Slashdot Mirror


If You Don't Want Your Car Stolen, Make It Pink

pickens writes "A study in the Netherlands illustrates car thieves' preferences. From 2004-2008, the most commonly colored vehicle stolen was black. This may be because black vehicles look more luxurious. Following close behind black were gray/silver automobiles. Of the 109 pink cars in the study, not one was stolen. A bright and uncommon color, like pink, may be as effective deterrent as an expensive security system. Ben Vollaard, who conducted the research, wrote, 'If the aversion to driving a car in an offbeat color is not too high – or if someone actually enjoys it – then buying deterrence through an uncommon car color may be at least as good a deal as buying deterrence through an expensive car security device.'"

390 comments

  1. Hm... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course, if everyone who didn't want their car stolen drove a pink car, then thieves would start stealing pink cars, and some other color would become the least popular.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:Hm... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think that analogy fails: the technical differences between operating systems are a bit more significant than the technical differences between car colors. I could be wrong, though, and it may also be the case that nobody is painting a car worth stealing pink...

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    2. Re:Hm... by ericspinder · · Score: 2, Funny

      Using a tech analogy to explain a car issue just doesn't have the same feeling as it does the other way around. Good try though.

      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    3. Re:Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does linux not have critical mass with 70% of the server market?

    4. Re:Hm... by rtaylor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Both operating systems allow a user program to access, modify, and delete content in the users home directory; can automatically start background tasks at user login by modifying .profile or .bashrc or similar; and will allow external communications for user executed programs on high ports.

      A trojan would work just as well with a person on Linux as it does for that same person on Windows but the odds of that person using Linux at the moment is lower and there isn't critical mass for it to spread.

      I'm far far more protective of the contents of /home than I am /usr. Do whatever you want to /usr, it takes less than 10 minutes to reinstall but the contents of /home can represent significantly more work.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    5. Re:Hm... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is terrible logic. It assumes that either a) everybody (or a least a majority) cares more about their car getting stolen than its color or b) thieves care more about the motivation of owners' choice of colors than the color itself.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    6. Re:Hm... by robthebloke · · Score: 5, Funny

      After my 3rd cycle was stolen in a year, I spray painted my new bike bright pink, put spokey-dokeys on it, and attached a large rainbow flag to the back. I've now managed to keep the same bike for over a year! (Admittedly, I now get a lot of people shouting words like 'gay' and 'bender' when i cycle past. In hindsight I should have probably thought about that before welding the flagpole on.... )

    7. Re:Hm... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The only pink cars I see are Cadillacs. I think there's some makeup company that gives them away as bonuses. And Bruce Springsteen wrote a song about them.

      I've never seen a pink economy car.

    8. Re:Hm... by broggyr · · Score: 1

      access, modify, and delete content in the users home directory; can automatically start background tasks at user login by modifying .profile or .bashrc or similar; and will allow external communications for user executed programs on high ports

      The skills to do these vary between Windows and other operating systems. I don't need a new skillset to drive a different color car... (or do I?) :D

      --
      Irony? Yea, it's like goldy and bronzy, only it's made of iron!
    9. Re:Hm... by grumbel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only significant difference between Linux and the rest is how you get software. In Linux you get by far most of it from your distribution, on Windows you get most stuff from more or less trustworthy webpages, so it is much easier to catch something evil by accident.

      In terms of actual security there really isn't much difference, as neither OS properly isolates applications by default and thus every evil tool has far more permissions then it needs.

    10. Re:Hm... by troc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Linux servers don't generally hang about in the average family home being badly managed by the average non-techy person like the average Windows box does :)

      Linux servers are usually seen hanging out in specially constructed and managed server farms (a.k.a. dungeons), administrated by gangs of pale, bespectacled geeks and BOFHs and generally up to date with decent security.

      to get slightly back on topic, the only pink cars I see in Holland tend to be bubblegum pink Nissan Micras, poverty-spec MINIs plastered with estate agency stickers and random old stuff that's been hand-painted by hippies. None of these would be particularly attractive targets even if they were black.

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
    11. Re:Hm... by broggyr · · Score: 1

      The "Mayhem" character in a recent Allstate commercial drives a pink Durango :)

      --
      Irony? Yea, it's like goldy and bronzy, only it's made of iron!
    12. Re:Hm... by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 0

      People aren't generally practicing irresponsible browsing and e-mail habits on a server. I hope.

    13. Re:Hm... by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yes, there are significant differences between MAC and windows systems. However, this does NOT mean that it is impossible to create a virus for a MAC computer. It's just as easy to write a virus for mac as it is for windows. Of course, given the choice between the two any sensible person will write it for windows because they'll infect more targets with the same amount of effort.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    14. Re:Hm... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a pink economy car.

      You have to look back in time. My first car was a pink 1960 Dodge Dart Phoenix, which was the 2-door. It was sold as an economy car, but you wouldn't know it by looking at it. Those used to thinking of a 1963+ Dart as "a Dart" wouldn't recognize this monster, which was 6.5' wide, 19.5' long, and allegedly had a curb weight of about 4700lb. It got around really well though, with a big-block 318 Hemi and a 650 carter 4bbl, and about 12:1 compression (premium+octane booster/lead substitute FTW!) And it got over 20 mpg on the freeway, too. Anyway, I actually have the advertisement for this generation of vehicle (the 4dr is depicted but they mention the 2dr) and the entire range was explicitly sold as an economy car. You'd never know by looking at one, though, or by driving one. It had all the features (including pushbutton transmission) and went down the road very nicely.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Hm... by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 1

      I've seen a pink VW Bug, Scion tC, and Honda Civic in my area.

    16. Re:Hm... by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      Servers are generally operated by people that know what they're doing. Yeah, a windows server might be more vulnerable than Linux, but a competent sysadmin can secure either system and fix any problems that arise in a timely manner.

      Basically, regardless of the system running on a server,a virus-infected server will be removed from the network within minutes and the virus removed within hours.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    17. Re:Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could be wrong, though,

      First logical, correct thing you've said in this thread!

    18. Re:Hm... by ballpoint · · Score: 1

      Cool car. Shows how progress really isn't and how we're gradually getting poorer physically.

      --
      Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
    19. Re:Hm... by MoOsEb0y · · Score: 1

      Going back to the unix analogy of the parent... Have you seen some of the custom themes for Gnome/KDE out there? :)

    20. Re:Hm... by Hojima · · Score: 1

      or that statistically, there are less pink cars out there to be stolen, so the rate seems low.

    21. Re:Hm... by hedwards · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thieves do care about the motivation of the owner's choice of color more than the color itself. The reason why they don't steal pink cars is that they stick out and are quickly spotted. Were it to become the dominant color it would be stolen far more frequently than it is now. Thieves like Black and grey cars simply because they blend in to the background. It's a stupid suggestion by the summary that it has to do with the luxurious look, that's bullshit, thieves choose based upon what's easy, profitable and available. It's no surprise that they choose the ones that blend into the background first.

    22. Re:Hm... by hedwards · · Score: 4, Funny

      Color, no, but driving a Prius requires you to forget how to drive and act generally dickishly when behind the wheel.

    23. Re:Hm... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      The differences between operating systems are not simply cosmetic, certainly not when it comes to writing code (including writing viruses and worms). The differences between Linux distros may be cosmetic, to a degree (there are plenty of exceptions to that statement, even among popular desktop distros), but there is a world of difference between Windows and Ubuntu or Fedora. The first thing that comes to my mind is that most desktop Linux users will find all the software they need in the repositories, with the exception of the Flash plugin (but Adobe maintains Ubuntu and Fedora repositories for that plugin anyway, so the point is a bit moot) -- so setting noexec on /home is reasonable and will probably go unnoticed by the users who are most vulnerable to trojans (at least in my experience). The same cannot really be said about Windows, for which an extensive system of repositories does not really exist. Setting noexec is not beyond the skill level of "that family member who knows about computers," and it would not be too far fetched for distro maintainers to create a "basic mode" which sets noexec, and an "expert mode" which does not (perhaps these modes would be selected at the first boot).

      Even if the noexec strategy was not in use, a virus writer would still have issues to deal with. Different distros are not necessarily compatible, and even within a single distro, there is no guarantee of compatibility. A trojan that tries to pass itself off as a routine program in GNOME would stick out like a sore thumb for a KDE user. A virus that tries to add itself to .bashrc would not be very effective for a csh user (nor would it be very effective for a user who does not use the shell, which is not as rare as you might think). The sort of monoculture that exists with Windows -- where a particular set of programs is very likely to be installed and used -- is not so prevalent with common Linux distros.

      Sure, it is possible to write Linux viruses, but the effect is not as severe (Warhol worms do not seem very likely); even if "Linux" grew to the popularity of Windows, it would require a single distro to be king, with a single configuration -- a monoculture that is not very likely to happen.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    24. Re:Hm... by put_the_cat_out · · Score: 1

      Its the automobile version of Windows vs. Mac vis-à-vis viruses.

    25. Re:Hm... by Conchobair · · Score: 1
    26. Re:Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Mayhem" character in a recent Allstate commercial drives a pink Durango :)

      So ah, why is this a "Technology" story? Paints/dyes/pigments have been around for a long long time and are quite low-tech. You see, it doesn't make sense. This is properly an Idle or maybe a News story.

    27. Re:Hm... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Cool car. Shows how progress really isn't and how we're gradually getting poorer physically.

      Try sticking a probe up the tailpipe and running an emissions test before you say that. This car was technologically advanced for its day. My 1982 MBZ 300SD is a diesel, probably gets similar emissions overall, and gets 30 mpg. A 1990s Golf TDI gets 50 mpg freeway and has even better emissions. It's not that it's not possible, it's that we're buyin' what they're sellin'.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    28. Re:Hm... by Conchobair · · Score: 1

      They broke that link... Hello Ferrari?

    29. Re:Hm... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is another significant difference: there is no "Linux monoculture," the way there is a "Windows monoculture." If I tell you that I use Linux, I am not really telling you much -- as a case in point, plenty of people look at my monitor and ask, "What the heck operating system is that?!" because they have never seen e16 before. Even a basic trojan would stand out if a user did not have the particular environment that the author thinks they have -- a KDE user will be harder to fool with a trojan that was intended for GNOME users.

      As another example, consider the number of viruses that exploit buffer overflows in Windows Media Player. I have seen these files, played in another media player, and they display a simple message: to play this properly, use Windows Media Player. Would such a strategy work for a desktop Linux user? Well, again, which media player would you target? There is no one universally installed media player across different distros or different "flavors" of a single distro. Your trojan is going to be less successful if you need to force people to open their package manager and search for a given media player first.

      These sort of things basically dull the impact of viruses. It is still possible to write viruses, of course, but it will be harder to spread a single virus as rapidly.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    30. Re:Hm... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      You contradict yourself, saying first that thieves care about the owners' motivation, then saying they don't and just go for whatever is easiest. While there may be overlap, one is either the primary reason or it isn't. I think we both know it's opportunity, not subtle purchase motivations, that drive theft. Hence my original criticism of the original post remains valid.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    31. Re:Hm... by WilyCoder · · Score: 1

      pics or it didn't happen...

    32. Re:Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just as easy to write a virus for mac as it is for windows.

      Not if you include "must be effective at infecting targets" without user assistance as one of the design criteria. Of course I wouldn't expect someone who thinks that "MAC" is capitalized to know fuck-all about them.

    33. Re:Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Painting my brand new bike with ugly fluorescent colors in combination with a very good lock did the trick for me. The lock can only be cut by a diamond saw used by professional thieves, and they cannot sell the bike anymore for a reasonable price. The amateurs who don't care about the color cannot steal the bike because of the hardened lock. The combination is perfect. See this blog article for the details how I transformed my new bike into a ugly but more thieve resistant bike.

    34. Re:Hm... by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      random old stuff that's been hand-painted by hippies

      These would have to be the hands-down least-attractive targets for thieves. There about a dozen nutjob/hippy/artiste vehicles driving around my city, and I can't imagine a thief making the mistake of stealing a vehicle that almost literally screams "look at me" as it rolls down the street.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    35. Re:Hm... by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      Then Pink will become the New Black!

    36. Re:Hm... by internewt · · Score: 1

      They are referer checking, that's why it appeared to break.

      As well as enhancing privacy, forging referers bypasses the desires of some webmasters to try to control the stuff they publish.

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    37. Re:Hm... by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 1

      Sure, it is possible to write Linux viruses, but the effect is not as severe

      My last run through Metasploit against one of my newest FreeBSD servers suggests there are many more known vulnerabilities in Linux/BSD as compared to Windows. With privilege escalations being the most common.

      Yes, some of the risk is mitigated by the source code being open for public scrutiny. Yes, some of the risk is mitigated by those other OSs being niche segments of the market.

      The OS vulnerability list is ALWAYS completely moot from the very moment you assume that a user will have physical access to the machine. The user itself is often the only relevant vulnerability. Any good sysadmin knows this and employs a handful of mitigation techniques.

      To make this post more on-topic than what I am replying to... How about ditch the standard keyed ignition systems, and install a 4.3" screen with tiny full qwerty and make the driver log in and run a CLI program to begin the ignition sequence. Bonus points for clever pop-ups targeting would-be thiefs that attempt to destroy the steering column to bypass the ignition circuitry.

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    38. Re:Hm... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      That is why they are not stolen. The Cars that are Rendered Pink also have an SEP (Someone Else's Problem) field around it, thus made invisible. You may only spot it from the corner of you eye when you are not looking. But once you realize what it is you then realize it is someone else's problem then you cannot see it, and you forgot you ever saw it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    39. Re:Hm... by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      I'm far far more protective of the contents of /home than I am /usr. Do whatever you want to /usr, it takes less than 10 minutes to reinstall but the contents of /home can represent significantly more work.

      Or you could perform automated incremental backups and not worry so much about /home either. I'm a big fan of Time Machine on my Macs but you can do much the same thing with RSync.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    40. Re:Hm... by LoyalOpposition · · Score: 1

      And if everyone in the nation did that then we would be a pink car nation.

      ~Loyal

      --
      I aim to misbehave.
    41. Re:Hm... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I don't need a new skillset to drive a different color car... "

      You might if it is pink..

      :)

      I mean, one of the more obvious reasons I'd think no one would want to steal a pink car...is that other thieves would give them grief for stealing a 'gay' car.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    42. Re:Hm... by pieceofstone · · Score: 1

      I'm glad your bicycle wasn't stolen. One time, the bicycle of a sibling was locked up tightly but someone wrecked the bicycle in such a state, presumably out of spite that it couldn't be stolen.

    43. Re:Hm... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Does noexec work against some user typing "perl Makefile.PL"?

      Windows users were willing to enter passwords to decrypt zipfiles in order to run the malware inside... Or to do various things in order to install "Antivirus 2010" on their "infected" machine. So give these sort of users a "Desktop Linux" OS, and I'm sure they'll step right up to the task. Anything to see bunnies/pigs/famousperson.

      While the distros differ, to create a spam or DDoS zombie, you don't need that much beyond the perl standard library and normal user privileges. LWP and even IO::Socket::INET are available on most distros.

      To keep it running you can hook onto all the .rc and .profile stuff, and/or use "at" or "crontab". Joe User isn't going to know anymore than they can look at the windows registry to find similar stuff.

      So I think you overestimate the difficulty of writing cross-distro malware. Writing it to also run on OSX will take a few more lines (e.g. to put the relevant launchd stuff in ~/Library/LaunchAgents or wherever), but I'm sure the average perl hacker is up to the task.

      Python and ruby are nearly as widespread nowadays if you don't want to use perl.

      I'm currently writing some crossplatform (Linux, Solaris, AIX, OSX etc) stuff for work. And only a very few of the problems I'm facing would make malware difficult. The only issues I see are installation (but the user might help ;) ), and getting the stuff to keep starting up (which isn't so hard).

      Anyway, if OSX gets really popular, The Steve is going to have a good excuse to "App Store" and jail OSX...

      --
    44. Re:Hm... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      nor does it stop the window link icon overflow that allows code to execute by simply viewing the contents of a folder in explorer..
      That bug that has been in windows for over 10 years....

