you deciding the horse doesn't want to be in porn is the same as the other people assuming the horse does want to be in porn. so who should we believe? i guess if the horse is arroused that's consent?
no i don't pay taxes but that's besides the point as if i did pay taxes that go to a library so they can buy books and and pay bills, how is that different than if i look at advertisements on google that go to keeping google and print.google alive? there might be a difference to the author but not to me and this little part of the convo was about the end user. the only difference to me is that the digital version is far more useful and easier to access(dewey decimal is for cultists).
the ones with current copyrights are only searchable so what's their problem? and don't say that someone could make a script to get the whole book because someone could more easily just shoplift a book from a bookstore.
holy crap that is a stupid argument. i could go into a bookstore and steal a bunch of copies of a book and throw them in the street. so that mean books should not be sold in stores?? and google does supply more than excerpts but for books that are in the public domain.
so how does this apply to google? don't they just want to put up the fucking public domain? what's wrong with that? just because someone makes to money off of some dead guys books means he should be able to? fuck no, public domain should be put up on the internet for everyone to read without the need for tangible objects(books) that actually cost money when the real value is the information not the paper ink and bindings.
well of course it means any device has a connection but i assumed in this context i didn't need to say 'in this context doesn't online mean the internet' since it said 'pre-internet online'. still my questions have not been answered at all since i still don't understand to what these thinks were connecting and why.
some tribes in africa drain blood from the jugular of cows without taking enough to kill them and then stop the bleeding since it's more economical then actually killing the cow and eating the meat
they are non-lethal, just like water is non-lethal but in some circumstances water can drown you, except these weapons are even more non-lethal than water is. the only alternative is to kill everyone? i said injure or kill everyone idiot, illiterate Bush. i don't know why you called me an idiot Bush but right back at ya
wait, so your argument is that since we might possibly have a chance of injuring or killing one or more people, we should just injure and kill everyone? yay for logical conclusions
yeh and on average it makes sense for men to be smarter. men have been bred for intelligence(success) longer than women, who have been bred for boobs, hips, etc., right?
after learning all about echolocation with this couldnt you make a device with headphones and mount it on a bat and instead of sending out waves and determining location sending fake readings to the bat so that they become remote controlled?
wow a remoter control bat, that would be, like, so awesome, especially with a mini HELLADS laser on it.
in a rational world that would be true, but as evident on even slashdot, you can see that most people try to use evolution or big bang or any science as proof to negate all of religion instead of just the beliefs of a few fanatics (who probably only use religion as a means to power because they like people listening to them and looking up to them as leaders)
Slashdot Mirror
you deciding the horse doesn't want to be in porn is the same as the other people assuming the horse does want to be in porn. so who should we believe? i guess if the horse is arroused that's consent?
Zap Brannigan: Kiff, I asked you a question!
no i don't pay taxes but that's besides the point as if i did pay taxes that go to a library so they can buy books and and pay bills, how is that different than if i look at advertisements on google that go to keeping google and print.google alive? there might be a difference to the author but not to me and this little part of the convo was about the end user. the only difference to me is that the digital version is far more useful and easier to access(dewey decimal is for cultists).
the ones with current copyrights are only searchable so what's their problem? and don't say that someone could make a script to get the whole book because someone could more easily just shoplift a book from a bookstore.
are you people seriously too stupid to find print.google.com?
http://print.google.com/googleprint/library.html
http://print.google.com/googleprint/common.html
writing a script
holy crap that is a stupid argument. i could go into a bookstore and steal a bunch of copies of a book and throw them in the street. so that mean books should not be sold in stores?? and google does supply more than excerpts but for books that are in the public domain.
so, it's still free to you
i don't know, i'm pretty sure a bunch of guys that have been dead for hundreds and thousands of years don't really care about money.
so how does this apply to google? don't they just want to put up the fucking public domain? what's wrong with that? just because someone makes to money off of some dead guys books means he should be able to? fuck no, public domain should be put up on the internet for everyone to read without the need for tangible objects(books) that actually cost money when the real value is the information not the paper ink and bindings.
well of course it means any device has a connection but i assumed in this context i didn't need to say 'in this context doesn't online mean the internet' since it said 'pre-internet online'. still my questions have not been answered at all since i still don't understand to what these thinks were connecting and why.
doesn't online mean connected to the internet? i'm confused. what exactly does this thing serve to c64 users?
yes it does
who proclaimed him anyway? i don't remember voting for him.
more important: will intel still allow avg free to exist?
giant dinosaur chicks? so are they baby chicken dragons?
maybe i'm behind the times or something but what the hell is a rudd fucker?
you're the first person to bring it up so what the hell are you complaining about
and anyway, of more importance is the chimp genome being mapped and found to be 96% similar to humans
some tribes in africa drain blood from the jugular of cows without taking enough to kill them and then stop the bleeding since it's more economical then actually killing the cow and eating the meat
willy duer
phil dese nughts
haywood jablomi
they are non-lethal, just like water is non-lethal but in some circumstances water can drown you, except these weapons are even more non-lethal than water is.
the only alternative is to kill everyone? i said injure or kill everyone idiot, illiterate Bush. i don't know why you called me an idiot Bush but right back at ya
wait, so your argument is that since we might possibly have a chance of injuring or killing one or more people, we should just injure and kill everyone? yay for logical conclusions
but don't we want the "drawback" of decreased fertility? i mean if we all live longer and keep increasing the population... handbasket, hell, etc.
yeh and on average it makes sense for men to be smarter. men have been bred for intelligence(success) longer than women, who have been bred for boobs, hips, etc., right?
it's parts of the goku, vegeta, freeza, king cold, piccolo, tienshinhan processors put together into one super processor
in other news, rumors spread about Intel's new gohan processor
after learning all about echolocation with this couldnt you make a device with headphones and mount it on a bat and instead of sending out waves and determining location sending fake readings to the bat so that they become remote controlled?
wow a remoter control bat, that would be, like, so awesome, especially with a mini HELLADS laser on it.
in a rational world that would be true, but as evident on even slashdot, you can see that most people try to use evolution or big bang or any science as proof to negate all of religion instead of just the beliefs of a few fanatics (who probably only use religion as a means to power because they like people listening to them and looking up to them as leaders)