Slashdot Mirror


Study: Waking Up Like Being Drunk

Ant writes "CNN reports that "sleep inertia" leaves some people so groggy, after they wake up, they might as well be drunk, researchers said on Tuesday. "For a short period, at least, the effects of sleep inertia may be as bad as or worse than being legally drunk," said researcher Kenneth Wright of the University of Colorado at Boulder."

417 comments

  1. Brilliant excuse by yobjob · · Score: 5, Funny

    I didn't get smashed last night, I just wake up drunk, honest!

    1. Re:Brilliant excuse by thermopile · · Score: 5, Funny
      No way. I don't buy it, not one iota.

      When I'm drunk, I have this irrational and very strong urge to hook up with whatever woman looks strikingly attractive in the room. Raging ball of hormones.

      When I'm waking up? are you kidding? I'm usually annoyed that the ugly troll of a thing sleeping next to me (who was strikingly attractive last night) has the nerve to have her arm draped over me.

      Way, way different.

      --

      "Diplomacy is something you do until you find a rock." --Richard Pound

    2. Re:Brilliant excuse by pHatidic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry, officer, I wasn't drinking. I was just taking a nap behind the wheel.

    3. Re:Brilliant excuse by myth24601 · · Score: 2, Funny

      How did that song go?

      "She's looking good after NINE Coronas!"

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    4. Re:Brilliant excuse by chrisnewbie · · Score: 0

      That condition would be best used when police does a road block after the closing hours of bars.

      No officer i did not drink, i'm just getting out of my sleep inertia.

    5. Re:Brilliant excuse by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Theres a difference between being drunk and really, really drunk though. When I'm drunk I may want to hook up with whatever woman is around, but when I'm really really drunk I just want to crawl into a corner and pass out - like when I wake up in the morning.

    6. Re:Brilliant excuse by sjwaste · · Score: 1

      The difference is, when you're wasted, you'll literally be ok with curling up in a pile of leaves, laying down on the steps of the bar, etc. When you wake up in the morning, there is no substitute for the bed :)

      This is a great article for a Thursday, though. It's really making me look forward to the weekend.

    7. Re:Brilliant excuse by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      OK, seeing as how this is Slashdot let me load your post into vim and make a run through the standard few corrections to translate for the majority slashdot crowd: :%s/hook up with/masterbate to/g :%s/woman/german fetish video/g :%s/in the room/on my computer in my mom's basement/g :%s/who was strikingly attractive last night/a picture of a sweet transvestite from transexual, Transylvania/g :%s/have her arm draped over me/point out how pathetic I really am/g :wq

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    8. Re:Brilliant excuse by Directrix1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't understand why that wasn't formatted right, it was set to plain text:

      OK, seeing as how this is Slashdot let me load your post into vim and make a run through the standard few corrections to translate for the majority slashdot crowd:
      :%s/hook up with/masterbate to/g
      :%s/woman/german fetish video/g
      :%s/in the room/on my computer in my mom's basement/g
      :%s/who was strikingly attractive last night/a picture of a sweet transvestite from transexual, Transylvania/g
      :%s/have her arm draped over me/point out how pathetic I really am/g
      :wq

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    9. Re:Brilliant excuse by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Your a /. geek, most likely sober/drunk you are hoping that the most ugly troll will sleep with you because you damn well know the hot girl won't.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    10. Re:Brilliant excuse by misleb · · Score: 4, Funny
      The difference is, when you're wasted, you'll literally be ok with curling up in a pile of leaves, laying down on the steps of the bar, etc. When you wake up in the morning, there is no substitute for the bed :)



      I dunno, my brother used to fall asleep in the shower in the morning.

      -mattew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    11. Re:Brilliant excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the preview button is your friend

    12. Re:Brilliant excuse by canofbutter · · Score: 1

      I was 3 hours late for work this morning because I fell asleep in the shower; too bad it wasn't on yet, I'm sure once the hot water ran out I would have woke up in a hurry...

    13. Re:Brilliant excuse by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Only one ball of hormones? What are you, Hitler?

      You have to learn to chew on your own ar...waitaminit, that was my wife, you bastard!

    14. Re:Brilliant excuse by Darby · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I'm waking up? are you kidding? I'm usually annoyed that the ugly troll of a thing sleeping next to me (who was strikingly attractive last night) has the nerve to have her arm draped over me.

      One of those nights where you go to bed with Bo Derek and wake up with Bo Diddley.

  2. Oh great by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So am I going to get a DUI for sleeping through the alarm and rushing to work while groggy? Can't wait for that.

    At least it won't show up on a breathilizer.

    1. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      At least it won't show up on a breathilizer.

      It will. Your breath will have a distinct lack of caffeine...

    2. Re:Oh great by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      Let me tell you from experience, your wife/girlfriend/significant other, should you have one, would disagree.

  3. And here I thought... by Patchw0rk+F0g · · Score: 0

    ...that all of my co-workers were just wasted. I think I liked it better when they were supposedly bonged out. "Sleep inertia" is just boring.

    --
    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. ~~ Hunter S. Thompson
  4. Remember Folks... by Burning1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So remember folks: If you fall asleep while driving it's very important that you don't attempt to wake up.

    1. Re:Remember Folks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      My grandfather died peacefully in his sleep. Unlike the four other people in the car he was driving.

    2. Re:Remember Folks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way I heard it...
      I want to go the way my grandfather did, peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming and howling like the rest of the people in the bus he was driving at the time.

    3. Re:Remember Folks... by jnunoferreira · · Score: 1

      i was gonna say that :P

    4. Re:Remember Folks... by Nos. · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I always heard it as:
      I want to go peacefully in my sleep, like my grandfather. Not screaming like his passengers.

    5. Re:Remember Folks... by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Eh? Why start now...

    6. Re:Remember Folks... by Dirtside · · Score: 3, Funny

      Best version:

      When I die, I want to go peacefully in my sleep, like my grandfather, and not screaming and helpless, like his passengers.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  5. I so have this problem by jdwilso2 · · Score: 1

    I end up babbling like an idiot to my wife every morning when I wake up. She thinks I'm just lazy in the mornings, but now I've got an excuse to hide behind :-)

  6. Its just like... by Saggi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its just like sitting and waiting for a new post on slashdot, and then quickly trying to write something usefull, witch actually ends up rather stupid.

    According to this research we should not allow post for at least 3 min after a new entry on slashdot.

    I think this entry proves my point.

    --
    -:) Oh no - not again.
    www.rednebula.com
    1. Re:Its just like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you should suscribe and thus get an extra 30 mins to come up with witty stuff to karma whore with.. :P

    2. Re:Its just like... by Zakabog · · Score: 3, Funny

      5, insightful, I think the moderators just woke up.

    3. Re:Its just like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would also help reduce flame wars!

    4. Re:Its just like... by spectrumCoder · · Score: 1

      Sit and wait for a new post to appear? Haven't these people got anything better to do? I think there's a lot I don't get about slashdot. (First Post)

    5. Re:Its just like... by UniXY · · Score: 1

      According to this research we should not allow post for at least 3 min after a new entry on slashdot. *Rapidly presses F5 for 3 minutes* I'm sorry, but didn't you know it was a felony to refresh a webpage? *doh*

    6. Re:Its just like... by RussR42 · · Score: 1

      No, they're just actually drunk.

  7. My afternoon nap by poeidon1 · · Score: 1

    Does it mean that I cannot take my afternoon refreshment nap?

    --
    They called me mad, and I called them mad, and damn them, they outvoted me. -Nathaniel Lee
    1. Re:My afternoon nap by wootest · · Score: 1

      Depends on how you define "refreshment". :)

    2. Re:My afternoon nap by poeidon1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I always thought that I am more productive after a few hours of nap in the afternoon. This study is going to spoil my productivity.

      --
      They called me mad, and I called them mad, and damn them, they outvoted me. -Nathaniel Lee
  8. Just one of the reasons... by Mortimer82 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just one of the reasons why I choose to shower in the morning rather than in the evening.

    1. Re:Just one of the reasons... by trandism · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean you shower? :o :o Every morning? :o ooops this place has changed radically lately :|

      --
      www.lemonodor.com A mostly Lisp weblog
    2. Re:Just one of the reasons... by robgamble · · Score: 1

      You mean other than the fact that you would smell like arm pit for the remainder of the day?

      --
      No sig for you!
    3. Re:Just one of the reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You need to take into account what he's doing there. I doubt the purpose is getting clean.

  9. Legally drunk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can a US-american please explain what "legally drunk" means?

    Coming from a country where you can legally drink starting with 16 and buy alcohol with any age as long as "it is for your parents" I have to wonder what the difference between "legally" drunk and "illegally" drunk is.

    Thank you.

    1. Re:Legally drunk? by silasthehobbit · · Score: 1, Informative

      I think "legally drunk" would refer to being under the blood alcohol limit for driving a car. I'd imagine that "drunk" would refer to any amount over that limit.

      Although I'm prepared to be wrong about this.

      --
      silas
      hobbit
      london

    2. Re:Legally drunk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      I think "legally drunk" would refer to being under the blood alcohol limit for driving a car. I'd imagine that "drunk" would refer to any amount over that limit.

      And "legally blind" means your vision is just barely good enough to drive a car?

    3. Re:Legally drunk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see, thank you.

      Well, I definitely couldn't drive a car right after getting up... ;)

    4. Re:Legally drunk? by Flendon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well it varies greatly depending on the situation and what state you live in. If you are drunk and creating a big scene in a public place you can be arrested for 'Drunk in Public', which is a sort of catch all which can also be used to get bums off the street and such. Then if your driving it is based off of a specific blood alcohol level, which varies by state. Also if a minor is caught drunk it has to be proven with a blood alcohol test, but the levels are very low. So really "legally drunk" is just a catch all phrase without a set scientific answer.

      --
      chown -R us ./base
    5. Re:Legally drunk? by Fruny · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not "legally" vs. "illegally", but, say, "legally" vs. "medically".

    6. Re:Legally drunk? by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      In most states here, you are "legally drunk" when your BAC reaches 0.08% (this lowers the bar, it used to be 0.10% in some). Since many people start to feel drunk at closer to 0.05%, legally drunk implies a level of alcohol in your bloodstream considerably above just regular old drunk.

    7. Re:Legally drunk? by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 2, Informative

      Drunk as defined by law.

      With a blood alcohol content over a certain percentage.

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    8. Re:Legally drunk? by kfg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Legally drunk simply means you are drunk as defined by law.

      This may or may not imply that you are illegally drunk, since being drunk in and of itself may not be illegal, say, if you are home in bed. Being legally drunk in public where such is against the law would make you illegally drunk and subject to arrest simply for being drunk, illegally.

      If you are driving a car while you are legally drunk it is the act of driving the car that is illegal, not the being drunk, per se and the charge would be Driving While Intoxicated. Driving illegally, not illegally drunk.

      Ain't legal semantics fun?

      KFG

    9. Re:Legally drunk? by masklinn · · Score: 3, Informative

      Legally drunk would probably be closer to "drunk according to the local laws/regulations", I think. I Am Not A Native English Speaker though.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    10. Re:Legally drunk? by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

      It is good that you are prepared, my friend...
      "Legally drunk" means "drunk, as defined by law,
      with respect to your blood alcohol level."

      I admit that it's a bit of doublespeak right up
      there with "functionally illiterate", but hey, it's
      not like we voted these clowns in...

    11. Re:Legally drunk? by mrpostal · · Score: 1

      0.08. christ, where I live, you can get your licence taken away immediately for over 0.05. although, I'd rather it that way. drinking under the limit is a pain in the ass anyway, I either generally drink, or I don't. I don't know about waking up is like being drunk. I think perhaps mental capacity is at least slowed, lord knows, any question more complicated than "where are the car keys?" is beyond me when I'm waking up.

    12. Re:Legally drunk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where I live, you can get your licence taken away immediately for over 0.05

      Try living where I do where you can wreck a car, kill your passenger wake up an hour later, walk a mile to the nearest house, call 911 and still blow 2 times the legal limit and only spend that night in jail and get the county to put in curve signs on a road that you have driven since you received your license with no other punishment.

      My friend and classmate was the one that died, we had know each other since 3rd grade

    13. Re:Legally drunk? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Can a American explain what "legally drunk" means?"

      Well, in generaly, it refers to the new, ridiculously LOW bac (blood alcohol content) levels they measure you against if suspected of driving while intoxicated (DWI). The level now is 0.08 which used to be 0.10.

      This was forced through country wide, by the now all to usual ploy of the Federal govt. 'blackmailing' the states with their own tax dollars (withholding of highway funds) to do this. Now...a grown man only having 2-3 glasses of wine with a meal, can get busted for DWI...and all the crap that comes with it.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    14. Re:Legally drunk? by BVis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not always. In some states in the US (like mine for example, and I sat on a jury for a DUI case), the percentage is not relevant. The jury is instructed to decide if, in their judgement, the person was "impaired" due to the consumption of alcohol, based on their own experience and witness testimony (arresting officer talking about a sobriety test and/or observed behavior, generally.) Matter of fact, we asked the judge for information regarding the legal definition as related to BAC, and we were told "never you mind, facts not in evidence."

      BTW, shotgunning 2 beers inside 15 minutes after driving for 6 hours = impaired. Guilty.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    15. Re:Legally drunk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe my state is somewhat the same. They have two different levels of charges that they can level depending on your blood alcohol level. If it is above 0.8 then you get the upper level charge if it is below but you are obviously impaired you get the second.

      Then again my state is backwards in some ways. They don't threaten to send unruly inmates here from other states for no reason.

    16. Re:Legally drunk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Legally drunk: see "President, pretzel"

    17. Re:Legally drunk? by MyOtherUIDis3digits · · Score: 1

      Insightful? Really? Try "legally" as in according to the level determined by local laws.

      --
      Ignore anything I said above, I actually agree with everything you believe - mod accordingly.
    18. Re:Legally drunk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i can't tell if you are proud or ashamed.

  10. Felt like this all my life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow! it's amazing to finally see in a study what I've known all my life. Like you're walking through a dense fog whilest dragging a couple of Yugo's roped to my brain. Sometimes in important situations I pass right through it into a more "complete" consciousness- if there is such a thing- but in general, its just a real pain. Caused me problems all my 35 years.

  11. Wha....? by lheal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shorry, I dinnt unnerstan that. Where's my damn coffee?

    I have this stupid little dog that keeps waking up at night and yipping with this ear-piercing yelp. Something about taking a piss. I hate that little dog. Damn activists would have me in jail if I shot her, though.

    So where's that coffee? Oh, here it is. Ahh.

    Wow, what a stupid post. Better not press Submi...

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
  12. So if you drink a lot... by Zakabog · · Score: 3, Funny

    So if you drink a lot before you go to sleep, and you wake up drunk, the two effects cancel each other out. So drink heavily every night and you'll be fine!

    1. Re:So if you drink a lot... by psykopotat · · Score: 1

      just make sure you do all your driving be for the sleep grogginess wears off

    2. Re:So if you drink a lot... by soloport · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought it was, "Two rights don't make a wrong".

    3. Re:So if you drink a lot... by soloport · · Score: 1

      Wow! How could I submit a post that was so backwards. Damn you /. for posting a story so early!

      (Posted by samzenpus on Thursday January 12, @03:58AM)

    4. Re:So if you drink a lot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was, "Two rights don't make a wrong".

      But Two rights do make a Left..

    5. Re:So if you drink a lot... by tutori · · Score: 1

      Actually, assuming 90 degree rights, two rights make a backwards.

    6. Re:So if you drink a lot... by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      I've been trying this every night since college, and I can attest that it doesn't work. But that's not going not going to keep me from trying again tonight!

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

  13. Attestation by AndyCampbell · · Score: 0

    I can attest to this. When I wake up, my judgment is severely impaired, to the point that I'll hit my snooze alarm for 2 hours and end up late for work, while not really getting much more sleep. Even after I do wake up, it takes a long time before I'm really capable of doing much. It seems that even our supercomputer brains need time to spin up before we're ready for action.

    1. Re:Attestation by PhotoBoy · · Score: 1

      I can attest to this as well, I've always said that I can do my best work at midnight, not 9am.

    2. Re:Attestation by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 1

      I used to do that, till i moved my alarm clock to the other side of my room so I actually have to get out of bed to turn it off. I haven't been late for work since I did that.

      Getting out of bed is easy when you find something to really motivate you.

    3. Re:Attestation by cnettel · · Score: 1

      It's only a matter of time until you are able to do that in some kind of pseudo-sleep and still get back to bed. I know that I am able to do that.

