Slashdot Mirror


Ars Technica Reviews Controller Keyboard

phaedo00 writes "Ars Technica has reviewed the AlphaGrip AG-5 handheld keyboard and mouse. From the article: 'After lots of research and five revisions, the perfectionists at AlphaGrip finally decided that they had a product worthy of marketing, and they released the long awaited AG-5. Although the AG-5 looks strange and intimidating, it is a unique and highly innovative product that deserves consideration, particularly by mobile computing enthusiasts. The AG-5 interfaces with computers via a single removable USB cable. It uses a simple chord-like keyboarding model and an integrated trackball to provide complete keyboard and mouse functionality in a unique form factor that looks a bit like a console gaming controller.'"

150 comments

  1. Cool.. So.. by Jupix · · Score: 5, Funny

    does it get you banned in WoW? :P

    1. Re:Cool.. So.. by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

      Avast, ye swab perhaps you'd rather read about Arrrrs Technica's review of a keyboard

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Cool.. So.. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Funny

      does it get you banned in WoW? :P

      And I nominate Jupix for the next slashdot cliché!

      Votes please?

    3. Re:Cool.. So.. by Mayhem178 · · Score: 1

      Only if you combine it with a handheld version of WINE.

      Hmmmm....that doesn't make sense.....

      --

      "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

    4. Re:Cool.. So.. by rich_r · · Score: 4, Funny

      Typical. The moment I give away my last mod point is the moment at which I end up choking on my coffee....

    5. Re:Cool.. So.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends...

      Will voting on this get me banned from WoW?

    6. Re:Cool.. So.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends... Will it get me banned from WoW?

    7. Re:Cool.. So.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that a AG-5 in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?

      Seriously though, I'm happy to see that people are still working on developing alternative keyboards. IMO, this is one of the big issues hindering portable computing from becoming truly portable (the other being the display size). The problem with the AG-5 is that it is still too big to fit in my pocket. I guess I cannot fault the AG-5 because it probably wasn't meant to solve this problem, but wouldn't it be great to have some sort of gyroscopic input device that could fit in the palm of my hand?

    8. Re:Cool.. So.. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "...get me banned from WoW"

      Dunno about that...but, this thing would be useless for surfing for porn..........

      ....Requires TWO hands.

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:Cool.. So.. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      It requires two hands like a normal keyboard. So, um, where's the advance? Show me an affordable one that I can use with one hand, and I'll buy it.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    10. Re:Cool.. So.. by Lord+Laraby · · Score: 1

      Not unless they make that trackball work better. You gotta be able to maneuver to make that backstab work well. And I hate mobs sneaking up on me and can't turn around fast enough to blast 'em.

      L @ L

      --
      Don't quote me on this...
    11. Re:Cool.. So.. by eclarkso · · Score: 2, Informative
      It requires two hands like a normal keyboard. So, um, where's the advance? Show me an affordable one that I can use with one hand, and I'll buy it.
      The Twiddler is a one-handed chording keyboard that's ~$200.
    12. Re:Cool.. So.. by Heembo · · Score: 1

      Even a one-armed pirate can use that keyboard with his hook!

      RrrrrRRrrrrrRRrr!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
    13. Re:Cool.. So.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded.

    14. Re:Cool.. So.. by thedletterman · · Score: 1

      RRRrrrr!!!!! So what's the spacebar for?

      --
      Any fool can criticise, condemn, and complain, and most fools do. - Benjamin Franklin
  2. in sum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the time required to learn a whole new keyboard layout is seldom worth the reward"

  3. Anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that speeds up the writing of my thesis... But this looks as if I would inevitably start the first-person-shooter of choice.....

  4. Well.... by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 0

    It's not really a keyboard is it. They just put letters on the buttons.

    1. Re:Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A keyboard is letters on buttons...

    2. Re:Well.... by LanMan04 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're current keyboard also has letters on buttons.....or keys, as someone might call them.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    3. Re:Well.... by kenwood720 · · Score: 1

      What do you call a device that has numbers and letters on it and its use is primarily for input into a machine. The only name I know to call it is a keyboard. I don't recall any other names for the keyboard off the top of my head.

    4. Re:Well.... by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

      What do you call a device that has numbers and letters on it and its use is primarily for input into a machine.

      I call that the telephone.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    5. Re:Well.... by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except it doesn't really look like a keyboard... more like a gamepad with a zillion buttons + trackball.

      I only point this out because the /. summary doesn't come right out and say it.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    6. Re:Well.... by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      Yes it does. It says it looks like a console controller.

    7. Re:Well.... by Lord+Laraby · · Score: 2, Funny


      I might call it an Alphanumeric Glyph-based Human Interface Peripheral Device. Or an "Anghip" device... if it hadn't already been named, that is.
      Or an "Anguhip" for Alphanumeric glyph-based USB human interface peripheral.

      Too bad, though. It might sound cooler than "keyboard".

      English Alphanumeric Glyph-based Loader Entry (or 'eagle') HID device????

      L @ L

      --
      Don't quote me on this...
    8. Re:Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A keyboard is letters on buttons...

      No... a keyboard is letters on buttons on a board.

    9. Re:Well.... by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      "...in a unique form factor that looks a bit like a console gaming controller.".

      Maybe next time you can read all the way to the end of the summary? It's one paragraph, for crying out loud.

    10. Re:Well.... by somersault · · Score: 1

      do you regularly call up your PC and have a chat with the modem?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    11. Re:Well.... by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 1

      So does the remote control for my tv but I don't call it a keyboard.

  5. Wha huh? by jmartens · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even from a person who has taught himself how to use dvorak ... that looks like a nightmare.

    --
    Now that's a death ray!
    1. Re:Wha huh? by GrievousMistake · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It does, doesn't it? Looks can be deceiving, though. TFA claims 45 wpm after a week, with a month as a more typical learning period.
      It looks fine for simple text input, actually, and maybe gaming, but I have my reservations against using this thing for Vi... I hate remapping the keys for anything more complex than a FPS, so configuring each application to avoid keys that are hard to press simultaneously sounds less than tempting. (Does anybody else here use default vim mappings with the dvorak layout, or am I just crazy?)
      If all I were doing with my computer was hanging around on Slashdot all day, I'd go for it.