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    45. Re:Hm... by heson · · Score: 1

      It is only allowed to have a pink car if its a 1959 Cadillac Eldorado.

    46. Re:Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Painting my brand new bike with ugly fluorescent colors in combination with a very good lock did the trick for me. The lock can only be cut by a diamond saw used by professional thieves, and they cannot sell the bike anymore for a reasonable price. The amateurs who don't care about the color cannot steal the bike because of the hardened lock. The combination is perfect. See this blog article for the details how I transformed my new bike into a ugly but more thieve resistant bike.

    47. Re:Hm... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Yes they do. I have yet to see a Windows7 NAS. yet I see a LOT of people that own a NAS that suprisingly all run Linux. In fact I cant find one that does not run linux in one form or another.. and yes they all are horribly managed... no passwords, open 100%....

      Plus most families have poorly managed linux routers and firewalls.. although many have changed to VXworks so those get all mismanaged as well.

      There's more linux machines out there in the home than Windows machines... you Blu ray player, your TV, they all run linux.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    48. Re:Hm... by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      There are a couple of different models of car available as part of the Mary Kay Career Car program, not just the Cadillacs. The cars aren't really bonuses, you can get them in lieu of cash for building a team with enough sales; intro. If your goal is to recruit more people to do even more sales, it's understandable how driving around the car could be worth more in new business than it costs.

    49. Re:Hm... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      What about the 80's honda civic here that is done up as a Starwars A wing fighter.... Yes it's real... and scary.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    50. Re:Hm... by ballpoint · · Score: 1

      By physically poorer I mean having to live with more physical constraints and restrictions. The fact that emissions and mpg become ever more important and that there's less room on the road are indications of that. Were it not, and were the Dodge, MB and Golf available today in a new state, with the same (easily upgraded) mod cons, which one would you prefer ?

      --
      Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
    51. Re:Hm... by rvw · · Score: 1

      After my 3rd cycle was stolen in a year, I spray painted my new bike bright pink, put spokey-dokeys on it, and attached a large rainbow flag to the back. I've now managed to keep the same bike for over a year! (Admittedly, I now get a lot of people shouting words like 'gay' and 'bender' when i cycle past. In hindsight I should have probably thought about that before welding the flagpole on.... )

      I have a pink Mercier racing bike (and this is the original color). The bike is about 30 years old, I have it 15 years now. Nobody ever called me any name because of the color. The funny thing is girls really like it. And it doesn't get stolen, and I live in a city where stealing bikes is very common. It simply doesn't have any value with a color like that.

    52. Re:Hm... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      So steal a hearse.

      NOBODY stops a hearse.

      You and your friends following you can ignore all stop signs and red lights, drive slow and piss off everyone, and nobody will bother you.

      You can speed, and nobody will bother you.

      You can park anywhere, and nobody will bother you.

      And if they do, just tell them you have a couple of cool ones in the back, wanna see if they're defrosting? ... :-)

      Nobody bothers a hearse.

    53. Re:Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time somebody says that, I just reply with a single word: Apache.

      (And if you need an explanation, Apache is more popular than IIS yet less hacked than IIS.)

    54. Re:Hm... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's a biggie, but for years not many malware authors exploited it though.

      So far autorun works well enough for them and I think using autorun to launch stuff is according to the Microsoft Windows guidelines, so I'm sure Microsoft will maintain backward compatibility with that method for a few more years ;).

      Whereas I bet Microsoft will fix the icon problem, if only for Windows Vista onwards (if they think they can get away with annoying the megacorps still on XP).

      --
    55. Re:Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thieves do care about the motivation of the owner's choice of color more than the color itself. The reason why they don't steal pink cars is that they stick out and are quickly spotted. Were it to become the dominant color it would be stolen far more frequently than it is now. Thieves like Black and grey cars simply because they blend in to the background. It's a stupid suggestion by the summary that it has to do with the luxurious look, that's bullshit, thieves choose based upon what's easy, profitable and available. It's no surprise that they choose the ones that blend into the background first.

      Right idea, wrong logic. Thieves steal cars based on the market for the parts. Black and silver cars far outnumber pink cars and therefore their body panels are more desirable. The most common cars stolen in America are just that, common cars. Thieves don't steal quirkier cars because they would stand out, they don't steal them because there is less people that want those parts.

    56. Re:Hm... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      My first car was a pink 1960 Dodge Dart Phoenix

      I would have been eight years old in 1960, don't remember ever seeing a car that matched that description. But I do remember the Chevys and Caddillacs with tail fins. A twenty foot long two door? Wow! That's almost limo sized.

      had a curb weight of about 4700lb. It got around really well though, with a big-block 318 Hemi and a 650 carter 4bbl, and about 12:1 compression (premium+octane booster/lead substitute FTW!) And it got over 20 mpg on the freeway, too.

      I find it hard to believe that a car that massive would get that kind of mileage on the freeway, unless you kept it under 55 mph. I had a 1974 Pontiac LeMans with a 350 CI engine (dual exhaust, 4 barrel, stcikshift) and it only got about 18 on the highway, far less if I opened up the back barrels.

      My dad's 1964 VW bug didn't get much more than 25 on the highway.

    57. Re:Hm... by operagost · · Score: 1

      I am not aware of a Hemi 318 (in 1960, the 318 was the A engine). I was also curious about your "big block" description, as 318 cu in is a small displacement for a big block. I found out that those old Mopars were originally called "wide blocks"-- so close enough!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    58. Re:Hm... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I didn't say I wanted to!

    59. Re:Hm... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      But they may still break into the cars to steal parts out of them, like airbags, radios, GPS, and other easily removed items for which the body color doesn't matter.

      Vanity plates for a pink car: LTSH RED.

      What about color-shifting paint, and what do you put on the DMV record for that?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    60. Re:Hm... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      The fact that emissions and mpg become ever more important and that there's less room on the road are indications of that. Were it not, and were the Dodge, MB and Golf available today in a new state, with the same (easily upgraded) mod cons, which one would you prefer ?

      If emissions and mpg didn't matter, which would I prefer? Well I hear that in that universe the Golf is powered by unicorn farts and it leaves a sweet-smelling rainbow trail from the exhaust pipe. So I'd take the Golf!

      Here's an observation about living within constraints, that I think will be echoed tenfold in future generations: Gee, maybe if they had focused more on efficiency then, we wouldn't have to restrict ourselves so much today to deal with their lack of foresight.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    61. Re:Hm... by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      You got it half right, thieves choose common color cars because
      A)They blend in and swapping plates for a similar model and color is simple
      B)the resale on a hot pink car is tough
      Even if the car is going to be chopped it will still need to be driven there

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    62. Re:Hm... by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the diversity of Linux vs. the weakness of the MS mono-culture is pretty much a myth. Not %100, but enough that it isn't a valid argument. The vast majority of users are running either Ubuntu or Fedora. XP and Windows 7 have have as much of a difference as Ubuntu and Fedora. Sure there are other distros out there, but pointing them out is a little like pointing out that some people still run win98. Then, you have to consider that the people who would run a Linux distro that is not Ubuntu or Fedora are the kind of people that would specifically go out and search for different options. Those people would be the ones already running Linux and Non-Ubuntu/Fedora OSes. If you brought all of the Windows users over to Linux, 98% of them would end up on Ubuntu.

      As for targeting the applications, Gnome or KDE... Exactly the same issue as with the rest of the OS. You write two simple front ends. One for KDE and one for Gnome, or you just hope the user doesn't notice that you are using the wrong widgets. It is the exact same issue as malware on various versions of windows. Media players? Target VLC or MPlayer. Even better target any of the libraries that get heavily reused like the ogg decoder.

      If you target any application that is installed by default by both Fedora and Ubuntu, you have targeted most users, and the percentage would only rise with more users switching from Windows.

    63. Re:Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, sir, drive a Prius and I act dickishly all of the time.

    64. Re:Hm... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      That's not something learned by Prius drivers.

      The existence of the Prius is just an attractant that gathers that sort of driver into it's demographics.

    65. Re:Hm... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      There are goth types in this area who drive old hearses. One of them has a giant fake spider up on the windshield ledge as a decoration. It's sort of a camp thing with these sorts.

      You're correct about generic nondescript hearses, of course.

    66. Re:Hm... by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      My experience is that BMWs and pickup trucks generally have the most dickheaded drivers.

      I am fortunate to have never encountered a BMW pickup. If there is such a thing I would not want to know about it lest I be unable to sleep.

      Priuses are only environmentally friendly if you don't understand how manufacturing and recycling works.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    67. Re:Hm... by cycleflight · · Score: 1

      This is the same reason Apple's OSX security is claimed to be so infallible. Not that many people are on macs, so why bother?

      --
      "...And who wants to make buttprints in the sands of time?" ~Bob Moawad
    68. Re:Hm... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that the more efficient you make the engine, the better your mileage the lower your emissions. Of all the technological reasons cars get better mileage and lower emissions, fuel injection is probably the biggest.

    69. Re:Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an asshole.

    70. Re:Hm... by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

      My guess is that he's thinking of a Polyspherical 318 (A-series) engine, however it could have been a 315 Hemi. although that would have required an engine swap.

      The real grate of it all is that I didn't catch the 318 Hemi on the first read. I guess I'm slipping.

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    71. Re:Hm... by wsanders · · Score: 1

      I do have a friend who painted his bike fluorescent pink to discourage theft. That was as far as he went with the "gay" motif, though. The bike has not been stolen yet.

      Actually, my old road bike is "flamingo" colored. It's a fairly common color for a bike, and I have yellow handlebar tape, which makes it look pretty spiffy but not unusual.

      Bottom line is pink is a much less common color for a car than a bike. You could paint your car international orange, too, so, like, whatever.

      --
      Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    72. Re:Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why but it seems like Jetta drivers are somewhat problematic.

    73. Re:Hm... by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      12:1 compression? Sounds a little fishy to me. Most cars of that era ran about 8:1, and the high-performance engines only ran a bit over 10:1.

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    74. Re:Hm... by sorak · · Score: 1

      There is also the issue of self-selection. Right now, Linux users tend to be more savvy than Windows users. If Linux were the big thing, then that bar would drop in a hurry, and we'd be hearing outcry about why there's no Linux version of weatherbug, or why it's so hard to run an application from an email attachment.

    75. Re:Hm... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's feedback. I have a hybrid now (not Prius), and the instant feedback about what your mileage is encourages you to drive a little slower, stick to the speed limit or even under, and to maintain a constant speed. Meanwhile people in gas guzzlers have instant feedback only about fast they're going, how long it's taking to get to work, how many people are in their way, how loud they're starting to yell, etc.

    76. Re:Hm... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Were it not, and were the Dodge, MB and Golf available today in a new state, with the same (easily upgraded) mod cons, which one would you prefer ?

      I'd want the golf because it handles pretty well and it's easy to park, plus it gets the best mileage of the three.

      If the MBZ got the same mileage as the Golf, which it doesn't mostly because it's a land yacht (sleek, but still a boat) then it would be my first choice. If the numbers worked out I would have got a Wolfsberg-built Golf TDI, but you can buy a lot of fuel for ~US$4k.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    77. Re:Hm... by McDozer · · Score: 1

      The town I grew up in this gothic chick drove an old beat up half broke down hearse. She had a skull on the front of it where the hood ornament should have been. It was flat black and ugly as hell. The bad part was you would see her all over town broke down on the side of the road.

    78. Re:Hm... by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      The first thing that comes to my mind is that most desktop Linux users will find all the software they need in the repositories, with the exception of the Flash plugin (but Adobe maintains Ubuntu and Fedora repositories for that plugin anyway, so the point is a bit moot) -- so setting noexec on /home is reasonable and will probably go unnoticed by the users who are most vulnerable to trojans (at least in my experience).

      That's no different to the way most Windows users find their software in shops, or on cnet. Setting noexec on /home also doesn't stop people just installing something system-wide using rpm (or whatever).

      Even if the noexec strategy was not in use, a virus writer would still have issues to deal with. Different distros are not necessarily compatible, and even within a single distro, there is no guarantee of compatibility. A trojan that tries to pass itself off as a routine program in GNOME would stick out like a sore thumb for a KDE user. A virus that tries to add itself to .bashrc would not be very effective for a csh user (nor would it be very effective for a user who does not use the shell, which is not as rare as you might think). The sort of monoculture that exists with Windows -- where a particular set of programs is very likely to be installed and used -- is not so prevalent with common Linux distros.

      Linux is more than enough of a monoculture where it counts, so that point is moot. Any user capable of identifying the difference between a GNOME app and a KDE is app is already well above the level of knowledge where they're unlikely to be infected by something so obvious. No competent (and even most incompetent) attackers would focus only on a single shell's dotfiles, they'll simply hit all of them, along with the various methods for automatically starting software in the most common GUI shells.

      Sure, it is possible to write Linux viruses, but the effect is not as severe (Warhol worms do not seem very likely); even if "Linux" grew to the popularity of Windows, it would require a single distro to be king, with a single configuration -- a monoculture that is not very likely to happen.

      It wouldn't require anything of the sort. If Linux really was that fragmented, and distros really were that different, then they wouldn't have such vast software repositories to leverage - anything that makes it simple to run a "good" program on multiple distros, makes it equally easy to run a "bad" program on those same distros. There simply isn't much variation between the most common Linux distros, and it's disingenuous at best to say the practical result is any different to the variations between the multiple versions of Windows on the market.

      The simple fact is that you can't protect a machine when ignorant end users can install arbitrary software.

    79. Re:Hm... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Wait, you can't use a computer analogy in a car conversation. It only works the other way around.

    80. Re:Hm... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      The lock can only be cut by a diamond saw used by professional thieves...

      Are you sure? It looks like your U-lock can simply be popped open with a car jack (probably a Volvo car jack, a truck car jack, or some other brand). The red part might be designed to expand, but I doubt it would hold even if that were the case. You may want to supplement your article with this information (no attribution necessary). In the University town I lived in, this was common knowledge and I doubt that this method of breaking U-locks was restricted to professional thieves.

      This is why painting your bike with fluorescent crap, having it registered with your city/police department, and actively using a second lock (of a different type, which is easy to use -- just like your "chip control" lock), is so important. Every layer of protection, however small, helps a little.

      Note that you can also purchase bones to fill in the remaining gaps in your U-lock where a would-be thief could stick his car jack in. And I don't know if it's customary in the Netherlands, but in some cities in the US, the police recommends to etch the registration number you got from them into the frame (instead of just using their stickers which can easily be defaced and/or painted over).

    81. Re:Hm... by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      Well, the flag isn't affixed in some permanent way, is it? You can always fly the Jolly Roger. Or the US flag. On second thought, the pirate flag might be considered too cool.

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    82. Re:Hm... by marcosdumay · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The vast majority of users are running either Ubuntu or Fedora."

      Or Susie, or plain Debian, or slackware. From the Distrowatcher, Debian based distros are the mos common, they are 1/3 of them. Of course, saying "Debian based" isn't enough information for an attacker (unless he targets synaptic, or should he target aptitude instead?), the most used is Ubuntu (all versions of it) with something near 20% of the instalations. So, the best you can target at is 1/5 of the population. Also, Ubuntu systems are mostly low profile, if you want to get the best computers, you'll have to go for Red Hat (the most used on that segment), and you'll discover that from the point of view of the attacker, one Red Hat install (or any distro on a hight profile system) differs way more from another HR install (even of the same version) than a Windows NT install differs from a Windows 2008 one.

      Anyway, diversity alone is not the end all explanation for Linux machines not being infected so often. Usability, bug count, the expertize of users and admins, and even the smaller number of instalations (on some segments) are also important.

    83. Re:Hm... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      If you're going to be a parasite, at least try to be a successful parasite and try not to kill off the host. For every bicycle that gets stolen/vandalized in a public place, the word-of-mouth will ensure that there are at least a dozen bikes that will not get used at that location, or used period, because the owners would rather not have the same thing happen to their bikes.