    4. Re:Attestation by toleraen · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I did this for years growing up. Now it's more of a "fly out of bed to turn the alarm off and jump back into bed real quick" without even thinking of it. So I started setting two alarms, one to "wake" me up, and the other to actually motivate me to get out of bed. Of course being required to get up at 4am just seems so unethical to me...so that doesn't help!

    5. Re:Attestation by Fred_A · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, I moved my alarm clock to my neigbour's house and it worked great for me.
      I haven't been to work since.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    6. Re:Attestation by syntaxglitch · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but in order to turn off an alarm in pseudo-sleep mode you rely on subconscious habit, since you don't have any conscious thought at the time. Thus the possibly(?) fool-proof solution: HIDE the alarm clock every night--or better yet get someone else to hide it for you--in a randomly changing location. That way you have to stumble around looking for it long enough that you'll likely wake up before you find the blasted thing.

    7. Re:Attestation by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      If finding an alarm clock is like trying to find a missing - but ringing - cell phone, then chances are I'd bypass looking entirely and go straight for the breaker box.

    8. Re:Attestation by nickos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have the same problem and think I know the solution. What we need is a loud alarm-clock with no or very limited snooze that cannot be turned off (its alarm would stop after say 5 minutes). The time and alarm settings could only be altered in a fixed window (say between midday and midnight), and the thing would be indestructible. What do you think?

    9. Re:Attestation by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

      Or better yet, buy a clocky.

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
    10. Re:Attestation by syntaxglitch · · Score: 1

      You have NO idea how much I want one of those.

    11. Re:Attestation by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      I think I'd unplug it every time it went off.

    12. Re:Attestation by cnettel · · Score: 1
      I've tried that. It's not subconscious. Sometimes, I can remember doing it, the desperate hunt for finding the clock, to turn it off, to get back into bed.

      I'm awake enough to think about the problem, but like the article says, I lack enough judgement to really realize that I shouldn't stay in bed.

      I've even asked people to call me for important situations, figuring that I couldn't fake being awake without that really being the case. I was proven wrong. If that means I always act like a drunk, well, that's another matter...

    13. Re:Attestation by nickos · · Score: 1

      I've thought of that - it will have a mobile phone style battery that's screwed in or non-removable...

    14. Re:Attestation by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you just need to get to bed an hour earlier? :-)

    15. Re:Attestation by pross · · Score: 1

      You expect that to work? The damn thing can ring as much as it likes once I've embedded it in concrete and thrown it in the river.

    16. Re:Attestation by pclminion · · Score: 1
      What we need is a loud alarm-clock with no or very limited snooze that cannot be turned off (its alarm would stop after say 5 minutes). The time and alarm settings could only be altered in a fixed window (say between midday and midnight), and the thing would be indestructible. What do you think?

      What I think is that it's amazing that some people have so little control over themselves that they require a device like that in order to get out of bed in the morning. Seriously, if you'd rather smash an alarm clock than simply get out of bed, there is something wrong somewhere and the problem does not lie with the alarm clock.

    17. Re:Attestation by facelessnumber · · Score: 1

      I've always wanted an alarm clock with electrodes. I've had several ideas for how to build one, thought about it for a long time, but haven't actually tried it yet. My reasoning is this: I have never, ever, had a good hard jolt of electricity and felt sleepy afterwards. Ever. I figure a capacitor from a camera flash ought to do it, or maybe a transformer from an electric fence controlled by a relay attached to the alarm clock's speaker. Maybe a small automotive coil... Attach the electrodes to some place sensitive but not near any vital organs, perhaps the feet. Maybe inside some specially-made socks. Any alarm clock that only uses sound, I will be fully immune to its effects within a week.

    18. Re:Attestation by nickos · · Score: 1

      You expect that to work? The damn thing can ring as much as it likes once I've embedded it in concrete and thrown it in the river.

      That would require waking up ;)

    19. Re:Attestation by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      i have motorhead - ace of spades play, from the other side of the room. when i wake up, i dont know whats going on, shit myself, jump out of bed, them i'm up.

    20. Re:Attestation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy to say for people like you who wake easily. Seriously. For me and many other people, waking up in the morning is incredibly challenging and painful - even on a full night of sleep.

      Sometimes for periods of like a week or so waking up becomes easy. This happens maybe once, twice a year. Then I realize what it is like for other people, how easy it is for them to wake up, and why they just don't understand how hard it is for people like me.

  14. theolein reports on Common Sense by theolein · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It may come as a great shock to these scientists to realise that most people on the planet take awhile to get fully awake after waking up. Those same people would refer to that knowledge as common sense.

    1. Re:theolein reports on Common Sense by datafr0g · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah but do you have scientific evidence that common sense exists?

      --
      "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
    2. Re:theolein reports on Common Sense by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Next up, a study that shows that if you put your head between your legs for a few minutes and then sit up really, really fast you get light headed.

      Will the miracle discoveries of science never cease?

      KFG

    3. Re:theolein reports on Common Sense by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      . . .do you have scientific evidence that common sense exists?

      Anecdotal evidence suggests that it does not. I shall apply for a grant to conduct a rigorous test of the hypothesis. If I get it. . .

      Q.E.D.

      KFG

    4. Re:theolein reports on Common Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Common sense is NOT as common as we would like to think...

    5. Re:theolein reports on Common Sense by aphoenix · · Score: 1

      Strangely, though, "Common sense" is the least common of the senses. (this comment is funny if you only woke up 2 minutes ago)

    6. Re:theolein reports on Common Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Don't waste my time with these stupid trivialities.

    7. Re:theolein reports on Common Sense by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, that and ... 5 minutes before you wake up, you're even worse than drunk, you're completely non-functional!

      PS Slashdot broke today (was working yesterday); I'm running Mozilla 1.7.8 on XP. Broke as in not columns any more, everything is indented too far.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    8. Re:theolein reports on Common Sense by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      Yes, but drunk?!?

      It's not as though I get out of bed every morning, lose all my money on the ponies, beat my wife, and get an inappropriate tattoo.

    9. Re:theolein reports on Common Sense by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Yeah but do you have scientific evidence that common sense exists?

      Yea, but not here on /.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    10. Re:theolein reports on Common Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pffft, scientific evidence is overrated.

      Have faith in your creator and you'll *know* it's fact.

    11. Re:theolein reports on Common Sense by blake3737 · · Score: 0

      I think there is a vast amount of research showing that in fact, common sense in people DOES NOT exist, at least where I live it sure as hell doesn't.

    12. Re:theolein reports on Common Sense by vishbar · · Score: 1

      Lots of times, common sense is wrong. Look at quantum mechanics. "Common sense" tells us that there are three dimensions and that matter is completely solid. Not so, however, when one takes a gander at string theory.

      --
      Ride the skies
    13. Re:theolein reports on Common Sense by Kupek · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of things that people considered common sense that experiment showed to be incorrect. These researchers aren't saying "Look, a revolutionary new concept!" they're just saying "Yeah, that phenomenon that we all think we experience is quantifiable; it does happen to everyone and these are the effects it has on us."

      This attitude of not investigating perceived obvious phenomenon means we would never be surprised by an experiment that gives results different than our expectation. Taking the sentiment to the extreme, we'd do no experiments at all, and simply reason our way through things without checking to see if our reasoning agrees with reality (which is basically what the ancient Greeks did).

    14. Re:theolein reports on Common Sense by Kuros_overkill · · Score: 1

      Look at it this way, We now have scientific evidence backing up our common sense, now how often does that happen?

    15. Re:theolein reports on Common Sense by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

      The trouble with common sense is that it's not common enough.

  15. MIT natural alarm clock by moonbender · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There was a story about some sleep researchers from MIT having developed an alarm clock that monitors your sleep and wakes you up at a time when you're most likely to be well rested (outside a REM phase or whatever). Of course that meant you couldn't enter the exact time to wake up, just an approximate. I still thought this sounded awesome, and they were going to commercialise it, but even if they did I guess it's really expensive and also, sleeping with sensors attached is bound to be annoying.

    --
    Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    1. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wrote a paper about biological rythms, night work and the use of bright light to ease the transitions from day to night work and back. During that work I read about "alarm" clocks called simulated dawn, it's like a brigth light like the ones used to treat seasonal affective disorders, but it's connected to a clock. You can adjust when the light should light up, and then it will gradually increase the light. This light will be sensed through the eyelids, and when you reach the next light sleep phase you will wake up feeling refreshed (in theory, at last). No need to do complicated, uncomfortable measurements of REM or whatever.

      I would love to have one of these but my girlfriend gets up later than me and she also wakes more easily, so she is less than thrilled about the idea.

      No idea on pricing.

    2. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by QuietGeek · · Score: 1

      I have used one for the last 5 years. The one I have is called SunUp (about $150 USD). I set the time of day I want "full dawn", attach a light. I've used 4 "flood" track lights, regular lamps, to a "pig light", and it slowly increases the light over 45 minutes, thus simulating a natural dawn.

      As soon as I used it I immediately noticed I didn't have the groggy, punch drunk feeling of a normal alarm. I don't have SAD but I've always had a hard time getting up with an alarm, especially in winter when dawn comes much later.

      According to a show I saw (Nova, TLC or something) the whole body, not just eyes, is sensitive to light. They put special "gel lights" behind test subject's knees and had the lights come on while they slept - had the same effect.

      I can't recommend one enough.

    3. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by Red+Alastor · · Score: 4, Insightful
      There was a story about some sleep researchers from MIT having developed an alarm clock that monitors your sleep and wakes you up at a time when you're most likely to be well rested (outside a REM phase or whatever).

      No need for sensors or anything complicated. Use two alarm clocks, set one at the earliest time you want to make. Set it on radio and set the sound fairly low. Set the second at the maximum time you want to wake but put it on alarm at maximum volume.

      When you'll be ready to wake up, the low sound will wake you up. If it doesn't happen, the second will wake you. It might take a few shots to figure out how low/loud you must set the first alarm.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    4. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I went for the lower-tech solution. I bought one of the cheap appliance timers, and put my bedroom light on it, to turn on 15 minutes before my alarm went off.

    5. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      I have an alarm clock with two alarms built-in. I can set it up exactly as you describe. It's truly marvellous, but it's still lousy at waking me up to perform system maintenance at 4:30 in the morning. I have to set all my cell phones and pagers to go off, too. Then, I hide them. By the time I've found them all, I'm awake enough to perform critical system work. :)

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    6. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by seminumerical · · Score: 1
      The light behind the knees experiment turned out to be flawed. You can read the paper demonstrating this at www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/297/5581/571.pdf but you have go through a lengthy process to become a free member before you can read the paper.

      Here is an excerpt: Although nonocular light exposure can directly affect deep brain and body circadian oscillators in many species (9), the suggestion that photic signals are carried from the back of the knee to the human brain via the circulatory system is not supported by our data.

      --
      In wartime... truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies. (Churchill)
    7. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by Guffy9 · · Score: 1

      That would be great, as long as my boss agrees to my new working hours of 3PM-5PM.

    8. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too. Works great. I had to replace the $7 cheap mechanical timer with the $14 digital one so I wouldn't hear the "wurrring" at night, but it works like a champ.

    9. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by drsquare · · Score: 1

      An alarm clock that only wakes you up when you'r ready to wake up is completely worthless. The whole point in an alarm clock is to wake you up BEFORE that so you're not late for work.

    10. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Exactly, so you can get to work, flop onto your desk and go straight back to sleep!

    11. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by jtoomim · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think this article (the news version, at least--I haven't read the actual paper yet, so I can't comment on it) makes one gross error of omission: there is very little discussion of where in the sleep cycles the subjects were woken up. The only thing I've seen that even remotely relates is the 8-hour sleep period used, and that disturbs me for reasons I'll go into later.

      So the human sleep cycle is about 90 minutes in length, and is composed of up to five stages. Stage one sleep is just a euphemism for barely-awake drowsiness. Stage two sleep is the first stage of what we typically call "sleep". It's a rather light sleep, usually dreamless or with vague, poorly-defined hallucination-like dreams. The EEG of stage two sleep is characterized by dominant theta wave (4-8 Hz) activity with small amounts of alpha (8-12 Hz) and delta (0.5-4 Hz). Stages three and four are commonly called "deep sleep" or "slow wave sleep" (SWS), and are defined according to the amount of delta waves present. By definition, stage three consists of 20-50% delta wave activity and stage four consists of more than 50% delta wave activity. These stages are completely dreamless, as the brain is nearly completely inactive during these times. Stage five sleep is also known as REM sleep. During the other four sleep stages, the eyes have little or no movement (as measured by electrooculogram, or EOG), and muscle tone is moderate (as measured by electromyogram, or EMG). During REM sleep, this pattern reverses: the eyes move rapidly, as if the subject were awake and alert, whereas muscular activity and tone flatlines. REM sleep is where the majority of dreams occur, and all of the more vivid ones. EEG and brain activity is similar to stage two sleep. I don't know for sure, but something makes me want to say that while theta waves are the dominant waveform in REM sleep, a fair amount of beta (> 12 Hz) and alpha present as well, moreso than stage 2 sleep.

      There's a paper or two in Claudio Stampi's /Why We Nap/ that describes performance on cognitive tests (e.g., a mathematical reasoning test) after being woken up from each of the five stages of sleep. They tested subjects who had been deprived of sleep for some period of time (I think about 24 hours or less), and then let the subjects sleep for between something like 15 minutes and 80 minutes, depending on their random group assignment and how long they took to enter each stage. On average, the cohort woken up in the middle of stage one, two, and five sleep performed the best, with cognitive deficits disappearing after about 40 minutes, followed by performance that for up to four hours significantly exceeded their pre-nap (and sleep-deprived) performance. Of those three groups, those woken during REM sleep performed the best, and those "woken" during stage one sleep (i.e., drowsy wakefulness) performed the worse, taking about 10 more minutes before shaking off the weight of slumber. On the other hand, those woken during SWS had much greater deficits that lasted several hours, followed by a (shorter) period of above-baseline performance that lasted until about four hours after being woken.

      If the subjects in this study performed that poorly for several hours after being woken, they were probably woken during SWS. Given that they were given 8 hours to sleep, they probably were woken during SWS.

      An average (uninterrupted) sleep cycle typically consists of about 25-40 minutes of stage one and two sleep at the beginning, 10-40 minutes of SWS in the middle, and 0-35 minutes of REM at the end. The amount of each stage of sleep depends on a number of factors, such as the time of day, the time since the last sleep, the amount of "sleep debt" (which is really SWS debt), how physically active the person has been (physical exhaustion produces more and deeper SWS), how mentally active the person has been (the more things a person has learned in the last 1-4 days, the more REM sleep the person will typically get--especially if the new knowledge is procedur

    12. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a problem. Make the device wake you up EITHER when you're at your ideal, OR the latest time you can sleep in before making it to where you need to be. Whichever comes first.

    13. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      I actually employ a similar system. I have two different times that my alarm goes off. One at 7, one at 7:30. For some reason I'm incredibly grumpy and out of it if I wake up and immediately get into the shower. Its like I need a 30-60 min. wakeup period to not hate the morning. Anybody else NEED that half-awake period?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    14. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, dude. I'm changing my alarm clock settings tonight. Thanks for potentially making my life easier.

    15. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Okay, so a quiet alarm at 75 minutes before I have to be at work, and a loud alarm at 70 minutes before I have to be at work. Check.

    16. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by mpfife · · Score: 1

      Ha! And what the heck would it do/think if you were having great sex?

    17. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      I have an alarm clock with two alarms built-in. I can set it up exactly as you describe. It's truly marvellous, but it's still lousy at waking me up to perform system maintenance at 4:30 in the morning.


      What's the name of this clock?

    18. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by igny · · Score: 1

      I read somewhere that a typical sleep consists of cycles with approximate period of 3-4 hours (depends on a person, and there are of course outliers). And indeed I noticed that 1. if I wake up in the middle of the night after 3-4 hours of sleep, I feel well rested 2. when an alarm clock wakes me up after ~5-6 ( or 9-10) hours I don't feel that well. The empirical data showed that the cycle for me is about 4 hours. I always try to go to sleep and set up the alarm according to this knowledge. My usual thought every evening is, ok I will sleep 2 cycles tonight and set the alarm 8 hours from now. When I wake up in the middle of the night, I usually think "oh great I have 1 more cycle to sleep." It did not always work this way especially near deadlines, but I would say I used to have a good sleep. Having a girlfriend have screwed my sleep up.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    19. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by periol · · Score: 1

      So I have some questions about this. Because the article seems to make sense of something that has been a lifelong problem for me - unless I am forced (by a person or a committment, and often not even then) it is almost impossible for me to get up. This has been the case for as much of my life as I can remember, but once I've been awake for about 15 minutes, I'm OK.

