the expected economic impact. For example, it is doubtful many of these people escaped with functioning cars. Existing mass transit systems (where they exist) are on the edge of economic collapse and won't be able to handle the extra demand without support. It would be logical, therefore, for the Federal Government to provide money specifically for putting every available tram, bus and train in service (and to require that States actually do that, rather than divert the funds to pet projects).


    Finally, the Federal Government should be looking to fund an emergency R&D program for the decontamination effort. And they should be doing so now. Nobody has ever had to decontaminate an area comparable to the entire British Isles. Most decontamination efforts are crude - the soil is simply replaced - which won't work on that scale and certainly won't work on land that is built on. There is no existing technique for handling a combined biological and chemical hazard that will work, so a new technique will have to be devised. That won't happen overnight, so if anyone plans on starting decontamination work this side of 2100, they'd best start funding a program to figure out how to do so.


    If all of that was being done, there would be next to zero crisis. People would know that something was being done, that what was being done was deliberate and competent, and that the necessary resources would be there when needed.


    If even one or two of these things were being done, it would likely be massively reassuring.


    The truth is that NONE of it is being done. There will be extra burdens on everyone, but no extra resources to deal with them. There will be no serious decontamination work, so I fully expect serious health problems for those who move back. Everyone (other than the rich) will suffer for absolutely no purpose whatsoever.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  78. Depends on interpretation. by jd · · Score: 0, Troll
    Are outside their country of nationality or habitual residence


    This would seem to apply on the second. And given the autonomy of States, it is arguable that the first could apply.


    have a well-founded fear of persecution because of their race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion


    Almost 100% of the displaced evacuees (including the forced evacuees) are black. Almost 100% of the evacuees who voluntarily left and have money, resources, vehicles, etc, are white. I don't know if the fear amongst blacks was "well-founded" but it was certainly damn-near universal and definitely based on race. I'd argue that there's a case for this one, too.


    are unable or unwilling to avail themselves of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution


    The length of time before FEMA acted at all was astonishing and even now it is blocking many badly-needed doctors and medical supplies from entering affected areas. When predominantly white areas are affected by hurricanes, FEMA is much quicker to respond. That could qualify as persecution.


    Cuba has offered medical aid - substantially more medical aid than the US Government - but if the evacuees managed to gain access to that aid they would most certainly be persecuted.


    I'd say, on the face of it, that the fear of persecution would be reasonable. I think that the outrage by Black organizations towards the treatment of those who survived Katrina is also evidence that the belief of persecution does also exist in fact.


    Whether that is enough to qualify is unclear, but I'd give it a solid maybe.


    Of course, none of this matters as the US doesn't recognize international law anyway.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Depends on interpretation. by glitchvern · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Almost 100% of the displaced evacuees (including the forced evacuees) are black. Almost 100% of the evacuees who voluntarily left and have money, resources, vehicles, etc, are white. I don't know if the fear amongst blacks was "well-founded" but it was certainly damn-near universal and definitely based on race. I'd argue that there's a case for this one, too.

      I live in Southeast Texas. We have an evacuation center in Beaumont. Many black people showed up to the center pre-hurricane landfall. We have some white people who have showed up too and many more people have showed up post-hurricane landfall. New Orleans was 68% black, so seeing a lot of black people shouldn't be surprising. New Orleans is also 20% below the poverty level. The large number of people without cars had no way to get out. Fear didn't have much to do with it. Also there have been a number of hurricanes to miss New Orleans contributing to a sense of invincibility. People just get a bunch of non-parishable food and fill the bathtub with clean drinkable water before the storm hits like their fathers and father's fathers did before them and survived.

      Like I said before I live in Southeast Texas and we've had our share of near hits over the past few years. I remember as a child we use to do the same thing, treat hurricanes as an occasion for a party and just ride the thing out. Until 1992 when Andrew grew in strength at the last minute and threatened to hit us. That was the first time I remember our region receiving evacuation orders. What followed was a complete and total debacle. As everyone tried to use the same road to get out all at once at the last minute the traffic came to a halt. We moved 15 mph and not continously either, it was all stop and go. If it had hit us, I wouldn't be making this post. A van on a road ain't the greatest place to be in the middle of a hurricane. That situation was scary as hell.