    84. Re:Hm... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      You could just target apt and then you have targeted both aptitude AND synaptic. High profile Windows boxes are not generally going to have someone sitting around surfing for porn from the server. Thus, pretty much all of the attacks on high profile sites are going to use the network as the entry vector, and are going to be very different than the kinds of attacks that happen to a desktop system. This is the same whether it is Windows or Linux. On the server side, a lot of tools are shared between the different distros. That means that you just pick one with a flaw. The same as you would with Windows.

      From a desktop perspective, Ubuntu rules the roost, and targeting it will get you most users. Sure there are people running Suse on the desktop, but besides the huge amount of shared code between it and Ubuntu, you are still talking about the same kind of user that wouldn't be as likely to get hit by a Windows virus. The vast majority of users would be no safer due to Linux diversity than they are from Windows diversity.

    85. Re:Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the instant feedback about what your mileage is encourages you to drive a little slower, stick to the speed limit or even under, and to maintain a constant speed

      If I drove a car with regenerative brakes, I would be far more keen to accelerate in stop-start traffic, because I'd know that when I brake the energy isn't gone for good. The only reason I accelerate in stop-start traffic now is either courtesy (people behind me might miss the light if I crawl, but this only applies if there are lights) or to stop someone cutting in front of me. The mileage feedback might help, but I don't see why they couldn't put that in an ICE-only car.

    86. Re:Hm... by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      After my 3rd cycle was stolen in a year

      Aha, this is the real answer that this study didn't evaluate. If you ride a bicycle [and don't own a car], your car will never be stolen!

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    87. Re:Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyway, diversity alone is not the end all explanation for Linux machines not being infected so often.

      The fact that Linux users are largely an elite few with computer literacy probably contributes far more to Linux users not being infected as often more significantly than any software differences.

      Microsoft caters to ordinary joes and people that have learned "Well what does this button do? It says press it so I'll press it!" *PRESS* "OH NO! A VIRUS!" Plus, because it's such a large target, there are bajillions of hackers trying for it. There are likely the tiniest fraction of those hackers trying to get viruses on Linux or even Apple machines.

      And let me be honest, I'm using a Windows box here. I ran a full antivirus and spyware scan for the first time in like 3 months the other day. Definitions fully updated and everything. 0 viruses, 0 spyware. I ran one for my parents (who probably don't frequent naughty sites due to their puritan morals). It's been maybe a month since I last ran one for them and BAM, like a dozen viruses and a hundred+ spyware.

      And I frequent quite a few shady sites. So it's really just a matter of user proficiency more than the software.

    88. Re:Hm... by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Admittedly, I now get a lot of people shouting words like 'gay' and 'bender' when i cycle past.

      I hope you're telling them back to "bite [your] gay meaty ass!"

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    89. Re:Hm... by anethema · · Score: 1

      As another poster said, a car jack will easily smash that lock.

      A large (4ft long) set of bolt cutters will also do it.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    90. Re:Hm... by pipedwho · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to also hire a couple of armed security guards to personally watch over your bike.

    91. Re:Hm... by codeButcher · · Score: 1
      The 50 pound bike rule:
      • A 5 pound bike needs 45 pounds of lock and chain
      • A 10 pound bike needs 40 pounds of lock and chain
      • ...
      • A 50 pound bike doesn't need locks or chains
      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    92. Re:Hm... by riT-k0MA · · Score: 1

      Obviously you've never lived in South Africa.
      There are some people in certain townships you can walk up to and order a silver BMW with green tinted windows and they'll have it for you within a week (100% stolen). Most car theft here is never opportunistic; it's organised and the thieves go through a lot of preparation before they steal/hijack cars.
      the worst part is they know that if they kill the driver in the process, the cops will take longer to start searching for the car because they have to take care of the body first.

    93. Re:Hm... by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      From the preventing sleep department:
      http://www.nextconceptcars.com/custom-cars/bwm-m5-pickup/ At your service.
      We are lucky it is only a concept car.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    94. Re:Hm... by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      Enjoy your self-imposed exile. Being able to connect and share with other comes with the risk of catching cooties.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    95. Re:Hm... by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's so douchey that reading the article means I can skip my shower today. Thanks!

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  2. Tonight in COPS! by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nobody wants to be that guy on youtube arrested at the wheel of a pink Miata.

    1. Re:Tonight in COPS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh please! He was driving 65 in a 30 zone while wearing a blond wig, lipstick, G-string, fishnet stocking and fuck-me shoes.

      He wanted to get caught honey.

    2. Re:Tonight in COPS! by bit9 · · Score: 1

      Then don't get arrested. It's generally not hard to avoid.

    3. Re:Tonight in COPS! by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

      Unless you're speeding in a hot pink sportscar. Most cops would consider that provocation.

    4. Re:Tonight in COPS! by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 0

      Then don't get arrested. It's generally not hard to avoid.

      I believe a "Whoosh!" is in order.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    5. Re:Tonight in COPS! by uncanny · · Score: 0, Troll

      I wouldn't want to be a guy caught driving any color miata anyways

    6. Re:Tonight in COPS! by bit9 · · Score: 1

      Duh. Not only did I get the joke, but it was already modded funny before I replied. Just because I give a half-serious reply to a joke doesn't mean I didn't get the joke. Or were you just hoping to get modded "Insightful" for saying "Whoosh"?

    7. Re:Tonight in COPS! by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't want to be a guy caught driving any color miata anyways

      So drive faster ...

    8. Re:Tonight in COPS! by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Duh. Not only did I get the joke, but it was already modded funny before I replied. Just because I give a half-serious reply to a joke doesn't mean I didn't get the joke. Or were you just hoping to get modded "Insightful" for saying "Whoosh"?

      I stand by my statement.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    9. Re:Tonight in COPS! by bmsleight · · Score: 1

      Honestly - LOL.

    10. Re:Tonight in COPS! by bit9 · · Score: 1

      I stand by my statement.

      Good. That and $1 will buy you a cup of coffee. You can stand by your statement all you want - doesn't make it any less of a karma-whoring troll comment.

    11. Re:Tonight in COPS! by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      See you and raise.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    12. Re:Tonight in COPS! by bit9 · · Score: 1

      Troll strategy #501:

      Step 1. Find a comment modded "Funny".
      Step 2. Find a reply that appears to be serious.
      Step 3. ASSume this means that respondent did not get the joke. Doesn't matter how stinkingly obvious the joke was, as long as respondent can be interpreted as having not gotten the joke.
      Step 4. Use the magic troll word: "Whoosh" (practically guaranteed to garner a mod point or two).
      Step 5. ????
      Step 6. Profit!

    13. Re:Tonight in COPS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, Be nice!!!

      I did not want to get caught. I just wanted to get a little noticed, that's all. :-)

  3. Solution to theft by quatin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have stuff nobody wants.

    1. Re:Solution to theft by xSauronx · · Score: 4, Funny

      this is why the patch cables I buy are purple....haven't lost a single one yet

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    2. Re:Solution to theft by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Funny

      This reminds me of one of the IT guys where I work. When I was tasked with setting up a new server for my research group, he loaned me a screwdriver...and it was pink. He said he had held on to it since the early 80s, because nobody wanted a pink screwdriver.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    3. Re:Solution to theft by augi01 · · Score: 1

      Solution #2: Do not have any possessions whatsoever.

      --
      No yesterday, no tomorrow, and no today.
    4. Re:Solution to theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard that the boxer shorts given in Arizona's Tent City Jail were being stolen. Sheriff Joe dyed them all pink.

    5. Re:Solution to theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      he loaned me a screwdriver...and it was pink.

      Maybe it's some sort of code.

    6. Re:Solution to theft by grimJester · · Score: 3, Funny

      My red stapler always disappears. I've thought about pink, but I like my red stapler.

    7. Re:Solution to theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zune!

    8. Re:Solution to theft by Reilaos · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thanks. Now I'll never be raped.

    9. Re:Solution to theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Be cautious with those purple patch cables around Prince..

    10. Re:Solution to theft by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      Yep! A few years back I was driving a beat up RX7 that I paid $900 cash for. The door locks had worn out and stopped working, so I left it unlocked all the time. Even with a CB Radio in the front seat, no one ever messed with the car for the three or four years I had it (Got my money's worth out of that thing.) I could have left the keys in the ignition the whole time and been fine.

      If you don't want your car stolen, buy a beat-up old pick-up truck. You know, the one with the cast iron bumpers. Then paint it pink, I guess.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    11. Re:Solution to theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It reminds me of the guy who, to displease his wife, cut his balls...

    12. Re:Solution to theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... that could explain why I can't seem to get rid of an old SGI workstation I still have laying around.

    13. Re:Solution to theft by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Also a solution to free beer or two at a pub. Well, relatively speaking.

      Seems the same effect was present, at least in the past, with pink GBA and pink NDS; new ones, too. Hey, if people want you to have a beer on them...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    14. Re:Solution to theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On reading this I glanced up to look at my very own pink screwdriver, only to notice it has been stolen.

    15. Re:Solution to theft by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      My dad drove a POS 94 Ford Ranger up until a few months ago and he never locked the doors. The only time it was broken into in the whole time he owned it was when kids were going around the movie theater parking lot stealing change out of cars. I bet they made a whole lot of money doing that...

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    16. Re:Solution to theft by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's a similar trick for wrenches in a machine shop. There's a couple sizes of wrench that are extremely common for changing tools on a mill/lathe. What you do is buy a combo wrench (one with a wrench on both ends) and use a chop saw or plasma cutter to cut off the worthless end of the wrench. The wrench still works great for changing tools, but no one steals it because no one wants a "broken" wrench in their toolbox.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    17. Re:Solution to theft by kungfugleek · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I've seem some weird things get stolen. A friend of mine had the control panel for his AC/Heat ripped right out of the console. I mean, what are you going to do with one of those??? Most of the wire connectors were still intact so he controls it all by reaching in and making connections. Why didn't they steal the CD player? Because that was already gone -- stolen a long time ago and never replaced. They've stolen water bottles, bags of chips, anything from that car. He intentionally leaves it unlocked now because he got sick of paying to have the windows fixed every time they broke in. But the genius is that he's turned it into an advantage. Now when he has old computers or electronics that he would have to pay to recycle he just leaves them in the car and pretty soon they're gone. No fuss, no fees. I'm halfway expecting the thieves to start leaving charitable donation receipts on the seats. But then, they'd probably steal those, too.

    18. Re:Solution to theft by kaizendojo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or maybe that wasn't a screwdriver he was handing him....

    19. Re:Solution to theft by sensei+moreh · · Score: 1

      Picked up 50-ft pink CAT-5e cable for $5.99 @ my local Microcenter a couple of years ago. Wondered why it was so inexpensive.

      --
      Geology - it's not rocket science; it's rock science
    20. Re:Solution to theft by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      PURPLE? I've never even seen them that color.

      I WANT ONE!!!!

      My solution has always been to just use boots that are different colors from the cable itself. Nobody wants a blue cable with yellow ends.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    21. Re:Solution to theft by Aphoxema · · Score: 5, Funny

      he loaned me a screwdriver...and it was pink.

      Maybe it's some sort of code.

      Yeah, "Don't fucking steal my screwdriver."

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    22. Re:Solution to theft by bit9 · · Score: 1

      Did he tap his foot twice while in the next bathroom stall err I mean cubicle?

    23. Re:Solution to theft by booch · · Score: 1

      Many construction workers and mechanics paint their tools a specific color, so that they can tell who owns each tool very easily. My dad chose florescent hot pink -- he didn't lose too many tools over his career.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    24. Re:Solution to theft by Aphoxema · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My dad drove a POS 94 Ford Ranger up until a few months ago and he never locked the doors. The only time it was broken into in the whole time he owned it was when kids were going around the movie theater parking lot stealing change out of cars. I bet they made a whole lot of money doing that...

      I had a cousin who never locked his doors because if someone was going to steal his shit he didn't want them breaking his windows to do it. Eventually someone got into his car to steal his stereo, but even though the doors were unlocked they had smashed the driver side window.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    25. Re:Solution to theft by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      My red stapler always disappears. I've thought about pink, but I like my red stapler.

      Hi Milton,
      I think your boss took it.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    26. Re:Solution to theft by b0bby · · Score: 1

      A friend had a beater old VW Golf with a shot 1st gear - had to start off in 2nd. He'd keep the key under the mat & leave it unlocked. It actually got stolen once, but they only made it around the corner & then left it in a parking garage - literally on the next block. He was happy to get the insurance money when he got t-boned in it a year or so later...

    27. Re:Solution to theft by mlts · · Score: 1

      Depends on area. Older pickup trucks in the southern states (before Ford/GM/Dodge started using RFID codes in the ignition keys) are very high on the list of stolen vehicles.

    28. Re:Solution to theft by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Ah, the real rationale behind Microsoft's free Windows phones for staff.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    29. Re:Solution to theft by the_one(2) · · Score: 1

      Nobody wants a blue cable with yellow ends.

      Except nationalistic Swedes!

    30. Re:Solution to theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And post your slashdot password so that you no longer own the account.

    31. Re:Solution to theft by icebraining · · Score: 1

      2a) get arrested for indecent exposure.

    32. Re:Solution to theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the subsequent vibrations and noises, we can conclude that it was, in fact, a SONIC screwdriver.

    33. Re:Solution to theft by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I don't want my car stolen, but why should I change to a car I don't want just because someone else can't be bothered to obey the law? Remember back in the good-ole days when they used to hang horse thieves? How about we just make it the consequences for stealing cars so much worse than the possible payoff that nobody would bother to try?

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    34. Re:Solution to theft by Rutefoot · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine was having issues in the parking lot of their apartment building. Kids were breaking windows and damaging locks to get inside cars to steal change, sunglasses, cds, etc. After breaking in they would sometimes slash the seats if there wasn't anything of value to steal. It was happening every couple months and was costing my friend a lot of money because each time it wasn't meeting their deductible. When talking to the insurance company about reducing their deductible to be able to cover these costs the agent, off the record, told my friend just to remove anything of value and leave the doors unlocked (and by no means tell the insurance company you are doing this). The kids will just go inside your car, see there is nothing to steal and move on. After issues with the kids slashing the seats it seems like a crazy move, but it works. I guess the theory is that the kids resort to damaging the vehicle after being frustrated that there was nothing to steal after expending the effort and time they used to get into it. That was 2 years ago and they haven't had any damage to their cars since.

      It's funny what can be done to protect your property. In certain situations, sometimes the easiest and cheapest things work the best.

    35. Re:Solution to theft by tophermeyer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Electricians I used to work with would replace the guts of their old broken power tools with the guts of the new shiny ones, leaving the old busted plastic casing.

      To be funny, they would then put the old guts into the new shiny cases and leave them lying around for people to find and steal. Eventually people stopped stealing tools from their job sites because even their new pretty tools didn't work.

    36. Re:Solution to theft by qwerty8ytrewq · · Score: 1

      have only what you cannot give away!

      --
      Waiting for the other shoe to...
    37. Re:Solution to theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've read this post three times and I have no fucking idea what this guy is saying. Anyone have a clue? I think it might be that gay dudes will buy beers for you if you have a pink gameboy??

    38. Re:Solution to theft by tophermeyer · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine had his Jeep Wrangler broken into. He had a simple button down soft top on it at the time, the idiot thief sliced through the soft top to open the door.

    39. Re:Solution to theft by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of one of the IT guys where I work. When I was tasked with setting up a new server for my research group, he loaned me a screwdriver...and it was pink. He said he had held on to it since the early 80s, because nobody wanted a pink screwdriver.

      I dated a woman who is a brilliant mechanical engineer. She'd painted pink stripes on all of her tools using nail polish for exactly this reason. Utterly identifiable, and nobody but her would be caught dead using them.

      Likewise I have friends riding high-end titanium bike frames that they've covered in duct tape and spraypaint, and nobody messes with them, preferring to steal beautiful mid-range Bianchis and the like.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    40. Re:Solution to theft by hippo · · Score: 1

      So did I. Thanks!

    41. Re:Solution to theft by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that the initial problem will soon lead to this solution if left to itself.

    42. Re:Solution to theft by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Most of my office tools say that...

      STOLEN FROM LUMPY YOU RAT BASTARD!