      This is true regardless of how much sleep I get (I can go for up to 20 hours at a time, only waking up because I start to feel guilty, but usually get around 7 hours). I've employed multiple alarm clocks of various decibels, but the problem is that first 15 minutes - my body convinced me to go back to bed.

      Maybe you're right, and I'm just not getting enough SWS sleep, but I sure *feel* like there's something else up with my body. I mean, it's always like this, no matter whether I'm getting 2 or 4 or 8 or 20 hours of sleep.

      I just wish I could sleep, and then wake up.

    20. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by Kuros_overkill · · Score: 1

      Have you tried changing when you get the sleep. I know with me it does not matter how much sleep if I get it between 10Pm and 7am, (not consistent) I am still a wreck the next day. If I get it between 3am and 12pm, I'm fine. Regardless of how much sleep I get. What the GP was saying helps make a little more sence out of everything. Shift SWS and REM up a few hours and I am most likely just getting to SWS when my alarms start going off. (to get to work for 8 am)

    21. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by periol · · Score: 1

      Well, that's the part I don't understand. No matter when I get sleep, I'm a wreck. I convinced my current employer to let me come in at 10:30, and I'm still a wreck. If I didn't know better, I would swear I get drugged when I'm sleeping. Hmm...

    22. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by LeBleu · · Score: 2, Informative

      You might want to try going to a sleep clinic, if you haven't already. I know they can diagnose things that impair sleep, such as sleep apnea.

      Just a thought,
      Kevin

      --
      --LeBleu

      If you're reading this you're part of the mass hallucination that is Kevin the Blue.

    23. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by Prune · · Score: 1

      My cat is too old now (21) and not as active at night, and so doesn't wake me up, but as time nears for me to get up in the morning, it's like the low-level alarm you described.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    24. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by jtoomim · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a sleep clinic would be a very good idea. Go to one. Spend a few nights there. See what they can find or tell you. They know a lot about abnormal sleep patterns than I do.

      Being really tired or groggy for fifteen minutes or even forty-five minutes after waking is normal, and will happen even if you wake up in the middle of REM or stage two sleep. Being tired for several hours (but NOT groggy--there's a difference) in the morning after waking from REM or stage two is also pretty common, though not as universal as the above. Being groggy and unable to think straight for several hours suggests that you woke up during SWS.

      From what you said, it sounds like you're having a more extreme version of the problem described in sentence two of the previous paragraph. One of my housemates has pretty much the same problem--he never really feels awake and alert until about 6:00pm every day, and can rarely stay awake during even the most interesting classes. His family has a lot of atypical narcolepsy-like sleep disturbances. It sounds like you may have something similar. Of course, you might also have sleep apnea or something simple like that, too--you'll have to find out.

      In the short term, you can try playing around with your alarm clock settings. Try to start going to bed at exactly the same time every night, but change your alarm clock time by ten minutes or so each night, and see if you can find a time that works better for you. Paradoxical as it might seem, you may have to sleep less every night in order to feel better. Personally, I think that this won't fix your problem, but it's definitely something you should try.

      It might come to drugs for you. Don't be afraid of them; some of the new anti-narcoleptics are quite effective and come with very few side effects. I recommend that you check out modafinil (brand name, Provigil): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modafinil http://www.modafinil.com/ http://www.erowid.org/smarts/modafinil/. Go to a sleep clinic, ask them about modafinil, and have them watch you. If they can't find an easier or better solution, modafinil or something like it may be able to lessen your symptoms dramatically.

      Nothing in the above is intended to diagnose any condition, or recommend any treatment for any condition, blah blah blah.

    25. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 1

      I'm the same way, I want to go back to bed but if I would just stay awake for a little bit I'd be fine. What seems to work well for me is putting the alarm clock away from the bed so that I have to physically leave the bed in order to turn it off. The motivation to stop that noise is enough to get me out of the bed, and usually getting out of the bed will make me cold enough that I want to take a shower (I live in Wisconsin, your milage may vary, but it seems the second I leave my bed it's cold again and getting back in bed just isn't near as warm as a hot shower) and this will keep me awake long enough to get my day started.

    26. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by periol · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the advice. I talked with my therapist about some of my issues today, and she agreed that a sleep clinic would be a good idea, along with drugs. Funny, it just never occurred to me that there might be something physically wrong - you'd think in 29 years I would have figured something out. Here I just thought I was lazy. :-)

      I like your idea about the alarm clock too. I'll give it a shot.

    27. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No idea on pricing [for things which gradually light up at a preset time]."

      When I last looked at these, there was just one company making them, which had a patent. So the lamps/clocks were absurdly expensive (£120 or so a couple of years ago?) and there wasn't any competition in the market.

    28. Re:MIT natural alarm clock by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Stop and think for once. Not everybody uses an alarm clock to get to work on time. You might want to wake up early and work on some personal stuff before you head out the door -- but not if you really need to sleep in. Or it might be your day off, and you're one of those people who will waste half the day sleeping, even though you don't need to.

  16. Then in the US by woodengod · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... waking up should be forbidden for persons younger than 21 years ;o)

    1. Re:Then in the US by Ambush · · Score: 1
      Then in the US waking up should be forbidden for persons younger than 21 years ;o)

      ... leaving the entire population sound asleep, of course.

      Oh wait, that was the idea, right? ;-)

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people; those who know ternary, those who don't, and those now hunting for a dictionary.
    2. Re:Then in the US by vwjeff · · Score: 1

      ... waking up should be forbidden for persons younger than 21 years ;o) In some places it is not forbidden but seen as taboo. Specifically, this place is kown as college.

    3. Re:Then in the US by AnalystX · · Score: 1

      I realize that was just meant to be funny, but if waking up is analogous to being drunk, those under 21 should not fall asleep. Sleep (most of the time) leads to waking up. Drinking (most of the time) leads to drunkenness.

  17. Where's that Snooze button? by datafr0g · · Score: 3, Funny

    There is evidence that the cortical areas of the brain thought to be responsible for problem-solving, complex thought and emotions take longer to wake up than other parts of the brain, Wright wrote.

    Problem Solving? COMPLEX THOUGHT?! EMOTIONS!?!?!?

    Fuck that! I'm goin' back to bed!

    --
    "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
    1. Re:Where's that Snooze button? by Andrzej+Sawicki · · Score: 1

      Funny as it seems, I know I am much easier to anger shortly after waking up. (And I mean even when waking up on my own, without any devices or people to "help".)

    2. Re:Where's that Snooze button? by fshalor · · Score: 1

      Same... exactly.

      I'm also pretty pissy at night after i've made the decision to "go to sleep now, dami!!" . Any conversation on a normal day between the "I'm going to sleep; leaveme alone" declaration and the first cup of coffee midpoint has a good posibility of pissing me off.

      A few days this week, for the first time in months, I actually woke up moving fast and not in that pissed off on a dime daze. (Drunk on sleep?)

      I miss being able to wake up and hit the ground running. I can do it, even in a daze, but it is much nicer to not have to fight myself for clock cycles in the mornings.

      I may actually look into one of those light timers. Or the audiable clock pair (radio first low, and then "wahm" with the alarm clock.

      And on an aside; the two most productive days for me in the last month were those two days I had no "dazed ness" upon waking.

      --
      -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
    3. Re:Where's that Snooze button? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      If you want to wake up easier I'd try ditching the coffee. Seriously, you've got an addiction to the caffeine and your brain is finding it impossible to wake up completely without it. Break the addiction and waking up becomes easier.

    4. Re:Where's that Snooze button? by fshalor · · Score: 1

      I doubt coffee's the issue. My reliance on coffee is short. I can slam a cup of espresso at 2 am, and fall right to sleep, waking up fine for a 8 am class (called a short all-nighter).

      I can also skip coffee in the mornings with no ill effects. A cup is a relaxing starter that I often don't have time for. So I take one with me.

      Its those first 3 minutes or so of wake time that seem to be the indicator of my alertness. If the first three minutes suck: then the day sucks.

      --
      -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
  18. Well, science says one thing... by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... but I have a shot or two in the morning, just to be shure.

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  19. This is news? by Flendon · · Score: 1, Funny

    Did it really take a team of scientists to figure this out?

    Scientist: Hey Bob I have an idea for a research proposal, but I'm going to need a big grant.
    Boss: What's your idea?
    Scientist: Well I want to study the effects of waking up.
    Boss: Is this just an excuse for why you are always sleeping at your desk?
    Scientist: *Looks guilty* N..No! I want to compare the effects to um.. Drunk Driving! Yeah I want to compare the effects of waking up to Drunk Driving thats it!

    --
    chown -R us ./base
    1. Re:This is news? by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      No, it just took a briefcase full of research grant money and a couple of years.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  20. GREAT! Now I can get plastered during lunch by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Just claim I took a nap and I can finally survive those afternoon meetings legally.

    As for this being true, my usuall waking up is from nice pleasant dreams to the stark reality that my life is half over and I am old and decrepit and nobody loves me and I am in a job I hate and it is cold and my body hurts.

    The reason I appear drunk is not because I wake up drunk but because a small drink is the only way to survive waking up.

    I don't drive so I am not putting anyone at risk by going to work with a small booster. Yeah sure sure I am ruining my health. Who gives a fuck. It is alcoholism or suicide.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:GREAT! Now I can get plastered during lunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you chose alcoholism?

  21. Re:I'm sure I read this yesterday on the BBC site by silasthehobbit · · Score: 1

    Sorry to reply to my own post, but how is that flamebait?

    This was on the BBC's website yesterday. I've given the link and complained about the fact this isn't what I consider news.

    I fail to see how this can be considered as flamebait.

    --
    silas
    hobbit
    london

  22. Ah... by JohnnyBigodes · · Score: 1

    !!! Now that's what it was! I always wondered why the world was making SsSs shapes under my feet after dropping out of bed.

  23. I was sleeping deeply by smittyoneeach · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and dreamt of being at a Black Sabbath concert. They were grinding out "Iron Man", and I was in front, doing some mighty head-banging.
    Things turned literal when my head met the window sill against which my bed lay.
    I became semi-conscious, with blood streaming from my forhead, but couldn't move well because my right arm was still asleep.
    Almost deathly so: my sleeping position had cut off circulation to the arm, apparently for a long time. The Sabbath dream had been my subconscious trying to 'rock' me into a different position. Later, when my arm functioned again and the bleeding stopped I thought, wow, that would have been pretty funny, if it hadn't happened to me...

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    1. Re:I was sleeping deeply by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think it's funny, even though it happened to you.

    2. Re:I was sleeping deeply by CaptainFork · · Score: 0
      The Sabbath dream had been my subconscious trying to 'rock' me

      Classic!

    3. Re:I was sleeping deeply by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      I dreamt I was in a fight once, and punched the brick wall beside my bed in my sleep. Needless to say I woke up pretty sharpish, with a busted knucle and a decent amount of blood.

      Interesting - when you get in a fight drunk, the adrenaline sobers you up pretty quick (as does the pain when you get your ass kicked because the other guy isn't as drunk), and it also woke me up pretty quick. Wow, waking up really IS like being drunk!

    4. Re:I was sleeping deeply by internewt · · Score: 1
      Almost deathly so: my sleeping position had cut off circulation to the arm, apparently for a long time. The Sabbath dream had been my subconscious trying to 'rock' me into a different position.

      I'm seemingly quite good at rolling over in my sleep onto my front, but with an arm under me. Several times upon waking I have wondered what's wrong with an arm, lifted it up (to check my hand is still there or something) but my elbow is dead, so I have ended up hitting myself in the upper torso or face! At that point I usually remember what's wrong with my arm, and how I've done it before...

      I've also head-butted bedside cabinets, radiators etc. in my sleep waking to quite a start, but never to the point where I've made myself bleed!

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    5. Re:I was sleeping deeply by m00j · · Score: 1

      I do the arm thing all the time. I don't think it harms it at all, just feels weird.

    6. Re:I was sleeping deeply by HawkingMattress · · Score: 2, Informative

      It can harm, in fact you can lose your arm definitly that way...
      Megadeth's singer, whatever his name is, losed his right arm for six months after having to sleep in a hospital with his arm sticked in a wrong position because there was some medications being injected in it. Strangely his body didn't waked him up when it should have. (I suppose it does wake one up most of the time when it notices their is something wrong with the blood flow...). He only got his arm back because he could afford the best neurologists on earth and even then it seems it was a miracle.
      I know it happened to me twice to wake up with an arm which seemed dead for two minuts or so because i had sticked it in a bad position, and i was frigging scared. Hopefully after a moment it started to hurt a lot as the blood flew though it again, and one minut after it was definitly back. I noticed it was linked to a position i take sometimes when trying to sleep so i try not to use it now...

    7. Re:I was sleeping deeply by name*censored* · · Score: 1

      Well this is slightly OT but anyways.. Does anyone else get that thing where you're about to fall asleep, but you feel as if you're freefalling; and then you have a kneejerk reaction and jerk awake violently? It's something to do with closing my eyes and looking down.. When I was younger, I once awoke so violently that i hit my head on the end of my bed (which my feet weren't even touching, it was so far away).. I must have somehow done a half-sommersault and propelled myself forward simultaneously. True story.

      --
      Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
    8. Re:I was sleeping deeply by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      How can adrenaline sober you up? It's not going to react with the alcohol in your blood and make it go away; you'll just be an unusually alert drunk.

      --
      -insert a witty something-
    9. Re:I was sleeping deeply by illtud · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else get that thing where you're about to fall asleep, but you feel as if you're freefalling; and then you have a kneejerk reaction and jerk awake violently?

      Myoclonic jerks.

    10. Re:I was sleeping deeply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That was rude. He just asked a question and you call him a myoclonic jerk?

    11. Re:I was sleeping deeply by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Later, when my arm functioned again and the bleeding stopped I thought, wow, that would have been pretty funny, if it hadn't happened to me...

      After reading your story, I can confirm that it's not very funny regardless of who it happened to.

    12. Re:I was sleeping deeply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw, c'mon: not even the pun on 'rock'?

    13. Re:I was sleeping deeply by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      "I thought, wow, that would have been pretty funny, if it hadn't happened to me..."

      The mods seem to agree with you.

    14. Re:I was sleeping deeply by Reziac · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm a very light sleeper, and typically quite aware of my surroundings even when asleep. True story:

      I'm taking a nap. I start having a dream that a spider is builing a web attached to my nose. I wake up and find... it's TRUE! Some stupid spider had just got done running an anchor line from my nose to the ceiling.

      I don't move in my sleep (I wake up to turn over). I guess the spider thought I was dead. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    15. Re:I was sleeping deeply by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      Jeez, that happened to me about 2 or 3 times, to my parents too.

      I wasn't scared that it was numb. But I can tell you it was scary as hell when it moved involuntarily in a dark room. There's nothing quite as embarassing as slapping yourself in the face...and not seeing it coming.

      --
      I don't get it.
    16. Re:I was sleeping deeply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot to include the errors in the first comment. Please click the "Preview" button before submitting next time then look for errors. You can check for more than broken URLs.

      Errors, in order:

      definitly -> definitely
      singer losed his -> singer lost his
      arm sticked in -> arm stuck in
      there was some -> there were some
      didn't waked him -> didn't wake him
      notices their is -> notices there is
      two minuts or -> two minutes or
      had sticked it -> had stuck it
      one minut after -> one minute after
      definitly -> definitely

      http://science.slashdot.org/~TheStonepedo

  24. Re:I'm sure I read this yesterday on the BBC site by hairykrishna · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's because there isn't a '-1, Whining'

    --
    "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
  25. Classic by hairykrishna · · Score: 4, Funny

    "University of Colorado: Quantifying the obvious since 1876"

    --
    "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
    1. Re:Classic by wuie · · Score: 1

      "University of Colorado: Trying to justify drunkeness since 1876"

  26. drunk according to statute by Quadraginta · · Score: 4, Informative

    If your blood alcohol concentration is above certain limits set by law, typically 0.08% these days, then you are defined by law to be drunk, whatever your state of reflexes, ability to concentrate, et cetera. Otherwise, whether you are drunk or not is a matter of judgment -- not yours, of course, but typically that of the policeman who stops you and the judge who hears the case.