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
  6. not what we want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No ...what we want for the living room:
    mobile phone with integrated bluetooth connected laser mouse, keyboard connection based on the numpad using predicitive text mode (customised for operating system & filename stuff) like we do with SMS messages.

    hint: your leg makes a great mouse mat (whether standing or stitting)

  7. One good thing about this controller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once you master it, you can get a job as a court transcriber.

  8. I'm not sure this is the answer by RunFatBoy.net · · Score: 4, Informative

    While most mobile users would like to have something more compact, is it really necessary to sacrafice teh productivity of a standard keyboard in order to gain a convenient, compact form factor?

    I like the promise that the virtual keyboards have (e.g. http://www.virtualdevices.net/ ). While functionly they have some limitations right now (e.g. having to hold your fingers about the infrared keys), over time they are going to get better. At least this solution you could have a full range keyboard without having to lug it around.

    -- Jim http://www.runfatboy.net/

    1. Re:I'm not sure this is the answer by harrkev · · Score: 5, Informative

      Try doing that while riding on a train, or as a passenger in a car. That invention that you pointed to ONLY works if you have a table or other flat surface in fron of you. And if you type too long on a table, your hands would likely start hurting.

      -- Now, on to other things --
      I am the proud owner of an Alphagrip. I have only spend a couple of hours with it so far, but I have an important comment that was not mentioned on TFA...

      I am a large guy. I am over six feet tall -- and I have large hands.

      I find the Alphagrip to be uncomfortable because it was designed for use by smaller hands. When I am holding it to comfortably reach the back keys, my fingers are in the wrong position to easily use the front keys. Similarly, if I can use the front keys, I have difficulty with the back keys.

      I am also not entirely sure how to hold this thing either. If it was bigger, I could press my palms against the side. However, as it is, I have to use my fingertips to hold it, which is awkward because those same fingertips are always over one button or another. If you press to hard then you get extra characters that you don't want.

      The Alphagrip seems like it has the posibility to be rather nice if it can fit you. But if you have large hands, you might want to reconsider until they make the AG-6.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    2. Re:I'm not sure this is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been there, done that.

    3. Re:I'm not sure this is the answer by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Actually...I think the only MAJOR upgrade to the keyboard,is to do away with it totally...and have the computer somehow be connected to read your thoughts...

      Of course, this will have some drawbacks, such as when your boss walks into your office, and you forget to turn off the mindreader....and he sees over and over on the screen behind you...

      ...what a tool.

      ...what a tool.

      ...what a tool.

      ...hehehe...I boned his wife at the Xmas party while he was passed out...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:I'm not sure this is the answer by jonaskoelker · · Score: 2, Informative

      is it really necessary to sacrafice teh productivity of a standard keyboard in order to gain a convenient, compact form factor?

      Uhmm.... yeah, right. Like the standard keyboard is worth more than a dime-a-dozen.

      I'm serious: I treated myself with a Kinesis Ergo Elan (http://www.kinesis-ergo.com/elan.htm), and I'm really glad I did--it's a really pleasant keyboard to work with. I only noticed when I first used a standard keyboard after adapting to using the Ergo Elan--not only did it feel uncomfortable, it felt painful. I'm serious--and it wasn't just because I had adjusted to something different (if it were, I should have felt pain when switching to Ergo Elan, something I did not). Also, one thing that completely confounds me is why modern keyboards still have stagger--it's just being mindlessly carried along from the 1890's up until today (sure, it was reasonable due to mechanical constraints on typewriters; newsflash: computer keyboards isn't a new invention).

      (End of rant about the sad state keyboard design is in these days)

      Actually, I think the AlphaGrip might be better than a (physical) keyboard layout designed for typewriters. I'm open to the possibility that I might be wrong (in general I dislike small keyboards, but this one might have been done well).

      I hope you don't argue that the usefulness of the standard keyboard layout is high just because it's a standard; if that was true, Windows 95 was once a good OS, and Bush was a good president (at election time, he was the "standard" choice).

      Also, the keyboard permutation matters. I'll replay this anecdote (I'm not playing any role, and I can't remember who participates in it, and I'm not even sure I got the phrases exactly right, or that I've go the gender information right, but... oh well, someone once said something to the effect of...):

      Alice: "Excuse me. If you don't mind me asking, are you using that alternative keyboard layout?"

      Bob:: "Yes--it's called Dvorak. How could you tell?"

      Alice: "Your fingers aren't moving."

      I like the promise that the virtual keyboards have
      It's not a bad idea (at all), but it's amazing that they haven't shuffled the keys around (okay, so I was almost done ranting about keyboard design): it must be almost trivial to do--all there is to it is basically detect surface contact in a different polygon.

    5. Re:I'm not sure this is the answer by object88 · · Score: 1

      I am a large guy. I am over six feet tall -- and I have large hands. I find the Alphagrip to be uncomfortable because it was designed for use by smaller hands.

      Damnit damnit damnit. I suppose I should still try to find one in a brick'n'mortar store to try out, but still, disheartening. Although I don't have a problem with RSI (yet), I'd like to find an inexpensive keyboard to prevent it as much as possible. I'm guessing that an input device like this would help.

      And if it confounds my coworkers at the same time, well, that's just sheer entertainment value.

    6. Re:I'm not sure this is the answer by segphault · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm also an AlphaGrip owner, and I'm six feet five inches also with very large hands. If I keep my hands loosely wrapped around the the device (with my hands out rather than with my palms firmly against the grips) and I hold it lightly against my stomach, I don't have to tightly grip the bottom part of the device. I experimented with a couple of different hand positions, and I found that holding it like that provided the best balance of comfort and control. If you hold it that way too you probably wont get that problem.

    7. Re:I'm not sure this is the answer by somersault · · Score: 1

      "...hehehe...I boned his wife at the Xmas party while he was passed out..."

      was that a confession or part of what your average boss will see? o.o Presumably his wife would have to have been passed out also :s If someone is gonna 'commit' adultery then why are they still married :s *hides from people who point out that it's just a sick joke*

      --
      which is totally what she said
    8. Re:I'm not sure this is the answer by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      It was what the boss would see on the screen...

