Slashdot Mirror


Your Online Education Experience?

pspahn writes "I am currently enrolled at a very well-known online school. I was hesitant when I enrolled; now more than a year has gone by, and I am regretting my decision. The main problem is that I am not learning anything. I have several years' experience with Web design, yet I was not allowed to bypass Intro to Web Design 1. Similarly, there are other classes on my list that will teach me very little I don't already know, yet will cost me money all the same. Now, I do have a great desire to learn and to further myself academically, but I just don't see much value in continuing to take classes I could have aced in ninth grade. It is also difficult when fellow classmates clearly have very little intelligent input to offer and our online discussions are reminiscent of an AOL chat room. While it is possible simply to attend a local school in person, I would much prefer an online environment as it seems to be a more natural medium considering the content of my studies. I am interested specifically in Information Security programs. What online education programs have Slashdot readers been happy with and considered successful?"

428 comments

  1. well... by Soilworker · · Score: 5, Informative

    You will experience the same problems with other types of educations. You only study to get the paper, if you want to learn stuffs do it by yourself.

    1. Re:well... by msobkow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Amen to the self-taught. With pretty much anything, cracking open some books and software (where applicable) will teach you through experience. There's not much point to going through the motions just for a piece of paper if you're truly self-taught already. The only problem is that businesses want that piece of paper in greater and greater numbers. It's been a long time since I worked with anyone who didn't have a university degree of some sort, even the sysadmins are educated nowadays. It's become a profession, even if there is no global overseeing body of accreditation like the Engineers have. Personally I'd prefer someone self-taught if their interests happened to coincide with a university degree, but having that degree guarantees you have a certain minimum education. With a highly competitive workforce, I'd have no option but to give the job to someone who has proven their willingness to put 4 years and significant money into a degree. Believe me, my first 2-3 years of university were boring because I was self taught from the age of 14. It wasn't until the 400 series classes that things got interesting and new (and fun!)

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    2. Re:well... by theskipper · · Score: 3, Informative

      To be fair, there is a difference between serious, accredited universities and paper mills. If he's enrolled in one of the schools profiled in the Frontline documentary below, then he may simply be getting ripped off.

      http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/collegeinc/?utm_campaign=homepage&utm_medium=proglist&utm_source=proglist

      It's pretty sad since these folks really are trying to better themselves.

    3. Re:well... by grahamsz · · Score: 1

      Still it happens in real schools too. I went to a school that's ranked in the Top 20 in the world for a CS&E degree and first year was a joke. Stuff like univariate differential algebra that i'd covered previously in high school. Even second year math had stuff like fourier and z-transforms which was also covered in advance high school classes.

      Can't remember any of that shit now, but it turns out a degree is more of a tool to open doors than learn stuff.

    4. Re:well... by UNIX_Meister · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think you make an important distinction. I attended two traditional brick-and-mortar undergraduate state universities in engineering and math/computer science. I wouldn't characterize the learning as "outstanding" at either, since I did learn a lot more on the job. However, the quality between these and the UofPhx where I got my masters was astounding.

      I didn't learn anything. I learned a few things in an accounting class that helps me with budgeting for a non-profit I'm involved with. But most of the work was busy work - reading and posting messages to a Outlook-based message forum. We also had to do 4-5 page papers each week, but the grading was very lax. There was also a lot of group work. Now, I think that this is a good idea since it mimicks the real world where in IT there is a lot of team work required. However, it was very inconsistent with the people who were in my group, and there was no choice on our part of whom to be in groups with.

      The biggest frustration was not any hands-on learning. It was all writing papers about databases, networks, operating systems, etc. There wasn't any actual logging into a database, a network switch, a server, or even writing a single line of code. Fortunately, I took it upon myself for my capstone project to do some actual coding and complete a project, rather than the usual writing again.

      So now, I'm stuck with $56k of student loans I'm struggling to pay back.

      I definitely would NOT recommend UofPhoenix.

    5. Re:well... by twilightzero · · Score: 5, Interesting

      {
      #begin rant here

      I would both agree and disagree. I did the atrocious U of Phoenix for 4 classes and couldn't take it any more. It was exactly as the OP said and more. The discussions were extremely stupid and shallow and the classes either weren't particularly relevant or were below-level, but additionally the pace was absolutely bonkers. I was ASSURED by my advisor when I started that in no circumstance should I be spending more than 15 hours a week on my coursework, including all reading, discussions, and assignments and that it was easy to do with a job and a family, just like the ads say. Well what they should tell you is that you HAVE to have a family to do it because you have to have people who can do everything else in your life for you besides, eat, sleep, work, and study.

      We were assigned an average of 900+ pages of reading a week over the courses I took and they expected you to read it all. Then there were the papers: the last course I took with them had 9 major papers due in 5 weeks, comprised of 5 individual and 4 group papers. And if that wasn't bad enough, being the local English nazi I was chosen by my group to be the guy to put the papers together. Normally work I actually kind of enjoy, except 2 members (out of 4) of our group could write at maybe a 5th grade level. I would open their submissions and would be presented with an opening run-on sentence followed by a colon and a list of talking points. That's it. Being that the pace was so insane and I didn't want to get a bad grade, I would end up re-writing their entire sections. Of course I would complain to the "professor" and was assured that the problem was being looked into and that the person's other papers were fine. Of course they were fine, the school had a department that you could send your papers to and they would coach you through every step of correcting your mistakes, all but doing it for you. But that doesn't help on the group papers.

      Bear in mind that all of this was also after going to traditional classroom college for 2 1/2 years and getting fed up with the hoop-jumping and ball-playing and endless drama and politics. I eventually left all of it and got a job and have been very successful being self-taught. Of course it causes a problem getting through HR drones, but my take on it is that if you're so hide-bound about everyone having a piece of paper, then I don't want to work there. True, it's been tough at times but I've never gone hungry and I've had (in my oh so humble opinion) better jobs because of it.

      end
      }

      --

      "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
    6. Re:well... by twilightzero · · Score: 2, Informative

      I did U of Phoenix for 4 classes (see full rant above) and everything in that report is 100% true. They lie like a rug to get you in the door then charge you exorbitant amounts for sub-standard ridiculously paced classes that are next to worthless.

      --

      "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
    7. Re:well... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      When I saw the summary on the front page, I came here specifically to mention this Frontline documentary. Kudos sir for beating me here =)

    8. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you may vaguely remember your teacher mentioning the terms "Fourier Transform" or "Z transform" in high school.

      But, no, you didn't seriously study any continuous or discrete transforms in high school. Same with topology.

    9. Re:well... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Well what they should tell you is that you HAVE to have a family to do it because you have to have people who can do everything else in your life for you besides, eat, sleep, work, and study.

      And this is different from a "real" school how? If you go to school full time and also work, yes, you have no time for a life. Been there, done that.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    10. Re:well... by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The big problem with self-teaching is that sometimes you need someone to build bridges to understanding that you just can't manage on your own. When I moved to Yale to do a post-doc I learned much more about advanced maths from discussing with colleagues than I ever learned from reading books on my own. For me, it wasn't because I couldn't learn from books, it was just that the more advanced material is written in impenetrable hieroglyphs that seem designed to obscure actual understanding. Nobody ever learned Lyapunov control from starting with "Consider unit ball B on set R3..." or if they did learn it that way, I doubt they really -understood- it.

      However, someone sitting down with you for 15 minutes with a piece of paper can suss out what you already know, fill in the gaps and draw parallels to the things you understand. That's why we -have- teachers to guide us, and not just inanimate rows of books.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    11. Re:well... by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Informative

      The first year of a degree is usually spent getting everyone on the same page.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    12. Re:well... by twilightzero · · Score: 1

      I would hazard to guess that it's pretty much impossible to go to traditional brick & mortar school "full time" (12 credits/semester I believe) and hold down a full time 40 hr job, family or no family.

      Besides, "real" schools don't tell you that you can easily go there full time and hold a full time job. In fact, usually you're advised to seek out financial aid and student loans specifically because you need to concentrate on studying and work as little as possible. Granted that's in an ideal world, but as with most things in life you start with idealism and step backwards until you find reality.

      --

      "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
    13. Re:well... by Cassini2 · · Score: 1

      At many Canadian Universities, 4 classes would be considered a full-time load. Part time load is 1 to 3 classes. Full time load is 4 or 5 classes, and "overload" is 6 classes. Generally, each class will have 3 to 4 of in class teaching, with lab work additional. As such, 15 hours per week of *classes* is reasonable for 4 courses. For each class hour, you are expected to work 4 to 5 additional hours independently. Thus an average student should be working up to 65 hours per week for 4 classes (15 in class + 40 independently).

      It sounds like you signed up for a full-time undergraduate load, and expected a part-time load with spare time to raise a family.

      To make matters worse, it sounds like you signed up for an arts (as in not science) based program. These programs tend to have a good portion of the workload in a few major papers due at the end of the term. Predictably, the students wait until almost the end of the term before starting the major papers.

      Math, engineering, science, and many business courses are easier to schedule for an adult learner. Many of these courses attempt to force the students to keep up, and mark based on on-going progress. As such, the workload is not as "peaky" as it is in courses that depend on major papers. However, the reason for the non-peaky workload, is that many math, engineering and science courses are much more difficult, in that if you miss any portion of the course the remaining concepts become much more difficult to understand. Another disadvantage of science and engineering courses is that it is common to have "lab" time, and this places additional demands on the students.

      In the end, an engineering degree proves that you have the ability to think analytically, learn quickly, and proceed with determination, while working 60 to 80 hours per week.

    14. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "classes either weren't particularly relevant or were below-level"

      Not relevant is in the eyes of the beholder. I knew plenty of people at my University who didn't think learning how to even write a program was relevant. Not that they were particularly good at, its that they figured code monkeys would write the software they designed. Never mind the fact that their designs sucked too.

      If the course work is truly below level. You should blow through it just like I did. For courses that were below my level, I just flipped through the reading material regardless of what it was or how many pages. It was just to assure myself I truly already had things memorized like I thought I did. And sure enough I did. I find most people overestimate what they actually know. I've more than once met a C, SQL, Java, Visual Basic, etc... "expert" who knew very little about the language they claimed to know so well. (And I quite frankly don't claim to be an expert in any language because there's so many little features I've never used) For example, I've met experts who didn't even understand arrays.

      FYI... I'd say UOP is a low end university. Not to slam you personally or anything just saying I wouldn't go there at all if I was you.

      "Well what they should tell you is that you HAVE to have a family to do it because you have to have people who can do everything else in your life for you besides, eat, sleep, work, and study."

      Of course. Any university where there is ANY kind of workload at all is going to be a ton of work. At the university I went to, I had projects where I had to work more hours than a full time job.

      "getting fed up with the hoop-jumping and ball-playing and endless drama and politics"

      You mean like... Everywhere just about? People are always indulging in drama and politics everywhere I've been ESPECIALLY those who claim to not like it. It's generally used as their excuse to run away when the going gets tough.

    15. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bear in mind that all of this was also after going to traditional classroom college for 2 1/2 years and getting fed up with the hoop-jumping and ball-playing and endless drama and politics.

      What?!? Sounds like (1) you were ill-disciplined and (2) had very little patience for the amount of bureaucracy you might find anywhere on the planet. You're either a genius or just unreasonable, but in either case it doesn't set you up all that well to give generally useful advice.

      I eventually left all of it and got a job and have been very successful being self-taught.

      I have to assume that you're of an older generation. As a younger engineer who struggled mightily to land my first job, I find it irratating that the older folks are somehow oblivious to how times have changed and how hard it is for an average (or above average for that matter) college grad to get a meaningful job these days. All I hear are stories about how "I started my engineering job before I finished college" which is impossible now. Don't you all notice that there are only a couple of guys in your group/dept/whatever under the age of 30? My point is, unless you're an absolute prodigy AND have concrete proof of it, don't expect to get anywhere without a degree.

    16. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I would also add, that on your own most people can't seem to figure out what their true limitations are. Lot's of people I met thought they were badass at teaching themselves computers. Some couldn't use Linux, arrays in their chosen programming language, etc...

      Sometimes it gets completely ridiculous. It seems like simply because someone can get SOMETHING to work on a computer and know more than the totally ignorant, they think they're a complete badass.

      Having a teacher (if he or she is decent) will get you familiar will all the stuff you don't know in a hurry. I'd say the real problem with going to school/university is that so many students don't want to be bothered with learning anything, they have to do it at a slow pace.

      And yes, I'm serious when I say they can't be bothered with learning. A number of students at my university for example, were self taught (I'm self taught too BTW) and thought the university should just accept their word for the fact that they were badass and hand them a degree. And that the teachers shouldn't try teaching them squat. They couldn't seem to accept the fact, that the university expected them to prove themselves and wanted to teach them SOMETHING. (Note: I don't intend to say that all self-taught people are that way, I certainly wasn't)

      And other people... Well... What can I say? They can't even be bothered to teach themselves the simple stuff. So yes... School is generally slow, sadly enough.

    17. Re:well... by mevets · · Score: 1

      I think there is a more subtle distinction than 'study to get the paper' vs 'learn stuffs'; although I do appreciate the humour. Most of what I've ever learned has been by 'learn stuffs'. At the same time, having suffered a reasonably strict base education, including people harping about grammar and punctuation, is a great way to 'learn stuffs' quite effectively.

      I remember a colleague, who was quite adept at complex software tasks like writing scsi adapter drivers, telling me about how he 'invented' hashing. He was quite right, in the sense that he had never seen it before, and came up with it independently. I didn't have the heart to show him it had been well documented before he was born.

      Sadly, Knuth is not for the feint of heart, unless you have a certain basis behind you in the first place. A structured education is handy for acquiring that basis, but after that quickly loses relevance.

    18. Re:well... by twilightzero · · Score: 1

      Please understand the subject you're talking about before discussing it as almost all of your information is incorrect.

      At U of Phoenix, there is no difference between full and part time. You take only one class at a time and each class lasts for 5 only weeks total. That's right, that whole load was ONLY ONE CLASS AT A TIME. Additionally, I WAS unemployed at the time and was still barely able to keep up. I was mentioning the full time employment bit in response to their (omnipresent) advertising that repeatedly describes how you can complete a degree and work full time.

      Second, I was in their IT program, not an arts program. That did include some management classes on the course list, however the classes I took were more oriented to networking and such.

      Third, US colleges are the same way. Note I stated 12 CREDITS, not 12 classes. Each class is a higher or lower number of credits depending on its course load and difficulty.

      --

      "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
    19. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I'm the AC below that forgot for a moment to use the Quote Parent button. LOL)

      Never pay attention to the advertising of a lot of Universities. They'll just tell you what they think you want to hear to get you in the door and shelling out money. That isn't to say that all of them are bad. But all of them will present themselves as being "awesome". Just like every software developer I've ever known presents himself/herself as "awesome".

      As I said... I wouldn't go to UOP. I was slightly involved with them when I was going to my university. I knew some of the people that worked at UOP and they wanted my help with some things. Let's just say... I wasn't impressed at all. To make matters worse... At the time they were changing their programs, and all the people I knew who I thought could teach anything to anybody left.

    20. Re:well... by twilightzero · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To mangle a Monty Python quote, "I'm 32, I'm not old". Everyone on my team is actually within 2 years of each other for what it's worth. Also when I conduct interviews I'm MUCH more concerned about what you know, what you can do, and how well you learn and think than what kind of piece of paper you have.

      Yes, I have little patience for bureaucracy, always have and always will, but I've by and large learned to deal with it or side-step it as the situation calls for. What I have ZERO patience for is pedagogy and jumping through arbitrary hoops that have no relation to the task at hand but are there to waste your time or prove that you have the patience to jump through hoops. I have too much shit to get done and life is too short to waste time on that.

      --

      "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
    21. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We were assigned an average of 900+ pages of reading a week over the courses I took and they expected you to read it all. Then there were the papers: the last course I took with them had 9 major papers due in 5 weeks, comprised of 5 individual and 4 group papers. ...

      Bear in mind that all of this was also after going to traditional classroom college for 2 1/2 years and getting fed up with the hoop-jumping and ball-playing and endless drama and politics.
      }

      I have a hard time believing that this was a University of Phoenix online diploma mill curriculum.

    22. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just be careful when you judge people like this, I sometimes had to realize that people were indeed aware of the a certain algorithm, but just didn't realize theirs was just a variation of it (since they approached the problem from a different angle they never saw the similarity).
      Also, 'hashing' in general isn't really an algorithm, the real "magic" is the very specific hash function, and it might well be that nobody had ever used the one he used - mostly because they never had the same constraints (speed, memory usage,...).

    23. Re:well... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      I would hazard to guess that it's pretty much impossible to go to traditional brick & mortar school "full time" (12 credits/semester I believe) and hold down a full time 40 hr job, family or no family.

      I graduated from UW, carrying 12 credits a quarter, and worked full time. I was (and am) married. Yes, it was tough, but it's *not* impossible.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    24. Re:well... by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Pedagogy is about "one size fits all". How many people are in your class? Do they have the same goals as you, or the same background? Do they have the same interest, or do they even know what they will find interesting (or not) about the course without going through it? As a rule, the only way to cut the crap is to have private tutoring, which can be tailored to an individual. If you're in a class with others, it will only fit you like a mass produced shoe.

    25. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ive had the same problems with CTU.... I think I will just enroll into a brick and mortar institution this year. Not sure.

    26. Re:well... by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You will experience the same problems with other types of educations. You only study to get the paper, if you want to learn stuffs do it by yourself.

      Who modded this nonsense informative? Proper teaching has huge benefits, not least in training you how to study properly rather than flitting around just picking on stuff you think is interesting.
      Do you really think that all the studying and practical work a doctor (say) has to do to get qualified could be done better at home, studying alone over the internet? You are deluded.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    27. Re:well... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Bear in mind that all of this was also after going to traditional classroom college for 2 1/2 years and getting fed up with the hoop-jumping and ball-playing and endless drama and politics.

      Don't be so precious, it's nothing compared to working in the real world.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    28. Re:well... by WH44 · · Score: 3, Informative

      What high school did you go to? I went to an excellent high school: the year I graduated (1979), 1/3 of the graduating class were PSAT/NMSQT finalists (note: semi-finalists are in the 99th percentile). I was one of three students that took Calculus BC (the most advanced math they had), and Fourier and Z-Transforms were definitely not covered. I did learn about Fourier in the Summer of '77, but it was entirely unrelated to school (a project for a university professor).

    29. Re:well... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      But it must work - look at how good he teached hi's self Englishes!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    30. Re:well... by rolnhgr · · Score: 1

      I completed my BSIT from UoP in May. Like you, I had a few years in a traditional campus environment (albeit almost 30 years ago). When I decided to go back and finish what I had started, I had 25 years as a self taught software developer. There were classes I didn’t think I needed, but approached them with the attitude of filling the assignment requirements. My biggest complaint revolved around the group projects. Like you, I was the one in the group that would keep the ball rolling and make sure the assignment was turned in on time. That, however, is an indication of what to expect in the real world, where there’s always going to be someone expecting others to pick-up the slack. The pace is hectic. I spent more than a few long nights and weekends doing the coursework. Too often I needed to choose between doing something I wanted and completing an assignment. Neither is different from a ‘traditional’ setting. There is no easy way to the end. Higher education is not necessarily to learn material, but to learn how to learn.

    31. Re:well... by rolnhgr · · Score: 1

      The UoP on-line curriculum is designed to cover a semester over a 5 week period. Taking more than one at a time at that pace is setting you up for failure.

    32. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, the big problem with self-teaching is getting credit for it, and credentials. (Not to mention a salary or funding.) This takes either years of acknowledged practice in your field with demonstrated results, which can be sometihing of a chicken vs egg proposition, and/or a judicious degree of self-promotion. Ha, ha, only serious. Nothing that can't be backed up, though, of course. Look, you at least need to document each project, website, job, etc. You know, build a portfolio.

      However, even if you're industrious, clever enough, or just plain good enough an autodidact to get published in peer-reviewed journals regardless, by far the least contrary approach is to apply your talents first to the immediate problem of funding an accredited program of education for yourself. (You can still IRC all you want.) Notice I didn't say "best", just "least contrary", or "most straightforward." In other words, "easiest". Independence has a price, too. I'd say meatspace institution, too, but maybe I just like coeds and lady postgrads. Plus there's nothing wrong with quaffing a brew with the guys after class. Hell, that's where half the ideas get formed anyway.

      Having said all this, sounds like your school needs to look at its placement procedures and prior work credit policies.

    33. Re:well... by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sometimes it gets completely ridiculous. It seems like simply because someone can get SOMETHING to work on a computer and know more than the totally ignorant, they think they're a complete badass.

      You've just described the average boss who thinks that they "know computers" because they can move a mouse on-screen and make spreadsheets and powerpoint presentations, or the average webmonkey who knows dreamweaver but couldn't set up a web server or hand-code a css file if their life depended on it (witness the earlier discussion with idiots claiming that php scripts could be linked to each other).

      These are not people who are self-teachers, because they don't go beyond what they need to know to do the task at hand. They stop learning because they stop exploring - they learn a limited amount because they have to, not because of any innate curiosity.

    34. Re:well... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Most colleges dont like you to test out of "required" classes either. they make a lot less money off you when they do that.

      It's what is really broken in the US education system. It's about getting money not about education.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    35. Re:well... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Sounds like my first year a Michigan State University. I took classes that covered what I had in AP chemistry at my high school. Plus I took AP Trig and Calculus... Yet was forced to take Algebra because it was a required class...

      It's not about education, it's about maximizing the amount of money you get out of each student.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    36. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!

    37. Re:well... by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Please realize not every high school out there has the resources yours does. I went to a rural school and we had almost zero college prep classes. Calculus wasn't even offered.

    38. Re:well... by Weezul · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't worry, you chose wisely. You know all those classmates with 5th grade reading level? Yeah, they are why a University of Phoenix degree is worse than no degree. ;)

      You most likely were not doing anything interesting enough during your brick & mortar 2.5 years. I'd have been bored studying computer science for undergrad, so I studied math instead, much fun.

      --
      The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    39. Re:well... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Only for the weak.

      I was full time student and a full time employee for the 4 years I went to school.

      School 7:00am to 4:00pm work was 7:00pm to 10:00pm and then I worked 7-7 saturday and sunday.

      It is very doable and what is required for the non rich kids to work their way through school on their own.

      Did I get to binge drink and party like a fool? no, thats only for kids that daddy paid their way.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    40. Re:well... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I remember a colleague, who was quite adept at complex software tasks like writing scsi adapter drivers, telling me about how he 'invented' hashing. He was quite right, in the sense that he had never seen it before, and came up with it independently. I didn't have the heart to show him it had been well documented before he was born.

      I loved showing people that most of what they "invented" was already done, mostly by telling them the book name that talks about what they did and suggesting they read it for even more ideas. Stroking egos is for the Management degrees not the CS degrees. Problem is Most CS teachers and classes dont even recommend you read "the art of computer programming" which I consider to be required.. It covers 98.7% of everything you will ever need to know.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    41. Re:well... by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      There's no way in hell you covered fourier transforms in high school.

      Even if you did, you're not taking into account the difference between high school and college level classes. Just because you took calculus 3 in high school doesn't mean that you know anything that's going to be taught in a college calc 3 class. The difference in level of material between the two is insane.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    42. Re:well... by kiwimate · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Replace the word "boss" with "server admin" and I'll agree with you. I'm sometimes frustrated at times by the prevailing /. opinions that (i) bosses suck, and (ii) "you can teach yourself". Yes, you can, but one of the best justifications for learning in a formalized course of study is you get to learn from other people's mistakes and experiences.

      I am thinking of two individuals right now, both very clever, both in the server admin field - one (call him Ricki) motivated to learn, the other (call him Gavin) who just got in because...well, I don't know, candidly. I suspect it's because he thought he "knew computers". Both had no formal learning in Computer Science or IT when they got started.

      Both of these individuals, while I was working with them, demonstrated a lack of knowledge of something very fundamental - permissions. In Ricki's case, he didn't understand how NTFS permissions on a folder combine with share level permissions when you're accessing over the network. He was very young, had only been in the industry a year or two, and very motivated. I liked him. We took ten minutes to cover the topic, and I can guarantee he never made that mistake again.

      "Gavin", on the other hand, had been in the industry for several years. The mistake he made was he didn't understand how different group memberships combine - the problem was someone could only read a file, but not write to it, they were in two groups, one with R and one with RW, and he thought the way to fix this was to take them out of the R group. He would not listen to any explanation of how permissions combined - not interested, too arrogant to learn. He'll get the desired result, eventually, but it's not because he knows what he's doing - it's because he will hack and chop and swear and guess until he gets it to work apparently correctly, and he doesn't care how he got there. So, of course, he can never reproduce it the second time, he continually repeats the same mistakes, and he introduces all kinds of underlying issues because he neither knows nor cares what he's doing.

      My point - these are fundamental errors and mistakes, and if you don't understand how permissions work, then how on earth have you gotten several years into a server admin position? Next point - that is why you take structured, formal courses of study. Things like permissions, if you're doing a technical server admin course, are taught at the beginning. It's like music - if you don't understand scales and modes and a little bit of basic music theory, it's really hard to know where you're going. A well designed course of formal study recognizes this and teaches all the necessary information in a logical sequence. The danger of self-instruction is you focus on the cool stuff and gloss over the boring but important stuff. Witness "Gavin" - he's spent several years playing with server farms, VMWare, all kinds of cool stuff, and he still doesn't know how file level permissions work! It's amazing...and scary. "Ricki", on the other hand, I'm sure will keep learning - but I am convinced that a structured course of study would've given him a much better base on which to build, rather than having to figure the basics out by trial and error. Working on something and figuring it out by trial and error is a great skill, and important for a tech - but there are fundamentals (like permissions!) which are just so basic and necessary that they should be taught up front. "Here's how they work, here's how groups work, play and experiment for ten minutes to verify what I've just told you and make sure you understand effective permissions, then on to the next module."

      Following on from this, and to swing back to the original question, I think you can't beat the experience of classroom learning. I recently finished my MBA, and some of the most valuable insights I've heard have been from the discussions we've had in class with various professionals who work in pharmaceuticals, banking, insurance, technology, etc. If I do another degree (and I would love to), I'll only pick online if there's no school in the area offering the exact programmes I want - I just don't think you get the quality of interaction.

    43. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would consider traditional classes at a local school. I didn't find anything "[un]natural" about the environment as concerns computer science. Quite the contrary, going to a university gave me access to a wide range of resources I didn't have on my own, such as computers with virtually any OS you would want to play with, servers, and advanced development tools. More important I was exposed to a lot of talented peers, and experienced professors that were able to inspire and direct me. It may be cheaper to study online, but it sounds like you're still paying a lot of money and not getting much out of it. You will probably have to invest more of your time in a traditional university and you will have to wake up and drag yourself to a physical class but the investment will pay off.

    44. Re:well... by aunt+edna · · Score: 1

      These are not people who are self-teachers, because they don't go beyond what they need to know to do the task at hand. They stop learning because they stop exploring - they learn a limited amount because they have to, not because of any innate curiosity.

      Oh, if only you could meet some colleagues here ...
      Oh, if only some useless manager could realize what the score is ...

      Oh, it's a true delight to work alongside these ... these ... monkeys!

    45. Re:well... by murphyd311 · · Score: 1

      I am currently getting my BS in Computer Information Systems through Saint Leo University. They are a brick and mortar school based out of Florida. They also have many satellite campuses on Military bases. I was actually in the Military when I started taking classes at the Langley AFB campus.

      I find that if you take the discussions seriously and put time into the papers, you can learn quite a bit. I feel that they are not a "degree mill" type of school. They do not differentiate between an "online" degree and a "regular" degree which to me is a plus, given the stigma of online learning.

      There are some classes I've breezed through (mostly the COM classes, I've been in IT for 12 years..) and others I've had to really work hard at. For instance I'm getting C in marketing, this semester, at least so far. Marketing?! I wasn't really prepared for all of the case studies and the professor wants very detailed answers that demonstrate a working knowledge of the material. Now that I know this, I will be able to bring my grade up, but it goes to show that it is on par with classroom learning as far as the range of difficulties.

    46. Re:well... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      the more advanced material is written in impenetrable hieroglyphs that seem designed to obscure actual understanding.

      That comes from two types of writers: Very intelligent writers with poor communications skills, and educated idiots who are trying to obfuscate how unintelligent they really are. I know one PhD who is a complete and utter moron; I have no clue how he ever graduated high school, let alone got a doctorate.

      When you see the word "enumerate" three times in one paragraph without once seeing the word "count", that's an indication it's the second sort of person.

      Also, with an actual instructor who has good communications skills, things seem to go faster. You have someone to ask questions to, which is a lot more rapid than searching for the information (although it's easier these days with the internet).

      They called Dr. Asimov "the great educator" because he was both intelligent, and knew how to write. Too bad there aren't more like him.

    47. Re:well... by Bryan3000000 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately most of those teachers are woefully ineffective. The fact that you didn't encounter such a situation until post-doc is extremely telling.

    48. Re:well... by twilightzero · · Score: 1

      THANK YOU for some fucking validation!

      --

      "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
    49. Re:well... by twilightzero · · Score: 1

      Working is much better. I'm not some snowflake dipshit who cries to mommy when I don't get a trophy for showing up. I work an average of 50+ hours a week at an extremely demanding job and enjoy it immensely. At times I've held truly shiatty jobs that sucked the life out of me but needed the money to eat/pay rent/etc. Right now I'm dealing with the transition from two incomes and one house to one income and two houses due to having to move to find work, wife can't find a job in new town, and old house won't sell. Life sucks, but you deal with it and move on.

      --

      "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
    50. Re:well... by aradnik · · Score: 1

      the literature available does seem to get worse as you progress in math and physics... i don't know how the state of things is where you currently are, but here by far not all the professors are that good at teaching and you often end up having to learn things on your own. but what is even worse is that the books available seldom provide exercises (and solutions) which are a great help when embarking on self study...

    51. Re:well... by twilightzero · · Score: 1

      It's very typical. They replace actual instruction with huge reading and paper loads to hide the fact that the courses are pretty much completely empty of any real value.

      --

      "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
    52. Re:well... by twilightzero · · Score: 1

      To my knowledge, pedagogy is not just about one size fits all but rather about, "we do it this way because that's the way it's always been done and it's the right way". May sound like splitting hairs, but IMHO it's a big difference.

      --

      "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
    53. Re:well... by twilightzero · · Score: 1

      I find most people overestimate what they actually know. I've more than once met a C, SQL, Java, Visual Basic, etc... "expert" who knew very little about the language they claimed to know so well.

      Tell me about it. We just got rid of a Linux "expert" who turned out to only know Ubuntu. We use SuSE enterprise and he could not understand at all why we didn't install apt-get as part of our standard install set. You should've seen his face when we explained to him that there IS no apt-get for SuSE and he'll have to go search for his own packages. Was priceless!

      You mean like... Everywhere just about? People are always indulging in drama and politics everywhere I've been ESPECIALLY those who claim to not like it. It's generally used as their excuse to run away when the going gets tough.

      Generally I agree, but I have no patience for it. When the drama/politics start up, I'll usually leave the room and just go do what needs to be done anyway. As I said in another post, life is too short and I have too much to get done to sit around and listen to that crap. In the end it's easier to ask forgiveness (especially for getting something done the right way) than it is to ask permission.