      After that warning shot across our bow, we got much more serious about planning evacuations. I don't know if we were the ones who came up with contraflow lane reversal, but after that we started using it. We set up evacution centers all across the state to handle massive evacuations. We have had a number of evacuations since then that have gone much better. We still try to make a party of it though. Go to some other city, get a hotel room, eat out at all these restaurants we don't have in our town. Treat it like a vacation. This makes evacuations somewhat expensive, but going and living in a highschool gym somewhere for a few days isn't anybodies idea of a good time.

      Evacuating major metropolitan areas isn't exactly a cakewalk even when everybody has cars and a tank of gas. There is always some who think they can ride it out and a mandatory evacuation isn't actually mandatory. At least not in Texas, here it's just a declaration no one will help you if you stay. The mayor was lucky to be able to get 80% of his population out of the city pre-landfall. Maybe he could have done better pre-landfall, maybe not. Afterwards, well getting 100,000 people out of a city with one road out left and getting food, water, and medicine in to keep people alive while you do it, and conducting rescue operations, while the criminal portion of your city is in open insurrection just can't be easy. I'm sure a congressional commitee will thoroughly investigate and discover just what went wrong.

      Like I said a lot of black people showed up pre-landfall so some of them had the resources to get out, but then a lot of them didn't too. Blacks aren't a homogeneous group of people you know. One should not make widespread generalizations about who has what resources. There are plenty of poor dead white people in Jefferson and St. Bernard parishes amongst others. The reason they aren't on tv is because the media has trouble imagining important things happening outside the city. As if no one lived in the parishes outside the city.

  79. matching news photos with the map photos by bbdd · · Score: 1

    i saw this picture on yahoo news earlier in the day.

    then, as i was scrolling around the map randomly, i recognized the spot when i saw it again here!

    it might be helpful (or at least interesting) to be able to map photos to their location on the map somehow, kind of like this

    1. Re:matching news photos with the map photos by bbdd · · Score: 1

      sorry, bad link in the parent.

      matching google map here

  80. Super-Island by asjk · · Score: 1

    I knew there was water near the Dome but this seems to show that the place was an island! Nice links.

  81. another news video by mbius · · Score: 1
    --
    you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
    Prime UID Club
  82. Fractile by pfafrich · · Score: 1

    Checkout the end of the mississippi http://maps.google.com/maps?q=New+Orleans&ll=29.13 8968,-89.306488&spn=0.548105,0.962814&t=k&hl=en just down from Orleans, a lovely fractile.

    --
    There are four sorts of people in the world: fools, lunatics, idiots and morons. - Umberto Eco, Foucaut's pendulum.
    1. Re:Fractile by (1+-sqrt(5))*(2**-1) · · Score: 1
      Check[ ]out the end of the [M]ississippi [...], a lovely fract[al].
      Does it really exhibit self-similarity, or is it pseudo-fractal?
  83. Accusations of racism are ridiculous by ccmay · · Score: 5, Insightful
    When predominantly white areas are affected by hurricanes, FEMA is much quicker to respond.

    Got any proof of that, or are you just parroting the anti-Bush talking points?

    The Feds always take two or three days to show up, and five to seven days to reach full strength. Local authorities are ALWAYS responsible for the first 72-96 hours of a disaster, that's how all the plans are made, and it's primarily because of the dithering incompetence of the local Democratic pols and the collapse of the New Orleans police department that so many people could not be rescued this time.

    The military won't put people and equipment directly into the path of a hurricane, lest they become victims themselves and lose their airlift capability. But shortly after the storm passes, they pour in.

    Military air, sea, and land operations began on Aug. 30, and in fact, there were more than twice as many soldiers on duty by day 5 of Katrina than on day 5 of Andrew in 1992. And that's after moving them in over a much larger area than Andrew affected. You can't wave a magic wand and move people and machines in an instant, but that seems to be what some of the ignorant anti-Bush ranters are expecting.