    However, the limit used to be 0.10%, and that is actually fairly sloshed. You would be pretty happy, typically, although people vary. The point is that it used to be the case that you could be definitely drunk, and know it, but still be under the limit at which you would be defined to be drunk by the law. Naive people would imagine, therefore, that you could be drunk but not legally drunk (because you were under the 0.10% limit). This was never the case, of course, since even under the 0.10% limit you could still be determined to be drunk by a policeman and a judge. But it was a popular fiction.

    From this beginning I think nowadays "legally drunk" has morphed into a colloquial expression meaning mostly just "pretty definitely drunk" versus just feelin' good -- you know, at that point where friends argue happily with each other -- hey, I'm not drunk, man, just...relaxed...g'wan, ask me anything...look! I can balance a beer bottle on my nose (crash)!

    It has nothing to do with the legal drinking age.

    1. Re:drunk according to statute by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "..the legal limit used to be 0.10 and that is fairly sloshed"

      I gotta disagree with you. The new 0.08 limit, that the feds blackmailed the states into adopting with threats of witholding hwy funding, is WAY too low. A grown man, with only a couple of drinks with a meal can now be DANGEROUSLY close to being busted for DWI...and not be anywhere near too impared to drive. So much of this is based on individual body chemistry...and also, if you are used to drinking on a regular basis. Hell...most anybody I know, at 0.08...doen't even feel any effects of alcohol.....but, then again...we are used to it.

      The best advice I can give...which I got from lawyer friends of mine. If you get pulled over, and you know you're over the limit...don't say a word, don't take any field tests....and for God's sake, don't blow.

      All this does is give the Police evidence to be used against you. Just put your hands out for the cuffs..and go along quietly..you're going to jail anyway, so, don't give them any extra evidence to be used against you. At the worst..you may in some states automatically lose your license for a period...6 mos or a year if you refuse to blow. But, you can get a temp permit to drive where you need like school, work, for food..etc. You might get stuck with a reckless driving...however, all this is still much better than a DWI which kills your insurance, and these days...can even affect your employability....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:drunk according to statute by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "If your blood alcohol concentration is above certain limits set by law, typically 0.08% these days, then you are defined by law to be drunk, whatever your state of reflexes, ability to concentrate, et cetera."

      Only with respect to driving. 'Drunk in public' offenses require behavioral evidence of drunkenness.

      And while most people call them 'drunk-driving' laws, the BAC limits for DUI or DWI reflect not drunkenness, but intoxication, which is different, IMO.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:drunk according to statute by Bazzalisk · · Score: 1
      You make the erroneous assumption that a person who has had a couple of drinks with a meal is safe to drive.

      Personal opinion, but I think anyone who'd be prepared to drive in such a circumstance has dangerously bad judgement and shouldn't be allowed to hold a license.

      --
      James P. Barrett
    4. Re:drunk according to statute by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      A grown man, with only a couple of drinks with a meal can now be DANGEROUSLY close to being busted for DWI...and not be anywhere near too impared to drive.

      So? Don't have a couple of drinks with your meal if you're driving afterwards, then.

      The problem is that you need to have the limit set at a level where an average person will not have their driving impaired. If you set it too high, you'll get more accidents, which is precisely what the law is supposed to prevent.

    5. Re:drunk according to statute by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      No...a person whose had a couple of drinks with a meal is not impared to the point to where driving is unsafe.

      If you really think that...I guess you're next step you'd vote for, is that no establishments can serve alcohol at all. That it can only be enjoyed at one's home, so there is no need to ever drive home after having 1-2 drinks?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:drunk according to statute by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "So? Don't have a couple of drinks with your meal if you're driving home afterwards then..."

      Not very practical in practice. I go out to eat...I like wine with my meal. I have to drive myself and my car home.

      If this weren't the case...we wouldn't allow establishments to serve alcohol. I cannot leave my car out at night..it would be stolen or vandalized in the city. I have to get to the establishment...so, I have to drive. Everyone I know drinks...hell, I've not met anyone that doesn't drink in years....and everybody had to drive home. If you think the situation is otherwise...you're living in a fools paradise.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:drunk according to statute by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Even 1-2 drinks impairs judgement and reflexes.

    8. Re:drunk according to statute by tooba · · Score: 1

      And while most people call them 'drunk-driving' laws, the BAC limits for DUI or DWI reflect not drunkenness, but intoxication, which is different, IMO.

      Well, unfortunately, your opinion does not agree with the english language. From dictionary.com:

      intoxicate
      To stupefy or excite by the action of a chemical substance such as alcohol.

      drunken
      Delirious with or as if with strong drink; intoxicated.

    9. Re:drunk according to statute by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Please refer to a medical dictionary for the applicable definition of intoxication. Medical intoxication is the state of having enough intoxicating agent (poison) in your system to have an effect -- regardless of how severe that effect is.

      Delirium is not necessary for medical intoxication. Nor is a general online dictionary a good source for legal definitions. Here's a better online dictionary for legal definitions.

      The difference between intoxication and drunkenness, however, depends on the situation, and the terms are not completely analogous.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    10. Re:drunk according to statute by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Even 1 or 2 drinks impares judgement and reflexes.."

      Sure...so do a lot of other things...such as lack sleep, or over the counter drugs. There are a lot of things that keep us slightly impared, that is just the nature of humans driving on the road.

      However, it isn't a serious problem till one is impared beyond being able to safely handle the vehicle...

      I've heard it said that a sleep deprived person is more impared than a drunk one...and this was back when the limit was at 0.10. So, I'd say the 0.08 is ridiculously low....and we still let people worse than that drive without any penalty...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    11. Re:drunk according to statute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't medical advice, but two normal glasses of wine taken gradually with a large meal over two hours shouldn't get an average-sized man anywhere near a BAC of 0.08. A much more dangerous habit is to run over to a bar afterwards "for a quick drink or two". I see lots of folks jetting over to a bar to cap off some activity, guzzling two oversized beers each, and getting right back in their cars. Taking 2+ drinks that way - all at once, without food to delay absorption, and without a delay afterwards to allow metabolism - would get an average man much closer to 0.08, and would affect anyone's driving, regardless of what their BAC turns out to be.

      "Two drinks with dinner" is only a DWI cliche because the person saying it has usually had four or more bar-sized drinks (16 oz beers, 6 oz glasses of wine, etc.), and "dinner" was a bunch of pretzels. But it became the standard "excuse" because at face value it's a reasonable limit for acceptable (non-impairing) intake.

    12. Re:drunk according to statute by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      I think the solution is to stop doing BAC tests and stupid human tricks by the side of the road and instead have a portable driving simulator in the cop car to see whether the suspect can actually drive well enough. There are people who shouldn't be driving no matter what their BAC (senile,sleep deprived, on antihistamines or opiates, etc.) and others who start off with much better than average reflexes and judgement who can drive safely despite being over the limit that the average person can handle.

      Interestingly, people with high IQs also almost always have exeptionally quick reflexes - Mensa members have bertter reaction times on avaerage than NASCAR drivers.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    13. Re:drunk according to statute by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

      Wait...what are you disagreeing with? I didn't say 0.08 is fairly sloshed, I said 0.10 (which is 25% more alcohol in your blood) is. I've had a BAC of about 0.10, if you believe the usual estimates of how much you have to drink to get there. For me, they say I'd have to drink a whole sixpack of beer or an entire bottle of wine over a 2-hour dinner. Hop behind the wheel after that? Noooo thank you, that would be madness.

      That said, the 0.08 limit for me -- four beers or 3/4 bottle of wine over dinner, they say -- is still a little dicy. I could maybe see driving on two beers, or 1/2 a bottle of wine, which probably puts me about 0.03.

      But in practise, I'm even more conservative than that, and pretty much don't drive if I've had anything to drink at all in the last 3-4 hours. This isn't out of some kind of moral statement or anything, and it's not because I don't think I can cope with the road, bad weather, sleet or snow, whatever. It's not the natural hazards on the road that scare me, it's the human. That is, it's just that I know a lot of other fools out there are probably half-sloshed, or yakking on the cell phone, or having a fight with the GF/BF in the passenger seat, and I want all my wits about me to deal with them.

      And, I do agree that the DUI laws are almost inhuman these days in the way the punishments are way out of proportion to the crime. I mean, if you actually do any harm while driving drunk -- e.g. kill someone -- then you get toasted in the usual criminal way, e.g. convicted of voluntary manslaughter and sent to the state pen for 5 years. So the DUI laws really only come into play when you have done no actual harm, you're just seen as capable of harm. Well, it's a little weird to be punishing people so harshly for doing things that might turn out to be dangerous, but which haven't, yet. It doesn't sit well with me. Seems kinda' Brave New World like, where Society decides what's best for you. I'm all for individual freedom, letting people do pretty much what their individual judgment says they can do -- with the catch that if your individual judgment screws up and you do someone harm, you catch all the hell we can devise, and no mercy, no whining your way out of it because society let you down by letting you screw up.

    14. Re:drunk according to statute by RussR42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I got pretty much the same advice from everyone I asked at the law firm I work for, but they recommend that you say "Yes, I'd love to take the breathalizer after I consult my counsel", then remember NOT to sign the form they will poke under your nose saying that you refused the test. You still go to jail, you might just keep your license. Oh, and there's supposed to be some helpful precedent related to requesting coulsel (at least in Texas)

    15. Re:drunk according to statute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, not at all true; your reflexes are BETTER with one to two drinks. at least in mice models.

      'course, this research will never be published, considering it was funded by anti-alcoholism dollars. but it's true...

  27. Similar New Scientist Article by sprocketonline · · Score: 2, Informative

    This was also reported by New Scientist: http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn8564.

  28. Sleeptracker by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 5, Informative

    The sleeptracker watch is what your talking about, it monitors your body signals to wake you up at the best moment, you set an alarm window & it will wake you up at the best time, they sell on Amazon for 139.95.

    1. Re:Sleeptracker by moonbender · · Score: 3, Informative

      Heh, Slashdot rules. I checked it out, and 1) it does seem to work, 2) it just monitors your movement, that's all. If you're moving, you're probably not in a state of deep sleep and are more easily woken up. Interesting, but still too expensive (if not quite as much as I'd have thought). Oh and 3) it's just a wrist watch, so not that annoying to wear, I guess.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    2. Re:Sleeptracker by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 1

      Iv been thinking about getting one to see what its like, im more interested that it records your movments during the night & can map your sleep cycles.

      A watch isn't that bad to wear to bed i don't think either, especially if its going to help you.

      I think it will be one of those things i get when I get my tax return.

    3. Re:Sleeptracker by proggoddess · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here is a review of the watch from The Gadgeteer website:

      http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/review/sleeptracker_w atch

      She said it didn't really work well and the watch itself is quite bulky.

      --
      --The Programming goddess from Gorflaz
    4. Re:Sleeptracker by Wolface · · Score: 1

      thanks for the link

    5. Re:Sleeptracker by igny · · Score: 1

      it just monitors your movement,

      But what if I don't want to wake up during sex?

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
  29. Re:I'm sure I read this yesterday on the BBC site by peterpi · · Score: 1, Informative
    Yeah, I read it too.

    Did you submit it to slashdot?

    No, neither did I.

  30. My brain is slower in the morning by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I literally think more slowly after waking up. When I shower in the morning it takes me like 20 minutes to do the exact same procedure I can complete in 10 minutes if take a shower in the middle of the day.

    I bicycle to work, and I've found the exercise really helps to jolt you awake. Fresh air and exercise in general wakes me up much better than getting on a bus to work does. Below freezing temperatures help too ;)

    I think people tend to take their need of sleep too lightly these days. I would prefer to sleep about 9 hours a night, but practical issues and social pressure keeps me at between 6 and 8 hours per night. I don't feel that time spent sleeping is wasted, as a programmer I often that I've solved problems during sleep.

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    1. Re:My brain is slower in the morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is intresting.. to feel good I have to sleep 9 hours, if I dont I get realy tired during the day, I have headackes and yes I feel that I react and think slower then when Im totaly awake.. I would realy realy like to be able to sleep just 6-8 hours, it would do wounder with my friends and family, couse I often just dont have the time as I have to get home to sleep.. work, sleep, work, sleep.. No kidding, its a real problem.

    2. Re:My brain is slower in the morning by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1

      Try doing some light exercise before lights-out--stretching, chi gung, even some isometrics. I wake up fresher because of this routine.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    3. Re:My brain is slower in the morning by hritcu · · Score: 1

      as a programmer I often that I've solved problems during sleep.

      Thank you. I really thought there was something wrong with me finding bugs during the sleep. Now that I know that I'm not the only one, I feel a lot better :)

      --
      If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
    4. Re:My brain is slower in the morning by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      What about shooting and dodging HTML tags after a full-night webpage writing followed by a hour of Q3A?

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    5. Re:My brain is slower in the morning by hritcu · · Score: 1

      Didn't try that yet. How did that make you feel?

      --
      If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
    6. Re:My brain is slower in the morning by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Horrible.
      First off, the gfx is icky. I mean, how many polygons can you use to create a HTML tag in a fixed size font?
      Then, there's LOTS of them. Mostly everything is HTML tags and you never know which ones are just the background and which ones are hostile and aggressive. I found a relatively calm place in a pool of CSS goo, but then fighting the META waving their long CONTENT at me from one direction and mass-shooting crowds of BR, TD, TR and such incoming from the BODY side was really bad. And when I thought I had the METAs in check and the flood of BR and other nastiness from BODY stopped, I got crunched by TITLE from behind. Respawn and swimming to the shore of TEXTAREA while artillery of LI in UL shoot their bullets at me.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    7. Re:My brain is slower in the morning by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > I really thought there was something wrong with me finding
      > bugs during the sleep

      You're not the only one. I used to this as a junior programmer. The primary difference being, I found the bugs while sleeping at my desk. Really, I got away with it too, 'cause it works!

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    8. Re:My brain is slower in the morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I literally think more slowly after waking up.

      Right now I'm self-studying some pretty gnarly abstract mathematics, and I do it first thing in the morning while still groggy. For some reason, that's my optimal point of cognitive ability, at least for following and writing difficult proofs. If I look at the same material later in the day, it's much more difficult.

    9. Re:My brain is slower in the morning by minus9 · · Score: 1

      "Mostly everything is HTML tags and you never know which ones are just the background and which ones are hostile and aggressive. "

      Shoot 'em all and let the W3C sort 'em out.

    10. Re:My brain is slower in the morning by Cutting_Crew · · Score: 1

      i need to look into this for myself. when i am asleep i might as well be in a coma.. i need 3 alarms to wake me up in the morning..well at least 2 , one of them counting my cell phone, turned up all the way and in the other room so i have to get up to turn it off. when i wake up, regardless of whether i have had 6 hours or 10 it takes me just as long to get out of bed.

    11. Re:My brain is slower in the morning by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      What I always found fascinating and really enjoy, is when you wake up in the morning, are half asleep, and time seems to be stretched so that when you close your eyes for 2 minutes, it seems like 10. I LOVE that because it makes me feel like I don't have to go to work so soon.

      Does anybody know what causes that time stretching? Is there any way to intentionally induce it?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    12. Re:My brain is slower in the morning by nexarias · · Score: 1

      [i]I don't feel that time spent sleeping is wasted, as a programmer I often that I've solved problems during sleep.[/i] This is due to unconscious "System 1" (as termed by Keith E. Stanvovich & Richard West) procedures that keep on working on the problem after you've stopped paying attention to it. The same thing happens when you see someone whose name you can't remember, and then minutes or hours later, you suddenly recall the person's name. Your unconscious system has been working on the name all the while.. This fact is always overlooked by many people, who keep desperately working on a problem they can't solve. Prominent mathematicians and physicists have solved problems this way in their sleep or rest. It is furthermore important to know that the unconscious processes probably take place only when you do non-intensive work after your problem.. that is, after you stop working on the then-unsolvable problem, you do some "light" work. Don't go trying to solve *another* problem, or do things that require alot of attention.

    13. Re:My brain is slower in the morning by bnenning · · Score: 1

      What I always found fascinating and really enjoy, is when you wake up in the morning, are half asleep, and time seems to be stretched so that when you close your eyes for 2 minutes, it seems like 10.

      Yeah, that's great. It doesn't happen for me if I wake up and just close my eyes again; I have to get up and do something that takes some amount of energy. Then if I go back to bed I can rest for an hour of subjective time in 10 minutes. When I was in college having to go to a boring early morning class would do it.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
  31. some tribe in africa by iogan · · Score: 1

    I wish I had a link or something (too early in the morning to look one up) but I read recently about a tribe in Africa somewhere whose warriors had the ability to go from sleep to full battle readiness in a matter of seconds. I wonder what their secret is.

    1. Re:some tribe in africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly impending doom and the adrenaline release it triggers...

