Just to let you know: The Daily Mail is never to be cited for anything, ever. Ever. It's simply not factual on a regular enough basis to be used in such a way.
It was either something in the Scientology 'fair game' rules, or specifically stated as something to do to a psychiatrist... but I remember having read in one of their own documents the tactic of false accusations against important individuals, specifically of sexual crimes. Not sure what to make of it.
Though it does seem like a fairly obvious thing to do as part of a character assassination.
Like someone mentioned above, I don't think its his analogy per se so much as "the rambling old-man-time's way of describing his point of view that he used".
And he stated that "one of his staff sent [him] an internet".
Yeah, I was actually surprised. The Slashdot quote and that snippet there make it look like pretentious horseshit, but it actually starts well and flows from there. Good article.
and the blue tails runnin thru map01 firing shotguns since tails are foxes are the best, on the multiplayer geting a DOUBLE KILLS and role play with MAH BOIS etc.
The way I see it, one can become equally suitable for a job from either university or self-study.
When it comes to a company choosing between the two, the company will think "well, they both appear to be equally competent from their interviews and performance on our light tests. However, the one with the degree has concrete proof that they perform satisfactorily for 4-5 years of constant study. Also, as a HR employee, if he fucks up I can say 'but he had a degree from X!'."
You're right. That's always come quite naturally to me, so I've got a history of being surprised at how nice people are in spheres where I've been told by others the only way to get ahead is to 'suck up' or be someone's bitch in an unspecified but theoretically humiliating way.
Very useful for small to medium-sized project collaboration, software and probably otherwise. That's how they should have billed it from the start. It lends itself to people putting up clumps of text, and allowing other people to modify it (the meat of it is basically a more dynamic version of a wiki).
It's too unstable to be particularly good for anything bigger than that, and offers nothing which makes it more suitable than the existing stuff for instant messaging.
I thought this was going to read like an angry old man having a good old confused fume about the modern day, but it actually seems like he thinks he's standing up for something here.
what I thought was an obvious possible explanation: people with pink cars tend to be the types that wear $400 shirts, have trophy wives or twenty boyfriends, and tend to have fairly good security, along with the habit of parking their cars in safe places.
This. I'm having trouble believing so many people here are saying "hurr this is college man, deal with it" when he's clearly talking about being in ITT Technical Institute or some other scam.
Well, you just stated that you think time cube might be a valid idea. Stay on the painkillers and wait until the brain surgery is over to post on Slashdot.
I'm going to side with Skype for no other reason than Fring is acting like a petulant and spoiled child.
As you say, Fring has been making use of Skype's APIs for some time (their blog post says 4 years), and as soon as something goes wrong, they turn around and say this? It's juvenile. The header image speaks volumes, and the document they link to that they claim is Skype "championing the cause of openness" in order to try and make them look hypocritical is a "Petition to Confirm A Consumer's Right to Use Internet Communications Software and Attach Devices to Wireless Networks", which isn't related.
Re:Sounds like Y2K predictions (again, groan)
on
Behind Cyberwar FUD
·
· Score: 1
The things is, all we can say about future threats is that they never turn out the way we've planned for them. Pearl harbour? who'd thought it? Sept 7? oops, didn't see that coming either. Fall of the USSR? dang! we never got to use all those nukes. So if / when there is what historians will look back on as cyberwar (or the first cyberwar), it almost certainly won't be the "war" that the government spent billions preparing for.
Cherry-picking. There are quite a number of threats that western governments have prepared for correctly, since it's a rare thing for intelligence to misreport the enemy's situation on the scale of 'Japan are not hostile'. The main point, however, is that Cyberwar, in the way this article describes it, is not going to happen, because it has little bearing on reality, in actuality or from the viewpoint of anyone but the Economist and anyone ignorant enough to believe them.
Slashdot Mirror
Having coded ActionScript, I can say that the claim their programmers will be improving their skills with the experience is bollocks.
I don't know, a heart attack from the victim's point of view as it happens sounds quite interesting.
Just to let you know: The Daily Mail is never to be cited for anything, ever. Ever. It's simply not factual on a regular enough basis to be used in such a way.
Insofar as the internet has 'fundamental principles', they may as well make them the most 'fundamental' ones.
I therefore suggest AT&T makes it their top priority to win the war against the Russians.