      --

      "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
    54. Re:well... by Cassini2 · · Score: 1

      Please understand the subject you're talking about before discussing it as almost all of your information is incorrect.

      The information in my post is about a Canadian University, as is stated in the first line of the post.

      We were assigned an average of 900+ pages of reading a week over the courses I took and they expected you to read it all. Then there were the papers: the last course I took with them had 9 major papers due in 5 weeks, comprised of 5 individual and 4 group papers.

      The workload that you are describing still corresponds to a light full-time workload for a university student in an arts program. For instance, 900+ pages is the equivalent of 3 to 4 books per week, which is just under the reading workload of an undergraduate English major. I have no idea why anyone would want an IT course with that level of reading and essay workload. You would not have any time to get any hands-on or theoretical learning done. Even MBA management courses limit the level of emphasis on reading and writing skills, because the focus is on the team-building and practical learning exercises.

    55. Re:well... by twilightzero · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Please read the posts before responding. I was taking one class at a time through UoP. The 12+ credits stated was for traditional brick & mortar university.

      --

      "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
    56. Re:well... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I was looking into courses recently and almost everyone I met warned me about the "University" of Phoenix. The consensus was that it's much better (and cheaper) to go to a reputable local community college (if you have one nearby). The thing that REALLY turned me off about Phoenix was the emphasis on group work. I *hate* group projects. "Group project" is just a euphemism for "I do all the work, the other lazy-ass students get to do nothing and ride my coattails for a free A."

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    57. Re:well... by FreekyGeek · · Score: 1

      Even MBA management courses limit the level of emphasis on reading and writing skills, because the focus is on the team-building and practical learning exercises.

      It's easy to tell that this is very true, given the extraordinarily crappy reading and writing skills of so many MBAs. Many of them, it's hard to believe they got accepted as undergrads at all, let alone get graduate degrees. When you get *business* emails from people with MBAs who use textspeak like "u" and "2" instead of "you" and "too", you know the educational system has hit rock-bottom and they're just nothing but diploma mills now.

      They should spend more time in useful things like reading and writing and less time on useless touchy-feely bullshit like "team building".

    58. Re:well... by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      Really? Did you take the AP calc exam? Did you pass? I went to Ohio State and tested into calc 3 (sequences and series) which we had covered in high school, I could have opted into a more advanced math, but I'm not sure that the increased difficulty and rigor would have been worth it.

      As for the GP. I was taught fourier transforms no less than 3 times in college, in the math department (diff eqs), in the comp sci department (numerical methods), and in the mechanical engineering department (dynamic systems). I didn't understand them until the third time - and not because I'm dumb, but because "Complete the fourier transform for the following wave form by hand it was never really clear to me why I'd want to do such a thing. OTOH, when I had to process actual signals, I was glad that this wasn't the first time I had heard of FFTs.

    59. Re:well... by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      they were in two groups, one with R and one with RW, and he thought the way to fix this was to take them out of the R group.

      ... sounds like a true winner! Seriously, though, how do you expect someone who learned everything on a system where they were the only user, and only worked as "administrator" all the time, to figure it out? They simply don't get exposed to the harsh reality that when they create a second account on their home machine, they can't just write to that second account's files by default. First time you run into that, you learn. Or if you're running your own ftp server, you learn. Or if you're writing some code that takes a downloaded file and moves it outside the web directory space, you learn.

      But there are people who don't learn, not because they don't have the opportunity, but because they don't want to. I love making mistakes, because that teaches me something new. Sometimes it's obvious in retrospect ("I'm having a blonde day" - my most recent one being comparing a signed char to an int while writing a utility in c to convert international characters to their html entities - duh! I make that mistake at least once a decade :-), sometimes it's "hey, this is something new, and now that I know it, how else can I use it?" Curiosity. It's the key ingredient.

    60. Re:well... by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      I was a bit of a curiosity at my old university - I was the only one doing controls with a practical bend and so I wound up in a laboratory by myself for 4 years, with my only real peer interaction coming at conferences. Sadly, being an aussie, they couldn't afford to send me to many. Doing a post-doc, though, means I'm working hand in hand with people who are doing very similar things and we have a great tutorial relationship, teaching each other stuff we didn't know before.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    61. Re:well... by Albatrosses · · Score: 1

      You realize the whole point of AP is to cover the same stuff you'll cover in university, right?

    62. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't disagree with you that it's possible, but it does depend somewhat on where you go, what program you're in, and how reasonable the time demands of the classes are.

      There were semesters of my undergrad that were 12 credits and demanded over 100 hours a week, including a few 1 credit hour classes that needed 20-30 hours each. That, you can't reasonably do and work full time. (I also don't recommend that program to other people, even though it's normally ranked about #3 for my field.)

    63. Re:well... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      BS.

      In a good educational environment you learn skills, gain knowledge. Very often from avenues you never would have thought to look.
      Any decent college would have let the poster test out of 'mandatory' classes.

      Self taught rarely give the people doing it depth of understanding what is going on. The deeper you understand something, the better your product will be.

      People that make the comment you posted are often under some sort of delusion that schools are supposed to teach you everything you will ever need to know.
      If you think you aren't supposed to continue to develop 'skills' after college, you are a moron. Very professional I can think of need to continue their education. Dr. Lawyers, Engineers, managers.

      |

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    64. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are not people who are self-teachers, but they still think they are and describe themselves accordingly.

    65. Re:well... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That only teaches one small portion of one skill. It doesn't offer any depth of knowledge, is almost impossible to use in other situations, and leads to nothing more then code monkey work.

      Yes, sitting down and learning a skill is good. Going to school to have a broad understanding, learn to hear other view points, learn how to evaluate what you are reading, learn how to apply knowledge from different areas.

      Yeah yeah, Uni as boring., i'm so smart, blah blah blah. I've heard it all, and it's the same pathetic whine. If you are so smart, why didn't you test into the 400s and by pass the stuff you found boring.

      It reminds me of people in high school who would want to drop out because ti was 'boring'. Al why taking low-mid level courses. Yeah, boring... certianly not 'lazy'~
       

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    66. Re:well... by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      I've just completed a "structured, formal courses of study". A CS degree in a respecteed university and graduated with honours yet I'll freely state that while I can handle linux/unix file permissions to a reasonable extent I have no idea about the more complex interactions you talk of.

      There was a hell of a lot of useless cruft in my course, a hell of a lot of stuff that appeared to only be taught because someone senior in the department had a hardon for it or an otherwise utterly useless speciality. lots of material so out of date that it no longer works and worst of all, in some subjects which I had studied extensivly myself outside the course already, simply awful advice.

      I'll never forget the lecture slides when the head of department decided to tell us about how to implement "security" when working with PHP in his module.*shudder*

    67. Re:well... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      The worst part, of course, is that even when it's painfully obvious that they're out of their depth, and you're willing to take the whole day and give them the nickel tour of the subject via white board, they "don't want to know."

      It's funny, I love doing the "I'll make it simple AND fun to understand" thing - peppering my impromptu presentations with analogies that are easily accessible to whoever I'm talking to, and that get a few laughs - and when people really want to know, it becomes a real dialog - it WORKS! But when they don't know, and they don't want to know ("why can't we set 64 different flags on a million records a thousand times a second - and then sort them on that basis?" - yes, that was an actual problem, and I explained that, on low-end hardware, the best I could do was 15-16 flags, using all sorts of in-memory buckets and cheats - and even that was a lot more than most people could do on a box with a half-gig of ram and a 1.6ghz single-core 32-bit cpu).

      Sure, given resources (time, money, hardware) I could think of several ways to solve the problem, because the impossible is just a challenge, but this would require some sort of partitioning of the data, and simultaneous execution. Or a collection of rainbow tables for some of the intial work ... Or any one of a number of other solutions, none of which fit within those constraints. But just like they don't "get" the "You put a penny on the first square of a chess board, 2 cents on the second, 4 cents on the third, and I'll match it by putting $1,000 on each square. We don't need to actually put the money on it - we'll settle up on the 64th day", they won't "get" other things because they won't let their pre-conceptions be challenged.

    68. Re:well... by AustinSlacker · · Score: 1

      Sorry you had such a bad experience with UoP. I too, went to UoP, but I have a completely different take on the experience. Yes, the pace is fast, but they are compressing a normal semester's worth of material into 5 weeks. Did you honestly think that going to school full time and working full time that you were going to have time for much else?
      As to the instructors, more than 50% of mine held PhD(s) in their relevant subject area, hell, one of my math teachers was a double PhD from the former Soviet equivalent of our MIT, and work in their space program. So yes, he was a rocket scientist. All in all, I only had one instructor in my 3 years that I had a major complaint about and evidently, others also had complaints, because he was not there very long.
      Anyway, as to the learning teams, because of the variety of scholastic backgrounds that people have, you will have folks that are not up to par and that presents some challenges. You chose to be the final editor out of fear of a bad grade. On my learning teams, each person was delegated that duty in turn and we only had one problem in a critical thinking class. In that case, we talked to the person and got nowhere, so we elevated to the instructor. In the end, we each turned in our section of the paper individually and were graded on our individual contributions. We all received fair grades and the problem child received a failure for his part. Because we were all mostly on the same schedule, many of us had the same classes and ended up being on the same learning teams. We were all mostly successful in our classes because of this.
      I have been in the computer industry for many years, and yes there were some classes that I could have taught, but rather than getting an attitude, I aced them and improved my GPA. I don't know what degree program you were in, but in my Computer Science\Information Systems degree, I NEVER had 900 pages of reading EVERY week, that seems like an unusually high load and maybe you should have voiced your concerns to the administrative staff. So, like anything, there will be good experiences and bad experiences and I am sorry that you had such a bad experience, but not all UoP campuses are like yours.

    69. Re:well... by AustinSlacker · · Score: 1

      One more thing...
      I was working full time while I went to UoP. It was hard and there were some times that I though about quitting, but luckily, my family was very supportive and I made it through. BTW, my final GPA was 3.90. So it can be done...

    70. Re:well... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      So ask them to teach someone else something. That's a good test. If they can't teach someone else, how can they teach themselves? There's a difference between "muddling through" or "learning by rote trial and error" and really understanding teaching yourself something to the point where you can communicate it 3 different ways to an audience.

    71. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I *hate* group projects. "Group project" is just a euphemism for "I do all the work, the other lazy-ass students get to do nothing and ride my coattails for a free A."

      I'm enrolled in a state university's online program, and it's the same thing there, though I will say the academic standards are higher (I have friends attending Phoenix and we compare notes).

      I believe a major driver for this is also instructor workload. Grade the group, screw the individuals.

    72. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a solid programmer, but I would not call myself a prodigy. However, I had worked full time as a programmer at a real engineering firm before graduating college. In fact, I left college for the exact reasons that he had: endless drama and politics within my CS and Applied Mathematics department.

      How did I get work? First off: I interned. Secondly, I had solid proof (earlier, hobbyist work) that I could program and do serious work, even without the internship. After the internship, I went to back to college for about a week before deciding I hated it and went back to work for them full time.

      After about a year and a half of that, I decided that I wanted more room for growth, so I transferred to a different college and graduated, but there was quite a bit of pain in doing so. I hated school, and I still hate the pathetic bureaucracy and politics played, but it's just an unfortunate fact of life. There was very little that I picked up at college, but it definitely opens doors and there was a handful of useful classes, such as numerical analysis (very deep understanding of floating point, and other numerical calculations) and discrete math (really, just graph theory which is pretty easy, but still useful to learn early on) that have come in handy.

      For the record, I'm 25. I'm also now getting my Master's in CS part time. My long term goal is to get a PhD and become a professor. I hated schools because most professors had no real world experience, and had no clue in terms of what worked and what didn't. The ones that did were great. I hope to be that for someone eventually.

    73. Re:well... by IICV · · Score: 1

      In Ricki's case, he didn't understand how NTFS permissions on a folder combine with share level permissions when you're accessing over the network. He was very young, had only been in the industry a year or two, and very motivated. I liked him. We took ten minutes to cover the topic, and I can guarantee he never made that mistake again.

      So how do they interact? I still haven't managed to figure that out completely, though I will admit I haven't actually taken any sort of structured course on Windows.

      I mean, there's like four different places you can set the permissions (in the "share this folder" dialog, in the shared folder itself, on the actual filesystem, at the root of the shared folder on the network (which is different because for some reason changing the permissions there overwrite all the other permissions, and Windows even warns you about that)) - how does Windows decide how to combine them?

    74. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lot's of people I met thought they were badass at teaching themselves computers.

      Lots of people I met thought they were badass at teaching themselves apostrophes.

    75. Re:well... by aunt+edna · · Score: 1

      I do try to temper my attitude with a rememberance of 'humanity' when it comes to mind ....

      Both for them & me, bless us!

    76. Re:well... by IICV · · Score: 1

      Doctors can't restore their patients from backup. They have to get it right the first time, or someone dies; they can't even test things out properly, or else someone might die (even if it's just a dog or some other animal model). A trainee sysadmin dicking around with a Linux box... not so much.

    77. Re:well... by wwfarch · · Score: 1

      Your structured degree was not intended to cover file-permissions in depth. You got a CS degree not an IS degree. You probably learned things like finite state automata, graphs, trees, etc... Those are the things that a lot of self-taught people in CS don't have any knowledge of but are extremely useful when designing algorithms.

    78. Re:well... by david_thornley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you're learning a subject, how do you tell the difference between jumping through arbitrary hoops that have no relation to the task at hand, and learning stuff that has no immediately apparent relation to the task at hand but will turn out to be vital to understanding things later? Both can seem tedious and pointless at the time, but one is worth spending time on.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    79. Re:well... by acheron12 · · Score: 1

      Believe me, my first 2-3 years of university were boring because I was self taught from the age of 14. It wasn't until the 400 series classes that things got interesting and new (and fun!)

      That's why I ended up doing my B.S. in math and statistics instead of C.S. I'm still not sure that was the right decision in terms of impressing HR people afterward, but at least most of the stuff I learned was new to me, not to mention useful for areas like machine learning which straddle C.S. and stat.

      --
      there is no god but truth, and reality is its prophet
    80. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The share has permissions and the filesystem has permissions. If you can access the share, you still need access to the filesystem objects being shared. If you have access to the filesystem, you still need permission to the share for remote access.

    81. Re:well... by CeruleanDragon · · Score: 1

      I only wish the hiring process involved more people like you more often.

      Unfortunately 98% of the IT jobs out there, especially with any company large enough to still be hiring in this economy, are filtered through HR drones first. And HR drones WILL put forth resumes with those pieces of paper attached ahead of resumes without. I have no college degree, but I have nearly 15+yrs in the industry (give or take) and I still run into those brick walls where, had I had a degree or certification of some sort, the HR person would've passed me on to the hiring manager who might've appreciated that I have experience over paperwork. Over the last 5 years the jobs I have gotten were always with companies where the hiring manager was doing the candidate searching himself, but believe me, during those job searches I got at least 5-6 "sorry, no papers" for every interview.

      I took some online courses at UMass @ Lowell and was sorely disappointed. I'm not a "book study" type nor very good at testing and unfortunately most of the courses were little better than that. "Read chapters X-X and then complete this quiz, if you have any questions... read the chapters again." Although in their defense I'd say that was only half of the classes, the other half were very good and I learned a lot.

      I don't ncessarily put much stock in "book smart" people or those who test well. I've known several people whose entire career was pumping gas or janitor at a high school and heard how IT people were making so much money, so they bought the books, sat down with flash cards and highlighters, a week or two of studying and being really good at testing and now they're sitting next to you with their MCSE supporting a few hundred servers. Fantastic.

      That being said my most memorable anecdote against degrees was regarding a girl I worked with who prided herself in her Comp Sci degree, but refused to believe me when we got into an argument over whether a server was really down when she couldn't reach the 10.x.x.x interface from our external dialup testing system...

      In conclusion: Everyone is different. Every college course is different (mainly because they're being designed and taught by people, who are also often different). Some people will get a LOT from going through a decent college program. Some will get next to nothing useful. Some will never take a single college course and know more than you could ever hope to in your field. No one should knock someone else for needing help or structured learning.

      --
      ad astra per alia porci
    82. Re:well... by brasscount · · Score: 1

      It took me a long time, and three colleges to finally understand that college is for the license to get a job. Education is for the skills. Education and college don't have to be mutually exclusive, if you intend to be a professor. Otherwise, get the degree to be competitive, and training to be proficient.

      --
      Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability: without Availability the other two are assured, as is Bankruptcy.
    83. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a similar experience to OP from http://www.aiuonline.edu/ AIU. "Full-Time" was two classes per five week semester. Each class consists of 5 papers, five "discussion boards", and a group project. The group projects were especially interesting as many students were creative in interpreting rules of spelling and grammar. One of my coworkers attended University of Phoenix and reported the same. This has turned me off of online learning completely.

      I have a degree from AIU now, and that will get me past HR folks. In the future, any class I care about will be in person.

    84. Re:well... by Desert_Scarecrow · · Score: 1

      Look, if you thought that workload was hard, you are not really preparing yourself well for a real education. When I shopped my Bachelor's from UofPxh around, I was quite pleased with the number of recruiting pitches I got for my MBA prospects, one of which I took. In almost any industry, college gives you the basic things you need to learn further, knowing that for the mast majority, "further" will be on the job. In any case, my degree took me from $14.20 an hour to $28.00 / hr in about six months...not all by itself, of course, but with a pretty significant role.

    85. Re:well... by Jaime2 · · Score: 1

      In Ricki's case, he didn't understand how NTFS permissions on a folder combine with share level permissions when you're accessing over the network.

      Funny that this is a classic case where a foundations-based education would have avoided the problem in the first place. Although you have the outcome right, are "Gavin"-ing the explanation. Learning to think critically is much more important than learning facts. If you never learn how share and NTFS permission combined, you can still come to the correct conclusions. Let's look at an analogous situation with a car -- Suppose you have to get to work and you work on an island, but live on the mainland. You have a bridge toll pass, but you lost your car keys. Can you get to work? Although this is an easy question, it is analogous in that we have two independent access control points, one path-based (share permissions) and one path-independent (NTFS permissions). Here's the rediculous question: How do your car keys combine with your toll pass?

      NTFS permissions don't combine with share permissions. They are both simply potential impediments to reaching a specific goal. Any talk about combining them leads to needing to learn N*(N-1) combinations of things instead of N things and a few simple combination scenarios. N*(N-1) gets large fast, so this learning pattern will limit your potential.

      BTW, what if you had the car keys, but not the toll pass, and you lived on the island? (Analogous to local access bypassing share permissions) What if you used the other bridge? (Do you have a pass for it? Analogous to using a different share that exposes the same file).

    86. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cute. A troll.

      And FYI... I never claimed to be a badass at apostrophes or grammar. So your whole little post has no value whatsoever.

      The people I'm talking about claim to be badasses they even say as much. And yet... (As an example) they don't know arrays. Right. Badass and don't know what an array is. I believe that one.

      Your post would fit the situation if I claimed I was awesome at the english language. Or a god. (I've heard that one too in regards to computers)

    87. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, one class and you couldn't keep up while unemployed. Let me tell you sonny, when I went to university I had to work to pay for it all since I had no loans or grants to pay for it. I did my 5 or 6 classes at a time AND all the work at home. I also had a girlfriend and an active social life. It was hard but you're whining about 4 hours per week? You say that was an IT course, but I agree that while it may have been one, as the GP said it was structured like an arts course. You complain that there was too much work. What would you rather it had been? A waste of time? Walk in on the first day and they hand you a degree? I thought you signed up to learn something. If it was too hard at school then maybe you need to rethink your career.

    88. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you're just a poor manager of time.

    89. Re:well... by rolnhgr · · Score: 1

      I did read the post before replying, and know what a full course load is. As my second sentence states, when you cover a semister in 5 weeks, more than 1 class at a time results in less than desirable results. With the amount of material covered in 5 weeks, a full schedule is achieved over the period of 1 year.

    90. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, that happens with all college courses. You get what you put into it. If you already know the topic then you ace it and move on to the next topic. Sorry, that's life.

    91. Re:well... by anyGould · · Score: 1

      I'm sometimes frustrated at times by the prevailing /. opinions that (i) bosses suck

      Well, it's a truism - you only think of your "one-up" as a boss if they don't have other redeeming qualities. (Put another way, you wouldn't think of them as The Boss if they pulled their weight.)

    92. Re:well... by twilightzero · · Score: 1

      ...and you walked uphill to school against the wind both ways in -100 degree weather with snow past your neck?

      You obviously didn't read the parent posts. UoP classes run such that each class runs for 5 weeks and covers an entire semester of material. You're not supposed to, or possibly even allowed, to take more than one class at a time. Or to say it differently, a single class at a time is considered a full time load. 9 papers over a semester isn't that bad, same with the reading load. However, condense that into 5 weeks and it quickly becomes insane.

      --

      "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
    93. Re:well... by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      The root file system permission can be inherited and often are by default, you can turn that off if you click the advanced button.

    94. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where ever u study u can learn only a quarter of the subject from the Guru or Teacher, and the next quarter you have to learn yourself and a quarter from interacting with your friends and the last quarter you will get from experience only . This is what ancient wise men of India says.

  2. There is by Dyinobal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is education and then there is training figure out which one you want and get it. Most everything these days is geared towards training.

    1. Re:There is by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      There is education and then there is training figure out which one you want and get it. Most everything these days is geared towards training.

      The fact that the one course mentioned is titled "Web Design 1" answers that question.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    2. Re:There is by RalphSouth · · Score: 1

      When I went to school, they did not have a computer science degree. I was able to take some computer courses while getting a math degree. I've been a professional computer programmer for 40 years now. (I do not want to retire!) I think that my initial computer courses were necessary in order to get me going. After that initial university work, most training has been self or job driven. I've had some thoughts over the years about computers and school:

      1) If I could do one thing over again, it would involve improving my writing and communication skills. In the end you must communicate your ideas in order to get the best work. You must listen to your users and really hear what they have to say in order to do the best work.

      2) Group projects and your ability to work in groups are part of the corporate landscape. Schools that teach people real techniques for working in groups give their students a real leg up in corporate work environments. This is not the same as giving 5 mismatched students a group project.

      3) Education should give you a human perspective that gives the semantics of your work lasting relevance. Training will teach you the syntax.

      4) HR in most companies takes care of government employment regulations and delivers internal management guidelines. HR does some recruiting work that filters on your credentials. HR is not generally capable of figuring out if you can do the job; but, they can prevent you from getting the chance.

      5) If your love for the work does not come across in the interview, only a short sided fool will hire you.

      Please decide to do both training and education.

    3. Re:There is by RalphSouth · · Score: 1

      See what I mean about writing skills, "short sighted" not "short sided", although it is a pretty funny malapropism. :-D

  3. College by Joshuah · · Score: 2, Informative

    College isn't about learning, it's about how long you can put up with all the crap you have to do and deal with the people around you.

    1. Re:College by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yep, that's pretty much what your typical college dropout says. Dunno about you but I did learn quite a bit.

    2. Re:College by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. While you may learn useful things along the way most of college is just learning how to be a good little cog in the bureaucracy machine.

    3. Re:College by BrianRoach · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Says the AC to the guy with a 5 digit ID ...

      A number of the really, really bright people with whom I've been privileged to work who actually did go to college will be the first to tell you they really didn't learn anything they didn't already know or wouldn't have learned on their own, but went so they'd have the piece of paper.

      Some people actually do need to go to college in order to learn things, and that's fine.

      Also, In a down economy that piece of paper is a handy thing to have if you don't have experience and can't get by the HR drones otherwise.

    4. Re:College by maxume · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is nothing particularly interesting about a 5-digit ui. I'm pretty sure lots of AC comments come from people that have been here quite a bit longer than I have.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:College by smidget2k4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      College is what you make of it. As someone said above, if you're interested in education, you'll learn. If you're interested in being trained for a job, you'll do that work and not much else.

    6. Re:College by blai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dunno about you but I'm forced into learning so much interesting stuff in a short period of time that I'm failing to absorb all of it.

      --
      In soviet Russia, God creates you!
    7. Re:College by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is nothing particularly interesting about a 5-digit ui.

      But I was always told that the length of your penis was inversely proportional to the length of your uid.

    8. Re:College by Reeses · · Score: 1, Funny

      A four digit UI on the other hand, is a completely different story.

      --
      Reeses
    9. Re:College by biryokumaru · · Score: 2, Funny

      The fact that you took that at face value says a great deal...

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    10. Re:College by dcollins · · Score: 1

      I call horseshit. My college programs (double B.A. in very different fields at a state university) were almost always interesting and mind-expanding. I took lots of electives, in anything I found intriguing (speech, folklore, creative writing, theater, computer science, etc.). If a class looked uninteresting or mean-spirited in the first session, then I dropped it.

      Maybe you just picked the wrong path and couldn't fix the problem.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    11. Re:College by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

      Excepting those of us who forgot their original account name....

      --
      We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    12. Re:College by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      one of these days, I'll be arsed to go look up my original acct id, something in the 2000 range, iirc.

    13. Re:College by longhairedgnome · · Score: 1

      Four digit UI's are known for their "Big Dickedness"

      --
      GENERATION O98346: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig and remove a random number from the generation. T
    14. Re:College by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      College isn't about learning, it's about how long you can put up with all the crap you have to do and deal with the people around you.
      ---

      That's pretty cynical. I guess everyone's experience is different, but I've had more than a few classes (as an undergrad) that I really enjoyed, and learned a huge amount. Obviously there's never a guarantee that what your learning will be applicable to whatever profession you go into, but if you're not learning in college, than you are not trying to learn.

    15. Re:College by eln · · Score: 1

      Four digit UIDs suck. Five digit UIDs that also happen to be prime numbers, on the other hand, are the pinnacle of awesome.

    16. Re:College by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing particularly interesting about a 5-digit ui. I'm pretty sure lots of AC comments come from people that have been here quite a bit longer than I have.

      Quite a lot of people have been here for years and never saw the need to actually create an account since you don't actually need one to post anyways.

    17. Re:College by gregrah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really couldn't disagree more. After having nearly all of the life sucked out of me in high school (quite literally), college is where I got my "spark" back.

      Math, Physics, Computer Science, Literature, Music... any one of these subjects has enough depth to keep you engaged for the rest of your life. In college they sit you down with a bunch of books (and friends, and professors) and just sort of let you go crazy... see what sticks. I discovered that I was interested in a number of different things.

      I was perpetually bored with life prior to my first semester at college. I don't think I've once been bored since.

    18. Re:College by Kamokazi · · Score: 1

      Then I must be an a-typical graduate. With a few exceptions, I learned shit. I just have an expensive piece of paper that gets me decent jobs.

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    19. Re:College by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      ... and those of us who lurked for a few years before ever creating an account. If only I had bothered to register when I first started coming here, I could have had a 4 digit UID.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    20. Re:College by mce · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah. Only 3 digits matter. Especially those below 510.

    21. Re:College by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      College isn't about learning, it's about how long you can put up with all the crap you have to do and deal with the people around you.

      Life is about putting up with crap and dealing with people around you.
      Oh, I forgot, you're probably one of the innumerable self-taught geniuses on slashdot who don't think they should have to sully themselves with ordinary human contact or existence.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    22. Re:College by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Says the AC to the guy with a 5 digit ID ...

      All a low ID means is that you had too much time on your hands because got fired when the previous tech crash happened.

      Or maybe the one before that,

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    23. Re:College by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, like this one (UID 0)?

    24. Re:College by aradnik · · Score: 1

      it must've took quite a bit of struggling to accept and admit it as a 7 dig, cut the dude some slack ;)

    25. Re:College by aradnik · · Score: 1

      i'd be kinda suspicious towards'em since there was probably be nothing to read here back in the day... probably are just a bunch of bored ppl creating acconuts on every site they see...

      man, it's like using linux on 1992... ;p

    26. Re:College by Bryan3000000 · · Score: 1

      Some of us lurked for a few MORE years. And then frankly question why we went ahead and registered at all, when maybe we should have simply left.

    27. Re:College by Frequency+Domain · · Score: 1

      No, college is about starting to take responsibility for learning. At any halfway decent school you're surrounded by opportunities. If you didn't take advantage of them, it's your loss but nobody else's fault.

    28. Re:College by spinkham · · Score: 1

      This.
      I think I learned more skills relevant to my career through side projects with friends then I did through coursework, but I learned through both.

      The people around you is part of the point, and that's why I'm not sure I'd do the online option myself.

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    29. Re:College by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      The fact that he's an AC says nothing. If I were to make a statement that I know would be unpopular and that would make me sound elitist, I would also post as AC.

      On topic: it probably also depends on which field you are in. I can easily imagine a smart and motivated learner willing to experiment learning all they need to know about computer science to make them a skilled software engineer/programmer on their own. In naturals science or [physical] engineering? Not so much.

    30. Re:College by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real men don't need to show the length of their UIDs.

      (Btw, mine is two digits.)

    31. Re:College by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words: you extended this silly off-topic discussion just to boats about your two digit UID and then even don't prove that it's real? Real men don't do that either.

    32. Re:College by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing particularly interesting about a 5-digit ui. I'm pretty sure lots of AC comments come from people that have been here quite a bit longer than I have.

      Quite a lot of people have been here for years and never saw the need to actually create an account since you don't actually need one to post anyways.

      And had the foresight to realize getting a UID meant comprimising your privacy. I only bothered getting one when I wanted to be better able to track occasional conversations, I still mostly post AC

    33. Re:College by iceaxe · · Score: 2

      OK, I'll bite.

      I went to college. More than one, actually. Four of them, in fact. Over the course of six years, with one semester off. In the end, the last one gave me a piece of paper and said I had to leave. It's a nice piece of paper, has some fancy little Latin words next to the "B.A.", and looks mighty fine in a frame on the wall... in my spare bedroom.

      Over the course of that experience I learned a great deal, about a great many things. Some things I learned in classrooms, some in the library stacks, some in student organizations, some in non-student organizations, some in bars, some while studying at home, some while traveling on weekends or during breaks, some while on dates or almost-but-not-really-a-date-things, some while.... being alive and paying attention. Overall, I'd say I learned more outside the courses of study than in them.

      However, the experience was invaluable, and I highly recommend it. You may not learn the totality of specific career knowledge that you will need for the rest of your life in the classroom while earning a degree. In fact, most people don't. In the classroom and its adjuncts, you will learn a baseline of background information, and a wide range of learning skills. You will be able to use those skills to acquire whatever knowledge you may need at any time during the remainder of your life.

      There may be people who have acquired all of those learning skills without exposure to University life - but I've not yet met one. I've known very bright people who have worked very hard to overcome the lack of a college level education, and have learned all that they needed to know to do the task set before them. But always, in my opinion, they would have had an easier time of it, or managed more with the same effort, had they been blessed with the opportunity to attend college. Furthermore, they either lack or have had to obtain at greater cost of effort the life lessons and broader knowledge background readily available to the University student. In every case in my experience, and of course in my opinion, these talented and hard working people would have had an easier or a richer life with the benefit of a University education.

      As for me, I work in a field that didn't exist when I attended college, and so it's no surprise that I learned it on my own, more or less, and outside of the University setting. Nonetheless, I am extraordinarily grateful for the years I spent focused on learning other things, and my life is enriched every day by the experiences I had and the directions I discovered during that time, not to mention the mistakes I made and overcame.