    Unless you have invented a Star trek transporter beam, just can the ill-informed bitching and do what you can to help, OK?

    -ccm

    --
    Too much Law; not enough Order.
    1. Re:Accusations of racism are ridiculous by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I thought the delay might have been the result of some rather intense contract negotiations. I mean there were some existing "agreements" in place but some would have argued that this was a exceptional circumstance and required some additional "consideration". Big disaster, big profits for some. Conspiracies are hardly ever required, greed and stupidity will generally suffice.

      Federal government responce time should be based on need alone (if you think anything greater than 24 hours in acceptable for a strong inital responce than I know where your balance of cost and human lives lies).

      Seriously how do you expect state and local government to cope with a major disaster when their ability to do so has been basically destroyed (if they were all dead would you complain because they haven't removed their own bodies).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:Accusations of racism are ridiculous by CosmicV · · Score: 1

      Uh, commie bastard isnt a racial insult as commies arnt a race. You would think after millions die under this system due to oppression, you wouldnt mind calling them the bastards they are.

      Also, surrender monkeys isnt a racial insult either... France isnt a race, its a country.

      If your going to start chewing people out, at least have the decency to make sure what your saying is remotely correct.

      Also, please learn the difference between racism, prejudice, and bigotry... theres very little racism still left in the US, while theres still an abundance of prejudice and bigotry. Words have meanings...

    3. Re:Accusations of racism are ridiculous by gravelpup · · Score: 1

      I see nothing factual in this post that refutes anything in the parent post. Good job ratcheting up the emotion level with irrelevant epithets, though.

      --

      Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.

    4. Re:Accusations of racism are ridiculous by lobsterGun · · Score: 2, Informative
      Ever since the 50s, those in power have realised that an environment of hate and fear in the populace not only makes their job easier, but it allows them to "steer" the country in the ways that they want. Want to invade Iraq? No problem!! Just a wee stir of fear & hate cauldrin...


      Ever since the 50s??? Brother, this didn't start in the 50s. This has been going on since the dawn of man. There's nothing American about it. Chalk it up to being human.
    5. Re:Accusations of racism are ridiculous by glesga_kiss · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      You want facts? How about quotes?:
      "It almost appears to me that the hand of gods [sic] is reaching down to smite the Southern Babylon."

      "I'm of the opinion that Mother Nature would be doing everybody a favor by cleansing the inner city."

      "It would be great if all the Whites could be evacuated and they could leave the groids/muds behind but we know that won't happen. The best we can hope for is that the best architecture stands and the casualties keep the n----r funeral homes busy."

      "Let us bow our heads and pray together that half the jig population of New Orleans stayed behind to do some lootin' and this one finishes them all off. And Lord, let's hope all the faggots in the French Quarters stay as well."

      "Mother Nature is a bitch and I don't have a problem with that at all. Especially when it leads to the possible culling of species detrimental to my race and country."

      I could go on and on. Interesting article on the (post-Katrina) rasism here

      Of course, feel free to stick your fingers in your ears and chant "la la la" while you live in the delusion that racial equality is present in the USA. The prison populations say otherwise and poverty & crime go hand in hand. How are blacks supposed to inprove their standard of living when those interviewing them a often racist hicks?

      Obviously I struck a chord pointing out this racism, down to -1 flamebait withing 30 minutes of posting...truth hurts, doesn't it? Don't even get me started on how you view other countries; the hate is even more venonmous.

    6. Re:Accusations of racism are ridiculous by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Ever since the 50s??? Brother, this didn't start in the 50s. This has been going on since the dawn of man.

      Yes, but it was then that it entered into US politics. There's always been an enemy at your door. Apparently... ;-)

  84. More things to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's links to a few interesting places on the new images over at Google Sightseeing, including Highway 610 and Lakefront Airport.

  85. You are convienently ignoring several facts by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    "So, let's see. If this were something that happened to a less wealthy nation, what would have happened? In matter of some weeks, there would be some pale shadow of the amount of support that was moving into the Gulf Coast area within hours."