    2. Re:some tribe in africa by lixee · · Score: 1

      Supports the link between drinking and agressiveness ;-) More seriously, being surrounded by wild animals and enemy tribes maybe the reason they only half-sleep.

      --
      Res publica non dominetur
    3. Re:some tribe in africa by Booshi · · Score: 1

      Fight or flight response?

      "Run away! Run away!"

    4. Re:some tribe in africa by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      I would guess that it has something to do with those who don't wake up so quickly being killed off.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  32. It's unpleasantly like being drunk. by GSV+Ethics+Gradient · · Score: 1

    'What's so unpleasant about being drunk?'
    'You ask a glass of water.'

    1. Re:It's unpleasantly like being drunk. by Smidgin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Was this experiment by any chance conducted by The Maximegallon Institute of Slowly and Painfully Working Out the Surprisingly Obvious? (Mostly Harmless, Chapter 6)

    2. Re:It's unpleasantly like being drunk. by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah actually the feeling i feel when i wake up is more like being drunk (as in glass of water) than being drunk (as in beer)

      p.s. i hate you for posting that DA reference first

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    3. Re:It's unpleasantly like being drunk. by GSV+Ethics+Gradient · · Score: 1

      Glad to be of service...

  33. Sleepiness and Intoxication by AnomalyConcept · · Score: 1

    I guess that explains a lot of these comments, like this one. (Posting at 06:33)

    On the topic of being drunk and sleeping, I recall seeing an 'experiment' on TV that compared the effects of being drunk to that of sleepiness while driving. The conclusion was that being sleepy was worse, as the driver invariably fell asleep, and the car ran off the road.

    IIRC, the testing was done with a driving simulator, and all that was tested was steering, which may not entirely be accurate, especially if the whole operation of the gas and brake is removed from the test.

    1. Re:Sleepiness and Intoxication by ladyKae · · Score: 1
      being sleepy was worse, as the driver invariably fell asleep, and the car ran off the road.
      *um* as opposed to being drunk and not running your car off the road...?!?!?
      --

      Smile, it confuses people

    2. Re:Sleepiness and Intoxication by DerWulf · · Score: 1



      being drunk isn't always on the edge of passing out. Even with 1.0 promile you can be quite fit and outside any complications in traffic have a (comparativly) good chance of getting home safely. Sure, your reaction time and judgement sucks (as they do when being sleepy) but at least you don't, you know, fall asleep.

      --

      ___
      No power in the 'verse can stop me
    3. Re:Sleepiness and Intoxication by AnomalyConcept · · Score: 0

      This is probably going way off-topic (relative to the article), but when you're drunk, I'd imagine you'd still have a small degree of consciousness to steer and whatnot, whereas if you fall asleep, well, you aren't aware of your surroundings anymore. Again, I saw that experiment a few years back, and the driving simulator may have had a constant velocity, eg. all that was measured/observed was the degree of staying on the road. The simulator 'reset' the car back on the road if it drifted too far off (or ran into something).

    4. Re:Sleepiness and Intoxication by ladyKae · · Score: 1
      quoting your comment:
      an 'experiment' on TV that compared the effects of being drunk to that of sleepiness while driving

      since when does sleepiness mean you're actually asleep
      (same as being drunk doesn't always mean being unconscious)
      --

      Smile, it confuses people

  34. Re:I'm sure I read this yesterday on the BBC site by silasthehobbit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ah! Then in that case, I'm fine with it.

    --
    silas
    hobbit
    london

  35. Anyone else here... by aug24 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...ever woken up still drunk? I remember doing so after my mate Frank's stag do. Got downstairs, drank some water, out of the house to Fulham High Road to a coffeeshop, bought coffee and a Sunday paper, sat down and realised that (a) I couldn't read and (b) I forgot shoes.

    Justin.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    1. Re:Anyone else here... by davidrb84 · · Score: 1

      About half of my university lectures before noon in my first year were taken drunk, I actually found waking up drunk made me more likely to go, seems like a good idea when drunk to go out in the freezing cold and dark outside world. When sober you relise it's a bad plan and remember you can read the notes late. Or was that just me?

    2. Re:Anyone else here... by iogan · · Score: 1

      yes i have... it's a weird feeling hey? you wake up, and you're amazed at how good you feel, somehow thinking a hangover should lurking somewhere. then you move about a bit and realise you're still drunk.

      i try to make something positive out of it, like drinking lots of water, maybe eating something, and then going back to sleep. alleviates the real hangover when it does show up later in the day..

      _____________________________
      http://www.doyoulikemyface.com/

    3. Re:Anyone else here... by LazyBoy · · Score: 1
      I've been there.

      Once a buddy and I had to get up early and do something after a night out. He was hurting and I was mysteriously pain free. I laughed at him because he usually handled his alcohol and the morning after better than me.

      Then my hangover hit in the afternoon...

      --

      If Chaos Theory has taught us anything, it's that we must kill all the butterflies.

    4. Re:Anyone else here... by lux55 · · Score: 1

      All too familiar, mate. All too familiar. :)

    5. Re:Anyone else here... by Doobie+Dan · · Score: 1

      I love when I wake up still drunk. It totally sucks the regret out of driving home the random girl I picked up last night.

    6. Re:Anyone else here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      at least you didn't (c) realize you were bare-ass naked.

    7. Re:Anyone else here... by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      You drive them home?!? And here I thought I was being a gentleman leaving them cabfare on the nightstand.

    8. Re:Anyone else here... by Doobie+Dan · · Score: 1

      You're going to trust a stranger, of obviously less-than-optimal moral standards, inside your own home???

      Plus, if you're nice to the ones you don't regret, you set yourself up for repeat visits next time you're drunk and lonely and at the same bar. ;)

    9. Re:Anyone else here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simply: yes. I am a 21 year old college student in Madison, WI (the drinking capital of America.) I have lived here all my life. That being said, the winters are so freaking cold, that usually there simply isn't anything else to do besides drink and have sex...so thats what we do -- a lot. Depending on the group of guys, 10 beers and five shots per person is nothing outragous -- and many of the girls can drink like fish too. So when you're drinking obscene amounts until 5 am, youre gunna be drunk for quite a while. I know that I have personally woken up drunk way more times than I'd be willing to count. And let me tell you, school (whether high school or college) can be a riot when you're still drunk. ;)

  36. I just woke up, and i just wanted to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (sobs) I love you, man. Every last one of you.

  37. Scientists with lots of time on their hands by oztiks · · Score: 2, Funny

    For a short period, at least, the effects of sleep inertia may be as bad as or worse than being legally drunk," said researcher Kenneth Wright of the University of Colorado.

    Is this one of these scientific tests that involve lots of alcohol and plenty of sleeping?

    1. Re:Scientists with lots of time on their hands by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      More like being in a deep sleep then suddenly being woken up with an air horn and having a test slammed in front of you immediately. You know, kind of like freshman year at college.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    2. Re:Scientists with lots of time on their hands by iphayd · · Score: 1

      How else do you think they were going to get UC to pay for their late-night partying and the beds for whomever they took home that night?

      I think it's a rather ingenious study myself.

    3. Re:Scientists with lots of time on their hands by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      Is this one of these scientific tests that involve lots of alcohol and plenty of sleeping?

      Sign me up!

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
  38. Is this like an inner ear infection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really felt drunk that time, either that or on the high seas. Glad I didn't drive a car, I could barely walk to the doctor's office. Got a week off from work though, and gravol and fluids.

  39. So.... by MindPrison · · Score: 1

    Youre saying Im an full-time alcoholic? Shit - my new year resolution was to give up alcohol and now they tell me that Im drunk every day just by waking up, greeeeeat! ...better get sign up for one of those AA meetings.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, standing up in a circle (head bowed)....

      "Hi I'm Fred and I have sleep inertia"

    2. Re:So.... by Punboy · · Score: 1

      Better sign up for the new WA too... Wakers Anonymous.

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
  40. Aliens by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    What happens when we sleep is fun. Have you ever woken up to find that the TV or radio is broadcasting exactly what you were dreaming about?

    I'm no sleep researcher or psychologist, but it seems that the human brain is incredibly quick (while dreaming) to pick up on external, subconscious influences/input. It's quite amazing, actually.

    1. Re:Aliens by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "I'm no sleep researcher or psychologist, but it seems that the human brain is incredibly quick (while dreaming) to pick up on external, subconscious influences/input. It's quite amazing, actually."

      I disagree. I suspect that what you see when you wake up is being projected back into your memories of being asleep.

      After all, you have no proof that you ever really 'dream', since you're not conscious at the time. All you have are some memories that may or may not bear any resemblance to reality (of course that's true of anything thats happened in the past when you were awake too).

    2. Re:Aliens by pipingguy · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      Whoa, dude, that's deep!

    3. Re:Aliens by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Nope. Heard of lucid dreams? They are not a "projection back". You are able to communicate with the outside world (by eyeball movement) with the outside world in realtime.

      It's likely though that you just hear some radio somewhere (neighbour?) playing given piece, then wake up and switch your radio on, to hear just the same piece. Your sense of hearing works pretty well in your sleep.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    4. Re:Aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is more plausible - that you quickly conjure up a longish sequence of events at the moment you wake up, or that you dream those events over time before waking up? I find the latter more plausible.

      Additionally, I have several experiences where I've been watching something on TV and fallen asleep, and dreamt the rest of the events in a way that fits the dialogue of the show, which still came through into my dreams.

    5. Re:Aliens by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Nah, the brain interconnects subconsciously and "fits" what you heard while sleeping into the story. The human brain is amazingly complex and fast. This is probably why people say that they saw their entire life pass before them when they thought they were going to die.

      If it can do that (albeit only from anectdotal evidence), the true speed of thought is truly amazing.

      But you already knew this because your brain anticipated it before I could type it.

  41. That explains things by John+Frink · · Score: 1

    I'm a surly drunk and definitely not a morning person. They go hand in hand.

    --
    Who is this Jimmy character, and why was he cracking corn in the first place?
  42. Hair of the dog is the best cure. by LazloToth · · Score: 1

    I'll take a couple of shots right now, straight up.

    --


    It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
    1. Re:Hair of the dog is the best cure. by pclminion · · Score: 1
      I'll take a couple of shots right now, straight up.

      You drink SHOTS of BEER? "Straight up?" As opposed to what, putting ice in the beer? You are aware that HotD brews beer, right?

    2. Re:Hair of the dog is the best cure. by LazloToth · · Score: 1

      Now why would you assume I'm a beer drinker? After about age 40, it was liquor all the way for me, usually a good Bombay Sapphire Martini with olives. But I've recently acquired a taste for Ciroc vodka. Come to think of it, I believe I'll have one now . . . .

      --


      It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
    3. Re:Hair of the dog is the best cure. by pclminion · · Score: 1

      I assume because Hair Of The Dog is a brewery, and they only make beer. Is there some other HotD I am unfamiliar with?

    4. Re:Hair of the dog is the best cure. by LazloToth · · Score: 1

      Indeed - - it was once said that if one were bitten by a mad dog, the cure was to ingest some of his (the dog's) hair. Which led, of course, to the contention that for a hangover, the best medicine is "the hair of the dog that bit you" - - or, a swig or two of alcohol to relieve the symptoms of alcohol withdrawal. I can attest to the fact that this works, based on recollections of my wedding day. Without those morning shots, I'd have been a goner.

      --


      It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
  43. where this scares me is wrt medical care by mrpeebles · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Where all this scares me is with respect to medical care. My understanding is that while there are guidelines on how many hours, eg, medical residents can work, at least in many cases it is cheaper for hospitals to pay the fine than to hire more residents. I have heard of studies comparing sleep deprivation to being drunk for a long time. Hopefully they are starting to add up, and we'll stop having to wonder whether the doctor looking at us in the emergency room hasn't slept in the last 24 hours.

    1. Re:where this scares me is wrt medical care by ray-auch · · Score: 1

      Thing about this news is that it allegedly shows that performance when just-woken-up is _worse_ than when sleep deprived.

      Which means that the doc who hasn't slept for 24 hours may actually be a better bet than the one who just got woken up to see you. Also means that the practice of being "on call" from asleep is a really bad idea (and that you shouldn't let them grab a couple of hours extra sleep on a slow shift).

      That is why this is interesting (sleep deprivation generally affecting performance is nothing new).

  44. Not like being drunk at all by Admiral+Burrito · · Score: 4, Funny

    I must disagree with the article.

    I hate waking up.

    1. Re:Not like being drunk at all by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      It's unpleasantly like being drunk.
      What's unpleasant about being drunk?
      Ask a glass of water.

      --
      -
  45. British army by 19061969 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This problem of getting to full cognitive capacity after waking is a serious one in some professions. Think about doctors who are on night duty and are woken up to immediately deal with an emergency. In some cases it might be better to just stand around and do nothing for a few minutes unless it really is life threatening.

    I had a doctor friend who, after coming in from a night out drinking, used to hook himself up to a drip. End result: waking up with no dehydration and much less of a hangover, but that's slightly OT.

    I also heard that in the British Army, the first minute after waking up doesn't officially exist - that's because they're aware that people are still "out of sorts" and incapable for at least a minute. In theory, you can punch the Sgt-Major and get away with it.

    Of course, he would make you pay one way or another...

    --
    bang goes my karma... again...
    1. Re:British army by galego · · Score: 1

      This problem of getting to full cognitive capacity after waking is a serious one in some professions. Think about doctors who are on night duty and are woken up to immediately deal with an emergency. In some cases it might be better to just stand around and do nothing for a few minutes unless it really is life threatening.

      I can see the real problem now ... at least in today's letigious/blameful society we call America. Since 'research' now shows something else ... we must make a new law. So ... now you can either be sued for a) Doing nothing for a minute because you were 'sleeping on the job' and the patient died or b) working while 'in a state equivalent to being legally drunk' and botching the job. Either that ... or 'rest regulations' become as complex as our tax code and you have to settle the amount of rest you got in the previous year by April 15th of the next year.

      --

      Que Deus te de em dobro o que me desejas

      [May God give you double that which you wish for me]

    2. Re:British army by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I also heard that in the British Army, the first minute after waking up doesn't officially exist - that's because they're aware that people are still "out of sorts" and incapable for at least a minute. In theory, you can punch the Sgt-Major and get away with it.

      Dunno about in the British Army, but in the American Army this same meme exists -- and it's a (rather dangerous) urban legend. I know this, unfortunately, because when I was an infantryman, a buddy of mine tried to use this as an excuse for kicking a 2LT in the face, and it didn't work. And yeah, the lieutenant deserved it; he used to think it was fun to sneak up to someone's tent and grab their feet and yell "Boo!" if they were sticking out. I'm 6'3", and my buddy was about the same height; you'd better believe that when we were in a tent together, especially those damn issue pup tents that probably haven't changed since the height of the average GI was 5'4" back in the Civil War, our feet were sticking out. To be fair, the 2LT got an ass-chewing -- but my buddy lost a stripe and his next three paychecks.

      Really, when you think about it, it makes sense that this principle isn't generally followed; infantrymen have to be able to wake up and function almost instantly. Generally, only one guy in a foxhole is going to be awake. The other guy has to be able wake up and roll into a firing position the instant anything Really Bad starts happening. It took me years to break that habit.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    3. Re:British army by pclminion · · Score: 1
      The other guy has to be able wake up and roll into a firing position the instant anything Really Bad starts happening. It took me years to break that habit.

      So like, you'll be sleeping next to your wife, and she makes a noise or something, and you instantly wake up and roll into a "firing position?" Sounds like a good deal for your wife!

    4. Re:British army by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I'm a very light sleeper, and from experience I know I can be instantly ready for an emergency even in the middle of the night...

      When I was in college, we still had "bed checks" in the dorms. So the proctor comes bopping along, opening doors to check whether all us miscreants, er, students were properly abed... all goes well til the hapless proctor opened MY door (my bed was right next to the door). I *was* asleep, but even so I came flying up out of the bed and ready for bear, and about gave the proctor a heart attack. Needless to say that was the end of bed checks for our wing of the dorm. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:British army by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh yeah, she loved it when I'd scrabble around frantically in the dark for a few seconds and then ask, "Where's my weapon? Where's my weapon?" ;)

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    6. Re:British army by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Something like that happened to me once. I was sound asleep in my dorm when the fire alarm went off. By the time I woke up, I had already stood up on my bed, fists ready, and been looking around and been shouting things like "huh?" and "whazzinon?" for the last 5 seconds.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    7. Re:British army by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I probably would not only awakened in the first instant the fire alarm went off, but spent 15 minutes hustling laggards out of the building before realizing I was awake. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    8. Re:British army by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I would have slept through the whole thing, since that's what I did for every fire alarm except one. It's a wonder no one ever ratted me out and earned me a fine for sleeping too soundly or something. I suppose it should be scary that fire alarms don't wake me up. Nor earthquakes. I'm curious now why alarm clocks wake me, but fire alarms don't.