      For these reasons, among others, I recommend that anyone who is able attend and participate fully in a University, live and in person. Distance learning has come a long way, and in many cases will suffice to learn facts and skills, although not in all cases. Self teaching is an invaluable tool, and you will use it throughout your life. But there really is no substitute that I've found for the community and culture of a University. With that said, not every person at every time has the opportunity, for any number of reasons. For those I would say that any education is better than none, but seek chances to take part in organizations, events, groups, or relationships that will provide for you a similar broadness of experience and knowledge. You will not regret it.

      In answer to the question of the OP - if a course or school is not providing what you need, don't waste your time and money. You have other options.

      --
      WALSTIB!
    34. Re:College by iceaxe · · Score: 1

      Says the AC to the guy with a 5 digit ID ...

      All a low ID means is that you had too much time on your hands because got fired when the previous tech crash happened.

      Or maybe the one before that,

      I got one at a yard sale, dirt cheap. I had no idea what fortune and fame it would bring! :p

      --
      WALSTIB!
    35. Re:College by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      AC is UID 666.

    36. Re:College by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely. Every time I hear someone bash the usefulness of university-level education, I can virtually guarantee that they never attended/graduated university. They have an inferiority complex, plain and simple. This world takes all types, and I do believe that education isn't for everyone--but stop bashing it just because you don't see the value or feel that you have a need for it.

    37. Re:College by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My aggravation with college was based on the opposite experience. These institutions (and I've attended more than my share of them) reward people who just do the paperwork, tow the line, and nothing else. In fact, they typically discourage learning on your own... albeit passively. Spend your time really LEARNING things to any degree of usefulness, and there's no time left for the worthless BS required to get that piece of paper. Be sure to get an A in Jazz & Rock instead of learning best practices in your language of choice.

      College is a joke, unless perhaps you've made it into MIT. Anyone that says otherwise tends to be useless in the real world anyway. They depend too much on their credentials to make up for their general ineptitude.

    38. Re:College by Nephilium · · Score: 1

      Sorry... it takes a six digit prime UID to truly be awesome.

  4. Test Out by DWMorse · · Score: 1

    Most any respected University will let you test out of courses, though their guidelines for doing so may differ from one to another.. In my experience, you speak to your admissions person, who talks to your instructor, who lays out what they want from you in order to test out.

    You still pay for some (or sometimes, all) of the class, of course; they're not just going to hand credits to the first knowledgeable person that asks politely and can demonstrate what they know, that would make far too much sense for higher academia. But at least you get your credits and don't waste your time.

    --
    There's a spot in User Info for World of Warcraft account names? Really?
    1. Re:Test Out by DWMorse · · Score: 1

      To expand a little on what I'm intending by recommending testing out of these basic courses, I'm presuming that hiding behind these prerequisites are classes that have some value to furthering your education.

      --
      There's a spot in User Info for World of Warcraft account names? Really?
    2. Re:Test Out by NoPantsJim · · Score: 1

      You still pay for some (or sometimes, all) of the class, of course.

      Not always the case. I went to Purdue for Aviation Management (to become an air traffic controller) and for some odd reason they let students take computer classes in place of some of the other Gen-Ed stuff. I was able to test out of several classes, without having to pay a dime. It depends on the school.

    3. Re:Test Out by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Many classes, particularly those at the core of your degree program can not be tested out of.

      I had to take CSC 101 and 102 (c++) in my last year at school because they would not accept my 2 semesters of C++ from my previous degree, and the 7 or so subsequent 300, 400 and 500 level classes that required me to know c++.

  5. ehh.. by spartacus_prime · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I took two undergrad classes online, Intro to Political Science (my major) and Business Writing. All course materials were posted on Blackboard, and I do not recall any classroom time. My grades in those classes were atrocious, partially because the distraction of the Internet while trying to do the coursework was too much as a 20-something year old student. Obviously, YMMV, but I don't think you can beat having an actual live instructor teach you the material (even something as dull as a writing course).

    --
    If you can read this, it means that I bothered to log in.
    1. Re:ehh.. by greatica · · Score: 1

      Different strokes for different folks. I took the same two classes online (intro to pol sci and business writing) and loved them. For me it was faster to read and do homework than sit through a lecture...then go home and read the same material and do homework. A little tough to work past the distractions (age 21 at the time), but definitely doable.

  6. A problem with colleges as a whole, and students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm taking online courses with Strayer University and don't like them, but am a few years in so can't go back. I have nearly 20 years of IT experience, yet had to sit through all the 100 level courses. I was forced into a 100 level English, even though I'm a published author. And every other student is a working adult or slacker wanting an easy schedule. So, even interesting classes have boring discussions as each student does just the bare minimum required of them. What could have been great discussions end up being basic sentences copied from the reading text with no intellectual thought. I've gone through most of my classes without opening the book. When test time comes, I read the question and search through the lecture notes for the answer. If not in there, then Google and Wikipedia. Being online makes it effortless to take and pass exams.

    Formal university education took centuries to perfect and hone in. Online training is just too new and educators are still trying to figure out how to do it appropriately. One of my friend's classes at his school, Western Governors, now requires their webcam to be installed on your computer when taking a test, so they can verify that you are doing it yourself. We've already found ways around that system.

  7. Your natural medium should be more natural by rxan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While it is possible simply to attend a local school in person, I would much prefer an online environment as it seems to be a more natural medium considering the content of my studies.

    When you deal with people in nearly any industry it will often be far more intimate than online discussions. I would suggest taking courses in person so at least you learn skills in an environment that will apply in your future career. Think about it: most customers would rather discuss their web designs (which you'll be making) in person rather than someone at the end of a phone line, chat room, or email thread. Taking offline courses helps you in so many ways. You'll discuss ideas with classmates, learn how to debate about best practices with others, and learn to learn through many different methods.

    1. Re:Your natural medium should be more natural by sexybomber · · Score: 1

      Think about it: most customers would rather discuss their web designs (which you'll be making) in person rather than someone at the end of a phone line, chat room, or email thread.

      Good point. Any design gig (not just web design) is equal parts people skills and technical skills. I'd venture that the former is almost more important, since the design ought to be tailored to the client if it's any good.

    2. Re:Your natural medium should be more natural by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the 'online environment' in an online school won't quite be the 'natural environment', it'll be proprietary web forums and chatrooms, etc.

      Adding that one advantage to meatspace school is that you're more likely to meet students in other specialties or levels in a social context. I'd think that in an online school you'd tend to mix only with your most immediate peers, and, frankly, the "quality" of your classmates might dissuade you from socializing more broadly with fellow students. In a physical school you might meet the classmate's older brother or sister or friend who's a few years ahead and doing something you're interested in.

      I work in a medical school, in the neurobiology department. On most fridays there's a department beer hour hosted by a lab (it rotates among them). Everyone gets together, mingles, eats and drinks, and talks about what they're working on and science in general.

      Finally, in real school your teachers and TAs are probably more likely to be fruitful professional contacts. I have a hard time imagining an online instructor doing so.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    3. Re:Your natural medium should be more natural by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a guy going into web related work and you are counseling him to pursue an offline program because that is more likely to conform to his real work environment? part of the reason customers would rather discuss with their designer in person is because so many people are so poor at communicating online. Maybe more practice expressing his ideas online in writing is exactly what this guy needs.

      I took my 3rd graduate degree online, and I would put the quality of the experience on par or better than with most of the learning experiences from my offline degrees. The most important aspects of any learning experience are the quality of the instructor and the quality of your fellow students. This is far more critical than whether it is offline or online. My online program was run by a very highly regarded public university, used well known and highly regarded instructors, and attracted a highly motivated and engaged group of students. In many scenarios I think online learning can be superior to offline, and I am happy to discuss that in more detail if anyone desires.

  8. Different kinds of goals by gutoandreollo · · Score: 1

    If you're paying to get a diploma, then it's going to be boring... even more if you're focusing on the skills you already have, and only need to get the diploma for, say, a work promotion.. That's going to be the same wherever you go, online or brick-and-mortar colleges.. But, if you're goal is to learn more about your field, then you're certainly paying for the wrong thing, and you should look for some training instead of learning..

  9. Welcome to College by slifox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The main problem is that I am not learning anything. I have several years' experience with Web design, yet I was not allowed to bypass Intro to Web Design 1. Similarly, there are other classes on my list that will teach me very little I don't already know, yet will cost me money all the same. Now, I do have a great desire to learn and to further myself academically, but I just don't see much value in continuing to take classes I could have aced in ninth grade. It is also difficult when fellow classmates clearly have very little intelligent input to offer

    Hey, welcome to college! Going to an online school might have lowered the standards a bit, but it's all part of the same experience.

    The truth is that academically most of college in just highschool part 2. For anyone who is getting a degree in a field that is already their passion & hobby (e.g. someone who has invested 10000+ hours of personal time into programming and then goes for a computer science degree), it's only in the final 1 or 2 years that the coursework is even worthwhile. The rest of the time is spent underachieving because the content is so rudimentary that you can't even stay focused. You think the colleges want you to just buy the quality courses at the end? Hell no, they want you for 2-4 years of tuition!... errr I mean "broadening experience!"

    Furthermore there are always a few assholes in the class who think they know more than the professor, and take every opportunity to bicker with them about each point. You may know a lot about the current subject, but most of the professors are teaching way below their knowledge level anyways... So that's a check on "incompetent classmates" too (not even mentioning the ridiculous amounts of cheating that goes on to pass tests that have no practical value except testing your ability to remember things)

    So yeah... welcome to college. If you want a real higher-learning environment, go for a masters and then a Ph.D with a quality advisor. First though, you need to get to that point... and a lot of us call it quits after a bachelors anyways ("it's good enough, and I can't bear another semester")

    Academically and averaged out over the entire experience, college (bachelors level) is a waste of time. A lot of people don't even work in the field they got their degree in -- I learned hardly any practical knowledge in college courses that relates to my current job... Of course, it's not all bad -- you do learn how to learn (supposedly), and you learn rigor (lab reports, etc), and you do get a bit of exposure to other interesting fields. Furthermore, if you're not an hermit, you can have a great time with social life. Well maybe that last bit isn't quite applicable to you.

    Summary: tough it out and get a degree, then forget the experience and get a well-paying job. You can be bitter all you want afterwards, but at least you'll have a good salary :) OR conversely, tough it out and do well, then get into a decent master program, and use your performance there to get into a top-quality Ph.D program

    1. Re:Welcome to College by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree 100%.

      and i really try not to be the "incompetent classmate" when my instructor started describing POINTERS in C++ wrong. i took it upon myself to find corrected information in the book and explained it to him in front of the class. he told me that i was wrong and that THE BOOK was wrong.

      later some fellow students backed me up and we eventually went after his teaching/school records. turns out he DOES NOT have ANY degree in computer science and was only hired because the university fired a slightly more competent teacher for incompetence.

      but yeah. i am FINALLY getting into the "fun" classes on my 6th year of a 4 year degree. damn those "broadening your horizons" general elective classes. :(

    2. Re:Welcome to College by Loomismeister · · Score: 1

      Can you get into a Ph.D program for web design?

    3. Re:Welcome to College by wickedskaman · · Score: 1

      This is the best question ever asked on Slashdot.

      --
      Sand's overrated... it's just tiny little rocks.
    4. Re:Welcome to College by fishexe · · Score: 1

      The truth is that academically most of college in just highschool part 2. For anyone who is getting a degree in a field that is already their passion & hobby (e.g. someone who has invested 10000+ hours of personal time into programming and then goes for a computer science degree), it's only in the final 1 or 2 years that the coursework is even worthwhile. The rest of the time is spent underachieving because the content is so rudimentary that you can't even stay focused.

      I think this shows the difference between different types of colleges. My first go at college I went to a private tech school and it was exactly as you describe, so I dropped out. My second time I went to university and it was a completely different experience. On the other hand, at uni I chose my courses aggressively and proactively to broaden my learning as much as possible, majoring in History and Chinese but taking advanced maths and mid-level computer science (which I talked my way into despite not formally having the background) just for personal enrichment, as well as searching for maximally interesting courses for each of my gen ed requirements, so if you just want to coast and not think too much about your courses, then my experience does not apply. If you just show up to your advisor's office asking "what courses should I take?" the experience is liable to be as you describe, but I always showed up with a list of long-term goals and a list of courses I thought made sense, and asked "will this get me there?"

      You think the colleges want you to just buy the quality courses at the end? Hell no, they want you for 2-4 years of tuition!...

      Not if you go to state school. They lose money on every course you take so they want you to get as much out of each course as possible. If you just ask (or show up) you can get into almost any advanced class without taking prereqs first. If it turns out you're out of your depth, that's on you, but you can get a good feel for this by talking to the instructor beforehand and reading the syllabus. I've never had this problem and I've taken at least 5 courses whose prereqs I hadn't met.

      Summary: tough it out and get a degree, then forget the experience and get a well-paying job. You can be bitter all you want afterwards, but at least you'll have a good salary :) OR conversely, tough it out and do well, then get into a decent master program, and use your performance there to get into a top-quality Ph.D program

      Looks like someone could use a dictionary. Perhaps you meant alternatively?

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    5. Re:Welcome to College by kaiidth · · Score: 1

      Yes. Look up 'Web Engineering'.

      "Proponents of web engineering supported the establishment of web engineering as a discipline at an early stage of web. [...] San Murugesan, Yogesh Deshpande, Steve Hansen and Athula Ginige, from University of Western Sydney, Australia formally promoted web engineering a new discipline in the first ICSE workshop on Web Engineering in 1999. Since then they published a serial of papers in a number of journals, conferences and magazines to promote their view and got wide support. [...]However, it has been controversial, especially for people in other traditional disciplines such as software engineering, to recognize web engineering as a new field. The issue is how different and independent web engineering is, compared with other disciplines.

      Terrifying but true, and it's good to know - because that way, no matter how depressing one's career choice might happen to be, one can always think: at least I'm not working towards a PhD in Web Engineering.

    6. Re:Welcome to College by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      A reasonable college will let you challenge courses. I did intro to computers (this is a CPU, this is a monitor) at the end of my BSc in computer science in about twenty minutes by just writing the final. Half my class did the same.

    7. Re:Welcome to College by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of this I think is the nature of what a college education is supposed to be. Most students starting with genX think going to college is only for getting a job. Prior to them, the college experience was about learning. It didn't matter the subject, in the classical sense of learning is what was important. I think the baby boomers were the last to experience college the way it was intended. Now I would agree with slifox here in that undergraduate education in America is mostly a big consumer fraud.

      Many colleges in order stay relevant with these younger kids out of high school offer silly courses like web design 1, give me a break....

      It doesn't matter whether online or physical environment. I think the online experience offers the greatest potential for traditional learning except that I understand many so called teachers want to be the difference for their students. They think their role can not be replaced but only in some cases is this true. There are more "bad" teachers than good so I eliminate this exception and hope that the online experience matures in that traditional learning can evolve and be achieved. Everything will be online anyway eventually.

    8. Re:Welcome to College by sac13 · · Score: 1

      For anyone who is getting a degree in a field that is already their passion & hobby (e.g. someone who has invested 10000+ hours of personal time into programming and then goes for a computer science degree), it's only in the final 1 or 2 years that the coursework is even worthwhile. The rest of the time is spent underachieving because the content is so rudimentary that you can't even stay focused.

      That's exactly why I changed my major to business (that and I was already working professionally doing development for a fortune 500 company in my late teens). I figured I could already talk to the technical people just fine, but it might help to be able to discuss things with those that have no clue using their own terms.

      As a consequence of that choice, I've rarely had the problems that many purely tech people complain about in the workplace. If I need or want something for technical reasons, I can put it in terms that the management types can understand, support and sell to their superiors.

      If you're already state-of-the-art in what you do, why the hell would you waste years and all that money to just get a piece of paper? Use that time to pick up something useful. Like you said, a lot of people don't have jobs directly related to their degrees.

    9. Re:Welcome to College by qbzzt · · Score: 1

      The truth is that academically most of college in just highschool part 2. For anyone who is getting a degree in a field that is already their passion & hobby (e.g. someone who has invested 10000+ hours of personal time into programming and then goes for a computer science degree), it's only in the final 1 or 2 years that the coursework is even worthwhile. The rest of the time is spent underachieving because the content is so rudimentary that you can't even stay focused. You think the colleges want you to just buy the quality courses at the end? Hell no, they want you for 2-4 years of tuition!... errr I mean "broadening experience!"

      That's the reason I do WGU. It's a fixed cost for an "all you can study" semester. You can do the assignments and get the easy stuff out of the way quickly.

      --
      -- Support a free market in the field of government
    10. Re:Welcome to College by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am curious- what degree did you go for in school, and what did you do after?

      The reason I ask is that my CS degree is highly applicable to my career. Sure there were lots of classes that were tangentially applicable at best, but data structures, "the hardware/software interface," and systems programming, to name a few, are classes that I use concepts from every day. My coursework was also very math intensive, and while I don't use that every day, I do feel that those classes helped me "learn to learn," and the statistics I took helped me land a high paying and very interesting job.

      I didn't go to a school that was that highly regarded, either- just barely in the top 100 cs schools from US news and world report.

    11. Re:Welcome to College by DedTV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You won't learn anything during the first 2 years at any college. That's why so many college kids spend their first 2 years at college majoring in Keg Tapping and Bong Hitting. It's the only thing that keeps them sane.

      And a college degree is slowly becoming less and less desirable to employers. At least in certain fields like programming, web design and graphics work. Quite a few of the places I've worked lately don't even ask for education info. They want a portfolio and couldn't care less if you learned your trade at MIT or in your basement on pirated copies of Visual Studio, Maya and Photoshop.

      This happened at my last place of employment. They kept hiring app programmers straight out of college but it was killing them because they ended up outsourcing all the most pressing programming work because none of the in-house programmers were lasting more than a few weeks because they had a great diploma, but they couldn't actually write programs. For years our in house apps were all crappy visual basic apps and batch files. And most of it was thrown together from libraries and code snippets found online because the people couldn't write them themselves.
      Eventually one of the guys in Tech Support convinced them to hire his little brother who had taught himself how to code in high school so he could make game mods. So he quit his job at Dollar General and started working there and within weeks was pumping out professional looking, stable apps from a huge backlog of requests by various departments over the years. After that, they no longer hired people based on their degree and instead required a portfolio.

      Unfortunately, most companies haven't learned such a lesson and still give more weight to a piece of paper than actual competency. And of course that obviously doesn't apply to all fields (insert joke about the self trained surgeon here).

      The best advice is to find some technical school with a 6-12 month training program that has worked out a deal with some local companies to hire their graduates and go that route. The curriculum at such schools usually actually teach you something as they want to pass people who are at least competent enough to do the jobs wanted by their sponsoring companies. And most companies these days will bypass their degree requirements in lieu of actual work experience. So you could spend 4 years at a college accumulating debt to learn skills that will probably be obsolete by the time you find a job and lead you to spend 5-10 more years bouncing from job to job or, you can plow through some specialized training course, move right into a crappy job, and after trudging through that for a few years, hopefully be able to parley that work experience into a real job.

  10. Welcome to the real world... by pookemon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have several years' experience with Web design, yet I was not allowed to bypass Intro to Web Design 1

    The same applies for real courses too. I did Physics, Biology, Chemistry and Maths at High School, and then when I went to Uni I did Physics, Biology, Chemistry and Maths - all over again. Pretty much the exact same thing as I did in High School. If I then went to do another science degree, I would get recognised prior learning. It basically comes down to the Institution has to cater for the fact that not everyone has done the subjects being taught. And in your case, you have experience - but that's not recognised (generally) as "prior learning".

    --
    dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    1. Re:Welcome to the real world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did Physics, Biology, Chemistry and Maths at High School, and then when I went to Uni I did Physics, Biology, Chemistry and Maths - all over again. Pretty much the exact same thing as I did in High School.

      So did I; however, we differ in our conclusions because I think that this was a tragic waste of time, money, and opportunity. I would have much rather had the opportunity to test out of courses I already had sufficient mastery in, especially if I could have replaced them with advanced topics courses in my discipline of choice.

      As it stood, I was forced to take courses for which I could have passed the final exam—with an A—even before I attended the first lecture. There is a very finite limit to the number of courses that one can take during a collegiate career. Rehashing topics cost me the benefit of deeper insights, and I gained nothing in return for that sacrifice. God bless the ivory tower and its bureaucratic functionaries; praise the mindless adherence to dogmatic regulation, for to question it would be heresy.

      If enabling the pursuit of deeper knowledge isn't the core principle at our academic institutions, perhaps we should question why we tolerate and enable such an edifice to continue in its present form.

    2. Re:Welcome to the real world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how it works in the US (and actually I am unsure how it is here nowadays), but in Germany you just "inscribed" but didn't go to the lectures that offered nothing to you (or you went there and did something else) but instead went to some other course, e.g. mathematics. Sure, it means you ended up with doing quite a bit of stuff you never get a grade or recognition for, but you learned something.
      Of course, it's difficult for the kind of lectures that normally include some kind of lab or so, there you absolutely depend on some professor to let you take part if you're not officially on that course...

    3. Re:Welcome to the real world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To put this into perspective, last semester at my four year, public institution I paid approximately $700 per 3 credit hour course. I need a total of 160 credit hours for my four year Bachelor of Science degree. Even with a scholarship or another form of financial aid, there is a strong incentive to ensure that you pass every course making it risky to just blow off classes. For example, my scholarships are tied to both my overall GPA as well as my semester GPA.

      Even if the monetary cost is disregarded, there is still a practical limit for the number of credit hours a student can take per semester. I maxed out at 22 one semester, but I wasn't holding a job. There are also many strong sociocultural imperatives for the typical person to complete undergraduate study in four years, so continuing for another semester or two is not really accepted. A notable exception to this is the person who is working full-time in order to be able to pay for college; these people may take 6–8 years to complete their undergraduate degree.

      Despite the obvious costs and inefficiencies, students are dissuaded from challenging the requirement to take courses by policy. The policy at my institution states that if you wish to challenge the necessity to take the course, you have to pay the full tuition for it even if you pass the course challenge exam. This is, of course, necessary to ensure that all of these departments can squeeze their "fair share" (*cough*) of tuition dollars out of students. I was so disgusted that I was going to be required to take English Composition courses from my university—with no way around it within the system—that I went and simultaneously enrolled in a two-year community college to get those credits and subsequently transferred them back to my primary institution. Fuck you, English Department, you won't get my money despite your racket.

      What we need is a challenge system that reflects the actual costs involved with the inconvenience of producing and grading such. $50–$75 would seem about right; naturally, to avoid cheating you would need a fresh, detailed exam for each administration. Even something more like a further expanded AP exam system would work, despite its heavyweight nature, provided that institutions recognized all the exams for placement (rather than pick and choose).

      Your idea about "crashing" courses is intriguing. I will note that if it works there is no reason that one must even be enrolled at all; this could be done at any time. Then again, for the advanced topics courses, there may only be 8 students enrolled. The prof will likely notice if there is an extra "student" cuckolded into the nest.

  11. Online schools are a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Online schools operate on a loophole that allows them to collect a ton of money that is disproportionately applied to the students. The current administration is finally starting to close the loophole but prior to that these online schools have proliferated. They exist to collect this money; educating you is the fake front to this shady business.

    DeVry, Unitek, Sequoia Institute, University of Phoenix, etc, are all scams. You learn nearly nothing, it costs a lot, there is NO JOB PLACEMENT no matter what they say and you have to bear the stigma/burden of going to an online school. We've had several online schools in California abruptly cancel all classes, fire everyone, and abandon the building(s) in question with no recourse for the students, even those about to 'graduate'.

    If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

    Here's my educational boilerplate info:

    - Go to community college. You can take all your GE, many of your lower division and some of your upper division courses there for cheap.
    - Transfer to a university. You'll only have to take the courses you couldn't take in community college, and you won't be there very long.
    - At both points try to take as many tests as you can to 'test-out' of lower classes you don't need.
    - Sign up for all the grants and scholarships you can find. Most of that money is never disbursed.

    Yeah, it's slow, but it's affordable even for the poorest of us.

    1. Re:Online schools are a scam by Uteck · · Score: 1

      Even an Associates degree will not prevent a traditional school from forcing more classes down your throat. They did not regocnize the World History class I took as part of my AA and I had to take Western History which turned out to be the same class but without the sections on India and China. Kind of ironic that a university was so euro-centric and a community collage was more global.

      It's all about accreditation, so it does not matter what school you go to as long as it is accredited.

      --
      no .sig found Please restart your browser.
    2. Re:Online schools are a scam by adversus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One can make the same argument about some brick and mortar colleges as well. I'm a graduate of a "for-profit" University, and found the coursework to be on par with friends that attended "traditional" universities. Having taken both traditional and for-profit/flex/adult classes, I feel that online universities require more effort as far as personal discipline. That said, there are a lot of diploma mills out there that DO fit your description. But don't lump all online Universities together. Last I checked, even Ivy League schools offer online programs now. I'd argue that even major Universities operate with a profit in mind (that may not be purely financial, but personal gain is personal gain).

    3. Re:Online schools are a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the way to go.

      One caveat. Check with your university before you take the community college classes to make sure those credits actually transfer.

    4. Re:Online schools are a scam by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      I have yet to see non-profit state/private schools called out *by the federal government* the same way for-profit schools have been for the fraud done U of Phoenix and the like. Those schools are an outright scam.

    5. Re:Online schools are a scam by kybudman · · Score: 1

      While I can't specifically argue with YOUR plan, it may not be for everyone. As an online instructor, course developer, and Administrator, I take great exception to your categorization of online schools in general. Urban legend personal bias, and inaccurate information do nothing for the benefit of this student. Like "brick and mortar" institutions (which have allowed me to pay nine times for their stamp of approval), online learning (which has allowed me to pay for three of their stamps) can be the most dynamic difficult, and rewarding learning you can ever get. You must choose the institution wisely, and apply yourself with the same or more determination to achieve your goals. It is actually, in my opinion, more difficult to "make the grade" in an online learning environment. But it was, for me, better education, a better and more significant learning experience than traditional learning. And, although I know it will come across as terribly biased, I would put my learning online up against any learning, period. In fact, I have. I won. Was that due to the Institution's name at the top of the Tariff Stamp? Well, perhaps a small bit. Was it because of the quality of the teaching? I believe so. Was it because of the quality of the student? Absolutely! In that, both are the same. It's not true that you get what you pay for in either. But, it is true that you get out of the learning experience what you put into it. And,that's true no matter where you learn. There are plenty of "traditional institutions of higher learning" that have been ripping students off for decades, or even centuries! Do your homework next time, and don't blame the bad grade for your work on the address!

      --
      Write Well! M. B. "Bud" Fields, Jr. http://grandorganproductions.net
    6. Re:Online schools are a scam by adversus · · Score: 1

      I'm not disagreeing that there are problems with the for-profit model (including lack of oversight). What I am saying is that there are people out there (like myself), who have had positive experiences with for-profit schools, such as: 1. Measurable outcomes to demonstrate the effectiveness of the coursework 2. Positive results in career advancement, partially based on the education 3. A feeling of personal accomplishment Saying that any online school is a scam is insulting, just like saying that your University of X_State_01 is full of drunken, womanizing, drunk, frat boys. I welcome more government oversight of for-profit Universities. But I'm also happy with my decision to get my BS from a for-profit University, and use it what I learned over those 4 years in my current position.

    7. Re:Online schools are a scam by eln · · Score: 1

      I agree with this, the only caveat being to do your homework first to make sure your CC classes transfer. Here in Texas, most of the universities and community colleges have long lists of courses that will transfer, so you can pretty much take your first two years at any community college and transfer without issue to most universities in the state. I've also been in states where this wasn't the case, though, or it only applied to certain colleges and universities, so you need to be careful so you don't waste your time on courses that don't transfer. And never go to one of the for-profit colleges like DeVry and expect anything to transfer.

      Here in Austin I was able to take all of my core classes at Austin Community College, which is a great institution with lots of campuses and tons of evening, weekend, and online course offerings. It's also dirt cheap compared to any 4-year institution I've ever seen. Then, I could transfer to Texas State and take all of my classes in the evenings at their Round Rock location. All of this ended up being far cheaper in aggregate than any of those online-only colleges and my degree comes from an accredited university (albeit not exactly one on the top tier or anything) that doesn't get weird looks when people see it on a resume.

      Face it: even if it is possible to get a decent education at an online university, the stigma against them in most industries is so huge that your resume is likely to get passed over if your degree is from one of them anyway. With many traditional universities and community colleges these days taking steps to cater to non-traditional students, it makes less and less sense to resort to an online university for your education. You don't want to spend tens of thousands of dollars and end up with a degree that people will believe came from a diploma mill.

    8. Re:Online schools are a scam by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the problem is going to be that once for-profit schools get the ratchets tightened down on them from accreditation organizations (for-profits purchase non-profit schools to get that accreditation, which is currently valued around $10 million), are stripped of their ability to churn and burn students (counselors paid on how many people they can drag in the door), etc., they're going to have very little competitive advantage against non-profit schools. If you had a great experience, that's great. Unfortunately, it appears that an overwhelming number of students are getting raked over the coals with taxpayers picking up the tab. Fark. That.

    9. Re:Online schools are a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Online schools operate on a loophole that allows them to collect a ton of money that is disproportionately applied to the students. The current administration is finally starting to close the loophole but prior to that these online schools have proliferated. They exist to collect this money; educating you is the fake front to this shady business. ...

      Here's my educational boilerplate info:

      I do not believe you have done any in depth research into the matter, only looked at the heavily marketed schools (i.e. for profits), and therefore probably should not be giving advice. For instance, you are obviously not aware that many online schools are non-profits, regionally accredited, and have their origins in traditional places (e.g. regents or governors). In particular you should investigate Excelsior University (began with the Regents on NY) and Western Governors University (Governors of several states started this one).

      There are tons of scam schools as you mentioned and online learning is not for everyone. However for the right student in the right set of circumstances who is willing to do the needed research into schools, online learning can be a vastly superior option to traditional schools.

    10. Re:Online schools are a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So an administration that does not like the profit motive calls into question the legitimacy of U of Phoenix and other for profit schools. Why does this fail to surprise me? Is U of Phoenix on the same level as the Ivies? No. Is it better than sitting in multi-hundred person lecture halls? Quite possibly. As the GP points out, online education requires more discipline - you don't have the same structured schedule of brick and mortar, nor do you have the peer group making studying in the afternoon/evening the norm. Does a for profit university come with a stigma? Yes, but is this so very different from directional state universities? The GGP has a point on the community college to university route advantages, although that route is likely to take longer and the opportunity cost of not working/working at significantly lower pay for that extra year or so should be taken into account when studying your options. Also keep in mind that a fair amount of the educational experience in the elite universities happens or should happen outside of the classroom as you work on projects with other students.

    11. Re:Online schools are a scam by wickedskaman · · Score: 1
      While I will vouch for most of this statement, I will say that I know several DeVry graduates who have actually gotten a good amount out of their CS degrees in well paying positions. One of the places a person I know got hired at actually ended up taking most of their managers from the pool of employees with DeVry degrees.

      It really is a piece of paper that gets you in the door. What you do behind that door is really up to you. The problem is that many people who go to these types of institutions think that the door-opener will help you all the way up. That's not true of any degree but it seems that a lot of the student population at these private institutions thinks it is. As a result there are a lot of hangers on who barely get their paper and don't do much with it. Their lack of focus on oral and written communication seems to be a barrier that you cannot buy your way over.