      Dunno where you live...but, married people fuck around on each other all the time, keep it a secret, and don't get divorced....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:I'm not sure this is the answer by somersault · · Score: 1

      Well I know that's true but I dont have to like it :( And I have no plans in doing that, neither does my gf, we dont even believe in sex before marriage actually

      --
      which is totally what she said
    10. Re:I'm not sure this is the answer by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "...neither does my gf, we dont even believe in sex before marriage actually"

      While I respect anyone's decisions on things like this...you might seriously want to reconsider. Sex is a big part of marriage....and well, I'd definitely like to sample the 'talents' before I commit lifelong to it...you know? Some women just are not good at it...or don't like it...and if you find that out too late...whew...you're stuck dude..

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    11. Re:I'm not sure this is the answer by somersault · · Score: 1

      lol :D hmm no I can tell we're gonna have fun =p but anyway, while sex is important, even if she 'wasnt good' or whatever, I obviously love her without the sex already *shrug* :)

      --
      which is totally what she said
  9. wouldn't it have made... by Chimera512 · · Score: 1

    more sense to try to sort of roll the traditional keyboard into that shape, so you're using the same fingers a different way? like have 3+ positions for each finger, so the bottom of the controller would have 3 buttons QAZ on one side and P:? on the other?

    1. Re:wouldn't it have made... by hahiss · · Score: 1

      Funny, this was the same thought I had! They could have leveraged the muscle memory of touch typers (who, let's face it, have to be the target audience, since hunt & peck requires turning the device back and forth to find keys).

      However, they don't promise that this keyboard will make you a faster typer than a standard keyboard (just handheld ones); but they promise that it frees you from your desk and reduces RSI.

      Personally, I'd rather stay lashed to my desk and have pedals for the modifier keys (shift, alt, ctrl); this would reduce the number of awkward reaches my unfortunately short and stubby fingers have to make.

      --
      "Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under." - H.L. Mencken
  10. Real geeks won't use it by Dekortage · · Score: 3, Funny

    This would eliminate the only exercise they get (typing!). Besides, it requires TWO HANDS.

    Also, from the article: If we are successful, the AG-5 will turn out to be just a glimpse of the future of desk-free computing. Desk-free? Where am I going to put my coffee cup?

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    1. Re:Real geeks won't use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, it requires TWO HANDS

      Don't worry, the first option planned for that expansion port is a Fleshlight.

    2. Re:Real geeks won't use it by mrsev · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Your two hands comment is actually very correct. This many provide a useful tool for people who type alot of the time in a "conventional" manner but most of the time I am doing other things with one of my hands (I can predict the replies to this part of my comment). I like to eat, drink, hold up a piece of paper or hold one of my kids on my lap. Plus my kids will be pissed that it does not seem to be able fit their hands very well.

      On the whole a good idea and a great device for alot of people but not for me.

    3. Re:Real geeks won't use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dork. Desk-free? Where am I going to put my coffee cup? was not in the article.

    4. Re:Real geeks won't use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "(I can predict the replies to this part of my comment)"

      I must be new here, but what kind of repies do you mean?

    5. Re:Real geeks won't use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, you haven't seen this: http://www.break.com/index/wowjerkoff.html

    6. Re:Real geeks won't use it by novado · · Score: 1

      You can still spell "Wanker" with only your left hand.

  11. What type of 'web browsing' are we speaking of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    'I can comfortably compute while reclining in my chair, and I no longer have to lean forward to type, a feature that is particularly nice when I'm doing lots of web browsing.'

  12. But what I want to know... by solarbob · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...Is how is it going to effect people with RSI. Having something which looks relativly heavy and having to hold it up for a longish period at a time isn't going to be good for your wrists (not that a keyboard is much better tbh)

    --
    SolarVPS - Quality Windows and Linux Virtual Servers
    1. Re:But what I want to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the manual:

      "AlphaGrip, Inc., has not conducted extensive studies to analyze the AG-5's ergonomic characteristics and, therefore, does not claim that using the AG-5 is more ergonomic than typing on a standard keyboard or using a game controller or joystick or that use of the AG-5 is ergonomic at all."

      Oh well. I would have bought one if I thought it would make my wrists hurt less.

    2. Re:But what I want to know... by freehunter · · Score: 1

      Okay, it would only make sense just to NOT buy it if you have RSI. It isn't like they are forcing you to.

    3. Re:But what I want to know... by Lalo+Martins · · Score: 1

      absolutely... it looks horrible.

      Playing on a console for more than half an hour leaves my elbows, forearms, writst and fingers all hurt. I don't think I'd be able to stand 4 hours straight on this monstrosity.

      It's not only having to hold it - it's the relative position it forces your arms and hands to be from each other. It's not very natural.

      Nah, I'll pass this one, thanks.

    4. Re:But what I want to know... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      For all controllers? What about computer gamepads? The PS2 controller is too small and the angular palm-grips are shaped to be stylish over ergonomics. The xbox's is larger and better. The 360's is smaller than the xbox's, but the handgrips are much better. More like the Dreamcast's, but angled outward for a more natural angle that bends the wrists less.

      Or are you just a freak in the minority?

    5. Re:But what I want to know... by somersault · · Score: 1

      huh? Whenever I've played console games for any amount of time, I sit on the sofa and my arms and wrists etc are just resting on myself or the sofa. And with regards to the child post on this, I've always liked the PS2 controller (dual shock, not so much the original, which does feel weedy and awkward now) much better than XBox/N64/whatever. It's mostly a matter of whatever you're used to (for example I've been using a QWERTY keyboard for 18 years now, since I was 4, and have been able to type quickly and without looking at the keyboard for a few years now (I did try the occasional typing tutor program, which I think helped a bit, though I 'd usually try the program for a few minutes then just get bored. I know I could switch to another keyboard layout, but it would take a long time for my fingers to adjust. For example my fingers often even type a similar word to one that I'm thinking, if I'm not paying attention - showing that in a way they even predict what word I'm going to write, or that my typing is on a really subconcious level that I'm not going to be able to alter quickly. It's like when I switched from using inverted and non-inverted mouse aiming on an FPS, on occasion if I was suddenly disturbed I'd move the mouse in the completely wrong direction. The keyboard would be much more complicated than just an up-down reassignment.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    6. Re:But what I want to know... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      My thoughts on game pads is for them to be ergonomic, I should be able to hold them with my wrists in a neutral position so they don't have to bend outward. The problem is kiddies and girls with smaller hands and shoulders who need a smaller controller and different angle. Consequently my wrists get bent outward.