      Funny part is they keep forgetting who I am ... Dang office people never learn my handle yo!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    43. Re:Solution to theft by TheLink · · Score: 1

      While that's true. You can also have stuff that nobody _else_ wants.

      Basically you get stuff that has low "fence/resale value", or customize/modify it to be so.

      Many thieves want cash and want it without having to do too much work. So they have to be able to sell the stuff easily. An item that's too unique looking will be hard to sell off.

      It can also increase their chances of getting caught. Stealing and driving the only "Hello Kitty" theme Camry in the city or even the state is going to be rather risky. People including cops might notice that it isn't the usual person driving it...

      --
    44. Re:Solution to theft by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I like having different colored cables all in the same switch/patch panel. Makes rats nests easier to deal with. Pink, purple, chartruse, aqua, brown, tan, yellow, red, blue, black, gray, green. I got lotsa colors.

    45. Re:Solution to theft by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Now when he has old computers or electronics that he would have to pay to recycle he just leaves them in the car and pretty soon they're gone.

      Same tactic for dealing with a garbage strike. Put all the garbage where I worked into a bunch of boxes, sealed them so they looked like new, and left them just outside the shipping entrance. So of course someone "stole" 8 large boxes of garbage.

    46. Re:Solution to theft by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Ehh...relatively speaking when compared to getting a "normal" color. Because new pink ones, too, seemed less popular when buying them; with price slightly reflecting that. Enough of a difference for a beer or two, in pub prices.

      Accidentally, it is my strong impression that such "shameful" details can actually pay off with, basically, an antithesis of people you imagine; with hetero girls. Cute things, and all that. Not nearly enough in itself of course, but if you quickly turn out to be somebody confident enough to not care about such nonsense - yeah, that tends to pay off :P

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    47. Re:Solution to theft by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      I feel his pain. I drive an '89 Wrangler, soft top with no door locks. (Came from the factory without door locks.) Someone cut my top just a couple of months ago. They got nothing. I leave nothing in my Jeep.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    48. Re:Solution to theft by tokul · · Score: 1

      He said he had held on to it since the early 80s, because nobody wanted a pink screwdriver.

      It does not have to be pink. Any unusual color that catches the eye will work. if you want stapler or screwdriver without legs, you get the one with shouting colors and nobody will take it.

    49. Re:Solution to theft by jermz · · Score: 1
      --
      Hi-Technical Excellent Taste and Flavor!
    50. Re:Solution to theft by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      If you don't want your car stolen, buy a beat-up old pick-up truck. You know, the one with the cast iron bumpers. Then paint it pink, I guess.

      Mine is that way, painted with primer, rust, and dents.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    51. Re:Solution to theft by toxonix · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't lock my doors or roll up the windows. The only time I roll up the windows is if its raining, and I'm actually driving. I leave them down in the rain. Truck has holes in the floor, so rain just drains out. No problem. I also don't have the door keys, just the ignition. Is a big white rusty truck, so nobody messes with it anyway. I have lots of tools under and behind the bench seat, but nobody bothers to look in a truck that looks like it was borrowed from a Afghan warlord. Does NOT work for picking up girls. Not at all.

    52. Re:Solution to theft by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Is that a screwdriver in your hand or are you just happy to see me?"

    53. Re:Solution to theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a common phenomenon in soft top Jeeps. The windows are plastic and held in place by zippers on the outside. The windows still get sliced open.

    54. Re:Solution to theft by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a strategy the RIAA/MPAA are working hard on embracing.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    55. Re:Solution to theft by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      How about we just make it the consequences for stealing cars so much worse than the possible payoff that nobody would bother to try?

      Because most western societies won't accept executing someone from car theft, and putting a car thief in jail for 20 years costs too many of my tax dollars and doesn't act as a deterrent.

    56. Re:Solution to theft by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

      That's not just in the southern states. Up here the top 100 stolen vehicles must be equiped with an anti-theft device prior to it being licensed and on that list was a 1979 Ford F150.

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    57. Re:Solution to theft by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, a friend of mine did that too, and after a while the inside of his car was completely messed up because some homeless person had slept (and probably everything else) in it. Don't do this while you are parked in a city.

    58. Re:Solution to theft by dwinks616 · · Score: 1

      I strongly support this. My big one is graffiti. It's a POINTLESS and COMPLETELY AVOIDABLE crime. No one accidentally goes to the store, buys paint, walks over to some surface, presses the button and vandalizes property. Nor could anyone possibly ever think it wasn't against the law. As such, I think anyone caught spraying graffiti should face a minimum penalty of the removal of their hand. Period. Don't want to lose your hand, don't spray your stupid fucking names and symbols on the sides of buildings. Then put up some billboards with people holding up their bloody stump right after losing their hand in areas with high rates of graffiti. Watch how quickly people get the point.

    59. Re:Solution to theft by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, when I drove my old Pontiac J(unk) 2000, it never got stolen. And, trust me, I tried to get someone, anyone, to steal the damn thing!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    60. Re:Solution to theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha! I paint ALL of the tools in my woodshop pink so my husband's employees won't steal them. Even my chainsaw is pink. It works!

  4. Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My cousin, long time ago, had an old car with an stereo radio tape without front panel and which required of an spoon to make a sort of force in order to keep the tape in the correct place. That radio was never stolen....

  5. Pink! by valnar · · Score: 1

    Pink? Pink? Well, what's wrong with pink?! Seems you've got a pink kink in your think.

    1. Re:Pink! by b0bby · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I wouldn't care if it was pink, purple or heliotrope.

  6. Maybe it's simpler than that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps the thieves prefer to drive something hard to pick out of a crowd?

    Pretty easy to find the stolen pink anything. Not as easy to find the stolen blue Civic. If you have a choice of cars (and in most cases thieves do) you'd pick something you can get away with for longer.

    1. Re:Maybe it's simpler than that. by Third+Position · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe it's just harder to steal a car which usually has it's tires slashed.

      --
      American Third Position
      Finally, a real choice!
    2. Re:Maybe it's simpler than that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly this. Same goes for Yellow, Orange... pretty much anything on the left end of the color spectrum aside from red.

    3. Re:Maybe it's simpler than that. by bit9 · · Score: 1

      I suspect it also has to do with being able to strip the car down and sell the parts. My guess is that in modern car theft rings, even things like doors, fenders, and trunk lids are resold on the black market. A bunch of pink body panels showing up at a swap meet somewhere would be a lot easier to trace.

    4. Re:Maybe it's simpler than that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not as easy to find the stolen blue Civic.

      Hey, I drive a blue Civic...

    5. Re:Maybe it's simpler than that. by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Not as easy to find the stolen blue Civic.

      Hey, I drive a blue Civic...

      THIEF!

  7. Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would the trend be similar for phones and laptops?

  8. Or you could by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Drive a stick shift :)

    1. Re:Or you could by Theoboley · · Score: 5, Funny

      I second this. I remember reading a story where a car was about to pull away from a gas station, and the jacker, while pointing the gun and screaming at the driver to get out, noticed the car was a Manual and exclaimed "Oh Shit" and Ran off.

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    2. Re:Or you could by tekrat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right on.

      I remember reading about a woman who pulled into her own driveway and was then "carjacked" by two guys that had followed her. But she drove stick, and the theives had no idea how to operate the car. She's rolling around on her lawn laughing her ass off while the two guys kept stalling the car. They eventually fled the scene in the car they had arrived in.

      --
      If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    3. Re:Or you could by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's smart. Discharging a gun at a gas station, of all places. He really didn't think things through, did he?

    4. Re:Or you could by sznupi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not in the Netherlands; and most of the world for that matter.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    5. Re:Or you could by Amarantine · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a study done in the Netherlands. Most people there drive a stick shift. My parents are about the only people i know driving automatic transmissions. It's considered a luxury.

    6. Re:Or you could by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Awesome. It's too bad it's getting harder and harder to find quality new cars with manual transmissions. I guess I can use it as an excuse to talk my wife into getting some classic 60s muscle car.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    7. Re:Or you could by sznupi · · Score: 1

      The risk is very negligible compared to the risk of doing, in the first place, armed carjackings.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    8. Re:Or you could by bytesex · · Score: 1

      only stateside. In the rest of the world, car-thieves don't have a problem with stick shift.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    9. Re:Or you could by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I'm sure anything European would be available with manual transmission if you're buying new. It is, after all, part of the standard spec in most of Europe. Sorry to disappoint.

    10. Re:Or you could by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Informative

      He was probably not planning to pull the trigger. Murder isn't easy to get away with.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    11. Re:Or you could by Aphoxema · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, that's smart. Discharging a gun at a gas station, of all places. He really didn't think things through, did he?

      I suspect most people who use firearms to try to coerce people don't actually intend to use them until alternatives have been exhausted.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    12. Re:Or you could by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Not to mention that in a public place the gun shot draws a lot more attention.

      That's why if you can keep your wits about you, your odds are better if you NEVER, EVER leave with the thief. If they tell you to drive, you say no. Leave the keys in the car, leave it running, and get out.

      For people who are willing to kill you, they are much less willing to do it somewhere like a parking lot. They don't want to shoot - at least not there.

      So, by removing yourself from the car, they either take it and leave if getting the car was the goal, or (and this applies to females more so than males), if the goal was a random kidnapping or the like, they're much more likely to leave and try for another victim later rather than making a ruckuss in public. If their goal was to get YOU specifically though, then you may just be SOL.

      Still, your chances go way, way down the instant you ride off with them.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    13. Re:Or you could by natehoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tell me about it. Sheesh.

      I went to France on business a couple of years ago, and the company's French travel agent assumed that, since I was American, of course I wanted "ze very large auto with ze automatique, and you want to be picked up at ze airport, yes?"

      After a very long conversation, I got train tickets from Paris to Orleans, a map of the subway system including a few markings where they had rent-a-locker places available for my luggage, and a manual-shift Yaris waiting for me in Orleans (which was an amazingly fun little car that hadn't quite reached the US at the time).

      Had a great if initially confusing time riding the Paris subway system to the train station, locked up my bags at a rent-a-locker place, toured Paris on foot/subway for a good chunk of a day, then took the train to Orleans to get my car.

      The woman at the train station, after I managed in my poor French to get across who I was, tried to tell me that there was some sort of mistake. The gist of what she was saying was "You are American and this is a small manual car, there must be some horrible mistake. I am very sorry that the car rental agency is closed, they only left me the key, I will call you a cab which we will pay for and the rental agency will have a larger automatic car delivered to your hotel early tomorrow morning." After nearly an hour of stumbling with funny gestures and my poor French (she was incredibly good-natured about my mangling of her language), I was able to tell her that the car was in fact what I had requested, and was told that I was pretty OK, "for an American", and got my key and directions to the car. :)

      Damn good thing I got a small car, too. Those streets are NARROW. But most of my travels in Orleans were done on foot anyway. The only thing I needed the car for was to get to work on the outskirts of town.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    14. Re:Or you could by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Yeah. A lot of people here in the US hate stick shifts, but most seem to still be able to drive them. I personally don't like them myself - I strongly prefer auto, but my first vehicle (a 1991 Ranger Pickup) was stick. My dad bought it and specifically looked for standard transmission, so that I'd learn on that, and then could switch off later. All my vehicles since have been auto, but about a year ago my car broke down and I had to borrow my brother's truck to go to work for about 3 weeks. It was stick, and I still had no issues with it.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    15. Re:Or you could by Nadaka · · Score: 0

      Or you could buy a nice truck.

      I am pretty happy with my standard Dodge Dakota.

      It won't win any long distance races, but it accelerates really well in the lower gears and is fun to drive.

      Except for the damn evaporator drain hose leaking in the passenger side floor.

      The engine block is to close where it passes through the firewall.

      That makes it impossible to clear blockages without either disassembling the entire dash or pulling the engine.

      This will keep me busy next weekend.

    16. Re:Or you could by sznupi · · Score: 1

      I'm betting most people don't strictly plan it...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    17. Re:Or you could by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Somebody at some bike rental place would be probably even more impresed ;)

      Seriously, that's sort of the mode of transport I'm settling on lately - it's easy with good quality folding bikes which aren't much more expensive from good quality "normal" ones. Even when getting at some general distant desitnation is practical only with a car, having a bike in the trunk at all times is not much of a problem, even in a small car (well, not Yaris; but Fabia Kombi isn't far off). And often gets handy.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    18. Re:Or you could by morie · · Score: 1

      Since this study was done in the Netherlands, where 90% of all cars are stick-shifts, the effect might be smaller than you think.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    19. Re:Or you could by morie · · Score: 1

      It's considered a luxury.

      Or an option for people who do not care about performance. There is still the widespread illusion that automatic transmissions shift at sub-optimal moments. Many people want to control shifting gears themselfs and regard automatic transmissions as inferior. Even more so for (much more efficient and responsive) Continuous Variable Transmission (invented in the Netherlands). Those were marketed as "so easy even your grandmother can drive one" and are subsequently associated with granny's driving performance.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    20. Re:Or you could by natehoy · · Score: 1

      I actually seriously considered that, despite the fact that it was my first time in France. But there were a lot of big busy roundabouts between my hotel (the nearest available) and where I had to go for work. Roundabouts are something I'm not all that used to in a car, on a bicycle I think they'd scare the shit out of me. And it was about a 15-mile ride. Plus the company I worked for at the time didn't have showers available on the campus.

      15 miles isn't much of a challenge - I actually commute part-time on my bicycle now and my ride is over 15 miles each way, and the terrain is a lot hillier here. But there were too many other factors working against it.

      I think, had I known how little I really needed a car, I would have just hired a taxi twice a day or seen if someone local could chauffeur in return for a nice dinner at a decent restaurant. My hotel was very near downtown Orleans, so I just dropped my stuff off in the room, changed to comfy clothes and sneakers, and walked into town for supper.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    21. Re:Or you could by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, not so much a luxury as something for "people who don't know how to drive a car". The extra cost isn't the issue, so much as the image.

    22. Re:Or you could by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      I do. Well I did - that was until it was stolen.

      It's actually a kinda funny story. To really get it all, you have to understand the culture around Calgary and Edmonton, the two big cities that occupy Alberta, (Up here in Canada, just above Montana and Idaho). Anyways, so some Calgarians have a full on hate for Edmontonians and vice versa, whereas everyone else just plays along with the whole subculture and makes fun of each other, regardless if they really mean it.

      Part of the reason is that Calgary is on the Trans-Canada Highway - so you'd think we'd be more of a centerpoint in the Nation. However, Edmonton is the Capital of the province. We'd think that because we're just a couple hours from the mountains and Drumheller is less than that, being on the highway would probably bolster our tourism a bit more - but damnit those Edmontonians one up'd us by building the world's largest mall, which features a massive waterpark and a theme park. (Yes, all indoors). They have their hockey team the oilers, we have ours the flames - neither of which have won a stanley cup in years.

      So you get the gist of it - rivalry between these two cities. Earlier this month* I drive up there to meet my girlfriend, who went up there for some work thing, and we decided a long time ago that since she was going up there, I might as well as come up after work and we'll make a mini vacation out of it by visiting West Edmonton Mall. A couple of our friends want to come along too, and so we say, why not? The more the merrier! Friday we drive up to Edmonton, eat in a fancy restaurant, I park my car in the hotel parkade and we check in. 10:16 PM was the last I saw my car.

      After checking out in the morning, I return to the parkade at around 10:45 AM Saturday, ready to hit the waterpark in the mall for a fantastic getaway. Odd, my car doesn't appear to be in the same spot that it was before. However, I KNOW that's where I parked because right next to me was a purple mini-van, with some catering logo decal on the back window. Check all the levels, it's not there. I go to the hotel Lobby, they tell me they don't technically own the parking lot, it's by a private parking company that works with the city police. Anyways, they call over to the impound lot, maybe it got towed on accident, despite registering my car plates with the hotel last night.

      Okay, the friends we drove out with, they have a strange sense of humour. My girlfriend goes "What if this is Andrew's idea of a prank?". I doubt it, but we approach him anwyways. "Okay, Andrew, if you DID move my car, it was a great joke, but it's over now." and he goes "While I have done that to my room mate, especially after a night of drinking, to be honest: I couldn't drive a standard. I wouldn't have made it out of the parkade with your car."