      --
      Sand's overrated... it's just tiny little rocks.
    12. Re:Online schools are a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why the fuck can't any of you who claim to have had good experiences say which online school you're talking about? If all you have to say is "I'm very satisfied and successful with my online education" and don't divulge the name of the place then it just doesn't seem very credible -- not to mention it's no help at all.

      --
      DUH!

    13. Re:Online schools are a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citations?

      DeVry and University of Phoenix don't promise anyone job placement. Some of those have been accused (and found guilty) of targeting low income people and high pressured sales tactics but other than that there's no "loophole" they're exploiting. The majority of students get federal loans and a bunch of them do so blindly thinking they'll finish school with a degree and immediately make n% more money to pay back the loan.

      I'm sure there are plenty of "shady" ones, don't get me wrong but I have personal experience with DeVry and University of Phoenix. I worked at UoP for quite a while and I believe they genuinely care about education. Maybe not at the top but the people I worked with did. And there was nothing disproportionate about the money they took in and what went towards education. UoP was constantly expanding and improving their network and they have a huge software development investment because the University software is home grown. If I remember correctly, out of the 200 or so apps required to run the school and online university about 75% were developed internally. They were employing 17000 people while I was there, many of them IT, and there were never any closures, only expansion.

      My wife went to DeVry because she could go for free and 1) they have crappy customer service, and 2) crappier software. But her classes were 8 weeks long and genuinely challenging. As consumers of what they offer we have no reason to believe they are a scam.

    14. Re:Online schools are a scam by DarkIye · · Score: 1

      This. I'm having trouble believing so many people here are saying "hurr this is college man, deal with it" when he's clearly talking about being in ITT Technical Institute or some other scam.

    15. Re:Online schools are a scam by supercrisp · · Score: 2, Informative

      This varies widely from state-to-state and school to school. What you have to do is research, just as if you were purchasing a widget. Find out what sort of agreements your CC has with the U you hope to attend. It also helps too if you have prepared some information about the curriculum. Keep syllabi and completed papers in case you need to argue for a class. Also, when it comes to "advising" at most universities, well, it will suck. So you might want to spend some time making sure you're talking to someone who gives a damn. Or find a way to politely get them to give a damn about them, such as not being surly or impatient or entitled or impatient or what-have-you. (Surprisingly, these are the go-to strategies for many undergraduates, so I'm including them here as Bad Ideas, not because I have any reason to suspect anyone at /. Would be be surly, entitled, arrogant, or impatient.) I have had very good experience obtaining transfer credit, but I sat down with the person and went through each class, point-by-point, reciting what we'd covered, what I'd learned, and what requirements of the degree the class would cover. I did this from memory. That's persuasive. Of course, all this said, I found out something. Too much transfer credit, especially at the graduate level is not a good idea. If, for example, your field is to be the study of blue baboon mating calls, you don't want to transfer Primate Nookie 101--because you need to be courting your thesis or dissertation committee, getting faculty to know you who will go to bat for you, find money for you, mentor you, etc. So you want to take a lot of classes in your specialty to meet those profs. (And seriously, a final note: don't bother courting non-tenure faculty like me. We can't do you any good, beyond telling you maybe who to court or how to find the bathroom.)

    16. Re:Online schools are a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      James Madison University - Information Security masters. Tiny classes (10-18 students), not terribly expensive, great experience, certified by NSA. The only thing it lacks that I'd like to see is actual video lectures.

      For InfoSec programs, it's hard to beat the ones certified by the NSA (this list includes online and offlien courses:
      http://www.nsa.gov/ia/academic_outreach/nat_cae/institutions.shtml

    17. Re:Online schools are a scam by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      Information Security masters. Tiny classes (10-18 students), not terribly expensive, great experience, certified by NSA.

      Wait. I'm not sure about the NSA's motivation in certifying such a program. It's not exactly in their interest to have schools teaching how to make really, really secure (as in NSA-proof) networks. ;)

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    18. Re:Online schools are a scam by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      - Go to community college. You can take all your GE, many of your lower division and some of your upper division courses there for cheap.
      - Transfer to a university. You'll only have to take the courses you couldn't take in community college, and you won't be there very long.

      It's worth mentioning that in at least some states you get guaranteed matriculation. As a california community college grad I have guaranteed entry into the UC of my choice. With good grades in the UC you can get into any uni you like.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Online schools are a scam by Isao · · Score: 1
      DeVry, Unitek, Sequoia Institute, University of Phoenix, etc, are all scams.

      Perhaps an AC troll, but I believe this is a generalization. I went to DeVry (after community college) and learned a lot - in a specific area (BS Information Systems). Liberal arts was of course neglected - this is a technical school. My classmates appeared to have a similar experience, generally successful.

      I was working in the field during and after school, and went on to get an MS in Computer Science (the BS transferred just fine). I'm about to start my PhD.

      I'm now mid-career, still doing work I love for six-figures. Worked out fine for me, and I'm NOT the top of my class or the most successful in the group.

      Job placement is always what you make of it, and especially so during hard economic times. At my DeVry campus the IS program was a feeder to places like CBIT (Cincinatti Bell IT) who sucked up programmers as fast as they could be made. I, however, went to smaller local IT shops, as I more quickly would become the "smartest guy in the room", which afforded me flexibility to learn a great deal. Right now this would be much harder; programming being outsourced, stressed economy, etc. I highly recommend professional networking, getting to know what your peers are interested in and making sure they know what YOU are looking for. I started that late, thinking I wanted to get a job on merit rather than contacts. I didn't realize you have to find the opportunity first, then get it on merit. Professional associations in your field are wonderful for this, are cheap(er) for students, and usually like having fresh blood to complement the greybeards.

      I do agree with the approach of starting with a community college - often the best bang for your buck, especially for the first two years. Then transfer to a four-year school who is credible in your field (which you might have only THEN decided upon). I also agree regarding applying for grants and scholarships. In fact, DeVry was truly outstanding in this, getting me grants I'd never heard of. The rest went on the ten-year student loan program.

    20. Re:Online schools are a scam by hguorbray · · Score: 1

      Amen to Community Colleges -some have really good online programs.

      I've taken about 200 units over the past 15 years (and still only an AS degree to show for it) in mostly IT and programming at Deanza and Foothill colleges.

      http://www.foothillglobalaccess.org/cgi/register/register.cgi

      they use a pretty good online system called Etudes:
      Etudes is a course management system based on the Sakai framework. Sakai is distributed as open source software under the Educational Community License.

      http://sakaiproject.org/

      I'm just sayin'

    21. Re:Online schools are a scam by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Online schooling doesn't intend to be a scam. It is simply due to it's nature and mechanisms - I don't think you can actually make online schooling effective without some sort of face time.

      I went to a school which was largely online - though only one or two of my courses were, and I had the option of taking some of the courses online. It's suitable for some course types as an auxiliary form for the course, but not the primary.

      I also took some "online" and "distance learning" courses at a private college with a good reputation. For whatever reason, educators are smitten by "online courses" even though it's seemingly impossible to convey anything worth a damn through them. (I think it's similar to/related to the driving-and-talking-on-phone phenomenon). Hopefully, after over 10 years of this nonsense, the online courses will die out in institutions genuinely interested in educating.

      That said, I went to college to get a diploma and to give me time to learn. I didn't expect much - I just didn't want a school that pretended to be something it wasn't, ending up being more of a time sink than anything.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  12. College doesn't train you in your vocation.... by Mrdzone · · Score: 1

    I doubt you'll find a school, e

    1. Re:College doesn't train you in your vocation.... by pookemon · · Score: 1

      What Mrdzone is trying to say is "I doubt you'll find a school that teaches you how to finish what you're saying before pressing the submit button".

      Personally I dont agree with that sentiment. But then I know how t

      --
      dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
  13. Not unusual by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To an extent, this is just how college is. How long have you been at it? I had a similar situation in a brick-n-mortar college; I re-took classes I'd gotten 4s and 5s from AP tests. Yeah, I was bored. But that stopped by the second year. Might be a question of whether your program is the right one.

    if you already know enough to get certifications in the things you want to do, do that, and get a degree in something that would differentiate you from the hordes. I can't say more without knowing what you want to do, but as an analogy, I always recommend that CS grads get a second minor (math is usually the first) in a science, whether it be biology, chemistry, physics, or something similar. Why? Because you know another field that frequently intersects with CS, making someone much more marketable. I'm not saying that particular program is or isn't right for you, but the general principle still holds, I think.

    In any event, good luck however you choose to proceed.

    1. Re:Not unusual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To an extent, this is just how college is. How long have you been at it? I had a similar situation in a brick-n-mortar college; I re-took classes I'd gotten 4s and 5s from AP tests. Yeah, I was bored.

      Um, why? Isn't the whole point of AP to get you out of those intro classes, and even if they don't take AP, any decent university should let you test out of classes if you already know the stuff.

    2. Re:Not unusual by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      To an extent, this is just how college is. How long have you been at it? I had a similar situation in a brick-n-mortar college; I re-took classes I'd gotten 4s and 5s from AP tests. Yeah, I was bored. But that stopped by the second year. Might be a question of whether your program is the right one.

      Pretty much every school will allow you to test your way out of basic academic requirements on your way in, but any degree requirements beyond this can (typically) only be "challenged" by paying the full fees and taking the final from the instructor. As you can see, this is purely about money. The proof? Schools will typically not even let you bypass classes which are full or which don't exist. The class isn't being offered? Either wait, or pick another major more profitable for the school. The unprofitable majors are the ones for which they don't bother to find replacement instructors.

      if you already know enough to get certifications in the things you want to do, do that, and get a degree in something that would differentiate you from the hordes.

      If you want to be a technician you can get away with a cert, but real jobs require degrees. Sure there are always exceptions but in general there's a lot of unemployed motherfuckers out there right now (all around the world!) and the degree rapidly becomes a differentiating factor. Most interviewers are looking at an awful lot of resumes these days and they need a quick way to filter out the bulk of them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  14. Fort Hays State University by kstatefan40 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Take a look at the Department of Informatics at Fort Hays State University - you can take all of the courses (at both undergrad and graduate level) online to complete a degree. It is not one of those curriculum sets you can just ace - it is a challenging set of courses which encompass internetworking, web development, media studies, and information assurance. You can pick your specific concentration, but you will still get to see a little bit of everything. This is one of the best programs in the country for updated networking and web curriculum. It is both a Cisco Networking Academy and an NSA Center of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance. You can work toward you CCNA/CCNP/CISSP if that is the direction you'd like to take, or you can work toward an advanced degree in web development. I know these classes are quality because I have taken them - the internetworking series of classes were the most difficult classes I have ever taken. I loved the challenge and the connections you gain with classmates from around the world are invaluable. http://www.fhsu.edu/informatics/ Thanks for posting and good luck!

    1. Re:Fort Hays State University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rants seem to be centered on the online only institutions. FHSU is a real brick and mortar university (and as I am from the area originally and have an undergrad degree from I am a bit biased). Most traditional colleges/universities that entered the online world do a far better job of making the experience equivalent in rigor and content. I am a professor at a small state college in Nebraska, and we work very, very hard to maintain that integrity. I also noticed that there seems to be some issues with online schools claiming you only need to spend a very small amount of time per week for each class. I can assure you that most upper division courses at a legitimate college/university will require significant time and dedication. I generally preface my courses with a statement that an upper division (300/400) level course will take at a minimum of 9-15 hours per week over a 16 week semester and depending on your project and ability may take significantly more. There is a reason that traditionally 12-15 credit hours per semester is considered full time. We do frustrate students at times by making them learn material that they may know, however my experience has been that often while they think they are knowledgeable on a subject, reality can be far different. All that said, we will rarely teach a student everything they need to know for a specific job, however we very decidedly emphasize the formation of critical thinking and learning skills. In most cases these are far more valuable than a specific skill. Picture a student who learned a very specific skill such as web page, but did not work on how to learn or other critical thinking skills. Are the specific set of skills they learned valuable during the entire 40 plus working life of the student?

      In our case being a small school, we know that we can not be everything to every student, nor do we advertise as such.

       

  15. Those who can, do... by drumcat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Those who can't, teach. It's just how it is. I spent most of my undergrad simply chasing "that piece of paper", with a few very cool exceptions that made my days reasonable. Education is not the same as certification/diplomas. Once you grasp that, you'll be able to successfully balance the academic jewels you acquire, and the real-world experience that helps you be gainfully employed. Knowing that those are, at best, loosely correlated will be one of the great lessons you take from this experience.

    1. Re:Those who can, do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If your professors couldn't do as well as teach, it is your fault you went to a crappy school.

  16. My friend felt the exact same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As he said, "I didn't go to college to learn how to program!" angrily because the Information Systems major included C#, Java, and web programming. He decided to go to ITT Tech, which is currently losing a lawsuit because their students are unhirable. Stick it out. You'll be missing these days when you get into the upper 300 and 400 level classes. Think of them as easy A's or GPA padding for later, much harder courses. I know how annoying it is to show up for the stupid Economics classes that you can get a B just showing up for the tests, but that'll help offset the future "Oh Crap! I didn't know I was doing that bad!" class.

    CS 110 - the "a printer is a type of peripheral" class - was the class that led to the most drop outs. 403, the CCNA equivalent where we're in the lab an extra two to three hours of the class, was a nightmare but we lost no one after that.

  17. Ras.Algethi.42 by RasAlgethi42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For profit educational institutions are never worth the money. EVER. You may get in cheap, you may even get out cheap. See if any employer will take your degree from Bob's University.

    1. Re:Ras.Algethi.42 by DarkIye · · Score: 1

      If the students got in or out cheap it would defeat the purpose of running such a scam.

    2. Re:Ras.Algethi.42 by dawning · · Score: 1

      Retarded point my friend. Standford, Harvard, Columbia, etc.. All Private. All the best schools are private ones. Granted there's some pretty crummy ones too, but that's extremely typical of the public institutions too, who stand little to lose if they "fail to meet their customers needs".

    3. Re:Ras.Algethi.42 by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      For profit educational institutions are never worth the money. EVER.

      Retarded point my friend.

      Standford, Harvard, Columbia, etc.. All Private.

      All the best schools are private ones. Granted there's some pretty crummy ones too, but that's extremely typical of the public institutions too, who stand little to lose if they "fail to meet their customers needs".

      "Retarded point my friend"? Were you prefacing your comment with a warning that your point was retarded?

      The GP said "For profit educational institutions"... you then went on to rant bout private, non-profit educational institutions. The difference is profound.

      As far as I'm aware, all of the Ivy League schools are private and non-profit. For that matter, last I checked the top 200 or so universities in the US were non-profit (public or private).

      Here's a list of for-profit colleges in the US.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  18. Slashdot 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read every story and comment on /. for a semester and you will learn more than any college class.

    You will also probably go insane.

  19. College doesn't train you on vocation by Mrdzone · · Score: 1

    I doubt you'll find a school either online or B&M that will fit your needs unelss you go into a very specialized program at a school like CalTech, CMU, or MIT.

    The reason for that is college is not, by and large, about learning how to do what you want to do. It's about learning how to do what you HAVE to do, in order to do what you want to do.

    Working in teams, doing BS work that you don't like (TPS reports anyone?) working through bureaucracy etc... once you demonstrate these skills any idiot can be taught web design at a basic enough level... everything beyond that is experience anyway.

  20. JMU InfoSec online degree program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got my MS from the James Madison University CS department, the focus of the track I took was information security. I had a great experience in this program that is delivered asynchronously over the Internet. Here is a link to more information about the program:

    http://www.infosec.jmu.edu/

  21. Naked Emperor vs. Pathfinder by WitnessForTheOffense · · Score: 2, Informative

    You have a choice to make.

    In one respect, the Emperor has no clothes. College is a just a bunch of hoops to jump through to get a piece of paper that supposedly (but doesn't) mean that you have skills. What it actually means is that you spent a lot of money (and made the loan servicer and your college a lot of money) and you jumped through a bunch of hoops. The skills you could gain can be gained through checking books out from the library, camping at the bookstore, and googling everything. RTFM and JFGI (google the acronyms if you don't know what they stand for).

    The upside to college is that there are some skills that are more difficult to learn on your own. Also, there are a lot of entrenched managers from older generations that won't look at your resume if you don't have that stupid piece of paper. So it can get you places and a modicum of respect, but you have to smile and say you learned a lot and deny that the emperor is buck naked.

    On the other hand, you can just be self-taught. Web design can be learned through reading design blogs, reading web design books from the library, and a lot of experimentation and experience actually designing websites. Web design is a demonstrable skill that doesn't necessarily require a piece of paper on the wall. There will be some closed doors because of the lack of the piece of paper, though.

    If you decide to go to college for web design, stay away from rip off online colleges that are just diploma mills. Four year colleges are expensive and unnecessary for a web design degree. Find a nice, cheap community college with a distance learning program and web design major available.

    Build your resume with as much experience as possible and build an online portfolio of your designs. This will get you a lot farther than a piece of paper in many cases. A lot of clients are just looking for people who know how to design and they don't care where you picked it up. Show them what you can do.

    1. Re:Naked Emperor vs. Pathfinder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Education is not job training. If you want job training, go to a vo-tech school or a cc,a university wouldn't be a good choice. Despite the majors, unis are about instilling more general way
      s of attacking problems within a discipline, the specific details are thought to be trivial and not worth covering (things like actual design implementation vs theory of design).

    2. Re:Naked Emperor vs. Pathfinder by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit mixed on the subject. On one hand you pick things up in academia that you simply don't get or have the time or inclination to go over in real life, simple methodology mostly. Also I'd have never gone through something as obvious as discrete math in day to day life. Not out of lack of interest, it is simply something I wouldn't have thought of (unless of course I had picked up a college catalog and said, "Hey, I want to cover as much ground as these guy, I'm gonna go read a book on that").

      On the other hand, I ended up working in IT; something far removed from my field of study. It just started out as something I did while in college and I never left it. With the exception of a few logic courses, I've had to go the self taught route. So instead of spending hours in school then, I now spend hours at home reading books, breaking and fixing things, etc. It is a mixed bag.

      For interviews, it really hasn't been as big a deal as I would have thought. Give me a laptop or piece of paper and a good problem and I'll go to town. The problem starts when promotions come into the picture. Getting and keeping a position is easy, that is me versus the company. Getting a promotion becomes me versus everyone in the company. Then that piece of paper changes everything and in the world of office politics it can become an albatross.

      I can't say I regret the path I've taken. I know a hell of a lot more in certain areas than many of my peers (many CS majors, especially those who double majored in business or math are woefully ignorant of very basic electrical engineering and they write off most of the OSI model as "magic" or "soon to be obsolete"). Then again, that is the difference between CS majors and CS nerds. The nerds don't need a degree.

    3. Re:Naked Emperor vs. Pathfinder by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      I'll also have to say that I'm not knocking math majors or putting them in the same boat as business majors. If there is any sin, the latter might be it.

    4. Re:Naked Emperor vs. Pathfinder by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      RTFM and JFGI (google the acronyms if you don't know what they stand for)

      Yep, you sound like an arrogant prick, I bet you're another self-taught twat who has a mad crush on his teacher.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:Naked Emperor vs. Pathfinder by tqk · · Score: 0

      RTFM and JFGI (google the acronyms if you don't know what they stand for).

      In a word, no. I'll guess, though: "Read the Fine/F-ing Manual" and "Just F-ing Give In."

      Do you know what acronyms are for? They're for shortening or minimizing what you need to write to put your point across. I don't think you're getting the point. "Read the Fine/F-ing Manual and Just F-ing Give In" is shorter than what you wrote.

      On a side note (though related), it sure is interesting to see the diverse range of composition skills exhibited by all these people who purport to have earned a higher degree.

      So, so many of you have missed the point of this discussion. Diplomas get you past HR, possibly after educating you too. Go multi-tens of thousands of dollars in debt, all just to get past/impress HR drones?!? That's what all you graduates think is an effective expenditure of time and money?

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  22. Some are good by Ghoser777 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had an excellent experience with Walden University. I was able to attend virtual lectures from distinguished professors from Duke to Carnegie-Mellon. The work was at an appropriate level, and I feel like I learned a great deal. Your mileage may vary in different areas (I got my MA in Comp Sci).

    --
    James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
    1. Re:Some are good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know Duke taught at Walden College, but I'm pretty sure he's not distinguished, unless you're studying mind-altering substances.... :)

    2. Re:Some are good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My late wife had a horrible experience with Walden. $20k in the hole and NOTHING to show for it... their stupid class auto-scheduler scheduled the wrong classes most semesters... and she couldn't get it fixed in time because you don't have any personal contacts there - you send your email to an address like advisor@walden.edu and half the time your email goes into oblivion. EVERY SEMESTER they screwed up her financial aid, blocked her from classes until it was too late to buy books, etc.

      The ONLY WAY I could get anyone at Walden to listen to our complaints was to find the board members and executive team members (via property searches in their home states) and send certified mail to their home addresses.

      Additionally, it seemed like more than half of the students in her *master's* degree program couldn't write at a college level. They shouldn't have been there in the first place.

    3. Re:Some are good by smalltalker · · Score: 1

      I have had 2 children use online courses as part of their college education, but the courses were online offerings by traditional universities (NC State and BYU). Their experiences were good and they got to interact with the instructors, not as much with classmates.

      --
      Steve Cline http://www.clines.org, http://www.objectbap.com
  23. Online is great by mandelbr0t · · Score: 0

    I went back to school, and transferred to a university with an online curriculum. I'm very happy I made the choice, and wish I'd gone that route in the first place. If you're bored, get a job. Not an IT job, just a job to make some spending money. The nice thing about correspondence is that you don't have to be poor to go to school. You can have a nice laptop, a console gaming system and a sweet Internet connection. You don't have to live in a noisy dorm. All in all it makes the enduring of all the pointless academic work much easier. Yeah, I'm pissed that I still have to finish my degree, even though I'm a bad ass hacker. The jobs available to those without degrees, in a word, suck. That's my motivation for putting up with it, even though I have to pay to challenge courses like "Introduction to Computing" or some such thing even though they gave me credits for 3 advanced courses instead. Getting your degree sucks. Getting a real job, on the other hand, is something to look forward to. Correspondence makes it that much more bearable for those of us who can't stand the trite classroom bullshit.

    --
    "Please describe the scientific nature of the 'whammy'" - Agent Scully
    1. Re:Online is great by lawnboy5-O · · Score: 1

      If you are this angry now, wait until that online degree is laughed at by some Ivy league douche (that actually gave you a job), who knows nothing but got there exactly because she had the opportunity to go to school and never really took advantage of the learning aspect, but DOES have that piece of paper from enduring trite classroom BS. You will call her boss, and hate that too.

  24. Why go to college? by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Most schools have a canon that must be transversed to graduate. At a good school the canon is not random. It is meant to insure that the students speak the same vocabulary, have simliar assumptions, and similar methods to the professors. One might have a familiarity with a subject, but if there is little common ground in the way one talks about a subject, then the student is wasting his or her time. Two big reasons why people drop out of college is that they are bored with the introductory canon, or get frustrated because they tink they are in high school where teachers will work put big concepts in imprecise language that the students already knows, instead of requiring the student to learn the precise language used in the field.

    US high schools make a significant effort to insure that every student has the opportunity to learn the skills the college, but most colleges are not going to make an effort to hold a students hand once in college, especially if the student is paying, especially if the student is paying with student loans. After all, there is another freshmen class next year, and they have the money from last years freshman class whether they earned it or not.

    The second issue is much more interesting. The students at a college provide as much value as the professors. I did not go to any kind of high level college, but I met some good people who really enhanced my experience. People who could hold a conversation, work a problem, accept that ideas different from their own might still be valid. If one does not have such people in their college life, this beyond anything else is a sign that one might be in the wrong place, or perhaps that one is not effort in the most efficient directions.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:Why go to college? by cordivae · · Score: 0

      You know where else I met people who "enhance my experience... hold a conversation, work a problem..."? My job... I had some amazing conversations with the professors at my school. I thought that was what I was paying for, and then I got a job. Same conversations only instead of paying for it, your getting payed.

    2. Re:Why go to college? by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      Most schools have a canon that must be transversed to graduate. At a good school the canon is not random. It is meant to insure that the students speak the same vocabulary, have simliar assumptions, and similar methods to the professors. One might have a familiarity with a subject, but if there is little common ground in the way one talks about a subject, then the student is wasting his or her time. Two big reasons why people drop out of college is that they are bored with the introductory canon, or get frustrated because they tink they are in high school where teachers will work put big concepts in imprecise language that the students already knows, instead of requiring the student to learn the precise language used in the field.

      I went to clown college. At my school the canon was a cannon, and you had to transverse it to without getting your floppy shoes hung up in it. You don't get bored with that sort of canon. You're too busy focusing on your landing and preparing for the segue into your next gag.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    3. Re:Why go to college? by inKubus · · Score: 1

      Once you get to the so called "upper division" they start treating you like a person again and all the people who aren't smart or hard working are gone. The first two years are somewhat of a scam. If it's Soooo easy, go to class, do the homework and pass the tests. It's only a little time, then you get to the real education.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    4. Re:Why go to college? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't make fun of Princeton, it is a good school.

    5. Re:Why go to college? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, most schools have a canon... but *there is a large difference* in the 'canon' between a real school and the 'canon' of U of Phoenix, Walden, DeVry, etc.

      The 'canon' of a for-profit school exists *only* to ensure that every warm body being dragged through the program takes *all* classes - simply to maximize profit.

      The 'canon' of a real school ensure that the student can do the coursework and *has earned the degree*.

      When I was at DeVry, *everyone* was made to take all the stupid rinky-dink classes. I had a basic class for Microsoft Office that was required to graduate. In that class we had 6 system administrators and 5 application developers. Why? When we took the test to skip over that class, we all failed. Why? There were stupid questions like "how many clipart images are there in MS office?"

      After I saw what kind of people go to DeVry, I went to a real University. Yeah, they had a 'canon' for my degree path, but I was able to make an exception (with good arguments as to why my way would satisfy the spirit of the canon but not the letter) for many classes.

  25. Well, you get what you pay for ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My experience was different. I "needed" a masters degree for work; field was irrelevant. I went with TAMU's online math program. I paid quite a bit more than my peers, but also got challenged and learned a lot. Did I get a real masters of math? No, but I got what I paid for.

  26. Grass is always greener on the other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm taking my degree at a normal brick and mortar university but I switched from on-campus to off-campus/online for all my units. Trust me, it's the same if it were on-campus, same idiot students with the same incompetent lecturers teaching stuff that should be prerequisite knowledge. Changing the medium doesn't change that.

  27. Online courses at most colleges are very simple... by Raineer · · Score: 2, Informative

    They are a cash cow. Little to no resources are put into them, and students gain (at most) some busy work to do while reading the book on their own. I have taken online courses at three universities. Each one of them charged more per credit hour (~50% more) while I felt like I learned much less from the course. I'm sure there are good programs out there somewhere, but none in the institutions where I have had experience. In order to do well in online courses, you need to be a self-starter. MUCH moreso than in a typical classroom environment. My advice, if it applies to your courses, is to use the heck out of MIT's OCW program. Those lectures have gotten me through many online courses where the professors had (for the most part) not even read the current text we were assigned to use. I have donated several times to MIT because of OCW, it is fantastic.

  28. SANS by Smoky+D.+Bear · · Score: 1

    Although I prefer the classroom courses, SANS security course are very practical. They will help you both with your job and in getting a job. http://www.sans.org/vlive/

    1. Re:SANS by rpmayhem · · Score: 1

      If you are wanting to pursue Computer Security, SANS is one of the best. They offer a good variety of classes, and as Smoky said, it's very practical. Personally, I've only taken their 1 week courses, but I've heard good things about their online courses. Plus, the brick and mortar classes are very fast paced, but with online you have more time to absorb the content.

      The downsides? Expensive. I believe it's grad level stuff, so that's expected.

      They also have certifications associated with the classes (it's a separate but affiliated with SANS). It's an additional cost, and you really have to study over your course material after the class in order to do well. www.giac.org for the certs.

  29. Online classes are a waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For profit schools are a waste of your time and your money. If you're signed up with University of Phoenix or a similar program...get the fuck out. NOW. You've already wasted a bunch of time and money on an unaccredited program and likely haven't learned a goddamn thing for your money. Online classes I find are pretty worthless for learning. Reading is great and useful (visual learning), but it's also helpful to hear it (auditory learning), write notes (kinestetic learning), and talk it over with your prof and classmates so you get the material and can explore corner cases.

    Community colleges are generally a very good value for your money. If you're already deeply within a field, don't expect to learn a lot, if anything, from the lower division courses (other than mathematics and similar). If you need that degree though, they'll help you out affordably, and then you can get into the good stuff once you transfer. Some colleges offer grants for students who are coming back after a long absence; you should look into those.

    Either way though, I'd drop the for-profit school like a bad habit and reconsider the choice of online classes--at least for anything you care about and expect to use at any time in the future.

    1. Re:Online classes are a waste of time by Dravik · · Score: 1

      Many community colleges are offering online courses. So does that mean they are pretty worthless for learning or a very good value for your money?

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    2. Re:Online classes are a waste of time by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's an interesting take. The University of Phoenix is actually accredited, by the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools, which in turn is recognized by the Department of Education and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation. Also, although I can't speak for UoP, the school I'm attending online offers recorded lectures (for aural learning and note-taking), discussion forums where the TA is active, opportunities to ask the professor questions live during class (naturally, this requires being online when the on-site class is being held) and plenty of homework to learn by doing.

      I think you're also generally giving for-profit schools short shrift for little good reason; they don't spend (or seek) money based on football teams, or endowments, but are actively trying to sell the quality of pedagogy and student attention. From what little I've seen, they pay more attention to student feedback on teachers, and teachers aren't given free reign to treat students like crap just because they've done important research. That doesn't mean they're perfect, but - like community colleges - they have a place of value and importance in society.

      So far I've done the traditional undergraduate degree, community college (actually after I got my Bachelor's), online classes, and yes a ton of learning on my own. They're all opportunities to learn and challenge yourself, with varying degrees and kinds of support infrastructure to encourage and help you. But they are definitely all different, and I think they do serve different purposes and subsets of the population.

      --
      --Matthew
    3. Re:Online classes are a waste of time by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      "The University of Phoenix is actually accredited, by the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools, which in turn is recognized by the Department of Education and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation."

      Big deal. Their incentive is to rope in as many students as possible, in order to get the federal loan money. This year they became the first university to collect $1 billion in Pell Grant money in a single year.

      See, once they get the students and their money, it doesn't matter if the students actually graduate. Some students might actually get an adequate education, but they probably won't get their money's worth.

      Overall, they're a pernicious influence in society.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    4. Re:Online classes are a waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "they don't spend (or seek) money based on football teams, or endowments, but are actively trying to sell the quality of pedagogy and student attention."

      HAHAHHAHAHA oh my god I just spit coffee all over my keyboard. BWHAHAHAHAH!

      Do you actually believe that?

      For-profit schools can suck in so many bodies, tie them down under tens of grand of student loans, and spit them out. They don't need to listen to any one student... and by far, by FAR the do not sell quality.

      My late wife had many, many problems with a school that was supposedly a high-quality institution. The only way we could get anyone to address these problems was when I tracked down the board members and executive management via property searches in their home states and sent certified mail to their homes asking for help.