    I'd like to point out that while last year's tsunami in the pacific ended with Canadian support taking a while to ramp up, this time around Canadian support was turned away by the US government.

    I imagine that the Canadians would've been very quick to step in and help the Cubans rebuild after hurricane Dennis, the most powerful hurricane to hit Cuba since hurricane Flora in 1963. Of course, that's not really relevant, as Cuba evacuated their people (650,000) from the affected area. 16 people died in Cuba. It was a cat 5 when it hit, and its winds reached 239kph (149mph). Haiti also had about 44 deaths.

    I think NO has had a great deal more death than that from what was a smaller storm, due to the non-motivation to evacuate, and the failures of the levies and dams that protected the city. Can you argue that this could not have been avoided based on this evidence?

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:You are convienently ignoring several facts by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      this time around Canadian support was turned away by the US government

      The US government isn't "turning away" help, it's trying to make use of that help which best compliments the huge resources already in play. I'm doubting that Canada could have had entire helicopter teams (pilots, flight crews, equipment, maintenance vehicles, fuel) in place any more quickly than the US Coast Guard and guard units did. It's part of the US's structure and custom that organizations like the Red Cross do a lot of the personal caring for people displaced in disasters, so just plain cash donated to organizations like that is a huge help (and such donations have indeed been coming in from all over the world, including Canada, and are part of what will help the individual people impacted by this storm rebuild their lives). But we don't appear to have any lack of doctors, medicine, food, water, police, or much of anything else - there are only so many ways, though, that we can use giant pumps to drain a flooded city - and I don't know how Canada, or anyone else, is going to be able to accelerate what we're already doing on that front.

      As for the Cuban government's control over its own people: yes, I imagine that they do regularly move people away from vulnerable coastal villages - they get big hurricanes all the time, and they also have a ruthless centralized government running an entire country that's very small, relative to, say, the impacted Gulf Coast area. People in Cuba generally do what they're told (or get in serious trouble for not), partly because that's what it's like to live in a totalitarian regime. People in Louisiana are a lot more their own people, foolishly or otherwise. I guarantee that if you told everyone in Toronto to evacuate, you'd have a lot of hold outs there, too. You don't live that far north without a certain amount of rugged individualism - at least in part of the population. And people like that chafe at being told to leave their homes. People in New Orleans did the same, in many cases - partly out of stupidity, partly out of difficulty, and partly out of a fear of abandoning their houses to looters. New Orleans has a long-standing crime problem that its elected city government can't seem to do anything about, and the people there know it - and it doesn't take much of an imagination to wonder what will happen to everything valuable in your house when you leave it for a few days amid that sort of chaos.

      Should the city have chosen to build bigger levies? Perhaps. It's sort of a losing proposition, regardless. They weren't designed to handle what hit them, and even if more maintenance money, as has been discussed, had been poured into them, the fundamental design would not have changed enough to handle a Category 4+ storm this time, or the next time, or the next time. An island like Cuba, which is basically the top of a small mountain range sticking out of the water, has a totally different set of issues than a swampy river delta with walls around it. Personally? I think it's crazy to have kept a city there where the French put one 300 years ago. Hopefully people will be re-thinking that whole issue, now.

      But more importantly - we can hope that people who live there will pay attention to the warnings they get, and fill up a couple jugs with drinking water next time they are being told, for days straight, that a giant storm is coming. A culture that comes to depend too much on anything other than its individuals to take care of themselves, at least for a couple of days, is going to hear a lot of grief when trouble happens. I'm hoping this is a wake up call for a more self-sufficient population - or at least for more people making a couple of advance purchases from the snack bar industry.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  86. More satellite pics by b00le · · Score: 1

    You can see much better high-resolution imagery here and here (the images at Eurimage have been sharpened a bit and have better contrast). Don't forget to check out the imagery of Biloxi - which has basically gone the way of Banda Aceh.