      My Car is stolen, I'm from out of town, all my plans pretty much out the window. The kicker? This is the first and only time I've ever parked overnight in Edmonton. I've always just had a ride or made day trips before. The first time I've parked overnight in Edmonton my car gets stolen. Damn it makes me hate that city.

      One of our friend's has a brother who lives in Edmonton, and he offered to drive us home. To keep my sanity, we decide to go to Waterpark and have fun anyways, you know, lets not make this the worst day of my life kind of thing. And it worked. Afterwards we all squished into the car (I'm the only one off my GDL so I had to drive, but I'm not complaining, I got home, and I wasn't squished in the back seat).

      So yeah - Driving a Standard, didn't work for me. At least, it doesn't deter the damn car theives in Edmonton.

      *I am not kidding, it was July 9th, it's like Slashdot lines these stories up with my life.

    23. Re:Or you could by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but one is likely to end in prison for 5 years, and the other a charred corpse when the car and fuel pump explode and kill everyone in the immediate area. Even if the risk is lower, the consequences are much worse.

    24. Re:Or you could by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      You'd have to make sure that it runs on petrol - diesel cars are much easier for inexperienced drivers to drive without stalling.

    25. Re:Or you could by Lumpy · · Score: 0

      Or an option for people who do not care about performance.

      In a drag race the automatic tranny will utterly kick the ass of a manual transmission every time. At the race track the Auto guys are always spanking the Manual guys. their ET's are spooky consistent.

      I'm into performance, I'm building a drag car, I'm using an automatic because I WANT performance.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    26. Re:Or you could by sznupi · · Score: 1

      How does basically the same consequence in some places, death penalty, work so far?

      (besides, there is in reality plenty of much more common things than gunshots which could, perhaps, cause an uncontrolled ignition at a gas station; how often does that actually happen?)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    27. Re:Or you could by Chowderbags · · Score: 1

      Wait, they were going to carjack her, but they left their car their? I sure hope they weren't dumb enough to use a car registered to them.

    28. Re:Or you could by djtachyon · · Score: 1

      It's the opposite in most other countries. My friend grew up in Brazil and his family was fairly well off. They owned a few cars, all automatic. One day they looked outside to find their car missing. They found it a couple hundred feet down the road with it stuck in first gear. Most people there have never even heard of an automatic, and they ditched it because they didn't know how to drive it.

      --
      "What's the use of a good quotation if you can't change it?" - Doctor Who
    29. Re:Or you could by sznupi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Less control could still be irritating sometimes - when I see a stretch where higher torque at the wheels might get handy, I want to have it instantly at the push of gas pedal; hence downshifting in advance. Heck, with how often I use the engine to return steering wheel to "neutral" after a bend, I probably prefer to be sure that the gear ratio will certainly remain constant.

      Now, if only people tought themselves to regularly brake with an engine; that's, I guess, a beauty of automatic - it kinda goes with it?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    30. Re:Or you could by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or drive a dented up beater rustbucket*. Shouldn't be a problem on your part as long as the powertrain, brakes, windows, and vital chassis parts are still decent enough. Only the body has to look craptastic. Often that's good enough to makes thieves think you're too broke to have much of anything decent inside, let alone there being any resale value of the vehicle itself. (The only way such a car would get stolen is if you left the keys in it. And even then there's only two kinds of thieves to worry about, joyriders or somebody doing a drive and dump because they can't afford a cab ride.)

      The other upside to driving an ugly ass beater is that it's much more rare for people to contest over parking spaces.

      *The only exemption to the beater working as theft deterrent is if the car is recognizable as something with collector value and still desirable on the restoration market. So you'd have to avoid certain classics, muscle cars, and older large car models popular with the lowrider crowd.

    31. Re:Or you could by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Depends on the quality of the automatic transmission. My car's auto is driving me nuts.

    32. Re:Or you could by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      That or car jackers are stupid and or not thinking straight at the time.

    33. Re:Or you could by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is still the widespread illusion that automatic transmissions shift at sub-optimal moments. Many people want to control shifting gears themselfs and regard automatic transmissions as inferior.

      I own a stick and drive automatics when I rent cars. I've never found one that shifted will. Some are worse than others. Most have very few gears, which is part of the problem. Then the mushy torque converter removes a lot of my control over the vehicle. Worse, a bunch of cars try to make up for it by making the gas peddle touchy. It certainly is a powerful illusion! I drive prefer small cars. It might be different on luxury boats.

    34. Re:Or you could by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's considered to be for the elderly or disabled.

    35. Re:Or you could by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Yes, because of all the places at a fuel station where fuel vapours collect, the exit to the road is the most concentrated...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    36. Re:Or you could by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      You think the roads in France are narrow? Try driving around Rome or Florence :)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    37. Re:Or you could by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Roundabouts don't have to be a problem. Of course I can't comment Orleans, but usually one can easily simply avoid them (and I'm saying this from a perspective of, literally, a roundabout city - think Paris-like, rebuilt in XIX century by the same urban planist who redesigned Paris, and with that style used ever since), as well as largish roads in general (abundance of avenues and large parks does help with that)...and such daily ride to work sounds like something also for public transport, if too far ;p

      It probably was too far, IMHO (for me a bike is about being lazy, using what is often the most convenient way of commutng, with an extended range in a given amount of time & without trying too hard / sweating; just an effort of fast walk) - a car is fine if used sensibly like that, it only gets ridiculous when people go overboard...

      (personal anecdote time: morning, the city wakes up, I'm sitting on a bench near some junction in a housing area (low traffic, abundance of walkways), some semi-older (but with visibly good health & stamina) guy drives his car to a grocery store 200m away...OK, that might pass; then he returns, parks the car near the junction, starts walking towards a newsstand that's on the diagonal of the intersection, just over a dozen meters away, changes his mind after a few meters and returns to the car; then he takes it on a few hundred m trip around one housing area (two arms of the intersection are unidirectional), at the beginning passing said newstand within 5m, the trip including some waiting due to venturing into a semi-major road, just so he can park directly in front of the newsstand...WTF?)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  9. Resale Value by bencollier · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course, the crazy colour will also affect resale value, so the money you save in insurance you lose in depreciation.

    1. Re:Resale Value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > so the money you save in insurance you lose in depreciation.

      Alternatively, just run your car as a car and stop thinking about it as an "investment".

      Do you analyse the likely resale value of a lawn-mower before you buy it? Or a drill? Unlikely. It's a tool that does a job, just like a car.

    2. Re:Resale Value by selven · · Score: 1

      You can always re-paint your car when you want to sell it.

      Let's do some math.

      Cost of painting a car = $400 (source) * 2 = $800
      Cost of auto insurance = $1837/year (source)
      Insurance reduction for anti-theft devices = up to 30% (source), we'll assume 10% for just this ($183/year)

      Thus, you need to keep your car for 800 / 183 = 4.5 years for painting to be a good use of your money.

    3. Re:Resale Value by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 1

      Do you analyse the likely resale value of a lawn-mower before you buy it? Or a drill? Unlikely. It's a tool that does a job, just like a car.

      No, because you are likely to use a lawnmower or drill until it breaks and is unrepairable, and not resell it before that point.
      Very few people want to keep a car for 15 years (assuming it was bought new) so cars get resold. If you intend to resell, the 'resale value' becomes important, doesn't it?

      --
      This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
    4. Re:Resale Value by tebee · · Score: 1

      not if you buy a second hand car

      --
      N.B. this user is far too lazy to write a witty and intelligent sig.
    5. Re:Resale Value by garwain · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't make much difference if you own a paint shop. I'm always looking for good deals, and often get a 2nd hand truck that someone is selling for next to nothing because they had a fender bender, and no one wants to buy a damaged vehicule. Often, I just have to bang on a panel a few times, pull in to my shop, tape it up, and hit it with the spray gun, and I can easily get 2x what I paid for it, My local DMV clerks know me by name.

  10. resale by bitcastle · · Score: 1

    Of course if you want to sell your car eventually don't make it pink.

    1. Re:resale by chomsky68 · · Score: 1

      Unless you remove your collection of Village People cds...

      --
      I'm Not Antisocial, I'm Just Not User Friendly
    2. Re:resale by DarkGreenNight · · Score: 4, Funny

      If only there was some way to replace the paint colors with colors of our own choosing. If only we possessed that level of technology...

      from : http://leasticoulddo.com/comic/20100719

    3. Re:resale by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this isn't Grand Theft Auto Spray-n-Pray shop. Paint shops can do a really lousy job on your car. It's not as easy as drive in, drive out. And then you get to deal with shifty asshole salesmen: "Yah, but I'm sayin', that TruCoat, you don't get it and you get oxidization problems. It'll cost you a heck of lot more than five hundred!"

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:resale by OnePumpChump · · Score: 1

      Unless you're equipped to do it yourself, a good, OEM quality paint job is going to cost at LEAST a thousand dollars, more likely 2000, and possibly a lot more, depending on the type of paint. A body shop doesn't have the economy of scale that a car factory does. Basically it's like knocking 1-2000 dollars off the resale value of your car, plus whatever value the fact that it has been repainted knocks off by itself. (That introduces uncertainty about accident damage.)

  11. Pink? by willda · · Score: 0

    I think any brightly colored car would have the same effect. They all say "Look at me!". That's that last thing a car thief want's, to have attention brought upon them.

    1. Re:Pink? by somersault · · Score: 1

      I think it's the fact that it's pink. If I were a car thief I'd have no problem with stealing a bright orange Focus RS, because they're actually cool. Bright pink though? You think a thief's friends are going to be impressed by that? Please.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Pink? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I bet the trend changes, and soon. I have started to see a lot of pink New Beetles, and a disproportionate number of the Smart cars are coming in colors like Pink and other colors that traditionally nobody would want. Probably also part of the "Look at Me. I'm special because I care about the environment,"

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    3. Re:Pink? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Thief's don't care what their friends think. Joyriders do, but that is not a large percentage of car thefts. Thief's are just out to sell it to a chop shop to part it out, so the more common the color, the better.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    4. Re:Pink? by willda · · Score: 0

      You think a thief's friends are going to be impressed by that? Please.

      Your point is well taken

    5. Re:Pink? by somersault · · Score: 1

      I see. All the thefts I've heard of over here have been of the joyrider kind - some just for fun, some actually used as the getaway car for other kinds of theft (a gang that liked stealing Landrovers so that they could get away from the cops over unconventional terrain..). Stealing for parts is a pretty smart way to go though if you have a good market.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    6. Re:Pink? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Then leave the EGO at the door when you buy a car.

      Buy a cheap common car where parts are dirt cheap.
      Buy a slow economy car, prefer coupe over sedan.
      Buy a smaller car.

      Benefits - lower cost to you... cheaper car = lower payment.
      Lower insurance rates -- significantly lower due to parts being cheap.
      Lower fuel costs -- as gas goes up your savings goes up.

      Makes the car very unattractive to thieves of all type. joyriders want a fast car, getaway car needs to be easy in out and fast. Strip it for parts need to have value.

      Alas many people buy a car to feed their own ego... I have to have that BMW 535i.. Everyone will think I only make 65,000 a year... It has to be black because that is "POWERFUL"... I have to have a SUV because it's safer... (in reality they are not) I have to..... I gotta..... gimmie..... gimmie...

      Honestly if you want a fun cheap car... get a Honda Civic Si coupe. debage it or even put on it the "DX" baseline badge so nobody knows it has the desireable engine in it. you get a car that will not get stolen or even messed with and are quite fun to drive. the 2010 with the aftermarket turbo is a ton of fun.. and still cheaper than any of the midsized econo american cars.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Pink? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Also, if you do find yourself in need of a part, DO NOT buy one that you think could have come from a chop shop. Strangle the bastards out of existence. It is more costly to you in the long run to buy a chopped part because the car they steal to get more parts for the next buyer may be yours.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    8. Re:Pink? by OnePumpChump · · Score: 1

      "Buy a cheap common car where parts are dirt cheap."

      This is the best predictor for a high-theft car. The more popular it is, and the more parts interchange (which makes them cheap) the more it gets stolen. A car being slow has nothing to do with it. A coupe might be stolen less if it's a base model POS just because there would be less of a market for the body parts.

      A smaller car is easier to steal with a flatbed.

      The only reason common, cheap cars are cheap to insure is that they are cheap to repair and replace. But the cheapness of their parts is not an impediment to theft, because it is far more profitable to steal a car whose parts sell cheaply but easily than to steal a car whose parts will sell slowly or not at all. Also, the more uncommon the car, the more likely you are to be found as you try to sell the parts.

      Getting a Honda Civic, even if it were actually base, is like putting a "STEAL ME" sign on your car. Even if you debadge the SI, people who know the cars will be able to tell.

    9. Re:Pink? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Landrover Defenders are pretty ugly, cheap, slow (0-60 in around 15 seconds) and economical (diesel).. but they're also very practical when it comes to offroading, which is why these guys were stealing them.

      I enjoy driving too much to choose to drive something slow and economical. I don't think liking fast cars always has to do with ego. Some cars definitely are more about image than the driving experience, but I care about how much fun it is. Anything that does 0-60 in under 8 seconds or so, doesn't wallow excessively round corners, and has a half decent sound system is good enough for me.

      I'm currently driving a 15 year old Toyota MR2, the model which I always used to think of as looking kinda "girly" and curvy compared to the awesome boxy 1st gen, but it really is the nicest car I've ever driven, being mid engined with rear wheel drive (as indicated by the name) :)

      My next car is going to be something like a Nissan 350Z, it's RWD and I just love the sound it makes. A few people I've mentioned this to say the 350Z is ugly and looks like a Nissan Micra or VW Beetle, but I really don't care if it's fun to drive :)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    10. Re:Pink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? would you like to wager on that?

      2010 Si coupe and 2010 EX coupe are 100% identical except for badging and engine. and light color on the dashboard... instead of blue lighting it is red lighting... something the thief cant see unless the car is running.

      Pontiac Grand Prix GXP versus base model Grand Prix difference is badging and engine. Zero body differences and zero visible differences outside the vehicle.

      p.s. the 2007-2010 honda civic is the least stolen car as well as a lot of other honda models because it's damn hard to override the ECM lock to start the car. Try knowing what you are talking about as you know NOTHING about cars let alone hondas...

      further to show you know nothing... the list of most stolen cars in the usa....

      1994 Honda Accord
      1995 Honda Civic
      1989 Toyota Camry
      1997 Ford F150 Series
      2004 Dodge Ram Pickup
      2000 Dodge Caravan
      1996 Jeep Cherokee/Grand Cherokee
      1994 Acura Integra
      1999 Ford Taurus
      2002 Ford Explorer

      Notice NO 2000+ hondas on that list. because of the changes for anti theft.

      1. 1989 Toyota Camry
      2. 1990 Toyota Camry
      3. 1991 Toyota Camry
      4. 1988 Toyota Camry
      5. 1997 Ford F-150 4X2 Pick Up
      6. 1994 Honda Accord EX
      7. 1995 Honda Accord EX
      8. 1996 Honda Accord LX
      9. 1990 Honda Accord EX
      10. 1994 Honda Accord LX
      11. 1994 Chevrolet C1500 Pick Up
      12. 1992 Honda Accord LX
      13. 1991 Acura Legend
      14. 1995 Ford Mustang
      15. 1987 Toyota Camry
      16. 1990 Honda Accord LX
      17. 1995 Honda Accord LX
      18. 1989 Chevrolet Caprice
      19. 1988 Honda Accord LX
      20. 1991 Honda Accord EX
      21. 1992 Honda Accord EX
      22. 1995 Dodge Neon
      23. 1991 Honda Accord LX
      24. 1989 Honda Accord LX
      25. 1996 Honda Accord EX
      * Source: National Insurance Crime Bureau for cars stolen for parts...

      Notice NO civics on that list... Hmmm... strange how you are incredibly wrong..... Let's look further into how wrong you are.....