      Many of the people in her *masters* program could not write at a college level. We were floored with the low quality of the people taking these classes.

    5. Re:Online classes are a waste of time by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 1

      "Big deal."

      Just trying to point the discussion in the right direction - toward facts, rather than inaccuracies and hearsay. That may not change anyone's overall assessment, but at least it provides a better basis for making such a judgement.

      "Overall, they're a pernicious influence in society."

      If you see them as the trend toward which every college should go, yes. On the other hand, they also provide educational opportunities to a lot of people ignored or sidelined by traditional colleges, and as an additional option - like community colleges are an additional option - I see value.

      Perhaps the difference in our opinion is really that I don't view traditional universities in as positive a light, particularly for people who don't fit into the expected mold, so the standard by which I judge Phoenix is lower.

      --
      --Matthew
    6. Re:Online classes are a waste of time by Dravik · · Score: 1

      How is this incentive any different than at a state run school?

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    7. Re:Online classes are a waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The University of Phoenix is actually accredited, by the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools

      So what. I can put a sign on my backyard shed that says "Big Jims Sk00l of Gynec0loGy and skeet shootin" and I can get it accredited by the same accreditor as UofP. The 6 regional accreditors are the only ones that matter and UofP isn't accredited by them.

      Seriously. Try to transfer your UofP credits to a state college and see what happens.

    8. Re:Online classes are a waste of time by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 1

      "Do you actually believe that?"

      You seem to be confusing the quality of pedagogy with the quality and depth of material. Yes, my impression is that teachers are held more accountable to students at University of Phoenix, as opposed to traditional universities.

      "Many of the people in her *masters* program could not write at a college level. We were floored with the low quality of the people taking these classes."

      That is also a separate issue. For myself, taking graduate classes online at another university, the fact that I didn't have to justify my ability to take the class before signing up was a boon... fewer hoops to jump through, no need to prove both my formal and informal education in the prerequisite material, etc. (I'll still have to go through all the hoops before I actually receive a Master's). It's a double-edged sword, sure, but it's useful to have universities that do it in addition to universities that don't.

      --
      --Matthew
    9. Re:Online classes are a waste of time by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 1

      North Central Association of Colleges and Schools:

      The North Central Association of Colleges and Schools (NCA), also known as North Central, is one of six regional accreditation organizations recognized by the United States Department of Education and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation.

      I'm not really sure where you are getting your information, but very basic Google searches are proving you wrong.

      Seriously. Try to transfer your UofP credits to a state college and see what happens.

      I don't have any UofP credits to transfer; as I said I am taking online classes elsewhere and my undergraduate degree is from a traditional university. However, my experience at traditional universities is that transferring credits between them is unreliable at best, and based at least in part on the opinions of the admissions people at the school you're transferring to.

      --
      --Matthew
    10. Re:Online classes are a waste of time by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      "How is this incentive any different than at a state run school?"

      I don't think a state-run school would be allowed to use the same deceptive practices. At least not for very long. There's more accountability to taxpayers and state legislators.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  30. Don't count on other people to teach you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to learn (at your own pace) then your best bet is to get a syllabus from a school or schools (online or offline schools) and use them as a guide for your own self-education. I have had lot's of formal in-class schooling myself, and have found that the quality of the educational experience increases the more that independent study is involved. In fact, I've learned far more after I graduated (and had time to actually learn things in depth) than when I was in school.

    For something like computer security (which I'm no expert at), you may want to choose an application suite and read the manual and experiment on your own (which can be a slow way of learning, but the very best way of learning); through trial and error, sweat and tedium. Also scour the Web for tutorials, RFCs, etc (don't search too hard though, sometimes there just isn't a lot of quality, detailed information out there, but that's the same with teachers).

    For the tedious, boring things that are difficult to remember, use a memory program like Mnemosyne or Anki. Don't let anybody tell you that memorization is bullshit; it's just one part of the learning process. Of course you should understand what you memorize, but the point being; if you don't remember what you learned then there is no point in learning.

    Unless you want to be a medical doctor then don't worry too much about a diploma; you've already got some professional experience, so just concentrate on learning. Diploma's are very over-rated in the computer field anyways (just ask anybody who graduated without getting a related job).

  31. College and Vocational School are not the same... by Godskitchen · · Score: 1

    Why do I keep seeing people complaining that they didn't learn any on the job skills in university? Computer Science is not just programming. If you want to learn to just program, teach yourself or go to ITT tech (a vocational school) for a programming certificate.

  32. Try a real school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your best bet would be to quit and go to a real school, rather than some online school. You'll have a better chance of getting a job after you graduate, too (or "graduate" as far as the online school is concerned).

  33. Go offline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what you get when you study online. It's also what you get when you study offline.

    BUT. There is one big difference: resources.

    Sure, studying in a normal offline university the classes were not that interesting. But the classes were designed for the lower-average student. It didn't mean that the teachers/professors had nothing more interesting to teach you. It also didn't mean that the (at the time) huge Unix machine were just there to practice bash and pearl scripting.

    A local school, if it's any good, has a lot more to offer outside the standard curriculum. In terms of material, knowledge and most importantly, people.

  34. Regional accreditation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find a regionally accredited not-for-profit school. From your description it very much sounds like you're attending a for profit institution. Assuming that is the case, of course they wont let you skip any classes: there mission is to turn a profit and the less classes you're required to take - the less money they make.

    Many first and second tier public universities have entirely online programs. Another benefit to this is the degrees don't say Big State University Online, they say Big State University. I think this has a lot more weight with employers than any of the various degree mills out there.

    Not that I'm against the free market, but I can assure when it comes to voting with my own wallet, I would choose a non-profit school.

    1. Re:Regional accreditation by Dravik · · Score: 1

      Ensuring that your degree does not differentiate between taking online courses and brick and mortar courses is good advice.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
  35. Learning to think by joeaguy · · Score: 1

    My high school teachers said that college is not so much about learning how to do something, but learning how to think. In the technology field, the specifics are going to change constantly, but you need to know the theories and principles behind the specifics so you can adapt as the world changes. I got a Bachelors of Science in Computer Science in 98, and while not every class I took is necessarily directly useful to me now, they did expose me to a pretty wide range of different kinds of problems and concepts that give me an additional ability to design and organize well when programming that I don't always see in my peers who didn't go through a computer science program.

    I think our education system in US has gotten really out of whack, although in many ways its nothing new. Education is about being a better person, not just a better worker. You should look for that sort of approach in a school, online or not, in order to get your money's worth and have something that will actually better your life, and not just be a piece of paper that shows you jumped through the right hoops.

    Why did you even join up with this place that is making you take so many classes you don't need? Didn't you look at the requirements and the sample course lists, etc, before joining? There are tons of choices out there. People take months to pick a real life college usually, with several visits, looking at course catalogs, talking to students, etc. You should place the same care into an online education if it is going to be the same sort of multi-year commitment.

  36. Stay away from for-profit degree mills by JoeBuck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, the kind that advertise. It's a racket; they'll take your money, or financial aid money from the government, and give you a "degree". They don't want to let you skip "learning" what you already know because they want your cash. You need a legitimate institution, a community college or a state university.

    1. Re:Stay away from for-profit degree mills by fishexe · · Score: 1

      You know, the kind that advertise. It's a racket; they'll take your money, or financial aid money from the government, and give you a "degree". They don't want to let you skip "learning" what you already know because they want your cash. You need a legitimate institution, a community college or a state university.

      Agreed. Having been to both a (brick and mortar) degree mill and two state universities, I can say even the third-rate state university provides a better experience than a first-rate for-profit institution.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    2. Re:Stay away from for-profit degree mills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife was hired to teach at one of the big for-profit schools, teaching beginning writing and tourism classes. One of her classes was training students on how to use the antiquated travel reservation system that travel agents use, even though she had never used or even heard of it before teaching the course. Her qualifications: able to read a book and then teach it to others, and the willingness to take the job. They don't care who is teaching some of those courses, as long as they can find someone to fill the job. And they will let people with 4th-grade writing skills into the classes, seemingly having no requirements for getting into the college besides having the ability to sign for student loans. After seeing the quality of some of the papers that they submitted, there is almost no way I would consider hiring somebody with a degree from that school.

    3. Re:Stay away from for-profit degree mills by luk3Z · · Score: 1

      You have right. Nowadays "schools" are almost "companies" - they need only money and make money on the students. Most important thing today is what you can - what skills you have and paper from school not always give you good skills. Anyway think about that: x people every year learn the same thing in the school, so this is too schematic for me. People should go by themselves way in the learning path.

      --
      Recipes for USA bankrupt - http://tinypaste.com/0d66f dd = dollar deluge (printed in the infinity)
  37. I just finished my Masters online by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just finished my Masters degree with Walden University in "Information Systems Management".

    So..my couple of cents:

    What I didn't know when I signed up was that I would be in the first class through the program. A lot of the classes were very badly layed out, as in what we would be doing one week would not match up at all with what we'd done the prior weeks or would be doing in the next weeks. It was very obvious the courses had been built by a bunch of outsourced educators in possibly another country, right down to the spelling errors or idiosyncracies in the language in the project descriptions. If we had problems with any of the assignments, or were unsure of the wording, we'd bring it up with the professor and it would be fixed quickly. I think they all understood that some bugs were still being worked out, and I received a nice discount ($600 a semester) for being a guinea pig.

    I do feel like I got a decent education for what I paid for and it being an online school. We never learned anything specific about any one product, ie IBM cognos, or MySQL or anything like that, but we learned in general what products like these were capable of, how to shop around for them, etc. Same sort of thing I learned in undergrad, we never got any certifications but I could easily pick up a CCNA, A+, etc because I've had all the ground work laid out for me and understand computers, networking and programing very well.

    I was kept fairly busy with the assignments, in an average week I would work on 2 papers, usually 4-8 pages in length, and a group project usually around 6-8 pages, as well as group discussions, reading discussions and some classes required we keep a blog of what we were doing. We had quite a bit of group work, which was some what challenging. Its kind of funny, I had no idea what my group members looked like until in the last class we all found each other on facebook. Nothing like what I expected. I was also the only male, and am fairly young (24) while everyone else was in atleast their mid-30's it seemed.

    I did have one really bad professor. I emailed him prior to the class starting and explained I would be on my honeymoon the first 2 weeks of class. I asked if he would rather send me the material early and I turn it in before I leave, or if it was ok if I did it when I got back. He said when I got back was fine. Well, I turned everything in the week I returned, only to get really bad grades for it being "late". I email him and am told "well I had to give you a bad grade for it being late, its only fair to everyone else.", and of course he stuck to his guns when I brought up the email where he said it was ok to turn everything in after I returned from vacation. He graded erratically throughout the class, never offering explanations for grades he gave. The class was badly laid out, and expected us to have a deep knowledge of Java in order to get an Apache Ant (I believe, its been a year and half) project built from the ground up, which I did not, and Java was not on the requirements for the entrance into the degree nor did I expect it, the degree was "how to be a programmers boss" not "how to be a programmer". The professor refused to help fix any of these problems, and I had to get in touch with the dean, who took care of everything for me and apologized for the problems we'd been having. After I got in touch with the dean, examples were added to the assignments involving Ant, so that instead of creating a project from a ground up, we had something to work with in order to get what we needed done.

    All and all, it was a pretty good experience.

    1. Re:I just finished my Masters online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is one place I can check off my list anyhow.

      Seriously a masters in IT and you figure you got a A+ cert in the bag if you wanted it?

    2. Re:I just finished my Masters online by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1
      1) Are you satisfied that you got your money's worth?

      2) What is the ROI on your degree? (How many years will it take to pay back the student loans?)

    3. Re:I just finished my Masters online by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 1

      Yes, I feel like I got my moneys worth. The degree took 10 classes to complete (33 semester hours), and each class cost about $2,220. So $22k total. My work picked up about $15k worth, so it really didn't cost me all that much. The loans are lumped in with about 60k in undergrad student loans, and they all go to into repayment here in a few months. It works out to about $350 a month.

      I chose walden because I liked the sound of the Information Systems Management degree, thats essentially the job I want to try to go into. I have a bachelors in programming, but I'm really not a great programmer. I figured this out too late to change degrees without being in debt up to my eyeballs and another 3 years in school. I enjoy technology, I just get bored and frustrated with programming.

      I also like Walden because its not as well known. It only comes up that I went to school online when people notice dates don't match up. IE, in an interview it was noticed I went to school in Baltimore (where walden is located) while living in Ohio. A simple explanation of (oh, the school offered that degree online) was all that it took.

       

    4. Re:I just finished my Masters online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello BeowulfBoy,

      Glad you had a good experience there! Let me tell you about my wife's experience.

      They screwed up her financial aid on the first semester. As a result, for EVERY SEMESTER after that, fin aid was screwed up - she could not get into classes until after they started, got her books late, had to drop out.

      The stupid automated course scheduling thing assigned her incorrect classes every semester.

      It was extremely difficult to get anyone to listen to us. The only way someone listened to us was when I hunted down the home addresses of the board and executive team and sent them certified letters at their home addresses.

      To top it off, many of the students in her masters program could barely write at a college level. We were floored that they'd let just anyone in to these programs.

  38. Collection of Capriciousness = College Culture by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    I find most Universities have zillions of strange and rather capricious policies that vary from department to department that somehow add up to the overall culture of the place.

    The Uni that I went to would allow you to get up to two credits in European languages after a talk with the appropriate profs but wouldn't in Asian languages. This plus attendance policies resulted in there being a effective 1 to 1 ratio of teachers to students making for great conversational courses for only the Asian languages. The Euro language courses were much more rigid textbook courses.

    Long story short the various departments varied widely in structure and thus culture. But if you have computer structured system it will probably dictate the culture for the entire online university. Thus if you see one cockroach...

  39. If anyone can enroll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...its not worth paying to learn anymore. Want to make money? Learn something that isn't taught in schools and can only be learned on the job.

  40. can the credits transfer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the USA. the first question you should ask, and get in writing, is whether the credits you earn at the school can transfer to an accredited university. Some companies run multiple schools and often the credits you pay for will transfer to another school that the company owns. I.e., it's meaningless in that case. Look for the ability to transfer to a real school. Many times the new "school" is just another office in the same building. Accreditation can also be meaningless. There are many accrediting agencies, some even on the the (US) government list, but they are privately owned.

    1. Re:can the credits transfer? by Dravik · · Score: 1

      Why would being privately owned make an accrediting agency meaningless?

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
  41. University of Phoenix by DavidD_CA · · Score: 5, Informative

    At the insistence of my employer, I enrolled in online classes at University of Phoenix about 8 years ago. I was aiming for their MBA program. At the time, the classes were 5 weeks long, with a decent amount of weekly work and plenty of reading. Everything was online, including the mandatory newsgroup-style discussions.

    After about three classes, it became clear to me that I wasn't learning much at all. I was also able to get by barely doing any of the reading, and just turning in a few well-written essays and keeping my virtual attendance up. In other words, I wasn't forced to think to earn my grades. There were no tests in any of the classes I had. For all they know, I could have been paying someone to take the class for me.

    The instructors were nothing more than babysitting facilitators. They'd answer a question if you had one, and they'd grade your paper, but they were not instructing. They doled out assignments from plans that other people had written. Not once did they engage in a discussion or challenge you to think.

    It wasn't until my fourth class when I realized the mistake I had made. The instructor was on vacation. Yes, vacation. For the five week class, he was literally gone and unavailable for the middle three weeks with the exception of one day (in 21) when he checked his email (to tell us he was on vacation). Yet the class continued on.

    When the class ended, I complained about the level of "instruction" I was being given. They ignored me for weeks, and it wasn't until I encouraged about a dozen of the other students in the same class to stand up and say something. Finally, they wrote back and told me that I would be refunded for the class if I was willing to lose the grade that I had been given. Gee, thanks. And, only those students who asked were given that choice.

    That was my last class, and I'm glad. A few weeks later I spoke candidly to the HR director and he told me he was glad I stopped taking them. He told me that when people come in with degrees from University of Phoenix he just tosses them to the bottom of the pile. He recognizes them as a diploma mill, and a BA from there is less valuable than a GED.

    I've spoken with others who have attended University of Phoenix online and they all have similar stories.

    University of Phoenix has employees whose job is to recruit students, and they earn commission for enrolling you. Their focus appears to be to get students through financial aid so that they have no problem getting their money. Once you're enrolled, and paid for, you're just a student ID.

    Sadly I paid that "school" about $6000 of my own cash before realizing any of this, but hopefully others can learn from my mistake.

    Have they improved since my experience? I sure hope so.

    --
    -David
    1. Re:University of Phoenix by leighjam · · Score: 0

      I'm currently enrolled there along with my wife, father-in-law, a close friend, and her parents. They've gotten a LOT more responsive to students, I had a serious problem with an instructor and it was resolved within a few days. It's still all online but they have added some remote desktop to use the various tools. Are my classes boring? I've been in IT 20 years and Web development for 14 so there's not much that I don't understand. Is it as great as getting a degree from a big name school? Nope, but fitting into my schedule and the price I'm getting what I'm paying for.

    2. Re:University of Phoenix by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      So you're ok overpaying for a worthless piece of paper?

    3. Re:University of Phoenix by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 5, Informative
      http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/collegeinc/

      A great deal of this excellent documentary mirrors what you've said, and is pretty scathing to University of Phoenix. The worst part is, folks take out huge student loans to pay for these worthless degrees from for-profit schools, can never afford to pay them back, and can never get out from under the loans because you can't discharge them in bankruptcy (because said loans are backed by the federal government).

    4. Re:University of Phoenix by DavidD_CA · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, there's a lot of information there. Click on the "Response from Colleges" link for all sorts of stuff.

      This reading is going to make me very upset, I can tell already.

      I would love to see a class-action suit brought against these schools for their practices. I'm just not sure there was anything illegal about what they did.

      Oh, and something I forgot to mention in my original post: very few of their classes are transferrable if you ever decide to move your credits to another university.

      --
      -David
    5. Re:University of Phoenix by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Informative
    6. Re:University of Phoenix by supercrisp · · Score: 1

      Those "instructors" are underpaid and have far too many students. I know some of them, work with some who moonlight at Kaplan, Phoenix, and others in order to pay the bills. There's no way even the best and most highly-motivated teacher can be a real teacher given the workload they must maintain at these places just to keep the lights on at home. Further, the curricula are micromanaged at these places. They want the teacher to just plug and chug, and they really, really are waiting for the day when an algorithm can "evaluate" student work for them. The true purpose of these places is only to transfer money from federal aid programs to the investors. They have very little to do with education. (That said, even public universities are trending this way as they become increasingly top-heavy with administrators, many who've had some sort of MBA kool-aid, and who must make cuts because of yearly budget cuts to the institution. And, yes, it will be education that's cut, not athletics, infrastructure, or research--because those are assumed to bring in money.)

    7. Re:University of Phoenix by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      So, wait.

      You enrolled at the insistence of your employer...

      But your employer's HR director discounts resumes of people with U of Phoenix on their resume.

      WTF?

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    8. Re:University of Phoenix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went to UOP as well but didn't have this experience. I actually attended UOP while at the local 4 year university. My employer kept playing with my schedule and I was determined to finish one of the programs. My experience at UOP was much better than yours. I tried to skate by on one class and ended up not passing and had to take it again. The work for the most part was way more demanding than I experience at the local university. But my goal was to get the b.s. so I can go on a get a graduate level degree. A friend attending the local university told me how easy he had it getting his b.s. in information systems and I heard from several others the same thing, so really, while I don't doubt your story, these kinds exist everywhere.

      I eventually went on to Capella and it as the most demanding education experience ever. This is after attending 3 different local universities. So the online experience can be good but mostly it depends on what you put into it. You can skate by at the physical university or you can work hard and study as well. Its your choice.

    9. Re:University of Phoenix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re:University of Phoenix

      A few nights ago I was watching "Are you smarter than a fifth grader?" with my wife. This ditzy old woman was a contestant. When the shows host was asking her about herself he mentioned that she had a masters degree and asked her where she had gotten it. She replied "I received my masters degree from the university of phoenix" and there were lots of chuckles and hushed laughter from the audience. That tells you how most people view online diploma mills like UofP.

    10. Re:University of Phoenix by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a little miscommunication there between my manager and the HR department.

      --
      -David
    11. Re:University of Phoenix by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

      I realize that many of their part-time instructors have other full-time jobs. But when a student is paying about $2000-3000 for a class (through loans or otherwise), I think they can expect a little more than the experience they're getting.

      The classes I were enrolled in (quite a while ago) all had between 10-20 people.

      --
      -David
    12. Re:University of Phoenix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what? first your employer forces you into UoP then they say they are happy you quit because they realize the place sucks?

    13. Re:University of Phoenix by supercrisp · · Score: 1

      I'm with you; students do deserve a real education for their tuition. I think U. of Phoenix, Kaplan, and the rest, are--for the most, most part--scams. My point is that the instructors aren't at fault. These institutions pay so poorly that an instructor must be overloaded to make a living, or to reach the full-time point at which they'll get any insurance. And the institutions set the curriculum AND have pretty rigorous requirements for the methods by which students are evaluated—methods adapted to the technology and the profit structure more than to pedagogical outcomes. Blaming the teacher under these circumstances is like blaming the burger flipper for not producing a healthy meal--the poor slob has to work, and YOU'RE the one who "walked" into the McCollege. Sadly, and I mean REALLY sadly, many four-year institutions are beginning to investigate ways to make their general education courses more like these monetized models, and for similar reasons: they want to reduce the "overhead" of teacher pay and physical infrastructure. I wish that I and other teachers could deal with you directly. You could cut your tuition by more than half, and I could still more than double my salary. But I'm afraid my stationery doesn't make as nice a diploma as the one you'll get from Degrees R Us.

    14. Re:University of Phoenix by Maxwell · · Score: 1

      I did my undergrad (upgrading from college) at UoP from 2000-2004. When I started they had something like 35,000 students. I met many of the same people as we progressed through the B.Science Business major. I learned TONS as I had never taken business before. It was all good and I really advanced my position in my firm by knowing HR, finance, accounting, etc. (Why would anyone study things they already know? I already knew IT, so I took business) As a Canadian living in the US I didn't qualify for any loans so paid cash for each course.

      I took a 1st yr course in my last year to put me over the credit requirements. I was appalled. The students were lazy, couldn't read/write and were all given A's. The new UoP was 'pay your fees, and pass'. They expected to do nothing and pass. I was really annoyed that all my hard work was being wasted as UoP pursued expansion at all costs. They hit 250k students in 2006 I think.

      I covered up my UoP BSB with a big buck MBA and haven't looked back. Am I happy with what I got from UoP? Yes. Would I enroll there today? Doubtful. Too bad, they took a great concept an ruined it for everyone...

  42. College is a scam by cordivae · · Score: 0

    I hate to say it, but I firmly believe most colleges to be a scam. I flew through my certs, a job, and have learned more in the 4 months since then I did in 4 years at college. In fact the only thing I really found valuable were the books, the practice tests, and the lady who wrote my resume. The classes were boring, slow, and geared for mechanics trying to transition to a new field rather then nerds who have lived and breathed computers since middle school. If I had to do it over again I'd gladly trade the piece of paper for 4 more years of experience and networking. "You wasted $150,000 on an education you coulda got for $1.50 in late fees at the public library."

    1. Re:College is a scam by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      I started my IT career by dropping out of high school and working for a webdev shop. Best. decision. ever. IT is not an industry a degree program can be built around. It changes too quickly.

    2. Re:College is a scam by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Most degrees are very general in what they teach. The foundations of CS/IT are pretty consistent. The API or database of the week may change, but the principals behind them are the same.

    3. Re:College is a scam by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      IT is not an industry a degree program can be built around. It changes too quickly.

      "Changing too quickly" is only an issue if you assume all degrees are the equivalent of Vo-Tech certificates.

      Plenty of... what's the marketing speak for that?... "dynamic" fields can have degrees built around them by focusing on core disciplines rather than specific implementations.

      Although, having worked IT, I do find myself wondering what its "core disciplines" might be. TCP/IP networking? That might be an issue, but in the specific case of IT, I guess I agree that IT is more suited for job-training than academic study.

  43. Maybe I'm Old by b4upoo · · Score: 1

    It has been quite a few years since I was in college but for my generation there was no such thing as being allowed to skip a course simply because one already knew the material. I am aware that things have changed quite a bit and perhaps some very liberal colleges allow skipping of courses for qualified students but when that is allowed accreditation becomes shaky.
                    I can recall asking to be allowed to take a final exam on the first day of a course and it was forbidden. But I did have certain professors who simply allowed me to go to the library and do as I wished and they simply asked whether I wanted an A or a B for each semester. They were cheating in allowing me that privilege.
                  I suspect that with your online courses you could move ahead at your own pace. If so simply cram and run the gauntlet and get the credits quickly. I suspect that it boils down to spending money for something that you dislike.
                  Also, in the past collaboration between students was actually frowned upon. One did one's work privately and submitted it for grading. The social part of college distilled down to catching girls for most of us.
                  If you decide to go for a conventional form of education make certain that you are not fooled. Not only must the school be accredited but the department must be fully accredited and often the department is not. That devalues your degree severely. Then make certain that the accrediting body is the exact one that accredits the big state universities in your region. Do not fall for the rotten, private college, nonsense accreditation bodies.

    1. Re: Maybe I'm Old by khb · · Score: 1

      Your instructors allowed you to just randomly read in the library? Perhaps your aged neurons have missed a few memories ;>

      I'm also "old", and while my instructors wouldn't allow me to entirely skip a course, I did have a couple who gave me detailed independent research (which they graded). For example, I took a "Fortran" class where I learned Pascal (we had a CDC, a couple of different Pascal compilers, I had the original Wirth report and I had a bevy of coding assignments ... all of which he graded).

      it was more work for both of us, but I was learning stuff I didn't already know. Since I was working in Aerospace already doing Fortran coding (and yes, it's not FORTRAN, not since the committee ruling in the 1990s; admittedly it was FORTRAN at the time under discussion ;>).

      What I found most interesting was the way this particular professor made the call that I knew Fortran too well to take the course as given. He showed me a listing of one of his commerical programming gigs, and was talking me through the code. However, he made several statements which were false ... after the first one, I starting putting up a fuss ... which was the right move. If I'd kept my mouth shut, he said he would have concluded that I needed more instruction.

      It's a rather good interview technique, can be used at higher levels of abstraction than just code.

  44. Best law degree I din't pay for. by Ostracus · · Score: 4, Funny

    What online education programs have Slashdot readers been happy with and considered successful?

    I got my law degree through "IANAL but..." offered through Slashdot. Next week I'm going for my economics degree.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
    1. Re:Best law degree I din't pay for. by fishexe · · Score: 1

      What online education programs have Slashdot readers been happy with and considered successful?

      I got my law degree through "IANAL but..." offered through Slashdot. Next week I'm going for my economics degree.

      Oh! You must be talking about that joint program through "Obviously..." and "Of course, everybody knows...". Is it as good as they say it is?

      I can't wait until Slashdot offers programs in Physics and Computer Science!

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    2. Re:Best law degree I din't pay for. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What online education programs have Slashdot readers been happy with and considered successful?

      Next week I'm going for my economics degree.

      Same here. Except I'll take the climatology and radio-transmissions (with a major in antenna design).

  45. Everything you need to learn is already available by crf00 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Everything you need to learn is already available for free on the web. You just have to search harder to find them. I'd assume you want to enroll in university computer science as you are asking this in slashdot.

    For pre-U education to brush up your knowledge, there's Khan Academy to teach you everything from primary school to even college.

    For formal university level education, you can get many of them free directly from university. MIT Open Courseware is one of the well known examples. You can find a list of them at Open Culture. Google Code University is a less known but great site that helps you start and search on your online education journey.

    There are also video lecture collection sites that contain lecture recordings from various universities, such as Academic Earth and Video Lectures.

    You may also interested in less formal technology videos such as BestTechVideos and Google Tech Talks.

    You can download a lot of ebooks from the web. Here is an example list you can found on Delicious.

    In case if you are only interested in web design, IMHO the best way to learn design and multimedia is go to a real college. But anyway, there are tons of resources for web design too. Delicious is a must have search tool for you to get started.

    I'd love to provide more links that I have but I'm short of time. But as always, Google is your best friend!

  46. Depends on what your needs are by Kelbear · · Score: 1

    You can face the same issues even when attending school in person.

    The educational benefit you reap will always rely on how much you want to extract from it. Motivated individuals can get competitive educations from crappy schools from their efforts on their own time. They can do this by just buying the books on their own without a college program. Others need college programs to guide their studies and their education.

    The college offers a degree, its reputation, and its network. If these aren't useful to your career, then attending that college may have limited benefit.

  47. Is it "Online" that makes College Bad? by HockeyGuy · · Score: 1

    Talk to a million people and you will get a million different answers as to how helpful college is but taking to the next level and going the route of teach yourself online courses will really make you wonder if your money is well spent.

    The first thing you have to understand is there are definite reasons that someone perusing a career must attend college. If your career requires a degree such as an Architect, Lawyer or Doctor. There is no question here that these careers require a degree but remember there are different levels of education that will put you in the same place as everyone else.

    You can get your law degree from the University of Delaware located next to a mall or drive 25 miles north to the University of Pennsylvania where Donald Trump and a lot of other well known lawyers attended. So what is the difference? Well President Obama attended Harvard and supposedly he did well but he did not submit his GPA or degree to get elected it was his friends he met at college that made him President.

    Now you can attend college online at Major Universities you get full credit just like you attended but you must attend the college for a year or so to complete your bachelors. This is not a bad deal and when I attended college I took a few Teach Yourself courses so I could Test Out of Math classes.

    But if you attend a degree mill online program believe me every Human Resources Manager knows before you walk in the door that the college you attended provided you an education that is basically useless for the real world.

    On the other hand you could attend Harvard and not be the popular one and never make it to be President ... you may not even accomplish developing your own practice to be able to pay back the $200K you spent to have them hand you a piece of paper.. however you should be able to file the bankruptcy papers when you and your family are so far in debt you have lost everything.

    There are a lot of choices and there are reasons to make them but you have to understand up front why you are making that decision.

    Do you live in the middle of Wyoming with a family that needs you and you can't move or commute to college so Online is your only option? Then look for the best school and like I said LOTS of schools now allow you to take online courses... heck you can take courses at a few colleges to build up your credits for final graduation but you need to know which school you will graduate from and how many credits they will accept... usually the most transfer credits a school will accept is about half or 60% of the credits needed for a bachelors degree and Masters or Professional Degrees they accept less unless there is a hardship case which you have negotiated...

    It takes a lot of work to get it done but it can be done... only attend accredited schools online that is the big thing. And the accreditation must come from the same organization that accredits the brick and mortar schools or your credits and degree is worth nothing....

    Now with that said
    You miss out on making connections when you work beside people day in and day out when you attend online so you will need to work much harder to find people you can count on. ... you can do that online anyway but... it can be difficult to really count on anyone you meet online to back you up...

    And finally no matter if you are attending online or in class you really need to understand what your degree can offer you. A degree in History, Art heck even computer science today ... there are millions of qualified people looking for work.. Hell I am one of them.. or at least I am looking for better work and you have to say is it worth 4 or 6 or 8 years of your life to study something... will it put a roof over your head and food on the table? No matter what philosophical questions you may learn to answer with your degree... food in your kids mouth is always #1 and if you can make more money being a plumber or electrician then

  48. What did you expect? by h7 · · Score: 0

    Online education is for people who pay to get degrees. If learning were so easy, there would be no full time students. The fact that you expected more actually, is surprising.