  87. More Before / After Pics by webhead74 · · Score: 1, Informative

    More concise before / after pics can be found here: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/ne w-orleans-imagery.htm

  88. incompetence = terror by xPsi · · Score: 1
    Heartbreaking images. I find it sickening and ironic. We live in a country where both the accumulated legacy and real-time leadership incompetence (at the city, state, and federal levels) are so high that the result of such anti-leadership is indistinguishable from a major terrorist attack. Granted, a class 5 Hurricane is a class 5 Hurricane. But aren't we living in a time ("war on terror") where we are supposed to maximally prepared for such events -- and, in principle, worse (nukes, bio, etc.)?!

    Who needs terrorist when we have leaders like ours? No wonder we haven't had any terrorist activity in the US for a while. Their job is being done for them...

    --
    i\hbar\dot{\psi}=\hat{H}\psi
  89. Not the richest nation in the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...unless you're including the trillions we have borrowed from other countries.. Norway, Switzerland, Qatar, Sweden all come to mind as countries that would come out better than us on most statistics

    It amuses me that so many of us still use that old fallacy..

  90. Mod Parent Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no reason to make a statement like "they're going to kill me for the bandwidth this uses" when we have resources like the Coral cache. If you're linking to something you fear will use a lot of bandwidth if it becomes popular, Coralize it.

    Normal URL: http://example.com/big.jpg

    Coralized: http://example.com.nyud.net:8090/big.jpg

    Parent is 100% correct in linking to a Coralized version of the image.

  91. Katrina was much much bigger than Dennis by Solandri · · Score: 1
    I imagine that the Canadians would've been very quick to step in and help the Cubans rebuild after hurricane Dennis, the most powerful hurricane to hit Cuba since hurricane Flora in 1963. Of course, that's not really relevant, as Cuba evacuated their people (650,000) from the affected area. 16 people died in Cuba. It was a cat 5 when it hit, and its winds reached 239kph (149mph). Haiti also had about 44 deaths.

    I think NO has had a great deal more death than that from what was a smaller storm,

    You have that backwards. Katrina had a pressure reading of 908 mb just before landfall, 902 mb while at sea. That makes it the fourth most powerful hurricane ever observed in the Atlantic, and the second most powerful hurricane to hit the US. Only Gilbert (888 mb), the 1935 labor day hurricane (892 mb), and Allen (899 mb) were stronger. Dennis only managed 930 mb and never reached category 5.

    Dennis was also a small storm. Katrina was a huge storm. It had hurricane-force winds covering an area almost the size of the UK, tropical storm-force winds covered an area about the size of France. It was bigger than the entire island of Cuba.

  92. had to dig at developing countries right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (more like 100 if you pack em in like they normally do in less-developed nations.)"

    yeah. even in this, you had to take a dig at them thirdworld countries right? no wonder you give the rest the 'arrogant american' tag.

  93. Look at all the busses! by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    http://maps.google.com/maps?q=new+orleans+transit& ll=29.967985,-90.088888&spn=0.002199,0.003720&t=e& num=10&start=0&hl=en

    Good thing nobody tried to use them for the evacuations, they'd be .. oh wait, nevermind.

    I wonder where all the school busses are parked?

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  94. Re:not evacuees by pigpen_ · · Score: 1

    They are not evacuees, they are internally displaced persons (IDP). The only difference between a refguee and an IDP is that refugee crosses an international border. It's seems silly to categorize people who are destitute and whose homes have been destroyed, but that's international law for you

    --
    Zambozay! My brain must've been eatin' a sandwich!
  95. It can't be a beta, it's Google! by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    Surely Google would never offer a product in its beta phase, much less keep it there until the end of time.

    Next thing, you'll be telling me that they've abandoned the whole project in favor of big announcements of 30 other new projects, all in beta too. And surely a company with such a ridicously overvalued stock would never engage in that kind of behavior.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:It can't be a beta, it's Google! by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      Perhaps "It's a beta" was a reference to New Orleans.

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
  96. Interesting article about funding by Madcowz · · Score: 1

    "No one can say they didn't see it coming"

    In 2001, FEMA warned that a hurricane striking New Orleans was one of the three most likely disasters in the U.S. But the Bush administration cut New Orleans flood control funding by 44 percent to pay for the Iraq war.