      One reason for these vehicles being the most frequently stolen is the high demand for their parts which are either no longer manufactured or are too difficult or expensive to obtain. In some areas of the country, these parts are in high demand by "tuners" and "street racers". Another reason for these particular makes and models being so frequently stolen is that they are very popular vehicles that have been sold in the U.S. for a long time, therefore, there are simply more of them available to steal. That does not make a thief want to steal it... are you that undereducated to not understand a basic law of numbers?

      In fact, when the numbers are adjusted to reflect the actual number of vehicles on the road (http://money.cnn.com/pf/features/lists/car_theft/), the Cadillac Escalade SUV turns out to be the most commonly stolen.

      Other 4WD vehicles frequently stolen include:
      Jeep Wrangler
      Lincoln Navigator
      Dodge Ram
      Ford Expedition

      Low price civics even the Si model are not stolen anywhere as much as the tuners wet dream accord. Again you know nothing about cars and what would get stolen. instead you make shit up and open your mouth as if you were an expert....

      By your horribly flawed logic, the most stolen car would be the Honda Fit, the Chevy Aveo, and dodge colt...

      Lumpy is actually pretty darn correct, you on the other hand are very, very, laughably very wrong...

    11. Re:Pink? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      It takes a whole 2 seconds to look at the VIN through the window and check the engine type.

      People looking to sell parts would care about such things.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  12. Only part of the story by Palestrina · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For example, pink cars might garner a greater degree of derision, leading to a greater incidence of vandalism. They might be pulled over more for speeding. Their owners might be more often victims of other crimes. Mechanics might inflate prices more.

    What you want to look at is the "total cost of ownership" for the car over a period of time, as a function of color.

    1. Re:Only part of the story by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      More importantly, they might depreciate more quickly and have lower residual value unless you're willing to repaint it before you sell it.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    2. Re:Only part of the story by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      IINM statistics say red cars get pulled over more often than any other color.

    3. Re:Only part of the story by OnePumpChump · · Score: 1

      Does that account for the type of car?

    4. Re:Only part of the story by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I don't know, sorry.

    5. Re:Only part of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example, pink cars might garner a greater degree of derision . . .

      For sure. I own a yellow car and am harassed far more often by other drivers than I am when I drive a normal color. Both fast drivers and left lane hogs get more aggressive around me. I don't want to think about what it would be like in a pink car.

    6. Re:Only part of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does leasing a car (thereby solving the "transportation problem") rate with your "total cost of ownership"?

  13. Top Gear already demonstrated this... by kazade84 · · Score: 3, Funny
    1. Re:Top Gear already demonstrated this... by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      Here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkWf4crJ9uI#t=2m18s :)

      I want that car. It's like staring at the sun against the dark, gloomy area.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  14. This sounds familiar... by Lindril · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you don't want viruses, run Linux!

    1. Re:This sounds familiar... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      Somehow, I think the differences between operating systems are a bit more significant than the differences between car colors...

      --
      Palm trees and 8
  15. Pink cars...the new Firefox. by TheRedDuke · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I remember when Firefox was the safest browser out there...then suddenly it had a huge market share and was receiving more security updates monthly than IE. Apply this logic to pink cars.

    1. Re:Pink cars...the new Firefox. by somersault · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Number of security updates per month is a poor measure of how safe a browser is.

      A 100% safe browser would never need any updates.

      Likewise a browser could have plenty of flaws, but hardly any updates to patch those flaws. It would be receiving less updates per month, and still be less safe than a browser that started off with the same number of flaws but is having them patched more quickly.

      As far as pink goes.. how many thugs do you know that desperately want to be seen in a more feminine light?

      --
      which is totally what she said
  16. Loosely From the movie "The Rookie" 1990 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [looking at a Lotus painted a garish pink] Wanna know what's a crime? Whoever defaced that work of art by painting it that color... ought to have his ass removed.

  17. Cloaking device? by rdesh · · Score: 1

    How about a cloaking device that makes the car pink when parked? Oh wait..why not make it then ;) D'oh!

    1. Re:Cloaking device? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a cloaking device that makes the car pink when parked? Oh wait..why not make it then ;) D'oh!

      Obviously you don't want it to be invisible! If your car was invisible while parked someone else would try to park in the apparently open space and hit it!

    2. Re:Cloaking device? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      To hard at normal wavelengths. The article is about how it's easier just to paint it pink and use a somebody else's problem field, and true to form, it turns out that all you really need is to paint it pink and you get the SEP for free!

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  18. Sanrio's Next Wave of Products by tekrat · · Score: 4, Funny

    The "Hello Kitty Car".

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Sanrio's Next Wave of Products by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      The "Hello Kitty Car".

      I heard an anecdote about someone who played in a comedy band and he plays a Hello Kitty guitar and his rhythm guitarist plays the Hanna Montana guitar. After a show someone broke into their van with all their gear and stole everything out of the van including the cases, picks, EXCEPT for the two guitars.

      Can't look cool trying to sell those on craigslist, I guess.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    2. Re:Sanrio's Next Wave of Products by Xemu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The "Hello Kitty Car".

      They are way ahead of you. Outside. And inside.

      --
      Tell your friends about xenu.net
    3. Re:Sanrio's Next Wave of Products by cyberpunkrocker · · Score: 1

      I've ALWAYS wanted to paint my car pink and put 'Hello Kitty' stickers on it!!! Now I have a perfect excuse for doing it :)

      (Then again, I've wanted to give a similar treatment to my shotgun... Should I be worried???)

    4. Re:Sanrio's Next Wave of Products by noidentity · · Score: 1

      And when it's time to change the oil, Hello Kitty has that covered too.

  19. Better paint the engine and other parts pink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if all pink cars are just crap? The only pink car that comes in mind is the VW Beetle, a crappy car indeed. Aside from that, most stolen cars are broken apart and the thieves sell their parts separately. I don't think it has anything to do with the car's color (and you can always paint a pink car anyway)

  20. Re:More lies with statistics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    zero

  21. Mr. Pink by boristdog · · Score: 1

    But you'll get crappy service at the Sonic because they'll assume you're a bad tipper.

    1. Re:Mr. Pink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I weren't an AC, I would mod this up.

  22. Sources & Mr. Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, according to one source 26% of the cars in Europe are black. Now the original article says that about 26% of the cars stolen in the Netherlands are black (see Figure 2).

    Bravo, Mr. Obvious!

    How come such an article is on /., and not even in the idle section!?

  23. Statistics require thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sample size makes the claim meaningless "Of the 109 pink cars in the study, not one was stolen" means nothing when the overall odds of a vehicle being stolen were around 1 in 500 as seen in the chart from the same study . Sensationalism from the statistically impaired at its best. The statistics do support black being more likely to be stolen, but not pink being some amazingly superior choice.

  24. My pink bike history by shoppa · · Score: 1

    When I was in college, I had a halfway decent bike but vandals would remove any part not literally chained down. Lost several seats and wheels. Sometimes the vandals would find the wheels chained up and damage them instead. Othertimes they would just randomly remove screws and nuts, maybe in some half-assed attempt to steal something, but more likely just to damage the bike. Tires were regularly slashed too.

    It got to the point where damage to the bike was costing me $50 to $100 every few months.

    I then painted the bike pink with bright green polkadots. I painted the seat and wheels this garish pattern too and made sure that a good amount of pink overspray ended up on the tires (very nice tires, Continental real rubber). You know what? They never ever touched the bike after that. That was the smartest thing I ever did.

    I don't think that it was that the pink and polkadots ruined the resale value of any stolen parts (that must've been pretty much zero to begin with), I think it was more of an abhorrently ugly color scheme making it completely undesirable to even get close to it.

    Once I worked at a place, where the phones were this indescribibly ugly shade of beigish pink. Sorta like the avocado green popular in the 70's but far far worse. Betcha they chose that color because nobody would ever steal a phone that color.

    1. Re:My pink bike history by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      I then painted the bike pink with bright green polkadots. I painted the seat and wheels this garish pattern too and made sure that a good amount of pink overspray ended up on the tires (very nice tires, Continental real rubber). You know what? They never ever touched the bike after that. That was the smartest thing I ever did.

      Perhaps that was their plan all along.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  25. Re:How to fail with statistics by guyminuslife · · Score: 4, Informative

    All of them. At least, new-ish cars in the Netherlands, in 2004-2008. ...you could have easily looked that up, TFA links to its sources.

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
  26. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, if I had a pink car, I would want it to be stolen. I guess you can't win.

  27. Pink everything, including ponies!@£ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't help but feel that this should be extended into other walks of life.
    How about all guns and knifes legally have to be pink.
    Just takes away any hints of machoism.

    1. Re:Pink everything, including ponies!@£ by sznupi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Societal norms would quickly change anyway. Less than a century ago, in western culture, blue was the color for girls...and pink for boys.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  28. Re:More lies with statistics... by guyminuslife · · Score: 4, Informative

    Zero. There were exactly zero pink cars stolen. (The study, if you had bothered to look at it, includes all reported thefts of all cars less than 3 years old in the Netherlands from 2004-2008).

    I really hate it when people start prattling along about errors with statistics when they don't bother looking at the actual statistics.

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
  29. Can anyone give me a computer analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand

  30. Direct link to the study by Xest · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here:

    http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/5262

    I generally agree with you though, I'm not sure the conclusions are valid from what's given. It basically says 0.26% of black cars, the most stolen colour, get stolen, whilst 0.16% of red cars, the least stolen get stolen. Apparently there's something like 6.8 million vehicles in the Netherlands, but it's hard from the data to tell how many cars this actually translates to in practice, particularly as the graph given changes over time, and older cars will most likely be off the road. I'm sure you could figure it out by averaging the amount bought over the period and factor in an exponential decrease in those taken off the road, but it'd be more reasonable if the author had done this. The very fact he does seem to have basically left things half finished and come to a conclusion without providing better supporting evidence and clearer data does leave me a little skeptical I'll admit, the level of work done would be fine for a high school science class, but for a professor of economics? a bit of a poor show to be honest.

  31. Re:How to fail with statistics by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

    Regardless of the number of cars in the study or the percentage of pink cars, the percentage of pink cars stolen in the study would still be zero. Pink cars may be a statistical minority, but zero is zero is zero.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  32. Elvis's Pink Cadillac by shoppa · · Score: 1

    If you're cool enough, you *CAN* have a pink car and be proud of it. Needless to say slashdot dweebs need not apply.

        http://elviscadillacs.tripod.com/ElvisPinkCad.jpg

  33. Re:More lies with statistics... by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

    I really hate it when people start prattling along about errors with statistics when they don't bother looking at the actual statistics.

    Making informed statements!? Researching before you reply?! What is this blasphemy?! Next thing you know you'll expect people to read the actual summary!

    --
    Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
  34. Re:How to fail with statistics by Minwee · · Score: 1

    "LYNDSI", whoever that is, could have looked it up too. And perhaps written a few words about it, so that the article would have something approaching value. Strange as it may seem there is a difference between "Here is some data and here are the conclusions that I have drawn from it" and "Here are some conclusions and if you spend enough time clicking on random, completely unlabelled links to other people's work, which may or may not still be in the same state as it was when I last consulted it, then maybe you might find some data to back it up. Good luck with that".

    One is good writing. The other is just wasting the reader's time.

  35. But... by HikingStick · · Score: 1

    But painting my car pink won't get me a discount on my auto insurance. Having a security device will. I'd never pay to add one to a car, but since I only buy used cars, I just hold out for one with a security system.

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  36. I knew this since high school by Ayanami_Rei_II · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in high school, I mostly used mechanical pencils. But I kept breaking them: the metal tips snap off usually within a week of use. Maybe I press down too hard, or they just make shitty pencils where I live.

    So I imported from Japan a few very well made--but obviously expensive--mechanical pencils. They have no problem taking my abuse. However, I ended up losing all of them over the course of the semester. I sometimes lend one to a classmate, but I didn't always get it back. I don't think they kept it on purpose, but they simply forgot to return it.

    Next semester, I had to import another batch, but I got one in pink. And since then, I only lend out the pink one. I still have most of the pencils I bought then, including the pink one.

    You might think that this strategy will only work ~50% of the time, but since I'm posting this on /. you should be able to figure out why I beat the odds.

  37. Re:More lies with statistics... by moronoxyd · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If you insert "black" into GPs question isntead of "pink", you might realize that he is right.

    The summary states that most cars stolen where black, but it does not give any information on how that relates to the number ob black cards in the test.
    You need to put absolute numbers into relation to actually learn somthing.

    Disclaimer: I haven't read the article. For all I know the authors may address this.

  38. Afraid of being cheated on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In this study, we found that all 109 of the ugly, disfigured obese women were faithful to their partners.
    It should also be noted that they were too fat to stand up and get out of bed, which may have been an influential factor.

  39. There aren't pink cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think everybody is forgetting you can not purchase one car in the color of pink. Unless you work for Mary Kay, or want to spend several thousand dollars on a custom paint job.

    1. Re:There aren't pink cars by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      Sure you can, Nissan sell them. (And it's not just the one they were given to test, I've seen them on the road.)

  40. Re:How to fail with statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    True, but the statistics are meaningless when a single car theft would have made them the most frequently stolen - there were 109 in the study and the average theft rate was around 0.2%. Expected value is then about 0.2 cars and hence none stolen is a function of sample size rather than thief preference.

  41. I've used this tactic before. by Galaga88 · · Score: 1

    In the academic library at which I work, we use student ID cards as stored-value cards to pay for printing in our computer labs. For people who don't have or forgot their student ID, we have some "loaner" cards that they can load money onto to pay for their printing session.

    People were not returning the loaner cards after they were done using them, so I printed a new batch in bright pink. The return rate rose dramatically afterwards.

  42. My car is safe... by Gadzeus · · Score: 1

    I screen printed my face on the driver's door.

    The near-side passenger door has a cartoon dialogue bubble: "My pedophile step-father keeps stealing my keys for his hunting trips"

  43. Re:More lies with statistics... by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    In late-breaking news, statisticians find that 8.2% of car thefts occur in June.

    rj

  44. Pink cigarettes by pmcevoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've always thought that more people would quit smoking, if cigarettes were pink...

  45. Child seats = problem solved by evilandi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Two baby seats (twins) plus one child seat seems to have solved the car theft problem for me. These days the only lock I bother with on the car is the one that stops the little blighters from opening the doors from the inside.

    If someone stole the stereo and the collection of children's song CDs from the car, I'd consider that a blessing. Well, apart from Lazytown, which sounds similar enough to Scooter that I might miss it.

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
    1. Re:Child seats = problem solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, apart from Lazytown, which sounds similar enough to Scooter that I might miss it.

      Do what you want 'cause a pirate is free. You are a pirate!

  46. Attention by AlpineR · · Score: 1

    Repaint before selling.

    I would think the bigger problem might be that you draw more attention from law enforcement. I've heard that red cars get more speeding tickets than other colors. I wonder what the statistics are for pink or yellow.

  47. Pink is just a color by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It has always blown my mind that some people (even females) shy away from anything pink. Sure, society has associated pink with femininity, but somehow people view these as being inextricably linked.

    Around here anyway, A male possessing anything the color pink (with the explicit exception of a bottle of Pepto Bismal) automatically suggests to people that he is one of those "evil sicko" homosexuals.

    Pink is a perfectly cromulent color! Get over it people!

    1. Re:Pink is just a color by ChrisK87 · · Score: 1

      It's widely known that the area around #FF1493 is the gayest region of the hex color wheel, scientifically speaking.

    2. Re:Pink is just a color by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Pink is a perfectly cromulent color!

      Sure, but it certainly doesn't embiggen the resale value.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  48. Re:More lies with statistics... by sznupi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did you really just put this disclaimer in a reply to the post ending with "I really hate it when people start prattling along about errors with statistics when they don't bother looking at the actual statistics"?...

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  49. Re:More lies with statistics... by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

    That's kind of the point.
    How many cars where in the test?
    How many cars where stolen?

    If we assume that 1% of the cars where stolen, then the fact that no pink car was stolen doesn't mean anything. One percent of 109 is 1, and zero stolen cards instead of 1 should be well within the margin of error.