  49. at the local community college.... by metalmaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I studied 2 years at my local community college, and the experience was rather interesting. I attended some classes where the discussion was heavy and student input was valued by the professor. I feel i received the most out of such classes. The curriculum for my major(Networking Technologies) was fairly basic stuff that I had seen previously. If a teacher had simply spewed a lecture or read from a presentation I wouldnt have attended class, Most of my IT courses used a CMS, so i could log in from home to get the lecture or the presentation. Basically, the teacher did not provide anything I couldn't have gotten on my own. Students participating in the discussion was a completely different animal though. It taught me a lot, because it forced different interpretations of the material.

    Of course, there were classes that the professor did nothing but spew lecture. Unfortunately thats unavoidable.

    I had only taken one online course in my two years at the college, and it was a complete waste of my time. The title of the course was "Interpersonal Communications." It was the only section that the college offered when i needed the course. For anyone outta the loop, interpersonal means person-to-person. I understand that times are changing and tech allows us to communicate around the world as if we are face to face. This course didn't lend itself to that though. The materials should have been taught in a classroom. In addition to that, the assignments were nothing more than "busy work." Anyone remember that from grade school? Your teacher calls in sick, so a substitute gives you work that means absolutely nothing. Yeah, that was this course.

    Anyways, the OP asks about taking unnecessary courses. At the community college a program exists just for this purpose. My school called it Credit By Exam(CrEX) For select courses, a student can be given what is, essentially, the course final. If you pass the exam you're given the earned credits and exempt from the course.The test still costs money, but for my school it was about 40% of the tuition for the class, and you save about 15 weeks of invaluable time. You might look into a similar program for your school. It might not apply to all of the courses you are capable of skipping, but it just may get you out of the most basic intro courses. I was able to skip Intro to Information Systems(starts by teach the student how to power on a machine) and Intro to Windows and DOS Concepts(a course that started with basics of windows GUI and ended with writing simple batch files)

    1. Re:at the local community college.... by metalmaster · · Score: 1

      http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/clep/about.html is the official college board fact sheet on the matter. Contact your school's office of admissions to see if this applies

  50. my experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had finished 80% of a BSCS degree while also working full time at a state university - then life got complicated and I couldn't finish the degree at that school.

    I finished the degree with an on-line institution. I didn't learn a single thing with them - but I was just after the piece of paper.

    First of all, the work experience on my resume is the only think making this work. If I didn't already have 5-10 work history, I doubt I'd find as many open doors as I currently do. Second of all, I realize now that it would be extremely challenging to continue on to a masters degree with any state university in the future. They simply wouldn't accept my BSCS as legitimate.

  51. Are you smart? by Mike610544 · · Score: 0

    If so you don't need eduction. Find a startup that's hiring smart people.

    --
    ... also, I can kill you with my brain.
    1. Re:Are you smart? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Smart people want an education.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:Are you smart? by pspahn · · Score: 1

      I tried that. I worked at a .com startup in Santa Clara after high school. Made a ton of money while I was there, but the 60-70 hour weeks along with the horrendous commute ruined my brain. They also went bottom up.

      If it was a great startup, possibly, but in all likelihood it could very well be a waste of time.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  52. For Profit Colleges are terrible by bigbigbison · · Score: 4, Informative

    Business Week has done a few scathing articles about for-profit colleges in the last year. One showed how they go into homeless shelters and try to get homeless people to sign up for student loan money. One college even went so far as to actually pay the homeless students for attending classes. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_19/b4177064219731.htm?chan=magazine+channel_features

    Another story was about how they have gotten into the practice of buying up super small trade colleges so that they can get the accreditation. One of these for-profit schools bought an aviation school and "expanded" it into mainstream courses http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_11/b4170050344129.htm

    A third story was about how these for-profit schools also target the military. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_02/b4162036095366.htm

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    1. Re:For Profit Colleges are terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod up.

      Bottom line- Any school that falls under the "for profit" heading is likely to be utter crap.

      I made the mistake 10 years ago of attending one of these so called institutions of higher learning. One day, the owner suddenly disappeared with everyones tuition. Thousands of students (and teachers for that matter) were utterly screwed and left with massive debt.

      In the end, it was learned that this particular school was in collusion with an institution known to be the largest student lender in the U.S. (who shall remain nameless- Slimy Lending Mofos). It took 3 years and a class action suit to even partially rectify the situation. 10 years later, these same Slimy Lending Mofos are still the "preferred" lender at many of these "for profit" schools

      "For profit" schools are predatory scams. Don't waste your time, money or life on them. Unless you simply want an expensive degree in Hard Knocks.

    2. Re:For Profit Colleges are terrible by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I want to elaborate for the people reading your post about the dangers of student loans. They are not simply online schools anymore and 80% of the private colleges are sharks.

      Students with real degrees from good private institutions are being screwed over as well. My wife and I being victims of this. The school told her +6 months could make her a teacher after her 4 year degree. Citi bank promised her it would be cheap and easy and within a year be done. Only 2% interest Meanwhile after a year the school kept changing the requirements to be highly qualified. It took 3+ years and the costs kept going up each year and interest is double digit.

      It took 8 years and $200,000 for her masters and credential after playing this silly game and after the school districts kept upping the standards to be rehired each year.

      It left us with $2,400 a month in student loans and only $700 left for food and rent. We plan to lose our kids and send them off to their father to pay off the d*mn loans. Pardon my language but this angers me to no end as the financial laws that the banks wrote ...err lobbied for make it illegal to declare bankruptcy on a student loan. This was not Harvard but rather just a private college that charged my wife a fortune. She was told 6 months to 1 year while the school was planning on adding 2 -3 years and Citigroup planned to up the interest rate.

      Unless you own a home you have no collateral to turn them into a 30 year with a more reasonable monthly fee. Our lives are going to be very horrible for the next 10 years. I take responsibility for this for not doing more research and I hope my post is a warning for all slashdotters who are college students. The private college is in the market to charge you money and not get you out of school quickly or cheaply.

    3. Re:For Profit Colleges are terrible by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      You want to blame the banks / colleges because you and your wife were dumb enough to spend $200,000 on a masters to be a frakking teacher? I'm sorry, but you definitely deserved that for not exercising a little common sense. I know many teachers, and with 20+ years of experience with a masters +30, you're only looking at around $75,000 a year - nowhere near enough to justify that level of debt.

      I've seen too many articles / people posting online lately where they blame the banks and colleges because they didn't exercise any common sense and racked up six figures in debt on a degree that will only make them around $50,000 a year. Sorry, but you have to accept the consequences of your actions and you have no one to blame but yourselves.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    4. Re:For Profit Colleges are terrible by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Community colleges, most state universities, and nearly all private institutions generally lose money on each student. They make it up in other ways - community colleges and state universities get public funding, while the private schools have significant investment earnings on their endowments as well as alumni donations. It's rather astounding to realize that when they're charging $50K / year they still aren't making ends meet, but it's true nonetheless. This dynamic, incidentally, means that private universities in particular have a strong interest in your future earnings, because that's their future as an institution.

      That should tell you something - if a "college" is somehow able to make a profit, it's cheating you. They're charging a lot more than the equivalent publicly funded school, and their faculty are usually cheap instructors without a doctorate in their field. They're also skimping on career placement. And of course anything else that an academic institution would do, like having talks by distinguished speakers, is completely off the list. These private "colleges" aren't academic institutions, they're businesses who's product is the illusion of an academic institution without actually being one.

      Frankly, I find their business model to be cruel: They go mostly to decent hardworking working-class folks who are trying to make something of themselves, sell them dream of becoming part of the college-educated middle class, get them to spend years of effort and thousands of dollars trying to achieve that dream, and then give them a nearly worthless piece of paper. It's slightly more moral than home loan sharking, but not much.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    5. Re:For Profit Colleges are terrible by Cassini2 · · Score: 1

      I think the Grand Parent Poster's point was that if CitiBank and the College said it would cost $200,000 for a Teacher's certificate, they would not have done it. Instead, they promised 2% interest and a 6 month program. After starting the program, the school started revised the program length. Ultimately the 6-month program required 2 to 3 years to complete.

      Once a student is in a program, the pressure to complete it is HUGE. You either walk away with nothing, or do what it takes to complete the program.

    6. Re:For Profit Colleges are terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frontline also did a story on For-Profit colleges. It is on the PBS website.

      http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/collegeinc/?utm_campaign=homepage&utm_medium=proglist&utm_source=proglist

    7. Re:For Profit Colleges are terrible by supercrisp · · Score: 1

      Where was she going to school that she racked up $200,000 for a masters?! I'm sorry, but that's just crazy, especially if she plans on being a teacher. You know that most teachers would only make that much money in six or more years? And the master's took EIGHT years? That's getting a bit on the long side for a _doctorate_. Seriously, even with a full-time job, you should be able to pull off a master's in three; you can get those things in a box of cracker jacks these days. But you're right about student loans being a problem, but I hope they don't choose you guys for the poster, because your case doesn't inspire much sympathy.

    8. Re:For Profit Colleges are terrible by supercrisp · · Score: 1

      In all fairness, many people invested in degrees for teaching expecting ANY job, but now there are none, and schools are even canning people. Blaming the loan people is dumb, and I suppose blaming anybody is. But the economy and the state/federal govt have sure taken a dump on education. (I'd like to know where this $75k figure is coming from. In Iowa, you'd be looking at the mid-40s to high 50s in a well-funded school district. In Tennessee (god help you), you'd be looking at $35k. In Long Island, I was offered a job for $57, but that would just about rent me a broom closet with a diet of baloney sandwiches.)

    9. Re:For Profit Colleges are terrible by supercrisp · · Score: 1

      Just got one more data-point from a friend: math teacher with master's teaching at a private high school in Manhattan makes $50k.

    10. Re:For Profit Colleges are terrible by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      You didn't ready all of what I wrote. I said with a Masters degree +30 (an additional 30 hours of graduate work) AND 20+ years of experience, you're looking at around $75,000, though of course that varies some by location. I know teachers in very average areas who make that much and ones who only have a couple years of experience making around $35,000 - $40,000.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    11. Re:For Profit Colleges are terrible by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Have you looked at income based repayment? You could be done in 20 years, 10 if she works for a non-profit or government, most k-12 schools would qualify. Hell I would default before I gave up my kids. There are limits on what they can garnish and all that is after taxes, health insurance, child support, and pensions.

  53. Re:Online courses at most colleges are very simple by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1
    You're absolutely correct. In most cases, you're better off buying a book and taking CLEP classes, as that's what an online class is (self-paced study/education), but at a much lower cost ($50-$75/CLEP test vs $95-$120/credit-hour in district).

    Props for mentioning OCW. They have some amazing classes you can take for free online. I'd *pay* to audit some of those classes remotely.

  54. Online classes aren't real great by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

    I've taught a few online classes for a state-wide community college. To say I've "taught" them is kind. I was basically a grader. The first day of the semester they blasted the material onto the online Blackboard system and it had all the due dates and assignments. I couldn't change anything on the syllabus because the syllabus was standardized for every section across the state and so were the grading tools. This meant that when they turned in speeches (yes I "taught" public speaking online for one of the classes as strange as that sounds) and the speeches were done on terrible topics I couldn't lower their grade or tell them to redo it. When their voices had no enthusiasm at all I couldn't lower their grade because the state mandated grading tool didn't have anything that covered enthusiasm. This meant that you could take the class, do a speech that wasn't really appropriate, read in a monotone and still get an A as long as you took all the tests, had good eye contact, and met the time length and visual aid requirements.

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
  55. Online classes are wastes... by Reeses · · Score: 0

    Go to a real school.

    College isn't about the trade you learn. (that's really what it is, white collar trade school).

    College is about the people you meet, the handful of cool projects you complete, and the doors that can be open to you by going to a specific school.

    This is one area where the real world trumps the online world. Face-to-face interactions. You'll interact with other people with similar interests. You'll interact with members of the opposite sex. You'll interact with professors. The thing is, the caliber of college you attend is a sorting hat (oblig Harry Potter reference) for the type of people you're going to interact with. If you're not good at interacting with people, in the long term that will become career limiting and college is a good place to get better. It's OK to be a little "off" in college.

    You're probably not willing to do what I'm about to suggest but, unless you're married or taking of parents in their dotage, you should move to a city/town with a really good program for what you want to do and attend classes there. Physically attend them. Yes, I understand the convenience of online course, but you miss out on a big part of the college experience that way and many employers see "online university" on your resume (trust me, they know) and discard it. You'll likely meet people that are smarter than you. You'll definitely meet people who have varied backgrounds. You will get a different experience than you think you need.

    Also, here's the secret thing I found out. College isn't about the degree you earn. It's about the set of keys you earn that open certain doors. For example, the odds of you working for Apple or Google are slim unless you attend Stanford. If you want to work at IBM, they have feeder colleges too. My undergrad program places a people at Target Corporate HQ (not the stores). Almost all colleges are feeder schools. They all have companies they put potential candidates in front of. Some of these companies you can't get into at all unless you attend the right schools. Some of them you can get into if you don't attend the right schools, but it's harder. But that's the thing that the college paperwork tells you in an oblique manner. They all tell you they'll get you a degree, and you will, but the degree isn't the important part. It's where you go afterwards, and the people you meet along the way.

    Which, unfortunately, you can't do online. Go to school in meatspace. It'll be worth it, in the long run and the short run.

    --
    Reeses
    1. Re:Online classes are wastes... by reiisi · · Score: 1

      You sound just like my brother.

      --
      Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  56. Backtrack Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Online/DVD security training - checkout out http://www.backtrack-linux.org/

  57. tough it out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are going to have to take those classes, online or not. The only two subjects you can possibly avoid are math and English. But then only of your placement test scores are high enough, and that only opts you right to required college level of said course. There is no fast track for college.

  58. why i come here by underqualified · · Score: 1

    i learned all my advanced physics from slashdot

  59. Online degrees perfect for salary increases by Tarantura · · Score: 1

    Heck - once you get that nice government job and your salary is determined by factors such as amount of accredited college hours (e.g., teachers): online degrees are ideal for nice jumps in pay raises. Simply submit said degree to Human Resources and BAM! your salary is increased accordingly (and sometimes quite dramatically). None of your peers need to know - not even your boss.

    1. Re:Online degrees perfect for salary increases by twilightzero · · Score: 1

      ...and then suddenly you're paid too much for your grade, you're bumped to a higher GS grade, and suddenly you're too high of a grade for your job. So you're shuffled to a job that's completely outside of your field but is for the right grade.

      Seen it done in person, never works well at all and is usually a complete disaster. That being said, you're also set for life as it almost literally takes an act of congress to get you fired.

      --

      "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
    2. Re:Online degrees perfect for salary increases by Tarantura · · Score: 1

      FYI: Gov't teachers (K-12) are not paid on a GS grade level. Even DoDDS (Dept. of Def. Dependent School) teachers - the civilians who teach children of the military on a military base - are paid on a special teacher scale. No chance of being shuffled to another job that isn't teaching. However, they are set for life, as you mentioned (and even retire millionaires!).

    3. Re:Online degrees perfect for salary increases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be nice if private industry worked that way. Well, I have a PhD, and make less money then the shitty "senior" programmers in my group even though I can program better and am older than them. PhD is useless for a job.

    4. Re:Online degrees perfect for salary increases by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Funny

      PhD is useless for a job.

      I guess you never got the memo.

      First there's the BS degree - and we all know what BS means.

      Then there's the MS degree - More of the Same.

      Finally, there's the PhD - Piled Higher and Deeper.

      Unfortunately, there's a lot of truth in that, same as everything else in life, there's going to be a sh*tload of crap to shovel, and you're either the shovel or the crap.

    5. Re:Online degrees perfect for salary increases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the professorial hierarchy, which is as follows:

      1) Assistant Professor. Assists in shoveling the shit.

      2) Associate Professor. Associates himself with shoveling the shit.

      3) Full Professor. Full of--oh never mind; you get the idea.

    6. Re:Online degrees perfect for salary increases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, there's a lot of truth in that, same as everything else in life, there's going to be a sh*tload of crap to shovel, and you're either the shovel or the crap.

      Until you get lucky and are promoted to being the source of the crap!

  60. this is why on-line sucks by nonguru · · Score: 1

    On-line courses compound the cliche of developers being unsocial dweebs. Very few people have the luxury of working in a vacuum; most workplaces demand and need teamwork and cooperation with respect to both clients and colleagues. Part of the learning is the interaction with students and lecturers. Go to a real school and learn...

  61. Do online with a real university by CaligarisDesk · · Score: 1

    Seriously, if the school is only online, you might as well print your diploma from the South Harmon Institute of Technology. I did an online certificate program from a university nearby and it was fairly challenging. The other people in the program weren't idiots and I learned from the assignments. The attrition was somewhat high, though. The program consisted of three classes. At the beginning, there were about 25-30 people in the class. At the end, there was around 10. I can't really say much about doing a BS or MS from an online program. I can see doing an MS online, but getting Bachelor's is mostly about the experience.

    1. Re:Do online with a real university by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'm wary of taking the online offerings from the real university I graduated from (Drexel).

      On the one hand, it's a real school. On the other hand, the temptation to go for the money-grab may be too great.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    2. Re:Do online with a real university by SonnyDog09 · · Score: 1

      I recently completed a Masters in Medical Informatics from Northwestern University online through their School of Continuing Studies. The program was initially offered on campus and online. Since I have a job, and do not live in Chicago, the online option worked for me. They have phased out the on campus version of the program, as enrollment dropped and they could no longer scrape together enough students to justify offering the classes in person. The online version of the program, on the other hand, is booming. I learned a lot in the program, and also learned how much I already new. Many established universities have distance learning options.

      --
      Your "fair share" is NOT in my wallet.
    3. Re:Do online with a real university by Masters+Champion · · Score: 1

      I recently finished a Masters in CS online from DePaul University (a decent brick and mortar college in Chicago) and was really happy with it. Learned a lot of theory that filled in the gaps of my self-taught understanding of a lot of things CS, even though I've worked in CS for 20 years (my BS is in Electrical Engineering).

      All the classes were recorded versions of in-class sections. Being a working father, it was great for accommodating my schedule.

      I initially started the program just to get the piece of paper, but I also found that now that I'm in my 40s, I really enjoy learning. MUCH more than undergrad when I was 20. I would definitely recommend the "online version of brick and mortar" programs at non-profit or state schools. You likely won't get to do research, but I think if you really wanted that, you'd be in a PhD program.

      Other schools I looked at that had similar programs were Colorado State, Stanford, USC, U of Illinois, Texas Tech, Penn State, Arizona State, and (I think) UCLA. Ironically, I decided on DePaul because it was close, but it turned out I never had to be on campus at all. I'm sure we'll be seeing a lot more online programs at most universities simply because it can increase their revenue with little marginal cost. Maybe not for liberal arts degrees which require discussion and face-to-face interaction. But I think for the sciences, and especially CS, the model works well.

  62. Depends who you study with... by Monty_Lovering · · Score: 1

    ... it is interesting that some (Walden) get fairly good reviews with some constructive criticism whilst others (Phoenix) get slated.

    This really tells you all you need to know. A mode of learning (online/campus) can be good or bad. It is the quality of the programme and institution that is important.

    Anyone saying online is useless has either been burned by a bad experience or doesn't know what they are talking about.

    Obviously no University is perfect. Both campus-based and online Universities will have Instructors who don't give students what they deserve, but the test of an institution is in how they react when a problem is raised, as the example above shows.

    So, for satisfaction in online learning look for;

    > Accredited/recognised degree equivalent to campus-based degree
    > Small classes taken by Instructors with suitable academic and professional experience
    > Support to students (advisors, tutors, online library)
    > Well-developed programme (an Institution that is just starting out with online is NOT a good bet, a programme that is going through its first couple of intakes will have kinks that need working out but that's true of on-campus too)
    > Lots of interaction with other students (can be asynchronous in DBs)
    > Continuous assessment and weekly feedback of grades
    > Safeguards against plagiarism
    > Dissertation (course work and weekly essays are one thing for a smart person to bang together (on campus or online), a 15,000 word dissertation requires seven months of real work and really tests you).

    The big benefit of online is you can carry on with work and family commitments. You study with people who want a degree that allows them to carry on with work and family commitments. So (for example) on a campus-based MBA you can have twenty-year olds in your class. On a good online MBA programme, you will typically have far older, more experienced students, which is great - peer learning is part of the Masters experience. You also tend to have more Instructors who are professionally active as well as just being Academcs, which is a good thing.

  63. This problem is present with brick and mortar too. by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

    Part of the problem with college is that you have to suffer through years of BS in order to study what you are interested in. Francis Bacon got his law degree at 14, and he was by no means an exceptional student.

    We are retarding our growth by limiting our rate of education. Please explain to me why a Business major needs 4 years of college to learn how to bullshit their way to the top.

  64. If it is a complete school environment by Asaf.Zamir · · Score: 1

    From personal experience, the thing that I felt really lacking is the social aspect of studying with people. Basically, you are on your own, but it's not just a course or something like that. It's your entire day passing by without contacting fellow students and studying together. I found it very difficult, perhaps some people won't.

  65. In this case by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    You're paying for a piece of paper that says you can complete assigned projects on time and of average (or better) competency. In most cases it doesn't really matter what you know, since you either already know it, or will learn it on the job. Your future employer is simply paying you more since you're already prequalified to be able to handle whatever project(s) they throw at you, and be able to expect you to finish them in a timely manner. If you're still convinced that being smarter than the average bear makes you a unique snowflake, get an appointment with the dean of that department and have him sign off on letting you bypass those courses.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  66. Confusion by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    When I first saw the title, I thought it was talking about one's first porn encounter.

  67. don't waste your $$$ by db10 · · Score: 1

    To become proficient, you have to work real projects and eliminate the fear of the unknown that pervades the IT industry. To be frank, there is enough knowledge out there, in easy to learn formats (head start, wrox, ms press etc) that if you are self motivated you can pretty much master different areas of study. But when you are tasked to design/redesign/extend real systems, the best path is experience coupled with the over-abundant knowledge and resources that are out there ripe for the plucking. An entry level job coupled with a desire to learn will kickstart your career. Moreso, a degree from a reputable University. If you are looking for shortcuts with these flim-flam on-line outfits, then you lack the fundamental desire to learn and succeed.. Take a loan, earn a scholarship, max out your credit card, flip burgers and put yourself through college. It really is the fastest track to gaining credibility and putting yourself ahead.

  68. Nothing to do with online.... by Skylinux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I had to take several classes where the teacher told me that I could teach this class.
    That is the problem when you have been working in the field and are now trying to join a system designed to start from zero AND to make money first.

    Awesome world we live in, is it not?

    --
    Everyone who buys Wild Hunt will receive 16 specially prepared DLCs absolutely for free, regardless of platform.
    1. Re:Nothing to do with online.... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there's an online university somewhere in the Cayman Islands that would suit your needs quite well.

  69. Open University? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone have experience with Open University in the UK?

    1. Re:Open University? by PBoyUK · · Score: 1

      I'm going into the third year of the Open University BSc in Computing. Certainly better than my previous experience in Higher Education at a traditional B&M uni.

      It's heavily focused on Java, but some of the more theoretical modules employ their own custom language to focus on the modules fundamentals instead of opening it up to the unnecessary complexity of all of Java. The default pathway in the Computing course is a tad light on theory as opposed to practice, but outside of the compulsory modules you can pick other related ones from the Technology side of the school, so I'll be picking one on Processors that's highly reviewed by past students to round out the course in that respect. The course materials are of high quality thus far, and the tutors have all been excellent so far.

      I also appreciate their approach to Tutorials - as it's a distance course, there are several meetings scheduled throughout the module where a tutor and students can meet for several hours to discuss progress so far, and have any questions answered. Often the results of the tutorials are recorded and made available via podcast for those that couldn't make it. But yeah, I'd definitely recommend the OU to others.

    2. Re:Open University? by Deb-fanboy · · Score: 1
      I can also highly recommend the OU. I have been studying with them since 2006 and I will be getting an Honours Degree in Information and Communication Technologies completed in the 2nd half of this year.

      I have found most of the courses pretty enjoyable, and the most recent section on computers is very well set out and a pleasure to do.

    3. Re:Open University? by kaiidth · · Score: 1

      Yup, studying dead and living languages. Their teaching for dead languages is excellent, the tutors are experts (but then, only 300 people a year study ancient Greek at the OU, so it is not surprising that they can easily find enough experts to tutor the course). Their teaching for living languages is relatively unexciting - as far as I can tell the 'Advanced' level is about equivalent to level B2 of the Common European Framework of Reference, and while tutors are native speakers in most cases, they're usually not academics or researchers. That's fairly unusual in my experience, but apparently the rules are somewhat more relaxed regarding who gets to call themselves 'associate lecturer' in languages than they might be in certain more technical areas.

      The level of attainment would be more disturbing if I hadn't just read a paper that lamented the fact that education in modern languages across the UK is systematically underperforming, with students achieving a limited vocabulary compared to advanced students from other European university systems. The OU therefore is simply conforming to national standards, but it is unfortunate, meaning presumably that if you want to further your language studies beyond B2 or so, studying in the UK may not be the way to do it.

      I've also been a little disappointed with the fact that there is no real opportunity to do any research in modern languages during the degree - there's no obvious 'undergrad dissertation' or research module, and although there is the chance to write an extended-length essay in your modern language of choice, you have to pick one of a small number of topics (~5 choices) on offer. This is presumably to facilitate marking, but it's a real shame since it means that the student cannot focus on their area of choice. I imagine there are ways to get this sort of thing to happen, but another problem with the OU is that the people who answer the telephone are pretty much just a helpdesk, and therefore it's often hard to find a way to get the course you want.

      So: at worst, infinitely better than no course at all -- you get a certificate; any practice is better than none, and even the worst courses are an opportunity to improve if you decide to put in the effort; and it's increasingly difficult to find language courses in the UK, so congratulations to them for giving us any chance at all of learning. At best, the OU can be an extraordinarily good experience. Many tutors are experts in the best sense of the term - well-known researchers, authors, full of domain knowledge and only too happy to share as much as possible with you.

      Although that might have sounded negative, the experience is, overall, the best thing to have happened to me in years. I'm kicking myself for not having tried it a long time ago.

    4. Re:Open University? by pspahn · · Score: 1

      As the original Ask Slashdot poster, the idea of OU is intriguing. Unfortunately, one click into their website returns, "An error has occurred, please try again later." Not exactly a good first impression.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    5. Re:Open University? by OutOfMyTree · · Score: 1

      It is definitely worth looking again.

  70. Something Positive too by ashraya · · Score: 1

    While everyone here seems to be quite negative about online learning experiences, I have somewhat positive experiences with the UoL Online Laureate program. I have completed 6 subjects there in pursuit of a Master's degree, and am fairly happy about it.
    With 15 years of experience in in the industry, I was cynical about the 'learning' part of it too. It is true that in some of the courses, the fellow students have nothing to offer and the discussions tend to remain shallow, but it depends on the instructor also who acts as the moderator. For example, in one of the modules which was programming oriented, I was sure that I would learn nothing new about programming itself and the moderator wasnt too great either, so it was boring. However in another module about networking which is my strong suite, despite the feeling that the other students are not up to the mark to make the discussions interesting, The moderator is making the discussions interesting by posing wonderful questions and stimulating the conversation.
    I have also learnt to moderate my comments and picked up soft skills of presenting an answer without being condescending, which is helping me at my work also. From being known as the blunt guy who cannot control his emotions, I was recently called as a 'voice of reason' in resolving a dispute, which is a huge improvement for me in growing in my career. It is possibly the soft skills that are more importantly learnt for the experienced guys participating in online learning. YMMV, but I am definitely better for joining this trend.
    Ashraya

  71. Forget Online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have studied at:
    1. A US high-school
    2. A Japanese High-school
    3. A US Community College (Including one online class)
    4. A US Private University (Mostly in class, but a few online classes)
    5. A US "On-line school"
    6. A US Semi-Public Grad School
    7. A Japanese Grad School

    So I know a thing or two about schooling. The online classes I took weren't as bad as I expected, but the quality was not as good as most in-class experiences.
    The bar for admission to online-only schools is almost always lower than for "real" schools, and there is less commitment from the other students. Even for the normal schools, online-only classes tend to be of lower quality for a variety of reasons. Perhaps in the future when there is a 30-way simultaneous real-time audio/video link, this won't be true anymore, but it is now.

    As for the computer being the ideal way to study about computers - How so? Usually in computer classes in school, you can use the computer while the professor talks. If you have to be using the computer for the communicating part, you can't be using it effectively for the lab part at the same time, unless you have several screens and what-not. Technology is something that can compliment education, but not replace it.

  72. Online is a student loan scam by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unless you are going to get a ton of money do not bother with online courses.

    Part of this movement is a big scam to get people like yourself in debt that you can't bankrupt yourself out of and can't scale back. CNN reported alot of these phony online courses simply put you debt that you have to pay up to $600 - $2,000 a month and do not get you the dream job to pay for the degree.

    I may sound cynical but my wife and I are about to go broke and go hungry because of our $2,300 a month in student loans that we can't get out of unlike other loans. We made more money at minimum wage because 70% of her income did not have to go to her masters degree.

    Go to a real university but watch your back as you make sure the degree you obtain gets a job that can pay for it.. Part of the reason for going to college is to gain network connections that can help you land a job out of college. There are a lot of sharks in the university market and it is looking similar to the housing craze of 5 years ago. Online learning tops it as they mostly charge you but offer little benefit in return. The people at HR really do not care if you have an online degree or not. They care about experience. My wife got a real degree too and it only caused us misery. Online programs are costly too and offer an inferior education in return. If you put in the money make sure you get the right results and connections.

  73. Why do they call it "web design"? by romania · · Score: 0

    I mean look at the sites around... every dork with an unlicensed dreamweaver installed computer becomes a "designer". Scripting 2-3 lines in JS or PHP also promotes you to "web programmer". How come?

    --
    http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  74. check out The Open University by fantomas · · Score: 1

    The Open University has over 200,000 distance learners world wide. It frequently gets high ratings in student satisfaction surveys - for three years running it was the highest rated UK university by this measure (beating off Oxford, Cambridge, London, etc). In the UK at least courses from the Open University are recognised as equivalent to those from other good universities, it's not a mickey mouse correspondence place like some "distance universities" but rigourously examined and with its own postgrad and PhD programmes. It's not the cheapest but you pay your money and you get what you pay for. This page seems to tell you about some of the courses aimed at US students.

    1. Re:check out The Open University by Some+Bitch · · Score: 1

      The first course listed on the courses available to the USA page is "Challenging obesity", this amused me greatly :)

  75. Ask and ye shall receive by fishexe · · Score: 1

    It is also difficult when fellow classmates clearly have very little intelligent input to offer and our online discussions are reminiscent of an AOL chat room. While it is possible simply to attend a local school in person, I would much prefer an online environment...

    aaaaand...you get what you asked for.

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    1. Re:Ask and ye shall receive by Stumbles · · Score: 1

      Well on-line classes from an accredited college is not exactly cheap. They can be several thousand dollars per course, so your flippant response shows a great deal of ignorance.