      I'm sure you're more used to the feel of the PS2's, but consider it's ergonomics. You can see the geometric shapes it's made out of. Circles for the d-pad and right-thumb buttons. Then there's two rounded-off cones extending from them for hand-grips. It isn't an organically-shaped controller that truly fills and fits the hands with the same amound of pressure from each finger and joint to hold it.

    7. Re:But what I want to know... by somersault · · Score: 1

      obviously if you are going to be pressing buttons with some fingers, then you aren't going to be able to have a design where you will have the same pressure on each finger.. anyway I'm not entirely sure what you mean by 'bent outward' at the wrists - I find the PS2 controller a joy to use.. when I use something like my DS, which is basically just a rectangle shape with buttons on it, then my left thumb gets very upset.. I certainly dont have small hands, but I find the PS2 controller is comfortable. As I've said elsewhere I would tend to be resting my hands and the controller on my legs though, I dont just hold it up in the air, as maybe I used to when I first used one as a kid (and swung my whole body as if that was going to help)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    8. Re:But what I want to know... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Put your palms together in front of you, about where you'd hold a controller, fingers pointing away from you. Your wrists bend outward, or upward, relative to your forearms. Just like it's bad when typing to rest your wrists on the keyboard or desk because the wrists are bent, leading to RSI and before that, general discomfort. Gamepads should be designed with the same things in mind. The back of the hands ought to be close to parallel to the forearms when holding the pad.

  13. Hard to believe he even needs a keyboard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I suppose my pedantically compulsive nature and capacity for data retention made it easier for me to assimilate the layout."

  14. No Wireless/Bluetooth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems to me that without wireless support via Bluetooth (not the USB wireless that they promise real soon now), this keyboard/controller's usefulness is decreased quite a bit.

    I might be open to switching to an alternate input device, but only if I'll be able to use it with my other devices (PDA, cell phone, etc.)

    Also, I fear my vi productivity will decrease dramatically with this device...

    1. Re:No Wireless/Bluetooth? by BinLadenMyHero · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Exactly what I would point out. Wireless is a must for me, as I don't use the computer on a desk, but a sofa, with the keyboard on my lap. I seldom use the mouse, so the embeded trackball is great.

      As for vi, well, you can remap keys. Not only in vi, but in X also. (I use caps lock as escape on my traditional keyboard.)

  15. Looks cool and all by DeDmeTe · · Score: 1

    .. but I'm still waiting for this thing to come out: http://www.artlebedev.com/portfolio/optimus/

    --
    -Guns kill people like spoons made Rosie O'Donnell fat-
    1. Re:Looks cool and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why?

    2. Re:Looks cool and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES! I have been waiting for the Optimus for a while now... I was a bit disappointed when they said it would cost about the same as a cell phone. That made me think it would be in the $200-400 range. But they just came out with a 3 button version that costs $100! I bet the full keyboard is gonna be $$$$$$$$$$

  16. Engelbart Chord Keyset by daddyrief · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That thing looks like a beast.

    This is Offtopic, but maybe someone here would know...

    I've been looking to get a chord keyset similar to the 5-key style that Engelbart created. Picture. I vaguely remember seeing one or two products when i looked a few months back, but nowhere could i find a purchase link.

    I guess the question is: does anyone know where i could buy a chord keyset? Maybe some uber-nerdy slashdotter has one laying around i can buy?

    --
    "Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies." -Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Engelbart Chord Keyset by burris · · Score: 2, Informative

      BAT Keyboard I used these for a while but gave them up in favor of a dvorak kinesis contour. They are great if you do a lot of CAD, diagramming, or anything else that requires lots of mousing and typing since you can keep one hand on the keyboard and one on the mouse. I suppose they would be awesome for games but I'm not much of a gamer.

      Downsides: The idiots STILL have not figured out how to generate the Mac command key and that is a large reason why I gave them up. The travel of the keys is too far so you hands bounce too much, causing undue stress. Less importantly, I couldn't really get over 50wpm, though that means I could type at 25wpm with one hand. The firmware is also somewhat buggy.

      Learning the letters is easy. Symbols are harder. Getting a smooth alternating left/right technique was very hard for me.

    2. Re:Engelbart Chord Keyset by Yojimbo-San · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cykey http://www.bellaire.demon.co.uk/newcykey.htm

      I have one here, it's a bit of a pain with IR connection, but once you have the receiver set up it works fine.

      The chording style they use here took me literally an hour to learn ~22 letters of the alphabet on, which matched the claim on the manual :-)

      I still have their Excellent 1990 PDA, the AgendA http://www.bellaire.demon.co.uk/cykey.htm

      --
      Quick wafting zephyrs vex bold Jim
    3. Re:Engelbart Chord Keyset by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

      Any reason you can't just find/create custom drivers for a keyboard or similar input device? Especially if it is just for a proof of concept, or out of curiosity, there's no point doing in hardware what can be done in software.

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
  17. Serious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even from a person who has taught himself how to use dvorak ... that looks like a nightmare.

    Can a user remap these buttons in the same way one can remap a standard keyboard to Dvorak?

  18. ICK by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I had to learn the Handeykey Twiddler for my foray into the world of wearable computing and it was a PITA to learn. But it at least let me do it one handed and at a somewhat decent rate. This thing looks really awkward to use no matter what you do.

    None of these alternative keybards have any real benefits. The twiddler was close as you could type while walking down the street or listening during a class without getting everyone's attention. This thing will get professors glaring at you.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:ICK by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      You mean as awkward as holding a gamepad from your sofa or bed and being able to type on a modified QWERTY layout?

    2. Re:ICK by hritcu · · Score: 1

      50 wpm ... is that not decent, or what?

      --
      If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
    3. Re:ICK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is great if you do all your computing that way.

      the rest of the world is interested in walking, riding, etc...

  19. All users? by LightningBolt! · · Score: 1

    The trackball problem [I had] may not affect all users

    I think it just did.

