1. Create a lame clone of a well known web site... let's say Flikr
2. Fill it up with Google adds
3. Anonymously submit a story on Slashdot saying that the new site is a Flikr KILLER
4. Profit
> 1. The Report on the language used a formal syntax specification, one of the first, if not the first, to do so. Semantics were specfied with prose, however.
Unfortunately this is the case with all programming languages (with the exception of standard ML).
Berkeley DB is not a relational database management system like MySQL. It has a much simpler architecture and does not support SQL, table schema or table columns.
Sun's contribution to open source is extremely valuable, and so it's IBM's. I really hate to see the two undermining each other's efforts. They should know better.
As for the slashdotters... they will always find something to pick on, no matter what the subject is.
... from the IBM P.R. department with the title: "IBM urges Sun to give up OpenOffice control"
The truth is that if a high enough percentage of the OpenOffice.org people wanted to break up with Sun nobody could stop them - they could just FORK. But wait... more than half of the OpenOffice.org developers are Sun EMPLOYEES! So how could _OpenOffice.org_ want "Sun Microsystems to give up control over the OpenOffice productivity suite, and donate the intellectual property to an independent not-for-profit foundation" (quote from the article)? And what developer would consciously use a term like intellectual property in the first place?
What does this have to do with what the parent asked?
The answer is yes: OpenLaszlo is the direct competitor to Flex, and rather than being totally trashed by Macromedia (now Adobe) they decided to open source their product. I don't know about you, but I would rather be using a GPL-incompatible open source product than a commercial one. But maybe this is just me... licence purists can still wait for projects like GplFlash or Gnash to catch up. However I doubt this will happen anytime soon.
I tried Moodle myself on several ocassions and I think it is a great. However I doubt it is what they are looking for, i.e. "Flash-compatible" stuff. I would rather recommend them OpenLaszlo (or Macromedia Flex).
When will 2.6 be the default kernel for Slackware?
50 wpm ... is that not decent, or what?
Why even go through all the pain of rewriting everything the Americans already wrote. Just ask them to open source their plane software :)
In that case you can buy a fire-resistant IBM ThinkPad. Or was that just an urban legend?
1. Create a lame clone of a well known web site ... let's say Flikr
2. Fill it up with Google adds
3. Anonymously submit a story on Slashdot saying that the new site is a Flikr KILLER
4. Profit
GPL v3?
http://www.mirrordot.org/stories/b3c2d8b1aa152a6cb 6af55c845c0868f/index.html
WordPress database error: [MySQL server has gone away]
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/
Don't need to. Knowing that is published by CNet is enough to stop reading the f****g article.
I see dead pixels
> 1. The Report on the language used a formal syntax specification, one of the first, if not the first, to do so. Semantics were specfied with prose, however. Unfortunately this is the case with all programming languages (with the exception of standard ML).
The Hype Management feature seems quite nice.
Berkeley DB is not a relational database management system like MySQL. It has a much simpler architecture and does not support SQL, table schema or table columns.
Sun's contribution to open source is extremely valuable, and so it's IBM's. I really hate to see the two undermining each other's efforts. They should know better.
... they will always find something to pick on, no matter what the subject is.
As for the slashdotters
... from the IBM P.R. department with the title: "IBM urges Sun to give up OpenOffice control"
... more than half of the OpenOffice.org developers are Sun EMPLOYEES! So how could _OpenOffice.org_ want "Sun Microsystems to give up control over the OpenOffice productivity suite, and donate the intellectual property to an independent not-for-profit foundation" (quote from the article)? And what developer would consciously use a term like intellectual property in the first place?
The truth is that if a high enough percentage of the OpenOffice.org people wanted to break up with Sun nobody could stop them - they could just FORK. But wait
What does this have to do with what the parent asked? ... licence purists can still wait for projects like GplFlash or Gnash to catch up. However I doubt this will happen anytime soon.
The answer is yes: OpenLaszlo is the direct competitor to Flex, and rather than being totally trashed by Macromedia (now Adobe) they decided to open source their product. I don't know about you, but I would rather be using a GPL-incompatible open source product than a commercial one. But maybe this is just me
I tried Moodle myself on several ocassions and I think it is a great. However I doubt it is what they are looking for, i.e. "Flash-compatible" stuff. I would rather recommend them OpenLaszlo (or Macromedia Flex).
Don't try to hack life ... or life will hack you back!
... for those who didn't RTFA: Sparkle and Acrylic. Registration required!
You can look here and here if you are curious.
... Wiki be with you!
Better wait even more and buy a second generation Intel-powered Apple from eBay for 300$, or even less.
And since all europeans speak latin every day it will be very easy to remember ... or not?
Didn't try that yet. How did that make you feel?