      --
      My karma is not a Chameleon.
    2. Re:Ask and ye shall receive by fishexe · · Score: 1

      Well on-line classes from an accredited college is not exactly cheap. They can be several thousand dollars per course, so your flippant response shows a great deal of ignorance.

      How does price have anything to do with my post? Your non-sequitur response shows far more ignorance.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  76. Get lessons from a Phd student ... by sourcerror · · Score: 1

    and read the books.

  77. Am Happy w/ Online Degree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My local community college offers complete degree programs online, so you might be able to go to a brick and mortar based school via an online format.

    I did two years for an associaites at my local community college, then transferred to a DETC ( http://www.detc.org/ ) accredited online university to complete my bachelors degree at American Sentinel University. I was very happy with their Information Systems program and have had employers and potential employers recognize that earning a degree online shows you have personal initiative in getting the work done without having a more traditional formal class structure to motivate you. At the time I attended, you could rush through classes you already understood well, but then slow down on the classes you didn't. I've been very happy with my degree, and it has opened many doors and opportunities for me.

  78. Whatever happened to UoSNY? by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

    Before ubiquitous computers, there was the University of the State of New York. It had a huge correspondence degree program that was originally built around and catered to the needs of armed forces veterans. There was quality instruction and real learning available. When you got a degree from them, it was a real degree.

    Of course, there was an overwhelming emphasis on writing skills since it was a *correspondence* school. Still, it wasn't a diploma mill like most or all of the online colleges I've been able to find out about.

    I don't know if the USNY program still exists or has changed names or something, but the last time I tried to Google for info, I got nothing that seemed related to the old correspondence degree program.

    Are they still around?

    Does *any* HIGH quality distance learning program still exist?

  79. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You get what you pay for. There is no free lunch. Degree mills give you paper degree minus your time and money. Learning takes places with networked classmates. Face to face learning from experienced instructors is the only way to learn and form friendship. This is important for developing social skills and learning to prevent scams. There is no short cut. A real dynamic teacher with industrial experience is worth a ton of gold. Even big name universities who tape and give online courses give you only illusion of learning. References, networking and life long friendship plus an opportunity to meet some great minds is not part of any online course. Grow up.

  80. Re:Everything you need to learn is already availab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree to this all the way. I too took online courses, and they were very..stupid, to put it simply. But be sure to also derive knowledge from such courses offered online. Odds are you're going to learn a lot more, have more experience in any one particular area (or some experience in ALL areas), and be better off after passing the course. If you feel like the course online is boring you, try learning it from three different sources. In this regard, you really do get a sense on what's being taught.

  81. Sadly, a good idea was destroyed.. by axafg00b · · Score: 1

    I was an online facilitator for UoP from 2001 to 2002. I taught an intro course that went into the SDLC, and had a good time with it. A few of the students were not prepared for the work, but overall there was good participation and good feedback from both students and support faculty. I stopped due to family issues, and when I tried to jump back in a couple of years later, there was no interest in having a former, well rated facilitator on board.

    In my last class, I had both a woman who lived in Idaho who was 2-3 hours away from a bricks and mortar school and a Navy seaman stationed in Guam. RIght there is a powerful argument for effective distance learning. Sure, some of us did do the "college experience" and we wouldn't trade what we remember for anything (and trust me, there are some things I really don't remember!). However, schools need to take back the online/distance learning franchise for those people who truly wish to increase their knowledge but cannot make the physical commitment to travel to a set location. Of course, many of these traditional schools like the endowments that help them build the ornate business schools or mall-like student centers because they can use that for advertising and for jacking up tuition.

    In any case, someone in Education needs to do this right and not as a ripoff.

    --
    I think, therefore I am - Rene Descartes; I yam what I yam, an' that's what I yam - Popeye
  82. Kaplan University by ElusiveMind · · Score: 1

    I get my degree from Kaplan University in about 2 weeks and while it had it's ups and downs, my experience was mostly positive. Sure there were some idiots in the class and even one student who complained because she "couldn't write her paper in anything but ebonics" but those were the exceptions as opposed to the rules.

    I made some friends that I keep in touch with via facebook and twitter who have similar interests and career goals and it's also been a great networking opportunity.

    I put in a lot of time, but it was worth it. I graduated with a 3.85gpa and get all my degree honors in Chicago on August 7th.

    I've not done any other online school - but because of being a single dad with a full time job and limited ability to be in a "real physical" classroom, it worked out well for me. I was in class for two and a half years and yeah, it was expensive, but I learned a lot and I grew as a developer and learned some a lot of things I would not have known ordinarily.... so I have to say my experience overall was very positive.

    1. Re:Kaplan University by Dravik · · Score: 1

      Did you get your degree in 2 weeks or 2 years?

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    2. Re:Kaplan University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you get your degree in 2 weeks or 2 years?

      I believe it meant "I graduate with my degree in 2 weeks."

  83. Internet college sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I get resumes listing internet college, I throw them right into the shredder. Seriously, don't do this. Go to a real school.

    1. Re:Internet college sucks by chasisaac · · Score: 1

      But why? Are you not being short sighted. there are many reasons to go to an online school.

      --
      -- A computer without Windoze is like a choclate cake without mustard
  84. Park University - private, not-for-profit, Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I finished my BS at Park University mostly online. They have a great distance learning program, having done work with the US Military for years and years. Good 'life credits' program, so you could have skipped those basic classes. And the best value in online schools too.
    http://www.park.edu

  85. Western Governors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll put a plug in for my Alma Mater - Western Governors University. You really ought to check them out as they've got a number of IT programs that are InfoSec aligned, including a new MS in Information Assurance. WGU is totally self-driven, has regional accreditation (Northwest Commission). I worked at a public ivy league for a number of years and continually balked at online schools (I'm an academic snob, what can I say). WGU was the first school that proved to me that online schools could provide just as effective an education as brick and mortar. They're also a non-profit, which means a lot to me personally compared to schools like UP which currently has something like 400k people on the books getting student loans.

    Many local schools have finally started catching on too. In Florida, for example, UCF now lists a number of undergraduate and graduate programs that you can attend online. So, make sure you do your due diligence and check them out.

    Most of all, good luck and have fun. Learning is about the journey.

    -WGU Alumn

  86. Its all about the money by kenbo0422 · · Score: 1

    Every one of those schools is offering those courses for one thing, and one thing only: Money. That's why you have to stick with their curriculum to gain their degree. How many of them offer a chance to test out of certain classes?

  87. Online Education is a Joke by cronos1013 · · Score: 1

    ""I am currently enrolled at a very well-known online school. I was hesitant when I enrolled; now more than a year has gone by, and I am regretting my decision. The main problem is that I am not learning anything. I have several years' experience with Web design, yet I was not allowed to bypass Intro to Web Design 1. Similarly, there are other classes on my list that will teach me very little I don't already know, yet will cost me money all the same. Now, I do have a great desire to learn and to further myself academically, but I just don't see much value in continuing to take classes I could have aced in ninth grade. It is also difficult when fellow classmates clearly have very little intelligent input to offer and our online discussions are reminiscent of an AOL chat room. While it is possible simply to attend a local school in person, I would much prefer an online environment as it seems to be a more natural medium considering the content of my studies. I am interested specifically in Information Security programs. What online education programs have Slashdot readers been happy with and considered successful?"" I had exactly the same experience. I first enrolled at the University of Phoenix's online program in January of 2008, determined to get my degree while I kept working full time. I kept with it for 2 years until I had achieved an associates degree, (with a 3.97 final GPA) but my experiences with the program caused me to become completely disillusioned with online education. I was faced with a plethora of unqualified teachers. Some didn't know the material; others would suggest corrections to a paper (especially in early communications classes) and then when the final paper was turned in with those "corrections" in place, they would be marked off, and wording very similar to the original content was suggested instead. I had a teacher actually take points off an assignment because she (her words) "didn't agree with the viewpoint from which I wrote." According to her syllabus, assignment wasn't one in which the side of the argument mattered; rather the effectiveness of the persuasive portion of the paper was to be graded. Now she took no points off for my argument, it was well constructed, supported with credibile facts, and she even noted as much! The class participation portion of the classes was a joke too. We were to have a forum discussion on specific topics. That is all fine and good so long as the people with whom you are having the discussion have more than a fifth grade education. How did these people get into college? Their writing is reminiscent of the papers I turned in to my middle school teachers. It was always filled with incomplete sentences, piss poor grammar, and clearly plagiarized materials with no references given. I figured that this would go away once I had gotten through the first couple classes, after all there HAD to be some sort of system in place to filter out those who really shouldn't have college degrees right? Totally wrong...in fact, the overall quality of the education was steadily plodding downwards as I progressed through the courses. Group projects were the last draw for me. Once a student completes an associate’s degree, he or she is transferred into the bachelor's program. In that program, a good portion of a student's grade has to do with group projects. Be prepared to get grouped with people who are absolutely useless. Not only will you be plagued with members who can't write past a 5th grade level, but you will have people who just don't do anything. It was a regular occurrence for me to have to do nearly the entire group project myself, to ensure my GPA didn't suffer. Now not every student in these classes are idiots, there were a few with whom you could have GREAT discussions, and not all of the teachers were useless, but the majority of both groups were. By time I had made the decision to withdraw, I had realized that while online education does have potential, it requires those involved to care about more than getting a paycheck for it to become successful. -Chris

  88. You are wrong, education is social by Weezul · · Score: 1

    There are decades of education research showing that education is largely a social activity for most students, see the Berkeley’s Professional Development Program by Uri Treisman and Leon Henkin for example. Any online school offers very little interaction, thus disrupting the education process for most students.

    You'll learn more if you study with better students and/or better professors, but an online school gets weaker students and faculty, especially for-profit schools.

    Also, graduate work requires understanding material that isn't well laid out in the literature, meaning you'll never learn it on your own, only by combining reading and doing with talking to more experienced people. OP doesn't say if he's after grad or undergrad, just saying.

    To answer the OPs question, yes you'r online degree program may very well suck ass, especially if it's a for-profit institution. In fact, an online degree from a for-profit school like University of Phoenix will often be viewed as worse than no degree.

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    1. Re:You are wrong, education is social by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I had a nice long reply for you but it probably won't make any difference in your judgmental world-view. You dog on online schools like they are a plague that is corrupting the holy bastions of traditional universities.

      That's the problem with modern education- it makes people think that they're better than everyone else. Quit sniffing your own farts and realize that it's not all black and white- it's a piece of paper.

      You are really no better than a racist - only you discriminate against educational pedigree. And you're an arrogant fuckwad.

      This message brought to you by a person with a masters degree, who's wife is a veterinarian, who's sister is an MD, who's father teaches as a tech school, who's friend is a PhD and former dean, and who's other friend has a GED and works construction.

  89. You get what you pay for and what you invest in. by staynegative · · Score: 1

    Sure, if you've been working in the field chances are you'll already know a good bit of the material in core classes, particularly the lower level courses. On the other hand, having the piece of paper is critical in many situations - so it's important to stick to it. Now, I will add one caveat and note that you get what you pay for - if you selected a college that is not well regarded then shame on you for taking the quick/cheap/easy way out.

    I too have worked towards a degree (my masters) using online educational programs, but unlike you there aren't too many places to attain this locally without drudging through extended travel and adverse weather to attend class. I went the route of UMUC (University of Maryland) for my online Masters study because they are well regarded in online studies and have been at the forefront of online education. They are also a well known education institution. I also studied online through Michigan State University for a Graduate Certificate program.

    With the wealth of schools offering online classes, you can find a place that will challenge you every bit as hard as a traditional school and will provide a degree that stands up to the riggors. I put in my time, I invested in myself - and I laugh in the faces of anyone that would discard my education for being online as I know I can run rings around them.
    -JC

  90. Depends on your experience (or the effort you put) by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    You will experience the same problems with other types of educations. You only study to get the paper, if you want to learn stuffs do it by yourself.

    Speak for yourself brother.

    It all depends on the value of the paper and the effort you put in. I'm currently doing a MS in Computer and Electrical Engineering with Worcester Polytechnic Institute (a reputable engineering school up in MA), all online, and I'm certainly getting an education. The professors I've had all have years of industrial and DoD experience and the teaching material and lectures do show it. Things we have had to learn included developing testing plans for artillery equipment, cryptography (including an analysis of new commercial ciphers), and case studies with real meat on them. I'm sure I could have picked up the barebones material by self-study, but it does pay to have a good professor that knows his stuff backed with a typical brick-and-mortar university with a strong engineering focus.

    I don't know about you, but I'm going to school for the paper on the condition that paper is getting me something. As of right now, it certainly does.

    Same when I was doing a MS in Computer Science 10 years ago. I can only think of one class that really didn't have an immediate impact in my work (Semantics of Programming Languages). But every other course (Software Architecture, Networks, Algorithms, Compilers, etc) plus the graduate research I did (performance and security characteristics in distributed systems), in cooperation with a real brick-and-mortar business that was participating in the research (a health care related business to be specific), all that has certainly helped me.

    Five of the jobs I've had (including the one I have right now), I got because of the research work I did 10 years ago. I've actually used what I've learned in grad school. I consider myself an intelligent, driven person, but there is no way I could have learned what I learned without having gone to school and be under the teaching of experienced people. If someone can do that all by himself with self-teaching, I tip my hat to him, he's a genius.

    I'm not, and neither are most of the people. Many of us need a structured approach to learn something. Better yet if we get someone who knows it well. So you have as the only recourse to work it for the paper. And here is where due diligence pays. If you only go for the paper, then you are simply going to the motions. And it is fine if you know this a priori (say you need a piece of paper to help you get a promotion.)

    But if you really think the paper is all there is, that's you. Not the education. You. In education, be it in a classroom or online, you get what you put in... and I'm not taking money. I'm talking intention.

  91. Re:Everything you need to learn is already availab by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

    MIT OpenCourseware's content is highly variable. Some (a few?) courses are pretty complete, even with full lecture video or audio, etc.

    Others have, maybe, lecture slides (lacking context for the points made) and a syllabus, which often isn't quite enough to work with.

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  92. My Experience... by BinaryCipher · · Score: 1

    I graduated from Norwich University (http://infoassurance.norwich.edu/) several years ago with a Master's degree in Information Assurance (MSIA). The program was all online with the exception of the last week of classes being held at the university. The school's physical location is in Northfield, Vermont and is both a military and civilian based school. The university is recognized by the NSA and DHS as a National Center for Academic Excellence (http://www.nsa.gov/ia/academic_outreach/nat_cae/institutions.shtml#nh).

    The MSIA program was very rigorous and I learned a great deal. The professors are leaders in their field. As for the program, we were required to write a 1000 word essay every week based on our lectures and reading material. We were also required to participate in online discussions and answer questions posed by the professor. Our weekly readings were relevant and current to the IA field. At the end of every seminar/course, we had a paper due that was 5000-10,000 words in length. The paper was based on an actual case study organization that we chose. I believe the program is top-notch and I learned a great deal about Information Assurance. You will definitely spend around 20 hours per week on school related work. For a year and a half, I was glued to my computer and course work. At graduation, we all joked about what we were going to do with the extra time we now had. While the program was all online, I feel a bond with the others in my cohort and the university. I never had this relationship with others in my undergrad classes, which was earned while attending classes in an actual classroom. It is very hard to explain, but it is all worth it in the end.

    I believe the MSIA program at Norwich is what has made me quite successful today. I worked at a government agency for several years before landing my current position at a well known university as an information security analyst that is also accredited by the NSA & DHS. Both of these positions recognized my MSIA degree from Norwich as one of the key hiring factors in their decision making process. The University is well respected and I believe I am making a name for myself in the information assurance / security field.

  93. My experience by Jupiter+Jones · · Score: 1

    I finished out my Bachelor's (from having an Associate's) completely online at an established, bricks-and-mortar state school (Troy). Now MIT it ain't. But it's regionally-accredited, and the price was right. Overall, it was a good experience, and, for the classes that weren't already old hat for me, I did learn a lot. Some professors were good, others not so much. Some were fantastic.

    Yes, I had to take some classes I could probably have taught. But as others have said, that's pretty much how it is everywhere. Remember: Getting your degree is only partially about learning new things. It's also--perhaps mostly--about getting proof that you've learned things. Many classes are more about demonstrating knowledge (by passing) than about gaining knowledge. It's a big, fat certification.

    And yes, I had some classmates whose class postings would make me wonder not only how they managed to get admitted to college, but how they even graduated high school in the first place. Some would even copy-and-paste their posts directly from Wikipedia--underlined links and all. Ugh.

    But there are goobers in B&M classes too. You just don't normally get to read or hear what they have to say. They have the option of participating very little in class and just turning in their papers directly to the prof. In an online class, there's usually a specific participation requirement in terms of number of posts, etc. You see a lot more of everyone's written work.

    When it comes down to it, all education is self-education. No one can educate you--they can only facilitate you doing it to yourself. If you want to stay where you are, then go for it. Trudge along, get the grades, learn what you can from the textbooks and elsewhere, and get your "certification."

    JJ

  94. depends by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    I took two undergrad classes online, Intro to Political Science (my major) and Business Writing. All course materials were posted on Blackboard, and I do not recall any classroom time. My grades in those classes were atrocious, partially because the distraction of the Internet while trying to do the coursework was too much as a 20-something year old student. Obviously, YMMV, but I don't think you can beat having an actual live instructor teach you the material (even something as dull as a writing course).

    Depends. I took an intro course on AVR-based embedded systems with UC Berkeley, all online just a few months ago. I had to drop the class since I'm also doing a MS in Computer and Electrical Eng, plus work... and a baby. But the material was good, lectures and discussions were all on a blackboard which we just have to follow while working with the required hardware we bought and had at home for the course. A great deal depends on what we put in, but it also counts the subject and the school.

    A good professor will make any class venue (including smoke signals) work. A shitty professor will make your life suck, even if in a typical brick-and-mortar setting.

  95. Does not compute by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1
    To the OP:

    While it is possible simply to attend a local school in person, I would much prefer an online environment as it seems to be a more natural medium considering the content of my studies. I am interested specifically in Information Security programs.

    Uh, it is with that nature of the program that you might want direct interaction with people. That is, unless you already have work experience in software/IT and experience in a real-life, brick-and-mortar school settings. I'm back in grad school, and doing it all online. It is good, but I don't think I could get as much juice of it if I didn't already have a learning experience in a real classroom (both grad and undergrad.) I'm a big proponent of quality online education, but I do acknowledge there are limits to what you can do with it.

    1. Re:Does not compute by pspahn · · Score: 1

      B&M is a possibility, like I said, it's just not ideal. I live in Denver, and with few exceptions, the type of program I'm looking for is not offered around here. This is still very much a cow-town.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  96. Re:Everything you need to learn is already availab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm ... I think Khan Academy is strictly focused on math, science and economics - and a smattering of the "history of Haiti" ...

  97. Get past the first 3 or 4 classes... by wighed · · Score: 1

    Once you get past the first 3 or 4 classes, you start to find that the instructors are actually professors again, usually, depends on the course I suppose, and the school. I tried U of Phoenix, and hated the curriculum, so I switched, tried Art institute of Pittsburgh, also, not a fan of the curriculum as much, and finally found myself attending Colorado Technical Institute online division. It's a real school, and they have an online division, and they're accredited. The virtual campus website is terrific, and they offer great labs, and after the first several courses, which are usually for online schools, all introductory anyway, I started to learn something. Can someone teach themselves, sure, but it's easier for me to have a professor I can contact and chat with, over the phone, online, or via email, to get a better understanding of things. I can teach myself Java for example, but logic and set theory are better studied with someone that knows what they're doing and has experience, and can critique your work. Also, Programming concepts and troubleshooting is more of a theory class, but it's not something you learn from a book alone that just teaches you a programming language. So I don't feel the online experience is much different than the standard college I went to for my Associates all those years ago, and going for my Masters now doesn't feel like a joke. When you have to write 3 to 8 page papers for a discreet mathematics class twice a week every week for 5 weeks, and the professor actually reads them and grades them according to what you know and write, I don't see it as a waste of a course. When you are expected to write classes and methods for the sake of other student's critiquing your style of writing code to discuss as well sticking to standards, I don't see that as a waste either. I find that it is just like a normal campus college, only I have the flexibility of attending my class at the hours I choose, so long as I still get my work done on time and correctly. I find less bureaucracy involved online as well than I did with a traditional campus college.

    --
    WWJD? (What Would Jonas Do? - Spinward Fringe by Ran
  98. MTSU & RODP by Little+Brother · · Score: 1

    In Tennessee many of the state colleges are under a single authority called the Tennessee Board of Regents. The board a few years back instituted an online program called, quite imaginatively, the Regents Online Degree Program, or RODP.

    You will have much LESS of the problems you were mentioning at such a school, since the regents do not wish to water down the name of every member school. Furthermore, if you enroll in any member school, you can take as many online classes as you want, so the thing to do would be to enroll in the physical school, talk in real life to professors to get department approval to skip the low level classes and enter the higher level classes directly. This will NOT save you time, as you will still need the same number of hours to graduate, but it WILL make it so you are learning more while they are siphoning money away from you.

    The only problem is that the only Board of Regents school I ever attended, MTSU, has a really crappy CS department. (I literally had a professor tell me my Linux box was not possible in the late 90's)

    If you can find a similar situation elsewhere, or if one of the other TBR has a better computer program, it would be a good thing to look into.

    --

    Little Brother, watching the watchers

  99. Dude its the game . . . the game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A college degree from regular colleges (meaning colleges that are not MIT), only means you persisted with the incompetence of the people who made up the degree plan. After 20+ years programming, I went back for my BSIT and if you insert a well placed 'H' there you'll understand what its worth. I aced everything summa cum laude (or whatever the top is) honor society, blah blah. Yes the majority of the other students, not all though, are dolts and THEY will get ALOT out of the courses. You, however, have to play the game. Just AGREE with the instructor. Quit whining, pay the fee and do better than they want. Sometimes you'll get a top instructor like I did with Doc Robinson, worked on Tokamac, flew jets in VN, Senioe Fellow at Motorola. He was interesting and we had great discussions.
    Online classes give you access to instructors that would have never taught you.
    Stick it out and get the degree. Its a metric only pinheads use to "measure" you to see if you're "qualified" for a job. Sorry, but that's the way it is.
    You and all slashdotters need to open up businesses and hire people like us that are self taught and pushed ourselves to new levels of knowledge.
    Cheers,
    -T-

  100. My Online Experience Pretty Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm attending Western Governor's University which is fully accredited with something like 4 or 5 different boards. My experience has been ideal as all their classes are based almost entirely on what you know. They do provide resources, book lists, and mentors for each course in your degree program but I have only actually purchased a few books and in general went right in and took the exams to get past those classes. Benefit is they also base most of their IT tests on certification exams so if you have them already you can transfer the class away right off the bat otherwise you have the side benefit of getting the certifications at the same time as passing the test.

  101. Re:Self Taught by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I got out of University I wondered why we bothered going to school. When I examined how they pay computer professionals it seemed almost arbitrary. Leaving the school I felt like I had learned everything on my own with books, and the internet. I thought that professors were such a small part of my learning. I wondered why Doctorates got paid so much more than someone with a BS degree and more experience . I asked my friend who received his doctorates why he thought 6 years of school was more important than 8 years of experience. I did not believe his answer until I put in the years and realized he was correct.

    Getting a doctorates is learning for 12 hours a day 5 - 6 days a week. Working is writing the same type of code over and over again to solve the same types of problems for 20 hours a week. Businesses like you best if you don't vary from what you already know. You produce more code if you do not spend time learning about alternatives. The rest of the time is spent doing administrative tasks. By the end of your 8 years you have learned almost nothing compared to someone who spent 12 hours a day focusing on new material. Unless you are spending 6 hours a night after work teaching yourself the new technologies you just end up falling farther and farther behind. The more educated person however knows many more solutions. As they have spent more time learning than doing they can have access to more concepts and can use those varied concepts to solve the same problem quicker with less code.

    In the business world i have found very few self taught individuals, who actually put in the hours learning, and therefore are not as well rounded as someone who graduate with good marks from a quality university.

  102. For Profit by aoshi73 · · Score: 1

    There is a good PBS documentary about this online. It is called "College Inc." Here is the link. http://video.pbs.org/video/1485280975/ Here is a quote from made by Mark DeFusco, University of Phoenix Dir from 1994 thru 2002: "If you take a look at for-profit colleges, the analysts will tell you that anywhere between 20 and 25 percent of the total revenue of a company is in sales and marketing, about a quarter. In most cases, the faculty are in the 10 to 20 percent range." He rationalizes it by saying this: "When I go and buy perfume for my mom, the chemicals in the bottle and the bottle itself amount to about $0.50. The advertising amounts to five or six bucks." This might explain why the quality of teachers might not be that great. And they tend to advertise on high traffic sites like Yahoo Mail or MSN.com to name a couple. You all seen those add that tell moms that "Obama wants you to go back to school." It is very sad how this companies take advantage of the Government, thru student aid, and people in need. They are so quick to sign somebody up for a loan that they won't be able to pay.

    --
    http://nyewin.org http://nyexug.com http://nycsqlusergroup.com http://nylug.org
  103. My experience with AIU by chrishillman · · Score: 0

    I Received a Bachelor of Fine Arts in Visual Communications from American Intercontinental University. That is a fancy term for Graphic Arts or Digital Design/Web Design. I have a very technical background but didn't want to get a technical degree ( I can code but knew the programming degree would be just "can write in C#" and didn't want a technology degree because it would be just "design a network in Visio"). I always wanted to get an art degree but since my parents were going to pay the bill when I first went they wanted something more "practical". So I showed them and flunked out of college.

    Years later I wanted that degree but work and my location prevented a traditional college education. So I looked into an online degree. I found American Intercontinental University (AIU). They were pushy and expensive, but at the time everyone was pushy and expensive (lets face the fact that online schools are there to make money). University of Phoenix wanted you to buy all the books and such, AIU the books and software were free. This is a big deal for graphic arts since they sent me a copy of Adobe Creative Suite, 2 copies of Windows XP and 1 copy of Microsoft Office -- all formats they required but it didn't stop me from doing some projects in GIMP, Blender and Open Office. The AIU classes were online lectures streamed via Adobe Breeze as well as required bulletin board posts. Each week there was a participation grade for bulletin board posts and a weekly project. The projects were intense and I had to work as a designer to meet their expectations, it was like an intense internship at a graphic design house with a picky client. I loved it.

    When it was all said and done I have a big student loan, a degree that confuses people on my resume (15 years as a network manager, with an Art degree). I met someone from my classes who helped me find a great job with a great company in the Washington DC area and moved to almost double my income. In the right area, the right degree and experience will open doors. You will not get an online degree that will open doors all by itself. Landing a cool job has a lot to do with luck (you in the right place at the right time doing the right thing) and desperation (you wanting badly enough to leave your present situation and the employer needing "you"). When all that comes together it is magic.

    Information Security is a hot topic right now, a lot of people are getting into it (including me). Depending on what you want to do with it, learn programming (to the point where Assembly makes sense), learn web development (where you can de-obfuscate JavaScript and see SQL injections), know TCP/IP (so PCAPs make sense) and never stop reading... I am not sure about specific degrees for Information Security. If you are trying to get into the government there are a lot of Federal regulations which are required reading for IA people. I'd focus on the skills the classes teach, as well as considering taking some SANS classes as well as certifications (not just CISSP but maybe CEH or some of the newer and better certifications). Good luck! The most important part is to love what you do so you can do what you love.

  104. What the hell are you doing taking academic by hey! · · Score: 1

    classes in Web Design? That's why God made the O'Reilly menagerie.

    Sure, the occasional "Web Design" class is OK, but "Web Design" classes aren't education; they're *training*. Education is things like art and design theory, cultural history, psychology, marketing and communications, software architecture and so forth. Stuff that is not tied to some product release.

    If you're paying for *training* and expecting to get an *education*, of course you're dissatisfied.

    Now they won't let you place out of "Web Design 1". What does that tell me? You are at an institution that sells education, but provides training. Why? Because an honest training outfit is up front about what they're providing, which is something that will help you in your job for the next two or three years. If you say you don't need "Web Design 1", how can they force you to take it? It's only if "Web Design 1" is part of a required curriculum that you can be forced to take it, and if you've committed to an entire curriculum, why should they let you get out of paying for the classes?

    Think about it: if you're going to commit to something as big as swallowing an entire curriculum, that curriculum should be almost entirely of things that don't become obsolete with the next software release or the Next Big Thing. Web Design elective? Great. Lets you know that the stuff you are learning isn't all theory. Web Design as a core requirement? OK, you're getting a degree with an expiration date.

    I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that the "well-known online school" is the U of P*x. You should really do you your homework before committing to send bundles of dough to an outfit like that. Yes, they are accredited, but they're also a for-profit outfit. There's nothing wrong with profit, but its run with an eye to quarterly profits, and that means spending as little on you (e.g. advising and departmental meetings to substitute useful stuff for what you already know). U of P*x has got horrible labor relations, and before you stand up and cheer for management, you have to realize this means it is notorious for having a transient faculty. I real educational institution has a stable faculty that does scholarly research.

    In any case, U of P*x is so aggressive in marketing, that when I see it on your resume I instantly recognize the name... but it's not the kind of name recognition I have when I see "MIT" or even "Michigan State". I see those names, and I think "educational institution". I see "U of P*x" and I think "spammer".

    So go to the real university, even if it means attending classes in meatspace. Or at least choose an on-line presence of a school that has a real campus and real faculty.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:What the hell are you doing taking academic by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Thanks for you insight. You mention "do your research", and unfortunately, this is a pretty difficult task when it comes to comparing online schools. Go ahead and look up reviews of online schools. It is a mess. Most of the time it is impossible to distinguish which reviews are legitimate, which are shills, and which are just utter BS.

      My choice in school ended up amounting to the least of all evils. I was definitely uneasy about my choice, but between the pressure from my GF to go back to school and the high-pressure tactics used by admissions, I didn't stand a chance.

      Now I'm going through the same thing. There are a couple programs that I'm looking at, but I'm basically narrowing it down to those involved with the NSA Academic Centers for Excellence. Colorado Technical is one of them, but talking with an admission advisor today left me with some of the same emotions I had after talking with the UoPx advisor. Regis University and Denver University are both on the list, though expensive. It is, however, much easier for me to justify the high cost of these schools because I have a lot more faith in their ability to provide a valuable experience. Lastly, Air Force Academy is on the list, but that is not going to happen.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  105. Baker College by Migizi · · Score: 1

    I spent a lot of time researching online schools. I decided that Baker (http://www.baker.edu/) was the best option for me. It's the biggest private, nonprofit, school in Michigan and has a Computer Science program that is worth it. The price per credit is only a little higher than going to a brick and mortar school where I live. I got my Associates in Computer Programming back in December and I'm working on my Bachelors now. The learning is more of a self taught environment. You're given the weekly notes from the instructor, the chapters to read, and the assignments for the week. You have to participate on a forum by answering weekly discussion questions and helping each other out. This works best for me since I'm a visual leaner. I read all the material and do the assignments and take the tests. If I didn't do that I wouldn't be able to pass the class. Most of the instructors have years of experience in the real world work force with degrees to backup their knowledge.

    In my experience Baker does things right. I have a few friends who took a Computer Science degree at the local college. They learned a few different things but their knowledge of the subject is far less than mine. I attribute it to the fact that most of the homework was group projects and they usually let one person do all the work.