    9. Re:British army by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it's a matter of what you're tuned and/or trained to respond to. I can and usually do ignore irrelevant noise while asleep, but anything affecting my own property wakes me immediately. New parents often discover the same thing -- the neighbours' kids can scream all night and it doesn't bother 'em, but let their own kid cough in his sleep and the parent is instantly awake.

      Also interesting how selective one can be even to apparently-identical stimuli... when I heated with a wood stove, the least hint of smoke from my own stove would wake me immediately. But considerably MORE-smokey air from an inversion (trapping smoke from thousands of other folks) didn't attract my sleeping mind's notice.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  46. I see you're problem by lheal · · Score: 5, Funny
    When I shower in the morning it takes me like 20 minutes to do the exact same procedure I can complete in 10 minutes if take a shower in the middle of the day.

    Perhaps you should find some other place to conduct that procedure. Most slashdotters do it in front of their PC at night, I think.

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    1. Re:I see you're problem by Phae · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      And most slashdotters do it way faster than 10 minutes.

    2. Re:I see you're problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prepare to execute Manual Override, Mr. Waterhouse

  47. you're - "your" by lheal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sorry. I just woke up.

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
  48. Woke up this mornin' got myself a beer by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    The future's uncertain and the end is always near.
    Let it roll baby roll.


    Jim Morrison did extensive research into this phenomenon, way back in 1970.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  49. speaking as.. by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1
    Speaking as someone who just woke up, I have to disagree.

    Being drunk is fun.

    --
    This is not my sandwich.
  50. Totally Inaccurate Report by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

    Waking up is not at all like being drunk. When I wake up, I'm groggy and pissed off. When I'm drunk, I'm groggy and happy.

    --
    You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    1. Re:Totally Inaccurate Report by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obligatory quote: "I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day." - Frank Sinatra

  51. I literally just woke up by MrNougat · · Score: 1

    It's 6:23 AM, I got up at about 6:15. I have come to know that I need to have about ten minutes of sitting down at the computer before I can function at all. For those ten minutes, it's like being in another world, and as I am typing this, I can feel the lucidity surging back into my head.

    Being awakened and having to get up out of bed and do normal awake things definitely demonstrates this effect more drastically than waking up on your own and lounging on the bed while you become fully awake.

    --
    Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
  52. obligatory by William+Robinson · · Score: 1
    I just wake up drunk

    Wake me up (not drunk), when you start driving. :)

    1. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Friends don't let friends drive awake.

    2. Re:obligatory by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Wake me up (not drunk), when you start driving. :)

      I want to die in my sleep like Grandpa, not screaming like the passengers in his car.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  53. And they did need research to find that out? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    Well, I guess researchers at Colorado are so busy that they never sleep :-)

    In German, there even exists the word "schlaftrunken", which literally translated means "sleep drunk".

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  54. Re:I'm sure I read this yesterday on the BBC site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone ever seen a "Slashdot Original Story"?
    Do you ever hear about their crack team of investigative reporters?

    No story on Slashdot, other than reviews, comes without a link to another source that reported on it first.
    So another site or 2 had it up first, who cares?
    Does slashdot say anywhere that they are only going to report on the most current, most interesting stories?
    And on top of that, they're going to have them posted first?
    Some people don't visit bbc.
    Some people don't visit digg.
    Some people don't visit any other sites to get this type of news.

    Congrats on seeing it first somewhere else...I just don't see what your point in telling us was.

  55. Easy to scoff by SimianOverlord · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you had gone to a hospital bureaucrat and argued against shift patterns for junior doctors requiring them to nap during the night when no patients were around, and they asked you for evidence, what then do you do? Say that they would be sleepy? That it was common sense that they couldn't do their job safely?

    I suspect you'd be dismissed because people don't make important decisions like that based on what Joe Schmoe reckons is 'obvious'. That's why things that, on the face of them seem obvious, must be checked out scientifically. There has to be evidence to base decisions on, as gut feelings and common sense are, in many cases, completely and flagrantly wrong.

    You demand those new conditions for junior doctors, and you're suddenly paying them millions of pounds more countrywide. I wouldn't stake millions of pounds on someones common sense without something more to back it up.

    --
    Meine Schwester ist sehr, sehr reizvoll - Nietzsche
    1. Re:Easy to scoff by DerWulf · · Score: 1

      Hows about instead of paying millions in tax dollars to scientist who state the obvious we give common sense the benefit of the doubt and instead investigate when it fails? Is there anyone, anyone at all in the world who thought it would be a good idea to perform critical medical procedures just after waking up?

      --

      ___
      No power in the 'verse can stop me
    2. Re:Easy to scoff by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Is there anyone, anyone at all in the world who thought it would be a good idea to perform critical medical procedures just after waking up?

      I worked in emergency medicine for nine years, and I can tell you that unfortunately, the answer is "yes." In small, rural ER's, there's almost always only one doctor on duty, and on night shift he's napping until someone comes in. In bigger, urban teaching hospitals, most of the doctors are interns and residents, and they're so exhausted from working their absurdly long hours that they grab sleep whenever they possibly can. And it's been a dirty little not-so-secret in the medical community for ... well, pretty much ever ... that this kind of thing kills patients. That's why this subject needs investigation; it's not just a waste of your preciousss tax dollars.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    3. Re:Easy to scoff by ryman · · Score: 1

      I think the poster's point was that this seems like something that would be obvious/reasonable to everyone, not just a single Joe Schmoe. Hence, the word "common" in "common sense"...

      --
      "We are far too easily pleased." --C.S. Lewis
    4. Re:Easy to scoff by DerWulf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I find it hard to believe that supervisors who couldn't grasp the concept when someone with common sense told them would believe (or even understand) a "scientific" study stating the very same thing.
      I'd speculate that the issue is not about people not knowing/not believing that the situation in hospitals causes problems, rather that they just don't know how to fix it within budget and practical constraints (like, can't shut down the hospital at night time).

      --

      ___
      No power in the 'verse can stop me
    5. Re:Easy to scoff by belmolis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that there are a couple of factors. One is the financial one. The other is that doctors regard going without sleep as a rite of passage. They did it when they were residents so those who come after them should too. It's a stupid macho thing, like surgeons wearing clothes encrusted with blood and gore until the late nineteenth century.

    6. Re:Easy to scoff by raygundan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thankfully, it's starting to change. There are some caps on what residents can work now. Unfortunately, the caps themselves are still absurd by any realistic standard, but it just goes to show you how bad it really was. When residents (my fiancee is an ER resident) are thankful that the new rules keep things restricted to "just" 80 hours a week, something is wrong. She gets off a 30-hour ER shift today. Keep in mind that the 80 hour cap doesn't include things that aren't "work", like the conferences they have to attend. Even with the 80 hour cap, they can still work well over 80 hours without breaking the rules.

      There are two big problems with the rules. (that I can see-- I suspect she knows more) Hospitals have become dependent on cheap 100-hours-a-week residents to do the work. Without additional funding, the hour restrictions mean that the staffing isn't going to cover what it used to.

      Additionally, the only teeth the rules have is to take away a residency's accreditation. If you're a resident, and your residency loses that, you're screwed. It's like having your college shut down mid-degree. So if you're being abused under the rules and working 110 hours a week, your options are "report it and possibly lose your residency," or "suck it up."

      But seriously-- does anyone really want brand new doctors running on no sleep for whole days treating them? Unfortunately, this is exactly what we have. The fact that we have as few incidents as we do is a testament to the residents.

    7. Re:Easy to scoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, I wish I had mod points. You are correct. This sort of thing is deadly.

    8. Re:Easy to scoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      your preciousss

      Gollum, is that you?
    9. Re:Easy to scoff by freeweed · · Score: 1

      The other is that doctors regard going without sleep as a rite of passage. They did it when they were residents so those who come after them should too. It's a stupid macho thing

      Damn straight. This exists in an even more pathetic form in the IT industry. I've seen people pull 48 hour shifts keeping equipment alive, and when someone points out the insanity of that... ... it's laughed at. Seriously. I've even seen management laugh it off, "hey those guys sure are dedicated to their jobs eh!"

      EA as a company survives entirely on this principle. If enough people are willing to kill themselves working, the rest are just treated as whiners, complainers, and otherwise lazy.

      It's one of the few times I'd ever call anything us geeks do "macho", and it's pretty sick IMHO. Like all machismo.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    10. Re:Easy to scoff by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      "I wouldn't stake millions of pounds on someones common sense without something more to back it up. "

      You'd have to be a fuckwit not to know that people take time to become fully alert after waking up, every person on the planet experiences this, they all have to sleep.

      Every person that's experienced sleep deprivation also has the same effects, the longer you go without sleep the worse you perform. You don't need study to verify what all observers can witness and experience as fact.

  56. Wake up in a high crime area. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You won't wake up groggy in a high crime area. Your eyes will suddenly pop open, and you'll quickly move to the window to scan the outside for threats. You listen carefully for any unusual noises.
      Sure would be nice to wake up "groggy".
    That's not going to happen here. You learn pretty quick that the police do not respond to calls for help fast enough.

  57. I'm still "drunk" by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 1

    I woke up at 5am, it's currently 7:39 and im sitting at work and I still feel "drunk".

    I prefer being ACTUALLY drunk. Maybe if I start drinking as soon as I wake up it'll cancel out the sleep inertia.. hmmm

    --
    [an error occurred while processing this directive]
  58. Tired v intoxicated & ramifications on late st by Nyph2 · · Score: 1

    In the summer of '99 I read a # of articles talking about the effects of driving shortly after waking up &/or while tired. The results clearly put the chances of an accident on par with drunk driving. Incidentally, highschool students will on average go to sleep sometime after midnight(I cant recall the specific avg'd time) regardless of when they have to get up for school, as was cited in a # of articles discussing late starts for high school. When combined, it means we're putting the worst drivers in our society on the road when they're in a state equivalent of being drunk daily during the school year. Top this off with how these sleepy students perform in class. Tho the studies I read didnt compare it to being drunk, the scores are significantly lower on average with a 7:30 start vs 9:30, which in retrospect are similar in magnitude, once again, to being drunk. Anyhoo, between these 2 reasons, it's pretty clear the early start times for highschools are somewhere between stupid & dangerous. Especially when one looks at the statistics for how elementry students would acheive with the early start, combined with the fact they arent dricing to school. Yet the elementry students get the latest start in most places because parents fear having them standing out on street corners in the dark before sunrise. (This is just plain silly in MN where I live when they end up standing out in the dark anyway 1/2 the school year)

  59. Amazing by catahoula10 · · Score: 1

    I am always amazed at what the pop media finds worthy of national news reporting.

    --
    This has been another valuable and informative opinion from:
    Catahoula!
  60. Sure there is joke in here by rf0 · · Score: 1

    about politcians and there inability and generally being asleep but I can't think of one

  61. Oh broher... by jav1231 · · Score: 0

    Don't you love it when Science validates common sense? I particularly like it when it's tax funded.

  62. What really sucks... by Chatsubo · · Score: 1

    .. is when you wake up, and for some reason you keep on thinking: "Yellow"

    --
    > no, yes, maybe (tagging beta)
    1. Re:What really sucks... by Kredal · · Score: 1

      This must be a Thursday... I never could get the hang of Thursdays.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  63. this was in The Globe and Mail yesterday by gnasby · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This story appeared in the Canadian newspaper The Globe and Mail yesterday.

  64. Proverb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh, I remember proverb in our country that says (translated to English) "Make fun of a drunk person, just don't with a person who just woke up."

  65. duh? by tont0r · · Score: 1

    CNN reports that "sleep inertia" leaves some people so groggy, after they wake up, they might as well be drunk, researchers said on Tuesday.

    maybe it was because they were in as relaxed as one could get for 8 fucking hours, only to be waken by [BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP]
    [throw alarm clock]

    i could have told you this and been on CNN. :(

    1. Re:duh? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You get 8 hours? Damn, you are the lucky one.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  66. Oblig. Futurama by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Funny

    Leela: Look at that 5 o'clock rust. Bender, you've been up all night not drinking, haven't you?!
    Bender: Hey, what I don't do is none of your business!
    Leela: Please, Bender, have some malt liquor. If not for yourself, then for the people who love you.

  67. I don't believe it... by Flaming+Babies · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm always tired when I get to work,
    yet the women I work with are consistently unattractive all day long.

    --
    The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously.
  68. Wait... I might as well be drunk? by sielwolf · · Score: 1

    That's all I needed to hear! *pops open a cold one*

    Ahhh, it looks like under Daylight Savings Time 8:32 is Beer O'Clock!

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
  69. Keep in mind by greysky · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind that this comes from CU Boulder. The same school that rioted for several nights because underage drinkers were kicked out of bars. They burned cars and rolled flaming dumpsters at riot police three nights in a row.

  70. Simple Solution... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm like that as well. That's why God invented coffee.

    1. Re:Simple Solution... by pclminion · · Score: 1
      I'm like that as well. That's why God invented coffee.

      It's not the OP's fault how the post gets moderated, but this isn't really insightful... Ever drank coffee while drunk? You don't get sober, you just become a hyperactive drunk. I would imagine that a caffeine hit immediately upon waking would probably just produce a groggy, bleary, hyperactive pissed off tired person.

      Besides, I don't drink coffee to wake up -- I can stay awake all day just fine without it. I drink coffee because I'm addicted. Oh well.

  71. Do studies ever reveal surprises? by WheelDweller · · Score: 1

    Do a study that tells me something I don't know, will ya? Geeze...I haven't been surprised by the news or these "studies" in almost a decade, except on 9/11.

    New study: "Sex causes pregnancy". "Viloence causes death". "Smoking causes cancer".

    Get jobs, guys- quit wasting money.

    --
    --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
    1. Re:Do studies ever reveal surprises? by rca66 · · Score: 2
      Do a study that tells me something I don't know, will ya?

      That you are groggy after waking up is no news. What was surprising was how strong this effect is. When someone is awake for 26 hours, although he is obviously very tired, he his still mentally more fit than 10 minutes after he woke up.

      New study: "Sex causes pregnancy". "Viloence causes death". "Smoking causes cancer".

      That there is a relation might be obvious. But still it is of interest to get the numbers: what is the probability to get pregnant after having sex, what conditions have an influence on this probability? How big is the risk of getting cancer if you are an average smoker (*very* interesting for insurance companies). Those numbers may not be listed in a short news message, but experts can get something out of the study, making it worth the money.

    2. Re:Do studies ever reveal surprises? by WheelDweller · · Score: 1

      Dude- I need to have you over to the house sometime. I have this whole box o'hairs to split! :)

      Have a great day!

      --
      --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
    3. Re:Do studies ever reveal surprises? by rca66 · · Score: 1
      Dude- I need to have you over to the house sometime. I have this whole box o'hairs to split! :)

      Sorry, not until I counted all the beans lying around here.

    4. Re:Do studies ever reveal surprises? by WheelDweller · · Score: 1

      Good answer! I was hoping you wouldn't take it as an insult. GoodOnYa!

      Maybe you *should* come over some time. Sounds like you'd be fun to debate/chat-with. Feel free to drop me a line, aye?

      --
      --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
    5. Re:Do studies ever reveal surprises? by rca66 · · Score: 1
      Maybe you *should* come over some time.

      Alas, an ocean seperates us.

      Sounds like you'd be fun to debate/chat-with.

      Besides my tendency to split hairs (not mine, they have become too valuable over the years), this can not be completely excluded.

  72. Re:Tired v intoxicated & ramifications on late by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

    When combined, it means we're putting the worst drivers in our society on the road when they're in a state equivalent of being drunk daily during the school year.

    And I have a simple solution. Don't buy cars for high school students. I rode the bus for four years of HS, those brats can too! :)

    --
    I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
  73. Temporary Insanity defense? by Del+Vach · · Score: 1

    Years ago I heard of a precedent, I think in Pennsylvania, where someone was aquitted of murder because they had just woken up. The basic thinking was that you're considered temporarily insane for up to seven minutes after waking up. The Google, it finds nothing - anybody else heard of this?

    Please respond quickly, I opted to make this post instead of calling my lawyer.

  74. Re:I'm sure I read this yesterday on the BBC site by BushCheney08 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Do you ever hear about their crack team of investigative reporters?