    If we are talking about 20% stolen cars, then it would be noteworthy: Statistically 22 cars should have been stolen, and that difference would actually mean something.

  50. Re:More lies with statistics... by bit9 · · Score: 1

    Why bother looking at the statistics? It's common knowledge that 78% of statistics are made up anyway.

  51. Nobody has posted by DarkIye · · Score: 1

    what I thought was an obvious possible explanation: people with pink cars tend to be the types that wear $400 shirts, have trophy wives or twenty boyfriends, and tend to have fairly good security, along with the habit of parking their cars in safe places.

  52. A 100% secure browser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as I can tell the only 100% secure browser is the one that doesn't allow ANY browsing (or for that matter any use) at all. Security on a browser is like locks on a door, a thief can always get in if you allow him enough time to work on it. The time may be very long but eventually he will prevail.

  53. Re:More lies with statistics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The keywords being "reported thefts". Do you really want to confess that you owned a pink car? Even in the Netherlands you'd be arrested by the fashion police.

  54. Actually... No. It is quite the opposite. by denzacar · · Score: 5, Informative

    From TFA:

    http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/5262

    It's resale value, not the fear of getting caught

    Is it only resale value that drives the preference of thieves for cars in common exterior colours or does the probability of apprehension also play a role?
    The recent history of car theft gives us some idea. Red is obviously a bright colour that attracts attention - including that of the police.
    Red is also a colour that has fallen out of fashion since the turn of the century (Figure 1).
    In the beginning of the 1990s around 25% of all new cars were red, now the number is close to 5%.
    The decline of red doesn't only go for the Netherlands, but is a worldwide trend according data from DuPont.
    If thieves are primarily interested in resale value and do not care much about being spotted in a bright coloured car, then we should see higher rates of theft for red cars in the 1990s.
    That is exactly what we find. Figure 3 shows that, just with the colour silver/grey, the popularity of red in new car sales is tightly linked with the prevalence of red among stolen cars.
    This suggests that car thieves do not seem to be particularly worried about being picked out from traffic by police.

    Figure 3. Popularity of colour in new car sales vs. theft risk by colour, the Netherlands
    http://www.voxeu.org/sites/default/files/image/Vollaardfig3.png

    Source: CBS/RDW

    Conclusion

    Differences in theft rates between cars in common and uncommon colour suggest that resale value is on the mind of car thieves.
    We find evidence that it is indeed the resale value rather than the fear of getting caught that is driving this difference.
    If the aversion to driving a car in an offbeat colour is not too high - or if someone actually enjoys it - then buying deterrence through an uncommon car colour may be at least as good a deal as buying deterrence through an expensive car security device.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Actually... No. It is quite the opposite. by ChrisK87 · · Score: 1

      However it might be stated in the article, I don't think the actual effect has to do with "bright" colors so much as "conspicuous" ones. Red cars, though they may be less popular now, are still going to be at least 10% of the cars on the road, counting used cars, and would still be "inconspicuous" enough for a thief. A neon green mustang with black stripes, one the other hand, is so conspicuous that driving it by any cop once the alert has gone out will not only get his attention, but remind him that he's looking for a stolen green mustang. A red mustang may make him want to give you a speeding ticket, but the difference may be enough to deter criminals.

      I also imagine body parts make up a decent enough chunk of a car's resale value, so anything painted a weird color is going to be more expensive to unload, since it would have to be sanded down and repainted.

  55. Re:How to fail with statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Actually, that's not necessarily true. Looking at the theft rates for all the non-standard colors (everything besides black, silver, and blue), it looks like a 0.1% theft rate is common. This means that if there are fewer than 1000 cars in the study, having no pink cars stolen could be expected without representing a thief's real aversion to pink (since it's impossible to steal half a car).

  56. Re:How to fail with statistics by gurps_npc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your grasp of statistics is poor. Consider the effect if there were only a SINGLE pink car in a study. Then when you say 0 pink cars were stolen, your study is no better than me saying my car has never been stolen. Now imagine what would have happened if the single guy with a pink car happened to have his car towed for illegally parking and didn't realized what had happened till after the article was published. Now you have 100% of pink cars being stolen. Sample size is ALWAYS important, regardless of the percentage.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  57. hmmm by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

    My Neon has an amazing security system. By virtue of being a stock Neon, what thief would ever steal it?

    --
    The game.
    1. Re:hmmm by celery+stalk · · Score: 1

      My neon was stolen. 1995 2.0L SOCH with a manual transmission, windows, and locks. Nothing special about it except an aftermarket deck (which was still there, though busted).

      My roommate was throwing a party (which I was at). As best as we could tell, while hanging out in the living room after everyone left, some fucker took my spare key from the garage and drove my car right out of the driveway. Seems they used it to either get home or to the next party, because the next morning my car was ticketed for being parked illegally. I didn't realize it was stolen until a few hours after that happened, then immediately called it in. My car got ticketed twice more before a connection was made, and I was notified they found it. Thinking about it now, I bet they were going to tow it and finally ran the plates, at which point it came up as reported stolen.

      --
      aaaand...whee!
  58. Works on underwear too by jmichaelg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When my boys were growing up, they were constantly stealing my underwear. I made them do their own laundry but they didn't get to that chore as often as they should have so they felt free, despite my protests, to dip into my underwear drawer. Nothing worked until I died my shorts pink.

    My girlfriend thought it was funny but I was just happy to be able to rely on having a clean stash of underwear.

    1. Re:Works on underwear too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is serious (which is why it's modded insightful) , what kind of moron kids do you have?

    2. Re:Works on underwear too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      When my boys were growing up, they were constantly stealing my underwear.

      For some reason, I assumed you were female until I read the whole post. It made that first sentence really creepy :)

  59. I would rather... by ashtophoenix · · Score: 2, Funny

    have it stolen than color it pink.

    --
    Life is about being a Phoenix!
  60. Re:How to fail with statistics by the_one(2) · · Score: 1

    Please mod parent up.

  61. Re:More lies with statistics... by AndersOSU · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, if you really want to be pedantic (and this is /., so who doesn't?), the 95% upper confidence interval of 0 events out of 109 is 2.7%. This does not compare favorably to the average risk of car theft of ~0.25%. I'd need more data to calculate the confidence intervals for risk of theft for black or average cars, but it's likely to be much tighter than +/- 2.5% given the total number of car sold.

    So the only think you can say from this study is that there's insufficient data to determine whether pink cars are more or less at risk than cars of another color.

  62. Uuuuuh! Look kids! A logical fallacy! by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Well, according to one source 26% of the cars in Europe are black. Now the original article says that about 26% of the cars stolen in the Netherlands are black (see Figure 2).

    Bravo, Mr. Obvious!

    So, Netherlands is actually the whole of Europe and ALL cars there (Europe, Netherlands, England, Prussia - same thing) are stolen?
    Or is it just all the black cars?

    Is that what you are trying to say?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Uuuuuh! Look kids! A logical fallacy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I it was a bit unclear (sry fot that, english is not my native tounge)

      What I am trying to say is:

      - They simply mix data from various sources

      - Assuming the data is usable, they still fail at statistics. Consider you have 100 cars, 99 of which are black, and 1 is pink. Now obviously the probability that a black car is stolen is much higher the probability that a pink car is stolen. But this _doesn't_ mean that if you own the pink car it's less likely that it is stolen! In order to say that, they would need to consider the total number of black or pink cars, too.

       

  63. works for lighters too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when i smoked i would always bring my pink lighter to work.
    i can't remember a time when my lighter was stolen and forgotten.
    if it was pink, it was always returned.
    smokers out there know how rare that is.

    i went thru many pink lighters from brand new to empty
    even the most unique lighters (i tried brown, duct tape, spraypainted) were stolen at some point

  64. cover-judging for fun and profit by qwerty8ytrewq · · Score: 1

    Good move, I did the same, bought a silver MTbike, then covered it with red/brown rusty spray, patches of manky tape and never cleaned it. Theives away! the dutch are masters of this art of course, everyone there has 2 bikes, one they can (and do ) leave out on the street all the time, that is a rideable (pink?) rust bucket and one that is black, shiny, and stays indoors and is only ridden on the weekend. Cover-judging manipulation for fun, and profit.

    --
    Waiting for the other shoe to...
    1. Re:cover-judging for fun and profit by bami · · Score: 1

      You are so spot-on it's not even funny.

      Everybody here (dutchlantis) have atleast 2 bikes, me included.

      I have my school bike (that I park next to a train station, it has been stolen 3 times but I found it somewhere in town with the lock all fscked up, only has one working gear and the back wheel is pretty bent), a regular bike for just when riding to someone or when I know I can park it somewhere without being nicked, and one that is just a trash bike which I don't even lock, useful when going to a bar or something where the likely-hood of someone just trashing your bike for the fun of it is pretty high.

      My garage contains enough parts to build about 2 complete bicycles, and is just for parts so that I can throw broken bits of the 3 'good' bikes away and replace them in a hurry, and of course when one of the bikes break down or have a flat tire, you can always take the bike that is a bit worse but still working.

      On the part of not locking down things also decreases the chances of someone trying breaking it to steal it. Good example would be a friend that has to park a car in the center of Amsterdam, on which he never locks, has a sticker on the side window saying it isn't locked and doesn't have anything valuable in it. He used to have one of his windows smashed in once a week, but no window smashings in the last year, just people opening the car to see if anything can be stolen from it, instead of throwing a brick or a 20+ kilo manhole cover through a windows. Yeah, Amsterdam is a nice place to live...

  65. Re:More lies with statistics... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    The summary itself says there were only 109 pink cars in the study, so it is impossible to say with any accuracy how many per 1000 were stolen.They would have to have more than 1000 in the study, and preferably more like 100,000.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  66. Re:More lies with statistics... by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Informative

    I really hate it when people start prattling along about errors with statistics when they don't bother looking at the actual statistics.

    And I really hate it when others start prattling about errors with statistics when they don't know when to take an adequate sample.

    In the linked 'study', we find that the highest risk category is for black cars, with a theft risk of approximately 0.25% during the length of the study. We also learn that the number of pink vehicles included in the study is just 109.

    If car thieves had an identical preference for pink cars and black cars (don't ask me why), then in a sample this size, there's still only about a 25% chance that any of the pink cars would be stolen over the study period. The sample is too small to draw any meaningful conclusions. It could be that car thieves desperately want to take pink cars, but are having too much trouble finding them.

    The data used in this study are insufficient to show that pink cars are less likely to be stolen than the other less-common colors; they aren't even a big enough sample to show that pink cars are safer than the most-stolen colors.

    --
    ~Idarubicin
  67. Re:More lies with statistics... by Deadstick · · Score: 1
    Precisely. To refine that a bit, one can add up the heights of all the colored bars in Fig.2 to find that about 1.6% of cars from the 15 most popular makes were stolen. 1.6% of 109 is 1.7 cars, still not an outlier -- it would still take just one theft to break the perfect record and one more to make the pink cars look theft-prone.

    rj

  68. Posting on slashdot... not really an indicator... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    You might think that this strategy will only work ~50% of the time, but since I'm posting this on /. you should be able to figure out why I beat the odds.

    At least not anymore. Maybe in the olden days. Your slashdot ID on the other hand...

    When you combine those two, there is quite a chance that most of the females you meet lack the necessary depth to take your pink pencil.
    And by that I don't mean anything... you know... sexual - I'm just saying that they are mostly two-dimensional.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  69. It's not pink... by sootman · · Score: 1

    ... it's, um, light red!

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  70. Non-relevant statistics? by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 2, Interesting


    With a mean probability of 0.1% of theft (at least it looks close to it in the charts, I do not have the study numbers), a sample size of 109 cars may be too small.
    To put an analogy, think that a medical researcher goes to a city of 10.000 people and finds that there are 10 cancer patients, and when he goes to the village with 100 people then claims that there is some kind of cancer cure in that village because there are no cancer patients in it.... Hardly significative at all..

    --
    Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
  71. Cost of painting a car: far more than $400 by becker · · Score: 1

    $400 will get you taxi-quality paint job. You'll get a single stage (non-clearcoat), not very durable layer of paint over everything. You'll be lucky if they don't paint over the tires and windows.

    A repaint like that will hurt the resale value of most cars rather than help it. It's only slightly better than mismatched body panels and heavy rust.

    A presentable paint job costs about $2000, and that doesn't include door frames, trunk interior and engine compartment.

    1. Re:Cost of painting a car: far more than $400 by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      Wherever you got those numbers is way overcharging.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
  72. Except... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    You don't go around driving in a stolen car if your plan was to sell it.
    You move it to the predetermined chop-shop or dealer taking the shortest path with as few of police patrols or cameras as possible.

    Stealing it "for a job" is something completely different.
    There, the criminal wants an older, common and inconspicuous model - i.e. an invisible car.

    But if you want to sell it - you want to steal a new, popular luxury car.
    And again... color is the indicator of the car's popularity (hence, the resale price) - criminals already plan not to be seen by the police for those 20 minutes or so they spend with the car.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  73. Car Thieves Steal What Sells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Car thieves steal models that they can sell, whole or as parts. A 5 year old common car is most likely to be stolen, since people will want its parts. I recall a time when 1990's Honda CIVICs were a popular target.

    Furthermore, a common car model raises no concern. Everybody is driving around in a car like that. A rare model, or a strange color, marks the car & the thief. Pink is a clear target.

  74. The study needs to try a different color. by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

    It's not that pink is an "undesirable" color, it's just that it's pink. Even car thieves know better than to piss off a Mary Kay rep. Mary Kay is one mean bitch!

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  75. My pink $3mil Bugatti won't be stolen? by Maarek · · Score: 2, Informative

    I highly doubt the case. The pink cars are always a repaint. Theives know that pink is not a color that is sold off a car lot. But, paint a Porsche, Lexus, Bugatti, etc pink, and the car will still be stolen.

  76. resale value on pink cars sucks by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

    My grandmother wanted her dream car so my granddad bought her a 1961 Olds Starfire with the high-performance engine, which at the time was one of the classiest domestic cars that existed. She got it in bright pink. She loved it. Five years later when they went to trade it in on a newer car, the salesman said it was in perfect shape, low mileage, and over the Blue Book value, but because of the color he'd only give her $1000 less than the Blue Book value, which was roughly a 50% price cut. She was incredibly offended, so they declined to trade it in, and tried to sell it on their own. They advertised it for a year and ended up selling it for even less than the salesman had offered, to a guy who said he was going to get it repainted.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  77. Just depends on the car... by ITBurnout · · Score: 1

    My baby loves me for my pink Cadillac. For my pink Hyundai Matrix, not so much.

  78. I find that hard to believe by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    everyone there has 2 bikes,

    One of my neighbors was from the Netherlands, and his garage had more bikes and bike parts than the local bicycle shop. Literally. You could not walk in there without having to squeeze through bikes, rims, frames hanging from the ceiling, etc. Easily enough parts to build at least 50, if not more, bikes.

    1. Re:I find that hard to believe by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      He's lucky that Officer Lumpy of the local police doesn't prowl around his garage.

      In some localities you have to register your bikes. "So, are all these bikes yours?" the officer asks, taking out his pad....

  79. additionally by shiftless · · Score: 1

    if you dont want your house robbed, rip off the siding and make it look like a hobo shack. if you dont want your guitar stolen, slam it into a brick wall a few times as hard as you can. if you dont want your pet stolen, put out its eyes with cigarette butts, break its legs, shave its fur off and spray paint it black. then of course, if you dont want your car stolen, paint it pink with polka dots and silver racing stripes. all great ideas of course, since anything that keeps you from being robbed is worth the trade-off, right!

  80. A trojan /usr/bin/ls is a risk to /home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A trojan /usr/bin/ls is a risk to /home. After all, if you try to list your data, that trojan could infect your data or corrupt it.

    However, if /home is hosed for ANY reason, you need to get it back from backup.

    If /usr/bin/backup is protected, you can safely restore your backup. If /usr/bin/backup is unknown then you have to restore EVERYTHING. And any backups are suspect too.

    So, tell me, how does protecting /usr become pointless?