  106. find a good brick-n-mortar school that does online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of good schools also have online components. The same profs that teach in the classroom usually also run the online courses. In fact, the online component is sometimes either a recording of in-class lecture or a live video feed, accessed via videocon or over the internet. I got a MS from RPI (http://rpi.edu/) that was challenging and useful. I in no way felt disconnected during my degree program there. Professors were fairly responsive and engaged in personal discussion whenever I felt the need.

    It's a good school, so the type of students enrolled were generally high-achieving. Group work went fine, and if someone wasn't pulling their weight, the rest of us in the group let them know it and straightened 'em out.

    So if the degree is important to you, find a school with a good reputation that has the online program you're looking for.

  107. I could only recommend The Open University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could only recommend The Open University - www.open.ac.uk - fantastic tutors, most courses are pretty good, you have a lot of flexibility in choosing your own curriculum. This particular university was probably the first one to start with the distance learning and the experience shows. Costs a bit of money for us outside of U.K., but I'm working at the same time (in IT), so it does not hurt that much financially. The uni also has a good reputation (at least in UK)

  108. Re:Everything you need to learn is already availab by edremy · · Score: 1

    I've been to a couple of talks by the guys running OCW. Their biggest problem? Copyright, especially for image-based courses. One architecture course had something like 750 images, the vast majority copyrighted. They had to clear every single image one at a time, since almost all of them were by different people. Converting the rest of the material was quite simple in comparison

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  109. University of Phoenix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, first the disclaimer, I worked for UoP in enrollment. Belly of the beast in question.
    Next disclaimer, I don't work there anymore and have little respect for the school as a whole (business and academic).

    Are they crap? absolutely.
    But it really depends what you're looking for.
    If you're not a stay at home baby maker or one of the many self-employed "entrepreneurs" I had to deal with, it's probably not the right school for you.
    The level of education is on par with community college...but you can do it online.
    Oh no! School without a classroom?!
    Hysteria! Panic! Defend your $80,000 bachelors from [respectable state school]! Hide the children!
    Seriously, you thought it would be a good plan to get a MBA from a school with little pull in the corporate world?
    Don't waste the time or money.

    Enrollment was calling people over and over and over...
    If we got your information, we were told "keep calling." Hanging up on me meant you were just busy. Telling me you're not interested meant you were not interested right now. Two days can really change things!
    In all seriousness, the job encouraged us to call until you cussed at us and told us to stop calling.
    As with any school that gets fafsa money however, enrollment counselors are not paid commission. It's just not allowed. Google UoP lawsuits.

    Now the last, and perhaps most saddening, UoP is the best online school out there...and one of the cheapest.

    Get the paper, do it as cheap as possible, and work on certificates if your field mandates it.
    take a look at apu/amu if you want to do it for 1/2 the cost of any other online schools.
    trust me, it wont matter which online school you went to, they are all considered bottom-stack when you're talking to an employer.
    your resume will have more pull than a high school diploma or associates from the community college however, so it's not totally worthless...

  110. WGU by shutslar · · Score: 1

    Try WGU.edu It is inexpensive, uses the same online classes as the more expensive online/physical schools, and allows you to test out of classes you may already have enough experience in that it would be moot to sit through the class. The chat & forum tools were equally bad as most other schools. But, I was able to live with them. It was the ability to take the final as soon as you thought you were ready that made it a good fit. Even if that was on day 1 of the class.

    1. Re:WGU by chasisaac · · Score: 1

      Have to agree with this. the other advantage that I missed - you pay by term and not by class. As many classes as you can cram in . . . all the better.

      --
      -- A computer without Windoze is like a choclate cake without mustard
  111. My XP (WGU) by chasisaac · · Score: 1

    I earned a degree from WGU. I also did it in record time. Why? Life experience. I went for a teaching degree. I already had a 4yr degree in an area that was not able to be certified. I did the program that suited me. I needed another BA.

    I was able to whip through the program quickly, because I had already been teaching for three years. I know the core stuff of the degree. I had taught and was able to draw on experiences for the papers on: make a plan to do XXX.

    Time was a another factor. I was able to work at my own pace. Which turned out to be 8-12 hours a day, 5-6 days a week.

    Oh yeah. no problem getting a job. One interview. One job.

    --
    -- A computer without Windoze is like a choclate cake without mustard
  112. Easily spotted issue by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1

    yet I was not allowed to bypass Intro to Web Design 1.

    That's the problem right there. Any educational institution that does not contain prior learning assessments is a money making machine with zero interest in its students. (Either that, or its an American High School.)

    Its basically the whole reason behind Wikibooks/Wikiversity - you aren't railroaded into courses you already took.

  113. IT should be like the other trades with on the job by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    IT should be like the other trades with on the job apprenticeships and more hands on and less filler class. Does a plumber real need to have a 4 year degree to do that job? About about Backhoe and other Construction vehicles operators.

    The cost of school is to high now days and why do you need a BS or MS for help desk level 1? I don't comcast even wants that much to do phone work / sit at a customer sever desk.

  114. My College by Wh15per · · Score: 1

    I have two social science degrees (Bachelors and Masters), and I got bored, and wanted to expand my career horizons, so I'm going back for a bachelors in Computer Science. I started out at the local public community college to knock out some of the math courses I didn't need for my other degrees. So far, I have been shocked at the quality of education. The math courses were alright, but not great. The computer courses however, have been horrific. I had a 96 in the last class I took, and half-butted the final. I got back a perfect on it. I quiried the instructor and told him I knew I had made mistakes on the project (Already had my A, didn't care), and he responde with "Well, you turned something in, which is more then most of your classmates, so I just gave you an A." That speaks volumes about the *quality* of student being produced. I'm sure just turning something in will make my future employers estatic. Then again, compared to the competition in my class, I'm solid gold. Too bad I'll get my ass kicked by some foreigner who has a *real* education. And frankly, I understand completely why.

  115. Re:IT should be like the other trades with on the by chasisaac · · Score: 1

    Do you really want to stay at help desk level 1 forever? Where I work at, the entery level person can have a HS diploma. To get a real promotion you need a BA degree.

    --
    -- A computer without Windoze is like a choclate cake without mustard
  116. Real university online courses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I took online classes (paid for by my employer) at RPI towards my masters in electric power engineering. The classes were either streamed live video and audio of class actually having real students in it, or on a tape delay of a few hours. Homeworks were the same for in class and online students. We even had group projects and presentations to do. A lot of that was done over the phone and with conferencing software online.
    Many real (not for profit) universities allow the general public to take any online classes they want, provided you pay full price (or your employer does). The quality of learning may be higher than for profit universities, and you'll probably have more freedom to choose the courses you want. And like most post grad programs, you probably pick to specialize in what ever you want, provided the courses are relevant to it.

  117. but to just to get to level 1 needs to be lower an by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    but to just to get to level 1 needs to be lower and why need a Degree to move on vs takeing on more and more work on the job and moving up under there setup vs the different set ups in the M$ books?

  118. Classroom vs. Online by HikingStick · · Score: 1

    There are many significant differences between classroom and online learning environments--too many to detail here. And, as has been noted, there are some unsavory institutions out there that are simply milking the online learning cow, without regard for their students (or, in the long term, their own reputations). I taught adult learners in a college environment for five years ('04-'09), mostly in classrooms, but with some online components. Also, I recently completed my own graduate degree in a program that was supposed to have an online option, but I ended up being forced into nothing but online classes for about the final 40% of all my coursework. Thus, I've experienced both traditional and online learning venues, and from both sides of the instructor's desk.

    One of the primary things to realize about most online learning methods is that they tend to be based on androgogical methods (the teaching of adults) versus pedagogical methods (the teaching of children). Most of us are familiar with pedagogical methods--lectures and lots of note-taking, tests, etc. You see, the methods are not entirely invalid in adult learning environments, but it is just that the burden of learning changes. Most associate and baccalaureate programs still include many classes that are aimed at the traditional college student (e.g., 18-22 years of age), and often rely on those methods that were still common in high school, though the amount of work (and expected quality of outputs) should increase. When dealing with adult students, a greater emphasis is placed on leveraging the students' own life experiences, and pulling in real-world examples and experiences to help connect the students with the learning topics. Often, much more reading is required, but there likely are fewer tests, with a greater emphasis on the completion of written papers or other projects that allow the student to demonstrate mastery of a concept. To my knowledge, since most online instruction rose out of adult-education environments, and has since been adopted by schools targeting traditional students, it explains one significant difference. Don't expect online courses to be just like another classroom experience with long lectures, note-taking, and tests.

    Then, another significant difference is the absence of the classroom environment. Even I, who spends much time in the virtual world each week, and has been online since 1992, found that I despised the online learning environment. The reason? No verbal banter--no back and forth. Yes, online classes have attempted to emulate class discussions through the use of threaded discussions and other messaging forums, but, in my opinion, they are a pale shadow of the original. In my own experience, the content of student postings was often defined in the syllabus or weekly assignment, severely limiting the exchange of ideas. Yes, everyone had to put together a coherent post about the topic (and the posts took the place of quizzes or tests), but the interactions were stale and often simply in line with what was expected. Only rarely did anyone (usually me) raise a contrary view. After the initial post(s) for the week, the rest of our participation was similarly prescribed. We had to make x initial posts by one day of the week, and y replies by the end of the week. Some classes (not all) required that you reply to each reply you received. If you were one who tended to post toward the end of each window, that typically meant you'd get little or no feedback.

    That's entirely different from a classroom setting, where an instructor might pose a question and seek responses. Rarely would all students be expected to answer, and the most valuable (in my opinion both as an instructor and as a student) interactions were often when one student would chime in, "I don't buy that at all...", prompting often heated debates. Classroom instructors have long known they must seek to consider different learning styles when presenting materials--lecture and discussion for auditory learners, g

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  119. so-so UOP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being in IT, my schedule was pretty much on call which did not leave me much choice. I took a BS from University of Phoenix. I will say half of the classes were either a waste of time or duplication of other courses. I did have a number of business and statistical courses that I did find valuable (either the course or the research to complete the course).
    The format was indeed like an AOL chat room, with 60% of the "students" who were complete and insipid morons only there to get enough of a passing grade. Most of the "team" projects were completed by 2-3 of the team and the rest just along for the ride. It was not uncommon to have "students" so lacking in a base education, that they could not write sentences. All and all, pretty similar to the vast majority of work places. Not what I wanted to experience, but I did get to avoid the alcohol soaked frat boys/girls with their helicopter parents.
    There are some stellar online universities or universities offering some online content. You do have to qualify and apply just as you would to a brick and mortar.

  120. Online classes in general by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in my 2nd year for a CIS degree. I've benn through half a dozen online classes and dozen or so onground classes. Online classes were identical except for subject.

    8 Weeks Total

    Week 1: Post your bio online and comment on at least 2 of your classmates. Read chapter for discussion next week.

    Weeks 2,3,5,6 - Read a chapter. Instructor will pick one of the following:
    500 word essay
    Assignment from book
    Timed quiz based on chapter
      - Additionally -
    Instructor will post something for online discussion. You must respond to it by midweek and respond to 2 other classmates by end of week.

    Week 4 - Midterm. Instructor picks one of the following:
    Timed exam online
    1000-2000 word essay
    Nothing special, same as other weeks

    Week 7 - Turn in 5-10 page research paper that you've been working on since week 2.
    (optional) read and discuss chapter if they really want to make you work

    Week 8 - Final, almost always a 50+ question multiple choice test online

    Summary:
    Instructor's role is to grade. You'll never see feedback on anything you submit other than a numerical grade. If instructor did provide material to read other than book it is irrelvant to assignments and exams.
    Research paper required
    Don't bother reading the entire book, just use the index for assignments, exams, or read a sub-section for the essay.
    Take on ground classes if you want to learn and get feeback on your work.

  121. GIGO by turdburgler · · Score: 1

    You only get out of an education what you put in to an education. I find it difficult to believe that if you read every chapter of every book (that is required reading) for every class, every recommended scholoarly article, and go beyond and even seek more scholarly articles from their library that you will be learning "nothing."

  122. Park University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went to U of P for a few months, and as other posters have mentioned, ran into the same problems. The coursework consisted of mindless papers, no learning, and I did not feel like I got anything out of the ridiculous amounts of cash I was giving them. I took a C source there which was mostly writing papers and posting in newsgroups (I think only 3 or 4 actual simple programs had to be written over the 5 weeks of "Flexnet")
    I transferred to Park University in Missouri and loved their online program. The courses were well-developed, the instructors were knowledgeable and easy to reach, and the courses were spread over 8 weeks so there was time to actually teach the material. I was impressed with them, even though they are a smallish brick and mortar school with a large online contigent. The professors varied between people at the physical school and those working in the field around the country. I actually felt like I learned somethere there, instead of just being required to make a few postings in newsgroups and write papers. If you want an online program that really teaches, you can check them out at www.park.edu/a href>. I know, sounds like a shameless advertisement, but I figured I would mention a school that does seem to do a good job.

    1. Re:Park University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it seems I failed to pay attention in courses regarding html...

  123. www.lynda.com - Software Training and Tutorials by Saedran · · Score: 1

    If you want to learn about Web Design and it's associated disciplines, I highly recommend http://www.lynda.com./ It's very affordable, and the videos feature top quality instructions recorded by industry professionals. Check it out!

  124. Western Governors University...any thoughts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone have any experience with WGU (Western Governors University)? Seemed interesting as it's completely competency based.

  125. Go WGU! by Grahad · · Score: 1

    I honestly believe for profit higher education should not qualify for subsidized government loans. Why should a company be able to secure government funding for private profit? The conflict of interest is just too great.

    After finishing my associates degree at the local community college (online and brick and mortar), I tried to go to the local state school, but the class schedules were very inconvenient for a parent. After taking a year hiatus, I discovered a not for profit online college Western Governors University.
    If a student already have experience in a given subject, WGU is a great idea. I would not recommend someone try these programs cold. Just like a brick and mortar college, the finals are proctored at a local college or testing facility (online only test are not reputable) for most classes.

    The tuition is very reasonable, less than the state schools. Some of the books are expensive, but that is a universal problem. The IT program has actually been pretty good so far and is unique in that some of the classes also reward industry certifications.

    I do miss the networking, but most of the education is very pragmatic compared to credit hour programs. The things that I am learning have actually been useful to me, even some of the fluffy business classes :P

  126. YMMV by clo1_2000 · · Score: 1

    I had an excellent experience with my online education while obtaining my M.A. in Leadership from Saint Mary's College in Moraga. We had very intelligent discussions online, but it took a bit of time for us to get into the habit of making more informed posts than one would usually see in a online forum. It took a lot of moderating and poking and prodding by the facilitators (teachers), but after 6 months, we reached a comfortable point. I should point out that we did meet face-to-face at the beginning and ending of each module. As to your other issues, you may have picked the wrong program for what you wanted. For my B.A., online program, I was able to "test-out" of beginning classes by writing a 15-20 page paper on the subject I wanted credit for. So, in short, there are online programs out there that work, you may want to attend open-house sessions and talk to graduates to see what their experience was like and see if it suits your preferences.

    --
    "In true dialogue, both sides are willing to change" --Thich Nhat Hanh
  127. Anyone Have Opinions on UMUC? by b0bby · · Score: 1

    I've been thinking about doing a security related degree, and University of MD University College (UMUC) has both a Master of Science in Information Technology: Information Assurance & a Master of Science in Cybersecurity. The Cybersecurity one, to me, looks like it's for people who already work for the government, which is not me, so I'm leaning towards the IA. (The IA has also been around for a while while Cybersecurity starts this fall.) If anyone has any thoughts on either of these I'd be interested. If not, maybe someone else will find the links useful!
    http://www.umuc.edu/programs/grad/msit/information_systems_assurance.shtml
    http://www.umuc.edu/programs/grad/csec/index.shtml

  128. Stanford/SITN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I did my MSEE (mostly) online part-time while working full time, and am pretty satisfied with that experience. I did most of my classes remotely (televised w/homework turnin via courier in the late 90's; later online as that became available), but took a LOA from work to attend full time for one quarter for some business/entrepreneurship electives.

    I'd highly recommend finding a respected/accredited B&M school that has an online option. While many technical classes are fine online, some classes (particularly those with a large discussion component) are best done face-to-face in meatspace.

    It certainly takes more effort to stay actively engaged in online classes, and it's tougher to build relationships with profs/TA's/other students since you're not physically together. At Stanford, I could drop in occasionally to physically meet with others, but still take advantage of the schedule flexibility that comes with an online program.

    Stanford also doesn't make any distinction between online vs. traditional attendance when granting the degree, so there's no potential stigma for going the online route.

  129. Online education is to education... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as phone sex is to sex.

  130. Anon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, check our local comm colleges in your area. A lot of them have on-line classes so you can work towards earning an associates degree from an accredited college. That way, if later on you decide to attend a brick-and-mortar school, you will actually be able to transfer credits you have already earned. Also, there are a number of reputable universities which offer distance learning opportunities in the way of video streaming and on-line courses. I'd recommend checking out Old Dominion University as well, a very reputable university that offers many distance learning opportunities. It looks a helluva lot better on a resume than the University of Phoenix.

  131. Check the rankings... by abramN · · Score: 1

    I'm attending Florida Institute of Technology right now - they have an online program for some majors. I'm getting my BS in Computer Information Systems. Research I did before selecting this school: Does the diploma have "online" written on it ANYWHERE. (no) Is the school ranked? In this case, FIT is ranked by US News and World Report - not the highest but not the lowest either. It also did pretty well on the ROI report published by Business Week: http://www.businessweek.com/interactive_reports/bs_collegeROI_0621.html?chan=bschools_special+report+--+buyer+beware_college+degree:+buyer+beware. Did the college start off with a physical campus, and then add the online extension later? (yes) What you want is a school that offers an online degree in order to attract students from across the country, and not because they can't afford an actual campus.

    1. Re:Check the rankings... by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      I'm attending Florida Institute of Technology right now - they have an online program for some majors. I'm getting my BS in Computer Information Systems. Research I did before selecting this school: Does the diploma have "online" written on it ANYWHERE. (no) Is the school ranked? In this case, FIT is ranked by US News and World Report - not the highest but not the lowest either. It also did pretty well on the ROI report published by Business Week: http://www.businessweek.com/interactive_reports/bs_collegeROI_0621.html?chan=bschools_special+report+--+buyer+beware_college+degree:+buyer+beware. Did the college start off with a physical campus, and then add the online extension later? (yes) What you want is a school that offers an online degree in order to attract students from across the country, and not because they can't afford an actual campus.

      Same here. Going for a BA in Business Admin (w/CIS focus).

      Those were some of the questions I asked when doing my own research. I had considered UofPhoenix, but was turned off by the style of classes and teaching methodology UofP had. I also knew people who went there and their experiences justified my decision.

      It was twenty years since I took any college course when I elected to go to Florida Tech (FIT) Online. So, I didn't quite know what to expect. I even got some ribbing that online classes will be "easy A's". Well, they're not. My first class, Philosophy, was the proverbial "trial by fire". I had a bastard of a professor (who has later earned my personal respect) and dealt with having 1500 word essays each week. I struggled with all of that excessive writing and eventually passed that class with a 90.56%.

      Online classes may seem easy, and in fact, many tests are "open book". However, if you did not read the assignments or view the lectures, about the only way you can maintain a high grade is if you already know something about the subject. Many of the multiple choice questions require a knowledge of the material to answer correctly as more than one answer for a question "could" appear to be correct if you didn't understand the subject matter in detail.

      I discovered that at my age (in my 40's) that I have a much more mature attitude toward my schoolwork and can understand and tolerate the need for study. I'm in my sophomore year now and holding a 3.83 GPA (got all A's and one B so far). I didn't "ace" anything. I struggled for almost all of the 4.0 grade points I've earned, even taking extra credit assignments when offered, then having barely broken the 90% barrier on each class.

  132. a football school degree should not beat a tech sc by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    a football school degree should not beat a tech school.

    why does HR like stuff from schools that are more about sports then class work and not like tech school that are more about IT work then schools that say we have a real good football team.

  133. Some good experiences, some not-so-good by FoolishOwl · · Score: 1

    City College of San Francisco has a lot of online courses, and a lot of hybrid courses that are mostly online, with occasional face-to-face meetings. I found that the quality varied a great deal, but ultimately, it depended upon the instructor.

    There are a few distinctions between online classes and face-to-face classes, in practice. First, there's the quality of the instructor's writing. I had a few instructors who posted notes online that, in scope and quality, were as good or better than our textbooks. I had one instructor who posted almost no notes at all. Second, there's the quality of the online discussion. In that context, the quality of your fellow students' participation is as important, if not more important, than the quality of the instructor's participation. At least sometimes, I found having excellent fellow students made up for having a lousy instructor.

    Finally, last semester I took all my classes online or mostly online, and that proved to be a mistake. There is something to be said for immediate, real-time interaction between an instructor and students, and it takes more independent work to make up for that.

  134. I recommend eClasses.org by ToSeek · · Score: 1

    Reasonably priced, good instructors - I've taken at least half-a-dozen Web-related classes from them and not been disappointed yet.

  135. Advisors generally stink by tys90 · · Score: 0

    I see a trend in the comments I wanted to address. I started reading comments about B&M colleges where people were bored in the classes. If I was bored in a class or it was too easy I just didn't go or put little effort into it. I passed the class with a good grade and moved on. I "wasted" as little time as I could on the class. Now, you might say, that's like wasting money but if you are a full-time student already you can basically take as many classes as your schedule will let you. If you know you will have some easy classes, load up and take other classes. You usually still pay the same amount. Sadly, most advisors won't help you out with something simple like this. I know I ended up taking too light and easy of a load my second semester although it didn't turn out to delay my graduation. However, if you are a part-time student or if the online university doesn't recognize "full-time" status, I can see how this would be very frustrating.

  136. it's all relevant to the candidate by Urd · · Score: 1

    In my experience: Even a college degree is no assurance someone is capable of doing a certain job. I've seen MSc. CS graduates who barely knew how to write a piece of code to give me the average of two numbers. Or how to translate some of what they learned into practicality. I've also seen graduates who were able to perform some mind bending feats.

    The catch is: I've found there are at least an equal amount of CS pro's out there without degrees who can do either as well as the person with the degree. Also in my experience: the best people keep learning new tech/languages all the time and their accomplishments speak for themselves.

    Make sure your resume paints a compelling picture so you get a foot in the door and then show people how good you are. If the company is going to be a good place to work they've probably learned to source and interview properly. Make your accomplishments speak for you.

  137. Thamir Ghaslan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the US experience is bad, but I've enrolled in Open University and love it.

  138. Re:Everything you need to learn is already availab by pspahn · · Score: 1

    Good advice, but in my case, a bit redundant. I am completely aware of the free knowledge. My brain is filled with it. I haven't looked at many of the options you put forth, but I have gone through CS106A from Stanford. I loved it and I actually learned something.

    When Intro to Java came around, I already had a good idea of what to do. I'm not sure the instructor appreciated me posting the video lectures to other students, however.

    While, of course, the primary goal is to learn, I am also interested in the prestige part of school. Prior to my current enrollment, I spoke with other graduates and they mostly had good things to say about my program. I felt relatively good about putting UoPx on a resume. Now, not so much. Hell, if I were checking over resumes, I would definitely give the UoPx candidate more scrutiny after seeing first-hand the types of students that can come from there. I wouldn't ignore them, of course, but I would be wary.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  139. Open University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    As a current student in Open University, Bahrain branch, I'm highly satisfied and will graduate within the next 6 months. Not worried about accreditation as it is backed by the British government, and the middle east branch is backed by royals, most notably al-Waleed bin Talal and the King of Bahrain. Total cost for a 4 year program is less than 8000$. The US can learn a thing or two from this system as its been successful for the past 40 years.

    http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2007/07/open-universities-try-to-bring-college-to-masses201.html

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Open_University

  140. Penn Foster College by Moe1975 · · Score: 1

    Absolutely sucked. I was enrolled in the Electronics technology program, and the material was horrid: tests asked questions that looked for whether trivial information had been memorized, and crucial items were omitted. For example, the test for the unit on batteries did not focus on SAFETY, when, at the technician level safety awareness when working with batteries is of utmost importance. Then, I went into a looooong 7th grade flashback when I found myself in the English unit. They literally have some old women in there who probably retired from teaching Junior high . . . I turned in an essay, and lo and behold, I was told that I "had uploaded the wrong file" (when I had made and honest effort at the thing) as if I had cheated on it . . . I am willing to accept an F if I messed up THAT bad, however, at age 34, in a college environment, I simply will not be treated like a child . . . Materials were late in the mail (according to the post stamp, they had been shipped late) and some of the literature had glaring factual errors . . . My Penn Foster experience was quite negative I am afraid. MOE

    --
    SARAVA!
  141. Re:the schools are for evaluators by lpq · · Score: 1

    schools are primarily for those who evaluate based on your possession of a "pass" from the school.
    Online schools will almost never let you skip classes, because usually, their only income is from those who pay -- and if you skip, then that means 1) they get less money for granting you a 'degree', and 2) the over-all value of their degree (measured in $$ to get degree) becomes less.

    If they all too many people to get degree too cheaply, degree becomes too easy to get and becomes worth less. You might find that you could proficiency through 90% of their program -- and their $10K+ degree program is now only gonna cost you $600 + materials... That wouldn't mess up their system.

    Conventional schools *sometimes* offer proficiency exams to pass through lower level course. They have a mixed incentive. Since part of their income comes from governments, they are often paid, "per-seat-term", with "term"=(1 if attendance >90%; 0 if attendance 90%). Notice how that part of the equation is only based on attendance, and not based on grades. In this sense conventional schools are paid for being babysitters for undertrained "persons". They aren't really (as far as I can tell) given alot of incentive to actually educate the students. Free market doesn't work because there is usually little or no competition for conventional schools -- they often have a semi-monopoly in their geographic market, though freedom may be granted to adults to attend out of their geographic region depending on local rules and situation.

    Conventional schools do have a charter to serve students -- which means they usually create turnover by creating time limits within which you have to graduate, but some have no such requirement or incentive. Depends on school.

    In either case, they don't really have any incentive to actually teach you anything. It's not required. You are just required to fulfill your "educational"[sic] institution's requirements.

    Evaluators -- such as future employers use your being able to complete those requirements as a rough-yard stick of competency, when you have no other measures, or when other measures/assessments are hard to evaluate or compare.

    Obviously, real learning, is a 'self-discipline'. It *CAN* occur at a school -- and if you are lucky course requirements will assist you and make it difficult to not learn, while completing them -- but this is 'luck' based primarily on teacher. As for support by the institution, what does the institute offer to support the instructor? Can he hold students back? Can he fail 30%? Will he? If he does, is he at fault? How is this assessed? [Good luck in determining an objective answer to that!]...

    Meanwhile, you have to determine whether you are disciplined enough to learn in a vacuum. Having other people to bounce ideas off of is useful, only if you get a chance to bounce ideas off of other people. If you have no interactions with people, then a classroom experience (including virtual) is of questionable benefit). Indeed, a virtual classroom could include virtual students, that ask common (but real questions) taken from real world classrooms. They could ask these questions on a classroom virtual whiteboard, where student's ask their questions and everyone in the classroom sees the questions -- so whether someone really asks important questions or not, the virtual shill/students could to make it look like someone was paying attention and someone is asking questions that might make you think -- and to encourage others to ask questions.

    Until schools and educators can have some financial incentive for for your actual learning, any learning, by you, will be a side product of the system.

  142. Find the right school by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

    While this is a brick and mortar school story, it should be applicable to the current age.

    I grew up in Idaho. Idaho is a non very wealthy state, quite conservative. School funding is local, and spotty. The constitution of the state specifies that anyone who graduates from high school has to be admitted to University.

    Some high schools offered only the minimum required courses. Some offered Calculus, 2nd year sciences, advanced English.

    So the university was faced with a wide spectrum of freshmen each year.

    Their solution:

    * The math stream started with Algebra and Trig. If you took Calculus I and passed it, you were automatically credited with the earlier two courses.

    * I walked into Biology 200 -- intro to biology, and was told, "The computer screwed up -- we have 30 more people that the room will hold. Monday will be a test. The top 15 will receive credit for this course, and can take Bio 201 or 202. The bottom 15 will be transferred to Bio 100 -- Biology for people who didn't take bio in high school.

    * ANY course could be challenged. There was a $25 per credit fee which payed for someone to set the test, and a grad to mark it. You could not have more than a third of your credits as challenges.

    This last rule was a shock to certain departments that had a reputation for sand piling -- notably business and education.
    The regents weren't sympathetic, and said that the material for the course content had to be available at the book store or at the Library.

    This then, is the answer for online education. Good placement tests to determine what you know. Modular instruction to fill in the gaps.

    --
    Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
  143. skydive instructor by gert+cuykens · · Score: 1

    Everybody is a professional until they reach the ground with or without a degree, the only reason you want this degree is because you want to proof something. It will not make you a professional.

  144. Data Recovery Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fascinating piece, thanks. Can you expand on the second section in a little more detail please?

    Regards,
    Data Recovery Software
    http://www.datadoctor.biz

  145. Re:Everything you need to learn is already availab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had my A.S. from a 2 year school and now that I've been in the working world for a while, I wanted the 4 yr degree. So, I enrolled at Excelsior College Online. They partner with a number of online universities, so the available course selection is pretty diverse. I took a network security course that was really awesome. Some of the other courses were just requirements for my degree, and they gave me credits for my IT certifications. All in all it was a good experience, albiet expensive. IMHO real world experience is the best measure, but when dealing with HR people, the sheep skin is a must have. Bottom line - It really depends on whether your aim is the diploma, knowledge, or both.

  146. You get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have taught at a community college and at a private, liberal arts college and attended a state university, and let me tell you, you get what you pay for. I imagine the same thing applies online. The amount of money an institution has to spend per student influences the quality of faculty they can hire, and the amount of time that professor can spend working with individual students.

    Most community college teachers and most online college teachers are adjuncts. That's academic speak for "part time." They don't get full benefits and usually are either in grad school or have another job that pays the bills. They are usually intelligent, and well versed in their subject, but they simply don't have the time to devote to teaching as a vocation. At a public university, the professors are well cared for, but their main job is research and publishing. They often approach teaching undergraduate students as if they've been sentenced to community service. Some private colleges are the same way, but their faculty are much more likely to consider teaching their vocation, and the quality of their classes demonstrate it.

    Too often students (and their parents) approach college with a consumer mindset. "We'll pay $X over 4 years and get a degree here, or I can get the same degree here for half price." That logic works if you're buying household appliances, but it's not a useful way of approaching education. You have to think about education like a fan approaches their fandom: you and those you associate with must invest yourselves in it to get anything out. For a few (my brother for instance), self-teaching works. But for the majority of us, we need teachers, mentors and a performative circle of co-learners to support us and compete with. It may be possible to get all of that online, but I don't think anyone has figured it out in a way that matches the effectiveness of real world classrooms and campus life yet.

    If you really want an online program, the best bet is to find a traditional college or university that offers online courses. Often these will also have an in-person element that will require you to spend a limited amount of time on campus. My experience teaching tells me that at least some teacher in-person contact time is necessary. Why? Because you're not just learning a skill, you're learning a way of thinking, a different method of problem solving and analysis, and communication skills. That's the real value of a college degree, and it's usually imparted tacitly rather than overtly and tacit learning is much harder to accomplish through online media.