    --
    Old people fall. Young people spring. Rich people summer and winter.
  20. A snowball's chance. by dpbsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Chording keyboards hae been since the invention of the stenotype machine in the late 1800s, enabling those willing to master what the Ars Technica article calls a "steep learning curve" to attain speeds of 225 wpm or about three times the speed of a comparably skilled typist.

    They were an integral part of Engelbart's conception--the mouse was intended for use with a five-key chording keyboard.

    There is nothing about them that is very difficult or expensive to manufacture. (In fact, common sense says that all things being equal a device with a dozen or so buttons ought to cost less than one with a hundred).

    This one must be about the tenth that's made it to the point of being manufactured and sold to the general PC-using public, several marketed at the height of concern about RSI with reasonable evidence that they would be less stressful to use than conventional keyboards.

    None of 'em have ever come close to catching on.

    Chalk up chording keyboards with leap-week calendars or decimal time or the Single Tax. Ain't gonna happen.

    1. Re:A snowball's chance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do keep in mind that stenographer keyboards spell phonetically. This is partly the reason the stenographer has to read back the transcript (other than that the transcript is right in front of her). You'll notice modern courtrooms typically don't have a stenographer -- they have microphones.

    2. Re:A snowball's chance. by byteframe · · Score: 1

      Will you dumb geeks stop discussing the metaphysical implications of this device? That thing is the ugliest piece of crap I've ever seen.

    3. Re:A snowball's chance. by MindStalker · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you had read the article you would see this isn't a chording keyboard, infact the button placements are almost identical to that of qwerty except its wrapped around a control pad. The fingers you use to type qwerty are the same fingers you use to type with this.

    4. Re:A snowball's chance. by somersault · · Score: 1

      "Will you dumb geeks"

      why are you even using a computer young man? Go and play some american football or something.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:A snowball's chance. by kryzx · · Score: 1
      Do you have any references for the 225 wpm/3x figure?

      I am interested in these alternative input devices, and even willing to invest some time and effort into practicing with one, but only if there is a payoff in speed. My typing speed on a standard qwerty is pretty decent, around 60 wpm. Any new input device has to offer the potential of beating that for it to be worthwhile. Speed is everything.

      The wikipedia article on AlphaGrip says: "According to the site, users can achieve approximately 50 or more words per minute once the initial learning curve of the AlphaGrip's "Enhanced QWERTY" arrangement has been overcome"

      And the AlphaGrip white paper does not mention anything above 50 wpm.

      I have never seen any decent data on measured typing speed with various input device. I'd love to see a good controlled comparison of standard keyboard vs. natural vs. dvorak vs. AlphaGrip vs. the various chorded keyboards. If you (or anyone else for that matter) have any data like this please share.

      --
      "I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
    6. Re:A snowball's chance. by Miraba · · Score: 1
      Chording keyboards hae been since the invention of the stenotype machine in the late 1800s, enabling those willing to master what the Ars Technica article calls a "steep learning curve" to attain speeds of 225 wpm or about three times the speed of a comparably skilled typist.

      How many people can think at 225 wpm? How many people can sustain clear and coherent thinking at 225 wpm? I type as I hear the words in my head so I can be reasonably sure that I'm not skipping anything; what's the point of communicating really fast if the information is too garbled to be understood by other people? When I think, my brain makes all sorts of shortcuts that just don't translate well into text; if my thinking speed overtakes my typing speed, words be dropped or condensin way cant bunderstood sily.

      Like the sibling post, I'd also like to see the reference for 225 wpm.

  21. Written by an android? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    I can consistently achieve about 45 words per minute with the AG-5 (vs. 65wpm on a traditional keyboard), and I think that with more experience I could probably exceed 50. My typing speed on the AG-5 is apparently not indicative of the average user experience. I suppose my pedantically compulsive nature and capacity for data retention made it easier for me to assimilate the layout.


    This just in: The AG-5 is the 'keyboard' of choice for robots, androids, and borg the world over!
    1. Re:Written by an android? by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      nonsense, androids and robots the world over would just connect via usb, bluetooth, or when necessary ps2 to the host machine and transfer the appropriate key commands directly. pfft typing.

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
  22. hehe by Danzigism · · Score: 0, Redundant

    what do you do if you just need to type with one hand?? heh

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
    1. Re:hehe by whitepony02027 · · Score: 0

      why would i need to....... Ohhhhhhh

  23. home row by endrue · · Score: 1

    I am not sure if the learning curve would be all that bad. Notice that it is set up to utilize the "home row" style of typing on a QWERTY keyboard. I think that its actually pretty cool and would definitely cut down on the carpal tunnel.

    - Andrew

    --
    I meta-moderate because I care.
  24. Looks good for VR by bigpat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Using the headtracking on my Z800 to full effect has been a challenge, since I have been largely stuck using the keyboard for FPS gaming. But this thing could really give me some extra freedom of movement. Just need a long enough USB cable and I should be able to manage the cables well enough to do a few 360 degree turns without getting too tangled.

    I tried a wireless programmable controller, but the batteries didn't last very long and their seemed to be some latency. This thing should provide all the keyboard commands you could ever need.

  25. stop propogating myths by demon411 · · Score: 1, Informative
    In 1874 a company called Sholes and Glidden developed the QWERTY keyboard layout for their typewriters in order to decrease the frequency of mechanical failure.

    Stop Propogating Myths

    1. Re:stop propogating myths by archen · · Score: 1

      You might want to read those articles and the quote you are trying to refute. The QWERTY keyboard was designed to decrease the frequency of mechanical failure .. assuming you referr to a head jam as a "failure".

      If you've ever used a typewriter with hammers you can attest that even with the design as it is, it's pretty easy to end up with a jam.

    2. Re:stop propogating myths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you fucking illiterate? You should try reading those articles. All of those links state that Stoles designed the QWERTY keyboard to reduce mechanical jams.

    3. Re:stop propogating myths by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      What myths?

      None of the links you provide contradict the claim in the cite.

      "Decrease the frequency of mechanical failure" and "slow typists down" are not necessarily the same goal.

    4. Re:stop propogating myths by Knight2K · · Score: 1

      Actually, your links don't dispute the parent's statement. QWERTY was created to reduce mechanical failures as its primary design goal. The myths involved in the QWERTY design are:

      1. QWERTY was arranged to slow the typist down as the solution to the mechanical problem.
      2. DVORAK is faster, but the lack of DVORAK typists and the lack of machines led to a chicken and egg problem.

