It depends on how much traffic they collectively receive. If it's just a home box, intended for use by me and me only, then it's more than likely OK to have everything on one box-and work off of it, too! But if you're a site whose logs huge numbers of visits, then you should be more of the "one function, one machine" school, or more: "one function, multiple machines".
>The average user may install some extra dashboard widgets and a driver or two, but I doubt that would add more than a couple seconds to boot time.
The average user? The average user won't plunk down $1500($1000 for the machine, $500 for the minimum ADC level, IIRC) just to rent a computer for 18 months!
Who comissions the study? If it's an OSS advocate, then the study will say that OSS is cheaper. If it's MS that comissions the study, then the study will say that MS is cheaper.
How much illegal file sharing is going on? Depends on who you ask. If you ask the RIAA, they'll tell you that it's running rampant and that for every song sold legally, there are umpteen bajillion swapped illegally. If you believe them, then everyone thinks you're in their pocket. If you believe the founders of Napster(who would say that there's next to none, then everyone believes you're one of the swappers.
It's impossible to get a report without bias. Minimal bias is what we all try for.
Want to get a comment modded funny on/.? Make some reference to porn or the/. effect, and do so fairly soon after the article is posted. And make it on topic.
Here we retrieve the configuration of the ConfigurationManager. In its configuration, it will find which ConfigurationAgent is defined along with the requiered parameters are requiered to initialize it. The Configurationmanager it self actualy retrieves its configuration by using directely the XMLConfigurationAgent.
No, he's ensuring that hardware sales don't fall off in the meantime. Nothing would kill them faster than telling the community that this isn't going to be supported much longer.
You probably could. You just can't do it out of the box. You'd have to do a significant amount of hacking the source code and then recompile. And anytime you wanted to download something from Apple, you'd probably have to do some more hacking.
Slashdot Mirror
But this could be your first offense as a spammer. This would mean that the ISP/webhost hasn't had time to pull the plug yet.
It depends on how much traffic they collectively receive. If it's just a home box, intended for use by me and me only, then it's more than likely OK to have everything on one box-and work off of it, too! But if you're a site whose logs huge numbers of visits, then you should be more of the "one function, one machine" school, or more: "one function, multiple machines".
I think Amazon.com might've. Check out their recent enforcing of some of their...more liberal...patents.
"OK, everyone use this protocol that I've designed."
>The average user may install some extra dashboard widgets and a driver or two, but I doubt that would add more than a couple seconds to boot time.
The average user? The average user won't plunk down $1500($1000 for the machine, $500 for the minimum ADC level, IIRC) just to rent a computer for 18 months!
[cynical]Microsoft run one? I don't believe it.[/cynical]
Oh wait. You said ideal world.
Who comissions the study? If it's an OSS advocate, then the study will say that OSS is cheaper. If it's MS that comissions the study, then the study will say that MS is cheaper.
How much illegal file sharing is going on? Depends on who you ask. If you ask the RIAA, they'll tell you that it's running rampant and that for every song sold legally, there are umpteen bajillion swapped illegally. If you believe them, then everyone thinks you're in their pocket. If you believe the founders of Napster(who would say that there's next to none, then everyone believes you're one of the swappers.
It's impossible to get a report without bias. Minimal bias is what we all try for.
[anal mode]Actually, it's 23.[/anal mode]
Indeed.
/.? Make some reference to porn or the /. effect, and do so fairly soon after the article is posted. And make it on topic.
Want to get a comment modded funny on
...get 2/3 the price worth of use out of them.
In short, look at quality vs price. Then use the one that gives you the best ratio.
Oh for want of a +6 insightful...
Reminds me of Microsoft.
OK, maybe I've gone overboard. I've just pulled MS into a discussion on a completely unrelated subject.
Hey, I never noticed that my LCD monitor fades out on the text there!
No, out of the n00bs to the computer world who'd be confused by /.'s URL.
/.'s URL; who'd be confused by any URL.
no, the heck with
No, he's ensuring that hardware sales don't fall off in the meantime. Nothing would kill them faster than telling the community that this isn't going to be supported much longer.
You probably could. You just can't do it out of the box. You'd have to do a significant amount of hacking the source code and then recompile. And anytime you wanted to download something from Apple, you'd probably have to do some more hacking.
OS 9 was on PowerPC, and Classic(the emulator that enabled OS 9-style apps to run) isn't being officially portd over. So no, it won't still run.
Yes we're sure. Steve Jobs, CEO of Apple and Jesus to the Apple community, has said so himself.
Apple press release
Why use them? There's your "and sometimes Y"
But they're primarily interested in learning new technology, and getting it however they can. Kinda like the Borg.
Do you know how much power that thing uses? It'd practically need a gasoline powered engine to get any serious battery life out of it.
30 miles? Only people out in the country farming will need 30 miles. Instead, why not 30 feet?