    Just the thought of that gives me the willies. I think I'm more comfortable with "slashdot's team of investigative reporters on crack."

    --
    Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
  75. ergo... by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 1

    Waking up drunk like being asleep?

    --
    -- dR.fuZZo
  76. I don't understand... by ExtraT · · Score: 1

    ... legally drunk ...

    If it's legal, then what is the f$%king problem?

  77. I feel better now by Anonymous+Codger · · Score: 1

    It's always taken me a couple of hours to really feel like I've woken up completely. When I first wake up I feel confused, tired, week, and stupid. Even riding my bike the short distance to work doesn't completely dispel this feeling. Coffee and/or a long bike ride will shorten the time it takes to feel human again.

    I've sometimes worried that something was wrong with me that I felt so out of it after waking up. This research makes me feel a bit more normal.

    --
    No sig? Sigh...
  78. We already proved this... by ayjay29 · · Score: 3, Funny

    On holiday with friends, we got into the habit of a group of us suddenly waking someone up and asking stupid questions or saying stupid stuff.

    "Wake Up!!! Wake Up!!! What's the captial of Paris? What's the captial of Paris? What's the captial of Paris?"

    "Uhh, duhhh, uhhh, France!, uhh, no, no, Paris, uhh France?"

    or even

    "Wake Up!!! Wake Up!!! The Zebras have escaped!! The Zebras have escaped!! The Zebras have escaped!!"

    "Uhh, uhh, Zebras, oh no, shit, Zebras, where, no, shit, what, Zebras?"

    There's definatly a period of a few seconds after waking up when you have no idea what's going on around you. (And it's even worse when a bunch of gits start taking advantage of the fact.)

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
    1. Re:We already proved this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is one I am familiar with:

      "Wake up wake up wake up there's a code blue 5th floor bed 14!"

      "Uhhh nurse isn't he DNR?"

  79. My Early Morning Experience by pfurlong · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I first wake up in the morning, I feel like someone has taken a baseball bat and nailed me in the back of the head with it. This is related to some serious headache issues I have, but it leads me to something else.

    My cognitive abilities upon waking are nearly non-existent: I've been known to slur words and been unable to string together a coherent sentence.

    My physical abilities aren't much better: I've fallen down the stairs, walked into doors, and walked into walls.

    What's scary is that for years I've been on call for various employers (ISPs mostly). When that pager goes off and I have to wake up and troubleshoot a problem, just getting to my office downstairs can be dangerous. Then trying to "rev up" my brain to work on the problem can take a long time. You should talk to some of my coworkers who've called me in the middle of the night for help with a problem - I'm sure that the conversation sounded like one with a person who has been drinking heavily.

    I have no difficulty at all in believing that waking up makes some people so groggy that their abilities are no better than those of someone who is drunk. And when that person needs to make decisions with serious consequences, that is not a good thing.

    1. Re:My Early Morning Experience by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 2, Interesting
      My cognitive abilities upon waking are nearly non-existent... My physical abilities aren't much better...

      I'm definitely slow and semi-coherent for up to twenty minutes upon waking. A source of much amusement to my wife, who doesn't experience the same effects. I also don't wake up too easily in the night, which annoys my wife to no end (I don't hear babies crying as well as she does).

      However, twice our kids have fallen out of bed, once breaking a collarbone (I dunno how, the bed's maybe two feet off the floor), and I was up out of bed, down the hall, and comforting them before my wife had even stirred. Apparently adrenaline is a mitigating factor.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    2. Re:My Early Morning Experience by pfurlong · · Score: 1

      I have had the same experience: my wife never understood my early-morning fog for a long time, and I got a lot of grief over my inability to wake up for much of anything (crying babies, pagers, etc.).

      In fact, she feels that she should be paid for when I'm on call, since she's the one who has to wake up to the pager, in order to wake me up, since I'll sleep right through both a pager beeping or a phone ringing.

      And don't even get me started on my experiences with alarm clocks...

  80. Prediction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you just watch: In a while, some nanny-wannabe CONgress-critter will introduce a law making it illegal to drive within 30 min after waking up, with penalties equal to the ineffective drunk-driving laws... I can see it now...

  81. omg this is me... well somethimes... by fireiceviperhotmail. · · Score: 0

    Somethimes when i wake up ... i just fall over or when people wake me up i somethimes seem to be speaking irrationally and mixing words up or answering questions they never asked... its creepy but there's nothing i can do to control it....

    Julien.http://free.hostdepartment.com/8/81fortune/

  82. Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which comes to the solution: Wake'n Bake!

  83. Mornings...grrrr by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 1

    Waking up is like getting drunk in that I have an IQ of 12 and only a basic grasp of language. However far more potent is only sleeping 4 hours a day for 2 weeks then staying up 36+ hours to finish a 10,000 word dissertation. Towards the end I thought I was a hummming bird drinking nectar from a flower, disturbingly I woke up next to the toilet. Best I dont dwell.

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
  84. Waking up like being drunk? by slowbad · · Score: 1
    Then it's time for a 6-pack ... tomorrow I'm setting the alarm ahead one hour, and hitting the snooze button every ten minutes.
    And to think I've been waking up just ONCE a day with the sun all these years, when I could be enjoying it in moderation!

    --
    Ask your doctor if alarm clocks might be right for you.

  85. Time at which people wakes also makes a difference by ArwynH · · Score: 1

    The articule didn't mention it but doesn't the amount of sleep you dad before you wake also affect the speed at which you wake? From my experience waking up after 7-8h of sleep only takes a few seconds, but waking up after >10h can take a few minutes...

  86. Slashdot by Thaelon · · Score: 1

    Slashdot: News from google, one day later.

    --

    Question everything

  87. ...in the US by corpsiclex · · Score: 1

    it is. :-/

    Of course, waking up is optional and there are many adults who chose never to try it.

    --

    eBayDig 1s a typo saerch engien
  88. Mandatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you lost your mind, can you see or are you blind?

  89. Waking drunk by Feanturi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I get some pretty weird ideas when I'm first waking up. I always use the snooze alarm, setting the clock to start half an hour before I actually have to get up, because I like to sort of 'ease into' waking up. But sometimes, when I'm particularly fatigued, I get strange ideas about what is going on with the alarm clock. On a few occasions, I've hit the snooze and thought to myself, "I'm tired, but at least I have this button that gives me 10 more minutes of sleep," and I would translate this as, "Good thing I can travel back in time by 10 minutes, I can keep this up indefinitely until I am bored with sleeping!" Then there'll be a harsh moment of panic when I actually look at the clock and realize that the time travel isn't working right for some reason.

    Other times, back when I was learning the guitar, I had the weirdest notion that the pulsing tone of the alarm clock was actually a musical scale of a particular key, and I've have to guess what key it was as I hit the button. Then I'd lie back down to wait for the next "test". The clock was a monotone, but I'd declare, "C minor!" and would feel that I had gotten it right, and I would get it right each time with different answers. :)

    1. Re:Waking drunk by nzhavok · · Score: 1

      I get some pretty weird ideas when I'm first waking up.

      I'm with you here! The strangest ones I had where whilst I was at university. I would hit snooze knowing that later I could just reload from an earlier point :-)

      --

      He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
  90. Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does Slashdot always link to the actual site via some random word in the middle of the article? It's very disorienting.

  91. What a bunch of cow manure... by GReaToaK_2000 · · Score: 1

    More and more studies come out saying studies are just that, studies.

    Not, experiments!
    Not, hypothesis!
    Not, anything more then an observation of a few hundred... Oh wait CORRECTION!!!

    SIXTEEN!!!! subjects.

    Junk! It's not even close to news worthy.

    It cracks me up that people even spent the time. They probably were pressured to publish SOMETHING or lose their money.

    Also, /. is late on this one, I saw this on the news last weekend.

    Oh well, back to the normal work load, because according to this study I should stay up and not be groggy, but I'm sure I have seen OTHER studies that indicate we need atleast 8 hours of sleep. I should do a study to see if the grogginess comes from the fact that Americans are working themselves into this state...

    bleh. Lame "science".

  92. Not necessarily by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

    It just depends on who you wanna believe

    --
    ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
  93. Study? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much tax payer money went to a federal grant to fund this study? They could have paid me half that amount and I could have told them that.

  94. Waking up? by itomato · · Score: 1

    Waking up is "awakening". When you awaken, your senses come alive, and are sometimes overwhelmed.

    Waking up - when it works like it should, results in your dream-state ending, and regular, daytime conciousness being dumped into reality like so many bowling balls out of a gunnysack. It's like Frankenstein getting the neckbolts juiced, and the table being rotated into upright.

    Sleep goes away very quickly and cleanly, when there's nothing getting in the way.

    Waking up in the morning after having eaten dinner at 10:00, and ice cream, cookies, and desserts at 10:45, then passing out. When you try to wake up your brain and mind, when the rest of your body is heavily into sluggish digestion, it will be like being drunk, because the same thing is happening.

    Ask Ben Franklin if after he rose early, he felt as if he were drunk. The whole point of the "early bed/early rise" thing is that it's *not* like being drunk.

  95. Actually... by name*censored* · · Score: 1

    I've found this to be more or less true. In fact, when people who have never been drunk before ask me to describe it to them, I explain it as "like pulling an all-nighter [staying up all night doing work due the next day], but drinking massive amounts of coffee [to negate the overwhelming desire to earn the nickname "Rip Van Winkle"]...only more fun." I think it's the loss of any concentration abilities whatsoever that's makes one like the other.

    --
    Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
  96. Waking up earlier by nikanj · · Score: 1

    Has anyone else noticed that no matter how early you wake up, you still arrive at the office at 10am. Everything seems to take exponentially longer when I wake up earlier, eg. shower at 7am takes 25 minutes, shower at 9am takes 5 minutes. Just as every task slows down as you get more and more intoxicated!

  97. IT by robertjw · · Score: 1

    This problem of getting to full cognitive capacity after waking is a serious one in some professions.

    The Army is an obvious example, although in a combat situation I believe most soldiers learn to be alert very quickly. Let's take it closer to home. I work in IT and I'm on call 24 hours. Fortunately the times I've needed to get up in the middle of the night are extremely rare, but when we have had a problem I know I haven't been at my best. If we ever had a real emergency I'm not sure if I would be able to get up at 2am and function properly.

  98. Sunday morning by IrquiM · · Score: 1

    This effect is also very easy to notice on Sunday morning!

    --
    This is blinging
  99. Frank Sinatra about drinking by Hossicle · · Score: 1

    Yes! My favorite quote from the late Frank Sinatra applies: "I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day." Hossicle

  100. No kidding by Hosiah · · Score: 3, Funny
    My spouse has watched with amusement over the years as I have attempted my first task of the morning - making my espresso. It's a 50% shot if I can pull this off the first time, without forgetting to add water, add beans, turn on pot, plug pot in, get coffee cup, avoid cracking head on cupboard doors, etc. By the time I have espresso in cup in hand and I'm right-side up, I'm OK from there.

    My theory is there's a boot-period for your brain just like a boot period when your computer turns on. The first five minutes after waking is POST, kernel module loading, login, starting the desktop...

    1. Re:No kidding by jcuervo · · Score: 3, Funny
      The first five minutes after waking is POST, kernel module loading, login, starting the desktop...
      Brain error or brain not present, please insert caffeine to continue...

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    2. Re:No kidding by pclminion · · Score: 2, Informative
      My spouse has watched with amusement over the years as I have attempted my first task of the morning - making my espresso. It's a 50% shot if I can pull this off the first time, without forgetting to add water, add beans, turn on pot, plug pot in, get coffee cup, avoid cracking head on cupboard doors, etc. By the time I have espresso in cup in hand and I'm right-side up, I'm OK from there.

      Your error is that you only practice in the impaired state. You can't develop a good engram (roughly, "muscle memory") for the espresso-brewing task if you always practice it while sleep-stoned. What you should be doing is practicing making espresso at 3 in the afternoon, when your brain is actually functional. Brew ten batches of espresso, back to back. Soon the process will be committed to your unconscious memory and you'll be able to carry it out even in the impaired state.

    3. Re:No kidding by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      Yep. For the first few minutes everything gets piped into /dev/null.

      --
      I don't get it.
    4. Re:No kidding by PsikeOmega · · Score: 1

      I have had Days where I go out in the kitchen to check my email as I drink my first cup of coffee, and it takes me untill the bottom of the mug untill I realize that I forgot the laptop back in my bedroom

      --
      "For the last time your computer Does not run off of black Magic..." -Me to a customer
    5. Re:No kidding by Bill+of+Death · · Score: 1
      My theory is there's a boot-period for your brain just like a boot period when your computer turns on. The first five minutes after waking is POST, kernel module loading, login, starting the desktop...

      That is the same theory I have about Morning Wood... sort of a power-on self test for critical systems.

    6. Re:No kidding by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      Brew ten batches of espresso, back to back.

      Doesn't that defeat the purpose, since he'd never ever sleep again? :)

    7. Re:No kidding by trajik2600 · · Score: 1

      I guess I found this funnier than those with mod points did :)

  101. Others With My pain by PacketScan · · Score: 1

    I though i was alone there for a while. Great we have a studdy that shows these issue. Do we have a treatment? Reccomendations? Seriously it takes me anywhere from 5-20 minutes to "wake up" in the morning.

  102. Waking up in the army by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

    This is also why they always have a period before dawn when everyone is awake. When I was in the 82nd, on field exercises we would always wake up around 4:30, well before BMNT (morning twilight). The idea is that historically dawn has been the best time for an attack, because it's the time when people are least alert, so waking everyone up well before dawn is a hedge against an enemy's dawn attack.

    Knowing that the military figured this out from experience, and that most people know it instinctively, it's hard not to wonder why someone thought it necessary to quantify this.

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    1. Re:Waking up in the army by Kupek · · Score: 1

      Knowing that the military figured this out from experience, and that most people know it instinctively, it's hard not to wonder why someone thought it necessary to quantify this.

      Because if we wrote off everything as knowable through common sense or anecdotes, then we'd never run those experiments that truly surprise us.

  103. I hope one day we get "Sleepiness" tests by Starker_Kull · · Score: 1

    It has been recognized for a long time that driving (esp. long-distance driving), or flying, while sleepy, can be as dangerous, or more dangerous, than being drunk. This is probably because of the sustained attention that has to be paid to the job at hand in these professions, and the high and obvious consequences of mistakes. That's why there are federal rules governing the number of hours of work that can be done both short and long term, particularly in aviation. IIRC, truck drivers now may not drive longer than 12 hours at a stretch without a rest period, specifically because of the high proportion of truck accidents that occured after 12 hours on duty.

    If we could actually make an easy, simple to administer test for sleepiness levels, it might provide a basis to stop encouraging the "60 hours a week means you are a wimp" mentality that seems prevalent at many corporations. Sleep is not an optional thing, and lack of sleep has definite effects on personality, performance, judgement, reasoning ability, and powers of concentration. While regularly forgoing enough sleep might appear to enhance productivity in the short term, in the long term it takes a toll on you. There are lots of rumors about the effects of long-term sleep deprivation, for instance this link which claims that for every year beyond 55 you work, you lose 2 years off of your lifespan http://www.fedex401k.com/News.html, but I would love to see links directly to comprehensive studies of the long term effects of sleep deprivation.

    I think that a society that encourages a lack of proper rest has a lot of people only functioning at half-steam, but to change that, one needs to be able to scientifically quantify sleepiness, which as far as I know has not been done. Anyone know different?

  104. a study with 16 people is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how can you write about a study that did research on 16 people.
    this number of participants is nowhere near scientific. it must be a joke.

    1. Re:a study with 16 people is a joke by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      >how can you write about a study that did research on 16 people.

      And does it make a difference if those 16 people were drinkers or non-drinkers? Age groups? Gender?

      Is this study being used to justify drinking alcohol or to campaign against sleep?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:a study with 16 people is a joke by pclminion · · Score: 1
      how can you write about a study that did research on 16 people. this number of participants is nowhere near scientific. it must be a joke.

      Misunderstandings about the significance of scientific results are common. Consider the following test. A sample of 16 people is selected. 8 of these people receive a blow to the toes with an 8 pound sledgehammer. All 8 of these people scream loudly. The other 8 people do not receive a blow to the toes. These people do not scream.

      From this experiment, the conclusion can be drawn that if you crush a person's toes with a sledgehammer, that person will scream. Now, are you going to dispute this conclusion because the sample size was only 16 people?

      Whether or not a result is significant depends on sample size and many other factors as well. Go Google the term "statistical significance." You'll find that it's an incredibly complex (and mostly boring) topic. Results should always be looked at critically, but you cannot unilaterally say that there is something wrong with a sample size of 16 without knowing all the parameters of the experiment.