      In fact, your links point out that:

      1. QWERTY was actually designed so typing common English letter combinations wouldn't cause mechanical failure. The designers were not actively trying to influence the typist's speed in either direction. They just tried to arrange the letters so that faster speeds wouldn't lock the machine.
      2. Despite several deficiencies in the design from a typist's point of view, QWERTY is generally as fast as Dvorak. In fact, some qualities of QWERTY actually may help typing speed. At the very least, Dvorak didn't result in enough measurable improvements to make it worth people switching.
      --
      ======
      In X-Windows the client serves YOU!
    5. Re:stop propogating myths by tyme · · Score: 5, Informative
      demon411 wrote:
      "In 1874 a company called Sholes and Glidden developed the QWERTY keyboard layout for their typewriters in order to decrease the frequency of mechanical failure."

      Stop Propogating Myths


      What are you talking about? According an article referenced from your first link:
      The first typewriter had its letters on the end of rods called "typebars." The typebars hung in a circle. The roller which held the paper sat over this circle, and when a key was pressed, a typebar would swing up to hit the paper from underneath. If two typebars were near each other in the circle, they would tend to clash into each other when typed in succession. So, Sholes figured he had to take the most common letter pairs such as "TH" and make sure their typebars hung at safe distances.

      He did this using a study of letter-pair frequency prepared by educator Amos Densmore, brother of James Densmore, who was Sholes' chief financial backer. The QWERTY keyboard itself was determined by the existing mechanical linkages of the typebars inside the machine to the keys on the outside. Sholes' solution did not eliminate the problem completely, but it was greatly reduced.

      The keyboard arrangement was considered important enough to be included on Sholes' patent granted in 1878 (see drawing), some years after the machine was into production. QWERTY's effect, by reducing those annoying clashes, was to speed up typing rather than slow it down.


      This indicates that the QWERTY layout is a direct result of the inventor attempting to prevent mechanical jams in the device. The submitter of the article wrote:
      In 1874 a company called Sholes and Glidden developed the QWERTY keyboard layout for their typewriters in order to decrease the frequency of mechanical failure.

      The myth to which you are alluding, however, is that Sholes developed the QWERTY layout to decrease the speed of typists (admittedly, to prevent the same jamming of typebars), when, in fact, the QWERTY layout acheived exactly the opposite effect (it allowed typists to type faster because jamming was less likely). The submitter is not claiming that Sholes was trying to slow down the typists (a myth) but that he was trying to reduce typebar jams (the truth).
      --
      just a ghost in the machine.
    6. Re:stop propogating myths by demon411 · · Score: 1

      lol i don't know what i was talking about. i thought the whole story was made up for some reason.

  26. Getting mine today! by supersoftdrink · · Score: 1

    I've been keeping an eye on these guys for a quite a while now. My wife ordered me one for my birthday, and it arrives today! Did we time this right or what?

  27. Sweet mother of mercy! by MaWeiTao · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Good god, my wrists shattered just looking at that thing.

    There's a need for some kind of new input device, but I dont think this is it.

    1. Re:Sweet mother of mercy! by naurhir · · Score: 1

      Get a Data Hand instead.

      I personally prefer the Kinesis Advantage Pro USB.

  28. They aren't guilty by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Read the first article again. They said it was invented to reduce mechanical failure (no word about typing speed), which is exactly what that article states it was for.

  29. Re:stop propogating myths, RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read any of the articles that you linked to you would see that indeed QWERTY was created to stop mechanical failures. What the articles that you link are about is the suposed superiorty of Dvorak. Nobody is questioning the validity that QWERTY was made to prevent mechanical interlocks.

  30. I bought One...My thoughts... by haplo21112 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I got one of these controllers. I have played with it a little its definately only for those that can seriously learn to touch type. Since many of the buttons are not at all in sight you really have to learn the keyboard. Over all its comfortable, but I feel that more than one size would have been better. The shipping model is more suitable for the average hand. A smaller hand could problay learn to work with it. My medium-large hands are pretty much at the limit of comfortable use. If you have large hands the buttons are not going to be anyplace near your finger tips.

    The keyboard makes extensive use of shift buttons to accomplish things. Get used to some finger acrobatics. I still have not quite got the hang of Control-Alt-Delete on this thing.

    The Built in Mouse....

    Personally this is the one true downfall in my opinion. The roller ball is WAY to small, and its far far far to slow it takes me far far to many rolls over the ball to get the mouse around even a 1024/768 acreen, never mind the 1280/1024 I typically run at. The performance in games (The reason I originally thought this might be a useful product) is basically worthless at this point. I went so far as to hack the registry to increase the mouse responsiveness to the maximum allowable, a setting you can't even do in the crontrol panel applet. The mouse still isn't acceptably responsive. In fact it seemed barley changed on the AG-5 despite the fact that another mouse on the same machine now zips the cursor accross the machine so fast you have to take a second after the movement to find it again.

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    1. Re:I bought One...My thoughts... by segphault · · Score: 1

      The registry settings don't consistently work for the AlphaGrip trackball. Have you tried using the mouse accelerator AHK script? It works very well. You can find it by poking around the AG google group: http://groups.google.com/group/alphagrip/

  31. May not be ergonomic by Tihstae · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the website http://www.alphagrips.com/store/shopping.html

    "The AlphaGrip may not be ergonomic. The company has not conducted the requisite studies to make that determination."

    1. Re:May not be ergonomic by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      Might as well say "The AlphaGrip may be a worthless geek-toy that is not superior in any way to a plain keyboard. The company has not conducted the requisite studies to make that determination."

  32. has voice recognition been abandoned? by ErisCalmsme · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For some reason it seems to me that using a device other than microphone is too much... why work so hard to go from one handheld device to another? I'm not advocating for brain implants (the ultimate in hands free computing), but voice control is a nice medium. Hands free + surgery free ;) Complex key combos can be shortened to a word or two... no more RSI... plus it frees up both hands............