    By Sidney Blumenthal

    Aug. 31, 2005 Biblical in its uncontrolled rage and scope, Hurricane Katrina has left millions of Americans to scavenge for food and shelter and hundreds to thousands reportedly dead. With its main levee broken, the evacuated city of New Orleans has become part of the Gulf of Mexico. But the damage wrought by the hurricane may not entirely be the result of an act of nature.

    A year ago the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers proposed to study how New Orleans could be protected from a catastrophic hurricane, but the Bush administration ordered that the research not be undertaken. After a flood killed six people in 1995, Congress created the Southeast Louisiana Urban Flood Control Project, in which the Corps of Engineers strengthened and renovated levees and pumping stations. In early 2001, the Federal Emergency Management Agency issued a report stating that a hurricane striking New Orleans was one of the three most likely disasters in the U.S., including a terrorist attack on New York City. But by 2003 the federal funding for the flood control project essentially dried up as it was drained into the Iraq war. In 2004, the Bush administration cut funding requested by the New Orleans district of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for holding back the waters of Lake Pontchartrain by more than 80 percent. Additional cuts at the beginning of this year (for a total reduction in funding of 44.2 percent since 2001) forced the New Orleans district of the Corps to impose a hiring freeze. The Senate had debated adding funds for fixing New Orleans' levees, but it was too late.

    The New Orleans Times-Picayune, which before the hurricane published a series on the federal funding problem, and whose presses are now underwater, reported online: "No one can say they didn't see it coming ... Now in the wake of one of the worst storms ever, serious questions are being asked about the lack of preparation."

    The Bush administration's policy of turning over wetlands to developers almost certainly also contributed to the heightened level of the storm surge. In 1990, a federal task force began restoring lost wetlands surrounding New Orleans. Every two miles of wetland between the Crescent City and the Gulf reduces a surge by half a foot. Bush had promised "no net loss" of wetlands, a policy launched by his father's administration and bolstered by President Clinton. But he reversed his approach in 2003, unleashing the developers. The Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency then announced they could no longer protect wetlands unless they were somehow related to interstate commerce.

    In response to this potential crisis, four leading environmental groups conducted a joint expert study, concluding in 2004 that without wetlands protection New Orleans could be devastated by an ordinary, much less a Category 4 or 5, hurricane. "There's no way to describe how mindless a policy that is when it comes to wetlands protection," said one of the report's authors. The chairman of the White House's Council on Environmental Quality dismissed the study as "highly questionable," and boasted, "Everybody loves what we're doing."

    "My administration's climate change policy will be science based," President Bush declared in June 2001. But in 2002, when the Environmental Protection Agency submitted a study on global warming to the United Nations reflecting its expert research, Bush derided it as "a report put out by a bureaucracy," and excised the climate change assessment from the agency's annual report. The next year, when the EPA issued its first comprehensive "Report on the Environment," stating, "Climate change has global consequences for human health and the environ

  97. not quite... by hamburger+lady · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Feds always take two or three days to show up, and five to seven days to reach full strength

    then they should have been there on monday. bush declared a state of emergency several days before the hurricane hit, essentially putting the response under the responsibility of the executive branch (namely FEMA). even if the federal response takes a few days to ratchet up, then they still should have been there sunday or at the latest monday. the storm had passed by monday morning..

    as for the local politicians belonging to the 'other party', i might remind you that nagin only became a dem 2 days before the mayoral primary, because he could win more votes as a dem. until then, he was GOP all the way.

    --

    ---
    Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    1. Re:not quite... by fawlty154 · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, this argument. A state of emergency does not take the authority away from the local government, it just gives them easier access to funds.

      I can't even imagine the backlash we'd be seeing if Bush had jumped in on day one, taking over an operation the feds had no business in. It boggles the mind.

    2. Re:not quite... by hamburger+lady · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, this argument. A state of emergency does not take the authority away from the local government

      it did in this case. bush declared a state of emergency under the stafford act. any emergencies under the stafford act are automatically designated "incidents of national significance".

      according to FEMAs national response plan, all 'incidents of national significance' are to be dealt with primarily by the federal government and FEMA, as they are too big and too complicated to involve coordination between local and state authorities.

      in other words, on the saturday before the storm hit, the bush admin. said they'd take care of the situation. then they promptly sat on their hands.

      to make it even simpler, you're wrong.