  81. What the hell is your problem by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

    Painting a car pink is not the same as damaging your property. Maybe to you it is, but maybe there are other people out there who would like a pink car. I know I wouldn't mind having a purple one.

    Carjackers aren't going to want to be driving a hot car around when it happens to be painted hot pink, covered in artwork, or shaped like a giant shoe. The reason is simple: if you're going to steal a car, you don't want the stolen car to be easily identified. A black car is much easier to hide than a pink one.

    1. Re:What the hell is your problem by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Painting a car pink is not the same as damaging your property. Maybe to you it is, but maybe there are other people out there who would like a pink car. I know I wouldn't mind having a purple one.

      Carjackers aren't going to want to be driving a hot car around when it happens to be painted hot pink, covered in artwork, or shaped like a giant shoe. The reason is simple: if you're going to steal a car, you don't want the stolen car to be easily identified. A black car is much easier to hide than a pink one.

      Oh, so that explains why nobody ever steals red sports cars, because they are afraid the color will get them caught, right?

      Obviously you know nothing of either carjacking or auto painting.

      The truth is, pink is a TERRIBLE color for most cars. Any talented auto painter will tell you the same thing. It looks right on VERY few cars, i.e. a '59 Cadillac, but not much else.

  82. Re:More lies with statistics... by IMightB · · Score: 1

    I'll bet that there were zero paisley or mauve cars stolen as well

  83. Did this with luggage by Yogs · · Score: 1

    haven't done this on a car, but I'll definitely recommend it for luggage.
    Have nice cover since I'm always travelling with my wife.
    Also got plaid luggage tags.
    When luggage gets misrouted, all you have to say is pink with plaid tags and it gets back to you 10X faster than it would otherwise.

  84. Am I the only one who instantly thought out?: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But ...It's pink.

  85. Wow by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    This same technique can be used to prevent piracy. The only problem is you have to license the patent from K-Fed.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  86. Average value of pink cars? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    Ever seen a pink Mercedes or BMW?

    Methodology FAIL.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Average value of pink cars? by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have. I saw a pink BMW yesterday.
      It was panted pink for breast cancer awareness.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  87. Red... by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

    I bet Red is the most likely to be pulled over and ticketed for speeding.

  88. Miss South Carolina? by aquila.solo · · Score: 1

    Is that you?

  89. Well actually by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Most stolen cars end up being disassembled and the parts fenced - especially collision-prone external body panels used by crooked body shops. So why steal a car that would require the most lucrative parts be repainted to a common color?

  90. OMFG by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    What a waste of a story on /., we need more technology more, science more IT, not more stupidity.
    Revoke that publisher's license to post stories please.

    1) If I steal a pink BMW car, I will repaint it before selling it on the black market
    2) If you have a pink car, chances are you do not know class, so chances are you will not find any real classy cars totally pink, so not worth stealing.
    3) If you really that into pink, you would go to a pink car convention, where of the 1 million pink cars, a few might get stolen, but going into a small area where there are .00001% of the car population with pink cars, your stats will be off the mark, really...

    I think with the level of stupidity of this article, it must have been just to see how many people were stupid enough to reply, of course I was, so don't be like me and just avoid this page altogether!

    1. Re:OMFG by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

      Almost every single pink car here is higher end model, usually quite much built tuning or street racer car, or otherwise particularly distinctive car. Very few of them are "traditional, off-the-line, direct from factory" cars.

      Doesn't mean they are not cool cars, some of them aren't but some were perfect fit for the car and owner.

      I drove a pink car for 4 years, chicks digged it like mad, guys were like "oh, do i dare to come into that car" quite often, but in the end didn't think twice about it. And when some guy complained i got to start fucking around telling them to show some self-respect and confidence in their sexuality by not being afraid to sit in a pink car.

      You clearly do not know what you are talking about, at all. I can attest to that pink car is very good deterrent against theft, from experience :P

    2. Re:OMFG by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      my point exactly.....not.
      My point was 3fold...reread my post, i did not challenge the fact that pink cars are not for their owners... I challenged the test, that when in a city of 1 million cars, and you say maybe 100 pink cars amongst them, of that study, the crime rate will be much less, not because the crime rate for pink cars is less, but the ratio to population is less, the stats are wrong, and secondly i was also mentioning this is not a /. story, and they should stop printing this type of BS...I wont even go for the third as I am already wasting too much time for a lame story like this one...

      As for your car, pink is a nice color for some oldies, although I could never see a ford tempo or
      a dodge stratus being pink, hence the factor that off assembly lines where you get 5 million cars
      coming out to the population, not many will end up with a new pink paint job, hence your car was the unique exception where it was a street racer tweaked up, or an oldie muscle car for show, of which either make up .001% of the car population in north america..

  91. ObSimpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But if I followed this advice, wouldn't there be rumors that I'm... ding a ling a ling! Helloooo! What a delicious quiche! I drive a pink Miata! I use a thalad fork, la di da! I wash my face!

  92. Re:More lies with statistics... by Torodung · · Score: 1

    The study shows that the theft risk of black was disproportionate to its popularity (Silver/grey was most popular in recent years).

    The study also shows that there are darned few pink cars on the road, period. Which means that the margin of error here is huge. You get one pink car stolen, and it becomes wildly disproportionate to the number of pink cars on the road.

    So he's right. Someone's being a little cutesy. The fact is there probably aren't enough pink cars on the road to tell if that "zero" is reliable.

    But it is fun to claim that car thieves are avoiding pink, and perhaps choosing black because it's easier to lose the cops in a black car.

    The study is good statistics, TFA is a cutesy blog piece. Her argument is fail. Unpopular cars are not unsellable, because it's trivial to repaint them. Additionally, a lot of car theft goes to chop shops, where they don't give a crap about the panel colors.

    Her only valid point is about the black cars being easier to drive away with, and it isn't actually supported by the study, only suggested as a theory that could be tested.

    --
    Toro

  93. not into girly colours, even though I'm allowed by uniquegeek · · Score: 1

    I used to be quite anti-pink, but I've often been making the choice to get the item in that colour, when I have a choice. I'm female, so there's nothing passe about it for me.

    When choosing between a silver Canon digital camera, or a pink one, I choose pink because it'd be easier to identify as mine, and people might think twice about stealing it.

    My last cell phone wasn't pink, but when I had to choose between black, silver, and red, I chose red. My most current cell phone is only available in black, and I find I lose it in the apartment a lot more often.

    My bike will probably need a paint job next year, and I'll do it in pink. Maybe even with Hello Kitty stickers (which I am not a fan of).

  94. Pink Guns? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing an interview somewhere or other with an American gun-nut. The gun-nut's point was that he didn't have all kinds of guns because they were cool or neat - He had them for 'protection.' That's why he needed to conceal-carry and had one under his bed and under his car seat and under his jacket etc.

    The interviewer then said something to the effect of "So since your concealed guns are for protection only, you'd be fine if all guns were required to be powder-coated bright pink?" The spluttering response from the gun-nut was very amusing.

    1. Re:Pink Guns? by PPH · · Score: 1

      "So since your concealed guns are for protection only, you'd be fine if all guns were required to be powder-coated bright pink?" The spluttering response from the gun-nut was very amusing.

      Its a question of deterence. The only time I've ever had to pull out my gun, I just had to show it. So paint a gun some silly color and the mugger might not take it seriously. Even worse, they'll think its a toy. And then I may have to shoot them.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Pink Guns? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      So paint a gun some silly color and the mugger might not take it seriously

      They would if all guns sold were powder-coated bright pink... They'd have to assume the gun was real.

    3. Re:Pink Guns? by PPH · · Score: 1

      They would if all guns sold were powder-coated bright pink... They'd have to assume the gun was real.

      So, what's the point? If pink becomes associated with guns and violence, then black or chrome guns will become non-threatening. But it will take time for the culture to change. That's why the whole 'assault weapon' regulations are so silly. Guns are defined by how evil they look, not what they can do. I have a gun with higher muzzle energy than a 0.50 cal. Barrett (a highly regulated rifle due to its 'evil' reputation). But because it has a nice wood stock and pretty engraving, it is considered to be a standard hunting weapon.

      Meanwhile, toy guns are often made in bright colors so kids won't get accidentally shot by cops. If people start painting real guns pink, there's an argument that cops won't respond to the threat, giving criminals the jump on them. In fact, I think there have been some cases where criminals have painted their barrels orange (another designation for toy guns) and been charged more severely, as this demonstrated an intent to actually do harm to their victims rather than use them as a threat to accomplish some other goal.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  95. Small sample size by Beerdood · · Score: 1

    Correct me if my probability is wrong here, but If only 0.26 of black cars get stolen (about 1 out of every 400) and we assumed that pink cars get stolen just as often as black cars, then the odds that zero black cars get stolen is (0.9976 ^ 109) - 0.769. So there's basically only about a 23% chance that at least one black car would get stolen according to those numbers given a sample size of 109. Clearly this isn't a big enough sample size to assume that your car wouldn't get stolen simply because it's pink .That 23% chance goes even lower if you give the same odds as red (at 0.16 - only a 16% chance at least one red is stolen).

    I still think that the odds of a pink car getting stolen would be less than 0.26 or 0.16 though - I can't remember the last time I saw a pink car, if ever. Why steal something that stands out?

    --
    Global warming and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking number of pirates - Gospel of the FSM
  96. Pink is as pink does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Viz: http://www.advicegoddess.com/features/archives/2005/09/the-pink-ramble-1.html

  97. Correction: If You Don't Want Your Pink Car Stolen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Corrected Headline: If You Don't Want Your Pink Car Stolen, Move To The Netherlands.

  98. Yeah.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...You keep thinking that.

    1. Re:Yeah.... by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      ...You keep thinking that.

      Yes, I'm sure I'll regret it in the likely scenario that someone tries to steal my car at gunpoint at a gas station.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  99. Faux rust by Taagehornet · · Score: 1

    In case you want to try something else next time:
    http://www.make-digital.com/make/vol11/?pg=76&u1=texterity#pg76

  100. No, make it a bluish-yellow. by M8e · · Score: 1

    it's impossible to steal a bluish-yellow car!

  101. Think of the pink! by nilbog · · Score: 1

    A pink car will not only deter thieves. Trust me, if you have a pink car, it's the only pink thing you'll be seeing.

    --
    or else!
    1. Re:Think of the pink! by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

      Oh, i found it to be very much to the contrary. But apparently, you've never driven a pink car before, so STFU :D

  102. No Mary Kay in the Netherlands? by rsolberg · · Score: 1

    Keep underachieving Mary Kay cosmetic representatives away from your pink cars! This is the only demographic where a pink car is a both positive status symbol and a sign of prestige. Obviously Mary Kay doesn't market in the Netherlands or all of those pink cars would be stolen by reps that want to look successful. I, however am not afraid of Mary Kay's minions, and recently considered an optioned-out Mary Kay pink 2001 Cadillac DTS with 12,000km and V8 engine as the asking price was only $2500.00. Talk about depreciation!

  103. The worst tag-line for a conclusion you could draw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Love Pink? Car Thieves Don’t", "If You Don't Want Your Car Stolen, Make It Pink"

    I'm sorry, but the actual article states that "Of the 109 pink cars in the study, not one was stolen."

    The source shows the most popular car to be stolen is black with a chance of ~0.22-0.25%...The median looks to be about 0.1%...

    Now...if just ONE of those cars were stolen, the rate would be "~0.9%", in which case the tagline would have read: Pink cars get stolen almost 9 times more often than most other cars."

    I'm not arguing the statistical approach that the study took, I'm just bewildered at the stupidity of a tag-line both on the story covering it and the slashdot post.

  104. They did not mix sources... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    TFA links to two DIFFERENT articles talking about two COMPLETELY DIFFERENT things.
    FFS the title of the yahoo article they linked to is "America's Most Popular Car Colors".

    And the study uses its own data.
    Which points out quite clearly that: A) Silver/gray cars are more popular and B) More black cars were stolen DESPITE there being more silver/gray cars.

    Also, color bars showing the percentage of cars stolen - those are not percentages of THE SUM OF ALL CARS STOLEN.
    If they were, when you add them all up you would get 100. And there are 10 colors there - ALL OF THEM with percentages above 10%.
    It is right there in the title of the graph - "Theft risk by colour (%), cars up to three years old, 2004-2008, the Netherlands".
    The graph show the odds that the particular car would be stolen, based on its color. NOT its availability (i.e. number of cars sold).

    So, when the chances are for black cars to be stolen at "about 26%" - that just means one in four of ALL BLACK CARS sold was stolen.
    It does NOT mean that 26% of ALL STOLEN CARS were black - despite "about 26%" of all SOLD CARS being black.

     
    It is a subset of a subset of the set.
    NOT two subsets of the same set magically connected together, or "not so magically adjusted to match".
    Nor is the total number of cars of each color relevant - which can be seen by looking at blue, gray and red cars.
    Blue and gray cars both have 1 in 5 chances to get stolen - despite there being 3 times more of the gray cars out there.
    And reds are being stolen less than any of the "other" colors, despite there being at least twice as many red cars than there is of any particular "other" color.
    Again, it is the theft risk by color, not theft risk by quantity.

    "1 in 4" cars remains "1 in 4" regardless if we are talking about 4 or 4000 cars.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  105. Already knew that... by Skal+Tura · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I drove for 4-5 years a pink car. It was a type of car likely to be stolen, in an area where cars are being stolen quite frequently, in a visible, big parking area, where practically no one was watching if there's a car being stolen.

    Car was easy to steal type, many cars like that even a ice cream stick was enough of a key, on top of that the trunk couldn't be locked so you could get inside from there, and if that's not enough i frequently forgot to lock the doors. It was never stolen, or attempted even.

    Not only that, but all the girls were curious about it always ;) It drew eyes like a magnet everytime i drove it around, and girls came talking to me at times just because how the car looked, yet the car had about nothing special in it's looks other than being pink.

    Best color for a car, ever.

  106. Alternatives to pink cars: underwear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In NYC, my car was broken into about 3-4 times. I accomplished the same goal by just putting two pairs of underwear in obvious places on my car. One in the front & one in the back.

    Never had a theft problem ever again.

    The best part is, if you want to go on a date, you can just stash the underwear, whereas the pink car....

  107. If my car was pink by gearloos · · Score: 1

    If my 335i was pink, I'd probably leave the keys in it hoping it was stolen anyway... And yes, it's black.. Time to worry? Well I'm not concerned, as I got these capacitors and filled the trunk with em... Something like 35 farads... Hmmm wonder if that explains why I always see these bum looking guys sleeping right by my car when I leave in the morning...

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  108. Why so few colours? by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

    Why, in any given year, are cars available in so few colours? It seems we go through phases when all the manufacturers have decided that this year is black, silver and earth tones. 5 years from now bright blue and green are in. I once had a civic that was dark chocolate. Haven't seen that colour in years. If you want a car that is pumpkin orange or school bus yellow you either have to special order it, or get it repainted at Maaco.

    Sure I can see that a given company doesn't want to deal with 100 different colours of paint, but I'd expect more variation between companies.

    Our current Subaru is a cadet blue. I've seen one other from Japan this colour. So currently it's the bottom end of the popularity curve. I sure love being able to spot it in a parking lot.

    Kia, I think it was, one year offered a car with a harlequin paint job. Hood was green. Front quarter panels were yellow. Front doors were blue. Rear doors were red. I thought it looked cool.

    --
    Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
  109. Garth Sundem by garthsundem · · Score: 1

    It'd be cool to correlate stolen car color with gender. I guess the vast majority of car thieves are male--would they prefer another outlandish color that's a bit more....manly?

    --
    GeekDad, TED speaker, Wipeout loser, author of Brain Trust
  110. Re:More lies with statistics... by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

    Fair enough. The sample size is small. There were zero hovercars stolen, also, and I'll offer that if I saw a hovercar in a parking lot, hell, I'd probably try to steal it. My post was a response to the AC who thought that what we really needed were absolute numbers, and, having RTFA, provided them.

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
  111. Solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Color-changing paint. When the engine's off, the car turns pink.

    2. A remote security device which not only locks the doors and activates the alarms, but disguises the car as a Yugo.