    --
    Chaos is Divine *
    1. Re:has voice recognition been abandoned? by Samah · · Score: 1

      This could be seen as both a good and bad thing however.
      For the first part, clicking in the Firefox address bar and saying "google free porn" is going to attract some odd looks from your roommate the next day.
      On the flip side, as you said, it frees up both hands... :)

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
  33. Still waiting... by 26199 · · Score: 1

    ...for an alternative keyboard that rivals the now-deceased TouchStream. This one doesn't look like it'll do the job, although it does at least combine keyboard and mouse...

    (If you've never used integrated keyboard/mouse input, you're missing out. Text editing, in particular, benefits hugely. Some things are far easier to do with the mouse, but power users stick to the keyboard to avoid the switch time.)

  34. No good if you don't have all your fingers by Tech · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem with all of these chorded keyboard replacements - including this one - is that they are mostly useless for anyone with fewer than five working fingers [*] on each hand, either accidentally or from birth. And a person with the normal allocation of fingers who temporarily loses use of one, due to an injury for example, would have to revert to the standard keyboard which, happily, is still entirely functional - albeit slower. I would be very interested to see more designs of alternative input devices that can accommodate temporary and permanent disabilities.

    [*] Ignoring the thumb-vs-finger debate.

    1. Re:No good if you don't have all your fingers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with all of these chorded keyboard replacements - including this one - is that they are mostly useless for anyone with fewer than five working fingers [*] on each hand, either accidentally or from birth. And a person with the normal allocation of fingers who temporarily loses use of one, due to an injury for example, would have to revert to the standard keyboard which, happily, is still entirely functional - albeit slower. I would be very interested to see more designs of alternative input devices that can accommodate temporary and permanent disabilities.

      [*] Ignoring the thumb-vs-finger debate.



      well, to quote an amazing tv show known as drawn together "now that your crippled society has no use for you" - so who really cares?
    2. Re:No good if you don't have all your fingers by segphault · · Score: 1

      If you have that kind of disability, you might want to look into the Twiddler2 from HandyKey: http://www.handykey.com/site/twiddler2.html It is a one-haned input device that can be used by either the right or left hand. Missing fingers on one hand or even a missing hand wont affect a Twiddler user.

  35. I vote "aye"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So seconded!

  36. Who, specifically, is this for? by Gulik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not being sarcastic here -- I'm honestly not sure what group of users is being targetted here. It seems that the only people who might find this useful are people who don't have a flat surface in front of them to rest a keyboard on. That might be laptop users, but if there's nowhere to rest the laptop, you can't use it anyway -- and while it can be argued that typing on the laptop while it's sitting on your lap is uncomfortable, I'm not sure balancing the laptop using only your knees while holding this thing over it is going to be any better. So, if not laptop users, then PDA users -- except this thing is larger than most of the PDAs commonly in use. Tablet users walking around the shop floor? If you're using both hands to hold the controller, what's holding up the tablet?

    This is an honest question: who is this thing for?

    1. Re:Who, specifically, is this for? by jcarter · · Score: 1

      Technophiles, I suppose. Or, video gamers whose hands have permanently cramped in that position.

    2. Re:Who, specifically, is this for? by rgf71 · · Score: 1

      Me. It seems perfect for someone like me.

      See... I'm legally blind, and need to get really really close to a monitor to see what's going on. That makes me have to lean over a keyboard while typing, or have the keyboard in some other awkward place/position. Having this handheld controller/keyboard would allow me to put a monitor up to my face, while comfortably typing with the controller near my lap.

      I'm going to have to try one out.

    3. Re:Who, specifically, is this for? by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Tablet users walking around the shop floor?

      Exactly. That's how I use it.

      If you're using both hands to hold the controller, what's holding up the tablet?

      I wear a special lectern-like structure and try to remain aroused all the time. It's hard work, but on the other hand, I've become very popular.

    4. Re:Who, specifically, is this for? by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Which is more comfortable, cradling a gamepad, or reaching out to a keyboard and mouse, the right hand often switching back and forth between them? If you said gamepad, maybe you can imagine how this product or its successor would be excellent.

    5. Re:Who, specifically, is this for? by Gulik · · Score: 1

      Having this handheld controller/keyboard would allow me to put a monitor up to my face, while comfortably typing with the controller near my lap.

      Man -- wish I could moderate a discussion I'm taking part in. +4 Informative, methinks.

    6. Re:Who, specifically, is this for? by Gulik · · Score: 1

      Hm. Yeah, okay, I'll buy that. It wouldn't be my preference (most of the tasks I do daily are either keyboard-dominant where I don't have to reach for the trackball very often, or vice-versa), but I can certainly see how someone who did a lot of mixed work could prefer this kind of keyboard. Thankee kindly.

  37. OOPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    awopaersJKNBAOPAkjaopsfsznopaeroahnfndbjanwekkkkkk kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
    oops i dropped my controller.

  38. Nintendo could do it. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

    The biggest problem w/ chordal input or any non-standard input device is that it's non-standard. The operating system and applications will not be designed with that input device in mind. They won't be widely available.

    Chordal input could be popularized by someone who builds both the input device and the OS & application stack. The only environments that I think could... uh... incubate such a snowball would be a console or cell phone company. Not Windows or Mac OS computers.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    1. Re:Nintendo could do it. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I'd quite like a bluetooth chorded keyboard that I could keep in my pocket and use for jotting down notes, or writing while walking. I don't really see the advantage of them when stationary, however.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Nintendo could do it. by BrianRaker · · Score: 1

      Actually, that doesn't matter, so as long as the device outputs standard scancodes via the PS/2 or USB interfaces. The input device itself will make sure that it will work properly with whatever hardware it's connected to, so as long as it has a standard input port (again, PS/2 or USB).

      Chording devices aren't widely *popular* because of the steep learinging curve, not because of them not being packaged with some other complete hardware solution. Honestly, if there was a chording input device for a gaming console, there would be a glut of original controllers on the used hardware market.

      IMHO, moot point.