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    3. Re:not quite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hamburger lady -

      Might help to get your facts straight before you tell someone they are wrong.

      Not all emergencies under the Stafford Act are deemed incidents of national significance. According to the Stafford Act: "Emergency" means any occasion or instance for which, in the determination of the President, Federal assistance is needed to supplement State and local efforts and capabilities to save lives and to protect property and public health and safety, or to lessen or avert the threat of a catastrophe in any part of the United States."

      Additionally Katrina was not called an "incident of national significance" because of political considerations. It seems that Bush was afraid what it would look like if he, a Republican male, took away all the authority of a Democratic female governor especially when a male governor from the neighboring state didn't require this assistance.

      And finally, FEMA is not responsible for evacuations this is solely up to the local and state governments. Even if an emergency is declared FEMA has no authority or material to respond to a situation like Katrina. FEMA is nothing more than a "bank". If you live in an area hit by a disaster they provide monetary assistance - nothing more.

  98. Let's see... by jd · · Score: 1
    Yes, the local authorities have planned for some time. They've also been wanting to shore up the defences against flooding, but the Federal Government cut all funding off. (Such repairs are the job of the Army Engineer Corps.)


    Second, the Federal Government - by creating a Homeland Security division and moving FEMA into it - has taken on 100% of the responsibility for all disasters. You take the power, you take the responsibility. It really is that simple.


    Blaming the States, when the Federal Government has taken total authority and power, is the last act of desparation by a Republican society that won't face up to its errors.


    And the disaster relief (currently standing around 150 billion) is focussed on salvage, rescue and rebuilding efforts. Airlines were asked if they could help. Asked - and in a very wishy-washy way, not paid to get the hell down there and do what was needed.


    In other words, the Government is spending money on projects that sound good (draining the landscape, for example), NOT on paying for the extra medical and transport needs which are less tangible and so not vote-winners.


    Rebuilding the barrier islands (necessary to avoid a repeat) along with restructuring coastal development to prevent further barrier island destruction is likely to cost as much again as has already been pledged. Let me know when NIST gets a 10 billion dollar grant to discover HOW someone can decontaminate the reclaimed land.


    In other words, the disaster "relief" from the Federal Government is nothing of the sort. It is a cynical manipulation of the American voter. The problem is, it'll likely work. And when New Orleans is declared unsalvagable (because the real work was never done), all Washington DC will care about is that there's one fewer Democrat stronghold.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Let's see... by gmuller · · Score: 1

      "but the Federal Government cut all funding off. (Such repairs are the job of the Army Engineer Corps.)"

      When did it become the Federal Government's reponsibility to fund local problems. Hell, if thats the case, I got a serious flooding problem in my backyard, everytime I have a storm that bastard erodes the hell out of my backyard, better see who's going to fund that one. The Army Corp of Engineers isn't the only group who deals with these problems, oh and btw, they receive local funding as well as Federal budgets. This situation has been a known possibility for atleast a decade, and to be honest I am not at all surprised, the victims had several days to a weeks notice, and a mandatory evacuation (Yes, there were buses removing people from the city for those who couldn't provide there own transportation, before you play the povery card), so this whole situation shouldn't be a big gotcha for anyone who decided to "ride it out". This was all to be expected.

      "And the disaster relief (currently standing around 150 billion) is focussed on salvage, rescue and rebuilding efforts."

      And the problem with this is...?

      "In other words, the disaster "relief" from the Federal Government is nothing of the sort. It is a cynical manipulation of the American voter. The problem is, it'll likely work. And when New Orleans is declared unsalvagable (because the real work was never done), all Washington DC will care about is that there's one fewer Democrat stronghold."