  105. Morning? by Ranger · · Score: 2, Funny

    For some reason I'm reminded of a bumper sticker I once saw:

    Beer! It's the reason I get up in the afternoon!

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  106. Morning People by Kenshin · · Score: 1

    The problem is that the world is ruled and owned by fucking morning people.

    Chipper morning people with no ability to understand that, to us, MORNINGS SUCK.

    "Why don't you just get up earlier?" makes me want to say "Why don't you just curl up an die?"

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    1. Re:Morning People by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      The problem is that the world is ruled and owned by fucking morning people.

      Would that I had mod points, brother. (Er, sister? Can't tell from here.) Amen!

      "Morning people are respected. Night people are feared." - calligraphic button I have

      "You can look at the moon / Not the sun, it's too bright / Take it as evidence / We were made for the night" - me

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  107. So how do we... by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    ...build this into an alarm clock?

  108. Techie equivalent: Night-time On-call by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm also amused by my stint in big companies that they seem to be alright with waking people up in the middle of the night in order to have them fix something on multi-million-dollar systems doing huge financial transactions.

    For a while, I was the guy staying up all night for a large bank, calling the day-shifters when something broke. The people were very good about it, and generally were able to cope with this, but I always thought it was a recipie for disaster.

    I find it difficult to make good decisions during my normal waking hours if I'm very tired, let alone being awakened a few hours after having gone to sleep and asked complex questions during my normal sleep time.

    1. Re:Techie equivalent: Night-time On-call by demi · · Score: 1

      It depends how it's handled; I've been doing after-hours oncall in addition to a regular workday/week for years, and I've had experience with a number of systems.

      If I can get a few minutes to wake up, go to the bathroom, splash some water on my face and have a long drink of water, I'm pretty much awake. I'm a little slower than optimum but I'm not going to do anything disastrous. However, sometimes problems are simple enough so that I don't have to wake up completely to handle them--that's why I want the page I get in the middle of the night to be informative and concise, so I know how much I have to wake up (if I wake up completely I won't go back to sleep).

      It's why it's much better to page out and have the person respond a few minutes later, ready to help, than to call them on the phone. When you call them, they've literally just woken up and in that state I, at least, am useful for nothing.

      A second factor is prioritization. If there's someone whose job it is to be the first line of defense, and to do everything except that which absolutely must be done by the specialist, that works better. People are much more willing to engage in the middle of the night if it's a) an actual emergency and b) they're not doing bookkeeping or makework (like updating trouble tickets or calling customers) besides.

      The third thing is that people just react differently. I do okay on an after-hours oncall schedule, but some people don't. Then again, I've done support while drunk, too, with no ill effects except some anxiety that maybe I was screwing things up.

      A fourth factor is compensation. People are much more likely to engage properly and carefully if they fell they're compensated for it. It could be money, overtime or compensation time off to take the next day but in my opinion it has to be there. Otherwise people feel they're getting screwed and are unlikely to do much, even if "required."

      --
      demi
  109. I can personally attest to this by d0qtrx · · Score: 1

    When I wake up, I can barely stand or walk, and can stumble into things, pass out in the shower, or pass out in traffic, or just black out my entire 1 hour commute to work.

  110. Re: DITTO by Fitch · · Score: 1

    It's no coincidence that the one wreck I've been in in the past 10 years of the 1 hour commute was on a morning when I forgot to take my second cup of coffee with me for the ride. Presumably forgotten due to 'sleep inertia'. =D Try to explain that to my insurance company tho.

  111. Wow - people are groggy on wake-up!?!?!?! by kellyfj · · Score: 1

    Another one for the "Journal of Obvious results" - just how much government funding is spent on this stuff? -Frank

  112. Common sense isn't always right by Kelson · · Score: 1

    There's an awful lot of "common sense" knowledge that turns out to be wrong. Some things are just counter-intuitive, some are easy to misinterpret.

    Anyone looking at the apparent motion of the sun and moon over the course of a day would reasonably assume that both revolve around the Earth. The sun comes up, the sun goes down. Over time, people who took careful notes of the movements of the planets noticed that things didn't quite line up, and eventually they realized that it could easily be explained if Earth revolved around the sun and just rotated once a day. Since then we've sent out spacecraft based on this theory and they've gotten where they're supposed to, which suggests we're on the right track.

    Until then, "common sense" said otherwise.

    It's always worth double-checking common sense to confirm it. Sometimes you'll find out that, yes, people are groggy when they first wake up, and maybe you'll even find out why and be able to deal with it. Sometimes you'll find out that there isn't enough tryptophan in turkey to put people to sleep after a Thanksgiving dinner, and the reason they're drowsing off is just that they've eaten too much food.

  113. Re:reports on Common Sense - groggy by saskboy · · Score: 1

    I think not everyone is groggy for long after waking up, because some people get enough sleep. It's more common for people to sleep less than 7hours a night these days, so it's more common to know groggy people.

    Do they call it "groggy" because it's as if you've had too much "grog"?

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  114. Dave's not here man by Uosdwis · · Score: 1

    Seeing as CU usually rates in the top 20 party schools, I think the guy probably just really does wake up drunk.

  115. My wife has this problem by pahoran · · Score: 1

    When my wife wakes up she is neither the coherent nor the pleasant person that I married.

    Maybe I should stop having her drive me to work in the morning.

    --
    I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous.
  116. You could have told me that... by badstate · · Score: 0

    BEFORE I fell down the stairs.

    --
    iPods are for girls.
  117. Megadeth guy slept with arm over back of chair by alienmole · · Score: 1

    In ordinary (not drugged) sleep, your body usually moves enough to prevent any lasting damage from restricted bloodflow. In the Megadeth case, the guy fell asleep in a chair, with his arm over the back of it. That's a bit different than ordinary sleeping in a bed. Moral of the story: if you're going to play it cool and strike a casual pose, don't fall asleep while doing it.

    1. Re:Megadeth guy slept with arm over back of chair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a friend who did something like that. He lost the ability to open his fingers for like 2-3 months and had to wear this freakish cast with rubber bands on it to pull his fingers back open when he stopped clenching them closed. The good news is that that after those 2-3 months, he recovered all lost functionality.

      We teased him mercilessly about it though after getting over the natural sympathetic, "Oh my God, what happened?" response to seeing the cast. The story was just too stupid to not mock. I mean, almost losing the ability to use your hand because you slept on it funny. Sheesh. I'm glad he's okay now, though.

      Eh, better post AC. I sound like a prick.

    2. Re:Megadeth guy slept with arm over back of chair by Reziac · · Score: 1

      The Megadeth dude links to an article, http://www.ncemi.org/cse/cse0919.htm which says in part:

      "Less severe forms may befall the swain who keeps his arm on his date's chair back for an entire double feature, ignoring the growing pain and paresis."

      Well, that'll teach ya :)

      Somewhat related, I've had to teach myself to never sleep with my arms stretched over my head (except for short naps) since after an hour or so my arms go to sleep. The curative event involved waking up with both arms dead to the shoulder, and have you ever tried to get up with a dead weight above the neck and no use of your arms? took major effort to get out of bed, and 15-20 minutes to regain use of my arms.

      [Since unlike most folk I don't move in my sleep -- if I go to sleep with my thumb up my nose, that's exactly the position I'll awake in! -- it's easy enough to prevent... just don't lay down that way in the first place.]

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  118. Well, it has to be said by orgelspieler · · Score: 1
    In Soviet Russia, drunk wakes YOU!!

    Sorry... I couldn't resist.

  119. IT on-call by Aero · · Score: 1

    My job situation is similar (fortunately, it's only one week in four), and by chance or design, it takes me about 2-3 minutes to get in a position to actually do something about a call that comes in, namely:

    Cell phone rings. I answer it. Stumble out of bed, mumble something into the phone about getting to my computer, head to my work room. Kick the cat out of the chair if necessary. Open up the laptop, wait for it to come out of sleep mode (if I've got to do it, then the computer should too), unlock the screen, and connect to the VPN.

    By the time I'm in the network, my brain's at processing speed. If I'm really lucky, the problem resolution takes little enough time that the brain doesn't have to get out of second gear, and falling back asleep is pretty easy. And if it's a real emergency, I've had enough lag time to be alert enough to think it through.

    --
    We can believe in you for 3 minutes, but beyond that, even the King of All Cosmos can't be expected to wait.
    1. Re:IT on-call by robertjw · · Score: 1

      I used to have a situation like that, the 'corporate policy' stepped in and decided we couldn't have access from the house. Now I have to get up and drive to the office, supposedly within 15 minutes of the page. Fortunately that's only happened once in the last year.

      Funny thing to me is, if it's so mission critical that you have to keep it up 24 hours a day why would you assign someone that's groggy and more prone to make a mistake to fix it. Seems like it would be more intelligent to wait until morning or actually hire someone to work the night shift.

  120. "limits" by raygundan · · Score: 1

    The hours cap for residents is 80 hours. It used to be worse, but nobody's gonna argue that they're really down to a sensible number yet. The 80 hours doesn't include things like the regular conferences theey have to attend as part of residency, either-- just the shifts they work. Some of which are as long as 30 hours. (My SO just got off work around noon today. She went in at 5am yesterday. They have to give them a day off after a shift like that, but apparently working until noon counts as "off.")

    There have only been guidelines for resident work hours since 2003. 2003. It took that long for somebody to say "wow, 110 hour weeks and 2-day shifts with no sleep is probably bad for the patients AND the doctors." Unfortunately, residents are cheap, and hospitals work them like this to keep costs down.

    Depending on which guidelines you're talking about, I'm not sure there's a fine involved, either. The only teeth the rules my SO is under have is that the residency could lose its accreditation. Are you really gonna complain about the hours if it means the program you're in will vanish? There may be some better state/local rules in other places.

    The worst part is that the hospitals are fully aware of studies like these. My SO is required to attend "sleep etiquette" classes several times a year that warn them about the dangers of not getting enough sleep and make all sorts of dire threats. And the SAME DAMN PEOPLE then schedule her for 80 hours of work, 30 hour shifts, and the additional weekly hours of meetings that go with the residency. They even tried to suggest that nobody was allowed to drive home after the 30-hour shifts because it was like driving drunk. Yes, it was okay 30 minutes ago for that person to be working in the ER, but they shouldn't drive? That makes sense. And, of course, the hospital had nowhere for all the off-shift docs to sleep.

    Blargh. Hospitals are incredibly cheap. So cheap it's killing people.

  121. Sleep cycles by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you need to track the length of your sleep cycle, and make sure your sleep period is a multiple of that -- ie. make sure you're not being awakened during the middle of a deep sleep cycle (which WILL finish its normal run, even if you're nominally up and moving).

    Frex, mine is about 2.5 hours. I can scrape by on two cycles, but I really need three. So I need to budget a dead minimum of 5 contiguous hours for sleep, but 7.5 hours is much better.

    So long as I wake up at the end of a sleep cycle, I'm up and at'em immediately. But if I get woke up in the middle of the cycle, especially deep sleep, it takes me a while to get going. (REM sleep is much easier to come out of.)

    Tho unlike most people, I'm not "stupid" when not properly awake (I can make reliably-correct responses to a middle-of-night emergency). But I'm also overall a very light sleeper and fairly aware of my surroundings.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    1. Re:Sleep cycles by pnot · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you need to track the length of your sleep cycle, and make sure your sleep period is a multiple of that

      I like the idea, but is there a straightforward way to track the length of my sleep cycle? Something not involving scalp electrodes, preferably...

    2. Re:Sleep cycles by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Electrodes... I had this weird vision of someone with a cattle prod informing you that your sleep cycle ends NOW ... ooops, not the desired technique!!

      As to how to determine it -- go to bed at a reasonable hour (so you're not disrupted by sleep deficiency), and take note of when you wake *by yourself*, and do so fully awake, not groggy. After a few iterations you should notice a pattern -- you'll find that left to yourself, you generally sleep some multiple of NN-long, and that NN is your sleep cycle.

      IOW, trial and error and observation. But expect it to be in the 2 to 3 hour range.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  122. He lies by tomzyk · · Score: 1

    No, that was just the excuse your brother gave you when he was locked in the bathroom for hours on end (while he was actually "exploring" his body).

    --
    Karma: NaN
    1. Re:He lies by kesuki · · Score: 1

      his brother could have narcolepsy, you insensitive clod!

  123. Huh... Sounds Familiar by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    I generally don't have so much of a problem when waking up from a normal night's sleep, but if I take a brief catnap of an hour or two, I often wake up with what does feel very much like mild drunkenness. My coordination is off, I feel too tall and light, and there's this general warm buzz drowning out much of the world around me. The length of sensation is usually fairly short, 10 minutes at the most, but I remember one time when it lasted over a half hour, which was one very interesting shamble across campus to class.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  124. Not enough. by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

    Actually it would be better to make the low alarm at something like 60 minutes before you have to wake up, as the likelihood of you finishing a sleep cycle within a 5 minute period of time is only around 5%. Then you should go to bed at a time that makes sure the amount of hours you have slept when you reach the 60 minute window is a multiple of 1.5. If you fall asleep easily, you can make the 60 minute window smaller, but don't make it too small as the sleep cycle varies between people and you need some extra minutes for the variation. If you want to go to sleep whenever you want to, then make the window 100 minutes and you'll be guaranteed to finish a cycle between the two alarms.

  125. Further Research by Pentalon · · Score: 1

    I hope they go on to show that sleeping is like being passed out. I think we need to make this absolutely clear. In case anyone was just sleeping 5 minutes ago.

  126. Perhaps unpleasantly like being drunk by pklinken · · Score: 0

    You ask a glass of water ?

  127. what's so unpleasant about being drunk? by dav1ross · · Score: 1

    "...ask a glass of water" Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy (couldn't resist!)

  128. What's wrong with being drunk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask a glass of water.

  129. I'd buy it by Dvondrake · · Score: 1

    Everyone says I look stoned in the morning, so I beleive them. This is a good excuse for when I get stoned at night and wake up still stoned. :P j/k

    --
    There's no place like 127.0.0.1
  130. I just experienced this by luckyguesser · · Score: 1

    Oddly enough, I just experienced this today. I had been taking a nap (since I was pretty short on sleep) between classes and work today. I woke up from my nap still feeling tired, but I forced myself to get up, because I wanted to get stuff done and not just sleep until work. I sat at my computer for about 15 minutes, still feeling groggy. I cranked up some music to try to wake me up- to no effect. I eventually left the house to get something to eat.

    On the drive to Taco Bell, my response times were slightly slowed, and my thought processes weren't very deep. However, I noticed that I was tired before I got in my car, so I made a conscious effort to not let that endanger my drive. For example, I kept a longer following distance, and made sure to use my turn signal well in advance, etc. I have never been drunk, but I definitely felt like my driving was not quite up to par.

    I have driven while tired before, but for some odd reason I was more conscious about it today. Then I came back to /. to find this article... weird.

    --


    The power of Christ compiles you.
    A Random Blog
  131. Informative, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone who has ever attempted to teach you to use the English language has failed.

  132. When I first wake up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can visualize things much more lucidly than at any other point in the day. I often exploit this time by remaining in bed with my eyes closed, thinking about any mechanical, graph, or otherwise visual-oriented problems that I have to work on. If I could maintain that difference in ability through the entire day, I'd be one happy camper.

    The few times that I have consumed alcohol on the other hand, I've become a useless, vapid douche that laughs at everything.

  133. I think the moderators were outsourced to India by StormKrow · · Score: 1

    ....I mean look at the way these threads have been modded, and modded into the wrong category....(I mean after all, isn't it morning in India right now?)

    --
    Who cares about the ozone layer?...thanks to CFC's I can write my name......IN CHEESE!!!
  134. Cockroach by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    HA!

    I was camping this summer in Florida and woke up to find a cockroach digging around in my bellybutton. I got him out but unfortunately I crushed and killed him in the process. The next 30 minutes was spent with a flashlight trying to pick out roach parts out of my navel.

    It was so nasty I almost gagged. I have a strong stomach (I go camping often) and not much gets to me but the thought of that was very disturbing.

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
    1. Re:Cockroach by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Used to go camping when I was a kid... woke up with variously a garter snake, a toad, and lake leeches in my bag, but never a cockroach! Here it's usually either black widows or wasps in the bed.

      Speaking of snakes in the night... where I used to live, twice I came down the hall in the middle of the night, stepped on something wiggly, and -- eeek! a baby snake. (I like snakes, but not underfoot in the dark!) Fortunately just gopher snakes, not rattlers!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?