      --
      As I walk through the valley of death I fear no one, for I am the meanest sonova bitch in the valley!
    3. Re:Nintendo could do it. by thedletterman · · Score: 1
      --
      Any fool can criticise, condemn, and complain, and most fools do. - Benjamin Franklin
    4. Re:Nintendo could do it. by somersault · · Score: 1

      most console games use some element of chording to make up for the lack of buttons (you could even say a standard keyboard is a chording device because of modifier keys I guess). A game/console maker could easily make a configuration where you could chord type using a controller, but on a console it is pretty pointless

      And what the grandparent said about Apple not being able to do this isn't true, because they *do* make their own hardware also.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:Nintendo could do it. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's exactly what I was talking about.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    6. Re:Nintendo could do it. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Of course Apple chooses their own hardware and software, but that obviously isn't the only constraint. Apple would have considerable trouble marketting a complete switch from the 105 key keyboard to chordal input. Just like Windows, Mac OS has been designed around the concept of a 105 key keyboard and a mouse.

      They could make a portable electronic device with a completely different interface, and that people might be willing to learn chordal input that way, but Apple doesn't have many special powers here w.r.t. chordal input on their desktop computers.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    7. Re:Nintendo could do it. by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      Yes! I would pay £200 for something like that. I did notice you could get an IR virtual keyboard for ~£100 these days, but you won't always have a flat surface.

      I think a palm-sized device with chording keys built in to the edge could be a killer piece of hardware.

      Still waiting for a modern device with a Qwerty keyboard as good as the Psion 5MX...

    8. Re:Nintendo could do it. by somersault · · Score: 1

      basically chordal input seems very pointless for a desktop machine, I agree that it is more likely to work for a portable machine, though I still think the learning curve wouldnt be worth it, and the speed would be pretty terrible. I like having lots of keys available for things like gaming etc anyway. I wouldnt say Windows or Mac OS have been designed around a 105 key keyboard, I'd say they'd been designed around devices that can input character data, but there's no requirement as to what that device is, as long as it does have the ability to type every character in the alphabet. Even our keyboards cant type every symbol possible without using 'ALT + 0254' type keycodes, and when I try ALT+0254 then preview this comment, it doesn't work. You'll find it does a shape that works well for an emote of a guy sticking out his tongue, like :p , but with the tongue sticking out of the middle of his mouth, hehe

      --
      which is totally what she said
  39. Console controllers by Jagasian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I really wish that somebody would make a console controller similar to the Xbox 360 controller, with the right analog stick replaced by a trackball. Using an analog stick for moving a pointer or your player's view in a first-person shooter is just terrible. Having a trackball would be much better for such actions. Also, with such a change, the controller would have 3 direction controls: D-pad, analog stick, and trackball. Each have proven themselves to be useful for certain game tasks, so why not make them all available at the same time?

  40. Why not a Nintendo Revolution style mouse? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I really like this device, except for the mouse. That trackball seems worthless. Even if the sensitivity issues were solved, it still occupies a thumb, which is already an overemployed digit with all the chords it needs to participate in. Also, I have no hope that a thumb-controlled wheel could be both fast and accurate enough to use in a game.

    But we already have a solution: the Nintendo Revolution!

    The idea is simple: you move the mouse cursor through tilting the device. It requires no extra buttons and is perfectly natural and intuitive, since you're already holding the thing in the air. Basically, it would be a pointing device that you could really point with. Finally, you could mouse around without interrupting your typing! There would be all sorts of ways the device could detect its orientation. I'm not sure which method will be best, though the Nintendo Revolution controller will probably provide us with good clues. So why not build the innards of the Revolution controller inside of this keyboard? Apart from being useful for living room applications, it would just be awesome for games! Consider for example a game like GTA where you turn the car's steering wheel by tilting the controller!

    If these guys don't build that in, I hope someone else does. Hell, I'd pay $200 for a wireless tilt-driven one of these (that fits large hands).

    1. Re:Why not a Nintendo Revolution style mouse? by superbam · · Score: 1

      Gyration makes a mouse that can do what you describe. Having used one while trying to game (trying is the keyword here) I can tell you it isn't as wonderful as it sounds. Tilting a controller isn't precise enough to use in any video game and is at best cumbersome in Windows. It works well when lounging back in your chair and surfing but isn't much good for anything else.

      --
      We've tried nothin' and we're all out of ideas. - Ned's Mom
  41. Gryo, not the tasty kind by uberjoe · · Score: 1

    Actually this has been done before nintendo. It's called the gryo mouse. http://www.gyration.com/en-US

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

    1. Re:Gryo, not the tasty kind by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      Nice! It really seems like the two technologies are perfect for each other! I'm a bit skeptical about letting gyros do all the work because I expect them to drift and not know how to re-zero. Still if these GyroMouse guys solved this problem, AlphaGrip should just borrow their solution. A more accurate way for the thing to become aware of its position is to install several mini-cameras that take pictures of the room and from these (plus gyro data) work out exactly which way the device is facing.

  42. 5 revisions and they couldn't make it wireless? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Oh, sure, give it a USB plug and let it run off computer power if you need to, but with bluetooth out there, why in the world would you make a handheld device in a corded-only model?

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  43. Did anyone else... by jda487 · · Score: 1

    Notice that in the demonstration video on the product website, the guy demonstrating how easy it is to use made simple typing errors...

  44. Just legal boilerplate by fm6 · · Score: 1
    This was obviously written by the lawyers. Pretty meaningless.

    Notice that most input devices you buy these days comes with a little leaflet on ergonomics that nobody reads. Why do they bother? Because when you get RSI and sue them, they can say, "Hey, did you read the leaflet?"

  45. They got a few things right... by Ansible42 · · Score: 1

    I like the look of the device, at least its not beige or some other lame color. Glossy black is cool. It sounds like you can actually type on it at a decent rate of speed, which is also good. Too bad the mouse isn't so great on it, but I'm sure they'll work that out in a generation or two. Hope they survive that long! I'd like to see a couple of developments with this:

    - A version with more analog axes than just the mouse. The ultimate to me would be if they could put a spaceball type controller on there in addition to the mouse; then you could do CAD with it. And that would be awesome.

    - A laptop which has no regular keyboard, just this device. The monitor part would be kind of like a tablet PC, maybe with a fold out stand to keep it upright.

  46. I overheard Taco muttering . . . by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    Smaller than an X-box controller. No wireless. Lame.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  47. How is button noise/feel? by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

    How are the buttons themselves? Are they noisy/clicky? Are they easy to press, and do they feel responsive?