      Well, at a minimum you're doing a great job of pulling the bullet-points out of every newcast for the last week and turning it into partisan politics. Kudos! Either party would benefit greatly from this kind of spin.

      gmuller

  99. Re:FEMA criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This post debunks part of your your claim quite nicely:
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=161298&cid=134 97375/

  100. Here in Houston, it's crazy... by boy_afraid · · Score: 0

    Yep, here in Houston you see a lot of Louisiana license plates. I have friends who are helping, and I wanted to help take sandwiches, but I would have to go through 2 hours of food-safety class (bullcrap!). Every business here is running some sort of collection for items and money. I don't know of anyone who hasn't given something. There are also people who are taking strangers in. I wanted to since I have a spare game room, but my wife didn't want any strangers.

    It's not over yet, not by a long shot here in Houston. We are just beginning.

    1. Re:Here in Houston, it's crazy... by IdolizingStewie · · Score: 1

      Just show up at one of the Red Cross shelters - Reliant Park or George R Brown. It's like a 5 minute orientation you only have to sit through once, then a bit of a wait while they figure out where to put you, though this may have gone down recently. It's been since Sunday that I've been over there. /looks ashamed/ I'm going back tomorrow I think.

  101. The Damn Busses by Cervantes · · Score: 1

    The one thing that bugs me about the talk of the busses is the "need for experienced drivers". Fuck that noise. If I have a big-ass hurricane coming at me, I will bloody well LEARN how to drive a bus in record time... and that's assuming there aren't construction workers, drillers, miners, city employees, or "people who just plain know how to drive stick" in the group of people I'm taking.

    Seriously, the busses have radios if you have real grief, and even at a slow pace, if they'd taken off 12 hours before the storm hit, they could have made it to a safer place.

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  102. I'll make it simpler still. by jd · · Score: 1
    You're right, both in your post and in saying fawlty 154 is wrong.


    I'll point out that FEMA had 500 helicopters on stand-by, precisely because the emergency had been declared, so they clearly believed they had authority. I'll also point out that this reaction came long before the State had called for help, yet not one person has yet screamed about those helicopters being there.


    The reaction has NOT been about what was done (before or after the hurricane), it has been about what was NOT done. A lot was done, but according to fawlty's prediction, this is what should have caused the complaints.


    What's causing complaints is doctors being prohibited from entering the affected areas, supplies being left to rot, aid from other countries being rejected - sure, we all know Cuba is out to score political points, but are we so eager to deny him that we'd let our own people die from entirely preventable causes first?


    The levees not getting rebuilt is another cause of complaint, and it's not partisan either. Those levees are many decades overdue for an overhaul, and both Democrats and Republicans have failed to ensure the maintenance took place. ALL presidents, in the past 50 years, deserve a severe reprimand and those still living should be forced to perform community service for those disposessed by the tragedy. Without exception.


    I am not "for" a particular affiliation, I am "for" humanity getting the best deal it can. It seems clear to me that it isn't and that immunities are being used by politicians to avoid any consequences for hurt and suffering. Fine, I'll accept that they're needed, but damnit, this is one situation in which they should be lifted far enough that those in - or who have been in - power are seen to be disciplined for their inactions.


    99.9999% of the time, immunities exist to prevent rivalries, partisanship and paranoia from immobilizing Congress. 0.000099999% of the time, it is effective at allowing people to stay on focus and not get side-tracked by frivolous lawsuits. This is the 0.000000001% of the time, where tens of thousands may have been killed and quarter of a million (or more) have been made homeless and jobless, where immunity means nobody need be held responsible.


    President Bush is going to be heading the inquiry into what went wrong. My guess is he'll also pick those on the investigation team. You seriously thing that the results will reflect badly on him? No matter what the truth may be?

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  103. If I had a mod point... by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

    This comment would get an underrated...

    They should only allow over for 5,4 (and maybe 3) and under for -1,0 (and maybe 1).

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
  104. We like to think that things new to us are new. by QMO · · Score: 1

    Qoute from GP "Ever since the 50s??? Brother, this didn't start in the 50s."

    Quote from Parent "Yes, but it was then that it entered into US politics."

    One more quote: "Remember the Maine!"

    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.