It was either something in the Scientology 'fair game' rules, or specifically stated as something to do to a psychiatrist... but I remember having read in one of their own documents the tactic of false accusations against important individuals, specifically of sexual crimes. Not sure what to make of it.
Though it does seem like a fairly obvious thing to do as part of a character assassination.
Like someone mentioned above, I don't think its his analogy per se so much as "the rambling old-man-time's way of describing his point of view that he used".
And he stated that "one of his staff sent [him] an internet".
Yeah, I was actually surprised. The Slashdot quote and that snippet there make it look like pretentious horseshit, but it actually starts well and flows from there. Good article.
You would know. Their 'waifu' are those stupid lolicon pillows.
http://www.geekologie.com/2009/07/29/2D-love.jpg
Doom? Is that supposed the old stupid game with the rickroll boom box?!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aJjMOy-Ops
and the blue tails runnin thru map01 firing shotguns since tails are foxes are the best, on the multiplayer geting a DOUBLE KILLS and role play with MAH BOIS etc.
http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Doom http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/LINK_MAH_BOIIIII
Doom's image has been tarnished plenty by these kinds of newbies these days. They no longer understand its contextual relevance and its significance.
http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Shit_Nobody_Cares_About
When it comes to a company choosing between the two, the company will think "well, they both appear to be equally competent from their interviews and performance on our light tests. However, the one with the degree has concrete proof that they perform satisfactorily for 4-5 years of constant study. Also, as a HR employee, if he fucks up I can say 'but he had a degree from X!'."
You're right. That's always come quite naturally to me, so I've got a history of being surprised at how nice people are in spheres where I've been told by others the only way to get ahead is to 'suck up' or be someone's bitch in an unspecified but theoretically humiliating way.
Very useful for small to medium-sized project collaboration, software and probably otherwise. That's how they should have billed it from the start. It lends itself to people putting up clumps of text, and allowing other people to modify it (the meat of it is basically a more dynamic version of a wiki).
It's too unstable to be particularly good for anything bigger than that, and offers nothing which makes it more suitable than the existing stuff for instant messaging.
I keep telling people this, but it's just bitch, bitch, bitch.
I think the worry is that as part of this 'dying' process a few other nations might get nukes rammed up their noses.
Hence, nobody wants a heated controller, but you might want a cooled one (to cure sweaty palms).
I thought this was going to read like an angry old man having a good old confused fume about the modern day, but it actually seems like he thinks he's standing up for something here.
what I thought was an obvious possible explanation: people with pink cars tend to be the types that wear $400 shirts, have trophy wives or twenty boyfriends, and tend to have fairly good security, along with the habit of parking their cars in safe places.
If the students got in or out cheap it would defeat the purpose of running such a scam.
This. I'm having trouble believing so many people here are saying "hurr this is college man, deal with it" when he's clearly talking about being in ITT Technical Institute or some other scam.
Because a visible house with a completely transparent heat signature isn't going to raise any eyebrows.
Well, you just stated that you think time cube might be a valid idea. Stay on the painkillers and wait until the brain surgery is over to post on Slashdot.
I'm going to side with Skype for no other reason than Fring is acting like a petulant and spoiled child.
As you say, Fring has been making use of Skype's APIs for some time (their blog post says 4 years), and as soon as something goes wrong, they turn around and say this? It's juvenile. The header image speaks volumes, and the document they link to that they claim is Skype "championing the cause of openness" in order to try and make them look hypocritical is a "Petition to Confirm A Consumer's Right to Use Internet Communications Software and Attach Devices to Wireless Networks", which isn't related.
Could you beat him too, please?
The things is, all we can say about future threats is that they never turn out the way we've planned for them. Pearl harbour? who'd thought it? Sept 7? oops, didn't see that coming either. Fall of the USSR? dang! we never got to use all those nukes. So if / when there is what historians will look back on as cyberwar (or the first cyberwar), it almost certainly won't be the "war" that the government spent billions preparing for.
Cherry-picking. There are quite a number of threats that western governments have prepared for correctly, since it's a rare thing for intelligence to misreport the enemy's situation on the scale of 'Japan are not hostile'. The main point, however, is that Cyberwar, in the way this article describes it, is not going to happen, because it has little bearing on reality, in actuality or from the viewpoint of anyone but the Economist and anyone ignorant enough to believe them.
I agree. I'm a young coot who gets the tattoo thing, but observes the majority of them aren't worth the skin they're printed on.
A private company could do this. It should mind it doesn't get sued in England, though.